Gong 内部:团队如何与设计合作伙伴 (design partners) 协作、他们的小队结构 (pod structure)、自主权、信任等
在AI技术席卷的当下,传奇思想家Seth Godin提醒我们,AI终将如电力般隐入背景,品牌真正的护城河在于向用户做出并兑现非凡的承诺。本文深入探讨了构建卓越产品与策略的核心法则:伟大策略的灵魂在于“张力”,它正是连接产品承诺与用户渴望的桥梁。Godin同时分享了关于品味与标准的深刻洞见——好品味是在他人察觉之前洞察其真正需求;高标准则是毫不妥协地提升规格以取悦受众,而非陷入自我感动的完美主义。无论身处何种岗位,理解策略的系统、培养敏锐品味并坚守高标准,都将助你在喧嚣中找到创造非凡的清醒力量。
Gong 内部:团队如何与设计合作伙伴 (design partners) 协作、他们的小队结构 (pod structure)、自主权、信任等
AI 时代的品牌与策略张力
Lenny Rachitsky: 在你来之前,我在推特上问大家,我该问 Seth Godin 什么问题?最常出现的主题实际上与 AI 有关。你认为所有这些新的 AI 公司该如何建立品牌来区分和差异化自己?
Seth Godin: AI 很快就会不再是一个功能,就像电力不是一个功能一样。AI 公司以及所有公司需要做的是说,这对用户有什么好处?我想做出什么承诺——一个艰难的承诺,一个非凡的承诺,然后我该如何兑现它?
Lenny Rachitsky: 你写了一本新书。你基本上谈到了一个伟大的策略为何在其中心存在张力。
Seth Godin: 张力是每种艺术形式和每次创新的核心。当我们推出一款新产品时,我们会说,我们有这个能做到 X 的东西,现在这个人就在想象,如果那是真的,他们的生活可能会是什么样。如果他们爱上了那种可能性,现在就有了张力。你说的是实话吗?这对他们有用吗?
Lenny Rachitsky: 有一个部分让我印象深刻,这四个洞察基本上决定了你在实际构建产品之外的生活会是什么样。
Seth Godin: 对于产品人来说,这些是关键的选择,而你可能把它们忽略了。
嘉宾介绍与节目预告
Lenny Rachitsky: 今天的嘉宾是 Seth Godin。Seth 绝对是个传奇。他出版了 21 本书,包括 18 本国际畅销书。他现在已经连续近一万天每天写博客。在过去的几十年里,他的文字和建议启发了我以及世界各地的许多人。他分享关于每个人都能从中受益的事物的智慧和建议,包括想法如何传播、何时放弃、如何领导、如何脱颖而出,以及最重要的是如何改变一切。除了写作和演讲,Seth 还创立了几家公司,包括 Yoyodyne 和 Squidoo。他还创办了 altMBA 项目,正如你将在我们的对话中听到的,他实际上是以产品经理的身份开始他的职业生涯的。在我们的对话中,Seth 分享了关于如何知道你是否有好品味以及如何建立品味的建议,如何在日益拥挤的 AI 初创公司和 AI 内容世界中建立品牌,他对捷豹品牌重塑以及特斯拉赛博皮卡的看法。
我们还深入探讨了他的新书《This is Strategy》,包括为什么每个伟大的策略中心都有张力,为什么你需要了解你运作所在的系统以建立伟大的策略,以及选择你的客户、你的分销策略,以及你如何验证你的想法将如何决定你构建的产品和你过的生活。我们还谈到了他在开发这本新书时如何使用 Claude 作为写作助手。这一集很短但充满了洞察,我知道这是你们都喜欢的。如果你喜欢这个播客,别忘了在你最喜欢的播客应用或 YouTube 上订阅和关注它。这是避免错过未来剧集的最好方法,并且对播客有极大的帮助。话不多说,我为你请出 Seth Godin。
Lenny Rachitsky: Seth,非常感谢你来到这里,欢迎来到播客。
Seth Godin: 太荣幸了,Lenny。谢谢你邀请我。Lenny 是我已故妈妈的昵称,所以能大声说出来感觉很好。
Lenny Rachitsky: 这太酷了。我从没听过它用在女性身上,我遇到的每一个叫 Lenny 的人都很棒,所以我想她一定也很棒。首先,我只想说能有你上这个播客我有多荣幸。当我真的开始做这个播客时,我当时正在听 Tim Ferriss 节目里的你,我心想,天哪,如果有一天我能请到 Seth Godin 来我的播客该多好?那该有多酷?我读了你的很多书。我后面的书架上有一堆。我经常引用你的东西,所以再次感谢你来做这期节目。
Seth Godin: 嗯,谢谢你。和你交谈是一种享受。
如何培养好品味与高标准
Lenny Rachitsky: 我想先问一个你以前的同事建议我问你的问题。Wes Kao。我想你记得 Wes?
Seth Godin: 当然。Wes 和我只有我们两个人在一个房间里坐了好几年。
Lenny Rachitsky: 所以她建议我问你的,也是我喜欢的问题是,她……我问她,和 Seth Godin 一起工作你学到最多的是什么?她立刻说,是帮助她建立更好的品味和提高标准,拥有非常高的标准。所以我想先问你,你怎么知道你是否有好品味和高标准,然后你如何建立好品味和更高的标准?
Seth Godin: 好问题。谢谢你,Wes。我把好品味定义为在别人自己意识到想要什么之前,就知道他们想要什么。所以,如果你是唯一想要花生酱裹甘草糖的人,你有权吃花生酱裹甘草糖,但你不具备好品味,因为其他所有人都觉得那很奇怪。而人们,无论他们是爵士音乐家还是面料设计师,当他们把世界不一定期待但乐于看到的东西带到世界上时,就会被认为具有好品味。
Lenny Rachitsky: 你觉得什么有帮助?所以 Wes 通过观察你学到,她意识到,好吧,我的标准远没有可能达到的那么高。除了和你一起工作,也许答案就是和像你这样有真正高标准的人一起工作。你觉得什么对帮助人们建立品味以及提高他们的标准最有帮助?
Seth Godin: 关于标准,值得了解一下什么是质量,听这个播客的人比大多数人更清楚。质量不是奢华。质量不是完美。质量意味着达到规格,如果你达到了规格,你就完成了。如果你觉得规格不够好,就制定一个更好的规格。但如果你达到了规格,你就完成了。所以拥有高标准意味着,你为了你所服务和共事的人,毫不妥协地改进规格。
而这不意味着你拿一件符合规格(spec)的东西,却因为完美主义而拒绝发布。那是逃避。因此,在 Spinnaker Software 我得到了第一份真正的工作——产品经理,我在那里学到的是,我们不是为了给自己制造完美,而是为了让购买软件的人感到愉悦。而且我们的标准不可动摇。我们说:“如果那个人,那个我们描述的对象,对我们发布的产品感到愉悦,那就是好的。如果他们不愉悦,我们有什么借口都无所谓。”这与大多数做这份工作的人的做法恰恰相反,他们会说,我该如何取悦老板?如果你只是在做你的工作,那就别指望因为超越工作本身而获得奖励,因为我们可以找到很多只会做你这份工作的人。
在任何工作中寻找意义
Lenny Rachitsky: 这让我想起你另一条非常有力的建议,关于无论你的工作是什么——这有点扯远了,但我一旦读了你的建议就难以忘怀——无论你从事什么工作,你都可以热爱它、享受它、在其中表现非凡,即使你只是一个服务员之类的。你能详细谈谈这个吗?因为这太有力量了。
Seth Godin: 嗯,我想我是从已故的马丁·路德·金(Martin Luther King Jr.)牧师那里学到的,这个观念就是没有完美的工作。我的一个朋友 Tim 是著名的爵士萨克斯风手,他不得不从一个城市奔波到另一个城市,不得不在半空的房间里演奏,不得不应付这应付那。所以你永远不会有无限的艺术自由。但我们所有人都拥有的,是了解我们工作的边界在哪里并走向边界的能力。
如果你是一个咖啡师,并且你选择做咖啡师,也许因为这是你能找到的最好的工作,好吧,你无法让下一个小时重来。那么成为世界上最棒的咖啡师一个小时会是什么感觉?这对你来说值得吗?因为我做过餐饮服务里的苦差事,我得告诉你,当老板强迫你变得平庸和无聊时,他们付多少钱都不够让你做那份工作。但如果你在那里,并且有机会为某人的一天增添愉悦,你是在为自己做这件事,而不是因为你拿了报酬。
Lenny Rachitsky: 而你完全能看出世界上这些人,当你去一个咖啡师那里,你就能看出来,她就是热爱她的工作。我想象她知道这长期来看不是她的职业,但她就是拥抱它,并在其中享受乐趣。这其中有太多的力量。另外说句题外话,你提到你做过产品经理,这我之前可不知道。这太棒了。所以听这个播客的大多数人都是产品经理。他们要么是产品经理,要么是创始人,要么是想成为创始人的人,还有与产品经理共事的人。所以首先,我想你能不能分享一下你人生的那段经历?因为我觉得人们不知道这个。
产品经理的起源故事
Seth Godin: 好的。起源故事可以说一整天,但我不打算全讲。我打算讲那个我当时觉得很普通,结果却成了世界上最幸运的事情的那部分。商学院两年之间的那个暑假对于确立你的职业轨迹非常重要。我在 Spinnaker Software 找到了一份工作。Spinnaker 发明了教育电脑游戏。我是第30号员工。那个夏天我都在做助理品牌经理之类的事情,和广告代理商开会,写文案。但在夏末,他们为我举办了一场美好的欢送会,因为我要飞回加州。然后最后,公司总裁、董事长和营销主管把我拉到一边说:“我们有一个秘密项目,我们希望你读商学院期间为我们工作,而我们给你的报酬几乎为零。”
“好吧,什么秘密项目?”“我们要做基于科幻小说、带有插图和音乐的电脑冒险游戏,而且我们已经获得了雷·布拉德伯里(Ray Bradbury)和亚瑟·克拉克(Arthur C. Clarke)的作品授权。”当时,我已经读完了克利尔菲尔德公共图书馆里从阿西莫夫(Asimov)到泽拉兹尼(Zelazny)的每一本科幻小说。这简直是梦想成真,但他们以为我的工作会是制作包装和投放广告。而我首先发现的是,我其实没法回商学院了。所以我几乎没在斯坦福露面,只是坐了很多次红眼航班。但我发现,工程师们,也就是开发团队,有很多人在争夺他们的时间。如果我想不出办法让他们分给我远超我应得份额的开发时间,我明年圣诞节就没有产品可做,然后我就会失业。
于是我在内部创办了一份简报,我是世界上最早拥有桌面排版系统的人之一,因为我是 Mac 的测试员,在简报里,我会提到工程团队中任何参与过我项目的人,并说他们的好话。然后我会把它打印出来,放进每个人的内部办公室信箱里。在三四个月内,部分因为项目确实很好,40名工程师在为我工作,而没有人向我汇报。于是我成了事实上的产品经理,那是我学到营销就是产品的时候。你不是先做一个产品,然后把它交给某个搞营销的傻瓜,说,去给它加个标志。我们做出来的产品,连续五个大卖,拯救了公司。产品才是成功的原因。
发布的刺激与意外来电
所以我本应该懂写代码,但我不懂,但我可以在那个房间里。最后一个月,RadioShack 买了多少套?3000家店乘以五乘以五,很多套。如果我们错过了日期,他们就会取消订单,公司就会破产,而软件还远远没有完成。而且我们当时没有像现在这样的源代码管理。没有云,所以一切都在我的脑子里。所以我没有离开办公室。我没有夸张,最后22天我没有离开过办公室,晚上在楼上睡四个小时,如果任何人有问题,我可以告诉他们该找谁谈。
那太刺激了。做那些决定,哄劝这个团队——他们中没有一个人是为了钱——来制作我们引以为傲的东西,太刺激了。然后产品发布了,其他人回家睡一个月,但我是项目经理和营销人员,所以我得继续上班。第二天电话响了,是伟大的爵士音乐家赫比·汉考克(Herbie Hancock)打来的,赫比说:“前台说你是负责《华氏451度》(Fahrenheit 451)的人。”我说:“赫比?我才24岁啊,老兄。赫比?”他滔滔不绝地说他熬夜玩了一晚上,他非常喜欢。
产品构建者最常忽略的
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很喜欢你分享的这些事情中所表现出的那种自然的产品经理特质,比如把功劳让给大家等等。这是优秀 PM 的标志。沿着这个思路,我想问一下,你早期是产品经理,现在你显然花了很多时间在营销上。我知道你说两者之间显然有很强的联系,但有没有什么发现,是你觉得构建产品的人最常忽略或误解的,让你感到烦恼,或者你认为他们需要听到的?
Seth Godin: 也许我能说出七点,但我试着凭即兴回忆讲几点。第一点是,共情(empathy)无关乎善意,而且共情不是可选项。这是你为其他人制作的东西。所以“去读该死的手册(RTFM)”这整个想法——我很生你的气。如果你对你的客户这么说,是你犯了错,不是他们犯了错。
Seth Godin: 第二点是,关于项目的一个事实是,当你的时间和金钱耗尽时,项目就结束了。所以不要耗尽时间,不要耗尽金钱。善意不能成为延期的理由。专业人士不会要求延期,因为专业人士明白,总会发生你意想不到的事情,这本就是约定的一部分。我想第三点是,对于软件,尤其是软件即服务,如果你没有把你正在做的东西融入网络效应,你几乎肯定会失败。你不能指望 Apple 会选中你、推广你,然后神奇地让你获得成功。问题在于,如果我的用户把这款产品告诉其他人,它对他们来说会更好用吗?如果答案是否定的,那他们为什么要告诉其他人呢?如果他们不告诉其他人,就没有人会听到它。但如果答案是肯定的,那么你的营销问题就基本解决了。
AI 公司的品牌建设
Lenny Rachitsky: 我觉得这其中的每一点都可以单独写一本书来探讨。我想回到最后一点,以及它与“紫牛”的关系。我想花点时间谈谈这个,但首先我要问一个营销问题。在你来之前,我在 Twitter 上提问:我该问 Seth Godin 什么?他要上我的播客了。我收到了海量的建议。最常出现的主题其实和 AI 有关。实际上,Intercom 的联合创始人问过这个问题,这也反映了许多人的疑惑。他的问题是,在一个越来越充斥着 AI 公司、AI 产品和 AI 内容的世界里,你认为所有这些新的 AI 公司该如何建立品牌来区分和差异化自己?
Seth Godin: 首先得问,什么是品牌?因为它不仅仅是一个标志。品牌是一个承诺。是我能从你这里期待什么。是如果你消失了,我会不会想念你。凯悦酒店有标志,耐克有品牌。我们之所以这么认为,是因为如果耐克开一家酒店,我们会知道它是什么样子的。但如果凯悦决定做运动鞋,我们就毫无头绪了。它们可能很舒服,但这就是我们所能知道的一切。所以,如果你想建立一个品牌,你必须代表某种东西,并且你必须说明你不做什么。第二点是,AI 很快就会不再是一个功能,就像电力不是一个功能一样。许许多多的东西都靠电力运行,但它们不是电力公司。它们只是碰巧使用了电力。所以 AI 公司和所有公司需要做的是问:这对用户有什么好处?我想做出什么承诺?一个艰难的承诺,一个非凡的承诺。然后,我该如何兑现它?所以,做出荒谬的承诺在 VC 层面可能管用,但在与消费者交谈时却行不通,因为你只能打破那个承诺一次。总结一下品牌的部分,航空公司没有品牌,航空公司也没有忠诚度。我们之所以这么认为,是因为人们坚持选择一家航空公司的唯一原因是为了积分,这是贿赂。忠诚度是你是否愿意支付额外的费用来坚持使用它?如果你不愿意支付额外的费用,那么这个品牌就没有价值。
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很喜欢这句话:做出承诺并兑现它。而 AI 这个元素,抬高了门槛,因为做出的承诺多得多,而兑现的承诺可能少得多。所以这里的建议是,继续做出雄心勃勃的承诺,然后关键是要真正兑现它,这就是建立品牌的方式吗?
Seth Godin: 是的。我对 Claude.ai 有一种非常情感上的联系。我认为他们有品牌。ChatGPT 在我这边的声誉不好,因为它经常过度承诺而兑现不足,而且它这样做时既没有善意也没有谦逊。而 Claude,我不知道他们是怎么做到的,至少在我的体验中,带来了善意和谦逊。所以当它不知道时,它表达得很清楚,它不偷懒,也不会生我的气。所以我心甘情愿为 Claude 支付额外费用,因为它有品牌。而 ChatGPT 对我来说只是一个我在别无选择时才会使用的工具。
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很喜欢 Anthropic/Claude 的广告牌。“我们是那个不搞抓马的。”没有抓马的 AI 公司。我本来打算把这留到最后,但我们现在就来谈谈吧。你在某个地方提到,你实际上使用 Claude 来帮你写这本书并润色这本书,我认为这种情况会越来越多。你能分享一下你是怎么做的吗?你做了哪些可能对他人有帮助的操作?
使用 Claude 辅助写作
Seth Godin: 首先,为了澄清我的品牌承诺,因为这是真的:每一个署着我名字的词,都是我写的。每一篇博客文章,每一本书。我没有团队。我的全部员工就是我自己。我用 Claude 做的事情——我也在书中鼓励人们这样做——是我会上传一个包含四项内容的清单,然后问:我遗漏了什么?它会建议三件事来完善这个清单。通常这些是我没有想到的。然后我就可以去写那个内容;或者我会上传几个章节,然后问:我在这里提出了哪些你认为我未能充分支撑的论点?它就成了一个耐心的编辑,在现实世界中很难找到这样的编辑,因为编辑们的薪水不够,也没有足够的时间来正确完成他们的工作。我发现,如果我有一句话听起来不够像我,我可以请 Claude 帮我找出为什么会这样。
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很喜欢用这个策略来找出你遗漏了什么。我觉得你同意这一点。我发现当我写作时,部分原因是我把一个想法抛出来。我想看看我哪里弄错了,哪里遗漏了。我喜欢你基本上跳过了这一步,不把它抛出来,而是直接让你放出来的东西变得更好。
Seth Godin: 嗯,关于每天写博客这件事,一开始感觉就像我该怎么坚持下去?但是一旦我能建立一个队列,因为我不想让我的连续记录中断——
Lenny Rachitsky: 顺便问一下,这个连续记录现在有多长了?
Seth Godin: 第 10,000 篇文章将在 2025 年初发布。连续不断地。有些日子会发两篇。但我发现,当我积攒了一些队列时,我会感觉不好,因为我有话想说,但我不能说,因为队列里已经有一篇了。所以我的心态从“我必须写点什么”转变为了“我有机会写点什么”。现在,因为压力解除了,我有时间重写,因为我并不缺少明天的想法,我还有多余的想法。
《这就是战略》中的四个选择
Lenny Rachitsky: 我们来聊聊你的新书。你写了一本新书,叫《这就是战略》。过去一周我一直在读,太入迷了,以至于把它落在了我岳母家,现在手边都没有。书名叫《这就是战略》,讲的是如何构建和制定战略。这本书有很多精彩之处,但中间有一节最让我印象深刻,我想花点时间谈谈。你有一段我非常喜欢的四步建议,我快速读一下:选择你的客户,就是选择你的未来。选择你的竞争,就是选择你的未来。选择你的认可来源(validation),就是选择你的未来。选择你的分销,也就是在选择你的未来。你能否详细讲讲这四个洞见、这四个基本决定了你的产品和人生走向的步骤,而不仅仅是直接去打造产品?
Seth Godin: 是的。对于做产品的人来说,这些是关键的选择,而你可能把它们忽略了。你可能认为这是既定事实,从而在最该由自己选择的四件事上放弃了主动权。所以首先是选择客户。如果你的座右铭是“你可以选择任何人,而我们就是任何人”,如果你希望必须赢得 SEO 才能获得任何东西,那你不会成功。当你选择你的最小可行受众时,他们说什么语言,他们有多少钱,他们试图解决什么问题,他们的技术能力如何,他们是否脾气暴躁,他们是否友善,他们是否会对你忠诚,你就选择了将进入产品的一切以及你的未来会是什么样。所以 Humane Pin 那帮人,不管它叫什么,在选择客户时犯了一个错误,因为他们表现得好像有一个成品 Apple 品质的产品,并且试图吸引那种会预售购买成品 Apple 品质产品的人。
当他们交付的东西并非如此,而且他们明知并非如此时,他们就注定失败了。相反,如果你说,我们在 Product Hunt 上,我们只找400个人。我们找的是喜欢 Raspberry Pi 的人。谁想来钻研这东西?现在你就可以起舞了,你可以让所有这些其他事情发生,因为你选择了不同的客户。如果你决定在汉普顿当婚礼摄影师,那你最好准备好应对一些被宠坏的、脾气暴躁的新娘和新郎,新郎和新郎,新娘和新娘,因为你选择了你的客户。好吧,那么随之而来的第二个问题是,你的竞争对手是谁?因为如果你在和沃尔玛竞争,为什么他们不断降价你会感到惊讶呢?沃尔玛就是这么做的,对吧?那样你就决定了你要在哪个领域运作。你为你所做的事情建立了一套巨大的边界。
第三个是认可来源。如果你试图取悦你的老板,那你就会这么做。另一方面,如果你能和老板进行一次艰难的对话,说,我们能不能达成共识,我不是在迎合你的品味,我是在迎合我们已达成共识的那400个客户的品味?从现在起,其他的每一次会议都会顺利得多,因为你已经明确了你试图取悦的是谁。
最后一个,在软件业务中,选择你的分销非常重要。例如,电子游戏,这是我起步的地方,我们的产品在 Target 和 Lechmere 以及大众商家销售。我们的竞争对手则在电脑店里的 Ziploc 袋里。那么,当像 Steam 这样的东西出现时,当像可下载的共享软件这样的东西出现时,关于你产品的一切都改变了。所以再说一遍,这四件事是选择,如果你忽略了它们,那是因为你害怕。
Lenny Rachitsky: 我认为必须指出的是,你并不能随意改变这些,比如,好吧,很酷,我们改变一下分销方式。这些是交织在一起的。但我从中听到的重点是,要确保你正在构建的产品明白这将是你的分销方式,这是你销售的对象。
Seth Godin: 是的,我的意思是,一个朋友刚给我发了一份商业计划书。他们在做一种食品,他们说,我们将在 Shopify 上分销,我们也将卖给企业、机场、酒店,以及需要销售这些食物的人。我就说,你们只有两个人。不,那不是你们的业务……你必须选择,就在今天,在你翻过这一页之前,你是为谁服务的,你又不是为谁服务的?
Lenny Rachitsky: 顺着选择客户这个话题,这提醒了我,我的一个朋友创办了一家公司,向房地产经纪人推销产品,她只是警告我,小心你的销售对象,因为你要和这些人花很多时间在一起。确保你准备好了这样做。
Seth Godin: 我最早的书之一是一本由律师事务所付费的、广告支持的目录。这可不是我想向任何人推荐的东西。
战略中的张力
Lenny Rachitsky: 书中另一个让我印象深刻的精彩观点是张力(tension)的概念。张力的重要性。你基本上谈到,一个伟大的战略在其中心有张力。为什么张力对于一个好的战略如此重要?
Seth Godin: 好吧,让我们达成共识,张力和压力不是一回事。压力通常是不好的。压力是同时存在的两件事:我想离开,我需要留下。对吧?我讨厌我的老板,但我需要这份工作。这就是压力。不要去寻找压力。张力是每一种艺术形式和每一次创新的核心。张力是它可能行不通。张力是哒-哒-哒-呐-呐,然后另一个人说,哒-哒。因为他们需要补全这个句子。
所以当我们推出一款新产品时,我们会说,我们有一个能做 X 的东西,现在这个人就在想象如果那是真的,他们的生活会是什么样。如果他们爱上了那种可能性,现在就有了张力。你说的是真话吗?它对他们有效吗?当我还是个孩子的时候,PF Flyers 是必须要买的运动鞋,那是在 Nike 之前。PF Flyers 的承诺是,它们最终会让你快到能跑开躲过恶霸。我记得10岁时走进那家鞋店,我脑子里有真正的张力,因为我需要躲开那个恶霸,而我在让 PF Flyers 的人兑现他们的承诺,但他们没有说实话。
Lenny Rachitsky: 这又回到了你关于不兑现承诺来建立——的观点。
Seth Godin: 是的。
Lenny Rachitsky: ——一个伟大品牌的观点,对吧?
紫牛与非凡的重要性
Lenny Rachitsky: 好吧,我想稍微偏题一下,进入紫牛(purple cow)的领域。顺便说一下,我这里有你的书。我后面有很多你的书,但我不想让我的书架……哦,那是什么?牛奶盒?
Seth Godin: 这是前 10,000 本,装在牛奶盒里。
Lenny Rachitsky: 天哪,我错过了那个。里面有紫色的牛奶吗?紫牛的奶是什么颜色的?我们永远不会知道。永远不会知道。我知道你已经无数次谈论过这个概念。但我感觉人们仍然没有……很多人没听过。很多人并没有真正理解它,而这是我最常引用的你的建议。你能否花点时间聊聊紫牛这个话题,以及变得非凡(remarkable)的重要性?
非凡与口碑
Seth Godin: 好的,让我们从史蒂夫·布兰克(Steve Blank)开始。我相信你谈过他关于客户牵引力(customer traction)的想法。判断一个初创公司是否有希望,最有效的方法就是看与你互动的人是否留下来了?他们是否会再次光顾?第二点是,他们会告诉朋友吗?如果他们告诉了朋友,他们会说什么?非凡(remarkable)这个词的意思就是值得被人评说。所以我不是在说要搞出那种靠噱头博眼球的病毒视频。我的意思是,如果你做出来的东西,能让人们在谈论你时改善他们的生活,并且你提前就知道你想让他们说什么,那么他们就更有可能这么说。所以玛丽莎·梅耶尔(Marissa Mayer)创造的股市价值可能比我认识的其他任何产品经理都要多。而她做到这一点的方式是,当时谷歌没多少人,但正是她说:“不行,你不能在主页上再放按钮了。主页上只能有两个按钮。”并且一次又一次地坚持。
当时我在雅虎。我在那里的时候,雅虎有机会以 1000 万美元买下谷歌。那是一个很有趣的故事。但当时雅虎主页上有 183 个链接,而谷歌只有两个。这其中包含的宣言是,我们向你许下了一个承诺,那就是我们足够聪明,能把你带到你想去的地方,而不需要你花大量时间去浏览 183 个链接。告诉我们你想要什么,我们就会带你去。所以我是一个走在技术前沿的人,如果朋友在互联网上迷失了方向,对某事感到困惑,我就会直接把他们送到谷歌,因为我知道他们不会再回来找我帮忙了,因为好的,他们走了。这会奏效的。这就是在谷歌发布时人们该怎么说:嘿,只要输入你想要的,你就能找到。他们把这个做进了产品里。这让产品变得非凡(remarkable),因为我想告诉其他人这件事,因为这会提升我作为技术创新者的地位。
Lenny Rachitsky: 这里的言外之意,也是你谈过的,就是你获胜最有可能的方式是口碑。很难通过付费广告获胜。除非你在做 B2B 软件,否则很难通过销售团队获胜。你需要关注的是如何打造一款人们会告诉朋友的产品。而其核心就是变得非凡(remarkable)。我很喜欢你拆解它的方式。变得非凡(remarkable)就是成为人们会评说的东西。
Seth Godin: 是的,如果你认为这只适用于小公司,微软就是这样打败 WordPerfect 的,因为 Microsoft Word 是你在使用现代电脑时与同事协作所需的格式,因为如果他们坚持使用 WordPerfect,你就会被 WordPerfect 困住。而他们有一条迁移路径,一旦你迁移了,你就不会再回去了。所以再一次,坚持让你使用 Word 符合我的利益。所以我这么做了。
张力、安全感与系统
Lenny Rachitsky: 关于玛丽莎·梅耶尔做这种有争议的事情的观点,又回到了你关于创造张力(tension)的观点上。感觉它既在访客中也在内部创造了张力(tension)。我这里还有一些你过去说过的类似的话,我想它们不在你的这本书里。“如果它让你害怕,那它可能是一件值得尝试的好事。”还有“安全是危险的”。关于这些你有什么想说的吗?
Seth Godin: 嗯,所以我在书中谈到的一点是,系统无处不在,而且它们很大程度上是不可见的,被视为理所当然。我花时间与高中高年级学生谈论大学。他们看不到大学产业复合体(college industrial complex)。他们只是觉得这很正常,因为那就是在郊区长大的样子。而系统保护自己的方式就是发明文化。文化就是这里做事的方式。所以如果你觉得某件事很可怕,那可能是因为系统想让你这么认为。
所以你不应该做有勇无谋的事。你不应该无所畏惧。但你应该做的是思考,为什么我做这件事会感到害怕?如果我这么做,什么系统会被冒犯?我是想与系统合作,还是我有足够的杠杆来帮助改变系统?所以第一批提供可下载软件的人,所有的反馈都是,你不能那么做。会被盗版的。你永远赚不到一分钱。好吧。这可能会发生,我也明白为什么这让人感到害怕,但我也能明白为什么占主导地位的软件分销系统不想让我哪怕只是尝试一下。但我只花了五个月的时间开发这款软件,让我们试试吧,因为如果它行不通并且被盗版了,我只需要开发新软件就行了。没关系。
Lenny Rachitsky: 有意思的是,相反的情况在 Salesforce 身上也成立。他们整体的推销说辞就是没有软件。全在云端。一旦那成为系统,它就成了张力(tension)和危险的举动。
Seth Godin: 是的。
战略思考与看见系统
Lenny Rachitsky: 所以你有这句话,实际上。我想在系统这个概念上多花点时间,因为它对这本书来说如此核心,对于你关于如何做得更好的建议也如此核心,你有这段原话。“做一个战略思考者意味着什么?意味着看见系统。”对于那些试图在战略上做得更好、理解你谈论系统时是什么意思、如何看见系统的人,你还有什么可以分享的?
Seth Godin: 任何时候我们与其他人打交道,我们都必须发明系统,因为互操作性是必不可少的。在我们的文化中,有一个关于如何问候他人的系统。你握手,右手对右手。随便找个时间出现,然后用瓦肯人举手礼(Vulcan salute)代替,看看会发生什么。这会很尴尬,因为我们只是想把这事应付过去,而现在那成了系统的一部分。所以系统发挥着有价值的功能,直到它们不再发挥,因为那时系统就会开始做一些事情来支持自己、强化自己。例如,有一个系统说我们应该面试求职者。而最成功的面试者是那些表现出他们像我们、看起来像我们、上过像我们一样的学校、拥有像我们一样的特权和背景的人。这是有毒的,因为它不仅削弱了多样性,也削弱了我们将真正的人才放入团队的能力。
如果你看不见那个系统,也没有给它命名,你就会继续做你一直在做的事。我昨天和一个人交谈,他说他们一直在和一家公司合作,他们雇佣的最后四个人都是常春藤盟校网球队的队长。嗯,显然这里有一个模式,而且它正在被那些不想惹麻烦的人强化,但这个系统并没有帮助他们。所以是的,我们需要公制系统,我们需要邮政编码系统。那些系统一直运行得很好。但如果你想在一个占主导地位的参与者不想让你成功的地方出现,你就必须在系统中找到能让你改变规则的机会。
选择更好的波浪
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很喜欢一个与此相关的隐喻,更好的波浪造就更好的冲浪者,你的很多成功取决于选择波浪,而不是你所拥有的技能。你能谈谈这个吗?
Seth Godin: 是的,这出人意料地深刻。我不知道我是从哪里想出来的,但当我看到擅长冲浪的人时,他们几乎总是在好的海浪上。我注意到我那个经常冲浪的儿子,他会放过别人可能会抓的海浪,去等待合适的浪,因为他知道自己能冲得更好。所以,当你考虑要签约哪家公司的软件,愿意让哪些人担任关键角色时,你是愿意等待能改变局面的超级明星,还是急着赶一个凭空想象的截止日期,以至于只能交付平庸的工作?因为平庸的意思仅仅就是平均。所以,如果你不想平庸,你最好做点和别人不同的事。否则,你得到的就会和别人一样。
Lenny Rachitsky: 听你这么说,我在想,不知道你有没有看到捷豹的品牌重塑和他们的整个发布会。感觉它遭到了体系的抵制。对此你有什么看法?也许是他们哪里做错了,或者也许这是个天才之举?
捷豹换标与噱头营销
Seth Godin: 好吧,你挑了一个我真的很喜欢谈论的话题。捷豹并没有重塑品牌,捷豹只是换了标志。这个标志可能表明他们正试图重塑品牌并做出不同的承诺,而且他们正在转向全电动,这是我赞成的。但我认为他们犯了一个非常严重的错误,那就是如果你要创办一家汽车公司,将要花费一亿或十亿美元来从从未听说过你的人那里赢得信任。如果你起步时拥有的是最具标志性、最美丽、最受喜爱的汽车品牌之一,而且有幸在这个世界上几乎没有其他车能削弱你希望它未来所代表的意义,那就太完美了。拥有它,那才叫聪明。而为了取悦某个艺术总监而放弃它,我不明白你为什么认为自己在重塑品牌,而你只是放上去一个削弱了你原本已拥有的许多认知资产的标志。
Lenny Rachitsky: 感觉他们引起了非常大的争议。他们可能有点过于违背现状了。我不知道。如果你是他们,你会怎么做?
Seth Godin: 你可能还记得,国际煎饼屋曾决定虚假宣布他们将把名字改成国际汉堡屋并制作了新标志,因为他们想要噱头。这是温蒂汉堡的推特策略。噱头卖不出汉堡。奥利奥在超级碗停电时发的那条推文获得了大量热议。没有证据表明他们多卖出了一块饼干。他们不是靠娱乐我们吃饭的。所以捷豹不会因为你我这样的人在谈论他们换标而卖出更多的车。能让他们卖出车的是客户牵引力。他们需要做的是找到50个有影响力的人,让他们坐进车里,在某种程度上改变他们,改造他们。
如果你想想特斯拉在Model S初期做对的两件事,会很有意思。第一件事是,据我认识的一位当时在那工作的人说,当人们在超市停车场看到你时,最常谈论的就是车门把手,因为车门把手会弹出来。它们弹出来的方式既烦人又危险,但很引人注目。所以这就产生了话题。
然后会发生什么呢?他们会说,你觉得怎么样?你会说,上车,然后你切换到狂暴模式,在2.4秒内从零加速到60英里,他们就会开始尖叫。这对你来说很有趣,也向乘客讲述了一个故事。这就是客户牵引力的开始,因为我在别的车上做不到这一点,对吧?把这和小丑车,也就是Cybertruck比较一下,它故意制造分歧,大多数人不仅不想开,甚至不想自己街区里有一辆,因为分歧卖不出东西。能卖出去的是实用性,是帮助某人得到他们想要的东西。所以你面前有一个品类,皮卡,全美国所有汽车中的第一大品类,就在那里等着被拿下。如果你是特斯拉这样的公司,你可以跨越鸿沟。结果相反,他们决定搞个噱头,这不行。这不是好的产品管理。这不是好的营销。
皮卡品类与跨越鸿沟
Lenny Rachitsky: 有意思。所以你认为Cybertruck不会成功?
Seth Godin: 嗯,我想说,跟什么比呢,对吧?福特F-150在某些年份创造了福特100%以上的利润,这意味着如果没有F-150皮卡,就没有福特。这就是那个品类的规模。你拥有一款势头上行的车和一家上市公司,你已经赢得了很多人的信任。现在你面对的是一个品类,皮卡,人们购买它有着非常具体的理由,向邻居展示你在乎实用性。即使你从来不用车斗,这也是开皮卡的故事。那么现在,如果你把本身就对改变持怀疑态度、对设计把戏持怀疑态度的人引入这个品类,而这个东西除了改变和设计把戏什么都没有,不,他们不会接受的。你本可以卖给大量原本可能会买福特F-150的人。那种跨越鸿沟才是你变得真正举足轻重的方式。
领导力的秘密与共情
Lenny Rachitsky: 我觉得光是这个就可以单独做一期播客对谈了。真希望我们有更多时间。我要问最后一个问题,这是我找到的你的一句话,我也很喜欢,实际上这让人想起埃隆·马斯克,因为我们刚刚还在谈论他。“领导力的秘诀很简单。做你相信的事。描绘未来的图景。去那里。人们会追随的。”你能谈谈这个吗?
Seth Godin: 我可能有点太轻描淡写了,因为我需要强调的是,描绘未来的图景需要建立在共情(empathy)的基础上。你不能描绘你想去哪里的图景。你必须描绘他们想去哪里的图景,正是这种非自恋,才是专业人士做工作的地方。你没有资格融资,你没有资格拥有市场份额,你没有资格因为努力工作就获得好价钱。我们能做的是提供服务。我们可以打开大门,帮助人们到达他们一直想去的地方。改变人们想要什么非常困难,但为人们提供一个到达他们最初就想去的地方的机会,倒是相当有帮助的。
Lenny Rachitsky: Seth,这真是梦想成真。感谢你来到播客。感谢你这么说。人们在哪里可以看你的书?大家应该去哪里了解更多你的动态?有什么想分享的吗?
Seth Godin: 我不太活跃于社交媒体,但我确实有一个博客在Seths.blog。如果你去Seths.blog/TIS,你会找到关于这本书、策略卡组、收藏版巧克力棒以及我在这期间想出的任何其他东西的所有你需要知道的信息。
Lenny Rachitsky: 巧克力。Seth,非常感谢你来到这里。
Seth Godin: 这些问题很棒,Lenny,我可以跟你聊一整天。谢谢你。
Lenny Rachitsky: 我很感激。我也是。大家再见。
Lenny Rachitsky: 非常感谢您的收听。如果您觉得这期节目有价值,可以在Apple Podcasts、Spotify或您最喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。另外,请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,因为这真的能帮助其他听众找到这个播客。您可以在LennysPodcast.com找到往期所有节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| college industrial complex | 大学产业复合体 |
| cross the chasm | 跨越鸿沟 |
| customer traction | 客户牵引力 |
| design partners | 设计合作伙伴 |
| empathy | 共情(empathy) |
| Fahrenheit 451 | 《华氏451度》(Fahrenheit 451) |
| Humane Pin | Humane Pin |
| Lechmere | Lechmere |
| Mac | Mac |
| Marissa Mayer | 玛丽莎·梅耶尔 |
| PF Flyers | PF Flyers |
| pod structure | 小队结构 |
| Product Hunt | Product Hunt |
| purple cow | 紫牛(purple cow) |
| RadioShack | RadioShack |
| Raspberry Pi | Raspberry Pi |
| remarkable | 非凡(remarkable) |
| RTFM | 去读该死的手册(RTFM) |
| spec | 规格 |
| Spinnaker Software | Spinnaker Software |
| Squidoo | Squidoo |
| Steve Blank | 史蒂夫·布兰克 |
| tension | 张力(tension) |
| Tim | Tim |
| validation | 认可(validation) |
| Vulcan salute | 瓦肯人举手礼 |
| Wes Kao | Wes Kao |
| WordPerfect | WordPerfect |
| Yoyodyne | Yoyodyne |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)
Seth Godins best tactics for building remarkable products, strategies, brands and more
Brand and Strategy Tension in the AI Age
Lenny Rachitsky: Before you came on, I asked on Twitter, what should I ask Seth Godin? The most recurring theme actually had to do with AI. How do you think all these new AI companies build brands to distinguish and differentiate themselves?
Seth Godin: AI very soon is going to stop being a feature the same way electricity is not a feature. What AI companies and all companies need to do is say, what’s in this for the user? What promise do I want to make a difficult promise, a remarkable promise, and then how do I keep it?
Guest Intro and Episode Preview
Lenny Rachitsky: You wrote a new book. You basically talk about how a great strategy has tension at the center of it.
Seth Godin: Tension is at the heart of every art form and every innovation. What we do when we launch a new product, we say, we have this thing that can do X, and now the person is imagining what their life might be like if that were true. If they fall in love with that possibility, now there’s tension. Did you tell the truth? Is it going to work for them?
Cultivating Good Taste and High Standards
Lenny Rachitsky: There’s the section that stuck out to me, these four insights that basically determine what your life is going to be like outside of actually building the product.
Seth Godin: For a product person, these are the critical choices and you probably have glossed over them.
Finding Meaning in Any Job
Lenny Rachitsky: Today my guest is Seth Godin. Seth is an absolute legend. He’s published 21 books, including 18 international bestsellers. He’s been blogging every single day for almost 10,000 days in a row now. His writing and his advice have inspired me and so many people all over the world for the past few decades. He shares wisdom and advice around stuff that everyone can benefit from, including how ideas spread, when to quit, how to lead, how to stand out, and most of all how to change everything. In addition to his writing and speaking, Seth has founded several companies, including Yoyodyne and Squidoo. He also started the altMBA program, and as you’ll hear in our conversation, he actually started his career as a product manager. In our conversation, Seth shares advice on how to know if you have good taste and how to build your taste, how to build a brand in an increasingly crowded world of AI startups and AI content, his thoughts on the Jaguar rebrand and also the Tesla Cybertruck.
We also delve into his new book, This is Strategy, including why every great strategy has tension at its center, why you need to understand the systems within which you operate in order to build a great strategy and how choosing your customers, your distribution strategy, and how you validate your idea will inform the product you build and the life that you live. We also talk about how he used Claude as a writing assistant in developing this new book.
This episode is short and packed with insights, which I know is what you all love. If you enjoy this podcast, don’t forget to subscribe and follow it in your favorite podcasting app or YouTube. It’s the best way to avoid missing future episodes and helps the podcast tremendously. With that, I bring you Seth Godin.
Seth, thank you so much for being here and welcome to the podcast.
The Product Manager Origin Story
Seth Godin: What a treat, Lenny. Thank you for having me. Lenny was my late mom’s nickname, so it’s good to say that out loud.
Lenny Rachitsky: That’s so cool. I’ve never heard it used for a woman, and every Lenny out there I’ve met is wonderful, so I imagine she’s wonderful. First, I just want to say how honored I am to have you on this podcast. When I actually started this podcast, I was like, and I was listening to you on Tim Ferriss at that point, and I was like, man, what if one day I get Seth Godin on my podcast? How cool would that be? I’ve read so many of your books. I have a bunch of them in the bookshelf back there. I reference your stuff all the time, so thank you again for doing this.
Launch Thrills and Surprise Calls
Seth Godin: Well, thank you. It’s a treat to talk to you.
What Product Builders Overlook Most
Lenny Rachitsky:
I want to start by asking a question that one of your former colleagues suggested I ask you. Wes Kao. I imagine you remember Wes?
Seth Godin: Of course. Wes and I sat in a room just the two of us for years.
Brand Building for AI Companies
Lenny Rachitsky: So what she suggested I ask you, and this question I love, is she… I asked her, what did you learn most from Seth Godin working with him? And she immediately said, it’s helping her build better taste and increase her standards, having really high standards. So I want to ask you first of all, just how do you know if you have good taste and high standards and then how do you build good taste and higher standards?
Writing with Claude
Seth Godin: Great question. Thank you, Wes. I define good taste as knowing what other people want just before they do. So if you’re the only person who wants peanut butter covered licorice, you’re entitled to eat peanut butter covered licorice, but you don’t have good taste because everyone else thinks that’s weird. And people, whether they’re jazz musicians or fabric designers are seen as having good taste when they bring something to the world that the world didn’t necessarily expect but is glad to see.
Four Choices from This Is Strategy
Lenny Rachitsky: What do you find helps? So Wes learned from watching you that she realized, okay, my standards are not nearly as high as they could be. Other than working with you, maybe that’s the answer is work with people like you that have really high standards. Just what do you find is most helpful in helping people build taste and also just increase their standards?
Seth Godin: Standards, it’s worth understanding what quality is and the people who listen to this podcast know better than most. Quality is not luxury. Quality is not perfection. Quality means meeting spec, and if you meet spec, you’re done. If you don’t think the spec is good enough, make a better spec. But if you meet spec, you’re done. And so what it means to have high standards is that you relentlessly improve the spec in service of the people you’re working with and for.
And what it doesn’t mean is that you take something that meets spec and refuse to ship it because you’re a perfectionist. That’s hiding. And so what I learned at Spinnaker where I had my first job, real job as a product manager, was this idea that we weren’t there to make perfect for us. We were there to delight the person who was buying the software. And our standards were untouchable. We said, “If that person, the one we’re describing is delighted with what we shipped, it’s good. And if they’re not, it doesn’t matter what kind of excuses we have.” This is the opposite of what most people in this job do, which is they say, how do I please my boss? And if you’re just doing your job, then don’t expect to get rewarded for more than just doing your job because we can find lots of people who can just do your job.
Tension in Strategy
Lenny Rachitsky: That reminds me of one of your other really powerful pieces of advice about how no matter your job, this is a tangent, but it really stuck with me once I read your advice here is no matter what job you have, you couldn’t love it, enjoy it, be amazing at it, even if you’re just like a waitress or whatever. Can you just talk through that? Because that’s so powerful.
Seth Godin: Well, I think I got it from the late Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., and the idea is there’s no perfect job. A friend of mine, Tim, is a famous jazz saxophonist and he’s got to schlep from city to city, and he’s got to play to half empty rooms and he is got to deal with this and deal with this. So you’re never going to have unlimited artistic freedom. But what we all have is the ability to understand where the boundaries of our work lie and go there.
And if you’re a barista and you’ve chosen to be a barista, maybe because it’s the best thing you could get, well you’re not going to get the next hour over again. So what would it be like to be the best barista in the world for an hour? Would that be worth it for you? Because I’ve had menial jobs in food service and I got to tell you, when the boss forces you to be mediocre and bored, there’s no amount of money they can pay you to do that job. But if you’re there and you have a chance to add delight to someone’s day, you’re doing that for you, not because you’re getting paid.
Purple Cows and Being Remarkable
Lenny Rachitsky: And you could totally tell these people in the world when you go to a barista that just you can tell, just loves their job. I know imagine she knows this is not her career long-term, but she just embraces it and just has fun with it. There’s so much power to that. On a different note, you mentioned that you were product manager, which I did not know. That’s amazing. So most of the people listening to this podcast are product managers. They’re either product managers, founders, people that want to be founders, and then people that work with product managers. So first of all, I guess could you just share that part of your life? Because I don’t think people know that.
Being Remarkable and Word of Mouth
Seth Godin: All right. So the origin story could take all day, but I’m not going to tell the whole thing. I’m going to tell the part that I thought was normal that turned out to be the luckiest thing in the world. The summers between the two years of business school are very important to establish your career arc. I got a job at Spinnaker Software. Spinnaker invented educational computer games. I was the 30th employee. And the summer was spent doing assistant brand manager kind of stuff, going to meetings with the ad agency, writing copy. But at the end of the summer, they had a lovely going away party for me, because I was flying back to California. And then at the end, the president of the company, the chairman of the company and the head of marketing bring me into this side when they say, “We have a secret project, we want you to work for us while you’re at business school and we’re all going to pay you almost nothing.”
“Okay, what’s the secret project?” “We’re going to do computer adventure games with illustrations and music based on science fiction novels, and we’ve already acquired the work of Ray Bradbury and Arthur C. Clarke.” Now, I had read every science fiction book in the Clearfield Public Library from Asimov to Zelazny. This was a dream come true, but they thought my job was going to be make the packaging and run the ads. And what I discovered, first of all is that I couldn’t really go back to business school. So I showed up hardly at all at Stanford and just took a lot of red eyes. But I discovered that the engineers, the development team, they had a lot of people vying for their time. And if I didn’t figure out how to get them to give me way more than my fair share of development, I wasn’t going to have any products to make next Christmas and then I was going to be out of a job.
And so I started a newsletter internally, I was one of the first people in the world to have desktop publishing because I was a beta tester for the Mac, and in it I would mention anybody in the engineering team who had worked on my project and I would say something good about them. And then I would print it out and put it in every single person’s inner office mailbox. And within three months, four months, partly because the project was really good, 40 engineers were working for me and no one was reporting to me. And so I became the de facto product manager and that is when I learned marketing is the product. You don’t make a product and then hand it to some marketing yahoo and say, go put a logo on this. That the product we made, and five in a row went gold, saved the company. Though product is why it worked.
And so I was supposed to know how to code but I didn’t, but I could be in the room. The last month, RadioShack had bought how many units? 3000 stores times five times five, a lot of units. And if we had missed a date, they were going to cancel the order and the company would go bankrupt, and the software wasn’t even close to done. And we didn’t have any source control like we do now. There was no cloud, so it was all in my head. So I did not leave the office. I’m not exaggerating this, I did not leave the office for the last 22 days, slept for four hours a night upstairs, and if anyone had a question, I could tell them who to talk to.
That was so thrilling. It was so thrilling to make those decisions, to cajole this team, none of whom were in it for the money, to make something we were proud of. And then the stuff ships, everyone else goes home to sleep for a month, but I am the project manager and the marketing guy, so I got to stay at work. And the next day the phone rings and it’s Herbie Hancock on the phone, the great jazz musician, and Herbie says, “The receptionist said you’re the person in charge of Fahrenheit 451.” And I said, “Herbie? I’m 24 years old, man. Herbie?” And he went on and on about how he had stayed up all night to play it and that he loved it.
Tension, Safety, and Systems
Lenny Rachitsky: I love how natural of a product manager you were in these things you shared of just thinking everyone deflecting credit and all these things. It’s sign of a great PM. Along these lines, I wanted to ask actually, so you’re a PM early on. Now, you obviously spend a lot of time marketing. I know you’re saying there’s obviously a strong connection between the two, but is there anything you find that people building the product most often miss or misunderstand that just annoys you or do you think they need to hear?
Seth Godin: Maybe I got seven, but I’ll try to do them off the top of my head. The first one is this, empathy is not about kindness and empathy is not an option. This is something that you are making for other people. So the whole idea of RTFM, read the manual, I’m angry at you. If you’re saying that to your customers, you made a mistake, they did not make a mistake.
The second one is that the thing about projects is when you run out of time and you run out of money, the project is over. Don’t run out of time, don’t run out of money. Good intentions are no reason for an extension. The professional doesn’t ask for an extension because the professional understands that things you didn’t expect are going to happen. That’s part of the deal.
And I guess the third one would be for software, particularly software as a service, if you don’t build the network effect into what you are making, you are almost certainly going to fail. You cannot hope that Apple’s going to pick you, promote you, and magically have you be successful. The question is, will this work better for my users if they tell other people about it? And if the answer is no, then why would they tell other people about it? And if they don’t tell other people about it, no one’s going to hear about it. But if the answer is yes, then your marketing problems pretty much solved.
Strategic Thinking and Seeing Systems
Lenny Rachitsky: I feel like each of these is its own book that we could talk through. And I want to come back to this last point and how it relates to the purple cow. I want to spend a little time there, but first I’m going to ask a marketing question. So before you came on, I asked on Twitter, what should I ask Seth Godin? He’s coming on my podcast. I got a flood of suggestions. The most recurring theme actually had to do with AI. Actually the co-founder of Intercom asked this question and it echoes what many people are wondering. So his question is how do you think all these new AI companies build brands to distinguish and differentiate themselves in a world that’s increasingly filled with AI companies, AI products, AI content?
Seth Godin: Well, the first question is what’s a brand? Because it’s not a logo. A brand is a promise. It’s what do I expect from you. It’s would I miss you if you were gone. And Hyatt Hotels has a logo, Nike has a brand. The way we know this is if Nike opened a hotel, we’d know what it would be like. But if Hyatt decided to make sneakers, we have no clue. They might be comfortable, but that’s all we would know. And so if you want to build a brand, you got to stand for something and you got to say what you don’t do. And the second thing is AI very soon is going to stop being a feature the same way electricity is not a feature. That lots and lots of things run on electricity, but they’re not electricity companies. They just happen to use electricity.
So what AI companies and all companies need to do is say, what’s in this for the user? What promise do I want to make? A difficult promise, a remarkable promise. And then how do I keep it? So making absurd promises might work at the VC level, but it doesn’t work when you’re talking to consumers because you can only break that promise one time. And so to wrap up the brand part, airlines don’t have brands and airlines don’t have loyalty. And the way we know this is that the only reason people stick with an airline is for the points, which is bribery. Loyalty is would you pay extra to stick with this? And if you wouldn’t pay extra, then the brand has no value.
Choosing Better Waves
Lenny Rachitsky: I love this phrase, make a promise and keep it. And the AI element, that raises the bar because many more promises are being made, fewer promises are probably being kept. So is the advice there, continue making an ambitious promise and then the key is actually deliver on that and that’s what builds you brand?
Jaguar Rebrand and Gimmick Marketing
Seth Godin: Yeah. I have a very emotional connection to Claude.ai. I think they have a brand. ChatGPT’s reputation with me is not good because it regularly over promises and under delivers and it does it without kindness or humility. Whereas Claude, I don’t know how they did it, at least in my experience, brings kindness and humility. So when it doesn’t know, it’s very clear and it’s not lazy and it’s not angry at me. And so I happily pay extra for Claude because it has a brand. Whereas ChatGPT for me is just a tool that I use if I have no other options.
Pickup Trucks and Crossing the Chasm
Lenny Rachitsky: I love the Anthropic/Claude’s billboards. “We’re the ones without the drama.” The AI company without the drama. I was going to save this to the end, but let’s actually talk about it. So you mentioned somewhere that you actually use Claude to help you write this book and refine the book, which I think is going to increasingly happen. Could you just share that process of how you did that? What did you do that might be helpful to people to help you write this book?
Seth Godin: Well, to be clear about my brand promise, because it’s true, every word that has my name on it, I wrote. Every blog post, every book. I don’t have a team. This is my whole staff is me. What I did with Claude and which I encourage people to do in the book is I would upload a list of four things and say, what did I miss? And it would suggest three things to complete the list. And often they would be things I hadn’t thought of. And then I could go write about that or I would upload a couple chapters and I would say, what are the claims I’m making here that you don’t think that I’m sustaining? And it became this patient editor that is so hard to find in the real world because editors aren’t paid enough and given enough time to do their job right. And what I find is if I have a sentence that doesn’t sound enough like me, I can ask Claude to help me figure out why that’s true.
The Secret to Leadership and Empathy
Lenny Rachitsky: I love that tactic of using it to figure out what you missed. I feel like you agree with this. I find that when I write, part of it is I’m putting an idea out there. I want to see what I got wrong and what I missed. And I like that you basically skip that step and don’t put it out and just make the thing you put out actually better.
Seth Godin: Well, the thing about blogging every day is at first it felt like how am I going to keep up? But once I could build a queue because I didn’t want my streak to end-
Lenny Rachitsky: How long is the streak at this point, by the way?
Seth Godin: Post number 10,000 comes out at the beginning of 2025.
Lenny Rachitsky: Oh my God. In a row.
Seth Godin: In a row. Some days there were two. But what I found as I got a little bit of a queue is that I would feel bad because I had something to say, but I couldn’t because there was already one in the queue. So I shifted from I have to write something to I get to write something. And now because I’ve taken the pressure off, I have time to rewrite it because I don’t have a shortage of ideas for tomorrow. I have extra ones.
Lenny Rachitsky:
So let’s talk about your book. You wrote a new book. It’s called This is Strategy. I’ve been reading it over the past week and I’ve been so into it that I actually left it at my mother-in-law’s house. I don’t have it with me. So it’s called, This is Strategy. It’s about how to build strategy and develop a strategy. There’s a lot to love about the book, but the section in the middle that is what most stuck out to me that I want to spend a little time on. You have this four sequence of advice that I love, so I’m just going to read it real quick. Choose your customers, choose your future. Choose your competition and choose your future. Choose the source of validation and you choose your future. Choose your distribution, and you’re also choosing your future. Can you just talk through these four insights, these four steps that basically determine what your product and life is going to be like outside of actually building the products directly?
Seth Godin: Yeah. And for a product person, these are the critical choices and you probably have glossed over them. You have probably assumed it’s a given and you’ve sacrificed your agency over the four most important things you should be choosing. So the first one is picking your customers. If your motto is you can pick anyone and we’re anyone, if your hope is that you have to win SEO to get anything, you’re not going to succeed. When you choose your smallest viable audience, what language they speak, how much money they have, what problem they’re trying to solve, what their technical facility is, whether they’re short-tempered, whether they’re kind, whether they’re going to stick with you, you have chosen everything that’s going to go into the product and what your future is going to be like. And so the Humane Pin people, whatever it was called, made a mistake when they picked their customers because they showed up like they had a finished Apple-quality product and they were trying to appeal to the kind of people that would buy on pre-order a finished Apple quality product.
When they shipped something that wasn’t that, and they knew it wasn’t that, they’re doomed. Whereas if you say, here we are in Product Hunt, we’re only looking for 400 people. We’re looking for people who like the Raspberry Pi. Who wants to wonk with this thing? Now you can dance and you can have all these other things happen because you picked a different customer. If you decide to be a wedding photographer in the Hamptons, well you better expect to have some very spoiled, cranky brides and grooms, and grooms and grooms, and brides and brides, that you have to deal with because you picked your customers. Okay, so then the second one which comes with that is who’s your competition? Because if you’re competing against Walmart, why are you surprised that they keep lowering their prices? That’s what Walmart does, right? That way you decide which space that you’re going to operate in. You’ve built an enormous set of boundaries around what you do.
The third one is validation. If you are trying to please your boss, that’s what you’re going to do. If on the other hand, you can have one difficult conversation with your boss and say, can we agree that I’m not trying to match your taste, I’m trying to match the taste of these 400 people that we’ve agreed are our customers? Every other meeting is going to go way better from now on because you’ve made it clear who you’re trying to please.
And the last one, choose your distribution matters a lot in the software business. For example, a video game, which is where I started, we were in Target and Lechmere and mass merchants. Our competitors were in Ziploc bags in computer stores. Well, when something like Steam shows up, when something like downloadable shareware shows up, everything about your product changes. So again, these four things are choices, and if you’re glossing over them it’s because you’re afraid.
Lenny Rachitsky: And I think it’s important to note, it’s not like you can just change these at will and just like, okay, cool, we’ll change your distribution. These are intertwined. But the important point here that I hear is just make sure the product you’re building understands this is how you’ll be distributed. This is who you’re selling to.
Seth Godin: Yeah, I mean, so a friend just sent me a business plan. They’re making a food product and they’re saying, we’re going to distribute on Shopify and we’re also going to sell to businesses, airports, hotels, and people who need to sell the food. I’m like, there’s only two of you. No, that’s not what your business… You got to pick, today, before you even turn the page, who are you for and who are you not for?
Lenny Rachitsky: Along the lines of picking your customer reminds me, a friend of mine started a company selling a product to real estate agents and she just warned me, be careful who you’re selling to because you’re going to be spending a lot of time with these people. Make sure you’re ready to be doing that.
Seth Godin: One of my very first books was a advertising supported directory paid for by law firms. This is not something I want to recommend to anybody.
Lenny Rachitsky: Another great nugget from the book that really stood out to me is this idea of tension. The importance of tension. You basically talk about how a great strategy has tension at the center of it. Why is tension so important to a good strategy?
Seth Godin: Okay, so let’s agree that tension and stress aren’t the same thing. Stress is generally not good. Stress is two things at the same time, I want to leave, I need to stay. Right? I hate my boss, but I need this job. That’s stress. Don’t look for stress. Tension is at the heart of every art form and every innovation. Tension is it might not work. Tension is da-da-da-na-na, and the other person says, da-da. Because they need to finish the sentence.
So what we do when we launch a new product is we say, we have this thing that can do X, and now the person is imagining what their life might be like if that were true. If they fall in love with that possibility, now there’s tension. Did you tell the truth? Is it going to work for them? And when I was a kid, PF Flyers were the sneaker to get, this was before Nike. And the promise of PF Flyers was that they would finally make you fast enough to run away from the bully. And I remember 10 years old walking into that shoe store and there was real tension in my head because I needed to get away from that bully, and I was keeping the PF Flyers people to their promise, and they didn’t tell the truth.
Lenny Rachitsky: It comes back to your point about not delivering on the promise that you make to build-
Seth Godin: Yes.
Lenny Rachitsky: … A great brand, right? Okay, I want to take a little tangent into Purple Cow territory. I have your book right here, by the way. I have many of your books in the back, but I don’t want to make my library… Oh, what is that? A milk carton?
Seth Godin: This is the first 10,000 copies came in milk carton.
Lenny Rachitsky: Oh man, I missed out on that. Was there any purple milk inside? What color is a purple cow’s milk? We’ll never know. We’ll never know. I know you’ve talked about this concept a gazillion times. I feel like still people don’t actually… Many people haven’t heard it. Many people don’t truly understand it, and it’s the thing that I reference most of your piece of advice. Could you spend a little time just chatting about this topic of the Purple Cow, the importance of being remarkable?
Seth Godin: Okay, so let’s start with Steve Blank. I’m sure you’ve talked about his idea of customer traction. The single best way to tell if a startup’s got any hope whatsoever is do the people who engage with you stick around? Do they come back for more? The second piece is, do they tell their friends? And if they tell their friends, what do they say? The word remarkable means worth making a remark about. So I’m not talking about coming up with some viral video that’s ridiculous in its gimmickry. I’m saying if you make something where the person’s life gets better if they talk about you and you know in advance what you want them to say, then they are more likely to say it. So Marissa Mayer probably created more stock market value than any other product manager I can think of. And the way she did it was there weren’t very many people at Google, but she was the one who said, “No, you can’t put another button on the homepage. There are only going to be two buttons on the homepage.” And over and over and again.
At the time I was at Yahoo. Yahoo had the chance to buy Google for $10 million while I was there. That’s a whole interesting story. But Yahoo had 183 links on the homepage and Google had two. And the statement built into that is we are making you a promise, and the promise is we are smart enough to take you where you want to go without you spending a lot of time browsing through 183 links. Tell us what you want and we’ll take you there. And so I was a tech-forward person, and if a friend came to me lost on the internet, confused about something, I’d just send them to Google because I knew they wouldn’t come back to me for more help, because okay, fine, they’re gone. It’s going to work. That’s what to say about Google at its launch is, hey, just type in what you want and you’ll find it. They built that into the product. That makes it remarkable because I wanted to tell other people about that because it would raise my status as a tech innovator.
Lenny Rachitsky: And the implication here, and you talked about this, is that most likely the way you will win is word of mouth. It’s hard to win with paid ads. It’s hard to win with sales teams unless you’re building B2B software. What you need to focus on is how to build something people tell their friends about. And the core of that is being remarkable. And I love just the way you break it down. Being remarkable is being something people remark about.
Seth Godin: Yeah, and if you think it’s just for small companies, that’s how Microsoft beat WordPerfect, because Microsoft Word was the format you needed your coworkers to work in if you were using a modern computer, because if they insisted on using WordPerfect, then you were stuck with WordPerfect. Whereas they had a migration path and once you migrated, you didn’t go back. So again, it’s in my interest to insist you use Word. So I did.
Lenny Rachitsky: This point about Mercer Mayer of doing this thing that was controversial, it comes back to your point of creating tension. It feels like it created tension both with visitors and internally. There’s also these quotes that I have here that are along these lines that you’ve said in the past, I don’t think they’re in this book. If it scares you, it might be a good thing to try. And safety is risky. Is there anything you want to say there?
Seth Godin: Well, so one of the things I talk about in the book is that systems are everywhere we look and they’re largely invisible, taken for granted. I spend time with high school seniors talking about college. They don’t see the college industrial complex. They just think it’s normal, because that’s what it is to grow up in the suburbs. And what systems do to protect themselves is they invent culture. Culture is the way things are around here. And so if you think something is scary, that’s probably because the system wants you to think that.
And so you shouldn’t do something foolhardy. You shouldn’t be fearless. But what you should do is think about why does it scare me to do this? What system will be offended if I do that? Am I trying to work with the system or am I leveraged enough to help change the system? And so the first people who put up downloadable software, all the feedback was, you can’t do that. It’ll be pirated. You’ll never make a penny. Okay. That might happen, and I can see why that feels scary, but I could also see why the dominant system of software distribution doesn’t want me to even experiment with this. But I only worked on the software for five months, let’s try it, because if it doesn’t work and it gets pirated, I’ll just have to make new software. It’s okay.
Lenny Rachitsky: It’s interesting, the opposite of that was also true with Salesforce. Their whole pitch was no software. It’s all in the cloud. Once that became the system, that became the tension and the risky move.
Seth Godin: Yeah.
Lenny Rachitsky: So you have this quote, actually. I want to spend more time on the system concept because it’s so core to the book, and so core to your advice for how to be better, you have this actual quote. “What does it mean to be a strategic thinker? It means to see the system.” What else can you share about it just for people that are trying to become better strategically, to understand what you mean when you talk about the system, how to see the system?
Seth Godin: We have to invent systems anytime we engage with other human beings, because interoperability is essential. There’s a system for how we greet other people in our culture. You shake hands, right hand to right hand. And just show up sometime and give the Vulcan salute instead and watch what happens. It’s very awkward because we just needed to get this over with and now that’s part of the system. And so systems serve a valuable function until they don’t, because then the system starts doing things to support itself, to reinforce itself. So for example, there is a system that says we should interview people for jobs. And the most successful interviews are people where they show that they are like us, they look like us, they went to schools like us, they have privilege and background like us. That is toxic, because it diminishes not just diversity, but our ability to put real talent on the team.
And if you don’t see that system and name that system, you’re going to keep doing what you were doing. And I was talking to someone yesterday who said they had been working with a company and the last four people that they had hired had been captain of their Ivy League tennis team. Well, clearly there’s a pattern here and it’s being reinforced by people who don’t want to get in trouble, but the system’s not helping them. And so yes, we need the metric system and we need the zip code system. Those keep working really well. But if you are trying to show up in a place where dominant players don’t want you to succeed, you’re going to have to find something in the system that gives you a chance to change the rules.
Lenny Rachitsky: This metaphor that I love that’s along these lines of better waves make better surfers, that a lot of your success is driven by choosing the wave versus the skills that you have. Can you just talk about that?
Seth Godin: Yeah. So it’s surprisingly profound. I don’t know where I came up with it, but when I see people who are great at surfing, they’re almost always on good waves. And my son who surfs a lot, I have noticed, passes up waves that other people might take waiting for the right wave because he knows he will be able to surf it better. So when you think about which company you’re signing up to bring software from, which people you’re willing to put on the key roles, are you willing to wait for the superstar who’s going to change things or are you in so much of a hurry to make an imaginary deadline that you’re going to ship mediocre work? Because all mediocre means is average. And so if you don’t want to be mediocre, you better do something different than the other people are doing. Otherwise, you’re going to get what the other people are getting.
Lenny Rachitsky: As you talk about this, I’m thinking about, I don’t know if you saw Jaguar’s rebrand and their whole launch. And it feels like it’s been rejected by the system. Any thoughts on that? Maybe what they got wrong or maybe it was genius?
Seth Godin: Okay, so you’ve picked a topic that I really like to talk about. Jaguar did not rebrand, Jaguar re-logo-ed. And the logo might be a sign that they’re trying to rebrand and make a different promise, and they’re switching to all electric, which I’m in favor of. But they made, I think, a very significant error, which is if you’re going to start a car company, a hundred million or a billion dollars are going to get spent earning trust from people who never heard of you. If you’re starting with one of the most iconic and beautiful and beloved car brands that has the luxury of having almost no cars in the world that could undermine what you want it to stand for going forward, it’s perfect. Own that, that’s brilliant. And to walk away from that so that you could please some art director, I don’t understand why you think you’re rebranding when you just put a logo on that undermines many of the awareness assets you already had going for you.
Lenny Rachitsky: It feels like they got very, very controversial. They went against the status quo more maybe than they should. I don’t know. What would you have done if you were them?
Seth Godin: You may recall when the International House of Pancakes decided to falsely announce they were changing their name to the International House of Burgers and made a new logo, because they wanted buzz. This is a Wendy’s Twitter tactic. Buzz does not sell hamburgers. Oreo’s got a lot of buzz when they did that tweet about the Super Bowl blackout. There’s no evidence they sold even one more cookie. They’re not in the business of entertaining us. So Jaguar isn’t going to sell more cars because people like you and I are talking about their re-logoing. What’s going to make them sell cars is customer traction. What they need to do is find 50 people who have authority and get them in a car that changes them somehow, that transforms them.
And it’s interesting if you think about two things that Tesla did right at the beginning with the model S. The first one is, according to someone I know who worked there at the time, the number one thing people would talk about when they saw you in the parking lot of the supermarket was the door handles, because the door handles popped out. They popped out in a way that’s annoying and dangerous, but it was noticeable. So there was a conversation.
And then what would happen is they’d say, what do you think of it? And you’d say, get in the car and you’d switch to ludicrous mode and you’d drive at zero to 60 in 2.4 seconds and they’d start screaming. This was fun for you and told a story to the passenger. This is how customer traction begins because I can’t do that in a different car, right? Compare this to the clown car, the Cybertruck, which was intentionally divisive and most people don’t want to not only drive one but have one on their block because divisiveness is not selling. That what’s selling is being of utility, to help someone get what they want. So here you have a category, the pickup truck, the number one category for all cars in the United States, just sitting there waiting to be taken. You can cross the chasm if you’re someone like Tesla. And instead, they decide to pull a stunt, and that’s not okay. It’s not good product management. It’s not good marketing.
Lenny Rachitsky: Interesting. So you think Cybertruck are not going to be a success?
Seth Godin: Well, I think, compared to what, right? So the Ford F-150 some years has made more than a hundred percent of Ford’s profit, meaning without the Ford 150 pickup truck, there is no Ford. That’s how big a category that is. You have a car with momentum and a public company where you’ve earned the trust of a lot of people. Now you have a category, pickup trucks, that are purchased for a very specific reason to show your neighbors you care about utility. Even if you never use the bed, that’s the story of driving a pickup truck. So now, if you bring people in that category who are inherently skeptical of change and inherently skeptical of design trickery, something that is nothing but change and design trickery, no, they’re not going to adopt it. You could have sold an enormous number of people who might’ve bought a Ford 150 instead. That crossing of the chasm is how you become really significant.
Lenny Rachitsky: I feel like this alone could be its own separate podcast conversation. I wish we had more time. I’m going to ask one last question, and this is a quote that I found of yours that I also love that is reminiscent of Elon Musk, actually, as we were just talking about this. “The secret to leadership is simple. Do what you believe. Paint a picture of the future. Go there. People will follow.” Can you just talk about that?
Seth Godin: I might be a little too glib because what I need to highlight is the painting the picture of the future needs to be based in empathy. You can’t paint a picture of where you want to go. You have to paint a picture of where they want to go, and it’s this non-narcissism that is where professionals do their work. That you are not entitled to raise money, you’re not entitled to have market share, you’re not entitled to get a good price because you worked hard. What we can do is be of service. We can open the door to help people get to where they always wanted to go. It’s very difficult to change what people want, but it’s pretty helpful to offer people a chance to get to where they always wanted to go in the first place.
Lenny Rachitsky: Seth, this was a dream come true. I appreciate you coming on the podcast. I appreciate you saying that. Where can people check out your book? Where should people go to learn more about what you’re up to? Anything you want to share.
Seth Godin: So I’m not active on social media, but I do have a blog at Seths.blog. If you go to Seths.blog/TIS, you’ll find everything you need to know about the book and the strategy deck and the collectible chocolate bar and whatever other thing I’ve dreamed up in the meantime.
Lenny Rachitsky: Chocolate. Seth, thank you so much for being here.
Seth Godin: These were great questions, Lenny, I could talk to you all day. Thank you,
Lenny Rachitsky: I appreciate that. Same. Bye everyone.
Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at LennysPodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| college industrial complex | 大学产业复合体 |
| cross the chasm | 跨越鸿沟 |
| customer traction | 客户牵引力 |
| design partners | 设计合作伙伴 |
| empathy | 共情(empathy) |
| Fahrenheit 451 | 《华氏451度》(Fahrenheit 451) |
| Humane Pin | Humane Pin |
| Lechmere | Lechmere |
| Mac | Mac |
| Marissa Mayer | 玛丽莎·梅耶尔 |
| PF Flyers | PF Flyers |
| pod structure | 小队结构 |
| Product Hunt | Product Hunt |
| purple cow | 紫牛(purple cow) |
| RadioShack | RadioShack |
| Raspberry Pi | Raspberry Pi |
| remarkable | 非凡(remarkable) |
| RTFM | 去读该死的手册(RTFM) |
| spec | 规格 |
| Spinnaker Software | Spinnaker Software |
| Squidoo | Squidoo |
| Steve Blank | 史蒂夫·布兰克 |
| tension | 张力(tension) |
| Tim | Tim |
| validation | 认可(validation) |
| Vulcan salute | 瓦肯人举手礼 |
| Wes Kao | Wes Kao |
| WordPerfect | WordPerfect |
| Yoyodyne | Yoyodyne |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py