Sanchan Saxena(Coinbase 产品副总裁)谈 Airbnb 如何挺过疫情的幕后故事、他从 Brian Chesky、Brian Armstrong 和 Kevin Systrom 那里学到的东西,以及更多内容
Sanchan Saxena (VP of Product at Coinbase) on the inside story of how Airbnb made it through Covid; what he’s learned from Brian Chesky, Brian Armstrong, and Kevin Systrom; much more
Lenny: I feel incredibly lucky to have gotten to work with Sanchan while I was at Airbnb. He joined Airbnb as a director of product and quickly moved up the ranks to head of product for all of Airbnb. Before Airbnb, he spent almost four years at Instagram as head of product for Instagram Ads, and then he created and led the Instagram Shopping product and team.
Before that he was director of product at Yahoo and a PM at Microsoft. And today he’s the VP of product at Coinbase. I don’t think I’ve worked with a harder working PM, particularly someone who’s incredibly kind and nice and generous.
In my conversation with Sanchan, we cover what he’s learned from working with some of today’s best CEOs, including Brian Chesky, Brian Armstrong, Zuck and Kevin Systrom, what it was like inside Airbnb when COVID hit and how they made it through travel completely stopping, how to set up your product development process at a startup, tips for hiring amazing product managers, when to hire your first PM, when to A/B test and when not to, and so much more.
I hope you enjoy this episode as much as I did. So many product managers are basically treated like project managers. You get higher thinking that you’ll be deep in product strategy and vision, and getting to know your customers, only to wind up organizing other people’s work and finding backlogs and optimizing tiny, tiny features.
If this sounds familiar, you need Dovetail. Because Dovetail gets that the true heart of product management is understanding what customers want, why they want it and how to give it to them. That’s why Dovetail built a suite of user research products that help you get to the core of what your customers really want and why they want it.
Dovetail offers a suite of powerful analysis tools to help you identify themes, patterns and insights in your customer interviews, allowing you to make better, data informed decisions about what solutions you should build next. Organizations all over the world, like Atlassian, Canva, Datadog, GitLab, Sketch, Nielsen Norman Group, and Deloitte use Dovetail to get a better understanding of their customers and build better products.
You can integrate Persona in an afternoon and personalize your flows using their SDK to meet your users on any device. Persona’s identity building blocks allow you to manage your entire end-to-end onboarding flow, verifying that each new user and their data are legitimate. Persona is trusted by both startups and the world’s largest companies, including Square, Block5, Gusto and Udemy.
And for a limited time, Persona is offering listeners of this podcast a free, end-to-end KYC and AML solution, where you can collect the user’s government ID and, or their selfie, and automatically verify that those two pieces of data are legitimate. You can also enrich that information to automatically see if the person exists on various watch lists. Just go to Withpersona.com/lenny to get started. Sanchan, welcome. Thank you so much for being here.
From Aerospace to Product Management
Sanchan Saxena: Thank you, Lenny, for inviting me. Excited to be here and chat with you today.
Lenny: Absolutely. My pleasure. I was really lucky to work with you at Airbnb for many years, where you were a beloved product leader. And then you went on to do bigger and better things now at Coinbase. And I’d love to just hear how you first got into product, and then just a little bit of your journey of how you got to where you’re today, where you’re basically head of product at Coinbase.
The Hypergrowth of Instagram
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, happy to answer. Maybe I’ll go back in time and start from my first job. I was in my third year of engineering where the entrepreneurial bug caught me, so to say, bit me. And I took a little bit of sabbatical from my engineering, which by the way, was in aerospace engineering.
I wanted to be an astronaut, go to space. Unfortunately back then, there wasn’t an Elon Musk for SpaceX. If you wanted to go to space, you got to work for a government agency, which I didn’t like. Fast forward that to my third year of engineering and I start my company, raised a bunch of money, hired some people.
Didn’t go as planned, so I [inaudible 00:04:20], came back and finished my engineering and got a job at Microsoft, which made my mom very happy. My mom said, “My son finally has a stable job. What the heck he was doing running some companies?” But jokes aside, I got a job at Microsoft, which was a great starting position.
I started in engineering. But within a year or so, I moved into product. And I moved to the Silicon Valley office of Microsoft. Never worked in Seattle, but always worked in Silicon Valley at Mountain View. And I worked for this product called Hotmail. I don’t know how many people know this or not, but there’s an email service called Hotmail. I was one of the product people.
Entering Web 3.0
Lenny: Absolutely. It’s scary that people may not even know what Hotmail is at this point.
Career Advice: Small Bets and Fast Learning
Sanchan Saxena: Right? It’s kind of crazy. Back in the day, it was pretty cool. I worked there, and then since then have been in Silicon Valley. So moved into product back in, I think, 2005 or ‘06, something like that, and since then been in product. I’ve been very lucky and fortunate to have stumbled upon incredible opportunities all the way from Facebook and Instagram to Airbnb and Coinbase.
And fun fact, when I joined Instagram, it was still very small. And it was less than, I think, 50 engineers or something like that. Very tiny. It was pre-revenue. We made 0 back then.
And was there till 2017. By the time it was like a billion monthly active users, multiple billion dollars in revenue, was my first hypergrowth experience as a product leader. And then in 2017, I joined Airbnb, which is where you and I worked together. There I had a dual role.
I was a GM of Airbnb Plus, but also the head of product helping Brian Chesky scale the product management organization, establish the culture of it, and see how best we can build a world class part organization. And then after that, I took some time off, about six months, introspective to see what do I want to do next.
And that is when I went into the Web 3.0 rabbit home, and that’s when I learned more and more about Web 3.0, what’s happening over there. I’ve always been investor in crypto since 2014, but never thought of it as a builder. I was like, “Ah, I don’t know if I want to build in there. It seems cool. I can participate from the outside.”
But then the more I read, the more I realized, “Man, this is one of the biggest revolutions happening.” And that’s when I joined Coinbase and here I’m the VP product for ecosystems and a bunch of other stuff that I do here, and excited to be able to play a small role in this next revolution called Web 3.0.
Lenny: Amazing. Just listening into that trajectory and places that you worked, I imagine people are wondering like, “Man, how do I follow a trajectory like that? How do I live a life like Sanchan?” Do you have any advice for someone that’s maybe just starting out that may be wondering like, “How do I follow this sort of path? How do I work at all these incredible companies and get to maybe where you are now?”?
The Art and Science of Product Management
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, I look back at my career, one thing that is very true is that I never had that plan. I stumbled upon a lot of things. I mean, I wanted to be an aerospace engineer, didn’t work out, pivoted. I started my own company, didn’t work out, pivoted. I came to Silicon Valley, worked at Hotmail, didn’t work out, pivoted.
Things start to materialize when you actually take steps to do something. My biggest advice to people is, oftentimes the analysis paralysis of dotting every eye, crossing every tee sometimes chokes you out of opportunities. When you find something that gives you energy, just jump in with both feet. And try to go through that process, and pivot and learn, and pivot and learn and pivot.
That’s how you would create a great career as opposed to sort of a five year career plan and working backwards from that. Those things just don’t work. The other thing I would say is I read this book early on in my life called the Little Bets. It actually was a reflection of whatever I did in my life. Before that I thought I was a weirdo, I don’t know what I’m doing. And then I read that book and I realized, “Oh my God, there’s some method to my madness. It’s called little bets.”
You take little bets, you try them out. If they don’t work out, you build rapid recovery and start to do something else. And that is the meta story connecting all the dots in my life, in all the career opportunities that I’ve had, just one piece of big advice I’ll tell everybody. The second thing I’ll say is product management is a very interesting discipline.
You don’t go to school for that. You don’t get a degree for that. And most people that I know in product have stumbled upon product management. They were doing something else and like, “Oh my God, this seems cool. I want to do this.” The advice I give early stage product people is you got to learn the art and the science of product management early on in your career.
There’s an art piece to it and then there’s a science piece to it, and you got to be able to manage both of those things in your head. If you become too scientific, you miss out on opportunities because you can’t see those opportunities using the scientific method of discovery, because they’re too tiny or they’re so farfetched that people cannot even understand them.
And the art piece is really important for you to be able to sniff those out by being in the community, hanging out with people who are actually builders and learning where the next trends would be. My advice to people is go get a job which will make you the fastest learner in the field of product management.
That is what will help you a lot. No course, no degree, none of those things will help. The most important thing will be how quickly can you jump in, learn the auto product management. Some people prefer doing that at a startup. Some people prefer doing it at a established fan company, which has processes and systems as well. It’s your choice. But the fastest you learn that, the better it’ll get for you.
Choosing Your Ideal Learning Environment
Lenny: Wow. I love so much about that advice. To go a little bit further on this last point. When people are looking for a company to go join to learn, to accelerate their career the way you’re describing, what do you think they should be looking for? I know you said maybe a startup. Do you think they should join a startup? Do you think they should join a bigger company? What kind of things should you look for to find the best place to learn?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, I think there is no right recipe for one, but it matters to the individual. I’ll share both stories with you. The way to think about this is let’s say you want to get to a destination, whichever destination it is, you probably want to get on the faster ship. You don’t want to get on a slower ship. That’s one metaphor to use in your mind.
And then when you got to the ship, you know the ship will get there, but remember you are not going to get to your destination faster than the ship will. You got to understand what your destination is, then optimize the learnings from there. At a startup, you’re going to learn a lot of things. There are three types of learning, a starter learning, meaning you can get started. You’re a person who can get started. You see an idea, you see an opportunity, you can get started. Right?
That is something that a startup will teach you a lot. You see something, you want to get started to do something about it, great, you’ll learn a lot over it. And there’s zero to one people who can then take what they have started and scale it to one. And then there are one and beyond people who are scalers, who will scale the system that is found product market fit.
And I think depending on your journey, depending on your career, depending upon where you are, you might want to optimize for different types of learnings as well. What I advise people is there’s a great way to go to Google, Facebook and Amazon and learn the scale mechanisms that these companies have built. And I look at Amazon and I get inspired by that company, because what they have figured out is how to scale innovation with 1 million employees.
It’s a pretty different learning. And you can’t potentially find that at a startup. Similarly, the ability to just get started, the ability to see an idea, start hacking at it, start building it without the encumbrances of the processes and the system that these big organizations have, you can probably learn that in a big company as well. You got to figure out what are you optimizing for, what goes well with you.
I’ve seen many successful leaders who will get choked up in a big company environment, and I’ve seen many big company successful executives who want to choke up in a very startup environment. And this is not for everybody. Both sides of the games are not for everybody. First and foremost recognizing what gives you energy, recognizing where you thrive the most is really important.
For example, I am not the guy who can optimize a 100,000 employee company. I will never enjoy that kind of learning. I’ve done to some extent a large company thing, but I thrive in that starter to scale angle. But when it becomes too large, I start to lose interest in that kind of learning. Some people enjoy different things. You got to understand what it is and be able to optimize there.
Airbnb: Where I Learned Most
Lenny: Where would you say you learned the most of all the companies you worked at that helped accelerate your career most?
Airbnb’s Product Philosophy
Sanchan Saxena: I think I would rank Airbnb probably the place that I learned the most. And I’ll share with you and your audience why I feel that way. I joined Airbnb back in 2017, making decent revenue, had good product market fit. I remember when I got there, the entire product management order was like 30 people or 40 people, something like that.
You had three directors of product, very small still for a company that was generating a billion plus dollars in revenue. And then the context was there was this ambitious founder, Brian, who will never take no for an answer. And he would bend reality in many regards to make shit happen.
And you are very familiar with those days as well, but you will have a practicability. You will leave the review thinking, “Shit, this is actually possible.” The guy just inspired you that this is actually possible and you went in thinking it’s not possible.
What I found is that at Airbnb, I learned a bunch of different things. One, I learned how to build products where software is just one part of the product. Let me explain that a little bit. The product of Airbnb isn’t the app. It is a means to an end. The product of Airbnb is the memories you’re going to create when you sit in that Airbnb beautiful house with your family, with your friends, and you’re building those memories. That’s the product. It’s in real world.
And how you build a real world product which is of course powered by software, like the app, the website, et cetera, is different than just building a pure product that is purely software. I learned what is operations, how to scale operations, how to work with operations, how to create beautiful physical homes over there. The second thing I learned is just how to build great products.
I mean, I got I think a masterclass from Chesky in how to build products by watching him act, behave, and make decisions as well. And we’ll talk about it later today. But I learned some of my fundamental product principles from him, and working with him and the team that he had assembled, the design leaders, the engineering leaders, et cetera. I learned a lot over there.
And last one but not least, there was still a hypergrowth thing. We were going through crazy growth. And then I learned what happens in leadership when coronavirus happens, the company starts to tank. It was a lesson in crisis management. I tell my friends I could not have gone to HBS Stanford business school to learn crisis management as much as I learned while being in the front row seat managing through that.
My learning as a product leader from Brian as a hyperscaler, taking the product management organization from 30, 40 people to 200 people, and last but not the least, managing the crisis. I felt like it all compressed into three years something that you will learn in 30.
Lenny: I imagine you had no sense of that sort of path or trajectory or learning when you joined Airbnb, it was like, “Hmm, this is going to be a great company, little [inaudible 00:14:46] things.”
COVID Shock and Crisis Management
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, absolutely. And oftentimes it’s a joke, but I’ll say it out anyhow. Oftentimes you meet leaders who are leaving Facebook, Amazon, Google, and it’s like, “Hey, here’s my Excel spreadsheet. Here’s how I imagine the startup that I’m joining will grow. Here’s the valuation. Here’s my life. Here’s my compensation. That’s it.” None of that shit is going to happen.
The companies have a different trajectory and you can’t predict those things. So yeah, you’re right. When I joined Airbnb, I thought it’s going to be a walk in the park, just like Instagram was. I mean, Instagram wasn’t a walk in the park. But relatively speaking, Instagram never experienced this kind of rapid pivoting of the reality, right?
I’ll share with you I was there when Instagram had less than a hundred million monthly active users, $0 in revenue, 50 engineers, till it had 1 billion monthly active users, billions of dollars in revenue and thousands of employees. And I don’t remember a time where the reality got bended so badly that we had to pivot.
In Airbnb’s time, man, one fine morning in January, Brian and us were all talking about going IPO and taking the company public. Six weeks later, we are figuring out, “Damn, how do we make this company survive?” The revenues, if I’m not wrong, dropped to less in single digits of last year’s revenue.
And there is no head of product, there is no CFO, there is no COO, whoever has a business plan to say, “Hmm, what are we going to do when our revenue drops to single digits of last year’s revenue?”
I definitely didn’t think that is what happened, but that’s what ended up happening. Luckily, everything worked out, and I’m happy to share what we did and how we navigated through that with the audience, but it was some crazy, crazy times, man.
Lenny: I was on the outside of that having left Airbnb a couple years prior and I was like, “Shit, what am I going to do now? I’ve been taking time off. There go all my Airbnb shares. I think I can get a job soon.” And that’s actually what led to the newsletter and starting to charge for the newsletter. But I’m very thankful for the turnaround that you helped create. I’d actually love to hear a bit more about what it is they did that helped them through that.
Founders Are the Key
Sanchan Saxena: I’ll share with you the behind the scenes story that we went through. This is January, and Brian had this idea of taking the company public in April. And we are working on the road show deck, we are working through numbers, we were crafting the story, et cetera, everything’s going well.
And then we hear of this coronavirus crisis and all of a sudden countries are shutting down, one after the other. Italy shuts down. Japan shuts down. This country shuts down. And all of a sudden we can see on our travel map, we have this dashboard where you can see where people are traveling, and you can see travel goes down to zero in this country on a map. This goes down to zero in this country, and you’re like, “Holy shit, what’s happening over here?”
I remember in all-hands where Brian stood up and said, “Look, we built this company for a crisis like this. We built this company, we have $2 billion in bank.” I think something like that, some ridiculous number. “We have not used a single amount of money from our last raise,” because we were profitable or growing really profitable. “And we are going to survive this.”
Six weeks later, he’s in the same all-hands and telling people, “This is a different world we are living in.” We had to lay off 1,900 employees, just 190 of those were in my organization. We had to raise $2 billion in debt, and the valuation dropped to 50% of what the valuation was. It was one of the craziest times.
And Lenny, when you go through that, the loss of challenges you face, one is fine. You can cut costs by laying off employees for a little bit and create a little bit more runway. But remember, this is coronavirus time. I had to let go of people over Zoom. I couldn’t even meet them in-person.
I still remember when I actually finished my speech and I told them, “This is the last day,” now, I literally shed a tear in front of everybody, because I was like, “Man, this is hard. This is really, really hard.” And the company let go of 1900 people. I just had to let go of 190 in my organization, but it was still very painful, because remember, it is no fault of these employees. They just happen to be at the wrong side of the tornado that’s hitting the world.
The second equally most important thing was the people who stayed back, how do you motivate them? One is you can let go of the people, but people who stayed back, they need a light of hope that something is going to turn around. But how do you plan when data is changing every single day? And every day we will wake up, a new country will go down and say, “No, no more travels into our market”.
And we start predicting that our revenue will be 7, 10, some ridiculous very small percent of last years. There’s panic. And this is where I would say Brian Chesky is an incredible leader. He’s the Rocky Balboa of Silicon valley. You can punch him, he’ll go down, he’ll stand up, he’ll fight again. That’s the analogy. He’s truly the Rocky Balboa where he took so many punches, but he stood up again and say, “One more round.”
And that’s how the company survived. From an operating principle, we went into two week planning mode. Greg Greeley, who was the president of Airbnb used to say, “Look, can’t plan for a year, can’t plan for a quarter. We’re going to plan every two weeks. We’re going to react to every two weeks.” And I think this is the lesson that I try to share with a lot of product people as well and founders as well is that things are going to go all right. Things are not going to go as you plan.
The real genius isn’t to dot every eye, to cross every team before you get started. The real genius is, what do you do when shit goes wrong? And I believe rapid recovery is the key to success. What you do, how quickly you can recover from failure becomes really important. Our operating model changed. We went to two weeks shipping. All right, what are we doing for the next two weeks? What is the most urgent thing for the company? For the company. Not my team, not your team, not somebody else’s team.
And we pivoted the entire machinery down over there. And then slowly and slowly after two or three months, we got to a place where we got semblance of what is happening. I want to tell you one story. Hotels and Airbnb are competitors, right? And when this thing happened, we had a debate, “How are we going to position Airbnb against hotels?” And actually we had to figure out what are the advantages of people staying in an Airbnb.
And luckily for us, being in an Airbnb where the air you breathe is only you and your family turned out to be a huge secret sauce to compete. When you’re in a hotel, there’s a lobby. You get to be with other people. But when you’re are in an Airbnb, you’re safe. We pivoted our marketing as well and messaging as well. The entire company came together to become one.
And through this, I would say Brian’s leadership was just phenomenal, everything I learned about crisis management, leading with calmness. There’s a very good saying in boxing. I love sports. There’s a very good saying, which is, you can have all the plan. The moment you step inside the boxing and you get a punch on your face, all your plans go out the window. And you got to stay calm when you get a punch on your face.
And that is what I learned from Brian, how to stay calm, how to stay composed while at the same time, deep down you know you owe a lot to these employees, you know you owe a lot to these employees to have clarity, and for them to stick around with you and believe in you that the company can turn around. It was an amazing journey, but pretty painful.
The Power of Storytelling
Lenny: Wow. I haven’t heard that level of detail about what went on inside, and so thank you for sharing all that. Very tactically, I’m curious, the two week planning cycles, how did that actually happen? Was there a large meeting every two weeks with the leaders and they just kind of discuss, “Here’s where we’re thinking for the next two weeks.”?
The Power of Simplicity
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, I think so. One of the things about Airbnb, and we’ll talk about it later as well, but it’s a very founder-driven company. While there are leaders over there, the founder is deeply in the trenches. He really understands the customer. He’s not this executive who’s so far removed from reality that they can’t actually create the content.
Brian was living, breathing that exercise. Execs were breathing that thing. What we’ll do is we’ll have a bunch of things top-down. Again, this is what we need to do guys. We need to cut this feature. We need to cut this product line. We need to cut this business unit. I literally had to shut down one full business unit because we had to cut the bleeding, so to say, and let go of those many people.
It was a top-down mandate, but also it was a bottom-up. The engineers, the product managers and designers are frontline. They are in connection with the CX team who’s hearing what customers are complaining about. And so there was a mixture of top-down guidance to a bottoms-up things that we are seeing on the field. And every two weeks or so, the leadership, Greg in that case, for example, would make a decision on, “Here are the things we are going to go handle.” And there were no teams anymore.
We basically dissolved this idea that there are sub-teams. There was one team, #Airbnb. Didn’t matter whether you worked in CX or Airbnb Plus or Lax, or any of those things, we’re going to move engineers wherever we have to, we’re going to move PMs wherever we need to, and there’s no such thing as sub-team anymore.
A lot of engineers on my team would go on to do marketplace dynamic stuff, like pricing and all that stuff, while some of those engineers would then go on to build CX tools or something else that was needed for survival. I felt like a 4,000 people company was operating as a four people company and a 40 people company, which is one team, no sub-teams, everybody rowing in the same direction. And that was really important.
Because remember, employees who are at your company are looking for clarity. What should they work on? Is the thing that they’re going to work on meaningful, right? Because nobody knows, right? And when people will ask you as a leader, like many people ask me, what does six months look like? What does a year look like? Where are we a year from now?
The most honest answer you can tell them is, “I don’t know.” Because if you cook shit up, they’re going to see through that lie. They’re going to like, “Ah, this is just all marketing fluff.” We would be very honest as leaders, would be very vulnerable as leaders, saying, “This is truly once in a lifetime thing. We don’t know how we’re going to navigate. But here’s what we believe to be true.”
We had to get people from feature obsession, revenue obsession, to belief obsession. What is belief obsession? When we all believe that when coronavirus is over, people will want to travel. We all believe that coronavirus will be over. You start going into first principles belief-based thinking, and you’ll bring stories that will make people believe that the future that we are working toward is actually possible.
For example, there was a survey we did, we said, “If money wasn’t a consideration, what would you do for the rest of your life?” 99.99% of the people said, “I will travel the world.” Travel is in human genes. And so we had to pivot to actually making people believe why travel will be back, why Airbnb will survive, and why Airbnb will eventually thrive if the coronavirus crisis is lower.
Lenny: These stories are incredible. I was going to ask around the morale piece. You mentioned keeping morale up. And it sounds like a big piece of that was pulling people back to the mission and the vision of Airbnb and re-inspiring them, and helping them feel like this will work out. Is that what you found to be most effective, to keep more morale up, or is there anything else that also helped keep more morale up in this very tenuous time?
The Founder’s Intuition
Sanchan Saxena: I think in these tenuous times you will notice that you can’t pay these employees better than market. When this happened, FAANG companies were at our door trying to poach our engineers. Overnight, every engineer was pinged by Facebook, Google say, “Hey, we heard Airbnb is going down. You want to come over? We’ll pay you X amount of money, and that stock is stable.”
You had vultures at the door, so to say, as a proverbial exercise where your top talent is getting poached, but you can’t pay this top talent the best. Right? You can’t. Because your financial situation doesn’t allow you to do that, right? But you still give them something, right? Because it’s at a lower price and you start to sell the vision that if the company turns around, this will be at a higher price and you’ll have right compensation. But those were some of the challenges.
The second challenge is you’ll notice that people who thrive in these situations will be the one who truly believe both in the mission, but I think more importantly in the founders to make that mission come to life. Because you and I both know, right, there are many companies who have the similar mission, want to do something similar, but some succeed and some don’t.
And the secret sauce of that in my opinion is the founder. And if the employees do not believe in the founder, if the employees do not believe that the founder can make things happen as they talk about, and the founder is not able to connect with the employees, those companies go down in flames. The second thing I would say is the founder needs to be at the front line. And Brian Chesky was on the front line.
He was literally 24/7 available, interacting, making decisions, holding all-hands, writing emails, sending messages, and assuring people that I’m in this with you. By the way, there’s a proverbial thing, right? When such situations happen, all execs take a pay cut. Every company does that, right? But then still certain companies survive, certain don’t, right?
It’s primarily because of the founder. And then the third thing I would say is somehow getting people to believe in the future that they came here to create. When drastic situations like these happens, when I joined Airbnb I had a vision of what it can become, and the reality snaps and all of a sudden like, “Holy shit. Is that even possible?”
That is the real art I learned from Brian is that the power of storytelling without any data. Your data is telling you, “You’re going to die.” The data is telling you, you got 7%, 10% of your revenue, whatever the number was now. I forget now. Like single digit number, right?
And every day you’re seeing the numbers go down, right? And Brian has this incredible ability to help you see a future in a way so crystal clear that when you leave chatting with him, you’re like, “Man, it’s possible. We can make it happen. We can do it.” That trait was really, really important that Brian invested in it, and all the three founders, by the way.
How to Validate Your Direction
Lenny:
Productboard can help you create a scalable, transparent and standardized process, so your PMs understand what their customers really need and then prioritize the right features to build next. Stakeholders feel the love two with an easy to view roadmap that automatically updates so everyone knows what you’re building and why. Make data-driven product decisions that result in higher revenue and user adoption, and empower your product teams to create delightful customer experiences.
Visit Productboard.com to learn more. I could talk about Airbnb all day, but I’m also curious of the other places you worked at, Instagram, Microsoft, even Coinbase. What are things you’ve seen the leaders at those companies do that have stuck with you that you’re going to take to other places that are maybe unique?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, I think a lot of amazing things. I tell people, I learned all things about building great products, building great businesses, building great companies from founders like Kevin Systrom and Brian Chesky, Brian Armstrong and others. Well, let me go back to Instagram days. I want to paint the picture first of what it was when I got there and the journey we were on.
At that time, Instagram was a highly successful app that was growing really fast, but there were many questions. Only photos, you can’t share anything outside. It’s only from the camera. You can’t share links. At Facebook they allow you to share links. Why don’t you allow that, right? There’s an existential question that comes at those stages, which is who do you want to be when you grow up?
When you’re a startup, that’s a big, important question for you to answer. And there were many debates. “Do we want to be the next Facebook? Do we want to be the first Instagram? Who do we want to be when we grow up?” Right? And that debate is really, really important. That clarity is really important for your employees.
The thing that I learned from Kevin Systrom was the power of simplicity. That guy can listen to everything, hear everything, hear the noise on Twitter, here, there, all the customers complaining, and then just simplify things that makes sense for the team to operate on. That’s his superpower, which is simplicity. Take all the information, but simplify your strategy, your belief, who you want to be when you grow up in a way that people can then act on it.
The other thing I learned from him was intentionality. This is the story of Instagram Stories. When Snapchat came about, Snapchat was eating Facebook and Instagram as lunch in many regards, because the Snapchat Stories was crushing it. And there are lots of myths, by the way, in the media, how that happened.It was a mandate from Zuck.
No, Zuck did not have a mandate. There was no such thing. It was something that people were experimenting. I want to tell you a story, two stories, which is stories in Facebook app and stories inside of Instagram app, and stories for your audience is the stuff that Snapchat invented, all credit to them. In product management, you always debate measure twice, cut once kind of a thinking. It’s like measure the data, get all the data, right? Get all the analysis, ask customers, et cetera.
Some of the successful founders don’t do that. Some of the successful founders go off of gut and instincts more than they go off of data. And that to me is a superpower of a founder is like they have this instinct, their vision. I’ll tell you a story. On Instagram side, Kevin Systrom made a decision. We’re going all in on this new format. There was no A/B testing that if you add stories at the top …
I mean, there were a little bit of A/B testing, but not like, “Okay, let’s go measure. If you add stories at the top, the feed will go down as a result. Engagement will drop as a result. Revenue will draw. And as a result, we should not do it.” There was no such thing. The founder said, “We’re going all in people. This is the future. We’re not going to measure and then cut. We’re going to cut. And then we are going to iterate from that new baseline. We’re going to continue to iterate on that on the Facebook side.”
And by the way, there’s a very good article that some PM inside of Facebook wrote why stories didn’t survive at Facebook but thrived at Instagram is because on that side there was a mathematical modeling being created, which is what are the trade-offs. And you have a successful business. And this is the innovator’s dilemma. You have a successful business called feed that is generating billions of dollars.
And you got to bring in this new thing, which has zero advertisers, we don’t even know if the engagement will be there or not, and you got to put those things together. There was a very different approach that Facebook took for stories versus Instagram. And by the way, there was no this rumor in the media there was a top-down man. No, these teams were just experimenting. They were just trying things out.
We always want to look at our competition, be inspired by what’s working, what’s not. There’s no harm in learning from somebody who’s doing something great and experiment and see if that works for you or not. That was the story. And the thing that I learned from Systrom was intentionality. As a founder, one of the things you have to recognize, or even as a product leader, you have to recognize is that every product that you build should be intentional in nature.
An intentionality doesn’t come just from A/B testing. A/B testing maybe you can do that, right, as a later on, but you got to have intentionality. Where do you want to go? What is the world you want to create for your customers? And then create out A/B testing to get you the fastest route to that end state world. When I talk to product managers, oftentimes I tell them you’re being either too lazy or you’re trying to be too risk averse by telling me, “Here are the assumptions you have that you’re going to test.”
First tell me the intentionality of the product that you want to create. What do you want to see come true? And then let’s talk about the A/B test we can run to measure that we are headed in the right direction. And it’s a flipping of the mind. And that was something that Brian also taught me. By the way, it’s a joke, but some degree it’s reality too. A/B testing at Airbnb is a bad word.
You don’t go to Brian and say, “Hey Brian, here’s my Excel spreadsheet. I want to run some 10 A/B tests and come back and tell you whether we are heading in the right direction.” You’re going to get thrown out of the window. It’s like, “No, we got to figure out what the product is.” The other thing I learned with Brian Chesky was you first want to create an ideal end state of the product without any constraint.
Here’s a good analogy that Brian will teach people. Let’s say you want to build Airbnb. What is the 15 out of 10 experience you want to create? That’s where Airbnb designers and PM start by the way. In most companies, the designers and PM start by saying, “Okay, 10 is perfect. We can probably do seven. Let’s start at seven.” It’s a very constrained minded thinking. It’s like, “I got this much time. I got this many resources. I got this much budget. I can only do so much.” Right?
And what Brian taught us was think unconstrained first. Think about a 15 out of 10 experience, design the ideal end state first. I’ll give you a very concrete example of this. Let’s say you’re building Airbnb lounges. A customer’s check in is at 3:00 PM, but their flight is at 6:00 AM. What are you going to do? Well, you got to build a lounge, right?
If you’re traditionally trained in product management, this is what you’ll do, which is, look, I don’t know how to build this in 120 countries. I don’t know how to scale this stuff. So I’m going to ignore some ideas and I’m going to build a MVP lounge. And then I want to say, “Okay, if I add internet access to it, customer detention went up by way. If I add coffee to it, this went up by Z.If I add cheers to it, it went up by X,” and hence I’m going to justify how to build a beautiful mall.
That’s not what you will do if you’re Brian Chesky. Here’s what you’ll do. You will pick one location because you don’t know how to scale a lounge in 120 countries. Pick one location. But you know how to get in one location a barista who can create coffee, you know in one location how to get the best seats, you know in one location how to get the best air conditioning, you know that right. Build the best possible lovable product first.
And then from that point on, understand what worked, what did not, and then scale the pieces that actually worked. It’s a very different way of thinking about things, doing things that don’t scale it first. Those are different things I learned at Instagram and Airbnb.
On Persistence and Intuition
Lenny: So much good stuff there that we could do a podcast at each learning. And that point about working backwards from the ideal, that’s something I’ve absolutely taken away also from Airbnb and news often. If folks want to learn a bit more about that, if you Google Snow White Airbnb, there’s a whole story about Snow White that kind of touches on where a lot of this idea came from.
I want to follow up on one point you made about intentionality. See your founder or PM and you’re just like, “Oh, yeah. Okay. I’m just going to figure out a vision, and this is where we need to go. And I need to be intentional, so I’m just going to tell people here’s where we’re going.” Oftentimes you’re wrong.
Do you have any thoughts for someone trying to decide how do I know if I’m going in the right direction, how do I know if I should trust this gut that I have versus running A/B test, because otherwise we don’t know? Do you have any thoughts on that?
Sanchan Saxena: Absolutely. I think there are lots of things to unpack there. The first and foremost thing I’d say is that when you sit in your car, you tell your GPS, “Here’s where I want to go.” You never go into your car and say, “Hey, GPS, tell me where I should go.” Right? At least I haven’t done that. And then you use the GPS to run an A/B test, say, “Look, I want to get there in the fastest way possible.”
GPS then figures out the path to get there in the fastest way, or sometimes tell the GPS, “I’m low on gas. Take me a gas efficient route that I can get there, or [inaudible 00:37:07].” Those are A/B tests. But you never say to the GPS that, “I don’t want to go to San Francisco. Tell me where I should go.” It’s a similar concept around intentionality.
You got to start first and foremost with, where do you want to go? What is the true customer problem that you want to solve? And why does that matter? The second thing I’ll say is, oftentimes, product leaders discount gut or intuition a lot. And the reason is it’s a safe thing to do. You can always point to data and say, “Look, I did this because of this. And if I fail, here’s the data. And don’t fire me.” I’m just joking.
But you get the extreme of it, right? It’s very hard to build a team and build your reputation and get an intuition. But the thing is, founders do exactly that. There was no document that said, “10 years later Facebook will make billions of dollars in revenue,” or no document that said, “Coinbase one day will become a hundred billion dollar company if you invest in that at that point in time.” You got to have gut and intuition. And founders have that and operators need to learn how to harness that as well.
And to me, gut and intuition is data. It’s just not statistically significant yet. That’s all it is. You have built that intuition, that gut, because you immerse yourself in a situation, you hung out with customers, you understood what was happening. You just can’t prove it that it is statistically significant yet.Don’t discount your gut. That’s the second point.
And the third point that I’ll say is, once you have figured out what that experience looks like, yes, you got to validate what’s happening, you got to get feedback back from the community while launching it, and then you got to constantly iterate. My advice to people is, don’t do that testing up front, start with some assumption, start with a bunch of intuition, et cetera. Create that and then have the appetite to actually persist through that.
That’s another thing I learned from Brian is that oftentimes these ideas, these crazy ideas, you need persistence. He used to say, “You got to have impatience with getting started, but patience for seeing them through.” Because at many other companies, you can actually kill a brilliant idea early on because you just didn’t have the patience to see that through.
You got to start with intentionality and then you got to iterate and test, and iterate and test, and iterate and test. But don’t give up too early either. And last but not the least, I’ll tell a secret to all your audios.
Coinbase’s Product Culture
Lenny: Oh boy, here we go.
How the DRI Model Works
Sanchan Saxena: Nobody knows everything. Right? The idea is that you can look at as much data as you want, which is still not going to feel that all the answers. What is really important? The really important thing is rapid recovery. Build a culture in your team where failure of those experiments is actually celebrated.
Build a culture in the team where actually people get energized when they fail, because guess what, each failure was a learning that will avoid a mistake for them in the future. Right? And I think that is the mindset and culture you want to build. Look at data, look at all the things. But at the same time, don’t just look at that and say, “Look, because the data said so, that is what I’m going to do.” I’m going to use a very good analogy over here.
And this story has been butchered many times, but I was right there when this happened, so my version is at least 80% accurate. There might be other versions as well. But this is Instagram Stories. Imagine you are Kevin Systrom and data science comes to you and say, “Look, I looked at data, and 99% of all photos on people’s phones are actually at least a week old. Please allow Instagram Stories to let people select a photo that is at least a week or two old.”
Then user research comes back and says, “We talked to a bunch of people. They said, ‘Yes, I would love to share a story of my birthday about a month ago.’” Right? And Kevin Systrom says, “No, my intentionality is that story should be real time news. It should be the world’s largest TV channel. You open that up and you see what’s happening right now. That is the intentionality I’m going towards.”
In the beginning, Instagram Stories did not let you pick anything that was not real time. You couldn’t go back in your camera and pick something a month ago or two ago, because the intentionality of the product was to create the world’s largest real time network of what’s happening in the world right now. If that’s the intentionality, you got to ignore the other customer needs that I want to share with the world what I did a month ago, and that changes the dynamics.
What Makes Coinbase’s Operations Unique
Lenny: Essentially, intentionality is setting up vision for where you want to go, where the product’s going and then working away towards it. That makes a lot of sense. An example of Instagram. It’s interesting because he eventually changed his mind, because I know that you can upload old photos to stories [inaudible 00:41:28]
Sanchan Saxena: No, that’s actually after he left. But yes, you’re right.
Who Thrives in Web 3.0
Lenny: Okay, I see. A different intentionality appeared.
Traits of Early Tech Believers
Sanchan Saxena: And look, it’s also nothing wrong with changing your mind afterwards once you push the envelope, and then you learn something new and you can pivot. And that’s another beauty of founders is that they’re very intentional people, very strong opinionated people, but in the face of something new, they’re also the fastest to change. They don’t have remorsefulness, they don’t have regrets, and like, “Yeah. All right, let’s pivot.” And that is the culture you want to build as well as an operator.
Lenny: I’d love to spend a little time on Coinbase and the product culture there. How A/B test driven is it at Coinbase? How do folks think about intentionally vision? And also just, what’s the product development process like? I’m always curious how products is developed at different companies.
Hiring Substance Over Process
Sanchan Saxena: I think all different companies that I’ve worked at have very different product development cultures. At Airbnb, for example, design and experience was super paramount, and you will not compromise over it. You won’t cut design to ship. In other companies you will cut design to ship sometimes because you want to find something quickly.
At Coinbase, it’s slightly different as well. Every company has their nuances. Coinbase is an industry which is rapidly growing. It’s Web 3.0. I mean, I have not come across a Web 3.0 expert yet. There is nobody who’s an expert in Web 3.0.
Lenny: They seem to be on Twitter.
Interviewing with Real-World Challenges
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. There are lots of people who think they’re experts on Twitter. But the reality is, man, the industry is so nascent, so early. You have good intentions and good intuition about where it could go, but it’s very hard to be right all the time. The culture of Coinbase is to take big, bold bets, get started with very tiny teams.
The Coinbase NFT marketplace that we just launched, it started with five people, one product manager, one designer and other three engineers. That’s how smart it start. And of course it has grown big now as we find product market fit, etcetera, et cetera. But that’s the idea is take big, bold swings, but with tiny teams that can move at lightning speed and make shit happen, because that’s one aspect of it.
The other culture that I love about Coinbase is this idea of how we make decisions. Emily, our COO, posted a blog. It’s public. You guys can all read it. It’s a very different mindset of making decisions, so let me unpack that. When I was at Facebook, Instagram and other companies, other tech companies, there’s a saying around product and design, marketing. All these cross functional people need to come together to build a product.
And oftentimes you will notice that the decision making process could get a little bit convoluted, not always, but a little bit convoluted. It’s like, okay, what do you like? What do you don’t like? You got to align influence, align influence. And next thing you know … And again, I’m not saying always, but sometimes it can happen that the thing that ends up shipping is the least common denominator that annoyed everybody the least amount, right?
Everybody said, “Yeah, I could get comfortable with that. I could get comfortable with that.” And Brian has an allergic reaction to things like committees. It’s like designing by committee. The idea that we have, and you can read it in her blog, is the idea of a directly responsible individual or DRI.
For every project, we’ll establish a DRI. It could be a person in operations, engineering, design, legal, marketing, whatever that is, depending on the nature of the project. And DRI’s job is to then listen to the cross functional partners, get their input. And we have a written culture like Amazon, so every input is provided in writing. Right?
You can see what head of legal is saying. You can see what your head of operations is saying, what engineering is saying in writing. And then the DRI’s job is to take all that input and make a decision. Not take all that input and do necessarily what’s right by everybody, right? Still do what’s right by the customer. Still do what’s right by the business. Still do what’s right for the user in many regards.
But take that input, inform yourself with all the right things, but it’s your job to then make the final call. Whoever you might be, sometimes it’s operations, sometimes it’s engineering, sometimes it’s design and product, and others then have to disagree and champion that for you. I might go in and I might write in that rapid, “I disagree with this. Here are the reasons why.”
But the decider the DRI has to make that decision. And once that decision is made, I got to disagree and commit to it and champion it with the rest of the team as if it was my decision. It’s not just disagree and commit, it’s disagree and champion. Go out there and evangelize that this is the right thing to do. Now, there are lots of advantages of that.
It cuts all the passive aggressive behaviors that all of us have seen in different companies. It’s like, “Ah, I got to go talk to this head of X, and I got to be nice. I got to make sure we have this relationship.” And the decision gets dragged over two, three months, because the speed of decision making is directly proportional to the strength of your relationship in those companies, right?
Here, the speed of decision making is directly proportional to the person who’s directly responsible from making that decision happen. And it is, of course, incumbent upon that person to listen and get unsolicited advice. But at the end of the day, they’re the single [inaudible 00:46:16]. They’re the final DRI. It’s a very different culture than any place I’ve worked in. And when you join Coinbase, we have to orient you by saying, “Look, this is how you operate,” very different than any other company.
Lenny: That’s so interesting. Is that how big decisions are made or does that filter down to even individual teams where a PM or whoever is a DRI in a team makes decisions this way?
The Founder’s Dilemma and Netflix Culture
Sanchan Saxena: Individual people as well. You will see PMs writing, engineers writing, and operations and legal writing a rapid. It’s called rapid. It’s for rapid decision making. And it’s the same format that I would use if I want Brian to make a decision. It’s the same format someone will use inside their team.
Let’s say you are working on a particular project, you will write that rapid. It’s the same exact format, same exact mechanism, and every team uses those mechanisms to actually scale. Otherwise, decision making can actually be the [inaudible 00:47:05] of hypergrowth companies.
Lightning Round Q&A
Lenny: Is there anything else that’s unique about how Coinbase operates that’s stuck with you that you might take to a future company that you may work at if you ever leave Coinbase?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. I think decision making is one. I think just the idea of how to operate in such an ambiguous industry. When I got to Airbnb, ambiguity was a lot, because it was the first time we were doing home sharing as an example, right? And it was not done before. But you had had the overall understanding of the travel industry, the customer, the regulation, et cetera, et cetera.
But I think [inaudible 00:47:35] is a very ridiculously new thing. People sometimes ask me what’s the future of NFD, I say, “Ta-da! I don’t know,” I’ll experiment, figure it out. I have an opinion. I’ll take that opinion and start to execute against it, but nobody knows. How do you build conviction in a highly noisy world?
I mean, Web 3.0, as you’re probably on Twitter, everybody has an opinion on Twitter. X should do Y, and Y should do Z, and this is how it should be. Right?And the thing that I would take with me everywhere is, how do you build in that noise? How do you stay focused and still build what you believe is the right thing and still let the noise happen around you?
And I think as Web 3.0 advances and every company becomes a Web 3.0 company, that’s at least my prediction in this decade, just like every company became a mobile company, didn’t have a mobile app, but became a mobile company, I think every company will become a Web 3.0 company. Everybody will have to build that muscle of operating in that level of ambiguity where there’s literally no data and lot of noise.
Lenny: Is there some way of operating at Coinbase that allows them to operate in this ambiguity and focus? Is there something that you’ve seen there?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. I mean, we have our own flaws. I mean, no, company is perfect. We have our own flaws. But what we have figured out is how to operate, just the way I described before, which is a DRI mindset culture. Instead of having 15 people have 15 different perspectives, et cetera, it should all be amalgamated into one rapid.
And we trust our leaders. We trust the DRI, whoever that DRI is, to make the decision. And then we start going towards the same direction. We ignore all the noise over there. Again, no company is perfect yet. We are still learning, but this is something I found to be very effective.
Lenny: On the thread of Web 3.0, if someone’s thinking about like, “Should I get into a Web 3.0 sort of company? Should I not?” what sort of people do you find are most successful maybe on the product side specifically, but even broadly, folks that may enjoy the world of Web 3.0 and others that maybe not?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, I think Web 3.0 is definitely at a stage right now where I’m seeing a lot of influx of people from Web 2.0 world. Literally, if I look at my LinkedIn post, there’s somebody saying, “Ta-da! I left X and I’m joining a Web 3.0 company.” So there’s already.
Lenny: Or starters pivoting to Web 3.0 in your entire team.
Sanchan Saxena: Exactly, starters pivoting to Web 3.0 as well. I feel like when I joined … I mean, I joined very recently. I mean, not long time ago. When I joined, it was a very different conversation. I was still telling execs and others at Google and Facebook, “This is why you should join. This is what’s happening,” et cetera, but now I feel like the world is slightly different.
I think the people who will thrive or who thrive in Web 3.0 are people who truly are able to understand the potential and disregard the constraints of today. And here’s what I mean by that. You all have seen articles written by really influential celebrities saying, “Web 3.0 sucks.” And let me tell you why, because today sucks, right? We agree with the future principles of Web 3.0 of decentralization, this and that. But look at today, everything is centralized. Everything is blah, blah, blah.
I always remind those people as like the path to Web 3.0 goes, and from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 goes through web 2.5. It doesn’t go straight from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0. It goes through web 2.5. You got to go through that journey. And a lot of stuff that’s happening in Web 3.0 today is web 2.5, 2.7 kind of. There’s no truly decentralized stuff that is there, but the idealism is there. The closest thing is Ethereum probably, or Bitcoin.
The idealism is there and we want to get to the towards that, right? The people who will thrive most are people who understand those ideals, understand the future and are builders. They want to take what it is today and then morph it into the ideals of tomorrow. I remember I’m a history buff and I love watching the history of technology.
And there’s a video on YouTube which describes someone playing with the internet back in 1986, ‘87, ‘89, right? And what you had to do was if I wanted to visit Lenny’s website, here’s what I’ll do. I’ll type 192. whatever the IP address was, and then I’m going to hit enter on a blue screen. And then there’ll be things coming down and I’ll pay $200 to just access his website.
[inaudible 00:51:23] too, right? But if you can get past that and see that someday Lenny and I will actually have a podcast, video podcast or YouTube podcast over the internet, and we’ll be able to see each other and record that shit, that is powerful. We are looking for people at this stage who believe in that journey.
Lenny: I love that. And just the idea of hiring and joining company, I wanted to touch on hiring advice. You’re really good at hiring. You’ve hired many people, you’ve interviewed tons and tons of PMs, and so I just wanted to touch on this before we wrap up.
I find that hiring and just finding people as maybe the single biggest pain point for companies these days and startups especially. Do you have any advice for our founders or product leaders or just leaders in general for hiring, including finding people and closing them, that kind of thing?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. I think maybe I can focus a little bit about what are some of the things that I believe are incredibly important for startups to get right when they’re hiring. The couple of things to remember is that what really matters, what’s highly code related to a startup success isn’t that they used a process like scrum, like this, like that.
Well, what’s highly correlated is that somebody bloody knew what to do when. That is the most important thing. And I call that content. Content means what you do when. Process means how you do the thing that I just said. And I think there’s a very easy love affection towards process.
And I think Reed Hastings has talked about this in their culture deck. Steve jobs has also talked about in the past is that, oftentimes we gravitate towards people who know how to avoid mistakes, who know how to create a process. Here’s what a typical cycle is. You get bigger and bigger, you start making mistakes, you’re like, “Oh, we got to create a process so we don’t make the same mistake again.”
And next thing you know, over a period of time, the process becomes the product. Every morning you wake up, you look at your calendar, 80% of the time as an exec you are moving the process, you are managing the process, and that process becomes the product, and you lose sight of what the real product is, who your real customers are.
My advice to people, especially in early stage startups is bring in people who know content and teach them process, as opposed to bringing in people who know process and trying to teach them content, because that’s a bloody hard thing to do.
And this obsession about a lot of funders ask me when I consult with them is like, “Should we do scrum? Should we do X, Y, Z process?” I’m like, “You can do whatever you want. It doesn’t matter. You can try any of those things. It will not be correlated to your success.” And maybe to some degree, but not a lot of degree.
What you really need to figure out is, who do you hire, who can actually understand what the content of your product is, what the content of your customers is? How do you win in that industry that you’re operating in? And make sure that you stay obsessed over there, right, as opposed to the process. This is something that Brian Chesky has grilled in me.
Hire executives who know how to execute. And his idea was, let’s say Sanchan’s entire team disappears, and then I go to Brian and say, “Hey, Brian, I got to hire this organization, I got to hire these people, and then I’ll tell you what to build, or I’ll then build.” Right? Now I should be able to then crawl up my sleeve, if I’m a content kind of a leader, and I should do exactly what my team did.
Maybe not with the same capacity, because if I have so many people team, I can’t do so many people worth of work. But at least be able to tell you, “This is what we should build. This is when we should build. This is how we should build.” Right? I shouldn’t be a leader who just delegates to the extent that I forgot what content is, right? And that is a very important piece.
Lenny: When you’re looking for a leader like that, because that sounds amazing, what do you look for? How do you know if there’s that sort of leader when you’re interviewing or just kind of evaluating?
Sanchan Saxena: One of the things we did at Airbnb, because this was the thesis that we had over there, we actually changed our interview process around this. We will give people a work challenge. You’re very familiar with that. Most people say, “Come and do a presentation.” No, we actually gave you a work challenge.
We said, “This is the problem you’re facing. How are you going to solve it?” Right. We’re facing Airbnb Plus problem, we need to build millions of homes that are Airbnb Plus, but we don’t know how to do that. What would you do? And we want to see the depth of thinking. They don’t know the right answer because they don’t have the right data. That’s okay. Right?
But they at least need to show us how they approach the problem. What are they going to do? And they need to show us the content of how they’re going to do. Some people will come in and say, and have seen slides in those presentation, they’ll come in and say, “Here’s my process. Ideation, execution, iteration.” That’s okay. I want to know what you’re going to do inside of ideation.
Some execs will come in presenter say, “Well, the first thing I’m going to do is go out there and figure out are their third party companies who can actually scale my operations without building it in now.” That is content, right? And I want to evaluate that.
The second thing we will do is in our interview process as well, if it’s an exec, Brian will spend time and I will spend time, anybody else will spend time, we will focus on whatever you did in the past, tell me the role that you played in that versus telling me everything that your team did. Right? To be precise, the role you played.
And this is something I tell a lot of my folks at Coinbase as well is like, you got to be able to bring things to me, escalate to me when you need my help and let me help you be successful. My role is such that I have a large team and I can’t do everything. But what I can do is set them up for success. How? Of course, the tactical supply of resources.
But more importantly, when we are thinking about the content, when we think about what to do, when to do, how to do it, let’s sit together and think about that. Escalate to me, bring things to me. I will go into the mud with you and I’ll create that clay for you, with you. And that is how I stay relevant. But more importantly, that is the value that I get to help my team succeed as well.
Lenny: I love that. I was just thinking that the fact that you call kind of the roadmap and the plan like a content, that makes you a content creator, and how does that feel?
Sanchan Saxena: Yes, that does feel good. I mean, you should have the ability to create a roadmap and that is your creating content around that. But the thing that I want to make sure people understand is that the format of that roadmap doesn’t matter. Whether you use Excel, or this, or that, it doesn’t matter. That process doesn’t matter.
What matters is that you were able to come up with the right roadmap, which is what you’re going to build, at what time you’re going to build. And that is a core value set of an individual or a leader that you should absolutely look for.
And so otherwise, my prediction is four or five years later or whatever the time is, that company will start to attract process people, and next thing you know, everybody in the company is a process person and nobody is a content person.
And then what hands up happening is the founder ends up taking that burden of becoming the content person, and next thing you know, they can’t scale. They just cannot scale. The company cannot scale.
Lenny: Yeah, because process eventually just kind of starts to break down.
Sanchan Saxena: Exactly. There’s a very good deck. I’ll encourage your audience to watch the Netflix Culture Deck. And Reed Hastings talks about this at length, better than I did. And it’s a beautiful concept, it’s a beautiful argument, and I think I will encourage every follower to start looking for that.
And again, I’m not saying process shouldn’t exist. You absolutely need some process. That’s why you can scale. You can’t scale without some process as well. But process is not the answer. Content is the answer.
Lenny: I feel like I’ve taken enough of your time. And so we’ve gotten to the final part of our chat, which is the lightning round, where I’m going to ask you a few questions and then just tell me what first thing that comes to mind. If nothing comes to mind, that’s totally cool too. Does that sound good?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah, that sounds great, man.
Lenny: Okay. What’s a book that you recommend most to other product leaders?
Sanchan Saxena: Two books come to mind. One is The Little Bets, which is how you live your life and how you build businesses with little bets. And the other thing I would say The Innovator’s Dilemma. Those are two of my favorite books and highly recommend everybody reading those.
Lenny: Awesome. What’s a company that you recommend most to PMs that are looking for a new job other than Coinbase?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. I mean, I think there are tons of Web 3.0 companies or tons of other companies. I would say amongst the companies [inaudible 00:58:58], the insights say where it is. I think Airbnb is a great company. People should definitely look at that company. It is once in a lifetime kind of a company as well, and people will enjoy working over there.
Lenny: Agreed. What’s your favorite app right now?
Sanchan Saxena: My favorite app right now, Coinbase NFT.
Lenny: Shit, I should have said other than Coinbase. All right, you get that.
Sanchan Saxena: I would say I love TikTok. I am on TikTok all the time. I love how entertaining it is. I love how simple it is. I’m on TikTok all the time.
Lenny: Same. We’re in trouble. Who is your favorite manager that you had?
Sanchan Saxena: Oh, my favorite manager. It was my first manager. His name is Sashi. He was at Microsoft. And he fundamentally helped change the trajectory of my life. He believed in me. And I was just out of college at that time. And he invested in me. The most important thing was he invested in me. If any successful person you meet in your life, one thing they will all tell you is at some point in their life, somebody believed in them and somebody invested in them, and that was that manager.
Lenny: Amazing. And then finally, what’s a favorite interview question that you like to use?
Sanchan Saxena: Tell me the story of your career and focus more on why you did what you did. And I ask this question because the resume is full of polished shit. It’s like, “Oh, I did this. I did this.” Right? I want to hear the story. And tell me why you did what you did. And that tells me a lot about the person when they’re answering the question, not the what. Because I can see that on the LinkedIn or the resume, but why, why they chose to do what they chose to do.
Lenny: I love that. Where can folks find you online, and then how can listeners be helpful to you?
Sanchan Saxena: Yeah. I mean, I’m pretty active on Twitter. Now that you know, I’m also active on TikTok. But Twitter is probably the best place to follow me. And yeah, if you have any suggestion, anything you want to chat about, send me a message on Twitter, DM me, or LinkedIn. One of those places and I’ll be happy to chat with you.
Lenny: And I imagine folks should check out Coinbase NFT and Coinbase Wallet?
Sanchan Saxena: Absolutely, man.
Lenny: How do people find that?
Sanchan Saxena: Nft.coinbase.com. Give it a shot and let us know what you think.
Lenny: Amazing. Thank you so much, Sanchan, for being here. This was amazing.
Sanchan Saxena: Thank you, Lenny, for having me.
Lenny: That was awesome. Thank you for listening. If you enjoyed the chat, don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast. You could also learn more at Lennyspodcast.com. I’ll see you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A/B testing | A/B 测试 |
| Airbnb Plus | Airbnb Plus(Airbnb 高端房源产品线,保留原文) |
| all-hands | 全员大会 |
| analysis paralysis | 分析瘫痪 |
| belief obsession | 信念执念 |
| Bitcoin | Bitcoin |
| Brian Armstrong | Brian Armstrong(Coinbase 创始人,保留原文) |
| Brian Chesky | Brian Chesky(Airbnb 联合创始人兼 CEO,保留原文) |
| content | 内容(指”做什么、何时做”的实质判断,与流程相对) |
| COO (Chief Operating Officer) | 首席运营官 |
| CPO (Chief Product Officer) | 首席产品官 |
| CX | CX(Customer Experience 客户体验,保留原文) |
| dashboard | 仪表盘 |
| disagree and champion | 异议并拥护 |
| disagree and commit | 异议并接受 |
| DRI (Directly Responsible Individual) | DRI(直接责任人) |
| Emily | Emily(Coinbase 时任首席运营官 Emily Choi,保留原文) |
| Ethereum | Ethereum |
| FAANG | FAANG(Facebook、Amazon、Apple、Netflix、Google 五家科技公司的缩写,保留原文) |
| feature obsession | 功能执念 |
| first principles | 第一性原理 |
| Greg Greeley | Greg Greeley(Airbnb 时任总裁,保留原文) |
| innovator’s dilemma | 创新者的窘境 |
| Instagram Stories | Instagram Stories |
| Kevin Systrom | Kevin Systrom(Instagram 联合创始人,保留原文) |
| Lenny | Lenny(主持人,即 Lenny Rachitsky,保留原文) |
| Little Bets | 《小赌注》(书名) |
| Luxe | Luxe(Airbnb 奢华房源产品线,保留原文) |
| MVP | MVP(Minimum Viable Product 最小可行产品,保留原文) |
| Netflix Culture Deck | Netflix Culture Deck(Netflix 企业文化演示文稿,保留原文) |
| NFT | NFT |
| pivot | 转型(商业策略方向调整) |
| PM (Product Manager) | PM(产品经理,保留原文) |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| RAPID | RAPID(Coinbase 内部快速决策文档框架,保留原文) |
| Reed Hastings | Reed Hastings(Netflix 联合创始人兼 CEO,保留原文) |
| revenue obsession | 收入执念 |
| road show deck | 路演演示文稿 |
| Rocky Balboa | 洛奇·巴尔博亚(电影《洛奇》系列主角) |
| runway | 资金跑道(初创公司在耗尽资金前可运营的时间) |
| Sanchan Saxena | Sanchan Saxena(受访者,保留原文) |
| Sashi | Sashi(Sanchan 在微软时期的第一任主管,保留原文) |
| scrum | scrum(敏捷开发框架,保留原文) |
| Snapchat Stories | Snapchat Stories |
| Snow White | 白雪公主(Airbnb 内部产品设计理念代号) |
| starter learning | 启动式学习 |
| Steve Jobs | Steve Jobs(保留原文) |
| TikTok | TikTok(保留原文) |
| Web 2.0 | Web 2.0 |
| Web 2.5 | Web 2.5 |
| Web 3.0 | Web 3.0 |
| zero to one | 从零到一 |
| Zuck | Zuck(Mark Zuckerberg 的昵称,保留原文) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
Sanchan Saxena(Coinbase 产品副总裁)谈 Airbnb 如何挺过疫情的幕后故事、他从 Brian Chesky、Brian Armstrong 和 Kevin Systrom 那里学到的东西,以及更多内容
逐字稿
Lenny: 我觉得自己非常幸运,能在 Airbnb 期间和 Sanchan 共事。他最初以产品总监的身份加入 Airbnb,随后快速晋升,负责 Airbnb 全线产品。在加入 Airbnb 之前,他在 Instagram 待了将近四年,先是担任 Instagram Ads 的产品负责人,之后创建并领导了 Instagram Shopping 产品及团队。再之前,他在 Yahoo 担任产品总监,在 Microsoft 做过产品经理。如今他是 Coinbase 的产品副总裁。我觉得我从未遇到过比他更努力的产品经理,尤其难得的是,他还极其友善、宽厚和慷慨。
在我和 Sanchan 的对话中,我们聊到了他从当今一些最优秀的 CEO 身上学到的东西,包括 Brian Chesky、Brian Armstrong、Zuck 和 Kevin Systrom;聊到了 COVID 来袭时 Airbnb 内部的情况,以及他们如何在旅行完全停滞的情况下挺了过来;聊到了如何在创业公司搭建产品开发流程;招聘优秀产品经理的技巧;什么时候该招第一位产品经理;什么时候该做 A/B 测试、什么时候不该;以及很多其他话题。希望你能像我一样享受这期节目。
Lenny: Sanchan,欢迎。非常感谢你来。
Sanchan Saxena: 谢谢 Lenny 邀请我。很高兴能来这里,和你聊聊。
Lenny: 当然,我的荣幸。我非常幸运能在 Airbnb 和你共事多年,你是一位深受大家喜爱的产品领导者。之后你去了 Coinbase 做更大更好的事情。我很想听听你最初是如何进入产品领域的,以及你一路走到今天、成为 Coinbase 产品负责人的经历。
从航空航天到产品管理
Sanchan Saxena: 好的,很乐意分享。也许我回到过去,从我的第一份工作开始说起吧。那时候我正在读工程学大三,创业的念头可以说是击中了我。我从工程学业中休了一段时间——顺便说一下,我学的是航空航天工程。我原本想当宇航员,去太空。但遗憾的是,那时候还没有马斯克搞 SpaceX。想去太空,就得给政府机构干活,这我不太喜欢。话说回来,到了大三,我创办了自己的公司,融了一笔钱,招了一些人。
但事情没有按计划进行,于是我回来了,完成了工程学业,然后去了 Microsoft 工作,这让我妈非常高兴。我妈说:“我儿子终于有了一份稳定的工作。他之前到底在搞什么,跑去做什么公司?” 但玩笑归玩笑,我在 Microsoft 得到了一个很好的起点。我一开始做的是工程,但大约一年之内就转到了产品方向,搬到了 Microsoft 在硅谷的办公室。我从没在西雅图工作过,一直在硅谷的山景城办公。我负责的产品叫 Hotmail。不知道有多少人知道——有一个叫 Hotmail 的邮件服务,我当时就是那里的产品人员之一。
Lenny: 当然知道。让人细想有点可怕的是,现在的人可能连 Hotmail 是什么都不知道了。
Sanchan Saxena: 对吧?挺疯狂的。那个年代,它还挺酷的。我在那里工作,之后就一直待在硅谷了。大概是 2005 或 2006 年转入产品领域的,从那以后一直做产品。我非常幸运,一路碰到了不可思议的机会,从 Facebook、Instagram 到 Airbnb 再到 Coinbase。
Instagram 的超高速增长
有一个有趣的细节:我加入 Instagram 的时候,它还很小,大概不到 50 个工程师,非常迷你。那时候还没有收入,我们一分钱都没赚。我还记得 Zuck 告诉 Kevin Systrom 我们得开始做收入的那天——而当时我们的收入为零。我在那里一直待到 2017 年,到那时候 Instagram 已经拥有约十亿月活用户、数十亿美元收入。那是我作为产品领导者经历的第一次超高速增长。
然后 2017 年我加入了 Airbnb,也就是你和我共事的地方。在那里我身兼两职:既是 Airbnb Plus 的总经理,同时也是产品负责人,帮助 Brian Chesky 扩展产品管理团队、建立产品文化,探索如何打造世界级的产品组织。之后我休息了大约六个月,静下心来想想自己接下来想做什么。
走进 Web 3.0
就在那段时间,我掉进了 Web 3.0 的兔子洞,开始越来越多地了解 Web 3.0 以及那里正在发生的事情。我从 2014 年起就一直投资加密货币,但从来没想过以建设者的身份参与。我当时想的是:“嗯,我不确定自己想不想在那里做东西。看起来挺酷的,我可以在外面参与就行了。”
但越读越多,我越意识到:“天哪,这是正在发生的最大革命之一。” 于是我加入了 Coinbase。现在我是生态系统部门的产品副总裁,还负责其他一些事情。很高兴能在这场名为 Web 3.0 的下一场革命中扮演一个小角色。
Lenny: 太精彩了。听你讲这一路走来的轨迹和那些工作过的地方,我想大家肯定在想:“天哪,我怎么才能走出这样的职业轨迹?怎么才能过上像 Sanchan 这样的生活?” 对于那些刚刚起步、可能在想”我怎么才能走上这样一条路?怎么才能在这些了不起的公司工作,达到你现在这个位置?“的人,你有什么建议吗?
职业建议:小赌注与快速学习
Sanchan Saxena: 回顾我的职业生涯,有一件事非常真实——我从来没有过什么规划。很多东西都是无意中碰上的。我本来想当航空航天工程师,没成,转型了。我自己创了业,没成,转型了。来到硅谷,加入 Hotmail,没成,转型了。
当你真正迈出脚步去做事情的时候,机会才会开始显现。我给大家最大的建议是,很多时候那种分析瘫痪——事事追求完美、点点要求到位——反而会让你与机会失之交臂。当你找到一件让你充满能量的事情时,就全身心投入进去。去经历那个过程,转型、学习、再转型、再学习、再转型。
这才是打造卓越职业生涯的方式,而不是做一个五年职业规划然后倒推。那些东西根本不靠谱。另外我想说的是,我很早读过一本书,叫《Little Bets》(小赌注)。它其实恰好映照了我人生中一直在做的事。在那之前我一直觉得自己是个异类,不知道自己在干什么。读完那本书我才意识到:“天哪,原来我的疯狂之中自有章法。这就叫小赌注。”
你去下一些小赌注,尝试一下。如果不成,快速恢复,然后去做别的事情。这就是贯穿我人生所有节点、所有职业机会的元叙事——也是我想告诉所有人的最重要的一条建议。
产品管理的艺术与科学
第二点我想说的是,产品管理是一个非常有趣的领域。你不需要专门去学校学,也没有专门的学位。我认识的大部分做产品的人,都是无意中闯入这个领域的——他们本来在做别的事情,然后觉得:“哇,这东西看起来很酷,我想做这个。“我给早期产品人的建议是,你必须在职业生涯早期就学会产品管理的艺术和科学。
这里面有艺术的部分,也有科学的部分,你得能够在脑子里同时驾驭这两者。如果你变得过于科学化,你会错失机会,因为那些机会无法用科学发现的方法看到——它们要么太微小,要么太超前,以至于人们根本无法理解。
而艺术的部分非常重要——通过融入社区、与真正的建设者交流、了解下一个趋势将在哪里出现,你才能嗅到这些机会。我的建议是:去找一份能让你在产品管理领域以最快速度学习的工作。
这才是最能帮到你的。没有任何课程、任何学位能替代这一点。最重要的因素是:你能多快地跳进去,学会产品管理的那套方法。有些人喜欢在创业公司里做这件事,有些人则偏好加入已经有成熟流程和体系的大公司。这取决于你的选择。但你学得越快,对你的发展就越好。
选择适合你的学习环境
Lenny: 哇,这条建议里有太多我喜欢的了。关于最后这一点,我想再深入聊一下。当人们在寻找一家公司加入,去学习、去按照你说的那样加速职业发展的时候,你觉得他们应该看重什么?我知道你提到了创业公司。你觉得他们应该加入创业公司吗?应该加入大公司吗?他们应该找什么样的地方才能获得最好的学习体验?
Sanchan Saxena: 我觉得没有一个放之四海而皆准的答案,这因人而异。我给你讲讲这两种情况。思考这个问题的方法是:假设你想去一个目的地,不管是什么目的地,你大概想登上最快的船,而不是一艘慢船。你可以在脑海中用这个隐喻。
然后当你上了船,你知道船会到达,但请记住——你不可能比船更快到达目的地。你得先弄清楚自己的目的地是什么,然后从那里去优化你的学习。在创业公司,你会学到很多东西。学习可以分为三种类型:启动式学习,意思是你能够把事情启动起来——你是一个能启动的人,看到一个想法、一个机会,你能把它启动起来。
这是创业公司能教给你很多的方面。你看到某件事,你想动手去做——好,你会在过程中学到很多。然后还有”从零到一”的人,他们能把自己启动的东西扩展到一。再然后是”一及以上”的人,也就是规模化的人,他们会把已经找到产品市场契合度的系统进行规模化。
我认为,取决于你处于人生的哪个阶段、你的职业在什么位置,你可能想要优化不同类型的学习。我给人们的建议是:去 Google、Facebook、Amazon 是一种很好的路径,可以学习这些公司所构建的规模化机制。我看 Amazon 就很受启发,因为他们解决了一个难题:如何在拥有100万员工的情况下持续规模化创新。
这是一种非常不一样的学习,你在创业公司里很可能找不到。反过来说,那种看到想法就开始动手、开始搭建的能力——没有大组织中那些繁复流程和体系的束缚——这种能力你在大公司里也未必学得到。你得弄清楚自己在优化什么,什么最适合自己。
我见过很多成功的领导者在大型公司环境中被窒息,也见过很多在大公司里很成功的高管在创业公司环境中感到窒息。这不是适合所有人的。这两种游戏都不是适合所有人的。首先,认清什么能给你能量,认清你在哪里最能蓬勃发展,这是最重要的。
比如,我就不是那种能优化一个十万人的公司的人。我永远不会享受那种学习。大公司的经历我也有过一些,但我真正如鱼得水的是从启动到规模化的阶段。但当规模变得太大的时候,我对那种学习就开始失去兴趣了。不同的人享受不同的东西。你得弄清楚那是什么,然后朝着那个方向去优化。
Airbnb:学习最多的地方
Lenny: 在你工作过的所有公司中,你觉得在哪家公司学到的最多、对你的职业加速帮助最大?
Sanchan Saxena: 我觉得应该排在第一的是 Airbnb,那是我学到最多的地方。我来跟你和你的听众分享下为什么。我2017年加入 Airbnb 时,公司已经有了不错的收入,产品市场契合度很好。我记得我刚到的时候,整个产品管理团队也就三四十人左右。
对于一个已经创造十亿美元以上收入的公司来说,这规模还是很小的,只有三位产品总监。当时的背景是:有一位雄心勃勃的创始人 Brian,他永远不会接受”不行”这个答案。他会以各种方式扭曲现实,让事情真的发生。
你对那段时期也很熟悉——他会给你一种可能性的感觉。你会做完复盘后想:“天哪,这真的能做到。“他就是能给你这种启发,让你觉得这实际上是可能的,而你在进去之前还觉得不可能。
Airbnb 的产品哲学
Sanchan Saxena: 我发现在 Airbnb,我学到了很多不同的东西。第一,我学会了如何构建软件只是其中一部分的产品。让我稍微解释一下。Airbnb 的产品不是那个 App。App 只是达到目的的手段。Airbnb 的产品是你和家人、朋友坐在那栋漂亮的 Airbnb 房子里将要创造的那些回忆。那才是产品。它存在于现实世界中。
而构建一个当然由软件驱动的现实世界产品——比如 App、网站等等——和纯粹构建一个纯软件产品是不同的。我学到了什么是运营,如何规模化运营,如何与运营团队协作,如何打造美丽的实体房源。我学到的第二件事就是如何打造优秀的产品。
可以说,我从 Chesky 身上获得了一堂关于如何打造产品的大师课——通过观察他的行动、举止和决策方式。我们今天稍后还会谈到这个。但从他身上,以及与他合作的过程中,从他组建的团队、那些设计负责人、工程负责人身上,我学到了一些最基本的产品原则。在那边我学到了很多。
最后同样重要的是,那里仍然处于超高速增长期。我们经历了疯狂的增长。然后我学到了当新冠发生、公司开始暴跌时,领导层该如何应对。这是一堂危机管理的课。我跟朋友说,就算我去哈佛商学院或斯坦福商学院,也学不到多少危机管理的东西——远不如我在最前排亲历那场危机管理学到的多。
作为产品负责人,我从 Brian 这个超高速扩张者身上学到了把产品管理团队从三四十人扩展到两百人的经验,最后还有管理危机的能力。我觉得这一切压缩在三年里的东西,你可能要花三十年才能学到。
Lenny: 我想象你加入 Airbnb 的时候,应该完全没有预料到那样的路径、轨迹和学习经历吧,当时可能就是觉得,“嗯,这是一家不错的公司,“诸如此类的。
Sanchan Saxena: 对,完全没有。虽然这是个玩笑话,但我还是要说出来。经常你会遇到那些从 Facebook、Amazon、Google 离职的领导者,他们会说:“嘿,这是我的 Excel 表格。这是我设想的我即将加入的创业公司会怎么增长。这是估值。这是我的人生规划。这是我的薪酬。就这样。“这些东西一件都不会按计划发生。
公司有完全不同的轨迹,你根本无法预测那些事情。所以你说得对。我加入 Airbnb 的时候,以为会是一段轻松的时光,就像 Instagram 那样。当然 Instagram 也不是轻松的。但相对而言,Instagram 从来没有经历过这种现实的急速转折,对吧?
我跟你说,我在 Instagram 的时候,它月活跃用户还不到一亿,收入为零,只有五十个工程师;后来发展到月活跃用户十亿,收入数十亿美元,员工数千人。我不记得有哪个时刻现实被扭曲到我们必须 Pivot。
新冠冲击与危机管理
而到了 Airbnb,好家伙,一月份的某个早晨,Brian 和我们还在讨论 IPO、把公司上市的事。六周后,我们就在想办法,“该死,怎么让这家公司活下去?“收入——如果我没记错的话——跌到了上一年收入的个位数百分比。
没有任何产品负责人、CFO、COO 会有一个商业计划说:“嗯,当我们的收入跌到上一年收入的个位数百分比时,我们该怎么办?”
我当时绝对没想到会发生这种事,但事实就是这样。幸运的是,一切最终都挺过来了。我很乐意跟听众分享我们做了什么、怎么走过来的,但那确实是一段疯狂的、疯狂的时期。
Lenny: 我是那场危机的旁观者——我几年前就离开了 Airbnb——当时我就想,“完了,我该怎么办?我一直在休假。我的 Airbnb 股票全完了。我估计短期内找不到工作了。“那其实也是我后来开始写 Newsletter 并开始收费的原因。但我非常感谢你们创造的那个逆转。我确实很想听听你们到底做了什么才挺过来的。
Sanchan Saxena: 我来跟你分享我们经历的那些幕后故事。当时是一月份,Brian 提出了四月份把公司上市的想法。我们在准备路演的 Deck,在梳理各种数据,在打磨故事,等等,一切进展顺利。
然后我们听说了这个新冠危机,突然之间,一个接一个的国家开始封锁。意大利封了。日本封了。这个国家封了。那个国家封了。我们突然能在我们的旅行地图上看到——我们有一个 Dashboard 可以看到人们在哪里旅行——你能看到某个国家的旅行量降为零。那个国家降为零,这个国家也降为零,你就觉得:“我的天,这到底怎么回事?”
我记得在全员大会上,Brian 站出来说:“听着,我们这家公司就是为了应对这样的危机而建的。我们银行里有 20 亿美元。“大概是这个数字,某个非常夸张的数字。“我们上一轮融资的钱一分都没动过,“因为我们当时已经盈利或者在高速走向盈利。“我们会挺过去的。”
六周后,他在同一个全员大会上告诉大家:“我们生活在一个完全不同的世界了。“我们不得不裁掉 1900 名员工,其中 190 人就在我的团队里。我们不得不通过举债融资 20 亿美元,估值跌到了原来的一半。那是最疯狂的时期之一。
Lenny,当你经历那种事情的时候,你面临的挑战是方方面面的。其中一个还好说。你可以通过裁员来削减成本,稍微延长一点 Runway。但别忘了,这是新冠时期。我不得不通过 Zoom 来辞退员工。我连当面见他们一面都不行。
我至今记得,当我讲完话、告诉他们”今天是最后一天”的时候,我在所有人面前真的流下了眼泪。因为我就想:“天哪,这太难了。这真的、真的太难了。“公司裁了 1900 人。我只在我的团队里裁了 190 人,但依然非常痛苦。因为你要记住,这些员工没有任何过错。他们只是恰好站在了席卷全球的那场龙卷风的错误一侧。
第二个同样最重要的问题是:留下来的人,你如何激励他们?你可以裁掉一部分人,但留下来的人需要一束希望的光,需要相信事情会好转。但是当数据每天都在变的时候,你怎么做规划?每天我们醒来,又一个国家关停,说”不,我们的市场不再接受旅行了”。
我们开始预测收入只会是上一年的 7%、10%,某个极其荒谬的极低比例。所有人都恐慌了。而正是在这个时刻,我要说 Brian Chesky 是一位了不起的领导者。他是硅谷的 Rocky Balboa。你可以击倒他,他会倒下,但他会站起来,继续战斗。就是这个比喻。他真的是 Rocky Balboa——挨了那么多拳,但他一次又一次站起来说:“再来一回合。”
公司就是这样挺过来的。从运营原则上来说,我们进入了以两周为周期的规划模式。Airbnb 时任总裁 Greg Greeley 常说:“看,一年规划不了,一个季度也规划不了。我们就每两周做一次规划,每两周做出反应。“我认为这也是我常跟很多产品人和创始人分享的经验——事情不会完全按你的计划来。
真正的天才不在于开始之前把每个 i 都点上点、每个 t 都划上横线。真正的天才在于,当事情搞砸的时候,你怎么应对?我相信快速恢复是成功的关键。你做什么、能多快从失败中恢复过来,变得至关重要。我们的运营模式改变了,我们改成每两周发一次版。好,接下来两周我们做什么?对公司来说最紧急的事情是什么?是公司层面的,不是我团队的,不是你团队的,不是其他什么人团队的。
我们把整个机制转向了那个方向。然后慢慢地,两三个月之后,我们终于大致看清了正在发生什么。我想讲一个故事。酒店和 Airbnb 是竞争对手,对吧?当这件事发生时,我们内部有一场讨论——“我们该如何将 Airbnb 相对酒店进行定位?“实际上我们必须搞清楚人们住 Airbnb 有什么优势。
幸运的是,住在 Airbnb 里,你呼吸的空气里只有你和你的家人——这一点成了我们竞争的一大秘方。住在酒店,有大堂,你会和其他人待在一起。但住在 Airbnb 里,你是安全的。我们的营销和信息传递也随之转型了。整个公司拧成了一股绳。
Lenny:
在这个过程中,Brian 的领导力堪称非凡,我学到的关于危机管理的一切,都是要以冷静来引领。拳击界有一句非常好的话。我很喜欢体育。有句话说得好:你可以有各种计划,但当你踏进拳击台,脸上挨了一拳的那一刻,所有计划都飞到九霄云外了。而当你脸上挨拳的时候,你得保持冷静。
Sanchan Saxena:
这正是我从 Brian 身上学到的——如何保持冷静,如何保持沉着,同时内心深处你知道自己欠这些员工很多,你知道自己欠他们一份清晰的方向,欠他们留下来和你站在一起、相信公司能扭转局面的信心。这是一段了不起的旅程,但相当痛苦。
Lenny:
哇,我之前还没听到过内部情况如此详尽的描述,谢谢你分享这些。很具体地问一下,我很好奇,两周一次的规划周期实际上是怎么运作的?是领导者们每两周开一次大会,大家讨论说”接下来两周我们打算这么做”吗?
Sanchan Saxena:
是的,我觉得是这样的。Airbnb 有一个特点,我们后面也会聊到,这是一家非常由创始人驱动的公司。虽然有各级领导,但创始人深度扎在一线。他真正理解用户。他不是那种离现实太远、连内容都做不出来的高管。
Brian 是切身参与、全力投入那个过程的。高管们也都全情投入。我们会自上而下确定一批事项——“各位,这就是我们需要做的。我们需要砍掉这个功能,砍掉这条产品线,砍掉这个业务单元。“我 literally 不得不关掉了一整个业务单元,因为我们必须止血,说白了,必须让那么多人离开。
这是自上而下的指令,但同时也有自下而上的反馈。工程师、产品经理和设计师都在一线,他们和 CX(客户体验)团队保持着联系,听到了客户在抱怨什么。所以当时是自上而下的指导与我们在前线看到的情况的混合。大约每两周,领导层——比如 Greg——就会做一次决定:“这些是我们接下来要处理的事情。“而且当时已经没有团队之分了。
我们基本上取消了这个团队、那个团队的子团队概念。只有一个团队,就是 #Airbnb。不管你是在 CX、Airbnb Plus、Luxe 还是其他什么部门,我们会把工程师调配到任何需要的地方,把 PM 调配到任何需要的地方,不再有什么子团队的概念了。
我团队里很多工程师转去做市场动态相关的事情,比如定价之类的,而另外一些工程师则去做 CX 工具或者其他维持生存所需要的东西。我感觉这家 4000 人的公司运作起来就像一家四个人、四十个人的公司——一个团队,没有子团队,所有人朝着同一个方向划桨。这一点非常重要。
因为别忘了,你公司里的员工在寻找的是清晰的方向。他们该做什么?他们要做的事情有意义吗?因为没人知道答案。当员工作为领导者——很多人问过我——六个月后是什么样子?一年后呢?一年后我们会走到哪里?
你能给他们的最诚实的回答就是:“我不知道。“因为如果你编出一套东西,他们会看穿那个谎言。他们会说:“呃,这不都是些营销话术嘛。“我们作为领导者会非常诚实,会非常坦诚脆弱,说:“这真的是一生一次的事件。我们不知道该怎么走。但以下是我们相信成立的事情。”
我们必须让人们从功能执念、收入执念,转向信念执念。什么是信念执念?就是我们都相信,当新冠病毒过去之后,人们会想旅行。我们都相信新冠病毒终将过去。你开始进入第一性原理的、基于信念的思维方式,然后你用故事让人们相信,我们正在为之奋斗的那个未来是真正可能实现的。
比如,我们做过一项调查,我们问:“如果钱不是问题,你余生会做什么?“99.99% 的人说:“我会去环游世界。“旅行是人类基因里的东西。所以我们必须转向让人们真正相信——旅行会回来的,Airbnb 会存活下来,而一旦新冠危机缓解,Airbnb 最终会重新蓬勃发展。
Lenny:
这些故事太精彩了。我本来想问士气方面的问题。你提到要维持士气。听起来其中一个很重要的部分就是把人们拉回到 Airbnb 的使命和愿景上,重新激发他们,让他们感觉事情会好起来。这是你觉得在维持士气方面最有效的做法吗?还是说还有其他什么也在这个非常脆弱的时期帮助维持了士气?
Sanchan Saxena:
我认为在这种脆弱的时期你会发现,你没法给这些员工开出比市场更高的薪资。这件事发生的时候,FAANG 公司都在我们家门口挖我们的工程师。一夜之间,每个工程师都被 Facebook、Google 私聊:“嘿,我们听说 Airbnb 快不行了。你想过来吗?我们给你 X 薪资,而且股票是稳的。“
翻译
Sanchan Saxena:
打个比方,你门口围着一群秃鹫——你最优秀的人才正在被挖角,但你却没法给这些顶尖人才开出最高的薪酬,对吧?你做不到。因为你的财务状况不允许你这样做。但你仍然要给他们一些东西,对吧?因为股票价格低了,你就开始向他们描绘愿景——如果公司扭转局面,股价会涨上去,到时候你们会得到应有的回报。这些都是当时面临的挑战。
第二个挑战是,你会发现在这种情境下真正能扛住的人,是那些既相信公司使命,又——我认为更重要的——相信创始人能把使命落地的人。因为咱们都知道,有很多公司使命相似、想做的事情也差不多,但有的成功了,有的却没有。
创始人是关键
在我看来,这里面的秘诀就是创始人。如果员工不信任创始人,不相信创始人能把他们说的那些事情做成,而创始人又无法与员工建立连接,这些公司就会付之一炬。第二点我想说的是,创始人必须站在第一线。Brian Chesky 就站在第一线。
他基本上是二十四小时全天候在岗——沟通、做决策、召开全员大会、写邮件、发消息,向所有人保证”我和你们在一起”。顺便说一句,这已经是惯例了——出现这种情况的时候,所有高管都会降薪。每家公司都这么做,对吧?但结果仍然是有的公司活了下来,有的没有。
归根结底还是因为创始人。第三点我想说的是,要想办法让人们重新相信他们当初来到这里想要创造的那个未来。像这种剧烈的危机发生时——我加入 Airbnb 时,对它能成为什么样有一个愿景,然后现实猛然一击,你突然就觉得:“天哪,这还有可能吗?“
讲故事的力量
这正是我从 Brian 身上学到的真正艺术——在没有数据支撑的情况下讲故事的力量。数据在告诉你”你要完蛋了”。数据在告诉你,你的收入只剩百分之七、百分之十,不管当时具体是多少。我现在记不清了。总之是个位数。
每天你看着那些数字往下掉。而 Brian 有一种不可思议的能力,能帮你清晰地看到一个未来,清晰到让你跟他聊完离开的时候心想:“天哪,这是可能的。我们能做到。我们可以。“这种特质真的非常重要,Brian 在这方面投入了大量精力,而且说实话,三位联合创始人都是如此。
Lenny:
我可以聊 Airbnb 聊一整天,但我同样对你工作过的其他地方很好奇——Instagram、Microsoft,甚至 Coinbase。你在那些公司的领导者身上看到了哪些让你印象深刻、会带到其他地方去的独特做法?
Sanchan Saxena:
好的,我觉得有很多非常精彩的东西。我经常跟人说,我从 Kevin Systrom、Brian Chesky、Brian Armstrong 这些创始人身上学到了关于打造优秀产品、打造优秀业务、打造优秀公司的一切。让我先回到 Instagram 那段日子,先描绘一下我加入时的状况以及我们当时的历程。
那时候,Instagram 是一个非常成功的应用,增长非常快,但存在很多疑问。只有照片,不能向外部分享任何东西。只能从相机发布,不能分享链接。Facebook 允许分享链接,你为什么不允许呢?在那个阶段会出现一个存在性的问题:你长大以后想成为谁?
当你是初创公司的时候,这是一个必须回答的重大问题。当时有很多争论——“我们要成为下一个 Facebook 吗?我们要成为第一个 Instagram 吗?我们长大以后想成为谁?“这种争论真的非常重要。这种清晰度对员工来说非常重要。
简洁的力量
我从 Kevin Systrom 身上学到的是简洁的力量。那个人能把所有东西都听进去——Twitter 上的喧嚣、这里的抱怨、那里的投诉、所有客户的意见——然后把事情简化到团队能够执行的程度。这就是他的超能力——简洁。吸收所有信息,但把你的战略、你的信念、“你长大以后想成为谁”简化成人们可以据此行动的东西。
我从他身上学到的另一点是意图性。这就是 Instagram Stories 的故事。当 Snapchat 崛起的时候,Snapchat 在很多方面都在蚕食 Facebook 和 Instagram 的午餐,因为 Snapchat Stories 太猛了。顺便说一句,媒体上有很多关于这件事的神话版本——说是 Zuck 下的命令。
不,Zuck 没有下什么命令,根本没有这回事。是大家在实验摸索。我想讲两个故事——Facebook 应用里的 Stories 和 Instagram 应用里的 Stories——为你的听众说明一下,Stories 就是 Snapchat 发明的那个东西,所有功劳归于他们。在产品管理中,你总是会讨论那种”量两次,裁一次”的思维方式——先测量数据,收集所有数据,对吧?做所有分析,问客户等等。
创始人的直觉
一些成功的创始人不这么做。一些成功的创始人更多依靠直觉和本能,而不是数据。对我来说,这就是创始人的超能力——他们有这种直觉、这种愿景。我讲一个故事。在 Instagram 这边,Kevin Systrom 做了一个决定:我们全力押注这个新格式。当时没有做什么 A/B 测试去验证——如果把 Stories 放在顶部……
我是说,有一点点 A/B 测试,但不是那种”好,我们先测量一下,如果在顶部加上 Stories,信息流会因此下降,用户参与度会因此下降,收入会因此下降,所以我们不应该做”这种。没有这种事。创始人说:“大家,我们全力押注。这就是未来。我们不会先量再裁,我们先裁,然后从新的基准线开始迭代。“我们会在这个新的基准线上持续迭代。而在 Facebook 那边……
顺便说一句,Facebook 内部有位 PM 写过一篇非常好的文章,解释为什么 Stories 在 Facebook 没活下来,却在 Instagram 上蓬勃发展——因为在那边,他们做的是数学建模,也就是权衡取舍。你有一个成功的业务,这就是创新者的窘境——你有一个叫做信息流的成功业务,正在产生数十亿美元的收入。
从创新者的窘境到产品的意图性
然后你还得引入这个新东西——它还没有任何广告主,我们甚至不知道用户参与度会不会有。你得把这些东西放在一起考量。Facebook 对 Stories 采取的方式和 Instagram 截然不同。顺便说一下,媒体上流传的那种说法——说这是自上而下的指令——根本不是这么回事。不,这些团队只是在做实验,只是在尝试各种东西。
我们始终应该关注竞争对手,看看什么有效、什么无效,从中汲取灵感。向做得好的人学习,然后自己做实验看看是否适合自己——这没有任何坏处。这就是事情的真相。
而从 Sanchan Saxena 那里我学到的东西,是意图性(intentionality)。作为创始人——或者即使是作为产品负责人——你必须认识到的一点是,你构建的每一款产品都应该是有意图的。
意图性不是靠 A/B 测试得来的。A/B 测试也许可以作为一种后续手段,但你首先得有意图性。你想去哪里?你想为你的客户创造一个什么样的世界?然后用 A/B 测试来帮你找到通往那个终态世界的最快路径。我跟产品经理们交流时,经常跟他们说:你给我说”这些是我们要验证的假设”——你要么是太懒了,要么是想回避风险。
先告诉我你想打造的产品的意图性是什么。你想看到什么样的结果成真?然后我们再来谈可以跑哪些 A/B 测试来验证我们的方向是否正确。这是一种思维方式的翻转。这也是 Brian Chesky 教给我的东西。顺便说一句,这是个笑话,但从某种程度上说也是现实——在 Airbnb,A/B 测试几乎是个脏话。
你不会跑到 Brian 面前说:“嘿 Brian,这是我的一张 Excel 表,我想跑十个 A/B 测试,然后回来告诉你我们方向对不对。“你会被扔出窗户的。他会说:“不,我们得先把产品想清楚。“
从理想终态倒推
我从 Brian Chesky 那里学到的另一件事是:你首先要在没有任何约束的情况下,创造出产品的理想终态。
Brian 会用一个很好的类比来教大家。假设你要打造 Airbnb。你想创造的体验是什么——满分 10 分,你要做出 15 分的体验。这就是 Airbnb 的设计师和产品经理的起点。而在大多数公司里,设计师和产品经理的起点是:“好吧,10 分是完美的,我们大概能做到 7 分,那就从 7 分开始吧。“这是一种非常受约束的思维模式——“我有这么多时间、这么多资源、这么多预算,我只能做这么多。”
而 Brian 教我们的是:先做无约束的思考。先想一个 15 分的体验,先设计出理想的终态。
我给你们一个非常具体的例子。假设你在做 Airbnb 休息室。客人的入住时间是下午三点,但他们的航班早上六点就到了。你怎么办?你得建一个休息室,对吧?
如果你受过传统的产品管理训练,你会这样做:你看,我不知道怎么在 120 个国家建这个东西,我不知道怎么把它规模化。所以我会忽略一些想法,先建一个 MVP 休息室。然后我想说:“好,如果我加上网络,客户留存率提高了 Y;如果我加上咖啡,提高了 Z;如果我加上椅子,提高了 X。“于是我就可以论证如何建一个漂亮的商场。
这不是 Brian Chesky 的做法。他的做法是:你选一个地点,因为你不知道怎么在 120 个国家做休息室。那就选一个地点。但你知道在一个地点怎么找到一个能做出好咖啡的咖啡师,你知道在一个地点怎么弄到最好的座椅,你知道在一个地点怎么搞定最好的空调——你知道的。先把那个最好的、让人爱的产品做出来。
然后从那个点出发,搞清楚什么有效、什么无效,再把真正有效的部分规模化。这是一种非常不同的思维方式——先做不可规模化的事情。这些都是我在 Instagram 和 Airbnb 学到的东西。
如何判断方向是否正确
**Lenny:**这里面好东西太多了,每一个心得都够单独做一期播客。关于从理想终态倒推工作这个观点,这也是我从 Airbnb 那里深深体会到的,而且经常提到。如果大家想多了解一些,去 Google 搜 “Snow White Airbnb”,有一个关于白雪公主的完整故事,讲述了这个理念的很多来源。
我想跟进你提到的一个点,关于意图性。假设你是一个创始人或 PM,你说:“好吧,我要先想清楚一个愿景,这就是我们要去的方向。我需要有意图性,所以我直接告诉人们我们要去哪里。“但很多时候你是错的。
你对那些正在纠结的人有什么建议——我怎么知道自己的方向对不对?我怎么知道该不该相信自己的直觉,还是应该跑 A/B 测试,因为否则我们根本不知道?你对这个问题有什么想法?
**Sanchan Saxena:**当然。我觉得这里面有很多可以展开的。我想说的第一点是:当你坐进车里,你告诉 GPS”我要去这里”。你从来不会坐进车里说:“嘿 GPS,告诉我应该去哪里。“至少我没这么做过。然后你用 GPS 来做 A/B 测试——“我想以最快的方式到达那里。”
GPS 会算出最快的路线;有时候你还会告诉 GPS:“我油不多了,给我一条省油的路线。“这些才是 A/B 测试。但你绝不会跟 GPS 说:“我不想去旧金山,告诉我该去哪里。“意图性的道理是一样的。
你首先得搞清楚:你想去哪里?你想解决的客户问题到底是什么?为什么这件事重要?
第二点我想说的是,产品领导者经常大幅低估直觉。原因是这很安全——你总能指着数据说:“看,我这样做是因为这个。如果我失败了,这是数据,别开除我。“当然,我是在开玩笑。
但你明白那个极端情况,对吧?要建立一个团队、建立你的声誉、培养出直觉,这非常难。但事实是,创始人做的就是这件事。没有任何一份文件写着”十年后 Facebook 将创造数十亿美元收入”,也没有任何一份文件写着”Coinbase 有朝一日会成为千亿美元公司,你应该在那个时点投资”。你必须要有直觉和判断力。创始人有这些东西,而运营者需要学会如何驾驭它们。
对我来说,直觉和判断力就是数据——只不过它还没有达到统计显著性而已。仅此而已。你之所以建立了那种直觉、那种判断力,是因为你沉浸在某个场景中,你和客户待在一起,你理解了正在发生的事情。你只是还无法证明它在统计上是显著的。不要低估你的直觉。这是第二点。
第三点是,一旦你想清楚了那个体验应该是什么样的,没错,你需要验证正在发生的事情,你需要在发布时从社区获取反馈,然后你需要持续迭代。我给人们的建议是:不要在一开始就做测试。先从一些假设出发,先从一堆直觉出发,把它创造出来,然后保持足够的耐心去坚持推进。
关于坚持与直觉
这是我从 Brian 那里学到的另一件事——很多时候,这些想法,这些疯狂的想法,你需要坚持。他常说,“对于启动要有急迫感,但对于坚持推进要有耐心。“因为在很多其他公司,你可能过早地扼杀了一个绝妙的想法,仅仅因为你没有耐心去等待它落地。
你要带着目的性开始,然后不断迭代和测试,迭代和测试,迭代和测试。但同时也不要过早放弃。最后,我要告诉你们所有听众一个秘密。
Lenny: 哦天哪,来了。
Sanchan Saxena: 没有人无所不知,对吧?你可以看再多的数据,但数据依然不会给你所有答案。真正重要的是什么?真正重要的是快速恢复。在你的团队中建立一种文化,让实验失败实际上是被庆祝的。
建立一种团队文化,让大家在失败时反而感到兴奋,因为你想,每一次失败都是一次学习,会帮助他们在未来避免犯同样的错误。这就是你想要建立的思维方式和团队文化。看数据,看所有东西。但同时,不要只是看了之后说,“看,数据这么说了,我就这么做。“我在这里要举一个非常好的类比。
这个故事被以讹传讹很多次了,但当时我就在现场,所以我的版本至少有 80% 准确。可能也有其他版本。但这就是 Instagram Stories 的故事。想象你是 Kevin Systrom,数据科学团队来找你说,“看,我看了数据,人们手机里 99% 的照片至少都是一周以前的。请允许 Instagram Stories 让用户选择一周或两周以前的照片。”
然后用户研究团队回来说,“我们和很多人聊过,他们说,‘是的,我很乐意分享一个月前过生日时的故事。‘“而 Kevin Systrom 说,“不,我的目的是让 story 成为实时新闻。它应该是世界上最大的电视频道。你打开它,看到的就是此刻正在发生的事情。这就是我要追求的目的。”
一开始,Instagram Stories 不允许你选择任何非实时的内容。你不能回到相册里选一个月前或两个月前的照片,因为这个产品的目的是创建世界上最大的实时网络,展示此刻世界上正在发生的事情。如果这是你的目的,你就必须忽略那些”我想和世界分享我一个月前做了什么”的客户需求,而这改变了整个格局。
Lenny: 本质上,目的性就是为你想去的地方、为产品的发展方向设定愿景,然后朝着它不断努力。这很有道理。Instagram 的这个例子很有意思,因为他后来改变了主意,因为我知道现在你可以往 stories 里上传旧照片了——
Sanchan Saxena: 不,那其实是他离开之后的事。但你说得对。
Lenny: 明白了。一种不同的目的性出现了。
Sanchan Saxena: 而且你看,在你突破了边界之后改变想法也没有任何问题,然后你学到了新的东西,可以转型。这也是创始人最美的地方之一——他们是非常有目的性的人,非常有主见的人,但在面对新事物时,他们也是最快速做出改变的人。他们不会懊悔,不会纠结,就像”好的,我们转型吧。“这也是你作为运营者想要建立的文化。
Coinbase 的产品文化
Lenny: 我想花点时间聊聊 Coinbase 和那里的产品文化。Coinbase 在多大程度上是 A/B 测试驱动的?那里的人怎么看待目的性和愿景?还有,产品开发流程是什么样的?我一直对不同公司如何开发产品很好奇。
Sanchan Saxena: 我觉得我工作过的所有不同公司都有着非常不同的产品开发文化。比如在 Airbnb,设计和体验是至高无上的,你不会在这方面妥协。你不会为了发布而牺牲设计。而在其他公司,你有时会为了快速发布而牺牲设计。
在 Coinbase,情况也有所不同。每家公司都有自己的特点。Coinbase 所在的行业正在快速发展。它是 Web 3.0。我的意思是,我至今还没有遇到过 Web 3.0 的专家。没有人是 Web 3.0 的专家。
Lenny: Twitter 上倒似乎挺多的。
Sanchan Saxena: 是的,Twitter 上有很多人觉得自己是专家。但现实是,这个行业如此初级,如此早期。你有好的意图和好的直觉来判断它可能的发展方向,但很难每次都对。Coinbase 的文化是做大胆的下注,用非常小的团队快速启动。
我们刚刚推出的 Coinbase NFT 市场,最初只有五个人——一个产品经理、一个设计师和另外三个工程师。就是这样起步的。当然,随着我们找到产品市场契合度等等,团队现在已经壮大了。但核心思路就是大胆出击,但用能够以闪电速度行动的小团队,把事情做成,因为这是其中一个方面。
我喜欢的 Coinbase 的另一个文化是关于我们如何做决策。我们的首席运营官 Emily 发表了一篇博客文章,是公开的,你们都可以去看。那是一种非常不同的决策思维方式,让我来拆解一下。我在 Facebook、Instagram 和其他科技公司的时候,产品和设计、营销之间有一句常说的话——所有这些跨职能的人需要一起协作来打造产品。
你经常会发现,决策过程可能会变得有点复杂,不总是如此,但有时候会有点复杂。就像,好吧,你喜欢什么?你不喜欢什么?你要去对齐、施加影响、对齐、施加影响。然后你发现……我再说一遍,不是每次都这样,但有时候最终发布出来的东西是那个让所有人最不讨厌的最小公约数,对吧?
每个人都说,“好吧,我可以接受这个。我可以接受这个。“而 Brian 对委员会式的决策方式有一种过敏反应。就是那种由委员会来设计的做法。我们的理念——你可以在她的博客里读到——是”直接责任人”的概念,也就是 DRI。
对于每个项目,我们都会设立一个 DRI。可以是运营、工程、设计、法务、市场等部门的人,取决于项目的性质。DRI 的工作是倾听跨职能合作伙伴的意见,获取他们的输入。我们有像 Amazon 一样的书面文化,所以每一条输入都是以书面形式提供的。
你可以看到法务负责人在说什么,可以看到运营负责人在说什么,工程团队在说什么,都是书面的。然后 DRI 的工作是综合所有这些输入并做出决策。不是综合所有输入然后做让所有人都满意的事,而是做对客户正确的事,做对业务正确的事,在很多方面做对用户正确的事。
DRI 决策机制的运作方式
Sanchan Saxena: 但要吸纳这些输入,让自己充分了解各方面的信息,然后做出最终决定——这就是你的职责。无论你是谁,有时候是运营部门,有时候是工程部门,有时候是设计和产品部门,其他人则不得不表示异议并全力拥护这个决定。我可能会进去,在那个 RAPID 里写上,“我不同意这个。原因如下。”
但决策者,也就是 DRI,必须做出那个决定。而一旦决定做出,我就得在异议的基础上全力投入,像拥护自己的决定一样向团队其余人推行。不仅仅是异议并接受,而是异议并拥护。你要走出去大力宣传这是正确的事情。这样做有诸多好处。
它消除了我们在各种公司里都见过的那种消极对抗行为。比如,“啊,我得去找那个 X 部门负责人谈,我还得客客气气的,得维护好这段关系。“于是决策就被拖上两三个月,因为在那些公司里,决策速度与你关系的强弱直接成正比,对吧?而在这里,决策速度与直接负责做出那个决定的人直接成正比。当然,这个人在倾听意见和获取未主动提供的建议方面责无旁贷。但归根结底,他们是唯一的决策者,是最终的 DRI。这跟我之前工作过的任何地方文化都非常不同。你加入 Coinbase 时,我们需要对你进行引导,告诉你,“看,这就是你的工作方式,“跟任何其他公司都非常不一样。
Lenny: 这太有趣了。大的决策是这样做的吗?还是说它也向下渗透到了各个团队,比如一个 PM 或某个团队的 DRI 也是用这种方式做决策的?
Sanchan Saxena: 个人层面也是如此。你会看到 PM 在写 RAPID,工程师在写,运营和法务也在写。它叫 RAPID,是为了快速决策。如果我希望 Brian 做一个决定,我会用同样的格式。团队内部有人做决定,也会用同样的格式。
假设你正在做一个特定项目,你会写那个 RAPID。完全相同的格式,完全相同的机制,每个团队都用这些机制来实现规模化。否则,决策可能真的会成为高速增长公司的瓶颈。
Coinbase 运营方式的独特之处
Lenny: Coinbase 的运营方式还有什么独特之处让你印象深刻,可能会带到未来你可能会去的公司的吗——如果你有朝一日离开 Coinbase 的话?
Sanchan Saxena: 有的。我觉得决策机制是一个。还有就是如何在如此模糊的行业中运营的理念。我到 Airbnb 的时候,模糊性就很大,因为那是我们第一次做房屋共享,对吧?以前没人做过。但你对旅行业务有一个整体的认知——客户、监管等等。
但我认为 Web 3.0 是一种极其荒谬地新的事物。人们有时问我 NFT 的未来是什么,我说,“我不知道,“我会去实验、去摸索。我有自己的判断,我会带着这个判断去执行,但没人真正知道。在一个高度嘈杂的世界里,你怎么建立信念?
我的意思是,Web 3.0,你大概也在 Twitter 上看到过,每个人在 Twitter 上都有自己的观点。X 应该做 Y,Y 应该做 Z,事情就该这样做,对吧?而我会带到任何地方的经验是:你怎么在那种噪音中做建设?你怎么保持专注,仍然建造你相信是正确的东西,同时让噪音在你周围继续存在?
我认为随着 Web 3.0 的发展,每家公司都会成为一家 Web 3.0 公司——这至少是我对这个十年的预测——就像每家公司都变成了一家移动互联网公司一样,不是说都有移动应用,但都成为了一家移动公司,我认为每家公司都会成为 Web 3.0 公司。每个人都必须锻炼出在那种模糊程度下运营的能力——那里几乎没有数据,却有大量噪音。
Lenny: Coinbase 有什么运营方式能够让你们在这种模糊性中运作并保持专注吗?你有没有看到什么?
Sanchan Saxena: 有的。我们有自己的缺陷。没有哪家公司是完美的,我们也有自己的缺陷。但我们摸索出了如何运营——就是我之前描述的那种方式,也就是 DRI 心态文化。与其让 15 个人有 15 种不同的观点等等,不如全部汇总到一个 RAPID 里。
我们信任我们的领导者。我们信任 DRI,不管那个 DRI 是谁,由他们来做决定。然后我们朝着同一个方向前进,忽略周围的噪音。再说一次,没有哪家公司是完美的。我们仍在学习,但我发现这种方式非常有效。
什么样的人适合 Web 3.0
Lenny: 顺着 Web 3.0 的话题,如果有人在想,“我是不是应该加入一家 Web 3.0 类的公司?还是不要?“你觉得什么样的人——也许是产品方向上的,但也可以更广泛地说——什么样的人可能会享受 Web 3.0 的世界,什么样的人可能不太适合?
Sanchan Saxena: 我觉得 Web 3.0 目前确实处于一个阶段,我看到大量来自 Web 2.0 世界的人涌入。真的,如果我看我的 LinkedIn 动态,总有人在说,“我离开了 X 公司,加入了一家 Web 3.0 公司。”
Lenny: 或者整个创业团队转型做 Web 3.0。
Sanchan Saxena: 没错,初创团队也在转型做 Web 3.0。我觉得当我加入的时候——我加入得非常近,不是很久以前。当我加入时,对话还非常不同。当时我还在跟 Google 和 Facebook 的高管及其他人说,“这就是你应该加入的原因。这就是正在发生的事情,“等等,但现在我觉得世界稍微不一样了。
我认为那些能在 Web 3.0 中如鱼得水的人,是那些真正能够理解其潜力、同时 disregards 今日之局限的人。我这么说是什么意思呢?你们都看过那些非常有影响力的名人写的文章,说”Web 3.0 糟透了。“让我告诉你为什么,因为今天确实很糟,对吧?我们认同 Web 3.0 的未来理念——去中心化等等。但看看今天,一切都是中心化的。一切都是如何如何。
我总是提醒这些人,从 Web 2.0 到 Web 3.0 的路径要经过 Web 2.5。它不是直接从 Web 2.0 跳到 Web 3.0 的,它要经过 Web 2.5。你必须走过那段旅程。Web 3.0 今天发生的很多事情其实是 Web 2.5、2.7 那个阶段。目前还没有真正去中心化的东西存在,但理想主义在那里。最接近的可能是 Ethereum 或 Bitcoin。
理想主义在那里,而我们想要朝着那个方向前进,对吧?最能如鱼得水的人,是那些理解这些理想、理解未来、并且是建设者的人。他们想把今天的样子,塑造成明天的理想。我是个历史迷,我很喜欢看科技史。
YouTube 上有一段视频,描述的是有人在 1986、‘87、‘89 年玩互联网的场景。当时如果你想访问 Lenny 的网站,你需要这样做——输入 192 点什么什么那个 IP 地址,然后在蓝色屏幕上敲回车。然后屏幕上会有东西一行行滚下来,而我得花 200 美元仅仅是为了访问他的网站。
早期科技信仰者的特质
Sanchan Saxena: 也是如此,对吧?但如果你能超越那些局限,看到有朝一日我和 Lenny 真的能通过互联网做一档视频播客、一个 YouTube 播客,我们能看见彼此、录下那些东西,那就是非常有力量的事情。我们在现阶段寻找的,就是相信这段旅程的人。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个观点。说到招聘和加入公司这件事,我想聊聊招聘建议。你在招聘方面非常擅长,你招过很多人,面试过无数的 PM,所以我想在结束之前谈谈这个。我发现招聘、找人,可能是当今公司——尤其是创业公司——最大的痛点。你对创业者、产品负责人或一般的领导者有什么招聘建议吗?包括如何找到人才、如何谈成入职这些方面?
招聘中最重要的是”内容”而非流程
Sanchan Saxena: 好的。我觉得我可以聚焦一下,谈谈我认为创业公司在招聘时必须做对的几件事。需要记住的是,真正重要的、与创业公司成功高度相关的,不是他们用了 scrum 之类的流程,或者这个流程、那个流程。真正高度相关的是,有人清楚地知道该做什么、何时做。这是最重要的东西。我把这叫做”内容”。内容指的是你做什么、何时做。流程指的是你怎么去做我刚才说的那件事。
我觉得人们很容易对流程产生偏爱。Reed Hastings 在他们的文化宣言中谈到过这一点,Steve Jobs 过去也谈过——我们往往会被那些知道如何避免犯错、知道如何建立流程的人所吸引。典型的循环是这样的:你的规模越来越大,开始犯错误,你就说:“哦,我们得建立一套流程,这样就不会再犯同样的错了。“然后不知不觉中,一段时间之后,流程本身就变成了产品。你每天早上醒来,看看你的日历,作为管理者 80% 的时间你都在推动流程、管理流程,流程变成了产品,而你失去了对真正产品的关注,忘记了真正的客户是谁。
我的建议是,尤其是在早期创业公司,要把懂”内容”的人引进来,教他们流程;而不是把懂流程的人引进来,试图教他们”内容”——因为那是一件非常困难的事情。
很多创始人咨询我时都会执迷于一个问题:“我们应该用 scrum 吗?我们应该用 X、Y、Z 流程吗?“我的回答是:“你想用什么就用什么,这不重要。你可以尝试任何一种。它与你的成功不相关。“也许在某种程度上有关,但关系不大。你真正需要搞清楚的是,你雇佣的人,谁能真正理解你的产品内容是什么、你的客户内容是什么?在你所处的行业中如何取胜?确保你始终保持对这方面的执念,而不是对流程的执念。
这一点是 Brian Chesky 反复灌输给我的:雇佣知道如何执行的领导者。他的理念是,假设 Sanchan 的整个团队都消失了,然后我去找 Brian 说:“嘿,Brian,我得重新招这个组织,我得招这些人,然后我再告诉你我们要建什么,或者我再开始建设。“如果我是那种”内容型”领导者,我应该能够撸起袖子,准确做出我团队之前做的事情。也许做不到同样的产能,因为如果我有一个很大的团队,我没法做那么多人的工作量。但至少应该能告诉你:“这是我们该建的。这是我们该建的时间。这是我们该建的方式。“我不应该是一个只会授权的领导者,授权到最后我自己都忘了”内容”是什么。这是非常重要的一点。
Lenny: 当你在寻找那样的领导者时——听起来太棒了——你会看重什么?在面试或评估中,你怎么判断一个人是不是那种领导者?
用实战挑战来面试
Sanchan Saxena: 我们在 Airbnb 做了一件事,因为那正是我们的核心理念,我们围绕这一点改变了面试流程。我们会给候选人一个实战挑战。你对此很熟悉。大多数人会说:“来做一场演示报告。“不,我们实际上是给你一个工作挑战。我们说:“这是你面临的问题。你打算怎么解决?“比如,我们面临 Airbnb Plus 的问题,我们需要把数百万套房源打造成 Airbnb Plus,但我们不知道怎么做。你会怎么做?我们想看到思考的深度。他们不知道正确答案,因为他们没有正确的数据。没关系。但他们至少需要向我们展示他们如何切入这个问题,他们打算怎么做,他们需要向我们展示他们做事的”内容”。有些人会进来,在演示文稿里用精美的幻灯片,过来说:“这是我的流程。构思、执行、迭代。“这还可以。但我想知道你在”构思”里面具体做什么。有些高管会进来说:“我第一件要做的事就是去看看,有没有第三方公司可以在我们不用自己搭建的情况下扩展我的运营。“这才是”内容”。而我要评估的就是这个。
我们面试流程中会做的第二件事是,如果是高管职位,Brian 会花时间,我也会花时间,其他人也会花时间,我们会聚焦于你过去做过的事情——告诉我你在这个过程中扮演的角色,而不是告诉我你的团队做了什么。准确地说,是你个人扮演的角色。
这也是我在 Coinbase 跟很多下属说的——你得能把事情拿给我,需要我帮忙的时候向我升级汇报,让我帮你取得成功。我的角色是这样的:我管理一个大团队,我不可能什么都做。但我能做的是让他们更容易成功。怎么做?当然,战术层面上的资源供给。但更重要的是,当我们思考”内容”的时候,当我们思考做什么、何时做、怎么做的时候,让我们一起坐下来想想。向我升级汇报,把事情拿给我,我会跟你一起下到泥里,跟你一起把那块泥巴捏成陶土。这就是我保持自身价值的方式。但更重要的是,这也是我能帮助团队取得成功的价值所在。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这一点。我刚才在想,你把路线图和计划称为”内容”,那你就成了一个内容创作者了,感觉如何?
Sanchan Saxena: 是的,感觉确实不错。你应该具备创建路线图的能力,那就是你在围绕它创作内容。但我想让大家明白的一点是,那个路线图的格式不重要。无论你用 Excel,还是这个工具、那个工具,都不重要。那个流程不重要。重要的是,你能否制定出正确的路线图——即你要建什么、在什么时间建。这是一个领导者或个人应该具备的核心能力,是你绝对要看重的东西。否则我的预测是,四五年之后或无论多长时间之后,那家公司就会开始吸引流程型的人,然后不知不觉中,公司里每个人都是流程型的人,没有人是内容型的人了。
创始人的困境与 Netflix 文化
Sanchan Saxena: 接下来就会发生的是,创始人最终不得不扛起成为那个”内容”之人的重担,然后你会发现,他们无法扩展了。他们就是无法扩展。公司也无法扩展。
Lenny: 对,因为流程最终总是会开始崩塌。
Sanchan Saxena: 没错。有一份非常好的演示文稿。我鼓励你的听众去看看 Netflix Culture Deck。Reed Hastings 在里面对此进行了深入阐述,比我讲得好得多。这是一个非常精彩的理念,一个非常精彩的论述,我想鼓励每一位关注者都去看看。
另外我要重申,我并不是说流程不应该存在。你绝对需要一些流程。这也是你能够扩展的原因。没有一些流程你也无法扩展。但流程不是答案,内容才是答案。
闪电问答
Lenny: 我觉得已经占了你够多的时间了。所以我们来到了聊天的最后一个环节,就是闪电问答,我会问你几个问题,然后告诉我你脑海中第一个想到的。如果什么都没想到,也完全没问题。可以吗?
Sanchan Saxena: 好啊,听起来很棒。
Lenny: 好。你最常向其他产品领导者推荐的书是什么?
Sanchan Saxena: 脑海中浮现有两本。一本是《小赌注》,讲的是如何用小赌注的方式来生活和创业。另一本我想推荐的是《创新者的窘境》。这是我最喜欢的两本书,强烈推荐每个人都读一读。
Lenny: 太棒了。除了 Coinbase 之外,你最推荐产品经理去哪家公司?
Sanchan Saxena: 嗯,我觉得有大量的 Web 3.0 公司或者其他各种公司。在那些公司中,我觉得 Airbnb 是一家非常棒的公司。大家绝对应该看看这家公司。它也是那种一生难得一见的公司,大家在那里工作会非常愉快。
Lenny: 同意。你目前最喜欢的应用是什么?
Sanchan Saxena: 我目前最喜欢的应用,Coinbase NFT。
Lenny: 该死,我应该加一句”除了 Coinbase 之外”的。好吧,这个算你赢了。
Sanchan Saxena: 我想说我喜欢 TikTok。我一直在刷 TikTok。我喜欢它的娱乐性,喜欢它的简单。我一直在刷 TikTok。
Lenny: 我也是。我们要完蛋了。你最喜欢的主管是谁?
Sanchan Saxena: 哦,我最喜欢的主管。那是我第一任主管。他叫 Sashi。当时在微软。他从根本上改变了我人生的轨迹。他相信我。那时候我刚大学毕业。他投资了我。最重要的是,他在我身上做了投资。你生命中遇到的任何成功人士,他们都会告诉你一件事:在他们生命的某个时刻,有人相信了他们,有人在他们身上做了投资,而 Sashi 就是那个主管。
Lenny: 太好了。最后,你最喜欢用的面试问题是什么?
Sanchan Saxena: “给我讲讲你的职业故事,重点放在你为什么做了你所做的事情上。“我问这个问题是因为,简历里全是精心包装的东西。“哦,我做了这个,我做了那个。“对吧?我想听的是故事。告诉我你为什么做了你所做的事。这能让我在对方回答问题时了解到很多关于这个人的信息,而不是他们做了什么。因为我可以在 LinkedIn 或简历上看到他们做了什么,但为什么——他们为什么选择去做他们所选择做的事——这才是关键。
Lenny: 我喜欢这个。大家在网上哪里可以找到你?听众可以怎样帮到你?
Sanchan Saxena: 嗯,我在 Twitter 上很活跃。现在你们知道了,我在 TikTok 上也很活跃。但 Twitter 可能是关注我的最佳去处。如果你有任何建议,想聊什么,在 Twitter 上给我发消息、私信我,或者 LinkedIn。这些地方都可以,我很乐意和大家交流。
Lenny: 我想大家也应该看看 Coinbase NFT 和 Coinbase Wallet 吧?
Sanchan Saxena: 当然。
Lenny: 大家怎么找到这些?
Sanchan Saxena: Nft.coinbase.com。去试试看,告诉我们你的想法。
Lenny: 太棒了。非常感谢你,Sanchan,能来参加节目。太精彩了。
Sanchan Saxena: 谢谢你,Lenny,邀请我来。
Lenny: 太棒了。感谢收听。如果你喜欢这期对话,别忘了订阅播客。你也可以在 Lennyspodcast.com 了解更多。我们下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A/B testing | A/B 测试 |
| Airbnb Plus | Airbnb Plus(Airbnb 高端房源产品线,保留原文) |
| all-hands | 全员大会 |
| analysis paralysis | 分析瘫痪 |
| belief obsession | 信念执念 |
| Bitcoin | Bitcoin |
| Brian Armstrong | Brian Armstrong(Coinbase 创始人,保留原文) |
| Brian Chesky | Brian Chesky(Airbnb 联合创始人兼 CEO,保留原文) |
| content | 内容(指”做什么、何时做”的实质判断,与流程相对) |
| COO (Chief Operating Officer) | 首席运营官 |
| CPO (Chief Product Officer) | 首席产品官 |
| CX | CX(Customer Experience 客户体验,保留原文) |
| dashboard | 仪表盘 |
| disagree and champion | 异议并拥护 |
| disagree and commit | 异议并接受 |
| DRI (Directly Responsible Individual) | DRI(直接责任人) |
| Emily | Emily(Coinbase 时任首席运营官 Emily Choi,保留原文) |
| Ethereum | Ethereum |
| FAANG | FAANG(Facebook、Amazon、Apple、Netflix、Google 五家科技公司的缩写,保留原文) |
| feature obsession | 功能执念 |
| first principles | 第一性原理 |
| Greg Greeley | Greg Greeley(Airbnb 时任总裁,保留原文) |
| innovator’s dilemma | 创新者的窘境 |
| Instagram Stories | Instagram Stories |
| Kevin Systrom | Kevin Systrom(Instagram 联合创始人,保留原文) |
| Lenny | Lenny(主持人,即 Lenny Rachitsky,保留原文) |
| Little Bets | 《小赌注》(书名) |
| Luxe | Luxe(Airbnb 奢华房源产品线,保留原文) |
| MVP | MVP(Minimum Viable Product 最小可行产品,保留原文) |
| Netflix Culture Deck | Netflix Culture Deck(Netflix 企业文化演示文稿,保留原文) |
| NFT | NFT |
| pivot | 转型(商业策略方向调整) |
| PM (Product Manager) | PM(产品经理,保留原文) |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| RAPID | RAPID(Coinbase 内部快速决策文档框架,保留原文) |
| Reed Hastings | Reed Hastings(Netflix 联合创始人兼 CEO,保留原文) |
| revenue obsession | 收入执念 |
| road show deck | 路演演示文稿 |
| Rocky Balboa | 洛奇·巴尔博亚(电影《洛奇》系列主角) |
| runway | 资金跑道(初创公司在耗尽资金前可运营的时间) |
| Sanchan Saxena | Sanchan Saxena(受访者,保留原文) |
| Sashi | Sashi(Sanchan 在微软时期的第一任主管,保留原文) |
| scrum | scrum(敏捷开发框架,保留原文) |
| Snapchat Stories | Snapchat Stories |
| Snow White | 白雪公主(Airbnb 内部产品设计理念代号) |
| starter learning | 启动式学习 |
| Steve Jobs | Steve Jobs(保留原文) |
| TikTok | TikTok(保留原文) |
| Web 2.0 | Web 2.0 |
| Web 2.5 | Web 2.5 |
| Web 3.0 | Web 3.0 |
| zero to one | 从零到一 |
| Zuck | Zuck(Mark Zuckerberg 的昵称,保留原文) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)