如何驱动口碑传播 | Nilan Peiris(Wise 首席产品官)
How to drive word of mouth | Nilan Peiris (CPO of Wise)
Nilan Peiris: Some people focus on conversion rate, like, “I’m going to make this really, really slick.” And that’s cool. You get a bit more growth. But to get to recommendation, you’re going to blow your user socks off. You have to give them an experience they didn’t know was previously possible. And when you are in that place of doing something that no one has ever done before, that’s when you get it.
Opening the Interview
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast, where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard won experiences building and growing today’s most successful products. Today my guest is Nilan Peiris. Nilan is chief product Officer at Wise, where he has been for over 11 years, basically from the beginning of the journey. If you’re not familiar with Wise, you should be. They make it incredibly easy and cheap to send money internationally. I am a regular user and customer, and because the product is so great, they’ve grown primarily through word of mouth. About 70% of their growth comes through word of mouth. And in our conversation, Nilan breaks down exactly how they made word of mouth so successful for their product. I don’t know any founder who wouldn’t wish to have more word of mouth growth, and Nilan’s advice is the most tactical, and useful advice I’ve ever heard for how to actually drive your word of mouth growth. I am really excited for you to hear this episode, and to learn from Nilan. And so with that, I bring you Nilan Peiris, after a short word from our sponsors.
No-code animations add Sparks of delight while adding custom CSS gives total design control, bringing ambitious client projects to life in any industry with a fully integrated suite of business solutions. From e-commerce to events, bookings and more, and extend the capabilities even further with hundreds of APIs and integrations. You know what else? The workflows just make sense. There’s the built-in AI tools, the on canvas collaborating, a centralized workspace, the reuse of assets across sites, the seamless client handover, and that’s not all. Find out more at wix.com/studio. Nilan, thank you so much for being here. Welcome to the podcast.
Nilan Peiris: Thanks for having me, Lenny.
What is Wise
Lenny: So you’re chief product officer at Wise, which I don’t know if you knew this, but I’m a very happy weekly active user of. To give folks a little bit of context on Wise, could you just explain, what does Wise do? And also share maybe a few stats to give people a sense of the scale that Wise has reached at this point.
Nilan Peiris: We’re looking to solve the problems associated with cross-border money movement, which is that moving money across border is pretty slow. It’s actually really expensive, and it can be really hard to do. We solve it with three products, our money transfer product, which is what we started with, our account, which would be like, think of trying to solve the problems of international banking with our account for people, and for businesses. And then finally we’ve also got an enterprise product where we take the underlying infrastructure that’s powered those products that we’ve built, and embed them in the banks, and products that people use every day, and then zooming into the numbers. So, we’ve got to come a little way on the journey. So today we’re now moving about $12 billion a month, growing between 30 to 40% year on year. We take about 0.65% on average across all our routes as price, and we’ve been profitable for about more than four years now, with 20% EBITDA margins.
But probably the stat I’m most proud of, and the hardest thing to make happen out of all of that was we acquired 70% of the users that found out about Wise last month through word of mouth. So, contextually, we have 16 million customers, and we’re acquiring about a million a quarter, about 10 million actives, and yes, so out of a million that joined Wise the first time, 700,000 found out about Wise from a friend.
Measuring Word of Mouth
Lenny: There’s a couple stats there that really stand out to me. One is you’re gaining a million new users a quarter, which is insane. Just like a million new people joining Wise every quarter. That’s an astounding number. The other number is what you just shared around word of mouth, that basically more than two thirds of people are discovering Wise and joining Wise through word of mouth. Mouth. I want to spend the bulk of our conversation on this topic of word of mouth. I think it’s extremely rare how you’ve been able to increase word of mouth, and just how much of your growth comes through word of mouth.
You’ve essentially developed a system for how to drive word of mouth, and how to basically structure your team, your goals, your priorities and things like that in order to lean into this growth channel. And so, I just have a million questions around how you think about word of mouth, and the first is just, how do you measure word of mouth? How do you know that say, 70% of your growth is coming through word of mouth?
Nilan Peiris: We ask customers, is the short answer. So, we have an attribution model, as you can imagine, and we’ve had one from the early days, and it overlays all the referrer data and cookie data you have on visits comes to the website. So you kind of know that. And then you obviously have the soundtrack stuff, and we sample, and ask customers a set of questions on this, and then overlay that onto the… What turns up in your web tracking as direct traffic to give us a sense of how big that word of mouth number is, and that’s what gets us back to the 70% stat.
From NPS to Product Pillars
Lenny: And very practically, how do you actually ask people? Is there a little pop-up on the website?
Nilan Peiris: It’s actually integrated into the flow. So when we built it originally, we thought it’s quite cool, marketing and acquiring customers is part of the product, and we should actually stitch that into the experience seamlessly so that we’re able to do this more effectively going forward.
NPS Scores and WOM Multipliers
Lenny: That’s actually, at Airbnb, exactly how the team did that, to understand what percentage of growth was word of mouth. It’s just a little interstitial popup when you visit say, airbnb.com, “How’d you hear about us?” You think there’s some fancy ways to understand the stuff, but it’s just like, just ask people, they’ll tell you how they heard about it.
Solving the Trust Problem
Nilan Peiris: Yeah.
Lenny: Awesome. Okay, so just to kind of dig into the meat of it, what has been the biggest shift in helping you significantly grow word of mouth, and make it such a huge lever of growth for Wise?
From Usable to Referral: Wow Experiences
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, before I launch into this, let’s just also take a step back, and why even focus on this? So in the early days, when I met the founders, Kristo and Tyler. It was quite funny, I got introed to them when they were just the founders, and without a team really, and with the beginnings of a product, and they said, “Nilan, you’ve got to meet these guys, they’ve got a great product, they just don’t have any customers.” And I sat there with them, and we kind of launched the first Google ads, and in the early days you try everything, hoping that something works. But taking a step back, think of money as the ultimate commodity. It’s pretty hard to build an expensive business that moves your money somewhere, and it costs a lot, so there’s less of it afterwards.
So building a brand led money transfer business, the brand’s got to be pretty damn good, right? You’re going to feel pretty special afterwards, in order to have less money afterwards. So what we’re looking for always, but what channels out there are super scalable, and can reach our entire audience, but have an incredibly low distribution cost. So, that’s one thing that led us to word of mouth and the other bit, when we get on to talk about marketing later, the other challenge with marketing which is unique is because we are lower price, but a superior product, we have less margin to spend on marketing than others in certain paid channels. So that’s another reason why marketing is inherently hard. Our marketing team does amazing work at Wise, in order to work within those constraints.
But back to your question, which was like, what’s the biggest thing we’ve done to shift word of mouth. When I joined Wise, and started wrangling with word of mouth, I spent a bunch of time with friends of mine in the US and around the world, Andrew Chen, some of the other growth gurus, this is going back 10, 12 years. It’s like what mouths, who’s done it? What’s the system? What do you measure? There wasn’t really anything out there. So we kind of had to figure our way out. So, first step was asking it, and the second step was kind of figure out how do you know what’s driving it? And the best proxy we found for this was something that most people have heard of, that we actually used quite a lot is net promoter score.
So from the very early days we’d start asking customers, and you probably have seen this survey, “Would you recommend Wise to a friend?”
Lenny: Never seen that ever in my life. Never been asked that question.
Building a 10x Better Product
Nilan Peiris: Exactly. There’s [inaudible 00:10:41] you said. And then in the end you’ve got the scale, zero to 10, and the theory is nine to 10 there are promoters, and zero to seven are detractors. Zero to six, detractors, and seven to eight are kind of neutral on your product. The intriguing bet was when we overlaid this… So we have word of mouth, it’s about 50 odd percent, and then we have a referral program. When we overlay the referral data over the NPS survey data, we saw something really interesting.
There’s very low invite rates at one to six, and not just invite, conversion rates of users that joined for invites. But when we’ve got people from sixes to this seven and eight group, they doubled the number of people they told. Eight to nine, they doubled again, and nine to 10, they doubled again. So, this is pretty crazy when you see it for the first time. I’m going to get back to your question in a sec, but it’s quite core buildup to it, because when you are a product manager, like you’ve been in your career, one of your jobs is to figure out what metric are you going to optimize for? What are you going to try to get the business to ground behind? And if you optimize for something like conversion, rate and you move conversion rate with 10%, you kind of get this one-off hit.
But if you move the NPS from 30% to 50%, you increase the viral coefficient of your customer base. So every customer that goes through tells X many more. When you model this through, the ROI on NPS increases is absolutely huge. So, it’s got to say, “Okay, this is the thing to zoom in on, so how to move it?” So, then the second magic of NPS is you get the numbers, but you also get the comments underneath it. I remember in the first year we built the NPS survey, and we emailed out every week all the comments to the whole company, which was pretty small, and we kept doing that, I think up till about three or four years, everyone got the NPS comments.
And when you read the comments, and now obviously we’ve got all kinds of fancy models sitting on top of these things, customers kept telling us the same things, “Make it faster, make it cheaper, make it easier to use.” Do you know at the beginning, when I said, “Price, speed, ease of use,” we kind of figured this out by thinking hard about this question. How do we make this product so good that people will use, it but they’ll recommend it?
And customers were pretty clear, the ones that were evangelical, is the word we use, are the ones that had a much… Had this cheaper experience, the ones that were talking about it had a fast experience. So it’s about price, about speed, it’s about ease of use. And when you generalize and take a step back, and look at consumer product companies, they have these product pillars they call it, and they usually have KPIs around them. The second insight we got, found, is when we entered markets, like when we entered the US for the first time, if we entered with a product that was priced at say 5.9%, and the alternative was six, customers would use us, but they wouldn’t talk about us. We only got the advocacy when we were eight to 10 times cheaper. That’s when people started talking about it.
Lenny: Let me actually interrupt you here a bit, just to kind of set a little frame around this, because this is extremely interesting, and I think people may miss, I think, some of the really interesting insights here. What I’m hearing is essentially there’s this clear sense that you had to grow through word of mouth because of the business model. You didn’t make a lot of money per user, and you didn’t have a lot of money to spend thus, to help grow. So essentially it’s like. “How do we grow the word of mouth?” And then it’s, “Okay, what do we need to convince people to share this product?” And used NPS, which I think a lot of people use, and also a lot of people probably know, “Let’s make our product more awesome so that people talk about it.” Those are kind of like, “Oh yeah, of course.”
But I think what I’m hearing is that you did that’s really unique, is one, you found this huge delta between these detractors, and even seven or… I guess it was six and below, and then seven or eight, and then nine, 10 kept kind of doubling. So one is just this focus on, how do we get someone from there to there? Two is this really big focus on the comments of the NPS survey, not just like, “Oh we have this percentage of detractors.” And then also I love how you just create these pillars, essentially, of like, “We’re going to work on these three things. These are the three levers to help grow word of mouth for this product.” Does that sound about right?
Working Backwards from the Ideal
Nilan Peiris: That all makes sense. Obviously at the time, it is also way more chaotic.
Lenny: Yeah.
Driving Down Remittance Costs
Nilan Peiris: So, at the beginning, everyone thinks it’s 20 different things, and then over time, slowly, you understand that it’s these things again and again. And a lot of building a successful businesses kind of building conviction that these are the things that matter. So, now I’d say price, speed, ease of use, it sounds… Like, but yeah, go back to seven, eight years. But we were arguing with each other around what, “Is it trust? Is it this? Is it this?” Trying to get clear on what are the things we missed there.
Lenny: That would be useful actually to know. It sounds like, of course, it’s going to be price and speed, but what are the things you kind of realize you don’t need to focus on as much, based on these surveys?
Securing EKYC License in Singapore
Nilan Peiris: Oh, wow, that’s a really hard one. So, then the challenge, is as you know, everything is important.
Mission-Driven Word of Mouth
Lenny: Yeah.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah? And that things that we use… We have a bucket called convenience. And inside the convenience bucket, there are many, many things hiding in there. And actually, you can measure this on contact rate, conversion rate, whatever, many different ways, and get many slightly different answers. So, I think I’ve learned there isn’t… I haven’t got a good answer on things we haven’t-
Customer-Led Growth Philosophy
Lenny: Well, as you said, trust, which is interesting. Obviously trust matters, but maybe it sounds like-
Nilan Peiris: Trust certainly matters. Yeah, trust’s a good one. Let’s talk about that one bit. I’ll talk to you through the trust problem. So I ran into the trust problem hardest in marketing. So, just imagine, you just started out, you’ve got a money transfer company, it’s good, your product’s really good, it’s really cheap. So, you put an ad out, and it says, “Move money with Wise, and really cheaply,” is anyone going to click that? People did, right? Is anyone going to use it? Yeah, people did use it. And you did work all the usual trust elements. But the bit I found that really helped, the way I got my head around this, was what people trust is their friends. And this really was way stronger a trust signal than anything I could put on a landing page.
And even when people came in through marketing, they’d been told. So marketing can aid recall, and all kinds of things, because people are told by their friends. They’d have a use case later on, then Google, and like, “Ah, I remember, this guy used this.” And we do definitely get users, especially today as we’ve got a larger brand, through marketing direct. But trust in isolation is a really hard problem to solve. You need to get under the skin of what it means. People don’t think my money is safe. “I don’t know if this company is reputable,” to unpick each of these problems and figure out systemically how to solve them. And we’ve done this to some extent, but really there’s a massive shortcut, which is if you deliver your customers a good experience, then figure out, how do you make it so good they’ll recommend it? Then that kind of shortcut a lot of really hard trust problems.
Determining Real Customer Impact
Lenny: What did you find most helped increase trust in that way? Is it just get more people using it and then they’ll share with their friends, or is there something you did there to…
”You Can’t A/B Test for Love”
Nilan Peiris: No, it was literally get more people using it, and they’ll share with their friends. There’s obviously a bunch of learnings we’ve had around what specific trust sentiments matter, especially geographically, but less powerful in the macro than get more people to use it.
So coming back to that, and I’d love to get your thoughts on this one. So, as you said, lots of people go up to NPS, and they kind of heard people talk about it, heard people talk about recommendations. So my learning on this is you’ve got to work really hard to get recommendation. So, to get a nine or a 10, so our NPS is 70%, so it’s really, really high. So it’s kind of higher than the iPhone, and Google search. So really, really high, so off the scale high.
And when we launch a market, or at the beginning it was much lower, so 20s and 30s. So instead it in context, like banks and financial services NPS is -30. So, most people don’t recommend banks. So it’s like, comes from a low base. But, what I’ve found is when you build a product, most founders, and most teams kind of stop when it works. As their next step, some people focus on conversion rate like, “I’m going to make this really, really slick,” and that’s cool, you get a bit more growth.
But to get to recommendation, you’re going to blow your users’ socks off, and the phrase we use is, you have to give them an experience they didn’t know was previously possible. And when you are in that place of doing something that no one has ever done before, that’s where you get it.
So the bar is all the way up there. And to put that in context, that means figuring out how to move money instantly. That means figuring out how to drop the price all the way from six all the way down to 0.35. And that’s because there are systemic infrastructure issues in moving money around the world, which some people haven’t solved before. And these problems are just really hard to solve. They take years to solve, but they have huge kind of returns when you do it.
Driven by Belief, Not Trial and Error
Lenny: I love that just as a framework, is how do… We need to blow our users’ socks off. And again, it just comes back to how you can get people to want to share this product, and drive word of mouth, blow their socks off.
I want to dig into how you actually just figured out what these attributes are. Obviously you talked about this NPS survey highlighting things. How did you decide it was instant money movement, and some of the other things? Is it just basically looking at these survey results, and picking the things that come up most often?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, it was talking to customers, and looking at the survey results, and then through that, in many different ways, price will come up, speed will come up, ease of use will come up, and they kind of aggregate up to that.
Measuring Impact in Performance Reviews
Lenny: I think a lot of people listening are still going to be this like, “Okay, we’re just going to make our product awesome, and it’s going to grow.” And in a sense, yeah, in another sense what you’re sharing is essentially kind of a really simple framework for how to actually do that. To kind of go a little deeper there, when you see other people trying to drive word of mouth, trying to drive virality, is there anything you think people often do wrong? Is there other missteps you’ve taken in trying to drive word of mouth?
Nilan Peiris: It’s this thing around growth rate. So, especially product net growth, which is what we’re talking about. So you can imagine, we’re going to open a new market to Indonesia, and the fastest way to do it is to take… Someone else has figured out how to move to Indonesia. We take that infrastructure, and we’ll plug it into Wise,
You know what? We can do this, we’ll get some users. But it doesn’t grow like a hockey stick. It doesn’t grow like a hockey stick because we haven’t fundamentally changed the problems in moving money internationally. So, got this mantra, you’ve got to build a 10x better product than what’s there. And if it’s 10x product better, basically it doesn’t exist already. So if you’re plugging in something else, that’s kind of a misstep.
So it comes from a very logical place, how do I get users quickly? I can take a shortcut in doing this, but that, you kind of realize is wasted effort. So the step then becomes this much harder question of these types of questions. Like what is the theoretical minimum cost for moving money into a market? What is the theoretical maximum speed? Not just make it instant, make it cheap, but what actually is the lowest it could possibly be? And instead of incrementally going, doing a jump to make it a little better, a little better, a little better, you can never get there. How do we take two years, and end up there?
Balancing WOM Growth and Experimentation
Lenny: I love that. It’s something that I talk about a lot. Something I learned at Airbnb is this idea of working backwards from the ideal, instead of working forwards from how do we iterate and make this better, and better, and better. It’s like, okay, if we could start again, and we could create the ideal experience, what would that look like? And then work backwards from what would it take to get there?
Nilan Peiris: And what’s an example of that at Airbnb? What was an ideal that you guys went for and then built?
Finding Evergreen User Needs
Lenny: The ideal was, there’s this whole process where the founders hired this storyboard artist from Pixar to draw out the ideal experience of a host and a guest. So, there’s these storyboards sitting in the office. I think there’s 12 kind of… They call them key frames of, it’s just like the booking experience being really seamless, arriving in the home, and being really amazed. Going out and finding things to do.
So, this became essentially the vision of the company is let’s make each of these frames, these key moments of a journey for hosting a guest as incredible as possible. That was one, and that became essentially the strategy for a few years is just make each of these frames awesome.
And then there was another project that they were working on around booking at Airbnb. I don’t know if you remember this, if you used Airbnb much, but most of Airbnb back in the day was you request to book with a host, you’re like, “Hey, can I stay in your home?”
Nilan Peiris: Yeah.
Building Products Worth Talking About
Lenny: And turned out 50% of the time the guest was ignored, or rejected, and the host was just like, “Nah, no thank you.” Now, over 80% as far as I know of bookings are instant bookings, where you just book and it’s done, just like every other place you book online. And so that was a huge transition that I worked on, and that came from, if we were to start Airbnb again today, or if someone were to disrupt Airbnb, what would it look like? And obviously it’d be you just book. You’re not sitting around hoping someone is cool with you. So, that came from that idea of just like, what would be the ideal Airbnb experience?
Macro vs Micro Team Structures
Nilan Peiris: That is incredibly inspiring. I’ll try and share a couple of stories, analogies from Wise. I’ll talk about two things. Let’s talk about price first. So, it’s a good question. So, Moneytrans has been around since the [inaudible 00:25:32]. How does a few people get together? And it’s evolved towards moving trillions around the world, and generally retail consumers paying about six to 7% around the world to do it. How do a small team in Europe start out and figure out how to move it? We launched at 0.5%, and now we’re down to about 0.35%. So what changed?
Lenny: Yeah, I was going to ask, how did you do that? That sounds like everyone would want to do that.
Localization Challenges for Global Products
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, so let’s try to unpick it a little bit. So, first question you’d ask is, “I know what you’re doing, you’re losing money on every transfer.” It’s like, “Especially what you’re doing,” but we’ve been profitable for five years. And one of the magical things here was we’re actually profitable in every transaction. So it’s probably about four or five years ago, I led this project to start to pull together our pricing.
So, every month you get bills, and they turn up in your P&L, but every single bill we got, we allocated the cost back to the customer, or the transaction that generated it. And then we add our margin on top, and that’s our price. And when you look at this and you analyze it, you’ll find obviously there are 20% of customers generating 80% of the costs. And what you do is you get those 20%, you give them a raise, because they should cover their costs, and you drop the price to everyone else. And then the team works really hard on reducing these costs down, and then you move into a different segment in the market as the price costs come down. Does that make sense, Lenny?
Local and Global Collaboration Mechanisms
Lenny: Yeah. Essentially charge the heavier users more to counteract less frequent users. And essentially that drives word of mouth.
Nilan Peiris: Totally, but it’s down to this level of, if an Australian customer calls up asking, “Where is my transfer?” That cost of that call gets allocated back to the AUD/GBP route. If a Brazilian business needs like 20 documents in order to be verified before we can give them an account, the cost of verifying check those customers goes back there, so that at a very atomic level starts happening. So yeah, as you said, the more expensive customers end up paying what they cost.
Evolving to the Spotify Model
Lenny: And it sounds like the more expensive markets.
Unexpected Breakthrough in Referral Programs
Nilan Peiris: Indeed, and the more expensive, systemically expensive markets. But let’s get to that. So, what are the costs? So if you look at our P&L, there’s just three costs at transaction level. You’ve got people costs, you’ve got the cost of risk, realized risk, and then you’ve got partner fees.
And so if you’ve got this mission of moving the world’s money for almost nothing, or zero, as close to zero as you can, you’ve got to invest as much of your cashflow in engineering to try to engineer away these three problems. So just to take them through briefly a bit, and remember, we’re trying to do this 10 times better than anyone else. So how do you really change the experience on each of them?
I’ll cover a couple with you. So let’s do the risk one first. There’s two risks we have. We have have FX risk, you come to Wise you see your rate, and then you may send us the money a little later. If you’re moving a million dollars, you can’t usually move it instantly. It might take you two to three days to move it. The rate’s locked, could move against us, we’d lose some money.
So that cost, if you look back, so we’ve halved that cost over the last few years, and you can imagine through understanding the bits of the product, they generate exposure, and limiting it, and a bunch of algorithms behind that. But the more inspiring stuff is the people costs, and the partner costs, go through each of these one at a time.
So the people costs are our customer service team, operations teams. But I like to think of that as the cost of poor quality. So you bring up customer support if the products are clear, you hire lots of people in the back office. If you haven’t automated it. We get like 20% improvement year on year as we’re doing that. But come back to your question, how do you step change that? How do you do a 10x better experience?
I’ll share with you a story from Singapore. It’s quite a fun one. Because we went to Singapore about six, seven years ago, and [inaudible 00:29:58], we asked for a license. We had 20,000 people on the wait list, or so, saying, “Wise, please come to Singapore.” And we went there, we asked the regular, “Hey, can you give us a license?” They gave us the license, but they said, “You have to physically meet every single customer.”
Lenny: Great.
Angel Investing and Market Failures
Nilan Peiris: Face-to-face. And this happens, this is… Remember, they’re banks that people use. So people go into banks usually, and you get face-to-face verified when you open a bank account. We’re like, “You don’t need to do this in Australia, in the UK, in other countries around the world.” They’re like, “In Singapore, for your license, you need to do this.” So we actually sent a small team out to Singapore, and we opened an office through [inaudible 00:30:43], and customers… You went through this really slick flow, and then you got invited in to come see the team.
Lenny: Amazing.
Rapid Fire: Book Recommendations
Nilan Peiris: And customers hated it, and it was really expensive, obviously.
Rapid Fire: Movies and TV Shows
Lenny: Yeah.
Favorite Interview Questions
Nilan Peiris: But the magic was we got the customers not to complain to us, but to complain to the government. And it took a year of lobbying, and a year of building, doing something unscalable effectively, before we got the world’s first EKYC license in Singapore. So you could take a selfie, picture of your ID, and then you could get verified.
And that’s what I call a 10x better experience than anyone else in the market, and that led to advocacy and word of mouth off the back of it. And that loop of getting your customers to help was also one of the learnings of word of mouth.
Guiding Life Principles
Lenny: Was the product team involved? Were you involved in that on the ground stuff? Or was it like [inaudible 00:31:40]?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, yeah. Generally when we go [inaudible 00:31:43], we’re running cross-functional teams, but this is a verification team. The team actually would verify the docs when you sent it to us. They went out to Singapore, verified them onsite, face-to-face.
So the fun bit here is why would customers help a company? And this is one of the other learnings on word of mouth. The way I think about this is that there are the rational reasons why people recommend, which we’ve covered. But there’s these emotional ones as well. Softer ones people would call brand. I prefer to call it on the mission.
So we do our mission, which is to make the world’s money move instantly at the touch of a button, for almost nothing. It was a very personal thing, it was like an internal company thing, to think our customers cared about it. And then we rebranded like eight, nine years ago, our first rebrand, and we wrote our mission and sent it to our customers.
We got more new customers from that email being forwarded around than any other kind of marketing. And I show this when I talk at conferences. This email broke all the rules of marketing. It didn’t have a call to action, it didn’t have a button to sign up, it didn’t have anything in it, but people just forwarded it around saying, “You should check out Wise.”
And it’s not all the customer base, but there was a proportion of the customer base that this resonated in. And I think it’s the authenticity within which they could see that we were genuinely trying to… Trying to bring the prices down was a scheme to help us grow faster, which is kind of where it started out, was actually genuinely because founders, they were really upset about how much it cost to money.
They found good ways to solve that problem, and they’re still really passionate about solving that problem. And they could see that authenticity flows through the whole company, because we got a… When you look at Wise, we’re full of people on visas, and immigrants, and people that have worked, and live around the world, and struggled with this problem, and are passionate about solving it. And so they wanted to help us solve it. So the second part of this word of mouth engine is for us, we managed to get this mission thing to work.
So somehow we emotionally connect our cause, and then I see going, taking a step back, getting 10x better on price is through our customers helping us do it, which gets us even cheaper, which then brings more customers, that then creates this flywheel that’s spins around.
Cultural Rituals at Wise
Lenny: What a flywheel you guys have built. This reminds me of a lot of different things. One is you talked about how there’s the reality of the things people need, and then there’s this soft, fuzzy stuff that’s harder to quantify. I actually is the framework just like that on that product I talked about of instant booking.
I kind of built a roadmap around the reality of what people actually need in order to feel comfortable, guests booking instantly. And then I call it the perception, what are their fears about letting guests book instantly? And there’s a lot of work to just convince them, you think you’re going to get all these guests that are really scary or whatever, but in reality it never happens. It’s really rare something bad happens, and if it does, we’re going to cover it.
So, I think that’s a really cool framework when you’re trying to get people to adopt something, is think about what do they actually need? And then how do you convince them of the things that are just in their head? And it sounds like the win there was kind of this sharing your mission and your values as a business.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, it just sounds, again very tweedy, right? Tweedy, like sounds very corporate, sounds like it’s never going to work, but I think it’s also… I mean, Airbnb, the authenticity is there. People are passionate about making that experience work for both sides of the marketplace. It’s kind of clear. So, I’m kind of taking a step back, personally very passionate about customer-led growth, and how that turns into shareholder value.
So, taking a step back, where every business I’ve ever worked in, it’s always got these two lists, a list of things to do for your customers, and then it’s got a list of things to do to make money. And you generally do everything you need to do to make money, and you do two things with the customer list, and you go, “Customer led business.” And then, neat thing about wise, and I’m pretty sure you’ll see the same thing on Airbnb is, we just had one list, which is this list of things that you need to do to make customers happy, and it’s prioritized by impact on the really hard things. And if you do these really hard things, they have an incredible impact for customers, but hence on your growth, and on your shareholder value.
Lenny: That is really interesting. Airbnb is not quite like that. It’s actually become more like that with a lot of just like, “Let’s build awesome products and not focus on experiments as much.” So that’s really interesting that prioritization basically at Wise came from, “What are people telling us?” I guess let me ask actually, how did you know what the impact would be on customers? How did you decide? Is it frequency of how often people request it? Is it, “We need to lower the cost, and so we’re just going to prioritize the things that will lower prices most?”
Nilan Peiris: Definitely on the journey at the beginning, you are into split testing, right? Let’s try to take apart a split test on price. So, you’ve systemically dropped the cost. Imagine we drop the cost. The question is, do we drop the price? Do we pass that all on to customers? And do we keep some of it? And split testing on the price thing, if the split test is going to mean you end up with more revenue, it means you drop the price by 10%, and there happened to be that day, more than 10% more customers in the market who, they saw the price at one pound, but they see the price at 90p, at 10% lower, and they’re like, “I wasn’t going to shift at buy at one pound but I’m going to buy it 90p.”
So this is pretty hard to do this. This word around conviction is one I use a lot, where you build this conviction that price is what matters. And through this incremental split test, you will take a long time to go there, but at some point you kind of go, “Actually I’ve got enough conviction.” So there’s one kind of strategic bet at the heart of Wise. That is if we have the lowest cost platform, and it’s really fast, and really high quality, the world’s volume will switch to us. And just marginally getting there step by step by step, and trying to track the incremental return is actually slower. And there’s a point that comes that you go, “I feel really comfortable investing in price. I feel comfortable investing in speed, because I know it’s going to pay back, and not necessarily this month, but eventually it will, and I need to make gains on all three levers in order to get there.” Does that make sense?
Lenny: Yeah, absolutely. So essentially, in that track of work, instead of everything that you did to reduce price, there wasn’t an experiment to see, “What impact does this have on growth, or revenue?” Instead, it’s just, “We know reducing price is going to help us grow, and so we’re just going to track how much we’re cutting price.” And that’s essentially the goals, I imagine, were just cut the price by some amount, find a way to make it this much cheaper every, say, quarter, or year.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, that’s it. You got it. And that conviction is core. That extends to our product management approach on the UX. So this is a great line for use internally, I’m sure you’ve heard it, “You can’t split test your way to love.” So, this experiment led product management approach, where you throw a bunch of things on the wall, and then you kind of see what sticks, and generally we don’t advocate this. Obviously there’s a bit of it that happens, but generally don’t advocate it. Mainly because engineering is expensive, and you can actually figure out what matters to customers through other means. Some of the techniques we’ve talked, and build it.
There’s a story I like to share. I had a product manager join our refer a friend team, viral growth team, and invite team, and after a quarter, I said, “So what are you going to build?” And he’s like, “I’m going to test everything. I’m going to test the landing page, I’m going to test the subject line, I’m going to test the program so I don’t know yet till run through all the tests, then I’m going to come back and tell you what I’m going to build.”
I said, “You’re not going to do this. I’m going to give you three weeks and you’re going to pick one thing to change, but you’re going to go talk to people, and get quantitative insights, and build your own gut feel around what matters, and then launch it, and submit, test it, and see if it works.” But this thing of building conviction on what matters, and I watch how teams slowly build this and you need the data there to make sure it doesn’t become a hubris, right? That enables you to make much bigger changes than just experimenting away, and it forces you to get clear on what actually is the problem to solve here, and how do I solve it really, really well? Does that make sense, Lenny, Do you disagree? It’s a bit provocative there. Some people are pretty strong in the expert led approach.
Lenny: No, there’s many ways to do it. There’s no right way, and it’s working. So I’m not going to argue.
In fact, Masterworks latest exit just last month delivered another double-digit annualized net return for their investors since the New York Times first reported on them in 2019, they’ve grown to over 800,000 users, and had some new offerings sell out in literal minutes. But you get special access and can jump the wait list queue at masterworks.art/lenny. As with any investment, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investing involves risk. See important regulations and disclosures and aggregate advisory performance masterworks.com/cv. Again for special access to skip the wait list, go to masterworks.art/lenny.
So, what I’m hearing essentially, the experimentation culture at Wise is instead of just run, test everything that you’re thinking about, throw out a bunch of ideas and see how they go, it’s more, “Let’s just decide we believe in this idea, and let’s go bigger there, and run an experiment. Maybe not even.” Is that roughly how you think about it?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And is that something that you’ve seen yourself in practice elsewhere?
Lenny: It’s interesting how many parallels there are to Airbnb, because this is what Airbnb is doing now. There’s been a shift recently, where instead of everything is very data experiment driven, it’s very just like, “Let’s build really great products that the founders are really excited about, and that the execs are hearing from people. Let’s just build things that are awesome and launch them, and we believe things will grow.” And Airbnb is doing great.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, the challenge of this is because it does become this risk thing of where it’s like, okay, it’s someone’s opinion, so I think it’s X, right? And everyone thinks they’re kind of Steve Jobs type thing.
Lenny: Yeah. That’s right.
Nilan Peiris: You have some way of using data to get this conviction, and show why this is what we should do, but try to learn how to build that faster CME, slight difference. So, it’s less product managers or me saying, “Hey guys, I think it’s X.” It’s generally data driven, and qualitative insights driven as well.
Lenny: Personally, I would always index towards running experiments just to put this out there, but I think in this case, it makes sense, where you just know, “We need to do these three things, just make it cheaper, make it faster.” You don’t need to AB test every idea there. Probably the main downside of not testing everything is you may be hurting things along the way, and you may not know it.
Nilan Peiris: I mean, yeah, so we definitely do… So you’re right. But there’s a very different thing to when you look at the… From a sample size perspective, you want to do a beta, and understand the negative impact. It’s a holdout group that’s smaller, than a test to get a significance. It’s quite define the criteria to know whether something is breaking, is generally a different thing to say, is this a material result in a test? Yeah.
Lenny: And along those lines, the other benefit of experimentation is you know the impact. And so, team members can understand, “Here’s what I did this quarter, this year.” How do you think about just like performance reviews, and people’s impact, and that kind of thing?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, that’s a good one. This one is definitely an ongoing debate. So, I generally ask teams what’s their impact? So, every quarter, every team, what… [inaudible 00:44:29] or Kristo will ask, “What did you ship?” And I generally ask, “How many people used it? What was the impact on volume?” Et cetera. And we have analyst teams that can answer this either with pre-post analysis, all kinds of techniques, or all through split tests. We generally have this, the debate is where the analysis slows us down, and we wouldn’t make a decision off the back of the analysis.
And then, this generally is what you said, where the team needs a validation, mainly for themselves, and maybe a little performance, but not too much. And so, there were ways in which you can maybe get some read on it that isn’t quite as strong as a split test, which we’d use in these things. It’s more just getting some… You can understand that people worried when you do split tests that slow down the release of something, but in order to get impact, if you know you’re not going to roll it back, then okay, you should just roll it out, and try to reduce the need for that validation.
Lenny: I think that there’s an interesting correlation between products that grow through word of mouth, and less need to experiment with everything. Airbnb is also actually 70% of growth is word of mouth from the last stat that I heard. And then you think about all these social consumer apps, they mostly grow through people sharing with their friends, and a lot of them come from just the founder’s intuition of what a great product’s going to be. I think about Snapchat, and the recent mobile social apps. And so I think maybe there’s something there about just as a founder, trusting your gut more often. But then it becomes difficult as you grow. You have to delegate, and then you have to trust people on your team making the right decisions. I guess, is there anything there that you’ve learned about just trusting individual product teams to make decisions that you can’t for sure know are positive or negative without running experiments?
Nilan Peiris: So, as I say, almost everything we do, we have some way of understanding the impact. So, that’s always there. We definitely have things where the team does something where Kristo or I will say, “This is just crazy. There’s no way they’re going to use this.” And then we have a culture where people are encouraged to do these things, if they believe in it.
Lenny: Is there an example of that?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, a couple. So the one [inaudible 00:46:52] that my head of SEO always talks about is a currency converter. So, the Wise homepage is a pretty good currency converter. It’s got a decent one on there. There’s tons of traffic on currency converter. So, if you click Wise link, now it’s a little bit hidden on send, it’s there. It’s pretty cool. Currency converter.
Lenny: Oh I see it at the bottom there. Yeah, it’s like [inaudible 00:47:13].
Nilan Peiris: But if you Google currency converter, there’s tons of traffic, and that converter on the Wise homepage obviously includes our price, and lets you sign up. And so, should we build a currency convertor? Should we try to capture this traffic? Is it more effective to try to push our own product there? And you can kind of understand why it was Kristo, actually not me, that was like, “This is a crazy idea.” And the founder, and the SEO team went out and built it, and it’s huge now, in terms of visits. I think we’ve got a currency convertor app out there. I think we’ve got [inaudible 00:47:51] out there, and yeah, people discover wise through that, as an example of off-topic traffic, but that’s a good example of one of those things where yeah, the founder said, “No,” or, “That’s’ a bad idea,” and we kind of went ahead, and did it anyway.
Lenny: Awesome. I’m just thinking about broadly all the things we’ve been talking about. There’s a couple of things that were floating around in my head. One is, reminds me of Amazon, where Jeff Bezos realized there are things that are going to be always true with Amazon. People always want cheaper prices, they want faster shipping. And I think there’s something else. And it feels like you guys found the same sort of thing. What are the three things people always want with a money transfer product? And let’s just make those as incredible as possible, and in your eyes, make them 10 times better than what anyone else has out there.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, totally. The business one example is relevant, and use it a lot when we talk to investors in the market, [inaudible 00:48:49] public helps validate this low cost, cutting price story. What’s interesting is what changed though. So we started with transfers, but we got to account, and then we got to enterprise. Just what changed was we realized with account, if you just have to move $10, you’re not going to download an app and do it. If you do it once, you’re just going to do it in your bank. And so, that was a little bit of the insight behind building the Wise account, and we kind of focused on, there’s a real problem with international banking.
So, really good example is for businesses. So if you are a business, say, in… Say a business in Europe, you’ve got a customer in Australia, and you want to get paid, you send them an invoice in Euros, and someday, some money’s going to turn up in your account, you’re like, “I don’t know.” They paid you an AUD, it got changed by three banks on the way through. You don’t know what it is. What you’d love to do is invoice them in AUD, and get AUD in your bank account. You might even have people who need to pay in AUD, so you have to call to keep it there. But to get an Australian bank account, I found out, you need to fly to Australia, you need to incorporate a business in Australia, you need to go to a bank with all those papers, and then they will give you an Australian bank account number.
Lenny: Great.
Nilan Peiris: So with Wise, you can get an Australian bank account number with three clicks. Anyone can, and any business can, and you get an Australian balance, and a US, and a UK, and a Swiss bank. And this is killer for businesses that receive money internationally. And then the next big jump we did, and for consumers, so there are plenty of people, if all your banking is in the US, you probably shouldn’t use Wise, but if you’re somebody who uses another currency a lot, then you probably should use us as your primary bank.
There’s some people, for example, who live in one country and get paid in another currency, and this is… Wise is great as an account for managing that. And we found with that, we got about… As we launched the account in markets, it was about a 20 to 30% more volume, cross-border volume coming into Wise from that market. Just a good example of how, while it’s not price, not speed, you could argue is kind of ease of use, but we had to evolve it in order to get to the next tranche of the market. Does that make sense, Lenny?
Lenny: Absolutely. And it all just comes back from what would be the theoretical ideal situation for people transferring money, say from Australia. And what I’m hearing is just find all the little friction points that get in the way. In this case you’re like, “Okay, we’ll create you an Australian bank account, and you don’t even worry about it.”
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, that’s exactly it. And so now then you have all these other problems, because we’ve got about $12.5 billion in deposits now, which is like a time. And the next problem customers are at is, “I want a return.” And we quite deliberately don’t have a banking license. You have to figure out, how are we going to solve that? We now put customers money in government bonds, US bonds, and when you pay with your card, it dynamically sells those bonds. And that’s how we give you an interest rate, in roundabout 5% right now, given where bond rates are.
Lenny: Yeah, interest rates are quite high, for better or worse. Zooming out a little bit, for folks that are starting to… Their wheels are turning, they’re like, “Okay, I want to think about word of mouth, driving word of mouth. I’m going to go look at my survey results. I’m going to figure out these pillars that are driving word of mouth. I’m going to think about how to make things 10 times better.” Just broadly, for someone that’s starting to approach this, what would you say to them? How should they approach this? Any major learnings at a higher level, of just how to drive word of mouth for a product?
Nilan Peiris: I think it just comes back to talking to customers and this is the question we’ve kept coming back to. What would it take to make it 10x better? And then you get clear in your head what it would take, and then it’s usually the thing that everyone’s looked at before and thought, it’s the thing that’s impossible. One more example is on the partner side. So, rather than find a cheaper bank for a banking partner, you think, well, the cheapest banking partner is the central bank. And imagine you’re a startup. How the hell do you get a bank account at the central bank?
But that kind of thinking, and we now have a bank account at the Bank of England, the National Bank of Singapore, Bank of Australia. And each of these was as hard as getting that face-to-face verification thing in Singapore. It took years of lobbying, and all kinds of stuff, in order to make it happen. But it’s setting your goal all the way up there. That’s what enables you to build a 10x better product. That’s what gets you to the word of mouth. So, the first step is getting super clear on what’s the problems that my customers are caring about, worrying about? And then once you’re clear there, as you said, how can I solve that completely, and what’s the best it could possibly be? And then the hard bit is figuring out how to move that.
Lenny: A lot of these things you’re talking about are just, they sound like they are either impossible, like no way we’re going to achieve that, or really, really hard. And a lot of companies, and a lot of founders, teams are just like, “Okay, we’re not ever going to create a bank here. We’re not going to be able to create an Australian bank account for everyone.” What is it about your culture, or approach to these problems that you think that’s unique to Wise that’s like, “No, we’re going to spend three years figuring this out, because it’s that important?”
Nilan Peiris: I think it’s two [inaudible 00:54:17]. So one is, definitely the founders have this philosophy that unless you’re doing something hard and new, it’s kind of a waste of time. So, I think that also kind of runs through the culture. So, it’s quite a rude awakening when people join Wise, because they’re like, “Okay, I’m going to come, and just play around with a few things.” You’re like, “No, actually, the culture of the product team is we’re super incentivized to do the hard things, and that’s what’s rewarded.”
And that’s quite hard to create the air cover. You can imagine like then in the early days and months when growth was slow, and people turned on the money taps in marketing, and you’re trying to keep focused and plugging your away up these hard things, it’s quite hard also to get the management cover in order to let the teams keep doing this. And then it’s also hard just to turn up to work and really keep… You can imagine being in Singapore, verifying customers face-to face, thinking, “This is going nowhere, this is going nowhere, this is going nowhere.” And then suddenly it changes. So that’s what progress very much feels like at Wise. And we try to recognize that, and create a culture that enables that.
Lenny: It feels like there’s also just a lot of patience for these things. There isn’t like, “We need to hit this quarterly goal. Why aren’t we creating banks in Singapore yet?”
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, exactly.
Lenny: Awesome. The other kind of metaphor that’s rolling around my head is something Seth Godin talks about. I don’t know if you’ve heard of this guy, he’s a marketing guru, and he has this concept that you want to build something that’s remarkable, because if something is remarkable, it’ll spread. And if you think about the word remarkable, it’s something worth remarking about, which essentially is word of mouth.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah.
Lenny: And so that’s his kind of mission and his, I don’t know, advice to people is build something remarkable, something people will want to remark about. And clearly, you all have been doing that. And that’s actually a good segue to where I wanted to go, which is around how you structure your team, and how you incentivize the team, organize teams, to achieve all these sorts of things. So, maybe just broadly, is there something unique to how you think about work structure, incentives, goals, things like that, in order to achieve these really hard things?
Nilan Peiris: There’s two unique lenses on this. One is in the macro-structure and one is in the micro-structure. So at the macro level, if you look at actually international banks, they don’t really exist. I’m not sure if you’ve moved around between countries, but say you open a bank account with Citibank in the US, and then you go to Citibank in the UK, your Citibank account doesn’t exist in the UK. You have to go to Citibank in the UK, and open a Citibank account. And actually, turns out, with some of these banks, to move money between your bank accounts is an international transfer. It’s crazy.
So, when you take a step back, and look at how the market looks, you have at one end, international banks which are local tech stacks. So there’s a core banking system in the US, and one in the UK, and one in Europe, say for Citibank, or for HSBC, but they have deep local integrations, so they’re directly integrated in the payment system. Citibank in the US has got relationships, say, with the Federal Reserve, et cetera.
Other end of the spectrum you’ve got something like PayPal. So it’s a tech company, it’s got a single global tech stack. It doesn’t run a additional version of PayPal in Australia than to the US, but it doesn’t have deep connections. It hasn’t got five central bank accounts, it hasn’t got any of that. And I’d like to think of in the middle, you’ve got Wise, where we have a single global tech stack, and we have deep local infrastructure.
Now, from a technological perspective, just take a step back and think through this. This is actually non-trivial to figure out how to design. So, let’s take something like the onboarding flow. So, we have global product teams, one part of product teams called global product teams. So we have a single onboarding flow that will give you a Wise account, and it’s the same code that runs, whether you are in Brazil, New York, or Australia.
The regulation in Australia and Brazil is really different, and it isn’t black and white in any country. So, there’s a bunch of… You get a bunch of things you just shouldn’t do in terms of letting people get so [inaudible 00:58:31] people who shouldn’t get access to accounts. And then you can need to check these people aren’t using it, and different jurisdictions have completely different requirements. Example is Japan, you have to take a picture of that front of the ID, the back of the ID, and the side of your ID. It’s the only country in the world that you have to do this.
Lenny: Wow.
Nilan Peiris: And imagine you’re the product manager for onboarding, and someone tells you, “Design the onboarding flow to give somebody a bank…” Just imagine gathering all the requirements from every country in the world, because there’s very little similarity. You can’t just say, “I take the US,” and copy it somewhere else. It’s very, very, very different.
It’d take forever to try to get that, and then normalize that into the main model, and try to figure out how you’re going to structure the data around this. So, it then becomes like, what is the organization structure that enables us to discover what the domain model, let’s call it that, for the onboarding flow should look like. And you end up with a global product team that owns overall KPIs around conversion rate, et cetera. And you have local, regional teams that own the conversion rate, and the cost to do KYC for their market, and they contribute to the global product code base.
So we have weak product ownership, where anyone can make code change, and pull requests, and these guys owning the vision in the center. But the only way that vision can evolve is by getting the feedback from these guys in the market, as they’re constantly pushing stuff forward. And through that process, artifacts start emerging, where other markets are like Japan, and so you start splitting off that, and creating subtypes for it, and slowly the model emerges from there.
And so with this structure, the thing to optimize for is a really hard one. That problem that every global business has, is how do you get this collaboration to work between the local and the global? But unlike every other business, most businesses solve this probably as you know, is you usually have the US, and then you have international. And international is usually a bump site, where everyone’s arguing to get their thing prioritized, right?
Lenny: That’s right.
Nilan Peiris: Whereas here, you’re kind of letting the local teams commit directly to the code base, and then this global team’s got this challenge of doing this, and we over time create sub-teams around parts of the regionalization of the structure, around different objects as they emerge. But that broadly speaking is the first problem, the global problem. And the other bit with us is this is quite unique to us, because most fintechs out there are usually in one market. Like you take Robin Hood, it was in the US, it came to the UK, they went back to the US. You take Monzo, only the UK, N26 only in Europe, Up in Australia, China, and the US. And that’s because their home markets are so big, and one regulator is a ton of work to manage. And the second complexity we have is we have all of these markets we have to be in, because we’re international by default. So a lot of our thinking is where do we take that, turn that into competitive advantage, and which customer base really needs that? Which is what zooms us into that positioning on the international account.
Lenny: It just comes back to again, and again, again and again, doing the hard thing, knocking peoples’ socks off, and it feels like that’s the formula for Wise.
Nilan Peiris: I think yeah, you more or less got it. So that’s one bit on structure. So this global local thing, and the second one has been a bit more of a journey. So when we started early on, we ran in autonomous independent teams, all focused on KPIs, and these KPIs rolled up to make it cheaper, make it faster, make it easier to use. You can imagine like a KPI tree, and teams around bits of their KPIs, and every quarter they talk through how they move their KPI, et cetera, and this kind of worked. And the way we ran our planning is, every quarter every team would stand up and talk through its plan, get feedback from other teams, and then move on. This worked till we got to 30 teams, and then you go from doing this in the afternoon, to doing it in two days and it’s just like whoa.
So, we started heading towards the Spotify model, where we group the teams in squads, and into tribes. Today, I think that autonomy is at the squad level. So the squads are around products. So, we’ll have a Wise account squad, a business squad, a Wise platform, our enterprise product squad, you’ll have a North Am squad that looks after the North American product, and Lat Am squad, et cetera. And then financial crime fighting, et cetera.
And inside those squads you’ve got the teams, and the squad… Imagine you’re the director for the Wise account, but you don’t have a vision for the account. You’ve got to say where it’s going. You’ve got to keep your teams on track against it. The teams aren’t off doing whatever they want. They kind of need to be on track, versus the overall vision, and you’re accountable for the results of that squad. And squads are in tribes, the tribe provides overall leadership, and a slight, light touch strategy on the squads. And that’s more or less our structure, and how we’ve evolved towards it.
Lenny: Is there anything else along the word of mouth concept that you think would be useful for people to share? Either how you think about it, team structure, anything else?
Nilan Peiris: There’s one tiny bit I’ll share, which was around marketing and referral. This was super interesting for me. So, we’ve been running it, like Airbnb, we’ve been running referral program for now 12 years, and after 12 years, you’ve kind of tested everything anyway. And like I said, by this point you have literally tested everything. So when somebody comes up with something that has a 300% increase, you’re like, “Whoa, that’s super interesting. What just happened?”
Lenny: Wow, I’m excited for this.
Nilan Peiris: And yeah, I’ll share this one, because it’s interesting. So we run many variants of refer a friend, where you’ll get different kinds of benefit. We tried chocolate, we tried money, we’ve tried 500, 100, generally it’s a sweet spot. Anyway, it’s a pretty creative PM there. And he was again talking to customers, and he spotted this thing, which is pretty cool, which is when you do a transfer with Wise, at the end you get this email, the email says, “Well done.” Then it says, “Your money’s there in the other person’s account, and you saved $10 on this transfer.” And he got this insight, which was pretty awesome, was he realized that people believed they saved money, but they didn’t believe the number. And he then thought, what would it take to get them to believe the number?
Lenny: That seems right.
Nilan Peiris: And so the fun bit was the approach. So then him and a designer sat there and they sketched out an alternative email, and they went down to the coffee shop downstairs, and they showed it to people, and they said… Just asked them what they thought, and they kept iterating it until they got to a graph. And this graph is like this… When you go through a money transfer thing, it pops up in places, behind the compare button. And this graph shows with your bank, when you send, how much is in the rate hidden as… This is how much you’re sending, this is how much they’re taking in the rate in a fee, and this is how much you can see in the fee, because the fees are hidden in the rates with banks. And then this is with Wise.
And they iterate this graph to the point that people looked at like, “Oh my God, I’m never using my bank again. This number… This is crazy.” And then they put this graph on the success page when you did a transfer. Saying, “You saved this.” And put a share button in there, and invite your friends button, and that’s what really drove it. And when you fast-forward to today, we’ve now got… So it’s actually quite hard. So, we now have I think about 70 bank accounts around the world. So, I think the top three accounts, banks in the world, where we log onto every day, and then we log the price and the quote for a bunch of different routes into a file. You can imagine how hard is. I think I personally have about 17 of these still in my name, that I’ve opened up around the world to help the team get going. But that’s kind of one of the biggest word of mouth growth, or referral insights. I’ve got to this comparison thing, made into our marketing, made into our homepage, just went everywhere up from that insight.
Lenny: And you said that that like 3x’d the sharing rate?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, that 3x’d the sharing rate. So we always had the share button after you completed a transfer. But putting that there with this graph, and that kind of got me to this, I’m curious on your take on this, on this definition of product marketing, where customers use the product, and they think they got this value, but when they actually know the value they get. So we got this on speed as well, where we’re doing instant transfers, and customers wouldn’t know it was instant.
So when you get an instant transfer, there’s like this wizzy animation at the end, and you kind of know the money’s in the other person’s account, ready to spend. And again, you see this big jump in referral rate when that happens, but people need to know it’s happened. And closing this delta between what you’ve done, and what’s perceived to be done is what I call product marketing within the product. And that in its own right is a discipline, I’ve learned.
Lenny: That’s an awesome insight. It comes back to this framework we talked about of reality and perception, in a flip way, instead of getting people to adopt something, it’s to appreciate the work you’ve done to make it remarkable, to make them understand how remarkable it really is.
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, that was it. And that’s something I’m continuously learning about yeah, as we go, as well.
Lenny: That is extremely interesting. Before we get to our very exciting lightning round, I know you also do a bunch of charity work, and I wanted to give you a chance to share what you’re doing there.
Nilan Peiris: Thanks, Lenny. So, less charity, essentially came out of angel investing, is probably the way to say it. So I invest in startups, generally fintechs, mission led founders, word of mouth type stuff, all the stuff we’ve been talking about, that I’m passionate about. It is less investing, more helping, and yeah, just getting through the angel route. And then over time, I realized the thing I’m most passionate about is market failures. So generally I find that the invisible hand means most human needs get fulfilled by the market, but there are a few things that don’t, and there’s a couple of exciting startups out there who work really hard in this space. A couple are Beam in the UK, working on homelessness, Affinity and Neobank in Ghana. And so, this type of thing is stuff I’m most passionate about. So, if any of your listeners out there know anyone doing anything of that kind, trying to solve these kinds of hard problems, definitely reach out, always keen to talk.
Lenny: Awesome. And we’ll link to those two you mentioned in the show notes just in case people want to check them out. With that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
Nilan Peiris: Let’s go for it.
Lenny: Let’s do it. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Nilan Peiris: Two, one’s at the other ends of the spectrum. So one is… This sounds terribly pretentious Crime and Punishment, and the other one is Midnight’s Children by Salman Rushdie. I read a lot, I’m very passionate about reading, fiction, mainly. I don’t read… Nonfiction is too much like work. And so, I generally need to read before I go to bed to decompress my brain. It’s generally escapist type stuff. But I’m curious what you think of this, but for me authors are people that create people with words.
Like you say artist is a good artists if it’s… Makes a good likeness to somebody, but imagine that you create somebody with words, and that person feels real, so they have some insight into the human condition. And what’s amazing is if you learn something about what it means to be human from reading that. So at that end of the scale, Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment, where this guy kills somebody, and it just eats him up. It’s a pretty amazing book. It’s not as heavy as it sounds, but books like that are pretty awesome. So, I recommend that a lot.
And the other end of the scale is sometimes you read a book and there’s a single sentence where each word has been just stitched together, and it’s like, again, a work of art, and there, Rushdie is probably the pinnacle for me, of Midnight’s Children, which is about partition in India, which is pretty… Through a metaphor, it’s pretty amazing.
Lenny: It’s a beautiful answer. What is a favorite recent movie or TV show?
Nilan Peiris: Oh gosh, I am not… I don’t love [inaudible 01:11:05] got TV, but we had rented Barbie for the kids. That one, probably the last movie.
Lenny: I just watched that too. So good.
Nilan Peiris: Good.
Lenny: You can actually stream it now. I don’t know when this comes out, but it just-
Nilan Peiris: Oh wow.
Lenny: Yeah, you can watch it at home. But it’s not cheap. I think it’s like 20 bucks in the US.
Nilan Peiris: Oh geez.
Lenny: What is a favorite interview question you like to ask candidates when you’re interviewing them?
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, so I only ask two. I got down to asking just two questions over time. The first one’s probably my favorite, which is, what is it that most frustrates you about… Instead of why you’re leaving, what frustrates you the most about where you’re working right now? And this is as people always tell you why they want to join Wise, or join whatever company you’re coming to, and that’s not that interesting. But what’s interesting, trying to figure out, is what they’re running away from. And usually there’s something broken there, that’s really wound them up. But what’s more interesting is they’ve been unable to fix it. And so, in asking this question, and probing, you kind of get quite good at getting a sense of what is their limit, what’s the thing they found, and what did they get stuck with? And you kind of think, “Okay, you’re going to run into that here every day, every week? Or… You should be fine.” And that’s kind of why I ask that question.
Lenny: I love that. What is a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you really like?
Nilan Peiris: I recently switched to Arc Browser.
Lenny: That’s what I use.
Nilan Peiris: And yeah, the onboarding flow was mind-blowingly good.
Lenny: That’s exactly how I felt. I had to tweet about it. It’s like, [inaudible 01:12:41].
Nilan Peiris: Yeah, I sent it to my onboarding team, and everyone. And what I loved about it is, it’s clearly like if you could try to use Arc with the same way you use Chrome, you just get really frustrated. But if you use it the way they want you to use, it’d be amazing. So, for figuring out how to get people to engage with, you need to use this fundamentally differently. They manage to almost get me to use it the right way. Still struggling a little bit with it, but that I thought was really clever.
Lenny: Awesome choice. We had Josh, the CEO of the Browser Company of New York, it’s called, on the podcast. And if you’re interested in learning about Arc’s story, definitely check out that episode. All right, next question. What is a favorite life motto that you like to repeat most to yourself, that you like to share? Anything come to mind?
Nilan Peiris: The thing that defines success is the speed at which you pick yourself up.
Lenny: I love that.
Nilan Peiris: And that’s the thing that I hold onto most, because you get knocked a lot, high growth company, and it’s obviously quite… Obviously knocks you, when someone says no to an offer, when somebody leaves the company, when a product doesn’t work as you think it should, when you get pushback from a partner. But yeah, if you lose four hours spinning around it, or you trying and figure out, “Okay, this happened, how do I move forward?” And just learning how to shorten that time has probably been one of the most important journeys for me.
Lenny: That was an awesome answer. One final question, is there a fun cultural ritual at Wise that has stuck around for a while?
Nilan Peiris: This one, my team would love to say. So, from the early days, we got everyone together from all around the world once a year. Oh, I actually did it twice a year. And the founders are from Estonia, and we have 5,000 people now, so we still have about 1,800 in Estonia. So it’s cheaper to flavor on Estonia. So in the old days when it was winter, winter in Estonia is not fun, but summer in Estonia is amazing, and we still do this. And the funnest bit about this is, I have a side hustle, DJ, so I get to DJ there, and it’s quite fun, and embarrassing for my kids because technically I’ve now DJ’d in other countries.
Lenny: International DJ.
Nilan Peiris: That’s it. That’s my side hustle.
Lenny: Amazing.
Nilan Peiris: That’s how I introduced myself to my 17-year old’s friends. So, yeah.
Lenny: Do you have a DJ name? Is there… Can we check you out on Spotify?
Nilan Peiris: No, no, you can’t check me on Spotify or anything, but yeah, it’s all private. [inaudible 01:15:19].
Lenny: All right. Maybe Burning Man, you could see your performance next year.
Nilan Peiris: Maybe.
Lenny: Nilan, thank you so much for being here. We talked a lot about word of mouth. I feel like this episode is going to spread 100% through word of mouth. Can’t wait for people to listen to it. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out, and how can listeners be useful to you?
Nilan Peiris: You can find me online on Twitter, nilanp, and always love to hear product feedback by email, by tweet, by LinkedIn. Generally by tweet is best, easiest for me to pick up, and my team to reach into directly. So, hit me up that way. And most useful for me, yeah, product feedback, and as I said, other people working on hard problems that need help, do reach out.
Lenny: Amazing. Nilan, thank you so much for being here.
Nilan Peiris: Thank you for your time. Take care, Lenny.
Lenny: Bye everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating, or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes, or learn more about the show lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| angel investing | 天使投资(angel investing) |
| attribution model | 归因模型 |
| Chief Product Officer | 首席产品官 |
| conversion rate | 转化率 |
| currency converter | 货币转换器 |
| customer-led growth | 客户主导增长(customer-led growth) |
| detractors | 贬损者 |
| EBITDA | EBITDA(息税折旧摊销前利润) |
| EKYC | EKYC(电子客户身份识别) |
| exposure | 敞口 |
| fintech | 金融科技(fintech) |
| flywheel | 飞轮(flywheel) |
| FX risk | 汇率风险 |
| holdout group | 对照组 |
| instant booking | 即时预订(instant booking) |
| instant transfer | 即时转账(instant transfer) |
| invisible hand | 无形之手(invisible hand) |
| KYC | KYC(客户身份识别) |
| market failures | 市场失灵(market failures) |
| Neobank | Neobank(新型数字银行) |
| net promoter score / NPS | 净推荐值(NPS) |
| onboarding flow | 引导流程 |
| P&L | 损益表 |
| pre-post analysis | 前后对比分析 |
| product pillars | 产品支柱 |
| promoters | 推荐者 |
| pull request | pull request |
| referral program | 推荐计划 |
| SEO | SEO(搜索引擎优化) |
| side hustle | 副业 |
| split test | 分流测试(split test) |
| squad | squad(小队) |
| tribe | tribe(部落) |
| viral coefficient | 病毒系数 |
| word of mouth | 口碑传播 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
如何驱动口碑传播 | Nilan Peiris(Wise 首席产品官)
如何驱动口碑传播 | Nilan Peiris(Wise 首席产品官)
文字记录
Nilan Peiris: 有些人专注于转化率(conversion rate),比如”我要把这个做得非常非常流畅”。这挺好的,你能获得一些增长。但要达到推荐(recommendation)的境界,你需要让用户惊艳到不行。你必须给他们一种他们之前不知道还能存在的体验。当你处于一个做前人从未做过的事情的位置时,你才能获得这种口碑。
访谈开场
Lenny: 欢迎来到 Lenny’s Podcast,在这里我采访世界级的产品领导者和增长专家,从他们在构建和增长当今最成功产品过程中来之不易的经验中学习。今天的嘉宾是 Nilan Peiris。Nilan 是 Wise 的首席产品官(Chief Product Officer),他在 Wise 已经工作了超过 11 年,基本上从公司创立之初就在了。如果你还不了解 Wise,你应该了解一下。他们让国际汇款变得极其简单和便宜。我是他们的常规用户和客户,而且因为产品非常出色,他们的增长主要依靠口碑传播。大约 70% 的增长来自口碑。在我们的对话中,Nilan 详细拆解了他们是如何让口碑传播对产品如此成功的。我不知道有哪个创始人不希望有更多的口碑增长,而 Nilan 的建议是我听过的最具体、最实用的关于如何真正驱动口碑增长的建议。我非常期待你收听这期节目,向 Nilan 学习。那么,在简短的赞助商信息之后,我为你带来 Nilan Peiris。
[赞助商广告已跳过]
Lenny: Nilan,非常感谢你来做客。欢迎来到播客。
Nilan Peiris: 谢谢你的邀请,Lenny。
Wise 是什么
Lenny: 你是 Wise 的首席产品官,不知道你是否知道,我是 Wise 每周活跃的忠实用户。为了让听众对 Wise 有一点了解,你能简单介绍一下 Wise 是做什么的吗?同时也可以分享一些数据,让大家感受一下 Wise 目前达到的规模。
Nilan Peiris: 我们致力于解决跨境资金流动相关的问题,即跨境汇款相当慢、实际上非常昂贵,而且操作起来可能很困难。我们通过三个产品来解决这个问题:我们的汇款产品,这是我们起步时的业务;我们的账户产品,可以理解为解决国际银行业务问题的个人和企业账户;最后我们还有一个企业级产品(enterprise product),将支撑前两个产品的底层基础设施嵌入到银行和人们日常使用的产品中。
来看具体数字的话,我们在这条路上已经走了一段了。目前我们每月处理约 120 亿美元的资金流动,同比增长 30% 到 40%。我们在所有路线上平均收取约 0.65% 的费用作为定价,而且我们已经持续盈利超过四年,EBITDA 利润率达到 20%。
但可能我最自豪的数据,也是所有这些当中最难实现的——上个月通过口碑传播获客的比例达到了 70%。具体来说,我们有 1600 万客户,每季度新增约 100 万,活跃用户约 1000 万。也就是说,在每季度首次加入 Wise 的 100 万人中,有 70 万是从朋友那里了解到 Wise 的。
口碑传播的衡量方法
Lenny: 这里面有几个数据让我印象非常深刻。一个是你们每季度新增 100 万用户,这太疯狂了。每个季度有 100 万新用户加入 Wise,这个数字令人震惊。另一个就是你刚才分享的口碑数据,基本上超过三分之二的人是通过口碑发现并加入 Wise 的。我想把我们对话的大部分时间花在口碑传播这个话题上。我认为你们能够提升口碑传播,以及口碑传播在增长中占比如此之高,是非常罕见的。
你本质上已经开发出了一套驱动口碑传播的系统,以及如何构建你的团队、目标、优先事项等等来充分利用这个增长渠道。所以我对口碑传播有无数的问题,第一个就是:你如何衡量口碑传播?你怎么知道 70% 的增长来自口碑?
Nilan Peiris: 简短的回答是:我们直接问客户。正如你所想象的,我们有一个归因模型(attribution model),从早期就开始建立了。它叠加了你掌握的所有引荐数据和关于网站访问的 Cookie 数据,所以你能大致了解来源。然后你还有搜索词方面的数据,我们进行抽样调查,向客户问一组相关问题,再将这些数据叠加到……网页追踪中显示为直接流量的那部分数据上,从而得出一个口碑传播的规模估算,这就是我们得出 70% 这个数字的方式。
Lenny: 具体来说,你们实际是怎么问的?网站上会弹出一个小弹窗吗?
Nilan Peiris: 实际上是整合在流程中的。最初构建的时候,我们觉得营销和获客本身也是产品的一部分,应该把这个环节无缝地编织到用户体验中去,这样我们以后才能更有效地做这件事。
从 NPS 到产品支柱
Lenny: 这其实跟 Airbnb 的做法如出一辙,他们的团队也用完全相同的方式来了解口碑传播在增长中占多大比例。就是当你访问 airbnb.com 的时候弹出的一个小插屏弹窗——“你是怎么知道我们的?“你可能以为要用什么花哨的方法才能搞清楚这些事,但其实就直接问,人们会告诉你他们是怎么听说你的。
Nilan Peiris: 对。
Lenny: 太棒了。好,那我们深入核心话题——在推动口碑传播显著增长方面,最大的转变是什么?是什么让它成为 Wise 如此重要的增长杠杆?
Nilan Peiris: 好,在我展开这个话题之前,我们先退一步想想:为什么要把重心放在这上面?早年我刚认识创始人 Kristo 和 Tyler 的时候,说来有趣,我是经人介绍认识他们的。那时就他们两个创始人,算不上有团队,产品也只是雏形。介绍人说:“Nilan,你得见见这两个人,他们的产品很棒,就是没有客户。“我跟他们坐在一起,我们投放了第一批 Google 广告。早期阶段你什么都试,盼着哪条路能走通。但退一步看,想想金钱本身就是终极的标准化商品。你要建立一个靠品牌驱动的汇款业务,而结果是人家的钱变少了——这件事本身就很难让人买单。品牌必须足够出色才行。你得让人觉得用完之后自己很特别,才愿意接受钱变少了这个事实。
所以我们一直在寻找的是:哪些渠道具备超强扩展性,能触达我们的全部目标受众,同时分发成本又极低?这是把我们引向口碑传播的原因之一。另一方面的挑战——等我们后面聊到营销时再说——在于我们的产品价格更低但品质更优,这意味着在某些付费渠道上,我们可用于营销的利润空间比竞品更小。这也是营销本质上就很困难的另一个原因。Wise 的营销团队非常出色,能在这些限制条件下做出卓越的成绩。
回到你的问题:我们在推动口碑传播方面做的最大的一件事是什么。我刚加入 Wise、开始琢磨口碑传播的时候,我花了不少时间跟美国和世界各地的朋友交流——Andrew Chen,还有其他几位增长领域的专家——那是十到十二年前的事了。当时的感觉是:谁做过这个?方法论是什么?该衡量什么?市面上几乎找不到什么现成的东西。所以我们必须自己摸索出路。第一步是去问客户,第二步是弄清楚到底是什么在驱动口碑传播。我们找到的最好代理指标是一个大多数人都听说过的东西,而且我们用得非常多——净推荐值(NPS)。
从很早开始,我们就持续向客户提问,你可能见过这个调查:“你会把 Wise 推荐给朋友吗?”
Lenny: 我这辈子从没见过。从来没被问过这个问题。
Nilan Peiris: 正是如此。最后你会看到一个 0 到 10 的量表。理论上,9 到 10 分是推荐者(promoters),0 到 6 分是贬损者(detractors),7 到 8 分则是对你的产品态度中性的人。有趣的地方在于,当我们把数据叠加起来看的时候——我们有口碑传播的数据,大约占 50% 多,同时还有一个推荐计划(referral program)。当我们把推荐数据叠加到 NPS 调查数据上时,发现了一个非常有意思的规律。
1 到 6 分的群体推荐率很低——不仅是推荐率,被邀请进来用户的转化率也很低。但当人们从 6 分进入 7 到 8 分区间时,他们告诉别人的人数翻了一倍。8 到 9 分,再翻一倍。9 到 10 分,又翻一倍。第一次看到这个现象时,你会觉得很震撼。我马上会回到你的问题,但这些是相当核心的基础,因为当你作为一名产品经理——就像你职业生涯中一直做的那样——你的工作之一就是弄清楚你要优化哪个指标?你要让整个公司围绕什么来对齐?如果你优化的是转化率这类指标,转化率提升 10%,你得到的是一次性的收益。
但如果你把 NPS 从 30% 提升到 50%,你提高的是整个用户群的病毒系数(viral coefficient)。也就是说,每一个经过产品的客户会多告诉 X 个人。当你把这个效应建模推演下去,提升 NPS 的 ROI 是极其巨大的。所以我们说:“好,这就是我们要聚焦的东西。那怎么提升它?“NPS 的第二层魔力在于:你不仅拿到了数字,还拿到了数字下面的评论。我记得我们搭建 NPS 调查的第一年,每周我们把所有评论邮件发给全公司——那时候公司还很小——这个做法我们持续了大约三四年的时间,每个人都能看到 NPS 的评论。
当你读这些评论的时候——当然现在我们上面搭了各种花哨的模型——但客户反复告诉我们的是同一件事:“让它更快,让它更便宜,让它更好用。“还记得我一开始提到的吗,“价格、速度、易用性”——我们其实是通过对这个问题的深入思考才总结出来的:如何让这个产品好到人们不仅会使用,还会主动推荐?
而那些客户说得非常清楚。那些堪称布道者的人——我们用的是”evangelical”这个词——正是那些获得了更便宜体验的人,那些四处谈论的人正是那些获得了更快体验的人。所以核心就是价格、速度和易用性。当你把它抽象出来、退一步看所有消费产品公司,它们都有自己的所谓产品支柱(product pillars),每个支柱下通常都有相应的 KPI。我们得到的第二个洞察是:当我们进入新市场时——比如第一次进入美国市场——如果我们的产品定价是 5.9% 而竞品是 6%,客户会使用我们的产品,但他们不会谈论我们。只有当我们便宜到 8 到 10 倍的时候,人们才开始谈论。那时候才真正出现了口碑拥护。
NPS 分值与口碑传播的倍增效应
Lenny: 让我在这里打断一下,帮你搭建一个框架,因为这部分极其有趣,我觉得有些人可能会错过其中一些真正精彩的洞察。我听到的是:你们首先有一个清晰的判断——由于商业模式的原因,增长必须靠口碑传播。每个用户赚的钱不多,能花的钱也不多。所以本质上就是:“我们怎么让口碑传播增长?“然后是:“好,我们需要让什么条件满足才能说服人们分享这个产品?“你们用了 NPS——我想很多人也在用,很多人也都知道”让产品变得更好,人们自然会谈论”——这些听起来像是”嗯,当然啦”。
但我听到你们真正独特的地方在于:第一,你发现了贬损者、6 分及以下群体与 7 到 8 分群体、以及 9 到 10 分群体之间存在着巨大的落差,而且每个层级都在翻倍。所以焦点就变成了:我们怎么把人从这个层级推到那个层级?第二,你们对 NPS 调查中的评论倾注了极大的关注,而不仅仅是看”我们有百分之多少的贬损者”这个数字。第三,我很喜欢你们构建了这些产品支柱——“我们就专注这三件事。这是推动这款产品口碑传播的三个杠杆。“我概括得差不多吧?
信任问题的破解
Nilan Peiris: 说得都对。当然,在当时,实际的情况要混乱得多。
Lenny: 是的。
Nilan Peiris: 一开始,每个人都觉得有二十件不同的事都很重要,然后慢慢地,你才意识到翻来覆去就是这几件事。打造一家成功的公司,很大程度上就是在建立一种信念——就是这几件事才是真正重要的。所以现在我会说价格、速度、易用性,听起来理所当然。但回到七八年前,我们还在互相争论——“到底是信任?还是这个?还是那个?“一直在试图搞清楚我们到底遗漏了什么。
Lenny: 其实知道这一点也很有用。听起来当然是价格和速度,但基于这些调查,有哪些你意识到其实不需要那么聚焦的东西?
Nilan Peiris: 哇,这个问题真的很难回答。因为你也知道,挑战在于每件事都很重要。
Lenny: 对。
Nilan Peiris: 是的。我们用的那些东西……我们有一个叫”便利性”的类别。而在便利性这个类别里面,其实藏了很多很多东西。而且你实际上可以通过联系率、转化率等各种不同指标来衡量,得到很多略微不同的答案。所以我觉得我学到的是……我没有一个很好的答案来回答哪些东西我们不需要——
Lenny: 嗯,就像你刚才提到的,信任,这个很有意思。显然信任很重要,但听起来也许——
Nilan Peiris: 信任当然重要。对,信任是个很好的话题。让我来讲讲信任这个问题。我在营销领域最深地遇到了信任问题。想象一下,你刚起步,有一家汇款公司,产品不错,价格很便宜。于是你投放了一个广告,上面写着”用 Wise 汇款,非常便宜”,会有人点击吗?有人会。有人会使用吗?确实有人用了。你也做了所有常规的信任元素。但我发现真正有帮助的是——让我想明白这件事的方式是——人们信任的是自己的朋友。这比我能在任何落地页上放的任何东西,都是一个强得多的信任信号。
即使是通过营销渠道进来的用户,他们也是被人告诉过的。营销可以辅助回忆,以及各种效果,因为他们的朋友告诉过他们。他们之后会有一个使用场景,然后去搜索,心想”啊,我记得,谁谁谁用过这个。“今天随着我们的品牌变大,确实也有用户是直接通过营销渠道来的。但信任本身作为一个孤立的问题,真的很难解决。你需要深入理解它到底是什么意思——“人们觉得我的钱不安全”、“我不知道这家公司靠不靠谱”——要把每一个这样的问题拆解开来,系统性地找到解决方案。我们在一定程度上做到了这一点,但真正的巨大捷径是:如果你给用户提供了好的体验,然后想办法让这个体验好到他们愿意推荐给别人,那就能绕过大量非常棘手的信任问题。
Lenny: 在那方面,你觉得什么最能提升信任?就是让更多人使用然后他们会分享给朋友,还是你做了什么其他的事情?
Nilan Peiris: 没有,真的就是让更多人使用,然后他们会分享给朋友。当然,我们在具体的信任感知方面也有很多经验,尤其是不同地区的差异,但在宏观层面上,这些都不如”让更多人使用”来得有力量。
从可用到推荐:令人惊叹的体验
回到这个话题,我也很想听听你的看法。正如你所说,很多人都接触过 NPS,也听过别人谈论它、谈论推荐。我在这方面的体会是,你必须非常努力才能获得推荐。要拿到 9 分或 10 分——我们的 NPS 是 70%,非常高。比 iPhone 和 Google 搜索还高。真的是非常高,已经超出常规量表了。
当我们进入一个新市场时,或者刚开始的时候,这个数字要低得多,大概 20 多、30 多。给你一个背景,银行和金融服务的 NPS 大概是 -30。大多数人不会推荐银行。所以起点本身就低。但我发现,当你做产品的时候,大多数创始人和团队在产品”能用”的时候就停下来了。接下来有些人会专注转化率——“我要把这个做得非常流畅”——这也挺好,你会多获得一些增长。
但要达到推荐的级别,你必须让用户大吃一惊。我们用的说法是,你必须给他们一种他们以前不知道还有可能的体验。当你做到了从未有人做过的事情,你才能获得推荐。
这个标准非常高。具体来说,这意味着要弄清楚如何实现即时转账。这意味着要把价格从 6 一直降到 0.35。因为跨境汇款存在系统性的基础设施问题,其中有些是之前没人解决过的。这些问题真的很难解决,需要花很多年,但一旦解决,回报是巨大的。
Lenny: 我非常喜欢这个作为框架——“我们怎么让用户大吃一惊”。说到底还是回到同一个问题:你怎么让人们愿意分享这个产品,驱动口碑传播——让他们大吃一惊。
我想深入聊聊,你们到底是怎么确定这些具体属性的。你刚才提到了 NPS 调查揭示了一些东西。你们是怎么确定即时转账和其他那些因素的?基本上就是看调查结果中出现频率最高的东西吗?
Nilan Peiris: 对,就是跟客户聊天、看调查结果,通过各种不同方式,价格会浮现出来,速度会浮现出来,易用性会浮现出来,然后它们汇总起来就是那几件事。
Lenny: 我想很多听众还是会觉得:“好吧,我们就是把产品做得超棒,然后它就会增长。“在某种意义上没错,但从另一个角度看,你分享的其实是一套非常简单的框架,告诉你具体该怎么做。再往深聊一点,当你看到其他人试图驱动口碑传播、驱动病毒式传播的时候,你觉得人们经常犯的错误是什么?在驱动口碑传播方面,你自己有没有踩过什么坑?
产品必须十倍优于现有方案
Nilan Peiris: 是关于增长率的问题。尤其是产品净增长,就是我们一直在讨论的这个。打个比方,我们要进入印度尼西亚这个新市场,最快的方式是——别人已经解决了往印尼汇款的问题,我们把那个基础设施拿过来,接入 Wise。
你知道吗?我们可以做到,也能获得一些用户。但它不会呈曲棍球棍式的增长。因为 我们没有从根本上改变跨境汇款中的问题。所以我们有一个信条:你必须打造一个比现有方案好十倍的产品。如果好十倍的产品已经存在了,那它本质上就还不存在。所以如果你只是在接入别人已有的东西,那就是一个误区。
从理想状态倒推
Nilan Peiris: 这种思路的出发点是非常合乎逻辑的:我怎样快速获得用户?我可以在做这件事时走捷径,但你慢慢会意识到那是白费力气。于是问题就变成了这类更难回答的问题——比如,把钱汇入某个市场的理论最低成本是多少?理论最高速度是多少?不仅仅是要做到即时、做到便宜,而是它实际上能低到什么程度?与其一点一点地渐进改良,好一点、好一点、再好一点——你永远到不了终点——不如我们花两年时间,直接到达那里?
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个思路。这也是我经常谈到的。我在 Airbnb 学到的一个理念就是从理想状态倒推,而不是从”怎么迭代、怎么一步步变好”往前推。就是说,如果我们能重新开始,创造一个理想的体验,那会是什么样子?然后再倒推——要实现它需要做什么?
Nilan Peiris: 在 Airbnb 有什么具体的例子吗?你们当时设定了一个什么理想状态,然后围绕它去构建的?
Lenny: 那个理想状态是这样的:创始人从 Pixar 请了一位分镜画师,把房东和房客的理想体验画成了分镜脚本。办公室里挂着这些分镜,大概有 12 幅,他们称之为关键帧——比如预订流程非常丝滑、到达住处后感到惊喜、出门去发现好玩的事情。这些分镜本质上就成了公司的愿景:让这些关键帧,也就是房东接待房客旅程中的每一个关键时刻,都尽可能令人惊叹。这就是其中一项,它基本上成了接下来几年的战略——让每一个关键帧都变得出色。
还有一个他们当时在做的大项目,是关于 Airbnb 的预订方式。不知道你还记不记得,如果你以前用过 Airbnb 的话——早期的 Airbnb 大多是”请求预订”,你给房东发消息说:“嘿,我能不能住你家?”
Nilan Peiris: 对。
Lenny: 结果发现 50% 的情况下房客要么被忽略,要么被拒绝,房东就是一句”不了,谢谢”。而现在据我所知,超过 80% 的预订都是即时预订——你直接预订就完成了,跟其他所有在线预订平台一样。这是一个巨大的转变,我也参与了这个项目。它的出发点就是:如果我们今天重新做 Airbnb,或者有人要颠覆 Airbnb,它会是什么样子?显然,就是你直接预订,不用坐在那儿等着别人愿不愿意接待你。这就是从”理想的 Airbnb 体验应该是什么”出发的思路。
如何把汇款成本降到极致
Nilan Peiris: 这太有启发了。我来分享几个 Wise 的故事和类比。我聊两个方向,先谈价格。这是一个很好的问题。汇款行业(Moneytrans)从[听不清]就存在了。几个人凑在一起,慢慢演变成在全球范围内流转数万亿资金,而普通零售消费者在全球范围内平均要支付大约 6% 到 7% 的费用。欧洲的一支小团队怎么起步,怎么想办法降低成本的?我们上线时费率是 0.5%,现在降到了大约 0.35%。这中间发生了什么变化?
Lenny: 对,我正想问,你们是怎么做到的?听起来所有人都想这么做。
Nilan Peiris: 好,我们来拆解一下。首先你可能想问的是:“我知道你们在做什么——你们每笔转账都在亏钱。“尤其是你们做的方式。但实际上我们已经连续盈利五年了。其中一个令人称奇的地方是,我们实际上每一笔交易都是盈利的。大概四五年前,我主导了一个项目,把我们的定价体系整合起来。具体来说,每个月你会收到各种账单,它们会出现在你的损益表里,但我们收到的每一张账单,都会把成本追溯分摊到产生这笔成本的客户或交易上。然后我们在成本之上加上毛利,这就是我们的价格。当你分析这些数据时,你会发现显然有 20% 的客户产生了 80% 的成本。你要做的就是把那 20% 的客户的价格提上去,让他们覆盖自己的成本,然后给其他所有人降价。同时团队拼命压缩这些成本,随着成本下降,你就进入了市场中不同的价格区间。这能理解吗,Lenny?
Lenny: 理解了。本质上就是让使用量更大的用户付更多费用,来补贴低频用户,而且这本质上也会驱动口碑传播。
Nilan Peiris: 完全正确,但精细程度到了这个地步——如果一个澳大利亚客户打电话来问”我的转账到哪了”,那通电话的成本会被追溯分摊到澳元兑英镑这条汇款线路。如果一个巴西企业需要提交 20 份文件才能通过验证、开设账户,那么验证这些客户的成本也会归到那条线路。在非常原子化的层面上,这种分摊就开始生效了。所以正如你所说,更昂贵的客户最终支付了他们的实际成本。
Lenny: 听起来更昂贵的市场也是如此。
Nilan Peiris: 没错,是那些系统性成本更高的市场。不过我们先说到这里。那成本到底有哪些?如果你看我们的损益表,在交易层面只有三项成本:人力成本、风险成本(已实现的风险损失),以及合作方费用。如果你的使命是让全球资金流动几乎不花钱,或者接近零,那你就必须把尽可能多的现金流投入到工程中去,用工程手段消除这三个问题。我们简单过一下,记住,我们的目标是比任何人都好十倍。那怎么在每一项上真正颠覆体验呢?
我跟你分享几个例子。先说风险。我们面临两类风险。一是汇率风险:你在 Wise 看到汇率,但可能稍后才把钱打过来。如果你转的是一百万美元,通常没法即时完成,可能需要两三天。汇率已经锁定了,但市场可能朝对我们不利的方向变动,我们就会亏损。这个成本,回顾来看,过去几年我们已经把它砍掉了一半。你可以想象,通过理解产品中哪些环节产生了敞口,加以限制,背后还有一系列算法支撑。但更有意思的是人力成本和合作方成本,我们一个一个来说。
人力成本就是我们的客服团队、运营团队。但我更愿意把它看作是”低质量的代价”。产品不够清晰,用户就会找客服;流程没有自动化,你就得招大量后台人员。我们在这方面每年大概有 20% 的效率提升。但回到你的问题,怎么实现质的飞跃?怎么做出十倍更好的体验?
我给你讲一个新加坡的故事,挺有意思的。大概六七年前我们进入新加坡,[听不清],我们申请了牌照。当时有两万人左右在等候名单上,说”Wise,请来新加坡吧”。我们去了,照常规跟监管方说:“嘿,能给我们一个牌照吗?“他们给了,但附加了一个条件——你们必须和每一位客户面对面见面。
Lenny: 好家伙。
在新加坡争取 EKYC 牌照
Nilan Peiris: 面对面验证。要知道,这些是人们日常使用的银行。人们通常会去银行网点,开户时进行面对面身份验证。我们说:“在澳大利亚、英国和世界上其他国家都不需要这样做。“对方回复:“在新加坡,根据你们的牌照条件,必须这样做。“所以我们真的派了一个小团队去新加坡,设了一个办事处,客户走完一个非常流畅的线上流程之后,就被邀请来跟团队见面。
可想而知,客户对此非常反感,而且成本显然很高。但奇妙的地方在于,我们没有让客户向我们抱怨,而是让他们去向政府抱怨。经过一年的游说,以及一年不可规模化的手工操作,我们最终拿到了新加坡全球首张 EKYC(电子客户身份识别)牌照。从此你只需要拍一张自拍、一张身份证照片,就能完成身份验证。
这就是我所说的比市场上任何对手好十倍的体验,由此带来了用户自发的推荐和口碑传播。让客户来帮你——这个闭环本身也是我们在口碑传播方面的一个重要经验。
使命驱动的口碑传播
Lenny: 产品团队参与了吗?你亲身参与了在新加坡的落地工作吗?
Nilan Peiris: 参与了。一般来说我们进入新市场时,会运作跨职能团队,但这次是一个身份验证团队。这个团队原本就是在你提交文件后负责审核验证的,他们亲自飞到新加坡,在现场面对面完成验证。
这里有一个有趣的问题:客户为什么会愿意帮一家公司?这是我们在口碑传播方面的另一个重要经验。我的理解是,人们推荐产品有理性的原因,这些我们已经讨论过了。但还有情感层面的原因——比较软性的东西,有人会称之为品牌,我更愿意称之为”使命认同”。
我们的使命是让全世界的钱能够即时流动,只需按一下按钮,成本几乎为零。这原本是非常内部的事情,我们以为只有公司内部才在意。大约八九年前我们做了第一次品牌重塑,把使命写下来发给了客户。那封邮件被转发带来的新客户数量,超过了我们做过的任何其他营销。我在会议上分享过这封邮件——它打破了所有营销规则:没有行动号召,没有注册按钮,什么都没有,但人们就是不断转发,说”你应该看看 Wise”。
当然不是所有客户都这样,但确实有一部分客户对此产生了强烈共鸣。我认为是他们看到了我们的真诚。我们不断压低价格,最初看起来像是为了加速增长的策略,但实际上是因为创始人们真的对汇款费用之高感到愤怒。他们找到了好的解决方案,至今仍然充满热情地解决这个问题。客户能看到这种真诚贯穿整个公司——看看 Wise 的员工构成,到处都是持工作签证的人、移民、在世界各地工作生活过的人,他们自己就深受这个问题困扰,并且满怀热情地想要解决它。所以客户愿意帮助我们。
口碑传播引擎的第二个部分,就是让这种使命感发挥作用。我们用某种方式实现了与客户的情感共鸣。退一步来看整个飞轮(flywheel):在价格上实现十倍改进,靠的是客户帮助我们做到,这又让我们进一步降价,带来更多客户,从而形成一个不断加速的飞轮。
客户主导增长的理念
Lenny: 你们构建的飞轮真是太厉害了。这让我联想到很多东西。一个是你提到的——一方面是人们真正需要的东西,另一方面是那些难以量化的、比较感性的东西。实际上我在 Airbnb 做即时预订(instant booking)那个产品时,用的框架也是这样的。
我基本上围绕两方面来制定路线图:一是让房客敢于即时预订所必需的实际功能;二是我称之为”感知”层面的东西,即人们对即时预订的恐惧。有大量工作只是为了说服他们——你以为会遇到各种可怕的房客,但现实中这几乎不会发生。即便真的出了问题,我们也会兜底。所以我认为当你想推动用户接受某样东西时,这是一个非常好的框架:想想他们实际需要什么?然后怎么消除他们脑海中那些并非现实的恐惧?听起来你们的突破点,正是通过分享企业的使命和价值观来实现的。
Nilan Peiris: 没错。这听起来很”空泛”,对吧?很企业套话,听起来不太可能奏效。但我觉得……以 Airbnb 来说,那种真诚是存在的。人们对于让双边的体验都做好是充满热情的,这一点很清楚。
退一步说,我个人非常推崇客户主导增长(customer-led growth),以及它如何转化为股东价值。回顾我工作过的每一家公司,总是存在两个清单:一个是为客户做事的清单,另一个是赚钱的清单。通常你会把赚钱的事都做了,客户清单上只挑两件事做了,然后就自称”以客户为中心的企业”。Wise 的特别之处在于——我想你在 Airbnb 大概也能看到类似的情况——我们只有一个清单,就是让客户满意的待办事项,并且按照对真正困难的问题的影响程度来排序。当你解决这些真正困难的问题时,会对客户产生巨大的影响,进而对你的增长和股东价值产生巨大的影响。
如何判断对客户的实际影响
Lenny: 这确实很有意思。Airbnb 不完全是这样,不过近年来确实越来越接近了,更多是”让我们打造出色的产品,而不是过于关注实验”。所以 Wise 的优先级排序基本上来自”客户在告诉我们什么”,这很引人注目。我想追问一下,你们是怎么判断对客户的实际影响的?怎么做出决定的?是根据客户提出需求的频率?还是”我们需要降低成本,所以优先做最能压低价格的事情”?
Nilan Peiris: 在发展初期,你确实需要做分流测试(split test)。我们来拆解一个关于价格的分流测试。你系统性地降低了成本,假设我们降低了成本,问题来了:我们要不要降价?是把节省的部分全部让利给客户,还是自己保留一部分?在价格上做分流测试,如果测试结果意味着你的收入会增加,那就说明你把价格降低了 10%,而那天市场上恰好有超过 10% 的潜在客户——他们看到一英镑的时候不会转化,但看到 90 便士,降了 10%,就会说:“一英镑的时候我不会买,但 90 便士我愿意。”
Nilan Peiris: 这其实挺难做到的。“信念”这个词我经常用——你会逐步建立起一种信念:价格才是关键。通过这种渐进式的分流测试(split test),需要很长时间才能走到那一步,但到某个节点你会说:“实际上,我已经有足够的信念了。“所以 Wise 的核心有一个战略性押注:如果我们拥有成本最低的平台,而且速度极快、质量极高,全球的资金流就会转向我们。一步一步地缓慢推进,试图追踪每一步的增量回报,其实反而更慢。总会有一个时刻你会说:“我对投资价格很有信心。我对投资速度也很有信心,因为我知道这终将获得回报——不一定是这个月,但最终一定会。而且我需要在所有三个杠杆上都取得进展才能达到目标。“这样说得通吗?
Lenny: 完全理解。所以本质上,在这条工作线上,你们为降低价格所做的一切,并没有一个实验去验证”这对增长或收入有什么影响”,而是”我们知道降低价格会帮助我们增长,所以我们只追踪价格降了多少”。我想象中目标就是每个季度或每年把价格降低某个幅度,想办法让它变得更便宜。
Nilan Peiris: 对,就是这样,你说得没错。而这种信念是核心。
“你无法通过分流测试走向热爱”
这种做法也延伸到了我们在用户体验方面的产品管理方式。内部有一句很经典的话,我相信你也听过:“你没法通过分流测试走向热爱。“这种以实验驱动的产品管理方式——往墙上扔一堆东西看看什么能粘住——总的来说我们不太提倡。显然这种方式多少会有一点,但总体上不推荐。主要原因是工程成本很高,而你完全可以通过其他方式弄清楚客户真正在乎什么,通过我们之前谈到的一些方法去了解,然后动手构建。
有一个我很喜欢分享的故事。我有一位产品经理加入了我们的推荐好友团队、病毒增长团队和邀请团队,过一个季度后,我问他:“你打算做什么?“他说:“我要测试所有东西。我要测试着陆页,测试邮件标题,测试整个推荐计划,所以在跑完所有测试之前我还不知道,然后我会回来告诉你我要做什么。”
我说:“你不能这么做。我给你三周时间,你只选一件事情来改变,但你要去跟人聊,获取定量洞察,建立你自己的直觉,判断什么才是重要的,然后上线、提交测试,看看效果如何。“关键就在于建立关于”什么重要”的信念。我观察到团队是如何慢慢建立起这种信念的——同时你需要数据在那里确保它不会变成一种自负,对吧?这种信念能让你做出比单纯实验大得多的改变,而且它迫使你真正搞清楚”这里到底要解决什么问题”,以及”我怎样把它解决得非常好”。这样说得通吗,Lenny?你不同意吗?这话有点挑衅性,有些人非常坚定地支持专家主导的方式。
Lenny: 不,方法有很多种,没有唯一正确的路,而且 Wise 的方式确实有效。所以我不会反驳。
信念驱动而非试错驱动
Lenny: 所以我听下来基本上是,Wise 的实验文化不是对所有想法都去跑测试、扔出一堆点子看效果,而更像是”我们先决定相信这个方向,然后在那里加大投入,可能跑一个实验,甚至可能不跑。“大概是这样理解的吗?
Nilan Peiris: 对,对,对,对。你自己在实际中见过类似的做法吗?
Lenny: 很有意思,跟 Airbnb 有很多相似之处,因为 Airbnb 现在也在做类似的事情。最近有一个转变——从过去一切都是数据实验驱动,变成了更多是”让我们打造创始人真正兴奋的、高管从用户那里听到需求的出色产品。我们就直接做出很棒的东西然后上线,我们相信产品好了增长自然会来。“Airbnb 现在发展得很好。
Nilan Peiris: 是的,这种做法的挑战在于,它确实会变成一种风险——就是”好吧,这只是某人的意见,我觉得应该是 X”,对吧?每个人都觉得自己是 Steve Jobs 那种类型。
Lenny: 对,没错。
Nilan Peiris: 你需要某种方式利用数据来建立这种信念,证明为什么这是我们应该做的,但要学会更快地建立信念——有一点微妙的区别。所以,不太是产品经理或者我说”嘿大家,我觉得应该是 X”,而更多是数据驱动的,同时也由定性洞察驱动。
Lenny: 就我个人而言,我通常倾向于跑实验——先把这一点说清楚。但我认为在 Wise 这个场景下,这种方式是有道理的——你就是知道”我们需要做这三件事:让它更便宜、让它更快。“你不需要对每一个想法都做 AB 测试。不测试一切可能的主要弊端是,你可能在过程中损害了某些东西,而自己并不知道。
Nilan Peiris: 嗯,对,所以我们确实会……你说得没错。但从样本量的角度来看,这是很不同的事情——你想做一个 beta,了解负面影响,用一个较小的对照组,这跟要达到统计显著性的测试是完全不同的。定义”某个东西是否在出问题”的标准,一般来说跟”这是否是测试中的一个显著结果”是两回事。
绩效评估中的影响力衡量
Lenny: 顺着这个思路,实验的另一个好处是你能知道具体的影响。这样团队成员就能说清楚”这是我这个季度、这一年做了什么。“你怎么看待绩效评估、个人影响力这些事情?
Nilan Peiris: 这个问题很好。这个确实是持续在讨论的话题。一般来说,我会问团队他们的影响力是什么。每个季度,每个团队,“你们交付了什么?”……Kristo 会问这个,而我一般问的是:“有多少人用了?对交易量有什么影响?“等等。我们有分析师团队,可以通过前后对比分析、各种技术手段来回答这些问题,或者完全通过分流测试。我们一直有这样的讨论——当分析拖慢了我们的速度,而分析结果并不会改变我们的决策时,这就成了问题。
一般来说就像你说的,团队需要验证,主要是给自己一个交代,可能也跟绩效有点关系,但不会太多。所以有一些方法可以获得一些判断,虽然不如分流测试那么严谨,但我们在这些场景中会用到。更多只是获取一些……你要理解,做分流测试会拖慢发布节奏,团队会有顾虑。但如果是为了获取影响力数据,而你已经知道自己不会回滚,那就直接上线,尽量减少对验证的依赖。
口碑增长与实验的权衡
Lenny: 我觉得有一个有趣的相关性——那些靠口碑传播增长的产品,往往不需要对每件事都做实验。Airbnb 也是,根据我最近看到的数据,70% 的增长来自口碑传播。然后你想想那些社交类消费应用,大部分增长靠的是用户之间的分享,很多产品最初就是靠创始人直觉判断什么是好产品。比如 Snapchat,以及最近的一些移动社交应用。所以我觉得,作为创始人,也许应该更信任自己的直觉。但随着公司规模增长,这会变得困难。你必须授权,信任团队成员做出正确的决策。对于团队做出的、不做实验就无法确定正负影响的决策,你在信任团队这方面有什么心得吗?
Nilan Peiris: 就像我说的,我们做的几乎所有事情,都有某种方式来了解其影响力,这一点始终存在。但也确实有团队做了一些事情,让 Kristo 或我说”这太疯狂了,不会有人用的。“我们的文化是鼓励人们去做他们相信的事情。
Lenny: 有具体例子吗?
Nilan Peiris: 有几个。一个我的 SEO 负责人经常提到的例子是货币转换器。Wise 主页本身就是一个不错的货币转换器,上面有一个还可以的转换功能。货币转换器的搜索流量非常大。如果你点击 Wise 的链接,现在它稍微藏在”发送”入口下面,但确实在那里,挺酷的,货币转换器。
Lenny: 哦,我在底部看到了。
Nilan Peiris: 但如果你在 Google 上搜货币转换器,流量是巨大的,Wise 主页上的那个转换器自然会包含我们的价格,还能让用户注册。那么,我们应不应该做一个独立的货币转换器?要不要去捕获这些流量?在那里推自己的产品是不是更有效?你可以理解为什么当时是 Kristo——其实不是我——说”这个想法太疯狂了。“但创始人和 SEO 团队还是去做了,现在访问量已经非常大了。我们推出了货币转换器应用,人们通过它发现 Wise。这是一个非常好的例子——创始人说了”不”或者说”这不是个好主意”,但我们还是去做了,而且做成了。
找到永恒不变的用户需求
Lenny: 太棒了。我在想我们聊的这些内容,脑子里有几个想法。一个是让我想到亚马逊——Jeff Bezos 意识到有些东西对亚马逊来说是永远成立的:人们永远想要更便宜的价格、更快的配送,还有一件事我忘了。感觉你们也找到了类似的东西。对于一个汇款产品,人们永远想要的三件事是什么?然后就把这三件事做到极致,在你们看来,做到比任何竞争对手好十倍。
Nilan Peiris: 对,完全正确。关于业务方面有一个很好的例子,我们跟投资者和市场沟通时经常提到,上市也帮助验证了这个降价的故事。但有趣的是,情况发生了变化。我们最初做的是转账,后来发展出了账户业务,再后来又做了企业业务。变化在于我们意识到,如果你只用账户转 10 美元,你不会下载一个 app 来做这件事。如果只做一次,你直接在银行做就行了。这就是推出 Wise 账户背后的洞察。我们聚焦于——国际银行业务存在一个真正的问题。
拿企业来说,一个很好的例子。假设你是一家欧洲的企业,有一个澳大利亚的客户,你想收款。你给对方发一张欧元的发票,然后某天,一些钱会到你的账上,你也不知道怎么回事。对方付的是澳元,中途被三家银行兑换了,你根本不知道最终到账多少。你真正想做的是用澳元开票,然后收到澳元到你的银行账户。你可能还有人需要用澳元支付,所以你想把钱留在那里。但要开一个澳大利亚银行账户,我发现,你需要飞到澳大利亚,在澳大利亚注册一家公司,带着所有文件去银行,然后他们才会给你一个澳大利亚银行账号。
Lenny: 天哪。
Nilan Peiris: 而用 Wise,三次点击就能获得一个澳大利亚银行账号。任何人都可以,任何企业都可以。你会得到一个澳大利亚余额,还有美国的、英国的、瑞士的。对于收国际款项的企业来说,这简直是杀手级功能。然后我们做的下一个大的跳跃是面向消费者的。所以,如果你所有的银行业务都在美国,你可能不需要用 Wise。但如果你经常使用另一种货币,那你可能应该把 Wise 当作你的主力银行。
有些人,比如,住在一个国家但用另一种货币领薪水,Wise 作为账户来管理这种情况非常合适。我们发现,在各市场推出账户后,来自该市场的跨境交易量增加了大约 20% 到 30%。这就是一个很好的例子——虽然它不是价格,也不是速度,你可以争辩说它算是易用性,但我们必须进化产品才能触及下一批用户。这说得通吗,Lenny?
Lenny: 完全说得通。而且这一切都回到一个核心——从澳大利亚转账的人,理论上最理想的情况是什么?我听到的就是,找到所有阻碍用户的小摩擦点。在这个例子里就是:“好,我们给你开一个澳大利亚银行账户,你什么都不用操心。”
Nilan Peiris: 对,就是这个意思。然后你就会面临各种新的问题,因为现在我们有大约 125 亿美元的存款,这可不是个小数目。客户下一个痛点就是:“我想要收益。“而我们非常刻意地没有银行牌照。你必须想办法,我们怎么解决这个问题?我们现在把客户的资金投入政府债券、美国国债,当你用卡消费时,系统会动态地卖出这些债券。这就是我们如何给你提供利息的方式,目前大概是 5% 左右,取决于当前债券收益率。
Lenny: 对,利率确实挺高的,不管这是好事还是坏事。稍微拉远一点看,对于那些开始……脑子里已经开始转的人来说,他们会想:“好,我想思考口碑传播的问题,想推动口碑传播。我要去看我的调研结果,我要找出那些驱动口碑传播的产品支柱,我要想怎么把东西做到好十倍。“总的来说,对于一个刚开始接触这些的人,你会对他们说什么?他们应该怎么着手?有没有更高层面的关键心得,就是关于如何推动一个产品的口碑传播?
Nilan Peiris: 我觉得归根结底还是回到与客户对话,这是我们一直在反复追问的问题。要做到好十倍需要什么?然后你在脑海中明确了需要做什么,而通常那就是所有人都看过、然后觉得不可能的那件事。再举一个合作伙伴方面的例子。与其去找一家更便宜的银行作为合作银行,你想想,最便宜的银行合作伙伴是中央银行。想象你是一家创业公司,你到底怎么才能在中央银行开一个账户?
但这种思维方式——我们现在确实在英格兰银行、新加坡金管局、澳大利亚储备银行都有账户。每一项都和当初在新加坡做面对面验证一样艰难。花了数年的游说和各种努力才实现。但关键是把目标设到那么高的地方。这才使你能打造出好十倍的产品。这才是口碑传播的来源。所以第一步是极其清楚地了解你的客户关心什么、担心什么问题。然后一旦你明确了这些,就像你说的,我怎样才能彻底解决它,最好能做到什么程度?然后最难的部分是弄清楚如何推进。
Lenny: 你说的这些东西,听起来要么是不可能的——“我们不可能做到”,要么就是非常非常难。很多公司、很多创始人、团队会说:“好吧,我们不可能在这里创建一家银行。我们不可能给每个人开一个澳大利亚银行账户。“你认为你们的文化或解决问题的方法中,有什么是 Wise 独有的,让你们说:“不,我们要花三年时间把这件事搞清楚,因为它就是这么重要?”
Nilan Peiris: 我觉得有两点。第一,创始人确实有一种理念:除非你在做艰难且全新的事情,否则就是在浪费时间。所以我觉得这也贯穿了整个文化。所以人们加入 Wise 时往往会有一种强烈的落差感,因为他们觉得:“好,我来这里,随便调调弄弄就行了。“你会告诉他们:“不,实际上产品团队的文化是,我们极度激励去做难事,这才是被奖励的。”
而要创造这种保护空间是很难的。你可以想象,在早期那些月里,增长缓慢,市场部门有人想打开营销的金钱阀门,而你要保持专注、一步步啃那些难啃的骨头,同时还要获得管理层的支持让团队继续做这些事情,这确实很难。而且每天上班也很艰难——你可以想象在新加坡,面对面验证客户,心里想着:“这毫无进展,这毫无进展,这毫无进展。“然后突然之间局面就变了。这就是在 Wise 推进事情非常真实的感受。我们努力去认可这一点,并创造一个能支撑这种做法的文化。
Lenny: 感觉你们对这些事情也有很大的耐心。不会是那种”我们必须达成这个季度目标,为什么还没在新加坡建好银行?”
Nilan Peiris: 对,没错。
值得谈论的产品
Lenny: 很好。我脑子里还转着另一个比喻,是 Seth Godin 谈到过的。不知道你有没有听过这个人,他是一个营销大师,他有一个概念:你要打造值得谈论的东西(remarkable),因为如果一个东西值得谈论,它就会传播开来。如果你想想 remarkable 这个词,就是值得被谈论的东西,本质上就是口碑传播。
Nilan Peiris: 对。
Lenny: 所以这就是他的使命和他的——我不知道该怎么叫——给人们的建议就是:打造值得谈论的东西,打造人们愿意谈论的东西。显然,你们一直在做的事情正是如此。这其实很好地过渡到了我想聊的下一个话题,就是你如何组建团队、如何激励团队、如何组织团队来实现所有这些事情。所以,也许可以先大致聊聊,在实现这些非常艰难的目标方面,你对工作结构、激励机制、目标设定之类的思考,有什么独特之处吗?
宏观与微观团队结构
Nilan Peiris: 这个问题有两个独特的视角。一个是宏观结构层面,一个是微观结构层面。在宏观层面上,如果你去看所谓的国际银行,它们其实并不真正”国际”。我不知道你有没有在不同国家之间搬过家,但比如说你在美国花旗银行开了账户,然后你去英国的花旗银行,你的花旗账户在英国是不存在的。你必须去英国的花旗银行重新开一个账户。而且实际上,在一些这样的银行里,在你自己的账户之间转账居然算国际汇款。这太疯狂了。
所以退后一步看市场的格局,一端是国际银行,但它们用的是本地技术栈。比如说花旗或汇丰,美国有一套核心银行系统,英国一套,欧洲一套,但它们有深度的本地整合,所以直接接入了当地的支付体系。花旗在美国与美联储等机构有合作关系。
另一端是像 PayPal 这样的公司。它是一家科技公司,拥有单一全球技术栈。它在澳大利亚运行的 PayPal 并不是美国之外的一个额外版本,但它没有深度连接。它没有五个中央银行账户,什么都没有。我认为 Wise 处在中间——我们拥有单一全球技术栈,同时有深度的本地基础设施。
从技术角度来看,退后一步想想这件事。这实际上是非平凡的(non-trivial)设计问题。拿注册流程来说。我们有全球产品团队,产品团队中有一部分叫做全球产品团队。我们有一套统一的注册流程来为你开通 Wise 账户,无论你在巴西、纽约还是澳大利亚,运行的都是同一套代码。
全球产品的本地化挑战
Nilan Peiris: 澳大利亚和巴西的监管要求截然不同,而且在任何一个国家都不是非黑即白的。所以有一系列……你会遇到很多不应该做的事情,比如让某些人不应该获得账户访问权限。然后你还需要检查这些人没有在使用账户,不同的司法管辖区有完全不同的要求。比如说日本,你必须拍摄身份证正面、背面和侧面的照片。这是世界上唯一一个要求这么做的国家。
Lenny: 哇。
Nilan Peiris: 想象一下你是负责注册流程的产品经理,有人告诉你,“设计一个注册流程来给用户开通银行账户……” 光是收集世界上每个国家的需求就难以想象,因为彼此之间几乎没有相似性。你不能直接说”我拿美国的流程”,然后复制到别的地方。它们非常、非常、非常不同。
要把所有需求梳理清楚就要花很长时间,然后还要将这些需求标准化到主模型中,再想清楚如何围绕这些需求来组织数据结构。所以问题就变成了:什么样的组织结构能够帮助我们发现在注册流程这个领域中,领域模型应该长什么样。最终你会有一个全球产品团队,负责转化率等整体 KPI。同时你会有本地、区域团队,负责各自市场的转化率和 KYC 成本,并向全球产品代码库贡献代码。
所以我们实行的是弱产品所有权——任何人都可以提交代码变更和 pull request,而中心团队负责把控愿景。但这个愿景演进的唯一方式,是从市场一线团队获取反馈,因为他们不断在推进各种工作。通过这个过程,一些公共构件开始浮现,比如其他市场也像日本一样,于是你开始将这部分拆分出来,为其创建子类型,模型就这样逐步浮现出来。
本地与全球的协作机制
在这种结构下,需要优化的东西非常困难。每个全球化企业都面临这个问题:如何让本地和全球之间的协作运转起来?但与其他企业不同的是,大多数企业的做法——你可能也知道——通常是先有美国市场,然后有”国际业务”。国际业务通常是个争议地带,所有人都在争抢自己需求的优先级,对吧?
Lenny: 没错。
Nilan Peiris: 而在我们这里,本地团队可以直接向代码库提交代码,全球团队则面临着协调的挑战。随着时间的推移,我们围绕区域化结构的不同部分、不同对象的涌现,创建了各种子团队。但总而言之,这是第一个问题——全球化问题。
另一方面,这在相当程度上是我们独有的,因为大多数金融科技(fintech)公司通常只在一个市场运营。比如 Robinhood,在美国做了之后来英国,后来又撤回美国。Monzo 只在英国,N26 只在欧洲,Up 在澳大利亚。因为他们的本土市场已经足够大,而应对一个监管机构本身就需要大量工作。而我们的第二个复杂之处在于,我们必须存在于所有这些市场中,因为我们天然就是国际化的。所以我们的很多思考是:如何把这一点转化为竞争优势,哪个客户群体真正需要这一点?这也正是我们将定位聚焦于国际账户的原因。
Lenny: 这一次又一次地回到同一个主题——做困难的事情,让用户惊叹——感觉这就是 Wise 的公式。
Nilan Peiris: 我觉得你基本上说对了。这是关于组织结构的一个方面,即全球与本地的问题。第二个方面则是一段更长的探索历程。我们在早期的时候,以自治的独立团队运行,每个团队都聚焦于各自的 KPI,这些 KPI 向上汇总就是:更便宜、更快速、更易用。你可以想象一棵 KPI 树,团队围绕各自的 KPI 节点运作,每个季度他们会汇报如何推进自己的 KPI,等等。这种方式在一定程度上是奏效的。我们做规划的方式是,每个季度每个团队会站起来讲述自己的计划,从其他团队获取反馈,然后继续推进。这在团队数量到 30 个之前还行得通,然后你从一下午能搞定变成要花两天时间,就觉得”哇,不行了”。
向 Spotify 模式演进
于是我们开始转向 Spotify 模式,将团队归组为 squad(小队),再组成 tribe(部落)。如今,我认为自治的层级在 squad 层面。Squad 围绕产品组建——比如我们有 Wise 账户 squad、企业业务 squad、Wise Platform 即我们的企业级产品 squad,还有北美 squad 负责北美产品、拉美 squad 等等。还有金融犯罪防控等等。
Squad 内部是各个团队,squad 的负责人……想象你是 Wise 账户的负责人,你需要对账户有愿景。你需要指出它的方向,确保你的团队朝着这个方向前进。团队不能随意做自己想做的事,而是需要与整体愿景保持一致,而你要对这个 squad 的成果负责。Squad 归入 tribe,tribe 提供整体领导力,对 squad 施以轻微的、轻触式的策略引导。这大致就是我们的组织结构,以及我们是如何逐步演进到这个结构的。
Lenny: 关于口碑传播这个话题,还有什么你觉得值得分享的吗?不管是你的思考方式、团队结构,或者其他什么?
推荐计划中的一次意外突破
Nilan Peiris: 还有一个小点我想分享,是关于营销和推荐的。这个对我来说非常有趣。我们一直在做推荐计划(referral program),和 Airbnb 一样,我们已经运营了 12 年。12 年之后,你基本上已经测试了所有能测试的东西。正如我所说,到了这个阶段,你真的已经把所有方案都测过了。所以当有人提出一个方案带来了 300% 的提升时,你会觉得”哇,这太有意思了,发生了什么?”
Lenny: 哇,我很期待这个。
Nilan Peiris: 我就分享这一个案例,因为它确实很有趣。我们运行过很多种”推荐好友”的变体,提供不同类型的奖励。我们试过送巧克力,试过送钱,试过 200 美元、500 美元、10 美元,你拿一些、我拿一些,各种形式。大致趋近于双方各得 100 美元,一般来说这是一个甜蜜点。总之,我们那边有一位相当有创意的产品经理。他又去跟客户交流,发现了一个很有意思的东西——当你在 Wise 完成一笔转账后,最后你会收到一封邮件,邮件上写着”做得好”,然后说”你的钱已经到了对方账户,你在这次转账中省了 10 美元。“他获得了一个非常棒的洞察:人们相信自己省了钱,但他们不相信那个数字。然后他开始思考,怎样才能让他们相信这个数字?
Lenny: 这听起来确实是这样。
Nilan Peiris: 所以有趣的部分是他的方法。他和一位设计师坐下来,画出了另一版邮件的草图,然后下楼去咖啡馆,拿给人们看,问他们的想法,不断迭代,最后做出了一个图表。这个图表是这样的——当你进行跨境汇款时,它会弹出来,藏在”比较”按钮后面。这个图表展示了通过你的银行汇款时,有多少钱隐藏在汇率里:这是你汇出的金额,这是他们通过汇率吃掉的费用,这是你能看到的显性费用,因为银行的费用都藏在汇率里。然后对比 Wise 的情况。
他们把这个图表迭代到人们看到后会说:“天哪,我再也不会用银行了。这个数字……太疯狂了。“然后他们把这个图表放在你完成汇款后的成功页面上,显示”你省了这么多”,并加上了一个分享按钮和邀请好友的按钮,这才是真正推动分享的关键。快进到今天,我们现在……这其实相当困难。我们现在在全球有大约 70 个银行账户。世界上排名前三的银行,我们每天都登录进去,然后把一堆不同汇款线路的价格和报价记录到文件里。你可以想象这有多难。我个人名下大概还有 17 个这样的账户,都是我在世界各地开的,帮团队起步用的。但这就是我们最大的口碑传播增长案例之一,或者说推荐机制的洞察之一。我从这个比较工具获得的洞察,变成了我们的营销素材,上了我们的首页,无处不在。
Lenny: 你说这让分享率翻了三倍?
Nilan Peiris: 对,分享率翻了三倍。我们之前一直都有完成汇款后的分享按钮,但把这个图表放上去之后效果完全不同。这也让我思考一个问题——我想听听你的看法——关于产品营销的定义:客户使用了产品,他们觉得自己获得了某个价值,但当他们真正认识到这个价值时会发生什么。我们在速度方面也有类似的发现,我们做即时转账(instant transfer)的时候,客户并不知道它是即时的。
当你收到即时转账时,最后会有一个很炫的动画效果,你会意识到钱已经在对方账户里,可以随时使用了。同样,当这个功能上线时,推荐率出现了大幅跃升,但人们需要知道这件事发生了。缩小你实际做到的事情和人们感知到的事情之间的差距,这就是我所定义的”产品内的产品营销”。而且我学到,这本身就是一门独立的学科。
Lenny: 这是一个非常棒的洞察。这呼应了我们之前谈到的现实与感知的框架,只不过角度相反——不是让人们去接受某个东西,而是让他们认识到你做了什么,让它变得令人惊叹,让他们理解它到底有多令人惊叹。
Nilan Peiris: 没错。这也是我在不断学习的东西,随着我们一步步往前走。
Lenny: 这太有意思了。在我们进入非常精彩的快问快答环节之前,我知道你还做了一些公益方面的工作,我想给你一个机会分享一下你在做什么。
天使投资与市场失灵
Nilan Peiris: 谢谢,Lenny。与其说是公益,不如说是从天使投资(angel investing)延伸出来的,这样说可能更准确。我投资初创公司,主要是金融科技(fintech)领域的,有使命感的创始人,口碑传播类的项目——就是我们一直在聊的这些我热爱的东西。与其说是投资,不如说是帮助,就是通过天使投资这条路走下来的。后来我意识到,我最热衷的是市场失灵(market failures)问题。一般来说,我发现无形之手(invisible hand)能确保大多数人类需求通过市场得到满足,但有一些需求没有被满足。有一些很棒的初创公司在这个领域非常努力地工作,比如英国的 Beam,在做无家可归者的问题;还有加纳的 Affinity,一个 Neobank。这类事情是我最热衷的。所以如果你们的听众中有人认识任何在做类似事情、试图解决这些难题的人,一定要联系我,随时愿意聊。
Lenny: 太棒了。我们会在节目简介里附上你提到的那两个项目的链接,方便大家查看。说到这里,我们进入了非常精彩的快问快答环节。准备好了吗?
Nilan Peiris: 来吧。
Lenny: 开始。你有两三本最常推荐给别人的书?
快问快答:书籍推荐
Nilan Peiris: 两本,恰好是光谱的两端。一本是……听起来可能很装,《罪与罚》(Crime and Punishment),另一本是 Salman Rushdie 的《午夜之子》(Midnight’s Children)。我读很多书,非常热爱阅读,主要是小说。我不读……非虚构对我来说太像工作了。所以我一般需要在睡前读点什么来让大脑放松下来。通常是比较逃避现实的那种。但我很好奇你怎么看——对我来说,作家就是用文字创造人物的人。
就像你可以说一个画家好不好,看他画的人物像不像本人,但想象一下你用文字创造出一个人,那个人感觉是真实的,所以他们一定对人性的某些方面有深刻的洞察。而最令人惊叹的是,你通过阅读学到了关于”作为人意味着什么”的东西。所以在这个光谱的一端是陀思妥耶夫斯基的《罪与罚》,一个人杀了人,然后这件事把他的内心吞噬了。这是一本非常了不起的书,没有听起来那么沉重。但这类书真的很棒,所以我经常推荐这本。
光谱的另一端是有时你读一本书,里面有一句话,每个词都像是精心缝合在一起的,同样是艺术品——在这方面,Rushdie 对我来说可能是巅峰。《午夜之子》讲的是印度分治的故事,通过一个隐喻来呈现,非常了不起。
快问快答:电影与电视剧
Lenny: 回答得真美。最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
Nilan Peiris: 天哪,我不是……我不太看电视,但我们给孩子们租了《芭比》。那部大概是我看的最后一部电影了。
Lenny: 我刚也看了。太好看了。
Nilan Peiris: 是的。
Lenny: 现在其实可以流媒体看了。不知道这期节目什么时候上线,但它刚刚——
Nilan Peiris: 哦,真的吗。
Lenny: 对,你可以在家看了。不过不便宜,在美国好像是 20 美元。
Nilan Peiris: 天哪。
Lenny: 你面试候选人时最喜欢问的面试问题是什么?
最喜欢的面试问题
Nilan Peiris: 对,我只问两个问题。时间长了,我精简到只问两个。第一个大概是我最喜欢的,就是——现在让你最沮丧的是什么?不是问你为什么离开,而是你现在工作的地方最让你沮丧的是什么?因为人们总是会告诉你他们为什么想加入 Wise,或者想加入你所在的公司,但那其实没什么意思。真正有意思的,是弄清楚他们在逃离什么。通常那边有某种坏掉的东西,真的让他们很上火。但更有意思的是,他们一直没能修好它。所以问这个问题,不断追问,你就会越来越善于判断他们的极限在哪里——他们碰到了什么,在什么地方卡住了?你会想,“好吧,这个东西你在这儿每天、每周都会碰到吗?还是……你应该没问题。” 这就是我问这个问题的原因。
Lenny: 我太喜欢这个了。你最近发现的最喜欢的、让你真的很喜欢的产品是什么?
Nilan Peiris: 我最近换用了 Arc Browser。
Lenny: 那就是我用的。
Nilan Peiris: 它的引导流程简直好到令人惊叹。
Lenny: 我完全有同感。我都忍不住发推了,就是那种……
Nilan Peiris: 对,我把这个发给了我的引导团队,发给了所有人。我喜欢的一点是,很明显,如果你试图用 Chrome 的方式来用 Arc,你会非常沮丧。但如果你按照他们希望你用的方式来用,体验就会非常棒。所以他们想出了怎么让人们以全新的方式来使用这个产品,而且他们几乎成功让我用对了方式。我还在适应中稍微有点挣扎,但我觉得这真的非常聪明。
Lenny: 选得太好了。我们请过 Josh,就是纽约 Browser Company 的 CEO,上过播客。如果你对 Arc 的故事感兴趣,一定要去听那一期。
人生信条
Lenny: 好,下一个问题。你最喜欢、最常对自己重复的人生座右铭是什么?愿意分享的?有什么想到的吗?
Nilan Peiris: 决定成功的,是你重新站起来的速度。
Lenny: 我太喜欢这句话了。
Nilan Peiris: 这是我最紧紧抓住的一句话,因为在高速增长的公司里你会被不断击倒,这显然挺……显然会打击你——当有人拒绝你的报价,当有人离开公司,当产品没有按你预期的方式运转,当合作伙伴给你阻力。但如果你因此花四个小时纠结打转,还是去想办法,“好吧,这事发生了,我怎么往前走?” 学会缩短那个时间,可能是我最重要的成长之一。
Lenny: 这个回答太棒了。
Wise 的文化仪式
Lenny: 最后一个问题,Wise 有没有什么有趣的文化仪式一直延续下来的?
Nilan Peiris: 这个问题,我的团队一定很希望我讲。从早期开始,我们就把全世界的人聚到一起,每年一次。哦,其实一开始是一年两次。创始人们来自爱沙尼亚,我们现在有 5,000 名员工,其中大约 1,800 人还在爱沙尼亚。所以飞去爱沙尼亚比较划算。早年的时候是冬天去,爱沙尼亚的冬天不好玩,但爱沙尼亚的夏天非常棒,我们现在还在这样做。最有意思的部分是,我有一个副业——DJ,所以我可以在那里打碟,挺有意思的,也让我的孩子们很尴尬,因为严格来说我已经在其他国家打过碟了。
Lenny: 国际 DJ。
Nilan Peiris: 没错。这就是我的副业。
Lenny: 太厉害了。
Nilan Peiris: 我就是用这个自我介绍给我 17 岁孩子的朋友的。
Lenny: 你有 DJ 名字吗?我们能在 Spotify 上找到你吗?
Nilan Peiris: 不不,你在 Spotify 上找不到我,都是私人的。
Lenny: 好吧。也许明年 Burning Man 上能看到你的表演。
Nilan Peiris: 也许吧。
Lenny: Nilan,非常感谢你来。我们聊了很多口碑传播,我觉得这一期也会 100% 通过口碑传播扩散。迫不及待想让人们听到。最后两个问题。大家想联系你的话,在哪里可以找到你?听众怎样才能帮到你?
Nilan Peiris: 你可以在 Twitter 上找到我,nilanp。我一直很欢迎产品反馈,邮件、推文、LinkedIn 都可以。一般来说推文最方便,我和我的团队最容易看到。所以通过推文联系我就好。对我来说最有用的,就是产品反馈,以及像我说的,其他正在解决难题、需要帮助的人,欢迎联系我。
Lenny: 太好了。Nilan,非常感谢你来。
Nilan Peiris: 谢谢你的时间。保重,Lenny。
Lenny: 大家再见。非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅。也请考虑给我们评分或写评论,这真的能帮助其他听众找到这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目,或了解更多关于节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| angel investing | 天使投资(angel investing) |
| attribution model | 归因模型 |
| Chief Product Officer | 首席产品官 |
| conversion rate | 转化率 |
| currency converter | 货币转换器 |
| customer-led growth | 客户主导增长(customer-led growth) |
| detractors | 贬损者 |
| EBITDA | EBITDA(息税折旧摊销前利润) |
| EKYC | EKYC(电子客户身份识别) |
| exposure | 敞口 |
| fintech | 金融科技(fintech) |
| flywheel | 飞轮(flywheel) |
| FX risk | 汇率风险 |
| holdout group | 对照组 |
| instant booking | 即时预订(instant booking) |
| instant transfer | 即时转账(instant transfer) |
| invisible hand | 无形之手(invisible hand) |
| KYC | KYC(客户身份识别) |
| market failures | 市场失灵(market failures) |
| Neobank | Neobank(新型数字银行) |
| net promoter score / NPS | 净推荐值(NPS) |
| onboarding flow | 引导流程 |
| P&L | 损益表 |
| pre-post analysis | 前后对比分析 |
| product pillars | 产品支柱 |
| promoters | 推荐者 |
| pull request | pull request |
| referral program | 推荐计划 |
| SEO | SEO(搜索引擎优化) |
| side hustle | 副业 |
| split test | 分流测试(split test) |
| squad | squad(小队) |
| tribe | tribe(部落) |
| viral coefficient | 病毒系数 |
| word of mouth | 口碑传播 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)