产品管理的本质 | Christian Idiodi(SVPG)
The essence of product management | Christian Idiodi (SVPG)
Christian Idiodi: I try to explain to people that the real essence of this job is that you wake up on behalf of someone else to solve a problem for them, and you have to do it well enough that they give you something back in return. That’s kind of the real essence of it, and that’s, I always call it a certificate of appreciation. And it could be in the form of revenue, engagement, loyalty, reference, all of those things. And that’s the real essence of this job. If it’s not fun, you’re probably not doing it right. If it’s not had, you’re probably also not doing it right.
The Most Interesting Person
Lenny: Today, my guest is Christian Idiodi. Christian is a partner at Silicon Valley Product Group, alongside Marty Cagan, who when he introduced us, called Christian the most interesting man in the world. After meeting him, I tend to agree. After a long career in product, Christian now spends his time working closely with companies, big and small, implementing and improving their discipline of product management. In our conversation, we discuss why the product management field is so often disliked and what you can do to avoid becoming a product manager people don’t want on their team. We spend a lot of time on coaching, how to get better at coaching your reports, how to get better coaching from your manager, and some really clever tactics for building trust with leaders within your company. Also, Christian shares his one favorite go-to method, out of all of the discovery methods out there, for figuring out what to build.
Also, we spend some time on the great work that he’s doing at Silicon Valley, Product Group. He’s been doing a lot of great work on the product management field in Africa to help product builders and founders build great companies. That and so much more Christian is awesome. With that, I bring you Christian Idiodi, after a short word from our sponsors.
You fell in love with building products for a reason. But sometimes the day-to-day reality is a little different than you imagined. Instead of dreaming up big ideas, talking to customers and crafting a strategy, you’re drowning and spreadsheets and roadmap updates, and you’re spending your days basically putting out fires. A better way is possible. Introducing Jira Product Discovery, the new prioritization and roadmapping tool built for product teams by Atlassian. With Jira Product Discovery, you can gather all your product ideas and insights in one place and prioritize confidently, finally replacing those endless spreadsheets. Create and share custom product roadmaps with any stakeholder in seconds. And it’s all built on Jira, where your engineering team’s already working. So true collaboration is finally possible. Great products are built by great teams, not just engineers.
Sales, support, leadership, even Greg from finance, anyone that you want can contribute ideas, feedback, and insights in Jira Product Discovery for free. No catch. And it’s only $10 a month for you. Say goodbye to your spreadsheets and the never-ending alignment efforts. The old way of doing product management is over. Rediscover what’s possible with Jira Product Discovery. Try for free at Atlassian.com/lenny. That’s Atlassian.com/Lenny.
Why Product Managers Are Unpopular
Christian Idiodi: Thank you for having me, Lenny. It’s a joy to be here.
Advice for Product Managers
Lenny: It’s a joy to have you here. So Marty Cagan introduced us, a colleague of yours at Silicon Valley Product Group. And the way he described you is he considers you the most interesting man in the world. Did you know that that’s how he thinks about you?
Christian Idiodi: I didn’t. I consider him one of the most interesting people in the world too.
Four Risks for Product Managers
Lenny: You guys are so kind to each other. I wanted to start with this trend I’ve been noticing in product management and the perception of product management. It feels like, I don’t know if this is new or if it’s always been around, but it feels like there’s this trend of people just not liking product managers. There’s trend of founders feeling like they should wait a long time to hire their first product manager. There’s a lot of teams that wish they didn’t have a product manager in their team. We don’t have this person telling us what to do. I’m curious just why you think there’s often this dislike of product managers. And then for PMs listening, do you have any advice for just how to not become a product manager people don’t like and don’t want on their team?
Christian Idiodi: I think most people don’t like product managers often because they haven’t experienced good product managers. The core of product management is competency-based, meaning there is someone in an organization that represents the customer the best, that has a deep knowledge of the customers and your users, that has a deep knowledge of your data, your industry, your business and the product itself. And because of this competence, you kind of trust them to make decisions because if you have a problem that says, say we want more customers, it makes a lot of sense to go to the person that is an expert in customers to say, “Help me solve this problem.” What you see happening in many organizations is that there is kind of this misperception displaced influence and mistrust because of the poor competency, meaning I feel I know more about the business or I know more about the customer or the data. And so why should I not tell you what to do?
And I think people fail to understand that this role is, it’s a team spot. They are part of a team of people working together to discover a solution we’re building and in a way that works for our company. And so I think when I think through the companies I’ve worked with, where I see this discipline really eroded is where there is just not a competent level of product management. The way I describe it to a CEO, I’ll ask him, “Tell me who you trust in your company to make a decision on what markets we go to, what things we do.” And they always have some senior leader, some VP, some person. And I say, “Why? Oh, Bob has been here a long time. He knows everybody. Everybody loves him and trusts him. He understands our business.” And I often say to him, I say, “Well, Bob said put up manager.” And it’s often interesting to executives when I try to explain that way. I say that’s the competent level that we’re talking about here.
Imagine if you had Bob’s on every team. Imagine how much you can accomplish. So one, I don’t really think it’s… I often say it’s not the hate for product management, it’s a hate for the understanding of what they have experienced in product management, which are people that are not able to deliver results that help them meet the outcomes they want.
So if I were advising product managers, I often say, look, when we see sales or executive driven product management where we see these alternatives to product management, it’s not a cultural knock or a leadership knock, it’s really on the individual and the discipline has to elevate itself to a place that it earns the right to make a decision on what we do.
Where New PMs Fail Most
Lenny: I have exactly the same perspective. When people say they don’t like product managers, exactly what I tell them is, you just haven’t worked with a great product manager. A great PM makes everything easier for you. If you want to be a PM, people would hate to lose on their team. I would never want to lose Christian on my team as a PM. Is there something they could do maybe or change to become that person?
Christian Idiodi: Well, I was just joking with someone earlier. I said, “I’ve only seen great product managers come out of two places. One, either a series of massive failure in their career or experiences that have been bad or from learning from great product leaders.” The reality of this kind of role, it’s kind of like if you have all kinds of… maybe you’re like on a sport, like a quarterback on a team, you need to practice product management to be good at product management. You’re not going to get mastery by avoiding some of these elements.
And we’ve kind of clearly defined what you need to represent to a company for them to trust you. So there is this period of humility that I challenge all product managers to have, this period of learning, recognizing what you do not know. And what you do not have is the trust of an organization or even in yourself that you know the customer, the business or the data better than anybody else. What you need to do is quickly try to accelerate that. You’re going to find the loudest, most influential person in your organization, the person that everybody knows, knows everything, is in every meeting and stuff, and you’re going to ask them to teach you. You’re going to challenge them. And if they don’t have the time to teach you, you’re going to volunteer to help them. I’m going to intern for you. You’re going to get permission from your manager and say, “Look, I want to spend time with Lenny. He’s the head of sales, he’s the head of operations and stuff. I just want to learn from him.”
Now, what you’re doing is you’re extending that person’s trust to yourself. You’re also building a relationship with that person. But more importantly, you’re learning what is driving that person’s influence, which is their competence in the business or the customer.
After you’ve done that, you have to keep doing discovery because what’s going to be different now is that person knows they’ve taught you everything that they know, but everybody now sees you learning every single day. So at some point, people will recognize that you might have more insights and more data than anybody else, and they will only know this because they’ve seen you learn from the best and they’ve seen you continuing to learn. So I always practically advise product managers in this kind of scenario, build relationships with people. You earn their trust by asking them to do two things. One, you’re either going to teach me or I’m going to help you. And you’re going to build relationships there, gain experience with them. You’ve got to immerse yourself in the deeper understanding of the business and the data.
The Ultimate Discovery Method: Reference Customers
Lenny: Wow, there’s a lot there. Because this is awesome. This is exactly, I think what people want to hear is how do you become better and how do you become more trusted and respected? So things you’re recommending to PMs that want to become better, less disliked, more successful. I just took some notes as you were talking. One is there’s a sense of becoming more full stack in the company, like understand the business, not just there’s your one product and here’s your one goal. And then this idea of just be always learning, which is both you are learning things and also people see that you’re learning and see that you really care about a lot of the parts of the business that maybe you wouldn’t naturally be inclined to understand. And that also helps you build relationships. And also just this really important point of if you know more than anyone else, people will innately trust you and respect you and want you on the team because you happen to have a lot of answers.
The Power of Immersive Discovery
Christian Idiodi: Yes.
Core of the Reference Customer Method
Lenny: Awesome. Kind of on a similar thread, something that Silicon Valley product group has is a really good definition of what a product manager’s job is. And I thought it’d be cool just to spend a little time here. There’s these four attributes you guys like to share. Can you just talk about that, as a little foundational?
Early Adopters: Tech Enthusiasts and Evangelists
Christian Idiodi: I kind of mentioned before, a product manager is in a team spor., so they work as part of a team to uncover a solution, what to build. And every time you solve a problem, there’s inherent risk involved. There’s the risk of will people buy this or will they choose it or will they choose to use it, which is all a value type of risk. There’s the risk of can they use it, which is a usability type of risk. The risk that we can build it to have the skills to build it or the time to build this, that’s a feasibility risk.
And the risk of it working for our business, which is a viability risk. I cannot call out the product manager’s competency. It’s really to try to drive the first and the last one, which is value and viability. A solution worth building, something people will buy, choose or use, and one that works for our business, which is at the core of what product teams do, solve a problem in a way customers will love and a way that works for our business. It’s why the product manager gets all the rap of, if everything goes great, a great team effort, if everything goes wrong, they blame the product manager.
It’s because people hold them accountable to results. Nobody wants to work on something nobody wanted in the first place and your job is to ensure that we are working on something people want in the first place. And it is such an amazing role. I try to explain to people that the real essence of this job is that you wake up on behalf of someone else to solve a problem for them. And what an amazing job. There’s just no greater… I cannot think of a better discipline with such inherent permission to solve problems on behalf of someone. And you have to do it well enough that they give you something back in return. That’s the real essence of it, and that’s the, I always call it a certificate of appreciation. And it could be in the form of revenue, engagement, loyalty, reference, all of those things. And that’s the real essence of this job. If it’s not fun, you’re probably not doing it right. If it’s not hard, you’re probably also not doing it right.
Lenny: Wow, I love that frame of reference of you’re giving something to customers and your success is measured by do they give something back in return, which is basically do they pay for your product? Such a beautiful way to think about that. Oh, man.
Okay. So just to summarize these four elements, there’s value, usability, viability, feasibility to understand if the product they’re building hits all these attributes.
25-Person Validation and Product-Market Fit
Christian Idiodi: That’s right. You’re trying to uncover a solution and you know you’ve solved the problem when you get those two things, something customers love, they give you something back, and our business can support it in some ways. And I’m calling out, these are the different risks in our kind of taxonomy, how we call the things you have to tackle. And it’s a team sport, and so there are these four risks of should we build it, will people use it, will people buy it, will our customers support it or our business support it? And you’re trying to answer those questions with a designer and a product engineer.
Lenny: Of these four, so value, usability, viability, feasibility, where do you think most new PMs fail most or should spend more time?
Driving Marketing with Real Customer Feedback
Christian Idiodi: Oh my goodness, value. Value is probably, it is the most important and the most overlooked. And the big driver for that is often because of the operating model of teams. Teams are often given roadmaps of projects and features to go build and deliver. If that’s the case, you actually really don’t need a product manager because they’re going to assume value. If the boss told me to build this, I cannot say, “Should we build this? Is this the right thing to build? Is there a better option? Is this what people will buy?” You just assume it’s valuable.
And so often, when people ask me why does the product manager seem to play like a core leadership role on a team, almost like the quarterback. And it’s not that they’re more special in solving the problem that the designer or the engineer, but they’re answering a question that determines if we should be working on this in the first place.
So value is often the hardest thing to solve and must be overlooked. We often see bad patterns where companies will say, “Yes, we ran a test, with 300 users and they all scored it 84% or 90%. They love it.” In that way. I said, “Well, just because somebody can use your product doesn’t mean that they will buy it. Just because they can use it doesn’t mean they will choose it. Just because they can use it doesn’t mean that they will actually use it.” And what people say is often different from what they do. And our job is to actually solve the problem, which is what core value is, in a meaningful way. And often overlooked because we check the box on our own item. So the most important, because that’s to the point of the certificate of appreciation, what you get in return, that’s the ultimate outcome. Really, value.
Recruiting Is the Signal
Lenny: You once gave a talk along these lines around discovery, and it was this talk of here’s all of the things you can do to help understand what to build to make something valuable. There’s a billion frameworks for every step of the discovery process, press releases, story mapping, opportunity solution, trees, fake door tests, all these things. And you’re like, if we had to pick one thing, if there’s one process or approach that you recommend most, your answer was essentially finding some number of reference customers to work with and helping them and working with them to design the product. Do you still see that as the one, if you had to pick one approach to figure out what to build? And if so, you just talk about how you recommend going about that.
Christian Idiodi: The holy grail of product walk is really a reference customer. This is somebody that has used your solution or your product, loves it enough to tell people about it. I kind of described the work of the product team is to solve problems in a way that customers love and a way that works for our business. The ultimate definition for me today of the love that somebody has for our product is they’re willing to put their reputation on the line by telling people about it. And for me, if we think about you do a lot of interviews with founders and entrepreneurs and you’re going to have people that they find a market with an idea and they jump in. But if you think at the core of some of these founder-inspired businesses where the founder will say, “Well, I had a problem and it was their problem and they focused on solving the problem and then they got their friends on it.”
And so it’s almost like this idea that if they were their own first reference customer. They were so close to the problem, immersed in the environment of the problem, solved it in a compelling way enough where it was like, there are more people like me. And it is like if I said to you, “Lenny, let’s go to a steakhouse. Find me a new steakhouse around you.” You might go online and Google and you see a steakhouse with one review. How do you feel about that? I don’t know. Maybe other people don’t want to try this. You see two reviews, you’re like, maybe it’s the chef and their spouse or something. The question is how many positive reviews would you have to see to jump and say, “Let’s go try this one.” There are some things inherent in, if you look at Geoffrey Moore’s adoption curve and those kinds of models in here, most people don’t want to be the first to try things. But you are likely to try things if other people that look like you have accepted it or defined it as good.
And so the whole essence for me of this technique is to create those first people, those reference customers. If you think about how companies make the shift to becoming sales-led or operations-led, almost all companies start product-led. The product is first. You kind of build something and it’s like, yeah, it’s going, let’s hire salespeople and marketing people and operational people to do it. What’s really happening is that the product team created the first customers. And now a group of people have to capture the value that was created. So what’s happening here is that it is constantly the job of product teams. The reason they lose influence is because salespeople are having to sell a product. You see? So they’re like forcing back, “I need this and I need this.” But if you came to me and said, “I want to buy steak,” and I say, “Let me show you 20 people that look like you that recommend this steakhouse,” my job as a salesperson is very easy. I’m just like, “Hey, you should eat here. Everybody that loves steak, they all eat here.”
So product teams feel, at this contract to an organization when they don’t create powerful reference customers. So it’s by far my favorite technique. And the way this technique works is you want to discover and deliver and develop who has the problem, the customer. I want to discover who has the problem. At the same time, discover and deliver a solution to this problem. The idea here is that if you really want to solve a problem, you need to get out of your building. Go spend time with someone that has the problem and don’t leave until you solve the problem. People talk about why we had such a record time to the Covid vaccine. Sure, technology has improved, our research has improved. But if you think about it, we had the highest number of volunteers for vaccination in the history of any vaccine in the history of time.
Why? Did we have to look for someone with Covid? No, they were literally all around us. The research was immersed in the environment of the problem. They could study… and so this is often what I call, it’s almost like a pressure-cooked discovery in some ways. If you truly, truly want to solve a problem, get out of your building, get out of the assumptions, get out of your opinions. Immerse yourself, find someone who has the problem, stick with them until you discover a solution for this problem. And you’re going to do that. The part of why I love this technique, the two biggest reasons I think, the first is if I cannot find a certain number of people that have this problem, my goodness, it might not be a problem, but solve it. I have never had a product failure using this technique. If I were to credit… goodness, I think last count, I’m up to like 205 products I have worked on or participated in creating in my career. And I tried to build a new product every year from scratch. It’s kind of a crazy thing about me. My friends know what I want for my bad day is a problem worth solving. And I like to go from idea to revenue, and the setup, and I test all of these techniques in this way. And everybody knows my favorite technique is if we find a problem worth solving, we need to uncover a solution for B2B, I want six to eight references, for B2C, I want maybe 15 to 25 references as an indication that we’ve achieved product market fit.
Case Study: Starbucks
Lenny: Just to be clear, you said you still work, you build products yourself and you practice this and you’ve built… okay, what’s like every recent product that you’ve built? I didn’t know this.
Discovering a Larger Market
Christian Idiodi: So I do a lot of work in Africa now. WorkNigeria is like a job board that helps people. We do kind of a job board HR replacement and advisory too as well. I’m actually working on another app around the NDA and protecting high-asset individuals in some ways. So kind of every year, I find a problem like that worth solving and I practice doing the work of discovery with a team of people.
Lenny: That’s amazing. I see this unraveling of the most interesting man in the world is happening a little, bit by bit. We learn more and more about you. Okay, amazing. So just to kind of summarize some of these-
Okay, amazing. So just to summarize some of these points, which are really great and I’ve never heard it described this way before. So basically, a really effective way to understand how to build something people actually want and solve real problems is this idea of pick reference customers. And I really like this word reference, which is not just they’re going to help you build a thing, but they’re also become a reference to future customers because they end up loving it because you built it for them and they love it.
Your advice is find six to eight in B2B space, 15 to 25 in B2C. And the reason there’s a number here is if you find just one or two, you never know, they might be just the one or two that have this really weird problem that no one else has. And I think that’s usually the flaw in this approach is you end up building it for a small number of people and nobody else really wants it. And it sounds like in your experience, this is a good kind of number where probably a lot of more people will have this problem.
First Attempt: Painful Lessons
Christian Idiodi: Yeah. There’ve been studies to validate some of these numbers. I think early, IBM, kind of struggled selling those supercomputers. And if you’re buying a million dollar computer, someone says, “Hey, do you want to buy?” And you’re like, “I don’t know. Is there anybody else that has bought it? Shall I be the first?” And there was this common question of what would it take for you to buy it? And someone says, “Hey, if I see five or six people that look like me already have this, then I feel confident making the argument to my company, we should jump on it.” And it’s like, so how do I create the first five to six? And you can see a lot of the validation on B2C in some of the things you might see in the App Store on Yelp or those places. My idea here is if you found a steakhouse with 25 5-star reviews, you are likely to adopt this.
So in every app I have ever put on the App Store, on the day I launch the app in the app store, they are 25 5-star reviews. I will never launch an app and be like, “Let’s hope Lenny loves it. Let’s see who the first person.” On the very first day of launching the app, there are 25… so I will know I am not ready until I have achieved 25 people that have told me, worked with me and said, “I am now ready to put my reputation the line.” Sometimes I might need to work with 30 people or 50 people because the output is 25 reference customers. Because if Lenny is like, “I don’t love it enough” or “I don’t feel comfortable,” I’m not going to customize for Lenny. I’m going to find my single target market, talk to more people. If I get 25, I have achieved product market fit.
Lenny: So interesting. It basically kicks in this word of mouth flywheel that everyone’s always looking for is how do I get people to talk about it. Build it for them, solve their problems, tell them that it exists. You mentioned a bit about how you understand if it’s actually, let’s call a product market fit, if you have product market fit with these people that you ask them if they’re going to leave you a 5-star review for example. I guess what do you consider this is good, I got one more person that’s really happy with this? What tells you it’s got product market fit with a person?
Iteration and Breakthroughs
Christian Idiodi: If I were thinking about how I will do this, pick a problem to solve, first of all, I have to know who I’m solving the problem for. And in some indication and I want to validate that this is actually a problem you do have. And I’m looking for a certain type of person. These early adopters in our world are broken up to technologists and evangelists. Technologists could be, “I love the new iPhone 16 is coming out and it’s going to have five cameras and I write an article in some tech review board. Super fast, super sleek, all good design.” You just love new technology. You always jump on new technology. And evangelist could be someone that says, “Oh my, I look great with the iPhone 15, it has three cameras. I will look phenomenal with the iPhone 16, so I’m going to go stand in line at the Apple Store for three hours or overnight because I just can’t wait to get my hands on the Apple 16.”
They may feel a little irrational, but those are the kind of people you’re looking for, people that believe they have a problem. So it’s like you will try any steakhouse, in my example. You’re just like, “I love steak. I don’t care if there are reviews or not. I’ll try it.” And what I’m trying to do here is I’m saying, okay, Lenny loves steak, he wants to try a steakhouse. And I’m good to say, “Lenny, I’m trying to build the best steakhouse here. If I create a menu that you absolutely love, are you willing to tell people about it?” That could be a video testimonial, write a review, stuff like that. And it’s okay Lenny, if you don’t love the first iteration of it and stuff like that, I want to hear your feedback. I want you to work with me in ensuring that I build the best steakhouse here. And that’s kind of the idea.
So I’m going to work with 25 people that look like you and I’m going to keep tweaking, in this sense iterating on the product and the menu until Lenny’s like, “My goodness, this is the best steakhouse in the world.” It is like I’m just going to write about it and when I get 25 people that have all, it’s not the steakhouse, they love it enough. Because this is where you really get the shift in value. Because if I say, “Lenny, go write me a review, a five-star review.” You’re like, “I don’t know if I feel comfortable about.” You say, “Why not?” You see, I’m really going to get deeper feedback because people will say or do anything just to avoid hurting our feelings or for us to get out of their face. So they’ll be like, “Yeah, yeah, yeah, I’ll give you a five-star review.” But when I say do it, you’re like, “Well, I have this hesitation.” Why? That’s really where great discovery comes. But it’s hard to in a silo. You have to be immersed with the person that has the problem. So product market fit is when you iterate it in this discovery, you’ve discovered and delivered something so meaningful that these customers that are your target customers, are willing to put their reputation on the line and be a reference. That’s my indication.
Lenny: I imagine though, Christian, so charismatic, comes to me and says, “Hey Lenny, would you leave me a five star review for this product. I’m working on this, I’m trying to figure out if people want it.” I would be like, “Yeah, of course. I’ll leave you a five-star review.” What do you do to kind of avoid that, just like I just want to be nice, like I don’t care, I’ll leave a five-star review.
Facing New Challenges
Christian Idiodi: You. It’s part of why I need 25 in B2C. And don’t get me wrong, if I can convince 25 people in there, I may have a marketing product and a charismatic marketing products. If that’s all I needed to do was a good message and charisma to get people on it. The good benefits of this is that you can tackle risk very early because you can involve many other parts of your organization, marketing, sales, legal, finance. People often ask me how do I come up with the marketing spiel or the description? I’m like, “I don’t make that up.” If I ask Lenny, “What do you feel about this product?” And he says, “Well, it’s cool and it’s very sleek and very nice.” The marketing department will say, “We don’t like those terms. We want to call it comprehensive.” And when you go out to sell your product, people are going to be disappointed because the expectations are created by what’s on the box.
I only market exactly what customers tell me. I have never been surprised about what customers will say when I release a product because in this technique I already get their feedback. And so I’m going to put exactly what Lenny said on the box. “Hey, this product’s cool and sleek and easy to use.” I’ve only launched a product that says super fast but difficult to read because the technology team said there was no way to change the font on something and it was just going to be difficult to read. And you know what everybody did when they got the product? “Oh my goodness, it is super [inaudible 00:31:39]. All right, it is also difficult to read.” It matched their expectations in some ways. So what I do here is I learn how to sell the product with this technique, I learn how to market the product because I have real people, that we’re not making assumptions.
What’s the best way to market this? How much Lenny? How would you find this? Does this language resonate with you? Does this properly describe the menu? See? So that’s kind of what you’re doing when you use a technique like this. It feels heavy to people, but that’s kind of part of the practice of it. If you do this a whole lot, you get really comfortable at involving, you’re working with your customers to solve it. But for me, the fact that you will not have a product failure because you have a natural pivot out, meaning if I can’t find 25 people that love steak, why in the world am I building a steakhouse? So if you don’t find enough people that love this problem and are willing to help you, just be like, this is not a problem worth solving. But more importantly, you really start to get… is the fastest part to product market fit, the clearest definition for me because I know when my product is ready, when I’ve dotted those I’s and crossed those T’s, in that way.
The Product Creation Process
Lenny: I think your point there, recruiting is itself a huge signal, is really important. Can you find people that have this problem and care enough about this problem that they’re going to talk to you and spend time exploring this thing that doesn’t exist yet. I think that’s super interesting. And then I think another key part of this is it’s one solution that solves many people’s problems. And it can’t be a bunch of different things for a bunch of different people.
The Essence of Leaders and Coaches
Christian Idiodi: That’s right, that’s right. If one person says, “I don’t want this,” wants this, another person wants this, you don’t do it. That’s how you know you do the minimum. All 25 have to want the same thing. If one person’s out, you just don’t do it at all. And the reason that’s powerful is because if I come to you and I say, “Hey, it’s missing this feature.” I say, “Well yeah, 25 people that look like you that are very happy without it.” You see? That’s how if you think about what you do in a review, you see the five stars and you instantly like, “Oh, that’s good enough.” But if you have a question, what do you do, you cannot double click on the review to read. And that’s how people get convinced. There’s this social influence of like, “Well, Lenny’s cool, he likes the steakhouse. I should like it. He’s fine with this not being there so I should be fine with it.” So your references are super powerful in more than any company, in influencing consumers on what they should choose or not choose.
Lenny: Basically, Strive builds new products exactly this way. They find new customers that have a problem and they work with very small number of customers to build a product for them, and that’s how a lot of their new product… I think Rippling works like this too. So I think this is a really good lesson for everyone listening, if they’re trying to build something new. Is there an example that comes to mind that would be, I don’t know, interesting to talk through, of something you built that you worked through this process?
Why Most People Cannot Coach
Christian Idiodi: Oh, boy. I tell the example of solving a problem when I was at a staffing company, a snag job. They do hourly jobs and help people find their best job or an hourly job and I actually get a call here from the head of Global staffing at Starbucks. Now, he called me, you can see the benefit of this technique, because I’m the person he calls when he has problems. I’ve used this technique with him at a previous company. He didn’t even know I was at a new company. And he calls me up and he says, “Christian, I have a problem.” I said, “Well, don’t we all have problems?” He said, well, “We just bought a bakery in the San Francisco Bay Area. And as we’re doing the paperwork to kind of take over this company or this acquisition, we realized that close to 800 of the employees may be undocumented workers.”
And I said, “Wow, that does sound like a problem.” He’s like, “Yeah, imagine if this breaks out in the news and all of that. But more importantly, we still need to get all their paperwork. So all these people are going to quit and we’ll have a new bakery without employees.” And my first question to him as a product guy is like, “Wow, would you give me a million dollars to solve this problem?” And it’s like, “No, seriously?” I was like, “300,000.” I’m throwing out numbers. He’s like, “Maybe.” I said, “Wow, you have my attention.” I go to my CEO, I tell him to call. I grab a designer and an engineer. I just say, “Hey look, I would love to work on a little project with you all if you have some time.” I kind of debrief them on the call. Now the first thing I have to do is to try to define the problem, identify problems. What really is the problem going on?
Yeah, we’re breaking it down, we’re talking through this. We say, well, at the end of the day, Starbucks needs to hire like 800 people quickly because we can’t fix getting everybody’s paperwork. But they’re going to lose these people and they need to hire those quickly. And I say, well, who else has this problem? We’re trying to throw out guesses. I’m like, “What are we talking about? Let’s go out.” Everybody jumps in my car and we start driving around and this is where we’re doing our product work from. We’re talking in the car, just out of the building. We see a new construction site for a new McDonald’s coming soon and we’re curious. We’re like, well, “Let’s go find out.” We start talking to people on sites. Fortunately, the operations director is on site and we ask him, we say, tell us about opening up a new McDonald’s.
He says, “Well, do you know we need like 120 people on opening day?” We’re like, “Whoa, for McDonald’s? Really, 120 people?” He’s like, “Yeah, do you know that most of the people in this industry don’t show up to work on the very first day, and every day we’re in construction, we’re losing money. So the second the bathrooms, the restrooms, are done, we want to open up.” We’re like, “Wow, we didn’t think about this, new construction, a new store opening.” They need to hire lots of people quickly. So I said, “Thank you very much.” I gave him my business card, he gave me his. We jumped back in the car. We just kept driving. We went to the mall. We started talking to people there. We talked to a manager at Macy’s and she said, “Oh look, we hire 20,000 people in the holiday season.”
We’re like, “Macy’s.” Yeah, it’s like nights, weekend, shipping, stuff like this. We started hiring in the summer because of how painful it is. Now, all we’re doing here is just validating that this is a real problem, like other people will have the problem. So we go back to the office, we’re brainstorming, like, “How will someone even go about solving this problem?” We’re thinking this was like, we’re not really sure, but McDonald’s guy was very desperate. I said, ” I have his business card.” We start throwing some ideas. So I called the McDonald’s person and I said, “Look, you just met with us.” He’s like, “Yeah. We would love to help you solve the problem.” He said, “Well, what do you have in mind?” I said, “We’ve been talking. What if we just sent you some people to interview. And if you like them, you’ll hire them.”
He said, “That seems fairly easy.” He’s like, “How do I pay for this?” And we took a swag like, “Maybe you pay us for everybody that you hire.” He was like, “Oh, I don’t see much risk to that. This is great.” I’m like, “Oh, okay.” We have no sense of what to do. We are literally Googling, how do people find a job at McDonald’s? We go to colleges, we are sticking up flyers. We are putting ads in the newspaper back then, we are looking at different techniques to try to get people into a funnel and interest by posting on Craigslist or things like that. At the end of the week, we get about 40 people that are interested to come to the interview. We’re like, that feels good for our first try. We call the manager up and we say, “Look, on Monday we will send you 40 people to interview. This is great.”
Monday I take my designer, my engineer, we are on site with the manager. At nine o’clock, we expect three people to show up for interviews. Nobody shows up. 10 o’clock, another three, one person shows up. We got to the end of the day, less than 20 people show up. This man only has four or five people. We are like, “We suck this. This is terrible.” We go to the manager, ” Let’s go and apologize for wasting your day and stuff.” He starts to laugh. We’re like, “What’s going on?” He said, “Look, I forgot to tell you. Folks in this industry don’t even show up to interviews. We are McDonald’s, we pay minimum wage. People will leave us for 25 more cents an hour. They will leave us for a job that is one block closer to their house or less than a mile closer to their home.”
Now, the engineer is with us and he’s thinking about it. It’s like, this is really interesting. About half of the people showed up. He hired one in five. If you really want to solve this problem, playing the laws of averages, we probably need to send this man close to 200 people. We need to go bigger. So we are storming the office, we called the McDonald’s guy again. I was like, “Can we try again next Monday?” And he’s like, “Do I only pay for the people I hire?” We’re like, “Sure.” It’s like, “Oh, go ahead and kill yourself on this.” It’s a pain. We’ve been trying all kinds of things for years.
Now, we start doubling down our efforts. We start calling back all the people that didn’t show up for interviews like, “What’s going on? Did you get lost? Don’t you want a job? What’s wrong with you?” We start figuring out what portals worked well for us the last time, what wasted our money, what was the cost to acquire a person. And we spend a week doubling our efforts on those channels. We probably have about 120, 130 people on the list. The Sunday beforehand, we start calling them up like, “Please show up. Don’t embarrass us. Don’t you want the job? Do you need that address? Should I call you a reminder, set your alarm.” We’re trying all the techniques to try to get more people. There we go the next day and at the end of the day he has about forty-five to 50 people. He comes to us, he shakes our hand. He’s like, “Whoa, the quality was excellent. All my recruiters were engaged. The day was smooth,” [inaudible 00:41:17] how successful we are.
He’s like, “I want to use you for every new McDonald’s I open in the area.” Now, I don’t know I have a product. I just know I was able to help one person at McDonald’s. But I feel like I have enough learning. So I called up my friend at Starbucks and I said, “Hey, man, remember the problem we talked the about?” He’s like, “Yeah. I would love to help you solve it.” He said, “Oh, okay. What do you have in mind?” I said, “Well, I think we need to send you about 3000 people to interview.” He said, “3000 people? I told you I only need 800.” I said, in this industry, most people don’t show up for interviews, right? He said, “Oh my goodness. You know our industry well. I like this. I’m going to take this up, I think we’ll give you this contract.” I take my designer, my engineer, we go to San Francisco. We’re out there recruiting because this is where it was based. We have to get a whole hotel, hire people. We are working all the channels we knew, working in the area. Remember, we don’t have any software, no technology. The designer, we’re doing this manually, Excel spreadsheets, phones, emails, in that way. In one week, Starbucks hired 784 people. I get an email the next Monday morning from the contact at Starbucks. He copied Howard Schultz, then CEO of Starbucks. The email read, “These guys just saved our butts.” I sent it to my CEO, but then I said, “You know what?” I only know now I can help on McDonald’s and a Starbucks, but that doesn’t mean I have a product. But I now have enough of problem definition. I reached out to the head of marketing, the head of sales. I said, “Tell us who has this problem you’ve come across,” because we need to work with more people to try to uncover a solution that is scalable, maintainable, reliable, and works for our business. Weirdly enough, the next opportunity we had was the Los Angeles International Airport. They were opening up a new terminal and they said, “We need 200 people to manage all the stores in the new terminal.” And we were like, “200 people? We just hired close to 800. We got this.” We go to LA for the briefing with the staffing group and they tell us the people that work at an international airport have to match the demographics of the travelers. We say, “Say what? Yeah, we have 13% Chinese-speaking travelers, we need 13% Chinese-speaking employees.” We say, “Sorry? We’ve got 5% Korean speaking.” I mean my team is in LA, we’re in Chinatown. We are speaking, trying to recruit people to come and work in an airport. If we expect 10 people to show up, only one person shows up.
We start calling job seekers up like, “What’s going on?” They say, “Do you know what it means to work at an airport?” First, I wake up at five o’clock, I drive to the employee parking lot. I get into a bus. Then I go through security. There was not like TSA pre-check back then. Then if I want to break, I go to security again and then you pay me minimum wage. It took us close to three months to staff this. We had to negotiate with the union to raise the price to like $15 an hour to attract people. When we come back from that, you know what we’re saying, that is not our customer. Never again. We are never doing airports. That’s a pain.
Around this time, it was the holiday season, so we reached out to the person at Macy’s. We told them about our work with McDonald’s. They say, “Oh, we’ll try this.” We started working with them. You can imagine through this, the engineer is thinking, how can I use technology to improve this? I always tell this to people, I never wrote a requirements document, I never wrote a story. So the designer is thinking, how can we improve the end-to-end experience? Okay, we need a recruiter experience, a job seeker experience. We had a funnel. We need to build a scheduling tool so that they can scale the interview. Oh, what about notification? Maybe text message. We can send them a map so that they can know how to get to the… I mean, all of these things, because they were involved from the very beginning in defining the problem, they were immersed in the solution to the problem. It takes us about eight and a half, almost nine months to build this. When we launched this product in its first 90 days, it booked $32 million in sales.
Why? Because you got McDonald’s probably until today using this product to open up every new store. Well, Starbucks went to the global contract. We say, ” Well, we’ve only done discovery in the US so I only know where it works in this market.” And we started finding, if you look at NASCAR, some of these big sporting events, they have to bring a lot of people together very quickly for a short amount of time. And this is the same kind of product they use to do that high volume hiring in a short amount of time. If you think about it, I was discovering who had the problem and developing the customers that have the problem. At the same time, I was discovering and delivering a solution to that problem.
Lenny: That’s insane. You said you made thirty-something million dollars the first year of launching this thing.
Finding a Practice Arena
Christian Idiodi: Yeah.
Lenny: That’s unreal. I love how this is the epitome of doing things that don’t scale. You going hiring McDonald’s employees and then Starbucks employees.
The Value of Collaborative Problem Solving
Christian Idiodi: That’s right.
Leaders Promoted Too Early
Lenny: Then airport employees. Wow.
Practice Leading Before Becoming a Leader
Christian Idiodi: You do things that don’t scale and then you do things that do scale. And it’s so powerful when you discover how to do things that don’t scale, when you actually know. Because it’s the power of technology is just the beauty of what it can do at scale.
Coaching Is the Key to Everything
Lenny: And to that point, it’s easier said… a lot of people talk about doing things that don’t scale. Many people don’t actually do anything like that. They’re like, “Nah, let someone else figure that out, or let’s just actually think about the future of this versus just doing it and solving and finding problems.” I love that also, you didn’t do any of these other, the things we talked about. There’s no fake door test, there’s no opportunity solution trees. There’s no user interview. You’re talking to people. It wasn’t like a user research interview, come sit down, ask questions.
Christian Idiodi: I said, there’s nothing better in learning how to solve a problem than trying to solve the problem. You will get all the answers, the research, the failure, the mistakes, all the evidence. You know the difference between what people say, this is what they do. You’ll validate and test. Because at the end of the day, what is statistically relevant? Solving the problem is the clearest indication that we’ve solved the problem and that we know how to solve the problem then. And so yeah, very powerful technique.
Promoting Products and Tech in Africa
Lenny: And I love that you didn’t really know exactly where this was going to lead. It was just kind of this exploratory, let’s see if there’s something here. And you just kept following this like, huh, there’s a problem. It looks like we found a way to solve it. Let’s just see where else this can take us. Amazing.
Lenny: Teal provides you with the tools to run an amazing job search. With an AI-powered resume builder, job tracker, cover letter generator, and Chrome extension that integrates with over 40 job boards, Teal is the all-in-one platform you need to run a more streamlined and efficient job search and stand out in this competitive market. There’s a reason nearly 1 million people have trusted Teal to run their job search. If you’re thinking of making a change in the new year, leverage Teal to grow your career on your own terms. Get started for free at tealhq.com/ lenny. That’s tealhq.com/lenny.
I want to shift to a different topic. You spend a lot of time helping product leaders get better at coaching, get better at building relationships, get better at building trust with their teammates. Marty Cagan actually shared this quote with me when he joined, he said that you can build trust with executives and product leaders faster than anyone else he knows, and the people you coach adore him like some kind of rock star.
He’s literally on speed dial for several of the CEOs of the largest companies in the world. Okay, so let me just ask you, what’s your secret to being a great coach, and how can people listening become better coaches to their reports, maybe colleagues?
Nonprofits and Education Empowerment in Africa
Christian Idiodi: This topic is probably near and dear to my heart because, I mean, there are many ways that I think our corporate structures have failed in creating high performance and stability in people, and I think one of them is actually encro of leadership. And by leadership, the key component I often point to is coaching. This idea of what truly is the job of a leader. And I tell people, yeah, it’s context and culture at the highest level like, why are we here? Where are we going? How do we organize ourselves to get there? What’s important?
Just kinds of things and the environment in which we do it, but there’s a people element because you recognize that you want an outcome and you need people working together to that outcome. So I now have to staff those people and I have to hire and train them and equip them and then appoint them to what those things are. But many of those things are one-off, meaning I create a vision, I create a strategy. I hire a person. There’s something that is every day and that’s coaching, that’s like the day job of managers. And if I think about high performing teams in the world, and you can pick sports is one of those, artists, they have coaches and managers like it’s an everyday thing. And the idea is that when I explain this to people, I say doing product management is a product manager’s job, but getting better at product management is the manager’s job, is the coach’s job. And people tend to misunderstand how that dynamic works.
You see, if you are playing a game, you’re in the game. The coaches are on the sideline watching you play the game and getting you better at playing the game. Your job may be to kick or pass the ball and you need a competence level, but somebody’s job is every day looking for ways for you to be better at your job.
The number one reason most people don’t give good coaching is because they’ve never experienced good coaching themselves. And most people can only give to other people what has been given to them, what experiences they’ve seen. I was in an executive meeting with a CEO and he gets up in a meeting and he just starts screaming and cursing at everybody, just throwing up And I said, “Whoa, whoa.” I said, “Can we talk outside?” They pick him outside. I was like, “First of all, I don’t even think I can work with you anymore given this environment you’re creating, but I need to understand why you are talking to your team like that.” And he says to me, he says, “Christian, well my boss used to scream at me like this. And look at me, I’m now a CEO, I got it, I understand it. They are grownups, they can understand it too.”
And I said, “Well, tell me what you’re trying to communicate.” And he explains it to me and stuff and I said, “Is it okay if I show you an alternative way of communicating that?” He says, “What do you mean?” I said, “Well is it first of all safe for me to do this with the team?” So I go back to the team and I say, “Look, I’m going to try to say what the CEO was trying to say again. He’s giving me permission for you to speak freely and candidly, I want your honest opinion as to what was more effective and why.” And I took a stab at kind of representing what he was trying to say and I asked the team and it’s like, yeah, it’s the same thing kind of message, but when he tells us this stuff we just go do it. We get it, we go do it. But the way you described it right now to us, I can think of four other things I need to do. I even understand some other things that may be missing that we need to now go tackle.
And the CEO is kind of really taken aback and it’s kind of in some ways he has never seen an alternative. And he’s never seen if an alternative be effective. Most people need to see something then they need to do it before they can even teach it, in some ways. Now I’m saying this all because I need to make a very strong argument for people understanding coaching. And in some ways I probably did not know that I was probably good at coaching. I coached my kids in soccer for eight years and we always won the championship, my boys team and I had long waiting list of people and I thought I had a fundamental flaw in understanding it because when my kids were all four years old, when you have the kids run around the soccer field just kicking the ball any way, my team always had plays, they all have strategy.
So winning games like 10 to zero, other kids, I thought I’m like, maybe I was born in another country. I didn’t know you were just meant to let them play. And I was really coaching kids and I was treating four-year-olds like adults. We’re watching video, watching tape, having real… [inaudible 00:54:05] But it was so funny when you see them execute on the field. But I’ve kind of always had this mentality about the truest forms like companies cannot care for people, people care for people. And the representation of what is acceptable in an environment or what we do is by the leaders. Now there’s some different dynamic to why that’s not happening with how we promote people and the whole poor structure around that. But fundamentally, trust is a key part of doing this. And I think when I tell these people, I say, “Look, most people don’t know that you know something until they test you.”
We do it a whole lot in our environment. I ask you a question, I see how you answer and it’s like I might ask you what’s one plus one? It’s two and now I know that one plus one is two. I don’t care when you learned it. I need you to know that it’s two to do my work. So it happens in everyday environment and what people fail to do is to do the learning so they get the question wrong and they lose trust. And trust is based on competence and character, there are other values like communication and concern and care, but most corporate environments, it’s a competency thing. That’s why you see so many companies accept people with bad communication, bad care, because they’re very good at their job. So if you can demonstrate competence, you will earn some trust, at least the trust of competence from people.
So I kind of explained to people a whole lot that the real core of their job at first is to learn, to seek to understand before they are understood, to know what you don’t know. That humility and ego only last a small minute. The most powerful way I have found to get trust with many people is to have them accountable for an outcome of mine, which is to know. So if I wanted to accelerate trust with Lenny, I will ask Lenny to teach me. And I see this like an emotional intelligence, black belt technique here, but many environments, if you get into environment, it’s very quickly for you to identify the power in that environment. Who is influential? Who has loudest voice and all? And there’s something behind why they’re powerful. Yes it is title, but if you think about why someone is called a CEO, it’s because there’s some competence that made someone give them the title, they are great at growing businesses, they have a good stride, whatever it is.
So what you do to build trust is you want that person to trust you. Okay. But the only way that person will know that they trust you is if they test you. And unfortunately many environments they do that publicly. I’m in a meeting, I ask Lenny a question. He bumps a presentation like, oh, product managers are useless. That person doesn’t know anything. So here’s what I do when I want to build trust, if Lenny’s a new hire in my company, I take Lenny to the loudest, most influential person in the company. And I say, “Look, I just hired Lenny. Super rockstar, did all of this. But he knows nothing about that business, nothing about how we work and stuff. I will love for you to teach him some things.” Now he may be like, “I’m super busy, I’m involved.”
I say, “Look, Lenny should just hang with you. I’ve played his calendar for the whole week. He’s just got to sit in meetings you are, quiet, observe, just by observing you, he will be a rockstar. No stress, nothing to give.” Now it’s impossible for this leader to sit with you for a whole week without saying things like, “So Lenny, where are you from? What do you do? Tell me about yourself.” What have I now done? I forced a relationship between a very powerful, trustworthy, influential person and somebody else that doesn’t have it. If you are walking around the company with this person, what is everybody going to say? Oh my goodness, you’re friends with that person. I want to know Lenny because we can never get him to agree on it. So if I know Lenny, I’ll be close with it. Lenny is more accessible, he’s new, but how did Lenny break in? I’m extending somebody else’s trust to you. Now by also making that person share in the accountability of training you or teaching you, in some ways, I am now making them accountable for your growth. It’s impossible two months from now for that person to say, “Oh, Lenny doesn’t do anything.” Why? Because it makes them a bad teacher. So they’re always going to be friendly, be like, “Oh yeah, Lenny, let’s have a conversation. Don’t do it like this in this way.” They will prep you because it makes them look bad if you’re not competent. Now, this technique accelerates relationships and trust. It’s the help me teach me type of technique. It also allows them to observe the dynamics within the company, but it accelerates relationships because it’s impossible for you to be in a meeting with a leader all the time without the person saying something like, “Oh yeah, hey folks, let me introduce you to Lenny.”
Now that person is now the one introducing you to more connections within the company. Fastest way to build is, now feels like it’s a expense but this is the job of a coach. You are designing a very specific playbook to help people achieve the outcomes reward and that’s by getting them competent at their job and then their potential where they need to go next.
A Message to the Product Community
Lenny: That are some Jedi ninja tricks right there. I love that. I’ve never heard this advice before. Makes so much sense and it’s so easy to implement.
Christian Idiodi: Yeah.
Quick Fire Questions
Lenny: Amazing. For someone that maybe doesn’t have a Christian around as a coach or a manager that isn’t at this level, what advice do you give people that are looking for a coach or someone that could help them along these lines to learn to build trust and learn to just generally improve?
Christian Idiodi: Boy, like I say with everything, you don’t get mastery by avoidance. And one of the things that good coaches do that when I say corporations fail companies is they don’t create space for practice. I see people complain to me about people all the time, oh this person is not good. They presented this, it was terrible. And I ask them, “What did they do at practice?” They say, “What do you mean?” I say, “When they were practicing this, what did they do?” Say, “Well, they didn’t practice. I told them to prepare this.” I say, “Think about what happens at practice. Any practice of any sport, any game. You can stop. You can make corrections, you can give feedback. What you do at practice, you do in the game. Product management is a one time, game time kind of role. So when do people practice?”
And so what I tell people in the absence of getting good coaching, you need to find practice arenas. It’s kind of like if you are learning a new sport or basketball, you kind go to the gym. It’s a practice arena. You can play and shoot around and let maybe some people have pickup games that you join and stuff like this in some ways. And so I always advise product managers like, you need to join a lot of pickup games, which they are low barriers to entry, low evaluation reward, loan risk type of thing. Go volunteer at a non-profit working with the team, go volunteer in your community event or church or whatever you go to, go party. But now what am I trying to do with these things? Find places where people do collaborative problem solving. That is what you’re doing as a product team.
It’s more likely in a high performance environment you’ll find a good coach. You’ll find somebody out there but what you’re also doing is you’re observing other people play. Most people learn a lot of skills by, you watch TV like, oh I like that move. And then you go to the gym and you practice that move, you see what you do? So it’s like you’re seeing then you’re doing it in some ways. So you need to see good product work so that you can do good product work so that you can teach good product work. So if you don’t have the benefit of having a good coach directly, you’ve got to find environments where you see good coaching happening and a good indication of good coaching is actually good outcomes over and over again. Winning teams, winning performances, great products, great products come from great product teams. They probably have good leaders or a good leader within a bad culture.
Favorite Interview Question
Lenny: So essentially it’s get a bunch of reps in is a big part of this advice. Just get reps in and I think what you just said is such an important part of it is collaborative problem solving is the key thing to look for. I was going to ask you how you recommend people get into product management. I imagine this is a very similar answer, it’s just find opportunities to collaboratively problem solve.
Christian Idiodi: That’s right. And I differentiate that because there are all those guys that are the, I know I like to change a light bulb or they can walk individually or thinker and stuff and I kind of differentiate that problem solving from the people that are very good at working with other people to solve a problem. And there are so many of those pockets, you’re getting reps. You’ve heard those who that just tell you stories of them working problem and I can see how they will help me. They know how to use data, they know how to use insights. They’re not afraid of talking to people. How are you going to get those reps? Because you come into my company I ask you a question like, oh, I really don’t know where do I find? But if you’ve done the problem solve with a team, sometimes you may not even know how to get the answer, but you know who to go to get the answer. That’s a gift too.
Recently Discovered Great Products
Lenny: I love that so much of your advice comes back to being the person that knows the most or has learned the most or even looking like they’re spending the time to learn the most, which makes so much sense. The people you want to entrust are the people that happen to have the answers.
Christian Idiodi: I try.
My Personal Life Motto
Lenny: And each person will know. Yeah, it just makes sense. Something else you talk about is people getting promoted too early. Leaders getting promoted too early, not doing well, they end up blaming others when really they were not actually ready for this new position. Can you talk about why you think that happens and then just how maybe as that person that might be in that position right now feeling like, oh, shit, maybe it’s not my fault.
Christian Idiodi: I don’t know how to make an appeal to corporations on this one. It’s a similar appeal in the light of coaching too as well. Most people are promoted to a point of incompetency or so, but I kind describe the dynamic this way. It’s kind of like Lenny is a fantastic engineer. If you think about it, he wins engineer of the year awards. If you go to the office, his picture is on the wall, everybody knows him. He’s feeling good. But it’s like one year, two years, maybe eight years in Lenny’s feeling like, am I really growing in my career? Am I really challenged in my career? He looks at the engineering career ladder. The next role from his senior engineer role is engineering manager. The leadership team, HR, they look at the same thing. That’s true. We love Lenny. We don’t want to lose Lenny, we need to promote him.
And the next step is engineering manager or product manager, manager, however, I want to use the rule here. And so, we do what? We promote Lenny. It feels good at the moment. Yeah! Congratulations on your promotion. He posts a nice post. We are like, “Yeah, we’re going to keep Lenny there for long time now because he’s promoted.” Now, Lenny has never been a manager in his whole life. He’s never interviewed people, fired people, didn’t even coach people or had done any of those things directly. After a couple of months, Lenny starts to recognize an interesting pattern. Nobody’s clapping for him at company meetings anymore. And sure they’ve taken down his picture from the world because he’s no longer an engineer, he’s a manager. So somebody else is now the engineer of the year, they are clapping for him in meetings. He’s like, he doesn’t feel recognized or seen anymore. He’s just a guy now behind the scenes and that kind of thing.
Then in a couple of weeks go by, then they have a big engineering problem. And you know what Lenny does? He jumps in and he solves the problem. Lenny did not recognize that his job has changed. His job is no longer to solve the problem directly, but to get a team of other people good at solving problems. This is because you’re a great engineer but not a good manager. This story or this dynamic I’ve told is probably the most common origin story of what people see or deem as micromanagement. In many cases here, this individual knows how to do engineering. They don’t know how to do engineering management. They don’t see the shift in their dynamic being changed. We see back patterns where it’s like the second you become a manager or a leader, you cannot say things like, I don’t know. I’m not sure, I need help. Who told us those things? But it’s like such an expectation that our leaders must have the answers, must know the right things, must do the right things.
And so what do we see people do? Rather than Lenny asks for help, he goes to Google and searches how to do an interview, how to write a review. Are you seeing? He reads different articles like this one looks cool and then he does it and nobody dies. Nothing breaks so he thinks there’s a good framework and a good pattern. And we have this dysfunctional culture of everybody doing different things, whatever works for anybody and that is the cycle that repeats itself. Now, a person that works for Lenny sees that he used this framework and thinks it must be a good framework, my boss did it, and you see how that cycle repeats itself? Because Lenny didn’t actually get coached to be a manager. If you ask anybody that works with me, if come to me and say, “Oh, I need to get promoted to be a director.” You know what I say? I say, “Go be a director. You don’t need a title. Let me tell you what a director does. And you’re going to work with me over the next couple of months to do those things because I am promoting you to do the job, not to learn the job.” You see where it falls apart in promotions? We promote people and it’s like you’re now a VP, do VP things. And you’re like, I have never done VP things before, but I cannot tell people I’ve never done VP things because it makes me look incompetent, but I see the job description. I should do some VP things. What did my last VP do? Those things and those. How you say? But the best place to learn how to be a VP is when you’re not a VP because that’s where you practice being a VP.
That’s where you get feedback on because then when you become a VP, you have done those things before. It’s like why is the first time you’ve done an interview when you’re now a VP? Come in and do an interview with me, observe me do an interview, ask questions, see what works, get feedback. That’s why I love those group product manager roles because those are actually meant to be designed as ways for people to make a decision if they want to be a manager or they want to just stay in the discipline, but people use them as why would you give somebody four direct reports if no evidence, they can manage one? So what I do is I give you one, you might tell me, I hate people. That’s okay, we can talk about that. But it’s like, let me give you four and you’re just going to practice the bad behavior on four.
So this is what often happens in company. We promote them into incompetence. It’s not their fault because we are not coaching them. What we need to do is create a safe environment for people to practice leadership before they become leaders, before we promote them. We have to have good coaching programs for leaders to say, if there’s a succession plan, I want Lenny to be a new manager. I don’t wait till it’s time to promote him then I teach him management because then apparently he cannot say things like, I don’t know. I have to teach him leadership and management before he becomes a leader or a manager.
On Nigerian Cuisine
Lenny: I love this idea of just doing VP things. I just picture someone walking around and, I’m doing VP things.
Christian Idiodi: I’m doing VP things. All the time, I see them live, but what’s a VP thing?
Lenny: I’m doing VP things. I think another added benefit of doing these things before you say you’re VP is that is the best way to get promoted to a VP is you are already doing the job.
Christian Idiodi: That’s right. And nobody bites you on it. You see that? And you’re not even surprised by it and it’s very safe because when you’re not in the job, you can make mistakes and nobody blames you. He’s not a VP, look at him trying to do VP things. You see? But the second you’re a VP, there’s so much leverage in the role that your mistake is serious because it impacts everybody. But when you’re not, it’s like you get coverage, you get protection, nobody’s as mad at you. It’s like, yeah, he was just trying to take a stab at it. Let’s coach him on that. But what is the best time to know those things? It’s before you’re in it. Before you’re in it
Lenny: To give companies and leaders something to do with this advice, you talk about helping them train and practice before they do this. How did you do that? I don’t know, is it work with Silicon Valley Product Group to help train and coach?
Christian Idiodi: There are many great product coaches out there. There are many leadership coaches out there. I think there’s some recognition. People have to have the humility and the self-awareness to recognize that there are opportunities for them to get better as a leader and product management, you need to see or experience, good leadership, you need the reps of good leadership and we do it in everyway. You probably talk to people about strategy and what did they do? They outsource it all the time. Tell somebody else to do it, and that cycle feeds itself because you never do it. You only know how to outsource it. You never learn how to do it. You see? And so many people outsource, oh, go get a mentor, go take a training class, and they’ll think that they’re outsourcing coaching in that way. It’s like go take a communication.
Sourcing coaching in that way. It’s like, ” [inaudible 01:12:03]. Go take a communication class.” I’m like, “Okay.” They come back from the class, and they punch you in the face. I’m like, “Why did you punch me?” “The class taught me to punch you in the face. You paid money for me to learn how to punch you in the face.” I say, go to the communication class with the employee because they’re going to need to practice the communication.
You learn what they’re learning. Both of you now will practice it together, so that they can get better at communication. A communication class doesn’t get you better at communication. Communicating better is an indication that you’re better at communication. You need to practice it. And I need to create a safe place for you to practice, I need to give you feedback that you’re communicating better. These are all patterns in coaching that many leaders just don’t have these tools and techniques to do it.
I do teach a lot of leaders how to coach. I do a lot of people work with leaders. There’s not a singular product problem. People here me say, “All problems are people problems.” There’s not a singular problem that I have not seen coaching address.
Lenny: What I hear is essentially the biggest burden is on the manager to be a great coach to their reports, and for a manager to get good at this, essentially a coach is a really good method. Bring someone in that could work with you one-on-one on a lot of these things. Awesome. That’s very actionable, very solvable.
Everyone’s always going to ask, “How do I find an awesome coach?” Difficult, I guess. I don’t know. What do you tell people to go find a coach? Is there anything you could recommend, just how to go find a coach?
Christian Idiodi: You’ve got to find people that have generated good outcomes. People are always like, “How do you find a good consultant?” I get people teaching people a lot that haven’t done the job. Don’t get me wrong. If you look at American football teams, there are some coaches that have played the game before, and you feel good that they can coach you. And there are also some coaches that have not played the game, but if you look at the pedigree, they’ve learned from good coaches, they’ve worked under good coaches.
Same thing with product. I say there are only two parts. A good coach is someone that has played the game before and has generated good outcomes, and the second is that they’ve learned from good product coaches. You want to find people with a strong pedigree. You see [inaudible 01:14:12], and you, “Oh, you worked at Amazon this year,” or “You worked at this company,” or “You worked at Stripe. [inaudible 01:14:18] good results. How did you do that?”
“Oh, my environment was great. The culture was great.” “Who taught you? Who coached you?” Do pick-up games with the people that they coached. They will tell you what patterns their coach told them. How do you do that? My coach told me to do this, and you’re going to learn from them. I say, “Oh.” Important things.
Lenny: Amazing. Okay. Final area I want to spend a little time on is the work you do in Africa. Marty said that you’re the foremost expert in introducing product and technology into world’s developing countries. I know you spend a lot of time in Africa specifically. Can you just talk about the work you do there and also just maybe the opportunities and challenges you run into when you’re working with folks there?
Christian Idiodi: Yeah. I have an African background, and my family is there, and I used to have this false notion that the things we’ve done in North America or Europe or Asia, the problems we’ve solved, have been solved in these markets. I remember talking to someone in Africa years ago, and he said to me, “Oh.” I said, “You just got a new job. Where did you find a job?” He’s like, “Oh, I found it in a newspaper.” I said, “A newspaper? What do you mean found a job?” I remember participating in solving that exact problem in 1998. I was working with the team to solve that, and I had this false assumption that because I solved it here, of course it’s solved everywhere.
I started to see patterns like this in Africa where just two things were trending. One, so many, the poor use of technology and enabling technologies to solve problems. And two, the difficulty in actually solving problems in these markets, in these emerging markets. And one of the things we take for granted, I always tell people the government is probably the biggest public private product platform in the world. In all countries, they all have this public… Because they provide the infrastructure and the architecture that is enabling for people.
Imagine if you were trying to code and you didn’t have power. Now you’re thinking there are markets where you have to solve the problem of getting power before you then getting access to a computer and then getting access to the right type of software to be able to code something. Look at all the different things. You have to solve many problems just before you can start to solve the problem in a meaningful way. This is a very big reflection of the dynamic in Africa.
The second pattern of what we see is because of this challenge, I see two things. One, people make a lot of money on a problem than from solving the problem. There’s this whole society that people are very good at walking around problems. “We’ve got an electricity problem, we’ll just buy generators.” “We’ve got a road problem, we’re going to buy bigger cars.” I was talk at a conference, and I was driving up to it, and I saw a Tesla with a portable generator at the back of it. They’ll stop and charge the Tesla, and they keep going on the road. In some ways, that’s a whole society, but it’s never been a society that didn’t have creative people.
Just an amazing, tremendous amount of talent. It’s a very young population. I talk to people all the time. I say, “Look.” Someone told me, “Well, Africa, seven of the eight most underdeveloped places in the world are in Africa.”
And I said, “Well.” They were talking about the discovery of the internet. Less than 30% of Africa has discovered the internet. And I tell them, “Wow. And we created seven Unicoms from that. Imagine if 50%, 75% discovered the internet. We need to understand the opportunities, the youngest population, the fastest growing, some of the fastest growing economies in these markets. Some of the problems are so basic, and the opportunities are so huge. So I had to kill all these assumptions. One, that I needed permission to come to solve problems there, and two, that we didn’t have the means to equip and educate people.
We don’t have a talent problem or a resource problem. The biggest opportunity I’ve found is to really empower a continent with enabling technology and the mindset and the skills to be able to leverage technology in solving problems.
This led to me starting a nonprofit in Africa, the Innovate Africa Foundation, and we are committed to this education of people on the continent, this enablement with technology. We did our first conference last year, the Inspire Africa Conference. It just blew my mind. I’m so humbled when I could see a thousand people from 31 different countries in Africa come with a hunger and an eagerness to learn how to do product work. And it’s not cheap by any means for them to do that.
What moved me the most is looking at the future generation. We had a 13-year-old and an 11-year-old in the workshop. The 11-year-old was a robotics engineer. The 13-year-old was a CEO of a small startup that keeps healthcare records, a leader. And I’m like, “If I can help these people learn how to do product well, this is the whole generation for Africa. This is the future of people that want to leverage technology in a meaningful way.” So I spend a lot of my time in Africa, coaching, advising and teaching teams how to use technology, how to do product, how to organize themselves as product teams, how to solve problems, and really to create a boldness within the continent for them to go after problems and solve them, than walk around the problems or make money on them.
Lenny: If people want to learn more about this, maybe support the work you’re doing, what’s the best way to find out more?
Christian Idiodi: You can visit the nonprofit website. It’s innovateafricafoundation.org. You can follow our work on SVPG or the inspireafricaconference.com. I know I will be doing a lot more next year. In January, I am going to be launching a fund, the Paid Africa Fund, and I want it to be a fund funded by the product community for Africa. It’s an angel investment fund. One of the problems I recognize is that so many of the startups, they are not ready for institutional investment, and they are forced into it in some ways. They say people are giving up a lot of equity when they just need cashflow. And so I really want to focus on a fund for the community to enable people to get product market fit in those markets.
That’ll be launching in January. I’ll probably do an announcement about it. I’m excited about that work and to really try to promote more of product-centric thinking on the continent.
Lenny: Amazing. You should call this fun reference customers or something along those lines, if the goal is to help them find product market [inaudible 01:21:12]-
Christian Idiodi: That’s right. They’ll be learning a lot of that.
Lenny: Christian, is there anything else you wanted to share or leave listeners with before we get to our very exciting lightning round?
Christian Idiodi: I’ve always made an appeal to the product community to really have a sense of what they do beyond the job of a products team or product manager. And I always try to encourage people to see that: at the very core of what you do is really solving a problem. And that’s creating… When you do that, create value in the world, you’re making a dent in the world. People that participate in trying to make things better or trying to solve problems, and we should not shy from that definition of our job.
It might feel like a fluffy one. It might feel too lightweight and not meaningful, but I think when people take to heart that that’s really what the essence of products is or product work is, they bring to work a different passion, they bring to work a different sense of empathy, they bring to work a different sense of customer centricity. And all of those things lead to good outcomes.
I always make that appeal to product people as like, “Yeah, all the frameworks, techniques, all the stuff, just think truly about what you’re trying to do. You’re trying to care enough about a problem to solve it on someone’s behalf and do it so well that it give us something every time.”
Lenny: I really love that last point of just that’s how you know if you’ve built something people care about. They give you something in return, and one of those things could be actually telling other people about it.
Christian Idiodi: That’s right.
Lenny: To your point about reference customers.
Christian Idiodi: Yes.
Lenny: Amazing. Well, with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
Christian Idiodi: I don’t have a choice.
Lenny: Nope. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Christian Idiodi: Oh boy. In this discipline, probably all of our books: Inspired, Empowered, and we are coming up with one in March, Transformed.
Lenny: I see that tee shirt there. I see the promo happening.
Christian Idiodi: Yes, it’s happening. It’s happening. But it’s really a reflection of so many decades of love and passion for product work. And I have not found, I always told Maddie that you write the books after have gone through the failure. It’s like, “I’ve failed at leadership, now there’s a book on it. I’ve failed at product, now there’s a book on it.” And it reflects really the heart of good product work. I love Ben said the hard thing about hard things I love. There’s some books that really describe the mindset and culture that good product work is done in. I always recommend those to people.
Lenny: Just on this topic of Transformed while we’re on it, when is it coming out, and can you give just an elevator pitch for the book just so people know what it’ll be about?
Christian Idiodi: Transformed is coming out March next year. Oh God, just three months. Some people should have gotten shipping dates on their books if you pre-ordered it now. But it really talks about how to move to the product model or the product operating model, which is really this set of beliefs and principles that the best companies work in. We share stories of companies that have transformed into this that are not your traditional bond digital or bond tech companies that have made this transition. We tell stories of what companies can do. If it’s anything, it’s an appeal that there is a better way of working and solving problems and that companies can work in this way regardless of where you are in the journey.
Lenny: All right. We’ll have to have you back once the book comes out to get more people aware of what is happening. Amazing. Okay, I’ll keep going. Favorite recent movie or TV show that you’ve really enjoyed?
Christian Idiodi: I jumped on the Succession bandwagon, and I enjoyed, and I used to love Billions too as well. I love good writing, really just intellectual media writing business. And so probably Succession and Billions would be two.
Lenny: Do you have a favorite interview question that you like to ask when you’re interviewing candidates?
Christian Idiodi: Well, I always give them a problem to solve. That is probably my favorite question, and it’s not a traditional problem. I probably will see something like, “Hey Lenny, I have a friend. He’s been legally deaf or hearing impaired his whole life, and he just got a new job that requires him to wake up significantly earlier than he normally does. And as you can imagine, traditional alarm clocks will not do it, will not solve the problem. And I would love to give that problem to you. Walk me through how you go about tackling this or solving this.” For me, I like that question because it gives me a sense of how you think. It gives me a sense of how you solve problems. It gives me a sense of how you know what you do not know and how you go about knowing the things you need to know, what you need to solve a problem.
There’s no magical right or wrong answer. I do a lot of people that say, “I have no clue what to do. I’m more curious and because I want to now know what you do, but you don’t have a clue.” Or people that jump straight to solutions, are more engineering-centric. People that jump straight to… I can get a sense of who you are when I give you a problem that requires you to do some thinking.
Lenny: And you’re doing this live in an interview? It’s not like, “Go home and think about this, and then-
Christian Idiodi: Oh, I’m doing this live in an interview.
Lenny: Live, okay. And then what’s a sign that they’re on the right track? What do you look for that’s like, “Yes, this is what I want to see”?
Christian Idiodi: Remember, when I think about what makes a good product manager, I look about collaborative problem solving. There are people that feel like, I’m just going to solve the whole thing myself. This is what we should do. We should do it like no evidence, no data, no kind of stuff in there. It’s very interesting. But people that are saying, “You know what? I would need probably work an engineer and designer. We might need to put [inaudible 01:26:46].” I look for intellectual curiosity in some ways, people that have proven questions in your head. People that are very quick to see things [inaudible 01:26:54] people. I will talk to 20 of them. I say, “How you going to do that? Do you know sign language?” And they’re like, “Oh, how am I going to talk to them?” There are people that are like, “I’m going to need a lot of help to try to figure this out. I don’t know a lot about your friend, but I know…” Some people have frameworks they run to. It exposes that, if they’re married to one way of working.
It’s more about knowing what you can’t know. I’m looking for empathy, humility in some sense. It is a competence thing because most of I can teach, I can coach a lot of things, but that arrogance, that ego, those kinds of things, those “I walk alone,” those things are very, very challenging and disruptive to a team culture.
Lenny: Do you have a favorite product that you’ve recently discovered that you really like? Either an app or something physical? Anything that’s like, “Oh, this is really cool”?
Christian Idiodi: My eldest son is into sports. He loves all kinds of sports stuff, sports apps, all of those kinds of things, and he got me on this app called Real, like real sports. It’s really cool. It shows scores of different games, but it’s really driven by social influence. So all of your Twitter posts will get there like, “Oh my God, [inaudible 01:28:07].” It’s almost like real time more than real time. You’re getting real time with reactions of people around you and your communities.
It’s a very different way of checking on a score than I’ve ever seen, and I thought it was just really, really thoughtful in how… I want to share reaction to touchdown with 50 people around the world that will care about my favorite team just got a touchdown, and you’ll all share reactions at the same time. And the first person that saw it, you can see it. It’s very simple. This is like scores for games, but these days I don’t check my scores anywhere else but on it.
Lenny: Do you have a favorite life motto that you often repeat to yourself, share with friends, either in work or in life, that you find useful?
Christian Idiodi: Wow, boy. I’ve said a lot in this talk about companies don’t care about about you, people care about you. It’s never too late to be what you want to be. But early on, my father would always tell me, “Show up. Show up, and you’re ahead of 80% of the people in the free world. Show up on time, and you’re ahead of 85% of the people in the free world. Show up on time with a plan, and you’re ahead of 90% of the people in the free world. And if somehow you have the guts to put that plan to action with a smile, then you probably will have a great chance of success. And if you do that over and over again, every aspect of your life, it can at least lead to successful outcomes.” And I think that’s a lot of some mental definition for me every day.
Lenny: Amazing. I love that. Final question: as maybe the most interesting man in the world, is there anything people may not know about you or would be surprised to hear about?
Christian Idiodi: Wow. I hope there are no surprises about me in that kind of case in that way, but I went to a gifted and talented school. I was out of my house at 12, and I went to kind of boarding school, and I’ve never been back home since then, so I’ve kind of been on my own. But we are kind of in the middle of nowhere, probably eight miles from any form of civilization and stuff in the middle of the jungle. No potable water, no electricity. So you kind of had to get water yourself, generate your own power. Probably the most interesting time in my life to shape my worldview, surviving at 12 to 16 on my own in the middle of the jungle. Very intriguing part of my life.
Lenny: Very different from your life these days. Actually, one more question. I think you’re the fourth… You’re from Nigeria, right? Your family’s from Nigeria?
Christian Idiodi: Yes.
Lenny: You’re the fourth Nigerian guest on this podcast, I realized. And I always like to ask, what’s your favorite Nigerian food slash which food should people seek out if they were to try to find some good Nigerian food?
Christian Idiodi: My favorite Nigerian is super-duper cultural and native. It’s like starch and [inaudible 01:31:06] soup. You can’t really find that anywhere, it got to come from mom’s cooking. Marty Cagan has tried it. He came to my hometown, my parents’ house and had it. But if you are discovering Nigerian food, [inaudible 01:31:18] is a variation of rice, which everybody has, jollof rice, and yes people, I’m going to say this: jollof rice, Nigerian jollof is better than Ghanaian jollof. It’s a war, but it’s okay. We already claim victory, and we’ll move on. But start with jollof rice is elementary, but then you have to try [inaudible 01:31:34] like a pounded yam with a soup. There are many different variations of that. And you get a pounded yam, like pounded cassava, and you eat that with a soup, and you will love it.
Lenny: Some controversy over here, competition-
Christian Idiodi: That’s right.
Lenny: … for who’s got the best rice. Amazing. Christian, I am now a huge fan of yours. I’m so happy we did this. Thank you so much for making time for this. Two final questions: where can folks find you online if they want to reach out, and how can listeners be useful to you?
Christian Idiodi: You can find me on LinkedIn as well. You can reach out to us on our websites svpg.com. I tell people the best fit to be useful to us is to do good work using these principles and all the things we teach people over and over again. We care about outcomes, we care about good product work in the world. I would love your support with the work I’m doing in Africa. I’ve always reached out to the product community around the world to help developing countries and communities. So please follow our work, please support our work in Africa in building a product community.
Lenny: And what is the website for that again? Specifically the nonprofit you started?
Christian Idiodi: Innovateafricafoundation.org.
Lenny: Amazing. Christian, thank you so much for being here.
Christian Idiodi: Thank you for having me, Lenny. Such a pleasure.
Lenny: Bye, everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| The Hard Thing About Hard Things | The Hard Thing About Hard Things(保留原文书名,Ben Horowitz 所著商业书籍) |
| Ben | Ben(保留原文,人名,此处指 Ben Horowitz,知名创业者和作者) |
| coaching | 辅导 |
| Craigslist | Craigslist(保留原文,美国知名分类广告网站) |
| Discovery | 发现工作 |
| early adopters | 早期采用者 |
| Empowered | Empowered(SVPG 系列著作之一,关于产品领导力) |
| evangelists | 布道者 |
| fake door test | 假的门测试(指假门测试/伪装门测试,一种产品验证方法) |
| Feasibility risk | 可行性风险 |
| funnel | 漏斗(营销/招聘中的转化漏斗) |
| Geoffrey Moore | Geoffrey Moore(保留原文,知名科技营销理论作者,采用曲线/跨越鸿沟理论提出者) |
| Howard Schultz | Howard Schultz(保留原文,时任星巴克 CEO) |
| Innovate Africa Foundation | Innovate Africa Foundation(保留原文,Christian Idiodi 在非洲创办的非营利组织) |
| Inspire Africa Conference | Inspire Africa Conference(保留原文,非洲产品大会名称) |
| Inspired | Inspired(SVPG 系列著作之一,产品管理经典) |
| Macy’s | 梅西百货 |
| Maddie | Maddie(保留原文,人名) |
| Marty Cagan | Marty Cagan(保留原文,Silicon Valley Product Group 创始人) |
| NASCAR | NASCAR(保留原文,美国知名赛车赛事组织) |
| opportunity solution trees | 机会方案树 |
| Paid Africa Fund | Paid Africa Fund(保留原文,Christian Idiodi 计划发起的非洲天使投资基金) |
| pickup games | 野球局(此处比喻低门槛、低风险的练习机会) |
| practice arena | 练习场域 |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| Quarterback | 四分卫(美式橄榄球位置,此处比喻团队核心指挥者) |
| Reference customer | 参考客户 |
| Silicon Valley Product Group | Silicon Valley Product Group(保留原文,知名产品管理咨询机构,常简称 SVPG) |
| single target market | 单一目标市场 |
| swag | 粗略估算(此处语境中 swag 指企业文化中的周边赠品,但术语表中已定义为”粗略估算”,本段未出现该词) |
| technologists | 技术狂热者 |
| Transformed | Transformed(SVPG 即将出版的著作,关于向产品运营模型转型) |
| TSA pre-check | TSA 预检通道(美国机场快速安检通道) |
| Usability risk | 可用性风险 |
| user research interview | 用户研究访谈 |
| Value risk | 价值风险 |
| Viability risk | 商业可行性风险 |
| word of mouth flywheel | 口碑飞轮 |
| 《Billions》 | 《Billions》(保留原文,Showtime 剧集) |
| 《Succession》 | 《Succession》(保留原文,HBO 剧集) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
产品管理的本质 | Christian Idiodi(SVPG)
产品管理的本质 | Christian Idiodi(SVPG)
文字记录
Christian Idiodi: 我常跟人解释,这份工作的真正本质是:你替别人醒来,为他们解决问题,而且要做得足够好,让他们愿意回馈你一些东西。这大概就是这份工作的真正本质。我一直把它叫做”认可证书”。它可以是收入、参与度、忠诚度、推荐——所有这些形式。这就是这份工作的核心。如果不有趣,你大概做得不对。如果不难,你大概也做得不对。
Lenny: 今天我的嘉宾是 Christian Idiodi。Christian 是硅谷产品集团(Silicon Valley Product Group)的合伙人,与 Marty Cagan 共事。Marty 在介绍我们认识时,称 Christian 为”世界上最有趣的人”。见过他之后,我倾向于同意这个说法。Christian 在产品领域有漫长的职业生涯,现在他把时间花在和各种大大小小的公司紧密合作上,帮助他们实施和改进产品管理的纪律。在我们的对话中,我们讨论了为什么产品管理这个领域经常被人讨厌,以及你能做些什么来避免成为一个大家都不想要的产品经理。我们花了很多时间讨论辅导——如何更好地辅导你的下属,如何从你的经理那里获得更好的辅导,以及一些在公司内部与领导者建立信任的非常聪明的方法。Christian 还分享了他所有探索方法中最喜欢的一种,用来决定该构建什么。
我们还花了一些时间讨论他在硅谷产品集团所做的出色工作。他在非洲的产品管理领域做了很多了不起的事情,帮助产品人和创始人打造伟大的公司。这些以及更多内容——Christian 非常棒。话不多说,为您带来 Christian Idiodi。
世界上最有趣的人
Lenny: Christian,非常感谢你的到来,欢迎来到播客。
Christian Idiodi: 谢谢你邀请我,Lenny。很高兴来到这里。
Lenny: 很高兴你能来。是 Marty Cagan 介绍我们认识的,他是你在硅谷产品集团的同事。他描述你的方式是,他认为你是世界上最有趣的人。你知道他是这么看你的吗?
Christian Idiodi: 我不知道。我也认为他是世界上最有趣的人之一。
Lenny: 你们对彼此真是太好了。我想从产品管理中我注意到的一个趋势开始聊,就是人们对产品管理的看法。感觉——我不知道这是新的现象还是一直存在——但似乎有一种趋势,就是大家不喜欢产品经理。创始人觉得自己应该等很久才招第一个产品经理。很多团队希望他们的团队里没有产品经理——“我们不需要这个人告诉我们该做什么”。我很好奇,你觉得为什么产品经理经常不受欢迎?对于正在收播的产品经理们,你有没有什么建议——如何避免成为一个大家不喜欢、不想要的产品经理?
为什么产品经理经常不受欢迎
Christian Idiodi: 我认为大多数人不喜欢产品经理,往往是因为他们没有经历过好的产品经理。产品管理的核心是基于能力的——也就是说,组织中应该有一个人最能代表客户,对客户和用户有深入的了解,对你的数据、行业、业务和产品本身有深入的了解。正因为这种能力,你才会信任他们来做决策。因为如果你有一个问题,比如我们想要更多客户,去找那个在客户方面的专家说”帮我解决这个问题”,就很合理。
而你在很多组织中看到的是,因为能力不足,产生了认知偏差、影响力错位和不信任——也就是说,我觉得我比你们更了解业务,或者更了解客户或数据,那我凭什么不能告诉你该做什么?
我认为人们没有理解的是,这个角色是一个团队角色。他们是一个团队的一部分,大家共同工作来发现我们要构建的解决方案,并以适合我们公司的方式来实现。所以当我回顾我合作过的公司时,凡是这个纪律被严重侵蚀的地方,都是产品管理的能力水平不够的地方。
我向一位 CEO 描述这个问题的方法是,我会问他:“告诉我,在你的公司里你信任谁来决定我们进入哪些市场、做哪些事情?“他们总会有某个高管、某个 VP、某个人的名字。我问为什么,他说:“Bob 在这里待了很久。他认识所有人。所有人都喜欢他、信任他。他了解我们的业务。“我常常对他说:“嗯,Bob 就是个产品经理。“当我这样解释的时候,高管们通常会觉得很意思。我说,这就是我们谈论的那种能力水平。
想象一下,如果你的每个团队都有一个 Bob。想象一下你能完成多少事情。所以,其一,我并不真的认为这是对产品管理的仇恨——这是对他们所经历过的产品管理的仇恨,也就是那些无法交付结果、无法帮助他们实现目标的人。
给产品经理的建议
Christian: 所以如果我给产品经理提建议,我常说,你看,当我们看到由销售驱动的产品管理或高管驱动的产品管理,看到这些产品管理的替代方案时,这不是对文化的否定,也不是对领导层的否定,而是落在个人身上。这个学科必须将自己提升到一个高度,赢得决定”我们做什么”的权利。
Lenny: 我完全持相同的观点。当人们说他们不喜欢产品经理时,我告诉他们的正是这句话——你只是还没有和一位优秀的产品经理共事过。一个出色的 PM 会让一切对你来说变得更轻松。如果你是一名 PM,你要做到你的团队不愿失去你。我绝对不想失去 Christian 作为我团队的 PM。那么,他们有没有什么可以做的,或者需要改变的,来成为那样的人?
Christian: 嗯,我刚才还在跟人开玩笑。我说,“我只见过两种途径能造就优秀的产品经理。一种是在职业生涯中经历过一系列惨痛的失败,或者有过糟糕的经历;另一种是从优秀的产品领导者那里学习。“这个角色的现实情况有点像——你做各种各样的事……也许就像体育比赛里球队的四分卫,你需要练习产品管理才能真正擅长产品管理。你不可能通过回避其中某些环节来获得精通。
我们已经相当清楚地定义了你需要向公司展现什么,他们才会信任你。所以有一段谦逊的时期,我要求所有产品经理都要经历——一段学习的时期,认识到自己不知道什么。你所不具备的,是组织的信任,甚至是自己对自己的信任——信任你比任何人都更了解客户、业务和数据。你需要做的是快速加速这个过程。你要找到组织里那个声音最大、最有影响力的人,那个所有人都知道他无所不知、每场会议都在的人,然后请他教你。你要去挑战他。如果他没时间教你,你就主动去帮他。我愿意给你做实习生。你要获得你经理的同意,然后说,“看,我想花时间跟 Lenny 在一起。他是销售负责人,他是运营负责人之类的。我只是想向他学习。”
这样做,你正在把那个人的信任延伸到自己身上。你也在和那个人建立关系。但更重要的是,你在学习是什么驱动着那个人的影响力——也就是他在业务或客户方面的专业能力。
做完这些之后,你必须持续做发现工作,因为现在不同的是——那个人知道他已经把所知道的一切都教给了你,而所有人都看到你每天都在学习。所以在某个时刻,人们会认识到你可能拥有比任何人都多的洞察和数据,而他们之所以能认识到这一点,是因为他们看到你向最优秀的人学习,也看到你在持续学习。所以我总是很实际地建议处于这种情况的产品经理:和人建立关系。你通过请他们做两件事来赢得他们的信任——要么你教我,要么我帮你。你要在这些关系中建立信任,和他们一起积累经验。你必须让自己沉浸在更深入的业务和数据理解中。
产品经理的四项风险
Lenny: 哇,这里面内容太多了。这太棒了。我觉得人们想听到的正是这些——如何变得更好,如何获得更多信任和尊重。所以你给那些想变得更好、减少被反感、更成功的 PM 的建议——我刚才边听边记了一些笔记。一是要有一种在公司里变得更加”全栈”的意识,去理解业务,而不只是”这是你的一个产品,这是你的一个目标”。然后就是这个持续学习的理念——一方面你在学习东西,另一方面人们看到你在学习,看到你真的关心业务中很多你可能不会自然而然想去了解的部分。这也帮助你建立关系。还有一个非常重要的点——如果你比任何人都知道得更多,人们自然会信任你、尊重你,希望你在团队里,因为你恰好拥有很多答案。
Christian: 是的。
Lenny: 太好了。沿着类似的思路,Silicon Valley Product Group 对产品经理的工作有一个非常好的定义。我觉得可以在这里花点时间聊聊。你们喜欢分享四个属性。能不能谈谈这个,作为一个基础性的内容?
Christian: 我之前提到过,产品经理处于一个团队之中,所以他们是作为团队的一部分来共同发现解决方案、决定构建什么。而每次你解决一个问题时,都伴随着固有的风险。有人会买吗?他们会选择它吗?他们会使用它吗?——这是价值风险(value risk)。他们能用吗?——这是可用性风险(usability risk)。我们能不能造出来?有没有技能来造?有没有时间来造?——这是可行性风险(feasibility risk)。以及它对我们的业务是否行得通——这是商业可行性风险(viability risk)。
产品经理的核心能力,主要是推动第一个和最后一个,也就是价值和商业可行性。一个值得构建的解决方案——人们会购买、选择或使用的东西——以及对我们的业务行得通的东西,这是产品团队所做事情的核心:以一种客户喜爱的方式、一种对业务行得通的方式解决问题。这就是为什么产品经理要承担所有的指责——一切顺利的话,是团队的功劳;一切出错的话,就怪产品经理。
这是因为人们要求他们对结果负责。没有人想做一个根本没人要的东西,而你的工作就是确保我们正在做的东西是人们想要的。这是一个非常了不起的角色。我试图向人们解释,这份工作的真正本质是:你替别人醒来,为他们解决问题。多么了不起的工作。我想不出还有哪个学科能拥有如此天然的许可,可以代表他人去解决问题。而且你要做得足够好,好到他们愿意给你一些回报。这才是这份工作的真正本质。我总是把它叫作”感谢证书”。它可以表现为收入、参与度、忠诚度、口碑推荐,所有这些形式。这就是这份工作的真正本质。如果不觉得有趣,你大概做得不对。如果不觉得困难,你大概也做得不对。
Lenny: 哇,我好喜欢这个框架——你给客户一些东西,而你的成功是以他们是否回馈你为衡量标准,基本上就是他们是否为你的产品付费。多么美妙的思考方式。天哪。
好的,总结一下这四个要素:价值、可用性、商业可行性、可行性——用来理解他们正在构建的产品是否满足所有这些属性。
Christian Idiodi: 没错。你是在试图揭示一个解决方案,而当你获得两样东西时,你就知道问题已经解决了——客户喜爱的东西,他们愿意回馈给你的东西,以及我们的业务能在某种程度上支撑它。我特别要指出的是,这些是我们分类体系中不同的风险,也就是我们所说的你必须解决的那些问题。这是一项团队协作,因此有这四个风险:我们是否应该做它?人们是否会用它?人们是否会买单?我们的客户或业务是否能支撑它?你需要在设计师和产品工程师的配合下回答这些问题。
新 PM 最容易在哪方面失败
Lenny: 在这四个风险中——价值、可用性、商业可行性、可行性——你认为大多数新 PM 最容易在哪方面失败,或者应该花更多时间?
Christian Idiodi: 我的天,价值。价值可能是最重要的,也是最被忽视的。造成这一点的主要原因往往是团队的运营模式。团队通常被分配一张路线图,上面列着要构建和交付的项目和功能。如果是这样的话,你其实真的不需要产品经理,因为他们会默认价值已经成立。如果老板让我做这个,我不能说”我们该不该做这个?这是不是正确的事情?有没有更好的选择?人们会买单吗?“你只会默认它有价值。
所以,当人们问我为什么产品经理在团队中似乎扮演着核心领导角色,几乎像四分卫一样——并不是因为他们比设计师或工程师更擅长解决问题,而是因为他们在回答一个决定我们是否应该一开始就做这件事的问题。
所以价值往往是最难解决却又最容易被忽视的。我们经常看到一种不好的模式:公司会说,“是的,我们做了一个测试,300 个用户都打了 84% 或 90% 的分数。他们喜欢它。“这时候我会说,“仅仅因为有人能使用你的产品,并不意味着他们会购买它。仅仅因为他们能用,并不意味着他们会选择它。仅仅因为他们能用,并不意味着他们真的会用。“人们说的往往和他们做的不一样。而我们的工作是真正解决问题——也就是核心价值——以一种有意义的方式。但它常常被忽视,因为我们只是在给自己的清单上打勾。所以它是最重要的,因为这正是”感谢证书”的核心——你得到的回报,那就是最终的结果。归根结底就是价值。
发现工作的终极方法:参考客户
Lenny: 你曾经围绕发现工作做过一个相关的演讲,讲的是所有可以帮助你理解该做什么、如何让产品有价值的方法。发现工作流程的每一步都有无数框架:新闻稿、故事映射、机会解决方案树、假门测试,等等。然后你说,如果我们只能选一件事,如果有一个你最推荐的流程或方法——你的回答本质上就是找到一定数量的参考客户,和他们合作,一起设计产品。你现在仍然认为这是唯一的最佳选择吗?如果只能选一种方法来决定做什么?如果是的话,能不能谈谈你具体是怎么推荐的?
Christian Idiodi: 产品工作的圣杯就是参考客户。这是一个使用过你的解决方案或产品,并且热爱到愿意向别人推荐的人。我之前描述过产品团队的工作是以客户喜爱且对业务可行的方式解决问题。对我来说,今天衡量一个人对我们的产品有多”爱”的终极定义是——他们愿意拿自己的声誉做担保去向别人推荐。
如果你想想,你采访过很多创始人和创业者,你会发现有些人找到一个有需求的市场,带着一个想法就跳进去了。但如果你看这些创始人驱动的企业的核心,创始人会说,“我有一个问题,这也是他们的问题,我专注解决这个问题,然后让我的朋友们也用上了。”
这几乎就像一个理念:如果他们自己就是第一个参考客户。他们离问题足够近,沉浸在问题的环境中,以一种足够有说服力的方式解决了它,然后意识到——还有更多和我一样的人。就好比我对你说,“Lenny,我们去吃牛排吧。在你附近找一家新牛排馆。“你可能会上网搜索,看到一家只有一条评价的牛排馆。你感觉如何?不确定。也许其他人都不想尝试这家。你看到两条评价,你会想,也许就是厨师和他配偶写的。问题是你要看到多少条正面评价才会决定”我们去试试这家吧”。这里有一些固有的规律——如果你看 Geoffrey Moore 的采用曲线和类似模型,大多数人不想做第一个尝试的人。但如果其他和你相似的人已经接受并认可了某个东西,你就更可能去尝试。
所以对我而言,这套方法的全部精髓就在于创造那些最早的人——那些参考客户。如果你思考公司如何转向以销售驱动或运营驱动,几乎所有公司一开始都是产品驱动的。产品在先。你先做出一个东西,然后觉得可以了,开始招销售、市场和运营人员。真正发生的是产品团队创造了第一批客户,然后一群人需要去捕获已创造的价值。所以这里的关键是,这始终是产品团队的工作。他们失去影响力的原因在于销售人员不得不去卖一个产品。你明白吗?所以销售人员会倒逼回来,“我需要这个功能,我需要那个功能。“但如果你来跟我说”我想吃牛排”,而我说”让我给你看 20 个和你一样的人,他们都推荐这家牛排馆”,我作为销售人员的工作就非常轻松了。我只需要说,“嘿,你应该来这吃。所有爱吃牛排的人都在这吃。”
所以当产品团队没有创造出有说服力的参考客户时,他们就会感受到来自组织的压力。所以这绝对是我最喜欢的方法。这套方法的运作方式是:你要发现、交付和培养——谁有这个问题,也就是客户。我想发现谁有这个问题,同时发现并交付这个问题的解决方案。这里的理念是,如果你真的想解决一个问题,你需要走出你的办公室。去花时间跟有这个问题的人在一起,不解决问题就不离开。人们谈论为什么我们在创纪录的时间内研发出了新冠疫苗——当然,技术进步了,研究也进步了。但如果你想想,我们拥有有史以来任何疫苗中最多的志愿者人数。
沉浸式发现工作的威力
Christian Idiodi: 为什么?我们需要到处去找新冠患者吗?不需要,他们就在我们身边。研究人员完全沉浸在了问题的环境中。他们可以研究……所以我经常把这叫做,某种程度上几乎像是一种高压锅式的发现工作。如果你真的、真的想解决一个问题,走出你的办公楼,走出你的假设,走出你的主观意见。让自己沉浸其中,找到有这个问题的人,跟他们待在一起,直到你发现一个解决方案。这就是你要做的。我之所以如此推崇这套方法,最大的两个原因是:第一,如果我找不到一定数量的、有这个问题的人,天哪,那这可能就不是一个值得解决的问题。使用这套方法,我从来没有经历过产品失败。如果要我算的话……天哪,上次数了一下,我职业生涯中参与或协助打造的产品大概已经到了 205 个。我每年都会尝试从零开始做一个新产品。这算是我一个比较疯狂的地方。我的朋友都知道,我生日最想要的礼物就是一个值得解决的问题。我喜欢从创意走到收入,整个搭建过程,我用这种方式测试所有这些方法。大家都知道我最喜欢的方法是:如果我们发现了一个值得解决的问题,我们需要为它找到一个解决方案——B2B 的话,我需要 6 到 8 个参考客户;B2C 的话,我大概需要 15 到 25 个参考客户,作为我们已经达到产品市场契合度的标志。
Lenny: 确认一下,你是说你现在还在做产品,自己亲手做产品,实践这些方法,而且你已经做了……那你最近做的产品都有哪些?这个我之前真不知道。
Christian Idiodi: 我现在在非洲做很多工作。WorkNigeria 是一个帮助人们找工作的招聘平台,我们做的类似于招聘平台加人力资源的替代方案,同时也有一些咨询服务。我其实还在做另一个应用,围绕 NDA(保密协议),在某些方面保护高净值人群。所以基本上每年我都会找一个这样值得解决的问题,然后带一个团队一起做发现工作。
Lenny: 太厉害了。我感觉”世界上最有意思的人”正在一点一点地揭开面纱,我们对你了解得越来越多。好的,太棒了。那我们来总结一下这些——
参考客户方法的核心要义
Lenny: 好的,太棒了。那我来总结一下这些要点,这些真的非常精彩,而且我以前从没听人这么描述过。基本上,要真正理解如何打造人们实际需要的东西、解决真实的问题,一个非常有效的方法就是挑选参考客户。我非常喜欢”参考”这个词——他们不仅仅是帮你打造产品的人,他们还会成为未来客户的参考,因为他们最终会爱上这个产品,因为你是为他们打造的,他们喜欢它。
你的建议是:在 B2B 领域找 6 到 8 个,B2C 领域找 15 到 25 个。之所以需要一个具体的数字,是因为如果你只找一两个人,你永远不知道,他们可能碰巧就是那仅有的、有着其他人都没有的奇怪问题的人。我认为这种做法通常的缺陷就在于此——你最终只为一小撮人做了产品,而其他人根本不需要。听起来在你的经验中,这个数字是一个很好的基准,意味着很可能还有更多人有这个问题。
Christian Idiodi: 对。有一些研究验证了这些数字。早期的时候,IBM 在销售那些超级计算机时就遇到了困难。如果你要买一台价值百万美元的计算机,有人来问”嘿,你要不要买?“你的反应是”我不知道。有没有其他人已经买了?我能不能做第一个?“当时有一个很常见的问题:什么条件能让你下定决心买?有人说,“如果我看到有五六个跟我类似的人已经有了这个,我就有信心向公司提出我们应该入手的论据了。“于是就变成了,那我怎么创造出最初的五到六个呢?B2C 方面的验证,你可以在 App Store、Yelp 这些平台上看到。我的逻辑是,如果你发现一家牛排馆有 25 条五星好评,你很可能会选择去尝试。
所以我放在 App Store 上的每一个应用,在应用商店上线的第一天,就有 25 条五星好评。我永远不会上线一个应用然后想”希望 Lenny 会喜欢”或者”看看第一个用户是谁”。上线的第一天就有 25 条……所以在达到 25 个人之前,我知道我还没准备好——这 25 个人跟我合作过,告诉我”我现在愿意拿自己的名誉来担保”。有时候我可能需要跟 30 个甚至 50 个人合作,因为最终的产出是 25 个参考客户。因为如果 Lenny 说”我没那么喜欢”或者”我不太放心”,我不会为 Lenny 单独定制。我会继续寻找我的单一目标市场,跟更多人聊。如果我拿到 25 个,我就达到了产品市场契合。
Lenny: 太有意思了。这基本上就是启动了那个大家一直在寻找的口碑飞轮——怎么让人们自发地去谈论你的产品。为他们打造,解决他们的问题,让他们知道这个东西的存在。你刚才提到了一些关于如何判断是否达到了产品市场契合度的内容,比如你问他们愿不愿意给你写五星好评之类的。我想知道,你觉得什么信号能告诉你”很好,我又多了一个真正满意的人”?你凭什么判断跟这个人之间已经达到了产品市场契合?
早期采用者:技术狂热者与布道者
Christian Idiodi: 如果让我想想我会怎么做,首先选定一个要解决的问题,我必须知道我在为谁解决这个问题。而且要有某种迹象,我要验证你确实有这个问题。我在寻找一种特定类型的人。在我们的领域里,这些早期采用者分为两类:技术狂热者(technologists)和布道者(evangelists)。技术狂热者可能是这样的:“新款 iPhone 16 要出了,有五个摄像头,我马上在某科技评测论坛上写了篇文章,超快、超酷、设计一流。“你就是热爱新技术,总是第一时间尝试新技术。而布道者可能是这样的:“天哪,iPhone 15 三个摄像头已经让我看起来很棒了,iPhone 16 一定能让我更帅,所以我要去 Apple Store 排三个小时甚至通宵,因为我等不及要拿到 iPhone 16 了。”
他们看起来可能有点不太理性,但你要找的就是这样的人——那些相信自己有这个问题的人。就像在我的例子中,你愿意尝试任何一家牛排馆。你就是那种”我爱吃牛排,管它有没有评价,我都愿意试试”的人。而我在做的事情是:好,Lenny 爱吃牛排,他想尝试一家牛排馆。我可以跟他说,“Lenny,我正在这打造最好的牛排馆。如果我做出一份你绝对爱吃的菜单,你愿意告诉别人吗?“可以是一段视频推荐、写一条评价之类的。而且没关系,Lenny,如果你不喜欢第一版,我想听听你的反馈。我希望你跟我一起努力,确保我在这打造出最好的牛排馆。这就是整套思路。
二十五人验证法与产品市场契合度
Christian Idiodi: 所以我会找 25 个像你这样的人,不断调整——在这个意义上就是反复迭代产品和菜单,直到 Lenny 说:“天哪,这是世界上最棒的牛排馆。“我就是要把这件事写出来。当 25 个人都……不是因为这真的是最好的牛排馆,而是因为他们足够喜欢。因为这才是价值真正发生转变的地方。因为如果我说:“Lenny,去给我写条评价,五星好评。“你会说:“呃,我不太确定我愿不愿意。“你说为什么?你看,这时候我才能真正得到更深入的反馈,因为人们会说或做任何事,只是为了不伤害我们的感情,或者为了让我们别再烦他们。所以他们会说:“好好好,我给你写五星好评。“但当我说真的去写的时候,你会犹豫:“嗯,我有点顾虑。“为什么?这恰恰是真正出色的发现工作所在。但这件事很难孤立地进行。你必须沉浸在那些有这个问题的人中间。所以产品市场契合度(product market fit)就是当你在这种发现工作中不断迭代,发现并交付了一样足够有意义的东西,以至于那些你的目标客户愿意拿自己的名声来担保,成为你的参考客户(reference customer)。这就是我的判断标准。
Lenny: 不过我能想象,Christian 这么有魅力,过来跟我说:“嘿 Lenny,你能给我的产品留个五星好评吗?我正在做这个,我想搞清楚大家到底需不需要。“我可能会说:“当然可以啊,我给你留个五星好评。“你怎么避免这种情况呢?就是那种”我只是想做个好人”、“无所谓啦,我给你五星好评”的情况。
用真实客户反馈驱动营销
Christian Idiodi: 这就是为什么在 B2C 领域我需要 25 个人。别误会我的意思,如果我能说服 25 个人,那我可能只是有一个营销产品和一套有感染力的营销话术。如果仅仅靠一条好的宣传语和个人魅力就能让人们接受产品的话。但这种做法的好处是,你可以极早地应对风险,因为你可以让组织中的许多其他部门参与进来——市场、销售、法务、财务。人们经常问我怎么想出营销话术或产品描述的?我说:“那不是我编出来的。“如果我问 Lenny:“你对这个产品感觉怎么样?“他说:“嗯,很酷,非常流畅,非常好用。“市场部会说:“我们不喜欢这些词,我们想叫它’全面’。“但当你出去卖产品的时候,人们会失望,因为期望是由包装盒上的文案塑造的。
我只宣传客户亲口告诉我的话。我在发布产品时从来不会被客户的反应惊到,因为通过这种方法,我已经拿到了他们的反馈。所以我会把 Lenny 说的话原封不动地放在包装盒上。“嘿,这个产品很酷、很流畅、很好用。“我也曾经发布过一个产品,上面写着”超级快但很难阅读”,因为技术团队说某个东西的字体没法改,就是会很难阅读。你知道大家拿到产品后说了什么吗?“天哪,确实超级快。好吧,也确实很难阅读。“在某些方面它匹配了他们的期望。所以我通过这种方法学会了怎么卖产品、怎么营销产品,因为我面对的是真实的人,我们不是在做假设。
“推广这个最好的方式是什么?Lenny,你觉得呢?你会怎么找到这个产品?这个措辞你能产生共鸣吗?这能准确描述菜单吗?“看?这就是当你使用这种方法时在做的事情。对很多人来说这感觉很重,但这恰恰是实践的一部分。如果你大量地这样做,你会变得非常擅长让各方参与进来,你和客户一起解决问题。但对我来说,最关键的是你不会遭遇产品失败,因为你有一个自然的退出机制——也就是说,如果我找不到 25 个爱吃牛排的人,我凭什么还要开一家牛排馆呢?所以如果你找不到足够多有这个问题并且愿意帮助你的人,就直接说:这不是一个值得解决的问题。但更重要的是,你真的开始走向……这是通向产品市场契合度最快的路径,也是对我来说最清晰的定义,因为我知道我的产品什么时候准备好了——当我把这些点点滴滴都落实到位的时候。
招募本身就是信号
Lenny: 你刚才提到的那一点我觉得特别重要——招募本身就是巨大的信号。你能否找到那些有这个问题、而且足够关心这个问题的人,愿意跟你交谈、花时间去探索一个还不存在的东西。我觉得这非常有意思。还有我认为另一个关键点是,它是一个解决方案解决很多人的问题,而不是一堆不同的东西满足一堆不同的人。
Christian Idiodi: 没错,没错。如果一个人说”我不想要这个”,另一个想要这个,又一个想要那个,你就不做。这就是你怎么知道该做最少的——25 个人都必须要同一个东西。如果有一个人不在这上面,你就干脆不做。这之所以有力量,是因为如果我跑来找你说:“嘿,缺了这个功能。“我就说:“是啊,25 个跟你一样的人没有这个功能也很满意。“你看?这就是为什么如果你想想你在看评价时怎么做的,你看到五星,立刻就觉得”嗯,够好了”。但如果你有疑问呢?你可以双击展开那条评价去读。人们就是这样被说服的。有一种社会影响力在起作用:“嗯,Lenny 挺靠谱的,他喜欢这家牛排馆。那我也应该喜欢。他都不介意没有这个东西,那我也不应该介意。“所以你的参考客户极其有力量,比任何公司都更有力量去影响消费者的选择。
实战案例:星巴克
Lenny: 基本上 Strive 就是这样打造新产品的。他们找到有问题的客户,跟非常少量的客户合作,为他们打造产品,他们的很多新产品就是这样做出来的。我觉得 Rippling 也是这么做的。所以我觉得这对所有听众来说都是很好的一课,尤其是那些正在尝试做新产品的人。你有没有什么想得起来的例子,可以比较有意思地聊一聊,某个你用这套流程做出来的东西?
Christian Idiodi: 哎呀。我讲一个我在 snag job 做的案例,那是一家 staffing 公司,做小时工的,帮人找到最合适的工作或者小时工岗位。我接到一个电话,来自星巴克全球招聘负责人。他打电话给我——你可以看到这套方法的好处,因为我是他有问题时会打电话的那个人。我在之前的公司跟他用过这套方法。他甚至不知道我换了新公司。他打给我说:“Christian,我有个问题。“我说:“我们谁没问题呢?“他说:“我们刚在旧金山湾区收购了一家面包店。在做接管这家公司的文件手续时,我们发现接近 800 名员工可能是非法务工人员。”
Christian Idiodi: 我说:“哇,这听起来确实是个问题。“他说:“是啊,想象一下这事儿要是上了新闻会怎样。但更重要的是,我们仍然需要把所有文件手续办好。所以这些人都会辞职,我们将拥有一家没有员工的面包店。“我作为产品人,第一个问题是:“哇,你愿意出一百万美元来解决这问题吗?“他说:“不是吧,认真的?“我说:“三十万呢?“我随便抛了个数字。他说:“也许吧。“我说:“哇,你成功引起了我的注意。“我去找我的 CEO,让他打这个电话。我拉上一个设计师和一个工程师,就说:“嘿,如果你们有时间,我很想跟你们一起做一个小项目。“我在电话里简单给他们介绍了情况。现在我要做的第一件事就是尝试定义问题,识别问题。真正的问题到底是什么?
我们把问题拆解开来,反复讨论。我们说,归根结底,星巴克需要快速招到大约 800 人,因为我们没办法解决所有人的文件手续问题。但这些人都走掉之后,他们需要快速招人。我说,还有谁有这个问题?我们开始抛出各种猜测。我说:“我们在说什么呢?走出去看看。“所有人都跳上我的车,我们开始到处转,这就是我们做产品工作的地方。我们在车里讨论,刚出大楼,就看到一个新麦当劳即将开业的建筑工地,我们好奇起来,心想:“去看看吧。“我们开始跟工地上的人聊。运气不错,运营总监正好在现场,我们问他,跟我们讲讲新开一家麦当劳是怎么回事。
他说:“你知道吗,开业当天我们需要大约 120 个人。“我们说:“哇,麦当劳?真的要 120 个人?“他说:“对啊,你知道这个行业大多数人第一天上班就不会来吗?而且我们在施工的每一天都在亏钱。所以洗手间一建好,我们就想开业。“我们心想:“哇,我们没想到这一点——新店建设、新店开业。“他们需要快速招到大量的人。我说:“非常感谢。“我给了他我的名片,他给了我他的。我们跳回车里,继续开。我们去了商场,开始跟那里的人聊。我们跟梅西百货的一位经理聊了聊,她说:“哦,你看,我们在假日季要招 2 万人。“
发现更大的市场
我们说:“梅西百货。“对,夜班、周末、物流之类的。我们从夏天就开始招人,因为实在太痛苦了。我们在这里做的事情,就是验证这是一个真实的问题,其他人也会有这个问题。所以我们回到办公室,开始头脑风暴:“人们会怎么着手解决这个问题?“我们也不太确定,但那个麦当劳的人确实非常迫切。我说:“我有他的名片。“我们开始抛出一些想法。于是我给麦当劳那个人打电话,说:“你看,你刚跟我们见过面。“他说:“是啊。“我说:“我们很想帮你解决这个问题。“他说:“哦,你们有什么想法?“我说:“我们讨论过了。如果我们直接给你送去一些人面试,你满意的话就雇他们,怎么样。”
他说:“这听起来挺简单的。“他又问:“我怎么付费?“我们粗略估了个价:“也许你可以按录用的人数来付费。“他说:“哦,我觉得这没什么风险,挺好的。“我心想:“哦,好的。“我们完全不知道该怎么做。我们真就是在 Google 上搜”人们怎么找麦当劳的工作”。我们去大学贴传单,在报纸上登广告——那还是报纸时代——我们尝试各种不同的方法来把人引入一个漏斗,在 Craigslist 之类的平台上发布信息来吸引人。到这周结束时,我们大概找到了 40 个有兴趣来面试的人。我们觉得第一次尝试能有这个成绩还不错。我们给那位经理打电话说:“听着,周一我们会给你送 40 个人来面试,这很棒。“
第一次尝试:惨痛的教训
周一我带着我的设计师和工程师,跟经理一起在现场。九点钟,我们预计有三个人来面试,没人出现。十点钟,又该来三个,来了一个人。到一天结束的时候,来了不到 20 个人。这个人只招到了四五个人。我们心想:“我们太差了,这太糟糕了。“我们去找经理,“我们去道个歉,浪费了你一天时间。“他开始笑了。我们问:“怎么了?“他说:“哦,我忘了告诉你们。这个行业的人连面试都不会来。我们是麦当劳,我们付的是最低工资。别人多给 25 美分时薪他们就跳槽了。他们会为了一份离家近一个街区——甚至不到一英里的工作离开我们。“
迭代与突破
这时候我们那位工程师也在旁边,他在思考这件事。他觉得这真的很有意思。大约一半的人来了,来了的人里面他录用了五分之一。如果你真的想解决这个问题,按照概率规律来算,我们大概需要给这个人送去将近 200 个人。我们需要做得更大。我们冲回办公室,又给麦当劳那个人打了电话。我说:“下周一我们可以再试一次吗?“他说:“我只为录用的人付钱对吧?“我们说:“对。“他说:“哦,那你们尽管折腾吧。“这确实是个苦差事,他们多年来一直在尝试各种办法。
现在我们开始加倍努力。我们开始给所有没来面试的人回电话:“怎么回事?你迷路了吗?你不想要这份工作吗?你怎么了?“我们开始搞清楚上次哪些渠道效果好,哪些浪费了钱,获取一个人的成本是多少。我们花了一周时间在那些有效渠道上加大投入。我们的名单上大概有了 120、130 个人。周日之前,我们开始给他们打电话:“请务必来面试。别让我们丢脸。你不想要这份工作吗?你需要地址吗?要不要我打电话提醒你、帮你设闹钟?“我们用尽各种方法来让更多人出现。第二天我们去了,到一天结束的时候,他招到了大约 45 到 50 个人。他走过来跟我们握手,说:“哇,质量非常好。我所有的招聘人员都全情投入了,整个过程很顺利,“——他说我们做得非常成功。
Christian Idiodi: 他说:“以后我在这个地区每开一家新麦当劳,都想用你们。“这时候我还不知道自己有了一个产品,我只知道自己成功帮了麦当劳的一个人。但我觉得已经积累了足够的认知。于是我给星巴克的朋友打电话:“嘿,还记得我们之前聊过的那个问题吗?“他说:“记得,我很乐意帮你解决。“我说:“好的,你有什么想法?“他说:“我觉得我们需要给你送去大约 3000 个人面试。“他说:“3000 个人?我跟你说过我只需要 800 个。“我说,在这个行业,大多数人不会来面试的,对吧?他说:“天哪,你很了解我们这个行业。我喜欢这个,我要上报一下,我觉得我们会把这个合同给你们。”
我带上设计师和工程师,一起去了旧金山,因为项目就在那边。我们包下一整间酒店,招兵买马,动用了所有我们知道的渠道,在那一带全力推进。记住,那时候我们没有任何软件,没有技术。设计师和我们一起纯手工完成这一切——Excel 表格、电话、邮件,全靠这些。一周之内,星巴克招到了 784 个人。第二个星期一早上,我收到了星巴克联系人的邮件,他抄送了时任星巴克 CEO 的 Howard Schultz。邮件写道:“这些人救了我们的命。“我把邮件转发给了我的 CEO,但随后我想:我现在只知道自己能帮麦当劳和星巴克解决问题,但这不意味着我就有了一个产品。不过我现在对问题本身已经有了足够的定义。我找到了市场营销负责人和销售负责人,我说:“告诉我你们接触过的哪些人有这个问题。“因为我们需要跟更多的人合作,去探索一个可扩展、可维护、可靠、并且适合我们业务的解决方案。
新的挑战
说来也巧,下一个机会是洛杉矶国际机场。他们要开放一个新航站楼,说:“我们需要 200 个人来管理新航站楼里所有的店铺。“我们心想:“200 个人?我们刚招了将近 800 个,小菜一碟。“我们去洛杉矶参加招聘团队的简报会,他们告诉我们,在国际机场工作的人员必须符合旅客的人口构成比例。我们说:“你说什么?""对,我们有 13% 的中文旅客,就需要 13% 会说中文的员工。“我们说:“抱歉?还有 5% 需要说韩语的。“我的意思是,我的团队在洛杉矶,在唐人街,挨家挨户去招募来机场工作的人。如果我们期望 10 个人出现,实际上只有 1 个人来。
我们开始给求职者打电话:“怎么回事?“他们说:“你知道在机场工作意味着什么吗?首先,我早上五点起床,开车到员工停车场,然后坐接驳大巴,再过安检——那时候可没有什么 TSA 预检通道——如果我想休息一下,还得再过一次安检,而他们只付我最低工资。“我们花了将近三个月才招满。我们不得不跟工会谈判,把时薪提高到 15 美元左右才能吸引到人。做完这个项目回来之后,你猜我们怎么说——那不是我们的客户。再也不做了。我们再也不碰机场了,太痛苦了。
产品诞生的过程
差不多这个时候,赶上节日季,我们联系了梅西百货的人。我们把跟麦当劳合作的经历告诉了他们,他们说:“哦,我们试试看。“我们开始跟他们合作。你可以想象,在这个过程中,工程师一直在思考如何用技术来改进这一切。我经常跟别人讲,我从来没有写过需求文档,从来没有写过用户故事。而设计师也在思考,如何改进端到端的体验——好,我们需要一个招聘者的体验,一个求职者的体验。我们有了一个漏斗。我们需要做一个排班工具,这样就能规模化地安排面试。那通知呢?也许可以用短信。我们可以给他们发一张地图,让他们知道怎么找到地方……所有这些东西,正是因为他们从一开始就参与定义问题,所以他们全身心地沉浸在解决问题的过程中。我们花了大约八个半月,将近九个月的时间把这个产品做出来。产品上线后的前 90 天,就签下了 3200 万美元的销售额。
为什么呢?因为麦当劳可能直到今天还在用这个产品来为每一家新店开业招人。星巴克也签了全球合同。我们说:“我们目前只在美国做了发现工作,所以只知道在这个市场行得通。“后来我们又发现,像 NASCAR 这种大型体育赛事,需要在极短时间内集中大量人手。他们用的也是同一类产品来完成短时间内的大规模招聘。你仔细想想,我一方面在发现谁有这个问题,在拓展有这个问题的客户;另一方面,我在发现并交付解决这个问题的方案。
Lenny: 太疯狂了。你说这个产品上线的第一年就做了三千多万美元。
Christian Idiodi: 对。
Lenny: 难以置信。我太喜欢这个故事了,这就是”做不可扩展的事”的完美典范——你亲自去招麦当劳员工,然后又去招星巴克员工。
Christian Idiodi: 没错。
Lenny: 然后又去招机场员工。哇。
Christian Idiodi: 先做不可扩展的事,然后再做可扩展的事。当你真正搞清楚了怎么做那些不可扩展的事情之后,那种力量是巨大的。因为技术的力量恰恰在于它在规模上所能实现的美好。
Lenny: 说到这一点,说起来容易做起来难——很多人都在谈论”做不可扩展的事”,但很多人实际上根本不会去做。他们会说:“让别的人去搞定吧”或者”我们先想想未来的样子,而不是直接上手去做、去解决问题、去发现新问题。“我也很喜欢你刚才提到的——你没有用我们讨论过的那些方法。没有假的门测试,没有机会方案树,没有用户访谈。你就是在跟真实的人交流,不是那种坐下来、一问一答式的用户研究访谈。
Christian Idiodi: 我说过,学习如何解决问题的最好方式就是去解决问题。你会得到所有答案——研究、失败、错误,所有的证据。你会了解人们说的和他们做的之间的差距。你会验证和测试。因为归根结底,什么是具有统计意义的?解决问题本身就是我们解决了问题、并且知道如何解决问题的最清晰的证明。所以,是的,这是一个非常强大的方法。
Lenny: 我也很喜欢你当时其实并不确切知道这会通向哪里。就是一种探索性的——让我们看看这里是否有什么东西。然后你就一直顺着这条路走——嗯,有个问题,看起来我们找到了解决办法,让我们看看还能走多远。太精彩了。
Lenny: 我想转到另一个话题。你花了大量时间帮助产品领导者提升辅导能力、建立关系的能力,以及与团队成员建立信任的能力。Marty Cagan 之前来做节目时跟我分享过一句话,他说你与高管和产品领导者建立信任的速度比他认识的任何人都快,你辅导的人对你崇拜得就像对待摇滚明星一样。他简直是全球最大几家公司的 CEO 们的快捷拨号联系人。好,那我就直接问——成为一名优秀教练的秘诀是什么?听众们怎样才能成为更好的教练,去辅导自己的下属,甚至同事?
领导者与教练的本质
Christian Idiodi: 这个话题可能是我最发自内心关心的。我的意思是,我认为我们的企业组织结构在很多方面都未能创造出高绩效和稳定发展的人才,而其中一个方面就是领导力的缺失。我所说的领导力,其核心要素我经常指向的就是教练。也就是,领导者的工作到底是什么。我告诉人们,是的,最高层面来说是背景和文化——我们为什么在这里?我们要去哪里?我们如何组织自己去达成目标?什么是重要的?诸如此类的问题,以及我们做事的环境。但还有一个人的一面,因为你认识到你想要一个成果,而你需要人们协同工作来达成这个成果。所以我要去配备人员,我要去招聘、培训、装备他们,然后把他们安排到相应的岗位上。但其中很多事情是一次性的——我制定一个愿景,我制定一个战略,我招一个人。但有一样东西是每天都在做的,那就是辅导,那才是管理者的日常工作。如果我去想世界上那些高绩效团队,你可以举体育为例,也可以举艺术家——他们都有教练和管理者,这是日常的事。当我向人们解释这一点时,我说:做产品管理是产品经理的工作,但让产品管理做得更好,是管理者的工作,是教练的工作。人们往往误解了这种动态关系。
你看,如果你在打一场比赛,你是在场上。教练在场边看着你比赛,让你在比赛中变得更好。你的工作可能是踢球或传球,你需要达到一定的能力水平,但有些人的工作就是每天都在寻找让你把工作做得更好的方式。
为什么大多数人不擅长辅导
大多数人给不出好的辅导,头号原因是他们自己从未经历过好的辅导。大多数人只能把别人给过自己的东西、自己经历过的体验,再给予别人。我曾经参加一个高管会议,一位 CEO 在会上站起来,对着所有人开始大吼大叫、爆粗口,完全失控。我说,“等等,等等。“我说,“我们能到外面谈谈吗?“他们把他拉到外面。我说,“首先,考虑到你正在制造的这种氛围,我甚至觉得我没法再跟你合作了,但我需要理解你为什么要这样对你的团队说话。“他跟我说,他说,“Christian,我的老板以前就是这样冲我大吼的。你看我,我现在是 CEO 了,我扛过来了,我理解。他们都是成年人,他们也能理解。”
我说,“那你告诉我你想传达什么。“他给我解释了一番,我说,“可以让我给你示范一种替代的沟通方式吗?“他说,“什么意思?“我说,“首先,让我在团队面前这样做安全吗?“于是我回到团队,说,“听着,我要试着把 CEO 想说的话再说一遍。他允许你们畅所欲言、坦诚反馈,我希望你们诚实地说哪种方式更有效,以及为什么。“我尝试把他想表达的意思重新表述了一遍,然后问团队。团队说,是的,同样的信息,但当他那样跟我们说的时候,我们就只是去执行。我们明白了,去做了。但你刚才这样向我们描述,我能想到还有其他四件事需要去做。我甚至还能理解一些我们缺失的、现在需要去处理的事情。
CEO 非常震惊,在某种程度上,他从未见过替代方案,也从未见过替代方案能奏效。大多数人需要先看到,然后自己去做,然后才能教给别人。我之所以说这些,是因为我需要让大家真正理解教练这件事的重要性。某种程度上,我自己可能都不知道自己在辅导方面可能比较擅长。我给我孩子的足球队当了八年教练,我们总是拿冠军,我带的那支男队有长长的等候名单。我曾以为自己有一个根本性的认知偏差——因为当我的孩子们都还四岁的时候,你让小孩们在足球场上随便跑、随便踢球,但我的队伍总是有战术、有策略。所以比赛经常是十比零大胜其他队。我心想,也许因为我在另一个国家出生,我不知道你原来就该让他们随便踢。但我确实在认真教那些孩子,我把四岁小孩当成年人对待。我们看视频、看录像,进行真正的……但当你看到他们在场上执行战术时,真的很有趣。不过我一直有一种信念——公司不会关心人,是人关心人。在一个环境中什么是可以接受的、我们做什么,是由领导者来代表的。当然,为什么这种事情没有发生,背后还有一些不同的原因,与我们如何晋升人员以及围绕此的整个糟糕结构有关。但根本上,信任是做好这件事的关键组成部分。我告诉这些人时,我说,“听着,大多数人不知道你是否知道什么,直到他们测试你。”
在我们的环境中这种事经常发生。我问你一个问题,我看你怎么回答——比如我可能问你一加一等于几?等于二,现在我知道你知道一加一等于二了。我不在乎你什么时候学的。我需要你知道它等于二才能做好我的工作。所以这发生在日常环境中,而人们失败的地方在于没有去学习,所以他们答错了问题,失去了信任。信任建立在能力和品格之上,还有其他要素比如沟通、关心和照顾,但在大多数企业环境中,核心是能力。这就是为什么你会看到那么多公司容忍沟通能力差、不关心他人的人,因为他们在自己的工作上非常出色。所以如果你能展示出能力,你就会赢得一些信任,至少是来自他人的能力方面的信任。
信任的加速技巧
所以我经常跟人们解释,他们工作最初的核心是学习,是先寻求理解再被理解,是搞清楚自己不知道什么。那种谦逊和放下自我的心态只能维持很短的时间。我发现与许多人建立信任最有效的方法,就是让他们对我的某个成果负责,而这个成果就是”知道”。所以如果我想加速与 Lenny 建立信任,我会请 Lenny 教我。我把这看作一种情商黑带技巧。但在很多环境中,你一旦进入,很快就能识别出那个环境中的权力格局——谁有影响力,谁的声音最大,诸如此类。他们之所以有权力,背后是有原因的。当然有头衔的因素,但想想为什么一个人会被称为 CEO,是因为某种能力让其他人给了他这个头衔——他们擅长业务增长,他们有好的节奏,不管是什么。
所以要建立信任,你需要让那个人信任你。但那个人知道他信任你的唯一方式,就是他测试你。不幸的是,在很多环境中,这种测试是公开进行的。我在一个会议上,我问 Lenny 一个问题,他在汇报时搞砸了,比如”哦,产品经理没用”,“那个人什么都不懂”。所以当我想建立信任时,如果 Lenny 是我公司的新员工,我会带他去见公司里嗓门最大、最有影响力的人。我会说,“你看,我刚招了 Lenny,超级明星,做过各种了不起的事。但他对我们的业务一无所知,对我们的工作方式也一无所知。我希望你能教他一些东西。“对方可能会说,“我特别忙,我走不开。”
我就说,“这样,Lenny 就跟着你就行。我已经把他的整周日历都腾出来了。他就坐在你开的那些会议里,安静地观察。光是观察你,他就能变成明星。没有任何压力,不需要你付出什么。“现在,这个领导者和 Lenny 待一整周,不可能不说这样的话:“Lenny,你是哪里人?你做什么的?介绍一下你自己吧。“我做到了什么?我迫使一个非常有权力、值得信赖、有影响力的人,和另一个没有这些资源的人之间建立了关系。如果你跟这个人一起在公司里走动,所有人会说什么?天哪,你跟那个人是朋友。我想认识 Lenny,因为我们永远说不动那个人答应什么事。所以如果我认识 Lenny,我就能接近他。Lenny 更容易接触,他是新来的,但 Lenny 是怎么打进圈子的?我把别人的信任延伸到了你身上。同时,让那个人承担起培训你或教导你的责任,在某种程度上,我就是在让他们为你的成长负责。两个月后,那个人不可能说,“哦,Lenny 什么都不做。“为什么?因为那等于承认自己是个糟糕的老师。所以他们会一直很友好,会说,“哦,Lenny,我们来聊聊,这件事不要这样做。“他们会提前给你指点,因为如果你表现不称职,会让他们看起来不好。这个技巧加速了关系的建立和信任的积累。这是一种”帮帮我、教教我”类型的技巧。它也让他们能够观察公司内部的动态,但它加速关系的原因在于,你不可能一直和一个领导待在会议里,而对方不说类似”哦,对了,各位,让我介绍一下 Lenny”这样的话。
现在那个人变成那个把你介绍给公司更多人脉的人。这是建立关系最快的方式。现在看起来好像是一种成本投入,但这正是教练的工作——你在设计一套非常具体的战术手册,帮助人们达成成果目标,而这就是通过让他们胜任自己的工作,然后发展到他们下一步需要达到的潜力。
Lenny: 这简直是绝地武士加忍者级别的技巧。我太喜欢了。我以前从未听过这个建议。完全说得通,而且执行起来非常简单。
Christian Idiodi: 是的。
Lenny: 太棒了。对于身边可能没有一个像 Christian 这样的教练,或者管理者没有达到这个水平的人,你对于那些寻找教练、或者希望有人帮助他们学会建立信任和全面提升自己的人,有什么建议?
寻找练习场域
Christian Idiodi: 哎,就像我对所有事情说的那样,你无法通过回避来获得精通。优秀的教练所做的一件事——而我说公司在这一点上失败的原因是——他们没有创造练习的空间。经常有人向我抱怨别人,说这个人不行,做的汇报糟透了。我就问他们,“他在练习的时候表现怎么样?“他们说,“什么意思?“我说,“他在练习这个的时候,做了什么?“他们说,“嗯,他没有练习。我让他准备这个。“我说,“想想练习时会发生什么。任何运动、任何比赛的练习都是如此——你可以暂停,你可以纠正,你可以给反馈。你在练习中怎么做,在比赛中就会怎么做。产品管理是一种一次性、临场发挥式的角色。那人们什么时候练习?”
所以我告诉人们,在没有好的辅导的情况下,你需要找到练习场域。就好比你在学一项新运动或篮球,你会去体育馆——那就是练习场域。你可以在那里打球、投篮,也许还会加入一些人打的野球之类的。所以我总是建议产品经理:你需要参加很多野球局——这些活动门槛低、评价风险低、几乎没什么损失。去非营利组织做志愿者,和团队一起工作;去社区活动或教堂做志愿者,不管你去哪里都行,去参加聚会。但我在这些事情中真正想做什么?找到那些人们进行协作式问题解决的地方。这正是你作为产品团队在做的事情。
在高绩效环境中,你更有可能找到好的教练。你会找到那样的人。但你同时也在做的事情是观察其他人如何表现。大多数人学到很多技能是通过这样的方式——你看电视,看到某个动作觉得不错,然后你去体育馆练习那个动作,你看,这就是先看后练。所以你需要看到好的产品工作,这样你才能做出好的产品工作,这样你才能教出好的产品工作。如果你没有机会直接获得一个好教练,你就必须找到那些能看到好的辅导正在发生的环境,而好的辅导的一个很好的标志,实际上就是反复出现的好成果。赢的团队、赢的表现、好的产品——好的产品来自好的产品团队。他们可能有好领导者,或者在一个不好的文化中有一个好的领导者。
Lenny: 所以本质上就是大量地重复练习,这是这个建议的重要组成部分。就是不断地练习。我觉得你刚才说的其中一个非常关键的部分是——协作式问题解决是需要寻找的核心要素。我本来想问你,你建议人们如何进入产品管理领域。我猜答案非常类似——就是找到协作式问题解决的机会。
协作式问题解决的价值
Christian Idiodi: 没错。我之所以特意区分这一点,是因为有那么一些人,他们擅长个人层面的问题解决——换个灯泡、独立思考、琢磨事情之类的——我把这种问题解决能力与另一种能力区分开来,后者是那些非常擅长与他人一起解决同一问题的人。组织中有很多这样的机会,你可以不断积累练习的机会。你一定遇到过这样的人,他们会给你讲自己如何在一个团队中解决问题的故事,你能看出他们能怎么帮到你。他们懂得如何使用数据,懂得如何运用洞察,也不害怕与人交流。你要怎样才能获得这些练习机会?因为如果你来到我的公司,我问你一个问题,你说”我真的不知道去哪里找答案”。但如果你曾经在团队中做过问题解决,有时候你甚至可能不知道怎么得到答案,但你知道该去找谁要答案。这本身也是一种天赋。
Lenny: 我非常喜欢你的这些建议——它们总是回归到同一个核心:成为那个知道最多、学得最多的人,或者至少看起来在花时间去学最多东西的人。这完全说得通。你愿意托付重任的人,恰恰是那些恰好手上有答案的人。
Christian Idiodi: 我尽力而为。
Lenny: 每个人都会明白的。对,这就是道理所在。
被过早提拔的领导者
Lenny: 你还谈到过另一个话题,就是人们被过早提拔。领导者被过早提拔,表现不佳,最后反而去指责别人,而实际上是他们自己根本没有为这个新岗位做好准备。你能谈谈你为什么认为这种情况会发生吗?然后也许可以谈谈,如果有人现在正处于那个位置,心里觉得”糟了,也许这不是我的错”,他们该怎么办?
Christian Idiodi: 我不知道怎样才能让企业界认真对待这个问题。这和辅导的诉求其实很类似。大多数人都会被提拔到自己的不胜任层级,但我想这样描述这个动态。就好比 Lenny 是一位非常出色的工程师。想想看,他拿了年度工程师奖。你去办公室,他的照片挂在墙上,人人都认识他。他自我感觉很好。但可能过了一年、两年,甚至八年之后,Lenny 开始想,我在职业生涯中真的还在成长吗?我真的还有挑战吗?他去看工程师的职业发展阶梯,从资深工程师往上的下一个角色就是工程经理。领导团队、HR 也在看同样的事情。确实如此,我们很喜欢 Lenny,不想失去 Lenny,我们需要提拔他。
下一个台阶就是工程经理,或者产品经理——不管你想在这里套用什么例子。于是我们做了什么?我们提拔了 Lenny。当下感觉很好。恭喜你升职了!他发了一条漂亮的帖子。我们心想,“太好了,Lenny 现在被提拔了,他会长期留在我们这里了。“然而,Lenny 这辈子从来没有做过管理。他从来没有招过人、辞退过人,甚至从来没有直接辅导过别人或做过任何这类事情。几个月后,Lenny 开始注意到一个有趣的现象——公司开会时再也没有人为他鼓掌了。确实,他们已经把他的照片从墙上摘下来了,因为他不再是工程师了,他是经理了。现在另一个人成了年度工程师,大家在会议上为那个人鼓掌。他感觉自己不再被认可、不再被看见了。他现在只是一个幕后的人了。
又过了几周,公司遇到了一个重大工程问题。你知道 Lenny 做了什么吗?他直接跳进去把问题解决了。Lenny 没有意识到他的工作已经变了。他的工作不再是亲自解决问题,而是带领一群擅长解决问题的人去解决问题。这是因为你是一个优秀的工程师,但不是一个好的管理者。我讲的这个故事或这种动态,可能就是人们所说的微观管理最常见的起源故事。在很多情况下,这个人知道怎么做工程,但不知道怎么做工程管理。他们没有看到自己角色动态的变化。我们会看到一些固化的行为模式——比如你一旦成为管理者或领导者,你就不能再说”我不知道”、“我不确定”、“我需要帮助”这样的话。谁告诉我们这些的?但似乎有一种根深蒂固的期待,认为领导者必须有答案、必须知道正确的事情、必须做正确的事情。
在成为领导者之前先练习做领导者
那么我们看到人们怎么做呢?Lenny 不会去寻求帮助,而是去 Google 搜索”怎么做面试”、“怎么写绩效评估”。你看到了吗?他读了各种文章,觉得这篇看起来不错,就照着做了,然后没有人死,也没有东西坏掉,所以他认为这是一个好的框架和好的模式。于是我们形成了一种功能失调的文化——每个人都在用不同的方法做事,什么有效就用什么,而这个循环不断重复。现在,在 Lenny 手下工作的人看到他用了这个框架,就认为这一定是个好框架——我的老板就是这么做的。你看到这个循环是如何自我复制了吗?因为 Lenny 实际上从来没有接受过如何做管理者的辅导。如果你问任何和我共事过的人,如果有人来跟我说”我想被提拔为总监”,你知道我说什么吗?我说:“先去做总监的事。你不需要一个头衔。让我告诉你总监做什么。然后你接下来几个月和我一起做这些事情,因为我提拔你是为了让你做这份工作,而不是让你学这份工作。“你看到提拔这件事在哪里出了问题吗?我们提拔了一个人,然后说”你现在是一个 VP 了,去做 VP 的事吧”。然后你说,我从来没有做过 VP 的事,但我不能告诉别人我没做过,因为那会显得我很无能,不过我看到了岗位描述,我应该做一些 VP 的事。我上一个 VP 做了什么来着?做了这个和那个。你看,这像什么话?但学习如何做一个 VP 的最佳时机,是你还不是 VP 的时候,因为那才是你练习做 VP 的时候。
那才是你获得反馈的时候,这样当你真正成为 VP 的时候,你已经做过那些事情了。为什么你第一次做面试是在你已经成为 VP 之后?先来和我一起做一次面试,观察我怎么做面试,提出问题,看什么有效,获取反馈。这就是为什么我喜欢那种高级产品经理的角色,因为这些角色的设计初衷本应是让人们在其中决定自己是想做管理还是想留在专业赛道上,但人们却把它当作——你凭什么给一个人四个直接下属,而你根本没有证据表明他能管理好一个?所以我的做法是先给你一个,你可能会告诉我”我讨厌管人”。没关系,我们可以谈这件事。但如果我一上来就给你四个,你只是在四个人身上练习错误的行为。
这就是公司里经常发生的事情。我们把人们提拔到他们不胜任的位置。这不是他们的错,因为我们没有在辅导他们。我们需要做的是创造一个安全的环境,让人们在成为领导者之前、在我们提拔他们之前就去练习领导力。我们必须为领导者建立好的辅导体系,也就是说,如果有继任计划,我希望 Lenny 成为新任经理,我不会等到该提拔他的时候才去教他管理,因为到那时候他显然不能说”我不知道”之类的话了。我必须在他成为领导者或管理者之前就教会他领导力和管理。
Lenny: 我非常喜欢这个”先做 VP 的事”的理念。我脑海中浮现出一个人到处走来走去说着”我在做 VP 的事”的画面。
Christian Idiodi: “我在做 VP 的事。“我经常看到他们实际在这么做,但什么是 VP 的事呢?
Lenny: “我在做 VP 的事。“我觉得在你自称 VP 之前就先做这些事的另一个额外好处是——这本身其实是晋升为 VP 最好的方式:你已经在这个岗位上了。
Christian Idiodi: 没错。而且没人会因为这个来咬你。你看到了吗?你甚至不会因此感到意外,而且非常安全,因为你不在那个位置上,你可以犯错,没人会责怪你。“他又不是 VP,看他试着做 VP 的事。“你明白吗?但一旦你真正成了 VP,这个角色的杠杆效应如此之大,你的错误就变得严重了,因为它会影响到所有人。而当你还不是 VP 的时候,你就像是得到了掩护和保护,没人生你的气。大家会觉得,“嗯,他只是在尝试。“我们来辅导他一下。但什么时候是了解这些事情最好的时机?是在你坐上那个位置之前。在你坐上那个位置之前。
Lenny: 为了让公司和领导者们能对这些建议付诸实践,你谈到帮助他们在正式承担角色之前进行训练和练习。你是怎么做的?我不太确定,是通过和 Silicon Valley Product Group 合作来进行培训和辅导吗?
Christian Idiodi: 市面上有很多优秀的产品教练,也有很多优秀的领导力教练。我认为关键在于一种认知——人们需要有谦逊的态度和自我意识,去认识到自己在领导力和产品管理方面还有提升空间。你需要看到或亲身经历好的领导力,你需要好的领导力的反复练习,我们用各种方式来做这件事。你大概也见过,人们谈论战略的时候都在做什么?他们总是在外包。让别人去做,然后这个循环就会自我强化,因为你从来不亲自做。你只知道怎么外包,永远学不会怎么做。你明白吗?很多人外包思维根深蒂固——去找个导师,去上个培训课,他们以为这样就是把辅导外包了。就像有人会说,“去上个沟通课。”
去找个沟通课上了就完事了。我说,“好吧。“他们从课上学完回来,直接一拳打在你脸上。我说,“你为什么打我?""课上教我打你脸的。你花钱让我学会怎么打你脸的。“我的建议是,和你的员工一起去上沟通课,因为他们需要练习沟通。
你要了解他们在学什么。你们双方然后一起练习,这样他们才能在沟通上变得更好。一个沟通课本身不会让你变得善于沟通。真正沟通得更好,才是你变得善于沟通的标志。你需要练习。而我需要为你创造一个安全的练习场所,我需要给你反馈,告诉你沟通是否在改善。这些都是辅导中的模式,而许多领导者恰恰缺少这些工具和技巧。
辅导是解决一切问题的钥匙
我确实教很多领导者如何进行辅导。我做大量的”人的工作”。人们听我说”所有问题都是人的问题”。在我所见过的所有问题中,没有一个问题是辅导无法触及的。
Lenny: 我听下来的感受是,最大的责任其实在管理者身上——他们需要成为下属的出色教练。而管理者要在这方面变强,找一个教练来一对一地帮你在这些方面提升,是非常好的方法。太好了。这非常可操作,也非常可解决。
大家总会问,“我怎么找到一位出色的教练?“这挺难的吧。我不知道。你会建议大家怎么去找教练?有什么推荐的吗,就是怎么去找一位教练?
Christian Idiodi: 你要找那些产生过好的结果的人。人们总问,“怎么找到好的顾问?“我看到很多人在教别人,但自己并没有做过那份工作。别误会我的意思。如果你看美式橄榄球队,有些教练自己踢过球,你会觉得他们能很好地指导你。但也有一些教练没踢过球,但如果你看他们的履历,他们师从过好教练,在好教练手下工作过。
产品领域也是一样。我说只有两点:一个好教练是那种自己亲自做过、并且产生过好结果的人;第二点是,他们师从过优秀的产品教练。你要找有深厚资历的人。你看到有人说,“噢,你在亚马逊工作过,“或者”你在这家公司工作过,“或者”你在 Stripe 工作过,取得了好的成果。你是怎么做到的?”
“哦,我的环境很好,文化很好。""谁教你的?谁辅导你的?“和他辅导过的人打打野球局。他们会告诉你他们的教练传授了什么模式。你怎么做到的?我的教练让我这样做,你就能从他们身上学到东西。我说,“哦。“这些都是很重要的事情。
在非洲推广产品与技术
Lenny: 太棒了。好的,我想花一点时间聊聊最后一个话题——你在非洲的工作。Marty 说你是将产品和技术引入世界发展中国家这一领域最重要的专家。我知道你特别常去非洲。能不能谈谈你在那里做的工作,以及在与当地的人合作时遇到的机遇和挑战?
Christian Idiodi: 好的。我有非洲背景,我的家人在那里。我曾经有一种错误的认识,以为我们在北美、欧洲或亚洲做的事情,解决的问题,在这些市场也已经被解决了。我记得很多年前在非洲和一个人聊天,他跟我说,“哦。“我说,“你刚找到一份新工作,在哪找到的?“他说,“哦,我在报纸上找到的。“我说,“报纸?什么叫在报纸上找工作?“我记得在 1998 年参与解决过完全一样的问题。我当时和一个团队一起解决那个问题,而我有一个错误的假设——因为我在这里解决了它,所以它当然在世界各地都已经被解决了。
我开始在非洲注意到这样的模式,有两个趋势尤其明显。一是大量对技术的不善利用,以及本可用于解决问题的赋能技术没有被善用。二是在这些市场、这些新兴市场中实际解决问题的困难程度。我们习以为常的一件事——我总是告诉人们,政府可能是世界上最大的公私合营产品平台。所有国家都有这样的公共属性……因为它们提供了基础设施和架构,为人们创造了可能。
想象一下,如果你想写代码却没有电。现在你想想,有些市场你得先解决电力问题,然后才能接触到电脑,然后才能接触到合适的软件来写代码。看看所有这些不同的事情。你必须先解决许多问题,然后才能开始以有意义的方式解决你真正想解决的问题。这在非洲是一个非常真实的写照。
由于这种挑战,我们看到第二个模式——我观察到两件事。一是人们从问题上赚到的钱比从解决问题上赚到的钱还多。整个社会形成了一种非常善于绕过问题的文化。“我们有电力问题,那就买发电机。""我们有路况问题,那就买更大的车。“我在一个会议上演讲,开车去的路上,我看到一辆特斯拉,后面放着一台便携式发电机。他们会停下来给特斯拉充电,然后继续上路。从某种意义上说,这就是整个社会的缩影,但这个社会从来不缺有创造力的人。
非洲的非营利事业与教育赋能
Christian Idiodi: 那里的天赋令人惊叹,人才极其充沛。非洲人口非常年轻。我经常和人聊起这件事。有人说:“非洲嘛,全世界最不发达的八个地方里有七个在非洲。“他们说的是互联网的普及——非洲不到30%的人接触过互联网。我告诉他们:“哇,即便如此,我们已经从中诞生了七家独角兽公司。想象一下,如果50%、75%的人接触了互联网呢?“我们需要看到这些机会——最年轻的人口、增长最快的一些经济体就在这些市场里。有些问题如此基础,而机会又如此巨大。所以我必须打破所有这些假设:第一,我需要获得许可才能去那里解决问题;第二,我们没有条件去武装和教育那里的人。
我们不存在人才问题,也不存在资源问题。我发现最大的机会,是真正用赋能技术、思维方式和技能去武装整个大洲,让他们能够利用技术来解决问题。
这促使我在非洲创办了一个非营利组织——Innovate Africa Foundation,我们致力于在非洲大陆教育人才、用技术赋能。去年我们举办了第一届大会——Inspire Africa Conference。那真的让我震撼。当我看到来自非洲31个不同国家的一千人,带着饥渴和热情来学习如何做产品工作,我深感谦卑。对他们来说,做到这一点绝非易事。
最让我感动的是看到下一代。我们的工作坊里有一个13岁的孩子和一个11岁的孩子。那个11岁的孩子是一名机器人工程师。那个13岁的孩子是一家小型初创公司的CEO,做的是医疗健康记录——一个领导者。我就想:“如果我能帮助这些人学会做好产品工作,这就是整个非洲的一代人。这就是那些想以有意义的方式利用技术的人的未来。“所以我花大量时间在非洲,辅导、顾问和教授团队如何使用技术、如何做产品、如何以产品团队的形式组织自己、如何解决问题,真正在非洲大陆培育一种勇气,让他们去直面问题、解决问题,而不是绕过问题或从问题上赚钱。
Lenny: 如果大家想了解更多,或者支持你正在做的工作,最好的方式是什么?
Christian Idiodi: 可以访问我们非营利组织的网站:innovateafricafoundation.org。也可以通过 SVPG 或 inspireafricaconference.com 关注我们的工作。我知道明年我会做更多事情。一月份,我将推出一个基金——Paid Africa Fund,我希望这是一个由产品社区出资、为非洲服务的基金。它是一个天使投资基金。我发现的一个问题是,许多初创公司还没有做好接受机构投资的准备,却在某种程度上被迫接受。人们在只需要现金流的时候被迫放弃大量股权。所以我真心想专注于一个面向社区的基金,帮助人们在那些市场找到产品市场契合度。
这个基金将在一月份推出。我可能会发一个公告。我对这项工作感到兴奋,也期待真正在非洲大陆推动更多以产品为中心的思维方式。
Lenny: 太棒了。如果目标是帮助他们找到产品市场契合度,你应该把这个基金叫”fun reference customers”之类的名字——
Christian Idiodi: 没错。他们会学到很多这方面的东西。
对产品社区的寄语
Lenny: Christian,在我们进入非常令人期待的快问快答环节之前,你还有什么想分享或想留给听众的吗?
Christian Idiodi: 我一直向产品社区发出呼吁,希望大家真正认识到自己做的事情超越了产品团队或产品经理的工作本身。我总是鼓励人们看到这一点:你所做之事的核心,其实是解决问题。当你这样做的时候,你是在世界上创造价值,你正在世界上留下自己的印记。那些参与其中、试图让事情变得更好或试图解决问题的人,我们不应该回避对这份工作的这个定义。
这个定义可能听起来有点空泛,可能感觉太轻飘飘、不太有意义,但我认为当人们真正将此视为产品和产品工作的本质时,他们会带着不同的激情投入工作,他们会带着不同的同理心投入工作,他们会带着不同的以客户为中心的意识投入工作。而所有这些都会导向好的结果。
我总是对产品人发出这样的呼吁:“是的,所有的框架、技术、所有的那些东西,但请真正想一想你在做什么——你在试图足够关心一个问题,去替别人解决它,并且做得足够好,以至于对方每次都愿意给你回报。”
Lenny: 我非常喜欢最后这一点——这就是你知道自己是否构建了人们真正在乎的东西的方式:他们会给你回报,而其中一种回报就是真的告诉其他人。
Christian Idiodi: 没错。
Lenny: 也就是你说的参考客户。
Christian Idiodi: 是的。
快问快答
Lenny: 太棒了。那么,我们到了非常令人期待的快问快答环节。准备好了吗?
Christian Idiodi: 我好像没得选。
Lenny: 确实没有。你推荐给别人最多的两三本书是什么?
Christian Idiodi: 天哪。在这个领域,大概是我们所有的书:Inspired、Empowered,还有我们三月即将出新书 Transformed。
Lenny: 我看到那件T恤了。我看到你在做推广。
Christian Idiodi: 是的,在做了,在做了。但这真的是对产品工作几十年热爱和热情的结晶。我一直跟 Maddie 说,你是在经历了失败之后才写书的。就像”我在领导力上失败了,现在有了一本关于它的书。我在产品上失败了,现在有了一本关于它的书。“它真正反映了优秀产品工作的核心。我喜欢 Ben 说的 The Hard Thing About Hard Things,我很喜欢。有些书真的描述了好的产品工作所需要的思维方式和文化的。我总是向人们推荐这些书。
Lenny: 既然聊到了 Transformed,它什么时候出版?你能给一个简短的介绍,让大家知道这本书是关于什么的吗?
Christian Idiodi: Transformed 将于明年三月出版。天哪,只剩三个月了。如果现在预购的话,有些人应该已经收到了发货日期。但这本书讲的是如何向产品模型或产品运营模型转型,也就是那些最优秀的公司所遵循的一套信念和原则。我们分享了一些已经完成这种转型的公司的故事,它们不是你传统意义上的数字公司或科技公司,而是完成了这种转型的企业。我们讲述这些公司能够做到什么。如果这本书有什么主旨的话,那就是一种呼吁——存在一种更好的工作和解决问题的方式,无论你处于什么阶段,公司都可以以这种方式运作。
Lenny: 好,等书出来之后我们得再请你来一次,让更多人了解。太棒了。好,我继续。你最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
Christian Idiodi: 我也跟风看了《Succession》,很喜欢。我以前也很喜欢《Billions》。我喜欢好的剧本,尤其是那种有智性的商业题材创作。所以大概就是《Succession》和《Billions》这两部。
最喜欢的面试问题
Lenny: 在面试候选人时,你有没有最喜欢的面试问题?
Christian Idiodi: 嗯,我总是会给他们一个问题去解决。那大概是我最喜欢的问题,而且不是传统意义上的问题。我大概会这样说:“嘿 Lenny,我有一个朋友,他从小就有法定的听力障碍,现在刚找到一份新工作,需要比平时早起很多。你可以想象,传统的闹钟对他不起作用,解决不了这个问题。我想把这个问题交给你,跟我讲讲你会怎么着手处理或解决这件事。“对我来说,我喜欢这个问题,因为它能让我了解你的思维方式,了解你如何解决问题,了解你如何意识到自己不知道什么,以及你如何去弄清楚解决问题需要知道的东西。
这个问题没有神奇的正确或错误答案。我遇到过很多人说:“我完全不知道该怎么做。我很好奇,因为我想知道你会怎么做,但我自己毫无头绪。“也有的人会直接跳到解决方案上,更偏工程思维。还有的人会直接跳到……当我给你一个需要动脑筋的问题时,我能从中看出你是怎样的人。
Lenny: 你是在面试现场直接做这件事?而不是说”回家想想,然后——”
Christian Idiodi: 对,我在面试现场直接做。
Lenny: 现场,好的。那什么表现说明他们方向对了?你会看什么来判断”没错,这就是我想看到的”?
Christian Idiodi: 记住,当我思考什么造就一个好的产品经理时,我看重的是协作式问题解决。有些人会觉得”我要自己把整个事情解决掉,我们应该这么做”——没有证据、没有数据,什么都没有。这很有意思。但有些人会说:“你知道吗?我大概需要和工程师、设计师一起合作,我们可能需要……”我在某种程度上寻找的是智识上的好奇心,那些脑子里带着已验证的问题的人。那些能很快发现问题的人……我会跟二十个人聊。我说:“你打算怎么做?你懂手语吗?“他们会说:“哦,我该怎么跟他交流?“有些人会说:“我需要很多帮助来弄清楚这件事。我对你的朋友了解不多,但我知道……”有些人有自己习惯套用的框架。这会暴露出来——如果他们只执着于一种工作方式的话。
这更多是关于知道什么是你无法知道的。我在寻找同理心,某种意义上的谦逊。这是一种能力问题,因为大部分东西我可以教,很多东西我可以辅导,但那种傲慢、那种自我中心、“我独行天下”这类态度,对团队文化来说是极具挑战和破坏性的。
最近发现的好产品
Lenny: 你最近有没有发现一个特别喜欢的产品?可以是 app,也可以是某个实体物品,任何让你觉得”哇,这个真的很酷”的东西?
Christian Idiodi: 我大儿子很爱体育,他喜欢各种各样的体育相关的东西、体育 app 等等,他让我用上了一款叫 Real 的 app,就是 real sports 那个。真的很酷。它显示各种比赛的比分,但核心驱动力是社交影响力。你所有的 Twitter 动态都会出现在那里,比如”天哪,[听不清]“,几乎比实时还实时。你能实时获得身边的人、你的社区里人们的反应。这是一种我从未见过的查看比分的方式,我觉得它的设计真的非常有心思。我想和全世界 50 个人分享达阵时的反应——他们都关心我最喜欢的球队刚完成了一次达阵,我们同时分享各自的反应。而且第一个看到的人,你能看到是谁。它很简单,就是比赛的比分,但如今我不会在任何其他地方查看比分了。
人生座右铭
Lenny: 你有没有一个最喜欢的人生座右铭,经常对自己说,或者跟朋友分享的,不论工作还是生活中,你觉得特别有用的?
Christian Idiodi: 哇,天哪。我在这次对话中说了很多——公司不会在乎你,在乎你的是人。成为你想成为的人永远不会太晚。但更早的时候,我父亲总会跟我说:“到场。到场了,你就领先了全世界 80% 的人。准时到场,你就领先了 85% 的人。准时到场并且带着计划,你就领先了 90% 的人。如果你还有勇气微笑着把那个计划付诸行动,那你成功的概率就很大了。如果你在生活的方方面面都一遍又一遍地这样做,它至少能带来成功的成果。“我觉得这在很大程度上是我每天给自己的一种心理定义。
Lenny: 太棒了,我很喜欢这句话。最后一个问题:作为可能是世界上最有趣的人,有没有什么是人们可能不了解你的、或者听了会感到惊讶的事情?
Christian Idiodi: 哇。我希望在那种意义上关于我没有什么令人惊讶的事情。不过,我上过一所资优学校。我 12 岁就离开了家,去了一所寄宿学校,从那以后就再也没回过家,所以基本上一直靠自己。而我们那个地方真的在荒郊野外,大概离任何形式的文明都有八英里远,就在丛林中间。没有饮用水,没有电。你得自己取水,自己发电。那大概是我人生中最有趣的一段时光,塑造了我的世界观——12 到 16 岁,独自在丛林中生存。那是我人生中非常引人入胜的一段经历。
Lenny: 跟你现在的生活截然不同啊。其实还有一个问题。你是第四位……你来自尼日利亚,对吧?你的家庭来自尼日利亚?
Christian Idiodi: 对。
尼日利亚美食
Lenny: 你是这个播客的第四位尼日利亚嘉宾,我刚意识到这一点。我一直喜欢问,你最喜欢的尼日利亚美食是什么?或者说如果有人想找好吃的尼日利亚菜,应该去尝试什么?
Christian Idiodi: 我最喜欢的尼日利亚食物非常地道、非常原生。就是淀粉配 [听不清] 汤。你在外面很难找到那个,必须来自妈妈的手艺。Marty Cagan 尝过,他来过我的家乡,去过我父母家吃过。但如果你刚开始接触尼日利亚食物,[听不清] 是一种米饭的变体,大家都有,就是 jollof rice(乔洛夫饭),而且没错,我要说了:尼日利亚的 jollof rice 比加纳的 jollof rice 好。这是一场战争,但没关系。我们已经宣布胜利了,然后继续前行。不过从 jollof rice 开始是最基础的入门,然后你得尝试 [听不清],就是 pounded yam(捣碎的山药泥)配汤。有很多不同的变体。你可以吃 pounded yam,或者 pounded cassava(捣碎的木薯泥),配着汤一起吃,你一定会喜欢的。
Lenny: 这边有点争议啊,一场关于谁家米饭最好吃的竞争——
Christian Idiodi: 没错。
Lenny: Christian,我现在成了你的超级粉丝了。我太高兴我们做了这次对话。非常感谢你抽出时间。最后两个问题:大家如果想联系你,可以在网上哪里找到你?听众怎样才能帮到你?
Christian Idiodi: 你也可以在 LinkedIn 上找到我。你可以通过我们的网站 svpg.com 联系我们。我常跟大家说,对我们最有价值的支持,就是运用这些原则去做好工作,把我们反复教授的东西付诸实践。我们关心成果,我们关心这个世界上有好的产品工作。我也希望大家能支持我在非洲所做的工作。我一直呼吁全球的产品社区来帮助发展中国家和社区。所以请关注我们的工作,支持我们在非洲建设产品社区的努力。
Lenny: 那个网站地址再说一下?就是你创办的那个非营利组织的?
Christian Idiodi: Innovateafricafoundation.org。
Lenny: 太好了。Christian,非常感谢你来参加这次对话。
Christian Idiodi: 谢谢你的邀请,Lenny。非常荣幸。
Lenny: 大家再见。非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这真的能帮助更多听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| The Hard Thing About Hard Things | The Hard Thing About Hard Things(保留原文书名,Ben Horowitz 所著商业书籍) |
| Ben | Ben(保留原文,人名,此处指 Ben Horowitz,知名创业者和作者) |
| coaching | 辅导 |
| Craigslist | Craigslist(保留原文,美国知名分类广告网站) |
| Discovery | 发现工作 |
| early adopters | 早期采用者 |
| Empowered | Empowered(SVPG 系列著作之一,关于产品领导力) |
| evangelists | 布道者 |
| fake door test | 假的门测试(指假门测试/伪装门测试,一种产品验证方法) |
| Feasibility risk | 可行性风险 |
| funnel | 漏斗(营销/招聘中的转化漏斗) |
| Geoffrey Moore | Geoffrey Moore(保留原文,知名科技营销理论作者,采用曲线/跨越鸿沟理论提出者) |
| Howard Schultz | Howard Schultz(保留原文,时任星巴克 CEO) |
| Innovate Africa Foundation | Innovate Africa Foundation(保留原文,Christian Idiodi 在非洲创办的非营利组织) |
| Inspire Africa Conference | Inspire Africa Conference(保留原文,非洲产品大会名称) |
| Inspired | Inspired(SVPG 系列著作之一,产品管理经典) |
| Macy’s | 梅西百货 |
| Maddie | Maddie(保留原文,人名) |
| Marty Cagan | Marty Cagan(保留原文,Silicon Valley Product Group 创始人) |
| NASCAR | NASCAR(保留原文,美国知名赛车赛事组织) |
| opportunity solution trees | 机会方案树 |
| Paid Africa Fund | Paid Africa Fund(保留原文,Christian Idiodi 计划发起的非洲天使投资基金) |
| pickup games | 野球局(此处比喻低门槛、低风险的练习机会) |
| practice arena | 练习场域 |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| Quarterback | 四分卫(美式橄榄球位置,此处比喻团队核心指挥者) |
| Reference customer | 参考客户 |
| Silicon Valley Product Group | Silicon Valley Product Group(保留原文,知名产品管理咨询机构,常简称 SVPG) |
| single target market | 单一目标市场 |
| swag | 粗略估算(此处语境中 swag 指企业文化中的周边赠品,但术语表中已定义为”粗略估算”,本段未出现该词) |
| technologists | 技术狂热者 |
| Transformed | Transformed(SVPG 即将出版的著作,关于向产品运营模型转型) |
| TSA pre-check | TSA 预检通道(美国机场快速安检通道) |
| Usability risk | 可用性风险 |
| user research interview | 用户研究访谈 |
| Value risk | 价值风险 |
| Viability risk | 商业可行性风险 |
| word of mouth flywheel | 口碑飞轮 |
| 《Billions》 | 《Billions》(保留原文,Showtime 剧集) |
| 《Succession》 | 《Succession》(保留原文,HBO 剧集) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)