战略叙事的力量 | Andy Raskin
The power of strategic narrative | Andy Raskin
Andy Raskin: The way I learned how to pitch in business school, and I think the way most people did is what I call the arrogant doctor. So you have a problem, a pain, I have a solution, a treatment, and I’m going to tell you why it’s better than all the other treatments. And the structure that I read about in these movies was different. Every movie starts with some kind of shift in the world, and I call this shift the shift from the old game to a new game. The archetypal example of this, I think in the business world, is what Benioff did with Salesforce. So he comes in and he says, “Hey, software is over and there’s this new world called the cloud, a new game, new rules. That’s the new way to win. And we’re going to help you if you’re in there.” This structure really is about defining a movement, and that’s very different from, “Hey, I’m going to solve your problem.”
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard won experiences building and growing today’s most successful products. Today my guest is Andy Raskin. Andy helps CEOs and company leaders align their teams around something he calls a strategic narrative, which as you’ll learn all about in this episode, is essentially a simple story that helps people understand why they need your product. And with that helps you align your sales, marketing, and product teams along with your fundraising and even your hiring efforts.
Andy has worked closely with some of the most successful founders and companies out there, including companies like Gong, Dropbox, Uber, Salesforce, Square, IBM, and many others. In our conversation, Andy explains why most people are pitching their product completely wrong, why focusing on the problem you’re solving for people is no longer an effective pitch and how the strategic narrative helps you frame your solution in a much more effective way. Andy also shares a ton of examples of the framework in action, why focusing on categories and category creation is so limiting, signs your narrative needs to work and so much more. Enjoy this episode with Andy Raskin after a short word from our sponsors.
If your team’s work is spread out across different documents and spreadsheets and a stack of workflow tools, that’s why you need Coda. Coda puts data in one centralized location regardless of format, eliminating roadblocks that can slow your team down. Coda allows your team to operate on the same information and collaborate in one place. Take advantage of this special limited time offer just for startups. Sign up today at Coda.io/Lenny and get 1,000. Coda.io/Lenny.
Are you hiring or on the flip side, are you looking for a new opportunity? Well, either way, check out Lennysjobs.com/talent. If you’re a hiring manager, you can sign up and get access to hundreds of hand curated people who are open to new opportunities. Thousands of people apply to join this collective, and I personally review and accept just about 10% of them. You won’t find a better place to hire product managers and growth leaders.
Join almost 100 other companies who are actively hiring through this collective. And if you’re looking around for a newer opportunity, actively or passively, join the collective. It’s free. You can be anonymous and you can even hide yourself from specific companies. You can also leave anytime and you’ll only hear from companies that you want to hear from. Check out Lennysjobs.com/talent.
Andy, welcome to the podcast.
Andy Raskin: Oh, thanks Lenny. So great to talk with you.
Lenny: You are quite known as someone that helps CEOs optimize their pitch, their story, their strategy, which we’re going to get deep into. But before we do that, can you just give us a little glimpse into how you found your way into this line of work?
Andy Raskin: I started as a coder. I was a computer science major, undergrad, a friend and I had an idea for an app. So this was like during the dot com years. So Windows app, and we coded a little prototype and we started, we put it out there, we started getting some users and we thought, “Oh, okay, maybe we can get some investments.” So of the two of us, I spoke English fluently. So we decided, okay, I’ll write the investor pitch. So I wrote the pitch, we sent it out and the reaction was really bad. One VC wrote back and said, “Listen, I rate every plan I get on a scale of 1 to 10, and yours is a 1,” and the next to the one he wrote in parentheses, “Worst,” in case we thought maybe that was the top of his rating scale.
Lenny: Brutal.
Andy Raskin: Yeah, brutal. But then lower down, so this was back when they would like you’d print, send the hard copy of the plan and they might mail it back with comments written in. And he had written in, “Not a compelling story.” A few weeks later, I’m walking by this Barnes & Noble and there’s a sign in the window that says, “For anyone who wants to tell a compelling story,” okay, that’s me. And there’s an arrow that points to these books and they turned out to be screenwriting books. I didn’t know anything about this, so I started reading these books and it strikes me a movie is a pitch. What is Star Wars a pitch for? It’s a pitch for be good, care about people, trust The Force in their terms. But I don’t have couple hours. I’m pitching a business. It’s very different. I’m not writing a three X screenplay.
So what applies, what doesn’t apply? I mean these are questions I think I’m still asking, but I did my best to take some of the learnings of how the movie was structured. It was very different from how my pitch was structured and kind of restructure it. And we did that and we sent the pitch out and we start getting more interest. It was really clear. And then we had a term sheet I think a few months later and I’m like, “What is this story thing?” That we didn’t change the product, it was basically the same business just sort of how we talked about it. That was really interesting to me.
I mean, over the next 10, 15 years, I thought about, “Hey, maybe I could do consulting with this.” CEOs who heard about this were asking me about it. But I still was like, “No. No CEO’s going to budget a line item for the story. That’s not a thing.” So I just didn’t do it for a really long time until eventually I was proven wrong about that.
Lenny: And how many years ago was this at this point?
Andy Raskin: So this was dot com. This was like ‘98 when I was pitching that company.
Lenny: Amazing. I think there’s a couple interesting tidbits about this. One is that interesting opportunities arise when you’re doing something you’re excited about. So you had the startup, it didn’t work out, but you had a problem that you solved for yourself and that led to another, a bigger opportunity for your career.
Andy Raskin: Yeah, totally.
Lenny: So that’s interesting. And then also just some of the best opportunities arise from solving your own problem, not planning to start something with it, but just like, “I have a problem.” Turns out [inaudible 00:07:44]-
Andy Raskin: Yeah, I think that’s same with you. Right, Lenny? You started writing about stuff and boom, that became the thing.
Lenny: Absolutely. It was not quite boom, but eventually it became boom.
Andy Raskin: Feels like boom from outside.
Lenny: Yeah, that’s how it goes. It always overnight for everyone else that isn’t here.
Andy Raskin: Right, exactly.
Lenny: Yeah. Okay, so let’s get into it. So you help CEOs at this point come up with what you call a strategic narrative and you help them not only come up with this strategic narrative, but you help their teams align around this strategic narrative. So let’s just start with what is a strategic narrative?
Andy Raskin: Yeah, you’d think, I’ve been doing this for 10 years, I’d have a very snappy definition of it there, and I don’t know if I’m really happy with … like I’ve ever found one that totally gets at it yet. The one thing I say is it’s this one story that the CEO uses to drive success in marketing, sales, but also product. That it becomes like a north star, strategic north star for product roadmap, for fundraising, for recruiting, really everything.
What I think is really interesting as a kind of qualifier is that this story has a certain structure. Like I said, when I found those screenwriting books, I sort of shifted the structure. And the traditional structure, the way I learned how to pitch in business school, I think the way most people did is what I call the arrogant doctor. So you have a problem, a pain, I have a solution, a treatment, and I’m going to tell you why it’s better than all the other treatment.
Not to say it’s not better, but just this is the structure of it, and it kind of sets you up for bragging. Let me tell you why it’s so great. And the structure that I read about in these movies was different. In the movies, every movie starts with some kind of shift in the world, in the character’s world. And I call this shift the shift from the old game to the new game. And the archetypal example of this, I think in the business world is what Benioff did with Salesforce. So he comes in and he says, “Hey, software is over,” meaning software in the sense that we’re going to own it and maintain it, “And there’s this new world called the cloud, a new game, like the new rules, everything has changed and that’s the new way to win. And we’re going to help you if you’re in there.” This structure really is about defining a movement and that’s very different from, “Hey, I’m going to solve your problem.”
Lenny: I think the Salesforce example is an awesome example of your approach. If they were thinking about it in the old way, what would Salesforce have done? How would they have pitched it if not for, “Everyone’s moving to the cloud, your dumb for using desktop software,”?
Andy Raskin: Well, I think they would’ve just come out and said like, “Oh hey …” I mean CRM by the way, was already a category. I mean, already Siebel was the huge giant of that space. There were already even companies doing it online, doing it through the web. And so they would’ve come and said, “Oh, we’re easier to install, faster to get up and running than Siebel,” or, “We have this much functionality compared to,” I think it was, was it NetSuite? Or, I don’t know. It was some early Salesforce-like thing that was out there. They would’ve done these sort of comparison things.
And Benioff, I mean he is a pretty proud guy. I think he did still say like, “Hey, we’re the number one CRM,” but wasn’t what they led with. They led with this story about this fundamental paradigm shift and, are you in or are you not in? And what they did was instead of just saying, “Hey, we’re better than,” they said, “Hey, all those others, those Siebel’s, they’re part of that old game. You want to play that software game? Be my guest, go buy Siebel,” and of course we know how it played out.
Lenny: So the crux of the approach is instead of, “Problem, solution, you should go do this,” it’s, “The world is changing, here’s where it’s going and we’re going to help you get there.” I want go in a little more depth of the framework. But before that, what are some other examples to give people a sense of like, oh, I see, I understand what this might be.
Andy Raskin: Yeah, so another great example and no coincidence, so is Zuora. So Zuora is the company I wrote about in this post called The Greatest Sales Deck I’ve Ever Seen, the CEO of Zuora, Tien Tzuo, was employee number 11 at Salesforce. So he learns this from Benioff. And he’s pitching, “Hey, in the old world, businesses operated on transactions. You sold things to people outright. In this new world,” he calls it the subscription economy, where people want the benefits of those things without necessarily having to pay for them. And of course gives all these examples of all the winners in this, look at all the winning companies. They’re all basically going to this new model.
And so he’s pitching someone like Ford and you can imagine they’re going to Ford and pitching a subscription for car service, which is quite different from just a lease. And they’re starting out with this. This is the big shift. Another one, team I worked with early on, and I think they’d agree their story came out of this work was Gong. So Gong everyone probably knows by now, they take the video recordings of all your sales calls and they stick AI onto it and come out with all these insights. And that story is, hey, goodbye opinions. Used to be a world where sales is run on opinions. Hello reality, that now all the winners are adopting this new mindset where we really have to see what’s really going on.
Lenny: In the Gong example, let’s say, what would they have done if they were going, “Here’s the problem, here’s the solution, here’s what we’re going to do for you,”?
Andy Raskin: Yeah, I mean that’s kind of what they were doing when they started out. And I’m not saying that didn’t work totally. I mean already by the time they started doing this, they were starting to become a big company. I remember Bendov said to me, “Listen, Andy,” they were around series B, I think this is around 2018. It’s like, “We’re going to be a huge company. The question is how huge. And I think that this narrative along the lines of Zuora or Salesforce, if we get this right, this is going to be a multiplier on our growth.”
So I don’t remember exactly the pitch beforehand, but it was very much like, “Hey, we’re going to record your calls. We’re going to get insights from them. They’re better than the insights you could get from Salesforce.” There wasn’t this kind of unifying kind of movement ideology that put it all in context. And what was really interesting was one thing, I don’t think they’d be upset if I shared, and maybe it’s known. Initially, they were seen as a tool for sales operations, for someone who’s going to record the calls and what this narrative did for them. And I think it was already starting to happen, but what it really coalesced was this is a tool for sales leadership.
Lenny: You talked about Zuora in the post you wrote, and I imagine many people listening are like, “Oh, shit. This is the guy that wrote that post that everyone’s always sharing with me about how to make a deck.” And I wanted to ask, how impactful was that one piece of writing for you in your career, just like as a tangent?
Andy Raskin: I had written some other posts on Medium in particular. Medium has changed quite a bit, but back then I found that I could write stuff there and get really a lot of people who were interested in what I was interested would sort of come in and create some noise about it. So I was already doing this kind of work for a couple of years, but that post immediately got something like 2 million views around the world and I started getting inquiries from teams all over the world.
And it was I think what really allowed me to say no, okay, I could do this work. That CEO’s would budget a line item for this. Because I think if you really understand that post, it’s not really about a sales deck, it’s really about this story that Tien, the CEO is telling everywhere and that is showing up in the sales deck and structuring it that way.
Lenny: I think it’s just another example that comes up a bunch on this podcast is just the power of writing and the power of content. Yeah, and you’re shaking your head.
Andy Raskin: Totally. I mean, I had a little mini career as a journalist, as a freelance writer and I really loved that. I actually, I took a class in New York called How to Write a Magazine Article, because I was sort of mid-career, I was curious. And the class wound up being more about how to sell a magazine article. And I found I really loved that, pitching articles, but one thing that was always a downer for me was there’s always this editor sort of deciding what’s going to be out there.
And when you work with a great editor, it’s great, they make yourself better and they’re priceless. But still there’s this intermediary. What started to happen, I think around when I started writing around 2013, ‘14, you start to see these platforms, like Medium, even LinkedIn where you can just write and have this audience and I think no way I could do this, the work I do if that development hadn’t happened first.
Lenny: I’m taking us off track, but I want to go a little deeper with this. I find that there’s kind of two paths to writing online. One is your path where you write one piece that just blows up like crazy. The other path is more my path where I just write consistently for a long time, and both work and most people try to go your path and they never succeed. It’s really hard to make something gets 2 million views, but you can go that path.
Andy Raskin: This is like you said earlier, hey, it seems like boom, but really it didn’t. So that was probably the 30th or 40th piece and they were gradually getting more and more traction. There was one I wrote before that about, it’s kind of dissecting Elon Musk’s pitch for the Powerwall, the battery that they sell. And that one got maybe few hundred thousand views and also was a big jump. And then the next one got some poultry number. So what I find is like, yeah, there’s this a while where you’re writing and it feels like you’re talking to nobody and then gradually it grows and you’ll have these peaks, but then over time is where the magic is.
Lenny: Okay, I’m really glad you pointed that out, that it rarely is just you write one thing and it’s boom.
Andy Raskin: I’ll also say, sorry, because I worked in a magazine, I haven’t done a newsletter because that idea of having a deadline all the time and constantly having to, we used to call the magazine Feed the Beast, I feel so free not to have that. So for now at least I haven’t done that.
Lenny: I know that well, so let me take us back on track and let’s talk about just the high level framework here. So you talked about, it starts with this idea of tell people worlds changing, join this movement. What’s the simple way to think about this, the pieces of this strategic narrative framework?
Andy Raskin: A lot of times people will contact me, say, “Hey, I tried it, didn’t work.” Well, one very common thing, at least earlier was they would basically just take the Zuora deck, they’d get ahold of it and just put their logo on it. And so that’s not going to work. One thing is we’re not just saying, “Hey, the world is changing.” And then sometimes I’ll see, “The world is changing,” and there’ll be, “Used to be,” and there’s a long list of things and then, “Now it is,” a long list of bullet points.
What’s really, I think key is naming it, naming that old game. The examples you saw, software, cloud, transactions, subscription opinions, reality. This very, very concise naming is really key. And it’s hard because in making it compact you’re losing completeness. So you can imagine you’re in a meeting, someone says like, “Hey, how about we do transactions to subscriptions?” And someone says, “Well I don’t know, there’s a lot of things I don’t really subscribe to. Subscription economy, really?” So we’re always kind of overstating it in a way, but it’s not a problem. I don’t think people say like, “Oh that’s wrong, subscription economy, because I still go to the grocery store and buy things.” So anyway, that’s the first piece.
The second piece is what I call naming the stakes. And there’s a few ways to do this, but one that’s really great if we can do it is to name the winners to show that winners are already playing this new game. So for instance with Zuora they’re saying, “Hey, look, look at all the new winners,” this is like 2015 so, “Airbnb, Box,” all these companies, they’re already doing this subscription thing.
And by the way, overall they show this scary stat about the longevity of Fortune 500 companies. It’s getting smaller, and so it’s a little disingenuous, but basically they make this case that, “Hey, companies are dying, the ones that are winning are doing this.” And so to the extent we want to make this life and death just like a movie. This is again, I’ll make the parallel to Star Wars. So Luke, he spends the first 15 minutes of the movie belly aching. He wants to be a pilot, he wants to go out and have adventures in space. So Obiwan comes, he says, “Hey, we got this mission, this princess we got to go,” and all this stuff, “Let’s go. I’ll teach you to be a pilot. We’ll go have adventures in space.” What does Luke say? He says, “Ooh, you know what, I can’t really get involved. They got to go home. It’s late.” Who does this sound like? The reluctant buyer.
So yeah, “I want to be innovative and all this. Ooh, you know what? I don’t have budget this quarter.” So how does George Lucas change Luke’s mind? He basically kills the aunt and uncle, sorry, spoilers, it’s been 40 years though. If you haven’t seen it, you’re probably not going to see it. Kills the aunt and uncle. Now it’s pretty clear they’re coming for Luke. Now the stakes are life and death. Probably he’s going to be dead. But there is this other path that Obiwan holds out for him.
And whenever I work with teams and I talk about this, so they’re like, “Okay, I guess we got to then for kill the prospect’s aunt and uncle,” and basically yes, I mean figuratively. We got to show them that the future is not going to just be sort of okay. People talk about making it emotional and I’ve always wondered, what does that mean? Literally, what is the definition? This is for me the definition, is that the prospect doesn’t see the future as sort of okay. They see it as split between a very negative outcome and a potentially very positive outcome.
Andy Raskin: The third piece is what I call naming the object of the new game. I used to call it the promised land message, but I’ve changed it to this because I’ve found that it’s sort of a little more fruitful. This subscription economy, transactions, it can get a little highfalutin and sort of big, but on the website when we just have to boil it down to a couple of words that’s going to be clear right away, what can we say? And I find that what’s the object of the new game really boils it down as kind of the rallying cry of the movement. So the example with Zuora, the object for a while was turn customers into subscribers. Very simple. It just sort of flows from it. Airbnb for a while had this one, live anywhere. If you think about-
Lenny: Belong anywhere.
Andy Raskin: Well actually it was-
Lenny: Oh, live like a human.
Andy Raskin: So you’re right, it was, “Belong anywhere,” and then it switched to, “Live there.” I may have the chronology wrong, but it was the two of those things. You know better than I do. But either one, I mean think they’re saying very similar things. Hey, there’s this new world where you don’t have to live in hotels, you can stay in people’s houses. What’s the object of that game is to belong anywhere, but live there. And I love it when it works that way where it’s almost like an asymptotically unachievable thing. You are never literally going to live there. And if you think about it, this buyer mission statement, this rallying cry, I think of it really as the mission of the company. I mean, what is the mission of Airbnb other than to help people live there if they’re going to be customer focused and all that?
The fourth piece is, okay, well this object of the game, winning this game, it better be hard because if it’s not, why would we even exist? Just with the movie, if Luke can just go destroy the Death Star then no movie. So there’s got to be sort of obstacles in the way, things that are preventing them from. So saying, “Okay, you want to turn customers into subscribers.” So whereas Zuora, where they go next is to say, “Okay, well how are you going to measure lifetime value?” Because now you have this always on thing. “How are you going to measure preferences and how they’re changing over?” All these new kind of challenges that didn’t exist before. And then these are like the monsters in Lord of the Rings or the Empire in Star Wars, these are the obstacles.
I think about them because they sound like problems. This is what people would normally say, “Oh, these are the problems we solve.” But by setting up this story thing first we’ve repackaged them as obstacles to a new goal state that we’ve already positioned as life and death. So they take on this much more emotional meaning. We understand why they matter. And then of course the last piece is now talking about, well, how are we going to overcome these obstacles? Narrative people, in the movie business they call these the magic gifts that the main character gets to go help them win. What are the ways? Now we can talk about that and success stories and all the rest of the stuff.
Lenny: There’s some obvious parallels to the hero’s journey here. I imagine that it was a source of inspiration, and the Star Wars I think is the epitome of that journey. Can you talk about just how related those two are, how you think about that?
Andy Raskin: Yeah, I mean so hero’s journey is this book that comes from, I think it’s Hero of A Thousand Faces is a book by Joseph Campbell, a sociologist. He looks at myths over different cultures and different times and he finds this kind of common structure that he calls the hero’s journey. I mean it’s some controversy about that, about his book. Is it a very male oriented sort of take on things and a bunch of things.
But even that aside, I found when I would talk about hero’s journey and stuff, it’s just like, it didn’t really tell me what to do. Yeah, okay, yeah I got to do this pitch. So in the hero’s journey there’s like refusal of the call. That’s actually that thing where Luke says he doesn’t want to go and where the buyer says, “Hey, I don’t have budget.” But I don’t know, it was just too theoretical for me to really … when I use it, people seem to sort of glass over. So I just don’t really talk about that at all. But yeah, I mean that’s behind a lot of this stuff for sure.
Lenny: Yeah, that makes sense because I think if people hear about that all the time when they’re like, become a better storyteller, tell your story in this hero’s journey, and it’s like, “I don’t know what I’m doing.”
Andy Raskin: Also, I would say there’s storytelling as a skill kind of thing, which is a great thing. Learn how to tell stories better, blah, blah, blah, blah. I’m not really interested in that in my work, what I’m interested in is the one story and the structure of that one story. And this one story, it doesn’t really have … like, the world is moved from transactions to subscriptions. There’s not a main character in that story who’s like having a problem and getting saved. It’s almost as if what’s happening is we’re turning the person we talk to into the main character. By spelling out the shift, we’re changing their world and we’re saying, “Hey, you got to change and you want to come with us.”
Lenny: It’s almost like you’re putting them into the hero’s journey, like, “Here’s how you win.”
Andy Raskin: Exactly. I love that.
Lenny: Let me just try to summarize what you shared, this five step framework. So you start with here’s a new movement that’s happening and you want to name it, you want to name the stakes and there’s winners and losers and here’s already happening and it’s really important. Then you want to name the object of the new game, like turning customers into subscribers. Then show the obstacles, here’s why it’s challenging, and then talk about how you’re going to overcome these obstacles.
Andy Raskin: And by the way, the naming of the object of the new game, I find it often is really nice to do it as a question. So we hey, there’s this shift from transactions to subscriptions and look, everyone’s doing it. So we asked a simple question, what would it take to turn every customer into a subscriber? And this way we’re kind of bringing the person we’re pitching to almost like they’re coming along with us as a co, I don’t know, adventurer in crafting this story.
Lenny:
What if you earn rewards for paying your rent or got rewarded for ordering food and shopping online or even earn rewards for saving each month? And then imagine if you got rewarded again just for getting rewarded. With Eco, you can spend at some of your favorite merchants and automatically get 5% cash back plus Eco’s APY rewards look more like $80, not 80 cents. And then there are Eco points, the world’s first open reward system. You earn them whenever you do almost anything in the eco app. Eco is working to make these points the most rewarding points ever so it pays to be early.
Lenny: Sound too good to be true? Go to Eco.com/Lenny, sign up for an onboarding and find out why it isn’t. Lenny’s podcast listeners who attend an Eco welcome session will get an exclusive 4% APY on deposits over $1,000. Learn more at Eco.com/Lenny, that’s E-C-O.com/Lenny. Maybe just to reinforce this even more, what if we go through the five steps and just with one company as an example and just talk about what each of those were for them?
Andy Raskin: Okay, great. So there’s a company called 360Learning. So this company, I don’t know if folks know, but this company is raised over $200 million. They’re in the space of corporate training software. So big companies, they have to train their people on all kinds of stuff. So you want to go through that one?
Lenny: Yeah, that sounds great.
Andy Raskin: Okay, great. By the way, Nick Hernandez is the CEO and Nick’s been on my podcast, so he’s talked about this. So they for a long time were pitching themselves as collaborative learning. So they have features that let people sort of collaborate on courses and all kinds of stuff. And Nick is often pitching CEOs, of course his team is as well. And he told me that it was sort of falling a little bit flat. People, collaborative learning, whatever. How are you different from this learning platform, this learning platform?
And so when we worked together this collaborative learning, it’s almost like a category name or a descriptor or something. They were so embedded that I decided, I don’t even want to take it out, but can we define it in terms of a story? So the story they came to was, hey, used to be that companies train their people through basically a mindset of top-down learning. There’s going to be some learning guru at the company, they’re going to get all the courses, they’re going to put it all together and sort of send out this training material to everybody.
What’s happening now is winning companies are approaching this differently. They’re adopting this approach we might call upskill from within, which is if you look at Google, there’s this page where I think you can go, it’s a public. You can connect with Google’s AI experts. They literally turn their internal experts into champions that are educating, not even just the company but even external people. They’ve created this culture of our own people are going to be the educators. So that’s the shift from top down to this upskill from within. And of course I just even started to do the second piece which was like, hey, look at the big companies who are doing this.
And then I think they showed, “Hey, you’re not doing this. Look, training is becoming very expensive. People don’t care. So this is the downside. So we’re creating these sort of stake …” And also I think he has something about how training now, like companies, if you don’t adapt, if you can’t get these skills to your people, if you’re a car company and you can’t get these skills around electric cars, you’re dead.
Nick was in France and he saw this poster, a recruiting poster from McDonald’s and it said, “Hey, if you work at McDonald’s you’re going to learn from everybody else on your team.” And it was like, wow, there it is. So there’s another example we used as a kind of winner example. And so then the question became, I can’t remember exactly, it was something like, how do you upskill from within? What would it take for you to turn your experts into champions of learning in the company and turn them into stars, and all this?
And then I’m going to forget here what all the obstacles were. But I think it was things like, well, how are you going to make it possible for anybody to create a course? People who might have expertise in electric engines but don’t know how to create a course, how are you going to make sure that there’s still the learning department, they’re going to keep control and can … all this. You can imagine all the different kind of questions. And then of course now 360Learning starts talking about all that stuff.
What Nick has told me, I’m actually going to be on a webinar with Nick where someone asked me, “Could you bring in a CEO who could talk about this stuff? Not just you B blabbing on about strategic narrative.” And so Nick is going to join it. And we had a dress rehearsal the other day and he was telling me it’s just like when he starts with this now he doesn’t even get the question anymore of well how are you different from this other learning platform? Which used to always be the thing. It’s just a much more seamless, okay, yeah, talk to our learning people, get this going. So it’s just sounds like it’s been really effective for them.
Lenny: That’s actually was what I was going to ask next is what kind of impact have you seen with someone shifting their pitch story from this doc? What was the arrogant doctor approach to the strategic narrative?
Andy Raskin: Yeah, I mean it’s always this kind of thing I hear. I mean, of course it’s very difficult to measure this. I mean, what was the value of the strategic narrative for Gong and its growth? Was it 3X versus 1X, 2X? Or I don’t, who knows, right? But the things I hear from CEOs, a few things. One is that when they’re pitching, they’re not pitching features out of context, they’re pitching now a movement which is a lot better place to be, I think. In a way you’re not pitching product. Product is like a prop for making the story come true. Very important prop, but there’s this higher level overlay that becomes the focus of the conversation, at first, and of course we’re going to get into product and that helps sell. Once we have this story then everything in marketing can be all about this story.
With Zuora, if you look at their website, well when they first started doing this, maybe 80% of the content is not, “Hey, let me tell you about how Zuora is so great,” or, “Here’s our new release,” or whatever. It’s, “Here’s how music companies are embracing subscriptions. Here’s how luxury goods companies are embracing subscriptions.” It’s all these kind of almost trend pieces that become unlimited fodder. And again, you’re not touting your … it’s less salesy, right?
Another thing I just hear always, I just interviewed a CEO this morning for my podcast and this is the first thing he actually said was, “It becomes the strategic north star for the product.” So what he was telling me, and this was actually a little unusual, I asked him, “Why did you come to me at first?” And of course I’d asked him that before, but he said something this time that was a little different from what I’d heard before. He said, “We are constantly getting feature requests through sales, through customer success. And we had sort of no way, bar to decide well what do we take on, what don’t we take on? And this clearly has become our bar.”
If you think about it for 360Learning, does it help us upskill from within? It’s in. Does it not? Or it’s prioritized. Does it not? Less prioritized. Amit Bendov told me this directly, he said we exactly the same thing. He said, “We get a lot of requests for features and a lot of them are basically about opinions, some way to record opinions.”
Lenny: And this is Gong.
Andy Raskin: “We’re not going to do those.” In Gong, yeah. “We’re not going to do those.”
Lenny: Are there any companies out there that maybe aren’t clients that you see as like, wow, these guys are nailing it and they’re doing a great job of this strategic narrative?
Andy Raskin: Well, one that really comes to mind is, I mean it’s been out there for a while, but Drift. Drift comes out with essentially like a chatbot for your website, which might be the 30th chatbot for your website. And they don’t say, “Hey, here’s why our chatbot is the best one.” They start from a completely different place, which is, “Hey, used to be people would sort of wait around for you to get back to them. It was a world of later. They called it the world of forms. You put up a web form and you expect someone’s going to fill it out and maybe wait a few days while you take your sweet time deciding if you’re going to get back to them.”
And David Cancel and David Gerhardt started from right the beginning saying, “Now we’re in a world of now, where buyers are …” I think they showed this woman, I remember it was this woman sleeping with her phone. That’s your prospect. They’re always on and they’re going to expect you to be engaging with them right away. And they called this conversational marketing, and they really went with that and created I think a whole movement and they broke away from all of the other chatbots.
Lenny: Awesome example. So earlier you threw out this word category, and I’ve noticed you haven’t talked about category and category creation too much, and I think that you’re kind of not a fan of this idea of creating a category and focusing on category. I’d love to hear your perspective on how that all relates to the stuff you recommend.
Andy Raskin: Lenny, are you trying to get me in trouble? Like that guy who guy on your podcast who attacked jobs to be done?
Lenny: Apparently, let’s do it. Let’s see what kind of trouble we can get into.
Andy Raskin: I would soften it a little bit and not just … because I don’t want the ire of the category design folks, but I really would soften and say, I wouldn’t say I’m not a fan of creating category. Look, I think if you look at Play Bigger, which has become The Bible of that category creation thing, if you look behind that going to, what do they say the category is? They say it’s a narrative. It’s a story about how the world was to how it is. And so what I find though is that when people think about category creation, they tend to just focus on, okay, well, what is this category name going to be that we got? What are these three words or two words, whatever, that are going to magically make us seem like we’re totally different from everybody else?
And A, I think that’s not really possible. These three words aren’t going to do it. Take Gong, I mean already other companies were using this term revenue intelligence. With Gong, it suddenly becomes a thing because I think they have this opinions-to-reality story behind it. At one point, again, I asked Amit, he said, “Yeah,” because I remember he really struggled, “What should we call it? What should we call it?”
He came up with that one. But then when I asked him later, he is like, “Yeah, you know what? In hindsight we probably could have called it strawberry intelligence. It didn’t matter. It was really the story that sort of mattered.” I think he was exaggerating a little bit. And I think the category people would actually agree with this, I think they would agree with, hey, these three words are, it’s sort of a shorthand for this movement of old game narrative.
But I guess I feel like still by calling it category and category name, we’re just focusing on those three words so much. And what happens often is CEOs will, they’ll kind of come up with this little category, like what happened with Nick at the 360Learning with collaborative learning. We have this name, but we don’t know how to tell the story around it. So my feeling is like, well, let’s focus on the story. So that’s why I talk about strategic narrative and movement creation versus category creation. If someone decides that your movement is a category, great. Bonus.
Lenny: I see. So essentially your approach is category can play a part of this, but there’s a bigger question you have of what’s the story, what’s the movement, what are the obstacles and categories and element of that potentially?
Andy Raskin: I mean, I almost see them as orthogonal, like with HubSpot. HubSpot had this narrative around inbound. It used to be just outbound stuff, now we’re going to have inbound. And that wasn’t really a category. Back then they were probably known as marketing automation. Now they’re probably known as CRM because they’ve broadened. But this movement is the thing that’s sort of the constant and in some ways orthogonal to whatever category they’re in.
Lenny: Is the strategic narrative framework right for essentially any company or is there a sweet spot? And I’ve noticed most of the companies you’ve been talking about are B2B SaaS. So I don’t know, maybe if there’s a spectrum of perfect fit for strategic narrative framework and then not a fit at all. What’s along that spectrum?
Andy Raskin: Yeah, well you can see, I mean it takes a little time to tell this story and you were kind of framing it a little bit and we’re telling it in lots of different channels. So I think it does really play well in this enterprise sales context because also we have a group buyer there. So it’s not just one person who’s doing some research. This whole group has to have a uniting story. So I think you’re right that in noticing that the companies that this tends to resonate with tend to be B2B, enterprise sales, technology I think because often the product is very complicated. That arrogant doctor stuff comes from an age when the things people were selling were products on shelves that didn’t change much, cans of soup at the supermarket or a car in a dealership. Even software back then, shrink-wrapped in a box, doesn’t change.
B2B software, this stuff is changing by the minute. And does it even make sense to make a claim to say, “Oh, we have these features and they have those features, therefore we’re better,” does that make any sense? That said, hey, I was looking for a sports watch, a Fitbit and I’m comparing specs and I’m doing all that stuff. And so that mode of buying is still happening, but I think, so yeah, when consumer products companies contact me, I usually say, “No.” Occasionally they still say, “Okay, yeah, we’ll build this, we still want to have this narrative.” But yeah, I think it has the most value, most impactful right away for B2B enterprise technology companies.
Lenny: Just a few more questions. One is just what’s a sign that you should spend time in this area, that something is broken in your strategic narrative story pitch?
Andy Raskin: Well, I can tell you what I hear from CEOs when they contact me. I always ask, what’s happening? Because that idea I had, no CEO’s going to budget a line item for this. I’m basically asking, why was I wrong? So a few things they tell me, one is that the company is maturing from a point a stage where they’ve been successful, but that success is … one CEO put it this way, was brute force of the founders. So the founders are in every meeting, they’re in every product discussion, every sales call, and that’s shifting, the company’s getting bigger.
Usually I’m seeing this around series B where the company is getting … so they can’t be in every sales call, every market call and they’re looking to transmit all the good stuff and some direction in a way that people are going to remember and all that. Everything from how we pitch to what the product should be and all that, and they see this as that.
Andy Raskin: There’s another point that I see people contacting me at, which is where they’re growing. It’s usually a bit later where they’ve scaled tremendously successfully. Now we’re either acquiring or building out whole new product units. And that old story we told is just, it’s just not big enough and we got to expand it to something bigger. This is the example of OneTrust, which the CEO I had on my podcast recently. Starts out with just, I think it’s data privacy around the regulations that people have to be able to say, “Don’t track me,” things like that. And then they buy these other company and now we have this much bigger offering. So how do we tell the story? And then I guess the third one is some form of pivot where hey, we were telling an old story but whatever, the market changed or whatever and we want to go in a different direction.
Lenny: Say a founders listening to this and they’re like, “Okay, I realize I need to do this. I haven’t spent enough time on this. Something’s not working. This could be a huge unlock for us.” What are the first couple steps they could take to start to figure this out? And I imagine at some point it’s like, go talk to Andy. He’ll help you through this. Is there stuff you can do on your own? How do you go about figuring this out?
Andy Raskin: Well, a lot of folks have emailed me over the years like, well I told you before, there were some who emailed me like, “Hey, tried it, didn’t work.” But many more have emailed me, “Hey, I tried it, it did work. Thank you.” And so yeah, just try to lay out that structure and try it mean even when I work with teams, I adapt what people might call sort of lean approach. I want to get that thing out there into sales calls. We’re not rolling it out to the whole sales team right away, but getting it out into some sales calls and get a sense, “Hey, is this resonating? Are people given the nods?”
Ideally by the way, one way I look to test it, is it working, is when we talk about this shift and the stakes and do they stick. Do they kind of say, “Yeah, let me tell you how that’s playing out for us,”? Or, “Am I? Yes, I’m seeing that.” Sometimes I’ll literally, I’ll train salespeople to ask them that question, like, “Am I crazy or are you seeing this?” And what do they say? And you can usually tell if they’re in and it’s qualitative. But I really like that kind of testing to see if it’s working. And I think anybody can do that.
Lenny: Is there a template or guide you have online for folks to follow other than maybe just listening to this podcast and reading? Is there a post that’s like, “Here’s the framework defined, and go follow these steps,”?
Andy Raskin: I mean, I guess the closest is that The Greatest Sales Deck I’ve Ever Seen post, which is the Zuora deck. But even there, people have asked me for a framework and presentation companies say, “Can we have your template so we could make it available to people? We’ll revenue share with you or something.” And I am so against this template. Every team I work with, it’s different. It’s not the same number of slides. Sometimes we can lay out this shift in one slide, sometimes it just feels better or the team likes it better, whatever, if it’s a few and we’re sort of getting people into it. Sometimes there’s no slides. So I am really hesitant to recommend any template. And what I’d say is these are principles for building it, not any prescribed formula.
Lenny: If they do want to reach out to you while we’re on this topic, what’s the best way to contact you?
Andy Raskin: Connect with me on LinkedIn. That’s usually a good one. And I’m usually posting things on LinkedIn that I’ve learned from working with other teams.
Lenny: Awesome. Last question before we get to a very exciting lightning round. Speaking of LinkedIn, you posted how in a working session with companies that the second session is always this low point they all go through and that everyone’s starting to get discouraged and pained. And first of all, I love the expectation setting. You’re like, “This is going to suck initially and it’ll get better.” Why is that the low point and what is it that they focus on in that second session?
Andy Raskin: Well, apparently I’m not doing enough of an expectation setting, because what that post was about was this woman. So when I work with a CEO I always ask them to create what I call a strategic narrative team of up to four people. And usually those are leads of marketing, sales, whatever. In this case, the CFO was a really important person in this company. And so the CEO wanted her as part of this team. And she said to me at the end, she’s like, “I love where we got to.” I always ask, “What worked? What didn’t work?” And she’s like, “I love where we got to. That worked great. What didn’t work was like, you told us that this second session was going to be bad, but I think you could have drilled home more like exactly how bad.”
And then I asked her, “Actually, could I have that quote with your face on a slide that I now present to future teams?” She said, “Yeah, you could do that.” So the way I work it is I have a kickoff session where essentially I’m asking people on the team, what are these pieces? What is this old game, new game shift? How do we talk about when to set the stakes and everything I just took you through? And we have like five people in the room. There’s going to be … we’re going to come out of this with notes and notes, boards and boards of ideas of this stuff.
And so then two things happen. One is I ask the team to start interviewing customers about how they see this shift and sometimes the customers will literally give us the words and that can be helpful in sort of aligning if we have differences. But I also start working with the CEO one-on-one and we build a first version of this thing, and it’s the second session where we present this first version to the team and think about what’s happening.
The team has just given us millions of gold ideas, truly they’re all … and in order to make something sort of clean and powerful, the CO and I have had to pretty much throw out all of them, save one or two. And there’s going to be feelings about that, first of all. Second of all, if this were easy to just get all … interview everybody, come up with it, they would’ve done it. So it’s going to be wrong.
But the good news is this is where the team gets to weigh in. I also ask, what’s working, not working in this thing? And when we learn how it’s not working, that gives us the juice to then me and the CEO go back to the drawing board. We plan on this in advance, we’re going to go back to the drawing board and then bring up something good. So having a shit draft is a million times more valuable than having all these great ideas. But it’s also really painful. It’s painful not only for them, but for me. No matter how many times I say this, I expect they’re going to love it in that first one too. And I’m really pissed off when they don’t. But luckily now I’ve done enough times I know that’s going to happen.
Lenny: I was just watching a documentary about Annie Lamont who came up with the first draft concept for writers that I stick to.
Andy Raskin: I’m a firm believer in that. Yeah.
Lenny: As you’re talking, one last thought that I had is, so you’d work with because and founders. I feel like this could be just as useful to product leaders, product managers working on a product that they’re launching, just like what is the movement, where it’s happening, here’s why this product’s important. Do you find that too?
Andy Raskin: Absolutely. And very frequently, the product leader, chief product officer is part of this group. What I’d say though is that the reason … so after I did this work for a few years, I looked back and I was like, which were the engagements I did where I can see it, and the narrative is really this true north star for everything?
It was always the ones where the CEO was leading it, not just in name, but literally the person who called me who was working on the drafts with me and going through. And so initially I didn’t insist that it would be the CEO doing that, but eventually I started to, and I think even for a product leader, you’re going to want the support. You don’t want to be just telling that story in product. You’re going to want that supported from this Zuora person who gave me the initial deck, he said it, “It was like I had air cover and I was just going down and knocking down deals on the ground.” You’re going to want that air cover in marketing, sales, recruiting, everything. And how much better is it if it’s really driven by the CEO and you have that?
Lenny: Amazing. Is there anything else you wanted to touch on or you want to share before we get to our very exciting lighting round?
Andy Raskin: No, except I love category design people and it’s really just sort of terms that I like that are … you know what? Forget it. Scratch that part.
Lenny: I thought that was funny.
Andy Raskin: Oh yeah. Okay. Yeah, we could leave it in. We could leave it in. You could even leave this in where I’m telling you to scratch it.
Lenny: Sounds good. I was actually going to joke that I was going to cut this out and leave you hanging, but okay.
Andy Raskin: No, you can do that. Yeah. Category design people. Love you. Don’t hate me. Thank you.
Lenny: Great. I love it. We’re going to be okay, I think. Well, with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. I’ve got five questions for you. Are you ready?
Andy Raskin: I’m ready. I saw like what you sent them, but I didn’t really look at them, so I’m just going to tell you what I said. I’ll go off that.
Lenny: Perfect. Excellent. The best version of this. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Andy Raskin: One of the books that I read initially from that Barnes & Noble, it was Story by Robert McKee. I think a lot of people know about it who are sort of interested in story stuff, but it’s kind of a Bible of people who are doing screenwriting and stuff. If anyone who’s in Hollywood who thought about going to Hollywood, they know about this book. I love a book called Out of Sheer Rage. It’s really not about what I do or anything, but the author is Geoff Dyer. Geoff, he’s written a lot of books that are kind of essay memoir, and this is a book about him trying to write a book about DH Lawrence. So it’s all about procrastinating and like, “Oh, I’m supposed to write this book. I’m about to go on a trip somewhere. Should I bring the collected works of DH Lawrence with me on the trip because that’ll help me start the book, but maybe I shouldn’t because it’s not going to … Then I could come back refreshed without having …” Basically, it’s all that. It’s this sort of in the head. I just really enjoy that book.
Lenny: What’s a favorite recent movie or TV show that you really enjoyed?
Andy Raskin: Station 11. Station 11. That was just so beautiful to me.
Lenny: Trippy. That was a trippy movie. Did not expect to go where it went. I usually ask what’s a favorite interview question you like to ask, and I don’t know how often you’re interviewing people, but does anything come to mind when I ask that?
Andy Raskin: Well, I can tell you one thing I ask when I speak with CEOs is I like to ask, what role has this narrative played in your leadership? How does it work in your leadership? And it’s always really interesting for me to hear that, ‘cause I often hear things that I don’t expect.
Lenny: What’s a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you just really like?
Andy Raskin: I recently got a Fitbit. I think I may have mentioned it earlier. I was looking for a product like that, and so far I’m really loving it.
Lenny: Amazing. Have you tried other versions of Fitbits or that’s the one that’s working?
Andy Raskin: I also ordered a Polar at the same time and wound up returning the Polar. Basically, it was just a little clunkier on my wrist, so I went with a Fitbit. Well, do you have one that you recommend instead?
Lenny: I just have the Apple Watch and I’ve never tried a Fitbit and it gives me all this stuff that seems cool, but I’ve never gone further.
Andy Raskin: I got the Fitbit like a week ago and I actually still am on the fence whether I bring it back to return it for the Apple Watch, so I’m enjoying it, but we’ll see.
Lenny: Okay. Final question. You’re expert on presentations and I imagine you spend a lot of time in decks, and so just what’s like one small change people can make to how they put together a deck or a presentation that will make their presentation a lot better?
Andy Raskin: This is the one thing, make the title the takeaway of the slide so that the person looking at it has to do zero work to take away. So example, you’ll sometimes see, “The problem,” or, “The team.” Replace, “The team,” with, “Our team is veterans of whatever industry,” or every single slide it’s a takeaway, not a label. It’ll make everything flow a lot better.
Lenny: You did a killer job answering the lightning round questions without having a peek at what they were going to be. Andy, this was incredibly insightful. I’m going to go start working on my strategic narrative for my podcast and newsletter. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out, learn more, maybe consider working with you? And then how can listeners be useful to you?
Andy Raskin: So I mentioned LinkedIn as a way to connect with me. That’s fine. My website is AndyRaskin.com. I also have a podcast where I talk with CEOs, so if you’re interested in hearing more details about actual use of this, it’s called The Bigger Narrative. My mom introduces every episode. I sent her the interviews in advance. I call her and interview about what she thinks people will get out of it, and that conversation becomes the intro to the podcast episode. And what was the last question?
Lenny: How can listeners be useful to you?
Andy Raskin: Useful to me. Just if you try any of this stuff, let me know. Like, “Hey, worked. Didn’t work. Have this question.” I would love to hear that stuff.
Lenny: Amazing. Andy, thank you again for being here.
Andy Raskin: Thanks so much for having me, Lenny. This is really fun.
Lenny: Bye everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at LennysPodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| arrogant doctor | 傲慢医生(Andy 自创的比喻) |
| category creation | 品类创建 |
| champions | 布道者 |
| collaborative learning | 协作式学习 |
| conversational marketing | 对话式营销 |
| Feed the Beast | 喂怪兽 |
| hero’s journey | 英雄之旅 |
| inbound | inbound(HubSpot 提出的营销理念,保留原文) |
| magic gifts | 魔法礼物 |
| marketing automation | 营销自动化 |
| naming the stakes | 命名利害关系 |
| north star | 北极星 |
| old game to a new game | 从旧游戏到新游戏 |
| outbound | outbound(与传统外向式营销相关的理念,保留原文) |
| paradigm shift | 范式转变 |
| Play Bigger | 《Play Bigger》(品类设计经典著作,保留原文) |
| promised land message | 应许之地信息 |
| refusal of the call | 拒绝召唤 |
| reluctant buyer | 犹豫不决的买家 |
| revenue intelligence | 收入智能 |
| shitty first draft | 糟糕的第一版草稿(Annie Lamott 提出的写作概念) |
| shrink-wrap | shrink-wrap(指传统盒装软件,保留原文) |
| strategic narrative | 战略叙事 |
| subscription economy | 订阅经济 |
| term sheet | 投资意向书 |
| top-down learning | 自上而下的学习 |
| upskill from within | 内部赋能提升 |
| VC | 风投(Venture Capital) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
战略叙事的力量 | Andy Raskin
文字记录
Andy Raskin (00:00:00): 我在商学院学到的做路演的方式,我想也是大多数人学到的方式,是我称之为”傲慢医生”的模式。你有问题、有痛苦,我有解决方案、有治疗方案,而且我会告诉你为什么它比其他所有方案都好。而我在那些电影相关书里读到的结构不一样。每部电影都以世界发生某种转变作为开端,我把这种转变称为从旧游戏到新游戏的转变。在商业世界中,我觉得最典型的例子就是 Benioff 当年为 Salesforce 所做的。他一上来就说:“嘿,软件时代已经结束了,现在有一个叫云端的新世界,一个新游戏,新规则。那是新的制胜之道。如果你身在其中,我们会帮助你。“这个结构的本质是定义一场运动,而这和”嘿,我要解决你的问题”截然不同。
Lenny (00:00:54): 欢迎收听 Lenny’s Podcast,在这里我采访世界级的产品领导者和增长专家,从他们打造和增长当今最成功产品的宝贵经验中学习。今天的嘉宾是 Andy Raskin。Andy 帮助 CEO 和公司领导者围绕他所谓的战略叙事对齐团队,正如你将在本期节目中深入了解的那样,它本质上是一个简单的故事,帮助人们理解为什么他们需要你的产品。同时,它也帮助你统一对齐销售、营销和产品团队,乃至融资甚至招聘工作。
Lenny (00:01:25): Andy 与一些最成功的创始人和公司密切合作过,包括 Gong、Dropbox、Uber、Salesforce、Square、IBM 等许多公司。在我们的对话中,Andy 解释了为什么大多数人推销产品的方式完全错误,为什么关注你为人们解决的问题已经不再是一种有效的路演方式,以及战略叙事如何帮你以更有效的方式框定你的解决方案。Andy 还分享了该框架在实际中的大量案例,为什么聚焦品类和品类创建如此局限,你的叙事需要改进的信号,以及更多内容。稍作赞助商播报后,请欣赏这期与 Andy Raskin 的对话。
赞助商播报
Lenny (00:02:07): 本期节目由 Coda 带来。你听我说过 Coda 是那个把一切整合在一起的文档,它如何帮助你的团队运行得更顺畅、更高效。我对此有切身感受,因为 Coda 就是这样帮到我的。我每天用 Coda 来打理我的 newsletter 内容日历、播客采访笔记,以及协调我的赞助商。最近,我还写了一整篇文章介绍 Coda 的产品团队是如何运作的,在那篇文章中他们分享了十几个内部用来管理产品团队的模板,包括管理路线图、OKR 流程、获取内部反馈,基本上他们整个产品开发流程都在 Coda 中完成。
Lenny (00:02:45): 如果你团队的工作散布在不同的文档、电子表格和一堆工作流工具中,那你需要 Coda。Coda 将数据集中到一个位置,不拘格式,消除可能拖慢团队的障碍。Coda 让你的团队基于相同的信息运作,在一个地方协作。抓住这个专为创业公司提供的限时特别优惠。今天就到 Coda.io/Lenny 注册,即可在首份账单上获得 1,000 美元的起始信用额度。那就是 C-O-D-A.io/Lenny,注册即可获得 1,000 美元的创业信用额度。Coda.io/Lenny。
Lenny (00:03:24): 你在招人吗?或者反过来,你在寻找新的机会吗?不管哪种情况,去看看 Lennysjobs.com/talent。如果你是招聘经理,你可以注册获取数百位经过人工筛选、对新机会持开放态度的人才。数千人申请加入这个人才集合,而我亲自审核,只接受大约 10%。你找不到比这更好的招聘产品经理和增长领导者的地方了。
Lenny (00:03:49): 已有近 100 家公司通过这个人才集合积极招聘。如果你正在寻找新的机会,无论是主动还是被动,加入这个人才集合吧。免费、可以匿名,甚至可以向特定公司隐藏自己。你还可以随时退出,而且只有你想听取的公司才会联系你。去看看 Lennysjobs.com/talent。
从程序员到叙事顾问
Lenny (00:04:16): Andy,欢迎来到播客。
Andy Raskin (00:04:18): 哦,谢谢 Lenny。很高兴和你对话。
Lenny (00:04:21): 你以帮助 CEO 优化路演、故事和策略而闻名,我们马上会深入探讨这些。但在那之前,能不能先给我们讲讲你是怎么进入这一行的?
Andy Raskin (00:04:35): 我最开始是写代码的。本科是计算机科学专业,我和一个朋友有个应用的点子。那是互联网泡沫年代,Windows 应用,我们写了个小原型,放出去之后开始有了一些用户,我们就想,“哦,也许我们可以拉点投资。“我们两个人里,我英语流利。所以决定,好吧,我来写投资人路演稿。于是我把路演稿写了,发了出去,反馈非常糟糕。有个 VC 回信说:“听好了,我给收到的每一份商业计划打 1 到 10 分,你们的是 1 分。“而且在那个 1 旁边他还用括号标注了”最差”,生怕我们以为那是他评分 scale 的顶端。
Lenny (00:05:20): 太狠了。
Andy Raskin (00:05:22): 是的,太狠了。不过再往下看——那时候还是会把商业计划打印出来寄出去,对方可能会把评论手写在上面再寄回来。他在上面写道:“故事不够吸引人。“几周后,我路过一家 Barnes & Noble,橱窗里有个牌子写着:“给所有想讲出引人入胜的故事的人”——好吧,说的就是我。旁边有个箭头指向一些书,结果是一堆编剧书。我之前对这些一无所知,于是开始读这些书。我突然意识到,一部电影就是一场路演。《星球大战》在路演什么?它在路演”要善良、关心他人、相信原力”——用他们的话说。但我没有几个小时的时间,我在做商业路演,完全不同。我又不是在写三幕剧本。
那什么适用,什么不适用呢?这些问题我觉得我至今还在思考,但我尽力从电影结构中学到的一些东西出发,它的结构和我的路演结构非常不同,我试着重新组织了它。我们照此做了,把路演稿重新发出去了,开始获得更多关注,效果很明显。几个月后我们就拿到了 term sheet,我就想,“这个’故事’到底是怎么回事?“我们并没有改产品,本质上是同一门生意,改变的只是我们谈论它的方式。这让我非常感兴趣。
在之后的十到十五年里,我一直在想,“嘿,也许我可以用这个做咨询。“听过这些的 CEO 们来向我请教。但我还是觉得,“不行。没有 CEO 会为’故事’专门拨一笔预算。那不是个正经事。“所以很长一段时间我都没去做,直到后来事实证明我错了。
Lenny (00:07:13): 那是多少年前的事?
Andy Raskin (00:07:15): 那是互联网泡沫时期,大概 ‘98 年我在为那家公司做路演。
Lenny (00:07:20): 太精彩了。我觉得这里面有几个有趣的点。一个是,当你做一件让自己兴奋的事情时,有趣的机会就会出现。你做了个创业公司,没成,但你在过程中解决了自己的一个问题,而这又为你带来了职业上更大的机会。
Andy Raskin (00:07:34): 是的,完全如此。
Lenny (00:07:35): 这很有意思。而且,一些最好的机会正是从解决自己的问题中产生的——不是一开始就计划要做点什么,而是就像”我有个问题”,结果发现 [听不清 00:07:44]——
Andy Raskin (00:07:44): 是的,我觉得你也一样,对吧,Lenny?你开始写一些东西,砰,那就成了你的事业。
Lenny (00:07:49): 完全同意。不过也不完全是”砰”的一下,但最终确实”砰”了。
Andy Raskin (00:07:53): 从外面看感觉就是”砰”的一下。
Lenny (00:07:55): 对,就是这样。对所有不在现场的人来说,一切都是一夜之间发生的。
Andy Raskin (00:08:01): 没错,确实如此。
什么是战略叙事
Lenny (00:08:03): 好,让我们进入正题。你现在帮助 CEO 们构建你所说的战略叙事,而且你不仅帮他们构建战略叙事,还帮助他们的团队围绕这个战略叙事达成对齐。那我们先从最基本的开始:什么是战略叙事?
Andy Raskin (00:08:19): 嗯,你可能觉得我做了十年了,应该有一个很精炼的定义,但我不确定我是否真正满意过……就是我一直没找到一个完全能概括它的说法。我唯一常说的是,它是 CEO 用来驱动成功的那一个故事——不只是在营销和销售中,也包括产品。它变成了一个北极星,产品路线图、融资、招聘的战略北极星,实际上就是一切的战略北极星。
Andy Raskin (00:08:54):
我认为真正有趣的一点——也可以说是一个限定条件——是这个故事有一种特定的结构。就像我说的,当我读到那些编剧书的时候,我改变了这个结构。而传统的结构,就是我在商学院学到的做路演的方式,我想也是大多数人的方式,我称之为傲慢医生(Andy 自创的比喻)。就是:你有一个问题、一个痛点,我有一个解决方案、一种疗法,然后我来告诉你为什么它比其他所有疗法都好。
Andy Raskin (00:09:24):
不是说它不好——只是它的结构就是这样的,它天然地把你引向自夸。“让我告诉你它有多厉害。“而我在这些电影书里读到的结构则不同。在电影里,每部电影都以某种变化开篇——在角色的世界中发生的变化。我把这种变化称为从旧游戏到新游戏。而我认为商业世界中最典型的例子,就是 Benioff 当年对 Salesforce 所做的。他出来说,“软件结束了,“——意思是那种我们需要自己拥有和维护的软件——“有一个新世界叫做云,一场新游戏,新的规则,一切都变了,这就是新的赢法。如果你入局,我们会帮助你。“这个结构的本质是定义一场运动,这跟”嘿,我来解决你的问题”非常不同。
更多战略叙事的案例
Lenny (00:10:34): 我觉得 Salesforce 的例子是说明你方法的绝佳案例。如果他们用旧的方式思考,Salesforce 会怎么做?如果不是”所有人都在迁移到云端,你们还在用桌面软件真是蠢”这种思路,他们会怎么推销?
Andy Raskin (00:10:48): 嗯,我想他们大概会出来说,“哦,嘿……”顺便说一下,CRM 当时已经是一个品类了。Siebel 已经是那个领域的巨无霸。甚至已经有公司在线上做这件事了,通过 Web 来做。所以他们大概会说,“哦,我们比 Siebel 更容易安装,部署更快,“或者”我们的功能比某某多——“我想是 NetSuite?还是什么来着。当时有一些早期的类 Salesforce 产品。他们会做那种比较式的东西。
Andy Raskin (00:11:25):
而 Benioff,他是个挺骄傲的人。我想他也确实说了”我们是第一 CRM”之类的话,但那不是他们最前面打的东西。他们最前面打的是这个关于根本性范式转变的故事——你入局还是不入局?他们所做的不是简单地说”嘿,我们比别人好”,而是说”嘿,所有那些其他的,那些 Siebel 们,它们属于那个旧游戏。你想玩那个软件游戏?请便,去买 Siebel 吧。“当然,后来的结果我们都知道了。
Lenny (00:12:02): 所以这个方法的核心不是”问题、解决方案、你应该这样做”,而是”世界正在变化,这是它的方向,我们会帮助你到达那里”。我想更深入地聊聊这个框架。但在此之前,还有什么其他例子,能让大家有种”哦,我懂了,我明白这是什么”的感觉?
Andy Raskin (00:12:19): 好,另一个很好的例子——而且不是巧合——是 Zuora。Zuora 是我在那篇叫做《我见过的最伟大的销售演示文稿》的文章中写到的公司。Zuora 的 CEO Tien Tzuo 是 Salesforce 的第 11 号员工。所以他是从 Benioff 那里学到的。他推销的是,“嘿,在旧世界里,企业靠交易运营。你把东西直接卖断给人们。而在这个新世界里——“他称之为订阅经济(subscription economy)——人们想要那些东西的好处,但不一定非要花钱拥有它们。当然他会举出所有赢家的例子,看那些最成功的公司,它们基本上都在转向这个新模式。
Andy Raskin (00:13:05):
所以他在向像福特这样的公司推销——你可以想象他们去找福特,推销汽车服务的订阅,这跟租赁完全不同。他们从这个切入:这是一个重大转变。另一个例子是我早期合作过的一个团队,我想他们会同意他们的故事就是从那次工作中出来的——Gong。Gong 现在大家可能都知道了,它们录制你所有的销售电话视频,然后用 AI 分析,产出各种洞察。他们的故事是:嘿,再见观点。过去销售是靠观点驱动的世界。你好现实,现在所有赢家都在采纳这种新思维——我们必须看到真正发生了什么。
Lenny (00:13:56): 在 Gong 的例子里,如果他们用”这是问题,这是解决方案,这是我们为你做的”这种路径,他们会怎么做?
Andy Raskin (00:14:03): 嗯,那基本上就是他们最初在做的事情。我不是说那完全不奏效。实际上到他们开始做这件事的时候,他们已经是一家正在壮大的公司了。我记得 Bendov 对我说,“听着,Andy,“他们当时大概在 B 轮左右,我想那是 2018 年。他说,“我们会成为一家巨大的公司。问题是多大。而我认为这种类似 Zuora 或 Salesforce 的叙事,如果我们做对了,会成为我们增长的一个乘数。”
Andy Raskin (00:14:38):
所以我不太记得之前的路演具体是什么样的,但基本上就是”嘿,我们会录制你的电话,从中提取洞察,比你能从 Salesforce 里得到的洞察更好。“没有那种统一的、运动式的理念,把一切放在一个更大的语境里。而真正有趣的一点是——我觉得他们不会介意我分享这个,也许大家已经知道了——最初他们被视为一个销售运营工具,给那些要录制通话的人用的。而这个叙事为他们带来的改变——虽然这种转变可能已经在发生——它真正凝聚起来的是:这是一个给销售领导层用的工具。
Lenny (00:15:23): 你在那篇文章里谈到了 Zuora,我猜很多听众会觉得,“靠,这就是写了那篇所有人都转发给我的、关于怎么做演示文稿的文章的人。“我想顺便问一下,那篇文章对你的职业生涯有多大影响?
写作的力量
Andy Raskin (00:15:39): 我之前已经在 Medium 上写过一些文章。Medium 现在变化挺大的,但那时候我发现,我可以在上面写东西,然后很多和我有共同兴趣的人就会过来,帮着制造一些声量。所以我已经做了几年这类工作了,但那篇文章很快就获得了大约 200 万的全球阅读量,然后我开始收到来自世界各地团队的咨询。
Andy Raskin (00:16:12): 而且我觉得正是这篇文章让我可以说,好吧,我可以靠做这个谋生了。CEO 们愿意为此单独列一笔预算。因为我觉得如果你真正理解了那篇文章,它其实不是关于一份销售演示文稿,而是关于 Tien 这位 CEO 到处讲述的那个故事,而那个故事体现在了销售演示文稿中,并且以那种方式被结构化了。
Lenny (00:16:40): 我觉得这只是又一个例子,在这个播客里反复出现的——就是写作的力量和内容的力量。是的,你正在点头。
Andy Raskin (00:16:48): 完全同意。我之前有过一段小小的记者生涯,做自由撰稿人,我真的很喜欢那段经历。实际上,我在纽约上过一门课,叫”如何写一篇杂志文章”,因为我当时算是职业生涯中期,挺好奇的。结果那门课教的更多是如何把一篇杂志文章卖出去。然后我发现我真的喜欢这个——推介文章,但有一件事一直让我挺沮丧的,就是总有一个编辑在决定什么东西能发表出来。
Andy Raskin (00:17:23): 当你遇到一个好编辑的时候,那当然很好,他们能让你变得更好,是无价的。但终究还是存在这么一个中间人。大概从 2013、14 年我开始写作的时候,你开始看到这些平台出现了,比如 Medium,甚至 LinkedIn,你可以在上面直接写,然后拥有受众。我觉得如果没有先出现这种变化,我根本没办法做我现在做的工作。
Lenny (00:17:53): 我把话题带偏了,但我想在这上面再深入一点。我觉得在线写作基本有两条路径。一条是你的路径——写了一篇东西然后就爆了。另一条更像是我的路径——就是长期持续地写。两条路都行得通,但大多数人想走你的路,却从来没成功过。写出一篇获得 200 万阅读量的东西真的很难,但你可以走那条路。
Andy Raskin (00:18:14): 这就像你之前说的,嘿,看起来好像一夜爆红,但其实不是。那大概是我写的第 30 篇还是第 40 篇文章了,之前那些在逐渐获得越来越多的关注。在那之前我写过一篇,基本上是拆解 Elon Musk 对 Powerwall——他们卖的那个电池——的推介。那篇大概获得了几十万阅读量,也是一个很大的跳跃。然后接下来那篇的阅读量又回到了一个很可怜的数字。所以我的经验是,确实有这么一段时期,你在写东西,感觉像在对着空气说话,然后慢慢地开始增长,中间会有一些高峰,但真正的魔法是在长期中发生的。
Lenny (00:19:03): 好的,我很高兴你指出了这一点——很少真的是写了一篇东西就一夜爆红的。
Andy Raskin (00:19:08): 我还想说一点——不好意思——因为我在杂志社工作过,我一直没做 newsletter,因为那种永远有个截止日期、得不断产出的感觉——我们以前在杂志社管这个叫”喂怪兽”——我现在没有这个包袱,感觉特别自由。所以至少目前我还没做 newsletter。
战略叙事框架
Lenny (00:19:27): 我太了解那种感觉了。让我把话题拉回来,我们来聊聊高层的框架。你谈到,它始于这个理念——告诉人们世界在变化,加入这场运动。对于这个战略叙事框架的各个组成部分,有什么简单的理解方式?
Andy Raskin (00:19:42): 很多时候人们会联系我说,“嘿,我试过了,没用。“一个很常见的做法——至少早期是这样的——他们基本上就是拿到 Zuora 的那套演示文稿,然后把自己的 logo 换上去。那肯定是不行的。有一点是,我们不是仅仅在说”嘿,世界在变化。“有时候我会看到”世界在变化”,然后是”过去是”,下面一长串东西,然后”现在是”,又一长串要点。
Andy Raskin (00:20:11): 我觉得真正关键的是给它命名,命名那个旧游戏。你看到的那些例子——软件、云、交易、订阅、观点、现实。这种非常非常简洁的命名才是真正关键的。而且这很难,因为在把它变得精简的过程中,你会丢失完整性。你可以想象一下,你在开会,有人说”嘿,我们用’从交易到订阅’怎么样?“然后有人说,“嗯,我不知道诶,很多东西我并不是真的去订阅的。订阅经济,真的吗?“所以我们总是某种程度上在夸大,但这不是问题。我觉得人们不会说”哦,那是错的,订阅经济,因为我还是会去杂货店买东西。“总之,这就是第一个组成部分。
Andy Raskin (00:20:59): 第二个组成部分是我所说的”命名利害关系”(naming the stakes)。有几种方法可以做到这一点,但如果能做到的话,一个非常好的方法是指出赢家——展示赢家已经在玩这个新游戏了。比如在 Zuora 的案例中,他们在说,“嘿,你看,看看所有这些新的赢家,“这是 2015 年左右,“Airbnb、Box,“所有这些公司,他们已经在做这个订阅的事情了。
Andy Raskin (00:21:28): 顺便说一下,他们还展示了一个关于财富 500 强企业寿命的吓人数据。这个数字在变小,所以虽然有一点不够严谨,但基本上他们构建了这样一个论点:“嘿,企业在消亡,而那些正在赢的企业都在做这件事。“所以如果我们要把这变成生死攸关的事情——就像电影一样。这里我再来做个和《星球大战》的类比。Luke 在电影前 15 分钟一直在抱怨。他想当飞行员,他想出去在太空里冒险。然后 Obiwan 来了,他说,“嘿,我们有这个任务,有个公主我们得去救,“所有这些东西,“走吧。我教你当飞行员。我们去太空冒险。“Luke 怎么说的?他说,“呃,你知道吗,我真的没法参与。我得回家了。时间不早了。“这听起来像谁?犹豫不决的买家。
Andy Raskin (00:22:27): 没错,“我想创新,想搞各种新东西。呃,你知道吗?我这个季度没有预算。“那 George Lucas 是怎么改变 Luke 的主意的呢?他基本上就是杀了他的叔叔婶婶——抱歉,剧透了,不过都 40 年了。如果你还没看过,大概也不会去看了。杀了叔叔婶婶。现在很清楚了,他们接下来要找的就是 Luke。现在利害关系变成了生死存亡。他很可能会死。但 Obiwan 为他提供了另一条路。
Andy Raskin (00:22:55): 每次我和团队合作讲到这个的时候,他们就会说,“好吧,所以我们得去杀掉客户的叔叔婶婶,“基本上是的——当然是比喻意义上的。我们得让他们看到,未来不会只是”还行”。人们总说要让它变得有情感(emotional),我一直在想,这到底是什么意思?字面意义上,定义是什么?对我来说,定义就是:潜在客户不再把未来看作”还行”,而是看到一个分裂的未来——一个非常负面的结局和一个可能非常正面的结局。
命名新游戏的目标
Andy Raskin (00:23:29): 第三个要素,我称之为命名新游戏的目标。我以前叫它”应许之地信息”(promised land message),但我改成了这个说法,因为我发现这样更有成效。订阅经济、交易,这些概念可能会有点高大上、有点虚,但在网站上我们得把它浓缩成几个词,让人一看就明白,我们能说什么?我发现,新游戏的目标是什么——这个问法能很好地把它浓缩成这场运动的口号。以 Zuora 为例,这个目标有一阵子是”把客户变成订户”。非常简单。就是水到渠成的感觉。Airbnb 有一阵子的口号是”住在任何地方”。如果你想想——
Lenny (00:24:21): “属于任何地方”(Belong anywhere)。
Andy Raskin (00:24:23): 其实——
Lenny (00:24:24): 哦,是”像人一样生活”(live like a human)。
Andy Raskin (00:24:25): 你说得对,是”属于任何地方”,后来又换成了”住在那里”(Live there)。我可能把时间顺序记错了,但就是这两个。你比我清楚。不过不管是哪个,我觉得它们说的其实差不多。嘿,有这样一个新世界——你不必住酒店,你可以住在别人的房子里。这个游戏的目标就是属于任何地方,住在那里。我很喜欢这种方式奏效的时候,它几乎像是一个渐近线般永远达不到的目标。你永远不会真的”住在那里”。你想想看,这个买家使命宣言,这个口号,我真的把它看作公司的使命。Airbnb 的使命是什么,如果不是帮助人们”住在那里”——如果他们要以客户为中心的话?
障碍:新游戏必须很难
Andy Raskin (00:25:17): 第四个要素是,好,这个游戏的目标,赢得这场游戏,它最好很难,因为如果不难,我们为什么还要存在?就像电影一样,如果 Luke 轻轻松松就能摧毁死星,那就没有电影了。所以必须有一些障碍挡在路上,阻止他们前进的东西。所以说,“好,你想把客户变成订户。“那么 Zuora 接下来会说,“好,那你打算怎么衡量终身价值?“因为你现在有了这个永续在线的东西。“你打算怎么衡量偏好的变化?“所有这些以前不存在的新挑战。然后这些就是《指环王》里的怪兽,或者《星球大战》里的帝国——这些就是障碍。
Andy Raskin (00:26:11): 我会这样想它们,因为它们听起来像是问题。人们通常会说,“哦,这些是我们解决的问题。“但通过先搭建这个故事框架,我们把它重新包装成了障碍——通向一个新目标状态的障碍,而我们之前已经把这个目标状态定位成了生死攸关的事。所以它们就带上了更深的情感含义。我们理解了它们为什么重要。然后当然最后一个要素是,好,我们怎么克服这些障碍?搞叙事的人在电影行业里管这些叫魔法礼物——主角获得的帮助他获胜的东西。有哪些方法?现在我们可以谈这个了,还有成功案例等等所有的内容。
Lenny (00:26:58): 这和英雄之旅(hero’s journey)有很明显的地方可以对应。我想它应该是一个灵感来源,《星球大战》我觉得就是那个旅程的典范。你能谈谈这两者的关联吗,你怎么看?
英雄之旅的局限
Andy Raskin (00:27:09): 对,英雄之旅出自一本书——好像是《千面英雄》(Hero of A Thousand Faces),Joseph Campbell 写的,一位社会学家。他研究了不同文化、不同时代的神话,发现了这种共同的结构,他称之为英雄之旅。不过这本书也有争议,比如它是不是太男性视角了等等。
Andy Raskin (00:27:38): 但即使抛开那些不谈,我发现当我讲英雄之旅之类的东西时,它就是……没有真正告诉我该做什么。对,好,我 gotta 做这个 pitch。在英雄之旅里有所谓”拒绝召唤”(refusal of the call),其实就是 Luke 说他不想去的那一段,也是买家说”嘿,我没预算”的那一段。但我不确定,它对我来说太理论化了,用的时候人们就有点走神。所以我现在基本不谈那个了。但当然,这背后确实有很多相通的东西。
Lenny (00:28:17): 对,这说得通,因为我觉得人们总听到这种说法——“成为更好的讲故事的人”、“用英雄之旅来讲你的故事”,然后就觉得”我不知道自己在干什么”。
Andy Raskin (00:28:25): 另外我想说,讲故事作为一种技能——学习怎么把故事讲得更好之类的,这当然很好。但我的工作真正感兴趣的不是这个,我感兴趣的是那一个故事,那一个故事的结构。而这一个故事,它其实并没有……比如,“世界正从交易走向订阅”——这个故事里没有一个主角在遇到问题然后被拯救。倒不如说,我们所做的事情是把与我们对话的人变成了主角。通过阐明这个转变,我们改变了他们的世界,然后说:“嘿,你得改变,你得跟我们一起走。”
Lenny (00:29:13): 几乎就像你把他们放进了英雄之旅里,“这是你获胜的方式。”
Andy Raskin (00:29:16): 没错。我喜欢这个说法。
Lenny (00:29:18): 让我试着总结一下你分享的,这个五步框架。首先,这里有一个正在发生的新运动,你要给它命名,你要命名利害关系,有赢家有输家,而且这已经在发生了,非常重要。然后你要命名新游戏的目标,比如把客户变成订户。接着展示障碍,说明为什么这件事很有挑战性,然后谈论你打算如何克服这些障碍。
Andy Raskin (00:29:41): 顺便说一下,命名新游戏的目标,我发现用问题的形式来呈现效果往往很好。所以我们说,嘿,世界正从交易转向订阅,看,所有人都在这样做。于是我们问了一个简单的问题:要把每一个客户都变成订户,需要什么?这样一来,我们几乎是在带着被 pitch 的人一起走,就像他是和我们一起冒险、共同打造这个故事的伙伴。
Lenny (00:30:17): 我喜欢这个说法。
本期赞助
本集由 Eco 赞助。上个月 Eco 用户平均获得了 84 美元的现金返还奖励。怎么做到的?用 Eco——个人理财的未来。Eco 是对一个错位的金融系统的升级,提供一个像银行一样运作的应用,但几乎去掉了所有中间商,帮助即便是最好的理财达人也能在更少的时间里自动完成优化。
Lenny (00:30:40): 想象一下,你付房租就能获得奖励,点外卖、网购也能获得奖励,甚至每月存钱也能获得奖励?然后再想象一下,你因为获得了奖励而再次获得奖励。有了 Eco,你可以在一些最喜欢的商家消费,自动获得 5% 的现金返还,而且 Eco 的年化收益率奖励看起来更像 80 美元,而不是 80 美分。然后还有 Eco 积分——世界上第一个开放的奖励系统。你在 Eco 应用里做几乎任何事情都能赚到积分。Eco 正在努力让这些积分成为有史以来最有价值的积分,所以越早加入越划算。
Lenny (00:31:13): 听起来太好了不像真的?去 Eco.com/Lenny,注册一个入门引导,看看为什么不是。参加 Eco 欢迎会的 Lenny 播客听众,1000 美元以上存款将获得专属的 4% APY。了解更多请访问 Eco.com/Lenny,E-C-O.com/Lenny。也许为了进一步强化这一点,我们用一家公司作为例子,把五个步骤过一遍,逐一聊聊它们分别是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:31:41): 好,没问题。有一家公司叫 360Learning。这家公司——我不知道大家是否了解——已经融资超过 2 亿美元。他们做的是企业培训软件。大公司需要培训员工做各种各样的事情。你想以这家来过一遍?
Lenny (00:32:01): 好啊,听起来不错。
360Learning 的战略叙事重塑
Andy Raskin (00:32:03): 好的。顺便说一下,Nick Hernandez 是他们的 CEO,Nick 上过我的播客,所以他讲过这些。他们很长一段时间以来一直在推销”协作式学习”。他们有各种功能让人们可以在课程上协作,等等。Nick 经常向 CEO 们做推介,当然他的团队也是。他告诉我,效果有点平淡。人们觉得,协作式学习,也就那样吧。你和这个学习平台、那个学习平台有什么区别?
Andy Raskin (00:32:42): 所以当我们合作的时候,这个”协作式学习”几乎就像一个品类名称或者描述词之类的东西。它已经嵌入得那么深,我决定干脆不要把它拿掉,但我们能不能用一个故事来定义它?所以他们最终提炼出的故事是这样的:过去,公司培训员工基本上是一种自上而下的学习思维。公司里会有某个学习大师,他负责收集所有课程,把它们整合起来,然后把培训材料发送给所有人。
Andy Raskin (00:33:23): 现在发生的变化是,那些胜出的公司正在用不同的方式做这件事。他们在采用一种我们可以称之为”内部赋能提升”(upskill from within)的方法。看看 Google,他们有一个页面,我想是公开的。你可以连接 Google 的 AI 专家。他们真的把内部专家变成了布道者,不仅在教育公司内部的人,甚至还在教育外部的人。他们创造了一种文化:我们自己的人就是教育者。所以这就是从自上而下到内部赋能提升的转变。当然我刚才其实已经开始讲第二部分了,就是:看看那些正在这样做的大公司。
Andy Raskin (00:34:10): 然后我想他们展示了:“你还没这样做。看,培训正变得非常昂贵,员工也不在乎。这就是代价。所以我们正在创建这种利害关系……”而且我觉得他还有一段关于培训的现状,比如企业如果不能把这些技能传递给员工——如果你是一家汽车公司,你无法让你的员工掌握电动汽车相关的技能,你就完了。
Andy Raskin (00:34:35): Nick 在法国的时候看到了一张海报,是麦当劳的招聘海报,上面写着:“在麦当劳工作,你将从团队中每个人那里学到东西。“就像,哇,就是这个。所以我们用这个作为另一个赢家案例。然后问题就变成了——我记不太清具体措辞了,大概是这样的:你如何实现内部赋能提升?你需要什么才能把你的专家变成公司内部学习的布道者,让他们成为明星,诸如此类?
Andy Raskin (00:35:06): 然后我忘了具体有哪些障碍了。但我觉得大概是这些问题:你怎么让任何人都能创建课程?有些人可能在电动引擎方面有专长,但不知道怎么创建课程;你怎么确保学习部门仍然能保持管控,可以……所有这些。你可以想象各种各样的问题。然后当然,360Learning 开始谈论所有这些事情。
Andy Raskin (00:35:36): Nick 跟我说的——我实际上马上要和 Nick 一起做一场网络研讨会,有人问我,“你能不能请一位 CEO 来聊聊这些东西?别光是你自己在那叨叨战略叙事。“所以 Nick 会加入。前几天我们做了一次彩排,他告诉我,现在他用这种方式开场之后,他甚至不会再遇到那个问题了——就是”你和那个学习平台有什么不同?“这个问题以前总是被问到。现在就顺畅多了,对方会说”好的,聊聊吧,把我们的学习团队拉进来,把这事推动起来”。听起来这对他们确实非常有效。
战略叙事的实际影响
Lenny (00:36:13): 这其实正是我接下来想问的——你看到有人按照这个文档把他们的推介故事从傲慢医生的方式转变为战略叙事之后,产生了什么样的影响?
Andy Raskin (00:36:23): 是的,我经常听到的就是这类反馈。当然,这很难量化。比如 Gong 的战略叙事对它的增长贡献了多少价值?是 3 倍还是 1 倍、2 倍?谁也说不准,对吧?但我从 CEO 们那里听到的有几件事。第一是,他们在做推介的时候,不再是脱离上下文地推介功能,而是在推介一场运动,这个站位要好得多。在某种意义上,你不是在推销产品。产品只是让故事成真的一个道具——非常重要的道具,但有一个更高层次的叙事框架成为了对话的焦点。当然,我们最终会深入到产品层面,但有了这个故事之后,销售就更容易了。一旦我们有了这个故事,营销里的一切都可以围绕这个故事展开。
Andy Raskin (00:37:21): 拿 Zuora 来说,如果你看他们的网站——当他们刚开始这样做的时候,可能 80% 的内容都不是”让我告诉你 Zuora 有多棒”,或者”这是我们的新版本”之类的。而是”音乐公司是如何拥抱订阅的”、“奢侈品牌公司是如何拥抱订阅的”。全是这类几乎像是趋势报道的内容,成为取之不尽的素材。而且,你不再是在自我吹嘘……它不那么像推销了,对吧?
Andy Raskin (00:37:51): 另一件事我也总听到——我今天早上刚为我的播客采访了一位 CEO,他第一句话就是:“它成为了产品的战略北极星。“他告诉我的——这其实有点不寻常——我问他,“你一开始为什么来找我?“当然我之前也问过他,但他这次说了一些和我之前听到的略有不同的话。他说:“我们不断通过销售、通过客户成功收到功能需求,但我们一直没有一个标准来决定接哪些、不接哪些。而现在这个叙事明确地成了我们的标准。”
Andy Raskin (00:38:38): 你想想对 360Learning 来说,它是否有助于内部赋能提升?是的,那就做。不是?那就排在后面。Amit Bendov 直接跟我说了一模一样的事。他说:“我们会收到大量的功能需求,其中很多本质上就是各种记录意见的方式。”
Lenny (00:39:04): 这是 Gong 的情况。
Andy Raskin (00:39:04): “我们不会做那些。“对,在 Gong。“我们不会做那些。”
Lenny (00:39:08): 有没有一些公司,可能不是你的客户,但你看了之后觉得,哇,这些家伙做得太好了,他们的战略叙事做得非常出色?
Andy Raskin (00:39:15): 我脑子里马上想到的一个例子是——虽然这个例子已经存在有一阵子了——Drift。Drift 推出的本质上就是一个网站聊天机器人,而这可能是市面上第 30 个网站聊天机器人了。但他们没有说:“嘿,我们的聊天机器人是最好的。“他们从一个完全不同的起点出发,说的是:“嘿,过去人们基本上就是等着你回复他们。那是一个’以后’的世界。他们称之为表单的世界。你放一个网页表单上去,指望有人来填写,然后可能等上好几天,而你不紧不慢地决定要不要回复他们。”
Andy Raskin (00:39:58): 而 David Cancel 和 David Gerhardt 从一开始就说:“现在我们处于一个’现在’的世界,买家们……”我记得他们展示了一个女人抱着手机睡觉的画面。那就是你的潜在客户。他们永远在线,他们期望你立刻与他们互动。他们把这种方式叫做 conversational marketing,并且真正围绕这个概念推进,我认为他们创造了一整个运动,从而彻底与所有其他聊天机器人区隔开来。
品类创建 vs. 运动创建
Lenny (00:40:35): 很好的例子。之前你提到了”品类”这个词,我注意到你没有太多谈及品类和品类创建,而且我觉得你似乎不太认同创建品类、聚焦品类这个思路。我很想听听你的看法,它和你推荐的那套方法之间的关系是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:40:55): Lenny,你这是想让我惹麻烦吗?就像你播客上那个攻击 jobs to be done 的人一样?
Lenny (00:41:02): 看来是的,来吧,看看我们能惹出什么麻烦。
Andy Raskin (00:41:06): 我会稍微缓和一下说法,不只是……因为我不想招惹品类设计那帮人。但我真的想缓和一下,我不会说我反对创建品类。你看,我觉得如果你看 Play Bigger 这本书——它已经成了品类创建这个领域的圣经——如果你往深里看,他们说什么叫品类?他们说品类就是一个叙事。是一个关于世界从怎样变到怎样的故事。但我的发现是,当人们思考品类创建时,他们往往只关注:好吧,我们这个品类名叫什么?这三个词或两个词是什么,能够神奇地让我们看起来和所有人都完全不同?
Andy Raskin (00:41:52): 而首先,我觉得这其实是不可能的。这三个词做不到这一点。拿 Gong 来说,当时已经有其他公司在用 revenue intelligence 这个词了。但在 Gong 这里它突然变成了一个真正的概念,因为我认为他们背后有那个从观点到现实的故事。有一次我又问 Amit,他说”对”,因为我记得他当时很纠结,“我们该叫它什么?我们该叫它什么?”
Andy Raskin (00:42:20): 他想出了那个名字。但后来我再问他时,他说:“你知道,事后回想,我们大概叫它草莓智能也行。名字其实无所谓。真正重要的是那个故事。“我觉得他有点夸张了。而且我觉得品类设计的人其实也会同意这一点,他们会同意,嘿,这三个词其实是这场旧游戏叙事运动的一个简称。
Andy Raskin (00:42:48): 但我还是觉得,称之为”品类”和”品类名称”,让我们过度聚焦在那三个词上了。经常发生的情况是,CEO 们会想出这么一个品类名称——比如 360Learning 的 Nick 提出了 collaborative learning。我们有了一个名字,但不知道怎么围绕它讲故事。所以我的感觉是,让我们聚焦在故事上。这就是为什么我谈的是战略叙事和运动创建,而不是品类创建。如果有人认定你的运动是一个品类,很好,那是额外的奖励。
Lenny (00:43:32): 我明白了。所以本质上你的方法是,品类可以在这个过程中发挥作用,但有一个更大的问题——故事是什么,运动是什么,障碍是什么,品类只是其中一个可能的元素?
Andy Raskin (00:43:45): 我几乎把它们看作是正交的关系。比如 HubSpot。HubSpot 有一个围绕 inbound 的叙事。过去只是 outbound 那一套,现在我们要做 inbound。这其实并不算一个品类。那时候他们大概被称为 marketing automation。现在他们大概被称为 CRM,因为业务范围扩大了。但这场运动才是那个恒定的东西,在某些方面与他们所处的品类是正交的。
战略叙事的适用范围
Lenny (00:44:16): 战略叙事框架是否基本上适用于任何公司,还是说有一个最佳适用区间?我注意到你谈到的大多数公司都是 B2B SaaS。所以我不知道,是否有一个光谱——一端是战略叙事框架的完美匹配,另一端则完全不适合——这个光谱上分布着什么?
Andy Raskin (00:44:33): 对,你可以看到,讲这个故事需要一些时间,而且你需要在很多不同的渠道里反复讲述。所以我觉得它在企业销售的语境下确实非常适用,因为那里有一个群体购买决策。不是一个人在做调研,而是这一整群人需要有一个统一的故事。所以你说得对,注意到这套方法最容易引起共鸣的公司往往是 B2B、企业销售、科技公司——我认为原因是产品通常非常复杂。那个傲慢医生的套路来自一个人们卖的是货架上的产品的时代——那些产品不怎么变,超市里的罐头汤,或者经销商里的汽车。即使是当时的软件,也是用盒子装的 shrink-wrap 软件,不会变。
Andy Raskin (00:45:44): 而 B2B 软件,这些东西每一分钟都在变。这时候去宣称”我们有这些功能,他们有那些功能,所以我们更好”——这有意义吗?这说得通吗?话虽如此,嘿,我买运动手表的时候,我也在比较 Fitbit 的参数,做各种对比。所以那种购买模式依然存在。所以,对,当消费品公司联系我时,我通常会说”不”。偶尔他们还是会说”好吧,我们还是想构建这个叙事”。但我觉得这套方法对 B2B 企业科技公司来说,价值最大,立竿见影的效果也最明显。
何时需要重塑战略叙事
Lenny (00:46:33): 还有几个问题。一个是,有哪些迹象表明你应该在这个领域花时间——你的战略叙事、你的故事推介中有什么东西出了问题?
Andy Raskin (00:46:42): 我可以告诉你,当 CEO 们联系我时他们会说什么。我总是会问,发生了什么?因为我之前的判断是,没有哪个 CEO 会为此专门批一笔预算。我基本上是在问,为什么我错了?他们告诉我的几件事:一是公司正在从一个阶段走向成熟——他们一直很成功,但那个成功……用一位 CEO 的话说,是创始人们的蛮力。创始人们参加每一个会议,参与每一次产品讨论、每一个销售电话,而现在这种情况在变化,公司规模变大了。
Andy Raskin (00:47:21): 通常我在 B 轮左右看到这种情况,公司变得……所以他们不可能再出现在每一个销售电话、每一次市场会议中,他们需要把所有那些好的东西和一些方向,以人们能记住的方式传递下去。从我们怎么推介到产品应该是什么样的,所有这一切,而他们把这个视为……
Andy Raskin (00:47:47): 人们联系我的另一个时机,是他们在增长的过程中。通常要稍晚一些,此时他们已经极其成功地扩展了规模。现在他们要么在收购公司,要么在建立全新的产品部门。而那个我们过去讲的老故事,就是不够大了,我们需要把它扩展到更大的层面。OneTrust 就是一个例子,他们的 CEO 最近上了我的播客。他们一开始只是做数据隐私,围绕的是用户需要能够说”别追踪我”之类的那些法规。然后他们收购了其他公司,现在有了更大的产品组合。那我们该怎么讲故事呢?我想第三种情况是某种转型——我们之前讲的是一个老故事,但不管怎样,市场变了,或者不管什么原因,我们想换一个方向。
Lenny (00:48:53): 假设有创始人听到这些,他们会想,“好吧,我意识到我需要做这件事。我之前在这上面花的时间不够。有些地方不对劲。这可能对我们是一个巨大的解锁。” 他们可以采取的前几个步骤是什么,来开始弄清楚这件事?我想到了某个阶段可能就是,去找 Andy,他会帮你搞定。那有没有你自己能做的事情?你怎么去着手弄清楚这件事?
Andy Raskin (00:49:11): 嗯,多年来很多人给我发邮件,就像我之前说的,有些人发邮件说,“嘿,试了,没用。” 但更多的人发邮件说,“嘿,我试了,确实有用。谢谢。” 所以是的,只要试着按照那个结构来搭建并尝试——即使我和团队合作时,我也会采用人们可能称之为精益方法的方式。我想尽快把那个东西放到销售电话中去。我们不会立刻向整个销售团队推广,而是先放到一些销售电话中试试,感受一下,“嘿,这个引起共鸣了吗?对方在点头吗?”
Andy Raskin (00:49:49): 顺便说一下,理想情况下,我测试它是否有效的一种方式是,当我们讲这个变化和利害关系时,看它们是否站得住脚。对方是否会这样说,“对,让我告诉你这在我们的情况下是怎么回事,” 或者,“我是不是……对,我确实看到了这个。” 有时候我会直接训练销售人员问对方那个问题,比如,“是我疯了,还是你也看到了这个趋势?” 他们怎么回答?你通常能判断出他们是否真的进来了,这是定性的判断。但我真的很喜欢这种测试方式,看它是否有效。而且我觉得任何人都能做到这一点。
Lenny (00:50:32): 你网上有没有模板或指南供人们参考,而不仅仅是听这个播客和读文章?有没有一篇帖子是说,“框架就在这里定义好了,按这些步骤走就行”?
Andy Raskin (00:50:41): 我想最接近的应该是那篇《我见过的最伟大的销售推介文稿》,也就是 Zuora 那篇。但即便在那里,人们也会向我要框架,演示公司会说,“能不能把你的模板给我们,这样我们可以提供给用户?我们可以跟你分成之类的。” 而我真的非常反对模板。我合作的每个团队都不一样。幻灯片的数量不是固定的。有时候我们可以用一张幻灯片就把这个变化讲清楚,有时候用几张感觉更好,或者团队更喜欢那种方式,让听众逐渐进入状态。有时候根本不用幻灯片。所以我真的不太愿意推荐任何模板。我想说的是,这些是构建它的原则,而不是任何规定性的公式。
联系方式与预期管理
Lenny (00:51:37): 如果我们就在这个话题上,他们确实想联系你,最好的方式是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:51:42): 在 LinkedIn 上联系我。这通常是个好方式。我也会经常在 LinkedIn 上发布一些我从与其他团队合作中学到的东西。
Lenny (00:51:52): 太好了。在进入非常令人期待的快问快答环节之前的最后一个问题。说到 LinkedIn,你发过一个帖子,说在公司的工作坊中,第二个环节总是会经历一个低谷,所有人都开始气馁和痛苦。首先,我很喜欢这种预期管理。你说的是,“一开始会很糟糕,但会好起来的。” 为什么那是低谷?他们在第二个环节中关注的是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:52:17): 嗯,显然我的预期管理做得还不够好,因为那篇帖子讲的就是一位女士的事。当我和 CEO 合作时,我总是让他们组建一个我称之为战略叙事团队的小组,最多四个人。通常是市场、销售等部门的负责人。在这个案例中,CFO 在这家公司是非常关键的人物,所以 CEO 希望她加入这个团队。她最后对我说,她当时说的是,“我很喜欢我们最终达到的成果。” 我总是会问,“什么有效?什么没效?” 她说,“我很喜欢我们最终达到的成果,那部分很棒。没效的部分是,你告诉我们第二个环节会很糟糕,但我觉得你可以更彻底地讲清楚到底有多糟糕。”
Andy Raskin (00:52:58): 然后我问她,“说真的,我能不能把这句话连同你的照片放在一张幻灯片上,以后展示给未来的团队?” 她说,“可以,你可以这样做。” 我的工作方式是这样的:我有一个启动会议,基本上是问团队里的每个人,这些要素是什么?这个旧游戏到新游戏的转变是什么?我们怎么谈论命名利害关系,以及我刚才带你们走过的所有内容。我们有五个人在房间里。结束的时候——我们会有满满的笔记,满满一白板又一白板的这些东西的想法。
Andy Raskin (00:53:34): 然后两件事会同时发生。一是我会让团队开始采访客户,了解他们怎么看这个变化——有时候客户真的会把那些词语直接给我们,这在团队内部有分歧时对统一认知很有帮助。但我也会开始和 CEO 一对一工作,我们构建这个东西的第一个版本。然后第二个环节就是把这个第一版展示给团队,大家一起来审视现在的情况。
第二个环节为什么是低谷
Andy Raskin (00:54:02): 团队刚刚给了我们无数金点子,真的,全都是……而为了做出一个干净有力的东西,我和 CEO 基本上得把那些点子几乎全扔掉,只保留一两个。首先,这会引发情绪。其次,如果这事简单到只需采访所有人、把结果汇总就行,他们早就自己做了。所以第一版肯定是错的。
Andy Raskin (00:54:30): 但好消息是,这正是团队可以发表意见的时候。我也会问,这个东西里什么有效、什么没效?当我们了解它哪里没效时,这就给了我和 CEO 回到起点的动力。我们事先就计划好了这一步——我们会回到起点,然后带出一个好的版本来。所以拥有一份糟糕的草稿,比拥有所有那些精彩的想法有价值一百万倍。但它也确实很痛苦。不仅对他们痛苦,对我也痛苦。不管我说了多少次”我预期他们会喜欢”,在第一个版本出来时我也还是会期待他们喜欢。当他们不喜欢的时候,我真的很生气。但幸运的是,我现在已经做过足够多次了,我知道这一定会发生。
Lenny (00:55:20): 我最近刚好在看一部关于 Annie Lamont 的纪录片,是她提出了”第一版草稿”(shitty first draft)这个概念——作家们都遵循的那个。
Andy Raskin (00:55:27): 我是这个理念的坚定信仰者。是的。
产品负责人同样适用
Lenny (00:55:30): 你说的这些让我最后一个想法是——所以你和 CEO、创始人合作。但我觉得这对产品负责人、产品经理来说可能同样有用,他们在推出一款产品时,同样需要思考——这场运动是什么,它正在哪里发生,为什么这款产品很重要。你也这样认为吗?
Andy Raskin (00:55:45): 绝对如此。而且很多时候,产品负责人、首席产品官也是这个小组的一部分。不过我想说的是,原因……所以我做了几年这个工作之后,回头看,我问自己,哪些合作项目中我能看到——叙事真正成为一切的北极星?
Andy Raskin (00:56:10): 那些项目的共同点是,CEO 始终在主导,不仅是名义上,而是真的亲自给我打电话、和我一起打磨草稿、逐字逐句地推敲。所以最初我并没有坚持一定要 CEO 亲自来做,但后来我开始坚持了。而且我觉得,即使你是一位产品负责人,你也会需要支持。你不会希望只在产品部门讲这个叙事。你会需要来自各方面的支持——就像那位给我初始 deck 的 Zuora 负责人说的,“就像我有空中掩护,我只需要在地面上一个一个拿下交易。“你会需要在市场、销售、招聘等各方面的空中掩护。如果这一切真正由 CEO 来推动,而你拥有这样的支持,那效果要好得多。
Lenny (00:57:01): 太棒了。在我们进入非常激动人心的快问快答环节之前,你还有什么想聊的或者想分享的吗?
Andy Raskin (00:57:07): 没有了,除了我很喜欢做品类设计的人,这真的只是……那些我很喜欢的一些术语……你知道吗?算了。把这段划掉。
Lenny (00:57:19): 我觉得那段挺逗的。
Andy Raskin (00:57:21): 哦对。好吧。对,可以保留。可以保留这段。你甚至可以把这段我让你划掉的部分也保留。
Lenny (00:57:26): 听起来不错。我其实正想开玩笑说我会把那段剪掉,让你悬在那里,不过好吧。
Andy Raskin (00:57:31): 不,你可以那么做。对。做品类设计的人。爱你们。别恨我。谢谢。
Lenny (00:57:37): 好的。我喜欢。我觉得我们会没事的。好了,我们已经到了非常激动人心的快问快答环节。我有五个问题。准备好了吗?
Andy Raskin (00:57:46): 准备好了。我看到你发过来的问题了,但我没有仔细看,所以我就凭直觉回答。
Lenny (00:57:52): 完美。太好了。最好的状态。你最常推荐给别人的一两本书是什么?
快问快答
Andy Raskin (00:57:59): 其中一本是我在巴诺书店最初读到的那本,叫 Story,Robert McKee 写的。很多对叙事感兴趣的人可能都知道这本书,但它是做编剧之类工作的人的圣经。任何在好莱坞待过、或者想过要去好莱坞的人,都知道这本书。我还喜欢一本书叫 Out of Sheer Rage。它其实跟我做的工作没什么关系,作者是 Geoff Dyer。Geoff 写了很多随笔式的回忆录,这本书讲的是他试图写一本关于 D.H. Lawrence 的书的经历。所以整本书都是关于拖延的——“哦,我应该写这本书。我马上要去旅行了。我要不要把 D.H. Lawrence 全集带上,这样也许能帮我开始动笔?但也许我不应该带,因为那样的话……那我不带的话回来就能精神焕发……”基本上就是这些。全是这种内心戏。我就是很喜欢那本书。
Lenny (00:58:59): 你最近最喜欢的一部电影或电视剧是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:59:03): 《Station 11》。《Station 11》。对我来说那部剧太美了。
Lenny (00:59:09): 迷幻。那是一部很迷幻的作品。完全没想到它会走向那个方向。我通常会问你最喜欢的面试问题是什么,我不知道你多常面试别人,但听到这个问题有没有什么浮现在脑海中?
Andy Raskin (00:59:21): 嗯,我可以告诉你一个我和 CEO 交谈时会问的问题——我喜欢问,这个叙事在你的领导力中扮演了什么角色?它在你的领导中是如何发挥作用的?对我来说,听到这些回答总是很有意思,因为我经常听到一些意想不到的东西。
Lenny (00:59:39): 你最近发现并真正喜欢的一款产品是什么?
Andy Raskin (00:59:43): 我最近买了一个 Fitbit。我想我之前可能提到过。我一直在找这样一款产品,到目前为止我真的很喜欢它。
Lenny (00:59:53): 不错。你试过其他版本的 Fitbit 吗?还是就用这一款?
Andy Raskin (00:59:58): 我同时也买了一款 Polar,后来把 Polar 退了。主要就是戴在手腕上感觉笨重了一点,所以我选了 Fitbit。嗯,你有什么推荐的替代品吗?
Lenny (01:00:13): 我只有 Apple Watch,从没用过 Fitbit。Apple Watch 给我展示一堆看起来很酷的数据,但我从来没深入研究过。
Andy Raskin (01:00:21): 我大概一周前买的 Fitbit,其实我还在犹豫要不要退了它换成 Apple Watch,所以我目前挺享受的,但走着看吧。
Lenny (01:00:28): 好的。最后一个问题。你是演示方面的专家,我猜你花很多时间处理 deck。那么,人们在对 deck 或演示文稿的组装方式上,做一个小小的改变就能让演示效果好很多——你会建议什么?
Andy Raskin (01:00:41): 就是这一条:把幻灯片的标题做成那一页的核心结论,这样看的人不需要做任何额外工作就能抓住要点。举个例子,你有时候会看到标题写”问题”或者”团队”。把”团队”换成”我们的团队是这个行业的老兵”——每一页幻灯片的标题都是一个结论,而不是一个标签。这会让整个演示流畅得多。
Lenny (01:01:17): 你在完全没提前看问题的情况下,快问快答回答得非常出色。Andy,这次对话信息量巨大,非常有启发。我要回去开始为我的播客和 Newsletter 构建战略叙事了。最后两个问题。如果大家想联系你、了解更多,或者考虑和你合作,在网上哪里可以找到你?另外,听众怎样才能帮到你?
Andy Raskin (01:01:35): 我之前提到过 LinkedIn,可以通过它联系我。我的网站是 AndyRaskin.com。我还有一个播客,在节目中和 CEO 们交谈,所以如果你想听到更多关于这些方法的实际运用细节,它叫 The Bigger Narrative。每期节目由我妈妈做开场介绍。我会提前把采访发给她,然后打电话问她觉得听众能从中学到什么,这段对话就成了那一期播客的开场白。你最后一个问题是什么来着?
Lenny (01:02:04): 听众怎样才能帮到你?
Andy Raskin (01:02:06): 帮到我。就是如果你尝试了这些方法中的任何一个,告诉我。“嘿,这个管用。那个不管用。我有这个问题。“我很乐意听到这些反馈。
Lenny (01:02:17): 太棒了。Andy,再次感谢你来做客。
Andy Raskin (01:02:20): 非常感谢邀请我,Lenny。真的很开心。
Lenny (01:02:22): 大家再见。非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你最喜欢的播客应用上订阅。另外,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这真的能帮助更多听众发现这个播客。你可以在 LennysPodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于这个节目的信息。下期见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| arrogant doctor | 傲慢医生(Andy 自创的比喻) |
| category creation | 品类创建 |
| champions | 布道者 |
| collaborative learning | 协作式学习 |
| conversational marketing | 对话式营销 |
| Feed the Beast | 喂怪兽 |
| hero’s journey | 英雄之旅 |
| inbound | inbound(HubSpot 提出的营销理念,保留原文) |
| magic gifts | 魔法礼物 |
| marketing automation | 营销自动化 |
| naming the stakes | 命名利害关系 |
| north star | 北极星 |
| old game to a new game | 从旧游戏到新游戏 |
| outbound | outbound(与传统外向式营销相关的理念,保留原文) |
| paradigm shift | 范式转变 |
| Play Bigger | 《Play Bigger》(品类设计经典著作,保留原文) |
| promised land message | 应许之地信息 |
| refusal of the call | 拒绝召唤 |
| reluctant buyer | 犹豫不决的买家 |
| revenue intelligence | 收入智能 |
| shitty first draft | 糟糕的第一版草稿(Annie Lamott 提出的写作概念) |
| shrink-wrap | shrink-wrap(指传统盒装软件,保留原文) |
| strategic narrative | 战略叙事 |
| subscription economy | 订阅经济 |
| term sheet | 投资意向书 |
| top-down learning | 自上而下的学习 |
| upskill from within | 内部赋能提升 |
| VC | 风投(Venture Capital) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)