如何为你的产品获得媒体报道 | Jason Feifer(Entrepreneur 杂志主编)
How to get press for your product | Jason Feifer (editor in chief of Entrepreneur magazine)
The Media Doesn’t Care About You
Jason Feifer: The editor, the writer, I’ll just say it as plainly as possible. They don’t care about you. They don’t care about you. They care about their reader or their listener or their viewer. That’s who they care about. That’s who they’re serving, and if you can be of use to them in sharing the kinds of information that they are looking to serve their audience, then you can get what you want. But you can’t treat them like a service provider because they’re not. And so you have to approach them with an understanding of what they’re trying to do for their audience and how you can fit into that because if you don’t, they are not interested in you.
Daily Pitches Journalists Receive
Lenny: Today, my guest is Jason Feifer. Jason is editor in chief at Entrepreneur Magazine, previously an editor at Fast Company and a number of other magazines. He’s also an author, podcast host, keynote speaker, and startup advisor. In our conversation, we get incredibly tactical about how to get press for your product. Jason shares how to pitch a journalist, how to find the right journalist to pitch, what publications to consider, why freelance writers are more likely to write about your story, why the mission of the publication is so important in how you pitch them, plus what channels to use to reach out to journalists, how to think about your goals and what success looks like from getting press, so much more.
With Sidebar, senior leaders are matched with highly vetted, private, supportive peer groups to lean on for unbiased opinions, diverse perspectives, and raw feedback. Everyone has their own zone of genius, so together, we’re better prepared to navigate professional pitfalls, leading to more responsibility, faster promotions, and bigger impact. Guided by world-class programming and facilitation, Sidebar enables you to get focused tactical feedback at every step of your journey. If you’re a listener of this podcast, you’re likely already driven and committed to growth. A Sidebar personal board of directors is the missing piece to catalyze that journey. Why spend a decade finding your people when you can meet them at Sidebar today?
Also, it is seriously delicious. Not at all [inaudible 00:03:37] and easy to cook. My wife and I made stew and steaks and all kinds of grilled goodies with the meat. We also feel great about it as a protein from an ethical standpoint. I highly recommend trying their all-natural Venison jerky sticks for an optimal protein snack, as well as a wide variety of fresh cuts, all available in their online butcher shop. There are limited memberships available, but you can sign up and get 20% off your first order at mauinuivenison. com/lenny. That’s mauinuivenison.com/lenny. Jason, thank you so much for being here, and welcome to the podcast.
The Real Impact of Press Coverage
Jason Feifer: Lenny. Thanks for having me.
Lenny: It’s absolutely my pleasure. We’ve actually collaborated on a couple of things recently, and as we were chatting about some stuff, I was asking for advice on how to help a startup I’m working with get press, and you shared a bunch of killer advice, and so I asked if you could just come on this podcast and share similar advice for how to help startups get press and here we are.
When to Pursue Media Coverage
Jason Feifer: Yeah, I’m really happy that you asked me to do that. This is something people ask me about a lot. I’ve been in media for decades. I’ve worked at a lot of different magazines. Obviously, I run Entrepreneur Magazine now, but I was a Fast Company. I was at Men’s Health, so I’ve seen a lot of different sides of media, and it is a very misunderstood tool, particularly for people in business, and so I love demystifying it.
Lenny: Amazing. I’m excited to learn all this too, and so thanks for doing this.
Choosing the Right Target Media
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: First question is just, as someone in press, how much volume is there coming at you from startup founders and PR people trying to get you to write about them and also just reporters that you work with?
Three Steps to Get Press Coverage
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it’s tremendous. It’s ridiculous. I would say that by the time we are done recording this podcast, I’ll have, I don’t know. I mean, it could be anywhere from 30 to 50 pitches in my inbox. It comes all day. Now, to be clear, most of that is garbage in the real garbagey sense, right.
It’s a lot of completely unrelevant press releases that were sent to me and a bazillion other people. But within, there are definitely some people who have spent the time to reach out very specifically to me, and everybody in media gets some kind of volume like that. To reach out to somebody in media is to be shouting over a lot of noise.
Media Is Not a Service Provider
Lenny: Wow. I imagine we’ll get to this later, but I’m curious just what percentage of those are PR people and press release versus a founder or someone that is doing it themselves?
Jason Feifer: The percentage of direct messages from founders that I’m getting is low. I would say probably 20, 25%. And then the 75% is PR in some capacity, either targeted PR where somebody’s intentionally reaching out to me or mass blast press releases.
Every Media Outlet Has a Mission
Lenny: You know what’s crazy is I’ve been getting a lot of these now. People think I’m some kind of journalist, and they’re just like embargoed announcement product launch.
What Stories Entrepreneur Looks For
Jason Feifer: It doesn’t take much because you just end up on some list, and what’s really interesting, and we’ll talk about PR later, I know. But one of the great insights that you can get into the challenges of that industry is how completely automated a lot of it is where a lot of people in PR are not thinking specifically about how to tell the right story to the right potential media outlet. Instead, what they’re doing is they’re just playing a numbers game, and they’re just blasting it out to everybody.
And that means that you could end up… I write this newsletter, right. I have… Entrepreneur Magazine is the thing that people obviously would pitch, but then I have this newsletter where I don’t interview anybody. There’s no opportunity to be featured in my newsletter, and I still get pitches to the newsletter because somebody saw it and dropped it in some spreadsheet, and it just… now I get it. And I think that’s a real disservice to entrepreneurs who are paying for people to do that, and I really hate that.
How to Decode a Publication’s Mission
Lenny: Yeah. Okay, so we’re going to get into the meat of just how to actually do this well, but a couple more questions just to set a little context. One is in terms of impact. What kind of impact have you seen from getting press for a startup in terms of growth for their product specifically?
Jason Feifer: So it’s a really wide range. I have had entrepreneurs tell me that a single story in Entrepreneur Magazine, like the print magazine or just online, will drive more, whatever more app downloads, more sales that month than any of their paid marketing efforts.
But then I have also heard entrepreneurs tell me that it didn’t do anything for them or that it did one very specific thing for them, which is to say maybe some potential partner read it and reached out, and it started an interesting conversation. It’s all over the gamut, and it’s a really important thing for people to remember is that this is not something that I think that you should bank on as a strategy for growth. It’s a great add-on. But if you think that press by itself is going to solve your problems, you’re wrong because it might, but it’s way too unpredictable.
Core Elements of Preparation
Lenny: Is there anything else along those lines of just when it’s worth somebody investing time into getting press, either stage of startup, type of startup, any just general broad advice of you should not be spending time on trying to get press versus this is a really good opportunity for you.
Jason Feifer: Think about press the same way that you think about raising money, which is to say you do it when you know what the money is for, and you should do it when you know what the press is for. A lot of people reach out to me at such an early stage that if we wrote about them, it wouldn’t get them anything. They’re not at a stage where they could use that press in any meaningful way, and so there’s really no purpose in chasing it now. You should step back and think really as a starting point, “What do I need press for?” And if you have a good tactical answer to that, that could be because I need to drive awareness to a new product. That could be because I’m going out to raise money, and I need articles to show that the marketplace takes me seriously.
These are good reasons, but I get a lot of emails. It’s funny because people are… like entrepreneurs, in particular, they’re just so vulnerable, and it’s kind of a wonderful way sometimes. And sometimes people will just email me, and they’ll just say, “You know, I’ve worked really hard, and I just feel like I deserve this.” I respect that, and I relate to it in some ways with my own trying to get attention for my own work. But, “I deserve this” that’s not a good tactical decision for your business that doesn’t do anything for you. And so I would put that to the side and only think of press as you don’t go out and raise money if you don’t know what the money is for. You shouldn’t go out and try to get press if you don’t know what the press is for.
Define Your Goals Clearly
Lenny: I’m curious to hear other examples when it’s not, when it’s a bad idea because, as like I said, an outside observer, I would always love to get more attention for my product and more people to be aware of it, more people to check it out. Is there an example or anything that comes to mind of there’s no need for you to do that in this moment or for this product?
Jason Feifer: Oftentimes, it’s not even about the moment, but it’s about the publication. So I’ll give you an example. I spoke at an event once, and afterwards, this guy comes up to me, and he has a small hot dog food truck business in Washington, DC. So he said he’s got a couple trucks, and he’s doing good business selling hot dogs, and he wants coverage in Entrepreneur Magazine. He’s like, “Oh, how can I get a feature?” And the problem with that instinct that he has is that he’s really directing his energy in the wrong place because if he is selling hot dogs in Washington, DC, then I understand what press is for him. Press is to drive hotdog sales. That’s what he wants to do. Entrepreneur is not going to do that for him. Full stop. Why? Because Entrepreneur reaches a national to international audience.
So that means that 99.5% of the people who would read a story about this guy have no ability to go get his hotdogs, which means that that was wasted effort. So fine. Was it that hard to come up and talk to me at the conference? No. But scale that out. How many emails is he sending that are like that? How much energy is he putting into chasing things that ultimately don’t have good direct value to him? What he needs to do is think, “Okay, my goal, get more people to buy hot dogs. Where am I? I’m in Washington, DC. How can I reach people who are interested in food in my market?” So stop chasing Entrepreneur and start chasing the local eater or the food section of the Washingtonian or something like that. That small shift can give you a lot more payoff for your effort.
Should You Hire a PR Agency?
Lenny: This is a good segue to just let’s just dive into how to actually go about getting press, and I know you-
Pros and Cons of PR Agencies
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: … kind of have this three-step structure for thinking about it. Maybe just start with what are the three steps, and then we’ll dive into each one.
Recommended PR Agencies and Professionals
Jason Feifer: Yeah, sure. So I mean, look, it is pretty simple, right. Step one is prep. You want to be thinking about how to tell your story. You want to be thinking about the kinds of stuff I just talked about. What is press for for you? Everything that you need to do to orient yourself towards what is this opportunity, and why am I chasing it, and how to make the most of it. Step two is figuring out who to pitch. Not all press is created equal. There are not reasons to just go chasing everybody arbitrarily. The hotdog example is a good one.
So finding the writers and editors who you’re actually going to reach out to, who are going to most receptive to you. And also making sure that because you did the prep, you can figure out how to tell your story in a way that they’re going to be interested in. We’ll talk about that. And then step three is the actual pitch. What does it mean to reach out to these people, to engage the writers and editors? How do you find them? What do you send them? What are you telling them? That’s it.
I mean, right. But what you need to understand is that you’re entering a world that probably doesn’t operate the way in which you think it does, and I see that all the time as the recipient of pitches. People don’t understand who they’re reaching out to and how I and my colleagues think. We should maybe even start with that because a really important thing to understand just again, to go to [inaudible 00:14:07]-
Lenny: [inaudible 00:14:07] do it. Yeah.
How to Choose Target Media
Jason Feifer: … yeah, the metaphor of the investors, you don’t reach out to an investor if you don’t understand what that investor does, what they’re interested in, or what kinds of companies they invest in. You can’t do that with media, either. So I get pitches every single day along the lines of, “How do I get coverage in Entrepreneur Magazine? How do I get a feature in Entrepreneur Magazine?” And to me, it always feels like they’re ordering a hamburger from me. Like, “How do I get a hamburger from Entrepreneur Hamburgers, right?” They’re treating me like a service provider. That my job is to provide press.
And I get it because, of course, if you’re an entrepreneur, and you’re looking for press, then the… [inaudible 00:14:51] writers and editors out there seem to be in the business of writing about people, and therefore, there’s some service that they seem to provide, and you’re trying to figure out how to get it. But that’s not how the media thinks of themselves, right. The editor, the writer, I’ll just say it as plainly as possible, they don’t care about you. They don’t care about you. They care about their reader, or their listener, or their viewer.
That’s who they care about. That’s who they’re serving. And if you can be of use to them in sharing the kinds of information that they are looking to serve their audience, then you can get what you want, but you can’t treat them like a service provider because they’re not. And so you have to approach them with an understanding of what they’re trying to do for their audience and how you can fit into that. Because if you don’t, they are not interested in you.
Lenny: I love that. And more… even specifically, what is it they’re trying to do for their audience? I imagine it’s just have something interesting that they want to read. Something they can learn. Something they’re like, “Wow, I’m really excited to read this.”
The True Value of Press Coverage
Jason Feifer: Yeah. But it’s going to be more specific based on the mission of each publication. So, for example, I’ve worked at two separate business titles. I was a senior editor at Fast Company for a number of years, and now I’m the editor-in-chief of Entrepreneur Magazine. The decision that is made about whether or not a story belongs in a publication, it was totally different based on these two publications. So I can’t speak to Fast Company now because they’ve gone through a couple of leadership changes. I don’t know what their mission is, but back when I worked there under Bob Safian, he was the editor-in-chief, that was really a magazine about where businesses going, and the stories that were in the magazine were all supposed to be in some way representative of the evolution of business.
And so when people would pitch what we’d really be looking for are, are there insights into… in what this person is doing that other people could read and say, “Aha, that helps me understand where this industry is going or that industry, or it helps me think about how I can shape my own company to match current trends,” that kind of stuff. Entrepreneur, totally different mission. The way that I think of Entrepreneur is that it’s not even a magazine about business. It’s a magazine about thinking. Or what I want to do is make sure that everybody who comes to the magazine walks away with great insights into how to think through the challenges in their business.
And so what I’m looking for when somebody reaches out is did they make some interesting counterintuitive decision that solved a problem in their business, and I’ll emphasize in. Because, oftentimes, when people hear me talk about solving problems in business, they think, “Aha, but I solve a problem in business, right. I saw that there weren’t the best razors in the world, and I made the best razors.” That’s not what I’m talking about. What I’m talking about is… There’s this woman whose name is Joelle Mertzel. She has a company called Kitchen Concepts Unlimited, and she makes a butter dish, and it’s a really smart butter dish because it is built on a hinge, right. So this is designed to solve a very specific problem, which Lenny, I don’t know if you knew this, I did not, that you don’t need to refrigerate butter. Did you know that?
Lenny: I knew that intellectually, but I still refrigerate it. I know people don’t.
Step Two: Find the Right Contact
Jason Feifer: Me too, even though I’ve had multiple conversations with this woman about this. You don’t need to refrigerate butter, and if you leave it out, it cuts easier. It’s more spreadable. Big problem, the butter dish. So most butter dishes you just lift up. And so if you have warm room temperature butter that’s soft, and you lift the butter dish top up, you might bump into the butter, and it’s going to make a big mess. So Joelle makes a butter dish on a hinge, right. Opens and closes exactly the same way every single time. No mess. Brilliant, solves a problem. She reaches out to me about this. This is not interesting to us, right. Maybe this is interesting for a cooking magazine, right. Maybe Bon Appétit is interested in this. Entrepreneur’s not interested in this because that doesn’t help other entrepreneurs to have thought through that problem.
But then she tells me something else. What she tells me is that she is, at the very beginning of this, trying to figure out how to answer some basic questions about her audience, like what colors do they want in this butter dish and what price point are they willing to pay? And she wants to do some market research. She goes to a market research company. She says, “How much would it cost to research consumers and answer these questions?” They say, 10,000. And then, one day, she’s sitting at the airport waiting to board a flight, and she looks around and she realizes that airports are full of people who have absolutely nothing better to do than answer questions about butter dishes, right. Nothing better to do, just sitting there. And you could start at gate one. By the time you get to gate eight, everyone in gate one is new. You could do it all over again, and you could have a 6:00 PM flight, and you could show up at 9:00 AM. Nobody’s going to stop you. You can do this all day in the airport. And this is how she starts to do her own market research. She saves that $10,000, and she does it herself. I put that story in the magazine. It’s tiny. It’s this tiny random company and this random decision. But the reason I did it is because every time I repeat that story to entrepreneurs, they’re all like, “Ugh, right, totally. There’s always other ways to do things.” They love the ingenuity of it. That’s what I’m looking for. That’s Entrepreneur’s stories. So to go back to the point that you were making, it’s not just about, “Well, it’s a magazine called Entrepreneur. They must write about entrepreneurs, right. I’m an entrepreneur. I belong in Entrepreneur.”
People think that all the time. No. You have to step back and read what these publications are publishing and ask yourself, “What are they doing? What is the purpose here?” The editors and the writers, they’re making decisions about what goes in this magazine, and they’re making decisions about how the stories are constructed. Why are they doing that? Who are they trying to reach? When you start to see it through that lens, you start to see the pattern, and you get an understanding a real instruction manual for what it actually means to pitch these publications.
Lenny: That is such an interesting insight. I had no idea that that was something you should be thinking about. Is there an easy way to understand the mission of the publication? Is there an about page they often add this to or is it, like you said, you just read a bunch of stuff and try to suss it out?
Leverage Freelance Journalists Effectively
Jason Feifer: Nobody publishes an about page in that way because the internal logic of the editorial team. But you can certainly make some starting assumptions based on who the publication is trying to reach. Everybody is trying to reach somebody. It gets more complicated the more general interest something becomes, right. What is the New York Times?
What is the mission? That’s a hard thing to answer. You sort of have to divide it up into sections, right. The mission of the National News Desk is different from the mission of the Business Desk, and even within there, the mission of the Sunday business section is different from the mission of the Monday to Saturday business section.
Why Freelance Writers Are Worth Pitching
Lenny: [inaudible 00:22:09].
Understanding the Concept of Media
Jason Feifer: So you have to start to really parse it out. And this is the reason why people hire PR is because if they’re good at their jobs, they understand a lot of this already. But I really do think that if you spent time with the content and your starting point is, “I understand that this publication is trying to reach X. They’re trying to reach these people,” then you can start to see the patterns of what it is that they’re doing. How are they telling stories? What do these five stories all have in common? They have something in common. There’s something that they’re all doing, and you can certainly read the tea leaves and try to figure it out.
Lenny: Awesome. Okay. It feels like we’ve already gone into step one around prep. What else is involved in preparing to get press?
Reaching Out: Dos and Don’ts
Jason Feifer: If we’re talking about prep, the very first thing that you need to do is what I had said earlier, which is just ask yourself, what do I need press for? And you need a good answer to that question. And once you have that, the next thing you should do is you should start to think about, “Well, what’s interesting about my business? And oftentimes, it’s not necessarily what you think, and you can be guided in a way by what’s happening in step two, where you start to think about who you’re trying to reach out to. Because, for example, the story that somebody might tell me at Entrepreneur is going to be different than the story that somebody might tell Cosmo.
There’s a reason for a company to end up in, both Entrepreneur and Cosmo, right. Maybe the product is for young women. And so, Cosmo might be interested in some kind of product feature or including the product in a roundup of some kind of products. Whereas Entrepreneur would do the entrepreneur-focused story. What did this founder do? How they do they write? You can take your… You could think about your story and kind of break it up into a whole bunch of different little pieces and then figure out which piece goes to what media. But oftentimes, people make the mistake of trying to do that in reverse, which is to say that they kind of decide what narrative they would like to have out in the world, and then they just go around to different publications trying to sell them on that. I get that all the time.
A lot of my pitches that I’ll receive in my inbox are somebody who hasn’t really thought at all about what Entrepreneur publishes but instead just has something that they would like to get out into the world. I mean, a good kind of dumb example is, yesterday, somebody sent me an email about a company that had just hired a new president. I don’t care about that. That’s not useful to my audience at all. I’m sure that there is a trade publication, right. Let’s say that there was a company in the restaurant industry. I’m sure that a trade publication that follows the blow by blow by blow of a restaurant industry might be interested in your new president. But I’m not because you hiring that new president isn’t useful to my audience. Stories in Entrepreneur are not really about the person that I’m writing about.
They’re really about the audience. They’re really me serving the audience through the stories of the people I’m writing about. That’s not useful. I wish that they had spent a moment and thought about that, but they didn’t. So once you start to think about who it is that you’re trying to reach, you can step back and say, “Well, what part of my journey is going to be most relevant to them? And I would push you to be really, really creative about it. Because if you go back to the Butterie example, the butter dish, that little funny story about the airport, I mean, who else is writing about that? It’s not central to her story as a brand. It’s not central to her sales pitch. It was-
… central to her story as a brand, it’s not central to her sales pitch. It was just for us. We were probably the only publication in the world who cared about that, but I really cared about it.
Lenny: Amazing. Okay, so just kind of summarizing what you shared, think about the goal. What are you trying to get out of press? Goals could be awareness of what we’ve done, something new, investor interest. What are some other common examples of goals that you see for trying to get press?
How to Write an Email Pitch
Jason Feifer: Yeah, awareness of something new. But also doesn’t have to be awareness of something new, it could just be continued growth, trying to reach into a new marketplace. That’s fine. Anything that’s tied to growth or reaching a new customer base-
Another Brilliant Pitch Example
Lenny: Cool.
How Much Time to Invest
Jason Feifer: … would make sense.
Strategies for Exclusive Press Coverage
Lenny: That makes sense.
Jason Feifer: But it could also be that you’re looking to position yourself in your own marketplace a little differently. I see, for example, a lot of people, a lot of big companies, keep knocking on my door because we don’t just hear from startups, we hear from major companies as well who are pitching stories. I know why they want to be an entrepreneur. They want to be an entrepreneur because they’re trying to position their brand as also being relevant to small business owners. It’s helpful to have that kind of context because coverage an entrepreneur can help them go out to the marketplace and say, “Look, we’re also reaching X, Y, Z people.”
So sometimes it’s not even about a conversion, but rather it’s about a positioning and that’s a good reason to also maybe put forward your executives. Sometimes it’s just about establishing your CEO or your founder as an authority in a particular area because you want them to be more trustworthy, you want them to be invited to more conferences. Because all of that stuff draws more attention to the company, all sorts of reasons to do this stuff. And then trying to get in front of investors, trying to get in front of partners. Look, there’s a million reasons why being visible can be useful, but you need to make sure you understand what you’re actually trying to do.
Risks and Uncertainties of Press Coverage
Lenny: Okay, awesome. That was really helpful. So think about what goal you have in mind for getting press, pick a publication and understand their mission and what their goals are. And then think about some interesting stories that you could pitch them. Not just like we have a new president, but something that you think they’d be excited to share that connects with their mission.
Jason Feifer: That’s right.
An Alternative Approach to Getting Press
Lenny: Kind of on this topic, I know we want to talk about who to contact and how to figure out who to actually talk to. A couple of questions that come to mind. This is all a lot of work. Founders are really busy.
The Fred Ruckel and Ripple Rug Story
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it’s a lot.
Create a Scene You Are Part Of
Lenny: So begs the question, PR agencies, do you have a perspective on would you recommend working with PR agency? Is there a time when it makes to and doesn’t make sense to?
Jason Feifer: Yeah, I mean it’s a ton of work. Everything that I’m describing is a ton of work. And let me be clear, people succeed in getting press without doing any of the things that I’m describing because dumb luck happens in the world. You could very well just bang out an email to some random editor and they might like it. That is entirely possible. You could disregard everything that I’ve just said. What I’m really helping you do is try to optimize your approach. But yeah, hiring PR can cut out a lot of this. Now you’re not doing this research yourself, you’re not thinking through these challenges yourself. You’re working with people who understand exactly how to identify the most interesting parts of your story and then turn them into good pitches. So why wouldn’t everyone do that? The couple reasons. Number one, cost PR can be expensive, so you just have to factor that in. Number two, PR is and can be, I’ll say can be, a very frustrating journey because a lot of PR people are very bad at their jobs. They’re very bad.
And this isn’t just me bashing PR people. I have literally been hired to give keynotes at PR industry conferences. And I get on stage and I say most PR people are bad at their jobs and everybody nods. And they all know it. And of course, none of them think that they’re one of the bad ones, but they all know it. PR is full of people who are bad at their jobs. Why are they bad at their jobs? They’re bad at their jobs because they’re lazy, because they’re primarily relying upon email blasts, just sending things out, because they have a older idea of what it means to get the word out. For example, if you hire or talk to a PR agency and one of the things that they recommend doing that you should spend money on is a press release, like a traditional press release, run as fast as you can away from that. I don’t know if you know this. Do you know this? The press release, there are some purposeful reasons to put out a press release, but the press release is really no longer the primary unit of press attraction.
Making News With Data and Surveys
Lenny: Yeah, I get that sense.
Creating News With Your Own Data
Jason Feifer: Yeah. But here’s what’s fascinating. So a PR agency I wouldn’t recommend might do this. They’ll tell you, “We’re going to put together a press release about this new thing, so you have to pay a little extra money for the production of this press release and then also the distribution of this press release because what we’re going to do is we’re going to put it out on the wire,” because there are a whole bunch of press release distribution wires. So they’ll do that, you’ll pay the money, it’ll go out on the wire. And then they’ll send you a report about all the places that this press release ended up on. It ended up on Yahoo Finance, it ended up on Market Watch. And it technically did. The press release is there, it was posted. And zero people are going to see it in the whole world because Yahoo Finance has a section where they just publish every damn press release that gets published by all these different distributors. Nobody saw that.
So don’t confuse posting press releases even on very big websites with actual success. What you want in an actual PR person is someone who traffics in one thing, and that is relationships. The most important thing that a PR person can have is active relationships with people in media. Why? If a PR person is guaranteeing you press, that’s another reason to run out the door as fast as possible because the PR people cannot control this. Writers and editors, they do what they want. It’s a completely subjective industry and very frustrating. I completely understand. That was totally subjective. So the best that a PR person can do is shape your story, understand who to pitch, and then get that writer or editor to look at it, to pay attention to it. There are some PR people in this world who I think very highly of. I think they’re incredibly smart, incredibly good at what they do, and they only pitch me when they have something that they think I will genuinely be interested in. Instead of a lot of PR people who just send me some random thing every week or every day.
I don’t pay attention to those people. But, I don’t know, just shout out, when John Beer from Jack Taylor PR sends me … John, I met him in a PR capacity a decade ago and we’ve since become friends. When he emails me, I pay attention. I don’t write about it all the time. I’m not going to write about something just because I like John, but I will pay attention. And paying attention honestly is half the battle because people in media are getting so much email. So you want someone who’s going to understand you, understand your industry, understand and know the people who they should be reaching out to, and who really respect you as an entrepreneur and are going to give you the hard feedback. Because there are a lot of people who will go and hire PR and they’ll say, “I want you to email this and this and this and this and this publication.”
And if the PR person just does that, all they’re doing is annoying their contacts if they don’t really feel like this was meaningful. You should like when a PR person pushes back on you and says, “You know what? I don’t think that your story is right for that publication. Here’s why.” That’s someone you should hire.
Lenny: Is there any other PR people you want to call out as ones that you think are awesome?
Final Advice: Be a Real Human
Jason Feifer: The challenge here is that I’m going to regret not including a whole bunch of people who don’t pop to mind immediately, but-
Quick Q&A: Book Recommendations
Lenny: We can include them in the show notes, whoever else.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, sure. Okay, so let’s see. Off the top of my head, so John of Jack Taylor, he does a lot of wellness stuff. So PR agencies tend to specialize, and so you want to make sure that you’re going with people who really understand you and the media ecosystem that you are reaching out to. So I think John’s really smart. Let’s see. Hannah Lee at Hannah Lee Communications is great on hospitality stuff. So restaurants, hotels, booze, they’re really smart. Jen Sesquila, sorry Jen, if I mispronounced your name. Max Borges Agency, really good on sort of consumer focused products. Greg Delman, he’s based in San Francisco, he has a boutique shop called G3 Media and he does a lot of tech startups stuff, just really knows that world. Greg, I’ll find writers through Greg because he just knows everybody. I just texted him recently and I was like, “I need somebody who can write about this very specific AI thing.” He happened to be at TechCrunch Disrupt and he found some freelancer and connected us. That’s great. So those are four. I will have more that’ll give you for the show notes.
Quick Q&A: Movie and TV Recommendations
Lenny: Amazing. Okay. This is really useful. If any come to mind as we’re chatting, feel free to shout them out again. Similar question, when people are thinking about publications to go after, say you’re a startup founder. Is there a list you could just share of just like, here’s probably the top five, 10 that you should be thinking about? The obvious ones, you talked about entrepreneur, [inaudible 00:36:15] Company, TechCrunch obviously comes to mind. Is there others that are just like, “Here’s a good list to start with?”
Jason Feifer: Honestly, it really, so much depends upon what it is that you’re looking to do. You could be a startup, founder and entrepreneur and Inc and Fast Company are for maybe some good reason not at the top of your list because you’re a startup founder, but your goal right now is to reach consumers. And those publications don’t reach consumers and they don’t reach people who are in a buying mindset. They reach people who are in a creating mindset. So I would expect that if you have a startup and that startup is not B2B in some way, that it would be possibly very reasonable that business publications might not be your target right now. Maybe Men’s Health is. Maybe, I don’t know, anything could be. I think oftentimes people tend to think too close to them about where they belong. Lenny, here’s a real kind of exchange that happens, which is if somebody will email me, I don’t respond to every publicist.
It’s just literally not possible. I would not have enough time in the day. I do do my best to respond to every entrepreneur who reaches out because I feel like they deserve a response. And sometimes somebody will email me and they’ll send me something and it’s just not relevant. And I’ll reply and I’ll just say, “Hey, thanks. Congratulations on what you’ve built. But this isn’t a fit for entrepreneur.” And maybe once a month somebody responds really in a testy way, and they’re like, “But don’t you write about entrepreneurs? I’m a great entrepreneur success story.” It’s like, no, that’s not what we do. Yes, entrepreneurs are featured in our stories, but no, we’re not just a directory of entrepreneurs. Here’s a good way of thinking about it. If you have a startup and you’re trying to figure out what publications to be in, go look at where your competitors have been featured. That’s a great place to start. What audiences are they reaching and how are they doing it? That should give you some direction about where you might want to go next.
Quick Q&A: Interview Tips
Lenny: Awesome advice. On TechCrunch, do you have a perspective on is it worth investing in getting featured in TechCrunch?
Quick Q&A: Product Recommendations
Jason Feifer: I’ll tell you a sort of personal press journey moment, and then I think that it will translate into the answer for TechCrunch.
Lenny: Amazing.
Favorite Motto to Live By
Jason Feifer: Okay. Something we haven’t talked about so far yet is, and this is sort of almost skipping all the steps that we’ve laid out to what happens after you get the press. But the point of the press is sometimes to reach the people who are reading it. You get covered in Entrepreneur and entrepreneurs are going to read it and maybe something good will come of it. But sometimes the point of it is not to reach the people who are reading it at all. Possibly a very small number of people are going to read it, which by the way is a real, real possibility. Because although all of these publications that I have mentioned, Entrepreneur, Forbes, Fortune Inc, Fast Company, whatever, these are reaching millions of people, their websites get many, many, many millions of unique visitors each month. That does not mean that your story is going to be read by millions of people.
In fact, the largest possibility here is that your story will reach five to 10,000 people, a small number of people because these publications are publishing tons of stuff. So you might get this story, it might look awesome, it might not reach that many people. That might also be okay. Because maybe the reason in your logic for why to get that kind of coverage is not to have reached that publication’s audience at all anyway. Maybe what it really is is to tweet it and then put some money behind promoting that tweet because then you can target that you got coverage to the people who you want to notice you got coverage.
And I see a lot of people do that. They’ll take articles that we ran on Entrepreneur and they’ll basically turn them into advertisements. And that’s really smart because what they got out of Entrepreneur was the social cachet. It was the validation in the marketplace. And then they’re going to do something with that themselves. That’s really smart. You also see it sometimes the reason to get coverage, it’s just so you can put it on your website. As seen in. As seen in is probably more valuable than anyone actually reading that story to begin with. They probably won’t read the story. You might not even have to link it on the website. But you could just get to say as seen in. Because again, it gives you that validation.
Me personally, I am building a small podcast company with my friend Nicole Lapin. Nicole Lapin is a bestselling business money expert. And we have a company, she’s the founder and I’m an advisor. And it’s called Money News Network. We have a podcast on it called Help Wanted that we co-host together. And we got coverage in Variety. And that was the result of pounding on a lot of doors and finally getting someone at Variety to take interest and they ran an article about us. Did we get anything from that story in Variety? The answer is no, like nothing. But you better believe that every email we send out to every potential advertiser, to every partner, includes the link. Variety has covered us. And I guarantee that when someone receives that email, it makes them pay more attention.
And I have used it many times too when I reach out to people. It just gives you that validation. So sometimes what you’re looking for is a prize to walk around with. And I would bet that the same is true for TechCrunch, which was your original question. Why get the funding announcement in TechCrunch? Probably not because anyone’s going to care because they read it on TechCrunch, but now you can use that to your own means. And sometimes that’s more valuable than the press itself.
Opportunity Set B
Lenny: That is an awesome insight. It also makes you realize you may not feel like it was a success after spending all this time getting in a story and entrepreneurs. Like, oh, nothing happened. But the benefits may come later, like weeks, months, years later when you start to share that.
Jason Feifer: Exactly right. A lot of this is what you make of it.
Where to Listen
Lenny: Amazing. Okay. That was extremely interesting. Okay, let’s talk about step two. So initially you prepped, we talked about how to think about who to go after and the mission and goals. Then you get to step two, which just figure out who to reach out to at a publication.
Jason Feifer: Right. So a lot of people make the mistake of emailing me. If they want coverage in Entrepreneur, they email me. And I understand why they’re emailing me. It’s really for two reasons. One, I’m the most visible editorial person at Entrepreneur. And so it’s easy to find me, it’s easy to find my email address. And also they just assume, well, editor in chief, making all the decisions. But no. I mean, think about it. If you have a problem with a purchase that you made on Amazon, you don’t email Bezos. He’s too busy. And I am not comparing myself to Bezos. But I am the busiest editorial guy at Entrepreneur for whatever the hell that’s worth. And I’m just not the guy to pitch because my job actually isn’t really to select stories that go in the magazine. My job is to work with editors who develop their own ideas and then I get to say, “Oh, that’s a good one,” or, “Oh, let’s refine that.” I’m not sourcing as much. And so you really should start by looking at who’s writing about your subject area.
And you can do that by going to the website and surfing around. You can do that by Googling around. But you’ll find the answer. Every publication is structured differently. Some people have specific beats. Some publications will be like, “This is the person on the transportation beat.” And some publications don’t. Entrepreneur doesn’t really have a beat system necessarily. But if you look, you’ll figure it out. “Oh, that editor is clearly interested in food. That writer is clearly interested in food. They seem to write all the food stories.” And a good way, again, to do it is to start with the publication and then look at how they’re covering your competitors. So a good example is I was once consulting with a guy who has a kind of fun peanut butter company. It’s like imagine peanut butter meets Ben and Jerry’s, so it’s like peanut butter with lots of stuff and fun names. And so he’s trying to figure out how to get press. And originally his thinking, the reason why he reached out to me was because he’s like, “Well, I’m an entrepreneur. I run a business. I should be in Entrepreneur.”
I was like, “No, no, no, you shouldn’t because none of our readers are going to buy your peanut butter. So who is your target audience? Who’s buying your stuff?” And he says, “Millennial moms.” I said, “Great. Okay, so Cosmo is a good place to reach them. So let’s look at how Cosmo covers snacks.” I don’t know how they cover snacks. I don’t read Cosmo, but let’s find out. It’s not hard. I went to cosmopolitan.com, searched for snacks. What I found immediately was a lot of stories that are all basically roundup-y and anchored to some time-sensitive things. So it’s 10 snacks for Valentine’s Day, it’s our 10 favorite new fall snacks, whatever. It’s all stuff like that. So now we know they are not going to run a thousand word feature on your peanut butter company. Instead, the best that you could hope to do is get into one of these seasonal-ish roundups.
So now next step, who’s writing these things? Let’s look. Let’s open some of the articles. The byline is right there. You can click on the byline. You can see what this person does. And in many cases, maybe they’re the food editor, maybe they’re the lifestyle editor, whatever. You’ll see what they cover. And you’ll have a good understanding of now how to frame the thing that you’re looking for. Now, let me introduce one other possible option. They don’t work for the publication at all. They’re a freelancer. Publications use a lot of freelancers. Freelancers are basically independent contractors. They’re writers who are working sometimes. Sometimes they have longer term deals with publications. Sometimes it’s just one-off. My wife is a freelancer. My wife is a freelancer who writes a lot for the New York Times and Washington Post and Guardian. And the interesting thing about my wife versus me is that my wife, whose name is Jen Miller, just so I don’t keep saying my wife.
So Jen, on a day-to-day basis as a freelancer is hungrier for stories than me because Jen has to hustle for her food. Jen has to find stories and pitch those stories to editors at publications, and that’s when she gets paid. So she actually is more incentivized to be looking for stories than I am because I am a salaried employee of Entrepreneur Magazine. And my email address is very easily found and people just send me stuff all the time. And I should add here also, note that a good journalist, a good writer is not actually sitting around thinking that their job is to wait for people to pitch them so that they can just write about the best pitches. Their job as they see it, is to go and find the most useful things for their audience. And they like to do a lot of that themselves. So they’re not sitting around just waiting for your pitches. And in fact, your pitches have to overcome their instinct to go find things themselves.
So Jen is constantly hustling. Jen is constantly talking to people. Jen is curious about the world and will spend a lot of time hunting things down. But if somebody reads a story that she wrote and says, “Ah, I think I have an idea of what this person is interested in,” and then tracks her email address down and then emails her, Jen is getting a lot fewer pitches than me, the chances of her reading it are close to a hundred percent. And the chances of her taking it seriously if it’s relevant to any of the publications that she writes for is much higher than me. So sometimes going to the staff person is not actually your best move. Finding the freelancer who’s doing the work is sometimes the better move.
Lenny: So many interesting tactical insights that you’re sharing. I love it. With this freelancer tip, how do you know they’re freelancers? Is there something in the byline?
Jason Feifer: If you find them on the publication’s website so let’s say that you go to Cosmo and you click on a author’s bio. If they’re staff, it’ll say staff. If they’re not staff, it’ll probably say something else. It might say writer, it might say contributor. It might say Jen Miller is a writer in Brooklyn, New York. But also you can just go one extra step and just Google their name because any smart freelancer has a portfolio website where they should be very easily found.
Lenny: Awesome.
Jason Feifer: So sometimes just take their name, plug it into Google, you’ll very quickly figure out who they are.
Lenny: Okay, so let me summarize things that you’ve taught us so far. One is think about publications that go to people that will buy your thing. So in your example, Cosmo is a good example of someone who would buy this peanut butter thing. Two is don’t think of it broad thing. Think about the writer at the thing. So it’s not like Cosmo would write about this. It’s like, who specifically at Cosmo would write about this? And we find that as go to their site, search for, you talked about search for your competitors, but I think it’s even broader, just things related to your area, right? [inaudible 00:50:01].
Jason Feifer: Yeahs, that;s good point. Search for your category.
Lenny: Even adjacent things probably are close enough. And then this tip about freelancers is really great, that they’re hungrier and that they’re more likely to respond to your pitch versus someone that’s working there. And then also this point that they’re like, their assumption is this is not a good pitch and they don’t want your pitch. But freelancers have a higher chance of being interested and will pay attention.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, freelancers got to eat.
Lenny: Amazing. Is there anything else along this step of finding somebody at a publication that you want to share?
Jason Feifer: Well, the next step is going to be how to actually reach out to them and pitch. So at this stage, I think that we’ve fairly well covered it. And I love your summary. And just to double click on part of that, the reason why you’re doing a lot of this is not just for the crazy busy work of it. But it’s because you have to understand that the media … Just sort of go back to translating the media. The media, which is a phrase that is used in all sorts of different ways, is a pretty bad way of actually understanding the media because the “media” makes it feel like it’s a unified entity. In politics, the media will be criticized as a sort of multiple publications colluding together in some way. But the way that we’re talking about it is just as organizations that you’re trying to reach out to.
But really and truly, these are just publishing companies made up of individuals. And those individuals are all making fairly subjective decisions about what it is that they’re going to write about. And there are layers of approval that they have to pass through. So nothing makes it into the print magazine, for example, without me saying yes. But I’m also trusting my editors to be passionate about the ideas that they’re finding and convince me of yes. And so the thing that you are really looking to do is to find the way-
Jason Feifer: The thing that you are really looking to do is to find the way in to a publication. Because nothing gets covered until a single individual at a publication takes interest in you enough that they go to somebody else and say, “I think that this would be a good story,” and that other person says yes.
So you have to find your way in. Because media is not a coordinated effort. It’s a bunch of people showing up every day trying to figure out how to make the best thing for their audience.
Lenny: Amazing. Okay, so that’s a great segue to final piece, which is actually, get someone excited and write about you.
Jason Feifer: So how do we do that?
Lenny: How do we do that?
Jason Feifer: This is where the rubber hits the road, okay? So things not to do, don’t call them, if you track down their phone number. Which is a real thing that happens. People call my personal cell phone number.
Lenny: Oh, wow.
Jason Feifer: It doesn’t happen often, but it happens. And I don’t even know where they get it from. But I don’t like it.
And media people are torn on whether or not DMs by social are an okay way to reach out. I find them kind of annoying. Because, number one, the format doesn’t lend itself very well, right? If you write anything wrong in a DM, it just looks like this endless thing that I got.
But also, I don’t know, my Instagram DMs, I just kind of don’t think of as the place to be pitched. But other people don’t care. So I don’t know, you can roll the dice on that.
Email is just the most traditional way. If you know somebody’s going to be speaking at a conference, that’s great, come up, you can talk to them. But the question of course is, what are you sending them? And here’s what you’re sending them.
You’re really sending them the product of the work that you have done in the previous two steps. Because you have now spent some time thinking about your story, and who you’re pitching, and the publication, and how they’re telling stories to their audience.
And then the individual person who you’re reaching out to, who you now have some sense of how they write about this. And you’re taking all of that, and you’re trying to distill it down into a presentation that they’re going to find appealing.
Which again, to go back to the thing about how press is not that dissimilar to going out and raising money, that’s kind of what you’re doing when you go and meet an investor too.
If you have meetings with 10 investors, the way in which you talk about yourself and the company should not be exactly the same with those 10 investors, because they’re all going to have somewhat different approaches and different thesis.
And you’re not trying to scam anybody, but you’re just trying to be as customized as possible by building in your knowledge of what it is that they do, and what their firm does. And the same is true for media.
So all of this is really going to take the form, in its most traditional sense, of a short email. A short email pitch. And what does that look like? I mean, look, there is literally no magic answer to that. I wish that there was, but there is not. There’s no format. People always ask me, what should the subject line of the email be?
That’s is a good question. There’s not one answer to that. The closest that I can give you to an answer is that, picture me. Picture me at my computer. I have a lot going on, and I’m glancing at my email, and 40 new emails are sitting there. And my instinct is to delete all of them as fast as possible, but I’m going to glance at each one.
I’m not going to open each one, but I’m going to glance at it, which means that I see the subject line and I see the preview text, or just the first thing that somebody had written. What you want to do is write something that makes it pretty clear to me that this is targeted to me. That’s step number one.
Because most of those emails that I got in my inbox are not targeted to me. They’re mass blasts, and I’m delete, delete, delete, delete, delete. So which is the one that actually is reaching me? And sometimes you can do that by referencing something that I wrote in the past. I see people do that a lot. Don’t fake it. People fake it all the time. People email me and they tell me they’re fans of my work, they’ve never read my work. It’s very obvious, right? Don’t do that. But if you’ve read something, or if you’re familiar with something, if you’re familiar with the publication in some way, any signals of that are good.
Because again, what you’re trying to do is just separate yourself from noise to, this is customized to you. Because If you think about it, this is really an efficiency question. What I’m trying to do is, I’m trying to spend my time on the things that have the highest percentage chance of being relevant to me. And I’m filtering out the things that seem not relevant to me, who are wasting my time.
So if I see something where somebody’s writing me and they have a sense of the publication and they have a sense of me, there’s a higher percentage chance that the next things that they’re going to tell me are going to be relevant to me. Maybe even turn into a story.
Which is great. I like when that happens. Because it saves me time, frankly, right? It’s one less story I have to find myself. So I’m happy for it, but it’s got to be right. So you want to structure … And then the email that you’re writing is don’t go on forever, like three paragraphs max.
And you are telling the version, you’re not writing an article, but you’re telling me the thing that you are pretty sure I’m going to be interested in. It’s the difference between, going back to the butter dish example, woman sending me a three paragraph email about the butter dish itself, and opening up, telling me a little bit about the butter dish, and then immediately moving into this very clever story about the product market testing survey.
That’s the difference. She told me the story that was going to be relevant to my audience. She got there quickly, and it felt like, to me, this is a interesting human being with an interesting entrepreneurial story to tell, and that’s why I’m going to engage.
Lenny: So that story actually came through a cold email?
Jason Feifer: That was a cold email. Yep. Just showed up one day.
Lenny: Amazing.
Wherever you work, running experiments is increasingly essential. But there are no commercial tools that integrate with a modern grow team stack. This leads to wasted time building internal tools, or trying to run your own experiments through a clunky marketing tool.
When I was at Airbnb, one of the things that I loved most about working there was our experimentation platform, where I was able to slice and dice data by device types, country, user stage. Eppo does all that and more, delivering results quickly, avoiding annoying prolonged analytic cycles, and helping you easily get to the root cause of any issue you discover.
Is there any other examples that come to mind, of someone doing this well? For people to have more kind of examples of here’s…
Jason Feifer: Oh sure. Well here, let’s see. We’ll have to do this in real time here. But I keep in my inbox a folder called Bad PR Pitches and a folder called Good PR Pitches. We can go through both.
Lenny: Let’s do it.
Jason Feifer: All right, I just pulled this up. This is, and I haven’t read this in a long time. I’m kind of trying to read ahead as I’m talking just to see if this is appropriate to read. But I think so. I don’t know, whatever. We’re just going to read it and see what happens.
All right, so the subject of this was, “Idea for entrepreneur and Problem Solvers, how the Border Closures grew my business.” So this was sent to me in September of 2020.
Lenny: And this is a good or a bad?
Jason Feifer: This is good, this is good. This turned into an episode of a podcast that I do for Entrepreneur, and I might’ve also then converted it into an article I can’t remember.
Lenny: Awesome.
Jason Feifer: And so here’s what she did. So her name, I shout her out. So this is Meg O’Hara. And Meg O’Hara is a painter, a Canadian landscape painter. Which again, a small business.
And she writes, “Hi Jason, I have an idea for a story I think would be valuable and relevant to you, Entrepreneur Magazine and the Problem Solvers Podcast.” That’s the show I do for Entrepreneur. And then she says, “Here’s what’s going on with my business. All entrepreneurs had to be flexible during Covid. This is a story about how one artist in Canada benefited from the border closure.” This just sort of intrigues me. Oh, how?
“When Covid hit in March, all ski resorts across North America shut down early. Skiers are a high earning demographic in Canada. They fall in the top 5% of income.”
Okay, well anyway. So she goes on. What she tells me, I remember this now, what she tells me is that her business used to be being hired by ski resorts to come and paint landscapes for their facilities. And when the border shut down and people weren’t going to these resorts anymore, she had to come up with a completely different way of doing her business.
And so she started to think, well, I can’t work for these resorts anymore. They’re not hiring me. But all these skiers who used to work at the resorts who have seen my work, or who used to ski at the resorts who were maybe familiar with my work, they’re not skiing either. They probably are sitting around wishing that they were skiing. They’d love something to see of their favorite ski location, and they also have money sitting around because they’re not spending it on the ski resorts.
So then she lists off the problems and the solutions in bullet points. Which I love. Because she has listened to the show, the Problem Solvers Show, which is structured in exactly that way. Tell me the problem, tell me the solution that you came to. So she lists it off.
Here are the problems: the skiers can’t come, people are spending more time at home.
The solution: I create artwork for their homes that depicts their favorite views from skiing as they were. She goes on and on and on.
I read this and I just think, there is something here about what this person did to reinvent their business at a time in which one marketplace shut down, but it created a new one that I think people would like to hear. Because at that time everyone was thinking about how to reinvent themselves and their business.
And even though I reach people who have very complex and large businesses, sometimes it’s really a beautiful thing to hear a single individual who does the simplest thing in the world, which is put paint to canvas, talk about how she did it for herself. Because you can extract these wonderful little lessons about how to reinvent yourself that I think are going to be relevant to a very broad audience.
So Meg sent me that email, I replied and I said, “I like it.” And we did it. So that’s a good example of someone who spent time understanding my work, down to the structure of how I’m communicating, and then sent me a pitch that very quickly and clearly seemed customized to me, and told me her story in a way that I could imagine telling my audience.
At that point, it’s a pretty easy yes,
Lenny: That is an amazing example. I just took some notes on things that she did right based on things you’ve shared in the past.
Even just from the subject line or the first sentence, it was clear that she knew you. She knew you had this podcast, she knew the magazine, and she even expressed this specifically, you’re going to be interested in this. She mentioned how this, she has a story. She starts immediately with a story. There’s not the value prop of the company, here’s what we do and here’s why we’re awesome. And then the lessons, the mission of Entrepreneur you talked about, is insights and lessons that people achieve, and she just went straight to here’s what we’ve learned.
Jason Feifer: That’s right.
Lenny: So I could see why that resonated.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it was great. And the next thing that made it a real success, by the way for her, was that once I got her on the phone, she was, and I find this, this is a make or break thing for me. Because I can talk to somebody and then kill the story, or not run the podcast. She was willing to be open about challenges.
I mean, she had reached out because of challenges, but not everyone is. I will get a pitch from someone who is presenting like, oh, we had this challenge in the business. But then when I talk to them, they act as if there was no problem. Or the problem was really small and their ingenuity immediately made this a very successful business. And that’s not interesting to me.
Because success stories are not interesting. They’re not interesting to anybody. It’s not useful for you to just hear that someone else succeeded. What’s useful is for you to hear how someone else faced challenges that you faced. And got through them so that you can see. Aha, that’s an interesting strategy to use for me.
I hate success stories. I love problem solving stories. And that’s why when I talk to an entrepreneur, I expect them to be really open about that stuff. And if they’re not, I basically lose interest.
Lenny: The hero’s journey. I’d love to hear another example. But before that, hearing this, obviously it takes a bunch of time to do this for a founder. I guess, two questions. Just, how many places should somebody probably try to reach out to give them a chance of being successful? And then do you have any thoughts on how much time they should put into something like this? I know it’s a very broad question. But, any thoughts there?
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it’s a really broad question. So again, this is in some way why, in a large way, why a lot of people hire PR. Because PR can just move this along. They can reach a lot of people very fast, whereas you as an individual cannot.
One way to think about it is, you’re going to be on the hunt. You’re going to try to make this work, and you’re going to take a couple bets and hope that some of them pay off.
Another way of thinking about it is, this is a passive activity. And I’ll spend some time when I’m reading media, thinking about this, kind of developing an idea. Another thing that you can do, follow a bunch of writers and editors on social media.
Meg, I can’t remember the order of operations here, because I know that Meg follows me on Instagram now, because she’s DMd me many times. And I respond to everybody. I can’t remember if she followed me before, but she might’ve. And maybe she even DMd me a few times. Usually it’s somebody’s responding to an Instagram story or something.
And I’ve seen a lot of people use this strategy with me, and I think that it’s a really smart one. Which is basically, before you ever pitch, just get me to recognize your name. Just engage in social media in a very casual way, such that when you email me, I think, do I know who that person is? Meg O’Hara, I think I know who that person is. It just makes it more likely that I’ll open the email.
And I see a lot of people do that. They’ll spend a long time engaging with me on social media before ever pitching me. I know what they’re doing, I understand that it’s probably calculated. I still like it. It’s smart. Because it means that by the time that they’ve reached out, I think you have a pretty good sense of my work. Which means that what you’re bringing to me is probably in pretty good faith. And for that, I like it. It’s a good filter.
So if you’ve been listening to this whole thing, and you’re thinking, this is a tremendous amount of work, I have a new product launch, or I have a bunch of budget that I can spend on this, this individual kind of approach, it may not be for you. You might want to just spend a bunch of time instead interviewing different PR firms. And find the one that seems most aligned with and understands your story, and your vision, and knows people in your space shortcuts a lot of this.
But even then, even then, I think that having heard this is really useful. Because at some point, if the PR person is successful, you are going to get on the phone with the writer or editor. And it’s very useful to understand how they think. That they’re not there to serve you. That this isn’t a service that they’re providing you.
So you better understand what they’re entering into this with, and what they have in mind. When they’re asking you questions, they’re asking questions, thinking, this is what my audience is going to be curious about. This is how I’m going to drive this person in this interview towards the kinds of insights that my audience are going to find gratifying.
So the more that you understand who you’re dealing with, the better.
Lenny: And also just having done it yourself, you’ll better understand what to ask your folks, how they’re going to work, find opportunities to improve the way they’re operating. On that question of quantity, say you’re doing this, say you’re spending the time. I’m going to really invest in understanding Jason and whoever else.
Is there a rule of thumb you’d recommend? Try to do this for three publications to get one, or is it five? I don’t know. Is there anything there that you could recommend?
Jason Feifer: So it’s really dependent upon how easy you are to write about. I may just sort of note, if you are some kind of B2B service, especially in some kind of very niche or wonky space, it’s going to be really hard for you to get [inaudible 01:09:40]. So hard that it might actually not even be worth trying. Because there are other things that you can do, or things that we haven’t even talked about yet.
You could say, you know what? Screw it. I’m not going to try to get coverage for my company. Why don’t I just try to position myself as an expert? Right? It’s a totally different kind of approach. Where instead, what you’re maybe trying to do is just hook onto the news, try to get a quote or a perspective to a reporter who might be writing about something. I get these all the time.
Something breaks, some news breaks, and people start reaching out to me. And they’ll say, “This just happened in the news. And my client,” or sometimes just the individual, “I have this insight into this, and here’s what I would say if you want to interview me.”
It’s not going to be a feature about you, You’re not going to be the subject, there’s no photo of you. You might get a quote. You might get a quote in a story. Which again, is all you need to be able to say as featured in on your website. So that’s the reason why people do that.
So sometimes it’s about that. Sometimes it’s about you could just be a writer. You might try to just pitch authoritative articles by you to different publications. Get yourself out in that way. Sometimes, again, you’re not going to be able to be easily written about. And sometimes you are. Sometimes you made some insane technology that everyone’s going to be talking about, and it’s going to be super easy for you to get press.
At which point your hit rate is going to be much higher. That’s why going into this with really realistic expectations, and if you’re going to work with PR, having PR who can set and hold you to those realistic expectations, can just save you a lot of heartache.
Lenny: Along the same lines, there’s always this idea of exclusivity and people want to write first about a thing. Say you talked about an awesome technology. Do you have advice on, do you just pitch the same thing to all of them and hope they all write about it? Do you pitch them different stories? Do you offer one an exclusive, any advice there?
Jason Feifer: Everyone has a different approach to this. The number one rule here is just, don’t do it in a way that the people in media feel like you’re playing them. Because they won’t have tolerance for it. I would rather walk away from something like this than do some funny dance with somebody.
So my favorite version of this goes like this. Actually, there’s a founder who recently, I met him years ago. So when he reached out, I recognized the name immediately. And he reached out and he’s like, hey, we did this really interesting thing and we haven’t told anybody about it yet. And I’d love to see if it’s a fit for entrepreneurs.
So I hop on the phone with him, and he tells me. And I’m not going to tell you what it’s yet because we haven’t run the story. But after 15, 20 minutes, I say, yeah, you know what? This is a really interesting story.
And frankly, I know other media outlets are going to be interested in this too, particularly because a finance element to it. So I think the Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg, and those kinds of places are going to be interested in this.
He wants to go to Entrepreneur for whatever reasons he wants. I mean, I think probably two. Because number one, he wants to position himself towards that audience. And then number two, there’s a trust factor. He knows me in a way that he doesn’t know the editors over there. And so he feels like I’ll probably treat the story more carefully.
So we worked out a deal, which he proposed. And the deal is that we’ll get the exclusive, and there’s going to be a three-hour window after our story runs, and then they’re going to start responding to everyone else. And then they’re going to start talking to other people, or maybe they’ll even line it up and reach out to some other media.
And that’s fine with me. I understand. And we’re going to create a little embargo window. And we’ll go first, and then they’re going to talk to everybody else.
Sometimes you can offer an exclusive to someone in that you are going to release the news to everybody, but only one media outlet is going to get the interview. Which works really well if you have a big personality.
So for example, recently a company that Mark Cuban has invested in offered us that, right? They’re like, we have this news. We’re going to reach out, we’re going to send the news everywhere, but we’re going to give you the exclusive interview with Mark Cuban. He’s going to do one interview and he’ll do it with you. You can parse it out in any way. You just want everyone to feel like you’re being upfront with them.
Lenny: And that they’re getting something special, as much as possible. That makes sense.
You touched on this relationship piece, and that’s something I wanted to ask. It feels like in tech, a lot of reporters end up writing a negative story, because a lot of times that’s what people want to read. Why is this destroying the world?
I actually had a fast company do a thing on me, and I talked to the reporter, and I had no idea. Was he going to just completely tear me apart, or is he going to be really friendly and positive over what I’m doing? And I have no idea, and it just comes out.
It’s not like I look at it before it comes out. So do you have any just advice to give you a set, help if this is going to turn into something positive or negative? I know you have no idea
Jason Feifer: What happened, by the way? Was it positive or negative?
Lenny: Super-positive.
Jason Feifer: Great.
Lenny: I was very happy with it, yeah.
Jason Feifer: Okay, good, good. I’m glad to hear that.
So part of it is the publication itself, right? Entrepreneur, and I would say Fast Company, are just sort of not in the business of running negative stories. And the reason is, it doesn’t serve our audience. My audience is coming to me to learn things for their business. Tearing somebody apart just doesn’t help them in any way.
So part of it is just what ecosystem are you dealing with? You can also look at the past work of the writer. And if you work with a PR person, it’s funny because occasionally somebody has accidentally forwarded this to me, and I’ll see the dossier that a PR agency will put together on me.
But a PR agency, if they set you up with an interview with someone, they’ll usually do some digging. And they’ll find, what does this person usually write about? What kind of stories do they do? What are they generally interested in? So you can have a sense, right? What kind kind of thing are they doing?
And past that, there’s also a question of, well, what are you doing in the world, right? I mean, if there is something somewhat controversial about you, and especially if you’re engaging with an outlet that is interested in that kind of stuff, there’s a halfway-decent chance they’re at least going to explore it with you, and ask you about it. And if you’re weird and cagey with them, they’re going to think that there’s more to it, and they’re going to start digging more.
But the ultimate answer here is that every part of this, and this has come through, I’m sure, in our whole conversation, every part of this process is really out of your control. Does somebody pay attention to you? What do they write about you? When do they write about? All of it is outside of your control,
Which again, is the reason why it’s not smart to think about press as a primary strategy for driving growth. It’s a good add-on, but these people are going to do what they’re going to do. And the best you can do is read the tea leaves.
Lenny: Yeah. It was a very weird … I don’t get press often, it’s not like something I pursue. But it was just like, this is wild. I’m just going to talk to this guy, and then something will come out. I have no idea what it might be.
He might have things wrong, because I didn’t get a chance to review, and might skew things. But it’s a strange experience to go through. But it all worked out great.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it is. It’s very strange.
It is, it’s strange. And I find that people often don’t … In business, people understand the structure of what’s happening. They understand that we’re a business magazine, we’re going to write a story about a business. It’s going to take a certain form.
But I’ve done a lot of different writing, and I have had the experience many times over my career where I will spend a lot of time with people, and they will have really no understanding of what it is that I’m doing at all. They can’t conceptualize it.
And then the story will come out and then they’ll always reach out to me and they’ll be like, oh, now I finally understand what you were even trying to do. It’s fascinating.
It is a vulnerable experience, and you have to know that. And the more you try to control it, the more the reporter is going to be annoyed at you. And the more, in fact, the reporter might try to take a shot at you in the story as a result. Because they found you too controlling, because they felt like you…
They found you too controlling because they felt like you had something to hide. This is not a comfortable thing. You have to go into this being vulnerable and you have to know that there’s a chance that it could blow up in your face. That’s the price that you’re paying for reaching their audience.
Lenny: Great advice. How about we do just one more example of an awesome email pitch that you got and then we get to our very exciting lightning round.
Jason Feifer: I’ll tell you about a pitch. I don’t know that I have it in my inbox still, do I? No, it’s not there, sadly. I’ll just tell you about it.
Lenny: Yeah.
Jason Feifer: Ii leads to something that is another way of thinking about getting press, which I think is really important for people to remember. So far, Lenny, we’ve spent the majority of our time talking about press in the form of some kind of feature on you, writing about you or including you in some kind of prominent way in a story that’s basically highlighting the thing that you wanted to get out there, your product or something about your business, something. Then we talked a little bit about another way of doing it, which is sort of putting you out as an expert in authority. There’s another way of thinking about this, which is that you can either create or present context in which you just happen to be a part.
Here’s the story pitch that I got that leads into this. This is years and years and years ago. I had just started at Entrepreneur. I hear from a guy named Fred Ruckel. Fred Ruckel has got a cat toy and it’s called the Ripple Rug. It’s basically, imagine a rug and then another rug kind on top of it, but ill-suited. The rug is lumpy, there’s a lot of lumps in and there are holes. This is for a cat to kind of crawl in and out these spaces and bat and do whatever cats do. I don’t know. I don’t know a cat. He wanted to tell me about the sales of this Ripple Rug and about how the sales are skyrocketing and all the things that he thought made it special. It’s made out of recycled bottles and whatever the stuff, made in the USA, all cool stuff, but not relevant to me because we’re not cat toy monthly and we’re not reaching a whole bunch of cat owners, not that I know of.
I replied and I said, what I usually say, “Congratulations on what you’ve built, but it’s just not a fit for coverage.” Now Fred stumbled his way into this, but he did really a very smart thing because what he responded with was he said, “Totally understand. If you’re ever interested in learning about a gigantic scam that’s happening on Amazon and eBay that we’ve been caught up in, let me know.” I was like, “Oh, well, yeah, I guess I am interested in hearing about that.” I said, “Tell me more.” He sent me this long email. Fred loves long emails, and I got him on the phone and had him explain, and finally I understood it.
This is, and maybe people are familiar with this, but this is sort of known as Amazon to eBay arbitrage. Basically the idea here is that Fred is selling his Ripple Rug on Amazon, or at least he was then, I don’t know if he still is, but he’s selling his Ripple Rug on Amazon. There are a lot of people who are copying the listing for his Ripple Rug and making their own postings for it on eBay. They sell it for a slightly higher price. Let’s say that, and again, I’m making these up, but let’s say the Fred is selling his Ripple Rug for 40 on eBay. Then somebody buys it on eBay, they find it, they buy it on eBay, they pay 40, takes $30 of it, goes to Amazon, buys the Ripple Rug, and then just has it shipped to the buyer. It’s arbitrage.
You might think, “Well, why would Fred care about this? He still gets the sale.” The reason he caress about this is because the Ripple Rug shows up at the customer’s house and it shows up in a Amazon box, even though they bought it on eBay. They think, “Why did that happen?” Then the next thing they do is they go to Amazon and they discover that it’s cheaper on Amazon and now they feel ripped off. Who do they feel like they got ripped off by? Fred, because they don’t know about the arbitrage. They don’t know that they exist.
This person who has at this point opened the cat toy and probably had their cat roll around in it, now shoves the whole thing back in a box and returns it and Fred gets dinged and that’s why he doesn’t like this. He has tried and tried and tried to get Amazon and eBay to stop this, but he said, “Nobody seems to care and all these small businesses are losing tons of money on returns because of this.” I had never heard of this. I thought it was fascinating. It’s like a problem small business owners are dealing with. I was like, “Fred, do you know other people who are dealing with this?” He’s like, “Yeah, I talk to them on the line all the time.” He sends me off.
I reported this whole thing out. I wrote this three 4,000 word story on this thing, and Fred was the main character because he was the way to understand this problem. I did all the reporting and I contacted the platforms and I contacted the people who make the arbitrage software. I did a whole report, but Fred got his press because sometimes, and here’s the lesson, sometimes you are not the story, but you can be part of the story. Sometimes that means if Fred stumbled into it, but I get plenty of people who’ve reach out and maybe they have a real estate startup and there’s something really interesting happening in the real estate space and they reach out and they tell me about this really interesting thing that’s happening in the real estate space and the role that they happen to play in it. Now I think, “Oh, well that’s interesting. Maybe there’s a story about that.”
My wife, the freelancer, Jen Miller, she’s done this many times where she once did this story about there was a bunch of startups that were all related to helping people prepare for death in some way or another. She’s not going to write about one of them, but when somebody reached out and said, “Hey, here’s a trend happening and we are one of them.” Well, great, that’s an interesting story. She wrote that and the company that reached out to her got kind of prominent billing because they were the ones who reached out. You know Barbara Corcoran from Shark Tank?
Lenny: I think so. I think so.
Jason Feifer: Yeah. She’s been a regular Shark Tank since the very beginning.
Lenny: Mm-hmm.
Jason Feifer: She made her fortune by building a real estate company called Corcoran, realtors, buy and sell property. The way in which she built this company is fascinating. Barbara, before she was Barbara Corcoran of Corcoran Realty, Barbara Corcoran was random New York City realtor Barbara from New Jersey. She was trying to figure out a way to distinguish herself from the masses. She came up with an idea which was to take her own sales data, the only window she has into the Manhattan real estate market at that time is what she is what her clients are buying and selling, which she’s facilitating. She has that data, is going up or down relative to last year. She puts all this data together in what she calls the Corcoran Report, and she starts sending the Corcoran Report out to the New York Times and the New York Post and whatever.
Because nobody else at the time was putting together a report on the health of the Manhattan real estate market, everyone started reporting on the Corcoran Report as if it was an authoritative thing. It’s produced by Barbara Corcoran, which immediately put her in the position of being an authority in this space. That was so smart, and I see it happen all the time.
My inbox will also be filled with, for example, a company that specializes in remote work consulting. Especially remote work consulting, you can hire them, it’s a B2B service. It’s hard to get press for that, here’s what they do. They pay a surveying firm to find all sorts of things. The top states for remote work, the top companies for remote work, the top whatever for remote work. They produce all these surveys and they send the surveys out. The surveys get covered because now they’re creating a piece of news. They’re creating some context in which they just happen to live in. Hard to write about them, this random company, but you write about the survey, that’s interesting stuff. Oh, it turns out that Utah is the top, I don’t know if that’s true, is the top state for, that’s something that people will write about. You’re giving people things to write about. Then once they do that, you are a part of the story. I get those pitches all the time. I occasionally bite on them and Fred from Ripple Rug got himself a big feature as a result.
Lenny: That’s an amazing other strategy. I imagine if I was a founder, I’d be like, “Hmm, what trends can I think about that I can tap into?”
Jason Feifer: Yeah. Sometimes you have it in your own data. If you have a lot of data, you might, Zapier. Zapier is a great example. I get a pitch from Zapier every single year about the fastest growing business apps of the year based on Zapier data because they see what people are using and they just compile that together into a top 10 list and people run it. It’s very smart.
Lenny: Amazing. We’ve gone through all three steps. Is there anything else that you wanted to touch on that we haven’t touched on? Anything else that you think would be really valuable for founders or product leaders trying to get press that we haven’t already shared?
Jason Feifer: This has come up in different ways, but I’ll just put a point on it as a maybe final way of thinking about this. Be human, be human. Press releases don’t work because they’re not human. I don’t like interviewing people who are on talking points because that’s not human. You’re ultimately engaging in a human business. A subjective decision is being made about how to serve an audience of humans. There’s no right or wrong. There’s no way to know. Media is a sort of barely data-driven industry because every story is kind of different. It’s like it’s hard. It’s hard to optimize the product because the product changes every minute. You’re dealing with humans and the more that you can be human in every step of this process, when you pitch, write a human email, don’t write a thing that looks like it came off of some marketing copy. Write a human email to another human and then when that person engages with you, be very human with them.
I mean, Lenny, the reason why that fast company reporter liked you, I am very sure was because when they got on the phone with you, you were just like a normal nice guy. If you presented yourself differently because you just wanted to frame yourself in some way or you felt protective or something or whatever it was, the reporter would’ve thought, “This guy is a dick,” and he would’ve written a totally different story.
Lenny: Mm-hmm.
Jason Feifer: Be as human as you can and you will be dealing with a human who will receive that.
Lenny: Amazing advice. With that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round.
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: Are you ready?
Jason Feifer: Let’s do it.
Lenny: Let’s do it. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Jason Feifer: Andrew Chen’s, The Cold Start Problem has come up over and over again for me because they’re just really great lessons about network effects. I’ve been having a lot of conversations about anxiety and perfectionism with entrepreneurs lately, and a book by a psychotherapist named Katherine Morgan Schafler called The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control, is, I think, just a really great read.
Lenny: Super cool. What is a favorite recent movie or TV show that you’ve really enjoyed?
Jason Feifer: Movie? I don’t get to see a lot of movies these days. I have two little kids, but I took my eight-year old to see the new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, which was great and a really nice way of, I loved them as a kid, and so it was cool to see the modern version. Then my wife and I just finished Better Call Saul like years late, but it was just perfect.
Lenny: I haven’t watched that series yet. I loved Breaking Bad.
Jason Feifer: Oh, it’s worth it. You got to.
Lenny: Okay. Another series I got to get started on.
Jason Feifer: I know it’s too much, too much television.
Lenny: I usually ask this next question too, like product leaders and growth people, but I’m curious what the answer for you would be is. Do you have a favorite interview question you like to ask people you’re interviewing? Usually it’s about people you’re hiring.
Jason Feifer: Interviewing a job candidate?
Lenny: Yeah, that’s the ideal, but take it either way.
Jason Feifer: I’ll take it a little bit different because we’ve been talking about press. This is a really great strategy for interviewing people, and I’m going to tell it to you because I think that it’s also good in any other context, and it might be a thing that somebody will do to you in an interview. My favorite strategy for interviewing people is to throw a theory at them, and I don’t mean a theory of the world. I mean that maybe 10 minutes in after they have told me a couple different things and answer some different questions, I’ll make a connection in my head and I’ll say, “I want to run a theory by you. Do you think that the reason why you are really interested in this or you made that decision is actually because of this other thing that you told me a little bit about?”
You’re listening. It’s really active listening, and you’re combining things together into some theory. The reason why the theory works so well is because it forces people to think in real time in front of you. I like that because I often interview people who have been interviewed a million times before. I interview Jimmy Fallon and The Rock and whatever. They’ve been interviewed a million times before, so how do you get them to think in front of you? The answer is to ask them the thing that they haven’t been asked. What I love about the theory is that it shows them that you’re really listening and you’re trying to understand them. “It’s so interesting that you did that. I wonder if it’s because of,” X, Y, Z thing. That gets them to react in a really earnest honest way.
I would say for what it’s worth, as a job candidate tactic, it’s not that bad either. My favorite job interview that I ever did as a candidate that I didn’t even get the job was years and years ago, I interviewed for a job at New York Magazine. I interviewed with Adam Moss, who is not there anymore, but he was the legendary editor in chief. He made me, on the spot, drill down specifically into an idea. He was like, “What’s your favorite section in Strategists,” which is one of the sections of magazine. I was like, “I really like the real estate section.” He’s like, “All right, what would be a good neighborhood that we should feature in the real estate section?” I was like, “Oh, I don’t know,” I named a neighborhood. He’s like, “What would be three good elements of that?” He just kept pushing me, drill down, drill down, drill down. There was no right or wrong answer. He just wanted to see how I thought. I found that to be incredibly powerful, and I do a version of that when I interview people.
Lenny: Awesome. I love that. What is a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you really like?
Jason Feifer: I use BIGVU, I don’t even know how to pronounce it, BIGVU, B-I-G-V-U, all the time. It’s a teleprompter app. I spent like $150 buying an actual teleprompter because I make a lot of video and that teleprompter is, it’s actually for people who are just listening to this, I’m pointing at another desk across my room where it’s sitting there and I’ve never used it. The reason is because then I discovered BIGVU, which is just a app that runs a teleprompter very close to the camera, either in horizontal or vertical mode. I’ve tested it out in a million different ways, and it really works like you’re reading it and it really looks like you’re looking directly at the camera. I love it. It has saved me so much time.
Lenny: That is cool. You basically put your phone on your screen next to the camera or wherever your camera is?
Jason Feifer: No, no, no. This would be for if you’re recording, if you’re recording on the phone.
Lenny: Got it. You’re staring at the phone and it’s telling you what to say. I get it.
Jason Feifer: Yeah. Yeah.
Lenny: That’s awesome.
Jason Feifer: You write a script and then you just import the script and then you choose the speed and you can fuss with it, how many words per minute, and then it’ll run the text very close to where the camera lens is.
Lenny: Amazing. All right.
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: I’m going to check that out. What is a favorite life motto that you’d like to repeat yourself, share with friends, something that comes up a lot,
Jason Feifer: Something that I’ve been repeating a lot to people is something that I heard, so I recommended Katherine’s book, The Perfectionist Guide to Losing Control. I met Katherine because I, we’ve since become friends, but I interviewed her for the podcast when her book came out. We were talking about feeling overworked and being stretched too thin, and she gave me this question, which I think about almost daily, and I repeat to people all the time, and that is, “What’s the point of building something if you can’t maintain it?” I love that question because I, like probably everyone listening to this, pushes themselves really hard, and at some point you have to step back and think, “Am I building something where at some point there is sustainability for me here, or is this unsustainable and what’s the point of building something if you can’t maintain it?” It’s a great reminder for why you’re building something and how you have to build it.
Lenny: I have a very similar quote that my sister’s partner once said that has stuck with me forever, which is, “Life is maintenance. Basically everything that you buy or bring into your life, you have to maintain.”
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: We got a new air conditioner. Now, we have a guy that comes every year to check it. You got a generator, someone’s got to check that thing all the time. We got a toy, now I got to think about where does it go and do we throw it away? Do we keep it? Everything that you bring into your life, you have to maintain basically for the rest.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, it’s really true.
Lenny: Yeah, so it’s really, I think specifically for work, it’s like you start a new project, you’re going to have to-
Jason Feifer: You’re going to have to maintain it.
Lenny: … maintain it, like this podcast, right? It’s like, do you want to start a podcast and do it forever?
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: That’s a part of it. Part starting something is you have to maintain it.
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: Yeah.
Jason Feifer: I know we’re in the lightning round and we’ve defied the logic of lightning rounds, but I’ll just add one other thing to that, which is that I interviewed Michelle Pfeiffer for the cover of the magazine, and one of the things that I thought was most fascinating was that she started this fragrance company, and it’s called Henry Rose. She said the major difference between making movies and building a company that she found, was that when you make a movie, all the work happens in the beginning. You make the movie and then the movie is out, and then you are done. You don’t have to work on the movie ever again. She was not really mentally prepared for a company being the exact opposite, that the launch of the company is actually the start of the work and there’s an endlessness to it. She said that it took her a solid year to adapt to that reality, and then it became fun. I think it’s the thing people forget.
Lenny: Mm-hmm, Well, that story, it’s cool that you got to interview Michelle Pfeiffer.
Jason Feifer: Yeah, she’s great.
Lenny: Final question. I was reading your profile line and you said that the only reason you were able to achieve what you’ve achieved in life and got to where you’re today is something that you called the opportunity set B.
Jason Feifer: Oh, yeah.
Lenny: Can you just explain what that is and why that is so important to you?
Jason Feifer: Oh, yeah, sure. In front of you right now, you, Lenny, you everyone listening, watching, there are two sets of opportunities. Opportunity set A and opportunity set B, opportunity set A is everything that’s asks of you. If you have a job, it’s what your boss expects of you. If you have your own company, it’s what everybody expects of you. Doing good at those things is really important. That’s a measurement of success. That’s opportunity set A, everything that’s asked of you. Then there’s opportunity set B and opportunity set B is what’s available to you, even though nobody’s asking you to do it. That could be, again, if you have a job, that could be taking on new responsibilities or joining a new team or something. Personally, it could be pursuing a hobby. It could be starting a podcast because you like listening to podcasts, anything.
What I have found throughout my own career is that opportunity set B is always more important, infinitely more important. The thing is that if you only focus on opportunity set A, then you are only qualified to do the things that you’re already doing. Opportunity set B is where growth happens and where you push yourself in different directions. I found a long time ago that it was just really helpful to think about these two things. Oftentimes, maybe we don’t do opportunity set B because we don’t know how it’s going to pay off, or we don’t know where we’re going to find the time. I have always found, always, that engaging in these things of what is available to me, what’s available to me right now around me, and nobody’s asking me to do, leads to the next growth either because it turns into an actual opportunity or because it informs some future opportunity.
I got to Entrepreneur Magazine, zero, zero people, when I became editor in chief, zero people said, “You should hit the speaking circuit. You should get really good at being interviewed on podcasts. You should write a book.” Nobody said any of that. My job was to make a good magazine and direct the editorial of the brand, but all those things were available to me, and once I recognized that, I realized that I can pursue them and in doing so, also think differently about who I am. Am I a magazine editor? Not really anymore. That’s one of the things that I do now. I think of myself as an entrepreneur, as a person who is now in the business of helping others. I’m an entrepreneur who helps entrepreneurs. That’s what I think of myself as. I only got there because I was thinking, I am here and therefore I can get there. Nobody’s ever going to ask me to do it. I have to do it myself. It’s the thing that I always think about, and it’s the thing that keeps me up at night. What am I doing now that is leading me to something else? I’m the only one who can figure it out.
Lenny: Beautiful. It reminds me of a recent podcast guest’s advice, which is the best way to track your progress in your career and in life too is just measuring how many, “Oh shit” moments you have because those are the moments where you’re growing, you’re doing something. I think maybe it’s an example of an opportunity set B where it wasn’t the default path that’s like, “oh, I think I should do this, even though it’s really hard.”
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: What a beautiful way to end it. Jason, not only do I want to start working on press, it feels like very achievable to get press now. That was really energizing, like, “Holy shit, I could do this. I could just find some people, pitch them. Here’s how I do it.”
Jason Feifer: Yeah.
Lenny: Not only that, I’m going to look for some opportunities set B routes for myself too. Thank you so much for being here. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out, maybe pitch you on their story? How can listeners be useful to you?
Jason Feifer: Oh, so Lenny, thanks for all the work you do, which I just really love, and for creating the space for me to share all this insight. How can you find me? Well, I’ll offer two things. An opportunity set B, like a good launching point for both of them, I wrote a book, it’s called Build for Tomorrow. It is meant for anybody who’s going through any kind of change in their lives or their work. There’s an audiobook version that I read myself, but also hardcover and eBooks, just find it wherever you get books. Again, it’s Build for Tomorrow. Opportunity set B, that whole thing, is actually a chapter in the book, so I go into a lot more detail there.
Then if you want to get in touch and also get those kinds of things, I have a newsletter, which is called One Thing Better each week. One way to improve your work and build a career or company that you love. Again, the kind of opportunities set B, that’s the kind of thing that I put out. It’s very much about the personal and emotional side of work. You can find that by going to the web address onethingbetter, that’s one, O-N-E, onethingbetter.email. Just plug that in. Onethingbetter.email. I said that’s a good way to reach out to me because if you get the newsletter and you reply to it, it goes to my inbox. I guarantee I will write back to you.
Lenny: Inside track. Jason, thank you again so much for being here.
Jason Feifer: Oh, thanks Lenny. This was so fun.
Lenny: Bye everyone.
Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| ”Oh shit” moments | ”Oh shit” 时刻 |
| Adam Moss | Adam Moss |
| app downloads | 应用下载 |
| arbitrage | 套利 |
| beat | 条线 |
| Better Call Saul | 《Better Call Saul》(剧名,保留原文) |
| BIGVU | BIGVU(产品名,保留原文) |
| blast | 群发 |
| Bloomberg | Bloomberg |
| boutique shop | 精品店 |
| Breaking Bad | 《Breaking Bad》(剧名,保留原文) |
| byline | 署名 |
| contributor | contributor(撰稿人) |
| Corcoran Report | Corcoran 报告 |
| counterintuitive | 反直觉 |
| coverage | 报道 |
| dossier | 档案 |
| editor-in-chief | 主编 |
| email blast | 邮件群发 |
| embargoed announcement | 禁播公告 |
| Entrepreneur | Entrepreneur(《创业家》杂志,此处作为杂志名保留原文) |
| Entrepreneur magazine | Entrepreneur 杂志 |
| exclusive | 独家(报道) |
| Fast Company | Fast Company(商业杂志名,保留原文) |
| feature | 专题报道 |
| freelance writer | 自由撰稿人 |
| freelancer | 自由撰稿人(已在术语表中) |
| Henry Rose | Henry Rose(品牌名,保留原文) |
| hit rate | 命中率 |
| hospitality | 酒店餐饮 |
| hustle | 奔波 |
| ingenuity | 独创性 |
| Jimmy Fallon | Jimmy Fallon(美国知名脱口秀主持人,保留原文) |
| keynote | 主题演讲 |
| Mark Cuban | Mark Cuban(知名人物,保留原文写法,此处首次出现,但属于国际知名人物,可译为马克·库班,但鉴于术语表规则”国际知名人物使用公认中文译名”,Mark Cuban 的公认译名为马克·库班) |
| media outlet | 媒体 |
| Michelle Pfeiffer | Michelle Pfeiffer(知名女演员,保留原文) |
| New York Magazine | 《纽约杂志》 |
| opportunity set A | 机会集 A |
| opportunity set B | 机会集 B |
| paid marketing | 付费营销 |
| pitch | 推介 |
| portfolio website | 作品集网站 |
| PR agency | PR 代理 |
| PR person | PR 人 / PR 从业者 |
| press | 媒体报道 |
| press release | 新闻稿 |
| Problem Solvers | Problem Solvers(Jason 主持的播客节目名称,保留原文) |
| read the tea leaves | 察言观色、审时度势 |
| roundup | roundup(汇总) |
| senior editor | 高级编辑 |
| Shark Tank | Shark Tank(美国知名创业投资真人秀节目,保留原文) |
| show notes | 节目备注 |
| slice and dice | 切片和细分(数据分析术语) |
| speaking circuit | 演讲圈 |
| Strategist | Strategist(《纽约杂志》的一个栏目名称,保留原文) |
| Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles | 《忍者神龟》 |
| teleprompter | 提词器 |
| The Cold Start Problem | 《The Cold Start Problem》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control | 《The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Rock | ”巨石” The Rock(知名演员/ wrestler,保留原文写法,加通用中译) |
| Wall Street Journal | 《华尔街日报》 |
| wellness | 健康养生 |
| wire | 通讯社 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
如何为你的产品获得媒体报道 | Jason Feifer(Entrepreneur 杂志主编)
如何为你的产品获得媒体报道 | Jason Feifer(Entrepreneur 杂志主编)
文字记录
媒体并不关心你
Jason Feifer: 编辑也好,记者也好,我就尽可能直白地说吧——他们不关心你。他们不关心你。他们关心的是自己的读者、听众或观众。那才是他们在乎的人,那才是他们服务的对象。如果你能提供有用的信息,帮助他们服务于自己的受众,那你就能得到你想要的。但你不能把他们当成服务提供商来对待,因为他们不是。所以你必须带着理解去接触他们——理解他们想为受众做什么,以及你如何融入其中。因为如果你做不到这一点,他们对你毫无兴趣。
Lenny: 今天我的嘉宾是 Jason Feifer。Jason 是 Entrepreneur 杂志的主编,此前曾是 Fast Company 以及其他多家杂志的编辑。他同时也是作者、播客主持人、主题演讲人和创业公司顾问。在这次对话中,我们非常务实地讨论了如何为你的产品获得媒体报道。Jason 分享了如何向记者推介、如何找到合适的记者去联系、应该考虑哪些媒体、为什么自由撰稿人更有可能报道你的故事、为什么媒体的定位使命在推介时如此重要,以及通过什么渠道联系记者、如何定义你的目标和媒体报道的成功标准,还有更多内容。
我从这次对话中学到了很多,如果你正在为自己的产品寻求媒体报道,你一定能在这里找到大量有价值的内容。那么,让我为你介绍 Jason Feifer。
Jason Feifer: Lenny,谢谢你邀请我。
Lenny: 这是我的荣幸。我们最近其实在几件事上有过合作,聊天时我向你请教如何帮我正在合作的一家创业公司获得媒体报道,你分享了一堆非常厉害的建议,所以我就问你是否愿意来这个播客,为创业公司分享类似的关于如何获得媒体报道的建议,于是我们就坐在这里了。
Jason Feifer: 是的,我很高兴你邀请我做这件事。这是人们经常问我的问题。我在媒体行业干了几十年,在许多不同的杂志工作过。当然,我现在负责 Entrepreneur 杂志,但我也曾在 Fast Company、Men’s Health 工作过,所以我对媒体的不同侧面都有所了解。媒体是一个非常容易被误解的工具,尤其是对商业领域的人来说,所以我很喜欢帮大家揭开它的面纱。
Lenny: 太好了,我也很期待学习这些,谢谢你来做这件事。
Jason Feifer: 嗯。
媒体人每天收到多少推介
Lenny: 第一个问题是,作为媒体人,你每天收到来自创业公司创始人和公关人员希望你们报道他们的量有多大?另外,和你合作的记者那边的情况又如何?
Jason Feifer: 嗯,量非常大,大到离谱。我估计到我们录完这期播客的时候,我的收件箱里大概会多出——我也不知道,大概 30 到 50 条推介吧。整天都在涌入。当然要说明的是,其中大部分是垃圾,真正意义上的垃圾。大量的完全不相关的新闻稿同时发给我和无数其他人。但在这之中,确实有一些人花时间专门针对我来联系。媒体行业的每个人都会收到类似量级的邮件。要联系媒体行业的人,就意味着你要在大量的噪音中让自己的声音被听到。
Lenny: 哇。我想我们后面会聊到这个,但我很好奇,这些邮件中 PR 人员和新闻稿占多少比例,创始人或自己动手来联系的人又占多少?
Jason Feifer: 我收到的创始人直接联系我的比例很低,大概 20% 到 25%。剩下的 75% 是各种形式的 PR,要么是有人有针对性地专门联系我,要么是群发的新闻稿。
Lenny: 你知道疯狂的是什么吗——我现在也开始收到大量这类东西了。人们以为我是某种记者,就直接给我发什么”禁播公告”、“产品发布”之类的。
Jason Feifer: 这不需要什么门槛,因为你就是被加到了某个列表上。而且很有意思的一点——我们后面会聊到 PR——你能从中深刻洞察到那个行业面临的挑战:很多东西完全是自动化的。很多做 PR 的人并没有认真思考如何把合适的故事讲给合适的潜在媒体听。相反,他们只是在玩一个数字游戏,把内容群发给所有人。
Jason Feifer: 这就意味着你可能会陷入一种情况……我自己写一份 newsletter,对吧。Entrepreneur 杂志显然是人们会去推介的目标,但我还有一份 newsletter,里面我不采访任何人,没有任何被报道的机会,但我依然会收到发到这份 newsletter 的推介,因为有人看到了它,把它丢进某个电子表格里,然后就……我就开始收到了。我觉得这对那些花钱请人做这种事的创业者来说是一种真正的伤害,我真的很讨厌这种情况。
Lenny: 对。好,我们马上就进入正题,聊聊到底怎么做好这件事,但在此之前还有几个问题先铺垫一下背景。一个是关于影响力的。你见过媒体报道对初创公司在产品增长方面带来了什么样的影响?
媒体报道的实际影响力
Jason Feifer: 影响范围非常大。有创业者告诉我,单篇 Entrepreneur 杂志的报道——不管是纸质版还是线上版——带来的应用下载量或销售额,超过他们当月所有付费营销投放的总和。但我也听创业者说,报道对他们没有任何效果,或者只带来了一个非常具体的效果——比如某个潜在合作伙伴看到了文章后主动联系,由此展开了一段有意义的对话。各种情况都有。这一点非常重要,大家必须记住:我不认为你应该把媒体报道当作增长策略来孤注一掷。它是一个很好的加分项。但如果你觉得单靠媒体报道就能解决你的问题,那你就错了——它或许可以,但实在太不可预测了。
Lenny: 关于这方面,还有没有其他建议——比如什么时候值得花时间去获取媒体报道,是初创公司的阶段、类型,还是什么?有没有什么大致的判断标准,比如”你不应该在这上面花时间”对比”这对你来说是个很好的机会”?
什么时候该追求媒体报道
Jason Feifer: 把媒体报道和融资一样来看待——你在清楚知道钱要用来做什么的时候才去融资,你也应该在清楚知道报道要用来做什么的时候才去追求报道。很多人在非常早期的阶段就联系我,即使我们报道了他们,也不会给他们带来任何东西。他们还没到能用媒体报道做任何有意义的事情的阶段,所以现在去追求它确实没有意义。你应该退一步,认真想清楚一个起点问题:“我需要媒体报道来做什么?“如果你能给出一个切实的回答——比如我需要为一个新产品提升知名度,或者我准备出去融资了,需要一些文章来证明市场对我认真看待——这些都是好的理由。
但我收到大量邮件。有意思的是,人们……尤其是创业者,他们真的很脆弱,有时候这也是一种可爱的品质。有时候人们会直接给我发邮件说:“你知道吗,我工作很努力,我觉得我值得被报道。“我尊重这一点,在某种程度上我也能感同身受,因为我自己也在为自己的作品争取关注。但”我值得”不是一个好的商业战术决策,它对你没有任何实际帮助。所以把这种想法放到一边,只把媒体报道当作——就像你不会在不知道钱要用来做什么的时候去融资一样,你也不应该在不知道报道要用来做什么的时候去追求报道。
Lenny: 我很想听听其他反面例子。因为就像我说的,作为旁观者,我总是希望能让产品获得更多关注,让更多人知道、更多人去试用。你有没有什么例子或想法,说明在某些时刻或对某些产品来说,其实没必要这么做?
选对目标媒体
Jason Feifer: 很多时候,问题甚至不在于时机,而在于媒体的选择。我举个例子。有一次我在一个活动上演讲,结束后一个哥们走过来,他在华盛顿特区经营一个小的热狗餐车生意。他说他有好几辆餐车,热狗卖得不错,想要在 Entrepreneur 杂志上获得专题报道。他问:“我怎么能被报道?“他这种直觉的问题在于,他把精力花在了错误的地方。因为如果他在华盛顿特区卖热狗,那我能理解媒体报道对他来说意味着什么——就是推动热狗销量。这正是他想要的。但 Entrepreneur 帮不了他。到此为止。为什么?因为 Entrepreneur 的受众是全国乃至国际范围的。
这意味着,看到这个人报道的读者中,99.5% 的人根本没办法去买他的热狗,也就是说那些努力都白费了。当然,在会上过来跟我聊聊也没费多大力气。但你把这个规模放大——他要发多少封类似的邮件?他要花多少精力去追逐那些最终对他没有直接价值的东西?他需要做的是想一想:“好,我的目标是让更多人买热狗。我在哪里?我在华盛顿特区。我怎么触达对我的市场感兴趣的吃货?“所以别再追逐 Entrepreneur 了,去追逐本地的美食博主,或者《Washingtonian》的美食版块,或者类似的地方媒体。这个小小的转变就能让你的努力获得大得多的回报。
Lenny: 这个例子很好地过渡到我们接下来要深入讨论的话题——到底该怎么去获取媒体报道。我知道你——
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 你有一套三步结构来思考这个问题。要不先说说哪三步,然后我们再逐一展开。
获取媒体报道的三步法
Jason Feifer: 好,没问题。其实挺简单的。第一步是准备。你要思考如何讲述你的故事,要思考我刚才谈到的那些东西——媒体报道对你来说是为了什么?所有你需要做的,都是为了明确方向:这是一个什么样的机会,我为什么要追求它,以及如何最大化利用它。第二步是确定向谁推介。不是所有媒体都一样,没有理由毫无目标地到处追逐。热狗的例子就很说明问题。
所以,找到你真正要联系的、对你最有可能有积极回应的撰稿人和编辑。同时,因为你做好了准备,你就能想清楚如何以他们感兴趣的方式来讲你的故事。这个我们后面会聊。第三步就是正式的推介。联系这些人、与撰稿人和编辑建立联系意味着什么?怎么找到他们?给他们发什么?跟他们说什么?就这么简单。
但你需要理解的是,你正在进入一个跟你想象中运作方式可能完全不同的世界。作为推介的接收方,我时刻都能看到这一点。人们不了解他们在联系的是谁,也不了解我和我的同事们是怎么思考的。我们也许应该先从这里讲起,因为一件非常重要的事情需要理解……
Lenny: 对,从这里开始吧。
Jason Feifer: ……对,拿投资人打比方,如果你不了解一个投资人做什么、对什么感兴趣、投资什么类型的公司,你不会去联系他们。对媒体也不能这样做。所以我每天都会收到这样的推介:“怎样才能在 Entrepreneur 杂志获得报道(coverage)?怎样才能在 Entrepreneur 杂志得到一个专题报道?” 对我来说,这总感觉像他们在向我点汉堡,就像在说”怎样才能在 Entrepreneur 汉堡店买到一个汉堡,对吧?” 他们把我当成了服务提供商,好像我的工作就是提供媒体报道。
媒体不是服务提供商
我理解这一点,因为当然,如果你是一个创业者,你在寻求媒体报道,那么……[听不清] 那些撰稿人和编辑看起来是写人的行业,因此他们似乎提供某种服务,而你在想办法获得这种服务。但媒体不是这样看待自己的,对吧。编辑、撰稿人,我就直说了吧,他们不在乎你。他们不在乎你。他们在乎的是他们的读者,或者听众,或者观众。
那才是他们在乎的人。那才是他们服务的人。如果你能对他们有用,分享他们想要服务于其受众的那类信息,那你就能得到你想要的,但你不能把他们当作服务提供商,因为他们不是。所以你必须理解他们想为受众做什么,以及你如何能融入其中,然后带着这种理解去接触他们。因为如果你不理解,他们对你没有兴趣。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个观点。更具体地说,他们到底想为受众做什么?我想就是提供一些受众想读的有趣内容,一些能学到的东西,一些让人看了觉得”哇,我真的很期待读这个”的东西,对吧?
Jason Feifer: 对,但这会根据每家媒体的使命更加具体化。比如,我在两家不同的商业刊物工作过。我在 Fast Company 做了好几年高级编辑(senior editor),现在是 Entrepreneur 杂志的主编(editor-in-chief)。一个故事是否适合某家刊物,在这两家刊物之间的判断标准是完全不同的。我现在不能代表 Fast Company 说话了,因为他们经历了几次领导层变动,我不知道他们现在的使命是什么,但当年我在那里工作的时候,在 Bob Safian 手下——他是主编——那真的是一本关于商业未来走向的杂志,杂志里的故事都应该在某种程度上代表商业的演进。
每家媒体的使命不同
所以当人们来推介时,我们真正在找的是,这个人做的事情中有没有什么洞见,能让其他人读了之后说,“啊哈,这帮我理解了这个行业或那个行业的发展方向,或者帮我思考如何调整自己的公司来适应当前趋势”,诸如此类的东西。Entrepreneur 就完全不同了,使命不一样。我对 Entrepreneur 的理解是,它甚至不是一本关于商业的杂志。它是一本关于思维的杂志。或者说,我想确保每一个来到这本杂志的人都能获得关于如何思考解决商业挑战的深刻洞见。
所以当有人联系我时,我在寻找的是,他们是否做出了某个有趣的、反直觉的决策,解决了他们商业中的一个难题。我要强调”中”。因为很多时候,当人们听到我说解决商业中的问题时,他们会想,“啊哈,但我确实解决了商业中的问题啊,对吧。我发现世界上没有最好的剃须刀,于是我做出了最好的剃须刀。” 这不是我在说的。我说的是——有一个叫 Joelle Mertzel 的女性,她有一家叫 Kitchen Concepts Unlimited 的公司,她做了一种黄油碟,一种非常聪明的黄油碟,因为它是用铰链设计的,对吧。这是为了解决一个非常具体的问题而设计的。Lenny,我不知道你是否知道这一点,我以前也不知道——你不需要把黄油放进冰箱。你知道吗?
Lenny: 我在理智上知道这一点,但我还是把它放冰箱里。我知道有些人不这样做。
Jason Feifer: 我也是,即使我跟她就此进行过多次对话。你不需要把黄油放进冰箱,而且如果你把它放在外面,它切起来更容易,更容易涂抹。大问题就出在黄油碟上。大多数黄油碟你就是直接掀开的。所以如果你有温热的、室温的、柔软的黄油,你掀起黄油碟盖子的时候,可能会碰到黄油,搞得一团糟。所以 Joelle 做了一种用铰链连接的黄油碟,每次开关的方式完全一样,不会弄脏。很聪明,解决了一个问题。她因为这个产品联系了我。这对我们来说并不有趣。也许对一本烹饪杂志来说很有趣,对吧。也许 Bon Appétit 会对此感兴趣。Entrepreneur 不感兴趣,因为这不能帮助其他创业者去思考那个问题。
Entrepreneur 在寻找什么样的故事
但她后来告诉了我另一件事。她告诉我说,在这件事的最开始,她试图弄清楚关于受众的一些基本问题,比如他们想要什么颜色的黄油碟,他们愿意付多少钱。她想做一些市场调研。她去找了一家市场调研公司,她说,“调研消费者并回答这些问题要花多少钱?” 他们说,一万美元。她没有一万美元。然后有一天,她坐在机场等登机,她环顾四周,意识到机场里到处都是没有任何比回答黄油碟问题更好的事情可做的人,对吧。没有更好的事可做,就坐在那里。你可以从一号登机口开始,等你走到八号登机口的时候,一号登机口的人已经全部换新了,你可以从头再来一遍。你可以有晚上六点的航班,然后早上九点就到。没人会阻止你。你可以在机场做一整天。她就是这样开始自己做市场调研的。她省下了那一万美元,自己完成了调研。我把这个故事写进了杂志。它很微小,就是一个不知名的小公司和一个小小的决策。但我之所以这样做,是因为每次我向创业者重复这个故事,他们都会说,“呃,对,没错。总是有其他办法来做事情的。” 他们喜欢其中的独创性。这就是我在寻找的东西。这就是 Entrepreneur 的故事。所以回到你刚才说的那个观点,这不仅仅是关于——“嗯,这本杂志叫 Entrepreneur,他们一定是写创业者的,对吧。我是个创业者。我应该在 Entrepreneur 里面。”
人们一直这样想。不是的。你必须退后一步,去读这些媒体在发布什么,然后问自己,“他们在做什么?这里的目的是什么?” 编辑和撰稿人,他们在决定什么内容进入这本杂志,他们在决定故事如何构建。他们为什么这样做?他们试图触达谁?当你开始透过这个镜头来看,你就会开始看到模式,你就会真正理解向这些媒体推介到底意味着什么——一份真正的操作手册。
如何读懂一家媒体的使命
Lenny: 这是一个非常有趣的洞见。我完全不知道这是你应该去思考的东西。有没有简单的方法来理解一家媒体的使命?他们通常会在”关于”页面上放这些吗,还是像你说的,就是读一堆内容然后自己摸索出来?
Jason Feifer: 没有人会用这种方式发布”关于”页面,因为这是编辑团队的内部逻辑。但你确实可以根据这家媒体试图触达的人群做出一些初步假设。每家媒体都在试图触达某个人群。当内容越偏综合性,事情就越复杂,对吧。《纽约时报》是什么?
它的使命是什么?这很难回答。你得把它拆分成不同的板块来看。国内新闻编辑室的使命不同于商业编辑室的使命,甚至在商业板块内部,周日商业版的使命也不同于周一到周六商业版的使命。
Lenny: [听不清]
Jason Feifer: 所以你必须开始真正地拆解它。这也是人们雇佣 PR 的原因——如果他们称职的话,他们已经了解很多这些了。但我确实认为,如果你花时间去阅读内容,并以此为起点:“我理解这家媒体试图触达 X 人群,他们试图触达这些人”,那你就能开始看到他们所做之事的模式。他们是如何讲述故事的?这五篇文章有什么共同之处?它们一定有共同之处。它们都在做某件事,你完全可以通过察言观色来摸索出规律。
准备工作的核心要素
Lenny: 太好了。我们好像已经进入了第一步——关于准备工作。准备获得媒体报道还涉及哪些方面?
Jason Feifer: 如果我们谈的是准备工作,你需要做的第一件事就是我之前说过的——问自己,我需要媒体报道来做什么?你需要对这个问题有一个好的回答。一旦你有了答案,下一步应该开始思考:“我的业务有什么有趣的?“而很多时候,有趣的地方未必是你以为的那个。你可以被第二步引导——当你开始思考你要联系谁的时候。因为,比如,有人讲给 Entrepreneur 听的故事,和讲给 Cosmo 听的故事会不一样。
一家公司完全有可能同时出现在 Entrepreneur 和 Cosmo 上,对吧。也许这个产品面向的是年轻女性。那么 Cosmo 可能会对某种产品专题报道感兴趣,或者把它纳入某类产品的 roundup 合集。而 Entrepreneur 则会做创业者导向的故事——这位创始人做了什么?他们是怎么做的?你可以把自己的故事拆成许多不同的小片段,然后想清楚哪个片段该投给哪家媒体。但人们经常犯的错误是反过来做——他们先决定自己想要在世界上传播什么样的叙事,然后拿着这个叙事去各家媒体兜售。我整天都收到这种东西。
我收件箱里的大量推介来自那些根本没有想过 Entrepreneur 发什么内容的人,他们只是有一个想要传播出去的东西。一个很蠢但很典型的例子:昨天有人给我发邮件,说某家公司刚刚聘请了一位新总裁。我不关心这个。这对我的受众毫无用处。我确信有行业媒体会感兴趣——假设这是一家餐饮行业的公司,那肯定有专门追踪餐饮行业动态的行业媒体会对你的新总裁感兴趣。但我不感兴趣,因为你聘请了那位新总裁对我的受众没有用。Entrepreneur 上的故事并不是真正关于我写的那个人。
它们真正是关于受众的——是通过我写的那些人的故事来服务受众。那条消息对我没用。我希望他们能花点时间想一想这个问题,但他们没有。所以一旦你开始思考你要触达的是谁,你就可以退一步说:“那我经历中的哪一部分对他们最相关?“而且我会推动你真正非常有创意地去想这件事。因为回到 Butterie 的例子,那个黄油盘,那个关于机场的有趣小故事——还有谁会写这个?它不是她品牌故事的核心,也不是她销售推介的核心。它只是给我们的。我们大概是世界上唯一一家在意那个故事的媒体,但我确实很在意。
明确你的目标
Lenny: 太棒了。好的,我来总结一下你刚才分享的:想清楚你的目标——你希望通过媒体报道获得什么?目标可能是让人们了解我们做了什么、某个新东西、吸引投资者兴趣。你还见过哪些常见的获取媒体报道的目标?
Jason Feifer: 让人了解某个新东西。但不一定非要是新东西,也可以只是持续增长,或者试图打入一个新市场。这些都行。任何与增长或触达新客户群相关的——
Lenny: 懂了。
Jason Feifer: 都是合理的。
Lenny: 有道理。
Jason Feifer: 但也可能你想要在自身所在的市场中重新定位自己。比如,我看到很多人——很多大公司——一直敲我的门,因为我们不只听到创业公司的声音,我们也会听到大公司来推介故事。我知道他们为什么想上 Entrepreneur。他们想上 Entrepreneur 是因为他们试图将自己的品牌定位为也与小企业主相关。有这种背景信息是有帮助的,因为 Entrepreneur 的报道可以帮助他们走向市场并说:“看,我们也在触达 X、Y、Z 人群。”
所以有时候这甚至不是关于转化,而是关于定位,这也是一个很好的理由去推你自己的高管出场。有时候只是为了让你的 CEO 或创始人在某个领域建立权威性——因为你希望他们更值得信赖,希望他们被邀请参加更多会议。因为所有这些都会给公司带来更多关注,做这些事有各种各样的原因。然后还有试图接触投资者、接触合作伙伴。听着,变得可见有一百万个理由是有用的,但你必须确保你理解自己到底想要做什么。
是否应该雇佣 PR 代理
Lenny: 好的,太好了,这真的很有帮助。所以总结一下:想清楚你获取媒体报道的目标是什么,选择一家媒体并理解他们的使命和目标,然后想一些你觉得他们会兴奋分享的、与他们使命相关的有趣故事来推介——而不是”我们有了新总裁”这种。
Jason Feifer: 没错。
Lenny: 在这个话题上,我知道我们想谈谈该联系谁、怎么确定该和谁谈。我脑子里冒出几个问题。这些工作量很大,创始人们都很忙。
Jason Feifer: 是啊,工作量很大。
Lenny: 所以就引出了这个问题——PR 代理公司,你对它们有看法吗?你会推荐与 PR 代理合作吗?什么时候该用、什么时候不该用?
PR 代理公司的利与弊
Jason Feifer: 是的,我说的一切都是巨大的工作量。而且让我说清楚,有些人完全没做我描述的任何一件事,照样成功获得了媒体报道,因为世界上总有碰运气这回事。你完全可能随便给某个编辑发封邮件,人家恰好感兴趣。这是完全有可能的。你可以把我刚才说的全当耳旁风。我真正在帮你做的,是优化你的方法。不过话说回来,聘请 PR 代理确实可以省掉大量工作。你不用自己做调研,不用自己思考这些难题。你合作的人完全知道如何挖掘你故事中最有趣的部分,然后把它们变成好的推介。那为什么不所有人都这么做呢?有几个原因。第一,成本——PR 可能很贵,你需要把这个因素考虑进去。第二,PR 是一段——我说是”可以是”——非常令人沮丧的经历,因为很多 PR 从业者在自己的工作上做得很差。非常差。
这不仅仅是我在贬低 PR 从业者。我真的被邀请去 PR 行业大会上做过主题演讲。我站上台说大多数 PR 从业者都做得很差,台下所有人都点头。他们都心里有数。当然,他们中没有谁觉得自己是那个做得差的,但他们都知道这一点。PR 行业里充满了在岗位上做得差的人。他们为什么做得差?因为他们懒,因为他们主要靠邮件群发,就是广撒网式地往外发东西,因为他们对”传播消息”的理解还停留在比较老的方式上。比如,如果你聘请或接触一家 PR 代理,他们建议你花钱做的事情之一是发新闻稿——那种传统意义上的新闻稿——那就赶紧跑,跑得越远越好。我不知道你是否了解这一点。你了解吗?新闻稿——确实有一些特定目的需要发新闻稿,但它已经不再是吸引媒体报道的主要手段了。
Lenny: 我有这种感觉。
Jason Feifer: 对。但有意思的是什么呢。一家我不太推荐的 PR 代理可能会这样做。他们会告诉你:“我们来写一份关于这个新东西的新闻稿,所以你得额外付一点钱用于生产这份新闻稿,然后再付分发这份新闻稿的费用,因为我们会把它发到通讯社上。“因为市面上有一大堆新闻稿分发平台。他们会这么做,你付了钱,新闻稿上了通讯社。然后他们会给你发一份报告,列出这篇新闻稿出现在了哪些地方——它出现在了 Yahoo Finance 上,出现在了 Market Watch 上。技术上确实如此。新闻稿确实在那里,确实被发布了。但全世界零个人会看到它,因为 Yahoo Finance 有一个板块,他们就是把所有这些不同分发商发布的每一篇新闻稿都直接贴上去。根本没有人会去看。
所以不要把在大网站上发布新闻稿和真正的成功混为一谈。你真正需要的是一个只专注于一件事的 PR 人,那就是——关系。一个 PR 人最重要的资产,是与媒体从业者的活跃关系。为什么?如果一个 PR 人向你保证一定能拿到媒体报道,那是另一个你应该立刻夺门而出的理由,因为 PR 人无法控制这件事。作者和编辑们想做什么是他们自己的事。这是一个完全主观的行业,非常令人沮丧。我完全理解这一点——它就是完全主观的。所以一个 PR 人能做的最好的事情就是:塑造你的故事,知道该向谁推介,然后让那个作者或编辑看到它、注意到它。这个世界上有一些 PR 人我非常欣赏。我觉得他们极其聪明,在自己做的事情上非常出色,而且他们只在确实认为我会感兴趣的时候才向我推介。而不是像很多 PR 人那样,每周或每天给我发一些随机的东西。
那些人发的信息我不看。但是——不知道算不算点名表扬——当 Jack Taylor PR 的 John Beer 给我发消息时……John,我十年前因 PR 工作认识他,后来成了朋友。他给我发邮件,我会看。我不会每次都写,不会仅仅因为我喜欢 John 就去写什么,但我会认真看。说实话,认真看就赢了一半,因为媒体从业者收到的邮件太多了。所以你需要的是这样一个人:了解你,了解你的行业,认识并且知道该联系谁,而且真正尊重你作为创业者,会给你坦诚的、哪怕不好听的反馈。因为有很多人去找 PR 代理时会说:“我要你给这家、这家、这家、这家、这家媒体发邮件。“如果那个 PR 人就照做了,那他们所做的不过是在骚扰自己的联系人——如果他们自己都不觉得这些内容有意义的话。你应该欢迎 PR 人对你提出反对意见,对你说:“你知道吗?我觉得你的故事不适合那家媒体。原因如下。“这种人才是你应该聘请的。
Lenny: 还有其他你觉得很棒的 PR 人想提一下吗?
Jason Feifer: 这个挑战在于,我肯定会后悔漏掉一大堆没能立刻想到的人——
Lenny: 我们可以把其他人放在节目备注里。
值得推荐的 PR 代理与从业者
Jason Feifer: 好,没问题。来想想看。凭记忆,Jack Taylor 的 John,他做很多健康养生类的业务。PR 代理机构往往有各自的专攻领域,所以你要确保找的是真正了解你和你所接触的媒体生态的人。我觉得 John 非常聪明。再看看——Hannah Lee Communications 的 Hannah Lee,在酒店餐饮方面很厉害。所以餐厅、酒店、酒类,他们非常在行。Jen Sesquila——Jen 抱歉如果我把你的名字念错了。Max Borges Agency,在消费类产品方面非常出色。Greg Delman,他在旧金山,有一家精品店叫 G3 Media,做了很多科技创业公司相关的事,非常了解那个圈子。我经常通过 Greg 找到作者,因为他认识所有人。我最近刚给他发短信说:“我需要一个能写某个非常具体的 AI 话题的人。“他当时正好在 TechCrunch Disrupt 大会上,找到了一位自由撰稿人并把我们联系上了。这太好了。所以这四位。我会有更多给你放到节目备注里。
Lenny: 太好了。好的,这真的非常有用。如果我们聊天过程中还想起来谁,随时再提。一个类似的问题——当人们在考虑要争取哪些媒体时,假设你是一个创业公司创始人。你有没有一个可以分享的清单,就是大概:“这里可能是你最应该考虑的前五到十家媒体?“那些显而易见的——你提到了 Entrepreneur 杂志、Inc.、TechCrunch 当然也在其中。还有其他可以说的吗,就是”这是一份很好的起步清单”?
如何选择目标媒体
Jason Feifer: 说实话,这真的很大程度上取决于你想要做什么。你可能是一个创业公司创始人,而 Entrepreneur 和 Inc 和 Fast Company 也许有充分的理由不在你的清单前列,因为你是创业公司创始人,但你现在的目标是触达消费者。这些媒体不触达消费者,也不触达处于购买心态的人。它们触达的是处于创造心态的人。所以我会预期,如果你有一家创业公司,而这家公司在某种程度上不是 B2B 的,那么商业媒体可能不是你现在的目标,这可能是非常合理的。也许 Men’s Health 才是。也许,谁知道呢,什么都可能。我觉得人们往往倾向于在自己太近的范围内去想自己属于哪里。Lenny,这里有一种真实常见的对话场景——有人会给我发邮件,我不会回复每一个 PR 人。
这确实不可能。我一天根本没有那么多时间。但我确实尽力回复每一个联系我的创业者,因为我觉得他们值得一个回应。有时候有人给我发邮件,发来一些东西,但就是不相关。我会回复说:“嘿,谢谢。恭喜你做出了这些成果。但这不适合 Entrepreneur。“大约每个月会有一个人以一种很不耐烦的方式回应,他们会说:“但你们不是写创业者的吗?我是一个很好的创业者成功故事啊。“答案是否定的,这不是我们做的事。是的,创业者会出现在我们的报道中,但不是的,我们不是一个创业者名录。这里有一个很好的思路——如果你有一家创业公司,正在想应该出现在哪些媒体上,去看看你的竞争对手曾经出现在哪些媒体。这是一个很好的起点。他们触达了哪些受众?他们是怎么做的?这应该能给你一些关于下一步该怎么走的方向。
Lenny: 非常好的建议。关于 TechCrunch,你有没有一个视角——值得投资精力去争取在 TechCrunch 上被报道吗?
Jason Feifer: 我跟你说一个我个人的媒体报道经历,然后我觉得它也能回答关于 TechCrunch 的问题。
Lenny: 太好了。
报道的真正价值
Jason Feifer: 好。到目前为止我们还没谈到的一点,这几乎是跳过了我们列出的所有步骤,直接到了你获得媒体报道之后会发生什么。媒体报道的目的,有时是为了触达正在阅读它的人。你在 Entrepreneur 上获得了报道,创业者会读到它,也许会有好的结果。但有时报道的目的根本不是为了触达阅读它的人。可能只有很少的人会读到它——顺便说一下,这是一个非常、非常现实的可能性。因为虽然我提到的所有这些媒体——Entrepreneur、Forbes、Fortune、Inc、Fast Company 等等——它们触达数百万人,它们的网站每个月有数千万的独立访客。但这并不意味着你的文章会被数百万人读到。
事实上,最大的可能性是你的文章会触达五千到一万人,一小部分人,因为这些媒体发布海量的内容。所以你可能拿到了这篇文章,它看起来很棒,但可能触达不了那么多人。这可能也没关系。因为也许在你逻辑中,获得那种报道的原因本来就不是为了触达那家媒体的受众。也许你真正想做的是把它发到推特上,然后花点钱推广那条推特,因为这样你就可以把”你获得了报道”这个信息精准投放给你希望注意到你的人。
我看到很多人这么做。他们会拿我们在 Entrepreneur 上发的文章,基本上把它们变成广告。这真的非常聪明,因为他们从 Entrepreneur 获得的是社会声望。是市场中的信任背书。然后他们自己要拿这个去做些什么。这真的很聪明。你也会看到,有时候获得报道的原因只是为了让它能放在你的网站上。“曾见于”——曾见于可能比任何人真正去读那篇文章更有价值。他们可能不会去读那篇文章。你甚至都不用在网站上给它加链接。你只需要能说出”曾见于”就行了。因为同样,它给了你那种信任背书。
就我个人而言,我正在和我的朋友 Nicole Lapin 一起打造一家小型播客公司。Nicole Lapin 是一位畅销商业理财专家。我们有一家公司,她是创始人,我是顾问。公司叫 Money News Network。我们上面有一档叫 Help Wanted 的播客,我们一起主持。我们在 Variety 上获得了报道。那是我们敲了很多门、终于让 Variety 的某个人产生了兴趣的结果,他们写了一篇关于我们的文章。我们从 Variety 那篇文章中得到了什么吗?答案是——什么都没有。但你最好相信,我们发给每一个潜在广告主、每一个合作伙伴的每一封邮件,都包含那个链接——Variety 报道了我们。而且我保证,当有人收到那封邮件时,它会让他们更加重视。
我自己联系别人的时候也用了很多次。它就是能给你那种信任背书。所以有时你要找的是一个可以四处展示的奖杯。我敢打赌 TechCrunch 也是一样,这才是你最初问题的答案。为什么要把融资公告发到 TechCrunch 上?大概不是因为有人会在 TechCrunch 上读到它就关心你,而是因为你可以把它用在你自己的用途上。有时候这比报道本身更有价值。
Lenny: 这是一个非常棒的洞察。这也让你意识到,你可能在花了大量时间争取到一篇 Entrepreneur 的报道后,觉得并不成功——“哦,什么都没发生。“但好处可能在之后才到来——几周、几个月、几年后,当你开始分享那篇报道的时候。
Jason Feifer: 完全正确。这里面很多在于你自己怎么利用它。
Lenny: 太好了。好吧,这真的非常有意思。好,让我们谈谈第二步。最初你做了准备,我们讨论了如何思考该争取谁以及使命和目标。然后到了第二步,就是搞清楚在一家媒体应该联系谁。
第二步:找到正确的联系人
Jason Feifer: 对。很多人犯的错误是直接给我发邮件。他们想要在 Entrepreneur 获得报道,就给我发邮件。我理解为什么给我发邮件。主要有两个原因。第一,我是 Entrepreneur 最显眼的编辑人员,所以很容易找到我,很容易找到我的邮箱地址。另外他们就是假设——主编嘛,做所有决定的人。但不是的。你想想看,如果你在 Amazon 买了个东西出了问题,你不会给 Bezos 发邮件。他太忙了。我不是拿自己跟 Bezos 比。但我确实是 Entrepreneur 最忙的编辑人员——不管这有多大价值。而我确实不是你应该推介的对象,因为我的工作其实不是挑选进入杂志的文章。我的工作是和各位编辑合作,他们发展自己的想法,然后我来说:“哦,这个不错”,或者”哦,我们再打磨一下”。我不怎么直接寻找选题。所以你真的应该从查看谁在写你的领域开始。
Jason Feifer: 你可以通过浏览网站来做到这一点,也可以通过 Google 搜索来找到答案。每家媒体的架构都不一样。有些人有专门的条线。有些媒体会说:“这是负责交通条线的人。“有些媒体则没有。Entrepreneur 其实不一定是条线制的。但如果你仔细看,就能搞清楚。“哦,那位编辑明显对美食感兴趣。那位作者明显对美食感兴趣。美食方面的稿子好像都是他们写的。“还有一个好办法,同样是从这家媒体出发,然后看看他们是怎么报道你的竞争对手的。一个很好的例子是,我曾经给一个人做咨询,他有一家很有趣的花生酱公司。想象一下花生酱版的 Ben and Jerry’s——就是加了各种配料的花生酱,还有有趣的名字。他在想办法怎么获得媒体报道。他最初的想法——也就是他来找我咨询的原因——是”嗯,我是一个创业者,我经营一家公司,我应该上 Entrepreneur”。
我说:“不不不,你不应该,因为我们的读者没有谁会去买你的花生酱。那你的目标受众是谁?谁在买你的东西?“他说:“千禧一代的妈妈们。“我说:“很好。那 Cosmo 就是一个触达她们的好渠道。那我们来看看 Cosmo 是怎么报道零食的。“我不知道他们怎么报道零食,我不看 Cosmo,但我们来查查看。这不难。我上了 cosmopolitan.com,搜索了零食。我立刻就发现了很多文章,基本上都是 roundup(汇总)类的,并且锚定在某个时效性节点上。比如”情人节十大零食”,“我们最爱的十款秋季新品零食”之类的。全是这种东西。所以现在我们知道了,他们不会为你的花生酱公司写一篇一千字的 feature。相反,你能期望的最好结果就是进入这些季节性的 roundup。
善用自由撰稿人
下一步,谁在写这些东西?我们来看看。打开几篇文章。署名就在那里。你可以点击署名,看看这个人是做什么的。很多时候,也许是美食编辑,也许是生活方式编辑,等等。你会看到他们负责什么领域。然后你就能很好地理解该怎么包装你想要推介的东西了。现在,让我介绍另一种可能的选择。他们根本不是这家媒体的员工,他们是自由撰稿人。媒体大量使用自由撰稿人。自由撰稿人基本上就是独立承包商。他们是有活儿就接的写作者。有时他们跟媒体有较长期的合作,有时就是一次性合作。我妻子就是一名自由撰稿人。她经常给纽约时报、华盛顿邮报和卫报撰稿。关于她和我之间有一个很有意思的区别——我妻子叫 Jen Miller,这样我就不用一直说”我妻子”了。
Jen 日常作为自由撰稿人,比我更渴望找选题,因为 Jen 必须自己奔波才能吃饭。Jen 必须自己找选题,然后向媒体的编辑推介这些选题,推介成功了才有钱拿。所以她比我更有动力去寻找选题,因为我是 Entrepreneur 杂志的领薪员工。而且我的邮箱地址很容易找到,人们不停地给我发东西。我还想补充一点,一个好的记者、一个好的作者,其实并不是坐在那里等着别人来向自己推介,然后从中挑最好的来写。在他们看来,自己的工作是去发现对受众最有价值的东西。他们喜欢自己去大量发掘。所以他们不是坐在那里等着你的推介。事实上,你的推介必须克服他们自己去找东西的本能。
为什么自由撰稿人更值得联系
Jen 一直在不停地奔波。Jen 一直在不停地跟人交流。Jen 对世界充满好奇,会花大量时间去追踪线索。但如果有人读了她写的文章,然后说:“啊,我觉得我知道这个人对什么感兴趣”,然后找到她的邮箱地址给她发邮件——Jen 收到的推介比我少得多,她读到邮件的概率接近百分之百。而且如果推介跟她写稿的任何一家媒体相关,她认真对待的概率也比我高得多。所以有时候,去找那家媒体的正式员工其实不是你最好的选择。找到在做这件事的自由撰稿人,有时是更好的策略。
Lenny: 你分享的这些战术层面的洞察真的太有意思了,我很喜欢。关于自由撰稿人这个技巧,你怎么知道他们是自由撰稿人呢?署名里有什么标识吗?
Jason Feifer: 如果你在媒体网站上找到他们——比如你上了 Cosmo,点击了作者的个人简介。如果他们是正式员工,上面会写”staff”。如果不是正式员工,可能会写别的。可能写”writer”,可能写”contributor”。可能写”Jen Miller 是纽约布鲁克林的一位 writer”。但你也可以多走一步,直接 Google 搜索他们的名字,因为任何聪明的自由撰稿人都会有一个作品集网站,让人很容易找到他们。
Lenny: 太棒了。
Jason Feifer: 所以有时候只要把他们的名字拿去 Google 搜一下,你很快就能搞清楚他们是谁。
Lenny: 好的,让我来总结一下你到目前为止教给我们的东西。第一,想清楚那些能让你的目标受众看到你的媒体。在你举的例子里,Cosmo 就是一个很好的例子,因为那些读者会买这种花生酱。第二,不要想得太宽泛,要想到那家媒体里具体的写作者。不是”Cosmo 会写这个”,而是”Cosmo 里具体谁会写这个”。我们通过去他们网站搜索来找到这个人——你提到搜索你的竞争对手,但我觉得范围更广一些,只要是跟你领域相关的东西都可以,对吧?
Jason Feifer: 对,说得好。搜索你所在的品类。
Lenny: 甚至相邻领域的东西可能也足够接近了。然后关于自由撰稿人的这个技巧真的很棒——他们更饥渴,比你更有可能回应你的推介,相比那些在职的人。还有一点也很重要,就是他们的默认假设是这个推介不好,他们并不想要你的推介。但自由撰稿人感兴趣的概率更高,也更愿意认真看。
Jason Feifer: 对,自由撰稿人得吃饭。
Lenny: 太精彩了。关于在媒体里找到合适联系人这一步,还有什么想分享的吗?
理解”媒体”这个概念
Jason Feifer: 嗯,下一步就是如何真正联系他们并进行推介了。所以在这个阶段,我觉得我们已经讲得比较充分了。我很喜欢你的总结。我想对你总结中的某一点再展开说说——你做这么多事情,不仅仅是为了完成那些繁杂的案头工作。而是因为你需要理解,所谓的”媒体”——我们回头来翻译一下”媒体”这个概念——“媒体”这个词在各种不同语境下被使用,但用它来真正理解媒体其实是个很糟糕的方式,因为”媒体”让人感觉它是一个统一的实体。在政治领域,媒体会被批评为多家媒体在某种程度上合谋串通。但我们谈论媒体的方式,只是把它当作你要去联系的组织而已。
但实际上,这些不过是由个人组成的出版公司而已。这些个人都在做出相当主观的判断,决定自己要写什么。而且他们写的每一篇东西都要经过层层审批。比如,没有我的点头,任何东西都不可能登上纸质杂志。但同时,我也信任我的编辑们——他们对自己发现的好点子充满热情,并来说服我同意。所以你真正要做的,就是找到那个切入点——
Jason Feifer: 你真正要做的,就是找到进入一家媒体的切入点。因为在任何一个个体对你的兴趣足够大,以至于去跟另一个人说”我觉得这是个好选题”、而那个人也说”好”之前,什么报道都不会发生。
所以你必须找到自己的切入点。因为媒体不是一个协调一致的运作。它是一群人每天到岗,想尽办法为自己的受众做出最好的内容。
Lenny: 太精彩了。好的,这很自然地过渡到了最后一步,也就是真正让别人对你的东西感到兴奋,然后写你。
Jason Feifer: 那具体该怎么做呢?
Lenny: 对,怎么做呢?
真正联系媒体:该做什么,不该做什么
Jason Feifer: 这就是动真格的地方了,好。先说不要做的事:不要打电话——如果你搞到了他们的电话号码的话。这种事确实发生过。有人打我的私人手机号码。
Lenny: 哇,太过分了。
Jason Feifer: 虽然不常发生,但确实有。我甚至不知道他们从哪儿弄到我的号码。反正我不喜欢。
至于社交媒体的私信算不算合适的联系方式,媒体人对此看法不一。我个人觉得挺烦的。首先,私信的格式本身就不太适合,对吧?你在私信里写任何长一点的东西,到我这边看起来就是一坨没完没了的文字。
而且,怎么说呢,我的 Instagram 私信,我真的不觉得那是用来做推介的地方。但别人可能无所谓。所以你自己掂量着来吧。
邮件是最传统的方式。如果你知道某个人要在某个会议上发言,那很好,你可以过去跟他聊。但问题当然是——你发给他们的是什么?答案是这样的。
你真正发给他们的,其实是你在前两个步骤中所做工作的成果。因为你现在已经花了一些时间思考你的故事、你在向谁推介、那家媒体是什么样的,以及他们是如何向自己的受众讲故事的。
然后是你联系的那个人——你现在对他的写作方向和方式也有了一定的了解。你要把所有这些整合起来,提炼成一个他觉得有吸引力的呈现方式。
再说回之前那个类比——媒体报道和出去融资其实没那么不同。你去找投资人的时候,做的事也是类似的。
如果你跟十个投资人开了会,你跟他们谈论自己和公司的方式不应该完全一样,因为他们各自的切入点不同,投资 thesis 也不同。
你当然不是在骗人,你只是想尽可能做到定制化——把对他们个人、对他们公司的了解融入进去。媒体也是一样的道理。
邮件推介的具体写法
Jason Feifer: 所以所有这一切,最终最传统的呈现形式就是一封简短的邮件。一封简短的邮件推介。那它应该长什么样?说实话,这个问题没有神奇的答案。我希望有,但确实没有。没有固定格式。人们总是问我,邮件的主题行应该怎么写?
这是个好问题,但没有标准答案。我能给你的最接近答案的说法是——想象一下我的处境。想象我坐在电脑前,我手头有很多事在忙,我扫了一眼邮箱,40 封新邮件堆在那里。我的第一反应是尽快把它们全删掉,但我会逐封瞟一眼。
我不会每封都打开,但我会瞟一眼——也就是说我能看到主题行和预览文字,或者就是对方写的第一句话。你要做的,就是写出让我一看就知道这封邮件是专门发给我的东西。这是第一步。
因为我收件箱里的大多数邮件都不是专门发给我的。它们都是群发邮件,我就删、删、删、删、删。哪一封才是真正跟我相关的呢?有时候你可以通过引用我过去写过的东西来做到这一点。我经常看到有人这样做。但别装。装的人太多了。有人给我发邮件说他们是我的忠实读者,但他们压根没读过我的东西。一眼就能看出来,对吧?别这样做。但如果你确实读过某篇文章,或对某个内容、对那家媒体有所了解,任何能体现这一点的信号都是好的。
因为说到底,你要做的就是把你自己从噪音中区分出来,告诉对方:这是专门为你定制的。因为仔细想想,这本质上是一个效率问题。我要做的事情是,把时间花在那些与我相关概率最高的内容上,同时过滤掉那些看起来跟我无关、在浪费我时间的东西。
所以如果我看到有人给我写信,而且他对这家媒体有所了解,对我也有所了解,那他接下来要告诉我的内容与我相关的概率就更高。甚至有可能变成一篇报道。
这当然很好。我很乐意看到这种情况。因为坦白说,这省了我的时间,对吧?我少了一个需要自己去挖掘的选题。我很开心,但前提是得靠谱。所以你要考虑邮件的结构……你写的这封邮件不要写得太长,最多三段。
你不是在写一篇文章,而是在告诉我那个你有相当把握我会感兴趣的东西。回到黄油碟的例子——区别就在于:她给我发了一封关于黄油碟的三段式邮件,开头简单介绍了黄油碟,然后立刻切入那个关于产品市场测试调研的非常巧妙的故事。
这就是区别所在。她讲了一个对我的受众来说有相关性的故事。她很快就切入正题,而且给我的感觉是——这是一个有趣的人,有一个有趣的创业故事要讲,所以我愿意互动。
Lenny: 所以这个故事是通过一封冷邮件发来的?
Jason Feifer: 就是一封冷邮件。没错。某天就出现在我邮箱里了。
Lenny: 太厉害了。
另一个精彩推介案例
Lenny: 你还能想到其他做得好的例子吗?让大家多一些参考,看看怎样……
Jason Feifer: 当然有。嗯,让我看看。我们得现场找了。不过我在邮箱里一直留着两个文件夹,一个叫”差劲推介”,一个叫”优秀推介”。我们可以都翻来看看。
Lenny: 来吧。
Jason Feifer: 好,我刚把这个打开了。这封邮件我很久没看了。我一边念一边往前扫一眼,看看适不适合读出来。不过我觉得没问题。管它呢,我们就读读看吧。
好,这封邮件的主题是”一个给 Entrepreneur 和 Problem Solvers 的选题:边境封锁如何让我的业务增长”。这封是2020年9月发给我的。
Lenny: 这是好的还是差的?
Jason Feifer: 好的,这个是好的。后来它变成了一期我为 Entrepreneur 做的播客节目,可能还被我改写成了一篇文章,我记不太清了。
Lenny: 太棒了。
Jason Feifer: 来看看她是怎么做的。她的名字,我直接说出来,她叫 Meg O’Hara。Meg O’Hara 是一位画家,一位加拿大的风景画家。同样,也是一家小企业。
她写道,“嗨 Jason,我有一个选题想法,我认为对你、Entrepreneur 杂志和 Problem Solvers 播客来说都是有价值且相关的。“Problem Solvers 是我为 Entrepreneur 做的节目。然后她说,“我的业务情况是这样的:疫情期间所有创业者都必须灵活应变。这个故事讲的是加拿大的一位艺术家如何从边境封锁中受益。“这就勾起了我的好奇心——哦,怎么受益的?
“三月疫情暴发时,整个北美所有滑雪场提前关闭。滑雪者在加拿大属于高收入人群,他们的收入位列前5%。”
好吧,总之她接着往下说。她告诉我——我现在想起来了——她告诉我,她的业务原来是受滑雪场委托,为他们的设施画风景画。边境封锁后,没人再去这些滑雪场了,她必须想出一种全新的经营方式。
于是她开始思考:我不能再为这些滑雪场工作了,他们不会雇我了。但所有那些曾经在滑雪场工作过、见过我作品的滑雪者,或者经常去滑雪、可能熟悉我作品的人,他们也不能滑雪了。他们可能正闲坐在家里,怀念滑雪的日子。他们一定很想看到自己最喜欢的滑雪胜地的画面,而且他们手头也有闲钱,因为不再花在滑雪场上了。
然后她用要点列表的方式把问题和解决方案一一列出。这一点我特别喜欢。因为她听过 Problem Solvers 这个节目,那个节目的结构正是这样的——告诉我问题,告诉我你想出的解决方案。所以她就照着这个结构列了出来。
问题是:滑雪者来不了了,人们在家的时间更多了。
解决方案:我为他们的家创作艺术品,描绘他们最熟悉的滑雪风光,让一切如初。她就这样一路写了下去。
我读到这封邮件就想,这个人重新发明自己的业务方式这件事,确实有些东西值得讲——一个市场关闭了,却催生了一个新的市场,我觉得人们会想听。因为那时候每个人都在思考如何重塑自己和自己的业务。
虽然我的受众中很多人经营着非常复杂的大企业,但有时候听到一个普通人做着世界上最简单的事——把颜料涂在画布上——讲述她如何重新定义自己,这真的很美好。因为你可以从中提炼出那些关于自我重塑的精彩小经验,我认为这对非常广泛的受众都有启发。
所以 Meg 给我发了那封邮件,我回复说”我喜欢”,然后我们就做了。这就是一个很好的例子——她花时间了解我的工作,甚至细致到我传达内容的结构方式,然后给我发来了一封看起来为我量身定制的推介,用一种我能想象如何讲述给我的受众的方式讲了她的故事。
到这一步,基本上就是一个很轻松的”可以”。
Lenny: 这个例子太精彩了。我刚才根据你之前分享的内容,把她做对的事情记了几条笔记。
仅从主题行或第一句话就能看出她了解你。她知道你有这个播客,知道这本杂志,她甚至还明确表达了”你会对这个感兴趣的”。她提到了自己的故事,而且一上来就开始讲故事。没有公司价值主张那一套——“我们是做什么的,我们有多厉害”。而 Entrepreneur 的使命你之前说过,就是人们获得的洞察和经验,她直接就切入”这是我们学到的”。
Jason Feifer: 没错。
Lenny: 所以我能理解为什么这封邮件打动你了。
Jason Feifer: 是的,非常棒。顺便说一下,对她来说,让这件事真正成功的另一个因素是,当我跟她通电话的时候,她——我觉得这一点至关重要,可以说成败在此一举。因为我可以跟一个人聊完之后毙掉选题,或者不上这期播客。她愿意坦诚地谈论困难。
我是说,她当初联系我就是因为遇到了困难,但不是每个人都愿意这样做。有些人给我推介时说的是,“哦,我们业务遇到了这样的挑战”。但等我跟他们聊的时候,他们表现得好像根本没什么问题。或者问题其实很小,而他们的独创性立刻就让业务变得非常成功了。这种故事我不感兴趣。
因为成功故事并不有趣。对任何人来说都不有趣。只是听说别人成功了,这对你没用。有用的是听到别人如何面对和你一样的挑战,并走出来了,这样你就能看到——“啊哈,这是一个对我也有用的有趣策略。”
我讨厌成功故事。我喜欢问题解决的故事。所以当我和创业者交谈时,我期望他们对这些事情非常坦诚。如果不是这样,我基本上就失去兴趣了。
Lenny: 英雄之旅。我很想再听一个例子。不过在那之前,听完这个,显然对创始人来说这样做需要花不少时间。我有两个问题。一个是,一个人大概应该尝试联系多少家媒体,才能有成功的机会?另外,你觉得他们在这方面应该投入多少时间?我知道这个问题很宽泛。但你有什么想法吗?
投入多少时间
Jason Feifer: 这确实是一个很宽泛的问题。所以这也从某种程度上解释了为什么很多人会雇佣 PR。因为 PR 可以推动事情进展,他们能快速联系到很多人,而作为个人你做不到。
你可以这样想:你要开始行动了。你要想办法让这件事成,你会下几个赌注,期待其中一些能有所回报。
换个角度想,这也可以是一种被动的方式。我在阅读媒体内容时会花些时间思考这件事,慢慢形成一个想法。另外你还可以做一件事:在社交媒体上关注一批撰稿人和编辑。
Meg,我记不清这里的先后顺序了,因为我知道 Meg 现在在 Instagram 上关注了我,她给我发过很多次私信。我会回复所有人。我不记得她之前是否关注过我,但她可能关注过。也许她还给我发过几次私信。通常是有人回复我的 Instagram 快拍之类的。
我看到很多人对我使用这个策略,我觉得这非常聪明。基本上就是,在你推介之前,先让我记住你的名字。以一种非常随意的方式参与社交媒体互动,这样当你给我发邮件时,我会想,我认识这个人吗?Meg O’Hara,我好像认识这个人。这就增加了我会打开邮件的概率。
我看到很多人这样做。他们在推介之前会花很长时间在社交媒体上与我互动。我知道他们在做什么,我理解这很可能是有计划的。但我仍然喜欢。这很聪明。因为这意味着到他们联系我的时候,我觉得他们对我的工作已经有了相当好的了解。也就是说,他们带给我的东西大概率是有诚意的。正因为如此,我喜欢这种方式。这是一个很好的筛选机制。
所以如果你听了这整段内容,觉得这工作量太大了,而我有一个新产品要发布,或者我有一笔预算可以花在这上面——这种逐个接触的方式可能不适合你。你可能更应该花时间去面试不同的 PR 公司,找到那个最契合你、理解你的故事和愿景、并且在你所在领域有人脉的那家,这样可以省去大量功夫。
但即便如此,即便你请了 PR,我觉得听过这些内容也非常有用。因为在某个时刻,如果 PR 人成功了,你最终要亲自和撰稿人或编辑通电话。了解他们的思维方式非常有用——他们不是来服务你的,这不是他们为你提供的一项服务。
所以你最好理解他们带着什么进入这次对话,他们心里在想什么。当他们问你问题时,他们心里想的是:这是我的受众会好奇的东西,我要在这次采访中引导这个人说出那些让我受众觉得有价值的洞见。
所以你越了解你面对的是谁,效果就越好。
Lenny: 而且自己亲身做过之后,你也会更好地理解该如何要求你的 PR 人,了解他们的工作方式,找到改进他们运作方式的机会。回到数量的问题,假设你在这样做,假设你在花时间——我打算认真投入去了解 Jason 和其他编辑。
你有没有一个经验法则可以推荐?比如尝试三家媒体来拿下一篇报道,还是五家?我不确定。这方面你有什么建议吗?
Jason Feifer: 这真的取决于你有多容易被报道。我可以直接说,如果你是某种 B2B 服务,尤其是在某个非常小众或晦涩的领域,你要获得报道会非常非常难。难到可能都不值得尝试。因为还有其他事情你可以做,还有一些我们还没谈到的方式。
你可以说,算了,我不去争取我公司的报道了。不如我把自己定位为一个专家?这是一种完全不同的策略。你的做法可能是蹭新闻热点,试图给正在写相关报道的记者提供一个引言或观点。我收到这种东西多了去了。
某个新闻爆出来,人们就开始联系我。他们会说,“新闻里刚发生了这件事。我的客户,“有时候就是个人,“我对此有这样的见解,如果你想采访我,以下是我会说的内容。”
这不会是一篇关于你的专题报道,你不会是报道的主体,不会有你的照片。你可能会得到一个引言。你可能会在某篇报道中被引用。但这也就是你在网站上写”曾被……报道”所需要的全部了。所以人们才这样做。
有时候是这种路径。有时候你可以自己成为撰稿人。你可以尝试向不同的媒体推介由你撰写的权威文章,用这种方式让自己曝光。有时候,你确实不容易被报道。有时候你确实容易被报道。有时候你做出了一项人人都想谈论的疯狂技术,那你获得媒体报道就会非常容易。
到那时你的成功率会高得多。所以带着非常现实的预期去做这件事,以及如果你要和 PR 合作,找一个能设定并帮你坚持现实预期的 PR,可以让你省去很多痛苦。
独家报道的策略
Lenny: 顺着这个话题,一直有个关于独家性的概念,人们总想成为第一个报道某件事的媒体。假设你谈到了一项很棒的技术,你有什么建议吗?是把同样的东西推介给所有媒体然后指望他们都写?还是给不同的媒体推介不同的故事?还是给其中一家提供独家?这方面有什么建议吗?
Jason Feifer: 每个人对这件事的处理方式不同。这里的第一条原则就是,不要用让媒体人觉得你在耍他们的方式来做。因为他们不会容忍这种事。我宁愿放弃一个机会,也不愿跟谁玩这种把戏。
我最喜欢的版本是这样的。实际上,最近有位创始人——我几年前就认识他了。所以他联系我时,我立刻认出了这个名字。他联系我说,嘿,我们做了一件非常有趣的事,还没告诉过任何人。我想看看它是否适合 Entrepreneur。
我跟他通了电话,他跟我说了。我现在还不能告诉你们是什么,因为我们还没发那篇报道。但聊了十五二十分钟后,我说,是的,这是一个非常有意思的故事。
坦率地说,我知道其他媒体也会对此感兴趣,特别是因为它涉及金融元素。所以我觉得《华尔街日报》、Bloomberg 之类的媒体也会感兴趣。
他想把故事给 Entrepreneur,原因他自己知道。不过我觉得大概有两个原因。第一,他想把自己定位到 Entrepreneur 的受众面前。第二,有一个信任因素。他认识我,而他不认识那边的编辑。所以他觉得我可能会更用心地对待这个故事。
于是我们达成了一个他提出的协议。协议内容是:我们拿到独家(报道),我们的报道发出后会有三小时的窗口期,之后他们才会开始回应其他媒体,开始和其他人谈,或者他们甚至可能提前安排好,主动联系其他一些媒体。
这对我来说没问题,我能理解。我们会设定一个小小的禁播窗口,我们先上,然后他们再去跟其他人谈。
有时候你可以向某家媒体提供独家——具体做法是,你把新闻发布给所有人,但只让一家媒体拿到采访机会。如果你背后有一位大人物,这个策略效果非常好。
比如最近,一家 Mark Cuban 投资的公司就向我们提出了这样的方案。他们说,我们有这条新闻,我们会联系各方、把新闻发给所有人,但我们把 Mark Cuban 的独家采访给你。他只接受一次采访,就跟你做。你可以随意拆分使用。你要做的只是让所有人都觉得你在坦诚相待。
Lenny: 而且要让他们觉得自己得到了一些特别的东西,尽可能做到这一点。这很合理。
媒体报道的风险与不确定性
Lenny: 你刚才提到了关系这个话题,这正是我想问的。在科技领域,很多记者最终会写负面报道,因为很多时候那就是读者想看的内容——“这个产品为什么在毁灭世界?”
我自己就有过这样的经历。Fast Company 做了一篇关于我的报道,我跟那位记者聊了聊,但我完全不知道——他到底是会把我批得体无完肤,还是会对我做的事非常友善和正面?我完全无从判断,报道就直接出来了。
我也不能在发稿前看到内容。所以你有没有什么建议,能帮助判断这件事最终会变成正面还是负面?我知道你也没有标准答案。
Jason Feifer: 顺便问一下,结果怎么样?是正面的还是负面的?
Lenny: 非常正面。
Jason Feifer: 太好了。
Lenny: 我非常满意。
Jason Feifer: 很好,很好,很高兴听到这个。
首先,要看媒体本身的定位。Entrepreneur,以及我觉得 Fast Company 也算,基本不做负面报道。原因在于,这不符合我们读者的需求。我的读者来我这里是为了学习经营方面的东西。把谁批一顿对他们没有任何帮助。
所以首先要看你面对的是什么样的生态。你也可以看看这位作者过往的作品。如果你有 PR 人配合,有一件有意思的事——偶尔有人不小心把邮件转发给我,我就能看到 PR 代理整理的关于我的档案。
PR 代理如果给你安排了一次采访,他们通常会做一些功课,了解这个人平时写什么,做什么类型的报道,一般对什么话题感兴趣。这样你就能有一个判断,对吧?
除此之外,还有一个问题:你自己在做什么?如果你身上有一些争议性的事情,尤其当你接触的媒体正好对这类内容感兴趣,那他们至少有相当大的概率会跟你探讨这个问题、向你提问。如果你表现得很奇怪、遮遮掩掩,他们就会觉得背后还有更多东西,会开始深挖。
但最终答案是,这整个过程中每一个环节——我相信在我们整场对话中已经有所体现——都真的不在你的掌控之中。有没有人注意到你?他们写你什么?什么时候写?全部都超出你的控制范围。
这再一次说明了,为什么把媒体报道当作推动增长的主要策略是不明智的。它是一个很好的补充,但这些媒体人会做他们要做的事,你能做的最多就是察言观色、审时度势。
Lenny: 确实。那是一种很奇妙的……我不常上媒体,也不是我主动追求的事情。但当时就是觉得,这也太离谱了——我就这么跟这个人聊聊,然后就会有一篇东西出来,我完全不知道会是什么样的。
他可能搞错一些东西,因为我没有机会审稿,也可能会有偏差。但整个经历确实很奇特。不过最后结果非常好。
Jason Feifer: 确实,非常奇特。
是的,很奇怪。而且我发现人们往往不了解……在商业领域,人们理解正在发生的结构——他们知道我们是一本商业杂志,会写一篇商业报道,会有一定的形式。
但我做过很多不同类型的写作,在我的职业生涯中多次有这样的经历:我会花很多时间跟采访对象相处,但他们对我到底在做什么完全没有概念,无法理解。
然后报道出来了,他们再来联系我说,哦,我现在终于理解你当时到底想做什么了。这很有意思。
这确实是一种让你处于脆弱状态的体验,你必须意识到这一点。而你越想控制它,记者就越会觉得烦。事实上,记者可能因此会在报道中对你来一下,因为他们觉得你太难控制,觉得你有所隐瞒……
他们觉得你太难控制,是因为他们觉得你有东西在藏。这不是一件让人舒服的事。你必须以脆弱的姿态走进去,并且清楚这有可能在你脸上炸开。这就是你为触达他们的读者群所支付的代价。
另一种获取媒体报道的思路
Lenny: 很好的建议。我们再来举一个你觉得很棒的邮件推介的例子,然后就进入我们非常精彩的快问快答环节,怎么样?
Jason Feifer: 我给你讲一个推介的故事。我不确定邮箱里还有没有那封——没有,很遗憾不在了。我直接口述吧。
Lenny: 好。
Jason Feifer: 这个故事引出了另一种思考如何获取媒体报道的方式,我觉得非常重要,值得大家记住。Lenny,到目前为止我们大部分时间都在讨论一种形式的媒体报道——围绕你本人的某种专题报道,写你,或者在一篇报道中以某种突出的方式把你纳入其中,基本上就是在呈现你想要传播出去的东西——你的产品、关于你业务的某个方面等等。然后我们还讨论了另一种方式,就是把你作为一个有权威的专家推出去。还有一种思路:你可以创造或呈现一个场景,而你恰好是这个场景的一部分。
Fred Ruckel 和 Ripple Rug 的故事
Jason Feifer: 我来给你讲一个我收到的推介故事,它可以引出这个话题。这是很多年前的事了。我刚到 Entrepreneur 不久,收到一个叫 Fred Ruckel 的人的来信。Fred Ruckel 做了一款猫玩具,叫 Ripple Rug。简单来说,想象一块地毯,上面再盖一块地毯,但形状不规则——上面那块皱巴巴的,到处是鼓包和窟窿。猫可以在这些空间里钻进钻出、扑腾玩耍,猫爱干嘛干嘛。我不太懂猫。他想跟我讲这款 Ripple Rug 的销量,说销量如何暴涨,还有他觉得这个产品有多特别——用回收瓶子做的等等,美国制造,都很棒,但跟我没关系,因为我们不是”猫玩具月刊”,我们的读者也不是一大群猫主人——至少据我所知不是。
我回复了他,说的也是我常说的那句话:“恭喜你做出了这样的产品,但它不适合我们报道。” Fred 其实是歪打正着,但他做了一件非常聪明的事。他回复说:“完全理解。不过如果你有兴趣了解一个正在 Amazon 和 eBay 上大规模发生的骗局,而我们刚好深陷其中,请告诉我。” 我一看,“哦,那我确实有兴趣听听。” 我说:“跟我详细说说。” 他给我发了一封长邮件。Fred 就喜欢写长邮件,然后我把他请上电话让他解释,最后我终于搞明白了。
这就是所谓的 Amazon 到 eBay 套利(arbitrage),也许有人已经听说过。简单来说,Fred 在 Amazon 上卖他的 Ripple Rug——至少当时是这样,现在还卖不卖我不清楚——他在 Amazon 上卖 Ripple Rug,但有很多人复制了他的商品信息,在 eBay 上自己发帖售卖,标价略高一些。举个例子,这些数字是我编的:假设 Fred 在 Amazon 上卖 30 美元,就有人在 eBay 上卖 40 美元。然后有买家在 eBay 上找到它,花 40 美元买下来。那个人拿到 40 美元,拿出其中 30 美元去 Amazon 买下 Ripple Rug,然后直接让 Amazon 发货给那个买家。这就是套利。
你可能觉得,“那 Fred 在乎什么呢?反正他卖出去了嘛。” 他在乎的原因是:Ripple Rug 送到了顾客家门口,装在 Amazon 的箱子里,但顾客明明是在 eBay 上买的。他们会想,“这是怎么回事?” 然后他们去 Amazon 上一搜,发现 Amazon 上更便宜,顿时觉得被骗了。他们觉得被谁骗了?Fred。因为他们不知道套利这回事,根本不知道这些中间商的存在。
这个人,此时已经拆开了猫玩具,很可能已经让猫在上面打了个滚,现在又把整个东西塞回箱子退货了,Fred 因此被扣了分——这就是他不喜欢这件事的原因。他一次又一次地尝试让 Amazon 和 eBay 制止这种行为,但他说,“似乎没人在乎,所有这些小企业都因为退货亏了一大笔钱。” 我之前从没听说过这种事,觉得太有意思了。这正是小企业主们在应对的问题。我说:“Fred,你认识其他也在处理这个问题的人吗?” 他说:“当然,我一直跟他们在论坛上聊。” 他给我介绍了那些人。
我对整件事做了完整的报道,写了大约三四千字的文章,Fred 成了主角,因为他是理解这个问题的切入点。我做了全面的采访报道——联系了各大平台,联系了做套利软件的人,做了一整套调查报道。但 Fred 最终得到了他的媒体报道,因为——这就是教训——有时候你不是故事本身,但你可以成为故事的一部分。有时候这意味着——Fred 是歪打正着撞上的——但我收到很多人的来信,比如他们做的是房地产创业公司,房地产领域正在发生一些非常有趣的事情,他们来找我,告诉我这个领域正在发生的有趣趋势,以及他们恰好在这个趋势中扮演的角色。那我就会想,“嗯,这挺有意思的,也许可以写一篇报道。“
创造一个场景,而你是其中的一部分
我妻子 Jen Miller,她是一名自由撰稿人,她好几次用这种方式操作。有一次她写了一篇报道,是关于一批帮助人们以各种方式为死亡做准备的创业公司。她不会单独写其中某一家公司,但当有人找到她说:“嘿,这里有一个趋势正在发生,我们是其中之一”——很好,这就是一个有趣的故事。她写了那篇报道,主动联系她的那家公司获得了相当突出的版面,因为是他们主动联系的她。你知道 Shark Tank 里的 Barbara Corcoran 吗?
Lenny: 我应该知道。应该知道。
Jason Feifer: 对。她从第一季开始就是 Shark Tank 的常驻评委。
Lenny: 嗯。
Jason Feifer: 她靠创办一家叫 Corcoran 的房地产公司赚到了财富,做房产买卖。她创办这家公司的方式非常精彩。在成为”Corcoran 房产的 Barbara Corcoran”之前,Barbara Corcoran 只是一个来自新泽西的纽约普通房产经纪人。她想找到一个办法让自己从众人中脱颖而出。她想了一个主意:拿自己的销售数据——当时她对曼哈顿房地产市场的唯一窗口就是她的客户在买卖什么,这些交易都是她经手的。她手上有这些数据,拿去跟去年同期做比较,涨了还是跌了。她把所有这些数据整理成一份报告,叫作 Corcoran Report,然后开始把 Corcoran Report 发给《纽约时报》、《纽约邮报》等媒体。
因为当时没有其他人在做曼哈根房地产市场健康度报告,所以所有人都开始引用 Corcoran Report 来报道,把它当作权威资料。而它是由 Barbara Corcoran 出品的,这立刻把她推到了这个领域权威的位置。这招太聪明了,而我看到类似的事情一直在发生。
用数据和调查制造新闻
我的收件箱里也常常收到这样的邮件,比如有一家专门做远程办公咨询的公司。尤其是远程办公咨询,你可以雇他们,是 B2B 服务。这种公司很难获得媒体报道。他们的做法是这样的:他们花钱请一家调研公司做各种调查——最适合远程办公的州排名、最适合远程办公的公司排名、最适合远程办公的各种什么排名。他们产出大量调查数据,然后把这些调查发给媒体。这些调查会被报道,因为他们在创造一条新闻。他们在创造一种语境,而自己恰好身处其中。很难写一篇关于这家普通公司的报道,但写调查数据就很有意思——比如”犹他州是最适合远程办公的州”——我不知道这是不是真的——但这类内容人们会愿意写。你在给人们提供可以写的东西。一旦他们写了,你就成了故事的一部分。我经常收到这类推介,偶尔也会上钩,而 Fred 凭着 Ripple Rug 获得了一篇大型专题报道。
Lenny: 这又是一个绝妙的策略。如果我是创始人,我会想,“嗯,我能想到哪些可以借势的趋势呢?“
用自有数据创造新闻
Jason Feifer: 对,有时候你自己的数据里就蕴藏着机会。如果你有大量数据,你可以像 Zapier 那样做。Zapier 是一个很好的例子。我每年都会收到 Zapier 的推介,内容是年度增长最快的商业应用排行榜,基于 Zapier 自身的数据,因为他们能看到用户在使用什么,然后把数据汇总成前十名榜单,媒体会报道这些内容。非常聪明。
Lenny: 太棒了。我们已经讲完了三个步骤。还有什么我们没涉及到的、你想补充的吗?对于那些想要获得媒体报道的创始人或产品负责人,还有什么你觉得特别有价值但还没分享的内容吗?
最终忠告:做个真人
Jason Feifer: 这些要点其实在之前已经以不同方式提到过了,但我想最后再强调一下,作为一种总结性的思路——做个真人,做个真人。新闻稿之所以没用,是因为它们不像人。我不喜欢采访那种照本宣科、只按话术回答的人,因为那不是真人的状态。你最终从事的是一项人的事业。一个主观的决定正在被做出——如何服务一群人类受众。没有绝对的对与错,也没有什么确定的法则。媒体行业基本上算不上一个数据驱动的行业,因为每个故事都各不相同。这很难。很难对产品进行优化,因为产品每分钟都在变。你在和人打交道,而你在整个过程中越能表现得像一个人——推介的时候,写一封像人写的邮件,不要写那种一看就是营销文案模板里出来的东西。给另一个人写一封人与人之间的邮件,然后当那个人与你互动时,也用真实的人的状态回应他们。
我的意思是,Lenny,那个 Fast Company 的记者之所以喜欢你,我很确定是因为当他们跟你通电话的时候,你就是个正常的、友善的人。如果你表现得不一样——因为你想要以某种方式包装自己,或者你感到防备,或者无论什么原因——那个记者就会觉得”这家伙是个混蛋”,然后写出一篇完全不同的报道。
尽可能地保持真实,你面对的是一个真实的人,他会感受到那份真实。
Lenny: 非常棒的建议。说到这里,我们进入了激动人心的快问快答环节。
Jason Feifer: 好。
Lenny: 准备好了吗?
Jason Feifer: 来吧。
快问快答:书籍推荐
Lenny: 来吧。你有两三本最常推荐给别人的书吗?
Jason Feifer: Andrew Chen 的《The Cold Start Problem》对我来说反复被提及,因为里面关于网络效应的课程真的很棒。最近我跟不少创业者聊到焦虑和完美主义的话题,一位名叫 Katherine Morgan Schafler 的心理治疗师写了一本书叫《The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control》,我觉得非常值得一读。
快问快答:影视推荐
Lenny: 很酷。你最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
Jason Feifer: 电影?我现在很少看电影了。我有两个小孩,但我带八岁的大孩子去看了新的《忍者神龟》,非常好,而且是一种很棒的方式——我小时候就很喜欢它们,所以看到现代版本很酷。然后我和我妻子刚看完《Better Call Saul》,虽然晚了几年,但真的很完美。
Lenny: 我还没看过这部剧。我很喜欢《Breaking Bad》。
Jason Feifer: 哦,值得看的,你一定要看。
Lenny: 好吧,又一部要开始追的剧。
Jason Feifer: 我知道,太多剧了,根本看不过来。
快问快答:面试技巧
Lenny: 我通常也会问下一个问题,通常问产品负责人和增长领域的人,但我很好奇你的回答会是什么——你有没有最喜欢的面试问题,喜欢问正在面试的人?通常是指你招人的时候。
Jason Feifer: 面试求职者?
Lenny: 对,理想情况下是这样,但你怎么理解都行。
Jason Feifer: 那我稍微换个角度来回答,因为我们一直在聊媒体报道的话题。我觉得这也是一个非常好的采访别人的策略,我告诉你是因为我认为它在其他任何场景中也适用,而且可能有人在面试中也会对你这样做。我最喜欢的采访别人的策略是向对方抛出一个理论。我不是指什么世界理论。我的意思是,也许聊了十分钟后,在他们回答了一些不同的问题、告诉我几件不同的事情之后,我脑子里会做一个关联,然后说:“我想跟你分享一个理论。你觉得你之所以对这个特别感兴趣,或者做出那个决定,实际上是不是因为你之前提到的另一件事?”
你在倾听。这是真正的积极倾听,你在把不同的信息组合成一个理论。这个理论之所以这么管用,是因为它迫使对方在你面前实时思考。我喜欢这一点是因为我经常采访那些被采访过无数次的人。我采访过 Jimmy Fallon、“巨石” The Rock 等等。他们被采访过无数次了,所以你怎么能让他们在你面前真正思考?答案是问他们从未被问到的东西。我喜欢这个理论策略的原因是,它向对方展示了你真的在认真听,你在努力理解他们。“你做了那件事真有意思,我猜是不是因为……”XYZ某件事。这会让他们以一种非常真诚、诚实的方式做出反应。
顺便说一下,作为一个求职者的面试策略,这招也不差。我做过的最喜欢的一次求职面试——甚至都没拿到那份工作——是好多年前,我去纽约杂志(New York Magazine)面试。我跟 Adam Moss 面谈,他已经不在那里了,但他当时是传奇性的主编。他让我当场就一个想法层层深入。“你最喜欢 Strategist 里哪个栏目?“那是杂志的一个栏目。我说:“我真的很喜欢房地产栏目。“他说:“好,那你觉得我们应该在房地产栏目里推荐哪个街区?“我说:“呃,我不知道,“然后说了一个街区。他说:“那这个街区的三个亮点是什么?“他就一直追问,层层深入、层层深入、层层深入。没有对错之分,他只是想看我的思维方式。我觉得这非常有力,我在采访别人时也会用这个方法的变体。
Lenny: 太棒了,我很喜欢这个。你最近发现的最喜欢的产品是什么?
快问快答:产品推荐
Jason Feifer: 我一直在用 BIGVU,我甚至不知道怎么发音,BIGVU,B-I-G-V-U。它是一个提词器 app。我花了大约 150 美元买了一个真正的提词器,因为我制作大量视频,但那个提词器——对于只听音频的人来说,我正指着房间另一头桌子上的那个东西——我从未用过它。原因是我后来发现了 BIGVU,它就是一个在摄像头附近运行提词器的 app,可以横屏也可以竖屏模式。我做了无数次测试,它确实有效——你看着屏幕读词,看起来真的像在直视摄像头。我很喜欢它。它帮我节省了大量时间。
Lenny: 这很酷。基本上就是把手机放在屏幕上,放在摄像头旁边或摄像头所在的位置?
Jason Feifer: 不不不,这是你在录像时用的,如果你用手机录像的话。
Lenny: 明白了。你盯着手机,它告诉你该说什么。我懂了。
Jason Feifer: 对,对。
Lenny: 太棒了。
最喜欢的座右铭
Jason Feifer: 你写好脚本,然后导入进去,选择速度,可以调整每分钟多少字,然后文字会在非常靠近摄像头镜头的位置滚动显示。
Lenny: 太棒了。好的。
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 我要去试试这个。你最喜欢、经常对自己重复、也会分享给朋友的人生座右铭是什么?就是那些经常冒出来的话。
Jason Feifer: 我最近经常跟人提起的一句话,是我从别人那里听来的。我推荐过 Katherine 的书《The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control》。我认识 Katherine 是因为——我们后来成了朋友——她书出版的时候我请她上播客做了一期访谈。当时我们聊到过度劳累、精力被拉得太散这个话题,她给了我一个问题,我几乎每天都会想到,也一直在跟别人提起,那就是:“如果你无法维护它,那建设它又有什么意义?“我非常喜欢这个问题,因为我——大概这个播客的每个听众也一样——都在拼命逼自己,但到了某个节点你必须退后一步想一想:“我正在建设的东西,最终对我来说是否具有可持续性?还是说它本身就是不可持续的?如果你无法维护它,那建设它又有什么意义?“这是一个很好的提醒,提醒你为什么而建设,以及你必须以怎样的方式去建设。
Lenny: 我有一句非常类似的话,是我姐姐的伴侣有一次说的,一直刻在我脑子里,就是:“生活就是维护。基本上你买来的或带进生活中的每一样东西,你都得维护。”
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 我们装了新空调,现在每年都有师傅上门检查。你买了发电机,就总得有人去检查那东西。孩子带回来一个新玩具,我就得想它放哪儿,是扔掉还是留着?你带进生活中的每一样东西,基本上余生都得维护。
Jason Feifer: 确实如此。
Lenny: 对,所以我觉得,尤其是工作中,就是——你启动一个新项目,你就得——
Jason Feifer: 你就得去维护它。
Lenny: ——去维护它。就像这个播客,对吧?你想开始做一个播客,打算一直做下去吗?
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 这就是其中的一部分。启动一件事的一部分,就是你必须维护它。
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 对。
Jason Feifer: 我知道我们在闪电问答环节,而且我们已经完全违背了闪电问答的逻辑,但我想再补充一点。我曾经为了杂志封面采访过 Michelle Pfeiffer,她做的一件事让我觉得特别有意思——她创办了一个香水品牌,叫 Henry Rose。她说做电影和办公司之间最大的区别在于:拍电影的时候,所有的工作都在前期完成。你把电影拍完,电影上映,然后你就结束了,再也不用为这部电影操心了。她完全没有心理准备去做一家公司恰恰相反——公司的发布才是工作的起点,而且这条路是没有尽头的。她说自己花了整整一年才适应这个现实,之后才开始觉得有趣。我觉得这是人们容易忘记的事情。
Lenny: 嗯。这个故事——你能采访到 Michelle Pfeiffer,真酷。
Jason Feifer: 对,她人很好。
机会集 B
Lenny: 最后一个问题。我在看你的个人简介时,你说你之所以能在人生中取得这些成就、走到今天,唯一的原因是你所说的”机会集 B”。你能解释一下这是什么,以及为什么它对你如此重要吗?
Jason Feifer: 哦,当然。在你面前——你 Lenny、每一位听众和观众——都存在两组机会。机会集 A 和机会集 B。机会集 A 是所有要求你去做的事情。如果你有工作,它就是你老板期望你做的事;如果你自己开公司,它就是所有人都期望你做的事。做好这些事情非常重要,那是衡量成功的标准。这就是机会集 A——所有被要求去做的事情。然后是机会集 B。机会集 B 是那些虽然没人要求你去做、但对你来说是可获得的机会。同样,如果你在公司上班,它可能是承担新的职责、加入新的团队之类的。在个人层面,它可能是培养一个爱好,可能是做一个播客,因为你喜欢听播客——任何事情。
在我自己的职业生涯中,我发现机会集 B 总是更重要——重要得多。关键在于,如果你只关注机会集 A,那你永远只具备做你已经正在做的事情的资格。机会集 B 才是成长发生的地方,是你向不同方向推动自己的地方。我很早就发现,把这两件事区分开来思考非常有帮助。很多时候,我们可能不做机会集 B 里的事,是因为不知道它怎么带来回报,或者不知道从哪里挤出时间。但我一直——真的一直——发现,去参与这些没人要求我去做、但就在我身边可以获得的事情,会带来下一次成长——要么因为它本身变成了一个真正的机会,要么因为它为未来的某个机会提供了启发。
我来到 Entrepreneur 杂志,没有任何人——真的一个人都没有——在我成为主编的时候对我说:“你应该去跑演讲圈。你应该擅长在播客上接受采访。你应该写一本书。“没有任何人说过这些。我的工作是做出一本好杂志、掌管品牌的编辑方向。但所有这些事情对我来说都是可以获得的。一旦我意识到这一点,我明白我可以去追求它们,而在此过程中,也重新思考自己到底是谁。我是一个杂志编辑吗?不完全是了。那只是我现在做的事情之一。我把自己看作一个创业者,一个现在以帮助他人为业的人。我是一个帮助创业者的创业者。这就是我对自己的定位。我能走到这一步,唯一的原因就是我在想:我在这里,因此我可以到达那里。从来没有人会要求我去做这件事,我必须自己动手。这是我一直在思考的事情,也是让我夜不能寐的事情。我现在正在做的哪些事情,能把我引向下一个阶段?只有我自己能想清楚。
Lenny: 说得太好了。这让我想起最近一位播客嘉宾的建议:衡量你在事业和生活中进步的最佳方式,就是数一数你有多少个 “Oh shit” 时刻,因为那些时刻正是你在成长、你在突破的时刻。我觉得这或许也是机会集 B 的一个例子——那不是默认路径,而是”我觉得我应该做这件事,尽管它真的很难”。
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 用这个来收尾真是太美了。 Jason,我不仅想开始做媒体报道了——现在感觉获得媒体报道是可以实现的。刚才那段真的让人充满能量,就是那种”天哪,我可以做到,我只需要找到一些人,向他们推介,方法原来是这样的”。
Jason Feifer: 对。
Lenny: 不仅如此,我也要为自己找一些机会集 B 的路径。非常感谢你来参加这次访谈。最后两个问题。如果大家想在网上找到你,想联系你,也许向你推介他们的故事,去哪里找你?听众怎样能帮到你?
Jason Feifer: 哦,所以 Lenny,感谢你所做的一切,我真的非常喜欢,也感谢你为我创造了分享这些见解的空间。怎么找到我?我提供两个途径。机会集 B,作为两者一个很好的起点——我写了一本书,叫 Build for Tomorrow。这本书适合任何正在经历生活或工作中某种变化的人。有我自己朗读的有声书版本,也有精装本和电子书,在你买书的任何地方都能找到。再强调一下,书名是 Build for Tomorrow。机会集 B 那整套东西,其实是书中的一个章节,所以我在那里有更详细的展开。
如果你想取得联系,也获取这类内容,我有一个 newsletter,叫 One Thing Better,每周一期。每周提供一种改善工作、打造你热爱的职业或公司的方法。再次说明,机会集 B 这类东西,就是我输出的内容。它非常侧重于工作中个人和情感的那一面。你可以通过访问网址 onethingbetter,就是 O-N-E 那个 one,onethingbetter.email 来找到它。直接输入就好,onethingbetter.email。我说这是联系我的好方式,因为你收到 newsletter 后直接回复,就会进入我的收件箱。我保证会给你回信。
Lenny: 内部渠道。Jason,再次非常感谢你来参加这次访谈。
Jason Feifer: 哦,谢谢 Lenny。这次真的很有趣。
Lenny: 大家再见。
收听信息
非常感谢你的收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你最喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。另外,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,因为这真的能帮助其他听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| ”Oh shit” moments | ”Oh shit” 时刻 |
| Adam Moss | Adam Moss |
| app downloads | 应用下载 |
| arbitrage | 套利 |
| beat | 条线 |
| Better Call Saul | 《Better Call Saul》(剧名,保留原文) |
| BIGVU | BIGVU(产品名,保留原文) |
| blast | 群发 |
| Bloomberg | Bloomberg |
| boutique shop | 精品店 |
| Breaking Bad | 《Breaking Bad》(剧名,保留原文) |
| byline | 署名 |
| contributor | contributor(撰稿人) |
| Corcoran Report | Corcoran 报告 |
| counterintuitive | 反直觉 |
| coverage | 报道 |
| dossier | 档案 |
| editor-in-chief | 主编 |
| email blast | 邮件群发 |
| embargoed announcement | 禁播公告 |
| Entrepreneur | Entrepreneur(《创业家》杂志,此处作为杂志名保留原文) |
| Entrepreneur magazine | Entrepreneur 杂志 |
| exclusive | 独家(报道) |
| Fast Company | Fast Company(商业杂志名,保留原文) |
| feature | 专题报道 |
| freelance writer | 自由撰稿人 |
| freelancer | 自由撰稿人(已在术语表中) |
| Henry Rose | Henry Rose(品牌名,保留原文) |
| hit rate | 命中率 |
| hospitality | 酒店餐饮 |
| hustle | 奔波 |
| ingenuity | 独创性 |
| Jimmy Fallon | Jimmy Fallon(美国知名脱口秀主持人,保留原文) |
| keynote | 主题演讲 |
| Mark Cuban | Mark Cuban(知名人物,保留原文写法,此处首次出现,但属于国际知名人物,可译为马克·库班,但鉴于术语表规则”国际知名人物使用公认中文译名”,Mark Cuban 的公认译名为马克·库班) |
| media outlet | 媒体 |
| Michelle Pfeiffer | Michelle Pfeiffer(知名女演员,保留原文) |
| New York Magazine | 《纽约杂志》 |
| opportunity set A | 机会集 A |
| opportunity set B | 机会集 B |
| paid marketing | 付费营销 |
| pitch | 推介 |
| portfolio website | 作品集网站 |
| PR agency | PR 代理 |
| PR person | PR 人 / PR 从业者 |
| press | 媒体报道 |
| press release | 新闻稿 |
| Problem Solvers | Problem Solvers(Jason 主持的播客节目名称,保留原文) |
| read the tea leaves | 察言观色、审时度势 |
| roundup | roundup(汇总) |
| senior editor | 高级编辑 |
| Shark Tank | Shark Tank(美国知名创业投资真人秀节目,保留原文) |
| show notes | 节目备注 |
| slice and dice | 切片和细分(数据分析术语) |
| speaking circuit | 演讲圈 |
| Strategist | Strategist(《纽约杂志》的一个栏目名称,保留原文) |
| Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles | 《忍者神龟》 |
| teleprompter | 提词器 |
| The Cold Start Problem | 《The Cold Start Problem》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control | 《The Perfectionist’s Guide to Losing Control》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Rock | ”巨石” The Rock(知名演员/ wrestler,保留原文写法,加通用中译) |
| Wall Street Journal | 《华尔街日报》 |
| wellness | 健康养生 |
| wire | 通讯社 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)