打造制胜销售话术的分步指南 | April Dunford(《Sales Pitch》作者)
A step-by-step guide to crafting a sales pitch that wins | April Dunford (author of Sales Pitch)
April Dunford: 40 to 60% of B2B purchase processes end in no decision. If you scratch on that data, the majority of those aren’t saying, “Well, I’m not making a decision to buy something new because the old thing we were doing is better.” That’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of those is they couldn’t figure out how to make a choice confidently. So what they did was they just went to their boss and said, “You know what? Now’s not a good time. Let’s not do it now. Let’s do it next year. Let’s just delay it.” Because that is the safe risk-free thing for that person who’s on the hook to make the decision to do.
Introducing the Guest
Lenny: Today. My guest is April Dunford. April is the world’s foremost authority on product positioning. She’s the author of the bestselling book, Obviously Awesome, which is my favorite book on positioning. And this is her second time on the podcast because she just published a new book called Sales Pitch, which builds on her 25-year career as VP of marketing and advisor to companies like Google and Epic Games and many others. The book guides you through a better way to pitch and sell your product. And in our conversation, April shares the framework that she has seen work most often in getting potential customers to get excited about your product and to decide to buy your product.
Like I say, at the top of this episode, you’ll become better at pitching and selling your product by the end of this episode. And if that’s useful to you, which it should be, this episode is for you. With that, I bring you April Dunford after a short word from our sponsors.
Speaker 1 (00:01:32):
Composer also has a powerful back tester to see the historical performance of your strategies, and you can then invest with a single click. Once you invest, Composer will automatically trade for you based on the logic of your strategy. With $1 billion in trading volume and over 1 million trades executed, composer already has many big time investors using the platform regularly.
April, thank you so much for being here. Welcome back to the podcast.
April Dunford: So great to be back. We were talking about this earlier, but it feels like it was so long ago when I did the last one. I was one of the first guests and I feel like, man, you’ve been running this thing forever. And that was like a year ago.
Opening Chitchat and Banter
Lenny: It feels like a lifetime, but it was about a year ago.
April Dunford: But what you’ve done with it is amazing, right? The growth in it, everything else, it’s super inspirational.
Starting With a Real Example
Lenny: Thanks April. I appreciate that.
Positioning and the Sales Pitch
April Dunford: You’re welcome. It’s true though. I think everybody looks at your stuff and goes, “What the heck? How does he do it?”
Lenny: The secret is a lot of work.
Pitching Around Differentiated Value
April Dunford: Yes.
The Pitch Framework Summary
Lenny: That’s the get rich quick scheme there.
April Dunford: Nobody wants to hear that.
Closing Steps for Sales Pitches
Lenny: Yeah. But it’s work that’s extremely fulfilling and we get to chat again and you are a very rare return guest, which makes me very happy. And the reason you’re back is you’ve written an incredible new book, which I have right here if you’re on YouTube called Sales Pitch.
Walking Away from Bad Fits
April Dunford: That’s so cool.
Discovery as the Setup
Lenny: There it is. And it’s in your background, too. It’s like a inception. The book is called Sales Pitch, How to Craft a Story to Stand Out and Win. And we’re going to be spending our time today digging into all of the lessons and frameworks in the book as much as we can in the hour that we have. And my goal for this conversation is for listeners to leave this podcast with better skills at pitching and selling their product. Which I think every product leader and founder will want to do and get better at. How does that sound?
Shifting From Presenter to Educator
April Dunford: That sounds great.
Lenny: Okay, sweet. I was thinking as a way to get into the conversation, we start with maybe a story or an example of a company that you worked with where you applied the frameworks and lessons they teach in the book. And then use that as kind of a jumping off point for digging in further.
Buyer Confusion and Information Overload
April Dunford: Yeah, sure. So my background is, I do positioning work. And so in the work that I do with clients, generally what we’re working on is a shift in the positioning, which is a little bit of a shift in our thinking around, how do we win in the market? So in order to test that positioning, what we want to do is take the positioning and translate it into a sales pitch and then test it live with prospects.
And one of the things I noticed right at the beginning of doing this work is that everybody’s sales pitch kind of looked the same and they weren’t all that great. And for the most part what was happening in the sales pitch is there was no positioning going on in the sales pitch at all. The sales pitch was essentially a product exposition, so essentially a glorified product box room. If there was five dropdown menus, we’re going to click on all five dropdown menus and show everybody everything just feature, feature, feature, feature, feature.
And so, most of the teams weren’t used to doing any kind of pitching in the pitch really. It was just the facts Jack, were just going to show you that. Some would do this really lightweight thing. Here’s the problem, we’re the solution. Now let me walk you through all the dropdown menus, but it is basically the same thing like that.
And so what I wanted to do was build a pitch structure that would reflect the positioning. And so in order to do that, we have to get a little bit into storytelling mode. Not a lot, but at least a little. And when we’re talking about features, we shouldn’t be talking about features. We should be talking about the value that the features deliver.
So let me give you an example and I’ll do before and after what this would look like. So I work with these folks, Help Scout, and so they’re in the customer service space, so think Zendesk or whatever. They’re in that space. And what’s interesting about them is they were built from the ground up to serve digital businesses. So businesses that don’t have a physical store, they don’t have sales reps. And so their approach to customer service was different from the outset. Help Scout said, “Well, you know what? Customer service for that kind of business is really important. It’s the only time you ever get to interact with actual customers.” And so the data shows that if you give them a really great interaction in service, it improves loyalty, it improves repeat purchases, and it’s actually a growth driver. Now, most folks in other industries see customer service as a cost center.
So your telephone company for example, wants to get you off the phone as fast as possible. And they want to push you to the self-serve FAQ channels, and they don’t care about giving you a good service at all. They don’t care about any of that. And so they’re all about driving the cost down. So if we look at Help Scout in their positioning, the alternatives to Help Scout are a handful of things. Most folks start using a shared inbox and it’s really easy to use and the reps love it. It’s easy to use. The problem is, is you start growing and then you want customer service features. You want to be able to do assignments and prioritization and things like that. So then these customers end up upgrading to help desk software and now they’re in this whole different world.
So the first thing is really hard to use. So we’re not in shared inbox territory anymore. And the second thing is that there’s this attitude of we’re trying to push folks to low cost channels. We don’t really care about them. We’re going to assign you a ticket number. You’re not a person anymore. All this stuff. So that’s the situation. So Help Scout, if they did a typical pitch the way I see most SaaS companies pitch, they would just expose the features. Right? So the pitch would look like this. Digital business comes in and they say, “Hi, Help Scout, let me show you how to log in, let me show you all the features. Look, there’s a shared inbox thing there that’s really great. Oh, look, we can do assignments and prioritization and we can do this other thing and we can do this other thing and la, la la.” And I keep going until the time runs out and I don’t have any more features to talk about.
The problem with that pitch is the customer’s sitting there going, “I don’t know, man, that sounds a little bit like my shared inbox, but it also sounds like help desk software. Is it different than help desk software? I’m not so sure. And there’s overlap in the features there.” And so it doesn’t really answer the question, why pick us over the other guys?
And so a different style of pitch would be one, we would do a little bit of setup to give everybody an idea about how we fit amongst all the other solutions and what our point of view is in the market. And then when we get to exploring the features, we would do that within the context of the differentiated value. So here’s how that pitch would look like. Customer comes in and Help Scout says, “Hey, digital business, we work with a lot of companies like you, and I’m going to show you the product. But before we get there, one of the things we think is interesting is that digital businesses look at customer service differently. They look at it as a growth driver rather than a cost center. And so most of the folks we work with see delivering a really amazing experience as a key part of customer service. Would you agree with that?”
Yeah, we would. They have a little conversation and then they say, “Great. We you have choices here. So most of the folks we work with start with a shared inbox, and that’s great because it’s really easy, really easy to use all that stuff. The problem is if you’re growing and you probably are, then you’re going to outgrow that because you’re going to need prioritizations assignments, help desk stuff.
And so then your option is to go to help desk software. And so help desk software is great, does all the things. The problem is that it was not designed for businesses like you. It was designed for businesses that want to take the cost out of customer service. So it’s going to do some things that are weird. It’s going assign your customers a ticket number and it’s going to try to drive them to low cost channels. So can we agree that in a perfect world for digital business like yours, we’d want something as easy to use as a help desk, but had all the bells and whistles so we wouldn’t have to migrate to something else. And on top of that was built from the ground up to deliver amazing customer service. Do we agree we want that?”
Now, at that point, the customer is either with you or you’re not. But if they are, then we switch to the actual demo part. If we do a demo and then we say, “Great, we’ve got those three things. Let me show you how that works. So one as easy to use an inbox. Look, here’s the inbox. It’s easy to use. Looks just like an inbox. It’s amazing. Two, features, so you never have to outgrow it. Look, here’s how we do prioritizations assignments, whatever. We can do all the stuff you need as you grow, and you’re never going to have to switch platforms. And then last one, deliver an amazing experience. Look, the customer gets to choose which channel that they interact with you with. And look, they get to stay Dave and not ticket number 1479.”
That sort of thing. So that’s how the pitch looks in the after. But that’s a really different pitch. That pitch is designed to answer the question, “Why pick us over the other folks?” And so as you might imagine, it is a lot more effective at actually getting clients to get their head around, what is this thing? Why is it different? Why should I pick you? And it just works way better in a sales situation.
Lenny: Awesome. So just to maybe summarize the framework ‘cause you went through each of these pieces, and I think it might be helpful to give people the kind of steps. And I have them here, but maybe it might be better for you to kind work through.
Helping Buyers Understand the Market
April Dunford: So you can think of it is… So first of all, the pitch structure has two big pieces. So the first is the setup. The setup piece is not about us, it’s about the market, our point of view on the market. The second bit is all about our differentiated value. So why pick us over the other guys? So those pieces aren’t equal. In a normal sales pitch situation, we don’t want to spend all day in the setup part. We want to get to the meat, which is our differentiated value, but we can’t skip that bit. So if I’ve got a half hour call or a 45-minute call, maybe I spend a few minutes on this upfront, this upfront stuff is really important though.
And we could break the upfront into three pieces. So it starts with our insight into the market. So you can think of this as our point of view on the market or kind of like the problem inside the problem, in some ways. So in Help Scout’s case, the insight is, ” Hey, customer service is just different for digital businesses, and this is really a growth driver, not a cost center. So we need to think about customer service in a different way.” That’s their insight. So we start with that.
The second piece is pluses and minuses of alternative solutions. What we want to do is paint a picture of the entire market and talk about what’s good and bad of the other ways of approaching the job. And then out of that conversation, we have a conclusion, which is what I call perfect world. But just kind of like can we agree that if we really wanted to solve this problem and knowing what works and doesn’t work in the alternate solutions, can we agree really good solutions should tick these boxes? This is getting the customer aligned with your worldview.
If they’re aligned, then we switch to the follow through. The follow through has a handful of steps, but the main step is this differentiated value step. So usually what we’d start with is an introduction. “Hey, we’re Help Scout. We do customer service stuff specifically for digital businesses.” And then we would move on to, “Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it. Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it. Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it.”
We generally end the sales pitch with a couple of little steps. So one is after we talk about the value, generally there’s a step for proof, which is how can we prove that we do what we say we could do. Which is often a customer case study or it might be independent third party verification on stuff. But usually there’s a proof step. There’s an optional step after that, which is handling objections that haven’t come up during the call. So sometimes we’ll have a silent objection, “Yeah, that sounds really good, but it sounds really hard to adopt.” Or, “Yeah, that sounds really good, but it’s probably pretty expensive.” Or, “Yeah, that’s okay, but it probably doesn’t meet our needs for security or whatever.”
And so we handle that at the end in this special objection step. And then we end the pitch with what I call the ask, which is whatever we want the customer to do next. So it could be just asking for the sale or it could be, “Hey, we want to do a proof of concept. Who do we need to talk to about that?” Or, “Hey, we’re going to do a project. Who needs to be involved in defining the project?” Whatever the next step is in your sales process. That’s how we end is with dask.
Lenny: Cool. I wanted to actually talk about objections. ‘Cause I imagine going through this, companies often don’t agree with what you’re saying, and I wonder how you handle that. So you’re going in this, do you agree? And yeah, the silent objection is really interesting. I don’t even think about that, where they’re just like, “Yeah, yeah, yeah, we agree.” But they don’t really agree. How would you suggest people handle them being like, “No, I don’t actually see the world that way.” Or the silent objection, which I guess is something you save for the end.
No Decision Is the Biggest Competitor
April Dunford: Typically when we’re starting with insight, our insight into the market, if we’re doing this well, the insight is generally not all that controversial. So you could think of it this way. So it’s kind of the reason you built what you built. So most founders, when you talk to them, they didn’t just come up with the idea out of nowhere. They woke up in the morning and said, “You know what sucks about email, this thing sucks about email. And so I’m going to build this different kind of email that solves that problem.” Or in the case of Help Scout, it’s like, do you know what sucks about customer service? It just wasn’t built for these kinds of businesses.
And so if you’ve got a point of view on the world and you’re talking to a customer that just fundamentally doesn’t agree with that… In the case of a Help Scout, they come in and they say, “No, actually it’s a cost center for us. We’re just trying to get the cost down.” They should disqualify that deal because they can’t serve that customer better than Zendesk does. Zendesk is going to win that deal. But if you’ve done this properly, your insight should resonate for the target account that you’re trying to go after. Now, that doesn’t mean there aren’t going to be other objections, and usually there’s all kinds of other objections. But the objections are more on a level of, if I can get you hooked at the beginning in this setup, then we go to the value, which is just proving I can do what we already agreed we wanted to get done. Then the objections tend to be more like operational stuff. “Yeah, this sounds good, but I don’t know if we can forward it.” Or “This sounds good, but boy, we’re going to have to migrate off the old thing or whatever.”
So mentally they’re kind of sold already, but they’re worried about, “Well, what’s IT going to say? And can I actually get budget about this?” And in B2B, we’ve got this network of people that we’ve got to go get agreement from to move forward on this thing. And so often there’s objections around that. The beginning of the sales pitch thing… One more thing on that is that part of what we’re doing in that setup is what salespeople would call discovery. And so that setup part should not be me talking at you. It should be a conversation between me and the client saying, “Do you agree with this? Is this what you’re seeing? Did you start with a shared inbox? What are you doing right now? Did you ever consider using help desk software? Why yes, why no? Do you have any constraints on what you’re looking at? What have you tried before? What are you looking at trying right now?”
This is part of the discovery that we do in a first substantive sales call that your sales reps would know how to do this. Typically, one of the things we don’t have in the pitch decks that I see in SaaS companies is there’s no good place to do this discovery. So it kind of happens outside of the structure of the pitch. In this pitch structure, there’s a definite spot for discovery. So by the time we get to the end of the setup, we should either be aligned like, “Yep, this looks like a good prospect for us. Yep, we can do something. Yep, they got a problem we can solve. This all looks good.” Or we kind of jointly come to the conclusion, “Hey, this just… Our stuff just ain’t for you, man.” And that’s it.
Buying Software Is Harder Than Selling
Lenny: I mentioned a lot of this comes from doing this enough times. You get to understand where people generally agree, this is a problem. We all know this is our problem. And it’s unlikely that you’re going to have to throw everything out because someone just decides, “No, this isn’t for us.”
I think one of the biggest shift maybe from this framework is that you go into a teaching mindset. It’s not just like, “Here’s our product, it’s going to solve your problem.” It’s more, “Here’s what’s happening broadly. Maybe you don’t have the time to do the research we’ve done. Here’s what we found.” And then that builds trust, I think in you as a company and as a leader, a salesperson. And then they’re like, “Okay, see, they see the world the way we do.” Or, “I’ve just realized something new. I never thought of it that way.” And then, “Okay, cool. How do they think about the solution to this?”
April Dunford: Right. One of the key things to think about in all of this stuff that I think we don’t think about enough as software vendors is that customers will come to us and they’ve done their homework. They’ve Googled around and they’ve looked at stuff, but that doesn’t mean they have perfect understanding of the market. In fact, it’s usually far from it. If we think about it, most of the folks in B2B software, most of the time, your buyer has never purchased software like yours before. This is the first time they’ve done it. And their bosses come to them and said, “Hey, figure this out. Go find us a CRM and look at all the CRMs and figure it out.”
And the buyers looking at it going, “Geez, I don’t know, man. There’s a lot of CRMs out there, and I’m looking at all the things. I’m on G2 Crowd and there’s 24 CRMs in the top right corner. And I’m looking at Gardner Group and I’m looking at this thing and I’m actually doing my research, but I’m overwhelmed. What I don’t have is a clear picture of the market. What are the different approaches to this problem? Forget about products. What are the approaches to the problem? Where do the products fit in those approaches? What’s a good solution for me look like? What should be my purchase criteria?” That’s really hard for buyers to figure out.
And in general, in a sales process, we’re not doing anything to help the buyer figure that out, even though we know it. We eat, sleep and breathe this market. We spend all day looking at competitors and thinking about this stuff and whatever. But we’ve got this idea, “Well, we shouldn’t do this because first of all, we can’t talk about the other guys that we’d be seen as bashing our competition, and that’s bad.” The other thing is, even if we did give our opinion, nobody would trust us because we’re biased. But if you look at the research on this stuff, the research doesn’t support that. The research actually says what B2B software buyers want in a sales interaction is perspectives on the market and help weighing their options. And we don’t do that. We’re just like, “Here’s our stuff. You figure it out, it’s up to you. You figure it out.”
And so as a result, what we get are these buyers come in, they’re overwhelmed with all this information. They come in and they sit in our sales process, and we overwhelm them even more with more features and more information. And what they’re really worried about is, “What if I make a bad choice here? I’ve never done this before and I’m going to have to recommend to my boss. And if I make the wrong suggestion to my boss, maybe my boss thinks I’m stupid. Or maybe I buy something and the whole department hates me because awful to use. Or maybe I pick something and it’s just bad software and then bad things happen for the business, maybe I get fired.”
And so the data on this shows that for B2B, 40 to 60% of B2B purchase processes end in no decision. And then when you look at, if you scratch on that data, the majority of those aren’t saying, “Well, I’m not making a decision to buy something new because the old thing we were doing is better.” That’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of the…
April Dunford: The old thing we were doing is better, that’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of those is they couldn’t figure out how to make a choice confidently. So what they did was they just went to their boss and said, “You know what? Now’s not a good time. Let’s not do it now. Let’s do it next year. Let’s just delay it,” because that is the safe risk-free thing for that person who’s on the hook to make the decision to do.
Using Market Maps for Buyer Decisions
Lenny: I think this is one of the most interesting insights that you share in your book and you also share this in the newsletter post about how buying software you could argue is harder than selling it because people will have learned there’s skills and training for selling, but buying is, as you described, extremely stressful. Basically your job’s on the line if you make a mistake. Is there anything more you can share along those lines just to help reinforce that buying software is extremely hard and stressful and people don’t understand that?
Status Quo Bias: Fear of Deciding
April Dunford: Once you get into that mindset, I think then you look at the situation a lot different. I think we’ve seen the statistics on this that says the buyer is 80% of the way through their buying journey by the time they talk to your sales rep. Yeah, maybe, but they might be 80% of the way to saying, “Nope, I’m not buying nothing.” And in fact that’s true 60% of the time. And so how do we combat that? The way we combat that is not just talking about ourselves, it’s actually about trying to be helpful to that person in this very stressful situation that is trying to figure out how do I make a really good decision.
So what we should be doing is giving them a way to think about the whole market and say, in the case of Help Scout, “Look, there’s shared inbox and then there’s help desk software and then there’s us. And I don’t care who the vendor is, I’m going to put them in one of those buckets.” And so you can just think of it that way. So you don’t need to know every single feature, every single thing. I’m giving you a bigger picture of the whole market and helping you feel good. Well, if you choose this or you choose that, now you know why.
Lenny: I think what’s interesting about this is a lot of startups fail because they can’t convince anyone to switch from the status quo. And I think people always think of that as the current product is good enough and that’s why they’re losing, but I think this adds an additional wrinkle of it’s also the person buying it is just like, “I don’t want to add the stress to even decide and make the choice and put my butt on the line to switch.” And I never thought of it that way.
Why FOMO Makes Things Worse
April Dunford: I think that hurdle is a lot more than you think. So we obviously have to compete with status quo, we can’t ignore status quo, because sometimes status quo just is good enough and so we can’t ignore that. We still lose deals to status quo, but we lose an awful lot of deals to just plain customer indecision, customers being more afraid of screwing up than missing out.
Lenny: So to try to overcome that, to drill into the things you find most powerful, one is help the customer understand the bigger picture and why essentially they’re falling behind, why maybe competition is going to have an advantage because they’re thinking in a different way.
The Don’t Get Fired Mandate
April Dunford: Well, I’ll throw something out about that.
Lenny: Please.
Defaulting to the Market Leader
April Dunford: And I’ve heard people talk about this a lot that one of the things we could do in this situation when a customer is feeling this indecision is to lean into this FOMO and say, “Look, you’re missing out. The competitors are all doing it and you’re not doing it.” And so this is an interesting question. And so I was super excited, Matt Dixon wrote this book called The JOLT Effect, and in that they studied two and a half million sales calls, they recorded on Gong and they studied it with AI, and then they looked at what happened after the sales call, so were these successful or not successful, did a deal happen or whatever. It’s pretty rare that we get a chance to dig into some data like this.
And so what his data showed is if a customer is indecisive, throwing FOMO into the mix makes it worse. So they’re less likely to close the deal if you throw that in. And the idea is that they’re already stressed out and you’re just putting more stress on them by pressuring them, by saying, “Oh, this is happening, bad things are going to…” You’re like, “Bad things will happen if I do something, bad things happen if I don’t do something, what do I do?”
B2B Champions and Objection Handling
Lenny: They just put their head in the sand, right? They’re just like, “Ah, forget it.”?
April Dunford: So they’re just like, “Forget it, I’m doing nothing. Now I’m totally paralyzed.” And so there’s an assumption that companies are very motivated by this FOMO thing, but I think that that is not always true, and if the customer is actually indecisive, throwing in this FOMO thing isn’t going to do it. So what does work in that situation is, one, giving them the tools to make the decision. So that includes paint the picture of the market, teaching them how to buy essentially. So teaching them, look, for customers like you, you just have to worry about these three, four things, and all this other stuff, it doesn’t apply to you. That applies to bigger companies, that applies to whatever, so this idea of teaching a customer how to buy is one way to take that stress down.
And then there’s a whole bunch of other techniques you can use. So one is if it’s a really big deal, we can split it into smaller pieces, we can do things like offer you a money back guarantee, we can do things like sometimes we have services and support that are going to help you if things go bad and this is how we’re going to make sure. So this idea of being able to take risk off the table is a really serious one if we’ve got a customer that is actually paralyzed because of this indecision thing.
Does This Work for Early B2B?
Lenny: That makes a lot of sense, basically it’s like how do we help the buyer cover their ass if they made a mistake, because what you’re saying is that’s the main reason they’re not buying your product.
April Dunford: And this FOMO thing is just not going to do it.
What Product Teams Can Learn
Lenny: That’s so interesting. So I really like this framework. I wrote this down, teaching them how to buy, that is a really simple way of just thinking about this whole process.
What Is Differentiated Value?
April Dunford: Well, it’s funny, I was having this conversation with Bob Moesta, he did Jobs To Be Done.
Lenny: Yeah, I watched that episode.
Real Examples of Differentiated Value
April Dunford: So he’s just the best. And so one of the things I think of is normally when we come at this we’re like, “Well, how can we convince the customer that we do the job that they need to have done?” And obviously we need to do that, but there is this secondary job that the champion of the deal is, and that’s how do I make a decision without getting fired? And so we got to help them accomplish that job, otherwise we don’t get what we want, which is the money.
Validating Your Differentiated Value
Lenny: It’s so interesting. And it’s not even necessarily get fired, it’s even the performance sufferers or they don’t get the promotion, it’s did they do a good job. This makes me think of a process at Airbnb we went through to buy community forum software and I just remember these massive teams of salespeople come to the office and pitching everyone on the software and they just keep pushing you to make what’s the next step here, who do we need to roll in, who needs to buy into it? And it’s just like, “Oh my God, it’s so stressful. I have to keep this thing moving.” And then there’s IT coming in like, “Oh, we got to make sure it integrates with Salesforce.” And you start with I just wanted the best community forum software because we were trying to build something really different and unique and you end up with like, “Okay, it’s fine, just go with the thing that works with Salesforce. It’s all good. I’m just going to move on to another process.”
Honesty and Confidence in Sales
April Dunford: Well, this is the thing, it’s so easy to default to the market leader in that situation. The market leader has this big advantage that you can say, “You know what? Who’s going to get me in trouble for picking Salesforce? Nobody.” It’s so easy to just flip back on that. And so if you’re the challenger in this situation, the brand that’s number two or number three, you’ve got to get over all of this inertia and tilting towards the status quo, because it’s just so easy, it’s the lowest risk decision, besides do nothing is to just pick the leader in the market and we’ll just run with that.
The Bowling Pin Strategy
Lenny: I think the classic phrase was no one gets fired for buying Microsoft. I wonder is it Salesforce now that’s the default version of that now?
April Dunford: Yeah, the original one was IBM. [inaudible 00:30:57]
Back to the Framework: Ideal Solutions
Lenny: I think you’re right. Oh, man.
April Dunford: Now you totally get fired for buying IBM. I don’t know what happens. The other thing you bring up is I think an interesting thing to think about too that really messes people up in these situations is that in B2B, typical purchase process, we have five to seven people involved in making the deal happen and so there’s this complexity we don’t have a consumer, but a lot of people I think overcomplicate that. In a typical B2B purchase process, we’ve got someone in that buying team is what we would call the champion. So that person is the person who’s been tasked with, hey, pick us the accounting software or pick us the CRM, you figure it out. And so that person is the person that does the initial research, makes the short list, probably sits on the first calls, and then there’s all these other people.
Now, the other people can’t make a deal happen, but they can kill it a thousand ways. So the way this works is your positioning and your pitch needs to really work for the champion, because if it doesn’t, you don’t even get to talk to anybody else, you don’t even get to go near anybody else if you don’t make it out of the shortlist and you don’t get the deal cooking. But once the deal is cooking it is on you to arm that champion to handle all the objections potentially of all the other groups. So if you’re the line of business buyer, let’s say you’re in the sales department and you’re buying a CRM, IT is going to have to get involved at some point, and IT doesn’t really care about the value of your CRM, but they do care does it meet the security requirements and does it integrate with the stuff we already have and how much of a pain is this thing going to be to manage, and so we’re not actually pitching value to those people, we’re just handling objections.
And so once we realize that, then we can get really tight on our positioning in our sales pitch. What we’re really trying to do is just cook the champion, get the champion, and then once the deal’s going we got to arm the champion for how to handle all these objections of all these other groups so that you can get a consensus to get a deal moving forward.
Proof, Objections, and Next Steps
Lenny: How do you actually do that? Is it ask them what are all the concerns you’re hearing? Is it ask the individual stakeholders what your biggest concern is?
Revisiting Positioning When Pitches Fail
April Dunford: Well, if we’re really smart, we already know because we’ve done lots of deals. So if we’re being a good partner in this, sometimes even in the very first meeting in that spot where we’re talking about objectives, we’re going to say, “Hey, look, IT is going to come in and they’re going to be worried about this, this, and this, and don’t worry, we got you.”
So we’re SOC 2 compliant, we do this, we do that, we know because we’ve done 15 deals and we know what these deals are like and we know what the stuff is going to be. You might have the champion come in and say, “Well, I don’t know, end users might not like it.” And it’s like, “Okay, well, here’s how we’re going to get your end users on board, this is the training we have, this is the stuff we’re going to do.” The neat thing, if you have a product like [inaudible 00:33:54] on the front end of that, it takes that objection off the table. And you might have other things like you’re going to take this to your boss and they’re going to want to know ROI numbers, blah, blah, blah, and we’ve already done that, look, here’s our calculator, if you give us this information, we can put this in, here’s how you sell your boss.
So that’s what we’re doing. We’re trying to arm them because we’ve done a million deals, they’ve never bought software like this before. So half the time you’ll be doing deals and they don’t even know what the purchase process is. And so if we’re being good partners, we’re like, “Okay, does this need to go to purchasing?” And they’ll say, “Yeah, it probably does.” Oh, well, here’s what typically happens at purchasing. They’re going to do this, this, this, and we’re going to give you this stuff and that’s going to help you get it through purchasing.
Lenny: The way you’re describing it now makes it feel like you need to be a big company for this to be useful because smaller companies don’t have all these reps and they may not have the resources to do all these things you’re describing. Who is this framework useful for? Can you use this approach if you’re just, say, an early stage B2B?
Testing and Rolling Out New Pitches
April Dunford: Well, so it’s B2B products. If you don’t have a sales team, I still think you can use this structure to build a story that marketing can use and you can use in different ways, and we can talk about that. But in the companies that I work with, they’re B2B, they’ve got a sales team, and so the immediate thing we’re doing is we’re making a shift in positioning, we’re building a sales pitch that reflects that positioning, we can immediately implement that in sales even though it’s going to take a while for us to forklift the messaging and do other stuff and change our campaigns and everything else to match this new positioning, but we can tighten up the sales pitch and have an immediate impact over in sales on that. Second thing is that I’ve worked with tons of companies where the founder is the only sales rep and this works pretty good for that.
I don’t think we need a ton of resources to do it, but I do think we need to have enough traction in the market that we understand how a deal typically goes. So if we haven’t sold anything yet then we don’t know yet, it’s hard for us to help you buy something if we don’t even know how to sell it. But if I’ve done 10 deals, I know what happens, I got a pretty good guess of what IT is going to say when you try to implement this stuff, I have a good guess of what’s going to happen when we go to roll it out, I have a pretty good guess of what your boss might object to or might get excited by. And so I don’t necessarily need a research team to go figure this out. This is just me trying to be helpful and help the champion do their job of getting this deal to the finish line.
How Long Does Positioning Take?
Lenny: So maybe the MVP of this approach is a deck that you continue iterating and adjust and restructure, and also bullet points of things you want to bring up like, “Okay, cool, IT is going to ask for these things,” a few bullet points that you keep track of.
April Dunford: Exactly.
The Role of the Marketing Team
Lenny: I’m also thinking from the perspective of a product team building a product, they don’t really sell it themselves. They work with sales, they work with marketing. Is there anything that you would recommend or that you think product teams could learn from this approach of selling that would help them build products in a different way or work with sales in a different way?
April Dunford: Yeah. So here’s what I think, the core of a good sales pitch is really deeply understanding your differentiated value, which is what is the value I can deliver that no other solution can. Often what I see at companies is you got a smart product team and they know a lot about the stuff they’re building and why it’s important and what the value is to the customer, and they did all this work on that when they were building it, but that information never made the jump to sales, because sales isn’t even trying to pitch value. They’re just pitching features like here’s the dropdown menus, here’s what they do. And so the first step in fixing this I think is to have a cross-functional team work on positioning.
So if I’ve got product, marketing, and sales together in the room working on defining what our differentiated value is, then I’m going to get all the good juice out of the product team that deeply understands the product, deeply understand what’s differentiated about it, deeply understands value, and then I’m also going to have all the juice from the sales team that understands what the common objections are, what the champion really wants to get done and doesn’t want to get done, what the situation is in a typical account, and then all of this cool information sharing happens, which actually you end up with way better definition of your differentiated value in the first place.
And so once we’ve done that work, it is very natural then for us to work together on the sales pitch that reflects that. What typically happens is not that at all. What typically happens is product’s working on some stuff, sales is working on some stuff, marketing’s working on some stuff. Marketing in their own little bubble comes up with positioning, they might build some stuff for the sales team, heave it over to the sales team. Sales team looks at it and says, “I don’t get what any of this stuff is. I disagree with this. This doesn’t match what I see,” and they just throw it out and they go back to doing the same pitch they’ve been doing since the year of the flood.
The Real Impact of Positioning Work
Lenny: That’s a long time. So first podcast episode was all around positioning, and so folks want to get deep into that, they should listen to that, so we’re not going to spend tons of time there, but differentiated value is a big part of this process also so I think it’s worth spending a bit of time here. Could you maybe share a couple examples of what this is to give people a sense of what does it mean to share differentiated value?
April Dunford: Yeah. So differentiated value is the answer to the question why pick us over the other alternatives? And so the way we get at that in positioning is we start with putting a stake in the ground of who do we actually compete with? And so if we didn’t exist in the market, what would a customer do? And so typically there’s some status quo thing, it might not even look like you, it might just be a spreadsheet, or do it with the intern or manual labor, and then there’s whatever else ends up on a short list against us. And it’s basically the definition of I got to beat all this plus indecision in order to win a deal, so I can stick my stake in the ground. Sales knows the answer to this question. If you have a sales team, they know the answer to this question, what would a customer do if we didn’t exist, they know.
And then we get to the next step is, well, so what do we have that’s different? And that’s capability wise, feature function of the product or capability of the company, so it could be features, it could be your pricing model, it could be we have support in a way that the other folks don’t. So there’s all kinds of things it could be. It could be be the breadth of the portfolio that you have beyond that one product, we can fill whiteboards with this stuff. And then what we do is we go down that list of features and we say, “So what? You got advanced AI, whatever the heck the thing is, so what? Why does anybody care?” And the answer to that so what is your value. And because it came from this differentiated feature, it’s generally value that the other guys can’t deliver because they don’t have the capabilities that underpin it.
So if I give you an example, a company I worked with a few years back, they’ve recently been acquired by Salesforce called LevelJump, and so they’re in the sales enablement space, which is terrible. There’s a million companies in the sales enablement space and they all look the same. And so LevelJump, so if you look at, well, what’s the competitive alternatives, if I look at all the companies in the sales enablement space, you can put them into two buckets in terms of approaches, they’re either a CMS like a jazzy content repository where you could make sure that people are using the right content and whatever, or they’re an LMS, a learning management system, which I can build the course and certify you on the course, and that’s how we’re going to train the sales reps.
If you look at LevelJump, they’re differentiated capability is they’re the only one that’s built on top of Salesforce. That’s the feature, we’re built on Salesforce, the other folks aren’t. And then who cares? So what? And so when we first had a conversation about it, there was five or six different answers to that so what question, but the big answer was, well, because we’re built on top of Salesforce, my sales enablement data is integrated with my sales data. And then you say, “Well, so what about that?” Well, because then that means I can actually tell did the sales enablement improve time to first deal or improve time to make quota? Well, so what about that? Well, if I improve that ramp time, then we get way more revenue faster. So that’s the differentiated value.
When I go to do that in a sales pitch, I can translate that into my insight. My insight is every day your rep’s not making [inaudible 00:42:36] it costs you money. So if we really want to solve sales enablement, don’t we really want to have something where we can measure whether or not the sales enablement is working with sales metrics? Yeah, we do.
Andy Raskin’s Framework Versus Sales Pitches
Lenny: Interesting. So the differentiated value often informs the insight that you start with?
Writing Tests in Job Interviews
April Dunford: It does. It absolutely is. The insight is basically the context that makes your differentiated value important, what is the thing you need to know to understand the importance of my differentiated value? In the case of Help Scout, the insight is, look, digital businesses like customer service is a growth driver, where does that come from? If you look at their differentiated value, it’s there. And so we can just reverse it, flip it around. Even if the product wasn’t necessarily constructed with that insight, maybe we got there sideways or the roundabout way or whatever, we iterated our way into that. We can look at the differentiated value and then basically reverse it out to the insight.
Products I’ve Liked Recently
Lenny: What’s a sign that the differentiated value or insight that you’ve come up with just isn’t clicking?
April Dunford: If the differentiated value doesn’t work in a sales pitch, what you’ll get is the company going, “Why would I pay for that? This is not value for me, buddy.” The companies I work with, the way I look at it is if you’re in market and you’re selling and you have happy, engaged customers, there’s differentiated value there. That’s why they picked you. That’s why they love you. That’s why they don’t turn out on you. It’s there. You might not know what it is, we might have to do a little process to get at it, but it’s there and it exists.
Lessons Learned From My Father
Lenny: Awesome. Another question that’s been in the back of my mind since we started talking about differentiated values is just how honest should you be about the competition? Obviously there’s a spectrum of extremely honest to super biased, what’s your guidance on just how honest to be there?
April Dunford: The posture I think you should assume in a sales situation, I had an old boss used to talk about this, is the posture we should have is calm confidence. So where that calm confidence comes from is we really understand why people should pick us. So this is differentiated value, we really understand it and we really understand who that’s a really good fit for, and we don’t even bother trying to chase anybody else.
So we should be able to come in and say, “Look, we’re sales enablement that delivers results. If you don’t care about those results, you shouldn’t pick us. You should pick someone else.” And so generally what we’re trying to be is extremely honest. We’re trying to come in and actually give credit where credit is due with the other approaches, because typically the other approaches work just fine for other kinds of companies. If you’re really small and you’re not growing e-commerce business, use a shared inbox. It’s free, it’s easy to use, there’s no problems there, just use it. If you’re really worried about bringing the cost down in a customer service center, maybe you should use Zendesk. And so I think the more we can act as a guide in this situation and come in and say, “Look, these guys are good for this, these folks are good for this, and we’re good for this. And you might not care about that, and if you don’t care about that, we’re not the one for you. You shouldn’t pick us.” But I think that…
We’re not the one for you. You shouldn’t pick us. But I think that this calm confidence idea is that where we know the client should pick us, we should be unafraid to fight for that business. But we should totally walk away from business where we’re not the best fit. We shouldn’t be chasing that business at all.
My Absolute Favorite City
Lenny: And this comes back to teaching them how to buy again and again. For these cases where you’re like, “This is not a fit.” Ideally you know that before you fly to their office and pitch them.
April Dunford: Yeah, generally you’ve had some kind of qualification happen upstream, and so that qualification could be done in lots of different ways. If you’ve got some kind of product like growth motion in the beginning, you’re looking for signals in that. And if the signals aren’t there, then you’re not talking to them. And so if you’ve designed your signals right, then you already know there’s intent there. You already know you’re a fit. You already know stuff. The way a lot of companies do this is they’ll have inside sales do a qualification call before they set up a first call with a sales rep. In that qualification call, you’re trying to make sure is this the right person? Do they have a need that we can actually meet? Is this actually a good fit for what we do? And if they’re not, they don’t even make it to the call.
Lenny: Mm-hmm. Imagine a place where you can find all your potential customers and get your message in front of them in a cost efficient way. If you’re a B1B business, that place exists, and it’s called LinkedIn. LinkedIn Ads allows you to build the right relationships, drive results, and reach your customers in a respectful environment. Two of my portfolio companies, Webflow and Census, are LinkedIn success stories. Census had a 10x increase in pipeline with the LinkedIn startup team. For Webflow after ramping up on LinkedIn in Q3, they had the highest marketing source revenue quarter to date. With LinkedIn Ads you’ll have direct access to and can build relationships with decision makers including 950 million members, 180 million senior execs and over 10 million C-level executives. You’ll be able to drive results with targeting and measurement tools built specifically for B2B. In tech LinkedIn generated two to five x higher return on ad spend than any other social media platforms.
Audiences on LinkedIn have two times the buying power of the average web audience, and you’ll work with a partner who respects the B2B world you operate in. Make B2B marketing everything it can be and get $100 credit on your next campaign. Just go to linkedin.com/podlenny to claim your credit. That’s linkedin.com/podlenny. Terms and conditions apply.
Another question around this idea of differentiated value and just alternative approaches is there’s a certain previous guest who was very big on creating a category being extremely important, and that potentially being the only way to build a legendary business. I know you have a different perspective on that because in theory if you go that direction, there’s no alternative. It’s like “We’re the one.” What’s your take on that?
April Dunford: Well, so here’s a few things. So one, obviously creating a category is not the only way to create a legendary business because the vast majority of legendary businesses did not create the categories that they’re in. So Google did not create search, Facebook did not create social network. There’s so many of them. It’s actually more of an exception to the rule that the company is creating a category than the other way around. So I think it’s a bit disingenuous to say the only way. It is a way to build a big business, no question about that. But it’s absolutely not the only way. In fact, it is not the most common way, but it is a way and it does work. So that’s one thing. The second thing is that category creation is interesting. Like most companies, if you look at their arc, even the category creators that are successful, they did not start out as category creators.
So they started out as a niche play in an existing category, and that’s because that’s generally the easiest way to get traction for a company early because what is the job of the market category? The job of a market category is to help answer the question, what is this thing all about? If I’m positioning an existing category, I can say, “Well, I’m CRM for very small businesses.” That was Salesforce’s initial positioning. I didn’t have to explain to you what a CRM was, that already existed. There was already billion dollar company in that space. We know what a CRM is, and I could say “We’re CRM for very small businesses. The reason you can use in this very small businesses is we don’t have any software. So you don’t have to have an IT department to babysit it. It’s fantastic.”
So most companies start there. Now what happens is that if you become the dominant player in that space, which again, category creation folks talk about this like no category creator has ever lost the market. In fact, most category creators wins their market. Like what happened to MySpace? What happened to Ask Jeeves? It didn’t work out so good for them. Most category creators actually get overtaken by fast followers. So if we look at the CRM market, Siebel was the big dominant player there and now they’re not. So now we’ve got Salesforce. Once you’re the dominant player in that market, a cool move to do is to actually extend the boundaries of the category so that you can continue to grow. And most of the category creation examples we see are companies that when they were 200, 300, 400 million revenue dominating their space, then decided to move the goalposts and say, “Well actually now we’re expanding into all these other areas and we’re going to call this category something. And that’s what it is.”
And there’s loads of examples of that. Like Qualtrics for example, is a company that a lot of people talk about very successful category creation. Well, they were survey software up until there were 300 million revenue just like everybody else in an existing category. So that got them there and that worked just fine. Oh, well, once we’re dominating it, now we can say it’s whatever, it is, customer experience software, whatever it is. Snowflake. Another good example like data warehousing in the cloud, they were that data warehousing, an existing market, were data warehousing for the cloud. That is not category creation. And that took them all the way up to the point where they were about to go public and now they’re cloud data, which is their attempt to expand and say, “Well, it’s not just data warehousing, it’s actually data lakes and all other data stuff.”
And so that’s a smart move for them because they’re now very well known in that space. I’m not saying category creation is a bad thing. There are examples of company that came right out of the gate and successfully created a category and then survived to own the category longer term. But a more common thing that happens is that the company does the hard work of creating the category and in exactly the moment where the category starts to take hold, fast follower can come in with fresh funding and a lot of it and learn from all your mistakes and come in and knock you off the peak right when you think you’ve made it.
So I think category creation is, again, it’s good, it works, but I think we have to be very careful when we’re thinking about doing that at an early stage business or a business that isn’t already dominating the category that they’re in. It’s much more common to see companies come in, shave off a piece of the market, dominate that, and then successfully branch out. It’s what Jeffrey Moore called bowling pin strategy. Almost all successful companies follow bowling pin strategy.
Lenny: Wait, what is that? Let’s touch on that real quick.
April Dunford: Oh yeah, you remember that thing. It’s funny how many times I’ve talked about bowling pin strategy in the last two months. So this comes from a bunch of work that was done around the way innovation gets adopted, blah, blah. So there’s a bunch of research done on this stuff, and I’m going to misquote it because Jeffrey Moore stuff, I’ve been reading it for decades. But bowling pin strategy goes like this. The easiest way to take over a great big market is to define a segment of the market that is underserved by the market leader.
And so if you think about a bunch of bowling pins, we’re going to circle around the lead pin, which is this little piece of the market that’s easy for us to go get, and the market leader probably doesn’t care about it. And so we knock over that pin and knocking over that pin enables us to get to the three pins right beside it. And so now I’m established here as a beachhead and I can go get the next three pins, I’m going to knock those over, and eventually I get big enough to challenge the market leader and then I overtake them.
So the example for my early career was I worked at this company, we thought we were enterprise software. We narrowed it down to CRM for investment banks, and so we literally drew bowling pins for our investors and said, “Lead pin is CRM for investment banks. Once we knock that over, then we’re going to go to retail banking, then we’re going to be CRM for banking. And then once we knock that over, we’re going to go to insurance, then we’re going to be CRM for financial services. Once we knock that over, then we’re going to be a great big company and we’re going to challenge Siebel to be CRM for enterprise software.” Instead we got acquired by Siebel for like $1 billion, but whatever. So most companies, if you look at the history of them, they actually start that way. And so yeah, if we just fast forwarded to when they were 300 million, we can say “Category creation’s the only thing to do,” but it’s like, well, what happened before then? That was something different.
Lenny: Awesome. Let’s come back to your framework. I’m looking at the list of bullet points. So we’ve covered a lot of this already actually. So there’s the insight where you helped them understand what’s happening in the world and what’s changing and why this is important. Then you talk about what the alternative approaches might be, pros and cons. Then there’s this third step, which we haven’t talked about yet, which is sharing the perfect world characteristics of a perfect solution. Can you talk a bit about that and why that’s important?
April Dunford: So this is the conclusion of the setup phase. So if I’m Help Scout for example, the conclusion is we say, “Look, you really want customer success software that’s as easy to use as an inbox. You’re never going to outgrow it, but it was built from the ground up to be deliver an amazing service.” And so it’s this part of the pitch where we actually get agreement with the customer that we are aligned in terms of our point of view on the universe. So it’s where I say, “Okay, we’ve had our little discussion about the pros and cons of the other alternatives,” and we say, “So look, so are you with me, man? Can we all agree that a really good solution for you would have A, B and C?” And the customer is either like, “Yeah, right,” or they’re not. And so if they’re right with you on this definition of the perfect world, then I’ve got you. I’ve already won the deal and I haven’t even talked about us yet because the way I’ve set it up, I’m the only one that can deliver that.
So if you say, “Right,” all I got to do is prove that I can do that and get you over the hurdle that it’s possible for you to adopt it.
Lenny: Sounds too easy.
April Dunford: Yeah, I mean…
Lenny: It’s like you lure them in.
April Dunford: If all of this was easy, Lenny we would be on a beach drinking out of a coconut.
Lenny: Oh man, let’s make it happen. Okay, so that’s the setup. What do you call the second part again?
April Dunford: It’s the follow through-
Lenny: The follow through.
April Dunford: … which is really focused on differentiated value. So in the second part, the first step is usually we introduce our stuff, which is where the market category is important. So we come in and we say, “Okay, can we agree that a really good solution should tick these boxes? Yes. Okay, good. Now let’s talk about us. Okay, so we believe that. That’s why we build what we build.”
So here I am, I’m Help Scout, we’re customer service software for digital businesses or whatever our market category is. So we introduce it just to get people straight in their mind about what it is, and then we move to here’s the value, here’s how we do it. If we think about a typical sales call, like let’s say a sales call is half an hour, 45 minutes, I would expect to spend more than half of the time in the sales call in this differentiated value phase. So if we’re doing a demo, that’s the demo, and we’re saying, “Okay, step one, let me show you how we do this. So easy to use as an inbox. Here’s the features. Never have to outgrow it, here’s the features. Delivers amazing customer experience, here’s the features.” And so that’s where we’re getting to the meat of what you thought you were getting when you clicked on the button that said, “Give me a demo.”
So that’s what we’re doing there. And then we end with these three little pieces. One is generally I got to show you some proof that I can do what I say I can do. So if I’m claiming this thing delivers an amazing customer experience, how do I prove that? Well, I can prove it by other customers saying it was amazing. That’s one way to prove it. If I had some independent third party data that proved whatever I was claiming, I could show that there too. But a lot of times what we’re doing is we’re like, “Let me show you how this worked in a company that used our stuff. So this is what the before looked like. They did this thing, here’s the after.” And so customer case study is usually good way to do that, but there’s usually a step called proof, which is, I showed you the value, now here’s the proof that I can actually deliver on that value and it’s not just me blowing smoke.
And then the step after that then is this optional objection step where they say, “Oh yeah, sounds good, but IT is never going to go for it,” or “Sounds good, but maybe it’s going to be too expensive,” or something. And so you’re going to handle that objection as best as you can. And then you finish with the ask, which is whatever the next step in your sales process is. So it’s, “Hey, so what we have to do to get a deal cooking here, do we have to get IT involved? Does IT need to see it? Would you like us to come in and present with you with IT or do you want me to just help you work on some stuff for IT?” It’s whatever your next step in the sales process is.
Lenny: Awesome. So let me read through this just to have it also succinctly here in case people are taking notes or trying to remember the stuff. So there’s the setup, there’s the follow through. Within the setup, you have the insight, the alternative approaches, pros and cons, in the perfect world. And then you introduce your product, talk about the differentiated value, share the proof of why it works, potentially handle objections, silent objections, and then the ask of what comes next.
April Dunford: That’s right. That’s it.
Lenny: In terms of knowing if this is working and if your differentiated value works or if your insight works, do you have kind of a heuristic of a success rate that feels right? How often should this work for you to feel like “I think we have it?”
April Dunford: Well, so generally if the sales pitch isn’t working, it’s because the positioning was weak.
And so companies that jumped straight to building the new sales pitch without going back and really making sure that they really nailed the differentiated value, who knows? Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. And a lot of times it doesn’t, I think. And so in the work I do with my clients, we go all the way back to the beginning. So we go right back to let’s work on the positioning first. Now, if I’ve got the smartest people from the company in the room and we’ve done enough deals that we are pretty knowledgeable about how customers buy and what they like and what they don’t know. If I’ve got the senior executive team in the room and they’ve got a reasonable amount of customer experience, we can pretty much feel good that the positioning we come up with if we’re following a process will be good.
Then it’s just a matter of taking that positioning, mapping it to the sales pitch and then going to test it. So I think there’s a bunch of things in testing that are really important. So one is we absolutely need sales involved in building the pitch. If we don’t have sales involved in building the pitch, the pitch is never going to stick. The rule with sales reps is even if they don’t like their current pitch, they’re comfortable with the current pitch and they know it and they’ve memorized it and they have a little joke they tell on slide three. So they’re not going to give up the current pitch without a fight. So you got to get sales management involved in building a new pitch, and then I would never just build the new pitch and then heave it over the wall and say, “Good luck, Chuck.” Because what’ll happen is they’ll come up with all kinds of excuses why they can’t use this pitch.
Instead, what you do is you take your best sales rep, your best one, and you bring your best sales rep over and you train them on the new pitch. They got to learn it, they got to pitch it to you, pitch it to the head of sales. We do a bunch of repetition on that, and then we have that rep test the pitch with qualified prospects. So we don’t go to existing customers. They’ve already been polluted with the old positioning and the old pitch, and this needs to work with a qualified prospect, so let’s do it in the way it was intended. We’re going to take qualified prospects and work that new pitch with them. Usually what we’ll do is a test period where after every pitch we’ll huddle and say, “What worked? What didn’t work? Maybe that word is tripping people up. Maybe we need to move this slide from here to here,” and so we’ll tune it.
And then after we’ve done a bunch of pitches, one of two things happens. And so in this test structure, I am very much relying on the expertise of my best rep to know what’s good. So after the best rep is comfortable with the pitch, done a bunch of pitches, re-twizzled it, at some point the rep will say, “Okay, I think we’re done optimizing this pitch, and I’m not going back to the old pitch. I’m sticking with this pitch because I think this one works better.” An experienced sales rep will know that, whether the pitch is better than the old pitch, if you give them the opportunity to feel comfortable with it, work with it a bit and pitch a bunch of new prospects with it.
So if your best sales rep says, “Oh, this is way better than the old pitch. I can just feel it from the way people react to it and the number of times we’ve been able to convert people over into actual opportunities from a first call.” Then what you do is at that point I call that pass. So then we take that rep, we can film them doing the pitch for training, and then we can take that rep, go back to the rest of the sales team and have that rep sell everybody else on it. So that rep goes back and says, “Listen up people, you’re stupid if you’re using that old pitch, which sucks. This new pitch is way better. Trust me, I’m the best rep on this whole team. By the way here’s the list of deals I have cooking in the pipeline that I got using this deck. You should go do it and I’m going to teach you how to do it.”
Now I got sales, teaching sales, teach and sales instead of marketing, sort of throwing something over the wall and crossing their fingers and saying, “Hey, I hope this works.” What we should see is an immediate uplift in what happens after first call. So most of the time what that is we get a higher percentage of deals converting into opportunities after that first substantive calls. Sometimes depending on the quality of the pipeline we had coming in, we’re actually disqualifying more. But sometimes that’s a good thing.
But what we should see is an immediate uptick. It’s stuff coming into the pipeline. It’s a neat trick to pull, especially right now when everybody’s budgets are really tight and you’re just trying to squeeze more juice out of the lemon. It’s a really easy way to get some more juice out of the pipeline. Just go in, tighten up your positioning, tighten up that sales pitch. And we can have instant impact with that because we can roll that out in a couple of weeks and start getting better deals flowing through the pipeline because these customers are understanding your value better, understanding why to pick you better. It’s just easy, low hanging fruit to do when the economy’s bad.
Lenny: To give people a sense of maybe how easy that might be, how long would you suggest people spend on maybe tweaking their positioning and then also on this pilot, how much total time could it take to potentially significantly increase sales?
April Dunford: So in the customers that I work with, when we do the positioning stuff, the positioning stuff takes a week. We’re beginning and we’re done in a week. We’re all about speed on this thing. We’re trying to get the thing happening fast. So we’re in and out on the positioning in a week. It might take you, it depends on the company, the bigger the company, the slower this is, but some big companies are actually quite fast, and if you’re motivated, it shouldn’t take long for us to take that pitch and make it real.
Then we got to find a rep, train the rep, and then how long it takes us to test it really depends on how much deal flow you’ve got. So if you’re working on monster deals and you don’t actually get that many qualified prospects to pitch, that might take a few weeks. But if you’ve got a lot of prospects coming through the door, and you can get through this fairly quickly. So I’ve had companies do it start to finish. We got new pitch out the door and people using it in two weeks. That’s about as fast as you can get it done. Most folks, I would say take about a month.
Lenny: Cool. That is a very short-
April Dunford: Sometimes you’re like IBM and who knows when you get to it, right? But most folks could get through it if everybody’s motivated, we can get it out and have it running a month.
Lenny: You mentioned marketing and earlier you said that marketing is involved in this process in some way. What’s your advice to just how to involve marketing, where they fit in?
April Dunford: Yeah, so usually marketing is going to end up being the stewards of the positioning once the positioning is done. So they’re going to end up being positioning police after this because a lot of the positioning stuff is going to take the form of marketing things. So they’re invested in this. So when I was the VP marketing, I was the person that would instigate the positioning thing, let’s get everybody together and work on the positioning. And then I would usually be the person that is driving, getting the sales pitch figured out, but it’s me and sales and product working together. And then once the sales pitch is done, depending on the size of the organization and whether or not you have sales enablement or somebody inside sales that can babysit the pitch. Usually me and the head of sales would work on, “Okay, this is the pitch and this is locked down and we’re not actually going to change this pitch until something happens that requires us to change the positioning. And then that’s when we’ll re-look at the pitch.”
So we would look at recertifying the reps every quarter on the pitch and all that kind of stuff. And that would be generally, me in partnership with the head of sales. But it depends on how you do it. I don’t think it really matters who owns it. If you have a good product marketing organization, good product marketing organization generally is very concerned with the positioning and the pitch, and those two things sit in their purview, but depends on how you define it. I can’t wait till you get Airbnb. Tell us how this stuff works. They’re different because they’re a consumer, but companies are arranged in all different ways. So if you have product marketing, it looks one way. If you don’t, it looks another way. Somebody’s got to kind of be the owner of this thing though. And so we have to decide who that’s going to be.
Lenny: Just a couple more questions. One is to motivate people to do this. What kind of impact have you seen at companies that invest this time and rethink the way they pitch?
April Dunford: Well, so people don’t like me to talk about revenue stuff. Hugely what we’ve seen though is again, the immediate impact is felted sales, and everybody’s very jazzed about that.
April Dunford: Impact is felt in sales, and everybody’s very jazzed about that. Because sometimes what the worry is, is we’ve got this old positioning and they came in through the pipeline that way. So they were exposed to our marketing somewhere with this old positioning, and then we hit them with the new positioning with this sales pitch. And aren’t they going to be all like, “Oh, you moved my cheese.” And usually it ends up not being a problem at all. So usually what we see immediately is an uptick in what’s happening in sales. And so I’ve had a couple of companies tell me they’ve doubled the number of deals that they’re bringing from first sales call to opportunity just by tightening up the pitch and getting that going. I think that’s not unusual. I worked at a company where we did it in-house where I was the VP marketing, and we, within two quarters, had doubled the revenue just by tightening up the pitch. Just tighten it up.
Lenny: Holy shit. All right.
April Dunford: Tighten it up.
Lenny: No big deal.
April Dunford: Yep.
Lenny: Okay. So-
April Dunford: It was a big shift in positioning, I’ll tell you that. Not small. Most of the time, we’re not doing that. Most of the time, it’s a tightening. We’re not saying, “Oh, we used to be this and now we’re this.” Most of the time, it’s a tightening, but usually the pitches are so bad. I’m telling you they’re so bad that there’s this low hanging fruit there that if we could improve it even a little bit, it actually has this big impact on how much stuff survives down the pipe.
Lenny: And again, if folks want to go deep into the positioning step, your first book Obviously Awesome, is a great guide, and our first podcast episode goes through this. Plus you have a guest post in my newsletter where you give them a quick start guide. So there’s so many tools to help you through this process.
April Dunford: So many tools.
Lenny: The other thought I’ve had in the back of my mind as we’ve been chatting is a previous guest, Andy Raskin, has a different framework, feels similar, but I know they’re different. His framework starts with a shift that’s happened in the world, and then here’s who’s going to win in the shift, here’s who’s going to lose. And then he goes into why this product is the best. What’s your perspective on that approach versus this approach and the big differences?
April Dunford: So the thing with that framework is I do think it works in certain conditions, but again, I think the conditions might be kind of edgy. So there’s a couple of things that I think are lacking in that structure for a sales pitch. So the first one is there’s actually no concept of differentiated value in that pitch, which for me is a giant miss. So in that pitch, it assumes that new is inherently valuable and old is inherently bad, and sometimes that’s true. So sometimes there’s just you versus the status quo and the status quo is some terrible old thing, some legacy thing or it’s manual processes or something, and you’re the only thing out there, then you can get away with that. But most of the time, we don’t have that. Most of the time, there’s multiple new ways of doing something and you just can’t say, “Well, I’m the only new and the rest of you are old and bad.”
So usually I’ve got to thread the needle. And so that’s the first thing. The second thing is that for most companies, if we really understood customer and decision, old is good, it’s safe, it’s not risky. And does anybody ever say, “No, I’m not going to buy Salesforce. That’s the old stuff,”? I just don’t think that happens. So in a lot of cases, I don’t think you can rely, it’s lazy to say, “Buy this because it’s new and new is better.” Most of the time, the customers are going to want to know, well, what’s better about it? Tell me what the value is that I can’t get anywhere else. And you’re going to have to get more specific than just saying, “Trust me, it’s new and new is good.” So that’s the first thing. The second thing is this idea of starting with a trend. On the surface it looks kind of good, but the problem is often the trend is not unique to you. So everybody else sees the trend too. And so you are starting in a way that any of your competitors could start the same way.
I did this for years where I was taught to do problem solution. We would define the problem like a trend. We’d say, “Well, the change in the world.” I was selling databases and I’d say, “Change in the world, data is exponentially growing.” It’s like, no shit. We all know that. All of my competitors could say that, and all of my competitors deal with the trend in the same way. So unless you have a particularly unique take on the trend, well, then it’s not the trend at all really, is it? It’s your insight into the trend. So I don’t think trend is that great because it’s not always unique to you. And ideally what we want is something that we can say that none of our competitors can. And typically a trend is something outside of our control. It’s out in the world and everybody else can see it too.
So I don’t think it’s great. I think that structure looks a lot like the structure we use in a VC pitch or an investor pitch because we’re talking about much longer timelines and we can say, “Look, the world is really changing and 10 years from now there’s going to be chaos and destruction and the only one standing is us and therefore there is no competition.” And because the timeframes are longer and we’re talking about disruption of an entire market, which is pretty theoretical, we can get away with a lot of that stuff in investor pitch. In fact, we want to go there in investor pitch. Sales pitch is all about right now. Sales pitch is like, okay, I’m going to exchange my money for right now. You can’t get too far into the future. Otherwise, all I’m doing is giving everybody a reason to delay, which they’re likely to do anyway because they’re indecisive about what they should do.
Lenny: I feel like I need a debate version of this podcast where people come on and-
April Dunford: I know, but here’s the thing that I think people should think about when they’re looking at all this stuff because it’s terribly confusing if you’re trying to figure this out. The one thing I really dislike about the category creation folks is they say that’s the only way that you can be successful. And in general, that’s just not true about anything. There’s lots of ways to do everything. And so I think people should mess around with stuff. And for any of these frameworks, I think they should look at it and see if it works for them and their situation. And maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t.
And I think they should steal things from wherever they can steal it and figure out what works in their own situation. My stuff, I like to think is a starting point, folks should use it as a starting point, but people shouldn’t be slaves to it. There are lots of things that work at a market, and I think the only thing that we know for certain is that we can’t say, “Well, this is the rule and it always works like this.” If it was that easy, again, this wouldn’t be so hard. We wouldn’t have podcasts and newsletters and all kinds of things trying to figure this stuff out.
Lenny: Extremely true. Well, with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
April Dunford: Oh yeah. Lightning round. Oh gosh. It gives me stress. Okay.
Lenny: Okay, question number one. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
April Dunford: Well, that’s an easy question. So right now I’m really into Matt Dixon’s work right now, which we’ve mentioned him a couple of times on the podcast, but Matt Dixon’s new book called The JOLT Effect is really great just because there’s all this data and the things that he discovered with that data, a lot of it go against what we would consider accepted sales wisdom. And so I think that book is full of juicy nuggets and everybody should look at it. His previous book, The Challenger Sale, and there was a companion book to that called The Challenger Customer. Those were also excellent and based on a deep set of research. And those books are older now, but what we see in The JOLT Effect is all the stuff holds true. All the stuff from The Challenger Sale has not changed in 10 years. So I think those books together are really cool.
The other one that I always recommend is the original book on positioning, which is the book by Ries and Trout Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. I have my copy of it, is dogeared. I probably read that book 100 times and I still see stuff in that book that I didn’t see before. So I think if you really want to go deep on this positioning stuff, my book is the how to book. Their book is what is it in the first place book. And I think everybody that’s interested in positioning should go read that.
Lenny: Amazing. By the way, I have your first book somewhere behind me there. I don’t know where it is, but it’s there.
April Dunford: I got mine right here so I can do this gag. There it is.
Lenny: Nailed it.
April Dunford: There’s the new one, there’s the old one.
Lenny: The YouTube audience can see that trick that you’ve learned. Second question, what is a favorite recent movie or TV show that you’ve really enjoyed?
April Dunford: Oh man, I’m going to get in trouble for this. So you know Bong Joon-ho is the guy that did the movie Parasite?
Lenny: Yeah.
April Dunford: So [inaudible 01:17:48] before Parasite, there was this book called, this movie called Snow Piercer. It’s really old. I think it came out in-
Lenny: I’ve seen that. Is that with the train?
April Dunford: 2013. Have you seen it?
Lenny: Yeah.
April Dunford: So I love this movie so much. So recently I went on a train trip with my dad and before I went to the train trip, we got talking about trains. And then we all had to go watch Snow Piercer again. Like me and my daughter watching Snow Piercer. We’re really into this movie. And it’s funny, when it came out, I was working at a startup and the CEO came and said, “Seen any good movies lately?” And I was like, “Oh man, you got to see this movie Snow Piercer.” And he went on a first date with a woman and he came back the next day and he was so mad. He was not just kind of mad. He was really mad at me. He was like, “That was the worst movie I’ve ever seen.” I was like, “Dude, you should have told me you were going on a date. I didn’t know.”
Lenny: Yeah, that is my experience with that movie. I did not enjoy it, but I think you have to go into it [inaudible 01:18:46]
April Dunford: It’s polarizing. You either think it’s amazing or you’re like, that was terrible. What did I just watch?
Lenny: This explains your taste in movies. We learned a lot about you, April. That movie is something else.
April Dunford: Did you see Parasite? That was amazing.
Lenny: That was amazing. Very different. Not what I imagined. I didn’t realize it was the same person.
April Dunford: Oh yeah.
Lenny: All right. Okay, cool. That’s two movies for people to watch. I’m curious how people think of Snow Piercer.
April Dunford: Be warned don’t go on a date with this.
Lenny: Oh man, I still think about that movie sometimes. Next question, what is a favorite interview question you like to ask people that you’re interviewing? Usually this is for when you’re hiring, so whatever this comes up for you.
April Dunford: So back when I was running teams internally back in my VP marketing days, I felt like a lot of marketing folks came with a certain amount of bad habits, particularly startup marketing folks. It’s a bit of the wild west in marketing. And so sometimes they’d come in and you get into somebody new and they’d be really smart, but they learned something at the previous company that you’re like, please never do that here. It’s not going to work here. And so I developed a thing where I was just looking for attitude. Were you enthusiastic? Are you super into what we’re doing here? And I can teach you pretty much anything. The only thing I can’t teach you is persuasive writing. And I think that’s a learnable skill. I think people can learn how to do persuasive writing.
I just don’t have time to teach it to you myself. And so I used to give people a writing test, so I’d say, “Look, think of something you bought recently and write me two paragraphs and just sell me on it.” And I used to love that test because people could either do it or they can’t. And there’s just so much stuff we end up doing in product marketing and marketing that involves a little bit of writing that it’s kind of a foundational skill. And if you don’t have that, that was the one thing I couldn’t teach you.
Lenny: Wow, that is fascinating. I’ve never heard of that as an interview question. And I love it. I feel like product managers-
April Dunford: I stole it from a company that made me do it before I got hired, and I was like, this is a really smart thing. I’m [inaudible 01:20:53] stealing it. My thing was I got anxiety and I couldn’t decide what product to write about, and I had literally just bought a new pair of running shoes. So I wrote two paragraphs about my new Brooks distance running shoes. But it was good. I got the job.
Lenny: It is an excellent segue to our next question, which is, is there a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you really like?
April Dunford: Right now I’m kind of into, I don’t even know how to describe this category of things, but things that are kind of low tech but are awesome. And so one of the category of things that I really love right now is I’m really into fountain pens. I don’t know if you’ve ever written with a fountain pen. [inaudible 01:21:35]
Lenny: I haven’t, but I know what they are.
April Dunford: And so there’s this company, Lamy, they’re based in Germany, and they make the world’s greatest fountain pens. They’re beautiful, they’re amazing. Some of them are really expensive. If you want to spend a lot of money on a pen, you can. But they have this one called the AL-Star, which is not an expensive pen. It’s 20, $30. It may be expensive for a pen, but it’s not so much money that you wouldn’t feel bad if you lost it. So Lamy AL-Star. That’s my great product lately. I don’t have one right here. I should, it’d be a great prop to pick it up, but I actually don’t have my bag here and it’s in my bag. But Lamy AL-Star. You Google it. These are beautiful pens. And then if you haven’t written with a fountain pen, it takes a minute to get used to it, but then it’s like, gosh, it just feels great. You’ll never write with a ballpoint pen again.
Lenny: I was going to ask, is it the feel of the writing that you really enjoy about it?
April Dunford: Feel. Totally different. Yeah. Amazing.
Lenny: I use Muji pens. I don’t know if you know these pens.
April Dunford: Oh yeah, these are actually really good. They’re like roller ball pens, roller ball pen, very good, but not as good as the fountain pen.
Lenny: It’s no fountain pen.
April Dunford: The Muji pen is pretty good.
Lenny: Then do you have to dip it in ink and stuff? How does that work?
April Dunford: No. You actually, they either come with a little cartridge that you stick in or if you feel bad about the environment, you don’t want to be throwing out cartridges all the time, there’s a refillable cartridge, so you basically just stick another thing and it sucks it up and yeah, you don’t dip it in ink. That would be crazy. I can’t take that on the airplane, man.
Lenny: Confiscate your ink. All right, questions get a little more challenging potentially or really easy. Do you have a favorite life motto that you like to repeat to yourself, you like to share with people, that you find useful to come back to?
April Dunford: My thing lately is, and maybe this is just an old person thing, but my thing lately is nothing’s a big deal. Nothing’s a big deal, nothing’s a big deal. And so you’ll have stuff that you think is a really big deal, positive or negative, and you’ll be like, wow, if this thing happened, it’d be so great, and then it happens and you’re like, yeah, it’s pretty great, but things are good otherwise, or it’ll be the opposite. Like, oh, if this thing happened, it’d be so bad. Then it happens and you’re like, that wasn’t that bad. And so I don’t know if this is good or bad, but lately I’m in this zone of I’m in this kind of chill zone where I’m like, nothing’s a big deal, man. Everything’s cool.
Lenny: That super resonates. And as much as you say that to yourself, it’s still hard to convince yourself of that sometimes. But that is a really good motto. I’m going to steal that myself. I kind of say that to myself often in different way.
April Dunford: Yeah.
Lenny: What is the most valuable lesson your mom or your dad taught you?
April Dunford: Yeah, it is funny because it’s a little bit related to that. So my dad ran a business, so I grew up in a really small town and my dad and it’s cottage country in Canada. And so my dad ran the local toys for tourists, like boats and motorcycles and ATVs and that sort of thing. And he ran that business for years and years and he sold it a few years back when he retired. But it’s a neat thing to grow up in entrepreneurial family because you kind of see this highs and lows. The business is really good. Then the business was really bad and then we were all broke and then the business was good and we were not broke. So there was this thing, and my dad used to always kind of have this attitude of you just got to grind it out.
You’re just going to grind it out. There’s going to be good stuff, there’s going to be bad stuff, but the key is to just keep going, just keep going. And so he ran that business for whatever, 30, 40 years. I don’t know. His motto is the home of fun since ‘71. So he started it in ‘71. I think he sold it three, four years ago. So a long time.
Lenny: Wow.
April Dunford: It all worked out good in the end. And so I don’t know, I think there’s something cool about growing up in a family where you can see the highs and lows and then again be like everything’s we’re just grinding it out over here. Nothing’s a big deal.
Lenny: It’s clear where all that comes from now.
April Dunford: Yeah.
Lenny: Final question. You do a lot of traveling, you do a lot of speaking, you go to a bunch of cities. I’m curious just what is your favorite either city that you go to that maybe people may not know about or venue that you speak at?
April Dunford: It’s such a cliche, but I love Paris. I just love it. But for me, Paris is like a particular vibe. So when I was in university, I did an exchange when I was in engineering and I did third year engineering at a school just outside of Paris. And so I spent the whole year there, learned a bit of French. My French was pretty good at the end. My French is really bad now. So I kind of get Paris. I like Paris. And so when I go to Paris, I just have the best time. I have my set of restaurants I want to go to. I have my handful of places I want to go shopping. I put my butt down in a cafe, look at the beautiful people, drink my nice coffee. I just really dig the whole vibe of Paris and people are starting to know that now. So French companies will call me and they’ll say, “Do we get a Paris discount? We hear you like coming here.” And I go, “Okay.”
Lenny: Now this is going to [inaudible 01:26:51]
April Dunford: There’s a great product management conference there called La Product Conference run by these folks at Tega, shout out to Tega. So I’ve been there a number of times for their conferences and they do an amazing job and the venue is really great. It changes around. But last year, the last time I went there, which was two years ago, it was at an old theater in [inaudible 01:27:13]. Absolutely beautiful. And that was a pretty great venue in a great city with a great conference. So yeah, shout out to French people.
Lenny: Oh man. That sounds dreamy. Paris. I see how that could be a favorite. April, I think we accomplished everything we were hoping to accomplish. I think everyone that has listened to this podcast is going to be better at pitching and selling. It feels like even if they take one element of this framework, say starting with an insight or focusing on different value will make them better. And so I’m proud of us. Thank you so much for doing this. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out and how can listeners be useful to you?
April Dunford: So where can people find me? I’m aprildunford.com. The only social media I’m doing these days is LinkedIn. I’m a bit social media-ed out. I’m experimenting a little on threads and Instagram, but LinkedIn is a good place to find me if you just want low lift way to follow my stuff. But I’m doing all the things now, Lenny, I got a podcast, it’s called Positioning with April Dunford. I got a newsletter that’s also called Positioning. You can find that if you go to, it’s on Substacks, you can find it there, otherwise aprildunford.com/books and you can sign up there. But those are the big things. And then there’s the books, obviously, if you want to learn more about this stuff. Everything I know is in the book. There isn’t stuff that I know that isn’t in the book to be honest.
Lenny: Amazing. And then how can listeners be useful to you? Just check out those things.
April Dunford: I guess so. You know what? I’m in this phase. I think, again, I think it’s an old age thing. I am in this kind of philosophical phase where I’m not going to be doing this forever. And what I’m trying to do right now is get everything that’s useful out of my head and out in the world before I’m done. And so right now I’m very focused on delivering useful things for other people. I didn’t think I needed to write a book about sales pitches, but then I got the idea in my head, everybody’s sales pitch is so bad and there isn’t a book on how to build a sales pitch. And I’m not saying mine’s the world’s greatest thing, but it’s better than nothing. So this is what I’m trying to do right now. I’m trying to be useful to other people because pretty soon I’m not going to be doing anything, I think is the idea.
Lenny: Arnold Schwarzenegger’s new book is called Be Useful. And I feel like that’s the perfect description of how to be successful and especially in the work that we do, just helping people. But I keep coming back to that. It’s just be useful.
April Dunford: I think this is a really important thing. When I wrote the first book, people started writing back to me and saying, “Oh, your book was so great.” And my reflex action was to say, “Oh, I’m glad you enjoyed it.” But then I stumped myself and I was like, you know what? I don’t actually care if you enjoyed it. This isn’t entertainment. I’m actually trying to create something that’s useful. So what I really want is for people to read this stuff and come back and say, “That was useful. We were struggling with this thing, and that unlocked something for me and that was useful.” And that’s what I’m trying to do right now.
Lenny: April, thank you so much for being here. This was amazing.
April Dunford: Thanks so much. It’s always good to be here.
Lenny: Always good to have you here. And we might do a V3 when you do a third book if you ever-
April Dunford: No, not happening.
Lenny: Okay. All right. Well, bye everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| AL-Star | AL-Star |
| beachhead | 滩头阵地 |
| Bob Moesta | Bob Moesta |
| Bong Joon-ho | 奉俊昊 |
| bowling pin strategy | 保龄球瓶策略 |
| Brooks | Brooks |
| calm confidence | 从容自信 |
| category creation | 品类创建 |
| champion | 推进者(交易推进者) |
| CMS | CMS(内容管理系统) |
| consensus | 共识 |
| cost center | 成本中心 |
| CRM | CRM(客户关系管理系统) |
| differentiated value | 差异化价值 |
| discovery | 探索 |
| dropdown menus | 下拉菜单 |
| fast follower | 快速跟随者 |
| FOMO | FOMO(错失恐惧) |
| fork lift | 彻底翻新(此处指全面替换现有文案/信息架构) |
| G2 Crowd | G2 Crowd(企业软件评测平台) |
| Geoffrey Moore | Geoffrey Moore(科技营销理论家) |
| Gong | Gong(销售对话分析平台) |
| growth driver | 增长驱动力 |
| help desk software | 工单软件 |
| Help Scout | Help Scout |
| inside sales | 内部销售团队 |
| insight | 洞察 |
| Jobs To Be Done | Jobs To Be Done(待完成任务理论) |
| Lamy | Lamy |
| LevelJump | LevelJump |
| line of business buyer | 业务部门买家 |
| LMS | LMS(学习管理系统) |
| Matt Dixon | Matt Dixon |
| Muji | Muji(无印良品) |
| niche play | 利基产品 |
| pitch deck | 销售演示文档 |
| positioning | 定位 |
| Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind | Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind |
| product exposition | 产品展示 |
| product led growth | 产品驱动增长 |
| prospects | 潜在客户 |
| qualification call | 资质筛选电话 |
| Qualtrics | Qualtrics |
| Ries and Trout | Ries 和 Trout |
| ROI | ROI(投资回报率) |
| sales enablement | 销售赋能 |
| Sales Pitch | 销售话术 |
| shared inbox | 共享收件箱 |
| short list | 短名单 |
| Siebel | Siebel |
| Snow Piercer | Snow Piercer(雪国列车) |
| Snowflake | Snowflake |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2(服务组织控制类型 2 合规认证) |
| status quo | 现状 |
| The Challenger Customer | The Challenger Customer |
| The Challenger Sale | The Challenger Sale |
| The JOLT Effect | The JOLT Effect |
| Zendesk | Zendesk |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
打造制胜销售话术的分步指南 | April Dunford(《Sales Pitch》作者)
访谈记录
April Dunford: 40%到60%的 B2B 采购流程最终以”不做决定”告终。如果你深挖这组数据,会发现其中大多数并不是在说:“嗯,我不决定购买新东西,是因为我们原来的做法更好。“根本不是那么回事。实际上,大多数情况是他们无法自信地做出选择。于是他们就去找老板说:“要不这样吧,现在时机不太好,先别做了。明年再说吧,先缓缓。“因为对于那个要为决策承担责任的人来说,这是最安全、零风险的做法。
嘉宾介绍
Lenny: 今天我的嘉宾是 April Dunford。April 是全球最权威的产品定位专家。她是畅销书《Obviously Awesome》的作者,这也是我最喜欢的定位类书籍。这是她第二次做客本播客,因为她刚出版了一本新书《Sales Pitch》,这本书建立在她25年的营销副总裁职业生涯以及为 Google、Epic Games 等众多公司提供咨询的经验之上。这本书将指导你用更好的方式来推介和销售你的产品。在今天的对话中,April 分享了她所见过的、最能激发潜在客户兴趣并促成购买决策的框架。就像我在本集开头说的那样,听完这期节目,你会变得更擅长推介和销售你的产品。如果这对你有用——当然应该有用——这期就是为你准备的。话不多说,有请 April Dunford。
[广告部分已跳过]
开场寒暄
Lenny: April,非常感谢你来做客。欢迎回到播客。
April Dunford: 很高兴回来。我们之前聊过这个,但感觉上次来的时候已经是好久以前的事了。我当时是最早的一批嘉宾之一,感觉你做这个播客已经做了好久了。不过那大概也就是一年前的事。
Lenny: 感觉像过了一辈子,但确实差不多是一年前。
April Dunford: 但你把这个节目做到现在的程度真的很了不起,对吧?它的增长,还有其他一切,都非常令人振奋。
Lenny: 谢谢 April,我很感激。
April Dunford: 不客气,不过我说的是实话。我觉得大家看你的内容都会想:“天哪,他是怎么做到的?”
Lenny: 秘诀就是大量的工作。
April Dunford: 是的。
Lenny: 这就是那个快速致富的方案。
April Dunford: 没人想听这个。
Lenny: 哈哈,但这是一种极其有成就感的工作,而且我们又能再次聊天了。你是非常少见的返场嘉宾,这让我非常开心。你回来的原因是你写了一本非常棒的新书——如果你在看 YouTube 的话,我手里就有一本——叫《Sales Pitch》。
April Dunford: 太酷了。
Lenny: 就是这本。而且你背景里也有一本,简直像盗梦空间一样。这本书的全名是《Sales Pitch: How to Craft a Story to Stand Out and Win》。今天我们将花时间深入挖掘书中的所有经验和框架,在我们这一个小时里尽可能多聊一些。我对这次对话的目标是:让听众在离开这期播客时,能更好地推介和销售自己的产品。我想每位产品负责人和创始人都需要这方面的能力并不断提升。听起来怎么样?
April Dunford: 听起来很棒。
从一个真实案例开始
Lenny: 好的。我在想,作为进入话题的方式,我们可以先从一个你合作过的公司的故事或案例开始,你在那里应用了书中教授的框架和经验,然后以此为切入点再深入展开。
定位与销售话术的关系
April Dunford: 好,没问题。我的背景是做定位工作的。所以在我与客户合作的过程中,我们通常在做的是调整定位,也就是在”我们如何在市场中取胜”这个问题上做一些思维上的转变。为了验证这个定位,我们需要把定位转化为销售话术,然后在实际客户面前进行测试。
我刚开始做这项工作的时候就注意到一件事:每个人的销售话术看起来都差不多,而且都不太好。在大多数情况下,销售话术中根本没有任何定位的成分。销售话术本质上就是一个产品展示,基本上就是一个花哨的产品功能展示间。如果有五个下拉菜单,我们就把五个下拉菜单全部点开,把所有东西展示给所有人看——功能、功能、功能、功能、功能。
所以大多数团队并不习惯在话术中真正进行推介。基本上就是”只摆事实”——我们就把这些展示给你看。有些团队会做一点非常轻量化的处理——“这是问题,我们是解决方案,现在让我带你过一遍所有下拉菜单”——但本质上还是一样的。
所以我想要做的是建立一个能够反映定位的话术结构。要做到这一点,我们就需要稍微进入讲故事的模式。不需要太多,但至少要有一点。而且当我们谈论功能时,我们不应该在谈论功能本身,而应该谈论这些功能所传递的价值。
话术改造的前后对比示例
让我举个例子,给你看看改造前后的对比。我之前合作过一家叫 Help Scout 的公司,他们做的是客户服务领域的产品,可以想象成类似 Zendesk 之类的,就是那个赛道。他们有意思的地方在于,这家公司从一开始就是为数字化企业打造的。所谓数字化企业,就是没有实体门店、没有销售代表的那种企业。所以他们对客户服务的切入点从一开始就不一样。Help Scout 说,“你知道吗?对于这类企业来说,客户服务其实非常重要。因为这是你唯一能与真实客户互动的时刻。“数据也证明了这一点——如果你在服务环节给客户一个非常好的体验,就能提升客户忠诚度、提高复购率,它实际上是一个增长驱动力。而在大多数其他行业,人们把客户服务视为一个成本中心。
比如说你的电话公司,他们的目标就是尽快挂断你的电话。他们会把你推到自助 FAQ 渠道,根本不在乎给你提供好的服务。他们完全不在乎这些。他们所做的一切都是为了压低成本。如果我们来看 Help Scout 的定位,他们的替代方案有这么几类。大多数企业一开始用的是共享收件箱,很好用,客服代表们也喜欢。确实好用。问题在于,当你的业务开始增长时,你就需要客户服务功能了——你需要做工单分配、优先级排序之类的事情。于是这些客户最终升级到了工单软件,进入了一个完全不同的世界。
第一个问题是,工单软件非常难用。我们已经不在共享收件箱的阶段了。第二个问题是,工单软件的态度是——我们要把用户推向低成本渠道,我们并不真正关心他们,我们要给你分配一个工单编号,你不再是一个人了,诸如此类。这就是现状。所以如果 Help Scout 采用我所见到的多数 SaaS 公司那种典型的销售话术,他们就会只是罗列功能。话术大概是这样的:数字化企业来了,他们说,“你好,Help Scout,我来给你演示怎么登录,我来给你展示所有功能。你看,这里有个共享收件箱的功能,特别好。哦,你看,我们可以做工单分配和优先级排序,我们还能做这个,还能做那个……”就这样一直说到时间用完、没有更多功能可讲为止。
April Dunford: 这种话术的问题在于,客户坐在那里心里想的是:“我不太确定啊,这听起来有点像我的共享收件箱,但又有点像工单软件。它和工单软件有区别吗?我不太确定。而且功能上也有重叠。“所以这种话术并没有真正回答那个问题——为什么选我们而不是别人?
以差异化价值为核心的话术
而另一种风格的话术是这样的:首先,我们会做一点铺垫,让每个人了解我们在所有解决方案中的位置,以及我们对市场的观点。然后当我们进入功能演示环节时,我们会把功能放在差异化价值的语境中来展示。这个话术大概是这样的——客户来了,Help Scout 说:“嘿,数字化企业,我们跟很多像你们这样的公司合作过,我马上给你展示产品。但在那之前,有一点我们觉得很值得关注——数字化企业看待客户服务的方式是不同的。他们把它看作增长驱动力,而不是成本中心。所以跟我们合作的大多数企业,都把提供卓越的客户体验视为客户服务的核心组成部分。你同意这个观点吗?”
客户说同意。双方有个简短的交流,然后 Help Scout 接着说:“很好。你现在有几个选择。跟我们合作的大多数企业一开始用的是共享收件箱,这很好,因为非常简单、非常易用,各方面都不错。但问题在于,如果你在增长——而你很可能正在增长——那你就会超越这个阶段,因为你会需要优先级排序、工单分配这些工台功能。”
“于是你的下一个选择就是升级到工单软件。工单软件当然很强大,什么都能做。但问题在于,它并不是为你们这类企业设计的。它是为那些想从客户服务中压缩成本的企业设计的。所以它会做一些让人觉得别扭的事情——它会给你的客户分配一个工单编号,会试图把他们推向低成本渠道。那么我们能不能达成一个共识:对于一个像你这样的数字化企业来说,理想状态下,我们是不是想要一个像共享收件箱一样好用的工具,同时具备所有高级功能,这样就不用再迁移到别的平台?而且最重要的是,它从一开始就是为提供卓越客户服务而设计的。我们是不是都想要这样的东西?”
到了这一步,客户要么认同你,要么不认同。但如果他们认同,那我们就进入实际的演示环节。我们可以说:“很好,我们刚才说了三个要点,让我来展示它是怎么实现的。第一,像收件箱一样好用。你看,这是收件箱,非常好用,看起来就是一个收件箱,太棒了。第二,功能齐全,你永远不会需要换掉它。你看,这是我们做优先级排序和工单分配的方式,诸如此类。随着你的增长,所有你需要的功能我们都有,你永远不需要更换平台。第三,提供卓越的客户体验。你看,客户可以选择他们想跟你互动的渠道。你看,他依然是 Dave,而不是工单编号 1479。”
诸如此类。这就是改造后的话术。但这确实是一种非常不同的话术。这个话术的设计目的就是为了回答”为什么选我们而不是别人?“这个问题。你可以想象,它在让客户真正搞清楚”这到底是什么?它有什么不同?我为什么要选你?“方面,效果要好得多。在实际销售场景中,它的效果也明显更好。
话术框架总结
Lenny: 太好了。要不我来总结一下这个框架,因为你刚才把各个部分都过了一遍,我觉得把步骤梳理出来可能会对大家有帮助。我这边的笔记里有,不过可能由你自己来讲会更清楚。
April Dunford: 可以这样理解——首先,话术结构包含两个大的部分。第一部分是铺垫。铺垫部分不是在讲我们自己,而是在讲市场——我们对市场的观点。第二部分则是关于我们的差异化价值——为什么选我们而不是别人。这两部分并不是等重的。在正常的销售话术中,我们不想在铺垫部分花太多时间。我们想尽快进入正题,也就是我们的差异化价值,但我们不能跳过铺垫。如果我有一个半小时或四十五分钟的电话,我可能会在前面的铺垫上花几分钟,但这个铺垫非常重要。
我们可以把铺垫部分拆成三个小段。首先从我们对市场的洞察开始。你可以把它理解为我们对市场的观点,或者某种程度上,像是问题之中的问题。以 Help Scout 为例,他们的洞察是:“嘿,数字化企业的客户服务就是不一样的,它其实是增长驱动力,而不是成本中心。所以我们需要用一种不同的方式来思考客户服务。“这就是他们的洞察。我们就从这里开始。
April Dunford: 第二部分是替代方案的优劣。我们要做的是描绘整个市场的全貌,讨论其他解决方式好在哪里、差在哪里。然后从这个讨论中得出一个结论,也就是我所说的”理想方案”——就是,综合来看,如果我们真的想解决这个问题,并且了解了替代方案中哪些管用、哪些不管用,我们能不能达成共识:一个真正好的方案应该满足这几个条件?这一步就是让客户与你的世界观对齐。
如果他们对齐了,我们就切换到正题部分。正题部分有几个步骤,但核心步骤是差异化价值这一步。通常我们会从一个自我介绍开始:“嘿,我们是 Help Scout,我们专门为数字化企业提供客户服务解决方案。“然后我们会进入正题:“这是我们交付的价值,我们是怎么做到的。这是我们交付的价值,我们是怎么做到的。这是我们交付的价值,我们是怎么做到的。“
销售话术的收尾步骤
我们通常在销售话术的结尾还有几个小步骤。第一个是,讲完价值之后,一般会有一个验证环节——我们怎么证明自己能做到所说的那样。这通常是一个客户案例研究,也可能是独立的第三方验证。总之通常会有一个验证步骤。之后还有一个可选步骤,就是处理通话中尚未提出的异议。有时候客户会有一个沉默的异议——“嗯,听起来不错,但迁移起来应该很难吧。“或者,“听起来不错,但估计挺贵的。“又或者,“还行吧,但可能满足不了我们对安全性之类的要求。”
所以我们会在结尾用一个专门的异议处理步骤来应对。然后我们用我所说的”请求”来结束整个话术——也就是我们希望客户接下来做的事情。可以是直接请求成交,也可以是”嘿,我们想做一个概念验证,需要跟谁谈?“或者”嘿,我们要启动一个项目,谁需要参与项目定义?“就是你销售流程中的下一步是什么,我们就以那个请求来收尾。
Lenny: 好的,我其实想聊聊异议这个话题。因为我想象在走这个流程的时候,企业常常不会同意你说的内容,我想知道你怎么处理。你一步步推进,问”你同意吗?“沉默异议确实很有意思,我之前都没想过这种情况——他们嘴上说”对对对,我们同意”,但实际上并不同意。对于他们直接说”不,我不是这么看这个世界的”,或者沉默异议,你有什么建议?
April Dunford: 通常我们从洞察开始——我们对市场的洞察——如果做得好,这个洞察一般不会太有争议。你可以这样理解:它本质上就是你构建产品的原因。大多数创始人,你去跟他们聊,他们不是凭空冒出一个想法。他们某天早上醒来,说”邮件这个东西有个地方真的很糟糕,所以我要打造一种不同的邮件来解决这个问题。“或者像 Help Scout 的例子——“你知道客户服务的问题在哪吗?它根本不是为这类企业设计的。“
不匹配时就该果断放弃
所以如果你对世界有一个观点,而你面对的客户从根本上就不认同这个观点——比如 Help Scout 走进来,客户说”不,对我们来说它就是个成本中心,我们只是想把成本降下来。“——那他们就应该取消这个客户的资格,因为他们无法比 Zendesk 更好地服务这个客户。Zendesk 会赢下那一单。但如果你做得正确,你的洞察应该能引起目标客户的共鸣。当然,这不代表不会有其他异议,通常会有各种各样的异议。但这些异议更多是操作层面的。如果我在前面的铺垫阶段就已经让你上钩了,然后我们进入价值部分,那只是证明我能做到我们已经达成共识想要完成的事情。这时候异议更像是——“嗯,听起来不错,但不知道能不能转发。“或者”听起来不错,但要从旧系统迁移过来可太麻烦了。”
所以他们在心理上其实已经被说服了,但他们担心的是——“IT 部门会怎么说?我能不能真的拿到预算?“在 B2B 领域,我们有一个人际网络,需要得到各方同意才能推进这件事。所以经常会有围绕这些方面的异议。
铺垫即探索
关于销售话术的开头部分,还有一点——我们在铺垫阶段做的事情,销售人员称之为”探索”(discovery)。所以铺垫部分不应该是我在对你单向输出,而应该是我和客户之间的对话:“你同意这个吗?你看到的是这样吗?你们一开始用的是共享收件箱吗?你们现在在用什么?你有没有考虑过用工单软件?为什么考虑,为什么不?你对选型有什么约束?之前试过什么?现在正在考虑试什么?”
这就是我们在第一次实质性销售电话中进行的探索,你的销售代表应该知道怎么做。但通常来说,我在 SaaS 公司看到的销售演示文档里,没有一个合适的位置来做这种探索。它往往发生在话术结构之外。而在这个话术结构中,探索有明确的位置。所以到铺垫结束时,我们要么达成了一致——“好的,这是个不错的潜在客户。我们能做点什么。他们有一个我们能解决的问题。一切看起来都很好。“——要么我们共同得出结论:“嘿,我们的东西真的不适合你。“就这样。
Lenny: 我之前提到,这些很大程度上来自于做得足够多之后的积累。你逐渐理解了人们通常会在哪些地方达成共识——这是个问题,我们都知道这是我们的问题。你不太可能因为某个人突然说”不,这不是给我们的”就把所有东西推翻。
从展示者变成教育者
我认为这个框架带来的最大转变之一是,你进入了一种教育者的心态。不再只是”这是我们的产品,能解决你的问题”,而是”这是大环境正在发生的事情。也许你没有时间做我们做过的这些研究,这是我们发现的。“这样做建立了对你作为一家公司、作为领导者、作为销售人员的信任。然后他们会想:“好,他们看世界的方式跟我们一样。“或者”我刚刚意识到了一些新东西,我之前从没这样想过。“然后,“好的,那他们怎么看待这个问题的解决方案?”
April Dunford: 没错。在这所有内容中有一个关键点,我认为我们作为软件供应商想得不够多的——客户来找我们的时候,他们已经做了功课,Google 搜索过,看过各种资料,但这不代表他们对市场有完美的理解。事实上,通常差得很远。如果我们想一想,在 B2B 软件领域,大多数情况下,你的买家从来没有买过类似的软件。这是他们第一次做这件事。他们的老板跟他们说:“嘿,去搞清楚这件事。去找一个 CRM,看看所有的 CRM,然后搞清楚该选哪个。“
买家的困惑与信息过载
April Dunford: 而买家看着这一切,心里想的是:“天哪,我也不知道,市面上的 CRM 太多了,我把所有的都看了个遍。我在 G2 Crowd 上看,右上角就有 24 个 CRM。我又去看 Gardner Group 的报告,看这个看那个,我真的做了功课,但信息量太大了。我缺少的是对市场的清晰认知。解决这个问题有哪些不同的思路?先别管产品。解决这个问题有哪些路径?各个产品在这些路径中分别处于什么位置?对我而言一个好的解决方案应该长什么样?我的采购标准应该是什么?“这些问题对买家来说真的很难搞清楚。
供应商应该帮助买家理解市场
总的来说,在销售过程中,我们没有做任何事情来帮助买家搞清楚这些问题,尽管我们自己是清楚的。我们对这个市场了如指掌,整天研究竞争对手、思考这些东西。但我们有一个观念——“我们不能这么做,因为首先,如果我们谈论竞争对手,会被认为是在抨击对手,这不好。“另一个顾虑是,即便我们给出了自己的看法,也没人会信我们,因为我们有偏见。但如果你看看这方面的研究,研究并不支持这个观点。研究实际上表明,B2B 软件买家在销售互动中最想要的是对市场的看法和帮助权衡各种选项。而我们偏偏不做这件事。我们只会说:“这是我们的产品。你自己琢磨吧,看你自己的。你自己搞清楚。"
"不决策”才是最大的竞争对手
结果是,买家带着一大堆信息蜂拥而至,本来就应接不暇,然后坐在我们的销售流程里,我们用更多的功能、更多的信息让他们更加不堪重负。他们真正担心的是:“万一我选错了怎么办?我从来没做过这件事,我还得向老板推荐。如果我给老板提了一个错误的建议,老板可能觉得我很蠢。或者我买了个东西,整个部门都讨厌我,因为太难用了。又或者我选了一个东西,结果就是劣质软件,然后业务出了问题,搞不好我会被开除。”
数据显示,在 B2B 领域,40% 到 60% 的采购流程最终以”不决策”告终。然后你如果深入去看这些数据,其中大多数并不是在说:“嗯,我不打算买新东西,因为老做法更好。“完全不是这样。事实上,大多数……
老做法更好的说法,完全不是这样。事实上,大多数情况是他们无法自信地做出选择。所以他们的做法就是回去跟老板说:“你知道吗?现在时机不太对。先别做了,明年再说吧。先放一放。“因为对于那个需要对决策负责的人来说,这是最安全、零风险的做法。
买软件比卖软件更难
Lenny: 我认为这是你在书里、以及在 newsletter 文章中分享的最有意思的洞察之一——购买软件可以说比销售软件更难,因为人们学过销售,有销售的技能和培训,但购买,正如你所描述的,压力极大。基本上,一旦出错,你的工作就悬了。关于这一点你还能多分享些什么吗?帮助进一步说明购买软件是极其困难和充满压力的,而很多人并没有意识到这一点。
April Dunford: 一旦你进入这种心态,你会用完全不同的眼光看待这个局面。我们看过这方面的统计,说买家在和你的销售代表交谈之前,已经走完了 80% 的采购旅程。好吧,也许是这样,但他们可能已经走到了 80% 的程度说”算了,我什么都不买了”。事实上,60% 的情况确实如此。那我们怎么应对这个问题?应对方式不是只谈我们自己,而是真正去帮助那个身处巨大压力中、试图弄清楚”我怎样才能做一个好的决策”的人。
用市场全景图帮助买家做决策
所以我们应该做的是给他们一个理解整个市场的框架。以 Help Scout 为例:“你看,市场上有共享收件箱,有工单软件,然后有我们。我不在乎供应商是谁,我会把他们分别放进其中一个类别里。“你就可以这样来理解市场。你不需要了解每一个功能、每一个细节。我给你的是整个市场的大图景,帮你建立信心。好,如果你选这个或选那个,现在你知道为什么了。
Lenny: 我觉得这里面很有意思的一点是,很多创业公司失败是因为他们无法说服别人放弃现状。人们通常认为那是因为现有产品已经够用了,所以他们才输掉,但我觉得你这里又多了一个维度——采购的人也可能只是觉得:“我不想承担做这个决定、做出选择、冒着风险去切换的额外压力。“我之前从来没有从这个角度想过。
现状偏见的另一面:决策恐惧
April Dunford: 我认为这个障碍比你想象的大得多。显然,我们必须和现状竞争,不能忽视现状,因为有时候现状确实够用了,我们不能忽视这一点。我们仍然会因为现状而丢单,但我们也有大量的单子输给了客户纯粹的犹豫不决——客户更害怕搞砸,而不是害怕错过。
Lenny: 那为了克服这个问题,深入看看你觉得最有效的方法——其中一个是帮助客户理解更大的全局,以及为什么本质上他们正在落后,为什么竞争对手可能会因为他们用不同的方式思考而获得优势。
April Dunford: 关于这一点我想说一个观点。
Lenny: 请讲。
FOMO 反而会让情况更糟
April Dunford: 我听到很多人讨论说,在这种情况下,当客户犹豫不决时,我们可以利用 FOMO(错失恐惧)来推动,说:“看,你正在错过。竞争对手都在做,你却没做。“所以这是一个很有趣的问题。我当时特别兴奋,Matt Dixon 写了一本书叫《The JOLT Effect》,他们在研究中录音了两百五十万通销售电话,通过 Gong 平台录制,然后用 AI 进行分析,然后再看每通电话之后的结果——这些电话是否成功,交易是否达成等等。我们能有机会深入研究这样的数据,真的非常难得。
他的数据显示,如果客户已经犹豫不决,再把 FOMO 加进去只会让情况更糟。如果加入这个因素,成交的可能性反而更低。原因在于,他们本来就已经压力很大了,你通过施压让他们更焦虑,说”哦,正在发生这样的事,如果不做就会出问题……”他们的感受是:“做事会出问题,不做事也会出问题,我该怎么办?”
Lenny: 他们就干脆把头埋进沙子里,对吧?就想”算了,不管了”。
April Dunford: 所以他们就想:“算了,什么都不做了。“彻底瘫痪。大家普遍假设企业很吃 FOMO 这一套,但我觉得这并不总是成立。如果客户本来就犹豫不决,再拿 FOMO 去刺激他们根本没用。那什么在这种情况下才有效呢?一是给他们做决定的工具。这包括描绘市场格局,本质上就是教他们怎么买。比如告诉他们:像你这样的客户,只需要关注这三四个要点,其他那些东西跟你们没关系——那是对大公司的,那是对什么什么情况的。这种”教客户怎么买”的思路,就是一种降低压力的方法。
然后还有很多其他技巧。比如如果这笔交易太大,我们可以把它拆成小块;我们可以提供退款保证;有时候我们有服务和支撑团队,万一出了问题可以帮你兜底,我们会这样来确保万无一失。所以如果客户真的因为犹豫不决而陷入瘫痪,这种”把风险从桌上拿走”的思路就非常重要。
Lenny: 这很有道理,本质上就是——如果买错了,我们怎么帮买家兜底。因为你说的正是他们不买你产品的主要原因。
April Dunford: 而 FOMO 这种手段根本帮不上忙。
Lenny: 太有意思了。我特别喜欢这个框架,我记下来了——“教他们怎么买”,这真是一个极其简洁的方式来理解整个流程。
“不被开除”的决策任务
April Dunford: 说起来挺有意思的,我之前跟 Bob Moesta 聊过这个,他是 Jobs To Be Done 理论的提出者。
Lenny: 对,我看过那一期。
April Dunford: 他真是太厉害了。我想到的一点是,通常我们思考的角度是:“怎么让客户相信我们能完成他们需要的工作?“这当然需要做到,但交易推进者还有一个次要任务——我怎么做一个决定而不被开除?我们得帮他完成这个任务,否则我们也得不到我们想要的东西——钱。
Lenny: 太有意思了。而且不一定是被开除,甚至可能是绩效受影响、升不了职——就是”我这件事做得好不好”的问题。这让我想起我们在 Airbnb 时采购社区论坛软件的经历。我还记得那些庞大的销售团队来到办公室,给所有人做产品演示,不断地推你——“下一步是什么?还需要拉谁进来?谁需要认可?“简直就像”天哪,太有压力了,我得不断推动这件事往前走。“然后 IT 部门又进来说:“哦,我们得确保它跟 Salesforce 能集成。“你本来只是想要最好的社区论坛软件,因为我们想做一个真正与众不同的东西,结果最后变成了:“好吧,算了,就用那个跟 Salesforce 兼容的吧。没问题的。我去忙别的事了。“
默认选择市场领导者的惯性
April Dunford: 这就是问题所在——在这种情况下,默认选市场领导者太容易了。市场领导者有一个巨大的优势,你可以说:“说真的,选 Salesforce 谁会找我麻烦?没人。“选它太轻松了。所以如果你在这种情况下是挑战者——品牌排在第二或第三——你就必须克服所有这些惯性和向现状倾斜的力量,因为除了什么都不做之外,选市场领导者就是风险最低的决定,大家直接用它就行了。
Lenny: 我想那句经典的话是”买 Microsoft 没人会被开除”。我好奇现在是不是 Salesforce 变成了这句话的默认版本?
April Dunford: 对,最初那句话说的是 IBM。
Lenny: 你说得对。天哪。
April Dunford: 现在你买 IBM 反而会被开除了。谁知道呢。你提到的另一点也很有意思,在这些场景中确实会让事情变得很棘手——在 B2B 的典型采购流程中,有五到七个人参与促成一笔交易,这种复杂性在消费端是没有的,但很多人把它想得太复杂了。在典型的 B2B 采购流程中,采购团队里有一个人是所谓的”推进者”(champion)。这个人被指派了任务——“嘿,你来挑个财务软件”或者”你来选个 CRM,你负责搞定”。这个人负责做前期调研、制定短名单、参加最初的沟通电话,然后还有一堆其他人。
B2B 采购中的推进者与异议处理
其他那些人没法促成交易,但他们有一千种方式把交易搅黄。所以逻辑是这样的:你的定位和销售话术必须先打动推进者,因为如果打动不了,你根本连其他人都见不到——你没进短名单,交易就启动不了。但交易一旦启动,你的责任就是武装这个推进者,让他能应对其他所有团队可能提出的异议。比如你是业务部门的买家,假设你在销售部门,要采购一套 CRM,IT 部门迟早会介入。IT 并不在乎你的 CRM 有什么价值,但他们确实在乎:是否满足安全要求?能否与我们现有系统对接?管理这个东西有多麻烦?所以对这些角色,我们不是在展示价值,而是在处理异议。
一旦意识到这一点,我们就可以把定位和销售话术做得非常精准。我们真正要做的是搞定推进者——先拿下推进者,然后交易推进起来之后,再武装推进者去应对所有其他团队的异议,从而达成共识,推动交易向前走。
Lenny: 具体怎么做呢?是问推进者”你听到了哪些顾虑”?还是直接去问各个利益相关者”你最大的顾虑是什么”?
April Dunford: 如果我们足够聪明,其实早就知道了,因为我们做过大量交易。作为好的合作伙伴,有时候甚至在第一次会议的”目标对齐”环节,我们就会说:“嘿,注意,IT 部门会介入,他们会担心这几点、这几点、这几点,别担心,我们帮你兜着。“我们是 SOC 2 合规的,我们做了这个、做了那个——我们知道,因为我们做过十五笔交易,我们知道这类交易是什么样,知道会碰到什么问题。推进者可能会来说:“嗯,不确定最终用户会不会喜欢。“那就说:“好吧,这是我们让最终用户上手的方式,这是我们的培训,这是我们打算做的事。“厉害的地方在于,如果你的产品在前端就能解决这些问题,那个异议就直接不存在了。你可能还会遇到其他情况——你要拿去给你的老板看,他会要 ROI 数据,等等等等——我们已经准备好了,看,这是我们的计算器,你把这些信息给我们,我们输进去,这就是你怎么说服你老板的方式。
April Dunford: 我们做的就是这件事——帮他们武装起来。因为我们做过无数交易,而他们从来没买过这类软件。所以有一半的时候,你在做交易,对方连采购流程是什么都不清楚。如果我们是好的合作伙伴,就会主动问:“好,这个需要走采购部门吗?“他们会说:“大概需要吧。“那我们就说:“好,采购那边通常会这样走——他们会做这个、这个、这个,我们给你准备这些材料,帮你过采购那一关。“
小公司和早期 B2B 能用这套吗?
Lenny: 你现在这么一说,感觉好像得是大公司才能用这套方法,因为小公司没有那么多销售代表,也不一定有资源去做你说的这些事情。这套框架对谁有用?如果你只是一个早期阶段的 B2B,能用这个方法吗?
April Dunford: 嗯,这个是针对 B2B 产品的。如果你没有销售团队,我认为你仍然可以用这个结构来搭建一个故事,让市场团队可以用,也可以在其他场景使用——这个我们可以后面再聊。但在我合作的公司里,都是 B2B,都有销售团队,所以我们第一步做的事情就是调整定位,构建一个反映这个定位的销售话术,然后立刻在销售端落地。虽然要把所有文案彻底翻新、调整营销活动来匹配新定位还需要一段时间,但我们至少可以先收紧销售话术,在销售这边立刻产生效果。第二,我跟很多创始人就是唯一销售代表的公司合作过,这套方法对他们也很好用。
我觉得不需要大量资源来做这件事,但确实需要你在市场上有足够的牵引力,能了解一个交易通常是怎么走的。如果你什么都没卖出去过,那你什么都不知道——如果连我们自己都不知道怎么卖这个东西,就很难帮客户去买。但如果我已经做了十笔交易,我就知道会怎样,我能猜到 IT 部门在实施时会说什么,我知道上线推广时会遇到什么,我也大致知道你老板可能会反对什么、会对什么感兴趣。所以我不需要一个研究团队去搞清楚这些,我只是在努力做一个好的合作伙伴,帮推进者把交易推过终点线。
Lenny: 所以这套方法的最小可行版本,可能就是一个不断迭代、调整、重组的销售演示文档,加上一些你想提到的话术要点——比如”好的,IT 部门会问这些东西”——几个你持续跟踪的要点。
April Dunford: 没错。
产品团队从中学到什么
Lenny: 我也在从产品团队的角度想这个问题——他们并不直接卖产品,而是跟销售、市场团队合作。你有什么建议吗?或者说,产品团队能从这种销售方法中学到什么,帮助他们以不同的方式打造产品,或者以不同的方式跟销售合作?
April Dunford: 嗯,我是这么想的。一个好的销售话术的核心,是真正深入理解你的差异化价值——也就是我能交付哪些其他方案无法交付的价值。我经常在公司里看到这样一种情况:你有一个很聪明的产品团队,他们对自己构建的东西很了解,知道为什么重要,知道对客户的价值是什么,在构建产品的过程中做了大量相关功课。但这些信息从来没有传递到销售那边去,因为销售根本没在讲价值,他们只是在讲功能——这是下拉菜单,这是它的作用。所以我觉得解决这个问题的第一步,是让一个跨职能团队来一起做定位。
如果产品、市场、销售坐在一起,共同定义我们的差异化价值是什么,那我就能从产品团队那里榨出所有好的东西——他们深入理解产品,深入理解差异化在哪里,深入理解价值。同时我也能从销售团队那里得到所有好东西——他们了解常见的异议是什么,推进者真正想做什么、不想做什么,典型客户账户里的情况是什么样的。然后所有这些信息就开始流动和共享,最终你对差异化价值的定义会比一开始好得多。
一旦我们完成了这些工作,接下来一起协作构建反映这些内容的销售话术就非常顺理成章了。但现实中的典型情况完全不是这样。典型的情形是:产品团队在做自己的事,销售团队在做自己的事,市场团队也在做自己的事。市场团队在自己的一亩三分地里搞出定位,可能给销售团队做了一些材料,扔过去。销售团队看了一眼说:“我完全不知道这堆东西在说什么。我不认同这个。这跟我看到的实际情况对不上。“然后直接扔掉,回去继续用他们从盘古开天辟地就在用的那套话术。
Lenny: 那可真是够久的了。我们第一期播客全部围绕定位这个话题,所以想深入了解的人可以去听那一期,这里就不花太多时间了。但差异化价值也是这个流程中很重要的一部分,所以我觉得值得在这里再花点时间。你能分享几个例子来说明什么是差异化价值吗?让大家有个具体的感知——“传达差异化价值”到底是什么意思?
什么是差异化价值
April Dunford: 好。差异化价值就是”为什么选我们而不是其他替代方案”这个问题的答案。在定位工作中,我们首先要确定的就是:我们到底在和谁竞争?如果我们在市场上不存在,客户会怎么做?通常会有某种现状方案——它可能看起来跟你的产品完全不一样,可能只是一个电子表格,或者让实习生做,或者纯手工。然后就是那些经常跟你一起出现在短名单上的其他东西。基本上就是:我得打败所有这些,再加上客户的犹豫不决,才能赢下一单——我可以据此锚定自己的定位。销售知道这个问题的答案。如果你有销售团队,他们知道——如果公司不存在,客户会怎么做,他们心里清楚。
然后下一步就是:那我们有什么不同?这个”不同”可以是能力层面的、产品功能层面的,也可以是公司层面的能力。所以可能是功能特性,可能是你的定价模式,可能是我们提供的支持方式是别人没有的。各种可能都有,可能是你除了那个单一产品之外的产品组合广度——这种东西可以把白板写满。然后我们要做的就是把那张功能清单逐项过一遍,问:“那又怎样?你有高级 AI,或者随便什么花哨的东西——那又怎样?为什么有人在乎?“这个”那又怎样”的答案就是你的价值。而且因为它源自一个差异化的功能,所以这个价值通常是其他对手无法交付的,因为他们没有支撑这个价值的能力。
差异化价值的实际案例
April Dunford: 举个例子,我几年前合作过的一家公司叫 LevelJump,后来被 Salesforce 收购了。他们做的是销售赋能(sales enablement)领域,说实话这个领域很糟糕——做销售赋能的公司多如牛毛,而且看起来都一样。来看 LevelJump,如果看竞争替代方案,把所有销售赋能领域的公司按方案类型分,基本可以归为两类:一类是 CMS,就是一个花哨的内容库,确保大家用的是正确的内容等等;另一类是 LMS,即学习管理系统,我可以搭课程、对课程做认证,用这种方式来培训销售代表。
再看 LevelJump,他们的差异化能力是——他们是唯一一个直接构建在 Salesforce 之上的。这就是那个功能特性:我们构建在 Salesforce 上,其他家没有。然后,谁在乎?那又怎样?我们最初讨论这个问题时,“那又怎样”有五六个不同的答案,但最重要的答案是:因为我们构建在 Salesforce 之上,我的销售赋能数据和销售业绩数据是打通的。接下来你会问,“那又怎样?“因为这意味着我确实能衡量销售赋能是否缩短了首单成交时间,或者是否加快了达成业绩配额的速度。那又怎样?因为如果我缩短了这个上手周期,我们就能更快地获得更多收入。这就是差异化价值。
当我把这个用到销售话术里的时候,就可以把它转化为我的洞察。我的洞察是:你的代表每天不开单,就是在烧钱。所以如果我们真的想解决销售赋能的问题,难道不需要一个能用销售指标来衡量销售赋能是否有效的工具吗?当然需要。
Lenny: 有意思。所以差异化价值通常决定了你开场时用的那个洞察?
April Dunford: 没错,确实如此。洞察本质上是让你的差异化价值变得重要的那个上下文——你需要知道什么,才能理解我的差异化价值有多重要?以 Help Scout 为例,洞察是:数字企业的客户服务是一个增长驱动力,这个从哪来的?从他们的差异化价值里来的。所以我们可以把它反过来推导。即使产品最初未必是基于这个洞察构建的,也许我们是通过间接的方式、迂回的方式找到的,或者不断迭代摸索出来的——我们都可以从差异化价值出发,反向推导出洞察。
如何判断差异化价值是否有效
Lenny: 那你怎么判断你提炼出的差异化价值或洞察没有奏效?
April Dunford: 如果差异化价值在销售话术中不成立,你会听到客户说:“我为什么要为这个付钱?这对我不值什么钱,伙计。“和我合作的公司,我的看法是:如果你已经在市场上销售,而且有满意、活跃的客户,那差异化价值一定存在。这就是他们选你的原因,这就是他们喜欢你的原因,这就是他们不流失的原因。它就在那里。你可能不清楚它到底是什么,我们可能需要做一点流程把它挖掘出来,但它存在,它是实实在在的。
Lenny: 太好了。自从我们开始聊差异化价值以来,我心里一直有个问题:对竞争对手应该有多坦诚?显然这里有一个光谱——从极度诚实到极其偏向自己——你对他们应该有多诚实的指导是什么?
销售中的坦诚与”从容自信”
April Dunford: 在销售场景中,我认为你应该采取的姿态——我以前一个老板经常讲这个——叫做”从容自信”。这种从容自信来自哪里?来自我们真正理解客户为什么应该选我们。这就是差异化价值,我们真正理解它,也真正理解这适合什么样的客户,其他人我们根本不去追。
所以我们应该能大方地说:“你看,我们是那种能交付结果的销售赋能工具。如果你不在乎这些结果,你不应该选我们,你应该选别人。“总的来说,我们要做到极度坦诚。我们要进来,对其他方案该肯定的给予肯定,因为通常其他方案对其他类型的公司就是挺好用的。如果你规模很小,又不是一个在增长的电商业务,那就用共享收件箱,免费的、好用、没什么问题,就用它。如果你真的很在意降低客服中心的成本,也许你应该用 Zendesk。所以我认为我们在这种情况下越是像一个向导,进来就说:“这些家伙适合这种场景,那些人适合那种场景,而我们适合这种场景。你可能不在乎这个,如果你不在乎,我们不是你的菜,你不应该选我们。”
但我觉得这种从容自信的理念就是——我们清楚客户应该选我们的时候,应该勇敢地为这单业务而战。但对我们不是最佳选择的业务,我们应该彻底放手,完全不应该去追那种业务。
Lenny: 这又回到了反复教导客户”怎么买”的问题上。对于那些你觉得”不适合”的情况,理想状态下你应该在飞到他们办公室去推销之前就知道这一点。
April Dunford: 对,通常在上游已经做过某种资质筛选了,这种筛选可以通过很多种方式完成。如果你前端有某种产品驱动增长的模式,你会在里面寻找信号。如果信号不对,你就不会跟他们谈。如果你把信号设计对了,那你已经知道对方有意图了,已经知道你是匹配的,已经知道一些关键信息了。很多公司的做法是,由内部销售团队先做一轮资质筛选电话,然后再安排与销售代表的第一次通话。在筛选电话里,你要确认的是:这个人是对的人吗?他们有我们能满足的需求吗?这个场景真的适合我们做吗?如果不是,他们根本不会进到正式的通话环节。
Lenny: 关于差异化价值和替代方案的思路,还有一个问题。之前有位嘉宾非常强调创建品类的重要性,甚至认为那可能是打造传奇企业的唯一途径。我知道你对此有不同看法,因为理论上如果你走那条路,就没有替代方案了——就是”我们就是唯一”。你怎么看?
April Dunford: 这么说吧,有几件事要讲。第一,显然创建品类不是打造传奇企业的唯一途径,因为绝大多数传奇企业并没有创造它们所在的品类。Google 没有创造搜索,Facebook 没有创造社交网络。这样的例子太多了。实际上,公司创造品类是例外,而不是常态。所以我认为说”唯一途径”有点不诚实。它确实是一种做大企业的方法,这毫无疑问。但它绝对不是唯一途径。事实上它也不是最常见的途径,但它确实是一种有效的方法。这是一点。第二点是,品类创建这件事很有意思。如果你去看大多数公司的轨迹,即使是那些成功的品类创建者,他们一开始也不是品类创建者。
他们一开始是在现有品类里做一个利基产品,因为这通常是一家公司早期获得牵引力最容易的方式。因为市场品类的功能是什么?市场品类的功能就是帮助回答”这东西到底是什么”这个问题。如果我在一个现有品类里做定位,我可以说”我是面向小微企业的 CRM”。这正是 Salesforce 最初的定位。我不需要向你解释 CRM 是什么,那东西已经存在了。那个领域里已经有十亿美元级别的公司了。大家都知道 CRM 是什么,我可以说”我们是面向小微企业的 CRM。为什么适合小微企业?因为我们没有任何软件需要安装部署,所以你不需要一个 IT 部门来维护它。太棒了。”
所以大多数公司都是从这里起步的。接下来的情况是,如果你成为了那个领域的霸主——品类创建论的拥护者们谈论起来好像从来没有哪个品类创建者输掉过市场一样。事实上,大多数品类创建者都赢得了他们的市场。那 MySpace 怎么样了?Ask Jeeves 怎么样了?他们的结局可不怎么好。大多数品类创建者实际上都被快速跟随者超越了。如果我们看 CRM 市场,Siebel 曾经是那里的绝对霸主,现在不是了。取而代之的是 Salesforce。一旦你成为某个市场的霸主,一个很酷的策略就是扩展这个品类的边界,这样你就能继续增长。我们看到的大多数品类创建的案例,都是那些已经做到两亿、三亿、四亿收入并主导了所在领域的公司,然后决定移动球门柱,说”实际上现在我们正在扩展到所有这些其他领域,我们要给这个品类起个新名字。这就是新品类。”
这样的例子非常多。比如 Qualtrics,很多人都在谈论它是一个品类创建的成功案例。但在此之前,它就是问卷调查软件,在现有品类里跟其他所有人一样,直到做到三亿收入的规模。是那个定位把它们带到了那个高度,效果很好。等他们主导了那个市场之后,就可以说”这是客户体验软件”之类的。Snowflake 是另一个好例子。云端数据仓库,他们就是做数据仓库的,在一个现有市场里——云端的数据仓库。那不是品类创建。这个定位一路带他们走到了即将上市的阶段,然后他们变成了”云数据”,这是他们扩展品类的尝试——“不仅仅是数据仓库,实际上还包括数据湖和所有其他数据相关的东西。”
这对他们来说是一个聪明的策略,因为他们现在在那个领域已经非常知名了。我不是说品类创建是坏事。确实有公司一上来就成功创建了品类,然后长期拥有那个品类的例子。但更常见的情况是,一家公司做了创建品类的艰苦工作,恰恰在品类开始站住脚的那一刻,一个快速跟随者带着充足的、全新的融资杀进来,从你犯过的所有错误中学习,然后在你以为自己终于成功的时候把你从巅峰上打下来。
所以我认为品类创建,再说一次,它是好的,是有效的,但我觉得我们在考虑早期阶段的公司、或者还没有主导所在品类的公司去做这件事的时候,需要非常谨慎。更常见的情况是公司切入市场,切下一块来,主导那一块,然后成功向外扩展。这就是 Geoffrey Moore 所说的保龄球瓶策略。几乎所有成功的公司都遵循保龄球瓶策略。
保龄球瓶策略
Lenny: 等等,那是什么?我们快速聊聊这个。
April Dunford: 哦对,你记得那个东西。最近两个月我谈论保龄球瓶策略的次数真是太有趣了。这来自于一系列关于创新如何被采纳的研究。关于这些有大量的研究,我可能会引用得不太精确,因为 Geoffrey Moore 的东西我已经读了几十年了。保龄球瓶策略是这样的。占领一个大市场最容易的方式,是定义一个被市场领导者服务不足的细分市场。
如果你想象一组保龄球瓶,我们先围绕最前面的那根瓶——也就是这个大市场里一小块我们容易拿下的、而市场领导者可能根本不在乎的部分。我们先把那根瓶击倒,击倒那根瓶使我们能够够到旁边的三根瓶。现在我在这里建立了滩头阵地,可以去拿下旁边的三根瓶,把它们也击倒,最终我变得足够强大去挑战市场领导者,然后超越他们。
我职业生涯早期的一个例子是,我曾在一家公司工作,我们以为自己是企业级软件。后来我们把范围缩小到了面向投资银行的 CRM。我们真的为投资者画了保龄球瓶图,说”第一根瓶是面向投资银行的 CRM。一旦我们击倒它,接下来就去做零售银行,那时我们就变成了面向银行业的 CRM。然后再击倒那根瓶,我们去做保险,那时我们就变成了面向金融服务的 CRM。再击倒那根瓶,我们就变成一家大公司了,去挑战 Siebel,成为面向企业的 CRM。“结果我们被 Siebel 以大约十亿美元收购了,不过无所谓。所以大多数公司,如果你去看它们的历史,实际上都是这样起步的。是的,如果我们直接快进到它们三亿收入的阶段,我们可以说”品类创建是唯一该做的事”,但这之间发生了什么?那完全是另一回事。
回到框架:理想方案的设定
Lenny: 太好了。让我们回到你的框架。我正在看这些要点列表。其实我们已经覆盖了其中大部分内容。第一步是洞察,帮助客户理解世界上正在发生什么、什么在变化、以及为什么这很重要。然后你谈到可能的替代方案及其优缺点。接下来是第三步,我们还没聊过,就是分享”理想方案”的特征。你能谈谈这个以及为什么它很重要吗?
April Dunford: 这就是设定阶段的结论。举例来说,如果我是 Help Scout,结论就是我们会说,“你看,你真正需要的是一款像收件箱一样好用的客户成功软件。你永远不会超出它的能力范围,而且它从一开始就是为了提供卓越服务而构建的。“在销售话术的这一部分,我们实际上是在与客户达成共识,确认我们对世界的看法是一致的。我会说,“好的,我们已经讨论了其他替代方案的优缺点,“然后我们说,“所以你看,你同意吗?我们能不能都认同,一个对你来说真正好的解决方案应该具备 A、B 和 C?“客户要么会说”是的,没错”,要么不会。如果他们对这个理想方案的定义完全认同,那我就抓住你了。这笔交易我已经赢了,而我甚至还没有谈到我们自己,因为按照我设定的方式,我是唯一能交付这个方案的人。
所以如果客户说”没错”,我接下来只需要证明我能做到这一点,并帮他们跨越采用它的障碍。
Lenny: 听起来太简单了。
April Dunford: 是的,我的意思是……
Lenny: 就像是你把他们引诱进来了。
April Dunford: 如果这一切都很容易的话,Lenny,我们现在应该坐在沙滩上用椰子壳喝酒了。
Lenny: 哎,让我们想办法实现吧。好的,那就是设定阶段。你把第二部分叫什么来着?
April Dunford: 是跟进——
Lenny: 跟进。
April Dunford: ——这部分真正聚焦于差异化价值。在第二部分中,第一步通常是介绍我们的产品,这也是市场类别重要的地方。我们进来说,“好的,我们能同意一个真正好的解决方案应该满足这些条件吗?是的。好的,很好。现在让我们谈谈我们自己。好的,我们相信这一点。这就是我们构建产品的原因。”
所以假设我是 Help Scout,我们是面向数字企业的客户服务软件,或者不管我们的市场类别是什么。我们介绍它只是为了让人们在脑海中明确它是什么,然后我们进入正题——这是价值所在,这是我们如何做到的。如果我们想象一个典型的销售电话,比如说半小时或 45 分钟,我预计会把超过一半的时间花在差异化价值这个阶段。如果我们做产品演示,那就是演示的部分,我们会说,“好的,第一步,让我展示我们是怎么做到的。像收件箱一样好用,这是相关的功能。永远不会超出它的能力范围,这是相关的功能。提供卓越的客户体验,这是相关的功能。“这就是我们切入正题的地方,也就是你点击”给我一个演示”按钮时以为自己会得到的东西。
这就是我们在那里做的事情。然后我们以三个小部分收尾。第一,通常我需要向你展示一些证明,证明我能做到我所说的。如果我说这款产品能提供卓越的客户体验,我怎么证明?一种方式是让其他客户说它确实很棒,这是一种证明方式。如果我有一些独立的第三方数据来支持我的说法,我也可以展示那些。但很多时候我们做的是,“让我展示一下这在一家用了我们产品的公司里是怎么运作的。这是之前的样子。他们做了这件事,这是之后的样子。“所以客户案例研究通常是不错的做法,但通常有一个步骤叫做证明——我向你展示了价值,现在这是我能真正交付这个价值的证明,不是我在吹牛。
证明、异议处理和推动下一步
然后下一步就是可选的异议处理环节,他们会说,“哦听起来不错,但 IT 部门不会同意的,“或者”听起来不错,但可能太贵了,“之类的。所以你要尽可能处理好那个异议。最后你以推动下一步来收尾,也就是你销售流程中的下一个步骤。比如,“嘿,那我们要推进这件事的话,需要让 IT 部门参与吗?IT 部门需要看看吗?你希望我们进去和 IT 一起做演示,还是你希望我帮你准备一些给 IT 的材料?“就是你销售流程中的下一步。
Lenny: 太好了。让我把这个梳理一遍,也简洁地放在这里,以防有人在记笔记或想记住这些内容。首先是设定,然后是跟进。在设定中,你有洞察、替代方案及优缺点、以及理想方案。然后你介绍你的产品,谈论差异化价值,分享它为什么有效的证明,可能处理异议、隐性异议,最后是推动下一步。
April Dunford: 没错。就是这样。
Lenny: 在判断这是否有效、你的差异化价值是否奏效、你的洞察是否奏效方面,你有没有一种经验性的成功率标准,让你觉得”我认为我们找到了对的方向”?
销售话术不奏效时回到定位
April Dunford: 嗯,一般来说,如果销售话术不奏效,那是因为定位太弱了。
那些跳过了定位、直接去构建新销售话术,而没有回去真正确保他们把差异化价值搞对的公司,谁知道呢?也许有效,也许无效。很多时候是无效的,我认为。所以在我和客户的工作中,我们会一路回到起点。我们回到最初,先做定位。现在,如果我房间里有公司里最聪明的人,而且我们已经做了足够多的交易,对客户如何购买、他们喜欢什么、他们不了解什么都有相当的了解,如果我有高管团队在场,而且他们有合理的客户经验,我们可以比较有信心地说,如果我们遵循一个流程,得出的定位会是好的。
然后就是把那个定位映射到销售话术上,然后去测试它。所以我认为测试中有几件事非常重要。第一,我们绝对需要销售团队参与构建销售话术。如果没有销售团队参与,这个话术永远不会被采用。销售代表的规则是,即使他们不喜欢当前的话术,他们也已经习惯了,他们知道它,已经背熟了,而且在第三页幻灯片上还有一个小笑话。所以他们不会轻易放弃当前的话术。所以你必须让销售管理层参与构建新的话术,而且我绝不会只是构建一个新话术然后就扔过去说,“祝你好运。“因为接下来会发生的是,他们会想出各种各样的借口说为什么不能用这个话术。
测试与推广新销售话术
April Dunford: 正确的做法是,把你最好的销售代表挑出来,让他们过来,用新的销售话术培训他们。他们得学会,得向你演示,向销售负责人演示。我们会反复练习很多遍,然后让这位代表去跟合格的潜在客户测试这个话术。我们不会去找现有客户——他们已经被旧的定位和旧的话术”污染”了,而这个新话术需要在合格的潜在客户身上奏效,所以我们就按它设计的方式来测试。我们找合格的潜在客户,用新话术跟他们沟通。通常我们会设一个测试期,每次演示之后大家会聚在一起讨论:“哪些奏效了?哪些没奏效?也许那个词让客户困惑了。也许我们需要把这张幻灯片从这边挪到那边。“就这样不断调整。
做完一批演示之后,通常会发生两种情况。在这个测试结构中,我非常依赖我最优秀的销售代表的专业判断力来判断什么才是好的。当这位最佳代表对话术已经驾轻就熟,做了一批演示,反复调整过之后,最终这位代表会说:“好了,我觉得这个话术已经优化到位了,我不会再回到旧话术了。我就用这个新话术,因为我觉得这个更好使。“一个有经验的销售代表是能判断出新话术是否比旧话术更好的——只要你给他们机会去熟悉它、打磨它,并拿一批新潜在客户去测试。
如果你的最佳销售代表说:“哇,这比旧话术好太多了。我能从客户的反应中感受到,也能从首次通话后转化为实际商机的数量上看出来。“那这时候我称之为”通过”。接下来我们就可以把这位代表演示的过程录下来做培训素材,然后让这位代表回去向销售团队的其他人推销这套新话术。这位代表回去会说:“各位听好了,你们要是还在用那个破旧话术就是蠢。这个新话术好太多了。相信我,我可是咱们团队最厉害的销售。顺便看看我用这套演示文档拿下的正在推进的成单列表。你们也该试试,我来教你们怎么做。”
这样一来,就是销售教销售,而不是市场部把东西扔过墙然后祈祷”希望这管用”了。我们应该能看到首次实质性通话之后的数据立即有所提升。大多数情况下,体现为首次通话后转化为商机的比例更高。有时候,取决于进来的线索质量,我们实际上反而会淘汰掉更多不合格的。但这有时候反而是好事。
但我们应该看到的是立竿见影的提升——更多交易进入管线。这是一个很巧妙的招数,尤其是在当下大家预算都很紧张、你只想从柠檬里再挤出一点汁的时候。这是一个非常简单的方法来从管线中挤出更多成果。只要回去把定位收紧,把销售话术收紧就行。而且我们能迅速见效,因为几周内就能推广开来,让更好的交易开始流过管线——因为客户更好地理解了你的价值,更好地理解了为什么要选择你。在经济不好的时候,这就是容易摘到的低垂果实。
定位和话术优化需要多长时间
Lenny: 为了让大家感受一下这件事有多容易上手,你建议大家在调整定位上花多长时间,然后在这个试点上又花多长时间——总体来说,可能需要投入多少时间才能显著提升销售?
April Dunford: 在我合作的客户中,我们做定位工作,定位部分一周就能完成。从开始到结束,一周搞定。我们在这件事上追求的就是速度,要让事情尽快运转起来。所以定位这块我们一周就进进出出搞定了。接下来的时间取决于公司情况——公司越大,这个过程越慢。但有些大公司其实也很快,如果大家都有动力,我们把话术落地也不应该花太长时间。
然后我们得找到一位销售代表,培训他,之后测试要花多长时间就取决于你的交易流量了。如果你做的是大单,本身就没有太多合格的潜在客户可以演示,那可能需要几周。但如果你有大量潜在客户源源不断地进来,就能比较快地完成。我有过客户从开始到结束,两周就推出了新话术并且投入使用。这大概是最快的速度了。大多数人,我觉得大概需要一个月左右。
Lenny: 这个时间确实非常短——
April Dunford: 当然,如果你是 IBM 这种公司,谁知道什么时候能搞完,对吧?但大多数公司,如果大家都有动力,一个月内就能完成并投入使用。
市场部在其中的角色
Lenny: 你提到了市场部,之前也说过市场部在某种程度上参与了这个过程。关于如何让市场部参与、他们应该在什么位置,你有什么建议?
April Dunford: 是的,通常定位一旦完成,市场部最终会成为定位的守护者。他们会变成定位的”警察”,因为很多定位相关的东西最终都会以营销物料的形式呈现,所以他们在这件事上是有切身利益的。当年我做市场副总裁的时候,我就是那个发起定位工作的人——“大家一起来做定位吧。“然后通常我也会是推动销售话术落地的那个人,但这是我和销售、产品一起协作完成的。销售话术确定之后,根据组织的规模以及你是否有销售赋能团队或销售内部有人专门负责看管话术,情况会有所不同。通常我和销售负责人会一起确定:“好,这就是话术,已经锁定了。除非发生了需要我们重新调整定位的事情,否则我们不会改动这个话术。到那时我们再重新审视。”
我们会在每个季度让销售代表对话术进行重新认证,诸如此类。这些通常是我和销售负责人合作推进的。但具体怎么做取决于你的组织架构。我认为归谁负责并不重要。如果你有一个好的产品营销团队,他们通常会对定位和话术非常关注,这两件事属于他们的职责范围,但具体怎么定义要看情况。我等不及想看到你们采访 Airbnb 了,看看他们怎么运作的。他们不一样,因为他们是面向消费者的。但每家公司的组织方式各不相同。如果你有产品营销团队,是一种做法;如果没有,是另一种做法。但总得有人是这件事的负责人,所以我们需要确定这个人选。
投入定位工作的实际影响
Lenny: 最后还有几个问题。其中一个是为了激励大家去做这件事——在那些投入时间重新思考话术方式的公司中,你看到了什么样的影响?
April Dunford: 嗯,大家不太喜欢我谈论收入方面的具体数字。但我们确实看到了非常显著的效果,同样,最直接的冲击体现在销售端,所有人都非常兴奋。
April Dunford: 冲击首先体现在销售端,所有人都非常兴奋。因为大家有时会担心:我们用的是旧的定位,客户是通过旧定位进入销售漏斗的,他们在某个地方接触到了我们旧的营销信息,然后我们在销售话术中又用新定位去打动他们。他们会不会觉得,“哦,你动了我的奶酪”?但通常这根本不是问题。所以我们通常立刻就能看到销售数据的提升。有几家公司告诉我,仅仅通过打磨话术,他们就把从首次销售电话到商机阶段的交易数量翻了一倍。我觉得这并不罕见。我自己曾在一家公司做过,当时我是市场副总裁,我们在两个季度内,仅仅通过打磨话术,就把收入翻了一倍。就是把它收紧。
Lenny: 我的天。好吧。
April Dunford: 收紧它。
Lenny: 没什么大不了的。
April Dunford: 嗯。
Lenny: 好的,所以——
April Dunford: 我得说,那是一次很大的定位转变,不是小调整。不过大多数情况下,我们不会做到那种程度。大多数时候,就是一种收紧。我们不是说”哦,我们以前是这个,现在变成那个了”。大多数时候就是收紧。但通常那些话术实在太差了。我告诉你,真的太差了,以至于低垂的果实就在那里——哪怕我们只做一点点改进,就能对漏斗中存活下来的交易量产生巨大影响。
Lenny: 再说一次,如果大家想深入了解定位的步骤,你的第一本书 Obviously Awesome 是一份很好的指南,我们第一期播客也讲过这个。另外你还在我的 newsletter 上发过一篇客座文章,给出了快速上手指南。所以有非常多工具可以帮助你完成这个过程。
April Dunford: 非常多。
Andy Raskin 的框架与销售话术的对比
Lenny: 在我们聊天的过程中,我脑海中一直想到的另一件事是,之前有位嘉宾 Andy Raskin 有一个不同的框架,感觉有些相似,但我知道它们是不同的。他的框架从世界上发生的一个变化开始,然后讲谁会在这场变化中胜出,谁会出局。接着他才讲为什么这款产品是最好的。你对那种方法 vs 这种方法有什么看法?最大的区别是什么?
April Dunford: 关于那个框架,我确实认为它在某些条件下是有效的,但同样,我觉得那些条件可能比较特殊。我认为那个结构在销售话术方面有几个缺失。首先是,那个话术中完全没有差异化价值的概念,对我来说这是一个巨大的缺失。在那个话术中,它假设”新的”天然就有价值,“旧的”天然就不好。有时候确实是这样。有时候就是你 vs 现状,而现状是某种糟糕的旧东西、遗留系统,或者是人工流程,而你是市面上唯一的选择——那你可以这样做。但大多数情况下,我们面对的不是这种局面。大多数情况下,做同一件事有多种新的方式,你不能简单地说,“我是唯一的新选择,其他都是旧的、差的。”
所以我通常需要精确地穿针引线。这是第一点。第二点是,对大多数公司来说,如果我们真正理解了客户和决策过程,就会发现”旧”是好的——它安全,没有风险。有谁会真的说”不,我不买 Salesforce,那是旧东西”吗?我觉得不会。所以在很多情况下,你不能依赖——说”买这个因为它是新的,新的就是好的”——这种做法是偷懒的。大多数时候,客户会想知道,具体好在哪里?告诉我那些我在别处得不到的价值是什么。你必须比说”相信我,新的就是好的”更具体。这是第一点。
第二点是关于以趋势开头这件事。表面上看挺不错的,但问题在于趋势通常不是你独有的。其他所有人也都看到了这个趋势。所以你的开场方式,任何一个竞争对手都可以用同样的方式开场。
我这样做了很多年,当时我学的是”问题-方案”的套路。我们会像描述趋势一样定义问题。我们会说”世界正在发生变化”。我当时卖数据库,我就会说,“世界的变化在于数据正在指数级增长。“废话,我们都知道。我所有的竞争对手都可以这么说,而且他们应对这个趋势的方式也是一样的。所以除非你对这个趋势有特别独特的见解——嗯,那其实就不是趋势了,对吧?那是你对趋势的洞察。所以我认为趋势不是一个好的切入点,因为它不总是你独有的。理想情况下,我们想说的是竞争对手说不出来的话。而趋势通常是我们在控制范围之外的,它存在于世界中,其他人也能看到。
所以我觉得它不太好。我觉得那个结构看起来很像我们在 VC 融资演示或投资者路演中使用的结构,因为我们讨论的时间跨度更长,可以说”看,世界真的在变化,十年后会是一片混乱和毁灭,唯一站着的就是我们,所以不存在竞争”。因为时间框架更长,我们讨论的是整个市场的颠覆——这其实很理论化——所以在投资者路演中我们可以用这套东西。事实上,在投资者路演中我们就应该这样讲。但销售话术是关于”现在”的。销售话术就是,好,我现在就把钱交出来,换的是当下。你不能扯太远的未来,否则我只是在给每个人一个拖延的理由,而他们本来就已经犹豫不决了。
Lenny: 我觉得我需要搞一个辩论版的播客,让人上来——
April Dunford: 我知道,但我想说的是,当大家在研究这些东西的时候应该思考一件事,因为如果你试图搞清楚这一切,确实会非常困惑。我真正不喜欢那些做品类创建的人的一点是,他们说那是成功的唯一方式。总的来说,任何事都不会只有一个正确答案。做任何事都有很多方法。所以我觉得大家应该多尝试。对于任何一个框架,他们都应该看看它是否适合自己、适合自己的情况。也许适合,也许不适合。
我觉得大家应该从任何能借鉴的地方去借鉴,找出适合自己情况的方法。我的东西,我希望大家把它当作一个起点来使用,但不应该被它束缚。市场上有很多行之有效的方法,我觉得我们唯一能确定的就是——我们不能说”嗯,这就是规则,永远都是这样运作的”。如果真有那么简单,这件事就不会这么难了。我们也不会需要这么多播客、newsletter 和各种各样的东西来试图搞清楚这些问题。
Lenny: 确实如此。好了,说到这里,我们进入了非常令人兴奋的闪电问答环节。准备好了吗?
April Dunford: 哦,准备好了。闪电问答。天哪,让我好紧张。好吧。
Lenny: 好,第一个问题。你向别人推荐最多的两三本书是什么?
April Dunford: 这个问题简单。最近我非常喜欢 Matt Dixon 的作品,我们在这期播客里已经提过他几次了,但 Matt Dixon 的新书叫 The JOLT Effect,非常棒,因为里面有大量数据,而他从数据中发现的很多东西,跟我们通常认为的销售常识是相悖的。所以我觉得那本书里充满了有价值的观点,每个人都应该看看。他的前一本书 The Challenger Sale,还有那本书的姊妹篇 The Challenger Customer,也非常出色,同样是基于深入研究。那些书现在比较老了,但我们在 The JOLT Effect 中看到,所有结论都依然成立。The Challenger Sale 里的那些发现,十年来没有任何改变。所以我觉得这几本书放在一起看,真的很棒。
另一本我总是推荐的是关于定位的经典之作,也就是 Ries 和 Trout 写的 Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind。我那本都翻卷边了,那本书我大概读了一百遍,到现在还能看到以前没注意到的东西。所以如果你真的想深入了解定位,我的书是讲”怎么做”的,他们的书是讲”定位到底是什么”的。我觉得所有对定位感兴趣的人都应该去读那本。
Lenny: 太棒了。顺便说一下,你的第一本书就在我身后某个地方,我不知道具体在哪,但就在那儿。
April Dunford: 我这本就在手边,所以可以做这个梗。看,在这儿。
Lenny: 完美。
April Dunford: 这是新的那本,那是旧的那本。
Lenny: 看 YouTube 的观众可以看见你学的那招。第二个问题,你最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
April Dunford: 天哪,说这个我要惹麻烦了。你知道 Bong Joon-ho 就是拍《寄生虫》的那位导演吧?
Lenny: 对。
April Dunford: 在《寄生虫》之前,他有一部电影叫 Snow Piercer,挺老的了。我觉得是——
Lenny: 我看过。是不是那部火车上的?
April Dunford: 2013 年的。你看过吗?
Lenny: 看过。
April Dunford: 我特别喜欢这部电影。最近我和我爸坐火车旅行,出发前我们聊起火车,然后大家就又把 Snow Piercer 看了一遍。我和我女儿一起看,我们真的非常喜欢这部电影。有趣的是,当年这部电影刚出来的时候,我在一家创业公司工作,CEO 过来说:“最近看了什么好电影吗?“我说:“天哪,你一定要看 Snow Piercer。“然后他带着一个女生去初次约会看了这部电影,第二天回来特别生气。不是一般的生气,他是真的对我很恼火。他说:“那是我看过最烂的电影。“我说:“兄弟,你应该告诉我你要去约会啊,我又不知道。”
Lenny: 嗯,那也是我对那部电影的感受。我不太喜欢,但我觉得你得带着——
April Dunford: 它是两极分化的。你要么觉得它太棒了,要么觉得这也太烂了,我刚看了个什么?
Lenny: 这说明了你的电影品味。我们对你了解了不少,April。那部电影确实很特别。
April Dunford: 你看过《寄生虫》吗?那部确实很棒。
Lenny: 那部确实很棒。完全不一样,跟我想象的完全不同。我没意识到是同一位导演。
April Dunford: 哦,是的。
Lenny: 好了,酷。这就给大家推荐了两部电影。我很好奇大家怎么看 Snow Piercer。
April Dunford: 提醒一下,约会别看这部。
Lenny: 天哪,我到现在偶尔还会想起那部电影。下一个问题,你在面试时最喜欢问的一个问题是什么?通常这是针对招聘场景的,所以看你在什么情况下会用。
面试中的写作测试
April Dunford: 回想当年我还在公司内部带团队的时候,就是在我做营销 VP 的那段日子,我觉得很多做营销的人都会带着一些不好的习惯进来,尤其是创业公司的营销人员。营销领域有点像蛮荒西部,所以有时候新人进来,人很聪明,但在上一家公司学了些东西,你会觉得拜托千万别在这里做,在这里行不通。所以我后来形成了一个方法,就是主要看态度。你是不是很热情?是不是对我们做的事情非常有激情?其他的我基本都能教你。唯一我教不了你的就是说服性写作。我觉得这是一项可以学习的技能,我认为人们是可以学会说服性写作的。
我只是没有时间亲自教你。所以我以前会给候选人一个写作测试,我会说:“想想你最近买了什么东西,给我写两段话,就把它推销给我。“我特别喜欢这个测试,因为能写就是能写,不能写就是不能写。我们在产品营销和营销中最终会做的大量工作都涉及写作,所以这算是一项基础技能。如果你不具备这个能力,那就是我唯一教不了你的东西。
Lenny: 哇,这太有意思了。我从没听说过这样的面试题。我很喜欢。我觉得产品经理——
April Dunford: 这是我从一家公司偷来的,那家公司在我入职前让我做这个测试,我当时就觉得这招真聪明,我要偷走。不过当时我很焦虑,不知道该写什么产品好,正好我刚买了一双新的跑鞋,所以我就写了两段关于我的新 Brooks 长距离跑鞋的内容。但写得不错,我拿到那份工作了。
最近喜欢的产品
Lenny: 这正好完美衔接我们的下一个问题:你最近有没有发现什么特别喜欢的产品?
April Dunford: 最近我有点迷上了——我甚至不知道该怎么描述这类东西——就是那种低科技但非常棒的东西。其中一类我最近特别喜欢的是钢笔。我不知道你有没有用过钢笔写字。
Lenny: 没有,但我知道是什么。
April Dunford: 有一家公司叫 Lamy,总部在德国,他们生产世界上最好的钢笔。非常漂亮,非常棒。有些真的很贵,如果你想花很多钱买一支笔,完全可以。但他们有一款叫 AL-Star,不算贵,二三十块钱。对于一支笔来说可能算贵的,但也没贵到丢了会心疼的程度。所以 Lamy AL-Star,这就是我最近最喜欢的产品。我现在手边没有,应该有的话拿起来展示一下会很棒,但我包没带在身边,笔在包里。Lamy AL-Star,你去搜一下,这些钢笔真的很漂亮。如果你没用过钢笔写字,需要一点时间来适应,但适应之后就会觉得,天哪,手感太好了。你再也不会想用圆珠笔了。
Lenny: 我正想问,你最喜欢的是不是就是写字的手感?
April Dunford: 手感。完全不一样。对,非常棒。
Lenny: 我用 Muji 的笔,不知道你知不知道这种笔。
April Dunford: 哦,知道,那种笔确实挺好用的。它们是滚珠笔,滚珠笔,很不错,但还是比不上钢笔。
Lenny: 毕竟不是钢笔嘛。
April Dunford: Muji 的笔确实挺好的。
Lenny: 那你需要蘸墨水之类的吗?怎么用的?
April Dunford: 不用。它们要么自带一个小墨囊,插进去就行,要么如果你觉得对环境不好,不想老扔墨囊,还有一种可重复灌墨的墨囊,基本上就是插上另一个东西,它就把墨水吸进去了。对,不用蘸墨水。那也太夸张了,我可没法带上飞机,老兄。
Lenny: 安检会没收你的墨水。好了,接下来这些问题可能会更有挑战性,也可能非常简单。你有没有一个最喜欢的人生座右铭,喜欢对自己重复、喜欢跟别人分享、觉得时常回味的?
April Dunford: 我最近的心态是——也许这只是上了年纪的人的想法——但我最近的心态就是:没什么大不了的。没什么大不了的,没什么大不了的。你会遇到一些自认为很大的事情,不管是正面的还是负面的,你会想,哇,如果这件事发生了就好了,然后它真的发生了,你觉得,嗯,确实挺好的,但其实其他方面本来也不错。反过来也一样,你会想,哦,如果这件事发生了就太糟了。然后它真的发生了,你觉得,其实也没那么糟。所以我不知道这算好还是坏,但我最近就是处于一种很松弛的状态,觉得什么都无所谓,老兄。一切都挺好的。
Lenny: 这句话太有共鸣了。虽然你一直这么告诉自己,但有时候还是很难让自己真正相信。但这确实是一个很好的座右铭。我自己要偷走这句话。我也经常用不同的方式跟自己说类似的话。
April Dunford: 是啊。
父亲的教诲
Lenny: 你父母教给你的最有价值的道理是什么?
April Dunford: 有意思的是,这跟前面说的还有点关联。我爸是做生意的,我在一个非常小的镇上长大,那个地方在加拿大算是度假区的乡间。我爸经营的就是面向游客的玩乐装备,比如船、摩托车、ATV 之类的东西。他做了好多年,几年前退休的时候才卖掉。在创业者家庭长大是一种很特别的体验,因为你会看到起起伏伏。生意很好的时候,然后生意很不好的时候,然后我们都穷了,然后生意又好了,我们又不穷了。所以我爸一直有一种态度,就是你得咬牙扛过去。
你就是得扛过去。会有好事,也会有坏事,但关键就是别停下来,继续往前走。所以那个生意他做了大概三十多年、四十年吧,我也不太确定。他那家店的口号是”1971年以来欢乐之家”。他是1971年开的,大概三四年前卖的。很长时间了。
Lenny: 哇。
April Dunford: 最后结果还是好的。所以我觉得在一个你能亲眼看到高峰和低谷的家庭里长大,确实很有意义。然后你就会觉得,我们就是在埋头干活而已,没什么大不了的。
Lenny: 现在能看出来这些观念都是从哪里来的了。
April Dunford: 嗯。
最喜欢的城市
Lenny: 最后一个问题。你经常出差,经常做演讲,去过很多城市。我很好奇,你最喜欢的——也许是一个大家不太知道的城市,或者你最喜欢的演讲场地?
April Dunford: 说起来很俗套,但我就是喜欢巴黎。就是喜欢。不过对我来说,巴黎有一种特别的氛围。上大学的时候,我参加过交换项目,当时读的是工程学,第三年在巴黎郊外的一所学校就读。所以我整个学年都待在那里,学了一些法语。到年底的时候法语还不错。现在法语已经很差了。但可以说我懂巴黎,我喜欢巴黎。每次去巴黎我都玩得特别开心。我有自己想去的那几家餐厅,有几个想去逛的购物的地方,坐到咖啡馆里,看看漂亮的人们,喝杯好咖啡。我就是真的很享受巴黎的整个氛围。现在大家也开始知道这件事了。法国的公司会打电话来说:“我们能不能享受一下巴黎折扣?听说你喜欢来这里。“我就说:“好吧。”
Lenny: 这下他们要——
April Dunford: 那里有一个很棒的产品管理大会叫 La Product Conference,是 Tega 团队主办的,在此向 Tega 致敬。我去过好几次他们的会议,他们做得非常出色,场地也特别好。地点会换。但上次我去的,大概是两年前,是在一家老剧院里,非常漂亮。那真的是一个很棒的场地,在一个很棒的城市,一个很棒的会议。所以,向法国人民致敬。
Lenny: 天哪。听起来太梦幻了。巴黎。我能理解为什么那会是最爱。April,我觉得我们实现了我们希望实现的一切。我觉得每一个听了这期播客的人,在销售话术和推销方面都会有所进步。感觉哪怕只从这套框架里取一个要素——比如从一个洞察开始,或者聚焦于差异化价值——就能让人变得更好。所以我为我们感到骄傲。非常感谢你来做这期节目。最后两个问题。大家如果想联系你,可以在哪里找到你?听众怎样才能帮到你?
April Dunford: 哪里能找到我?我的网站是 aprildunford.com。我现在唯一还在用的社交媒体就是 LinkedIn。我有点被社交媒体搞累了。我在 Threads 和 Instagram 上稍微试了一下,但如果你想用一个轻松的方式关注我的动态,LinkedIn 是最好的选择。不过我现在什么都做了,Lenny,我有一个播客,叫 Positioning with April Dunford。我还有一个 Newsletter,也叫 Positioning,你可以在 Substack 上找到,或者去 aprildunford.com/books 那里订阅。这些是主要的东西。然后就是那些书,如果你想深入了解这些内容的话。我所知道的一切都在书里了。说实话,没有什么我知道的东西是没写进书里的。
Lenny: 太棒了。那听众怎样才能帮到你?去看看那些东西就好?
April Dunford: 大概吧。你知道吗?我现在正处于这样一个阶段。我觉得,又是上年纪的关系,我正处于一种比较哲学的阶段,我不会永远做这件事。我现在想做的就是把脑子里所有有用的东西都拿出来,在我结束之前放到世界上。所以我现在非常专注于为他人提供有用的东西。我本来不觉得自己需要写一本关于销售话术的书,但后来我脑子里冒出一个念头,每个人的销售话术都那么糟糕,而且市面上根本没有一本关于如何构建销售话术的书。我不是说我的书就是世界上最了不起的东西,但总比没有强。这就是我现在想做的事,我想对别人有用,因为很快我就什么都不做了,大概是这么个想法。
Lenny: 阿诺德·施瓦辛格的新书叫 Be Useful。我觉得这完美描述了如何获得成功,尤其是在我们做的工作中,就是帮助别人。我一直在反复思考这个问题——做一个有用的人。
April Dunford: 我觉得这一点真的很重要。当我写完第一本书的时候,人们开始给我写信说,“哦,你的书太棒了。“我的第一反应是说,“哦,很高兴你喜欢。“但后来我把自己问住了——你知道吗?我其实不在乎你喜不喜欢。这不是娱乐。我真正想做的是创造出有用的东西。所以我真正希望的是人们读完这些东西后回来说,“那很有用。我们一直在为这件事苦恼,而你帮我打开了某个突破口,那很有用。“这就是我现在想做的事。
Lenny: April,非常感谢你能来。这次太棒了。
April Dunford: 非常感谢。来这里总是很棒。
Lenny: 随时欢迎你来。如果你以后出了第三本书,我们也许可以再来一个第三版——如果你有的话——
April Dunford: 不会有的,不可能。
Lenny: 好吧。好了,大家再见。非常感谢你们的收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。另外,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评价,这真的能帮助其他听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| AL-Star | AL-Star |
| beachhead | 滩头阵地 |
| Bob Moesta | Bob Moesta |
| Bong Joon-ho | 奉俊昊 |
| bowling pin strategy | 保龄球瓶策略 |
| Brooks | Brooks |
| calm confidence | 从容自信 |
| category creation | 品类创建 |
| champion | 推进者(交易推进者) |
| CMS | CMS(内容管理系统) |
| consensus | 共识 |
| cost center | 成本中心 |
| CRM | CRM(客户关系管理系统) |
| differentiated value | 差异化价值 |
| discovery | 探索 |
| dropdown menus | 下拉菜单 |
| fast follower | 快速跟随者 |
| FOMO | FOMO(错失恐惧) |
| fork lift | 彻底翻新(此处指全面替换现有文案/信息架构) |
| G2 Crowd | G2 Crowd(企业软件评测平台) |
| Geoffrey Moore | Geoffrey Moore(科技营销理论家) |
| Gong | Gong(销售对话分析平台) |
| growth driver | 增长驱动力 |
| help desk software | 工单软件 |
| Help Scout | Help Scout |
| inside sales | 内部销售团队 |
| insight | 洞察 |
| Jobs To Be Done | Jobs To Be Done(待完成任务理论) |
| Lamy | Lamy |
| LevelJump | LevelJump |
| line of business buyer | 业务部门买家 |
| LMS | LMS(学习管理系统) |
| Matt Dixon | Matt Dixon |
| Muji | Muji(无印良品) |
| niche play | 利基产品 |
| pitch deck | 销售演示文档 |
| positioning | 定位 |
| Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind | Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind |
| product exposition | 产品展示 |
| product led growth | 产品驱动增长 |
| prospects | 潜在客户 |
| qualification call | 资质筛选电话 |
| Qualtrics | Qualtrics |
| Ries and Trout | Ries 和 Trout |
| ROI | ROI(投资回报率) |
| sales enablement | 销售赋能 |
| Sales Pitch | 销售话术 |
| shared inbox | 共享收件箱 |
| short list | 短名单 |
| Siebel | Siebel |
| Snow Piercer | Snow Piercer(雪国列车) |
| Snowflake | Snowflake |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2(服务组织控制类型 2 合规认证) |
| status quo | 现状 |
| The Challenger Customer | The Challenger Customer |
| The Challenger Sale | The Challenger Sale |
| The JOLT Effect | The JOLT Effect |
| Zendesk | Zendesk |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)