将热爱变现、规模化市场平台,以及来自创作者经济资深从业者的故事 | Camille Hearst
Monetizing passions, scaling marketplaces, and stories from a creator economy vet | Camille Hearst
Camille Hearst: … those Steve Jobs’ lore was that if you were in an elevator with him, you better be prepared to talk about what you do at the company because he had a habit of getting in the elevator and looking at you and saying, “What do you do? What do you do here?” And there were also rumors that people who had not given him a good answer, that ended up being their last day at Apple.
So there was someone who I didn’t know personally but worked in my department before I got there who got in an elevator and looked up and Steve was approaching him and so he went to press the button to open the door and accidentally pressed the one to close the door. And it was like doing this press… You can’t see me if you’re listening on podcast but frantically pressing the button, trying to open the door, but accidentally pressing the closed door button and the elevator going to its destination. And apparently he got off and just bolted straight up, ran down the hallway.
About This Episode
Lenny: He’ll never remember my face.
Camille Hearst: Yeah, exactly.
Spotify Fan Monetization Business
Lenny: I disappeared.
Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard win experiences building and growing today’s most successful products.
Today my guest is Camille Hearst. Camille is head of fan monetization at Spotify. Before that, she was head of product for creators of Patreon. She was product marketing manager at YouTube and the second PM on iTunes. She’s also a former founder. She started a company called Kit that she sold to Patreon.
And this episode is for anyone who’s curious about the creator space, either from the creator side or the platform side, or if you’d just like to hear a bunch of fun stories from an awesome product leader.
We chat about the future of creator platforms, how to be successful as a creator, and also as a new creator platform, the downsides of creator life plus frameworks, stories from Steve Jobs, ways to monetize being a creator and so much more.
Enjoy this episode with Camille Hearst after a short word from our sponsors.
Merge’s unified API can fully remove this blocker from your roadmap. With one API, your team can add over 180 HR, accounting, ATS, ticketing, CRM, file storage and marketing automation integrations into your product. You can get your first integration into production in a matter of days and save countless weeks building custom integrations, letting you get back to building your core product.
Merge’s integration speed up the product development process for customers like Ramp, Drata, and many of their fast growing and established companies, allowing them to test their features at scale without having to worry about a never ending integrations roadmap.
Save your engineers countless hours, hit your growth targets, and expedite your sales cycle by making integration offerings your competitive advantage with Merge.
Visit merge.dev/lenny to get started and integrate up to three customers for free.
I know this firsthand because Coda does that for me. I use Coda every day to wrinkle my newsletter content calendar, my interview notes for podcasts, and to coordinate my sponsors.
More recently, I actually wrote a whole post on how Coda’s product team operates, and within that post, they shared a dozen templates that they use internally to run their product team, including managing the roadmap, their OKR process, getting internal feedback, and essentially their whole product development process is done within Coda.
If your team’s work is spread out across different documents and spreadsheets and a stack of workflow tools, that’s why you need Coda. Coda puts data in one centralized location regardless of format, eliminating roadblocks that can slow your team down. Coda allows your team to operate on the same information and collaborate in one place.
Take advantage of the special limited time offer just for startups. Plan up today at coda.io/lenny and get a thousand dollars startup credit on your first statement. That’s C-O-D-A .io/lenny to sign up and get a startup credit of $1000. coda.io/lenny.
Camille, thank you so much for being here. Welcome to the podcast.
Taylor Swift Parking Lot Culture
Camille Hearst: Thank you so much for having me, Lenny.
Best And Worst Of Working With Musicians
Lenny: I first wanted to just give a big thank you to Adam Fishman for introducing us who had just so many nice things to say about you and so I’m really excited to be chatting.
I want to start with talking about your current role at Spotify and I believe your role is head of fan monetization. What does that actually entail and what are you responsible for within Spotify?
Camille Hearst: As head of fan monetization, I have a team of folks who are really passionate about figuring out new ways to help artists and fans connect and also figure out ways to make those connections result in new monetization opportunities for the artists.
So one of the things that we all know and we’ve seen is how passionate fans are about the artists that they love. You’ve been following any of the latest bits about the Taylor Swift tour, the Beyoncé tour that’s been happening this summer, and their effect on local economies. It’s been pretty impressive.
But one of the things that we also know is it’s not just the big huge superstars who have those rabid and super engaged fan bases. People are really passionate just about supporting the artists that they love in general.
And on Spotify, we want to figure out ways we can help that result in more money that goes directly to the artist.
Pricing Dilemmas In The Creator Economy
Lenny: What are some of those ways just to give people a sense of what might be happening?
Camille Hearst: So one of the ones that most mature is merch which is funny to say because most people probably don’t realize that you can purchase merch on Spotify. That’s one that’s been around-
The Content Creation Hamster Wheel
Lenny: I did not realize that.
Camille Hearst: … for a bit of time and my team’s recently been working on making it more prominent, giving artists more ways to offer that merch in the form of a reward for fans. So things like an exclusive discount or an exclusive design or early access because you’re a top listener on Spotify, really thinking about thank yous and rewards for your Spotify listenership and fandom.
And then other things we’ve been looking at have been listening parties. We ran a few of those over the past year. I think I talked about it actually on a Spotify event a few years ago. We were running… Sorry, it wasn’t a few years ago, it was last year.
But listening parties is another way and then we’ve got some new ideas we’re exploring.
The Future Of The Creator Economy
Lenny: I’ve heard people do listening parties with this podcast actually and I hope that you roll that out to podcast too because that would be very cool.
Camille Hearst: Yeah. We have all kinds of ideas of really interesting ways we can bring groups of people together and get the monetization going.
NPC Streaming And Creator Success
Lenny: All right.
Camille Hearst: One day.
Curation, Recommendations, And Influence
Lenny: Mysterious but exciting.
Speaking of Taylor Swift, I was watching a TikTok the other day and they showed a video of someone inside the concert showing the whole concert and then they panned to the parking lot and there was just tens of thousands of people just standing around in the parking lot listening to the second order music out at the stadium. And I wonder how can you monetize that if there’s an opportunity?
Camille Hearst: Yeah. I think they often have the merch trucks in those parking lots though one way-
Startup Journey And Acquisition Experience
Lenny: Probably unofficial merch.
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
Supply-Side Marketplace Thinking
Lenny: So you work with artists and I actually wanted to ask this question. What’s the best part about working with artists, musical artists, and what’s the worst part?
Understanding Market Dynamics Through Hailo
Camille Hearst: I think the best part is working with people who really lean into their creativity and their passion so much so that they do it for a living. And I think a lot of us have creative pursuit and passions and things we love to do and if we made millions of dollars and could retire, what would you do full time? Usually, it’s one of these pursuits. But I think it takes an element of bravery, not to mention talent, but you really have to go out on a limb.
And so that’s this equality that exists in this group of people and it’s fun to be around and feel that rub off on you and think, “Oh, maybe I could take the dive one day and I don’t know, go do my calligraphy or learn my ukulele and then do it full time.” But that’s the best part.
And the thing I’m really… I grew up in a musical household. My dad’s a drummer although his joke when we were growing up was real musicians have day jobs because he had to actually have a job with benefit to support the family and couldn’t just be gigging full time.
Which actually brings me to the flip side of the question which you asked what is the hardest part. I do think we saw this a lot at Patreon and I think you see it especially with musicians and artists, this feeling that you want to give your fans everything that you create and you want to do it for free because you’re so enamored with this idea that people really love you and want to support you and they’re really responding to your creativity and everything that you’re making, you don’t want to charge them. But what comes with that is, well, how are you going to make a living.
To some degree, there has to be a value exchange that happens in order for a creative person to live from their art.
And I’ve found that that’s much more pronounced with musicians, this starving artist ethos which makes what I’m trying to do actually quite difficult because a lot of the feedback we get is, “Oh, that’s awesome. I want to have a listening party and have everything be free and just have everyone show up and don’t sell anything.” And we’re really looking at it as a way to fans want to support the artists they love, they want to open up their wallets.
You’ve see nothing else from a Substack and Patreons that people are actually really happy to be a patron of the arts and they look at it as like a badge of honor.
But musicians in particular I think tend to shy away from that which makes the kind of thing that I’m working on more difficult.
Apple Experience And Steve Jobs Anecdotes
Lenny: This’s a great segue to an area I want to spend time on is the creator economy and creators and artists and things like that. And along these lines, I think I have this issue too. I feel bad charging people but there’s also… I don’t think my stuff is worth enough to charge for and why would anyone ever pay anything for it and so I imagine you see that too. It’s just like, “No one’s going to pay for this. It’s crazy.”
First Day At Apple And Jobs’ Keynote
Camille Hearst: Yeah. It’s funny because we live in a very capitalist and market dictate the price kind of society, but on an individual level, particularly when the commodity so to speak is art, there’s so many emotions and feelings involved in that that it’s hard for someone who’s the creator to disassociate themselves from it and see what the market will bear.
Which is why I actually think it’s great that there’s platforms who have stepped in and said, “Hey, we see an opportunity. Let us insert ourselves in the center, let us aggregate, and let us do the hard work of pricing and payment and tax and finance and actually create value where it would be really hard for an individual person who’s a creator to do all of this work and facilitate that connection.” It’s almost like the perfect marketplace solution.
But again, it’s hard because if the supplier doesn’t want to actually make money in some cases or shies away from optimizing or making money.
And then there’s the creative process. Sometimes, you’re in a flow mode and you’re producing a lot and then other times, you’re in a drought spell and these things ebb and flow which is why I think companies like Patreon and Substack are really cool because what they try to do is smooth out that revenue and make it so an artist can actually have a predictable… They’re not even artist, a creator can have a predictable sustainable paycheck so that they aren’t bouncing around from job to job and losing the ability to have that burst of creativity because they’re worried about their bills.
Lenny: I have that experience myself with Substack which is a subscription newsletter and one of the big downsides people don’t think about with this life is once you start charging, people start buying, say, an annual subscription and that means I have to at least go for another year and in reality, I never really want to stop it because the revenue would just stop and that would be really sad. So you get on the treadmill where you don’t really have an exit path. And I’m not sure exactly where this all goes, but it’s been great. But that’s something people don’t think a lot about is this never ending, keep creating, keep creating life.
Running Into Steve Jobs At A Restaurant
Camille Hearst: We call it internally the hamster wheel of content creation. You get on because you love it and then how do you get off.
So it’s actually an interesting challenge again for platforms to think about where can they add value, are there ways to either make the content creation process that much easier and I don’t want to say less of a burden because it’s not a burden but sometimes, if you don’t have time or you’re just at a point in life where you can’t do it, are there services or things that can be offered, are there things like financing that makes sense for creators that banks or traditional institutions wouldn’t offer because of just the difference in the type of work that’s being produced.
Or another potential solution is are there ways that platforms can create content. Maybe it’s automated so that the creator can take a break. So maybe they’re not AI necessarily, maybe it’s more just aggregating data or doing summaries or maybe there’s just other ideas that haven’t been explored out there. But it’s a real problem.
Managing Steve Jobs’ Keynote Music Library
Lenny: So I have this lennybot.com site which is an AI chatbot based on all my content including the podcast episodes and actually, an engineer who was listening to this podcast reached out and offered to help me build it and he did and it’s awesome. And I’m curious if that becomes my retirement plan as the bot ends up just doing this and learns enough. I highly doubt it, but it’s fun to experiment with.
Camille Hearst: Yeah. Use your own content as your large language model, right?
Product Management The Apple Way
Lenny: Exactly. That’s exactly what it is. And I’m curious where this goes.
I want to follow the thread of the creator economy. It feels like there’s this huge wave of the creator economies, the future of work, and all these platforms launched to allow creator to make money. But it feels like over the past couple of years, it feels like it faded away. And these very small number of platforms essentially one YouTube, Spotify, Instagram, TikTok, Patreon, maybe Substack, and there was also the sense that the future of work is freelance, everyone’s going to be working for themselves, creating stuff, and it feels like people are still working regular jobs. A lot of these startups haven’t done great.
So I guess I’m just curious what you think happens maybe in the next five or 10 years from a perspective of platforms emerging and also just from creators, what… Do you think things stay the same? Do you think there’s another wave? Where do you think things go?
From Apple Product Management To Creator Economy
Camille Hearst: I think it was probably predictable to some degree that platforms would win because just of the nature of aggregation. Once you have either all of the supply or you’ve aggregated the demand, it’s really a strong network effect. Why investors love to invest in these types of businesses, it’s hard to break out.
I wouldn’t underestimate the strategic ability either of some the big platforms. They were definitely thinking ahead and building features and thinking about whether or not they saw it as a monetization opportunity. It certainly is a great strategic play to make sure that creators felt like they were on the platform that made the most sense for them and they weren’t going to churn or leave or try too many other places out.
So I think the rush and the funding was to figure out is there room for any other new platforms, are there specific vertical that maybe there’s an opportunity to create vertical specific features and tooling.
And actually, I think we saw a huge massive creation there in Twitch, right? Twitch did not exist and they’re just a juggernaut.
I think TikTok is another one that came out of this era. Maybe they weren’t positioned as creator economy type startups but effectively…
Did you see what happened in Union Square here with Kai, the gaming streamer?
Advice For Creator Platform Founders
Lenny: No.
Monetization Dilemmas For Top Podcasters
Camille Hearst: So I’m in New York and last week, there was a mob and a riot because a Twitch streamer announced that he was going to be giving away PlayStations and computer gear in Union Square and something like a million teenage boys showed up. I’m not making this up. And they had to shut down the center of New York City to clear what turned into protest, riot, mob-
Lenny: Holy shit.
Growing Up: Buddhism, Music, And Tech
Camille Hearst: … of teenagers who came for this one creator that probably no one listening to me right now has even heard of.
Favorite Frameworks And Methods
Lenny: Yeah.
Lightning Round Q&A
Camille Hearst: So I do think a lot of the predictions have come to bear. There are tons of people making money and making a living from creating content on the internet.
There have been studies too where they ask young people what they want to do and what they want to be when they grow up, we quote these at, excuse me, Patreon and over 60% want to create content for a living.
So those trends I don’t think are going anywhere. Maybe it’ll be supplemental income, maybe it’ll be something you do for a period of your life. But I do think that this area continues to be untapped. I just don’t see a world where…
I think of Michelle Phan, right? She’s basically a mini Disney and when you think of it like that, she’s created IP. What can you do with IP? Comic books, movies, TV shows, plushies, merch. How many millions of Michelle fans are we going to have seen?
Look at what’s happening in China. There’s tons of creators like this.
So whether or not the VCs have won or the startups have succeeded, there’s no way that you can lower the cost of content creation and increase the scale of distribution and not see this emerge, this creator economy I think emerge. But I think that maybe there’s still opportunity for more companies to blossom and to grow and certainly for more individuals maybe do this, figure it out on their own, and do it without too many big platforms getting paid off of their creative pursuit.
My Favorite Artists
Lenny: Have you seen the NPC trend on TikTok/maybe Instagram Reels where people pretend to be NPCs, non-playable characters, from a video game?
Camille Hearst: I have not.
Contact Info And Outro
Lenny: Okay. It’s crazy. People just pretend to be a computer character and people pay them little gifts to do a thing.
Camille Hearst: Oh. Is this the… Yes. Have seen it. [inaudible 00:19:19] ice cream, ice cream.
Lenny: Yeah, exactly.
Camille Hearst: Yes. I didn’t realize.
Lenny: You’re making tens of thousands of dollars a day just… So that’s one way to make a living.
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
Lenny: On the thread of becoming a creator, you’ve seen a lot of creators try to do this on Patreon, back at Apple even with iTunes, I want to chat about that, at Spotify now, and even your startup. I’m curious what you’ve seen is important to success in the creator life, especially things that are maybe not obvious to people. What do people need to get right if they want to pursue that path?
Camille Hearst: One of the things that I’ve seen that I don’t know if people realize is consistency and predictability of content creation which is where this idea that we were talking about earlier of a hamster wheel kind of comes on.
But there is something to churning out consistent quality work and putting it out there for your audience to consume and respond and react to that goes a long way. It’s almost like the 10,000 hours. You have to do 10,000 hours of something in order to truly master it. But I’ve seen that time and again.
I started at YouTube in, let’s see, how old am I? It must have been 2010. And that was when I really think this whole thing was just first getting going. And we used to put together these playbooks of what made a creator successful because a lot of the effort there was trying to support this burgeoning economy. And I remember even back then in 2010 and to this day, that continues to be one of the top pieces of advice.
Another one is collaboration. So working with other great creators, sharing audience, exposing one another to those audiences, and then this was something we tried to employ at my startup, Kit. We would actually host events for creators to get together to facilitate meeting and cross pollination in the hopes that it would just benefit their careers. If they were doing YouTube videos with someone they met at the party, then it would be great for all parties all around. So those are two things.
And then I do think in a world with all of this content, there continues to be a need and a space for the curator. And curators as creator’s kind of an interesting concept. But a curator is almost like what the role at book publishing company plays or a record label plays or a radio station plays, right?
There is a degree of having a brand, having something you stand for, having a vibe or an ethos and that person being almost, not a gatekeeper in a bad way, but like, “I, Camille, can’t consume anywhere near all this content. You, I trust your vibe. Tell me what I should be listening to.” And so that would be the third thing I would say is figure out who are those curators who you really can associate your content with who are on the same page as you, have an audience who you think would like your stuff and just try and get associated with them.
Lenny: Yeah. The last piece is so… I totally see that all the time. If there’s someone I super respect and they recommend something, I’m obviously going to value that recommendation highly. That’s like we’re influencing emerged from organically, right? People just, “Here’s something you should check out,” and then, “Oh, let’s pay you to share things so that people try our product.”
Camille Hearst: That was the exact concept behind my startup, Kit. It was all about curating, finding people who are great recommenders for gear, having them curate that gear, and then you could follow the curators you love who wants to go look on Amazon and see reviews from people you’ve never heard of. Oftentimes, if it’s your brother-in-law who’s a great cyclist and they say, “Buy this,” you just buy it. You don’t even care what the reviews say because you trust that person.
Lenny: What happened with the startup and what did you learn from that experience?
Camille Hearst: I started working on the startup in 2015. We managed to raise some money, raised over $2 million, which is a huge accomplishment, especially if you know anything about venture capital. They have a horrible track record when it comes to funding people of color, women, people who are non-cisgender white male, just the track record.
And we had an amazing experience building this company over several years, grew a bunch of the key metrics up into the right and got to a point where we were trying to figure out what the next move was and should we get a bridge round. We were trying to raise Series A. We were, I think, early on the creator economy trend. Probably about a year and a half later, it would’ve been, I think, I hope a snap to raise money. But anyway, we were battling a bunch of different choices, different options.
And I actually did this startup accelerator called StartX that’s run out of Stanford which is my alma mater. And we learned a lot about how to sell a company and what M&A looks like. So we started exploring that path.
And in the end, it made the most sense for us to have an exit and join forces with Patreon. And so that’s what we ended up doing. Sold the company in 2018, joined Patreon, worked there a couple of years, and that’s where I met Adam.
Lenny: Amazing. And I wanted to ask actually about that experience of selling a company. There’s a lot of people listening right now who are thinking about selling their company or maybe you hope to sell their company someday, and I think there’s a reality of it and then there’s the idea of how it might go. I’m curious what you’ve taken away from that experience. And I guess specifically is there any advice you could share with folks that are thinking about selling their company someday? What you think maybe could have done earlier or also just share a glimpse of the reality of acquisitions?
Camille Hearst: I think it’s different for every company for sure. Some companies get souped in and get bought. And other companies actively sell themselves.
We are definitely in the latter camp which means that we manage a process. It’s similar to how you manage a process for fundraising. Not every company just meets the VC and raises money on the first try. They go through a process and meet tons of VCs and put them through the funnel and end up on the other side hopefully with a successful round. So I think that’s one takeaway is treat it like a process and manage it like a process if it is something you’re interested in. It doesn’t really just… For most companies, I would say it doesn’t just happen.
And then the second piece of advice I would give I think we should have been talking to potential acquirers from the beginning and sharing our vision and what we were trying to accomplish because we started those quite late in our journey as a company and it just meant it took… When I met a potential CPO, who would acquire the company, who would end up being my boss or CEO, it was their first time meeting me whereas if it had been their fifth time, we would’ve had a relationship established and they would’ve known more about the vision and what we’re trying to do and hopefully, would’ve had some more time to think about it.
So those would be my two pieces of advice. Start preparing to sell your company from the moment you found it which is a weird thing because obviously, if you’re starting a company, for most founders, they want it to be the next big thing, they’re not starting it in order to sell it, but it’s a good thing to have on your radar because you never know what the future holds. And then two is to treat it like a process.
Lenny: Yeah. On that piece of knowing people who may acquire you, I found that to be a thousand percent true. We sold our company the Airbnb and that’s how it got to Airbnb and what I realized is you just need people who may buy you in the future to have you in their head when they have a problem so that they could be like, “Oh, Camille and her team could solve this problem for us. Let’s go chat with her and-
Camille Hearst: Exactly.
Lenny: … see if they’re interested in acquisition.”
And on the process piece too, 1000% resonates. We basically… When we started chatting with a company, we’re just like, “Okay, who else could potentially acquire us? Let’s make a big list and who we can talk to at that company as soon as possible and then just explore.” But it’s more challenging there because it’s you reaching out to them being like, “Hey, you want to chat about buying our company,” versus them reaching out to you. So to your point, always goes better if they reach out to you, but you can’t always control that.
Camille Hearst: Right. Or if the meeting is not under the context of buying it all, it’s like, “We’re working on something cool. We have a great vision. It aligns with what you’re doing. Maybe there’s a partnership here,” versus just tell you what we’re doing and then when I contact you in 12 months about buying me, you’ve heard of me before.
Lenny: I find even when you’re starting to chat about acquisitions, you never want to say directly, “Hey, you want to buy us?” It’s like, “Hey, you want to have a strategic partnership of some kind? You want to explore partnership?” So funny.
Camille Hearst: Like dating.
Lenny: Yeah, yeah. You can’t just be too direct sometimes.
So when you got to Patreon, I don’t know if it was immediate or eventually you ended up leading the creator side of the marketplace, and I find that looking at your background, you basically stayed on the supply side of marketplaces through your career mostly.
And I actually did the same thing. All I worked on at Airbnb especially, or mostly, was the host side.
And I think it takes a specific mindset in person to be excited about that side of the marketplace versus the consumer side which is where everyone always generally wants to go, to the customer side. So I’m curious what it is that’s drawn you to that side of the business across all the places you work and then just what you found to be important to be successful in that role and on that side?
Camille Hearst: What drew me to that side of the business probably was maybe accidental at the beginning. Just again, coming from this musical family and background, I always had a natural interest in helping artists make a living. So I think that interest was there.
At Apple, I did… There were only two PMs there. We did everything.
At YouTube, I accidentally ended up in creator.
But where I started understanding deeply the dynamics of the marketplace was actually my experience and the one job I’ve had that not been in the creator or art or these big consumer platforms or creator economy which was at a startup called Hailo based out of London and at the time was a huge competitor to Uber and Lyft in the ride sharing and ride hailing space and I worked on the supply side making sure that there were enough cars to fuel the demand.
And in a marketplace like that where it’s real time people trying to get a cab to go from uptown to downtown, you see the inexperience firsthand the impact to your business if you don’t have suppliers, if your suppliers aren’t happy, if they go on strike, if there’s regulations that mean you can’t use your service. And there I think I was…
So one of the projects that I worked on that I launched was the U.S. Uber competitor because Hailo in Europe was all about getting taxi cabs and did not play in the livery is what it’s called in New York or the private rides. Basically, it’s like your uncle or your aunt or your cousin who can switch on Lyft and go pick up whoever. That just was not a thing in Europe.
And so we had to figure out how to launch that in the U.S., how to get drivers on how to create this supply and it was like it doesn’t matter how nice the user experience is, how great the marketing is, how much demand you can generate if when someone opens that app, there are no cars available.
So a lot of people talk about marketplaces as chicken and egg. I actually just think they’re two-sided and you start with the supply and at the end of the day, you can optimize for the demand side or choose who you’re going to prioritize in terms of if there’s a conflict, we’re going to pick this side or the other.
And yes, you won’t be successful with one side or the other but I just experienced and lived firsthand the pain of having built this great operations back in that fed into this gray UI and then you open that app and you can’t get a ride because there aren’t enough cars available.
So I think that solidified my feeling that with marketplaces, you can’t lose sight of the solving real pain points and needs for the supply side in order to make sure the entire business can operate.
Lenny: I’ve done a bunch of research into marketplaces and I found basically the same thing, that supply is almost always where you need to focus almost all your time especially at the beginning.
The way I think about it is that’s if you have a store that’s stuff on your shelves and you’re not going to have a business if you don’t have anything on the shelves.
Camille Hearst: Exactly.
Lenny: There’s a few rare cases, I forget exactly which they were, where demand was actually the bigger challenge and supply is really easy.
You know what? It was Rover. Rover had no problem it turns out with supply because who wouldn’t want to make 50 bucks watching a dog for a few hours. It was a really easy sell and a lot of people could do it and wanted to do it so they actually found supply was not an issue.
But in most cases exactly how you said most 10 times supply is what people are looking for.
Camille Hearst: Totally.
I find that the counter example I hear a lot is eBay, how they were so good at aggregating demand, they were basically able to force suppliers to the terms that they like. But I can’t imagine… It’d be interesting to talk to some folks who were at eBay in their early days that the whole thing didn’t start up without them going out and figuring out who are the key suppliers we need to get on this thing so that we can get aggregating demand.
Lenny: Yeah. You got to have some good stuff on eBay. I wonder if Beanie Babies or whatever they started with.
Camille Hearst: Yeah, exactly.
Lenny:
By offering the most in-demand security and privacy frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and many more, Vanta helps companies obtain the reports they need to accelerate growth, build efficient compliance processes, mitigate risks to their businesses, and build trust with external stakeholders.
Over 5,000 fast-growing companies use Vanta to automate up to 90% of the work involved with SOC 2 and these other frameworks.
For a limited time, Lenny’s Podcast listeners get $1000 off Vanta. Go to vanta.com/lenny, that’s V-A-N-T-A .com/lenny, to learn more and to claim your discounts. Get started today.
You mentioned Apple and I want to spend a little time there. So you said you were the second PM on iTunes back in the day and I’m curious what you learned from the experience you had working at Apple. I think I read somewhere you worked maybe closely with Steve Jobs and Jony Ive, but I don’t know if that’s true, but I’m curious just… No? Okay, but you do have a Steve Jobs story?
Camille Hearst: Yes.
Lenny: Okay.
Camille Hearst: Yes. So I was very early on in the iTunes days I started interning there when I came out of grad school and my internship was actually in label relation and then I started a full-time job doing product marketing.
And at Apple at the time, I think even to this day, they didn’t have a product manager title, they had product marketing managers. And so one of my colleagues who remains good friends to this day, Steve was the first also named Steve, not Steve Jobs was the first PMM working on iTunes and he primarily was doing all the client stuff. He launched the store and everything. But I think I was the second person in the iTunes group with that title. So that was really cool.
And then as far as the Steve Jobs story, I would think I mentioned to you people like hearing this story, nothing happened, I just went up to him and said, “Hi, I’ll tell the story.”
But I think the context of why people find it interesting is because of other stories about Steve. So let me give a little context.
Those Steve Jobs lore was that if you were in an elevator with him, you better be prepared to talk about what you do at the company because he had a habit of getting in the elevator and looking at you and saying, “What do you do? What do you do here?” And there were also rumors that people who had not given him a good answer that ended up being their last day at Apple.
So there was someone who I didn’t know personally but worked in my department before I got there who got in an elevator and looked up and Steve was approaching him. And so he went to press the button to open the door and accidentally press the one to close the door and was doing this press… You can’t see me if you’re listening on podcast but frantically pressing the button, trying to open the door, but accidentally pressing the close door button and the elevator going to its destination. And apparently he got off and just bolted straight up, ran down the hallway.
Lenny: He’ll never remember my face.
Camille Hearst: Yeah, exactly.
Lenny: I disappeared.
Camille Hearst: So that’s the context.
So in 2005, it’s my first day of my internship at Apple and I had this situation where I attended graduation because I only had one semester left to go back to, so I just decided to attend the graduation. That happened basically the week before. And for those of you who are the job span, this is when he gave his really inspiring and famous Stanford commencement speech and it’s an awesome, awesome thing to listen to.
Lenny: You were at that speech?
Camille Hearst: I was there, yeah.
Lenny: Whoa. People love that speech.
Camille Hearst: It’s a good one. It’s really-
Lenny: What did you feel being there listening to it in the moment?
Camille Hearst: Totally inspired.
Apple was not quite what it is today in terms of brand and influence and just it’s at the peak. It’s really come a long way. It was still when I met the recruiter at a conference, I was like, “Apple? What do they do again? My roommate had a Mac, but what’s iTunes? Oh, yeah, I think I’ve heard of that. I think…”
The dancing iPod silhouette ads which really sent Apple over the top. Those hadn’t even really dropped yet, but it was starting, right? It was starting to percolate and bubble and you heard more and more about it and just the association with music was making Apple more cool.
But that speech is… Talk about a commencement speech. That is top-notch.
And Steve’s great at those. He was phenomenal storyteller.
So graduation is what? Saturday, I go home Sunday. The Monday I started my internship and here we are at Cafe Max with my new coworkers and Steve is sitting literally at the table next to me. And so I was like, “Oh my gosh, there’s Steve. I would love to say hi and introduce myself and everyone at the table.”
Now mind you, I hadn’t heard this story about the elevator button in the full yet because it was my first day, but they’re all looking at each other. They’re like, “Yeah, go say hi to him if you want, but you’re an intern.” They say, “Hopefully, he doesn’t fire you on your first day.”
But I’ve always, in my family and in my life, had this encouragement to say hi to people when you see them and let them know that you appreciate what they do and just thank them because it doesn’t happen often.
A lot of times, people go and they ask for a picture or an autograph but this idea of just introducing yourself, saying hello, and thanking someone for something that they’ve done that impacted you to something that’s been a way that my parents have encouraged me to behave in the world and something that I saw them do and saw them model because probably, again, coming from my dad being a musician and being fans of other musicians that like a thing in music, the artist culture that talked to one another about how something you created influenced you or whatnot.
So I went up to him and I got up from my lunch table and walked over and I said, “Hi, my name’s Camille. I’m interning here this summer. It’s my first day. I was at graduation at Stanford on Saturday and your speech was amazing. I was really inspired. I’m so excited to be here and so excited to work on this company and I just wanted to say thank you for spending your time doing that speech for us on Saturday.”
And he was like, “Who are you? What? You’re an intern? Well, what are you doing here?” It was a little… We had a little bit of an exchange. I had to clarify like, “Yeah, I graduated, but I’m interning and I have another semester left.” And he was like, “Oh, okay. Well, welcome to Apple and good luck and I hope you have a really great experience this summer.” And that was it. I didn’t get fired and I said hello to Steve.
And after that, I felt like I knew him. Every time, I’d see him around campus I’d wave high and I think he had no idea who I was but he would look at me confused and then wave back hello.
Lenny: “She’s so friendly. Who’s this person?”
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
Lenny: Do you still remember how you would’ve described what you do? I have a feeling it’s seared in your head, but if not, then never mind.
Camille Hearst: Oh, my statement, if he had asked me where [inaudible 00:41:23].
Lenny: Yeah, exactly.
Camille Hearst: Well, yeah, I was lucky because one of the things that I did he would actually know exactly what it is which is I would manage press rooms whenever there was an iTunes launch. So this is very much grunt work.
But when there would be a press event for one of the new iTunes 6 launch or whatever, they would have interviews with Walter Isaacson or I don’t know if Kara Swisher was working back then, but whoever the journalist and Steve would have a room set up with an iMac computer with an iTunes library full of track. There would be whatever the new iPod was synced to that computer and all of the track. And after every interview, everything would have to be reset.
Also, the library was crafted so he would give feedback for months on the content of the library because he would do demos. And so he wanted to know, “Make sure all my favorite tracks are in there, my favorite Beatles records, my favorite Bob Dylan records, and who’s this artist? Let me check them out. Okay, they don’t cross the bar. Oh, what’s this song? Oh, I love this song. Oh, add this.” So he was very involved in the entire presentation and someone had to go do all that.
So who better than the fresh out of masters of engineering in Stanford graduate student to go do all of the grunt work of making library? But those are the kinds of details that he paid attention to. And so I would’ve just told him that I did product marketing and one of my main responsibilities was fixing the press room for him and he would’ve been like, “Oh, okay.”
Lenny: You mentioned that your title is product marketing manager and there was a recent kind of a hubbub on Twitter where Brian Chesky at Airbnb shared that they shifted the role of product manager to essentially the Apple model. And I’m curious what your perspective is on that approach to product, the Apple kind of way versus a traditional product manager?
Camille Hearst: They have done this very intentionally from what I’ve seen. I know they hired Hiroki actually from Apple-
Lenny: Yeah. A lot of Apple people.
Camille Hearst: Yeah. And actually one of the new leaders they’ve hired, I don’t know if you know Judson Coplan, dear friend of mine, we interned that same summer at Apple and he worked there for 15 years before heading over to Airbnb.
But yeah, the Apple construct, it’s much more of design and engineering led organizations, craftspeople I would say more so than strategy people. So that was one of the stark differences I saw in my transition from Apple to Google. There are a lot more like people from Coca-Cola and McKinsey and Bain at Google. I don’t think any of those people even existed at Apple.
And it was very much like, “Let’s 3D chess our way into what our next move is going to be.” Whereas at Apple it was, “Let’s tinker and let’s craft and let’s build and let’s see what feels right.” There’s different approaches. As a result, the approach to product management was quite different.
So I think it makes sense. Brian Chesky’s background is a designer so it probably resonates a bit more within the Apple way.
And then in terms of what it means for product managers on an individual level, so again, there weren’t product managers, the closest thing would’ve been CPMs, technical program managers who help manage the sprints and manage the schedule and listing out what features would happen.
I spent a lot of my time with the incredibly talented design team and if I had ideas of product features or… We would think months ahead of time, like what’s the anchor story or what are the three key messages for the launch of iTunes 10 or whatever and we might have ideas for new features that would go in that.
But because we had that moment in time, we knew well ahead we were planning for and you were working on the messaging and working on the consumer positioning again while in advance of anything actually being live or built. That was what framed what features you wanted to build and what problems you would put on the table to be solved as opposed to as clear cut metric you’re trying to drive forward which is how product management has evolved in another capacity.
Lenny: And that’s how it works at most companies.
Camille Hearst: Mm-hmm.
Lenny: I want to come back actually to the creator economy stuff. I feel like you’ve worked in the creator economy longer than most anyone, and so I wanted to use our time to spend a little more time there. What about on the platform side? If someone were thinking about starting a company to cater to creators, to build a new platform maybe for creators to make a living, do you have any advice for them? Where do you think maybe there’s opportunity? Where do you think it’s like, “No, probably you don’t want to spend time here?”
Camille Hearst: I think with any company, solving a real problem is the most important thing. So creators have lots of challenges and things that can be solved. Some painful things are more acutely felt than others.
I think at the core, every creator needs two things. They need to grow an audience and they need to get paid so that they can make a living. And in some ways, I do think that growing an audience is more important because with that audience, it opens up opportunities in ways that you can monetize.
But there are all kinds of other things like we’re talking about financing, health insurance, the list goes on, things we face as human beings, trying to be freelancers in the world often apply equally to people who are creative for a living.
And then there are unique things about the creator space like the spurts of energy, the spurts of creative flow that maybe don’t apply in a salary job or an hourly job.
So there are lots of problems out there still to be solved for creators. I don’t think that this space is nearly solved, done, stick a fork in it. So my advice would be to look at the problems that exist and pick a real one and go for it.
Lenny: Wise advice.
Have you seen this podcaster, Bobbi, I forget her last name, she rocketed up to the fourth biggest podcast in America with a few episodes of her podcast, she interviews Drake and a few comedians. Have you seen this person?
Camille Hearst: I feel like I should, but as we said at the beginning, I’m such a music head, I don’t listen to any podcast.
Lenny: The reason I thought of her is I was watching a clip of her on an interview show and she hasn’t made any money from this even though she’s got the hottest podcast in America right now, and we’re going to link to her in the show notes, but she’s hilarious.
Camille Hearst: Amazing.
Lenny: There’s something about her that just is really fun to watch. But okay, no podcast for you right now. We’ll get you on a podcast. You’re on the podcast.
Camille Hearst: I’m on a podcast now.
Lenny: There we go.
You’ve mentioned your parents and I was reading your Wikipedia page and the way your parents are described on there is radical Buddhist artists technologists. I’m curious what that means maybe and then also just is there a memory or moment of growing up that highlights that aspect of them?
Camille Hearst: What’s funny about this is I had no idea how to Wikipedia page until you sent that.
Lenny: What?
Camille Hearst: I don’t know where it came from.
Lenny: Oh my God. Who made this?
Camille Hearst: Exactly.
Lenny: That’s amazing.
Camille Hearst: Like, “What? I’m on Wikipedia?” So that was funny.
Lenny: That’s crazy.
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
So let’s see. I grew up in San Francisco in the eighties and nineties. My parents started practicing Buddhism on the East Coast in the seventies. And my dad was, I mentioned he’s a drummer and a musician, and he also had a studio. We had this closet under the stairs that he turned into a production studio and he was an artist.
He worked for the city. My mom worked for the city, didn’t have a ton of money growing up, and so a lot of the computer equipment came from the street. He would find… Somebody put a PC out… He was building PCs before the gamers were doing it. And I remember he would come home with boxes and boards and chips and would literally go get a book from the library or the store and would figure out how to assemble these computers, keyboards that were broken. He would just fix them. Probably should have been a mechanical engineer, super talented at this stuff.
But basically he had this entire production studio with drum machines and all the equipment. And I was his helper. So I would help him solder stuff together and tinker and actually put these computers together. So that’s probably… I don’t know where that quote came from. I’ll have to go click the link of what the reference is from, but that’s some of the background there.
And the other thing that happened back in San Francisco in the eighties and nineties, we used to host Buddhist meetings in our house and back then there was a lot of what was called street propagation like the Hare Krishna used to be up and down Haight Street right around the corner for me.
The Nation of Islam, which my brother joined for a period of time, would be selling Final Calls and bean pie brothers on the corners.
Lenny: Yes.
Camille Hearst: So The Final Call is the newspaper at the time for the Nation of Islam.
And so it was just a different era, completely different from today, and us practicing Nichiren Buddhism, we had pamphlet that said, “Nam myoho renge kyo,” on them, and I would stand on the steps of our house and… We had a gate. So I would stand behind the gate and I’m probably seven or eight years old, just ask people walking by, “Hey, if you’re a nam myoho renge kyo, here’s a pamphlet. Learn a little more. We’re having a meeting at our house.”
I’d laugh with my mom now. She’s like, “I can’t believe we’re doing that.” It seems totally crazy now but at the time, it was just, again, coming off of the seventies, it was a very different era.
If you’ve ever seen What’s Love Got To Do With It, Tina Turner’s probably… Who recently passed away, probably one of the more famous, more well-known practitioners of Nichiren Buddhism and she actually started practicing in the same kind of era, seventies and eighties… Or seventies probably.
So that’s what that means. And those are a couple memories that illustrate that moment. But you can see, music, technology, helping creators get paid, it’s certainly influenced everything about how I am today.
Lenny: That was a perfect description of your parents based on those stories. And it feels inevitable that you would’ve ended up doing what you’re doing now. Product, technology, music, artists, creators. So that’s amazing.
I’m going to ask one more question before we get to our very exciting lightning round, and the question is just around frameworks. Is there just a favorite framework or process or system or approach to building product or teams that you come back to and/or to share often that you think might be useful to listeners?
Camille Hearst: I have this great manager in my experience at Hailo who turned me on to Marty Cagan who I since befriended and learned a ton from. And I just love the way that-
Lenny: Really?
Camille Hearst: Yeah, he’s awesome. Actually, I should ask him about early days at eBay because I think he was there probably one of the people who got off the ground.
But one of the things that I learned and that we really emphasized during that time is this idea of having dual track agile going where you’re doing discovery and delivery simultaneously and doing it in a way that’s not waterfall.
It’s not like, “All right, the designers are going to go over here and tinker for months, and then once we’ve figured it out, we’ll lob it over the wall to the coders and cross our fingers and hope everything works.” But rather having this continuous cycle of essentially de-risking your assumption and getting to a point where you’re able to do that with speed so that you can chart your way to new paths and to innovation by constantly figuring out where the errors are in your thinking or where things that you didn’t expect to happen were going to happen.
So I think everyone knows an impact effort or risk reward two by two and can map out different opportunities and things you might do on that two by two.
But one of my favorite takeaways from that is that from this way of working around this dual track agile de-risking your riskiest ideas first approach is a concept of taking the things in the top, the biggest swing and actually prioritizing those first in terms of product discovery and figuring out what can you do to start de-risking because if you constantly put those off in favor of the lower risk or more predictable smaller swings, how are you ever going to truly innovate and get to the next level.
It’s a less safe choice. So it’s someone that as a leader, you are in the hot seat and you can take accountability. So if some of these things don’t pan out, it’s on you and not on your team and give your team permission to fail and try things and de-risk those risky assumptions and get them to a point where they become low risk and they become predictable and you can just put them in the delivery column and execute them.
Lenny: It reminds me of this piece of advice that people call eat the frog which is first thing in the morning eat the frog which essentially is do the hardest thing first and then there’s the day becomes easier.
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
Lenny: I don’t know why it’s eat a frog, I don’t know where that comes from.
Camille Hearst: I don’t know either. I like draw the owl. That’s one of my favorite values, the Twilio ones.
Lenny: Say more. I would say more. What is that?
Camille Hearst: Companies have their values. One of them is draw the owl. It’s really draw the effing owl and the meme is how do you draw an owl and you draw some circles and then you draw a fucking owl. So it’s like just do it. At some point, you got to just figure it out and figure out how to do it.
Excuse my language, but it’s funnier when you say what the value actually is which is sometimes you got to just go for it. You’re not going to know the exact path to get there and maybe you won’t have de-risked everything but you start with some circles and then you get it done.
Lenny: I love it. Cursing is very loud on this podcast, so I’m glad you went there.
And with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
Camille Hearst: I hope so. I didn’t prepare this. I thought I’d figured out on the spot.
Lenny: Great. Perfect.
What are two or three books that you recommended most to other people?
Camille Hearst: Three-Body Problem, A Wrinkle in Time, and Octavia Butler’s Kindred.
Lenny: Three-Body Problem’s come up a number of times recently and there’s a show coming out actually based on the book.
Camille Hearst: I’m excited. Yeah.
Lenny: I’m so excited. I’ve been watching Foundation which is also another series I’ve been excited to see, but it’s like, I don’t know what’s going on. It’s so complicated.
Camille Hearst: How is it? I’ve been waiting…
Lenny: Eh.
Camille Hearst: So I’m a huge sci-fi head. I watched Battlestar Galactica. Classic. [inaudible 00:57:16] and so I’ve been waiting to see what happens with Foundation because I just don’t have that kind of commitment in me these days.
Lenny: Yeah. I don’t know what to think of it. It’s beautiful and there’s a lot of interesting pieces but it just goes out… I think they’re making a lot of stuff up. I don’t know if you’ve read Silo. Have you read Silo?
Camille Hearst: No. But I saw the preview for the show. Another one I’m going to [inaudible 00:57:36] season two.
Lenny: That’s a good one to read because in the show… They’re just making up stories. I don’t know what they’re doing. There’s… Ninety percent of it, they just totally invent for the show and then there’s a little bit that’s connected to the story so I don’t know what’s going on.
Camille Hearst: Okay. Cool. I didn’t even know it was a book. I’ll read it.
Lenny: Oh, yeah. It’s really good. There’s three of them, but the first one’s the only good one, so I found.
Camille Hearst: Okay.
Lenny: Anyway, moving on. Speaking of this topic actually, any favorite recent movies or TV shows that you’ve really enjoyed?
Camille Hearst: I’ve been watching Hijack over the last week with Idris Elba. So that’s been fun. Got a couple episodes left there.
And then movies, I’m a huge Chris Nolan fan. So I haven’t seen Oppenheimer yet, but can’t wait to see it. Most of his movies I’m confused by, but the visuals are just so stunning if you let it go.
Lenny: Yeah. I’m excited to see it too. I’ve not seen it either. Have a new child and it’s harder to see movies [inaudible 00:58:30].
Camille Hearst: Oh, another good one. Shadow and Bone on Netflix.
Lenny: Shadow and Bone?
Camille Hearst: Way better than the book I have to say. Well, I read one series, the Six of Crows. This is my young adult sci-fi fantasy streak. Again, coming to the forth. But the show is incredible. It is so good. So if you’re into-
Lenny: Really? Never heard that.
Camille Hearst: … this kind of vibe, go for it.
Lenny: Okay. I’m going to check that out.
What is a favorite interview question that you like to ask people when you’re interviewing them?
Camille Hearst: I like to ask people to tell me about something they’re really proud of that they accomplished and take me through the process and talk to me about why they’re proud of it. I find you can learn so much about a person’s motivations, about their work ethic, about what they care about, what good looks like to them, and I think those are all really important things to understand about a person if you’re going to work closely with them.
Lenny: What is a favorite life motto that you just really like to share or often come back to either in work or in life?
Camille Hearst: Yeah. So there’s one which is actually a Japanese proverb. I took Japanese in high school and college but this phrase is a frog in a well cannot know the ocean. And so the idea is to push yourself to expand your limits and your horizons and get out of the well so that you can experience the ocean.
Lenny: I love that.
Camille Hearst: I got a better one, sorry.
Lenny: Okay, great. Go.
Camille Hearst: Another one.
Lenny: Sure. Tell me.
Camille Hearst: I learned this one from someone at Patreon because someone was posting this around the streets of San Francisco. It’s become more known recently. Apparently, it’s a Chinese proverb. I don’t know if it’s true or not but it is that the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, the second best time is now. So this idea that don’t delay, maybe you missed the prime opportunity but waiting any longer certainly isn’t going to help.
Lenny: I heard that one actually I was at the park in San Francisco and there was this piano thing, I think it was called, it’s a botanical garden and people play piano all throughout once a year. And there’s a guy that was just playing incredibly well and I left and he left around the same time and I was standing next to him. I’m like, “Man, I wish I studied piano when I was younger.” And he’s like, “The best time to have studied piano is 10 years ago. The second best time is to start now.”
Camille Hearst: Yep, he’s right.
Lenny: And I couldn’t get off the hook there. He is like, “You’re right. And you’re still not going to do it I guess.”
Final question, who’s a favorite artist right now? Who are you liking?
Camille Hearst: Ooh. So I’ve been for probably a good three years now really into Afrobeat and right now there’s this artist called Rema, R-E-M-A, who I first heard a couple years ago, he’s got this track called Dumebi. But he has a song out right now that is, my opinion, song of the summer called Calm Down. I think Ariana Grande, is it, came over and did a verse on it? But I’ve just been listening to Rema Radio, Calm Down radio on Spotify and tons of Afrobeats artists. So that’s the vibe I’m on right now.
Lenny: I love it. I actually… Once someone suggested some music at the end of a podcast and I was just like, “Hey, we’re going to end the podcast with that tune.” And it turned out we did that and then YouTube shut us down because it’s copyrighted and so I’m not going to offer. Never going to do that again, so we’re just ending with regular music but we’ll link-
Camille Hearst: [inaudible 01:01:59] it’s hard.
Lenny: I know. It’s so tough. Come on. It’s just like a few seconds. Give us a break.
Camille Hearst: You should have 30 seconds for your play. Right?
Lenny: I don’t know. Maybe we’ll-
Camille Hearst: Don’t ask me, I’m not a lawyer.
Lenny: We’ll send you the bill.
Camille Hearst: Yeah.
Lenny: Camille, this was amazing. I think we’re living the creator economy here. I really appreciate you making time for this.
Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out and maybe ask any additional questions? And then how can listeners be useful to you?
Camille Hearst: I used to be real big on Twitter but that ship has sailed. I’m still on there. You can find me-
Lenny: It’s X now.
Camille Hearst: Yes, on X. Camillionz is my handle, C-A-M-I-L-L-I-O-N-Z. Also on Threads these days, trying that out, seeing if that sticks. So probably LinkedIn. You could find me on LinkedIn. I don’t think anyone ever promotes that.
Lenny: They do. Most people actually.
Camille Hearst: Do they? Yeah?
Lenny: Yeah.
Camille Hearst: Okay.
And how can listeners be useful to me? Hey, go support your favorite creator. Find out, go to the show, find out if they have a Patreon. I would love to see more and more people feeling like they are patrons of the arts.
Lenny: Amazing. Maybe buy some merch.
Camille Hearst: Buy some merch. Yeah.
Lenny: Camille, thank you again for being here.
Camille Hearst: Thanks, Lenny.
Lenny: Bye, everyone.
Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A Wrinkle in Time | 《时间的皱折》 |
| Adam Fishman | Adam Fishman |
| Afrobeat | Afrobeat(非洲节拍音乐) |
| aggregation | 聚合效应 |
| Airbnb | Airbnb |
| Apple Podcasts | Apple Podcasts |
| Ariana Grande | Ariana Grande |
| Bain | Bain(贝恩咨询) |
| Battlestar Galactica | 《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》 |
| Beanie Babies | Beanie Babies(豆豆公仔) |
| Beatles | Beatles(甲壳虫乐队) |
| Beyoncé | 碧昂丝 |
| Bob Dylan | Bob Dylan |
| Bobbi | Bobbi(播客主持人) |
| Brian Chesky | Brian Chesky |
| bridge round | 过桥融资 |
| Cafe Macs | Cafe Macs(Apple 总部餐厅) |
| Chris Nolan | Chris Nolan |
| CPM | CPM(Critical Path Method / 技术项目经理,此处上下文指技术项目经理) |
| CPO | 首席产品官(Chief Product Officer) |
| creator economy | 创作者经济 |
| curator | 策展人 |
| delivery | 交付 |
| discovery | 探索 |
| Drake | Drake(说唱歌手) |
| draw the owl | 画猫头鹰 |
| dual track agile | 双轨敏捷 |
| eat the frog | 吃青蛙 |
| exit | 退出(公司出售/并购) |
| fan monetization | 粉丝变现 |
| Final Call | Final Call(《终极呼唤》,伊斯兰民族组织的报纸) |
| Foundation | 《基地》 |
| Haight Street | Haight Street(海特街,旧金山著名街道) |
| Hailo | Hailo(伦敦网约车创业公司) |
| Hare Krishna | Hare Krishna(克利须那运动) |
| Hijack | 《劫机》(Hijack) |
| Hiroki | Hiroki |
| host | 房东 |
| Idris Elba | Idris Elba |
| IP | IP(知识产权) |
| Jony Ive | Jony Ive |
| Judson Coplan | Judson Coplan |
| Kai | Kai |
| Kara Swisher | Kara Swisher |
| Kindred | 《血亲》(Kindred) |
| Kit | Kit |
| label relations | 厂牌关系 |
| listening parties | 聆听派对 |
| livery | livery(纽约私人网约车许可类别) |
| M&A | 并购(Mergers and Acquisitions) |
| Marty Cagan | Marty Cagan |
| McKinsey | McKinsey(麦肯锡) |
| merch | 周边商品 |
| Michelle Phan | Michelle Phan |
| Nam myoho renge kyo | 南无妙法莲华经 |
| Nation of Islam | 伊斯兰民族组织(Nation of Islam) |
| Nichiren Buddhism | 日莲佛教 |
| NPC | NPC(非玩家角色) |
| Octavia Butler | Octavia Butler |
| Oppenheimer | 《奥本海默》 |
| PMM | 产品营销经理(Product Marketing Manager) |
| Rema | Rema(尼日利亚歌手) |
| Rover | Rover(宠物寄养服务平台) |
| Series A | A 轮融资 |
| Shadow and Bone | 《影与骨》 |
| Silo | 《Silo》 |
| Six of Crows | 《六鸦》(Six of Crows) |
| Spotify | Spotify |
| Stanford | Stanford |
| StartX | StartX |
| Steve Jobs | 乔布斯 |
| Taylor Swift | 泰勒·斯威夫特 |
| Threads | Threads |
| Three-Body Problem | 《三体》 |
| Tina Turner | Tina Turner |
| Twilio | Twilio |
| Walter Isaacson | Walter Isaacson |
| What’s Love Got To Do With It | What’s Love Got To Do With It(《与爱何干》,Tina Turner 传记电影) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
将热爱变现、规模化市场平台,以及来自创作者经济资深从业者的故事 | Camille Hearst
文字记录
Camille Hearst: ……那些关于乔布斯的传说是这样的:如果你和他同乘一部电梯,你最好做好准备,能说清楚自己在公司做什么,因为他有个习惯——进了电梯就看着你问:“你是做什么的?你在公司做什么?“还有传言说,那些没给出好回答的人,那天就成了他们在 Apple 的最后一天。
有个人我不认识,但在我入职之前和我同属一个部门。他进了电梯,一抬头看到 Steve 正朝他走来,于是赶紧去按开门按钮,结果不小心按成了关门按钮。就这样反复按啊按……听播客的朋友看不到,但我在这里疯狂按按钮想开门,却不小心一直按的是关门键,电梯就这么直接到了目的地。据说他一出来就撒腿就跑,一路冲下走廊。
Lenny: 他永远不会记得我的脸。
Camille Hearst: 对,没错。
Lenny: 我消失了。
节目简介
Lenny: 欢迎来到 Lenny’s Podcast,我在这里采访世界级的产品领导者和增长专家,向他们学习在打造和发展当今最成功产品过程中积累的宝贵经验。
今天的嘉宾是 Camille Hearst。Camille 是 Spotify 粉丝变现(fan monetization)业务的负责人。在此之前,她曾担任 Patreon 创作者业务的产品负责人、YouTube 的产品营销经理,也是 iTunes 的第二名 PM(产品经理)。她还是一位创始人,创办了一家名为 Kit 的公司,后来卖给了 Patreon。
这一期节目适合所有对创作者领域感兴趣的人——无论你是从创作者角度还是平台角度来关注,或者你只是想听一位优秀的产品领导者讲一些有趣的故事。
我们聊了创作者平台的未来、如何成为一名成功的创作者,以及如何打造一个新的创作者平台;还有创作者生活的弊端、各种框架、乔布斯的故事、创作者变现的方式,以及更多其他内容。
Spotify 粉丝变现业务
Lenny: Camille,非常感谢你来到这里。欢迎来到播客。
Camille Hearst: 非常感谢你的邀请,Lenny。
Lenny: 首先我想特别感谢 Adam Fishman 介绍我们认识,他对你的评价非常高,所以我非常期待这次对话。
我想先聊聊你目前在 Spotify 的角色。我记得你的职位是粉丝变现负责人。这个角色具体包括什么?你在 Spotify 负责哪些方面?
Camille Hearst: 作为粉丝变现负责人,我带领一支团队,大家都非常热衷于探索新的方式来帮助艺术家和粉丝建立连接,同时想办法让这些连接为艺术家带来新的变现机会。
我们都知道也亲眼看到了粉丝对自己喜爱的艺术家有多么热情。如果你一直在关注最近的新闻——泰勒·斯威夫特的巡演、碧昂丝今年夏天的巡演,以及它们对当地经济的影响——那确实令人印象深刻。
但我们也知道,拥有狂热且高度参与的粉丝群体的,不仅仅是那些超级巨星。人们对支持自己喜爱的艺术家这件事本身就充满热情。
在 Spotify,我们想找到方法,让这份热情能转化为直接到达艺术家手中的更多收入。
Lenny: 能举几个具体的例子,让大家了解目前正在做哪些事情吗?
Camille Hearst: 其中最成熟的一个是周边商品(merch),说起来有点好笑,因为大多数人可能都不知道你可以在 Spotify 上购买周边商品。这个功能已经上线——
Lenny: 我确实不知道。
Camille Hearst: ——有一段时间了。我的团队最近一直在做的是让它更加醒目,给艺术家提供更多方式把周边商品作为对粉丝的回馈来提供。比如专属折扣、专属设计,或者因为你是 Spotify 上的顶级听众而获得优先购买权——真正围绕感谢和奖励你在 Spotify 上的收听和粉丝身份来设计。
另外我们一直在探索的还有聆听派对(listening parties)。过去一年我们办了几场。我想我之前在 Spotify 的一个活动上谈到过,其实不是几年前,是去年。
聆听派对是另一种方式,然后我们还有一些新想法在探索中。
Lenny: 我听说有人拿这个播客办过聆听派对,我希望你们也能把这个功能推广到播客上,那会非常酷。
Camille Hearst: 是的,我们有各种各样的想法,可以用非常有趣的方式把人群聚集在一起,同时推动变现。
Lenny: 好的。
Camille Hearst: 总有一天。
Lenny: 神秘但令人期待。
泰勒·斯威夫特演唱会的 parking lot 文化
Camille Hearst: 说到泰勒·斯威夫特,前几天我在刷 TikTok,看到有人发了一段视频——画面里是一个人在演唱会现场拍整个演出,然后镜头一转到了停车场,那里居然站着好几万人,就在停车场听着从体育场传出来的”二手音乐”。我在想,这种情况有没有可能变现?
Lenny: 我觉得他们通常会把周边商品的卡车停在那些停车场里——
Camille Hearst: 嗯,不过那些多半是非官方的周边商品。
Lenny: 也不一定,说不准。
与音乐人合作的最好与最坏
Lenny: 你的工作需要与音乐人打交道,我正好想问一个问题:与音乐人合作,最好的部分是什么,最差的部分又是什么?
Camille Hearst: 我觉得最好的部分,是能和那些真正全身心投入创造力和热情的人一起工作,他们甚至以此为生。我们大多数人都有自己的创意追求和热爱的事物,如果你赚了几百万美元可以退休了,你会全职做什么?通常就是这些追求中的一种。但我觉得这需要一种勇气,更不用说天赋了,你真的得放手一搏。
所以这个群体身上存在这样一种特质,跟他们在一起很有趣,你会感受到那种氛围的感染,心想”也许有一天我也可以放手一试,去全职练书法或者学尤克里里什么的”。这就是最好的部分。
另外有一点我真的很……我成长在一个音乐世家。我爸爸是鼓手,不过我们小时候他总爱开一个玩笑:真正的音乐人都有正职工作。因为他实际上必须有一份带福利的工作来养家,没办法只靠演出为生。
这其实正好引出了你刚才问题的另一面——你问最难的部分是什么。我确实觉得我们在 Patreon 看到了很多这种情况,尤其是在音乐人和艺术家身上尤为明显:你有一种感觉,想把所有创作的东西都给粉丝,而且想免费给,因为你太沉迷于”人们真的爱你、想支持你、对你创作的每一件东西都有强烈共鸣”这种感觉,你不想向他们收费。但随之而来的问题是——那你靠什么生活?
在某种程度上,必须有一种价值交换,创作者才能靠自己的艺术生存下去。
我发现这种情况在音乐人身上更加突出,这种”挨饿的艺术家”精神让我的工作变得相当困难,因为我们收到很多反馈是:“哇,这太棒了。我想办一个聆听派对,所有东西都免费,大家来就行,什么都不卖。“但我们真正看重的角度是——粉丝想要支持他们喜欢的音乐人,他们愿意打开钱包。
从 Substack 和 Patreon 上你可以看到,人们其实非常乐意成为艺术的赞助者,而且把这当作一种荣誉徽章。
但音乐人尤其倾向于回避这一点,这使我正在做的事情更加困难。
创作者经济中的定价困境
Lenny: 这是一个很好的过渡,正好引向我想深入聊聊的领域——创作者经济,以及创作者和艺术家等相关话题。顺着这个思路,我觉得我自己也有这个问题。向别人收费我会不好意思,而且我还会觉得……我觉得我的东西不够好,不值得收费,为什么会有人愿意为此付费?所以我猜你也会遇到这种情况——“没人会为这个付钱的,太荒谬了。”
Camille Hearst: 对。有意思的是,我们生活在一个非常资本主义、市场决定价格的社会里,但在个人层面,尤其是当所谓的商品是艺术的时候,其中牵涉到太多的情感和感受,创作者很难把自己从中抽离出来,客观地看市场能承受什么价格。
所以我其实觉得那些平台站出来说”嘿,我们看到了一个机会,让我们介入中间,做聚合的工作,来承担定价、支付、税务、财务这些困难的部分,真正创造价值”——这很棒,因为让一个作为创作者的个人来做所有这些事情是非常困难的。平台来促成这种连接,几乎是完美的市场解决方案。
但同样,这也很困难,因为在某些情况下,供给方并不想真正赚钱,或者回避优化赚钱这件事。
然后还有创作过程本身的问题。有时候你处于心流状态,产出很多;而另一些时候你陷入枯竭期,这些起伏波动就是创作的常态。所以我觉得像 Patreon 和 Substack 这样的公司很酷,因为它们试图做的就是熨平那种收入波动,让艺术家——甚至不只是艺术家,是创作者——能够拥有一份可预测的、可持续的收入,这样他们就不必在不同工作之间来回跳,也不必因为担心账单而失去那种创造力的迸发。
内容创作的仓鼠轮
Lenny: 我在 Substack 上就有这种切身感受。Substack 是一个订阅制 newsletter 平台,这种生活方式有一个人们不太会想到的大弊端——一旦你开始收费、人们开始购买,比如说年度订阅,那意味着我至少还得再坚持一年。而实际上,我永远不想停下来,因为收入一旦中断会很让人难过。所以你就上了跑步机,没有退路。我不太确定这一切最终会走向何方,但总体来说体验不错。只是人们很少想到的就是这种永无止境的”继续创作、继续创作”的生活。
Camille Hearst: 我们内部把这叫作”内容创作的仓鼠轮”。你因为热爱而上路,然后问题是怎么下来。
所以这对平台来说其实是一个有趣的挑战——思考平台能在哪里创造价值,是否有办法让内容创作过程变得更轻松。我不想说它是一种负担,因为它不是,但有时候你就是没有时间,或者正处在人生某个无法顾及的阶段——那么是否有可以提供的服务或其他支持?是否有一些面向创作者的金融服务,而传统银行或机构因为创作工作的特殊性而不愿提供的?
另一个可能的解决方案是,平台是否有办法生成内容——也许是自动化的——这样创作者就可以休息一下。也许不一定是 AI,也许更多是聚合数据、做摘要,或者还有其他尚未被探索的想法。但这是一个真实存在的问题。
Lenny: 我有一个 lennybot.com 网站,这是一个基于我所有内容(包括播客节目)训练的 AI 聊天机器人。实际上,是一位听这个播客的工程师主动联系我,提出帮我搭建,他也确实做到了,非常棒。我在想,这会不会成为我的退休计划——让机器人最终接手这一切,学得足够多。我高度怀疑这一点,但实验一下很有趣。
Camille Hearst: 嗯,用自己的内容做自己的大语言模型,对吧?
Lenny: 没错,就是这个意思。我也很好奇这会走向何方。
创作者经济的未来走向
Lenny: 我想沿着创作者经济这条线继续聊。之前感觉有一波巨大的浪潮——创作者经济、未来工作方式,各种平台纷纷涌现,帮助创作者赚钱。但过去几年,感觉这股热潮有所消退。最终只剩下极少数平台——基本上就是 YouTube、Spotify、Instagram、TikTok、Patreon,可能还有 Substack。还有那种说法,说未来工作是自由职业,每个人都会为自己工作、创作内容,但感觉人们还是在正常上班。很多创业公司表现也不太好。所以我很好奇,从平台涌现的角度,以及从创作者自身的角度来看,你觉得未来五到十年会发生什么?你觉得会维持现状吗?还是会有新一波浪潮?你觉得事情会往哪个方向发展?
Camille Hearst: 我觉得在某种程度上,平台会胜出是可以预见的,原因就在于聚合效应的本质。一旦你掌握了全部供给端,或者聚合了需求端,那就是非常强的网络效应。这也是为什么投资者喜欢投资这类业务——很难被打破。
我也不会低估一些大平台的战略能力。它们肯定都在提前布局,开发新功能,思考这是否是一个变现机会。让创作者觉得自己所在的平台最适合自己,不会流失、不会离开、不会去尝试太多其他地方——这本身就是一个极好的战略举措。
所以我觉得当时的抢跑和资金涌入,核心问题是要弄清楚:还有没有空间留给新的平台?有没有某些垂直领域存在机会,可以打造垂直专属的功能和工具。
实际上,我觉得我们在 Twitch 身上看到了巨大的成功案例。Twitch 以前是不存在的,现在它是一个庞然大物。
TikTok 也是那个时代涌现出来的另一个例子。也许它们并没有被定位为创作者经济类型的创业公司,但实际上……
你看到前几天 Union Square 发生的事了吗?就是那个游戏主播 Kai?
Lenny: 没看到。
Camille Hearst: 我在纽约,上周发生了一场骚乱,起因是一个 Twitch 主播宣布要在 Union Square 免费发放 PlayStation 和电脑设备,结果差不多有一百万个十几岁的男孩涌了过去。我没在开玩笑。纽约市中心不得不封闭,来清理这场演变成抗议、骚乱、聚集——
Lenny: 我的天哪。
Camille Hearst: ——全是为了一个大概在场听众中都没人听说过的创作者而来的青少年。
Lenny: 是啊。
Camille Hearst: 所以我确实认为很多预测已经应验了。有大量的人通过在互联网上创作内容赚钱、以此为生。
也有一些研究调查年轻人长大想做什么、想成为什么,我们在 Patreon 经常引用这些数据——超过 60% 的人想以创作内容为职业。
所以我认为这些趋势不会消失。也许它会是补充性收入,也许是你人生某个阶段做的事。但我确实认为这个领域仍然远未被充分开发。我就是看不到这样一种可能性——
想想 Michelle Phan,对吧?她基本上就是一个迷你迪士尼。你从这个角度去想——她创造了 IP。有了 IP 能做什么?漫画书、电影、电视节目、毛绒玩具、周边商品。我们会看到多少百万个 Michelle 的粉丝?
看看中国正在发生什么。那里有大量这样的创作者。
所以不管风投有没有赢、创业公司有没有成功,当内容创作的成本降低、分发规模扩大,你不可能看不到这一切涌现——我认为这就是创作者经济的崛起。不过我觉得可能仍然有机会让更多公司茁壮成长,当然也让更多个人——也许自己摸索这条路——在没有太多大平台从他们的创作追求中抽成的情况下做到这一点。
NPC 直播与创作者成功之道
Lenny: 你有没有看到 TikTok 上,可能 Instagram Reels 也有,那个 NPC 的趋势?就是人们假装自己是电子游戏里的 NPC,即非玩家角色。
Camille Hearst: 我还没看过。
Lenny: 好吧。太疯狂了。人们就假装自己是一个电脑角色,然后观众付小礼物让他们做一个动作。
Camille Hearst: 哦,是不是那个……对,我看过了。“冰淇淋,冰淇淋,冰淇淋”。
Lenny: 对,就是这个。
Camille Hearst: 是的,我当时没意识到是那个。
Lenny: 一天能赚几万美元,就靠那个……所以这也是一种谋生方式。
Lenny: 沿着成为创作者这个话题,你在 Patreon 见过很多创作者尝试做这件事,早在 Apple 做iTunes的时候也是如此,我想聊聊这个,现在在 Spotify 也是,还有你自己创业的时候。我很好奇,从你观察到的来看,创作者生涯中什么是成功的关键,尤其是那些可能不那么显而易见的东西。如果有人想走这条路,他们需要把什么做好?
Camille Hearst: 我观察到的其中一点,我不知道大家是否意识到,就是内容创作的一致性和可预见性——这也正是我们之前聊到的”仓鼠轮”概念的来源之一。
但持续地产出质量稳定的作品,发布出来让受众消费、回应和反应,这确实能产生很大作用。这几乎就像一万小时定律——你必须在一件事上投入一万小时才能真正精通。但我一次又一次地看到这一点。
我加入 YouTube 是在——让我想想,我多大了来着——应该是 2010 年。那时候我觉得这一切才刚刚起步。我们当时会整理一些攻略手册,总结什么让一个创作者成功,因为当时大量工作都是在扶持这个新兴的经济生态。我记得即使在 2010 年,直到今天,这仍然是最核心的建议之一。
另一点是合作。就是和其他优秀的创作者一起创作、共享受众、互相将对方暴露在彼此的受众面前。这也是我在我的创业公司 Kit 时尝试做的事情。我们会为创作者举办线下聚会,促进他们之间的交流和碰撞,希望这能对他们的职业发展有帮助。如果他们在聚会上认识的人之后一起拍了 YouTube 视频,那就是各方都受益。所以这是两点。
第三点,我觉得在一个内容爆炸的世界里,策展人(curator)的需求和空间会持续存在。“策展人作为创作者”是一个挺有趣的概念。但策展人的角色几乎就像图书出版公司、唱片公司或广播电台所扮演的角色,对吧?
它有一定程度的品牌属性,有你代表的立场,有一种风格或精神气质。这个人几乎——不是那种负面意义上的”守门人”——而是像这样:“我 Camille 没可能消费所有这些内容。你,我相信你的品味,告诉我应该听什么。“所以我想说的第三点就是,找到那些真正能和你内容关联起来的策展人,他们和你理念一致,拥有一个可能会喜欢你作品的受众群,然后努力与他们建立关联。
策展推荐与影响力
Lenny: 最后这点真的太……我完全一直都有这样的体会。如果有位我非常尊敬的人推荐了某个东西,我显然会高度重视那个推荐。这就是影响力最初自然形成的方式,对吧?人们就是——“这个你应该看看”,然后——“哦,不如付费让你分享东西,这样人们就会来试试我们的产品。”
Camille Hearst: 这正是我创办 Kit 的核心理念。就是围绕策展展开的——找到那些擅长推荐装备的人,让他们来策展这些装备,然后你可以关注你喜欢的策展人。谁愿意去 Amazon 上看一堆你根本不认识的人写的评论呢?很多时候,如果你的姐夫是个骑行达人,他说”买这个”,你就直接买了。你甚至不在乎那些评论怎么写,因为你信任这个人。
创业历程与被收购的经验
Lenny: 这家创业公司后来怎样了?你从那段经历中学到了什么?
Camille Hearst: 我 2015 年开始做这家公司。我们成功融到了一些钱,总共融了超过 200 万美元,这是一个很大的成就,尤其是如果你了解风投行业的话。他们在资助有色人种、女性、非顺性别白人男性方面,记录一直很糟糕。
我们在几年间有了一段很棒的公司建设经历,各项关键指标都在往上涨。到了一个阶段,我们需要考虑下一步该怎么走,是不是应该做一轮过桥融资。我们当时在尝试融 A 轮。我觉得我们踩在了创作者经济趋势偏早的位置。如果再晚一年半,我想融资应该会轻而易举。但不管怎样,我们当时在各种不同的选择和方案之间权衡。
我其实参加了一个叫 StartX 的创业加速器项目,它由 Stanford 运营——那是我的母校。我们在那里学到了很多关于如何出售一家公司以及并购(M&A)是什么样的知识。所以我们开始探索那条路。
最终,对我们来说最合理的选择是通过退出(exit)和 Patreon 合并。所以我们就是这样做的。2018 年卖掉了公司,加入了 Patreon,在那边工作了几年,也就是在那里我认识了 Adam。
Lenny: 太棒了。我其实正想问问关于卖公司的经历。现在有很多听众正在考虑卖掉自己的公司,或者希望将来有一天能卖掉自己的公司。我觉得这件事有它的实际状况,也有人们对它想象的状况。我很好奇你从那段经历中得到了什么体会。具体来说,有没有什么建议可以分享给那些正在考虑将来卖公司的人?你觉得有什么是可以更早去做的,或者分享一下并购的真实面貌?
Camille Hearst: 我觉得每家公司的情况肯定都不一样。有些公司被突然看中然后就被买了。还有些公司则是主动把自己卖出去。
我们绝对属于后者,这意味着我们需要主导整个过程。这和融资的过程很像。不是每家公司都是见了风投第一次就融到钱的。他们要经历一个过程,见大量的风投,把他们一层层筛选,最终 hopefully 拿到一轮成功的融资。所以我想说的一个经验就是:把出售当成一个流程来对待和管理,如果你确实有意向的话。对大多数公司来说——至少我认为——它不会自己就发生了。
第二条建议是,我觉得我们本应从一开始就与潜在的收购方保持沟通,分享我们的愿景和我们要做的事情,因为我们开始做这件事的时候在公司发展的历程中已经相当晚了。这就意味着……当我见到一位潜在的首席产品官(CPO)——也就是可能收购公司、日后成为我老板或 CEO 的人——那是他们第一次见到我。而如果这已经是第五次见面,我们之间就已经建立了关系,他们会更了解我们的愿景和要做的事情,希望也能有更多时间来思考这件事。
所以这就是我的两条建议。从创办公司的那一刻起就开始为出售公司做准备——这听起来有点奇怪,因为显然,对大多数创始人来说,创办公司是想把它做成下一个大事件,他们不是为了让它被卖掉而创办的,但这件事值得放在你的雷达上,因为你永远不知道未来会怎样。第二条是把它当成一个流程来管理。
Lenny: 对,关于认识可能收购你的人这一点,我百分之千地认同。我们把公司卖给了 Airbnb,当初能联系上 Airbnb 就是靠这个方式。我意识到,你需要让那些未来可能收购你的人心里有你,这样当他们遇到一个问题时就会想——“哦,Camille 和她的团队能帮我们解决这个问题,去找她聊聊——”
Camille Hearst: 没错。
Lenny: ——看看他们是否有兴趣被收购。”
关于流程这点也是,百分之千感同身受。我们基本上……当我们开始和某家公司聊的时候,我们就想:“好,还有谁可能收购我们?列一个大名单,我们能联系上那家公司的什么人,尽快联系上,然后就去探索。“但更有挑战性的是,因为是你主动联系对方说”嘿,想聊聊收购我们公司吗”,而不是对方主动联系你。所以正如你说的,对方主动找你总是更好的,但这一点你不能总是控制。
Camille Hearst: 对。或者如果会面的背景完全不是收购,而是——“我们在做一些很酷的东西,有一个很好的愿景,和你们在做的事情契合,也许我们可以合作”,而不是——单纯告诉你我们在做什么,然后等到 12 个月后我联系你说要卖公司的时候,你已经听说过我了。
Lenny: 我发现即使你开始聊收购的事,你也绝对不会直接说”嘿,你想买我们吗?“而是说”嘿,要不要谈谈某种战略合作?想不想探索一下合作可能?“挺有意思的。
Camille Hearst: 像谈恋爱一样。
Lenny: 对对对,有时候就是不能太直接。
供给侧的 marketplace 思维
所以当你到了 Patreon 之后,我不知道是不是一开始就这样,还是后来才——你最终负责了 marketplace 中创作者这一侧。我看你的履历,发现你基本上整个职业生涯都待在 marketplace 的供给侧。
我自己其实也一样。我在 Airbnb 工作的内容,特别是——或者说主要就是房东(host)那一侧。
我觉得这需要一种特定的心态和特质,才会对 marketplace 的这一侧感到兴奋,而不是消费侧——大家普遍都更想去客户那一侧。所以我很好奇,是什么吸引你在所有工作过的地方都选择了商业的那一侧?以及你发现要在那个角色和那一侧取得成功,重要的是什么?
Camille Hearst: 吸引我到那一侧的原因,一开始可能多少有点偶然。还是那句话,出身于这个音乐世家和背景,我一直有一种天然的兴趣,想帮助艺术家谋生。所以我觉得这种兴趣一直都在。
在 Apple 的时候,我做的是……那里只有两个产品经理,我们什么都做。
在 YouTube 的时候,我阴差阳错地进入了创作者方向。
深入理解市场动态:Hailo 的经历
Camille Hearst: 但让我真正深入理解市场动态的地方,其实是我唯一一段不在创作者、艺术或大型消费平台、创作者经济领域的工作经历——那是在一家总部位于伦敦的创业公司 Hailo,当时它在共享出行和网约车领域是 Uber 和 Lyft 的强大竞争对手。我负责的是供给端,确保有足够多的车辆来满足需求。在那种实时市场里,人们急着从城北打车去城南,你会亲身感受到,如果缺乏供给方、如果供给方不满意、如果他们罢工、如果有监管政策导致你的服务无法使用,这对业务的影响是立竿见影的。我觉得我在那里……
我负责推进并上线的一个项目是面向美国的 Uber 竞品,因为 Hailo 在欧洲主要做的是出租车业务,并不涉足纽约所谓的 livery,也就是私人网约车。简单来说,就是你的叔叔、阿姨或表亲可以打开 Lyft 接单载客的那种模式。但这在欧洲根本不是个事儿。
所以我们得想办法在美国上线这个服务,想办法招募司机、建立供给。当时的感受就是——不管用户体验做得多好看、营销做得多出色、能激发多少需求,如果用户打开应用发现没有车可用,一切都是白搭。
很多人讨论市场时喜欢用”鸡和蛋”来比喻。我其实更倾向于认为市场就是双边的,而且你要从供给端开始。说到底,你可以在需求端做优化,或者在出现冲突时决定优先照顾哪一方——我们选这边还是那边。当然,只有一边是做不成的,但我亲身经历过那种痛苦:辛辛苦苦搭好了运营后台、对接了精美的 UI,结果打开应用却打不到车,因为根本没有足够的车。
所以我觉得这段经历让我坚定了一个看法:做市场,你绝不能忽视供给端的真实痛点和需求,因为整个业务的基础运转都依赖于它。
Lenny: 我对市场做过不少研究,得出的结论基本一致:供给几乎永远是你需要投入绝大部分精力的地方,尤其是在早期。我的理解是,这就像开一家店——货架上得有东西,货架空着就没生意可做。
Camille Hearst: 没错。
Lenny: 也有少数例外,我记不太清具体是哪些了,但确实存在需求端才是更大挑战、而供给相对容易的情况。对了,是 Rover。Rover 在供给端完全没问题——毕竟谁不想看几个小时狗就能赚 50 块钱呢?这太容易推销了,很多人都能做也愿意做,所以他们发现供给根本不是问题。但在大多数情况下,正如你所说,十次里有九次供给才是人们需要解决的核心问题。
Camille Hearst: 完全同意。我经常听到的一个反例是 eBay,说他们聚合需求的能力非常强,基本上可以迫使供给方接受他们设定的条款。但我很难想象……如果能和 eBay 早期的人聊聊一定会很有意思——整个平台的起步,不可能没有他们主动去找”谁是关键供给方、我们需要把谁拉上来才能开始聚合需求”这一步。
Lenny: 是的。eBay 上总得有些好东西吧。不知道是不是 Beanie Babies 之类的,他们最早靠什么起家的。
Camille Hearst: 对,就是那个。
在 Apple 的经历与乔布斯轶事
Lenny: 你提到了 Apple,我想多聊聊这段。你说你是当年 iTunes 团队的第二个 PM,我很好奇你在 Apple 的经历中学到了什么。我记得好像在哪读到过你可能与乔布斯和 Jony Ive 有过密切合作,不过不确定是不是真的,但就是好奇……不是吗?好吧,但你确实有一个关于乔布斯的故事?
Camille Hearst: 是的。
Lenny: 好,说说看。
Camille Hearst: 好的。我是在 iTunes 很早期的阶段加入的,研究生毕业后先去那里做实习生,实习内容其实是厂牌关系,然后转正做了产品营销。当时在 Apple——我想直到今天可能也是如此——他们没有”产品经理”这个职位,而是叫”产品营销经理”。我有一个同事至今还是好朋友,他叫 Steve,也是第一个叫 Steve 的,不过不是乔布斯——他是 iTunes 团队的第一个 PMM,主要负责所有客户端的工作,商店也是他上线的。我应该是 iTunes 团队里第二个拥有这个头衔的人。所以那段经历真的很棒。
至于乔布斯的故事,我觉得我跟你提过,大家喜欢听这个故事,但其实什么都没发生——我就是走上去跟他打了个招呼。让我从头讲讲吧。不过大家觉得这个故事有趣,主要是因为关于乔布斯的其他传说。所以我先铺垫一下背景。乔布斯有一个著名的传说:如果你和他同乘一部电梯,你最好准备好说清楚自己在公司做什么,因为他有个习惯——进了电梯就看着你问:“你是做什么的?你在这里做什么?“还有传言说,那些没能给出好答案的人,那天就成了他们在 Apple 的最后一天。
所以有一个人,我不认识他本人,但他在我之前就在我们部门工作过。有一次他进了电梯,一抬头看到乔布斯正朝他走来。他赶紧去按开门按钮,结果不小心按成了关门按钮,就在那里拼命按……(如果你在听播客的话看不到我的动作)他疯狂地按着按钮想开门,却一次次按到了关门键,电梯就这样一路到了目的地。据说他出了电梯直接撒腿就跑,沿着走廊飞奔。
Lenny: “他肯定记不住我的脸。”
Camille Hearst: 对,就是那种感觉。
Lenny: “我消失了。”
Camille Hearst: 这就是背景。
Apple 实习第一天与乔布斯的演讲
Camille Hearst: 2005 年,那是我在 Apple 实习的第一天。我之前参加了毕业典礼,因为只剩一个学期就能毕业了,所以决定去参加。毕业典礼基本上是前一周的事。对那些关注就业市场的人来说,那正是乔布斯发表那场极具感染力、闻名遐迩的 Stanford 毕业典礼演讲的时候,非常非常值得一听。
Lenny: 你当时就在那场演讲现场?
Camille Hearst: 我在的,是的。
Lenny: 哇,人们太爱那场演讲了。
Camille Hearst: 确实精彩。真的很——
Lenny: 身处现场聆听的那一刻,你是什么感受?
Camille Hearst: 完全被激励了。当时的 Apple 在品牌和影响力方面还远不如今天这般如日中天。它是从巅峰一步步走过来的。事实上,当我在一个会议上遇到那位招聘人员时,我的反应是,“Apple?他们是做什么的来着?我室友有一台 Mac,但 iTunes 是什么?哦对,好像听过。好像……”
那些让 Apple 一飞冲天的 iPod 剪影跳舞广告当时甚至还没有大规模推出,但势头已经开始了对吧?开始酝酿、开始发酵,你听到越来越多关于它的消息,而与音乐的关联正在让 Apple 变得更酷。
但那场演讲……说到毕业典礼演讲,那绝对是顶尖水准。而 Steve 非常擅长这些。他是一位非凡的讲述者。
在餐厅偶遇乔布斯
毕业典礼是周六,周日我回家。周一开始实习,我和新同事们坐在 Cafe Macs 里,Steve 就坐在我旁边那张桌子上。我心里想,“天哪,Steve 就在那儿。我太想去打个招呼、自我介绍一下了。“我跟桌上所有人说了。
要知道,我当时还没完全听过那个电梯按钮的故事,因为那是我第一天,但他们面面相觑,说,“行啊,你想打招呼就去吧,但你只是个实习生。“他们还说,“希望他不会在你第一天就把你开除。”
但我从小到大,在家里一直受到这样的鼓励——见到人就打个招呼,让他们知道你欣赏他们所做的事情,感谢他们,因为这样的机会并不常有。很多时候,人们上去就要合影或签名,但仅仅是自我介绍、问好、感谢某人做的事情对你产生了影响——这种做法是我父母一直鼓励我在世界中践行的行为方式,也是我从他们身上看到并学到的。可能也因为我的父亲是音乐人,会有其他音乐人的粉丝,在音乐圈里,艺术家们之间会交流你创作的东西如何影响了我之类的。
于是我走向他,从午餐桌旁站起来走过去,说,“你好,我叫 Camille,今年夏天在这里实习。今天是我第一天。周六我在 Stanford 的毕业典礼现场,你的演讲太精彩了,我深受鼓舞。我非常兴奋能来到这里,非常兴奋能为这家公司工作,我只想感谢你周六花时间为我们做了那场演讲。”
他的反应是,“你是谁?什么?你是实习生?那你在这里做什么?“有那么一点……我们有一小段交流。我需要解释清楚,“对,我已经毕业了,但我在实习,还有一个学期才结束。“他说,“哦,好吧。欢迎来到 Apple,祝你好运,希望你这个夏天有一段很棒的经历。“就这样。我没有被开除,我跟 Steve 打了招呼。
从那以后,我感觉自己好像认识了他。每次在园区里见到他,我都会挥手致意。我觉得他根本不知道我是谁,但他会一脸困惑地看着我,然后挥手回应。
Lenny: “她好热情啊。这人是谁?”
Camille Hearst: 对。
管理乔布斯的发布会音乐库
Lenny: 你还记得当时会怎么描述自己的工作吗?我有一种感觉那段话已经刻在你脑海里了,但如果记不清了也没关系。
Camille Hearst: 哦,我的那套说辞——如果他真的问了我的话。
Lenny: 对,就是那个。
Camille Hearst: 嗯,我还算幸运,因为我做的事情他其实会非常清楚——那就是每当有 iTunes 发布时,我负责管理新闻发布室。这算是非常基础的体力活。但每当有 iTunes 6 发布之类的新闻发布会时,他们会安排 Walter Isaacson 或者——我不确定 Kara Swisher 当时是否已经在做了——总之那些记者来做采访。Steve 会准备一个房间,里面放一台 iMac,iTunes 曲库里装满了曲目。还会有当时最新的 iPod 与那台电脑同步,里面也有所有曲目。每次采访结束后,一切都要重新设置。
而且那个曲库是精心编排的——他会提前几个月就曲库内容给出反馈,因为他要做演示。他想确保,“把我最喜欢的曲目都放进去,我最喜欢的 Beatles 专辑,最喜欢的 Bob Dylan 专辑,这个艺人是谁?让我听听看。好吧,不够格。这首歌是什么?哦,我喜欢这首歌,加进去。“所以他在整个展示过程中参与得非常深,而总得有人去做所有这些事情。那么,谁比一个刚从 Stanford 工程硕士毕业的学生更适合去做这些曲库的基础工作呢?但正是这类细节他会亲自关注。所以我当时只需要告诉他,我做的是产品营销,主要职责之一就是为他布置新闻发布室,他就会说,“哦,好的。“
Apple 模式的产品管理
Lenny: 你提到你的职位是产品营销经理,最近 Twitter 上有一阵讨论,Airbnb 的 Brian Chesky 分享说他们把产品经理的角色调整为了基本上是 Apple 模式。我很好奇你对这种产品管理方式有什么看法——Apple 的方式与传统产品经理之间的区别?
Camille Hearst: 从我看到的情况来看,他们是非常有意为之的。我知道他们其实从 Apple 招来了 Hiroki——
Lenny: 对,很多 Apple 的人。
Camille Hearst: 是的。而且他们新招的一位负责人——不知道你认不认识 Judson Coplan——我的好朋友,我们那年夏天在 Apple 一起实习,他在那里工作了 15 年之后才去的 Airbnb。
但 Apple 的架构确实更多地是以设计和工程为主导的组织,我更愿意称之为”匠人”,而非策略人员。这也是我从 Apple 转到 Google 时感受到的最鲜明的差异之一。Google 有很多来自可口可乐、McKinsey 和 Bain 的人。我认为 Apple 根本没有这类人。Google 更像是,“让我们像下三维国际象棋一样推演下一步该怎么走。“而 Apple 则是,“让我们不断打磨,精雕细琢,动手构建,看看什么感觉是对的。“这是两种不同的路径。因此,产品管理的做法也截然不同。
所以我觉得这是合理的。Brian Chesky 的背景是设计师,所以 Apple 的方式可能更契合他。至于这对产品经理个人意味着什么——再说一次,Apple 没有产品经理这个角色,最接近的是 CPM,即技术项目经理,他们负责管理冲刺周期、管理进度安排、列出要做的功能清单。
从 Apple 的产品管理方式到创作者经济
Camille Hearst: 我大部分时间都是与那个才华横溢的设计团队一起度过的,如果我有产品功能的想法或者……我们会提前几个月就思考,比如 iTunes 10 发布时的核心叙事是什么,或者三个关键信息是什么,我们可能会为要加入的新功能提出各种想法。
但因为我们在时间轴上有那个明确的节点,我们很早就知道自己在为什么做准备,在产品真正上线或搭建出来之前,你就在同时打磨传播信息和消费者定位。正是这些框架决定了你想构建哪些功能、要把哪些问题摆到台面上去解决——而不是去追求某个清晰明确的指标,后者是产品管理在另一种语境下演变出来的方式。
Lenny: 大多数公司都是后一种做法。
Camille Hearst: 嗯哼。
给创作者平台创业者的建议
Lenny: 我想回到创作者经济的话题。我觉得你在这个领域工作的时间比绝大多数人都长,所以我想利用我们剩下的时间多聊聊这块。从平台的角度来看呢?如果有人在考虑创办一家服务创作者的公司,也许是打造一个让创作者以此为生的新平台,你有什么建议吗?你觉得哪里可能有机会?哪里你觉得”不,你可能不该在这上面花时间”?
Camille Hearst: 我觉得无论做什么公司,解决一个真正的问题是最重要的。创作者面临很多挑战和可以解决的事情,其中一些痛点比其他的更尖锐。
核心来说,每个创作者都需要两样东西:扩大受众群,以及获得收入,这样他们才能以此为生。在某些方面,我确实认为扩大受众群更重要,因为有了受众,就会以各种方式打开变现的机会。
但还有各种其他的事情,比如我们刚才谈到的融资、健康保险,清单还可以继续列下去——我们作为人类、作为在世界上尝试做自由职业者所面临的种种问题,对以创作为生的人同样适用。然后创作者领域还有一些独特的情况,比如那种能量的迸发、创意灵感的迸发,这些可能不适用于拿固定薪水或按小时计酬的工作。所以创作者领域仍然有大量问题有待解决。我不认为这个领域已经接近解决完毕、万事大吉了。所以我的建议是,去看看现有的问题,挑一个真正的问题,放手去做。
Lenny: 很好的建议。
当红播客主持的变现困境
你有没有见过一位播客主持人,叫 Bobbi,我忘了她的姓,她的播客只做了几期就冲到了全美第四大播客,她采访过 Drake 和几个喜剧演员。你见过这个人吗?
Camille Hearst: 我觉得我应该知道,但正如我们一开始说的,我是个音乐迷,我不听任何播客。
Lenny: 我之所以想到她,是因为我看了一段她上访谈节目的片段——虽然她现在拥有全美最火的播客,但她还没有从中赚到任何钱。我们会在节目备注里放上她的链接,她非常搞笑。她身上有种特别的东西,看着就是很有趣。好吧,你现在不听播客。我们迟早会让你上播客的——你现在就在播客上。
Camille Hearst: 我现在就在播客上了。
Lenny: 这不就对了。
成长环境:佛教、音乐与技术的交融
你提到过你的父母,我看了你的 Wikipedia 页面,上面对你父母的描述是”激进的佛教徒、艺术家、技术专家”。我很好奇这具体是什么意思,另外,有没有什么童年记忆或时刻能够体现他们的这一面?
Camille Hearst: 有趣的是,在你发给我之前,我都不知道自己有 Wikipedia 页面。
Lenny: 什么?
Camille Hearst: 我都不知道它是从哪来的。
Lenny: 天哪,谁建的这个?
Camille Hearst: 就是啊。
Lenny: 太厉害了。
Camille Hearst: 就是那种感觉——“什么?我在 Wikipedia 上?“所以这事挺搞笑的。
Lenny: 太不可思议了。
Camille Hearst: 是啊。让我想想。我在八九十年代的 San Francisco 长大。我父母七十年代在东海岸开始修习佛教。我爸爸——我提过他是鼓手和音乐人——他还有一个工作室。我们家楼梯下面有一个壁橱,他把它改造成了一个制作工作室,他是一位艺术家。他在市政府工作。我妈妈也在市政府工作。小时候家里没什么钱,所以很多电脑设备是从街上捡来的。他会发现……有人把一台 PC 放在了路边……他在游戏玩家之前就在自己组装 PC 了。我记得他会带着一箱箱的零件、电路板和芯片回家,然后真的去图书馆或书店找本书,研究怎么组装这些电脑。键盘坏了,他就修。他大概应该去做机械工程师的——他在这些方面超级有天赋。
总之,他有一整套的制作工作室,里面有鼓机和各种设备。而我是他的小助手。我会帮他焊接东西、捣鼓零件,实际参与组装这些电脑。所以这大概就是……我不知道那个引语是从哪来的,我得去看看那个引用链接是什么出处,但这就是一些背景。
另外一件关于八九十年代 San Francisco 的事——我们过去经常在家里举办佛教聚会。那时候有很多所谓的街头传教活动,就像 Hare Krishna 曾经在我家附近的 Haight 街上来回走动传教。伊斯兰民族组织——我哥哥还加入过一段时间——会在街角卖 Final Call 和豆子派。“The Final Call”是当时伊斯兰民族组织的报纸。
那是一个完全不同的时代,和今天截然不同。我们修习的是日莲佛教,我们的传单上印着”南无妙法莲华经”,我会站在家门前的台阶上……我们家有一扇铁门,我就站在门后面,大概七八岁的样子,问路过的行人:“嘿,如果你对南无妙法莲华经感兴趣,这里有一份传单。多了解一下。我们家要办一场聚会。”
现在跟我妈聊起这事我们会笑。她会说,“真不敢相信我们当时在做那种事。“现在看来完全疯了,但在当时——再说一次,那是从七十年代过来的——是一个非常不同的时代。
如果你看过 What’s Love Got To Do With It 这部电影的话,Tina Turner——她最近刚去世——大概是日莲佛教最著名、最广为人知的修行者之一。她实际上也是在同样的时代开始修习的,七十年代左右。
所以”激进的佛教徒、艺术家、技术专家”大概就是这个意思。以上是一些能说明那个时代的记忆。但你可以看到,音乐、技术、帮助创作者获得收入——这一切确实影响了我今天所做的一切。
Lenny: 这些故事完美地诠释了你父母的样子。而且感觉你现在做的事情几乎是命中注定的——产品、技术、音乐、艺术家、创作者。真的非常了不起。
最喜欢的框架与方法
Lenny: 在我们进入非常精彩的闪电问答环节之前,我想再问最后一个问题。这个问题是关于框架的:你有没有最喜欢的框架、流程、体系或方法——不管是做产品还是带团队——你会反复使用或者经常分享,觉得对听众可能会有帮助的?
Camille Hearst: 我在 Hailo 期间有一位很棒的管理者,他向我介绍了 Marty Cagan,后来我和 Marty 成了朋友,从他身上学到了很多东西。我特别喜欢他的——
Lenny: 真的吗?
Camille Hearst: 是的,他很棒。其实我应该问问他 eBay 早期的事,因为他可能也是最初那批把平台做起来的人之一。
不过我在那段时间学到、并且我们非常强调的一点,就是双轨敏捷(dual track agile)的理念——同时进行探索(discovery)和交付(delivery),而不是瀑布式的流程。不是那种”设计师先到一边鼓捣几个月,等搞清楚了再扔给程序员,然后祈祷一切正常”的方式。而是形成一个持续循环,本质上就是不断降低你的假设的风险,并且以足够快的速度做到这一点,这样你就能通过不断发现思维中的错误或出乎意料的情况,来开辟新路径、走向创新。
我想大家都知道影响- effort(impact-effort)或风险-回报(risk-reward)的 2×2 矩阵,可以把不同的机会和可能做的事映射到这个矩阵上。
但我从这种工作方式中最喜欢的一个收获是——围绕双轨敏捷、先降低最大风险的想法这种方法论——一个核心理念就是:把矩阵上方的东西,也就是最大的赌注,在产品探索中优先处理,想办法开始降低风险。因为如果你总是把这些推迟,转而去做低风险、更可预测的小赌注,你怎么可能真正创新、达到下一个层级呢?
这是一个不那么安全的选择。所以作为领导者,你要坐在热板凳上,要承担责任。如果其中一些事情没有成功,那是你的责任,不是你团队的责任。同时要给团队失败和尝试的许可,让他们去降低那些高风险假设的风险,直到它们变成低风险、可预测的事项,可以直接放进交付列去执行。
Lenny: 这让我想到一个建议,人们叫它”吃青蛙”(eat the frog)——每天早上第一件事就是吃掉青蛙,本质上就是先做最难的事,然后这一天就会变得更容易。
Camille Hearst: 是的。
Lenny: 我不知道为什么是吃青蛙,也不知道这个说法从哪来的。
Camille Hearst: 我也不知道。我喜欢”画猫头鹰”(draw the owl),那是 Twilio 的价值观之一,是我最喜欢的。
Lenny: 展开说说。我想多听听,那是什么?
Camille Hearst: 每个公司都有自己的价值观。其中一条就是”画猫头鹰”。其实完整的说法是”画他妈的猫头鹰”。那个梗是说,怎么画一只猫头鹰?先画几个圈,然后你他妈的画一只猫头鹰。意思就是——去做就完了。到了某个时刻,你必须自己去摸索,想办法搞定它。
不好意思爆粗口了,但说出这条价值观的完整说法更好笑——意思就是有时候你得硬着头皮上。你不会知道到达目标的精确路径,也许你没办法把一切都去风险化,但你从几个圈开始,然后把它完成。
Lenny: 我太喜欢了。这个播客上爆粗口很正常,所以很高兴你说到那里了。
闪电问答
好,说到这里,我们进入非常精彩的闪电问答环节。准备好了吗?
Camille Hearst: 但愿吧。我没什么准备,打算临场发挥。
Lenny: 很好,完美。
你最常推荐给别人的两三本书是什么?
Camille Hearst: 《三体》、《时间的皱折》(A Wrinkle in Time),还有 Octavia Butler 的《血亲》(Kindred)。
Lenny: 最近《三体》被提到好几次了,而且正好有部根据原著改编的剧要上线。
Camille Hearst: 我很期待,是的。
Lenny: 我也非常期待。我最近在看《基地》(Foundation),也是我一直很想看的剧,但说实话——我不知道在演什么,太复杂了。
Camille Hearst: 怎么样?我一直在等……
Lenny: 嗯……
Camille Hearst: 我是个超级科幻迷。我看过《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》(Battlestar Galactica),经典之作。所以我一直在等看《基地》会怎么样,只是现在我没有那种精力投入进去了。
Lenny: 是的,我也不知道该怎么评价。画面很美,有很多有趣的元素,但越看越……我觉得他们在大量编造内容。你读过《Silo》吗?
Camille Hearst: 没有,但我看了剧的预告片。又一部我准备等第二季的。
Lenny: 那本值得读,因为剧里……他们完全在编故事,我不知道他们在搞什么。百分之九十的内容都是剧里完全虚构的,只有一小部分和原著故事有关联,所以我看不太懂。
Camille Hearst: 好的,我甚至不知道它是书改编的,那我去读一下。
Lenny: 哦,是的,很好看。一共三本,不过我觉得只有第一本好看。
Camille Hearst: 好的。
Lenny: 好了,继续。说到这个话题,你最近有没有特别喜欢的电影或剧集?
Camille Hearst: 我最近一周在看 Idris Elba 主演的《劫机》(Hijack),挺有意思的。还剩几集没看完。
电影方面,我是 Chris Nolan 的超级粉丝。我还没看《奥本海默》(Oppenheimer),但迫不及待想看了。他的大多数电影我都看得一头雾水,但如果你放松去感受的话,那些视觉效果真的太震撼了。
Lenny: 是的,我也很期待。我也还没看。刚有了小孩,去看电影比较难了。
Camille Hearst: 哦,还有一个不错的——Netflix 上的《影与骨》(Shadow and Bone)。
Lenny: 《影与骨》?
Camille Hearst: 说实话比书好看多了。嗯,我读了一个系列,《六鸦》(Six of Crows)。这是我青少年科幻奇幻阅读爱好的又一次爆发。但这部剧真的太棒了,非常好。所以如果你喜欢——
Lenny: 真的吗?从没听说过。
Camille Hearst: ——这种风格的话,去看看吧。
Lenny: 好,我去看看。
你面试别人的时候,最喜欢问的面试问题是什么?
Camille Hearst: 我喜欢让人告诉我一件他们真正感到自豪的成就,带我走一遍整个过程,讲讲他们为什么为之自豪。我觉得你可以从中了解一个人非常多——他们的动机、工作态度、在意什么、他们心中”好”的标准是什么样的。这些都是如果你要和一个人密切合作的话,非常重要需要了解的事情。
Lenny: 你有没有最喜欢的座右铭——在工作或生活中经常回来、也喜欢分享的那种?
Camille Hearst: 有。有一个其实是一句日本谚语。我在高中和大学学过日语,这句话是”井中之蛙不知大海”。意思是说要推动自己去拓展极限和视野,走出那口井,去体验大海。
Lenny: 我喜欢这句。
Camille Hearst: 我还有一句更好的,不好意思。
Lenny: 好的,来吧。
Camille Hearst: 再来一个。
Lenny: 好,说说看。
Camille Hearst: 这句是我从 Patreon 的某个人那里学到的,因为当时有人在旧金山的街头到处贴这句话。最近它变得更广为人知了。据说是一句中国谚语,我也不知道是不是真的,但内容是:种一棵树最好的时间是二十年前,其次是现在。意思是不要拖延,也许你错过了最佳时机,但继续等下去肯定不会有什么帮助。
Lenny: 我也听过这句。实际上有一次我在旧金山的一个公园里,那里有一个类似钢琴活动的安排,我记得是在植物园,每年有一次,人们到处弹钢琴。有个人弹得极其出色,我离开的时候他差不多也走了,我就站在他旁边。我说:“唉,真希望我年轻的时候学过钢琴。“然后他说:“学钢琴最好的时间是十年前,其次是现在就开始。”
Camille Hearst: 没错,他说得对。
Lenny: 我没法反驳他。他就像在说:“你说得对,但我猜你还是不会去学。“
最喜欢的艺术家
Lenny: 最后一个问题,现在最喜欢的艺术家是谁?你在听谁的歌?
Camille Hearst: 哦,大概过去三年我一直很沉迷于 Afrobeat。现在有一位叫 Rema 的艺术家,R-E-M-A,我第一次听到他是几年前,他有一首叫 Dumebi 的歌。但他现在有一首歌,在我看来就是今年的夏日之歌,叫 Calm Down。好像 Ariana Grande 来唱了一段?不过我最近一直在 Spotify 上听 Rema Radio、Calm Down Radio,还有大量的 Afrobeats 艺术家。这就是我现在的音乐风格。
Lenny: 太棒了。我其实……有一次有人在播客结尾推荐了一首歌,我就说:“嘿,我们就用那首歌来结束这期播客吧。“结果我们确实那么做了,然后 YouTube 把我们下架了,因为有版权问题。所以我不会再提议了。再也不会那么做了,所以我们现在就用普通音乐收尾,不过我们会在链接里——
Camille Hearst: 确实很难。
Lenny: 我知道。太难了。拜托,就那么几秒钟,给我们通融一下嘛。
Camille Hearst: 你应该有三十秒的播放权吧?
Lenny: 我不清楚。也许我们会——
Camille Hearst: 别问我,我又不是律师。
Lenny: 帐单寄给你。
Camille Hearst: 好的。
Lenny: Camille,这次太棒了。我觉得我们亲身经历了一回创作者经济。非常感谢你抽出时间。
联系方式与尾声
Lenny: 最后两个问题。如果大家想联系你或者问一些额外的问题,在网上哪里可以找到你?另外,听众怎样才能帮到你?
Camille Hearst: 我以前特别爱用 Twitter,但那艘船已经开走了。我还在上面。你可以在——
Lenny: 现在是 X 了。
Camille Hearst: 对,X 上。我的账号是 Camillionz,C-A-M-I-L-L-I-O-N-Z。最近也在用 Threads,试试看能不能留下来。大概 LinkedIn 吧,你可以在 LinkedIn 上找到我。我觉得好像从来没人推荐过 LinkedIn。
Lenny: 他们有。其实大多数人都会推荐。
Camille Hearst: 是吗?真的?
Lenny: 真的。
Camille Hearst: 好的。
至于听众怎么能帮到我?嘿,去支持你最喜欢的创作者吧。去看看他们的演出,看看他们有没有 Patreon。我希望能看到越来越多的人觉得自己是艺术的赞助者。
Lenny: 太好了。也许还可以买点周边商品。
Camille Hearst: 买点周边商品。对。
Lenny: Camille,再次感谢你来参加节目。
Camille Hearst: 谢谢你,Lenny。
Lenny: 大家再见。
感谢大家的收听。如果你觉得这期内容有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你最喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。另外,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这真的能帮助更多听众找到这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A Wrinkle in Time | 《时间的皱折》 |
| Adam Fishman | Adam Fishman |
| Afrobeat | Afrobeat(非洲节拍音乐) |
| aggregation | 聚合效应 |
| Airbnb | Airbnb |
| Apple Podcasts | Apple Podcasts |
| Ariana Grande | Ariana Grande |
| Bain | Bain(贝恩咨询) |
| Battlestar Galactica | 《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》 |
| Beanie Babies | Beanie Babies(豆豆公仔) |
| Beatles | Beatles(甲壳虫乐队) |
| Beyoncé | 碧昂丝 |
| Bob Dylan | Bob Dylan |
| Bobbi | Bobbi(播客主持人) |
| Brian Chesky | Brian Chesky |
| bridge round | 过桥融资 |
| Cafe Macs | Cafe Macs(Apple 总部餐厅) |
| Chris Nolan | Chris Nolan |
| CPM | CPM(Critical Path Method / 技术项目经理,此处上下文指技术项目经理) |
| CPO | 首席产品官(Chief Product Officer) |
| creator economy | 创作者经济 |
| curator | 策展人 |
| delivery | 交付 |
| discovery | 探索 |
| Drake | Drake(说唱歌手) |
| draw the owl | 画猫头鹰 |
| dual track agile | 双轨敏捷 |
| eat the frog | 吃青蛙 |
| exit | 退出(公司出售/并购) |
| fan monetization | 粉丝变现 |
| Final Call | Final Call(《终极呼唤》,伊斯兰民族组织的报纸) |
| Foundation | 《基地》 |
| Haight Street | Haight Street(海特街,旧金山著名街道) |
| Hailo | Hailo(伦敦网约车创业公司) |
| Hare Krishna | Hare Krishna(克利须那运动) |
| Hijack | 《劫机》(Hijack) |
| Hiroki | Hiroki |
| host | 房东 |
| Idris Elba | Idris Elba |
| IP | IP(知识产权) |
| Jony Ive | Jony Ive |
| Judson Coplan | Judson Coplan |
| Kai | Kai |
| Kara Swisher | Kara Swisher |
| Kindred | 《血亲》(Kindred) |
| Kit | Kit |
| label relations | 厂牌关系 |
| listening parties | 聆听派对 |
| livery | livery(纽约私人网约车许可类别) |
| M&A | 并购(Mergers and Acquisitions) |
| Marty Cagan | Marty Cagan |
| McKinsey | McKinsey(麦肯锡) |
| merch | 周边商品 |
| Michelle Phan | Michelle Phan |
| Nam myoho renge kyo | 南无妙法莲华经 |
| Nation of Islam | 伊斯兰民族组织(Nation of Islam) |
| Nichiren Buddhism | 日莲佛教 |
| NPC | NPC(非玩家角色) |
| Octavia Butler | Octavia Butler |
| Oppenheimer | 《奥本海默》 |
| PMM | 产品营销经理(Product Marketing Manager) |
| Rema | Rema(尼日利亚歌手) |
| Rover | Rover(宠物寄养服务平台) |
| Series A | A 轮融资 |
| Shadow and Bone | 《影与骨》 |
| Silo | 《Silo》 |
| Six of Crows | 《六鸦》(Six of Crows) |
| Spotify | Spotify |
| Stanford | Stanford |
| StartX | StartX |
| Steve Jobs | 乔布斯 |
| Taylor Swift | 泰勒·斯威夫特 |
| Threads | Threads |
| Three-Body Problem | 《三体》 |
| Tina Turner | Tina Turner |
| Twilio | Twilio |
| Walter Isaacson | Walter Isaacson |
| What’s Love Got To Do With It | What’s Love Got To Do With It(《与爱何干》,Tina Turner 传记电影) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)