不懈的好奇心、极致的责任感,以及 HubSpot 的制胜增长公式 | Chris Miller
Relentless curiosity, radical accountability, and HubSpot’s winning growth formula | Chris Miller
Chris Miller: … The actual really small initial growth team. We really had an aggressive mentality, an aggressive approach, and what that looked like was at the time, a very small percentage of, I think HubSpot’s subscription revenue would be described as self-service, so we approached the team who owned it and we were like, “Are you all working on this?” They were like, “Nah, we’re working on a bunch of other stuff.” We were like, “Can we take this?” They were like, “Sure, if you want it.” And so, we took it and immediately blew it up, and so that attitude of saying that every problem is our problem and radical accountability and ownership mentality helped us find opportunities that maybe the business wasn’t explicitly asking us to solve, but we were able to triangulate why it might be important for the business for us to solve it. When you do that, we look hungry, so let’s keep feeding us, right?
Conversation with Chris Miller
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast, where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard win experiences building and growing today’s most successful products. Today, my guest is Chris Miller. Chris is VP of product for growth and AI at HubSpot. Chris started as an ICPM at HubSpot where he helped create their early growth team and as you’ll hear, shifted HubSpot towards one of the most successful product-led growth businesses in history. Seven years later, he leads both their growth and AI teams and advises founders on product-like growth and growth strategy in general.
In our wide-ranging conversation, we cover what it takes to become a successful product leader in tech, what skills the most successful PMs need to build, how to find mentors, why you need to scrape your knees as an early PM. Also, a lot of great stories and insights about what HubSpot figured out about growth across content, sales product, market segments, and growth loops. I so enjoyed this conversation and we could have gone for another hour if I didn’t cut myself off, and so I’m really excited for you to listen to this conversation. With that, I bring you Chris Miller after a short word from our sponsors.
Everyone has their own zone of genius, so together we’re better prepared to navigate professional pitfalls, leading to more responsibility, faster promotions, and bigger impact. Guided by world-class programming and facilitation, Sidebar enables you to get focused, tactical feedback at every step of your journey. If you’re a listener of this podcast, you’re likely already driven and committed to growth. A Sidebar personal board of directors is the missing piece to catalyze that journey. Why spend a decade finding your people when you can meet them at Sidebar today? Jump the growing wait list of thousands of leaders from top tech companies by visiting sidebar.com/lenny to learn more, that’s sidebar.com/lenny. Chris, thank you so much for being here and welcome to the podcast.
The Intersection of Growth and AI
Chris Miller: I’m so excited to be on the podcast. Thank you, Lenny, for having me. This will be a lot of fun.
Lenny: A huge thank you to Kyle Poyer for introducing us. I’ve heard so many great things about you from so many great people, and so I’m really excited to be chatting and I wanted to start with your very unique role that you’re in now at HubSpot and it feels like it might be a sign of things to come for product leaders. Your title as far as I can tell is VP of product of growth and AI. Can you just talk about what that is and how growth and AI relate in the context of HubSpot?
Joining HubSpot and Early Experiences
Chris Miller: I’ve been leading PLG at HubSpot for several years now, and I recently took on the AI leadership role. It’s a special place to be in and that I get to help lead HubSpot in terms of how we should be thinking about building the foundational technology to create AI-powered experiences and then also lead the strategy of how we leverage those experiences to help that B2B business builder be way more successful using our platform than they might’ve been in years past. So, it’s a really cool intersection point between those two things. There’s a lot we can do there.
Core Traits of Product Managers
Lenny: One thing I took away from what you just shared is that you are given these two teams to lead, which aren’t necessarily connected, but I think it tells me that you’re doing a great job at HubSpot and I’m going to try to pierce through your modesty and I’m curious, what is it that you think you’ve done really well or been successful at that got the leaders at HubSpot to decide to give you this other team that feels like an incredibly important initiative in this time of AI?
Resilience and Coachability
Chris Miller: So when I joined HubSpot in 2016, it was definitely an element of timing that really worked in my favor. It was maybe like a year or so after HubSpot had launched their free CRM, which was a big strategic play for them and for us, excuse me, at the time, and it was meant to be disruptive, but I don’t think that there was a fully formed perspective on what was going to happen after that. How are we actually going to get leverage and enterprise value out of this sort of big, enormous piece of free software we just put into the universe? And I think the pedigree of product manager at HubSpot at that time was also a bit different. There were folks who maybe started their time at HubSpot in support, and so intimately familiar with the product and with customers. Some of these people had closed thousands of support tickets and my background was a bit different.
I was actually less of a feature PM and I was sort of more of a growth PM in my DNA, and so I sort of looked at this through a completely different lens and I guess I understood that what we were trying to actually do was product-led growth, but we didn’t really have the shared vocabulary to call it that. And so I think to answer your question, I think I was just willing to take some risks and really push for the things that I believed made sense even though maybe based on the titles that I had at the time, I wasn’t sort of inherently given a seat at the table and really pushed my away into some of these conversations and then was eventually invited to them. And so, just always had an interest in driving a strategy that was a click or two higher than maybe what my immediate team was focused on and was always curious about how other parts of the business functioned.
I used to spend a lot of time sitting on the sales floor, just going into the other buildings and talking to other folks, working on different parts of the business, and that’s part of maybe the serendipity that I miss about being in person, which is that you might just discover something from having a casual conversation with someone at the water cooler. You’re like, “Oh, that’s an interesting problem. I think my team can help with that,” so you absorb a bunch of context around how pieces of the business are connected and you can start to really widen your aperture in terms of the size of opportunities that might be in front of you that maybe you would’ve missed if you would’ve been so heads down on execution work. And so, if I had to guess how people might talk about that, if I wasn’t in the room, maybe they would cite that, but it’s tough to say.
Falling into Product Management
Lenny: Hard to do those serendipitous watercolor chats in these remote hybrid times, huh?
Chris Miller: Yeah, everything’s so scheduled and tightly scheduled and you’re bouncing from Zoom to Zoom and obviously HubSpot has embraced hybrid and there’s a ton of benefit to it. In fact, I was a new dad when I came back to work and my son wasn’t in daycare, and so it was so cool to just be able to pop out in between meetings and play with him for a few minutes just to go back and you don’t get that when you’re in the office all day. So definitely a lot of upside, but certainly you got to be a little bit more creative in terms of that serendipitous knowledge sharing, the osmosis learning, and just context sharing that happens more organically when everybody’s sharing the same physical space.
Serving Donuts and Scraped Knees
Lenny: You talked about how some of your early success was taking risks and being in meetings maybe you shouldn’t be in. Is there an example or a story that comes to mind of doing that where you kind of took a risk early kind of in being a PM at HubSpot and/ or something that worked out really well, surprisingly?
First PM Role: B2B2C Challenges
Chris Miller: This is a funny story. For anybody at HubSpot listening, I apologize in retrospect for this, but-
Lenny: I’m excited for this.
Meeting Fareed Mosavat at Fitness Tech
Chris Miller: There was a time where we were having a lot of debates around pricing and packaging, and we’ll get into this, but our go-to-market model and sort of where we play in the addressable market created some complexity in the sense of we’re serving different parts of the market simultaneously with the connected unified platform. And so, how do you think about packaging and go-to-market? And we were trying to just figure out how to simplify, simplify, simplify. And at the time I was an IC, individual contributing PM, so who am I to have a point of view on pricing and packaging? But the person I was working with, my designer, her name’s Mariah Moscato, she’s in product now, she’s excellent, we were part of a triad and we both had a similar school of thought in terms of what the pricing packaging could be.
And we were over in Dublin where we have our European headquarters and there was a party happening at the Guinness sort of storehouse, and I don’t know that we were exactly on the guest list, but we figured out a way to get into the party and we ran into the COO at the time and out of the blue I think he had asked us what we thought about pricing and packaging and it was sort of one of those funny you should ask moments. And so, we ended up kind of pitching in the midst of pints being sort of handed every which way you could turn this vision for a completely different way we might approach pricing and packaging, and he was pretty intrigued and he said, “Why don’t you come to the next executive meeting and pitch us on it?”
I think that meeting was maybe a couple of weeks away and so we looked at each other and we were like, “Uh-oh,” not exactly what we expected in terms of, I think people welcoming maybe a contrarian point of view at that moment in time. And so, we sort of were invited into this meeting with folks that we generally don’t get to spend a lot of time with to pitch this thing that swam a little bit upstream and we ultimately didn’t go full steam ahead down that path. I think a lot of elements of what we pitched have made their way over time into HubSpot’s pricing and packaging, but it certainly I think opened the door for us and for me, speaking for myself, certainly for me to be welcomed back into that room in the future and to be able to contribute ideas towards important decisions.
Lenny: I love that. It’s another example of serendipity and just running into people. Also, I think it’s a really good example of just how important it’s for PMs to be proactive and think ahead and not just rely on people coming to you, asking you for your advice and getting invited to rooms. I feel like so much of success in the product leadership role is just suggesting great ideas, being ahead of where people are and having the answers. You have the answer right there in the moment because you did the work ahead of time. Is that something you find as well that ends up being really important?
The Power of Data-Driven Decisions
Chris Miller: Yeah, one of the traits that I look for in PMs that I hire onto my teams, and also when I think back to the people that I’ve learned a lot from working with over the years, one of the common behaviors or traits is relentless curiosity, this insatiable desire to understand things and a lack of fear in admitting when they don’t understand things and being uncompromising and getting the answers so that they do understand. And I think if you can bring that to the table, it’s much easier to have an outsized impact on whatever or you’re a part of or whatever mission you’re working on or whatever team you may be a member of.
Why You Must Talk to Customers
Lenny: Are there any other traits on that list of traits you look for that you think are really important that maybe other people don’t focus on?
Chris Miller: Yeah, relentless curiosity is probably my number one. My number two would probably be resilience, specifically if you’re working in growth. I think if you’re doing growth, right, if you’re doing product-led growth the right way, then you’re trying to balance the science and sort of taking a somewhat hygienic approach to validating assumptions and hypotheses with being really ambitious and really pushing for the things that are going to have massive impact for your customers at the end of the day. And when you’re doing that, you’re going to fail more than you’re going to be successful along the way. And if you’re not resilient, that can be really demotivating. I think there’s a stat that some growth person put out there years ago, which is that on average only 20 to 30% of experiments of growth team runs might be successful. So, that means 70 to 80% of the time you’re, you’re not putting numbers on the board and you’re extracting learnings hopefully that you can apply to the future.
But I think if you’re not resilient, what I’ve seen happen is you end up sort of grasping for a win, which can sometimes look like making bets that are too small and too insignificant to matter. If your sort of primary modality of product-led growth work is experiment-driven product development and you’re hitting more than like 30, 40% of the time, you’re thinking too small. And so, that resiliency piece is certainly important in my mind. I think coachability is another one in the sense that I still think that the sort of subcategory of growth product management is still fledgling compared to PMs working on platform features. And so, even when I’m interviewing folks, I’m not necessarily looking for 10 years of experience doing PLG. I think that’s mostly an unreasonable ask, but it can certainly be taught and even if you do have some experience doing PLG work, it’s important to know that what that work is going to look like is going to potentially vary in a meaningful way from shop to shop.
And so, being coachable and adaptable to whatever the context is of the business or problem space that you’re working on I think is an important trait that I look for in PMs, and then creativity is so important too. Valuing simple solutions to really hard problems, I think if building the next super sophisticated widget is the thing that gets you out of bed in the morning, growth might not be for you, I think the best growth product leaders and growth minds that I’ve worked with over the years or have had the privilege of learning from over the years, I think the thing that I noticed about them is they’re almost ambivalent to the solution and certainly ambivalent to how complex a solution may or may not be. And taking little to no pleasure or pride in the complexity of a solution so long that it delivers the outcome that the business and your customers need, I think is a really cool trait, and I kind categorize that under creativity.
Surprising User Research Discoveries
Lenny: You mentioned this phrase, relentless curiosity, and it made me think about a story I read about you where the way you got into product management was you were at some startup and the founder was just like, “I’ve read that the cure to all our problems is going to be hiring product manager,” and you heard that and you googled, what is product management, and then you asked them, “Can I do that?” And that’s how you got into the role. So first of all, is that true? And second of all, what’s your advice to people trying to get into product management and any lessons from that experience?
Chris Miller: So first, yes, that is 100% true. That is how I stumbled into product management. So, I appreciate all the folks who took a shot on me back then, but this was at a time where I would say product management even as a function was definitely not ubiquitous across tech. There was, at least in the world that I was in, a lot more of a standard waterfall approach to building product with a lot of middle layers and engineering managers and really no one who had the job of owning the problem from a customer’s point of view. And so, there wasn’t a ton of content out there. There weren’t even a ton of people in the city at the time that I could really talk to sort of learn, and so a lot of what I did was scrape my knees through the first years and a lot of painful trial and error.
And then eventually I think there’s a lot more energy and an interest around the trade craft and the function, and so I think it’s much easier today for someone to learn the fundamentals of product management without necessarily needing to do it via trial by fire. My advice to folks who are interested in breaking into product management specifically is focus on a few things. One, focus on structure. I think there’s usually a lower barrier to entry to do product management at a smaller shop, which they might not have as much access to the best talent out there, but I think what you may often give up in those instances is structure to your own sort of professional development and formal training and education and potentially even the opportunity to work for people who are truly battle tested and have seen the movie several times and can actually wisdom share because truthfully, it looks different in every company, and so it is one of those functions.
I do believe that taking a truly academic approach towards upskilling has fairly diminishing returns because it’s tough to field curveballs in a classroom. And so, choosing where you want to break in is almost as important as choosing that you want to break in the first place. Thinking about who you’re going to be reporting to, thinking about what’s the track record of success for people at that company, breaking into product management, trying to think five years in advance and work backwards, I think are all sort of important thought exercises along the way. I would also say that if you’re already at a shop where you are working at a different function and you’re sort of product curious, go talk to the PMs, literally I say go reach out to a PM and ask how you can make their day easier.
Figure out what you can do in your spare time that they can offload to you and do a little bit of volunteer labor, even if that’s just shadowing because I think just getting that context and understanding the sort of rhythm of how a team ideates and defines problems and prioritizes and ship software is the experience that’s going to be the most important because a lot of product management is also managing personalities and figuring out how people want to work with you and figuring out how you work for them. And so, just getting that hands-on experience or at least direct sight-line into the day-to-day of a team is really important because the extent to which you can understand their problem space and understand the things that keep them up at night, you can be valuable, and then at the very least, what you get out of it is hopefully an advocate or a sponsor at the end of the day who is willing to gamble some professional and political capital on you to get your foot into the door even though you might not have any formal experience on your resume.
HubSpot’s Secret to Success
Lenny: There’s so much stuff that super resonates there. One is that I always think of the bare minimum job of a PM is just to be useful to people on the team and help them do better work. If you do that alone, people-
Short-Term Survival vs. Long-Term Vision
Chris Miller: Bring the donuts, right?
Systematizing a Customer-First Approach
Lenny: Bring the donuts, exactly.
Chris Miller: I must be old, I don’t know that anybody uses bringing the donuts now anymore.
What Makes HubSpot Special: SMB Focus
Lenny: No, we had Ken on the podcast, we talked about it. We asked, what is the digital version of that when everyone’s working remote? I think that’s something that even if you’re a brand new PM you come across soon enough. And then the other piece there, I really love this metaphor of scraping your knees because I find that to be so important to becoming a PM is you think you could just read these things, take some courses and you got this, and you’re not going to mess up, but I find that messing up is so important in helping to learn to do the job because like you said, there’s relationships and people and changing plans and leaders, and it’s just like you’re not going to get it right and you learn how to deal with all these things by messing it up.
So, I super agree with that, and even though you said it’s easier not to learn to be a PM, it’s still I think important to scrape your knees a number of times for you to actually learn to do the job. Along those lines, what did you find was most helpful to you to learn the craft of product management in the first few years? What do you think back to like, “Oh, that was really helpful,” other than just doing it messing up, sometimes getting it right?”
Chris Miller: So, my first product management job/mission was working on a B2B2C product, and there’s a lot of unique challenges that came with that. Our customer was not the end user of our product. We sold into institutions who then white labeled our product and then resold it to the end customer. And so at the end of the day, our customers own the relationship with the end user and not us, and so-
… own the relationship with the end user and not us. And so, the challenges that that created were that there was a lot of distance between us and the voice of the end user. And we ended up building a lot of things to satisfy the buyer and the customer, but not necessarily the end user. And that’s challenging because you don’t necessarily know whether you’re building something to get a contract signed, or you’re building something that’s going to delight the person using it at the end of the day, or provide magical value. And so, I think I probably shipped a lot of bad product those years, if I’m being completely honest. I don’t know that I would look back at what I shipped back then or what we shipped back then, and say they were the best possible solutions or best possible product.
It wasn’t until I got my second product management job where it really was an inflection point, where I was like, “Oh, got it. This is what this is supposed to look and feel like.”
The HubSpot Culture Code
Lenny: Where was that? Was that with Keeper?
Chris Miller: I was working at a fitness technology company, and the person who really I would say changed my entire paradigm of what product management is supposed to be, someone I know you know, Fareed Mosavat, who I believe was on the pod-
Fun HubSpot Culture Stories
Lenny: Ooh. Absolutely.
Early Playbook for HubSpot’s Growth Team
Chris Miller: … last October. Shout out to Fareed if you’re listening. Fareed is a good friend and mentor, and he really helped me level up. And what was interesting about those years is it was the first time I’d really gotten to work on a product where it was a freemium B2C run-tracking app. And so, we spent a lot of time talking to users directly, and a lot of guerrilla user research techniques. Literally, sometimes going outside and just talking to runners in passing to understand what were the challenges in finding motivation, and why do they choose running assistance, running applications in the first place? And so, just that having that deep connection to the customer and not feeling like you’re being kept at arms’ distance was eyeopening. I was like, “Oh, I didn’t know that it could be like this.”
And then, the second thing that we had at our disposal that changed the game for me was access to a huge user data set. And so, having data at scale to drive decisions, being able to know that if we make a change, we can prove causation from a business impact standpoint or a customer delight or engagement standpoint. And so, it was almost like I didn’t realize I was blind until… Or you didn’t realize you weren’t seeing in color. It’s like that scene in The Wizard of Oz where they land on Oz, and all of a sudden, everything’s in Technicolor. And you’re like, “Oh, my gosh, I can actually make informed decisions about what I’m shipping.”
And having a level of rigor around that and really being forced to articulate a hypothesis and have a point of view on what the outcomes might be before you actually build something, were all sort of, I would say, behaviors and just philosophy around product discipline that I learned from Fareed and that group of folks that I worked with closely during those years. And that was, I think the… I consider that to be when I really became a product manager.
Lenny: There’s two things I want to highlight there that, again, super resonate. One is just whenever I talk to customers, I’m like, “Why don’t I do this more often?” Because every time it’s like, “Wow, I had no idea how big of a problem that was. Why don’t I do this all the time?” And then, you don’t again. And then, you do it months later and you’re like, “Oh, my god, I learned so much again.” And so, I think if you’re listening and you’re just like… Maybe just go talk to a customer today.
Crazy Sprints and Breakthrough Moments
Chris Miller: Talk to customers, and we also learned a lot from talking to people who we wanted to be customers but were not, right? And people who had either broken up with our product or evaluated it and never fell in love with it in the first place. And so, I think every PM struggles with time management and it feels like you need 60 hours in a day to get through your weekly checklist, or 60 hours in a week, excuse me. But finding time to just talk to people. Even today, I have a lot of friends who are entrepreneurs or small business owners, and some use HubSpot, some don’t. But I usually tend to really enjoy my conversations with people who decided not to use HubSpot and to really try to unpack what drove that decision.
Was it as calculated, as I think sometimes we can all maybe assume that some of these decisions are? And then you often learn that they’re sometimes kind of emotional, really instinctual and visceral and maybe connected to brands more than they even connected to product. And there’s a lot of things that I think when you’re in the proverbial digital conference room with your team, trying to understand what makes your users tick, you’re just like, “We’re actually just…” We’re illogical humans at the end of the day at our core, and that all rides on decisions people make in the day-to-day. And it doesn’t change, necessarily, when they’re engaging with your product. As much as we love it to be perfect science, so that we can moneyball the system, if you will.
HubSpot’s Shift to Product-Led Growth
Lenny: It reminds me of a story where we were doing some user research on a booking feature with an Airbnb. And we went to Paris to do these really in-depth user research studies. We were behind one-way mirrors and all that stuff. And we were trying to figure out why hosts weren’t connecting Facebook to their account. This is like, I don’t know, five, six years ago. Because it gave them so much access to where their friends are traveling and reviews and all these things. And especially, in France, they were just like, “I don’t trust Facebook.” And this was before it became a big thing in the US. They’re just like, “I don’t trust… I don’t want them to have any of my data.” “But look at all this power you get.” They’re like, “No, I don’t care. I don’t trust it.” And-
Hybrid Strategies in Product-Led Growth
Chris Miller: Yeah, that’s why talking to customers is so… You could have all the usage data in the world, that’s going to tell you what’s actually happening in your product, but it doesn’t tell you why. It will never explain the why behind a behavior that you can track through events firing. And so, that’s why that sort of proximity to the customer and directing that sort of relentless curiosity towards the qualitative stuff is so, so important because you just learn things that are just sometimes really unintuitive or are blind spots because we’re often not the people we’re building product for.
Defining Product-Led Growth
Lenny: Absolutely. I want to shift talking about HubSpot the business, but one more last thing I wanted to highlight from what you just shared, which is a really good insight is you shared that your biggest inflection in your career was a manager, Fareed in this case, who helped you learn the craft and develop your skills, and that’s the exact experience I had too. Just one specific manager changed everything for me. And that feels like a recurring theme to a lot of people, just having one person that really spends the time to help you learn and correct you when you’re making mistakes and all that. So, if folks are wondering maybe why am I not learning enough or why is my care stagnating? See if you can just find… Easier said than done, but oftentimes it just takes one person to change everything.
Misconceptions About Becoming Product-Led
Chris Miller: It gets into sort of a conversation about the difference between a manager and a mentor, versus a sponsor and an advocate. Mentors are great, don’t get me wrong. I have a ton of people that I would consider to be mentors, but when I think about the people in my life, who… The time that they donated to me, the time that they volunteered to me and for me, calling them mentors, I think sells what they were very short. And I would actually describe those folks as being sponsors and advocates, people who were willing to put up capital, whether that’s professional, social capital to bet on you.
I mean, truth be told, when I interviewed with Fareed that first time, I think back to the interview and I think I bombed it. I actually don’t think I would’ve hired me back then. And I remember the answers I gave to some of those questions, and I think they were good, but I don’t think they were certainly great. And I imagine that there was something in there where the decision maker, who was Fareed said, “I think I can make something out of this.” And I think being willing to invest in someone and finding people who are willing to invest in you is what really matters. And finding people who are willing to, again, put something up for you, whether that be whatever kind of capital it is. When I think about true gasoline on the career fire, it’s finding mentors, but it’s also finding sponsors and advocates.
Lenny: Is there anything that you think you did right to help find mentors and sponsors and advocates for people that are thinking about, “Hey, I need this. How do I help myself in the same way?” Is there something you did that helped people get excited to help you?
Common PLG Misconceptions
Chris Miller: Something I think I certainly continue to work on, but really, putting ego aside and embracing not knowing stuff and embracing not being good at stuff, and not feeling self-conscious about that and letting the desire to be the best at something or at least be great at something overpower the fear of being inadequate at something. And I played sports growing up, and so I like being coached. I can take hard feedback, and I like it because if I get better feedback than the people I’m competing against, I think I can beat them over time if I work hard enough.
And so, I think just taking that mentality with me into product management, I think has helped me build bridges with people who don’t owe me anything, right? People who don’t necessarily need to be invested in me at all, but who might get delight out of it somehow. And I don’t know exactly how that works and the calculus that goes on in folks’ brains, but at least what’s within my control is how I can show up in the context of those relationships and really embrace even the hardest, ugliest feedback and hope that I can extract something from it that’ll make me better at the end of the day.
The HubSpot Growth Flywheel
Lenny: I love that advice. Makes me think about Jules Walter’s advice, which I’ve referenced many times on this podcast now, where his tip is when people are giving you feedback, just be like, “Thank you so much for that feedback,” even though you’re melting inside and just completely disagree with what they’re telling you.
Chris Miller: Yeah, shout out to Jules. Jules is also someone who has been generous with me in the past in terms of giving time when I’ve needed help with stuff. Also, a great episode you did with Jules.
The Importance of Channel Diversification
Lenny: So, many people have said what you just said about Jules, about how helpful he is been to them. So, clearly, a class act to that guy, maybe we’ll have to bring him back.
Chris Miller: Would love that.
How Covid Accelerated Growth
Lenny: Yeah. V2 Jules. So, let’s shift to HubSpot the business, which is a pretty incredible success story. From what my notes, it’s worth something like $30 billion now as a business. It’s been around for 17 years. Still growing, I think, something like 30% year over year. And most interestingly, Okta put out this really interesting report recently where they looked at their data of what tools people are using to authenticate with, and they showed that basically HubSpot is maybe the fifth fastest-growing software product in the world. I don’t know if it’s true, but feels true because all the other companies make sense there. So, you don’t have to confirm or deny this, but clearly things are going great at HubSpot. I’m curious just what makes HubSpot so special and unique and successful that’s specifically unique to HubSpot versus other companies?
Chris Miller: There’s a lot in there. I can speak to the things that have resonated most deeply with me in my time there. The first is legitimate customer obsession. It’s not marketing, it’s legitimate, right? I’ve witnessed fierce and passionate debates internally that the root of what the people in the debate were really trying to unpack was what was the best thing for the customer. And so, really having that be central to our dogma and how we think about the business and why the company exists in the first place, really walking the walk there is something that I don’t know that that’s true everywhere.
I mean, I’ve certainly worked at places where that hasn’t been true, and there’s a lot of factors that can lead to those trade-off decisions at times. Like is this the right thing for the business, the right thing for the customer? Being really challenging. I think just sort of having that customer centricity really baked into the DNA of the company makes those decisions, maybe not easier, but at least you can have more conviction around the why behind the decision at the end of the day. Another thing that I think makes HubSpot-
Lightning Q&A Round
Lenny: Before you actually move on to the next one, I want to spend a little time on this one because I think people hear this and they’re like, “Yes, okay, we’re going to be customer obsessed.” And then, you have to make these hard decisions. Look at this experiment, it’s going to grow our revenue 1%, but it’s not really going to make the customer’s life easier. How do you actually make this real? And there may be an example where you have to trade off growth versus we need to make sure the customer is getting what they need or making the customer happy to make it a little more real even.
Chris Miller: One, I think that’s a really fantastic, maybe not counterpoint, but thing to call out. My point of view here is that oftentimes it’s a function of what’s the time horizon that the company uses as their sort of baseline for assessing decisions? And typically, when you’re making decisions that could be described as hostile towards your customers, but a net positive for the business, you’re probably not thinking long-term enough, right? Because there’s no possible way, unless you have completely cornered a market and there is no competition whatsoever, that you could continually be hostile towards your customers and grow, right? At some point, that’s going to catch up.
And so, oftentimes I think it’s the tension of what do we need to do in the short term to survive? Versus long-term, where are we going? What’s the path that we’re actually charting? Is I think the true tension. But if you’re making decisions that might have lasting impact that are customer hostile, I think that’s a really dangerous path to kind of go down. And so, having, I think, the discipline or the bravery or the courage, whatever, to I think focus on not necessarily tomorrow or the day after, and really think about two, three, four years from now, what are the outcomes we’re trying to drive and what are the decisions we need to make in the interim that are going to lead to that outcome? If you stick to that sort of framework, or first principle is a better way to describe it, then I think you’ll often end up arriving at the conclusion that doing the thing that’s right for customers at the end of the day is the right decision.
Guiding Life Principles
Lenny: Is there something in the way you operate that helps you systemize that in your experiment plan or product specs or experiment results? Or is there a story of something where you just shipped something that shows this customer obsession to make it even more concrete for listeners?
Chris Miller: There’s definitely structure you could put around customer centricity. And I think a lot of it for growth at HubSpot and the teams that I lead, it’s around forcing specificity of language. So, for example, you look at a lot of standard documentation for features or experiments, whatever, and one of the first things, it’s like outline the problem. I don’t know that we even talk about problems without a qualifier. Are we talking about a business problem? Are we talking about a customer problem? Are we talking about an efficiency problem? Describe the nature of the problem and parse it out. Because generally speaking, if there’s a business problem, you might do the thought exercise of asking, “Well, why hasn’t that problem solved itself? What’s the actual customer problem that is leading to the downstream negative thing that’s happening to the business?”
And if we can actually create some daylight between those two things conceptually, we can avoid making the mistake of trying to solve a business problem in a way that leads to a bad outcome for the customer at the end of the day. And I think, also, creating a system that makes it easy for PMs to call out assumptions that they might be making. So, if we do this, what would you predict to be some of the sort of derivative downstream things? And if we can call those things out and just keep asking why, why, why, to sort of justify some of the direction you want to go in and then keep asking in what, what, what, in terms of what’s the sort of true blast radius and domino effect of these decisions is the approach that we take at HubSpot, in my teams at least.
Recent Favorite Products
Lenny: Awesome. Okay. So, I cut you off in this one bullet point so far. So, let’s keep going.
Chris Miller: Yeah. So we’re talking about the things that make HubSpot special. So, customer obsession is definitely one. I think where we play in the market, too. Being a company that has been comfortable staying in the mid-market, SMB mid-market space, and resisting the temptation to try to crawl up into enterprise software, I think makes us special. And one of the things that’s actually really straightforward, which is that a lot of enterprise software companies, a lot of your revenue is tied up in a small subset of customers. And I think what can happen there is if those customers decide that they want you to build something and they’re willing to threaten their business over it, then you’ll end up building it. And is that necessarily the thing that is going to serve all your customers best? Probably not. Are you going to end up having to build and maintain bespoke software for one customer? Probably.
And don’t get me wrong, I think there’s a lot of product folks out there who enjoy that modality of work, I’m not one of them. And so, by playing in the mid-market, it means our revenue is distributed more evenly across our entire install base, which means that there’s no single customer who can hold us hostage, really. But what that does is with great power comes great responsibility. I think what that does is the forcing function of ensuring that the decisions that we make are a net benefit for the largest swath of customers possible. And I think it really is the guiding light behind some of our decisions around connected experience and usability and user experience. And so, playing in the mid-market, I think affords us to be able to do that. So, I think that’s another thing that makes us special for a company of our size.
Culture is another one. And I won’t get into the culture code. I think a lot of folks have probably read it. If not, go check it out.
Lenny: I don’t know if people have heard of that. What is that?
Chris Miller: Yeah. Dharmesh, our co-founder, one of our fearless leaders, Dharmesh, one of the things he most famously did early on is he published the HubSpot culture code externally. You can Google it and find it anywhere. I think a lot of companies sort of replicated that over the years, but by being really open and transparent about the culture both internally and externally, I think one, it internally creates alignment and it gives everyone something to point to to enforce why did we choose to work with each other the way that we work with each other. I think it also helps in attracting the right type of candidates because we put it out there, we’re sort of really open about it. If you don’t like that culture, chances are you probably won’t be super excited to work here. But if that’s something that you’re craving, and I think a lot of quality people crave a lot of the things that are sort of codified in our culture. Humility, empathy, adaptability, remarkability, transparency are sort of all things that I think people take quite seriously.
And so, being really open and honest about that. And being willing to sort of pressure test it on a regular basis, like is this still a company we want to be? We are growing really fast. What has changed? What conditions are still able to be supported with the culture we have codified today? What amendments might we need to make in terms of who we want to represent ourselves to be to our customers and how do we want to work with each other? And investing in that, hiring really good people that can help us scale that I think is something that makes HubSpot really special.
Lenny: Amazing. I’m reading the culture code on the side here, and there’s these little quotes that are really sweet. I really like this one, “Solve for the customer, not just their happiness, but also their success.”
Chris Miller: Yes.
Lenny: Wise.
Is there anything really fun about the culture, like a fun thing that you all do that’s a quirky HubSpot ritual?
Chris Miller: Yeah, there’s a ton, but I think there’s definitely a very legitimate school of thought around how culture can both contribute to inclusion, but also, be a headwind to inclusion. I think a lot of the things that I might associate with HubSpot culture are very much rooted in a specific period of HubSpot, right? It was probably a pre-pandemic period. It was probably a period where we were all working in the same physical space. And so, there’s a lot of inside jokes. And sometimes the things are rooted in very specific quirks of specific individuals who may not even be at the company anymore. And so, if you’re someone who’s joined the company in the past two or three years and that flies over your head-
The company in the past two or three years, and that flies over your head. I think we have to ask ourselves, “What’s the value of continuing to embrace these things?” And so I think what we’ve been doing over the years is taking inventory of the things that might have been considered part of HubSpot legacy culture and really trying to again, pressure test it. Does this continue to serve us today? And if not, we should be really comfortable of letting it go.
But one of the things that I think is super dope that we do is we do this thing called PEER Week, which was something that popped up during the pandemic and the TLDR is that it’s like an event for product and engineering; where travel changed with the pandemic and people don’t get to see each other in person as much, but there’s a couple of weeks in the summer in June where we fly everybody in either if you’re in North America, we fly you to Cambridge. If you were in Europe somewhere, then we fly you to Dublin and we spend a week together.
There’s not a ton of focus on just classic productivity. There’s a ton of focus on building connections and safety and just getting to know people and who they are as human beings, but also, damn I forgot how much I missed whiteboarding. It’s actually being able to get in a room with a physical whiteboard of people and work on some stuff. And so this is, I think the second year in a row, or second or third I don’t remember, pandemic years have really fogged the brain… That we’ve done it. And it’s one of the things I look most forward to every year is getting everybody in the same city to just hang out.
Lenny: I love it. I keep peeking at these highlights and they’re really interesting. So we’re going to link to this culture code also in the show notes if you want to check it out. But anyway, let’s focus on how HubSpot grows. And there’s kind of two parts, in my mind there’s just like, how did it start and what worked really well. You’re actually on the inaugural team, I believe, of HubSpot’s growth team and things worked out. Well done. I’m curious maybe just to start what you think you did so right, early on in the history of HubSpot to help it grow into the behemoth it has become. What was kind of the early success elements that were key?
Chris Miller: I would say the early years of doing freemium. And for the record, there’s definitely an iteration of the growth team before I joined that, you know really like Brian Balfour was the person who I would say injected that first dose of PLG DNA into HubSpot. So shout out to Brian. I want to make sure he gets the credit that he’s owed.
Lenny: Yeah, we’re going to have him on the podcast at some point. It’s in the works.
Chris Miller: Yeah, he’s a legend. Brian’s great.
Lenny: Absolute legend.
Chris Miller: And so after Brian had left HubSpot, it was a bit start and stop. And so when I joined and we sort of took another stab at it, I think there were a few things we did. One, in the beginning is we really had an aggressive mentality, an aggressive approach I think. And by we, I mean the team, the actual really small initial growth team. We tried not to be pedantic about where we were spending our time. And so we sort of tossed our mission and charter out of the window. We said, cool, maybe on paper we were, I think the sales tool, activation team. It was a very boutique mission and remit compared to I think a lot of the other teams at HubSpot’s missions and remit at the time.
But even though that’s what we were supposed to be working on paper, we were sort of like, if we find something that looks like an opportunity and no one else in the business is thinking about it, we’re just going to try to fix it. We’re going to ask for forgiveness rather than permission and start to call some plays.
And what that looked like was at the time, a very small percentage of, I think HubSpot’s subscription revenue would be described as self-service, like people putting in their credit card and buying something. It was predominantly product driven leads like PQLs. And so we were literally sending everything to the sales team, which it was running revenue, but certainly opportunities for efficiency because it was the first time we’d really had a product at a price point that could be transactional and not a highly considered purchase. And so we were thinking about this and we were like, “Well, how does this work? Is there even a pricing page in the product that people could actually buy something?”And we found it, but it had been neglected. It was sort of like, I think no one was sort of committing any code to that repository.
So we approached a team who owned it and we were like, “Are y’all working on this? Is this an active development?” And they were like, “Nah, we’re working on a bunch of other stuff.” We were like, “Can we take this?” And they were like, “Sure, if you want it, take it. It’s one less code base for us to maintain.” And so we took it and immediately blew it up. We redesigned the whole thing focused on discoverability, how are people getting to this page, focusing on desirability, like how are we talking about the value props of the things that we’re wanting to sell to customers to help them grow better. And then thinking about doability or usability, how do we actually just remove the friction that’s standing in the way?
And so we did a mad dash towards this outcome we wanted to drive, and when we released it worked. It was actually a step function change in the way that the physics of the business and the funnel really looked. And I think that was probably a catalyst moment of everyone saying, “Oh wow, there might actually be something here.” And so that attitude of saying that every problem is our problem and being willing to really take a mentality of like, I think radical accountability and ownership mentality helped us find opportunities that maybe the business wasn’t explicitly asking us to solve, but we were able to triangulate why it might be important for the business for us to solve it.
And when you do that, I think the business, a business may get more comfortable putting more on your plate. Right? And so it’s like we look hungry, so let’s keep feeding us. And so over time our remit expands and there’s other things that we think are opportunities to gain leverage for the business or deliver a delight to our customers in a more efficient way, and honestly in a way that they probably expected to engage with us at that point in time. It was quite odd that there were so many humans involved in every stage of the customer journey and some of our customers just like, “I just want to be able to try the thing and buy it if I want to be. I really don’t want to be forced into a sales engagement.” And so it was really kind of meeting the expectations of the modern software buyer in many ways.
Lenny: It sounds incredibly important. Basically your team turned HubSpot into a very product led growth business, which feels very important in the history of HubSpot’s growth. Would you consider what was there before where it was the beginnings of self-service, but they had to talk to a salesperson? Would you consider that product led?
Chris Miller: Yes.
Lenny: Okay.
Chris Miller: Yes.
Lenny: And so how would you describe what the shift was in terms of the way the sales motion and growth motion changed?
Chris Miller: The go-to-market motions that we were working on definitely fit under, I think the broad umbrella of PLG, but I don’t think the culture of the company was necessarily explicit about being a PLG company. I don’t think that’s the way we talked about who HubSpot was and trust me, there were a bunch of other factors in here. I definitely, I won’t say that our team were the sole driving force behind that shift in our strategy and approach, but certainly the data that we were able to collect and the experiments we were able to run and the insights we were able to surface and the research we were able to synthesize… It gave us conviction to double down on it for sure. And that was definitely maybe the beginning of that inflection point for the company, but there was certainly a lot of other things that led to us wanting to become more product led.
Again, I think about it, I think any company is probably searching for ways to operate more efficiently. And if your revenue is so tied to go-to-market headcount, it gets really hard to scale the bigger you get. And so I think there’s an innate desire to want to be more non-linear in our growth. And I think us arriving at the right place at the right time created sort of alignment around what the path forward could look like. If we want to live in that world, how might we get there? And I think that’s where we really fit into the equation. It’s like, “Oh, we invest in this team. If we invest in the type of work this team is doing, that’s how we’re going to build efficiencies over time.” And it’s also, we like that because it’s in line with what our customers are already expecting from us.
Lenny: And it sounds like you weren’t like, “We need to be more product led.” It was more just how do we get the sales process more efficient and the motion of growth more efficient and that emerged out of that.
Chris Miller: Yeah, I mean, don’t get me wrong. We were definitely like, we need to be more product led. And I think that’s actually the nuance here. You asked would I consider what we were doing product led growth? And I think the answer is absolutely, but that’s because a fallacy that people, a lot of, I think maybe early stage founders or folks who are unfamiliar with chronic growth or maybe only know about it from an academic point of view, maybe fall into the trap of is assuming that in order to be a PLG company you can use that interchangeably with being a fully self-service business or fully self-service go-to market.
I don’t actually think that those things are one and the same. I think that most companies, at least the larger, more successful ones that have done amazing things and are cornering their market or category, that we would consider to be PLG companies have a bunch of humans working on really important things on their go to market, and it’s more of a hybrid motion. And I think it’s less about, again, being sort of myopic about your approach to PLG and having it being really rooted in principles that are, I think very kind of academic or conceptual in nature.
But more sort of being pragmatic and saying, “Okay, cool. Who is our customer? What is the product that we sell? How are our customers used to buying this thing? How would they prefer to buy it in the future that they would like to live in? What’s the packaging of our products? How do our customers decide? Is it a top down decision or a bottoms up decision? How complex are our building and subscription terms is something that’s going to be pretty transactional or something that’s going to be fairly considered? How comfortable is our target market with the technology in our category? Are we competing against non-consumption? Are we competing against competitors in the same category?”
And if you actually answer those questions, and I think it may be obvious where I’m going with this, but based on the answer to those questions, the conditions on the ground might lend themselves to be more favorable to product-led growth and be more favorable to self-service, right? It’s why there are companies that the value prop is just so… Like you don’t need a person to sell you Loom. I use Loom and it’s so intuitive that I can just decide on my own whether I want to buy it. You don’t need a person to teach you how to use even Slack to some example. Like Slack is extremely intuitive. Right? Like you could throw someone in Slack and use a product in a similar paradigm and it can probably figure out the basics on their own.
There are certain products that don’t necessarily check those boxes. And so I think what you can do is kind of take a more modular approach to PLG, and it’s like based on how a customer in the best case scenario might go from zero to one when it comes to activation and onboarding, do we need to have a human involved in that process at all? Or as a backstop? If the answer is yes, then maybe figure out ways to have humans involved where your cost structure is durable or at least defensible. If that’s not the case, then go take a PLG approach to it.
And so across our entire business, we’ve never taken a very pure, everything here for this line of business or this product line is going to be self-service without being able to defend and contextualize why across the entire customer journey this makes sense. And so yeah, we have customers who come in through the product led front door and kick the tires on the product on their own and activate on the product on their own. But then when it comes time to buy the product, they want to talk to somebody and there’s legitimate reasons why, right? There are maybe IT and security concerns that they need to get somebody on the phone for. Maybe they’re coming for a platform where data migration is a huge fear they have, and that’s not something that’s easy to do in a self-service environment yet. I think that’s going to change over time. But today it’s still kind of painful when you’re doing rip and replaces.
And so to try to brute force that into a sort of self-service motion for every customer writ large would be solving for your business’ desires, not necessarily solving for the customer at the end of the day. But we also sell into different segments of customers that are maybe digital natives but not familiar with products in our category. And maybe they’re coming from not a competing product, but they’re coming from a more rudimentary system like spreadsheets. I mean, I’ve seen customers using post-it notes to manage their.
Lenny: [inaudible 00:59:25].
Chris Miller: The deal pipeline, the real old school way, and that was sort of their locus of control for their sales team. Right?
And so there are use cases like that if you’re a smaller team, you kind of have an acute understanding of the pain points that are like today’s buyers that you need to put out. You don’t have to deal with the burden of a huge data migration. And the person who’s going to be in the CRM day in and day out is also the person who gets to make the final call on what CRM they’re going to use. There’s a ton of those customers that we never talk to in person, right? And that’s awesome too. And so being comfortable with things not necessarily fitting into clean boxes and having conviction that a modular approach or a more hybrid approach is actually the way to optimize for the customer and the business at the end of the day is something that I think we embraced really early on.
One of the first metrics that I had was activation rate, but it was also how much demand am I sending to the sales team? And there was no turf war about that, right? It’s like, oh, that’s net positive for if people are able to get helped and a lot of the questions that they have cannot be answered with the product today, we should absolutely be proud to connect them with one of our awesome people in sales who can be like, help see if the solutions we offer are a good fit for them. And there are instances where people just don’t want to talk to somebody, and our job is to make sure that there’s a friction-free way for them to make that decision on their own.
Lenny: Amazing. I think on the one hand, this could be a whole podcast is just talking about your PLG learnings, knowing… It feels like HubSpot is one of the biggest success stories of transitioning more and more into PLG, at least at that point. Even though you’re saying it was PLG early on, it feels like a huge shift to the business. So I really like this framework you just shared of if you’re trying to become more product led, just think about the zero to one from visit to activation and when does someone really have to talk to someone and how do we help them not have to talk to people in that moment? So either in that direction or just broadly, if someone was trying to explore how do we become more product led, what are the first couple steps and dives you would recommend they do to help them down that road?
Chris Miller: First I would ask, why do you want to be product led? What assumptions are you making in terms of why being product led are going to be net positive for the business or for your customers? And I might even ask them to define what product-led means to them that we can get on the same page of what we’re even talking about.
Lenny: How would you define it? Do you have a rough, an answer to that? Just so people get a sense of what it probably means.
Chris Miller: Yeah. At the highest level, it’s like taking a go-to-market approach where your product job is to grow revenue and you use humans as a backstop and not the other way around.
Lenny: Awesome.
Chris Miller: And I think the key thing is that humans can be a backstop. There are moments where it’s going to make sense for humans to be a backstop. One example that is I think is really normal, a hardship circumstance where a customer needs to end their relationship, right? Like every SaaS company deals with this. Some take a fully automated approach, but most usually have some sort of escalation path that will result in a human having to resolve this. It doesn’t make them any less product led. I think every company at its core is having some humans behind the scenes interface with customers on things related to go-to-market. But I think once defining that and getting on the same page about that, I think you can learn a lot. And by the way, these are the normal conversations that I have with founders all the time. I’m actually an operator in residence at OpenView, and so I speak to a lot of their poor [inaudible 01:03:01], and this is usually the conversation that we end up having.
And I think what’s always interesting is how different the sort of array of answers are when you ask that question. Some are like, oh, it’s about top of the funnel demand. We want to be more product led because we want more leads, we want more signups. You’re like, “Oh, okay.” And that’s a very defensible reason. There’s a lot of data that shows that freemium products attract a lot more top of the funnel demand than sales led go-to-market products do. Right? Some, it might be a matter of constrained resources. We absolutely need to be more product led in the stage of the company because we simply cannot hire an army of implementation specialists and folks on the customer success outside of the house to help every single customer at scale, which is generally a byproduct of having a really large top of the funnel. And then there are others that are, it’s about revenue efficiency.
And so when you can kind of articulate the outcomes that you want to drive, it helps triangulate where to begin. So if you are really focused on top of the funnel demand, trying to do self-service checkout is a silly place to start. And so just really doing the fun exercise of articulating why do you care about this? Why are you actually interested in this in the first place? If you do this, what would change about your business? What assumptions are you making? And when you can actually list those things out, you can map them to parts of the customer journey where there may be opportunity to be more product led if the company isn’t there yet.
Lenny: Awesome. Maybe a couple more questions along these lines and then I just have a couple more questions I definitely want to ask. When someone is trying to go in the direction of product led growth, A.K.A. more self-service, and I guess maybe let me just ask, is that sort of how you think about the equivalency of those two?
Chris Miller: Sure.
Lenny: Okay. What are maybe the most common mistakes they make that aren’t as obvious?
Chris Miller: I mean, the number one mistake is hiring a head of growth, giving them no resources and expecting them to pull rabbit out of their hat.
I feel like every PLG veteran has some joke that they tell about the poor head of growth who has no tooling, no engineering cycles, no designer, no access to data, and then are handed a really scary big number and told to go move it. I think that’s a common mistake that has stood the test of time.
Another one is expecting really quick turnaround and thinking of it the same way you might think about hiring a sales, an incremental sales headcount, which is that you’re expecting near term liquidity from that investment, but when you’re doing PLG at its core, it’s still R&D. You’re still sort of planting seeds with the hope that over time this is going to play out in the form of durable pie efficient growth. But if you’re expecting, you put a team on something and then you want that team to sort of have outsize impact, and sure there’s going to be low hanging fruit, but I think just not having the patience to see the investment through and cutting bait too early is another, I think mistake some companies make.
And then I also think that bad data hygiene is the other one. So not having taken a beat to properly instrument their product, messy data, no real self-service way for people to access that data. Like having analyst bottlenecks can be a terrible position to be in. And so eating your veggies, getting your house in order from a data standpoint, I think is a crucial first step because if you can’t actually measure what’s happening, then like why?
And then maybe the last one is people giving up because they don’t have enough data, right? They’re like, we can’t do PLG because we don’t have this massive data set the way that HubSpot has or the way the Airbnb has. And it’s like you can still do PLG, you just need to use different data. The way we think about data is that quant data is just another form of data. The same way experiment results are just another data point. You can learn a ton from just talking to customers. Like qual research is super-duper important, and so if you don’t have data to tell you exactly what every single person is doing in your product in aggregate, you can still talk to 10 customers and probably get a clear sense of what’s happening and why it’s happening. That you wouldn’t even get from the quant data.
So people getting demotivated or companies getting demotivated because they think they’re too early to do PLG, you can still do PLG. PLG at its core is just having your product sell the value prop of what your business does, and you can still deliver on that without being able to stand up a very robust and sophisticated experimentation practice.
Lenny: Kind of along those lines, but going even broader. Without disclosing trade secrets of how HubSpot works, how would you describe the loop of growth of HubSpot? In the words of, you mentioned Brian Belfor and Fareed, what is the growth loop of HubSpot either now or recently? Just a simple way to think about how HubSpot grows.
Chris Miller: Our loops are less tactical. In fact, if I’m being brutally honest, I think loops are kind of hard to achieve in B2B SaaS. I think there’s some examples of that, but I think some of the best loops come from UGC, user generated content. I think a lot of B2C community focused platforms can do loops really well. I think if it’s B2B SaaS, it’s hard to find things that get loopy. And it is me going, I think all my Reforge [inaudible 01:08:40] are going to be upset that I said that. But I think that’s the truth.
When I think about the flywheel of HubSpot, I think it’s more of a macro flywheel. And just to kind of lean into our own lingo, it’s really attracting gage and delight. And so, one of the principles that guides our thinking and our strategy is give value before you extract value. And I think that was at the core…
Give value before you extract value, and I think that was at the core of inbound marketing at its inception, that outbound marketing was asking for something from customers or prospects before giving anything. And so at its core it’s like, okay, yeah, if you give a little for free, people who are interested in sort of hearing the rest of how that album sounds are going to come and stick around for more. And so in our pre PLG days, it was content marketing and white papers and listicles and eBooks and things that people had to download that were really filling the top of the funnel. And that is just taking another form with PLG.
And so we intentionally put out a lot of free software. And the idea is that this software is not sort of gimmicky. It’s not designed to run out of value on day one. It’s actually designed so that our smallest customers can get some value out of it in a sustainable way. But if they’re engaging with it deeply enough, they’re going to run into the limits of what that value is. And if we’ve done our jobs and delivered what we believe we were supposed to deliver, then the decision to purchase becomes a no-brainer.
And if they’re delighted with the experience of being a customer, they’re going to become advocates, and they’re going to become promoters, and they’re going to tell their peers. Because what we also know is that a lot of small business owners and even medium-sized business owners take a lot of guidance from their community of peers. And sometimes that’s a digital community, sometimes that’s not. And so anytime we win an advocate through delivering an excellent customer experience, they bring more people into the top of the funnel. And so it’s a really honest, and I would say an honest macro loop in the sense, but that’s the way we think about our flywheel.
Lenny: Oh man, this could be a whole other hour of a podcast just diving into this stuff. This is so good. You shared this interesting story that I wasn’t aware of. So HubSpot’s kind of known for content and SEO. You search for anything and there’s always a HubSpot article about it. And so is what you’re sharing here, essentially that was a big part of the early days, SEO, free content that drove people to the site and the product wasn’t free, is what I’m hearing. And then it shifted to now it’s a free product that anyone can use and that’s what drives the top of funnel.
Chris Miller: Yes, correct.
Lenny: Amazing.
Chris Miller: I can’t give a specific number, but a large percentage of our revenue flows through the product. And it’s not necessarily maybe where people ultimately purchased, but that’s their sort of first conversion event with us. They were in the product, they liked what they saw, they spoke to somebody, and then eventually became a customer. And that is now a pretty robust top of the funnel for the company.
Lenny: So I think this is a really interesting story of just starting with one growth channel of SEO essentially, content marketing and then shifting to something else. Is there any lessons from that experience for people trying to kickstart their growth of SEO versus this freemium approach? Is there anything there that just like this worked really well for us and you should probably try this, or SEO kind of runs out in this specific type of business?
Chris Miller: I’ll admit I’m definitely not an SEO expert. I’ve been fortunate to work with some of the best marketers in the world who I think are bonafide legends at this point in terms of what they’ve been able to achieve at HubSpot and building that lead and signup machine.
What I will say is being really aggressive about experimenting with new channels is so important, and diversifying your channel mix is so important because things can change overnight and that might disrupt your entire funnel. Like a Google algorithm change can have a massive impact. If you’re reliant on app store optimization, a change in Apple’s algorithm might have a massive impact. What we’re seeing with generative AI, I think there’s a lot of people losing sleep at night because it’s unclear how this is going to impact SEO writ large. If that’s what fuels your entire business is being on Google search result page, then what’s going to happen in this new sort of world we’re about to enter?
And so I think to the extent that you can not have your funnel be relying on a single or a couple of channels is really important. We’re always testing new channels. One of the channels that we’re spending some time experimenting with is this concept of microapps. And it’s actually not a new concept for HubSpot. One of the first microapps you ever built was a… Maybe Dharmesh built this, the original one, but it was called Website Grader. And it was you put in your domain, and it crawled your site, and then gave you a set of recommendations for how you would optimize your site. And it was free. It was definitely a one trick pony. But what it did was it created an interesting conversation, which is like, okay, cool, now that you have this information, what are you going to do about it? And one of the things you could do is you could become a HubSpot customer and you can use our product to fix a lot of this stuff.
And that worked for us. It worked really, really well. And so we’ve done that play a few times and it’s something that we’ll probably continue to do. We have a bunch of these microapps. We have a brand kit generator, we have an email signature generator. We’ve experimented with a Build My Persona generator. There’s a couple of ones that I can’t talk about right now, but we’ll learn a little bit about in a few weeks at Inbound. But yeah, microapps are an exciting new channel for us. And some will be successes, some will flop, and we’ll probably sunset them. But being willing to fail in the pursuit of finding new distribution channels is also really important.
Lenny: That’s an awesome insight. Is there a place people can go to find these microapps that you all have built?
Chris Miller: There will be soon.
Lenny: Oh, mysterious. I also noticed Dharmesh tweeting about some AI projects he’s working on. Is that related to these microapps? Or is that just him on his own time just doing fun stuff?
Chris Miller: Very related to microapps. I would say ChatSpot is actually, and for those who don’t know what ChatSpot is, ChatSpot is a bit of an AI copilot that Dharmesh built that has sort of been very positively received by both HubSpot customers and non-HubSpot customers alike. And so that’s something that we’re, wearing my AI hat, spending a lot of time thinking about, sort of what direction do we want to go in the ChatSpot.
But again, it was something that we put out in the universe to see what happens. And now it’s like, oh, we’re getting an interesting amount of signups every month. Who would’ve guessed that? I don’t think that… That definitely wasn’t on the roadmap a year ago. And I think being a 17-year-old SaaS company that can still operate with that sense of urgency and pace helps a lot to why wait to get consensus on a decision when we can put something out there and then see what happens and see what the data says.
Lenny: Yeah, I was just going to say that it feels like it’s such a win-win-win, including it’s just a release for people on the team that have been there for a long time just to work on something totally different and new and just launch a new product.
Chris Miller: Yeah, 100%.
Lenny: I love that. Is there anything that just significantly accelerated growth in the last, I don’t know, number of years that was like, wow, this really changed the game.
Chris Miller: Covid. Covid was obviously challenging and awful on so many levels, but it was scary. It was super scary. We were all terrified. We didn’t know what it meant for our jobs. My own sister, who also works at HubSpot now, she at the time was transitioning into hospitality and was two months into her job when she got furloughed because of Covid. So who knew what the world was going to look like and how it was going to impact businesses?
I think we were prepared for the worst, and we actually caught a bit of the Covid tailwind and a lot of other businesses did, because companies who never had to think about digital marketing all of a sudden had to, and it was urgent. It was a burning need for them to figure out how they were going to weather the storm. And I think one of the things that HubSpot did, and this is one of the sort of phrases we use internally, is never waste a good crisis.
And so, one of the things we leaned into was sort of goodwill pricing, and we lowered the price on some of our tools and created some temporary leniency around certain things. And just the removal of that friction ended up being a really interesting tailwind for the business and specifically for the business that I run, which is our starter business, our free and starter business, we really accelerated growth during that period, which was not… I think if you would’ve looked at my Bingo card in March of 2020, I don’t know that I had that on the Bingo card.
Lenny: I’m looking at the stock price in another window here and I could see what happened. That went great, and even it came down with the whole market, but it’s coming right back up. With that, we reached our very exciting lightning round. I’ve got six questions for you. Are you ready?
Chris Miller: Yeah.
Lenny: What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Chris Miller: Truthfully, I don’t read a ton of books. Got a one and a half year old. I also probably didn’t read a ton of books before, but it’s a nice excuse to have. That’s why I don’t have time to read today. But when I think of books that I think about a lot still, there’s a book called Everybody Lies, and it’s a book… I believe the guy who wrote it was a data scientist at Google. And part of the message is that everybody’s a data scientist and really trying to democratize the idea of using data in your everyday lives to make decisions and demystifying the idea of data science. But the way he kind of does this is through comparing Google search data and what we know people to be actively looking for answers for, with sort of qualitative survey data. And people lie on surveys all the time for a variety of different reasons, but no one lies to Google because it’s transactional. If I lie to Google, I’m not going to get what I want. And so it kind of really explores what it means to tell the truth and how honest we are with ourselves and with the internet. And so I really love that book.
The other book I really love is Chop Wood Carry Water, which it’s like a parable about a young boy who wants to become a samurai. But the sort of message of the book is about falling in love with the process, especially the most mundane parts of a process of becoming great at something. And that’s something I… It’s a good reminder about patience, humility, and sort of taking things one step at a time. And I often reference Chop Wood Carry Water a lot.
Lenny: Reminds me of The Score Takes Care of Itself, I think is the name of the book.
Chris Miller: Yeah, yeah, I’ve heard of it.
Lenny: Bill Walsh. Amazing. Okay. What’s a favorite recent movie or TV show?
Chris Miller: Oh, man. On Amazon Prime, I’m a Virgo, and it’s a Boots Riley show. Boots Riley directed Sorry to Bother You. It just blew my mind. It’s super surreal and funny and dark and it stars Jharrel Jerome, who I think he played one of the characters in the Netflix Central Park Five. I think he won a couple of awards for that too. And that was a show I watched recently where I had no expectations going into it other than I knew it was a Boots Riley show and was just enthralled. It touches on… It is a really cheeky way of touching on a lot of really important topics, but often hard to talk about topics and themes, and it’s kind of delightful to get through it. So, I’m a Virgo. I just binged Barry from season one through four. Henry Winkler was spectacular. And then just came off of Succession, too. The theme here is I really dark comedies. Yeah, really, really dark comedies are kind of my thing.
Lenny: And that first one was called I Am a Virgo, because I thought you were just saying you’re a Virgo.
Chris Miller: No, no. The name of the show is called I’m a Virgo. Yeah.
Lenny: Amazing. I will check that out. Okay. What’s a favorite interview question you like to ask candidates?
Chris Miller: I think it depends on what level of role that they’re interviewing for. I don’t really interview as many frontline PMs anymore, but I used to really like doing case study questions and really random ones too. I’d be like, “Tell me how many people crossed the Longfellow Bridge in a week.” And I could not care less what the actual number they arrived at was, but it’s more for me to observe what’s the array of data points that they can kind of start to collect in their mind to inform their calculus, and how close can they get to ballpark, and what’s their defense behind their thinking. And then just the process of watching people’s brains move in those moments is… You learn a lot about how they might operate as a product manager I think in those scenarios. I try not to overdo them, because I do think there’s a lot of inherent bias in some of those types of questions. And so trying to think of things that are really relatable to anybody who might be looking to work on a team that I’m leading is I think a requirement there.
But I would say the other question I really like to ask is, if the people that you most recently worked with were in a room and you weren’t there, how would they talk about you? One, it’s because sometimes I will reach out and get references, and so the extent to which that might actually be part of the interview process is very legitimate, but also I think it is usually very clear whether the person is taking an honest and introspective and self-aware approach to answering that question. And I like to see people being really self-aware, because I don’t think anybody ever comes in any situation perfect. I have a lot of rough edges to my personality that I think people have just learned to deal with over the years, but I try to be self-aware about them at the… If I can do nothing else, if I can’t change them, at least recognize them and do what I can to mitigate the blast radius.
And so I think just getting a sense of the EQ of a candidate and their self-awareness is really important for me because at the end of the day, if you’re in product, you can be the smartest person in the room, but if people don’t want to work with you, you’re probably not going to go very far.
Lenny: Do you have a favorite life motto that you come back to or you share with other people?
Chris Miller: The details matter.
Lenny: And that’s both in work and life, I imagine?
Chris Miller: Yeah, the details matter. The details matter. I read a cool interview with the product leadership team at Stripe, and one of the things they talk about is for their product managers, they want you to have taste. And it was a really kind of controversial thing to say because it was like, “Oh, that is so subjective. Who gets to decide what taste is?” Maybe that’s even biased to some extent.
And I think they had a super defensible answer about how they define taste, and taste in their opinion was to be so interested in something, it doesn’t matter what that thing is, where you can go deep enough in it to have a strong set of informed opinions. And that’s how they defined it. And they were almost ambivalent to what that thing that was, what the subject was. But having taste, having something that you were passionate about, that you have spent enough time learning and understanding and appreciating and critiquing and being frustrated with that you have a point of view that is potentially even polarizing is taste. Riding the fence is usually not taste. And so when I think about the details matter, that’s almost like a nod to taste. Obsess over the details of something, whether that be art, music, product, film, whatever. I care a lot about that.
Lenny: I love that. And that comes back to a lot of the things we’ve talked about of talking to customers, looking the data, actually having the firsthand information on what people need and what people want from your product.
Chris Miller: Yeah, absolutely.
Lenny: Okay. I’m just going to ask two more, and I’ll let you go. What is a favorite product that you’ve recently discovered that you love?
Chris Miller: I fell in love with golf right before the pandemic, but the pandemic really is when I lost my mind and was obsessed with golf. It was one of the few safe things that you could do outside that was social and less dangerous than getting a drink with your buddy at the bar. That’s the joke. It’s like men invented golf so they could go on walks with each other, and that’s essentially what kind of drove the interest in golf. And I also was horrible at it when I first started.
And so I think also as you get older and maybe you get more established in your career, or I’ve been in a product-led growth sort of lane for a while. You almost forget what it’s like to be really bad at something until you have a kid and then everything’s new and you’re failing every day.
But golf was a refreshing, consistent experience of frustration and inadequacy and just really embracing that and just waiting in it for a while knowing that it’s just going to take cycles and time to get better and better. It was something I got really addicted to, and so I tried to play golf whenever I can, and most recently I bought a Garmin watch, and that thing is just magical. You roll up to the first tee box, you look at your watch, it knows exactly where you are, which golf course. Sometimes it’ll even tell you which tees you’re at, because in golf sometimes you’re further back and sometimes you’re further ahead, and it tracks your swings, it tells you distances.
Lenny: That’s insane.
Chris Miller: It reads the greens for you.
Lenny: Wow. I just want to play golf just to use that watch.
Chris Miller: Oh my gosh, some of the guys that I golf with, a couple of them had one recently and I just was enthralled by it and I literally went home and ordered it that same day. And it’s been the coolest product or gadget that I bought in a while.
Lenny: Damn. I love it. And I was also thinking as you were talking about getting into golf connects back to your relentless curiosity and resilience that you look for in people that you hire. So clearly you have it yourself.
Final question, I believe you have a dog named Ferney, which is short for Fernet.
Chris Miller: Yes.
Lenny: Okay. So on that note, what is your favorite current cocktail, if it’s not just a shot of Fernet?
Chris Miller: The nightcap is always a shot of Fernet. Sometimes you might mix a little Coca-Cola with that. I think, where do they do that? Is that Spain?
Lenny: I have not heard of that.
Chris Miller: Or Argentina. I don’t know. It’s definitely a country that that’s a thing. My wife has been really into really high quality margaritas, made at home, and we’re big into Aperol Spritz in the summer, so I would say that that’s usually what dominates the happy hour rotation these days.
Lenny: I just had an Aperol. Is it Aperol? Aperol Spritz, right?
Chris Miller: Yeah. I’m not good at pronunciation. It’s probably one of those two.
Lenny: I just had that for the first time. It’s amazing. That’s going to be my new go-to.
Chris Miller: You had an Aperol Spritz for the first time recently?
Lenny: Yes. I didn’t know what that was.
Chris Miller: That was like the zeitgeist a couple summers ago and then there, oh man. There’s the other one too. The Negroni Sbagliatos are having a moment too. It’s like a Negroni with Prosecco. I forget.
Lenny: Ooh, that sounds amazing. There’s so much knowledge to be gained in this podcast episode. Chris, this was incredible. Thank you so much for being here. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out and maybe ask you a question or two. And two, how can listeners be useful to you?
Chris Miller: You can connect with me on LinkedIn. Shoot me a message. Christopher Miller. There’s a lot of Christopher Millers. I’m the one that looks like me, works for HubSpot. I have a Twitter. I don’t spend ton of time… X. I have an X account, but I don’t spend a lot of time on the app, formerly known as the bird app, but I’m on Instagram @millsyjoeyoung, which is a nod to one of my favorite old monster films, Mighty Joe Young. And so yeah, I’m on Instagram a bunch, too. That’s where you can find me.
Lenny: Then I know two other things that you wanted to share. One is that you advise on PLG and things like that, so maybe talk about that real briefly. And then also you’re hiring at HubSpot, or can people know about that?
Chris Miller: I definitely do a bit of angel investing and advising companies on the side, and I really enjoy it. I think there’s something really cool and awesome about getting to see fresh problems all the time and not necessarily being so laser focused on the sort of categories or verticals or target customers that you’re dealing with for 40 plus hours a week. And so it’s kind of refreshing to spend time with founders who are working on products in different categories and having different challenges at different stages of growth and being able to figure out how I can be a resource to them. And so if you’re looking for, if that sounds interesting to you, you’re a founder or head of product out there, definitely reach out and maybe opportunities for us to collaborate and maybe that can be a resource.
Lenny: Cool. And then on the hiring front, any specific roles you want people to know about that you might be hiring?
Chris Miller: There’ll definitely be more roles opening up in the fall, but I think most immediately I’ll be looking for a group product manager to work on the AI platform team that I’m leading.
Lenny: What a role.
Chris Miller: Yeah, it’s a great role with a fantastic team and a space that might be a little important these days. And so if you go to the HubSpot job site, that role should be there by the time this podcast is live. That role should definitely be up there.
Lenny: Amazing. Chris, thank you again for being here.
Chris Miller: Lenny, pleasure. Thank you for having me. This has been amazing.
Lenny: Bye, everyone.
Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| adaptability | 适应力 |
| advocate | 倡导者 |
| Aperol Spritz | Aperol Spritz(鸡尾酒名,保留原文) |
| battle tested | 身经百战 |
| Bill Walsh | Bill Walsh(人名,保留原文) |
| blast radius | 影响范围 |
| Brian Balfour | Brian Balfour(人名,保留原文) |
| case study | 案例分析 |
| ChatSpot | ChatSpot(不翻译,保留原文) |
| Chop Wood Carry Water | 《砍柴挑水》(Chop Wood Carry Water) |
| coachability | 可教练性 |
| connected experience | 互联体验 |
| Culture Code | 文化准则(Culture Code) |
| culture code | 文化准则 |
| data hygiene | 数据治理 |
| Dharmesh | Dharmesh(HubSpot 联合创始人,保留原文) |
| empathy | 共情 |
| EQ (emotional quotient) | 情商 |
| Everybody Lies | 《人人都在说谎》(Everybody Lies) |
| Fareed | Fareed(人名,保留原文) |
| freemium | 免费增值 |
| go-to-market | 上市(指产品推向市场的策略和流程) |
| goodwill pricing | 善意定价(goodwill pricing) |
| group product manager | group product manager(产品管理岗位,保留原文) |
| head of growth | 增长负责人 |
| HubSpot | HubSpot(不翻译,保留原文) |
| humility | 谦逊 |
| IC (individual contributor) | 独立贡献者 |
| Inbound | Inbound(HubSpot 年度大会,保留原文) |
| inbound marketing | 集客营销(inbound marketing) |
| install base | 客户群体 |
| Jules Walter | Jules Walter(人名,保留原文) |
| listicle | 列表文章 |
| Longfellow Bridge | Longfellow Bridge(地名,保留原文) |
| low hanging fruit | 低垂的果实 |
| microapp | 微应用(microapp) |
| Mighty Joe Young | 《Mighty Joe Young》(电影名,保留原文) |
| Negroni Sbagliato | Negroni Sbagliato(鸡尾酒名,保留原文) |
| no-brainer | 理所当然的选择 |
| operator in residence | 驻场运营者 |
| outbound marketing | 推式营销(outbound marketing) |
| PLG | PLG(产品驱动增长的缩写,保留原文) |
| PQL (product qualified lead) | 产品驱动线索(PQL) |
| pricing and packaging | 定价和打包 |
| Product-Led Growth | 产品驱动增长 |
| promoter | 推广者 |
| Prosecco | Prosecco(意大利起泡酒,保留原文) |
| qual research | 定性研究 |
| quant data | 定量数据 |
| remarkability | 卓越 |
| resilience | 韧性 |
| revenue efficiency | 收入效率 |
| sponsor | 赞助者(职场语境中指愿意为你背书推动职业发展的人) |
| taste | 品味 |
| top of the funnel | 漏斗顶部 |
| transparency | 透明 |
| UGC (user generated content) | UGC(用户生成内容) |
| waterfall | 瀑布式 |
| Website Grader | Website Grader(不翻译,保留原文) |
| white paper | 白皮书 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
不懈的好奇心、极致的责任感,以及 HubSpot 的制胜增长公式 | Chris Miller
访谈转录
Chris Miller: ……那支真正非常小的初始增长团队。我们当时确实有一种进取的心态,一种进取的方式。具体表现就是,当时 HubSpot 的订阅收入中只有很小一部分——我觉得是非常小的一个比例——可以被称为自助服务(self-service),于是我们去找负责这块的团队,问他们:“你们在搞这个吗?“他们说:“没有,我们在做一堆别的事情。“我们说:“那这个能交给我们吗?“他们说:“行啊,你们想要就拿去。“于是我们接过来,立刻把它做大做强。这种”每个问题都是我们的问题”的态度,以及彻底的责任感和主人翁意识,帮助我们发现了那些也许公司并没有明确要求我们去解决的机会,但我们能够通过多角度分析,弄清楚为什么解决它对公司可能是重要的。你这样做,就会显得我们很饥渴、很有冲劲,那就继续给我们喂资源,对吧?
Lenny: 欢迎来到 Lenny’s Podcast。在这里,我会采访世界级的产品领导者和增长专家,从他们打造和增长当今最成功产品的宝贵经验中学习。今天的嘉宾是 Chris Miller。Chris 是 HubSpot 负责增长和 AI 的产品副总裁。他最初以 ICPM 的身份加入 HubSpot,帮助创建了早期的增长团队,正如你将听到的,他推动了 HubSpot 向产品驱动增长(product-led growth)转型,使其成为历史上最成功的产品驱动增长企业之一。七年后,他同时领导着增长团队和 AI 团队,并为创始人提供关于产品驱动增长和增长战略方面的建议。
与 Chris Miller 的对话
在我们的广泛对话中,我们涵盖了成为科技行业成功产品领导者需要具备什么,最成功的 PM 需要培养哪些技能,如何找到导师,为什么早期 PM 需要擦破膝盖(摔跤历练)。此外,还有许多关于 HubSpot 在内容、销售产品、市场细分和增长飞轮方面所积累的精彩故事和洞见。我非常享受这次对话,如果不是我主动打住,我们还能再聊一个小时。所以我非常期待你收听这次对话。话不多说,为你带来 Chris Miller。
Lenny: Chris,非常感谢你的到来,欢迎来到播客。
Chris Miller: 我非常高兴能上这个播客。谢谢你 Lenny 邀请我。这一定会很有趣。
Lenny: 非常感谢 Kyle Poyer 介绍我们认识。我从很多优秀的人那里听到了关于你的很多好话,所以我非常期待这次交流。我想从你目前在 HubSpot 所担任的那个非常独特的角色聊起,这个角色感觉可能是产品领导者未来趋势的一个信号。据我所知,你的头衔是”增长和 AI 产品副总裁”(VP of Product of Growth and AI)。你能谈谈这个角色是什么,以及增长和 AI 在 HubSpot 的语境下是如何关联的吗?
增长与 AI 的交汇
Chris Miller: 我已经在 HubSpot 领导 PLG 好几年了,最近又接手了 AI 的领导角色。这是一个很特别的位置,因为我既要帮助引导 HubSpot 思考如何构建基础技术来创造 AI 驱动的体验,又要主导战略,思考如何利用这些体验来帮助那位 B2B 业务构建者在使用我们的平台时,比过去几年获得大得多的成功。所以,这是这两者之间一个非常酷的交汇点。我们可以在那里做很多事情。
Lenny: 我从你刚才分享的内容中得到的一个印象是,你被赋予了这两支团队来领导,它们之间未必有必然的联系,但我觉得这恰恰说明你在 HubSpot 做得非常出色。我想试着穿透你的谦逊,我很好奇,你觉得自己做对了什么、取得了什么成功,才让 HubSpot 的领导者们决定把这支同样重要的团队交给你——尤其是在这个 AI 时代,这似乎是一项极其重要的举措?
加入 HubSpot 的时机与早期经历
Chris Miller: 2016 年我加入 HubSpot 的时候,时机确实对我非常有利。那大概是 HubSpot 推出免费 CRM 之后一年左右,那是他们——也是我们,抱歉,那个时候——的一个重大战略举措,目的是要颠覆市场。但我觉得当时对于之后会发生什么,并没有一个完全成形的想法。我们到底要如何从我们扔到互联网上的这个庞大的免费软件中获得杠杆效应和企业价值?而且我认为当时 HubSpot 产品经理的背景也有些不同。有一些人可能是从客服岗位开始他们在 HubSpot 的职业生涯的,所以对产品和客户都非常熟悉。这些人处理过上千个客服工单,而我的背景则有些不同。
我骨子里与其说是功能型产品经理,不如说是增长型产品经理,所以我看待这件事的视角完全不同。我当时理解我们真正想做的其实是产品驱动增长(Product-Led Growth),只是当时大家还没有一个统一的语言来称呼它。所以回到你的问题,我觉得我就是愿意承担一些风险,真正去推动那些我认为合理的方向——尽管以我当时的职级,我并不是天然就有一个席位,而是硬挤进了那些对话,然后最终才被正式邀请参与其中。我始终对推动比我所带团队当前关注点再高一两个层次的战略抱有兴趣,同时也一直好奇公司其他部门是如何运转的。
我以前经常花很多时间坐在销售区域,去别的办公楼和其他同事聊天,了解他们在业务不同部分的工作。这也是我怀念线下办公那种偶然性的原因之一——你可能只是在水冷机旁和人闲聊,就发现了什么:“哦,这是个有趣的问题,我觉得我的团队可以帮忙。“你自然而然地吸收了大量关于公司各个部分如何关联的背景信息,视野也会逐渐打开,看到面前更大的机会,而这些机会在你埋头执行的时候可能就会错过。所以如果要我猜别人在背后会怎么评价我,也许他们会提到这一点,不过也很难说。
Lenny: 在如今这种远程加混合办公的时代,很难再有这样的偶遇闲聊了吧?
Chris Miller: 是啊,现在所有事情都被排得满满当当,你从一个 Zoom 会议赶场到下一个 Zoom 会议。当然,HubSpot 拥抱了混合办公模式,这带来了很多好处。实际上,我回来上班的时候刚当上爸爸,我儿子还没上托儿所,能趁会议间隙出去陪他玩几分钟再回来工作,这种体验真的太好了——整天待在办公室里是做不到这点的。所以混合办公确实有很多优势,但在那种偶然性的知识分享、潜移默化的学习、以及更自然地传递信息这些方面,你确实需要更有创意一些。毕竟当大家共享同一个物理空间时,这些事情会自发地发生。
Lenny: 你提到你早期的一个成功因素是敢于冒险、出现在也许你不该出现的会议里。有没有一个具体的例子或故事,是你在 HubSpot 做产品经理的早期冒了个险,或者出人意料地取得了很好的结果?
Chris Miller: 这是一个很有趣的故事。如果 HubSpot 的同事在听这个,我事后为此道歉——
Lenny: 我很期待这个故事。
Chris Miller: 有一次我们围绕定价和打包(pricing and packaging)有很多争论。这个我们后面会深入聊,但我们的市场进入模式以及在可寻址市场中的定位确实带来了一些复杂性——因为我们是在用一个互联互通的统一平台同时服务市场的不同层级。所以如何考虑打包和市场进入策略?我们当时就是想方设法地简化、简化、再简化。那时我还是一个独立贡献者(IC)产品经理,一个独立贡献的产品经理,我凭什么对定价和打包有观点呢?但和我搭档的设计师 Mariah Moscato——她现在也在产品团队,非常优秀——我们是一个三人小组的成员,在定价打包应该怎么做这件事上,我们有相似的想法。
当时我们在都柏林,那是我们的欧洲总部所在地。吉尼斯啤酒仓库那边正在举办一场派对,我不确定我们是否在嘉宾名单上,但我们想办法混了进去,碰到了当时的 COO。他突然问我们对定价和打包怎么看,这恰好是一个”你算是问对人了”的时刻。于是,在啤酒杯被递来递去之间,我们向他阐述了一个关于定价和打包的全新思路的愿景,他非常感兴趣,说:“下次高管会议你们来给我们讲讲怎么样?”
那个会议大概就是两三周后的事情。我们面面相觑,心想”完了”,没想到会得到这样的回应——我以为人们在那个时刻更欢迎的可能不是一个相左的观点。就这样,我们被邀请进了一个平时很难接触到的领导层会议,去推销一个有些逆流而上的方案。最终我们没有完全沿着那个方向全速推进,但我认为我们当时提出的很多元素,随着时间的推移已经融入了 HubSpot 的定价和打包策略中。不过可以肯定的是,这次经历为我们打开了门——至少对我来说,我后来被欢迎回到那个房间,能够在重要决策中贡献想法。
产品经理的核心特质
Lenny: 我太喜欢这个故事了。这又是一个偶遇的例子,只是碰到了对的人。同时我觉得这也很好地说明了产品经理主动出击、提前思考有多么重要——不能只等着别人来找你征求建议、等着被邀请进会议室。我觉得产品领导角色中成功的很大一部分,就是提出好的想法,走在别人前面,随时能给出答案。你之所以能在关键时刻拿出答案,是因为你提前做了功课。这一点你也有同感吗?这是否也是你发现的一个关键因素?
Chris Miller: 是的。我在招聘产品经理时非常看重的一个特质,也是回顾这些年我从合作过的同事身上学到很多的原因之一——他们有一个共同的行为特征,就是”不懈的好奇心”。这是一种对理解事物的强烈渴望,不怕承认自己不懂什么,并且在弄懂之前绝不妥协。我觉得如果你能把这种特质带到工作中,无论你身处什么团队、参与什么使命,都更容易产生超乎寻常的影响力。
Lenny: 在你看重的那份特质清单里,还有没有其他你认为非常重要、但别人可能不太关注的特质?
Chris Miller: 有的。不懈的好奇心大概排第一。排第二的大概是韧性(resilience),尤其是如果你做的是增长方向的话。我觉得如果用正确的方式做增长——用正确的方式做产品驱动增长——你需要在对假设和假说进行科学验证、保持严谨的同时,又要有远大的抱负,真正推动那些最终能为客户带来巨大影响的事情。而当你这样做的时候,你失败的次数会远多于成功的次数。如果你没有韧性,这会非常令人沮丧。我记得有位做增长的人多年前提出过一个数据:平均来说,增长团队运行的实验中只有 20% 到 30% 可能成功。这意味着 70% 到 80% 的时间里,你并没有在数字上交出成绩——当然,你希望从中提取可复用的经验教训,应用到未来。
韧性与可教练性
Chris Miller: 但我觉得如果你没有韧性,我看到的结果往往是你会急于抓住一次”赢”,而这有时候看起来就像是在下一些太小、太无关紧要的注。如果你做产品驱动增长的主要模式是基于实验驱动的产品开发,而你的成功率超过 30%、40%,那说明你的思考格局太小了。所以,韧性在我心中确实非常重要。另外一个我认为重要的是可教练性(coachability),原因在于我认为增长产品管理这个子领域,相比做平台功能的产品经理来说,仍然处于起步阶段。所以即使我在面试候选人的时候,也不一定会要求对方有十年做 PLG 的经验。我觉得这基本上是个不太合理的要求,但这件事确实是可以教出来的;而且即便你确实有一些做 PLG 工作的经验,很重要的一点是要认识到,这份工作在不同公司之间的具体形态可能会有很大差异。
所以,能够接受指导,并且能够适应你所处的业务或问题空间的具体语境,这是我在产品经理身上看重的一个重要特质。然后,创造力也非常重要。看重用简单的方案解决真正困难的问题——我觉得如果你的动力来源是构建下一个超级复杂的组件,增长方向可能不适合你。这些年来我合作过的、或者有幸向其学习的最优秀的增长产品领导者和增长思维者,我注意到他们的一个共同点是:他们对解决方案本身几乎是无所谓的,对方案的复杂度也毫不在意。他们不会因为解决方案的复杂而感到任何快乐或自豪,只要它能交付企业和客户需要的成果就行。我觉得这是一个非常棒的特质,我把它归到创造力这一类。
偶然入行产品管理
Lenny: 你提到了”不懈的好奇心”这个说法,这让我想起我读到过的一个关于你的故事——你进入产品管理的方式是,当时你在某个创业公司,创始人说了一句”我看了文章说,解决我们所有问题的办法就是招一个产品经理”,然后你听到之后就搜了一下”什么是产品管理”,然后问他们”我能做这个吗?“就这样你进入了这个角色。首先,这是真的吗?其次,对于那些想进入产品管理的人,你有什么建议?这段经历有什么经验教训?
Chris Miller: 首先,是的,这百分之百是真的。我就是这样歪打正着进入产品管理的。所以我非常感谢当时愿意在我身上赌一把的那些人。但那是一个产品管理作为一项职能在整个科技行业还远未普及的时代。至少在我所处的环境中,构建产品还是以传统的瀑布式方法为主,中间有大量的层级、工程经理,但真正没有人负责从客户视角出发去定义和_OWNER那个问题。当时市面上没有太多相关内容,我所在的城市里甚至也没有多少我能去交流学习的人,所以我最初几年基本就是在不断碰壁中度过的,大量痛苦的试错。
后来,围绕这门手艺和职能逐渐有了更多的热情和关注,所以如今一个人要学习产品管理的基础知识,比当年容易得多,不需要再非得通过战火洗礼的方式。我对那些想进入产品管理的人的建议是,关注几个方面。第一,关注结构。我觉得进入小公司做产品管理的门槛通常更低,但这些公司可能没有机会接触到最顶尖的人才,而我认为你在这种情况下经常要放弃的是你自己职业发展的结构化、正式的培训和成长,甚至可能失去为那些真正身经百战、已经看过好几遍这部电影、能够真正分享智慧的人工作的机会,因为说实话,产品管理在每个公司看起来都不一样,它就是这样的一个职能。
我确实认为,用纯学术的方式去提升技能,收益是递减的,因为在教室里你很难应对各种出其不意的变数。所以,选择在哪里入行,几乎和决定要入行本身一样重要。想想你要向谁汇报,想想那家公司在培养人进入产品管理方面的成功记录,试着提前想五年再往回倒推——我觉得这些都是在过程中很重要的思维练习。另外我还想说,如果你已经在一家公司但做的是其他职能,而你对产品管理有兴趣,那就去跟产品经理聊聊。说真的,我建议你主动找一个产品经理,问你能怎么帮他们减轻负担。
想想你业余时间能帮他们分担些什么,做一些义务劳动,哪怕只是在旁边跟着看看也好。因为我觉得获取那种上下文、理解一个团队如何构思创意、定义问题、排列优先级、发布软件的节奏,这些才是最重要的经验。因为产品管理很大一部分也是在管理人之间的关系,搞清楚别人想怎么和你合作,以及你怎么为他们的工作服务。所以,获得那种亲身体验,或者至少能直接观察到团队的日常工作,真的非常重要。因为你对他们的痛点理解得越深,对那些让他们夜不能寐的事情理解得越透彻,你就越能创造价值。而且至少,你最终能得到的是 hopefully 一个愿意支持你的人或赞助者,他愿意在自己的人脉和政治资本上为你押注,帮你跨进这扇门,哪怕你简历上没有任何正式的相关经验。
“端甜甜圈”与”磨破膝盖”
Lenny: 你说的这些有太多让我深有共鸣的地方。第一点是,我一直认为产品经理最基本的工作就是让团队里的人觉得你有用,帮助他们做出更好的成果。如果你能做到这一点,人们就——
Chris Miller: 端甜甜圈嘛,对吧?
Lenny: 端甜甜圈,没错。
Chris Miller: 我一定是老了,不知道现在还有没有人说”端甜甜圈”了。
Lenny: 不,我们请 Ken 来做播客的时候聊过这个。我们还问过,现在大家都远程工作了,那个的数字化版本是什么?
Chris Miller: 我觉得这是即使你是一个全新的产品经理也会很快遇到的事情。
Lenny: 然后你刚才说的另一点,我非常喜欢”磨破膝盖”这个比喻,因为我觉得这对接成为一名产品经理来说太重要了。你可能觉得自己读几本书、上几门课就搞定了,不会犯错,但我觉得犯错对于学会做这份工作来说太重要了。因为就像你说的,这里面有人际关系、有各种人、有不断变化的计划和高层的调整,就是——你不可能每次都做对,而你只有通过犯错才能学会如何应对所有这些事情。
所以我非常同意这一点。而且即便你说现在学做产品经理比以前容易了,我觉得磨破几次膝盖对于你真正学会做这份工作来说仍然很重要。顺着这个思路,你觉得在你最初的几年里,什么东西对你学习产品管理这门手艺帮助最大?你回想起来会说什么”那真的很有帮助”,除了直接去做、去犯错、偶尔做对之外?
第一份产品经理工作:B2B2C 的挑战
Chris Miller: 我的第一份产品经理工作是在一个 B2B2C 产品上,这带来了很多独特的挑战。我们的客户并不是产品的最终用户。我们把产品卖给机构,机构再将其白标化后转售给最终客户。所以归根结底,与最终用户的关系掌握在客户手中,而不是我们手中。
这造成的问题是,我们与最终用户的声音之间存在很大的距离。我们最终构建了很多东西来满足买方和客户,但不一定是最终用户。这很棘手,因为你不一定知道自己在做的究竟是为了签下一份合同,还是为了真正打动最终使用它的人,为他们创造神奇的价值。所以,如果完全坦诚地说,那几年我可能交付了很多糟糕的产品。我不觉得回顾那时候我们交付的东西,能说它们是最好的解决方案或最好的产品。
直到我得到第二份产品经理工作,才真正迎来了一个拐点,我当时的感觉就是:“哦,明白了。这才是产品管理该有的样子和感觉。”
Lenny: 那是在哪里?是在 Keeper 吗?
在健身科技公司遇见 Fareed Mosavat
Chris Miller: 那是在一家健身科技公司。真正改变了我对产品管理的整个认知框架的人,是一个你我也都认识的人——Fareed Mosavat,我记得他去年十月上过你的播客——
Lenny: 哦,当然。
Chris Miller: 如果 Fareed 你在听的话,向你问好。Fareed 是我的好朋友和导师,他真的帮我上了一个台阶。那段经历有趣的地方在于,这是我第一次真正参与一个免费增值模式的 B2C 跑步追踪应用产品。所以,我们花大量时间直接与用户交谈,运用了很多游击式用户研究方法。有时候真的就是走到外面,跟路过的跑步者聊天,了解他们在寻找动力方面遇到了什么挑战,以及他们一开始为什么选择跑步辅助工具和跑步应用。所以,与客户之间那种深度的连接,不再觉得自己被隔在一臂之外——这让我大开眼界。我当时就觉得:“哦,我不知道原来可以是这样的。“
数据驱动决策的力量
另外,我们当时还有第二个改变局面的资源——一个庞大的用户数据集。拥有规模化数据来驱动决策,能够知道如果我们做了一个改动,可以从商业影响、客户满意度或用户参与度的角度证明因果关系。这几乎就像我一直不知道自己是盲的……或者说你不知道自己之前看到的不是彩色。就像《绿野仙踪》里他们降落在奥兹国的那一刻,突然之间,所有东西都变成了彩色画面。你会惊叹:“天哪,我终于可以对我交付的东西做出有据可依的决策了。”
围绕这一点建立起严谨性,真正被要求在动手构建之前先阐述清楚假设并对预期结果形成明确观点——这些我认为都是从 Fareed 和那些年与我密切共事的那群人身上学到的行为习惯和产品理念。我认为那是我真正成为一名产品经理的时刻。
为什么你需要去跟客户交谈
Lenny: 这里面有两点我想强调,同样非常引起我的共鸣。第一就是,每次我跟客户交谈时,我都会想:“我为什么不经常做这件事?“因为每次都会让我惊叹:“哇,我完全不知道那个问题有这么严重。我为什么不一直这样做?“然后你又不做了。过几个月你再去聊,又会感叹:“天哪,我又学到了好多。“所以,如果你正在听并且觉得……也许今天就去找个客户聊聊吧。
Chris Miller: 去跟客户聊,而且我们还从那些我们希望成为客户但目前还不是的人身上学到了很多东西,对吧?还有那些要么已经放弃我们产品的人,要么评估过但一开始就没有爱上我们产品的人。我觉得每个产品经理都在时间管理上挣扎,感觉一天需要六十个小时才能完成每周的待办清单——抱歉,是一周六十个小时。但是一定要挤出时间去跟人聊。即使到现在,我有很多朋友是创业者或小企业主,有些用 HubSpot,有些不用。但我通常特别享受跟那些决定不用 HubSpot 的人的对话,真正去拆解决定背后的驱动因素。
这些决定是不是像我们有时候可能假设的那样理性计算过的?然后你往往会发现,这些决定有时候是感性的,非常凭直觉和本能,可能跟品牌的关联甚至比跟产品本身的关联更大。我觉得当你在那个 proverbial 的数字会议室里和团队一起试图理解用户的行为逻辑时,你会发现:“其实我们就是……”归根结底,我们本质上就是不理性的人类,而这一切都体现在人们日常所做的决策中。当他们与你的产品互动时,这一点并不会改变。尽管我们都希望这是完美的科学,好让我们能像用数据打棒球一样(moneyball)来优化系统。
用户研究中的意外发现
Lenny: 这让我想起一个故事。当时我们在 Airbnb 做一个预订功能的用户研究,去了巴黎做这些非常深入的用户研究。我们坐在单向镜后面,整套流程都做了。我们试图弄清楚为什么房东不愿意把 Facebook 关联到他们的账户。这大概是五六年前的事了。因为关联之后他们可以获得朋友们去哪里旅行、评论等所有这些信息。尤其在法国,他们直接就说:“我不信任 Facebook。“而那时候这在美国还没有成为一个大话题。他们就是:“我不信任……我不想让 Facebook 拿到我任何数据。""但你看你能获得这么多强大的功能啊。“他们会说:“不,我不在乎。我不信任它。”
Chris Miller: 是的,这就是为什么跟客户交谈如此重要……你就算拥有世界上所有的使用数据,那也只能告诉你产品里实际发生了什么,但不会告诉你为什么。它永远无法解释通过事件追踪到的某个行为背后的”为什么”。所以,与客户之间的那种亲近感,以及将那种不懈的好奇心投向定性层面的东西,是如此、如此重要,因为你会发现一些完全不直观的事情,或者一些盲点——因为我们往往不是自己为之构建产品的那群人。
Lenny: 完全同意。我想把话题转向谈谈 HubSpot 作为一家企业,但在此之前,你还分享了一个非常好的洞见,我想最后再强调一下——你说你职业生涯中最大的转折点是一位管理者,在这里就是 Fareed,他帮助你学习专业技能、提升能力。我自己的经历完全一样,就是一位特定的管理者改变了一切。这似乎是很多人身上反复出现的主题——只需要有一个人,真正花时间帮助你学习,在你犯错的时候纠正你,诸如此类。所以,如果有人觉得自己为什么学得不够,或者职业发展为什么停滞不前?看看能不能找到一个……说起来容易做起来难,但很多时候,只需要一个人就能改变一切。
Chris Miller: 这其实涉及到一个关于管理者与导师、以及赞助者和倡导者之间区别的讨论。导师当然很好,别误会。我也有很多我愿意称之为导师的人。但当我回想起生命中那些人——他们捐赠给我的时间,他们主动为我付出的时间——仅仅称他们为”导师”,我觉得大大低估了他们的价值。我更愿意把这些人称为赞助者和倡导者,那些愿意为你投入资本的人——不管是职业资本还是社会资本,愿意在你身上下注。
说实话,我第一次跟 Fareed 面试的时候,回想起来,我觉得我搞砸了。我其实不觉得当时的我会雇用我自己。我还记得我对一些问题给出的答案,我觉得还行,但绝对算不上出色。我猜想,决策者 Fareed 在其中看到了某些东西,然后说:“我觉得我能把这个人培养出来。“我认为愿意投资于某个人,以及找到愿意投资于你的人,这才是真正重要的。找到那些愿意为你付出的人——不管是什么样的资本。当我思考什么是职业生涯中真正的”火上浇油”时,找到导师是一方面,但同样重要的是找到赞助者和倡导者。
Lenny: 你觉得你做对了什么来帮助自己找到导师、赞助者和倡导者?很多人可能在想:“我也需要这些,我怎样才能帮助自己做到同样的事?“你有没有做什么让别人有热情来帮助你?
Chris Miller: 这也是我一直在努力做的事情。简单来说,就是把自我放到一边,坦然接受自己有不懂的东西,坦然接受自己有做不好的事情,不要为此感到难为情,让”想在某件事上做到最好,或者至少做到出色”的渴望压过”害怕在某件事上表现不够好”的恐惧。我从小打体育运动,所以我喜欢被教练指导。我能接受严厉的反馈,而且我喜欢,因为如果我得到的反馈比我竞争对手得到的更好,我觉得只要我足够努力,假以时日我就能赢过他们。
所以,把这种心态带进产品管理中,我觉得帮助我与那些对我没有任何义务的人建立了联系——那些完全不需要在我身上投资的人,但他们可能从中获得了某种乐趣。我不完全清楚这背后的机制和人们大脑中的计算方式,但至少在我能控制的范围内,我能做的就是在这些关系中如何展现自己,真正去拥抱那些最严厉、最难听的反馈,希望从中提取出一些东西,让自己最终变得更好。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个建议。这让我想起 Jules Walter 的建议,我在这个播客上已经引用过很多次了。他的建议是,当别人给你反馈的时候,你就说”非常感谢你的反馈”,哪怕你内心已经崩溃了,而且完全不认同他们说的。
Chris Miller: 是的,向 Jules 致敬。Jules 也是过去在我需要帮助时慷慨给予我时间的人。你做的那期与 Jules 的节目也非常棒。
Lenny: 很多人都对你刚才说的关于 Jules 的话深有同感,说他对自己帮助有多大。显然,这个人真的很了不起,也许我们应该把他再请回来。
Chris Miller: 非常乐意。
HubSpot 的成功秘诀
Lenny: 好,第二季 Jules。那我们转向 HubSpot 作为一家企业的话题吧。这是一个相当了不起的成功故事。根据我的笔记,HubSpot 目前市值大约 300 亿美元,已经存在 17 年了,年同比增长大概还在 30% 左右。更有意思的是,Okta 最近发布了一份非常有趣的报告,他们查看了人们用什么工具进行身份认证的数据,结果显示 HubSpot 基本上是全球增长第五快的软件产品。我不知道这是否完全准确,但感觉是对的,因为榜单上其他公司都很合理。所以你不需要确认或否认这一点,但显然 HubSpot 的发展非常好。我很好奇,HubSpot 如此特别、独特、成功的因素是什么?有哪些是 HubSpot 独有而其他公司不具备的?
Chris Miller: 这里面包含了很多内容。我可以谈谈我在 HubSpot 工作期间感受最深的几个方面。第一是真正的客户至上。这不是营销话术,是真的。我亲眼见证过内部激烈而充满激情的辩论,辩论双方真正试图厘清的核心问题就是——什么对客户来说是最好的。这种客户至上真正成为我们信条的核心,成为我们思考业务方式的基础,成为公司存在的原因——真正做到知行合一,我不确定所有地方都能做到这一点。
我当然也曾在那些并非如此的公司工作过,有很多因素可能导致那些权衡决策变得很困难——比如对业务有利的事情和对客户有利的事情之间如何抉择。我觉得把这种以客户为中心真正融入公司 DNA 中,或许不能让这些决策变得更简单,但至少你在做决策时能对背后的”为什么”有更强的信念。还有一个我认为让 HubSpot——
Lenny: 在你继续说下一个之前,我想在这个点上多停留一下。因为我觉得人们听到这个会说:“好的,我们要客户至上。“然后你不得不做那些艰难的决策。比如看这个实验,它能让我们的收入增长 1%,但并不能真正让客户的生活变得更轻松。你怎样让这个理念真正落地?也许可以举一个你需要在增长和确保客户得到他们需要的东西之间做权衡的例子,让它更具体一些。
Chris Miller: 首先,我觉得你提的这点非常好。我的观点是,这往往取决于公司用什么时间跨度作为评估决策的基准。通常来说,当你做出那些可以被称为对客户不友好、但对企业净收益为正的决策时,你大概率没有想得足够长远。因为除非你完全垄断了一个市场且没有任何竞争,否则你不可能持续对客户不友好还能实现增长。在某个时刻,这一切都会追上你。
短期生存与长期路径的权衡
Chris Miller: 所以很多时候,我觉得真正的张力在于:我们短期内需要做什么才能生存?而长期来看,我们的方向是什么?我们实际规划的路径是什么?这才是真正的矛盾所在。但如果你做出的决策可能产生持久的负面影响、且对客户不友好,我认为这是一条非常危险的道路。因此,具备那种纪律性,或者说勇气、胆量——不管你怎么称呼——不去只关注明天或后天,而是真正思考两三年、四年后的未来——我们想要驱动什么样的结果?在这期间我们需要做出哪些决策才能通向那个结果?如果你坚持这样的框架,或者用第一性原理来描述可能更准确,那么你往往会得出这样的结论:归根结底,做对客户正确的事情,就是正确的决策。
将客户至上系统化
Lenny: 在你的工作方式中,有没有什么机制能帮助你将这种理念系统化——比如在实验计划、产品规格文档或实验结果中?或者有没有一个你上线的功能的故事,能更具体地向听众展示这种对客户的执着?
Chris Miller: 确实可以在客户中心性方面建立一些结构化机制。我觉得在 HubSpot 的增长团队和我带领的团队中,很大程度上是围绕”强制语言的精确性”来做的。比如,你看很多标准的功能文档或实验文档,第一件事通常是描述问题。我甚至觉得我们不会不带限定词地讨论问题——你说的是业务问题?客户问题?还是效率问题?要把问题的本质描述清楚,并加以区分。因为一般来说,如果存在一个业务问题,你可以做一个思维练习:问问自己,“为什么这个问题没有自行解决?背后的客户问题是什么,才导致了下游业务上出现的负面结果?”
如果我们能在概念上把这两者区分开来,就可以避免犯这样的错误——用一种最终对客户不利的方式去解决业务问题。同时,我认为还要建立一个机制,让 PM 能够方便地指出他们可能做出的假设。比如,如果我们这样做,你预测会出现哪些衍生后果?如果我们能把这些假设标注出来,然后不断追问”为什么、为什么、为什么”,来论证你想走的方向,然后再不断追问”影响什么、影响什么、影响什么”,搞清楚这些决策真正的波及范围和连锁反应——这就是我们在 HubSpot 采用的方法,至少在我的团队中是这样做的。
HubSpot 特殊之处:坚守中小企业市场
Lenny: 太好了。好的,我之前打断你了,你那一点还没说完。我们继续。
Chris Miller: 对,我们刚才在聊让 HubSpot 独具特色的东西。客户至上肯定是其中之一。我觉得我们的市场定位也是。作为一家公司,我们一直很安心地留在中小企业和中端市场,抵住了向企业级软件攀升的诱惑,我觉得这让我们与众不同。其中一个非常直观的原因是,很多企业级软件公司的大量收入集中在少数几个客户身上。而一旦这些客户想让你开发某个功能,并以撤走业务相要挟,你最终就会去开发它。但这一定是最有利于所有客户的事情吗?大概不是。你是否最终不得不为单个客户开发和维护定制化软件?很可能是的。
别误会,我知道很多产品人很享受这种工作模式,但我不是其中之一。而留在中端市场,意味着我们的收入更均匀地分布在整个客户群体中,这意味着没有任何一个客户能真正”绑架”我们。但这背后也意味着更大的责任——它形成了一种倒逼机制,确保我们做出的决策能对尽可能广泛的客户产生净正面的影响。我认为这正是我们在互联体验、可用性和用户体验方面一些决策背后的指路明灯。所以,在中端市场深耕,让我们能够做到这些。这也是我觉得在我们这个体量的公司中,让我们与众不同的另一点。
文化准则
文化是另一个方面。我不会深入讲文化准则(Culture Code)。我觉得很多人可能已经读过了。如果没有,建议去看看。
Lenny: 我不确定大家是否都听说过这个,那是什么?
Chris Miller: 我们的联合创始人 Dharmesh,我们那些充满魄力的领导者之一——Dharmesh 早期做的一件非常著名的事,就是对外公开发布了 HubSpot 的文化准则。你在 Google 上搜一下就能找到。我觉得后来很多公司都效仿了这个做法。但通过在内部和外部都保持对文化的开放和透明,首先,它在内部建立了一致性,给了每个人一个共同的参照——为什么我们选择以这样的方式协作共事。同时它也有助于吸引合适类型的候选人,因为我们把它公之于众,对文化非常坦诚。如果你不喜欢这种文化,你大概率也不会特别想来这里工作。但如果这正是你渴望的——我觉得很多优秀人才都渴望文化准则中所凝练的那些东西——谦逊、共情、适应力、卓越、透明——这些都是大家非常认真对待的品质。
所以,对这些保持开放和诚实,并且愿意定期去检验它——这还是我们想成为的那种公司吗?我们增长非常快,什么发生了变化?现有的文化准则还能支撑哪些条件?我们可能需要做哪些修正,来定义我们想向客户呈现什么样的自己,以及我们想如何彼此协作?在这些方面持续投入,雇用优秀的人才来帮助我们规模化地推行文化——我觉得这是让 HubSpot 真正与众不同的地方。
Lenny: 太棒了。我正在旁边读这份文化准则,里面有一些小引语真的很打动人。我特别喜欢这一句:“为客户解决问题,不仅是让他们满意,更是让他们成功。”
Chris Miller: 是的。
Lenny: 说得很对。
HubSpot 文化中的趣事
Lenny: HubSpot 文化中有没有什么特别有趣的东西,比如你们会做的一些古怪仪式?
Chris Miller: 有很多。但我认为确实存在一种非常合理的观点:文化既能促进包容性,也可能成为包容性的阻碍。我觉得很多我会联想到的 HubSpot 文化,其实都深深植根于 HubSpot 的某个特定时期——大概是在疫情之前,大家都在同一个物理空间里工作的那段时期。所以有很多内部笑话,有些事情甚至根植于某些已经不在公司的特定个人的古怪习惯。所以如果你是过去两三年才加入公司的,这些东西可能完全get不到。我觉得我们得问自己:“继续坚持这些东西有什么价值?“所以这些年来我们一直在做的,就是盘点那些被认为是 HubSpot 遗留文化的东西,然后真正地去压力测试它们——它在今天是否还在为我们服务?如果不在了,我们应该很坦然地放手。
有一件我觉得特别酷的事情,是我们有一个叫 PEER Week 的活动,这是疫情期间冒出来的。简单来说,它是一个面向产品和工程部门的活动。疫情之后差旅发生了变化,大家很少能线下见面了,但在六月夏天有那么几周时间,我们会把所有人飞过来——如果你在北美,就飞到 Cambridge;如果你在欧洲某处,就飞到 Dublin,然后大家一起待一周。重点不在于传统的生产力输出,而在于建立连接、安全感,去真正了解彼此作为人的那一面。同时,该死,我都忘了自己有多想念白板了——能和一群人待在一个房间里,面对一块真正的实体白板一起做事情,那种感觉太好了。这应该是我记得第二年还是第三年做了,疫情那些年真的把脑子搞糊涂了。但这是每年我最期待的事情之一——把所有人聚到同一个城市,就是一起待着。
Lenny: 太喜欢了。我一直在看这些亮点内容,真的很有意思。我们会在节目笔记里附上这份文化准则的链接,感兴趣的话可以去看看。好了,接下来让我们聚焦 HubSpot 是如何增长的。在我看来有两个部分:它是怎么起步的,以及什么做得特别好。你实际上是 HubSpot 增长团队的创始成员,对吧,而且一切进展顺利。干得漂亮。我很好奇,在 HubSpot 早期历史中,你觉得你们做对了什么,帮助它成长为今天的巨头?早期成功的关键要素是什么?
HubSpot 增长团队的早期打法
Chris Miller: 我觉得早期做免费增值(freemium)那些年是关键。先说明一下,在我加入之前确实已经有一版增长团队了,真正给 HubSpot 注入第一波 PLG DNA 的人其实是 Brian Balfour。向他致敬,我要确保他得到应得的认可。
Lenny: 对,我们之后会邀请他来播客,已经在安排了。
Chris Miller: 是的,他是个传奇。Brian 非常棒。
Lenny: 绝对的传奇。
Chris Miller: Brian 离开 HubSpot 之后,增长方面有点时断时续。所以当我加入、我们重新尝试的时候,我觉得有几件事我们做对了。首先,一开始我们有一种非常进取的心态和打法。这里的”我们”指的是团队——那个真正很小的初创增长团队。我们尽量不去纠结时间应该花在哪里,基本上把使命和章程都抛到了脑后。我们说,好吧,虽然纸面上我们是销售工具激活团队,但与当时 HubSpot 其他团队的使命和职责范围相比,这是一个非常小的使命和权限范围。
但即使纸面上我们应该做的是那件事,我们的态度是:如果我们发现一个看起来像机会的东西,而且公司里没有其他人在考虑它,我们就直接去解决它。我们宁可先做了再请求原谅,而不是先请求许可,然后开始主动做一些决策。
具体表现是这样的:当时 HubSpot 的订阅收入中,只有很小一部分可以被称为自助服务——也就是人们自己输入信用卡购买东西。绝大部分是产品驱动线索(PQL)。所以我们实际上把所有东西都发给销售团队,这确实在创造收入,但效率方面肯定有提升空间,因为这是我们第一次有了一个价格点可以做交易型销售、而不是高决策成本购买的产品。我们开始思考这个问题:“这到底怎么运作的?产品里甚至有没有一个定价页面让人们可以真正购买东西?“我们找到了,但它已经被忽视了——我觉得没有人再往那个代码库提交代码了。
所以我们去找了拥有这个页面的团队,问:“你们在搞这个吗?这是在积极开发中吗?“他们说:“没有,我们在忙一堆别的事情。“我们就问:“那能不能把这个给我们?“他们说:“行啊,你们想要就拿走,我们还少一个代码库要维护。“于是我们接手过来,然后立刻把它大改了一番。我们重新设计了整个页面,聚焦于可发现性——人们是怎么到达这个页面的;聚焦于吸引力——我们如何描述我们想卖给客户的那些产品的价值主张,帮助它们更好地增长;然后再考虑可操作性或者说可用性——如何消除阻碍用户完成购买的那些摩擦。
疯狂冲刺与突破时刻
Chris Miller: 于是我们朝着想要达成的目标疯狂冲刺,发布之后果然奏效了。它对业务的物理规律和漏斗的实际表现产生了阶梯式的变化。我认为那可能是一个催化剂时刻,所有人都在说:“哇,这事儿可能真的有戏。“所以那种把每一个问题都当作自己的问题的态度,以及愿意真正秉持一种彻底问责和主人翁意识的心态,帮助我们找到了一些业务并没有明确要求我们去解决、但我们能推断出解决它们对业务来说为何重要的机会。
Chris Miller: 当你这样做的时候,我觉得公司——一个组织——会变得更愿意把更多的事情交给你来做,对吧?就像我们看起来很饿,那就继续喂我们。于是随着时间的推移,我们的职责范围不断扩大,我们又发现了其他一些机会——可以为企业获取杠杆的机会,或者以更高效的方式为客户带来愉悦体验的机会,坦率地说,也是以他们当时可能已经期待的方式与我们互动的机会。毕竟,客户旅程的每个阶段都牵涉这么多人力,这确实相当奇怪。我们的一些客户就说:“我只是想自己试试这个东西,想买就买。我真的不想被迫进入一个销售流程。“所以在很多方面,这其实是在满足现代软件购买者的期望。
HubSpot 向产品驱动增长的转变
Lenny: 听起来这非常重要。基本上,你的团队把 HubSpot 变成了一家非常产品驱动增长的企业,这在 HubSpot 增长的历史上感觉非常关键。之前那种模式——自助服务的雏形,但仍然需要和销售人员交谈——你会把它称作产品驱动的吗?
Chris Miller: 会的。
Lenny: 好的。
Chris Miller: 会的。
Lenny: 那你会怎么描述这个转变——销售方式和增长方式发生了什么变化?
Chris Miller: 我们当时在做的上市(go-to-market)方式,确实可以归入 PLG 的大框架下,但我觉得当时公司的文化并不一定明确地把自己定位为一家 PLG 公司。我们谈论 HubSpot 是谁的时候,并不是用那种方式来描述自己的。而且相信我,这里面还有很多其他因素。我绝对不会说我们团队是推动公司战略和方式转变的唯一力量,但我们能够收集的数据、能够运行的实验、能够呈现的洞察、能够综合的研究……这些都给了我们信心去加大投入。那确实是公司拐点的开端,但当然还有很多其他因素促使我们想要变得更加以产品为主导。
Chris Miller: 回头想想,我觉得任何公司大概都在寻找更高效的运营方式。如果你的收入如此依赖于上市团队的人数规模,公司越大就越难扩展。所以我觉得存在一种内在的愿望,想要实现非线性的增长。而我们在正确的时间出现在了正确的位置,恰好围绕前进的道路可以是什么样子形成了一种共识。如果我们想生活在那样的世界里,我们该怎么到达那里?我觉得这就是我们真正切入这个等式的地方——“哦,我们投资这个团队。如果我们投资这个团队正在做的这类工作,那就是我们逐步构建效率的方式。“而且我们也喜欢这样做,因为这和我们客户对我们的期望是一致的。
Lenny: 听起来你们并不是在说”我们需要更加产品驱动”,而更多是”怎么让销售流程更高效、让增长方式更高效”,然后产品驱动增长自然就从中浮现出来了。
Chris Miller: 对,但别误会,我们确实也在说”我们需要更加产品驱动”。我觉得这正是这里的微妙之处。你问我是否认为我们当时做的事情算产品驱动增长,答案绝对是。但这是因为很多人——我想也许一些早期创业者,或者对持续增长不太熟悉的人,或者只是从学术角度了解它的人——容易陷入一个误区,就是认为要做一家 PLG 公司,就等于要做一家完全自助服务的企业,或者完全自助服务的上市模式。
Chris Miller: 我实际上不认为这两者是一回事。我认为大多数公司——至少那些做了了不起的事情、正在占据自己市场或品类的、更大型、更成功的公司——我们会称之为 PLG 公司的那些,它们的上市团队中都有大量的人在做一些非常重要的工作,更多是一种混合模式。我认为关键不在于对 PLG 的方法过于狭隘,把它根植于非常学术化或概念化的原则中,而更在于务实,说:“好,我们的客户是谁?我们卖的产品是什么?我们的客户习惯怎么买这种东西?他们未来更喜欢以什么方式购买?我们产品的打包方式是什么样的?我们的客户是怎么做决策的——是自上而下的决策还是自下而上的决策?我们的订阅条款有多复杂——是偏向交易型的,还是需要慎重考虑的?我们的目标市场对我们这个品类的技术熟悉程度如何?我们是在与’不消费’竞争,还是在与同品类的竞争对手竞争?”
Chris Miller: 如果你真的回答了这些问题——我想大家可能已经猜到我要往哪里说了——根据这些问题的答案,实际的业务条件可能更有利于产品驱动增长,也更有利于自助服务,对吧?这就是为什么有些公司的价值主张就是……比如你不需要一个人来向你推销 Loom。我用 Loom,它太直观了,我自己就能决定要不要买。你也不需要一个人来教你用 Slack——某种程度上 Slack 也极其直观,对吧?你把一个人丢进 Slack 里,他使用一个类似范式下的产品,自己就能搞清楚基本操作。
Chris Miller: 但也有些产品并不完全符合这些条件。所以我觉得你可以采取一种更加模块化的方式来实践 PLG——根据客户在最理想的情况下从零到一完成激活和上手的过程,我们是否需要让人员介入这个过程?还是仅仅作为兜底?如果答案是需要的,那就想办法在成本结构可持续的、至少是可防御的环节让人参与进来。如果不需要,那就采用 PLG 的方式来做。
产品驱动增长中的混合策略
Chris Miller: 因此,在我们整个业务中,我们从未采取过一种非常纯粹的做法——比如说这条业务线或产品线全部采用自助服务——除非我们能够论证清楚并在整个客户旅程中解释为什么这样做是合理的。所以没错,我们有客户通过产品驱动的前门进来,自己试用产品,自己完成激活。但到了真正要购买产品的时候,他们想找个人聊聊,而这有正当的理由,对吧?可能是有 IT 和安全方面的问题需要打电话确认。也可能是他们正在从一个平台迁移过来,数据迁移是他们的一大顾虑,而这在自助服务环境下目前还不容易实现。我认为这种情况会随着时间改变。但今天,当你做替换和迁移的时候,还是挺痛苦的。
所以如果对所有客户不加区分地强行套用自助服务模式,那解决的是你自己业务的诉求,而不一定是解决客户最终的需求。但我们也面向不同细分市场的客户,他们可能是数字化原生用户,但对我们这个品类的产品并不熟悉。也许他们不是从竞品转过来的,而是从更原始的系统比如电子表格转过来的。我的意思是,我见过客户用便利贴来管理他们的……
Lenny: [听不清]
Chris Miller: 交易管道,最老派的那种方式,那就是他们销售团队的控制中枢。对吧?所以如果你是一个较小的团队,确实会有这样的用例——你对当前买家感受到的那些痛点有非常敏锐的理解,需要优先解决。你不需要处理大规模数据迁移的负担。而且每天在 CRM 里操作的人,就是有权决定用什么 CRM 的那个人。我们大量这样的客户从来不跟我们面对面交流,对吧?这也很好。所以,能够接受事情不一定都能被归入整齐的框框里,并且坚信一种模块化的或更混合的方式才是真正为客户和业务优化的最佳路径——这一点我觉得我们很早就接受了。
我最初追踪的指标之一就是激活率,同时还有我向销售团队输送了多少需求量。这两者之间没有地盘之争,对吧?如果有人能得到帮助是净正向的,而他们遇到的很多问题目前无法仅靠产品来解答,我们完全应该自豪地把他们介绍给我们优秀的销售人员,让销售人员帮助他们判断我们的解决方案是否适合。也确实有人就是不想跟任何人交谈,我们的工作是确保有一种零摩擦的方式让他们自己做决定。
如何定义产品驱动
Lenny: 太棒了。一方面,仅就你的 PLG 经验来讲,这本身就可以做一整期播客了。感觉 HubSpot 是向 PLG 转型最成功的案例之一,至少在那个阶段是这样。尽管你说很早就是 PLG 了,但感觉这对业务来说是一个巨大的转变。所以我非常喜欢你刚分享的这个框架——如果你想变得更加产品驱动,就想一想从访问到激活这个从零到一的过程,想清楚什么时候有人真的需要跟人交谈,以及我们怎么帮他们在那样的时刻不需要跟人交谈。不管沿这个方向,还是更广泛地说,如果有人想探索如何变得更加产品驱动,你会建议他们最初采取哪些步骤和尝试,来帮助他们走这条路?
Chris Miller: 首先我会问,你为什么想变得产品驱动?你做了哪些假设,认为产品驱动对业务或客户来说是净正向的?我甚至可能让他们定义一下产品驱动对他们意味着什么,这样我们才能在同一频道上讨论到底在说什么。
Lenny: 你会怎么定义?你有没有一个大致的答案?让大家感受一下它大概意味着什么。
Chris Miller: 有的。最高层面的说法就是:采用一种上市方法,其中你的产品的职责就是推动收入增长,而人工只是兜底——而不是反过来。
Lenny: 很好。
成为产品驱动的常见误区
Chris Miller: 我认为关键在于,人工可以作为兜底。确实有些时刻让人工来兜底是合理的。一个我觉得非常典型的例子就是,客户遇到困难需要终止合作关系,对吧?每个 SaaS 公司都要面对这个问题。有些公司采取完全自动化的方式,但大多数通常会有某种升级路径,最终需要人工来处理。这并不代表他们就不够产品驱动。我认为每家公司在本质上都会有一些人工在幕后与客户就上市相关的事务进行交互。但我认为一旦定义清楚这一点,并且在此上达成共识,你能学到很多东西。顺便说一句,这些就是我跟创始人之间最常规的对话。我实际上在 OpenView 担任驻场运营者,所以我会跟他们投资的大量公司交流,最终通常都会聊到这个话题。
我觉得有意思的是,当你问这个问题时,得到的答案千差万别。有些人会说,哦,这是关于漏斗顶部的需求。我们想变得更产品驱动是因为我们想要更多线索、更多注册。你会说,“哦,好吧。“这是一个站得住脚的理由。有很多数据显示免费增值产品比销售驱动的上市产品能吸引多得多的漏斗顶部需求,对吧?有些人可能是出于资源受限。我们在公司这个阶段确实需要更产品驱动,因为我们根本没法雇一支由实施专家和客户成功人员组成的军队来大规模地服务每一个客户——而这通常是拥有一个超大漏斗顶部的副产品。还有一些人关注的是收入效率。
所以当你能清晰表述你想驱动的业务成果时,就能帮助定位从哪里开始。如果你真正关注的是漏斗顶部的需求,那么从自助结账开始就是一个愚蠢的起点。所以真正去做那个有趣的练习——说清楚你为什么在意这件事?你为什么一开始就对它感兴趣?如果你这样做了,你的业务会发生什么变化?你做了哪些假设?当你真正把这些列出来,你就可以将它们映射到客户旅程中那些可能存在更产品驱动机会的环节——如果公司目前还没有做到的话。
Lenny: 太棒了。沿着这个方向可能再问几个问题,然后我还剩几个确定想问的问题。当有人试图朝产品驱动增长的方向走,也就是更多自助服务的方向——我想顺便确认一下,你是不是也认为这两个概念基本等同?
Chris Miller: 当然。
Lenny: 好的。那么他们最常犯的错误有哪些?尤其是不那么显而易见的那些?
Chris Miller: 头号错误就是招一个增长负责人,不给任何资源,然后指望他从帽子里变出兔子来。
PLG 的常见误区
Chris Miller: 我觉得每一位 PLG 老兵都有那么一个段子,讲的就是那个可怜的增长负责人——没有工具,没有工程资源,没有设计师,拿不到数据,然后被塞给一个吓人的大数字,被告知去把它挪动一下。我认为这是一个经得起时间考验的常见错误。
另一个错误是期望快速见效,把它当成招聘一个额外的销售人员来对待——你期望这笔投资能产生短期回报。但当你在做 PLG 的时候,本质上它仍然是研发工作。你仍然是在播种,期望随着时间推移,这会以持久、高效的收入增长的方式呈现出来。当然会有一些低垂的果实,但如果你不愿意耐心地等到投资见效而过早放弃,我认为这是很多公司常犯的另一个错误。
还有就是数据基础太差。没有花时间好好地在产品中埋点,数据一团糟,也没有让团队自助获取数据的方式。分析师成为瓶颈,这会是一个很糟糕的处境。所以我说要先把蔬菜吃了——从数据的角度把基础工作做好,我认为这是至关重要的第一步。因为如果你连正在发生什么都无法真正衡量,那还搞什么呢?
最后一个,我觉得是人们因为数据不够多就放弃了。他们会说,我们没有 HubSpot 那样庞大的数据集,也没有 Airbnb 那样的数据集,所以我们没法做 PLG。但其实你仍然可以做 PLG,只是需要用不同的数据。我们对数据的看法是,定量数据只是数据的一种形式,就像实验结果也只是一个数据点。你仅通过与客户交谈就能学到很多东西,定性研究超级重要。所以如果你没有数据能精确告诉你产品中每个用户在做什么,你仍然可以去跟十个客户聊天,很可能就能对正在发生什么以及为什么发生有一个清晰的认识,而且是那种你从定量数据中甚至都得不到的认识。
所以不要因为觉得自己太早期就做不了 PLG 而泄气。你仍然可以做 PLG。PLG 的核心就是让你的产品去销售你的业务所提供的价值主张,你不需要搭建一个非常成熟和复杂的实验体系也能做到这一点。
HubSpot 的增长飞轮
Lenny: 顺着这个方向,但聊得更宏观一些。在不泄露 HubSpot 商业机密的前提下,你会怎么描述 HubSpot 的增长循环?用你提到的 Brian Balfour 和 Fareed 的语境来说,HubSpot 现在或近期的增长循环是什么?用一个简单的方式来理解 HubSpot 是如何增长的。
Chris Miller: 我们的循环不那么偏战术层面。说实话,我认为在 B2B SaaS 中要真正实现循环是很难的。确实有一些成功的例子,但我觉得最好的循环来自 UGC(用户生成内容)。很多 B2C 以社区为核心的平台可以很好地做循环。但如果是 B2B SaaS,很难找到能形成循环的东西。我想我所有 Reforge 的同行都会因为我说这话而不高兴,但我觉得这就是事实。
当我思考 HubSpot 的飞轮时,我认为它更像是一个宏观飞轮。用我们自己的术语来说,就是吸引、参与和愉悦。所以,指导我们思考和战略的原则之一就是:先给予价值,再获取价值。我认为这正是……
先给予价值,再获取价值。我认为这正是集客营销(inbound marketing)创立之初的核心。因为推式营销(outbound marketing)是在没有给予客户或潜在客户任何东西之前就先向他们索取。所以本质上就是说,好吧,如果你先免费给一些东西,那些有兴趣继续了解的人就会留下来。在我们的 PLG 时代之前,靠的是内容营销、白皮书、列表文章和电子书,这些都是人们需要下载的东西,真正在填充漏斗顶部。而随着 PLG 的推进,这只是一种新的形式而已。
所以我们有意识地推出了大量免费软件。而且这些软件不是噱头,不是设计成第一天就用完价值的。它的设计初衷是让我们最小的客户也能以可持续的方式从中获得一些价值。但如果他们深度使用,就会触碰到价值的边界。如果我们做好了自己的工作,交付了我们认为应该交付的东西,那么购买的决定就变成了一个理所当然的选择。
如果他们对作为客户的体验感到愉悦,他们就会成为倡导者和推广者,会告诉他们的同行。因为我们还知道,很多小型企业主甚至中型企业主很大程度上会听从同行社区的建议。有时候是线上社区,有时候不是。所以每当我们通过出色的客户体验赢得一位倡导者,他们就会把更多人带入漏斗顶部。这是一个非常诚实的宏观循环,这就是我们思考飞轮的方式。
Lenny: 天哪,光聊这个就又能做一整期播客了,太精彩了。你分享了一个我之前不知道的故事。HubSpot 以内容和 SEO 闻名。你搜索任何东西,总能找到一篇 HubSpot 的文章。那么你现在分享的是不是这个意思:在早期,SEO、免费内容是把人们带到网站和产品面前的主要驱动力,而产品本身并不免费,这是我听到的。然后后来转变为现在任何人都可以使用的免费产品,由它来驱动漏斗顶部。
Chris Miller: 是的,没错。
Lenny: 太精彩了。
Chris Miller: 我不能给出具体数字,但我们很大比例的收入是通过产品流转的。不一定说人们最终是在产品里完成购买,但产品是他们与我们之间的第一次转化事件。他们先在产品里,喜欢看到的东西,跟某个人聊了聊,最终成为了客户。这现在已经是公司一个相当强大的漏斗顶部了。
Lenny: 我觉得这是一个非常有趣的故事——从 SEO 这个增长渠道起步,然后转向另一种方式。这段经历中有没有什么经验教训,给那些想要启动增长的人,在 SEO 和免费增值方法之间做选择?有没有什么心得,比如”这个方法对我们特别有效,你们也许应该试试”,或者”SEO 在这种类型的业务中会在某个时候触达天花板”?
Chris Miller: 我得承认我绝对不是 SEO 专家。但我有幸与世界上一些最优秀的营销人共事,我认为他们已经是名副其实的传奇人物了——看看他们在 HubSpot 所取得的成就,以及他们打造的获客和注册机器。
Chris Miller: 我想说的是,积极尝试新渠道非常重要,多元化渠道组合也非常重要,因为一切可能在一夜之间发生变化,进而颠覆你的整个漏斗。比如一次 Google 算法的调整就可能产生巨大影响。如果你依赖的是应用商店优化,那么 Apple 算法的变化也可能带来巨大冲击。我们在生成式 AI 方面看到的趋势,我想很多人现在晚上都睡不好觉,因为不清楚这将如何大规模影响 SEO。如果你的整个业务都建立在 Google 搜索结果页的基础之上,那么在我们即将步入的这个新世界里,将会发生什么?
渠道多元化的重要性
因此我认为,尽可能不要让你的漏斗依赖于单一或少数几个渠道,这一点非常重要。我们一直在测试新渠道。我们目前正在花时间试验的渠道之一,就是微应用(microapp)的概念。实际上这对 HubSpot 来说并不是一个新概念。你们最早构建的微应用之一是一个……可能是 Dharmesh 构建的最初版本,叫做 Website Grader。你输入你的域名,它就会爬取你的网站,然后给你一组优化建议。它是免费的,确实只有一个功能。但它的作用是发起了一场有趣的对话,就是,好吧,现在你有了这些信息,你打算怎么处理?而你可以做的一件事就是成为 HubSpot 的客户,用我们的产品来解决很多这些问题。
这个方法对我们有效,而且效果非常好。所以我们已经做了好几次同样的打法,将来可能还会继续做。我们有大量这样的微应用。我们有品牌套件生成器,有邮件签名生成器,我们还试验过用户画像生成器。还有几个我现在不能透露的,不过几周后在 Inbound 大会上大家会了解到一些。总之,微应用对我们来说是一个令人兴奋的新渠道。有些会成功,有些会失败,我们可能最终会让它们下线。但愿意在寻找新分发渠道的过程中接受失败,这也是非常重要的。
Lenny: 这个洞察太棒了。有没有一个地方让人们可以找到你们构建的这些微应用?
Chris Miller: 很快就会有。
Lenny: 哦,好神秘。我还注意到 Dharmesh 在推特上发了一些他正在做的 AI 项目。这和这些微应用有关吗?还是说他只是业余时间做点好玩的东西?
Chris Miller: 和微应用非常相关。我想说 ChatSpot 其实就是——对于那些不了解 ChatSpot 是什么的人,ChatSpot 是 Dharmesh 构建的一款 AI 副驾驶,受到了 HubSpot 客户和非 HubSpot 客户的一致好评。所以这件事,戴上我 AI 负责人的帽子来说,我们花了很多时间思考 ChatSpot 未来要往什么方向发展。
但说到底,这也是我们放到市场上看看会发生什么的东西。结果我们发现,哦,每个月都有相当可观的注册量。谁能想到呢?我不认为……这绝对不在一年前的路线图上。我觉得作为一家有 17 年历史的 SaaS 公司,仍然能以那种紧迫感和节奏运作,这是非常有帮助的——为什么要等待就某个决策达成共识,当我们完全可以先把东西放出去,然后看看会发生什么、看看数据怎么说。
Lenny: 是的,我正想说,这感觉真是一个三赢局面,包括对团队里那些已经在公司待了很长时间的人来说,能做一些完全不同的、全新的东西,推出一个新产品,本身就是一种释放。
Chris Miller: 是的,百分之百同意。
Covid 如何加速增长
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个。在过去的——不知道多少年里,有没有什么东西显著加速了增长,让你觉得”哇,这真的改变了游戏规则”的?
Chris Miller: Covid。Covid 在很多层面上显然是充满挑战和可怕的,但它确实令人恐惧。非常令人恐惧。我们都吓坏了,不知道这对我们的工作意味着什么。我自己的妹妹,她现在也在 HubSpot 工作,当时她正在转行做酒店行业,刚入职两个月就因为 Covid 被停薪留职了。所以谁知道世界会变成什么样子,会对企业产生什么影响?
我想我们做好了最坏的准备,但实际上我们赶上了一些 Covid 的东风,很多其他企业也是如此,因为那些从来没有考虑过数字营销的公司突然之间不得不考虑了,而且迫在眉睫。这是他们能否度过风暴的燃眉之急。我觉得 HubSpot 做的一件事——这也是我们内部常用的一个说法——就是永远不要浪费一场好危机。
所以我们着力推行的一件事就是善意定价(goodwill pricing),我们降低了某些工具的价格,在某些方面给予了一些临时性的宽松政策。仅仅是消除这些摩擦,就成了业务的一股非常有趣的东风,尤其对我负责的业务来说——也就是我们的入门级业务,我们的免费和入门级业务,在那段时期真的加速了增长,这并不是……我觉得如果你看我在 2020 年 3 月的宾果卡,我不确定上面有没有这一项。
Lenny: 我正在另一个窗口看股价,我能看到发生了什么。发展得非常好,虽然后来跟着整个大盘回落了一些,但现在又在回升了。说到这里,我们进入了非常精彩的闪电问答环节。我为你准备了六个问题。准备好了吗?
Chris Miller: 好了。
闪电问答
Lenny: 你最常推荐给别人的是哪两三本书?
Chris Miller: 说实话,我不怎么读书。家里有个一岁半的孩子。不过我在此之前可能也不怎么读书,但这是个不错的借口。这就是我今天没时间读书的原因。但说到那些我至今仍时常想起的书,有一本叫《人人都在说谎》(Everybody Lies),作者我记得是 Google 的一位数据科学家。这本书的部分核心信息是,人人都可以是数据科学家,真正努力让在日常生活中用数据做决策的理念民主化,揭开数据科学的神秘面纱。但他实现这一点的方式,是通过对比 Google 搜索数据——我们已知人们在积极寻找答案的内容——和定性调查数据。人们在问卷调查中总是因为各种原因撒谎,但没有人会对 Google 撒谎,因为它是交易性的。如果我对 Google 撒谎,我就得不到我想要的东西。所以这本书深入探讨了说真话意味着什么,以及我们对自己和互联网有多诚实。我真的非常喜欢这本书。
另一本我很喜欢的书是《砍柴挑水》(Chop Wood Carry Water),它就像一个寓言,讲的是一个想成为武士的小男孩的故事。但这本书的核心信息是关于爱上过程,尤其是爱上在某个领域变得卓越的过程中那些最平凡的部分。这一点……它很好地提醒了我要有耐心、保持谦逊、一步一步来。我经常引用《砍柴挑水》。
Lenny: 这让我想起了《成绩自然会来》(The Score Takes Care of Itself),好像是这个书名。
Chris Miller: 对对对,我听说过这本书。
Lenny: Bill Walsh 写的。非常棒。好的,最近最喜欢的一部电影或电视剧是什么?
Chris Miller: 哎呀,在 Amazon Prime 上有一部叫《I’m a Virgo》的剧,是 Boots Riley 的作品。Boots Riley 执导过《Sorry to Bother You》。这部剧简直让我大开眼界。它超现实、搞笑又黑暗,主演是 Jharrel Jerome,我觉得他在 Netflix 的《Central Park Five》里演过其中一个角色,好像还得过几个奖。这部剧是我最近看的,之前完全没什么期待,只知道是 Boots Riley 的作品,结果一下子就被迷住了。它以一种非常巧妙的方式触及了很多重要的话题,但往往是那些难以谈论的话题和主题,而且看下来的体验令人愉悦。所以,就是《I’m a Virgo》。还有我从第一季到第四季一口气刷完了《Barry》。Henry Winkler 太精彩了。然后刚看完《Succession》。这里的共同点是,我真的很喜欢黑色喜剧。没错,非常非常黑暗的喜剧才是我的菜。
Lenny: 刚才那个叫《I’m a Virgo》是吧?我还以为你在说自己是处女座呢。
Chris Miller: 不不不,那个剧的名字就叫《I’m a Virgo》。对。
Lenny: 太好了,我会去看看。好的,你最喜欢问候选人什么面试题?
Chris Miller: 我觉得这取决于他们面试的是什么级别的职位。我现在不太面试一线产品经理了,但以前我特别喜欢做案例分析题,而且是很随机的那种。比如我会问,“告诉我一周之内有多少人走过 Longfellow Bridge。“我完全不在乎他们得出的实际数字是多少,我更想观察的是他们脑海中能收集到什么样的数据点来支撑他们的推算,他们能多接近大致范围,以及他们背后的推理依据是什么。然后观察人们在那些时刻大脑运转的过程……你能从中学到很多关于他们作为产品经理可能如何运作的信息。我不会过度使用这类问题,因为我确实认为这类问题中存在很多固有的偏见。所以要尽量想出一些对任何可能想加入我团队的人都真正有共鸣的题目,我觉得这是必要条件。
但我另一个很喜欢问的问题是,如果你最近共事过的人在一个房间里,而你不在场,他们会怎么谈论你?一来是因为我有时候会去联系了解情况做背景调查,所以这确实可能成为面试过程的一部分,是非常合理的;但另一方面,我觉得通常很明显能看出一个人是否在以诚实、内省和自我觉察的方式来回答这个问题。我喜欢看到人们有很强的自我觉察,因为我认为没有人在任何情况下都是完美的。我自己的性格也有很多棱角,只是这些年人们已经习惯了,但我至少会努力去觉察它们——如果我无法改变,至少要认识到它们,并尽可能控制其影响范围。
所以我觉得了解候选人的情商和自我觉察能力对我来说非常重要,因为说到底,如果你做产品,你可以是房间里最聪明的人,但如果别人不想和你共事,你大概也走不了太远。
人生信条
Lenny: 你有没有一个最喜欢的人生信条,经常回想起或者分享给别人的?
Chris Miller: 细节很重要。
Lenny: 我想这既适用于工作也适用于生活吧?
Chris Miller: 对,细节很重要。细节很重要。我读过一篇对 Stripe 产品领导团队的采访,很酷,他们谈到的一点是,他们希望产品经理要有品味。这话说出来其实挺有争议的,因为人们会说,“这也太主观了。谁来定义什么是品味?“也许在某种程度上这甚至是有偏见的。
但我觉得他们对如何定义品味有一个非常有说服力的回答。在他们看来,品味就是对某样东西如此感兴趣——不管是什么东西——以至于你能深入到足以形成一套有根据的、有见地的观点。这就是他们的定义。而且他们几乎不在乎那个东西具体是什么、主题是什么。但拥有品味,意味着你有一样热爱的事物,你花了足够的时间去学习、理解、欣赏、评判,甚至为之沮丧,以至于你形成了一个可能甚至具有两极分化性的观点——这就是品味。模棱两可通常不是品味。所以当我说”细节很重要”的时候,那其实是在向品味致敬。对某件事的细节着迷——无论是艺术、音乐、产品、电影,什么都好。我很看重这一点。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个说法。而且这也呼应了我们之前聊过的很多东西——跟客户交谈、看数据、真正获得一手信息来了解人们需要什么、想要你的产品做什么。
Chris Miller: 没错,完全同意。
最近喜欢的产品
Lenny: 好的,我再问最后两个问题就放你走。你最近发现的、最喜欢的产品是什么?
Chris Miller: 疫情前我迷上了高尔夫,但疫情期间我是真的疯了,对高尔夫到了痴迷的程度。那是当时少数几件你可以在户外做的安全且社交的事情,比去酒吧跟朋友喝一杯危险性低多了。有个笑话说,男人发明高尔夫就是为了能一起散步,基本上这就是我对高尔夫产生兴趣的原因。而且我刚开始打的时候简直烂透了。
我觉得随着你年龄渐长,事业越来越稳定,或者像我一直在产品驱动增长这个领域待了挺久,你几乎忘了做某件事真的很差是什么感觉——直到你有了孩子,一切都很新鲜,每天都在失败。
但高尔夫是一种令人耳目一新的、持续的挫败感和无力感的体验,就是真正地拥抱这种感觉,在其中浸泡一段时间,知道这需要反复练习和时间才能越来越好。这让我上了瘾,所以我一有机会就打高尔夫。最近我买了一块 Garmin 手表,那东西太神奇了。你走到第一个发球台,看一眼手表,它知道你在哪里、哪个高尔夫球场。有时候它甚至会告诉你你在哪个发球台,因为高尔夫有时候你站得靠后,有时候靠前,它还能追踪你的挥杆,告诉你距离。
Lenny: 太夸张了。
Chris Miller: 它还能帮你读果岭。
Lenny: 哇,我都想打高尔夫就为了用那块表了。
Chris Miller: 天哪,跟我一起打球的几个朋友,有几个人最近买了,我一下子就被迷住了,当天回家就直接下单了。这是我最近买过的最酷的产品或小玩意了。
Lenny: 哇,我好喜欢。而且你讲到学高尔夫的时候,我也在想,这正好呼应了你招聘时看中的那种不懈的好奇心和韧性。显然你自己就具备这些品质。
最后一个问题,我相信你有一只狗叫 Ferney,是 Fernet 的简称。
Chris Miller: 对。
Lenny: 好的,那就着这个话题,你目前最喜欢的鸡尾酒是什么?如果不只是喝一口 Fernet 的话?
Chris Miller: 睡前总是来一杯 Fernet 纯饮。有时候会兑一点可口可乐。我记得,哪儿的人这么喝来着?是西班牙吗?
Lenny: 我没听过这种喝法。
Chris Miller: 或者阿根廷?不太确定。反正肯定有个国家流行这种喝法。我妻子最近很热衷于在家做高品质的玛格丽特,夏天我们特别喜欢喝 Aperol Spritz,所以这两样基本霸占了我们最近欢乐时光的轮换阵容。
Lenny: 我刚喝了一杯 Aperol。是叫 Aperol 吗?Aperol Spritz,对吧?
Chris Miller: 对,我发音不太准。大概是这两种叫法之一。
Lenny: 我最近才第一次喝。太棒了,这要成为我的新标配了。
Chris Miller: 你最近才第一次喝 Aperol Spritz?
Lenny: 对,我之前都不知道那是什么。
Chris Miller: 那可是几年前夏天风靡一时的饮品,然后……哎,还有一种也在流行。Negroni Sbagliato 最近也很火。就是用 Prosecco 代替金酒的 Negroni。具体我记不清了。
Lenny: 哦,听起来太棒了。这期播客里能学到的东西真不少。Chris,太精彩了。非常感谢你来参加。最后两个问题。一是大家想联系你的话,在网上哪里可以找到你,也许问你一两个问题。二是听众怎样才能帮到你?
Chris Miller: 可以在 LinkedIn 上加我,给我发消息。Christopher Miller。叫这个名字的人很多,我是那个长得像我、在 HubSpot 工作的那个。我有 Twitter 账号……X。我有一个 X 账号,但不太常用,就是以前那个鸟图标的应用。不过我在 Instagram 上比较活跃,账号是 @millsyjoeyoung,这是致敬我最喜欢的老怪兽电影之一《Mighty Joe Young》。所以是的,Instagram 上也能找到我。
Lenny: 然后我知道你还有两件事想分享。一是你在做 PLG 方面的顾问之类的,也许可以简单聊聊。二是 HubSpot 在招人,可以告诉大家一下吗?
Chris Miller: 我确实做一些天使投资和公司顾问的工作,我很享受这件事。我觉得能不断接触到新鲜的问题真的很酷,而不是每周四十多个小时只盯着某几类特定的品类、垂直领域或目标客户。所以能花时间和不同品类的创始人在一起,看他们在不同增长阶段面临不同的挑战,然后想想我能怎么帮到他们,这很令人耳目一新。如果你觉得这很有意思,你是一位创始人或产品负责人,欢迎联系我,也许我们有机会合作,也许我能成为一个资源。
Lenny: 酷。那招聘方面呢,有没有具体想让大家知道的岗位?
Chris Miller: 秋季肯定会有更多岗位开放,但最迫近的是,我要为领导的 AI 平台团队招一位 group product manager。
Lenny: 这岗位真不错。
Chris Miller: 对,这是个很棒的岗位,团队也很优秀,而且 AI 这个领域现在可能还挺重要的。如果你去 HubSpot 的招聘网站,这期播客上线的时候,那个岗位应该已经挂出来了。
Lenny: 太好了。Chris,再次感谢你来。
Chris Miller: Lenny,荣幸之至。谢谢你的邀请。这次体验太棒了。
Lenny: 大家再见。
非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期内容有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评价,这真的能帮助更多听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| adaptability | 适应力 |
| advocate | 倡导者 |
| Aperol Spritz | Aperol Spritz(鸡尾酒名,保留原文) |
| battle tested | 身经百战 |
| Bill Walsh | Bill Walsh(人名,保留原文) |
| blast radius | 影响范围 |
| Brian Balfour | Brian Balfour(人名,保留原文) |
| case study | 案例分析 |
| ChatSpot | ChatSpot(不翻译,保留原文) |
| Chop Wood Carry Water | 《砍柴挑水》(Chop Wood Carry Water) |
| coachability | 可教练性 |
| connected experience | 互联体验 |
| Culture Code | 文化准则(Culture Code) |
| culture code | 文化准则 |
| data hygiene | 数据治理 |
| Dharmesh | Dharmesh(HubSpot 联合创始人,保留原文) |
| empathy | 共情 |
| EQ (emotional quotient) | 情商 |
| Everybody Lies | 《人人都在说谎》(Everybody Lies) |
| Fareed | Fareed(人名,保留原文) |
| freemium | 免费增值 |
| go-to-market | 上市(指产品推向市场的策略和流程) |
| goodwill pricing | 善意定价(goodwill pricing) |
| group product manager | group product manager(产品管理岗位,保留原文) |
| head of growth | 增长负责人 |
| HubSpot | HubSpot(不翻译,保留原文) |
| humility | 谦逊 |
| IC (individual contributor) | 独立贡献者 |
| Inbound | Inbound(HubSpot 年度大会,保留原文) |
| inbound marketing | 集客营销(inbound marketing) |
| install base | 客户群体 |
| Jules Walter | Jules Walter(人名,保留原文) |
| listicle | 列表文章 |
| Longfellow Bridge | Longfellow Bridge(地名,保留原文) |
| low hanging fruit | 低垂的果实 |
| microapp | 微应用(microapp) |
| Mighty Joe Young | 《Mighty Joe Young》(电影名,保留原文) |
| Negroni Sbagliato | Negroni Sbagliato(鸡尾酒名,保留原文) |
| no-brainer | 理所当然的选择 |
| operator in residence | 驻场运营者 |
| outbound marketing | 推式营销(outbound marketing) |
| PLG | PLG(产品驱动增长的缩写,保留原文) |
| PQL (product qualified lead) | 产品驱动线索(PQL) |
| pricing and packaging | 定价和打包 |
| Product-Led Growth | 产品驱动增长 |
| promoter | 推广者 |
| Prosecco | Prosecco(意大利起泡酒,保留原文) |
| qual research | 定性研究 |
| quant data | 定量数据 |
| remarkability | 卓越 |
| resilience | 韧性 |
| revenue efficiency | 收入效率 |
| sponsor | 赞助者(职场语境中指愿意为你背书推动职业发展的人) |
| taste | 品味 |
| top of the funnel | 漏斗顶部 |
| transparency | 透明 |
| UGC (user generated content) | UGC(用户生成内容) |
| waterfall | 瀑布式 |
| Website Grader | Website Grader(不翻译,保留原文) |
| white paper | 白皮书 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)