创始人主导销售 | Pete Kazanjy(《Founding Sales》作者,Atrium 联合创始人)
Founder-led sales | Pete Kazanjy (Founding Sales, Atrium)
Pete Kazanjy: The thing that I just like to encourage founders and product managers and what have you is just don’t be afraid of sales. There’s a lot of people out there who would love to tell you a story that it’s magical or like, “Oh, you’ve got to be a born seller,” things like that and it’s really not. Those people are just talking their book, if you will, and so just getting good at those behaviors, it’s going to benefit you in a myriad of ways.
Background and Introduction
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast, I’m Lenny, and my goal here is to help you get better at the craft of building and growing products. Today my guest is Pete Kazanjy. Pete is the author of my single favorite book on sales, called Founding Sales, which I point every B2B founder to. He also runs a huge community of salespeople called Modern Sales Pros. He’s also the CEO and founder of Atrium, which is a SaaS product that helps you make your sales team more efficient through analytics and data. In our conversation, we focus on three things. One, why founders should be doing sales themselves for a long time before hiring your first salesperson and also when it’s time to hire that first salesperson, we get into how to hire for your first salesperson, what to look for in their profile and the most common mistakes people make, and finally, we cover a bunch of tactical tips for getting better at sales. Pete didn’t come from a sales background and he learned everything by just doing it, learning, researching, and repeating. I know that you’ll learn a ton from this conversation. With that, I bring you Pete Kazanjy.
Enter Vanta. Over 3,000 fast growing companies use Vanta to automate up to 90% of the work involved with SOC 2. Vanta can get you ready for security audits in weeks instead of months, less than a third of the time that it usually takes. For a limited time, Lenny’s Podcast listeners get $1,000 off Vanta. Just go to vanta.com/lenny, that’s V-A-N-T-A.com/lenny, to learn more and to claim your discount. Get started today. Hey, Ashley, head of marketing at Flatfile. How many B2B SaaS companies would you estimate need to import CSV files from their customers?
Ashley Mulligan: At least 40%.
Founder-Led Sales
Lenny: How many of them screw that up and what happens when they do?
Ashley Mulligan: Well, based on our data, about a third of people will consider switching to another company after just one bad experience during onboarding. So, if your CSV importer doesn’t work right, which is super common considering customer files are chock full of unexpected data and formatting, they’ll leave.
Lenny: I am 0% surprised to hear that. I’ve consistently seen that improving onboarding as one of the highest leverage opportunities for both signup conversion and increasing long-term retention. Getting people to their aha moment more quickly and reliably is so incredibly important.
Ashley Mulligan: Totally. It’s incredible to see how our customers like Square, Spotify, and Zora are able to grow their businesses on top of Flatfile. It’s because flawless data onboarding acts like a catalyst to get them and their customers where they need to go faster.
Lenny:
When to Hire Your First Sales Rep
Pete Kazanjy: Hey, Lenny, super awesome to see you.
Win Rate Rules of Thumb
Lenny: Even more awesome on my part. Ever since I launched this podcast, I have always wanted to have you on it, we’re finally here. We’ve been online buddies for a few years now, ever since I discovered your book, Founding Sales, which we’re going to talk about, and it’s just been a lot of fun knowing you, so thank you again for being here.
Pete Kazanjy: The quick story was Lenny had shipped his different genres of marketplaces and how to start the liquidity and growth and whatever and I was obsessed with it, and then somehow, I ran into you at Brianne Kimmel’s SaaS School. I gave a presentation on Founder-led Selling and there was a scrum of people around me and I was talking about amazing writers and amazing content online and I referenced the series, and then you raised your hand and you were like, “That was me,” and I was like, “What? You’re amazing.” And then we got beers and now, we’re happily ever after.
Leading Indicators and Early Signals
Lenny: Look at us now. And then you encouraged me to make a book out of that post, which I have not yet done, maybe one day.
Pete Kazanjy: Eventually.
Must Founders Be Good at Sales?
Lenny: Eventually.
So, we’re going to be talking a lot about sales and a lot of the stuff that you cover in your book. Before we get into it, could you just take a minute to share a little bit about your background and some of the wonderful things you’ve done, to give folks a sense of your experience in the sales world?
Pete Kazanjy: I think probably the most important thing to characterize for folks is that I don’t actually have a background in sales originally, which were most sales leaders and sellers come from, they graduate from school or a BDR, become an AE, AE manager, or a BDR manager, and then go on to sales leadership. My background’s actually in product marketing and product management. I started my tech career at VMware back in the day, tons of amazing, fun VMware diaspora. And then I started a software company called TalentBin, it was a recruiting software company in, geez Louise, 2009. We quickly realized that, “Man, this B2B software stuff doesn’t sell itself, irrespective of maybe what people say on the internet,” at least back then. So, I had to be our first seller, our sales manager, our first sales leader, and that’s where I learned how to do sales.
Also, I just realized, “Man, this isn’t rocket surgery, anyone can learn this. If I can learn this, other people can learn this, even though there’s not documentation on it.” So, the software company was eventually acquired by Monster Worldwide in 2014 and then I wrote a book on sales for founders and other first-time sellers, it’s called Founding Sales. Mainly, it was the book that I wish I had, rather than having to learn by a narrative from the first round capital portfolio and what have you. And then subsequent to that, I started what became the nation’s largest sales operations and leadership community, it’s called Modern Sales Pros. It’s 30,000 sales operations, sales leaders, et cetera. And then started a new software company called Atrium that makes data-driven sales management software, and then here I am. So, I think a little bit about sales, turns out modern sales, not that old sales, modern sales.
How to Improve Sales Skills
Lenny: Ooh, I’m curious to hear what that is. But before I ask you that question, I just wanted to mention your book, Founding Sales, is the book I give every founder that is trying to figure out sales. Every time I give it to them or point them to even your site that has it all for free there, they’re always just like, “Holy shit, this is exactly what I needed,” so we’re going to be covering a lot of that stuff in our little chat.
Shifting Your Sales Mindset
Pete Kazanjy: Rad.
Lenny: Can you actually just briefly talk about what is modern sales versus what you called traditional sales or old-school sales?
Building Rapport Quickly
Pete Kazanjy: Oh, I just think that there’s a little bit of a mindset change. It’s a little bit related to some of the reasons why founders and other folks maybe have this perception of sales be like, “Ew, sales, ugh” because people, their only experience with sales is Glengarry Glen Ross or movies with a sleazy used car salesman and stuff like that, whereas the way to think about what sellers are is they’re the microeconomic agents in the market that bring supply to demand rather than waiting for demand to find supply. They have supply in their back pocket and they run around trying to find people who ought to have the demand, maybe they have the demand right now, maybe they don’t realize that they have the demand, and then they elucidate to them why they ought to have the demand.
So, A, that process is very important from a technology deployment standpoint and also, B, it’s very measurable, especially in a modern environment with modern CRMs and also all the digital activity that we do, email, calendar, phone, Zoom, et cetera, all this information is now being recorded such that you can then measure, manage, and improve behavior. So, very similar to how back in the day, you do product analytics by licking your fingers and sticking it in the wind, and then Mixpanels showed up, then Amplitude showed up, then so on and so forth, and the same is the case in sales, as well. So, modern sales is a more thoughtful, operational, rigorous, analytical bent, it’s been around for a while. It’s one of those things, the future is here, it just wasn’t widely distributed, but now it’s being much more distributed and much more embraced. Like the pre-Moneyball moment in sports and baseball to the post-Moneyball moment, we’re now just flipping over there, so that’s the delta.
From Persuading to Helping
Lenny: Awesome. I definitely want to talk about ways to get better at sales and things you’ve learned about just how to improve at sales, but to set a little bit foundation for that conversation, I want to talk about founder-led sales. You touched on this topic, your book is basically named after this concept of founder-led sales. Can you talk about what that is, why it’s so important, and maybe why founders often get this wrong?
Pete Kazanjy: The way that I think about the book, Founding Sales, I like to think of it as the sequel to Eric Eric Ries’s The Lean Startup or Steve Blank’s Four Steps to the Epiphany or Startup Owner’s Manual or whatever, where if you think about the stages, and this is all B2B, if you think about the stages that a product goes through, it’s one, you’ve got to know what problem you’re solving and validate that, and it’s got to be real. It can’t be like, “Oh, well, I thought I had this problem,” it’s got to be validated. That’s customer development, that’s customer research, and that’s more of a product management function. And then there’s building the minimum feature set in order to prove that maybe technology can fit to this problem and solve it.
That’s how we create value as technologists, is piecing together technology and code or bits and atoms and what have you in order to solve a problem that people have. But then the next step is like, “Cool. Now, I’ve got to get someone to pay for this and I’ve got to do that in a reliable fashion and I’ve got to do it in a scalable fashion,” and so there’s a little bit of a loop there. It’s not like, “The product’s done, throw it over the wall, have fun, kids.” It’s a loop, where the minimum viable version of your product is probably going to suck and then in order to get to the minimum valuable step, you’ve got to be interfacing with a lot of customers and that’s a sales behavior, getting in front of people and being like, “Hey, I think you probably have this problem if you look like these other folks right here.”
The point is is that you can’t outsource that behavior, the founder’s got to do that stuff. A lot of people ask me that question, “Well, I suck at sales,” or, “I’m afraid to talk to people,” or, “Interfacing with non-friendly parties makes me uncomfortable.” The way to think about it is, I forget who the person was who said, “Startups versus incumbents is a race between can innovation get to distribution before distribution can get to innovation?” So, this is a related concept where as a founder, it’s going to be way easier for you to get good, or minimally viable good, at selling by having interactions with non-friendly parties and having commercial conversations and asking for money in exchange for the value delivery.
It’s going to be easier for you to do that than it is for some third party to become as expert at the subject matter that you’re tackling that you are. Because as a founder, early on, use Atrium as an example, we make data-driven sales management software, which it exists to help sales managers and teams use metrics and data to improve the performance of their reps. The way I think about it is Datadog-y Amplitude-y, but for your sales reps. I’m probably the expert in sales analytics in the world, and so back in 2016 and 2017 when we were doing this, put aside the fact that I already know how to do minimum viable selling, if I had tried to get somebody else expert at that in order for them to go out and do that in the market, that would have been not good.
This is why Steve Blank always talks about startups can’t get to scale without firing their first VP of sales, it’s oftentimes because they skip that step, and so the founder’s like, “Hey, man, I’m going to pour a little bit of sales on this, hire some sales leader or whatever, some sort of seller, and outsource this.” You really just can’t do that, not for the first couple dozen customers, it’s just not tenable. You lose that feedback loop, you lose the learnings of whether or not your message fits the market, all that sort of stuff. You’re playing a game of telephone with that with a third party seller versus even you just want to keep that in one brain to start, then package it, and then when you have a repeatable while loop, a selling while loop, then package it and hand it to someone else. So, that’s my diatribe on why founders have to do this.
Actionable Sales Improvement Tips
Lenny: I was going to try to summarize the reasons that you should be doing this and it sounds like there’s so many. One is figure out what you should actually be building, that’s a reason founders should be selling, two is learn how to position and pitch and sell, three is figure out what you could teach your salesperson when you hire them. Is that a summary of why you should be selling as a founder for a while?
Pete Kazanjy: Yeah, for sure. One, it’s going to help you with your product development because you’re not going to have that abstracted, for sure, two, you’re going to be the person who’s going to figure out how to talk about it in an effective way, and then three, it’s going to make it such that you can package that up such that other human… Because that’s the way that B2B startups scale, is it’s not WhatsApp or Twitter or Airbnb or whatever, where you have this scalability via marketing, the way that B2B organizations scale primarily is by adding more salespeople who then have customer-facing meetings with prospects.
And then you cap out with the number of hours that are in the week, there’s only four or 50 hours in the week, especially as a seller because you interface with other people during business hours, and so the way that you scale up is by just adding more salespeople. So, that’s why packaging that up is really important, because then you’re going to shove it into the brains of two more salespeople, and then once they’re successful, you’re going to go to four, and then once they’re successful, you’re going to go to eight, and then once they’re successful, you’re going to go to 16.
Hiring Sales Reps
Lenny: You talk about this while loop concept, which I love. What are signs that it’s time to hire your first salesperson? It begs the question, when do I do this?
Pete Kazanjy: I’m not a software engineer, but I like to use technical metaphors with technical audiences because I think it’s helpful, so it’s like when it runs on your local, now it’s time to see if it reproduces over here, so if it reliably runs on your local and it doesn’t air out, so then what would the definition of not erroring out look like? So, generally speaking, it is to contingent on your sales motion, but it’s going to be that you can reliably, at a pretty okay win rate, so maybe 15% or 20% or 25%, turn first meetings into eventual customers and do that in a reliable fashion. It’s not like, “I engaged 10 arms-length parties and I got two customers closed.” It’s like, “Hey, that’s great. That’s a good start. 5X that, 10X that.”
Take 50 at-bats, take 100 at-bats, and now that you know that you reliably, for every cohort of ten first meetings, what’s known in sales land as opportunities, for every cohort of 10 that you engage, are you closing 1, are you closing 1.5, are you closing 2, or are you closing 2.5, if you’re in there? But if you’re at like, “For every 30 I interact with, I close one,” well, it seems like that’s probably pretty inefficient, unless you’re selling $500,000 deals or something like that. So, it’s at the point where it feels like it’s statistically significant, it feels like it’s repeatable, because what you’re going to then do is now it feels like it’s a safe bet to try to abstract that out to somebody else.
Because the only way we’re going to get to success is we’re not going to have Lenny go and sell from morning, noon to night. What we’re going to do is we’re going to take the information out of Lenny’s brain and we’re going to put it into slides and we’re going to put it into scripts and we’re going to put it into email templates and all that sort of stuff, and then we’re going to shove that into the brain of two more reps and see if now we can get it to run in the cloud, in the sales cloud here. And then to start out, it may fail, the same way you’re like, “Cool, it runs on my local. Uh-oh, it breaks over here. Why?” And then that’s the next stage is now you’re figuring out how to get those other folks to sell as successfully as you have, and that becomes the next job.
Actually, this is the presentation I gave at Brianne’s SaaS School, if you Google it’s just called Founder-led Selling, it’s available online. Essentially, there’s a bunch of stages in the B2B maturity journey and you have to go through them in order to get to the next one, if you jump stages, you’re hosed. So, in this case, if you know that you can reliably sell this yourself, that’s great. Then, the next thing to do is get at least a couple people reliably selling, as well as you, not 10, because you’re never going to get 2 successful if you’re trying to onboard 10 concurrently. And then if you get those 2 successful, now you’ve earned the right to go to 4, 8, et cetera.
Early Signs of Sales Struggles
Lenny: I love this heuristic that you shared that you want to get to about 15 to 25% of contacts closing to a customer. I see you shaking your thumb. I think that’s really useful. So, it’s a bit less than a third and doing 50 to 100 attempts is roughly where you want to be?
Leading Indicators for Sales Ramp
Pete Kazanjy: Yeah. Importantly, what you don’t want to do is, and I think probably a lot of the product managers who like to listen to Lenny’s Podcast here might appreciate this, is you want to bring on cohorts of users and then see what’s going on, then learn, and then bring on new co cohorts of users. So, going and doing 100 at-bats and then being like, “Did it work or did it not?” Versus, “Hey, let’s have 10 for prospect and try to get 10 first meetings,” have all those interactions, see how your conversations land, see how the discovery questions are evoking the right response or not the right response, see how your slides land, see how your demo lands, all that sort of stuff.
If it’s working well and you’re getting to the next stage, “This is great, I would love to introduce you to my boss,” that’s a good sign. If it’s like, “I’m just not getting it.” Cool, back to the drawing board, versus doing 100 all at once and being like, “Now, did it work?” We want to break it up and then constantly just be iterating, iterating, iterating. Again, I think your audience might appreciate this, the way to think of a sales motion, so sales motion is a fancy-pants way of describing just all the things that you do in order to take a prospect and bring them through the sales process and then eventually close them. One helpful way to think about it is kind of like software and what you want to be doing is constantly updating it. Oh, that was a really interesting question that the prospect asked right there, I didn’t have a good answer for it and moreover, I didn’t have a slide for it.
You know what I should do? I should make a slide that handles that objection so I can show it to them visually and also, it’ll help give me guardrails and a talk track and that’ll be nice. So, I’m going to do that and then I’m going to update the source code. Now, my sales motion has been updated. And then the next loop through, ideally the next time that person says, “Oh, I don’t know, Lenny, it doesn’t really sound like X, Y, Z,” you’re like, “Oh, a lot of people say that, but here, if you look over here, you can see this.” “Oh yeah, that’s a really good point.” “Wonderful. So, as the next step, let’s go ahead and talk to your boss.” So, now your sales motion has been updated and the collateral’s been updated and now, we’re being more effective sellers. You’re just going to do that dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens of time before you have a repeatable sales motion.
Remote vs. In-Office Work
Lenny: What’s interesting is with this heuristic, two-thirds of the time, it’s not going to work out.
Pete Kazanjy: Nope.
Don’t Be Afraid of Sales
Lenny: So, a lot of times, they’re going to be like, “Ah, I don’t get this, leave me alone.” Is there other leading indicators that tell you that you’re improving, knowing that only a third or maybe a fifth of the time it’ll work out? Is it talking to the boss off more often, what else do you look for?
Pete Kazanjy: Yeah, exactly. Totally. So, what are the leading indicators of success? Because if you’re only looking at lagging indicators, again, it’s probably a it’s a funnel on a new feature, so the opportunity is an at-bat or a potential transaction, and so usually what you do is you model out the stages in your opportunity. So, generally, there will be different stages depending on the sales motion. So, use Atrium as an example, we sell on customer data. It takes five minutes to turn on an Atrium account, it’s really helpful for folks. They just sign in, they OAuth with Salesforce, great. So, a really important stage in our sales motion is, we call it data light, has data been lit up? So, that’s a stage, we have a discovery stage, we have a data light stage, we have what we call a preview stage, are we previewing it with the staff? Then, we get to a commercial discussion.
So, you can measure how you’re getting to those stages, which is somebody lands on whatever page that Lenny was in charge of at Airbnb and did they click on the right thing and do they get to the next thing and did they get to the next thing, get to the next thing? So, in sales, it’s kind of the same thing. So, the more sophisticated version of this is looking at stage conversions, what have you, the less sophisticated version of it, which early on, I think is an appropriate way of doing it, is like, “Hey, man, are we getting second dates?” So, just metaphorize it to Hinge or Coffee Meets Bagel or whatever the more recent one is, it’s like, “Are we getting the second dates? Are we getting the third dates? Because if we’re not getting the second dates, probably something’s amiss there.”
So, what we want to do is we want to say, “Great, of all of our ten first meetings, how many gets to second meetings?” It would be great, the lagging indicator is 2 wins out of 10 or what have you, but I’m going to come into these conversations and out of my ten first meetings, I want seven of them to get to the second meeting. And then of those seven, maybe I want 4.5 of them to get to the third meeting, and then ultimately, I want 2 or 3 to win. That’s the way to think about that, those are the leading indicators. So, as those conversions get better like, “Man, I’m not getting any second dates. Oh, okay, cool, you need a haircut or you need a shower,” and the same applies to your sales motion, as well. Your message is not landing, you’re targeting the wrong people, what’s going on here? You need to think about it.
Rapid Fire Q&A
Lenny: You need a better pickup line.
Pete Kazanjy: There you go. Now, you’re not even getting first dates, man, go all the way up to you need a better Hinge profile picture. You’re just not getting any matches, ew.
Lenny: As a founder, do you have to get good at sales? A lot of founders are like, “Oh my God, we’re going to do PLG. We’re going to be self-serve, freemium, we don’t need sales. I’m just going to let people figure it out.” Is it a requirement of a B2B business to get good at sales as a founder?
Pete Kazanjy: I would say you don’t have to get good at it, you just have to get non-zero at it. There’s this really great article on Lenny’s newsletter on adding a sales organization to a self-serve product that Lenny had me write and then he edited the heck out of it, and it’s really a fantastic asset. But what I would say there is that there are a lot of PLG or self-serve motions out there that they’ve stagnated themselves because they didn’t add the sales piece to it. I would encourage people to read that article, I forget what it’s called, you added a really cool name.
Lenny: Oh, The Transition: Layering on Sales to Product-led Growth.
Pete Kazanjy: See, you’re good at naming things.
Lenny: That’s inspired by David Sack’s The Cadence, which I love for how to operate.
Pete Kazanjy: There you go. That is a great article. So, it’s not that you have to be great, you just have to recognize that it’s important. A good example of this would be, probably the most famous example of an organization that maybe didn’t get sales religion as quickly as they should have would be Dropbox. Dropbox has phenomenal early sales leadership. One of our investors here at Atrium is a gentleman named Mike Marg, he’s a partner at Craft Ventures, he was an early sales manager and leader there, Kyle Parrish was the head of sales at Figma, Marissa Fuhrer is over at Figma, as well. There’s all these just absolutely fantastic Dropbox folks, but the problem was is that the organization, from a product standpoint, never put all as many calories behind product development that would support the ability to sell to across an entire organization.
So, the way that I try to succinctly describe that is never mistake your lead gen for your business. I think the good news is that a lot of people took a lot of lumps there and folks have learned that, maybe Slack almost missed that, but then they brought in a bunch of Salesforce folks and other folks, actually, Mike Marg was also an early sales manager at Slack, as well, and really got a religion around that. Because it turns out that people paying 19 bucks a month or 29 bucks a month or what have you is really great, but getting to a 100,000 or a $250,000 contract, that’s where big ARR numbers start racking up, and organizations want to talk to a human in order to navigate that.
So, PLG is great for landing and permeating an organization and there’s a bunch of great… Craft invests in this like crazy, so Scratchpad is a great example of very bottoms-up. Atrium’s pretty bottoms up, as well. It’s like, I don’t know, what is the Silicon Valley joke, middle out or whatever, because we land with sales managers and SDR managers. What you’re doing is you’re solving the problem that the user has, but the problem is the user doesn’t necessarily have large budgetary authority, so you can get them stoked up, but then you’ve got to talk to the person who’s got the purse strings, and so that’s going to require sales. That’s okay.
Lenny: Just to punctuate that, basically 100% of B2B companies end up building a sales team?
Pete Kazanjy: I would say that’s the case. It’s more of a question of when versus if, so even the really famous ones like Atlassian. Atlassian, they had a sales organization, they just didn’t call it a sales organization and they went pretty far without a lot, but instead what they did was they just priced the product breathtakingly low. I think developer tools can oftentimes do this, where because developers are pretty technical, they can adopt product, they don’t need handholding in order to adopt a product that is complicated enough to be valuable. Datadog’s a good example or New Relic or AppD, but even those guys very early on had meaningful sales organizations. There’s a lot of reasons why Datadog ended up winning that market, but their sales organization is no joke. Even developer tools, you might think, cool, well, the developers can just swipe their credit cards. Yeah, they can, but then you’re going to be eventually capped there. Look at Snowflake. Snowflake has, I don’t know, 500 salespeople, you’re going to need a sales org.
Lenny: Let’s shift a bit to talking about just how to get better at sales, at the scale of sales. I think it’s interesting because you don’t have a sales background and so you’ve had to learn how to do this and you did a lot of research and building your business, you’ve had to get really good at sales. So, maybe a first question, what’s the number one tip that you have for getting better at sales?
Pete Kazanjy: The first chapter of Founding Sales talks about what I call sales mindset changes. Because I think the big thing is it’s just so weird, it’s just such a weird shift in behavior. Because if you think about it as a product manager or as an engineer or whatever, how many people do you interact with day-to-day? Oh, 6, 10 maybe.
Lenny: Not too many.
Pete Kazanjy: It’s always the same people and so it’s super comfortable, whereas in sales or anything customer facing, what ends up happening is you’re meeting multiple new humans every day, if you’re doing it right, and that just is such a mindset shift. You’re not going to be able to remember everybody. You’re going to have to write it all down. You’re going to have to use the CRM for that. You’re in the starting blocks on the track. You’re in the starting blocks and you have 90 seconds or a couple minutes to form rapport, to make somebody feel like they should trust you and they want to be honest with you. You have to be very focused on activity orientation, whereas engineering and product management, there’s does a lot of super deep work.
It’s like Paul Graham’s Maker versus Manager Schedule. Salespeople have manager schedules, interestingly enough, where what you’re doing is you’re constantly contact switching, an ideal salesperson’s calendar or a founder who’s doing sales is 2, 3, 4, maybe 5 customer-facing meetings a day with different humans. And then moreover, then you’re having incremental interactions with those folks later on, like later that week or the next week or what have you, so then you have to keep continuity of these multiple parallel conversations. It’s a totally different set of skills and so it feels super weird to start out, but what ends up happening is it’s just a skill. You just start doing it, you start doing it, you start doing it, and you just become used to it, you become calloused. You’re like, “I’m incorrigible now. You put me in an elevator, I can talk to anyone.”
So, one, just recognizing it’s going to be a pretty big mindset change, and then the second thing you can do is then once you know that there’s going to be a mindset change, is you can focus in on making those behaviors be better. So, as an example, one of the things I challenge my staff to do is I call it turbo rapport, it needs a better name. But think about people that you interact with in the world who maybe are a little shields up, they’re probably used to interacting with people who are not going to be super nice to them, maybe it’s bartenders or a flight attendant or a barista, or fill in the blank. Think about how quickly you can become friends with them, how you can break that down, because that’s going to be a really good skill for you to have when you’re interacting with a prospect.
And then what that’s going to allow you to do is then ask them candid questions about their current situation that either, A, they may know about or, B, you ask provocative questions that make them think about the world in a way maybe that you want them to and realize that they have pain they didn’t want or didn’t know that they had. My friend, Brett Burson, had this great tweet one at one point where he said, “Think about the things that you do in your day-to-day that are like a pianist, like a piano player, playing scales like, ‘Da, da, da, da, da, da.’ What is the version of that for selling?” That’s rapid rapport building, asking good questions, asking follow-up questions, being willing to ask uncomfortable questions, all those sort of things, and asking for money and then shutting up and waiting for them to answer, all these are very uncomfortable things, but the more you do them, you’ll just get good at them.
Lenny:
One of the things in your book that most shifted my mindset on sales was this shift from you’re trying to convince someone to buy this thing to you’re trying to help them and maybe this will make their life easier. Can you talk a bit about that?
Pete Kazanjy: I think this is like the, remember the modern sales versus old-school sales thing?
Lenny: Mm-hmm.
Pete Kazanjy: The old-school sales thing is like, “I’m going to sell something to a mark,” or the best example of this, “That guy’s a great sales guy, he can sell ice to an Eskimo.” It’s like, “Man, if you’re selling ice to an Eskimo, you’re an asshole. What is wrong with you? They don’t need ice,” unless they’re visiting Southern California. So, as a seller, the way that I like to frame it to people is that you’re a consultant that has a particular predilection for a given solution, your solution. Use Atrium as an example. Atrium’s minimum ICP is probably SDRs plus AEs in an organization should probably be at 10 all the way up to 300. So, if someone shows up and they’re like, “Man, I’ve got to get really good at sales, I need to buy your software, Pete,” and I’m like, “Cool. How many salespeople do you have?” They’re like, “I have one.” I’ll be like, “Man, I’m not going to sell you Atrium. You’re just going to be unhappy, it’s going to be dumb, it’s going to be a waste of our customer success resources, you’re going to churn,” all those sort of things.
But if instead what you’re doing is you’re saying, “Hey, I’m going to go out in the market and I’m going to find the people that have a high proclivity that our technology solves and then I’m going to talk with them about how they’re solving that problem right now, and ideally, through a series of questions, I’m going to reveal that to them that they’re doing it probably not great. And then once I’ve revealed to them the fact, through this directed questioning, what’s known as discovery, that they have this high magnitude problem, that it is causing them lots of money, that it is a pain in their ass, and then I reveal to them that there is a better way of approaching it and magically enough, I happen to be a representative of that solution,” well, now that’s an ideal transaction and everybody wins. And then scale that up across an entire economy and you can see why I was saying that sales is the grease that makes the economy work like that and also importantly, brings new technology to the market in a way that makes everything better.
Lenny: If someone’s listening to this and they’re like, “I want to get better at sales, what’s one thing I could do differently tomorrow, this week, to improve my ability to sell my product?” What would that be?
Pete Kazanjy: There’s the non-complicated version and there’s the complicated version. The non-complicated version would just be just walking down the street, make eye contact with everybody, and then every person that you stop next to at Starbucks or the crosswalk or whatever, just strike up a conversation with them, figure out a mechanism by which you can start a conversation with them. Compliment their shirt or their shoes or remark on something. Don’t use the weather, because that’s lazy, but figure that out, so that’s the first version. Probably the more sophisticated version is just be very, very tight on your ICP, just be very, very, very crisp around who has your problem and why. Being more crisp around that and then having that understood is a great way of making sure that you’re not wasting time on people who don’t have your problem and that you’re doing more of those loops with people who are right in the white-hot center. So, one is a behavioral thing and one is a more thoughtful thing.
Lenny: That’s great. Can you actually explain ICP briefly, because a lot of people may not know that term?
Pete Kazanjy: Thank you. So, ICP stands for Ideal Customer Profile. Actually, it’s important to think about there’s two things in a B2B sales motion, there’s the characteristics of the account, which is the company that’s going to buy, and then there’s the characteristics of the human and the personas that you’re going to be interacting with. Let’s use Amplitude as an example. Amplitude’s ICP would probably be organizations that make software products, that probably have at least a couple of product managers, because if there’s a single product manager, it might be too much, they might be at the point where they don’t need a full-blown enterprise analytics suite, and that’s probably it. And then on the human side, who are the people who participate in that conversation? Well, the product managers are going to be the ones who are going to be the users, but engineering is probably involved in order to make sure that Amplitude can talk to the cloud data warehouse and so on and so forth, and then moreover, the person who owns the budget might be the VP of product, not the product manager, or it might be the VP of engineering or the CTO.
So, those three different folks that we talked about there, it’s different humans. Ideal customer profile is understanding what those parameters look like for looking at an organization in order to say, “Man, that’s an awesome op, let’s go get in front of them,” versus, “Eh, I don’t know if that’s a very good opportunity, maybe let’s pass on that,” and then the personas are, “Great, that’s an awesome op right there. I know that I’m going to have my first conversation with Lenny, but with an intention that I’m eventually going to get to the VP of product at Airbnb, and that’s Suzy over here. And then once we get validation from her, then I know that the VPE over here is Frank,” and knowing who the personas are. So, that’s what ICP and personas are.
Lenny: Awesome. There’s a template that you’ve created that helps you lay out your ICP, so we’ll try to link to it in the show notes. I have to find it again.
Pete Kazanjy: Nice. Sounds good.
Lenny: So, we’ve talked about founder-led sales and how founders should be starting sales, we’ve talked about just how to get better at sales as a founder, as anyone. I want to talk now about hiring salespeople.
Pete Kazanjy: Sure.
Lenny: Great mug, by the way, Coffee is for Closers. I love it. Can people buy that online or is that just a one-off?
Pete Kazanjy: This is a Modern Sales Pros mugs. I think we have a bunch of Yetis that we give away for Atrium, as well, but we’re big onto sales jokes here because you have to… We stole this from New Relic, being very user-centric in your swag, so I’ve got my Sales Nerds jacket on here, I’ve got my Let’s Get It hat here, I’ve got my Coffee is for Closers mug. These are all inside sales jokes that maybe your audience won’t necessarily get, or maybe they will, but our audience very much gets them. They’re like, “Oh man, your hat’s so funny. Can you send me one?” I’m like, “No problem. You should buy our software.”
Lenny: Love it. So, hiring salespeople, we’ve talked a bit about a lot of these things, like maybe when it’s time to hire a salesperson when you’re closing a fourth or fifth of your opportunities when this while loop is kicking in. So, in terms of the who to find for this first sales role, and you mentioned that VP of sales are often let go, it’s a very high rate of not working out, is that true?
Pete Kazanjy: Yeah. Again, this is mapped out in the Founder-led Selling presentation and then also in Founding Sales, the book. Generally, what you want to do is you probably don’t want to start with a VP of sales to start, a sales leader, and there’s a couple of reasons why there. Even if you figured it out yourself, that’s required, you have to get to that minimum sufficiency of 10, 20, 30 customers yourself first. But then the reason why I advocate for folks to hire a couple of sellers or a couple of AEs to start is because, again, you have that software in your brain. Unfortunately, there is no GitHub for sales motions, and so it’s in your brain, it’s in your documents, et cetera, and so now, you’re going to teach these other folks. So, what you want to do is you want to hire a couple early-stage pioneer sellers to take that sales motion.
The downside of seeking to hire a VP of sales or a head of sales, or what have you, who actually is a head of sales is coming out of an organization where maybe he or she is a manager of managers or manages eight reps or something like that, is that person hasn’t been selling for a hot second. I think actually Jason Lemkin had a pretty funny tweet about this the other day where he was like, “Hiring the VP of sales who’s been there and done that before, why exactly does she want to do it again?” Like, “Oh, you scaled up a Datadog or Figma or whatever, you should come to my crappy little startup,” it’s like, “I’m professionally rich.” So, instead, the great folks to look at are the deputies or those early-stage sellers.
So, the example I always use here, my last software company was in recruiting, so if you have a new recruiting technology, my buddy, Troy, runs this recruiting software company called Guide. They make this really cool, guided, hey, hiring process for candidates, whatever, but they sell to recruiting organizations. So the early-stage sellers that he would be interested in would probably be early people at Lever or Greenhouse who sell to the same persona, probably around the same average selling price, but ideally, not an AE who joined Greenhouse last year or two years ago.
Greenhouse just has a phenomenal sales organization, their sales leadership is absolutely fantastic, the gentleman who’s the CRO over there is a good friend of mine, Sean Murray. But early-stage selling takes early-stage sellers or people who have been there, because you’re not going to have all the collateral, slides and scripts and whatever aren’t going to be all buttoned up and with a bow around them, and so looking for those early-stage, grimier, grittier sellers is a more effective way of going about that. Those are the folks that you want to look for once you’ve gotten to that statistical significance of your own selling capacity.
Lenny: To make that just even clearer, the suggestion is if you’re, say, a Series A founder, what’s a profile of a person you look for? You said it’s a deputy at a successful sales org?
Pete Kazanjy: I’ll give you a couple examples. I don’t know, say you’re doing some sort of design tool, I would go look at the Figma sales organization and I would look at some of the earlier sellers who were there maybe two years ago or three years ago or what have you, maybe you could consider getting a sales manager there who’s not super far from selling. A great example of this is there’s this woman, Marissa Fuhrer, who works at Figma, she’s absolutely fantastic. She works on the enterprise team there and she was at Dropbox previously as a seller for a long time.
She would be a great profile for someone who’s not too far from having sold and is willing to roll up her sleeves, but ideally, that would probably be the person who you’d want to hire after you’ve hired those couple of sellers and gotten them to success. Because the other thing, too, with Marissa, she’s probably going to look at your organization and be like, “Cool. Prove to me that your product fits the market, because I don’t want to necessarily take a bet on you,” and then you would say, “Well, in addition to having a 25% win rate with me, I have these two sellers right here and they both have 20% win rates and you can see that they’re both closing $50,000 of bookings a month, all I need you to do is scale it up.” In which case, that early stage head of sales is like, “Let’s do it.”
Lenny: She’s about to get a bunch of LinkedIn requests.
Pete Kazanjy: She’s great. This is one of the things that we really love at Atrium, is we have really great customers. We’re creating a new category of software and so it’s one of those things where more advanced, more modern sales managers and leaders really get it, that’s how it always is in category creation. But when you find the people who really get it and really get it, they turn out to be awesome. That’s one of the things that just makes startups fantastic.
Lenny: What’s a sign that maybe it’s not working out when you hire your either first salesperson or maybe first five, what are signs? Because you said it often does not work out, what are early signals like, “We should rethink this”?
Pete Kazanjy: This is another reason why it’s really important to do it yourself to start, but presuming that you’ve been able to close business on a reliable basis, again, with arm’s length prospects, it can’t be Lenny’s mother-in-law buying my software-
Lenny: Huge fan, for real, actually, she is.
Pete Kazanjy: God bless, but she’s not ICP for Atrium. This is the danger of doing revenue trades in your accelerator or whatever, it’s not real. So, if you have done that and you’ve sold 20 or 30 deals, you know it can be done, we have an existence proof of this. So, if someone else can’t do it the way that you do it, and this is why hiring two folks to start is effective, you don’t want to hire just one, maybe three, but four, it’s like, “Ugh, that’s a lot to manage,” at least to start. So, if you have done that and the person, their win rates are poor or their activity levels are poor, things like that, those are usually indicators that it’s not work out, that they’re not getting those second dates, they’re not getting those third dates, but importantly, they have to have the materials in question.
Did you create the slide deck? Did you take people through and did you give it to them? Did you take all the discovery questions that were in your brain and write them down into a Google Doc or a Notion page or what have you? Do you have a demo script for them? If those things are not present, then probably no one’s going to be successful, or at least they’re going to have to rederive all that stuff that you already did. But if you have all those precursors and it’s not sticking for someone, that’s probably a good leading indicator that they’re not going to work out
Lenny: How much time do you give these folks before you make a decision?
Pete Kazanjy: This is why it’s so, so, so important to look at leading indicators. This is something that we just think about all the time here at Atrium, from a instrumentation and data-driven sales management, is if someone’s not having customer-facing meetings, if they’re low activity, you’re never going to win anything. If you have a 50% win rate on two opportunities in a month, that’s probably still not going to be super helpful unless you have a very, very, very high deal size. So, looking at those leading indicators like, “Are they having first meetings? Are they having second meetings? What does their email volume look like? Are they progressing things through, are they getting things to proposal, and then eventually, are things closing?”
I do a bunch of masterclasses for Atrium on data-driven sales management and one of them is on ramping. It’s called Ramping For Success, I forget the name of the masterclass, but looking at those leading indicators like opportunity inflow, “Is a person putting meetings on their calendar, are they progressing them? Are they being active in the meantime?” Those are all really good leading indicators. If somebody’s not getting first meetings on the calendar, you know within a month, it’s like, “Cool, this isn’t working out.”
Now, if they’re not getting to second or third meetings, but they are getting those first meetings, well, now you know you’ve got a different problem, which they’re getting those first dates, but they’re not getting a second date and they’re not getting a second date the same way that you were, maybe that’s a coaching issue or maybe it’s just a behavioral problem that’s that you’re not going to be able to surmount. But the point is having instrumentation on the most leading indicator possible gives you eyes onto whether or not things are working or not and you can make judgements fast, because the worst possible situation is nine months in, you’re like, “Man, it’s not working.” It’s like, “Man, I bet if you looked at the leading indicators, you would have known two months in this wasn’t working.”
Lenny: I like that you gave us a bottom end of the range like, “In a month, you should be able to know, a lot of times.” What would be the max by which like, “If things are going okay, by six months, it’s probably going to be good,” or what is that timeframe?
Pete Kazanjy: Oh, where you know you’re successful?
Lenny: Yeah. It sounds like maybe from a month to some future month, this is a period where you can get a sense of this person is going to work out. What’s that range, in your mind?
Pete Kazanjy: It’s almost like you’re continuously monitoring. In the first month, maybe you spend that time onboarding the rep, teaching them, going through mock discovery conversations, mock demos, et cetera, having them ride along with you. In the second month, we would expect them to have 10 first meetings or maybe 20 first meetings and we would expect 50% of those to get to the second meetings, and we would measure those things. In the third month, we would expect some subset of those first meetings and second meetings that happened in the second month to get to a proposal, to get to a commercial conversation, and then maybe we would expect some of the deals in that month to close to win, or maybe the next month.
It’s essentially like you’re looking at the leading indicators in the appropriate timeframe, such that if someone is in month three and they’re getting a bunch of their deals to proposal, you can’t declare victory yet because the money is not in the bank, however things are looking good. So, if you get to month four and lots of things are getting to proposal, but nothing’s closing in month four and nothing’s closing in month five, you still can’t say “Olly olly oxen free,” you should still be very concerned. But if the leading indicator is at the right level for the right period or right interval in ramp, then you can feel confident, but not declare victory yet.
Lenny: Got it. Something that this is reminding me of is we are chatting ahead of this call and you mentioned that working from home is really bad for salespeople, in your experience. Can you talk about that?
Pete Kazanjy: It’s primarily bad for junior salespeople. Senior salespeople have been selling out in what’s known as the field for a long time, but when you think about the behavior that we’re talking about, which is learning, so what needs to happen? The new sellers, they need to learn the sales motion and then they need to be audited, instrumented, so the faster the loops are on that, the better off you’re going to be. If the loops are once a day of listening to their calls or maybe even a longer interval, then just the correction loops are just going to be way too slow, versus if you’re sitting next to somebody or you’re sitting amongst three or four people and listening to all their calls concurrently and then they get off of a call and it’s like, “Hey, that was really good, correction here, correction here, correction here, correction here. Here, run it back to me.”
Now, the loops, the speed with which you’re able to update their software and make sure that the sales motion is running appropriately on them, is quite high. In early-stage startups, that’s the only thing that matters, it’s a race against time to make sure that you get to success, so you can raise your next round of financing or get to profitability or what have you, and so having asynchronous distance is really problematic for that, especially for junior folks, like SDRs, junior AEs, all of that, it really is problematic. Once that sales motion is baked and can be distributed, that’s potentially a different situation, but very early on, having someone being able to sit side-by-side with your sellers, t’s hard to beat.
Lenny: So, what’s the solution, if you’re starting, now, a B2B company, your advice is, “Don’t be remote, work in an office”?
Pete Kazanjy: My point of view on that is, especially at early stage, from a founder’s standpoint, being shoulder-to-shoulder with your co-founders certainly, but even a founder who has a couple of sellers that they’re working with, being side-by-side with them in order to help them learn faster, teach them more, have accountability, and then have training loops is really what you need to do. Because the alternative is there’s a whole generation of SDRs who are, it’s kind of like learning loss, if you will, there’s a bunch of 24 year olds who have never learned the skills that are needed at the same way, at the same clip, that they would have sitting amongst 10 others with an SDR manager sitting in the middle of them, or an AE manager sitting in the middle of them.
Lenny: Any last pieces of wisdom before we get to a very exciting lightning round?
Pete Kazanjy: I think probably the biggest thing is, the thing that I just like to encourage founders and product managers and what have you, is just don’t be afraid of sales. There’s a lot of people out there who would love to tell you a story that it’s magical or like, “Oh, you’ve got to be a born seller,” or things like that and it’s really not. Those people are just talking their book, if you will, and so just getting good at those behaviors, it’s going to benefit you in a myriad of ways. Even if you don’t want to necessarily be an early-stage founder, even as a product manager within an enterprise organization or even a consumer organization, selling behaviors and good communication and persuasion and always thinking about what’s in it for them, et cetera, those are really good skills for internal selling, for external selling, if you want to interface with customers, et cetera. All these skills are very important and impactful for a myriad of personas.
Lenny: Amazing. Well, with that, we’ve reached the very exciting lightning round. I’ve got five questions for you, we’re going to go through it pretty fast. Are you ready?
Pete Kazanjy: I am.
Lenny: Question one, what are two or three books that you recommend most to other people?
Pete Kazanjy: The books that I recommend the most, there would be The Goal by Eli Goldratt. There are two books that inspired Atrium, one is the Goal, which is essentially is a novelization of the Toyota lean manufacturing system, so it’s a process engineering book written as a novel, it’s really fantastic. Sales organizations are just revenue factories, so if you want to think about systems thinking and processes, but in a way that’s not a textbook, it’s absolutely fantastic.
And then the other one is a book by Bill Walsh called The Score Takes Care of itself. Bill Walsh is a really famous football coach for the Stanford Cardinals and the San Francisco 49ers and he just broke down how you can’t worry about the score in the football game, you can only worry about the things that are in front of you, that you can control, and that if you do a high quantity of high-quality actions, whatever your position is, as a quarterback or a linebacker running back or whatever, then the score will take care of itself. That’s very applicable to sales, as well, if you focus on those leading indicators and make sure that you’re doing it in a high quantity of high quality way, then the score will take care of itself. So, those are two great books I like to recommend to folks.
Lenny: Favorite other podcasts?
Pete Kazanjy: Oh boy, I don’t listen to too many. I listen to Lenny’s and I listen to the All-In Podcast, just so I can get my fill of doom and gloom.
Lenny: And knowledge, with this one. Favorite recent movie or TV show that you’ve really enjoyed?
Pete Kazanjy: I’ve got a five-year-old, so we’re all Disney all the time, so I think probably the one that’s been on repeat recently has been Encanto. There you go.
Lenny: Love that one. Favorite interview question that you like to ask folks?
Pete Kazanjy: So, I’m going to change this up on you, it’s less about interview questions. One of the things I’m a really big fan of is job simulation, especially in sales, and so I’m a big fan of doing screens, so we actually have a written screen that we do with folks, where it’s the Google Doc that has a dozen or so biographical questions that we allow people to answer. You’d be shocked at how well it screens people, 57% people won’t do it. These are not complicated questions, it’s like, “Lenny, tell me about something that you’ve built that you’re proud of,” it’s a dozen of those questions. So, one, you can filter out people who are not serious, you can filter out people who have low levels of give a shit. You also can see whether or not people can communicate in a compelling fashion with a beginning, a middle, and an end. You can also see their attention to detail, whether or not it’s ridden with typos or they forget to answer some of them or what have you. So, it’s not an interview question thing, but that’s a huge hiring hack, from my perspective.
Lenny: This is a form that folks fill out when they’re trying to apply to work at Atrium, is that right?
Pete Kazanjy: Yeah. Or it’s just something that for all my portfolio companies, as well, that people just use it. It’s a Google Doc and you just clone it, give it to them, “You have edit rights, let me know when it’s done.” You’d be shocked, people are like, “Oh, I didn’t forgot to do it.” Great, you told me everything I need.
Lenny: Amazing. Final question, do you have a favorite story of you or a salesperson closing an awesome deal, something that seemed impossible, something that you’re proud of?
Pete Kazanjy: There’s a gentleman in our sales organization named Sean, who was an early seller here, he’s now a sales manager, he is absolutely fantastic. I think one of the things that early-stage founders and also sellers have to remember is you’re, generally speaking, not going to close the deal on the first time through the pipe. As we discussed earlier, if you have a 30% win rate, that’s pretty great. If you have a 20% win rate, that’s pretty solid, but that still means that four out of five are not going to close, but the next time around, they might, so win rate on the second time through the pipeline.
So, Sean closed, one of our biggest customers is a company called GRIN, they’re absolutely fantastic. They make influencer management software for brands, very cool stuff. I think Sean probably ran three or four ops with them before we were able to get a toehold in the account a couple years ago, they were much smaller, and so now, I think they have 100 SDRs and 80 AEs that are being managed using Atrium. So, I think there’s a good lesson there, which is it’s not necessarily going to be the first time through the pipe and it’s maybe not the second time, but you just have to keep pushing that boulder up the hill and eventually, when you do, good things happen.
Lenny: What a great lesson to leave us with, very empowering. Pete, this was everything I hoped it would be. Two final questions, where can folks find you online if they want to learn more, more about Atrium, the book, and then how can folks be useful to you?
Pete Kazanjy: I’m pretty easy to find online, I’m the only Pete Kazanjy in the United States, as far as I can tell. Google will autocorrect my name if you Google it wrong, so that’s pretty helpful. Find me on LinkedIn, find me on Twitter. You can also find Founding Sales at foundingsales.com, as Lenny notes. The whole book is available online as hypertext, you can buy a physical copy, as well, but the reason why my wife put it into a Squarespace site was because we wanted people to be able to search it and come back to it and use it as a reference and so on and so forth. And then in terms of how folks can be helpful to me, if you work for an organization that has between 10 and 300 salespeople and you’re looking to manage them better via metric, make them more efficient, that’s a big watch word these days, is efficient sales organizations through better management, Atrium is fantastic for that. Atriumhq.com is the domain, but you can also just Google Atrium sales and we’ll be the top result, as well.
Lenny: Amazing. Pete, thank you for being here.
Pete Kazanjy: It was awesome. Thanks, Lenny.
Lenny: Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| AE | 保持原文(Account Executive,客户经理) |
| All-In Podcast | 保持原文(播客名) |
| Amplitude | 保持原文(公司名) |
| AppDynamics | 保持原文(公司名) |
| ARR | 年度经常性收入(Annual Recurring Revenue) |
| Atrium | 保持原文(公司名) |
| BDR | 保持原文(Business Development Representative,销售开发代表) |
| Bill Walsh | 保持原文(人名) |
| bookings | 签约额 |
| Brett Burson | 保持原文(人名) |
| Brianne | 保持原文(人名,SaaS School 的组织者) |
| churn | 客户流失 |
| collateral | 配套材料(如幻灯片、话术脚本、邮件模板等销售辅助材料) |
| CRO | 首席营收官(Chief Revenue Officer) |
| customer development | 客户开发 |
| customer success | 客户成功 |
| Datadog | 保持原文(公司名) |
| David Sacks | 保持原文(人名) |
| discovery | 需求发现 |
| Eli Goldratt | 保持原文(人名) |
| Encanto | 《魔法满屋》(迪士尼电影) |
| existence proof | 存在性证明 |
| Figma | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Founder-led sales | 创始人主导销售 |
| Founding Sales | 保持原文(书名/品牌名) |
| give a shit | 上心程度(口语,指做事的认真/在意程度) |
| Greenhouse | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Guide | 保持原文(公司名) |
| ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) | 理想客户画像 |
| incumbents | 现有大公司(指市场上已有的成熟企业) |
| Jason Lemkin | 保持原文(人名) |
| job simulation | 工作模拟 |
| Kyle Parrish | 保持原文(人名) |
| lagging indicators | 滞后指标 |
| leading indicators | 领先指标 |
| Lever | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Marissa Fuhrer | 保持原文(人名) |
| Mike Marg | 保持原文(人名) |
| minimum viable product (MVP) | 最小可行产品 |
| mock discovery | 模拟需求发现 |
| New Relic | 保持原文(公司名) |
| objection | 异议(销售术语,指客户提出的反对意见或疑虑) |
| opportunities | 商机(销售术语,指潜在的交易机会) |
| Paul Graham | 保持原文(人名) |
| PLG | 产品驱动增长(Product-led Growth) |
| proposal | 提案 |
| ramping | 入职 ramp(销售新人的爬坡期) |
| ride along | 旁听跟单 |
| rocket surgery | 高深莫测的东西(由”rocket science”和”brain surgery”拼合的俚语) |
| sales motion | 销售模式(指将潜在客户带过整个销售流程并最终成交的所有活动的总称) |
| Scratchpad | 保持原文(产品名) |
| screen | 筛选 |
| SDR | 销售开发代表(Sales Development Representative) |
| Sean Murray | 保持原文(人名) |
| selling while loop | 销售循环(借用编程中 while loop 的比喻,指可重复的销售流程) |
| talking their book | 为自己站台(金融术语,指维护自身利益而发言) |
| The Goal | 《目标》(Eli Goldratt 的著作) |
| The Score Takes Care of Itself | 《比分自然会好》(Bill Walsh 的著作) |
| Troy | 保持原文(人名) |
| turbo rapport | 极速破冰(Pete 自创的销售技巧术语) |
| win rate | 赢单率 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
创始人主导销售 | Pete Kazanjy(《Founding Sales》作者,Atrium 联合创始人)
创始人主导销售 | Pete Kazanjy(《Founding Sales》作者,Atrium 联合创始人)
访谈文字稿
Pete Kazanjy: 我最想鼓励创始人、产品经理等人的就是:不要害怕销售。外面有很多人喜欢给你讲一套故事,说销售是某种魔法,或者”你必须天生就是个销售”,诸如此类。其实根本不是那么回事。那些人不过是在为自己站台罢了。掌握这些行为技能,会在方方面面给你带来好处。
Lenny: 欢迎收听 Lenny’s Podcast,我是 Lenny,我在这里的目标是帮助大家在打造和增长产品的手艺上变得更好。今天的嘉宾是 Pete Kazanjy。Pete 是我个人最喜欢的销售类书籍的作者,这本书叫 Founding Sales,我推荐给每一位 B2B 创始人。他还运营着一个庞大的销售人社区,叫 Modern Sales Pros。他也是 Atrium 的 CEO 兼创始人——一个通过数据和分析帮助销售团队提升效率的 SaaS 产品。在这次对话中,我们聚焦三件事:第一,为什么创始人应该自己长期做销售,然后才能招聘第一位销售人员,以及什么时候该招第一个人;第二,我们讨论了如何招聘第一位销售人员、简历上应该看重什么、以及人们最容易犯的错误;最后,我们分享了一堆提升销售能力的实操技巧。Pete 并非销售出身,他所有的一切都是通过实际去做、学习、研究、反复实践得来的。我相信你会从这次对话中学到很多。好了,有请 Pete Kazanjy。
结缘与背景
Lenny: Pete,欢迎来到播客。
Pete Kazanjy: 嘿,Lenny,太高兴见到你了。
Lenny: 我这边更高兴。自从这个播客上线以来,我一直想请你来,今天终于如愿了。我们在网上认识好几年了,从我发现了你的书 Founding Sales 开始——这个我们后面会聊到——认识你一直很愉快,所以再次感谢你来。
Pete Kazanjy: 说来话长——当时 Lenny 发了他那篇关于不同类型的市场(marketplace)以及如何启动流动性和增长的文章,我简直着了迷。后来不知怎么的,我在 Brianne Kimmel 的 SaaS School 上碰到了你。我做了一个关于创始人主导销售的演讲,结束后围了一大群人,我在聊网上那些优秀的写作者和优质内容时提到了那个系列,然后你举起手来说”那是我写的”,我当时就想,“什么?你也太厉害了吧。“之后我们一起喝了杯啤酒,从此幸福地在一起了。
Lenny: 看看我们现在。后来你还鼓励我把那篇文章扩展成书,我到现在还没做,也许有一天吧。
Pete Kazanjy: 总会的。
Lenny: 总会的。
接下来我们会聊很多关于销售的内容,以及你在书中涵盖的大量话题。在正式开始之前,能不能花一分钟介绍一下你的背景和你做过的一些事情,让大家对你在销售领域的经历有个了解?
Pete Kazanjy: 我觉得对大家来说最重要的一点可能是:我最初其实并没有销售背景。大多数销售领导者和销售人员都是科班出身——从学校毕业,从 BDR 做起,然后升为 AE,再成为 AE 经理或 BDR 经理,最终走向销售管理层。而我的背景其实是产品营销和产品管理。我早期的科技生涯是在 VMware 开始的,那里有非常多优秀的 VMware 校友网络。然后我在 2009 年创办了一家叫 TalentBin 的招聘软件公司。我们很快意识到,“天哪,B2B 软件这东西不会自己卖出去,不管网上的人怎么说”——至少在当时是这样。所以我不得不成为我们自己的第一个销售、销售经理、第一任销售负责人,我就是在那时候学会做销售的。
我也意识到,“这不是什么高深莫测的东西,谁都能学会。既然我能学会,别人也能学会,哪怕当时根本没有相关文档。“后来这家软件公司在 2014 年被 Monster Worldwide 收购了。再之后我写了一本面向创始人和初次做销售的人的销售书,就叫 Founding Sales。写它主要是因为这就是我当时希望拥有的那本书——而不是只能靠 First Round Capital 投资组合里的那些故事来摸索。之后,我创办了后来成为全美最大的销售运营和领导力社区——Modern Sales Pros,现在有三万名销售运营和销售领导者等成员。然后又创办了一家新公司 Atrium,做数据驱动的销售管理软件,然后就到了今天。所以我对销售还算略知一二,事实证明我说的是现代销售,而不是老派销售。
Lenny: 噢,我很想听听那是什么意思。但在问你这个问题之前,我想先提一下你的书——Founding Sales——我给每一位正在摸索销售的创始人的都是这本书。每次我把这本书推荐给他们,或者直接指向你的网站(上面全部免费公开),他们的反应永远是:“我的天,这正是我需要的。“所以在我们今天的对话中,会覆盖书中大量的内容。
Pete Kazanjy: 太好了。
Lenny: 你能不能简要谈谈什么是现代销售,跟你所说的传统销售或老派销售有什么区别?
Pete Kazanjy: 哦,我觉得就是一个思维方式的转变。这跟为什么创始人和其他人会对销售有那种”呃,销售,恶心”的印象,多少有点关系——因为人们唯一接触到的销售就是《大亨游戏》(Glengarry Glen Ross),或者电影里那种油腻的二手车推销员之类的形象。但实际上应该这样理解销售人员的角色:他们是市场中的微观经济行为者,主动把供给带到需求面前,而不是等需求自己找到供给。他们手里有供给,四处奔走去找那些可能产生需求的人——也许他们现在就有这个需求,也许他们自己还没意识到有这个需求——然后销售人员向他们阐明为什么他们应该有这个需求。
所以,第一,这个过程从技术推广的角度来看非常重要;第二,它非常可衡量,尤其是在现代环境下,有了现代 CRM 系统,加上我们所有的数字化活动——邮件、日历、电话、Zoom 等等——所有这些信息现在都被记录下来了,使你可以据此衡量、管理和改进行为。这就像当年做产品分析,最初只能凭感觉、靠直觉,然后 Mixpanel 出现了,Amplitude 出现了,以此类推。销售领域也是一样。所以现代销售是一种更深思熟虑、更运营化、更严谨、更分析的路径,这其实已经存在一段时间了。有句话说得对——“未来已经到来,只是尚未广泛分布”——但现在它正在被更广泛地传播和接受。就像体育界、棒球界从《点球成金》(Moneyball)之前到《点球成金》之后的转变一样,我们现在正在经历同样的翻转。这就是两者之间的差异。
创始人主导销售
Lenny: 太棒了。我确实想聊聊怎么在销售上变得更好,以及你在销售提升方面的心得。但在展开那部分对话之前,我想先谈谈创始人主导销售。你之前提到过这个话题,你的书基本上就是以这个概念命名的。能不能谈谈它是什么、为什么这么重要,以及创始人通常会在这个问题上犯什么错?
Pete Kazanjy: 我把 Founding Sales 这本书看作是 Eric Ries 的《精益创业》(The Lean Startup)、Steve Blank 的《四步创业法》(Four Steps to the Epiphany)或《创业所有者手册》(Startup Owner’s Manual)的续篇。如果你想想产品经历的发展阶段——这里说的都是 B2B——第一步,你得搞清楚你在解决什么问题,并且验证它确实存在。它不能是”哦,我以为我有这个问题”——它必须经过验证。这就是客户开发(customer development),是客户研究,更偏产品管理的职能。然后就是构建最小功能集,证明也许技术能匹配这个问题并解决它。
我们作为技术人员创造价值的方式,就是把技术、代码——比特也好、原子也好——拼装起来,解决人们的问题。但接下来的步骤就是:“好,现在我得让人为这个付钱,而且得用可靠的方式做到,用可扩展的方式做到。“这里有一个循环。不是说”产品做完了,扔过墙去,你们玩去吧”。它是一个循环——你的最小可行产品(MVP)很可能很烂,而要把它推进到最小有价值产品,你就得和大量客户打交道,这就是一种销售行为——走到客户面前说:“嘿,我觉得你可能也有这个问题,如果你跟这些人看起来差不多的话。”
关键在于,你不能把这个行为外包出去——创始人必须亲自做。很多人问我这个问题:“可我不擅长销售啊”,或者”我害怕跟人说话”,或者”跟不那么友好的人打交道让我不自在”。换个角度想——我忘了是谁说的——“初创公司对 incumbents(现有大公司),就是一场创新能否跑赢分发、分发能否跑赢创新的竞赛。“跟这个相关的一个概念是:作为创始人,你自己去学会卖东西——哪怕只是达到最低限度的”还行”——通过跟不那么友好的人互动、进行商业对话、要求对方为交付的价值付费——这比你让某个第三方变得跟你一样精通你所要攻克领域的专业知识和议题,要容易得多。
因为作为创始人,在早期——拿 Atrium 来说,我们做数据驱动的销售管理软件,它的存在是为了帮助销售经理和团队用指标和数据来提升销售代表的绩效。我的理解是类似 Datadog、Amplitude 那样的产品,但面向的是你的销售团队。我大概是全世界最懂销售分析的人了,所以回到 2016、2017 年我们做这件事的时候——先不说我本身就已经知道怎么做最低可行销售——如果我那时候试图让另一个人先变得跟我一样专业,再让他出去在市场上做这件事,效果会很差。
这就是为什么 Steve Blank 总说,初创公司想要规模化就非得开除第一个销售副总裁——往往就是因为跳过了这一步,创始人想着:“我来往上面撒点销售的东西,再招个销售负责人什么的,某个销售员,把这个外包出去。“你真的不能这么做——至少在前几十个客户阶段不能做——根本行不通。你会失去反馈循环,失去关于你的信息是否匹配市场的学习机会,诸如此类。你等于在通过第三方的销售人员玩传话游戏——而你真正应该做的是一开始把这一切都保留在一个人的脑子里,等形成一个可重复的销售循环(selling while loop)之后,再把它打包交给别人。所以这就是我关于为什么创始人必须亲自做销售的长篇大论。
Lenny: 我本来想试着总结一下你该做这件事的理由——听起来有很多。第一,搞清楚你到底应该做什么产品,这是创始人应该去卖东西的一个理由;第二,学会如何定位、推介和销售;第三,搞清楚你招销售的时候能教他们什么。这算是你对”为什么创始人应该亲自销售一段时间”的总结吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 对,没错。第一,这能帮到你的产品开发,因为你不会被隔离开来——这一点是确定的。第二,你会成为那个搞清楚如何有效谈论这个产品的人。第三,它让你能够把这些打包起来交给其他人——因为 B2B 初创公司就是这样扩展的:它不是 WhatsApp、Twitter 或 Airbnb 那种通过营销实现规模化的模式,B2B 组织扩展的主要方式就是增加更多的销售人员,让他们去跟潜在客户面对面开会。
Pete Kazanjy: 而且你最终会撞上每周时间的上限——一周也就四五十个小时,尤其是作为销售人员,你要在工作时间跟其他人打交道,所以扩展规模的方式就是增加更多的销售人员。这就是为什么把销售流程打包起来如此重要——因为你要把它塞进两个新的销售人员脑子里,等他们成功了,就扩展到四个,再成功就扩展到八个,再成功就扩展到十六个。
Lenny: 你提到了这个 while loop 的概念,我很喜欢。那么,什么时候该招第一个销售人员呢?这就引出了一个问题:我什么时候该做这件事?
什么时候该招第一个销售人员
Pete Kazanjy: 我不是软件工程师,但我喜欢跟技术受众用技术比喻,因为我觉得这样有助于理解。就好比当程序在你的本地能跑通的时候,就该试试看能不能在别处复现了——如果在本地能稳定运行不出错,那下一步就是看看能不能在别人那里也跑通。那”不出错”具体怎么定义呢?一般来说,这取决于你的销售模式(sales motion),但基本上就是你能以一个还算不错的赢单率——大概15%、20%或25%——稳定地把首次会议转化为最终客户,而且是以可靠的方式做到的。不是那种”我接触了10个潜在客户,谈下来2个”的情况——那当然很好,是个不错的开始——但你得把规模扩大5倍、10倍。
拿50次、100次尝试来说,现在你知道了,对于每一批10个首次会议——在销售领域这叫作商机(opportunities)——每接触一批10个,你能成交1个、1.5个、2个还是2.5个?如果你处于这个区间,那就不错。但如果你是”每接触30个才成交1个”,那看起来效率就相当低了,除非你卖的是50万美元一单的那种生意。所以,判断标准就是到了那个感觉具有统计显著性的节点,感觉是可重复的——因为接下来你要做的事情,就是觉得现在可以安全地把这套流程抽象出来交给别人了。
因为要走向成功,我们不能指望 Lenny 从早到晚一直在卖东西。我们要做的是把 Lenny 脑子里的信息提取出来,做成幻灯片、话术脚本、邮件模板之类的,然后把这些塞进两个新的销售代表的脑子里,看看能不能让它在”销售云”上跑起来。刚开始可能会失败——就像你发现”嗯,本地能跑,但那边跑崩了,为什么?“——然后下一个阶段就是你要搞清楚怎么让其他人也能像你一样成功地销售,这就变成了你的下一个任务。
其实这就是我在 Brianne 的 SaaS School 上做的那个演讲,你 Google 一下”Founder-led Selling”就能找到,网上有。基本上,B2B 成熟度旅程中有好几个阶段,你必须按顺序一步步走完才能进入下一个——如果你跳过阶段,那就完了。所以在当前这个情况下,如果你已经能可靠地自己销售这个产品了,很好。接下来要做的是让至少几个人也能像你一样可靠地销售——不是10个人,因为你同时上手10个人是不可能让其中2个人成功的。等你把那2个人带成功了,你才有资格扩展到4个、8个,以此类推。
赢单率的经验法则
Lenny: 我很喜欢你分享的这个经验法则——你希望达到大约15%到25%的联系人最终转化为客户。我看你在晃大拇指表示认可。我觉得这真的很有用。所以大概不到三分之一的比例,尝试50到100次,差不多就是你该达到的水平?
Pete Kazanjy: 对。重要的是,你不应该——我觉得听 Lenny Podcast 的很多产品经理可能会对这点有共鸣——你不应该一次把所有事情做完。你应该分批次引入用户群体,观察情况,学习,然后再引入新的用户群体。去做100次尝试然后问”成功了吗还是没成功?“,跟”先找10个潜在客户,争取约到10个首次会议”是完全不同的。你要把这些互动全部走一遍,看看你的对话效果如何,看看你的发现性问题是否引发了正确的回应还是不对的回应,看看你的幻灯片效果如何,看看你的演示效果如何,诸如此类。
如果效果不错,你能推进到下一个阶段——“太好了,我很愿意把你介绍给我的老板”——这就是个好信号。如果感觉”就是没有打动对方”,好,回到起点重新来过。而不是一口气做100次然后问”到底行不行?“我们要把它拆分开来,不断地迭代、迭代、迭代。再说一次,我觉得你的听众可能会对这一点有共鸣——理解销售模式(sales motion)的一个好方法是把它类比成软件。所谓销售模式,就是个花哨的说法,指的就是你为了把一个潜在客户带过整个销售流程并最终成交所做的所有事情。你要做的就是不断更新它。比如刚才潜在客户问了一个很有意思的问题,我没有一个好的回答,而且我连对应的幻灯片都没有。
那我该怎么办?我应该做一张幻灯片来处理那个异议(objection),这样我可以视觉化地展示给他们看,同时也能给我提供一个框架和话术路径,这样会好很多。好,我就这么做,然后我更新源代码。现在我的销售模式就更新了。到下一轮循环,理想情况下,下次有人说”嗯,我不太确定,Lenny,感觉不太像 XYZ 那样”的时候,你就能说”很多人都会这么说,但你看这里,你可以看到这个。""哦,确实,说得有道理。""太好了,那下一步,我们来跟你老板聊聊。“于是你的销售模式更新了,配套材料更新了,现在我们变成了更高效的销售人员。你就是要在拥有一个可重复的销售模式之前,这样反复迭代几十次、几十次、又几十次。
前置指标与领先信号
Lenny: 有意思的是,按照这个经验法则,三分之二的情况下是不会成功的。
Pete Kazanjy: 没错。
Lenny: 也就是说很多时候对方会说”嗯,我没搞懂,别烦我了”。除了最终的成交结果,有没有其他领先指标能告诉你自己在进步?毕竟知道只有三分之一甚至五分之一的情况会成功。是更多地被引荐给老板吗,你还看什么?
Pete Kazanjy: 对,没错,完全正确。那么成功的领先指标有哪些?因为如果你只看滞后指标的话——同样,这就像一个新功能的漏斗——商机就是一次尝试或一笔潜在交易,通常你会把商机的各个阶段建模出来。一般来说,根据销售模式的不同,会有不同的阶段。以 Atrium 为例,我们基于客户数据来销售。开通一个 Atrium 账户只需要五分钟,对用户来说真的很有帮助——他们只需要登录,用 Salesforce 做 OAuth 授权就好了。所以我们销售模式中一个非常重要的阶段,我们称之为”data light”——数据是否已经点亮了?这就是一个阶段。我们有一个发现阶段(discovery),有一个数据点亮阶段,有一个我们称之为预览阶段的——是否在与员工进行预览?然后我们才会进入商务讨论。
Pete Kazanjy: 所以你可以测量自己在各个阶段之间的推进情况——就像有人访问了 Lenny 当年在 Airbnb 负责的某个页面,他们有没有点击正确的按钮,有没有进入下一步,再进入下一步?销售中其实也差不多。更精细的做法是看阶段转化率之类的,但更简单的做法——我觉得早期阶段这样做是合适的——就是,“嘿,我们有没有约到第二次约会?“把它类比为 Hinge 或者 Coffee Meets Bagel 之类的约会软件,“我们有没有第二次约会?有没有第三次约会?因为如果连第二次约会都约不到,那多半是哪里出了问题。”
所以我们要做的就是问:“好,在我们十次初次会面中,有多少能推进到第二次会面?“滞后指标是十次中成交两单,那当然好。但我会给自己设定这样的目标——十次初次会面中,我希望有七次能推进到第二次会面。然后在这七次中,我希望有四次半能推进到第三次会面,最终我希望赢下其中两到三单。这就是思考这个问题的方法,这些就是领先指标。所以当这些转化率变得更好时,你就会发现——“天哪,我连第二次约会都约不到。哦好吧,你需要剪个头发,或者洗个澡。“这同样适用于你的销售模式——你的信息没有打动对方,你的目标人群选错了,到底怎么回事?你需要好好想想。
Lenny: 你需要一条更好的搭讪词。
Pete Kazanjy: 没错。现在你连初次约会都约不到了,得从最根本上说起——你需要一张更好的 Hinge 头像。完全匹配不到,唉。
创始人是否必须擅长销售
Lenny: 作为创始人,你必须擅长销售吗?很多创始人会说,“天哪,我们要做 PLG,我们要做自助服务、免费增值,不需要销售。我就让用户自己摸索好了。“对于 B2B 企业来说,创始人擅长销售是一个必要条件吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 我觉得你不必做到擅长,你只需要不做零就行。Lenny 的 newsletter 上有一篇非常好的文章,讲的是如何在自助服务产品上加建销售团队,是 Lenny 让我写的,然后他大刀阔斧地编辑了一番,确实是一份非常棒的资料。但我想说的是,有很多 PLG 或自助服务的模式,因为没有加上销售这个环节,反而使自己停滞了。我建议大家去读那篇文章,我忘了它叫什么名字了,你加了一个很酷的标题。
Lenny: 哦,叫《The Transition: Layering on Sales to Product-led Growth》。
Pete Kazanjy: 看,你就是擅长起名字。
Lenny: 那个标题灵感来自 David Sacks 的《The Cadence》,我很喜欢那本书讲运营的方式。
Pete Kazanjy: 没错。那确实是一篇好文章。所以,你不必做到多出色,你只需要认识到它的重要性。一个很好的例子,大概也是最著名的例子——一个也许没有尽早”皈依”销售信仰的组织——就是 Dropbox。Dropbox 早期拥有非常出色的销售领导力。我们在 Atrium 的一位投资者名叫 Mike Marg,他是 Craft Ventures 的合伙人,曾是那里早期的销售经理和领导者;Kyle Parrish 曾是 Figma 的销售负责人;Marissa Fuhrer 也在 Figma。有很多非常出色的 Dropbox 出身的人才,但问题在于,从产品角度来说,这个组织从未投入足够多的精力去开发那些能够支撑向整个企业级客户销售的产品功能。
所以,我尝试用一句话来概括:永远不要把你的获客手段误认为是你的业务。好消息是,很多人在那上面吃了不少苦头,大家已经学到了这一点。也许 Slack 差点也错过了这一步,但后来他们引入了一大批来自 Salesforce 的人,实际上 Mike Marg 也曾是 Slack 早期的销售经理,他们真正开始重视这件事了。因为事实证明,用户每月付 19 美元或 29 美元确实不错,但要拿到 5 万美元、10 万美元甚至 25 万美元的合同,那才是大额 ARR 数字开始累积的地方,而企业客户在走完这个流程时,是需要和一个真人沟通的。
所以 PLG 对于切入并渗透一个组织是很好的。Craft 在这方面疯狂地投资,比如 Scratchpad 就是一个很好的自下而上的例子。Atrium 也算是比较自下而上的。就像硅谷的那个笑话,什么”中间切入”之类的,因为我们的切入点是销售经理和 SDR 经理。你做的是解决用户的问题,但问题是用户不一定有很大的预算权限。你可以让他们兴奋起来,但最终你得跟掌握预算的人谈,那就需要销售了。这没什么问题。
Lenny: 总结一下,基本上 100% 的 B2B 公司最终都会建立销售团队?
Pete Kazanjy: 我觉得确实如此。问题更多是”何时”而不是”是否”。即使是那些非常著名的公司,比如 Atlassian。Atlassian 其实是有销售团队的,他们只是不叫销售团队而已,而且他们在没有太多销售力量的情况下走了很远。但他们的做法是把产品价格定得极其低。我觉得开发者工具很多时候可以做到这一点,因为开发者技术能力很强,他们可以自己采用产品,不需要手把手地教他们使用一个足够复杂、有足够价值的产品。Datadog 就是一个好例子,New Relic、AppDynamics 也是。但即使是这些公司,在很早期就有了相当有规模的的销售组织。Datadog 最终赢得那个市场有很多原因,但他们的销售组织绝对不是开玩笑的。即便是开发者工具,你可能会想,“开发者直接刷信用卡就行了嘛。“是的,他们可以,但你最终会在那里遇到天花板。看看 Snowflake。Snowflake 大概有 500 个销售人员,你会需要一个销售团队的。
如何提升销售能力
Lenny: 我们换个话题,来谈谈如何提升销售能力,以及销售的规模化。我觉得这很有意思,因为你本身没有销售背景,所以你不得不学习这些。你在创业过程中做了大量研究,也必须把销售做到非常出色。那么第一个问题:你对提升销售能力的第一条建议是什么?
Pete Kazanjy: 《Founding Sales》的第一章讲的就是我所说的”销售心态转变”。因为我觉得最关键的一点是,这真的很奇怪,这是一种非常奇怪的行为转变。你想想看,作为产品经理或者工程师,你日常要跟多少人打交道?大概 6 个、10 个吧。
Lenny: 不算太多。
销售的心态转变
Pete Kazanjy: 总是同一批人,所以非常舒适。而在销售或任何面向客户的工作中,如果你做得对的话,你每天都会见到好几个陌生人,这本身就是一个巨大的心态转变。你不可能记住所有人,你必须把一切都写下来,必须为此使用 CRM。你就好比站在田径赛的起跑器上——你只有 90 秒或几分钟的时间来建立融洽感,让对方觉得应该信任你、愿意对你坦诚。你必须非常注重活动导向,而工程和产品管理则截然不同,那里面有大量深度专注的工作。
这就好比 Paul Graham 说的”创造者日程 vs 管理者日程”。有趣的是,销售人员的日程表是管理者类型的——你做的事情就是不断切换沟通对象。一个理想的销售人员,或一个正在做销售的创始人的日历,应该是每天 2 到 5 个面对不同客户的会议。而且不仅如此,之后你还要跟这些人进行后续互动——也许是那周晚些时候、下周等等——所以你必须同时维持多条并行对话的连续性。这是一套完全不同的技能,刚开始的时候会感觉非常别扭。但最终你会发现这只是一门技能而已。你不断去做、不断去做、不断去做,慢慢地就习惯了,就变得皮糙肉厚了。你会觉得自己变得”无可救药”了——把我扔进电梯里,我能跟任何人搭上话。
快速建立融洽感
所以,首先要认识到这会是一个相当大的心态转变。接下来你能做的,就是一旦知道会有这种心态转变,就可以集中精力让那些行为做得更好。举个例子,我给团队的一个挑战,我把它叫作”极速破冰”(turbo rapport)——这个名字还需要更好的措辞。你想想那些你在日常生活中接触到的人,他们可能有点防备心,可能习惯了跟不太友善的人打交道——也许是酒吧调酒师、空乘人员、咖啡师,诸如此类。想想你能多快跟他们成为朋友、如何打破那层隔阂,因为这对你在跟潜在客户互动时会是一个非常有用的技能。
一旦你做到了这一点,接下来就可以对他们当前的真实情况提出坦诚的问题——要么是他们可能已经意识到的,要么是你提出一些有启发性的问题,引导他们以你希望的方式思考自己的处境,从而意识到自己有未曾察觉或不愿承认的痛点。我的朋友 Brett Burson 曾经发过一条很棒的推文,他说:“想想你日常工作中有哪些事情像钢琴家弹音阶一样——‘哒哒哒哒哒’——那销售版本的音阶是什么?“那就是:快速建立融洽感、提出好问题、追问、敢于问令人不舒服的问题,诸如此类——还有开口要钱,然后闭嘴等对方回答。这些都是非常让人不舒服的事情,但你做得越多,就会越擅长。
[广告段落已跳过]
从说服到帮助的思维转变
Lenny: 你书中有一段内容,对我销售观念的改变最大,就是从”试图说服别人买这个东西”转变为”试图帮助他们,也许这个东西能让他们的生活更轻松”。你能谈谈这个吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 我觉得这就是我之前提到的现代销售和传统销售的区别。
Lenny: 嗯。
Pete Kazanjy: 传统销售的思路是”我要把东西卖给一个冤大头”,最典型的说法就是:“那家伙是个了不起的销售,他能把冰卖给爱斯基摩人。“这就好比——“伙计,如果你在把冰卖给爱斯基摩人,你是个混蛋。你怎么回事?人家根本不需要冰”——除非他们正好在访问南加州。所以,作为销售人员,我喜欢这样向人们表述:你是一个顾问,只是碰巧对某个特定解决方案——也就是你自己的解决方案——有偏好。拿 Atrium 来举例。Atrium 最低的理想客户画像(ICP)大概是一个组织中 SDR 加 AE 的数量应该在 10 到 300 之间。所以如果有人跑来说:“嘿,我得把销售搞好,我需要买你的软件,Pete。“我说:“好的,你们有多少销售人员?“他们说:“一个。“我会说:“伙计,我不会把 Atrium 卖给你。你只会不开心,这会很愚蠢,会浪费我们的客户成功(customer success)资源,你最终会流失(churn)掉”——诸如此类。
但如果你换一种方式,你说:“我要走向市场,去找那些我们的技术极有可能解决他们问题的人,然后跟他们讨论目前是怎么解决这个问题的。理想情况下,通过一系列提问,我要让他们意识到自己目前的做法可能并不怎么样。“然后,一旦通过这种有针对性的提问——也就是所谓的需求发现(discovery)——揭示出他们确实存在一个高严重度的问题,这个问题让他们损失大量金钱,让他们头疼不已,接下来我再告诉他们有一种更好的方法,而恰好我就是那个解决方案的代表——那么,这就是一笔理想的交易,所有人都赢了。把这个模式放大到整个经济体,你就能理解为什么我说销售是让经济运转的润滑剂,同时也是将新技术引入市场、让一切变得更好的关键力量。
立即可行的销售提升建议
Lenny: 如果有人在听这期节目,心想”我想提升销售能力,有什么是我明天、这周就能做出改变来提升产品销售能力的?“你会怎么说?
Pete Kazanjy: 有简单版本,也有复杂版本。简单版本就是走到街上,跟每个人有眼神交流,然后在星巴克、人行横道或者任何地方,每一个停在你旁边的人,就跟他们搭话,想出一种开启对话的方式。夸他们的衬衫或鞋子,或者对什么发表一句评论。别用天气当话题,因为那太偷懒了,但要找到一种方式——这是第一个版本。可能更成熟的做法是,对你的理想客户画像(ICP)做到非常非常精准,对谁有你的问题、为什么有,做到极其清晰。在这上面更清晰,并把这种理解内化,是一个很好的方式,能确保你不会在那些没有你解决的问题的人身上浪费时间,同时把更多的循环留给那些正好处在最核心需求区的人。所以,一个是行为层面的练习,一个是更偏思考层面的方法。
Lenny: 很好。你能不能简要解释一下 ICP?因为很多人可能不知道这个词。
Pete Kazanjy: 谢谢提醒。ICP 的全称是理想客户画像(Ideal Customer Profile)。实际上很重要的一点是,在 B2B 的销售模式中有两个维度:一个是账户特征,也就是将要购买的那家公司;另一个是你将要打交道的人类特征和角色画像。以 Amplitude 为例。Amplitude 的理想客户画像可能是什么样的?大概是那些做软件产品的公司,至少有几名产品经理——因为如果只有一个产品经理,可能还没到那个阶段,他们可能还不需要一套完整的企业级分析套件,差不多就是这样。然后从人的角度来看,谁会参与到这场对话中?产品经理会是使用者,但工程团队可能也要参与,确保 Amplitude 能对接云数据仓库等等,而且,掌握预算的人可能是产品副总裁,而不是产品经理,也可能是工程副总裁或者 CTO。
所以刚才提到的这三类不同的人,是不同的个体。理想客户画像就是理解这些参数长什么样,这样你在审视一家公司时就能判断:“这个商机太棒了,我们要去接触他们”,还是说:“嗯,不确定这是不是一个好机会,也许可以跳过”。然后角色画像就是:“好的,那边确实是个很棒的商机。我知道我的第一次对话会从 Lenny 开始,但我的意图是最终要接触到 Airbnb 的产品副总裁,那边是 Suzy。一旦从她那里得到认可,我就知道工程副总裁是 Frank”——清楚这些角色都是谁。这就是理想客户画像和角色画像的含义。
Lenny: 太棒了。你做了一个模板,可以帮助梳理理想客户画像,我们会尽量在节目简介里放上链接。我得再找一下。
Pete Kazanjy: 好的,没问题。
招聘销售人员
Lenny: 好的,我们已经聊了创始人主导销售,以及创始人应该如何开始做销售;也聊了作为创始人或者任何人,如何提升销售能力。现在我想聊聊招聘销售人员。
Pete Kazanjy: 好的。
Lenny: 顺便说一句,你这个马克杯太棒了——“Coffee is for Closers”,我很喜欢。这个网上能买到吗,还是说只是一个定制款?
Pete Kazanjy: 这是 Modern Sales Pros 的马克杯。我想我们 Atrium 也有一批 Yeti 杯用来送人。我们这里很喜欢销售相关的段子,因为……这个是我们从 New Relic 那边学来的,就是在周边产品上要非常以用户为中心。所以我这里穿着我的 Sales Nerds 夹克,戴着我的 Let’s Get It 帽子,还有这个 “Coffee is for Closers” 马克杯。这些都是销售圈内部的梗,可能你的听众不一定能get到,也许能,但我们的听众非常能get到。他们会说:“天哪,你的帽子太搞笑了,能给我寄一个吗?“我就说:“没问题,你应该买我们的软件。”
Lenny: 哈哈,好的。回到招聘销售人员这个话题——我们已经聊了很多相关的事情,比如什么时候该招销售,可能是在你第四次或第五次成功关单的时候,当这个销售循环已经转起来了的时候。那么,关于这第一个销售岗位该找什么样的人,你之前提到销售副总裁经常被解雇,不成功的比例非常高,这是真的吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 是的。这一点在《Founder-led Selling》的演讲以及《Founding Sales》那本书里都有详细阐述。通常来说,你大概率不想一上来就招一个销售副总裁来起步,也就是一个销售领导者,这其中有几个原因。即便你自己已经搞清楚了门道,你也必须先自己达到那个最基本的门槛——自己先搞定十、二十、三十个客户。但之后我之所以主张先招几个销售或者几个 AE,原因在于,你脑子里装着那些”软件”。不幸的是,销售模式没有像 GitHub 那样的代码托管平台——它存在你的脑子里、你的文档里等等,所以现在你要教给其他人。所以你要做的是,招几个早期阶段的拓荒型销售,把你的销售模式交接给他们。
直接去找一个销售副总裁或销售负责人来做的弊端在于——尤其是那些从成熟组织出来的、可能已经是管理者的管理者、或者管着八个销售代表的人——这个人已经有一段时间没有亲自卖东西了。实际上 Jason Lemkin 前几天发了一条挺搞笑的推文,他说:“招一个’曾经做过这一切’的销售副总裁——她到底为什么要再来一次?""哦,你把 Datadog 或 Figma 做大了,你应该来我这个破烂小创业公司”——“我已经有钱到不需要这么做了。“所以,你应该找的是那些副手或者早期阶段的销售。
我一直用的例子是这样的:我上一家软件公司是做招聘的,所以如果你有一项新的招聘技术,我朋友 Troy 运营着一家叫 Guide 的招聘软件公司,他们做的是一种很酷的、引导式的候选人招聘流程等等,但他们的客户是招聘团队。所以他会感兴趣的早期销售,大概是 Lever 或 Greenhouse 的早期员工——卖给同样的角色画像,大概同样的客单价,但最好不是一两年前才加入 Greenhouse 的 AE。
Greenhouse 的销售组织非常出色,他们的销售领导层绝对一流,那里的 CRO Sean Murray 是我的好朋友。但是早期阶段的销售需要早期阶段的销售来做,或者至少是在那个早期阶段待过的人,因为你不会有全套的配套材料——幻灯片、话术脚本之类的东西不会都整整齐齐、包装精美地摆在那里。所以,去寻找那些早期阶段的、更接地气、更能吃苦的销售,是一种更有效的方式。这些才是你在自己的销售能力达到统计意义上的足够样本之后,应该去寻找的人。
Lenny: 为了让这一点更清晰——如果你是一家 A 轮阶段的创始人,你应该找什么样的人?你的意思是找一个成功销售组织里的副手?
早期销售招聘的具体例子
Pete Kazanjy: 我给你举几个例子。比如说你做的是某种设计工具,我会去看 Figma 的销售团队,找那些两三年前就在那儿的早期销售,或者你也可以考虑从那里找一个离一线销售不太远的销售经理。一个很好的例子是 Marissa Fuhrer,她在 Figma 工作,非常出色。她在企业销售团队,之前在 Dropbox 做了很长时间的销售。她就是一个很好的画像——离一线销售不远,而且愿意卷起袖子干活。但理想情况下,她可能是在你先招了几个销售并让他们取得成功之后,再去招的那个人。因为 Marissa 看到你的公司时很可能会说:“好啊,先向我证明你的产品符合市场需求,因为我不想在你身上押注。“然后你就可以说:“你看,我自己能做到 25% 的赢单率,我这里两个销售都能做到 20% 的赢单率,你可以看到他们每月都能签下五万美元的订单,我只需要你来做的是把它规模化。“在这种情况下,那个早期阶段的销售负责人就会说:“干吧。”
Lenny: 她马上要收到一堆 LinkedIn 请求了。
Pete Kazanjy: 她真的很棒。这也是我们在 Atrium 特别喜欢的一点——我们有非常出色的客户。我们在创造一个新的软件品类,所以那些更先进、更现代的销售管理者和管理层才真正理解我们,品类创造都是这样的。但当你找到那些真正理解、深刻理解的人时,他们会变得非常出色。这也是让创业公司如此美妙的原因之一。
销售不行的早期信号
Lenny: 当你招了第一个销售,或者前五个销售时,什么迹象表明可能不太行?因为你说过经常会出现不成功的情况,有哪些早期信号让你觉得”我们需要重新考虑”?
Pete Kazanjy: 这也是为什么一开始自己来做非常重要的另一个原因。但假设你已经能够稳定地成交了——我再说一遍,得是毫无私交的潜在客户——不能是我岳母来买我的软件……
Lenny: 说真的,她其实是个超级粉丝。
Pete Kazanjy: 上帝保佑她,但她不是 Atrium 的理想客户画像。这也是在加速器里做互相捧场的营收交易的危险之处——那不是真实的。所以,如果你已经做到了,卖出了二三十笔交易,你知道这件事是可以做成的,我们有了存在性证明。那么,如果另一个人不能用你那样做的方式来做到——这也是为什么一开始招两个人是有效的,你不想只招一个,也许三个,但四个的话,就像”呃,管理起来太多了”,至少一开始是这样。所以,如果你已经做到了这些,而这个人赢单率很低,或者活动量很低,诸如此类,这些通常都是不行的迹象——他们没有得到第二次会面,没有得到第三次会面。但重要的是,他们必须手里有相关的配套材料。
你有没有制作演示幻灯片?你有没有带他们走过一遍然后交给他们?你有没有把脑子里的所有需求发现问题写成一个 Google 文档或 Notion 页面之类的?你有没有给他们准备演示脚本?如果这些东西都不存在,那可能谁都不会成功,或者至少他们得把你已经做过的所有事情重新推导一遍。但如果你已经准备了所有这些前置条件,而在某个人身上还是不奏效,那这就是一个很好的领先指标,说明这个人可能不行。
Lenny: 你给这些人多长时间来做判断?
Pete Kazanjy: 这就是为什么看领先指标如此、如此、如此重要。这是我们在 Atrium 一直在思考的问题——从数据驱动的销售管理仪表盘的角度来看——如果一个人没有面向客户的会议,如果活动量很低,你永远赢不了任何东西。如果你一个月只有两个商机,赢单率是 50%,这可能也没什么用,除非你的客单价非常高、非常高。所以要去看那些领先指标:“他们有没有第一次会议?有没有第二次会议?他们的邮件量是怎样的?他们有没有在推进事情,有没有推进到提案阶段,最终有没有成交?”
我在 Atrium 做了一系列关于数据驱动销售管理的大师课,其中有一门是关于入职 ramp 的。叫 Ramping For Success,我忘了具体的课名了。但去看那些领先指标,比如商机流入量——“这个人有没有在日历上安排会议?他们有没有在推进?他们期间是否保持活跃?“这些都是很好的领先指标。如果一个人连第一次会议都安排不上,一个月内你就能知道了——“好吧,这不行。”
那么,如果他们没有得到第二次或第三次会议,但确实得到了第一次会议,那你面临的就是另一个问题了——他们得到了第一次约会,但得不到第二次约会,而且不像你当初那样能得到第二次约会。这可能是辅导的问题,也可能就是一种你无法克服的行为问题。但关键是,在尽可能领先的指标上建立监测手段,能让你看清事情是否在正常运转,从而快速做出判断。因为最糟糕的情况是九个月过去了,你说”天哪,不行的。“但其实如果你去看领先指标,两个月前你就该知道这不行了。
Lenny: 我喜欢你给出了范围的下限——“一个月内,很多时候你就能判断了。“那上限是多少?比如”如果六个月时情况还不错,那大概就没问题了”,这个时间框架是怎样的?
Pete Kazanjy: 哦,就是你知道已经成功的时候?
Lenny: 对。听起来大概是从一个月到某个未来的月份,这段时间里你可以感觉到这个人到底行不行。在你看来这个范围是多少?
Pete Kazanjy: 这更像是你在持续监控。第一个月,你可能花时间让销售入职,培训他们,做模拟需求发现对话、模拟演示等等,让他们跟着你旁听。第二个月,我们期望他们能安排 10 次第一次会议,也许 20 次,我们期望其中 50% 能进入第二次会议,我们会去衡量这些数据。第三个月,我们期望第二个月发生的那些第一次会议和第二次会议中的一部分能推进到提案阶段,推进到商务对话,然后也许我们期望那个月的一些交易能成交赢单,或者下一个月。
入职 ramp 的领先指标
Pete Kazanjy: 本质上就是你在合适的时间范围内观察领先指标,比如如果一个人到了第三个月,他的很多交易已经推进到提案阶段,你还没法宣布胜利,因为钱还没到账,但情况看起来不错。所以,如果到了第四个月,很多东西都推进到提案阶段,但第四个月没有任何成交,第五个月也没有任何成交,你仍然不能说”万事大吉”,你仍然应该非常担忧。但如果领先指标在入职 ramp 的正确时期、正确阶段处于正确水平,那你就可以感到有信心,但还不能宣布胜利。
Lenny: 明白了。这让我想起我们这次通话前聊天时,你提到在远程办公下销售人员的工作表现很差。能谈谈这个吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 主要是对初级销售人员不利。资深销售人员长期以来一直在所谓的”外勤”进行销售,但想想我们讨论的行为——学习,那么需要发生什么?新销售需要学习销售模式,然后需要被审计、被监测,所以这个循环越快越好。如果循环的间隔是一天听一次他们的通话,甚至更长的间隔,那纠偏循环就会太慢。相比之下,如果你坐在某人旁边,或者坐在三四个人中间,同时听他们所有的电话,他们一挂电话你就可以说,“嘿,刚才那段很好,这里需要纠正,这里需要纠正,这里需要纠正。来,重新给我来一遍。”
这样,你更新他们这个”软件”的速度,确保销售模式在他们身上正确运行的速度,就非常快。在早期创业公司,这是唯一重要的事情——这是一场与时间的赛跑,要确保你获得成功,这样你才能融到下一轮资金,或者实现盈利等等。所以异步的距离感对此确实很有问题,特别是对初级人员,比如 SDR、初级 AE 等等,真的很有问题。一旦销售模式已经固化并且可以复制分发,那可能是另一种情况,但在非常早期的阶段,有人能和你的销售人员并肩而坐,这是很难替代的。
远程办公 vs 线下办公
Lenny: 那解决方案是什么?如果你现在正在创办一家 B2B 公司,你的建议是”不要远程办公,去办公室工作”?
Pete Kazanjy: 我的观点是,特别是在早期阶段,从创始人的角度来说,与你的联合创始人肩并肩当然重要,但即使是一个创始人带着几个销售人员一起工作,和他们坐在一起帮助他们更快地学习、教他们更多东西、建立问责机制,然后进行训练循环,这才是你真正需要做的。因为另一种情况是,有一整代 SDR,可以说是一种”学习损失”——有一大堆 24 岁的年轻人从来没有以同样的方式、同样的速度学到所需的技能,而如果他们坐在其他 10 个人中间,中间坐着一个 SDR 经理或者 AE 经理,他们本可以学到。
不要害怕销售
Lenny: 在进入非常精彩的快问快答环节之前,还有什么最后的智慧要分享吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 我想最重要的一点是,我一直想鼓励创始人和产品经理等人的就是:不要害怕销售。很多人喜欢给你讲一些故事,说销售是神奇的,或者说”哦,你必须是天生的销售”,诸如此类。其实真的不是那样。那些人不过是在为自己站台罢了。所以,把这些行为做好,会在很多方面让你受益。即使你不想做早期创业者,即使你是一个大企业或消费类公司里的产品经理,销售行为、良好的沟通、说服力、始终思考”对他们有什么好处”等等,这些对于内部销售、外部销售、与客户对接等等都非常有用的技能。所有这些技能对于各种角色来说都非常重要且有影响力。
快问快答
Lenny: 太棒了。那么,我们到了非常精彩的快问快答环节。我有五个问题给你,我们会比较快地过一遍。准备好了吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 准备好了。
Lenny: 第一个问题,你最常推荐给别人的是哪两三本书?
Pete Kazanjy: 我最常推荐的书,一本是 Eli Goldratt 的《目标》(The Goal)。有两本书启发了 Atrium 的创建,一本就是《目标》,它本质上是将丰田精益生产系统写成小说,所以是一本以小说形式呈现的流程工程书,非常精彩。销售组织本质上就是收入工厂,所以如果你想理解系统思维和流程,但又不想看教科书,这本书绝对太棒了。
另一本是 Bill Walsh 的《比分自然会好》(The Score Takes Care of Itself)。Bill Walsh 是斯坦福大学红衣主教队和旧金山 49 人队非常著名的橄榄球教练,他阐述了你不能去担心橄榄球比赛的比分,你只能关注眼前你能控制的事情,如果你在各自的位置上——不管是四分卫、线卫还是跑卫——做了大量高质量的动作,比分自然就好了。这对销售也非常适用——如果你专注于那些领先指标,确保以高质量做大量高数量的动作,那比分自然会好。所以这是我喜欢推荐给人们的两本好书。
Lenny: 最喜欢的其他播客?
Pete Kazanjy: 天哪,我听得不多。我听 Lenny 的播客,还有 All-In Podcast,好让我摄入足够的末日论调和悲观情绪。
Lenny: 还有知识,这一期就有。最近最喜欢的电影或电视节目?
Pete Kazanjy: 我有个五岁的孩子,所以我们全家全天候都是迪士尼,最近反复播放的应该是《魔法满屋》(Encanto)。就是这样。
Lenny: 超爱那部。你最喜欢问面试者的面试问题?
Pete Kazanjy: 这个我要换个角度回答,不完全是面试问题。我非常喜欢的一个做法是工作模拟,尤其在销售领域。我非常推崇做筛选——我们实际上有一个书面筛选,让候选人填一份 Google 文档,里面有大约十二个背景类问题让他们回答。你会惊讶于它的筛选效果有多好——57% 的人不会去做。这些问题并不复杂,就是比如”Lenny,跟我说说你做过的一件让你感到自豪的东西”之类的,一共十二个这样的问题。所以,第一,你可以筛掉不认真的人;第二,你可以筛掉那种不怎么上心的人。你还能看出一个人是否能以有开头、有中间、有结尾的方式有说服力地沟通。你还能看出他们的细节关注度——是否满是拼写错误,或者是否会漏答其中一些问题等等。所以这不是一个面试问题,但从我的角度来看,这是一个巨大的招聘技巧。
Lenny: 这是人们申请加入 Atrium 时填写的表格,对吗?
Pete Kazanjy: 是的。或者说这也是我所有投资组合公司都在用的东西。就是一个 Google 文档,你把它克隆一份发给他们,“你有编辑权限,做完了告诉我。“你会很震惊,有人会说,“哦,我忘了做了。“很好,你已经告诉我所有我需要知道的了。
Lenny: 太棒了。最后一个问题,你有没有一个最喜欢的故事——关于你自己或某个销售员拿下一个大单的经历,某个看似不可能、让你感到自豪的案例?
Pete Kazanjy: 我们销售团队里有一位叫 Sean 的同事,他是我们早期的销售人员,现在已经是销售经理了,他非常出色。我觉得早期阶段的创始人和销售员都需要记住的一点是,一般来说,你不会在第一次进入管道时就成交。就像我们之前讨论的,如果你有 30% 的赢单率,那就相当不错了。如果你有 20% 的赢单率,那也很扎实,但这仍然意味着五个里面有四个不会成交。但下一轮的时候,它们可能就会成交了,所以要看第二次通过管道时的赢单率。
Sean 拿下了我们最大的客户之一,一家叫 GRIN 的公司,他们非常棒。他们为品牌做网红管理软件,非常酷的产品。我记得 Sean 大概跟他们跑了三四个循环,才在几年前终于在这个客户那里站稳了脚跟。当时他们还小得多,而现在,他们有 100 个 SDR 和 80 个 AE 在使用 Atrium 进行管理。所以我觉得这里有一个很好的经验教训,就是不一定第一次通过管道就能成交,可能也不是第二次,但你就是得不停地把那块巨石往山上推,最终当你做到的时候,好事情就会发生。
Lenny: 用这个经验来结束访谈真是太好了,非常鼓舞人心。Pete,这次访谈完全达到了我的期望。最后两个小问题,大家如果想了解更多,想了解 Atrium 和这本书,在网上哪里可以找到你?另外,大家怎样才能帮到你?
Pete Kazanjy: 我在网上很好找,据我所知我是全美国唯一的 Pete Kazanjy。如果你拼错了我的名字,Google 会自动纠正,所以这还挺方便的。可以在 LinkedIn 和 Twitter 上找到我。你也可以在 foundingsales.com 找到 Founding Sales,正如 Lenny 所注。整本书以超文本形式在线提供,你也可以购买纸质版。我妻子把它做成 Squarespace 网站的原因是,我们希望人们能够搜索它、反复回来查阅、把它当作参考工具来使用。至于大家能怎么帮到我,如果你所在的组织有 10 到 300 名销售人员,你想通过数据指标更好地管理他们、提高他们的效率——“通过更好的管理实现高效销售组织”是当下的关键词——Atrium 在这方面非常出色。域名是 Atriumhq.com,但你也可以直接 Google 搜索 Atrium sales,我们会是第一个结果。
Lenny: 太棒了。Pete,谢谢你来做客。
Pete Kazanjy: 非常棒。谢谢你,Lenny。
Lenny: 非常感谢你的收听。如果你觉得这期内容有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这真的能帮助其他听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| AE | 保持原文(Account Executive,客户经理) |
| All-In Podcast | 保持原文(播客名) |
| Amplitude | 保持原文(公司名) |
| AppDynamics | 保持原文(公司名) |
| ARR | 年度经常性收入(Annual Recurring Revenue) |
| Atrium | 保持原文(公司名) |
| BDR | 保持原文(Business Development Representative,销售开发代表) |
| Bill Walsh | 保持原文(人名) |
| bookings | 签约额 |
| Brett Burson | 保持原文(人名) |
| Brianne | 保持原文(人名,SaaS School 的组织者) |
| churn | 客户流失 |
| collateral | 配套材料(如幻灯片、话术脚本、邮件模板等销售辅助材料) |
| CRO | 首席营收官(Chief Revenue Officer) |
| customer development | 客户开发 |
| customer success | 客户成功 |
| Datadog | 保持原文(公司名) |
| David Sacks | 保持原文(人名) |
| discovery | 需求发现 |
| Eli Goldratt | 保持原文(人名) |
| Encanto | 《魔法满屋》(迪士尼电影) |
| existence proof | 存在性证明 |
| Figma | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Founder-led sales | 创始人主导销售 |
| Founding Sales | 保持原文(书名/品牌名) |
| give a shit | 上心程度(口语,指做事的认真/在意程度) |
| Greenhouse | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Guide | 保持原文(公司名) |
| ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) | 理想客户画像 |
| incumbents | 现有大公司(指市场上已有的成熟企业) |
| Jason Lemkin | 保持原文(人名) |
| job simulation | 工作模拟 |
| Kyle Parrish | 保持原文(人名) |
| lagging indicators | 滞后指标 |
| leading indicators | 领先指标 |
| Lever | 保持原文(公司名) |
| Marissa Fuhrer | 保持原文(人名) |
| Mike Marg | 保持原文(人名) |
| minimum viable product (MVP) | 最小可行产品 |
| mock discovery | 模拟需求发现 |
| New Relic | 保持原文(公司名) |
| objection | 异议(销售术语,指客户提出的反对意见或疑虑) |
| opportunities | 商机(销售术语,指潜在的交易机会) |
| Paul Graham | 保持原文(人名) |
| PLG | 产品驱动增长(Product-led Growth) |
| proposal | 提案 |
| ramping | 入职 ramp(销售新人的爬坡期) |
| ride along | 旁听跟单 |
| rocket surgery | 高深莫测的东西(由”rocket science”和”brain surgery”拼合的俚语) |
| sales motion | 销售模式(指将潜在客户带过整个销售流程并最终成交的所有活动的总称) |
| Scratchpad | 保持原文(产品名) |
| screen | 筛选 |
| SDR | 销售开发代表(Sales Development Representative) |
| Sean Murray | 保持原文(人名) |
| selling while loop | 销售循环(借用编程中 while loop 的比喻,指可重复的销售流程) |
| talking their book | 为自己站台(金融术语,指维护自身利益而发言) |
| The Goal | 《目标》(Eli Goldratt 的著作) |
| The Score Takes Care of Itself | 《比分自然会好》(Bill Walsh 的著作) |
| Troy | 保持原文(人名) |
| turbo rapport | 极速破冰(Pete 自创的销售技巧术语) |
| win rate | 赢单率 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)