Nickey Skarstad (Airbnb, Etsy, Shopify, Duolingo) 谈将愿景转化为目标、运营化产品质量、二阶决策、头脑风暴、影响力等
Nickey Skarstad (Airbnb, Etsy, Shopify, Duolingo) on translating vision into goals, operationalizing product quality, second-order decisions, brainstorming, influence, and much more
Lenny: When I asked in my newsletter Slack community who I should have on the podcast who’s a bit under the radar, but amazing, Nickey Skarstad was the first name that I heard. And I was not surprised. I actually overlapped with Nickey at Airbnb, where she had a legendary reputation as a PM who everyone loved, but got shit done. Before Airbnb, Nickey worked at Etsy for over seven years where she went from being a forum moderator to director of product management. Then she went on to work at Airbnb for a couple years.
After leaving, she went on to be VP product at The Wing, and is currently a director of product management at Duolingo. In our conversation, we cover how to set vision, translate that into goals, and then how to execute on it, making your strategy actionable, and keeping your teams aligned and focused, designing your product review sessions, how to maintain product quality, and what skills have most contributed to her success in her career. I hope that you enjoy this conversation with Nickey Skarstad.
So many product managers are basically treated like project managers. They get hired thinking they’ll be deep in product strategy, vision, and getting to know their customers, only to wind up organizing other people’s work and refining backlogs and organizing tiny, tiny features. If that sounds familiar, you need Dovetail. Because Dovetail gets that the true heart of product management is understanding what customers want, why they want it, and how to give it to them. That’s why Dovetail builds a suite of user research products that help you get to the core of what your customers really want and why they want it.
Dovetail offers powerful analysis tools to help you identify themes, patterns, and insights in your customer interviews, allowing you to make better data informed decisions about what solutions you should build next. Organizations the world over like Atlassian, Canva, DataDoc, GitLab, Nielsen Norman Group, Sketch, Deloitte, all use Dovetail to get a better understanding of their customers and build better products. Try Dovetail’s products for free for as long as you need. You can sign up and dive straight in at dovetailapp.com/lenny. Nickey, thank you so much for joining me today. I am really excited for our chat and to get to learn from you. So welcome.
From Forum Moderator to PM
Nickey Skarstad: Thank you. Thanks for having me.
Lenny: My pleasure. Today, you are director of product at Duolingo, which is an awesome product, and something that I used to use. I’m not learning a language currently, but I know where to go if I were to. Can you just talk about how you got into product, and then a bit about just your journey from that point to where you are today?
Tackling the Airbnb Experiences Product
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, so it’s been a long, meandering journey, which is fun. And so I’ve been in technology roles now for 12 years. I’ve been in PM roles, actually product roles, for 10. I’m starting to be the person with experience in the room, which is really fun and kind of daunting at times. But how I got my first role in product was I was at Etsy in 2010 is when I joined. And I joined them, I’d say it was post-product market fit, but before they truly started to really grow and scale. And I actually joined them on their community team. So I worked as a forums moderator, and then as a seller education specialist. Yeah. Spent a couple years doing that. And then through that process became sort of one of the internal voices that had a really good understanding of how their customer, one of their core customers, their sellers, were actually using their product.
And the VP product at the time, his name’s Mark Headland. Hey Mark, if you’re listening. Was like, “Hey, Nickey, you’re in all these product meetings. Have you thought about being a product manager?” And at the time I was like, “Oh God, no. Never.” I was like, “No. Technology what? Engineering? I’d have to work with engineers? I know nothing about engineering.” And so I was very imposter syndrome-y about it. And he gave me a little nudge, and was like, “I think you’d be really good at it.”
And so I tried it. And I started as an APM. And I was at Etsy for around, I think, it was seven years total, and spent the majority of time actually in PM product roles. So I left as a director of product. And for most of my time there, I worked on the seller side. So it was all seller tooling, working with sellers to figure out how they could grow and scale their businesses. And it was an awesome, wild ride. But that was my first role in product. And then I went on after that into several other product roles as well.
Lenny: Yeah, let’s get into it. Where’d you go next?
An Obsession With Product Quality
Nickey Skarstad: So after seven years at Etsy, I was kind of getting the itch to try something new. When I took a step back and was like, all right, what do I want to do next? I really loved the marketplace component at Etsy. And I don’t know if this is just says something about my personality, or actually probably your personality too, is marketplace product is really hard, right? You have this constant balancing of both buyer and seller sides or both sides of the marketplace. And I really liked that. And it was something that I was good at.
And so I was like, all right, where else could I go that’s interesting or having a moment? And I was like, Airbnb. Has to be Airbnb. I was a huge fan of their product. They were also post-product market fit. But sniffed around, ended up basically getting an opportunity to join the experiences team. And I joined that team when the product had just launched. So they had done sort of their early thinking, the existential thinking. Had a brand new product in market, and then I joined the team.
And so I was the first boots on the ground product manager, and really helped that team figure out how do we get product market fit? And then how do we start to think about how to scale it, which was, you can imagine, experiences is interesting because it is a very nuanced product in that, and this is similar to Airbnb if you work on homes as well, but part of it is building the digital experience that someone will interact with when they’re booking an Airbnb experience. And the other part is actually influencing the live event experience that you will experience when you actually join an event or an experience.
And I think that layer of abstraction for me was really fascinating, and something I’ve learned a ton about is it’s not just influencing the digital product, but it’s actually the consumer experience when their boots around the ground. And that is another layer of complexity. And so that was super fun. I was there for about, I think, a little over two and a half years. Started as a PM. I think I got promoted a couple times. Left as senior product lead, I believe was my title. And forever grateful for that experience because I learned a ton about product market fit and also product quality.
Measuring Product Quality
Lenny: Is there anything else you took away from that experience? Because I was at Airbnb at the same time. We never really got to work together. But I just heard amazing things about you on the experiences team. And experiences was a wild ride, from what I understand. Is there anything that you took away from that experience that kind of has stuck with you as a PM?
Ensuring Quality Through Dogfooding
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So part of it is more of just the way Airbnb works is something that I think I use every day in my job, which is just truly thinking about product quality and the end consumer experience. And Airbnb does not ship product if it is not good. And even if they’re trying new things, they are obsessed with the end consumer experience. And I learned so much from that line of thinking because just, if it shipped, it was really high quality. All the edge cases had been thought through. And the experience I had before that was definitely we were shipping things more quickly, things weren’t always perfect. And it’s not to say that everything Airbnb ships is perfect, but I think that obsession with the end consumer experience really influences the quality of their product suite and is something I try to bring to my job today because no one does it better, in my personal opinion.
Lessons From Etsy’s Quality Metrics
Lenny: I’d love to unpack that a little bit. There’s kind of two questions in my mind. Is there an example of that at Airbnb where it’s just like, okay, here’s how they keep quality so high? And then do you have any advice for just how to do that as a company?
Managing Friction in User Onboarding
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I don’t think that’s easy for sure. One of the things Airbnb did for experiences is we had this balancing metric, which was basically using the review rate as sort our end all, be all top line goal. So you can imagine a business like that. Obviously we needed to have revenue kind of moving through the platform, and we cared about high level bookings. But really at the end of the day in the beginning, we were obsessed with making sure every person who booked actually had a good experience when they showed up to experiences.
And so especially if you are building early product, really thinking about how can you pick some good quality metrics that might actually balance or conflate with growth metrics, and use that as sort of your north star because it really helped the whole team to understand what they were actually trying to do at the end of the day. Growth was important, sure. Obviously we needed to grow for a lot of reasons. But the most important thing was that the actual customer experience was great. And I know Airbnb does that in other places too, but that really was experience’s top line goal was our review rate and quality and it trickled down for sure.
Lenny: How did they operationalize that? Because it sounds great. Cool, let’s make sure everything, all the reviews are five star. How do you build that into the way the team operates and tracks their success?
Startup Ups and Downs
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So a big part of that was actually operational, which was just making sure that hosts who weren’t meeting those specific rigorous standards. There was a lot of coaching and education that was happening. Some of that was in the product and some of it wasn’t. It was something that was discussed at all of the meetings that we had across everyone’s teams, right? Everyone understood that it was important. And so I think that really impacted both the ops team as well as the product team who are literally building the product that would bring that to life. And I think just thinking from, especially if you’re a founder and you’re thinking about building your sort of early metrics, there’s a lot of ways to really make sure your team really understands what that means.
Another thing we did a lot on the experiences team is we just dogfooded all the time. And so we were lucky in that it’s a really fun product to dogfood. We were taking experiences all over the world all the time. But it really helped because you would know right away when you showed up to an event, if you were going to have a five star experience or if it was not going to be great. I mean that really helped us too because then we would go back to the teams and be like, “All right, we were just in San Francisco. We were on an experience last night, and it did not go well. What do we do about it?” So there’s lots of ways to do it. But dogfooding is a good one.
Is This Role Right for You
Lenny: I know Brian is infamous for texting the team anytime anything isn’t working right in the product. And I know he was very intimately involved in experiences. Is that something you’ve learned to do just to kind of like, “Hey team, I found a big problem. Let’s fix it.” Or do you try to avoid that and not create that stress?
Product Organization Across Different Companies
Nickey Skarstad: I mean I think sometimes that can be a healthy stress if you do it in the right way. The nice thing I think is just making autonomous teams that feel like it is their goal to bring that quality experience to life can help you avoid some of that. But I do think that pushing teams to use the product so they firsthand experience when it is not great is a really good way to give teams sort of the motivation to act on fixing things like that. But I don’t know that I text people, but I’m on Slack all the time. So if anything, I’m going to Slack you.
Two Models for Product Orgs
Lenny: Great. Okay. Maybe one more question on this topic because it’s so interesting. So on experiences you measured, I imagine, percentage of trips that were five star. Are there other quality metrics that you’ve used at other companies that you found helpful for keeping track of product quality and maintaining product quality?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So another one that we used at Etsy, which was an interesting one, is we realized that, so one of the pieces of product that I owned was the onboarding flow. So it was onboarding new sellers specifically. And you can imagine if you’re owning that flow, you’re just going to be like, all right, we just need a ton of sellers, and we need them to open their shops right away. So we started and we went down that path. And then we realized we actually tanked a couple of downstream metrics that we didn’t really understand at first. And those metrics were basically getting sellers to a first sale. So we opened up a lot of shops, but they actually weren’t successful when they were on the platform, and they weren’t successful in a certain amount of time.
So we did a lot of unpacking of what happened there, why did we do that, and actually does that matter? And the end answer was, yes, it matters greatly. When Etsy sellers are opening their shop, it’s really important that you get them a sale right away because it’s a huge motivator, right? If you make a sale in your first day, you’re like, “Oh wow. Okay, this is a thing. I could make money doing this. This is exciting. I get to ship something to my buyer.” If it takes you seven days, you start to be like, “Oh no. I’m not good enough. I’m terrible at this.” 10 days, into 30 days, it really impacts people.
And so we actually put more friction in the onboarding flow to help to start to solve for that. So we actually slowed you down. We made you be more thoughtful about what you were listing. And by doing that, we actually helped you get to a first sale faster. And so that was another good example of a quality metric that we used, which was, I think it was first sale in seven days. I might be wrong. But something along those lines. And it actually conflated with the high level growth metrics, but it was a huge quality predictor, and it was really important for long term seller success.
Iterating on Organizational Structure
Lenny: So interesting. That’s such a good topic. And I feel like we could explore that for an hour, but maybe for a little bit longer. Was that metric the metric that you used to measure supply growth at that point? Or was it alongside just general growth?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, it was alongside general growth. It wasn’t our top, top OKR. But it mattered because, again, it’s sort of like you think about these things a bit as a seesaw, right? We basically were balancing our growth with making sure people were successful. And the more equilibrium you had there, the better it was for their overarching marketplace. And it’s similar if you think about experiences too, right? Where, all right, you could just be growing, but people are having a terrible experience. So how do you balance those two things? And if you can get those two things in balance, you’re going to cruise, and you’re going to be more successful longer term.
Translating Vision Into Goals and Execution
Lenny: Got it. At Airbnb when I was working on supply growth, our main goal for the supply growth team was similar. And that was actually the goal we had, which is new listings that got their first booking. We only counted listings that had one booking as new supply. Everything else didn’t really count. Because we knew that if it got booked at least once, at least it’s got some level of quality and people want that place, and it’s valuable to the marketplace. Okay. So you were at Airbnb, and where’d you go next?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I went to a startup. And for lack of a better way to describe this, they were basically kind of building a marketplace as well, but it was more of a marketplace of ideas. And I hate when people say that, because I think it’s cheesy, but it’s true. They had physical co-working spaces, and they were trying to take some of the magic that was happening in their spaces. So people meeting each other, networking, people getting funding for their startups, et cetera. And they wanted to bring it online and they wanted to try to scale it so it wasn’t constrained inside of their four walls. So I helped them basically come up with a longer term strategy, start to figure out how to unpack that, and get product market fit. And then also just build a technology team around trying to solve that.
And so that started late 2019. And then I was out for a bit, had a baby. And came back and then COVID happened. And they were a physical co-working business. That was where their majority revenue came from. And so COVID was pretty horrible for what they were trying to do. They also had some other cultural issues, and so the whole thing kind of paused/fell over. So I actually spent a year hiring a team and then had to lay them off, which was a great lesson in leadership. I’m not going to lie. I learned a lot about how to lead in that experience.
But after that, and it was COVID, I had a eight month old, and so I spent time actually just vibing with my kids, which was kind of fun. And then ended up going to Shopify after that. And so I was looking for a more bigger scaled, not startup, and was trying to find something a little bit more something where I could be longer term and was more excited about, and took a platform role at Shopify. And so that was really interesting in that I had, honestly, for the most part spent the majority of my career in super consumer facing roles. And the role that I took was more platform.
And I realized that, honestly, pretty quickly after I took the role, I was like, oh, good to know. I didn’t really understand what this job was and now I know what it is, but it does not give me energy. And so I felt like I had a lot of red energy every day. And so I made a call pretty quickly to bounce, which was actually another good learning experience. I think I’ve gotten a lot. As I’ve advanced through my career, have learned a lot about what gives me Nickey Skarstad energy and have been really prioritizing that, especially in a post-COVID world.
And so left Shopify, and made my way to Duolingo. And so Duolingo has been super fun. I’ve been there since September of 2021. And in the process of helping them kind of think through a zero to one product challenge, something that’s newer. Can’t really talk about it unfortunately, but has been another sort of product market fit thinking exercise. It reminds me a little bit of some of the work that I did on experiences. And so it’s been actually pretty challenging. It’s super fun. So I’m also having a great time here as well.
The Vision, Mission, Strategy Pyramid
Lenny: Amazing. The companies you worked at is incredible and there’s so much I want to explore there. Going back to Shopify briefly, a lot of PMs, I imagine, are trying to decide should they stay where they’re at? Should they go explore other places? So you said the thing that kind of pulled you out there was just the platform role didn’t feel like a fit for you. Do you have any advice for folks on just how to know if a role or a company isn’t a fit for them?
Facilitating an Effective Vision Workshop
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I think I really learned that while I was there, and also I want to make sure I actually had a great experience at Shopify and I think it is an awesome company. I would highly recommend people work there, especially if they like platform product work. One of the things I did when I was like, I don’t know if I love this is I actually went through my calendar and I changed the colors of all of the meetings on my calendar to red, yellow, and green after I had the meeting. And I looked. And basically if it was yellow, I was like, okay. It was a fine meeting. My energy was baseline. If it was red, I was either bored or I was stressed, or I was not having a good time. And if it was green, it gave me energy and I felt excited and I wanted to keep working on that.
And when I looked back at the last few weeks, it was almost all red and yellow. And I was like, okay, this is really from an energy standpoint, I don’t think I love this. And so I would say think about the work that you’re doing and that lens. Get really good at figuring out what are the things that you love most about being a product person, and how can you optimize your next role for those things that you love?
We should talk a little bit more about this, but each company has a very different product org. And the day to day of your job as a product manager, depending on where you go in the product that you’re building, is very different. And so really thinking through what that work looks like, what their process is, who your end consumer is, what will the actual work you be doing every day, what will that be? And if you can get really clear on that, and then get clear on what gives you energy and what you love, it makes it a lot easier to figure out where you should go next.
Running an Effective Brainstorming Session
Lenny: Wow. I love that tactic. I’ve never heard of that. Just going back to the meetings that you have in measuring, just reflecting on how much energy that meeting gave you. Great tip. Thank you for sharing that. And I’ll also double down on Shopify is an amazing place to work. Just to make that clear. It’s probably one of the few places I recommend PMs go try to work at.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I think especially if you’re newer in your PM career, they just have a really great organization. And I think it’s a great place to learn how to PM. Also their product, it’s a huge scaled product. And so it’s complicated to build in. So I think it’s a great place to really understand second order systems and systems thinking. And especially if that type of work gives you energy, I would recommend that people look for jobs there. But again, get really good at what you love. And I think what I’ve realized longer term is I really like the zero to one early stage. How do we get product market fit? And how do we really think through the early experience? And Shopify is at a very different stage than that. They’re doing that in a couple places for sure, but that’s not their day to day. And so that was interesting.
Brainstorming Prompt Examples
Lenny: Yeah. That makes a lot of sense. Going back to what you just touched on, the idea of product org and structure and how different companies build product, there’s kind of two ways to approach this and take whichever direction you want. Which of the companies you’ve worked at did you enjoy most, and that’s kind of stuck with you as a way you want to build product? Or just like, how would you approach building a product org in cross-functional teams versus not, and reporting lines, things like that? What do you recommend there?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I feel like you’re asking me to pick a favorite child, which especially as a mother, that’s hard to do. But no, I don’t know. I feel like I’ve learned things from a lot of these different places and it’s hard to choose. I think some of my early work at Etsy was very formative, and it was where I learned how to be a product manager. And so I feel very proud of that. I also think Etsy was out there building in public. I’m literally doing air quotes right now. I know you can’t see me.
From Vision to Goals to Execution
Lenny: I can see them.
Nickey Skarstad: But they were doing that because they had such a passionate, involved, engaged early community that they could not just ship things and have them land well if they did not involve their community early. So they were doing prototyping, beta testing, and basically getting people to try things and give feedback on things. I honestly, I think before a lot of people were, and that was something at the time that was really interesting and has really stayed with me, it’s how to work with community and how to build community around the product that you’re building.
Because at the end of the day, especially when it’s early days, it really helps scale, get people to evangelize what you’re building, help teach other people how to use it, things like that. And so I learned how to do that at Etsy. And I think that was super formative. And then also just Airbnb, what we talked about before, and just deeply baking in product quality and the end consumer experience into everything that you’re building is also something I literally apply every day. So if I had to choose, it would be those two places, but I plan on continuing to learn.
Methods for Team Decision Making
Lenny: Interesting. Both very community driven businesses.
One-Way vs Two-Way Door Decisions
Nickey Skarstad: True.
Second-Order Thinking and Decision Frameworks
Lenny: And then in terms of how they structured their org, is there anything there about just here’s what I’ve learned works best for how to build product teams, structure product teams, that stuck with you?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I think there’s kind of two overarching popular organizational modes for product org specifically. There’s either the functional organization where everyone in the product team will report up through either a VP product, or a chief product officer, or something along those lines. And I think that actually really works in certain circumstances and is great. And typically how that works is you’ll have your product partners, your trifecta, if you will, you have your design partner and your engineering partner, they will typically also report up into functional leadership. I think in bigger organizations that really works well, especially when you have orgs that need a lot of development in the function. So you’ll have a lot of either APMs or product managers who are newer in their career and need a lot of support in development. And I think those functional ways of building makes sense. When I was at Etsy, that was the way that the reporting structure was and it made a lot of sense.
And then on the flip side, actually, when I was at Airbnb, because experiences was this new pretty nascent business opportunity, it had a GM structure. And so basically the whole product org that worked on experiences laddered up into a business leader and that business leader managed all of the functions. So they were the manager of the operations team, the marketing folks, product, and whatever. And I actually think that really worked for team like experiences at a company like Airbnb because what it did is it gave the leader of that business a ton of autonomy to really figure out what does this business need to be successful? And they didn’t have to rely on, I guess they did in some ways, but not 100% rely on the larger company’s resources to get the work that they needed done.
And I actually think that had they launched experiences inside of the Etsy style of organizational structure, it never would’ve succeeded because it had such a unique business need, and it needed its own process and ways of building product, et cetera. And because they sort of, hate to say wall it off, because it wasn’t fully walled off, but because they gave it its own space and its own structure, it allowed it to succeed because they were able to fund it in the right way, give it the resources that it needed, et cetera.
So I’ve seen those two types of models work. And I think if I was a founder and I was building my initial product org, how I would think about it was basically what are we trying to build? What is the product? And then what type of process do we need to put in place for us to figure out how do we build it? And then what type of people do we need? And then really taking a step back to really figure out, all right, organizationally, how do we shape this so we can make sure that those people have autonomy and they have what they need to just be able to cruise? So I honestly don’t think there’s a right way. I know that’s a non-answer. I think it really depends on what you’re trying to build and the stage at which you’re at.
Putting Second-Order Thinking Into Practice
Lenny: Is there a default approach you’d suggest, just like most often you should go to the GM model, or most often you should just go with this cross-functional team?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I mean, I think especially if your business is new, going functional makes sense because you don’t necessarily have a lot of organizational complexity. Airbnb at the time we were there, Lenny, was a huge company, right? It had tons of different teams that were trying to tackle many different problems. So that GM model made a lot of sense because it again was able to take a specific business opportunity, give it the resources that it need, and give it space to run. When your company’s smaller stage, I think that matters less. Typically, especially if you’re working on solving similar problems as an organization, functional makes a ton of sense. Because then you’re also thinking more holistically about, all right, how do we build the right product development process across different functions to make sure that we are, to use a bad metaphor, it’s like the symphony metaphor. You have all these different instruments that need to figure out how do we play together at the right times? And I think that functional way of working actually allows you to do that really well.
Applying First Principles Thinking
Lenny:
Unit is the market leader in banking as a service, combining multiple bank partners with a developer friendly API to empower companies of all sizes to launch accounts, cards, payments, and lending in just a few weeks. Unit is trusted by leading brands, such as AngelList, ID, Invoice2go, and Roofstock. To hear more about how Unit enables companies like yours to build banking, visit unit.co/lenny to request a demo or to try their free sandbox. That’s unit.co/lenny.
Something I learned at Airbnb and from many other companies at this point is there’s never going to be the one right way to structure, and companies bounce back and forth between them. Like Airbnb, for example, has moved from GM model to functional reporting lines back to GM. And so things change and you try some, see how it goes, adjust, optimize for the biggest opportunity. And then you’ll probably change it six months later.
I asked a few people that know you and that worked with you questions that they think I should ask you. And one of the questions that came up most often is around how you set vision, translate that into goals, and then execute on those goals. And I know that’s something a lot of PMs want to get better at and something that a lot of PMs aren’t great at. And so can you just share any thoughts, advice, stories around that and how you do that well?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. Well one, I want to know who you talked to. That’s terrifying. Hopefully they said good things. You don’t have to out them.
Keeping Teams Focused and Aligned
Lenny: Unnamed sources. Unnamed sources.
Nickey Skarstad: Yes. Well I’m glad to hear that because that actually is some of the work that I honestly love the most. And when I look at my calendar, those are moments where I am green energy. And so I have some first principles that I like to apply when I’m thinking about setting high level vision and strategy. And the first is make sure that you pull in your people and your team. I’ve seen a lot of director level people through my career who will try to work on strategy in a vacuum alone. They’ll write a document and they’ll be like, “Okay, team. Here’s what we’re doing. Here’s our strategy.” And it never goes well. And it doesn’t go well. It might be the right strategy, but because you did not bring people along on that journey to come up with it, they did not feel like they had a hand in crafting it themselves. They are often not bought in, and getting people to buy in when they haven’t been involved is very challenging and time consuming. We don’t got time, right?
And so I think that’s my first principle is just bring along the team. And I think there are ways to do that where you’re not voting on strategy. You should not be voting. I think good product work is often not democratic, right? You need a clear leader who understands a lot of the signals and understands the larger competitive marketplace that can make decisions. And I think, especially when you’re thinking about strategy, it’s great to get input, but ultimately at the end of the day, you should have one person who is responsible for it.
And the other thing is a lot of times people don’t really talk to leadership or the larger business leaders to get organizational context that helps them come up with the right strategy. They’ll sort of build something in a vacuum, and then they’ll come up with it and they’ll get a ton of feedback from people across the org that were like, “Oh, this conflates with our strategy. We’re doing this, and it’s very similar.” Or, “Our structural platform actually does not have the capability for us to do that thing.” Whatever. And so just make sure that you’re talking to people. And also all the way up to the CEO, and making sure the founder and the CEO is very bought in because ultimately, at the end of the day, they’re choosing to resource what you’re working on and are going to help you meet what you need. So those are some of the foundations for good vision and strategy work.
And then kind of zooming down into the weeds, I really like the vision mission strategy pyramid. I think might be a little tired. I like to think it’s wired. But yeah. So if you just think about a pyramid shape, at the top is vision. Below it is mission and strategy, and then objectives. And this is a very simple framework. You honestly just Google vision mission strategy objectives, and you’ll see it in Google image results. And all it is really is thinking about hitting those specific notes and thinking about them top down. So where do you need to go long term? What is the long term vision of what you’re trying to do? In 10 years, if you could zoom up and look at what an ideal path for you would be, what is that? Write it down.
And then you start, as you go down the pyramid, you get clearer and basically you bring things down to your moment in time more clearly. So if you’re thinking about your mission, all right, it’s another level of abstraction of how do we make our vision come to life. And then you get into strategy. All right, how do we actually pick apart what we think is going to need to happen for us to actually be able to execute on that vision? And then your objectives can be OKRs, or whatever sort of goal setting model that you use to really one level get clear on, all right, in the next three to six months, what are the actual notes that we need to hit to be able to sing that beautiful symphony, is a terrible metaphor. And now I’m open to say it. But whatever.
Product Review Meetings and Processes
Lenny: I get it. I get it.
Nickey Skarstad: Dang it. Love a bad metaphor.
Product Management in a Remote World
Lenny: That’s evocative. While we’re on that topic, actually just to interrupt briefly, how are you very practically doing this for say vision and mission? Are you starting a Google doc and writing it out, are you using Miro or FigJam, or something like that?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, so I think visioning exercise is a great moment to pull in your larger team. Because I’m remote now, I would use Miro or FigJam. Duolingo, we use FigJam typically because we are super embedded in Figma. In the past I’ve used MURAL. I actually personally like MURAL’s whiteboarding product better. So I would open that up and I would walk through a number of things with the team and do a brainstorm literally. All right. Where do you all see us going in 10 years? What do we think what is the larger competitive landscape going to do in the next 10 years that could need to influence the work that we’re doing? What are their ideas, and get everyone thinking.
Good brainstorm are often cross-functional. So go outside of your own team. Can you pull in somebody from marketing? Can somebody from the larger policy team sit in? How do you make it really cross-functional and really zoom up and give everyone the space and the freedom to think existential and to frame it that way,?we are going to be thinking in a five to 10 year timeline. Do not worry about what’s happening today. And honestly, if you do that right, those are super fun exercises.
Lightning Q&A Session
Lenny: And you’re doing this remotely, I imagine.
Nickey Skarstad: Yep.
Favorite Work Software Tools
Lenny: And so do you just kind of schedule a meeting, kick it off, point everyone to this Miro doc, for example, with a bunch of prompts and sticky notes and things like that? How do you actually practically do that?
Nickey Skarstad: So I would pre-fill out the Miro beforehand. So figure out what are the things you want to discuss with your team, create them as headers in the Miro document. So when everyone lands in there, you have a very clear here’s what we’re talking about today. You can put that into the agenda on your calendar invite. I’ve actually been to some really good strategic brainstorms that will attach some kind of competitive thinking landscape in advance. So people could have a little bit of a pre-read.
And then when you get into the actual session, you already have the time allotments scheduled and thought through. And both Miro and FigJam have really awesome timer, and it’ll play music while everyone is working. It’s pretty cute. FigJam’s sounds are really well done. Whoever their sound architect is, bravo. And it’ll ding after, give them 10 minutes and it’ll give you a nice chime, and then you can review them together and you can go through each touchpoint that you want to talk about.
After it’s done, I like to do some synthesis together in the meeting. So basically grab ideas that are similar, bucket things into concepts that are alike. And then I will take it later and spend more time thinking about it. I think a lot of people think you have to actually come away with a vision together in a meeting that’s very clear, and you don’t. You can just come up with ideas, take a stab at drafting it, and get some more feedback before it’s final.
Favorite Managers to Work With
Lenny: One last question on this thread, which also could be an entire hour of discussion, are there any examples of prompts or things you ideated that you could share? I know you can’t talk about what you’re doing at Duolingo, but just to make it a little more concrete for people, what are some examples of things that you brainstormed?
Where to Find Nickey Online
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I mean, so to take it back to experiences, because we’ve talked about that a lot, so people have some baseline context. Some of the early experiences visioning was really interesting because it was all about what type of experience can we create. And really thinking through when you’ve traveled in the past, what has brought you joy? Or what were the moments in your travel journey that have been really interesting, provocative, basically you remember the most, and why? And thinking through some of those things as a group. And those are good group exercises, because you’re like, wow, I got to know a lot about Lenny by that crazy travel experience that he had. And so really kind of thinking through about how you craft really meaningful prompts that, again, connect to your strategy. So how does that ladder up into strategy? Obviously thinking through the experience that you’re creating is going to help you come up with the right vision and fill out your pyramid in the right way, right?
Lenny: Okay. So we went on kind of on a tangent around brainstorming. Did you want to share more around just going from vision to goals to execution?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I think just generally, as you walk down that strategy pyramid, really getting down into the OKRs. And I think it’s important because sometimes strategy is too abstract and too high level. And it’s hard for people to take the step on how do I walk up that pyramid? And that to me is where having good strategy and having good OKRs help your team do that. And so good OKRs to me are just clear articulations of your strategy, whatever it is that are important to you, and it boils it down into the next three months, here’s what we’re working on. And I think that is just really good for teams because, again, if you’re always in the clouds, it starts to get hard to really bring things down to the feature level of we’re going to create a Jira ticket for this specific thing that we need to build. It needs to connect up to a strategy and back down.
Lenny: Got it. Where do you put, say, these OKRs? Do you just brainstorm, come up with vision and rough strategy, that translates into goals? Where do you do this? And then also just how long do you usually spend on this overall process?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So the way that we do it at Duolingo now is we work on quarterly OKRs. And so that process will kick off usually the third month in the quarter. Really thinking through, all right, how are we trending on our OKRs this quarter? Did we commit to the right number of things? How are we doing? And then it is going, all right, so what do we need to do next quarter? And ideally, again, that’s going to plug into a longer term plan. Otherwise it feels a little messy, and it feels not grounded in a long term plan or strategy in any way, shape, or form.
And then, so what we’ll do is spend a few weeks as a team coming up with, all right, what could the next quarter look like? What is going to add the most impact and help us execute on that long term strategy? And then how do we make sure that we’re setting the right objectives and KRs below them? And then usually there’s some sort of leadership review. I actually forget, Lenny, how did goal setting go at Airbnb? I honestly don’t remember. It sounds terrible, but it was a while ago. I can’t even remember if Airbnb used OKRs.
Lenny: There was a long period where OKRs were a very big deal. Our head of product was really gungho on OKRs. And I think for a couple years, we were very strict OKR culture. And then it kind of evolved into just rough-
Nickey Skarstad: Goals.
Lenny: … interpretation of OKRs. Yeah, goals and strategy and mission and vision. And so it’s kind of this morphed version at this point, as far as I know.
Nickey Skarstad: Gotcha. Yeah. And I will say OKR frameworks might not be the best for every single team, but having some sort of goal framework that is shared across functions is useful no matter the size or the scale of your business. I think a lot of times people get hung up and they want to nitpick OKRs specifically. And I think some of those criticisms are very fair. But you should have some sort of framework that’s shared from a process standpoint across your team that everyone can use and work on together. Because again, it takes your strategy and it brings it down into the now. So you can act on, in the next three months, you can bring something to life, and you’re very clear on what that looks like.
Lenny: I’m going to pull out a thread of something you mentioned earlier of how to finally make decisions. And how in your experience the PM kind of is often sort of a final decision maker. I’d love to hear any advice you have of how to set that up on a team where it’s either clear the PMs have a little bit more say and/or just bring people along to a final conclusion. Is there any advice on tips and tactics used to help with that?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I actually just read this really great book that is slightly tangential, but I thought it really applied to this type of basically getting people to align on decisions. It’s by Chris Voss. He is this famous FBI negotiator. I think it’s called Split the Difference: Negotiating As if Your Life Depends on It. Don’t quote me on that.
Lenny: I think it’s Never Split the Difference, right? And then I think he’s also got a masterclass which I’ve watched, which is really good.
Nickey Skarstad: I actually haven’t watched the masterclass yet, but it’s on my list after reading the book. And a lot of it, I think, especially because he’s an FBI person, I thought it was going to be very much, “You’re going to do this.” And it’s all basically his whole approach is empathy, and it’s repeating things back to you, making people feel heard, making sure that you’re hearing why they maybe don’t like your strategy, or why they think that’s a bad OKR. And I think if you can spend some time just listening to your team and really understanding why is this not resonating, you can help guide people on the right path. Or you realize you’re wrong. Good PMs are humble people, right? You’re not always right. Not always going to be right. So how do you know when you’re right and wrong is another good podcast that you should do with somebody else cause I’m probably not very at it. Yeah.
Lenny: Good tip. I really like that.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. But I think that helps. And the other thing is I love the concept of one way versus two way door decision making, right? If your team is making a really critical long-term decision that’s going to be limiting to a lot of the future things that you could want or need to do, that is a one way door decision. And you should spend time really thinking about discussing it, getting feedback and buy-in from your larger community, from your leadership team, et cetera. If it is a two-way door decision, it’s not going to make a huge impact, you can change it later if you need to, let your team cruise on those things. Because it gives people autonomy. It helps you move fast. And then it just makes sure that when it does come down to decisions that are harder to change longer term, then those are the moments you should spend time and really think about and discuss and debate, et cetera.
Lenny: Do you have any examples or stories that come to mind of those sorts of decisions that you kind of help people just go for it, even though I may not necessarily agree?
Nickey Skarstad: Let’s see. Yeah. So one big one that we made at Airbnb that was pretty formative in early days was we came up with basically an articulation of what we thought a good experience was, and the standards that an experience needed to meet for it to be considered a good experience for us. And that was a many month long term project. And it was so important because we ended up building the product around it, building our policies around it, building how we educated our hosts around it. We had one moment in time to figure it out and get it right until it scaled everywhere. And so that was a true one way door decision where it was really hard to change later because we literally needed it to be relatively final.
On Etsy, there was some big decisions that were made at certain points in time around what can be sold in the marketplace, and how to think through what constitutes something that is hand made. Those were one way door decisions, right? It’s really hard to change that later because it’s going to influence all of the listings that you have in your ecosystem. And so I think really thinking through those types of things are important and really setting teams up to be able to pause and spend some time to get it right because it will influence the end product in a very real way.
Lenny: How do you know if it’s a one way or a two way door decision? Do you find that it’s generally pretty obvious when you’re making the decision, or is it sometimes like, oh shit, we should have thought about that more?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I would say I think I’m good at this 80% of the time these days, just because I’ve seen it done wrong in a lot of ways. But I think it’s a muscle that you build honestly, and you get better over time about thinking about second order thinking. And so it’s starting to understand, all right, if I make this decision today, it’s going to impact this next level of decisions and the next level after that. And that will cascade through our larger system.
A great book to read if you are a product person is Thinking in Systems by Donella Meadows. It’s just about really thinking through how systems work, and then you can start to extrapolate what is the second order effect of the system. And if you think about that through your own ecosystem, it starts to help you understand, all right, this is a linchpin in our larger ecosystem that we got to be really careful about if we’re going to touch it or change it longer term. But I do think some of that it’s muscle, you build it over time. You make a couple of mistakes sometimes, and then you have to realize the true consequences of those mistakes and you don’t make it again.
Lenny: Can we talk a bit more about the second order decision framework? I know you have a awesome newsletter post about this, and it was something I wanted to chat about. Is this a framework that PMs can use to make better decisions? And I guess how could they do that? And then maybe just describe a little bit more about just this concept of second order decisions, because it sounds really important.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. Basically what second order thinking is is you being able to think beyond the decisions that you’re making today. The decisions you make today will affect tomorrow’s decisions and your ability to build on your decisions that you made today. And this feels very existential and meta, but why it’s important is that, especially when you’re building product, is there’s a cost associated with your time of everything you build. Especially when you’re building marketplaces or anything with UGC content. When you make a change today, and it impacts every single user in your ecosystem that then is going to act on that change, it’s really hard to make those changes later.
Let’s talk about Airbnb home listing as an example. Really thinking through what are the pieces of data or all the pieces of data in the system that we need to actually list a home. And then how do we use those throughout our whole system in different ways? And then anytime you have to change those things. So that could be little simple things like truncating the length of the title of an Airbnb home when it’s listed on the platform. You’re going to have mad hosts, you’re going to have design changes that need to be made to make sure that they can actually display something in a different way. It gets just inherently more complex the more complex your system is. So that is probably a terribly described way of describing second order thinking.
Lenny: That makes total sense. And that’s something we dealt with it, sorry to interrupt, but that’s like on the host team, we dealt with this question often of just any change you make and the listing flow is going to impact so much of the experience of a host and a guest. And so that makes total sense. Sorry, keep going.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. No, and I think that forcing yourself and your team to think in that way is just a really good thinking exercise because it will save you time and it will save you money, a lot of money later, if you don’t constantly have to rebuild things when you want to make changes to your system later. And that ladders up again into having a very clear vision and a strategy. Because what you’re doing is you’re starting to think on the long horizon. And so the decisions that you’re making today are in service of that long horizon. So you can actually build in that direction and you don’t constantly have to rebuild every time you’re trying to change something.
Lenny: On the second order thinking, sorry, I called it second order decision, but in this framework that you spoke of, how do you actually operationalize this concept? When you’re planning, do you write out in the document second order impact that we should be thinking about, or do you do something else?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I think there’s many ways to do this. If you have a spec-ed template or a piece of documentation that your team typically use when they’re writing out product strategy or product requirements, et cetera, you can put a line in here to force people to think about it. I also think thinking about first principles and writing out first principles for the changes that you’re making often are in service of second order thinking. Where it’s like here are the things that we care about. Here’s why these things are important. And we want to make sure these are baked into what we’re building. Typically you’ll write those through the lens of second order thinking.
Shopify uses first principles a lot in everything that they build. And this is something I took away from that way of working because it’s extremely effective. If you can get teams to align on first principles early on, it saves you a lot of heartache later because you’ve got people to align way early days before you even got into the design process, or before you had to start thinking about how do we actually technically implement this.
And then the other way I would say is there’s ways to structure or have thoughtful discussion around second order effects. That could be a brainstorm. You could use Miro to think about that. We’re going to make these changes today. How do they cascade through our ecosystem? What are the gotchas or the things we need to worry about? And again, I think the more complex your ecosystem is, the more you are forced to do this. A lot of founders in early stage products don’t think like this because they’re so focused on the product market fit. We need to just get something that people are using. That then when they get product market fit, they realize when they get into scale mode, they didn’t build something scalable, and they have to rebuild things which can actually really hurt them when they’re trying to grow really quickly later on.
Lenny: Yeah. Absolutely. Happens all the time. For principles, do you put those in to say the team strategy, like the quarterly strategy document? Like here’s our principles for the quarter? Is that how you generally do that?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I think that is a great place to put it. You can write them on the feature level too. So something that you’re building, just getting clearer on here are the things that matter to us. Here’s what we care about. We’re going to design in service of these things. And here are the things that aren’t that important. And again, those are the types of places in a product requirements doc where people will argue the most, which is a good thing because you’re basically discussing and debating sort of foundations of what you’re going to build before you get into the work of building it. And so those exercises are always a good idea.
Lenny: Awesome. I love that. Okay. So going back, because I wanted to close this thread, you’ve come up with your vision, your mission, your strategy, your goals as a team. People start to align around it. What do you do to kick it off and get people on board and aware of the plan, and then to stay on plan with that strategy and not kind of be distracted by new priorities and shiny objects?
Nickey Skarstad: Yes. Oh, the shiny object thing is very real. Good question. So for example, I just did this recently where I brought my team along through the OKR process for Q2 planning. They had a say in basically what we decided we were going to work on. It went up for leadership approval. We got approval. And my process was I used Loom, which is another one of my favorite products. It’s just a really easy screen share and video recording tool that you can share with teams. And so I just recapped, “All right, here’s what I presented to leadership. Here are the feedback that we got. Here’s the strategic feedback that we got. And here are the changes we’re going to make. Any questions, let me know.” And I posted it in Slack.
So I was just trying to keep the feedback loop really quick and tight with teams rather than wait till the next meeting you have with them a week later. I was like, all right, I’m going to just try to spend five minutes recording this and get it out ASAP. And that helps because then it gets people excited. Okay, cool. This thing that I worked on got really great feedback from leadership, and now we’re working on it. I’m excited to get going.
And then it depends. Usually depending on the project, I have some sort of kickoff. I don’t usually do a quarterly kickoff or anything like that because I think there’s usually disparate teams owning different parts of strategy. But usually having a good weekly team meeting where you’re really thoughtful about cascading feedback down from leadership, constantly checking in on what are we trying to do here? What is our strategy? How are these goals that we set laddering up? Are we achieving it? Are we not? Whatever. Having a meeting like that where you’re kind of constantly talking about it each week also helps people feel bought in and not get distracted.
And actually I found that teams who are very bought to your vision and strategy are less distractable. Where I usually have more trouble is with leadership that aren’t necessarily in the weeds with your team every day. And I’ll get an idea. “Have you thought about doing this one random obscure thing?” “Yes. However, it’s not in service of this long term plan, so we don’t want to do that right now because we don’t think it’s the best use of our time.”
Lenny: Got it. And the way you’re describing it, this is as a manager of product managers-
Nickey Skarstad: Yep.
Lenny: … versus an ICPM? Cool. So as an ICPM, I imagine you would do a quarterly kickoff, or whatever your cycle length. You kick off with the team. Here’s what we’re doing. Any questions?
Nickey Skarstad: Totally.
Lenny: Okay. Another thing I wanted to make sure we have time to chat about is product review meetings and process. Just kind of like how do you, as a product leader, make sure that you’re shipping great stuff that you’re proud of and that your leaders aren’t surprised by? How do you design just a product review and design process.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. So I have a lot of strong feelings on product reviews. And it’s because I’ve been in a lot of different organizations and I’ve seen a lot of bad ways of doing this honestly. And I think it also depends on the product that you’re building and the team that you’ve created. So I don’t think that there’s one right or wrong way to do this.
Where I’ve seen them fail is when they happen at the function level, and they’re not done or shared as a team. Typically it’s normal to have a design review or to have some sort of technical review. And the more you can try to bring those different review processes into one central moment to check in, the better it tends to go. Because what happens is you’ll have feedback in a vacuum. The design leader will give the designer feedback, and then you don’t hear about it. Or there’ll be some technical flaw that happens in a very specific technical review that doesn’t get back to the larger team.
So finding ways to make sure that those parts of your process are shared across each function, and you attend them and prepare for them as a team, I think really helps a lot of that. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t have a design review. Of course you should. I mean, you should just be really thoughtful about having moments, especially if there are moments where you’re blessing something to move forward, to making sure the whole team is there. And that there’s a very strategic check-in process to get those things approved that everyone knows about and is a part of.
Lenny: Is that a meeting that you do weekly and you invite the designer and the engineer? Who do you invite, I guess, and what is the goal of that meeting? The goal of that meeting, I imagine, is approved the product to go launch and build.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. And I think especially going back to the one way, two way door moment, giving teams autonomy to ship some things that you think are two way doors and aren’t necessarily mission critical are important to your vision, but aren’t going to conflate with the larger system, I think trying to keep things quick and not have too many barriers for people to ship is incredibly important. So you’ll have to figure that out for your own org and it’s nuances, but that is something that is important.
But when there are moments where you think it is basically a feedback gate, where it’s a gate you need to walk through and a specific moment in time where you’ve gotten feedback, I think having a cross-functional meeting where there’s a clear pre-read or something that’s sent before. It’s like, here’s what we’re talking about today. And then aligning on, do we think this meets our goals and does this meet our quality bar? And doing that in a really thoughtful way just so the team gets feedback. So the leadership is plugged in, but also so you’re not standing the way of people shipping their products.
Lenny: And then do you check in throughout the process of the product being built, or do you kind of encourage teams to get to a point where it’s basically ready for approval?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. Ideally in a perfect world, there’s three check-in moments. There is the first principles check-in. What are you trying to build, or what are you trying to do? What are the sort of foundations that you’re going to build on? What is the most important thing? What are you solving for? Getting approval on that, weirdly, is almost the most important thing. Because it saves a lot of teams a lot of time when they get later in their feedback review process and people are like, “You’re not solving for the right thing.” So that’s important.
Once you’ve aligned on that, then it’s like, all right, what approach are we going to use? What are we going to build? And that’s sort of how we solve the problem. Making sure that there is a technical component there too so there’s some sort of infrastructure review or architecture review, or whatever you want to call it. And then it’s like, all right, this is ready to ship. Let’s check in again. Do we think it’s ready? And I think that, again, it depends on your organization. If you have a very small team, you might be very plugged in and these things might not need to happen. But in bigger organizations, especially where leadership isn’t always able to be in the room, making sure that you have a clear checking in a few times to make sure that everyone is moving in the right direction and everyone feels good is, I think, a worthwhile exercise.
Lenny: I love that. Such a simple framework. And then one last question along those lines, do you leave it up to the team to schedule these meetings, or are you pulling it out of them and making sure they schedule it?
Nickey Skarstad: Today, because the team that I’m working on is pretty small, and we’re pretty pre-product market fit, we’re not doing a ton of very formal check-in moments because we don’t need to be. Because it’s a small team and we’re all cruising together. But in bigger orgs that I’ve worked in, for Shopify, for example, there was a process around having these meetings and who would be there. And so those would kind of be scheduled through the larger processor system that they were working in, which really worked for them actually. And I think it allowed teams to be pretty autonomous on the day to day, but just making sure that there was feedback coming of from their users as well as from leadership.
Lenny: Got it. One last question before we get to our exciting lightning round. And it’s something that I’ve been thinking a lot about recently, which is around remote work as a product manager. I left Airbnb before COVID, and so I never lived in this world of everything is remote and product managing remotely. Is there anything you’ve picked up or learned that has been really helpful to being a product leader in a remote world?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. I would say last couple years have just been a huge shift in my ways of working. I sort of grew up as a PM in IRL environments where we did the majority of our work together in the same room. So that was whiteboarding, having a quick sync after you had an in person meeting to finalize some details or keep hashing out a problem. It’s so cheesy and overhyped, but the proverbial water cooler moment where you see somebody, and you’re like, “Hey, how are you doing, Hey, did you hear about this thing?” All of those things literally went away overnight.
And I think especially the job of a PM, it’s hard under normal times because you are doing so much labor to make sure people are informed and give feedback, et cetera. And then overnight you took away a lot of the methods that they were using to do it. And so I think that has been a pretty profound shift for a lot of people working in product roles.
The good news is there’s a ton of new tools and new technology that’s actually being built right now that’s majorly helpful for this. So I use Slack in very new ways today than I did two years ago. Things like just making sure to post more asynchronous updates. Trying to actually take the burden off of an IRL or a Zoom meeting. Can we talk about this asynchronously and do it in Slack? Slack has this really great feature called huddles where you can just quickly get on. It’s just audio. So there’s no video. And you can just have a 30 second conversation. It’s good for standups and things like that. Suggest you try it if you haven’t yet.
And then a lot of the old in person whiteboarding, things like that, you can do those now using awesome tools like Miro and FigJam. And I feel like, especially at Airbnb, we had such an international team that there was always somebody who was remote typically. And I think we never really got the remote experience right. And now that the majority of our teams are remote, I’m a fully remote person, I’ve been a lot more thoughtful about making sure we’re creating a really good experience of how we’re working for the larger team. And so I think you have to hack on this with your team. Different teams have different ways of working, but trying to be a synchronous, using Slack, making sure you’re following up in very visible ways where people can see. Don’t rely on Zoom meetings to fill all of your time. Otherwise people will literally hate you. And things like that really make a huge difference.
Lenny: Awesome. Super helpful. All right. Nickey, are you ready for the lightning round?
Nickey Skarstad: I’m ready. Let’s do this.
Lenny: What’s a book that you recommend most to other product managers?
Nickey Skarstad: I love Thinking in Systems by Donella Meadows.
Lenny: Awesome. Okay. We’re going to link to that in the description. Other than Duolingo, what’s another company that you recommend the PMs go work at or explore when they’re looking for a new gig?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, I would say Etsy hands down.
Lenny: And why is that?
Nickey Skarstad: I think it’s a great place to learn how to be a PM. Data driven, really supportive, product leadership, and a super fun product to build.
Lenny: Awesome. Love that. What’s the current favorite kind of app or piece of software that helps you do your work better?
Nickey Skarstad: I’m obsessed with Superhuman, which is a email productivity app, which once you start using it, you can’t not use it. You basically have to use it for the rest of your days. I also am obsessed with Loom, which is a video recording tool that makes it really easy to share really quick video updates.
Lenny: Awesome, great choices. And then outside of work, what’s a current favorite app or just piece of software that you love?
Nickey Skarstad: Definitely TikTok. Short form video is very fun and entertaining. Can’t get enough of it, and have been creating some myself. So I’m definitely hooked.
Lenny: While we’re on that topic, how do people find you on TikTok?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, it’s just my name. It’s Nickey Skarstad, and give me a follow.
Lenny: I’m a very happy follower. And then I’ll link to that in description too. Who’s a favorite person that you like to follow on either Twitter, or Instagram, or even TikTok?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, so I love, she is a cultural journalist, her name is Anne Helen Petersen. And she’s really plugged into sort of the larger cultural zeitgeist of the time. And I always give people, when people ask me my top advice for new PMs, it’s just to be a consumer. To download new products, to try them out, to use all the things and try them because I think it actually makes you a better product builder. And follow people that are not just tech people on Twitter. You are doing yourself a disservice if your entire feed is tech people. So find people that are plugged into cultural zeitgeist because it helps you also understand the moment in which you are shipping, and it’ll make sure that you’re acing your product marketing and your messaging and you’re building the right thing.
Lenny: What’s her name again?
Nickey Skarstad: Her name is Anne Helen Petersen.
Lenny: Anne Helen Petersen. Love it. Okay. And then final question. Who’s been your favorite manager?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, so I couldn’t pick one person here, so don’t be mad. But it’s actually a lot of women that I worked for at Etsy. The majority of my entire reporting line the time that I was there was all women, which has never happened to me again. So shout out to Kruti Patel, who is their current chief product officer, a woman named Heather Jassy, who ran the community team at Etsy long ago, who was a true delight to work for. And then Linda Findley, who is now the CEO of Blue Apron, but she was the chief operating officer at my time at Etsy. And she was my boss for a bit. And she was wonderful.
Lenny: Amazing. Thank you for sharing all that. And thank you so much for joining me, Nickey, for doing this. Where can people find you online? And then just generally, how can people that are listening to this be helpful to you?
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah, so I have newly become obsessed with TikTok, like I said before. I’ve been creating some fun, little short form videos. One of my regrets as a long time product builder is it’s very time consuming to write down the stories of building products and to share them. But I found TikTok actually really easy to do that. So I’m going to try to experiment there a little bit more.
So you can follow me, I’m @NickeySkarstad on TikTok. And then I have a newsletter. I call it Builders. It’s nickey.substack.com. Nickey is spelled like Mickey Mouse, but with an N. N-I-C-K-E-Y, .substack.com. And I publish their occasionally. I need to get it going again. But again, trying to write down more of the stories of actually being a builder who’s been doing this for a long time. Because a lot of us don’t have a lot of time to actually talk about it, but it’s really interesting work and I want to share it more.
Lenny: Awesome. I’m a follower and a subscriber to both. So highly recommend that.
Nickey Skarstad: I love it.
Lenny: And thank you so much, Nickey.
Nickey Skarstad: Yeah. Thank you, Lenny.
Lenny: That was awesome. Thank you for listening. If you enjoy the chat, don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast. You could also learn more at lennyspodcast.com. I’ll see you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Never Split the Difference | 《Never Split the Difference》(Chris Voss 著谈判类畅销书) |
| Thinking in Systems | 《Thinking in Systems》(Donella Meadows 著系统思维经典) |
| alignment | 对齐/协同(首次出现保留原文) |
| Anne Helen Petersen | Anne Helen Petersen(文化记者,人名保留原文) |
| APM (Associate Product Manager) | 初级产品经理 |
| backlogs | 需求积压/待办列表 |
| Blue Apron | Blue Apron(美国食材配送公司,不翻译) |
| Brian | 指 Airbnb 联合创始人 Brian Chesky |
| Builders | Builders(Nickey Skarstad 的 newsletter 名称,不翻译) |
| buy in / bought in | 认同/支持(指对决策或方向的心理认同与投入) |
| Chris Voss | Chris Voss(前 FBI 谈判专家,人名保留原文) |
| cross-functional | 跨职能(指跨部门、跨专业角色的协作) |
| dogfooding | 内部试用/吃自己的狗粮(指团队使用自己开发的产品) |
| Donella Meadows | Donella Meadows(系统思维学者,人名保留原文) |
| Duolingo | Duolingo(语言学习应用公司,不翻译) |
| Experiences | Airbnb 体验产品(指 Airbnb 的线下体验业务) |
| FigJam | FigJam(Figma 旗下的在线白板工具,不翻译) |
| first principles | 第一性原则(指回归最基本假设的思维方式) |
| Heather Jassy | Heather Jassy(前 Etsy 社区团队负责人,人名保留原文) |
| imposter syndrome | 冒名顶替综合征(首次出现保留原文) |
| Jira | Jira(项目管理和缺陷追踪工具,不翻译) |
| Kruti Patel | Kruti Patel(Etsy 首席产品官,人名保留原文) |
| linchpin | 关键节点 |
| Linda Findley | Linda Findley(Blue Apron CEO,人名保留原文) |
| Loom | Loom(视频录制工具,不翻译) |
| marketplace | 双边市场/交易平台(首次出现保留原文) |
| MasterClass | MasterClass(在线名人课程平台,不翻译) |
| Miro | Miro(在线白板协作工具,不翻译) |
| MURAL | MURAL(在线白板协作工具,不翻译) |
| newsletter | newsletter/邮件通讯 |
| north star | 北极星指标(指团队的核心指导目标) |
| OKR | OKR(目标与关键结果,Objectives and Key Results) |
| onboarding flow | 入驻引导流程 |
| one way versus two way door decision | 单向门与双向门决策 |
| platform role | 平台型角色(指面向内部基础设施或开发者平台的产品角色) |
| PM (Product Manager) | 产品经理 |
| product-market fit | 产品-市场契合(首次出现保留原文) |
| second order thinking | 二阶思考 |
| senior product lead | 高级产品负责人 |
| Shopify | Shopify(加拿大电商平台公司,不翻译) |
| Superhuman | Superhuman(邮件效率应用,不翻译) |
| truncate | 截断 |
| UGC (User Generated Content) | 用户生成内容(UGC) |
| VP Product | 产品副总裁 |
| zeitgeist | 时代精神(zeitgeist,首次出现保留原文) |
| zero to one | 从零到一(指从无到有构建新产品) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
Nickey Skarstad (Airbnb, Etsy, Shopify, Duolingo) on translating vision into goals, operationalizing product quality, second-order decisions, brainstorming, influence, and much more
Nickey Skarstad
访谈记录
**Lenny:**当我在我的 Newsletter Slack 社区里问,谁算得上有点低调但非常厉害、应该请到播客上来的嘉宾时,Nickey Skarstad 是大家第一个提到的名字。我一点也不意外。实际上我和 Nickey 在 Airbnb 有过交集,她在那里作为产品经理有着传奇般的声誉——人人都喜欢她,而且她能把事办成。在加入 Airbnb 之前,Nickey 在 Etsy 工作了七年多,从论坛版主一路做到了产品管理总监。之后她又在 Airbnb 工作了几年。
离开之后,她去了 The Wing 担任产品副总裁,目前在 Duolingo 担任产品管理总监。在这次对话中,我们聊了如何设定愿景、将其转化为目标、然后如何执行,如何让战略具备可操作性并保持团队的 alignment 和专注,如何设计产品评审会,如何维护产品质量,以及在她职业生涯中对成功贡献最大的技能。希望你享受这次与 Nickey Skarstad 的对话。
**Lenny:**Nickey,非常感谢你今天能来。我真的非常期待我们的对话,也很期待向你学习。欢迎你。
**Nickey Skarstad:**谢谢,感谢邀请。
**Lenny:**我的荣幸。你目前在 Duolingo 担任产品总监,这是一个很棒的产品,我以前也经常用。我现在没有在学语言,但如果要学的话我知道该去哪。能不能谈谈你是怎么进入产品领域的,以及从那之后到今天你的职业历程?
从论坛版主到产品经理
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的,这是一段漫长而曲折的旅程,很有意思。我从事技术类角色到现在已经十二年了,从事产品角色——准确说是产品管理——已经十年了。我开始成为房间里那个有经验的人了,这很有趣,有时候也有点令人敬畏。
我获得第一个产品角色的经历是这样的:我是 2010 年加入 Etsy 的。我加入的时候,可以说 Etsy 已经过了 product-market fit 阶段,但还没有真正开始大规模增长和扩张。我其实是加入了他们的社区团队,先做论坛版主,然后做卖家教育专员,做了几年这样的工作。在这个过程中,我逐渐成为内部为数不多的、对他们的核心客户之一——卖家——如何实际使用产品有着深入理解的声音。
当时的 VP Product 叫 Mark Headland(如果你在听的话,嗨 Mark)。他说:“嘿 Nickey,你总是出现在各种产品会议上,有没有想过做产品经理?“当时我的反应是:“天哪,不,绝对不行。“我说:“技术什么?工程?我得和工程师一起工作?我对工程一无所知。“所以我当时 imposter syndrome 非常严重。他给了我一点推动,说:“我觉得你会很擅长的。”
于是我就试了。我从 APM 做起。我在 Etsy 一共待了大约七年,其中大部分时间都在做产品管理相关的工作,离开时是产品管理总监。在那里的绝大部分时间,我都在做卖家端——全部是卖家工具,和卖家合作,研究如何帮助他们扩大和发展自己的业务。这是一段非常棒的、疯狂的旅程。这就是我的第一个产品角色,之后我又经历了其他几个产品角色。
**Lenny:**好,我们接着聊。你之后去了哪里?
加入 Airbnb,挑战 Experiences 产品
**Nickey Skarstad:**在 Etsy 待了七年之后,我开始有点想尝试新东西了。当我退一步思考接下来想做什么的时候,我意识到自己非常喜欢 Etsy 的 marketplace 这个层面。我不知道这是否说明了什么性格特质——可能你的性格也是如此——marketplace 产品真的很难做,对吧?你需要不断平衡买家和卖家双方,或者说市场的两端。我真的很喜欢这一点,而且这也是我擅长的。
于是我就想,还有什么地方既有趣又正处在风口上的呢?我想到了 Airbnb。必须是 Airbnb。我是他们产品的超级粉丝,他们也已经过了 product-market fit 阶段。我去探了探路,最终获得了加入 Experiences 团队的机会。我加入那个团队的时候,产品刚刚上线。他们已经完成了早期的思考,那些存在层面的思考,全新产品刚投入市场,然后我就加入了。
所以我成为了第一个实地参与的产品经理,真正帮助那个团队弄清楚如何获得 product-market fit,然后如何开始思考规模化的问题。你可以想象,Experiences 是一个很有意思的产品,因为它非常微妙——这一点和你在 Airbnb 做 Homes 的工作也类似——一部分是构建用户在预订 Airbnb Experience 时与之交互的数字体验,另一部分则是影响你实际参加一场活动或体验时的现场体验。
对产品质量的执念
**Nickey Skarstad:**我觉得这层抽象对我来说非常迷人,我也从中学到了很多——不仅仅是在影响数字产品层面,而是真正关乎用户落地后的实际消费体验。这又是另一层复杂性,所以这段经历特别有趣。我在那里待了大约两年半多一点。一开始是 PM,后来升了几次职,离开时的头衔应该是高级产品负责人(senior product lead)。我永远感激这段经历,因为我学到了大量关于 product-market fit 和产品质量的东西。
**Lenny:**那段经历还有什么别的收获吗?因为我当时也在 Airbnb,我们没能真正合作过,但我总能听到 Experiences 团队里对你的极高评价。据我了解,Experiences 是一段相当疯狂的旅程。有没有什么你从那段经历中带走的东西,一直作为 PM 陪伴着你?
**Nickey Skarstad:**有的。其中一部分更多的是 Airbnb 的运作方式,我觉得自己每天都在工作中用到,那就是真正地思考产品质量和终端消费者的体验。Airbnb 不会发布不够好的产品。即使他们在尝试新东西,也对终端消费者体验有着极度的执着。我从这种思维方式中学到了很多,因为只要发布的东西,质量就是非常高的。所有边界情况都已经被考虑到了。而我之前的经历则截然不同——我们发布东西更快,但并不总是完美的。当然这不是说 Airbnb 发布的一切都完美无缺,但我认为那种对终端消费者体验的执着,真正影响了他们整个产品矩阵的质量,这也是我今天努力带到自己工作中的东西,因为在我看来,没有谁比他们做得更好。
如何衡量产品质量
**Lenny:**我很想展开聊聊这个。我心里有两个问题。能否举一个 Airbnb 的例子,说明他们是怎么保持这么高的质量的?然后你对一家公司如何做到这一点,有什么建议吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的。我觉得这确实不容易。Airbnb 在 Experiences 上做的一件事是,我们设立了一个平衡指标,基本上就是把评价率(review rate)作为我们的终极顶层目标。你可以想象这样一个业务——显然我们需要平台上有收入流转,我们也关注高层次的预订量,但到了最后,在早期阶段,我们最执着的是确保每一个预订了 Experiences 的人,在真正到场时都有好的体验。
所以,尤其是当你在构建早期产品的时候,真的要思考如何挑选一些好的质量指标,它们可能与增长指标形成平衡甚至对冲,然后把那个指标当作你的北极星(north star),因为这真的帮助整个团队理解他们最终到底在努力做什么。增长当然重要,是的,显然我们需要增长,原因有很多。但最重要的是实际客户体验要好。我知道 Airbnb 在其他地方也这样做,但 Experiences 的顶层目标就是评价率和质量,这一点确实贯穿了整个团队。
**Lenny:**他们是怎么把这个落地执行的?听起来很美好——好的,确保所有评价都是五星。但你怎么把这件事嵌入到团队的工作方式和成功追踪中去呢?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的,很大一部分其实是运营层面的,就是确保那些没有达到特定严格标准的体验主人得到应有的关注。我们做了大量的辅导和教育工作。其中一部分体现在产品里,一部分不在产品里。这件事在我们所有跨团队的会议上都会讨论,每个人都明白它很重要。所以我觉得这真正影响了运营团队和产品团队——产品团队正在构建将这些理念变为现实的产品。我认为,尤其是如果你是一位创始人,正在思考如何搭建你的早期指标体系,有很多方法可以确保你的团队真正理解这些指标意味着什么。
用 Dogfooding 保证质量
**Nickey Skarstad:**Experiences 团队还做了很多的一件事是,我们一直在做 dogfooding。我们很幸运,因为这是一个特别有趣的可以内部试用的产品。我们经常在世界各地参加各种 Experiences。但这确实很有帮助,因为你一到活动现场,马上就能知道这将是一次五星体验,还是不太行。这对我们帮助很大,因为我们会回去跟团队说:“好,我们刚在旧金山,昨晚参加了一个 Experience,效果很差。我们该怎么办?“所以有很多方法,但 dogfooding 是一个好方法。
**Lenny:**我知道 Brian 有个出名的习惯,只要产品里有什么东西不正常,他就会给团队发消息。我也知道他非常深度地参与了 Experiences。你是否也学会了这种做法,比如”嘿团队,我发现了一个大问题,我们修一下”?还是你会尽量避免这样做,不给团队制造压力?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我觉得有时候如果你做得方式得当,这种压力可以是健康的。我觉得好的地方在于,如果你打造的是自主性强的团队,让他们觉得实现高质量体验就是他们自己的目标,这就能帮你避免一些那样的情况。但我确实认为,推动团队使用自己的产品,让他们亲身感受到产品不好的地方,这是一种非常好的方式,能给团队带来自主修复问题的动力。不过我不会给人发短信,但我一直在 Slack 上。所以如果有什么事,我会在 Slack 上找你。
Etsy 的质量指标教训
**Lenny:**很好。好,关于这个话题也许再问一个问题,因为太有意思了。在 Experiences 上你们衡量的是——我猜是——五星行程的占比。你在其他公司是否还用过其他质量指标,对于追踪和维持产品质量有帮助的?
**Nickey Skarstad:**有的。我们在 Etsy 用过另一个,很有意思。我们意识到——我当时负责的产品中有一部分是入驻引导流程(onboarding flow),具体来说是新卖家的入驻引导。你可以想象,如果你负责这个流程,你的直觉就是:好的,我们需要大量卖家,需要他们尽快开店。所以我们一开始确实走了这条路,然后我们发现我们实际上搞砸了几个下游指标,一开始我们并不太理解。这些指标基本上就是让卖家完成首单。我们开了一堆店,但这些卖家在平台上的表现并不成功,也没有在一定时间内取得成功。
所以我们做了很多拆解分析——到底发生了什么,为什么会出现这种情况,这件事到底重不重要?最终的答案是:非常重要。当 Etsy 卖家开设店铺时,让他们尽快获得一笔订单非常关键,因为这是一个巨大的激励。如果你在第一天就成交了一单,你会想:“哇,好的,这是真的。我可以靠这个赚钱。太令人兴奋了,我要给买家发货了。“如果花了七天,你就会开始想:“糟了,是不是我不够好,我是不是很不擅长这个。“十天、三十天,真的会影响人们的心态。
入驻引导中的”摩擦力”
**Nickey Skarstad:**所以我们实际上在入驻引导流程中增加了更多摩擦力,来帮助解决这个问题。我们实际上放慢了你的速度,让你在上架商品时更加用心。而这样做之后,我们反而帮助卖家更快地实现了首单成交。所以这是我们使用质量指标的另一个好例子,我想应该是”七天首单率”,可能不完全准确,但大致如此。这个指标实际上与高层增长指标有一定冲突,但它是一个极其重要的质量预测指标,对卖家的长期成功至关重要。
**Lenny:**太有意思了,这个话题真的太好了。我觉得这个话题我们可以聊一个小时,不过也许再稍微聊一会儿就好。那个时候这个指标是不是你们用来衡量供给增长的核心指标?还是说它只是一个辅助指标,旁边还有整体增长指标?
**Nickey Skarstad:**对,它是一个辅助指标,不是我们最顶层的 OKR。但它很重要,因为——你可以把这些事情想象成一个跷跷板。我们基本上是在增长和确保人们成功之间寻找平衡。两者之间的均衡做得越好,整个交易平台(marketplace)就越健康。这跟 Experiences 的逻辑也很类似——你可以一味追求增长,但用户体验可能很差。所以你怎么平衡这两件事?如果你能让这两件事保持平衡,你就能走得又稳又远,长期也会更成功。
**Lenny:**明白了。我在 Airbnb 做供给增长的时候,我们供给增长团队的核心目标也是类似的。我们当时的指标就是”获得首次预订的新房源”。只有拿到至少一个订单的房源,我们才算作新增供给,其他都不算。因为我们知道,只要它被预订过至少一次,至少说明它有一定的质量水准,有人想要那个地方,对平台有价值。好的,你在 Airbnb 之后去了哪里?
创业公司的起伏
**Nickey Skarstad:**我去了家创业公司。不太好描述他们具体做什么,但他们基本上也在做一个双边市场,不过更像是”想法的交易市场”。我很讨厌这种说法,觉得挺俗的,但确实是这么回事。他们有实体联合办公空间,想把空间里发生的那些奇妙连接搬到线上——人们互相认识、建立人脉、创业拿到融资等等。他们想把它产品化,不再局限于自己的四面墙之内。我帮他们制定长期战略,梳理方向,找到产品-市场契合(product-market fit),同时也在搭建技术团队来解决这个问题。
那是 2019 年底。后来我休了一段时间假,生了个宝宝。回来之后疫情就来了。而他们本质上是一个实体联合办公业务,大部分收入都来自线下空间。所以 COVID 对他们来说简直是灾难性的。他们还有一些其他文化层面的问题,整个项目基本上就暂停了,或者说直接崩了。我花了一年时间招了一个团队,然后不得不把他们裁掉。这是一堂非常好的领导力课,我不骗你。从那段经历中学到了很多关于如何带领团队的道理。
那之后又是疫情期间,我的孩子八个月大,所以我花了不少时间就陪孩子玩,也挺开心的。后来就去了 Shopify。我当时想找一个规模更大、不是创业公司的平台,找一个我可以长期待下去、更有激情的工作。我在 Shopify 接了一个平台型的角色。这个经历很有意思,因为我之前职业生涯的大部分时间都在做纯面向消费者的产品,而这次接的是一个平台角色。
说实话,我很快就意识到了一个问题——我想,“哦,好事,我之前其实不太理解这份工作到底是什么,现在我知道了,但它确实不能给我带来能量。“我每天都感觉有很多”红色能量”。所以我很快就做出了离开的决定。这其实也是一次很好的学习经历。随着职业生涯的推进,我觉得我学到了很多关于什么事情能给”Nickey Skarstad”带来能量的认知,并且开始真正优先考虑这一点,尤其是在后疫情时代。
离开 Shopify 之后,我来了 Duolingo。Duolingo 特别好玩。我从 2021 年 9 月就在那了。在帮他们做一个从零到一的产品挑战,是一个比较新的方向。不太方便具体说,但本质上又是一个关于产品-市场契合的思考过程,让我想起了当年做 Experiences 时的一些工作。所以确实挺有挑战性的,但也非常有趣。我在那里也过得很开心。
如何判断一个角色是否适合你
**Lenny:**太厉害了。你工作过的公司真的很令人惊叹,有太多我想深入聊的。先简单回到 Shopify,我想很多产品经理可能都在纠结:是留在原地,还是去别的地方看看?你刚才说把你拉走的原因是平台角色不太适合你。对于如何判断一个角色或公司是否适合自己,你有什么建议吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**有的。我觉得这个认知是我在 Shopify 期间真正学到的东西。另外我也想说清楚,我在 Shopify 的经历其实很好,我觉得它是一家非常棒的公司。我非常推荐大家去那里工作,尤其是喜欢做平台型产品的人。我当时意识到”我不太喜欢这个”的时候,做了一件事——我回过头去看了自己的日历,把所有会议按开完之后的感受标成红色、黄色和绿色。黄色代表这个会议还行,精力处于基准线。红色代表我感到无聊、有压力,或者体验不好。绿色代表这个会议给了我能量,让我感到兴奋,想继续做下去。
当我回看过去几周日历时,发现几乎全是红色和黄色。我就想,好吧,从能量的角度来看,我确实不太喜欢这份工作。所以我会建议大家用这个视角来审视你正在做的工作。弄清楚作为产品经理你最喜欢的是什么,以及如何在下一个角色中最大化那些你热爱的事情。
这一点我们之后可以再聊,但每家公司的产品组织结构差异很大。作为产品经理,你每天的工作内容——取决于你去哪家公司、做什么产品——是非常不同的。所以要仔细想清楚那些工作实际是什么样的,流程是什么,你的终端用户是谁,你每天真正在做什么。如果你能把这些想清楚,再搞清楚什么能给你带来能量、你真正喜欢什么,那找到下一个该去的地方就容易多了。
**Lenny:**哇,我特别喜欢这个方法,之前从来没听过。就是回过头去看你参加过的会议,然后反思那场会议给了你多少能量。非常好的建议,谢谢你分享。另外我也想补充一句,Shopify 确实是一个非常棒的工作去处。我需要说清楚这一点。它是我推荐产品经理去尝试的少数几家公司之一。
**Nickey Skarstad:**是的,我觉得尤其是如果你在产品经理职业生涯早期,Shopify 的组织确实非常出色,是学习如何做产品经理的绝佳去处。而且他们的产品体量巨大、规模成熟,在其中构建产品本身就很复杂。所以我认为那是一个真正理解二阶效应(second order systems)和系统性思维的好地方。如果这类工作能给你带来能量,我会推荐大家去那里找工作。但还是要回到那句话——把你热爱的事情做到极致。而从长远来看,我意识到自己真正喜欢的是从零到一的早期阶段:如何实现产品-市场契合?如何深入思考早期用户体验?而 Shopify 所处的阶段完全不同。他们确实在某些地方做这样的工作,但那不是他们的日常。所以这也是让我觉得有意思的地方。
**Lenny:**嗯,这完全说得通。回到你刚才提到的——产品组织的结构和不同公司如何构建产品——这个话题可以从两个方向切入,你选哪个都行。一个是:你工作过的这些公司里,哪一家你最喜欢,它的产品构建方式至今仍在影响你?另一个是:你会如何搭建产品组织、跨职能团队与非跨职能团队、汇报关系等等?这方面你有什么建议?
不同公司的产品组织经验
**Nickey Skarstad:**好吧,我觉得你这是让我选最喜欢的孩子——作为一个母亲,这尤其难。但说真的,我觉得自己从这些不同的地方都学到了东西,很难取舍。我觉得我在 Etsy 的一些早期工作非常有塑造力,那是我学会如何做产品经理的地方,所以我对那段经历感到非常自豪。另外我觉得 Etsy 当时非常注重公开构建(building in public)。我现在真的在比划双引号——我知道你看不到。
**Lenny:**我看到了。
**Nickey Skarstad:**但他们之所以这样做,是因为他们拥有一个非常热情、深度参与、高度投入的早期社区。如果不让社区早期参与进来,他们就没法直接发布产品并指望效果良好。所以他们做了大量的原型测试、内测,基本上就是让用户试用、收集反馈。说实话,我觉得他们比当时大多数公司都更早地在做这件事。这在当时非常有趣,也深刻地留在了我的记忆中——如何与社区协作,以及如何围绕你正在构建的产品培育社区。因为归根结底,尤其在早期阶段,社区真的能帮助你实现规模化——让用户成为你产品的传播者,帮助其他人学会使用,诸如此类。这些是我在 Etsy 学到的,我认为那段经历非常有塑造力。
然后就是 Airbnb,我们之前也聊过——把产品质量和终端消费者体验深度融入到你构建的一切之中,这也是我每天都在践行的东西。所以如果非要选的话,我会选这两个地方,但我也打算继续学习。
**Lenny:**有意思。这两家都是非常以社区驱动为核心的业务。
**Nickey Skarstad:**确实。
产品组织的两种模式
**Lenny:**那么在组织架构方面,关于如何搭建和组建产品团队,有没有什么你学到并一直带在身上的最佳实践?
**Nickey Skarstad:**有的。我觉得产品组织目前有两种比较主流的组织模式。一种是职能型组织(functional organization),产品团队中的所有人都汇报给产品副总裁或首席产品官之类的负责人。我认为这种模式在某些特定情境下确实非常有效。通常的运作方式是,你有你的产品搭档,你的”三人组”——设计搭档和工程搭档——他们通常也各自汇报给职能线的领导。我觉得在大型组织中,这种方式运作得很好,尤其是当组织需要在职能本身上进行大量培养和发展的时候。比如你有很多初级产品经理或者职业生涯早期的产品经理,需要大量的指导和发展支持,那么这种职能型的构建方式就很有意义。我在 Etsy 的时候,汇报结构就是这样的,非常合理。
而另一种,实际上我在 Airbnb 的时候,因为体验产品是一个相当新兴的业务机会,它采用的是 GM 制(General Manager,总经理制)。基本上,整个做体验产品的产品团队都向上汇报给一位业务负责人,而这位业务负责人管理所有职能——运营团队、营销人员、产品等等。我实际上认为,对于像 Airbnb 这样公司里的体验产品团队来说,这种方式非常有效,因为它赋予了该业务负责人极大的自主权,让他真正去弄清楚这个业务需要什么才能成功。他们不必——虽然在某些方面确实还需要——但不必百分之百依赖大公司的资源来完成需要做的工作。我甚至觉得,如果当初他们在 Etsy 式的职能组织结构内部推出体验产品,它根本不会成功,因为它的业务需求非常独特,需要自己的流程和产品构建方式。因为他们在某种程度上——我不想说”隔离”,因为并没有完全隔离——但因为他们给了它独立的空间和独立的结构,使得它能够成功,因为他们能够以正确的方式为其提供资金、给予所需的资源等等。
所以这两种模式我都见过能行得通。如果我是创始人,要搭建最初的产品组织,我会这样思考:我们到底要构建什么?产品是什么?然后我们需要建立什么样的流程来弄清楚如何构建它?需要什么样的人?然后真正退后一步,认真想清楚:好的,在组织层面上,我们应该如何塑造这一切,才能确保这些人拥有自主权、拥有他们所需的一切,从而顺畅地运转?说实话,我觉得没有一种”正确”的方式。我知道这算不上一个明确的答案,但我认为它真的取决于你正在构建什么以及你所处的阶段。
**Lenny:**那你有没有一个默认的建议方向?比如大多数情况下应该采用 GM 制,还是大多数情况下应该采用跨职能团队的模式?
**Nickey Skarstad:**嗯,我觉得如果你的业务是全新的,采用职能型是合理的,因为你还没有太多的组织复杂性。Lenny,当时我们在 Airbnb 的时候,Airbnb 已经是一家大公司了,对吧?它有大量不同的团队在尝试解决各种不同的问题。所以 GM 制非常合理,因为它能够把一个特定的业务机会独立出来,给它所需的资源,给它空间去跑起来。而当你的公司处于更小的阶段时,我认为这没那么重要。通常来说,尤其是当整个组织在解决类似的问题时,职能型非常合适。因为这样你可以更全局地去思考:好的,我们如何在不同职能之间建立正确的产品开发流程,以确保我们——用一个不太恰当的比喻——就像交响乐团的比喻:你有这么多不同的乐器,需要搞清楚如何在正确的时间协同演奏。而职能型的工作方式实际上能让你把这件事做得很好。
组织架构的反复调整
**Lenny:**我在 Airbnb 以及后来接触的很多公司里学到的一点是,永远不会存在一种”正确”的组织架构方式,公司往往会在不同模式之间来回切换。比如 Airbnb,就从 GM 模式切换到职能汇报线,又切回了 GM 制。所以事情总是在变的,你尝试一些做法,看看效果,然后调整优化,抓住最大的机会。然后可能六个月之后你又得改了。
如何设定愿景、转化为目标并执行
**Lenny:**我问了几个认识你、跟你共事过的人,问他们觉得我应该问你什么问题。其中出现频率最高的一个问题是关于你如何设定愿景、将愿景转化为目标,然后去执行这些目标。我知道这是很多产品经理想提升的能力,也是很多产品经理不太擅长的。所以你能不能分享一些这方面的想法、建议或者故事,谈谈你是怎么做好这件事的?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的。首先,我想知道你都跟谁聊了。这挺吓人的。希望他们说了好话。你不用把他们供出来。
**Lenny:**匿名信源。匿名信源。
**Nickey Skarstadt:**好吧。不过我很高兴听到这个问题,因为说实话,这恰恰是我最喜欢的工作之一。当我看自己的日历时,这些时刻对我来说是充满绿色能量的。所以我在思考如何设定高层愿景和战略时,有一些喜欢运用的第一性原则(first principles)。第一条就是:一定要把你的团队和人员拉进来。在我的职业生涯中,见过很多总监级别的人试图独自在真空中做战略。他们会写一份文档,然后说:“好了团队,这就是我们要做的,这就是我们的战略。“但结果从来都不好。即使战略本身可能是对的,但因为你没有让大家参与进来、没有让他们一起走过制定的过程,他们没有觉得自己亲手参与了塑造,往往就不会真正认同。而在大家没有参与的情况下再去争取认同,是非常困难且耗时的。我们没有那么多时间,对吧?
所以我认为这就是我的第一条原则:把团队带上。而且有一些方式可以做到这一点,但并不意味着你在对战略进行投票。你不应该投票。我认为好的产品工作通常不是民主决策,对吧?你需要一个清晰的领导者,能够理解大量信号、理解更大的竞争格局,并做出决策。尤其是思考战略的时候,获取意见很重要,但归根结底,应该有一个人对最终结果负责。
另一件事是,很多时候人们不会真正去跟高层领导或更广泛的业务负责人沟通,获取组织层面的上下文信息来帮助自己制定正确的战略。他们会在真空中构建一些东西,然后拿出来后会收到来自整个组织的大量反馈,比如:“哦,这跟我们的战略冲突了。我们也在做类似的事情。“或者”我们的底层平台架构实际上不具备做那件事的能力。“等等。所以要确保你跟各方沟通,包括一直沟通到 CEO 那里,确保创始人和 CEO 非常认同,因为归根结底,是他们在决定为你正在做的事情分配资源,也是他们在帮你获取所需的一切。以上就是做好愿景和战略工作的一些基础。
愿景-使命-战略金字塔
然后再往下深入到具体操作层面,我很喜欢愿景-使命-战略金字塔。这个概念可能有点老套了。但我觉得它依然很有效。你只需要想象一个金字塔的形状——最顶层是愿景,下面是使命和战略,再往下是目标(objectives)。这是一个非常简单的框架。你直接在 Google 图片里搜 “vision mission strategy objectives” 就能看到。它的核心其实就是逐一击中这些关键节点,自上而下地思考。比如,你长期来看需要走到哪里?你正在做的事情的长期愿景是什么?如果拉开到十年的维度去看你最理想的路径是什么样子?把它写下来。
然后随着你沿着金字塔往下走,事情变得越来越具体,你基本上是把内容拉回到你所处的当下,更加清晰。比如思考使命时,好,这是另一个抽象层级——我们如何让愿景落地。然后进入战略:好,我们实际上怎么拆解,为了真正执行这个愿景,需要发生哪些事情?然后你的目标可以是 OKR,或者你使用的任何一种目标设定模型,再清晰一个层级:好,在接下来的三到六个月里,我们具体需要命中哪些关键节点,才能演奏出那首美妙的交响乐——这是一个糟糕的比喻。算了我还是说了吧。不管了。
**Lenny:**我懂,我懂。
**Nickey Skarstad:**哎,我就喜欢糟糕的比喻。
**Lenny:**很有画面感。趁这个话题,我稍微打断一下——你实际上是怎么操作的?比如做愿景和使命的时候,你是打开一个 Google Doc 写出来,还是用 Miro 或者 FigJam 之类的工具?
愿景工作坊的实操方法
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的,我觉得愿景练习是一个非常好的时机把更大的团队拉进来。因为我现在远程办公,所以会用 Miro 或 FigJam。在 Duolingo,我们通常用 FigJam,因为我们深度嵌入 Figma 生态。以前我也用过 MURAL。说实话我个人更喜欢 MURAL 的白板产品。所以我会打开它,然后和团队一起梳理很多东西,做一个真正的头脑风暴。好,你们觉得我们十年后会走向哪里?你们觉得未来十年更大的竞争格局会发生什么变化,可能会影响我们正在做的工作?大家的想法是什么?让所有人都开始思考。
好的头脑风暴通常是跨职能的。所以要跳出你自己的团队。能不能拉一个市场部门的人来?能不能让更大范围的政策团队的人也坐进来?怎么做到真正的跨职能、真正拉高视角,给每个人空间和自由去做存在性思考——你要这样去框定它:我们要在五到十年的维度上思考。不要担心今天正在发生的事情。说实话,如果你做得对,这些练习会非常有趣。
**Lenny:**你现在是远程做这些的,对吧。
**Nickey Skarstad:**是的。
头脑风暴的实操方法
**Lenny:**所以你就是大概安排一个会议,开场,然后让大家打开比如一个 Miro 文档,上面放一堆提示语、便利贴之类的东西?实操层面你具体是怎么做的?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我会提前把 Miro 填好。想清楚你要和团队讨论哪些事情,把它们做成 Miro 文档里的标题。这样当所有人进来的时候,就能非常清楚地看到”今天我们要讨论什么”。你也可以把它放进日历邀请的议程里。我参加过一些非常棒的战略头脑风暴,他们会提前附上一份竞争格局的分析材料,这样大家可以先做一点预读。
然后进入实际会议时,你已经把时间分配安排好、想清楚了。Miro 和 FigJam 都有非常好用的计时器,所有人工作的时候还会播放音乐,挺可爱的。FigJam 的音效做得特别好,他们的音效设计师,给你点赞。计时器会在十分钟后响起一声清脆的提示音,然后你们就可以一起回顾,逐一过一遍每个讨论点。
结束之后,我喜欢在会议里就一起做一些归纳整理。基本上就是把类似的想法抓到一起,归入相近的概念类别里。之后我会再花更多时间深入思考。我觉得很多人以为你必须在一个会议里就得产出一个非常清晰的共同愿景——其实不需要。你只需要产出想法,试着起草一版,然后在最终定稿前再收集一些反馈就好。
头脑风暴的提示语示例
**Lenny:**关于这个话题最后一个问题,这个话题本身也够聊一整小时的——你有没有什么提示语或构思的例子可以分享?我知道你不能聊 Duolingo 正在做的事情,但为了让大家更有体感,你头脑风暴过的一些东西有哪些例子?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好。回到 Airbnb 体验产品来说吧,因为之前聊了很多,大家有一些基础背景。早期体验产品的愿景构想非常有趣,因为核心问题是我们能创造什么样的体验。真正去想——你过去旅行的时候,什么让你感到愉悦?在你整个旅行过程中,有哪些时刻特别有趣、特别有冲击力、让你印象最深的?为什么?然后作为团队一起去思考这些事情。这类练习特别适合团队一起做,因为你会有”哇,Lenny 那段疯狂的旅行经历让我对他了解了不少”这样的感觉。所以关键在于精心设计有意义的提示语,而且这些提示语要能挂钩到你的战略上。它怎么向上对齐战略?显然,深入思考你要创造的体验,会帮助你形成正确的愿景,把你的策略金字塔填充到位,对吧?
从愿景到目标到执行
**Lenny:**好。我们在头脑风暴这个话题上有点跑偏了。你还想继续聊聊怎么从愿景到目标再到执行吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好。我觉得总体来说,当你沿着策略金字塔往下走,一直到 OKR 这一层,这个环节很重要,因为有时候战略太抽象、太高层了,大家很难迈出那一步——我怎么从这个金字塔底端一步步走上去?对我来说,好的战略加上好的 OKR,就是帮助团队完成这件事的工具。好的 OKR 就是对你战略的清晰表达——不管你的战略重点是什么——把它浓缩成”接下来三个月,我们做什么”。我觉得这对团队来说非常重要,因为如果你总是飘在云端,就很难真正落到功能层面的”我们要为这个具体需求建一个 Jira 工单”。它需要向上连接战略,再向下贯穿到执行。
**Lenny:**明白了。这些 OKR 你放在哪里?是不是先头脑风暴,得出愿景和粗略的战略,再转化为目标?你在哪里做这件事?另外,整个这个过程通常要花多长时间?
**Nickey Skarstad:**在 Duolingo 我们现在的做法是按季度做 OKR。这个过程通常在季度第三个月启动。先认真想一想:这个季度我们的 OKR 进展怎么样?我们承诺的事情数量合适吗?做得怎么样?然后进入下一步:下个季度我们需要做什么?理想情况下,这应该对接到一个更长期的计划。否则就会感觉有些混乱,会觉得完全没有扎根于长期计划或战略之中。
然后我们会花几周时间作为团队一起讨论:下个季度应该长什么样?什么能带来最大影响力,帮我们执行那个长期战略?然后我们怎么确保设定了正确的目标(Objective)和下面的关键结果(Key Results)?之后通常会有某种管理层评审。说实话我忘了,Lenny,Airbnb 当年的目标制定是怎么做的?我真不记得了。听起来很糟糕,但毕竟已经过去挺久了。我甚至都不记得 Airbnb 有没有用 OKR。
**Lenny:**有一段很长的时间 OKR 是非常重要的事情。我们的产品负责人对 OKR 特别热衷。我觉得有好几年我们的 OKR 文化非常严格。后来就慢慢演变成了比较粗略的——
**Nickey Skarstad:**目标。
Lenny:——对 OKR 的宽松解读。就是目标、战略、使命、愿景这些。据我所知,现在已经演变成了一种混合形态。
**Nickey Skarstad:**明白了。我想说的是,OKR 框架未必对每个团队都是最合适的,但不管你企业的大小和规模如何,拥有某种跨职能共享的目标框架都是有用的。我觉得很多人会纠结在 OKR 本身上,想去挑它的毛病,其中有些批评确实很有道理。但你应该有某种从流程角度在团队中共享的框架,让所有人都能一起使用和推进。因为它再一次把你的战略拉回到当下。你可以在接下来的三个月内把一件事落地,而且你对它长什么样非常清楚。
团队决策的方法
**Lenny:**我想展开你之前提到的一点——关于最终如何做决策。根据你的经验,产品经理往往某种程度上充当最终决策者。我很想听听你在这方面的建议:怎么在团队中把这件事建立起来,让大家都清楚产品经理有更多发言权,或者怎么把大家带到一个最终结论上?有什么技巧和策略方面的建议吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**好。我最近刚读了一本非常好的书,虽然稍微有点偏题,但我觉得它真的非常适用于这类让大家对决策达成对齐的场景。作者是 Chris Voss,他是那位很有名的 FBI 谈判专家。书名好像是《Split the Difference: Negotiating As if Your Life Depends on It》。书名别以我说的为准。
**Lenny:**好像是 Never Split the Difference 吧?然后他还有一个 MasterClass 课程我也看了,非常不错。
**Nickey Skarstad:**我其实还没看那个 MasterClass 课程,但读完书之后已经列在计划里了。书里很多东西,尤其因为他是 FBI 出身,我原本以为会是非常强硬的风格——“你得这么做。“但实际上他的整套方法论核心就是共情,就是把对方的话复述回去,让人觉得被倾听了,确保你真的听懂了他们为什么不喜欢你的策略,或者为什么觉得那条 OKR 不合理。我觉得如果你能花一些时间真正倾听团队,理解为什么你的方案没有引起共鸣,你就能引导大家走上正确的方向。或者你意识到自己错了。优秀的产品经理都是谦逊的人,对吧?你不可能永远是对的。不可能总是对的。至于怎么判断自己什么时候对、什么时候错,这是另一个很好的播客话题,你应该找别人来做,因为我大概也不太擅长。对。
**Lenny:**好建议,我很喜欢这个。
单向门与双向门决策
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我觉得这个很有帮助。另外一点是,我非常喜欢”单向门”和”双向门”决策这个概念。如果你的团队正在做一个非常关键的长期决策,它会限制未来很多你可能想做或需要做的事情,那就是一个单向门决策。你应该花时间认真思考、讨论,从更大的社区、从领导层那里获取反馈和认同(buy in)。如果是一个双向门决策,不会产生巨大影响,以后需要的话还可以改——那就放手让团队自行推进。因为这赋予了人们自主权,帮助你们快速推进。而这样一来,当真正遇到那些难以更改的长期决策时,那些才是你应该花时间认真思考、讨论和辩论的时刻。
**Lenny:**你有没有什么具体的例子或故事,比如说你帮助团队放手去做的决策,即便你个人不一定完全同意?
**Nickey Skarstad:**让我想想。有。在 Airbnb 早期有一个非常重要的决策——我们基本上拟定了一套关于什么是好的体验的定义,以及一个体验需要达到什么样的标准才能被我们认为是一个好的体验。那是一个长达数月的项目。它之所以如此重要,是因为我们后来围绕它构建了产品、制定了政策、设计了如何教育房东的方式。我们只有一次机会把它弄对,然后它就会扩展到所有地方。所以那是一个真正的单向门决策,因为后来真的很难再改——我们需要它在相当程度上是最终版本。
在 Etsy,某些时候也有一些重大决策,比如交易平台上什么可以被出售,以及如何界定什么是手工制品。这些都是单向门决策。因为事后很难再改,它会影响你生态系统中所有的商品列表。所以我认为认真思考这类事情很重要,也要真正给团队创造条件,让他们能够停下来、花时间把它做对,因为它会以非常真实的方式影响最终产品。
**Lenny:**你怎么判断一个决策是单向门还是双向门?你觉得在做决策的时候通常是很明显的,还是有时候会事后才觉得”糟了,我们应该多想想的”?
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我觉得现在大概 80% 的情况下我能判断对,主要是因为我见过太多做错的例子了。但我认为这确实是一种你慢慢练出来的能力,随着时间推移你会越来越擅长二阶思考。就是开始理解:如果我今天做了这个决定,它会影响到下一层的决策,再下一层,然后在整个更大的系统中产生连锁反应。
如果你做产品,有一本很值得读的书是 Donella Meadows 写的 Thinking in Systems(中文译名《系统之美》),讲的就是如何真正思考系统的运作方式,然后你就可以开始推断系统的二阶效应是什么。如果你把这个思路套用到自己的生态系统中,就会开始理解:好吧,这是我们更大的生态系统中的一个关键节点,如果要动它或者长期改变它,我们必须非常谨慎。但我确实认为这其中有一部分是靠积累练出来的。你偶尔会犯一些错误,然后你必须真正承受那些错误的后果,就不会再犯了。
二阶思考与决策框架
**Lenny:**我们能再多聊聊二阶决策框架吗?我知道你写过一篇非常好的 newsletter 文章讲这个,这也是我一直想聊的话题。这是产品经理可以用来做出更好决策的框架吗?具体怎么用?然后也许可以再描述一下二阶决策这个概念,因为听起来确实很重要。
**Nickey Skarstad:**好。所谓二阶思考,本质上就是你能超越当下正在做的决策去思考。你今天做的决策会影响明天的决策,也会影响你在今天决策基础上继续构建的能力。这听起来很哲学、很元,但它之所以重要,尤其是在做产品的时候,是因为你构建的一切都伴随着时间成本。特别是在做双边市场(marketplace)或任何有用户生成内容的产品时,你今天做了一个改动,它会影响到生态系统中每一个用户,而那些用户又会基于这个改动做出行动——之后再想改就很难了。
拿 Airbnb 的房屋列表举个例子。要认真思考:列出房源需要哪些数据,或者系统中所有需要的数据点。然后我们如何在整个系统中以不同方式利用这些数据?以及每次你需要改动这些东西时会怎样。可能是一些很简单的小事,比如截断 Airbnb 房源在平台上展示时的标题长度。你会惹怒房东,你需要做设计上的改动来确保标题能以不同方式正常显示。你的系统越复杂,事情就越天然地更复杂。所以这大概是我描述二阶思考的一种很糟糕的方式。
**Lenny:**完全说得通。而且这也是我们处理过的问题——抱歉打断一下——在房东团队的时候,我们经常面对这个问题:你在列表流程中做的任何改动,都会影响房东和房客的大量体验。所以完全说得通。抱歉,请继续。
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我觉得强迫自己和团队用这种方式思考是一个非常好的思维训练,因为它会帮你省时间,还会帮你省钱——省很多钱——如果你不需要在之后想改系统时不断重建的话。而这又层层递进,回到了拥有清晰愿景和策略这件事上。因为你做的事情是在长线的维度上思考。你今天做的决策是为了那个长远方向服务的。这样你就能朝那个方向一步步构建,而不是每次想改什么的时候都得推倒重来。
二阶思考的操作方法
**Lenny:**关于二阶思考——抱歉,我刚才叫它二阶决策——在你提到的这个框架里,你实际上是怎么把二阶思考落地操作的?做规划的时候,你会在文档里写上”我们需要考虑的二阶影响”吗?还是用其他方式?
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我觉得有很多种做法。如果你的团队在撰写产品策略或产品需求时通常会使用某个规范文档模板,你可以在里面加一行,强制大家去思考这个问题。我也认为,运用第一性原则(first principles)思维,把你所做的变更的第一性原则写出来,往往本身就是在服务二阶思考。就是说——这些是我们关心的事情,这些事情之所以重要的原因是什么,我们要确保这些要素被融入我们构建的东西里。通常你会透过二阶思考的视角来撰写这些内容。
Shopify 在构建任何东西时都大量运用第一性原则。这是我从那种工作方式中学到的一点,因为它极其有效。如果你能让团队在设计流程开始之前、在你还需要思考如何进行技术实现之前,就在第一性原则上早早达成对齐(alignment),就能在后期省去很多麻烦。
另一种方式是,你可以通过一些结构化的方式就二阶效应展开有深度的讨论。可以是一场头脑风暴,也可以用 Miro 来辅助思考——我们今天要做这些变更,它们会如何在我们的生态系统中层层传导?有哪些坑或者需要担心的事情?同样的,我觉得你的生态系统越复杂,你就越不得不做这件事。很多早期产品的创始人不会这样思考,因为他们全部注意力都集中在产品-市场契合(product-market fit)上——我们只需要做出一个有人用的东西就行。然后当他们拿到了产品-市场契合,进入规模化阶段时,才发现自己当初没有构建一个可扩展的架构,不得不重新构建——这实际上会在他们后来试图快速增长的阶段造成严重伤害。
第一性原则的落地位置
**Lenny:**没错,完全是这样。这种情况一直发生。关于第一性原则,你会把它放在团队策略里吗?比如季度策略文档里?类似”这是我们这个季度的原则”?你通常是这样做的吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**对,我觉得那是一个非常好的放置位置。你也可以在功能层面来写。比如你正在构建的某个功能,先明确——这些是对我们重要的事情,这些是我们关心的东西,我们的设计要为这些东西服务;而这些是我们认为没那么重要的。同样的,在产品需求文档中,正是这类内容最容易引发争论,而这其实是一件好事,因为你本质上是在真正开始构建工作之前,就讨论和辩论将要构建的东西的根基。所以这类练习总是值得做的。
保持团队聚焦与对齐
**Lenny:**太好了,我很喜欢这个做法。好,回到之前的话题——因为我想把这条线索收尾——你已经制定了愿景、使命、策略,以及团队的目标。大家开始围绕这些形成对齐。那么你如何启动这一切,让大家了解这个计划、投入其中,然后又如何在执行过程中保持团队不偏离策略、不被新的优先事项和闪亮的新鲜事物分散注意力?
**Nickey Skarstad:**是的。“闪亮的新鲜事物”这个问题确实非常真实。好问题。举个例子,我最近刚做了这件事——我带着团队一起参与了 Q2 规划的 OKR 流程。他们对我们最终决定要做什么有发言权。方案提交给领导层审批,我们拿到了批准。我的做法是用 Loom 录了一段视频——Loom 是我最喜欢的产品之一,就是一个非常便捷的屏幕录制和视频分享工具,可以分享给团队。我就大概复盘了一下:“好,这是我向领导层汇报的内容,这是我们收到的反馈,这是战略层面的反馈,这是我们接下来要做的调整。有问题随时找我。“然后我把它发到了 Slack 里。
我当时就是想让反馈循环尽可能快速和紧凑,而不是等到下周再跟团队见面的时候才说。我就想,花五分钟录一下尽快发出去。这样做也很有帮助,因为能让团队兴奋起来——“太好了,我参与的这个东西得到了领导层的正面反馈,现在我们要动手了,我很期待开始干。”
然后就要看情况了。通常根据项目的不同,我会做某种形式的启动会。我一般不会做季度启动会之类的东西,因为通常策略的不同部分由不同团队各自负责。但通常有一个好的周会——你认真地把领导层的反馈层层传达下来,不断回顾:我们在这里要做什么?我们的策略是什么?我们设定的这些目标是否在向上对齐?我们达成了吗?没达成?——有这样一个每周都在持续讨论这些内容的会议,也能帮助团队保持认同感,不被分散注意力。
实际上我发现,对愿景和策略非常认同的团队更不容易被干扰。我通常遇到更多麻烦的反而是领导层——他们不一定每天跟你的团队一起深入细节。然后他们会冒出一个想法:“你们有没有想过做这个某个很随机的东西?""想过。但它不符合我们的长线计划,所以我们现在不想做,因为我们认为那不是时间的最优利用。”
**Lenny:**明白了。而且你描述的这些,是作为产品经理的管理者——
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。
Lenny:——而不是作为独立贡献者产品经理(ICPM)的情况?好的。那作为 ICPM 的话,我猜你会做一个季度启动会,或者不管你的周期是多长。你跟团队启动:“这是我们要做的事情。有什么问题吗?”
**Nickey Skarstad:**完全正确。
产品评审会议与流程
**Lenny:**好。还有一件事我想确保我们有时间聊的,就是产品评审会议和流程。作为产品负责人,你如何确保自己交付的是让你自豪的高质量成果,同时也不会让领导层感到意外?你如何设计产品评审和设计流程?
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我对产品评审有很强的看法。这是因为我经历过很多不同的组织,说实话,我见过很多糟糕的做法。而且我认为这也取决于你构建的产品和你组建的团队。所以我不认为有一种绝对正确或错误的方式来做这件事。
我见过产品评审失败的情况,是当它们停留在职能层面,没有以团队为单位来进行或共享的时候。通常来说,设计评审也好,某种形式的技术评审也好,都是正常的。而你越是能把这些不同的评审流程合并到一个集中的检查节点里,效果往往越好。因为否则会发生的情况是——反馈是在真空中产生的。设计负责人给设计师反馈,你完全不知道。或者在某个非常专门的技术评审中发现了某个技术缺陷,这个信息也没有传回到更大的团队中。
**Nickey Skarstad:**所以想办法确保流程中的这些环节在各职能之间共享,让你们以团队的身份参与其中并做好准备,我觉得这能解决很多问题。我不是说你不应该做设计评审——当然应该做。我的意思是,你需要非常审慎地安排这些节点,尤其是当某个节点意味着给某个方案放行、让它继续推进的时候,要确保整个团队都在场。并且要有一个非常清晰的、战略性的检查流程来审批这些事项,每个人都清楚这个流程,并且参与其中。
**Lenny:**这种会议是每周一次吗?你会邀请设计师和工程师吗?你邀请哪些人,这个会议的目标是什么?我猜目标是审批产品,让它进入开发和发布阶段。
**Nickey Skarstad:**对。我觉得回到之前说的单向门与双向门决策(one way versus two way door decision),给团队一定的自主权去发布那些你认为是双向门的、不是任务关键的、对愿景很重要但不会与更大的系统产生冲突的东西——尽量保持快速迭代,不给发布设置太多障碍,这是极其重要的。所以你需要根据自己的组织和它的具体情况来摸索,但这一点确实很重要。
不过,当出现某个节点确实是一个反馈关卡的时候——也就是说你必须通过的一道关卡,一个在特定时间点获取反馈的时刻——我认为应该安排一次跨职能(cross-functional)会议,提前发送一份清晰的预读材料或类似的东西。比如:“这是我们今天要讨论的内容。“然后对齐:我们是否认为这符合我们的目标?是否达到我们的质量标准?以一种非常审慎的方式来做这件事,既让团队获得反馈,让领导层了解进展,同时又不至于成为团队发布产品的阻碍。
**Lenny:**那在整个产品开发过程中,你会持续做检查,还是鼓励团队自己推进到基本可以审批的阶段?
**Nickey Skarstad:**理想情况下,在完美的世界里,有三个检查节点。第一个是第一性原则(first principles)检查:你想要构建什么,或者你想要做什么?你要建立的基础是什么?最重要的事情是什么?你在解决什么问题?获得对这一点的认可,奇怪的是,几乎是所有环节中最重要的。因为它能帮团队节省大量时间——不然到了后面反馈评审的时候,有人说”你解决的不是正确的问题”,那就很麻烦。
一旦大家对齐了这一点,接下来就是:我们要用什么方法?我们要构建什么?这就是我们解决问题的方式。确保其中包含技术层面的内容,比如某种基础设施评审或架构评审,或者你怎么叫都行。然后就是:好了,这个准备好了,可以发布了。我们再检查一次,是否认为它已经准备好了?我觉得这同样取决于你的组织。如果你的团队很小,你可能已经非常深入其中,这些流程可能不需要正式进行。但在较大的组织中,尤其是领导层不总能亲自在场的情况下,确保有几个清晰的检查点,保证每个人都在朝着正确的方向前进、每个人都感觉良好,我认为这是一项值得做的实践。
**Lenny:**我很喜欢这个。一个非常简洁的框架。再沿着这个方向问最后一个问题——你是让团队自己去安排这些会议,还是你去推动他们、确保他们安排上?
**Nickey Skarstad:**现在,因为我带的团队相当小,而且我们基本还处于产品-市场契合(product-market fit)之前的阶段,我们并没有做太多非常正式的检查节点,因为我们不需要。团队很小,大家都在一起并肩推进。但在之前工作过的更大的组织中——比如在 Shopify——有一套围绕这些会议的正式流程,明确谁需要参加。这些会议通过他们工作体系中更大的流程或系统来安排,实际上效果非常好。我觉得这让团队在日常工作中保持了相当高的自主性,同时又确保了来自用户的反馈和来自领导层的反馈能够持续流通。
远程工作下的产品管理
**Lenny:**明白了。在进入精彩的闪电问答之前,还有最后一个问题。这是我最近一直在思考的事情,就是作为产品经理的远程工作。我在 COVID 之前就离开了 Airbnb,所以我从未经历过这个一切都在远程、远程做产品管理的世界。你有没有什么心得或学到的东西,对于在远程世界中做产品负责人特别有帮助的?
**Nickey Skarstad:**有的。过去几年里,我的工作方式发生了巨大的转变。我作为产品经理的成长经历主要是在线下环境中——我们大部分工作都是在同一个房间里一起完成的。比如一起用白板画图,线下会议结束后快速同步一下,敲定一些细节或继续讨论某个问题。还有那种——说起来很俗气也被说烂了——但就是传说中的饮水机时刻:你碰到某个人,然后说:“嘿,最近怎么样?你听说了那件事吗?“所有这些,真的是一夜之间就消失了。
我觉得产品经理这个角色,即使在正常时期也不容易,因为你要做大量的工作来确保人们获得信息、给出反馈等等。然后一夜之间,很多你赖以完成这些工作的方法都被拿走了。所以我认为这对很多从事产品角色的人来说是一个非常深刻的变化。
好消息是,现在有大量新的工具和技术正在被开发出来,对此非常有帮助。比如我现在使用 Slack 的方式跟两年前已经完全不同了。比如更加注重发布异步更新。尽量减轻对线下会议或 Zoom 会议的依赖——我们能不能在 Slack 里异步讨论这件事?Slack 有一个很好的功能叫 huddle,你可以快速上线。它只有音频,没有视频,可以进行三十秒的对话。很适合用来做站会之类的事情。如果你还没试过,建议试试。
还有以前线下的白板协作之类的,现在可以用 Miro 和 FigJam 这些很棒的工具来完成。我觉得,尤其是在 Airbnb 的时候,我们的团队非常国际化,通常总会有人是远程的。但我们一直没有把远程体验做对。现在大多数团队成员都是远程的了——我自己就是完全远程办公——我也更加用心地去确保我们为整个团队创造一个良好的工作体验。所以我觉得你需要跟自己的团队一起不断摸索和调整。不同的团队有不同的工作方式,但尽量做到异步,善用 Slack,确保你的后续跟进是可见的、大家都能看到。不要靠 Zoom 会议把所有时间都填满——不然大家真的会讨厌你。这些事情确实会产生很大的差别。
闪电问答
**Lenny:**太棒了。非常有帮助。好,Nickey,准备好闪电问答了吗?
**Nickey Skarstad:**准备好了。来吧。
**Lenny:**你向其他产品经理推荐最多的一本书是什么?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我很喜欢 Donella Meadows 的《Thinking in Systems》。
**Lenny:**太棒了。好的,我们会在简介里放上这本书的链接。除了 Duolingo 之外,还有哪家公司是你推荐产品经理去工作或了解的?
**Nickey Skarstad:**毫无疑问,我会说 Etsy。
**Lenny:**为什么?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我觉得那是一个学习做产品经理的绝佳之地。数据驱动,产品领导层非常支持,而且要打造的产品本身也超级有趣。
最爱的工作软件
**Lenny:**棒,喜欢这个。目前最喜欢的、能帮你更好完成工作的应用或软件是什么?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我非常着迷于 Superhuman,这是一款邮件效率应用,一旦开始用就再也离不开了,你基本上余生都得用它。我还很着迷于 Loom,这是一个视频录制工具,可以非常方便地分享简短的视频更新。
**Lenny:**好选择。那工作之外呢,目前最喜欢的一款应用或软件是什么?
**Nickey Skarstad:**肯定是 TikTok。短视频非常有趣、非常娱乐,根本停不下来,而且我自己也在创作一些,所以确实上瘾了。
**Lenny:**既然聊到这个话题,大家在 TikTok 上怎么找到你?
**Nickey Skarstad:**就是我的名字,Nickey Skarstad,关注我吧。
**Lenny:**我已经是一个很开心的关注者了。我也会把链接放在简介里。在 Twitter、Instagram 或者 TikTok 上,你最喜欢关注谁?
**Nickey Skarstad:**我喜欢一位文化记者,她叫 Anne Helen Petersen。她对当下更广泛的文化 zeitgeist(时代精神)非常敏感。每当有人问我给新产品经理的最重要的建议是什么,我总是说:去做一个消费者。去下载新产品,去试用,去把所有东西都玩一遍,因为我觉得这实际上会让你成为更好的产品构建者。而且要关注的不只是 Twitter 上的科技圈的人。如果你的信息流全是科技圈的人,你其实是在亏待自己。去找那些对时代精神有感知的人,因为这能帮助你理解你正在发布产品所处的时代,确保你的产品营销和信息传达到位,也确保你在做正确的事情。
**Lenny:**她叫什么名字来着?
**Nickey Skarstad:**Anne Helen Petersen。
最喜欢的管理者
**Lenny:**Anne Helen Petersen,好的。最后一个问题。你最喜欢的主管是谁?
**Nickey Skarstad:**这个问题我没法只选一个人,所以别生气哈。实际上是在 Etsy 时我为之工作的很多女性。我在那里期间,我的整条汇报线上几乎全是女性,这种情况之后再也没发生过。所以要感谢 Kruti Patel,她是 Etsy 现任首席产品官;还有 Heather Jassy,她很久以前负责 Etsy 的社区团队,为她工作真的是一件非常愉快的事;还有 Linda Findley,她现在是 Blue Apron 的 CEO,但在我任职 Etsy 期间她是首席运营官,她有一段时间是我的上级,非常出色。
**Lenny:**太棒了。谢谢你分享这些。也非常感谢你参加这次访谈,Nickey。大家在网络上哪里可以找到你?另外,听这期节目的听众怎么才能帮到你?
去哪里找到 Nickey
**Nickey Skarstad:**好的,如前所述,我最近迷上了 TikTok,一直在创作一些有趣的短视频。作为一个长期做产品的人,我的一个遗憾是:把做产品的故事写下来并分享出去非常耗时。但我发现 TikTok 其实很容易做到这件事,所以我打算在那里多做一些尝试。你可以在 TikTok 上关注我,我的 ID 是 @NickeySkarstad。另外我有一个Newsletter,叫 Builders,地址是 nickey.substack.com。Nickey 的拼法和 Mickey Mouse 一样,只是开头换成 N,N-I-C-K-E-Y,.substack.com。我偶尔会在那里发布内容,需要重新开始更新了。但说到底,还是想把更多做产品的真实故事写下来,因为我们很多人其实没有太多时间去讲述这些,但这确实是非常有趣的工作,我想更多地分享出来。
**Lenny:**太好了,我是你两个平台的关注者和订阅者,强烈推荐。
**Nickey Skarstad:**太好了。
**Lenny:**非常感谢你,Nickey。
**Nickey Skarstad:**谢谢你,Lenny。
**Lenny:**太精彩了。感谢收听。如果你喜欢这次对话,别忘了订阅播客。你也可以在 lennyspodcast.com 了解更多。我们下期见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Never Split the Difference | 《Never Split the Difference》(Chris Voss 著谈判类畅销书) |
| Thinking in Systems | 《Thinking in Systems》(Donella Meadows 著系统思维经典) |
| alignment | 对齐/协同(首次出现保留原文) |
| Anne Helen Petersen | Anne Helen Petersen(文化记者,人名保留原文) |
| APM (Associate Product Manager) | 初级产品经理 |
| backlogs | 需求积压/待办列表 |
| Blue Apron | Blue Apron(美国食材配送公司,不翻译) |
| Brian | 指 Airbnb 联合创始人 Brian Chesky |
| Builders | Builders(Nickey Skarstad 的 newsletter 名称,不翻译) |
| buy in / bought in | 认同/支持(指对决策或方向的心理认同与投入) |
| Chris Voss | Chris Voss(前 FBI 谈判专家,人名保留原文) |
| cross-functional | 跨职能(指跨部门、跨专业角色的协作) |
| dogfooding | 内部试用/吃自己的狗粮(指团队使用自己开发的产品) |
| Donella Meadows | Donella Meadows(系统思维学者,人名保留原文) |
| Duolingo | Duolingo(语言学习应用公司,不翻译) |
| Experiences | Airbnb 体验产品(指 Airbnb 的线下体验业务) |
| FigJam | FigJam(Figma 旗下的在线白板工具,不翻译) |
| first principles | 第一性原则(指回归最基本假设的思维方式) |
| Heather Jassy | Heather Jassy(前 Etsy 社区团队负责人,人名保留原文) |
| imposter syndrome | 冒名顶替综合征(首次出现保留原文) |
| Jira | Jira(项目管理和缺陷追踪工具,不翻译) |
| Kruti Patel | Kruti Patel(Etsy 首席产品官,人名保留原文) |
| linchpin | 关键节点 |
| Linda Findley | Linda Findley(Blue Apron CEO,人名保留原文) |
| Loom | Loom(视频录制工具,不翻译) |
| marketplace | 双边市场/交易平台(首次出现保留原文) |
| MasterClass | MasterClass(在线名人课程平台,不翻译) |
| Miro | Miro(在线白板协作工具,不翻译) |
| MURAL | MURAL(在线白板协作工具,不翻译) |
| newsletter | newsletter/邮件通讯 |
| north star | 北极星指标(指团队的核心指导目标) |
| OKR | OKR(目标与关键结果,Objectives and Key Results) |
| onboarding flow | 入驻引导流程 |
| one way versus two way door decision | 单向门与双向门决策 |
| platform role | 平台型角色(指面向内部基础设施或开发者平台的产品角色) |
| PM (Product Manager) | 产品经理 |
| product-market fit | 产品-市场契合(首次出现保留原文) |
| second order thinking | 二阶思考 |
| senior product lead | 高级产品负责人 |
| Shopify | Shopify(加拿大电商平台公司,不翻译) |
| Superhuman | Superhuman(邮件效率应用,不翻译) |
| truncate | 截断 |
| UGC (User Generated Content) | 用户生成内容(UGC) |
| VP Product | 产品副总裁 |
| zeitgeist | 时代精神(zeitgeist,首次出现保留原文) |
| zero to one | 从零到一(指从无到有构建新产品) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)