掌握产品策略与 PM 成长之道 | Maggie Crowley(Toast, Drift, TripAdvisor)
Mastering product strategy and growing as a PM | Maggie Crowley (Toast, Drift, TripAdvisor)
Maggie Crowley: If you ever find yourself saying something like, that’s not my job, that’s probably a thing you should do. And you know what? It probably isn’t your job and it probably is someone else’s job and you can spend your life getting frustrated at that or you can just get over and get the work done. And people who are willing to just get the work done will move faster. Their products will be more successful and they probably aren’t carrying around all that anger and crappy emotion because as a PM, for better or for worse, and maybe this is not how we all want it to be, but you’re oftentimes the emotional center of the team and it’s your job to keep people motivated, keep people excited, keep them bought into the project, and you just have to keep that optimism going and it’s hard work and part of it can be just like, you know what? Let me take that on. I’ll do this thing. I’ll hop on this sales call, I’ll implement this with the customer. You just have to do whatever it takes.
Key Traits of Great PMs
Lenny: Today my guest is Maggie Crowley. Maggie is currently vice president of Product at Toast. Prior to this, she was VP and head of product at Charlie Health, senior director of product at Drift, director of product at BevSpot, a product manager at TripAdvisor. She’s also got an MBA from Harvard Business School. She was also an Olympic speed skater, which is insane and incredibly cool. And in our conversation we discuss the three most common threads across the best product managers that she’s worked with, hired and managed how to very tactically write out a product strategy to share with your team and manager why being data-driven is a red flag for product thinking. Why product content you find online can be dangerous. Her best advice for how to break into product management. Also, the impact writing online has had on her career and so much more. Maggie is amazing.
Maggie, thank you so much for being here. Welcome to the podcast.
The Essence of Prioritization
Maggie Crowley: Thanks for having me. I’m super excited.
Improving These Three Skills
Lenny: You put out so much content across podcasts, blogs, tweets, I’m sure there’s other things I haven’t even seen. And so what I’ve done is I’ve scoured all of your content as much as I could to find topics that we could dig into in our conversation today. And I thought it’d be fun to start with how to become a successful product manager and what it takes to be a successful product manager, especially long-term in your career. You’ve worked with a bunch of PMs, you’ve hired a lot of PMs, you’ve managed a lot of PMs, and so I guess the question is just what are some common threads you’ve seen across the best product managers?
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, it’s an interesting question mostly because I’ve worked in startups, zero to one, scaling stage startups, enterprise, all that kind of stuff. And there’s a lot of content out there I think on how those roles are different and how PMs are different across those different types of companies. But what I’ve seen is that there are some standard things that are the same across the role no matter whether you’re a consumer, B2B or startup or a large company and in particular about what sets PMs apart from one another. And the things that I look for when I’m hiring or when I’m looking to promote people or when PMs stand out, even when you’re not looking are three things.
First, I think the best PMs are really good at breaking things down and simplifying things. So, finding at any moment what is the really truly the only thing you need to do, especially in a big company, there are 8 million priorities, there’s 700 OKRs, there’s 25,000 projects you could work on, and teams will get bogged down in that complexity. Similarly speaking at a startup, you might think that it’s easy to find the one thing to do, but at the same time there’s so many fires that are happening and so many things you could do in such a world of opportunity that even just picking one and sticking with it is really difficult. And so the best PMs not only can find the one thing to work on, but they can stay with that one thing long enough to actually finish it.
Building Your Simplification Muscle
Lenny: I think that’s a really interesting point, because it sounds simple. Also, just this idea of simplifying, but I think there’s so much up there partly because within simplifying is prioritizing and you can almost boil down the job of the PM as they’re just prioritizing and telling people what is next. And so I think that’s a really powerful point you’re making.
Maggie Crowley: Prioritization is a tough word because there’s so much wrapped up in that and what it means to prioritize. And I’ve worked for people who wanted to understand the formula for prioritization and why this thing and how can you prove that this is the right thing to work on and not that thing. And then a week goes by and then they want to reevaluate the priority and they want to re-litigate the priority. And so it’s so much more than just a moment in time deciding, but it’s the ability to stay with it and to make sure that it continues to be the most important thing, that you finish it and actually see that it works and that you can get people to continue to stay excited and engaged in that project.
Because I think a lot of when we talk about product, it’s like, oh, what should you build? What should you ship? But then you actually have to ship that and that can take a week, a month, three months, six months, a year. And so as a PM, your job is to stay on that and be the person who’s beating that drum over and over again, and the best PMs are the ones who can do that and have the resilience and the energy to stay with it.
Tactics for Simplified Writing
Lenny: Energy. That’s a really important part of that. I’m going to ask you how you suggest people get better at these things. So, either we can go into how you found you get better at simplifying or we go through all three and then we can come back, however you prefer.
Making Trade-offs and Owning Outcomes
Maggie Crowley: Let’s just do all three really quick and then we can dig in.
Lenny: Sounds great.
Practical Simplification Tips
Maggie Crowley: So, yeah, first one, simplifying. I think the second one has to do with this point about sticking with something and it’s following up on results. So many people in the spec or the one pager or something will say, okay, here’s the metric that I care about. Here’s what I want to move. Awesome. Maybe they’ll even write a SQL query, get a dashboard going, figure out what the number is today, that gets you some extra points, but the really, really good PMs remember to follow up. Because especially when you’re in management, couple layers up in management, I’m not going to remember to follow up on that feature, but if a PM comes back to me and says, “Hey, remember we did that thing, here’s what happened.” I can’t tell you how rare that is and how many times as a leader you might have to ask for that and for the people you don’t have to ask that of is one of the best things when I’m looking at PMs and it’s easy.
It’s not hard to do that, especially if you’ve set up metric tracking or you know how to pull that information or you have somebody who can help you get that. It’s pretty easy to do and it’s really high value activity. And then the third thing, and I think maybe we’ll talk about this later too, is that a phrase actually we were talking about David Cancel before we started carrying the water, and this was a big theme when I joined Drift, and this is about how you can’t be a good PM if you’re not willing to do the hard boring unglamorous work of customer support, sales, marketing, writing, copy, project management, you have to do that stuff. It’s your job. No one else is going to do it, because at the end of the day, you’re responsible for outcomes and results. So, you’re the person that has to do that, and if you’re willing to do that work, that’s what’s going to make your product successful, which is what makes you successful.
Lenny: It’s such an interesting list because when you ask most people what you need to get better at to become a great product manager, it’s always communication skills, collaboration skills, vision, strategy, and it feels like these are input metrics to what it’s normally what people think about.
Peer Support Groups
Maggie Crowley: Those things to me, communication, super important, analytical ability, really, really important. The ability to look at a, especially if you’re doing something that has a user experience component, the ability to look at that and understand if it’s going to work and build up intuition around that, also really important. Those are things that I would see as sort of basics of the role. These are the things that make you great at the role and strategy to me, and hopefully we’ll talk about strategy in a bit. It’s one tiny slice. You do a strategy, but it’s 5% of the work that you do. Yes, it’s important because you want to get your strategy and you need to pick the right products, but at the end of the day, the person who has a good strategy will not be as successful as the PM who ships more stuff, gets more reps and has the ability to actually create impact. So, to me, you could be great at strategy, but if you’re not good at this stuff and your stuff isn’t getting out the door, you’re never going to be that great at the job.
Tracking Your Outcomes
Lenny: And impact is the other one. Everyone’s always like, what makes a great PM? Oh, drive a lot of impact. And again-
Maggie Crowley: But they never say how.
PM Growth Takes Time
Lenny: Right, exactly.
Maggie Crowley: It’s like, cool, let’s do a strategy, let’s have impact. Then when I was starting off as a PM, I was hearing this advice and reading about it and I was sitting there saying, awesome, I want to create impact. And I’m looking at my job thinking, now what? Yeah, impact. Let’s do it. Where is it? How do I find it? Someone help me.
Breaking Into Product Management
Lenny: I love it. Okay, so let’s go back to these three and I’m curious just what you found helps you become better at these things and also just an example if you can share. So, say what’s simplifying? How does one build that muscle?
Maggie Crowley: This is a tough one because some people, a broad generalization that I think comes up in things like when you’re interviewing PMs for a job and you say things like are they a simplifier or are they complexifier? Do they make things complicated? And so some of it’s a little bit of just who you are and how you think. But having said that, there’s one tool that I use that I actually learned from my dad when I was in grade school, which is when you write something, for example, and a lot of what we do as PMs is written, when you write something, read it out loud, literally just read the thing you wrote out loud and half the time you’ll realize it’s way too complicated, it doesn’t make sense. Or what happens is when someone comes to me and they say, okay, I’m working on this thing, check it out, can you read it?
I read it and then I put it down and I say, “What are you trying to say?” And 99% of the time they say, “Oh, users are really struggling with this problem. We found this in research and we think that the way to solve it’s to do X”, but that’s not what the document says. And so my reaction is always, and if anyone who I’ve worked with is listening to this, they’re going to laugh is always, “Just say that. Just say that thing. The thing that you said to me in conversation is the thing you should write.” There’s no reason why your pros in a document has to be a certain way. We’re not in school. Our goal is to get things done. So, those are just some simple tricks that I’ve used to help simplify what I’ve already been working on.
And as for how to boil things down and really find the most important thing to do, which is another part of simplification, I think the best thing you can do is just get as many reps in as you can, have people review your work and listen to them. There’s a thing that happens I think with PMs where you join a company and then all of a sudden it’s like my boss doesn’t know what they’re doing and the highest paid person’s opinion and the founder wants to swoop in and mess everything up, but those people had an insight on the market that you’re in that made the company worth founding and they probably know more than you and so you might want to listen to them. And so find people who can review your work, listen to them and ask them to help you simplify.
How to Write Product Strategy
Lenny: I’ll share a couple other things that came to mind as you were talking, because this is a very hard thing to teach and you kind of have to do it again and again and honestly, I have this one manager who taught me to simplify in my writing and strategy docs one-pagers and things like that, and I think that actually had a big impact on my newsletter success is learning just to strip down as much as you can and anything that isn’t necessary. So, there’s a couple things that I’ll share real quick. One is there’s this book I read called On Writing Well, that is one of the most impactful books for writing for me, and the whole book is like, I don’t know, 20 chapters and every chapter is more things you should cut from your writing and they show all these examples of like, here’s a before and here’s an after.
And all these words were cut and nothing changed. They’re completely necessary. So, I think that book can help and partly it’s just like what is not necessary? You think all these adjectives are important. Another thing I found really helpful is the rule of thirds, I guess the rule of three, of just always having three. Try not to go beyond three when you’re giving strategy bets or priorities or things like that. Just try to keep things under three.
When to Use Strategy Docs
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, it’s a very sort of business school ex-consultant point of view that I do agree with and share, which is there’s always three things or fewer, never more than three things. You have to have a nice round couple and if you have a fourth, you’ve got to figure out how to squish it in there because it just doesn’t look right if there’s four.
Lenny: Agree. Yeah, even though I’ve been guilty of more than three, try hard to avoid it.
Who Strategy Docs Are For
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, you’re using notion and you have your three bullets expanding and there’s sub bullets, but at least you have that top line.
Concrete Strategy Examples
Lenny: That’s right. The other thing is I think that there’s just a focus you need to get good at just like, people often want to lump together a bunch of ideas and then every time you do that it just dilutes everything. So, I think there’s just a lot of power and pick the thing, pick the thing that’s going to have the most impact and cut other stuff that may have some impact but is much less important.
Bridging Strategy and Roadmaps
Maggie Crowley: I think again, simplification is something and prioritization, which is sort of the same thing, gets tossed around a lot as a thing you have to get good at, but it’s really challenging. Getting to the one thing you should do is extremely difficult and being able and having the gumption to say no to all those other things is really hard, because there’s probably at any given time, 10 things you should do, but you can’t do 10 things, you’ll never be successful if you do that in a number of things. And so you have to pick one.
And so it’s both figuring out how to get confident in your decision and then B, having the willingness, and maybe I should have added this to my what makes great PMs list, the willingness to make the bet and be responsible for it. And that’s what I think separates the PM role from a lot of other roles and why it’s such a challenging job when done right is because you have to be willing to take responsibility and it’s your job to pick the thing and it’s your job to be accountable to your team for picking the thing so you better get it right.
Lenny: Ownership such an important part of just being a PM. Again, coming back to this interview I just did with an ex Amazon guy, that’s one of their principles at Amazon is just leaders, basically ownership, feeling like you have ownership of what you’re working on.
The One-Pager Template
Maggie Crowley: I agree, but to me at least the word ownership doesn’t have the same oh shit feeling as you’re making a bet. You make a bet, that means you know that there’s a chance that the thing you’re working on is not going to work out and you still have to be the one to do the thing, jump off the ledge, drop in on the ski run. So, ownership to me never signaled that risk that I think comes with being a PM.
The “Why Now” Question
Lenny: Good point. On the simplify concept, it reminds me at Airbnb, one of the core values at Airbnb for time was simplify. Is this idea that we should always try to be simplifying, and then it turned out the founders realized we’re not actually great at this and it’s unfair for us to say this is a value for not doing it. So, they actually cut it as a core value because their feeling was we shouldn’t have aspirational values, we should reflect who we actually are, and they actually cut two different values to be more clear, even though they still want to simplify, they’re just like, we’re not actually good at this, so why are we pretending like we are.
Maggie Crowley: I think maybe I’m good at it on paper, but there’s been many times where I’ve been in situations where things are not simple and you just have to keep fighting for it.
Reconsidering “Why Now”
Lenny: Someone’s trying to think about, okay, I want to become better as a PM and I’m going to try to start simplifying. What are examples of simplifying? Is it reduce your email length? Is it one pager focus? What are these buckets of things? And then also if there’s an example of something you’ve simplified that comes to mind
Maggie Crowley: On what to simplify and more specifics, I would say anything can be simplified and shortened. Maybe another way to say shorten it. Definitely emails. I read them sometimes don’t love them. Make them short. The Minto principle is something that I would recommend everyone do, which is put the headline, the full conclusion first and then you’re supporting argument second.
Product Failure: Lessons From Rewrites
Lenny: I have a newsletter post about that exact concept that people that I will link in the show notes that gives you-
Counterpoint: The Data-Driven Trap
Maggie Crowley: Fantastic.
Lenny: The Minto Pyramid principle.
Product Content: Value and Pitfalls
Maggie Crowley: Yes, everyone should do that. A lot of new PMs fall into the trap of thinking that they should have some sort of buildup. Don’t do that. Just tell me whatever the thing is, everyone will thank you. Doing things like that, things like you said, limiting your strategy docs, your conclusions, your next steps to three things maximum. I would generally say a rule of thumb would be pretty much every doc you write, you can delete the first two paragraphs that you’ve written. You don’t need them. My dad, again, to go back to my dad when I would write, and this sounds cruel, but I promise it wasn’t. When I would write a paper for school, he would just, and this is we didn’t really have computers, whatever, he would just take away the first page and he’d be like, just start here. He would go, “Everything on the first page is crapola, don’t use it.”
And he wouldn’t even read it, which would drive me crazy. He would just like, “Oh, it’s crap. I don’t care about that.” So, I would do that and then just get other people, there’s probably somebody around you that’s good and find people to edit your work and to look at it. I have a little Slack workspace that has three people in it, me and two other women who are product leaders, and we oftentimes send each other our work still and we say, “Hey, I’m struggling with this. Can you read it? Help me make it simpler. Can you help me fix this up?” And we do that for each other. So, find a peer maybe who’s in a non-competitive space who can do that for you. I mean I still use those people to help me.
Lenny: That is extremely cool. Can you talk more about this group that you have?
How Content Creation Boosts Careers
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, I don’t know if it’s a group. It’s like three friends. Shout out Alexa and Daphne. Yeah, I mean the three of us all worked together when we were at Drift. We’ve stayed in touch and I’ve just found that in order to be good at your job continuously, you need people who can help give you feedback, and the more senior you get, the harder that is. And so having people who can give you another point of view who maybe you can vent to if it’s not appropriate as a leader who can give you other experiences that they’re going through has been incredibly valuable. And so we just have a little group chat that is focused on product.
Why I Share Content
Lenny: That is so cool. Is there a tip you could share for someone that wants to create something like this? Is it important for you to have worked with them before? Is Slack a good way to communicate? Anything there that’s just like, oh yeah, here’s a cool tip.
Maggie Crowley: Slack just worked for us where we are during the day, and I think having easy access to it was important. You could probably use WhatsApp or a literal group text. There are small community, there’s one, I worked in healthcare for a year and a bit, and there’s a Slack community that somebody organized for heads of products and healthcare startups that is similar to those really, really powerful and a really great space to be in. And so you just have to kind of suss out where these things are. You work with amazing people and there’s people around you who are going to become your friends, and so keep an eye out for them and keep in touch with them when you leave a job because you never know when they might become your little Slack workspace.
Rapid Fire: Book Recommendations
Lenny: Oh, I love it. Okay, I’m glad we talked on that. Okay, back on track. The second bucket you described as following up on results, is it just do that. Is there anything more you can add there?
Rapid Fire: Movies and Interviews
Maggie Crowley: I put reminders in my calendar. I mean, yeah, it’s just do that. But if you’re launching a product, usually you release something and you have that initial push of a couple of weeks where you’re finding bugs and you’re maybe you’re pulling metrics and everyone remembers it, then I would remember two weeks after that, a month after that, six months after that, put a reminder in your calendar to check your dashboard or check the metrics or check whatever it is that you were doing, and you won’t forget and then share them with whoever might care about it. And it’s as simple as that.
Lenny: And is the reason this is one of the three things you think are most consistent across great PMs, that it helps your manager see you like, wow, Maggie’s so on top of everything, or is it more that you learn from that experience and drive more impact or is it both?
Rapid Fire: Product Recommendations
Maggie Crowley: It’s definitely both. I’m not going to pretend like if you’re just great at your job quietly that you’re going to get what you want. Just if you’re toiling in the background, doing a great job getting results. If you have a great manager, maybe you’ll be successful. Great managers are few and far between, and I am of the opinion that I never wanted to rely on someone else to get what I wanted. And so I would always make sure to share that, always make sure to share my progress because I didn’t want to leave it up to chance that someone would notice. So, I would suggest doing it for both reasons. And that’s one of those things that people want to pretend that everything’s perfect and we’re all great and we’re always going to get what we want and always going to get that promotion, but you have to work for it.
Lenny: I love that point. It reminds me what I find one of the most important traits of a great product manager is they create this aura that they’ve got this, they put something on their plate and they’re not going to drop it, that the threads are not going to be forgotten. And this connects to me there. They feel like Maggie’s going to tell me what happened with this experiment. I don’t have to think about it as a manager.
Rapid Fire: Life Philosophy
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, that’s a really good point. And then you mentioned this a little bit ago, the side benefit is that you learn more. You will go back and learn why something happened or why it didn’t happen, and the more that you follow up on what you’ve been doing and the more you learn, the better you get every time you ship something. To me, the other answer of what makes a great PM is family shipped a lot of stuff. The more you ship, the more you learn. And that’s why it can take years to build up expertise because you just have to ship a lot of stuff.
Lenny: There’s a lot of people that are always frustrated. They’re not getting promoted quickly enough as a PM. They’re not moving off the ladder like, oh my god, I’ve been a PM for two years. I’m not a senior PM yet. Can you speak more to just that thought and just how long it takes to get actually good? I guess I’ll share briefly in my experience, it took me four years to actually know what the hell I was doing as a PM and then things started to really take off. What’s your experience?
Speed Skating and Product Management
Maggie Crowley: I would say similarly, it took a lot of years to feel confident that I knew what I was doing. My first PM job was a product management rotation job at TripAdvisor. I had no PM background. It was after business school and I left those two years thinking, yeah, I’ve worked on four different teams over the two years. I’ve shipped all this stuff, I’m good. Went to a startup, there was another product person there, they left and I was the only product person at the startup. And I realized really quickly, I had no idea what I was doing. I had no one to learn from. I had only had two years of experience and I was not ready for that job. I didn’t feel confident in the decisions I was making. That’s why I joined Drift is because that team had all these really incredible product thinkers on it and they were shipping all sorts of stuff. They had all this momentum and I thought, okay, that’s where I’m going to go to learn.
And so then two more years. So, that’s five years until I really felt like I knew what I was doing. And that’s because it takes a long time to ship stuff. And so to people who want to progress, you can progress by job hopping, you can progress by going in and out of startups. But to me staying at that, when I was at Drip, I was there for almost four years. I got to see two or three cycles of the same product and I learned more from that than I did out of the year or so I spent doing other things each at a time because you got to see the consequences of your decisions and that’s rare. And people, myself included, of course you want to get promoted, of course you want to move up. I’m ambitious. Lots of people are ambitious, but for better or for worse, spending the time is really helpful and I think allowed me to move faster later because I had just spent the time grinding it out for a while in order to be better later.
Lenny: So, is that advice you often give of go deep into a company or a product versus just bounce and track a bunch of different companies or depends?
Maggie Crowley: It depends. There are lots of really good reasons to bounce. I’ve done it, many people have done it, but I was surprised at how much I value that experience of having stuck around for a while and how much I learned from it was something I hadn’t expected going into it, especially because you don’t hear that point of view as much or as I wasn’t hearing that point of view as much when I was thinking about the sort of arc of my career, but I’m glad that I did it. And then of course people always want to get promoted, always ask that question and my answer is always create impact and that can take time.
Lenny: At my first job, I was there for nine years and then I started a company for a year and a half and then we sold to Airbnb, and then I was at Airbnb for seven years. So, I’m very much on that train of just, not that I intended for that to happen, but I definitely went deep and I think there’s pros and cons, but there’s so many pros to that, so many reasons. Okay. Let’s talk about the last part, which is the third point you made, which is carrying the water, I think is how you described it.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah. This one, there’s no tips and tricks. It’s just do the work. If you ever find yourself saying something like, that’s not my job, that’s probably a thing you should do. And you know what? It probably isn’t your job and it probably is someone else’s job and you can spend your life getting frustrated at that or you can just get over and get the work done. And people who are willing to just get the work done will move faster, their products will be more successful and they probably aren’t carrying around all that anger and crappy emotion.
Because we touched on this earlier as a PM for better or for worse, and maybe this is not how we all want it to be, but you’re oftentimes the emotional center of the team and it’s your job to keep people motivated, keep people excited, keep them bought into the project, and you just have to keep that optimism going. And it’s hard work. It’s really hard work to stay positive and to keep people amped for that thing. And part of it can be just like, you know what? Let me take that on. Let me grab that, whatever. I’ll do this thing. I’ll hop on this sales call, I’ll implement this with the customer. You just have to do whatever it takes.
Lenny: It reminds me of one of your lessons that you shared, in one of your podcast episodes. It was one of your PM lessons of 2021, and the lesson was, when in doubt it’s your job as a PM, which I think relates very much to which it just shared. Can you speak to that?
Maggie Crowley: It might actually make sense to put this in the context of the other roles that are part of the team. So, as an engineer, your job is to write the code to really reduce this down and build the thing and make it work to spec. As a designer, maybe your job is to design the thing, design the solution, design the user experience. Obviously there’s lots more complexity in that role. Design your amazing engineering, your amazing TLDR, caveat, whatever. But as a PM, you don’t have that thing, right?
It’s not like, oh, my job is just to write the one-pager. That’s not true. Your job isn’t just to pick the problem. Your job is to deliver a business result. And so you’re uniquely positioned to have to fill in all the gaps because no one else is incentivized to do that. As an engineer, you can finish your work and hand it off and say, I did it, and the good ones care, but you don’t have to care. As a PM, you’re not going to do your job unless that problem gets solved for the customer or the user at the end of the day. And so your job is to make sure everything happens for that product.
Lenny: It reminds me of another interview you did where you talked about how a lot of the PM job sucks. It’s not as glamorous as people often think, and most of the job is these really boring, annoying things. I guess, is there anything you want to add there of just a lot of people want to get into PM, they’re like, oh, I’m going to run the show. It’s going to be so great. I’m going to be a product manager and tell people what to do. But that’s not how it is.
Maggie Crowley: It’s just one of those things that people, and when I joined product, it was just sort of becoming a cool job. It wasn’t the hot job on campus when I was in business school. That was more private equity, venture capital. And now there’s a sense of cachet around it. But again, it comes back to that earlier point, which is you do get to do cool stuff. You get to decide what gets built. That’s cool. You have a lot of ownership like we talked about. You could see it as you have a lot of power, but at the same time you’re responsible.
And so with that comes this responsibility to get it right, to make the right bets, ship the right products, get them out the door. And so there’s a lot of bullshit work you have to do. Again, project management is one everyone hates on. QA is a really good one. You should QA your products. That’s great if you have a QA team, you should QA them. You should know how they work. You should implement with your customers, you should be able to sell them, you should be able to find users. All that stuff is stuff that you should be able to do, and none of it is above you.
Lenny: If someone is listening and they’re not a PM and they are not convinced to not get into product manager, they still want to become a PM, what is your best advice for selling that is trying to get into product management of how to actually break into product management?
Maggie Crowley: I thought about this one a lot and I consulted the Slack workspace team. Because it’s been a long time since I’ve tried to get into product. And so I didn’t know what was going on these days because it’s hard and I don’t know if things have changed. I went to business school and that’s how I got in. There was a program that took MBA students. I think there are some entry-level programs out there, big tech companies, if you can get them, I think they’re really hard to get because they’re very few and far between. And so the most common two paths that I’ve seen are people who switched laterally within a company. Again, challenging but can be done. Or people who joined startups. So, when I was at my last startup, I did hire someone who was coming out of business school who hadn’t been into product into a PM role. And I can’t say I wouldn’t do it because it was awesome and she was amazing, but it takes a lot of work.
The reason why people don’t do it is because as a manager, it takes a lot of work because there’s so much that these people need to learn. And what we ended up doing is she and I spent four months working together in a WeWork in person to help her onboard really quickly into the role, which was so rewarding. And I loved every second of it, and I wish I could do that again and again and again. But to get that, she basically just hounded me. Christina, if you’re listening, you emailed me a lot. We talked a lot and we waited until the time was right and then you finally convinced me to do it. So, I don’t know. I don’t if there’s a reliable path that I can say this is what my advice would be other than try a startup network. See what you can do.
Lenny: And you’ve made up this point elsewhere, which I think is an additional key piece is once you have a PM title on your resume, everything gets easier. As a hiring manager, I’m just like, I look at a resume like, oh, they’ve never been a PM. This isn’t the role. It’s rarely that someone wants someone that’s never been a PM.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah. And I tell people, I do unsurprisingly talk to lots of people who either are in product or want to be in product. And that’s one of the things I always tell them because if they’re deciding between roles and they have an opportunity to do something, and my advice is always, if you can get someone to stamp you with the product manager role, take it. Because to your point, it’s what we screen on. It’s for better or for worse, it’s just like you have to get that first job. And then once you get that first job, it all gets easier. You can get in and then you can talk about your experience because then the second question I have is, what have you shipped? So, it’s like, have you been at PM before? What have you shipped? And it’s fascinating how quickly people can’t answer that question. And the people who can are always several steps ahead of the people.
Lenny: Let’s shift topics and talk about product strategy. Many people are told you need to get better product strategy. You’re not great at strategy. A lot of people are also just confused, what is strategy? How do I get better at strategy? How do we describe a strategy? And you have a really great explanation and overview of how to think about this stuff. So, I’d love to hear your take on just how do you actually write out and describe a strategy.
Maggie Crowley: Sure, yeah. And another thing that happens, and I’ll give the outline, but another thing I hear, especially as you get further in your career, and unfortunately if you’re maybe an underrepresented person in tech, is that you need to be more strategic. And so that’s feedback that almost always happens, especially if you’re a woman in product, in tech who’s knocking at the door of a leadership role. You’ve probably gotten that feedback. And so I made it my mission to figure out what the heck is this thing? How do I do it? How can I do it in a way that is demonstrable so that I’m never getting that feedback that’s like, oh, she’s not strategic. And so what I did was something that I kind of did in the background because I had an engineer who I worked with who really wanted to understand why we were doing what we were doing, and he was not satisfied with sort of a surface level answer.
And he was just pushing and pushing and pushing. And so what I did was I just wrote out a Google doc and I started with like, okay, and not fancy, these are just bullets. What is the mission? What is the point of the company? What are our goals? Maybe we have some sort of high level framing of what we’re working on. And then I had this big section that was just the landscape. And in that section I put in what’s going on with our business? What’s happening with our products? What’s our point of view on the market? Who are our competitors? A SWOT analysis, key risks that we might be facing. Just dump that all on paper. Then what are the current quarters business goals or however you do planning, what are the current things that your company’s working on? Then I put in, all right, that’s sort of the context that we’re operating in.
Then I wanted to understand where are we. So what is an honest accounting of the current state of your product, the business overall, and then the specific area that you’re working in. What works, what doesn’t work? What are your customers saying? Bottoms up feedback, users, customers, teams, what are your support tickets? Get that all out on paper. And then really importantly, where are your technical hurdles? What are the big pieces of tech debt? What are your engineering and technical teams always harping on that they want to invest in? Are there some big things coming down the pipe that you need to think about? Just get everything on paper. And then usually in the process of writing all that down, you’ll start to see, okay, I kind of get where we are. I kind of get what the challenge is. And then you write a section that’s like, what’s the opportunity?
From all of that, what’s going to bubble up as the top one or two opportunities for your team? Where do you want to play? Where can you win? Where’s the unique? Based on your unique competitive advantage, where do you think you all should be and why? And then based on that opportunity, what are the challenges? So, what’s going to be the hardest about taking advantage of that? What has to be, another way to frame it is what has to be true about the world for that to work? That’s a one that’s been helpful. And then what would you do? Take a swing at writing down your solution, what you would need to build, how might it work? Anything that you have, this is where I would say three bullets, maybe what you might want to do and then a plan. If no one else had an opinion, how would you go about it?
How would you sequence it? What would you do? How might you get the team to work on it? What would your team have to look like? How much would it cost to do it? All that you can start to layer in all that kind of stuff. And then I just share the doc. Share it with everybody. There should not be any secret. And you should be able to walk all the way from your company’s mission down to the individual priority on your team and see the logic chain and why you got there. And if anyone doesn’t agree with it, they can call out where their disagreement lands in that landscape. But at least then you’ve put everything on paper, you understand how you got to where you’re going, and then you can have an argument about the different pieces and points of data and feedback that you’re getting, but at least people understand how you got where you got. And then it doesn’t become like, I don’t agree with you. It becomes, I don’t agree with this point.
Lenny: This is such a cool way of doing it. By the way, is there a template that we can point people to that has this sort of-
Maggie Crowley: There’s not, I’ve only ever done it in a loose Google doc and then it just grows and changes. I can maybe try to write up those bullets, but it’s just like I just make headers and then I just start dumping content in it.
Lenny: Yes, that’s all people need. If you end up creating that before this comes out, we’ll throw it in the show notes. And if not, people can just bother you on Twitter and ask Maggie, where’s that template that we talked about?
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, I’m happy to write it on a piece of paper and take a photo of it and send it around.
Lenny: There you go. Just make it really grainy and an artifact. We found Maggie’s template. This is awesome. So, I’ve never heard of a version of this with so much depth into the landscape, and I think that’s so smart because so much of conflict and disagreement comes from you just don’t have the same information or the manager, exec or whatever doesn’t think you have the information. So, if you just lean into, here’s everything that I know and here’s what’s happening, and if you disagree with this goal, tell me, and then it’ll change the plan.
Maggie Crowley: Right.
Lenny: And yeah.
Maggie Crowley: Part of it’s also that typically speaking, when you’re doing a strategy, you’re doing it at a higher level. So, I don’t think every product needs a strategy. Every feature doesn’t need a strategy for example, you don’t need to do this if you’re working on a tiny slice of a product and you have user feedback, don’t overcomplicate it, just do the stuff that makes sense. But especially as I’ve gotten more senior in my career, the questions are bigger and the impact is broader and the timelines are longer. And honestly, it was also because I wanted to get it right. I didn’t want to make a bet on something and put a bunch of resources against a problem and get it wrong. And so this was also homework that I wanted to do for myself to know that I was going to do the right thing. For some reason, I’m always paranoid that other people have more information or doing it better than I’m doing it.
So, I was like, okay, I have to write it all down and then make sure I got it right and share it with everyone and make sure that they agreed with me so that I didn’t screw this thing up. And it just was such a useful exercise that I kept doing it. And of course people don’t read it. People only read a tiny section. You’ll run into the same problems you run in with everything else, but at least I knew that I had done the work and if people cared to engage with it was there.
Lenny: So, along those lines, I was going to actually ask, how long do you find this should be depending either on the timescale, say you’re doing a quarterly strategy or a year, how many pages should this doc be as any guide?
Maggie Crowley: It’s long. It gets real long.
Lenny: What is long?
Maggie Crowley: The actual content, I end up writing a summary to go back to the Minto principle. I end up doing the whole thing, then putting a summary at the top so that there’s one, within the first, above the fold, if you will. You can kind of get the point and the suggestion on what I think we should do or what the strategy should be, should be customizable in that section. But it can go 20 pages just because if you really want to get deep in a competitor or there’s interesting market dynamics, interesting technological changes that are happening. Sometimes I’m screenshotting other companies marketing websites and dumping that in there. And that might be some interesting comments. So, it doesn’t have to just be words or it can be all kinds of different things that you might want to put in there.
Lenny: And you made the point that it’s not like you expect people to read this whole thing. There’s the summary that gives them a conclusion and in theory if they want to really dig into it, they can. But I guess how do you find that balance of writing everything and making it so long that no one’s ever going to read it to like this is actually going to be useful to someone and plus here’s a summary.
Maggie Crowley: It comes back to the reason why I write the document in the first place. And that’s for me. So, it’s my homework to do my job effectively. I just make sure to share it. And I find that my, especially my engineering and design counterparts, if you’re working in a true triad, will almost always engage really deeply on the doc because they’re pretty much also on the line and they want to make sure that when they sign their teams up to do whatever it is that they believe in the thing that you’re working on.
And so I find that those people will engage pretty deeply. Sometimes you’ll have more junior folks on the team that’ll just be interested and they’ll get really into it too. And then there’s some people that’ll skim the upfront part and either say, yeah, that looks great, or You’re dumb, I hate this. And okay, sure. There’s always those people. So, it never really mattered to me that people read the whole thing. It was more I knew I had to do it to be confident in my own decisions and then I could facilitate a conversation, so it didn’t really matter.
Lenny:
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, I think, obviously this is where product content gets really challenging because obviously I can’t really talk about the stuff I’m currently working on.
Lenny: Just tell us all of the secrets. And that [inaudible 00:45:38] know.
Maggie Crowley: The toast PR department would be really unhappy with me. It’s questions like, if you’re a director of product somewhere, maybe you’re running a section of a business and it’s annual planning. We’re in Q4. What are you going to do next year? How do you answer that question? How do you back up your choices for that? You use a doc like this. Maybe you are realizing that the product that you’re working on doesn’t really matter, it’s not really making an impact. You’re kind of treading water. I would use this as a tool to figure out, okay, well what else could you do? So, yeah, quarterly planning, annual planning. If you feel like your team needs to make a pivot or if you think that there’s a really interesting new opportunity that your business or your team should go after, is another time I might use something like this.
Lenny: Awesome. This reminds me a little bit of, I keep mentioning this chat with Bill Carr that I had who is an early Amazon exec and how the narrative approach at Amazon, one of the benefits of that and the reasons they go there is partly for you to realize this is a bad idea before anyone even needs to give you feedback. And that’s why they force you to write six pages in depth about your idea and then it goes in these concentric circles through the company. And idea is like, here’s okay, and this is just not a good idea. Here’s all the reasons why. So, I think there’s a lot of similarities there.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, there are many, many times when if you combine this artifact and process with the point about simplification where through that process you just start cutting so many things because then what happens is, let’s say you’ve gone through this exercise and you’re like, okay, I know exactly what my three things are that I want to work on. Then there’s a moment where you take the strategy and then you look at your roadmap and they’re never the same. And the roadmap is just bloated with all of this random stuff that like, oh, well, we have to do that because of this, or we have to do that because of that.
This thing we’re still working on, this is like six months delayed, so we’re still going to do the thing. And then all of a sudden you’ve got 90% of your resources committed to things that don’t track against your strategy. And it’s a really interesting moment as a leader especially to sit there and go, well, what do we do? What do you do when you have that problem? And especially if you’re a PM, you probably don’t have the agency to say, scrap the entire roadmap and work on my new strategy. But at least it allows you to think about critically about whether you should be doing what you’re doing and allows you to evaluate whether those things are still the most important things to work on.
Lenny: I’m going to summarize the template real quick, and then I’m going to have another question kind of along the lines. So, if you’re trying to create your own little template, you start with the mission of the business, and then I imagine you also share the mission of your team because oftentimes it’s a little more specific, if you’re working on it like a product team strategy. Then there’s a landscape of what’s happening. So, you include competitive, SWOT analysis of competition risks, product state, business state, things like that.
And then you share the current goals of what you’re trying to achieve as a team slash business. And there’s an account, honest accounting of what’s happening in the product and technical hurdles and things like that that’ll keep you from moving, I guess, achieving some of these goals. And then you share, here’s the opportunity I see, how we win and how we actually achieve this opportunity where we place bets and things like that, or we could place bets. Then challenges of doing this, what needs to be true for this to be possible? And then you finally get to, here’s what I think we should do, essentially the solution, ideally three bullet points, and then the plan. And I imagine the plan is step one, get sign off from exec. Step two, resource the team. Step three, start on this design research sprint.
Maggie Crowley: Pretty much.
Lenny: Awesome. All right. Amazing. Somebody will create this template if you don’t end up doing it.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah.
Lenny: There’s another-
Maggie Crowley: I hope somebody does.
Lenny: Okay. That’d be awesome. If they do, I will tweet it and we put it in the show notes.
Maggie Crowley: Great.
Lenny: So many promises already from this podcast. Along the same lines, you also have a one-pager template and process that I think people find really useful. So, how about we chat about that one briefly and then I’m going to go in a whole different direction.
Maggie Crowley: Okay. Yeah, I don’t think I have much to say about this. That has not been said by many people many times, but whether it’s a spec, a PRD, a one pager, I don’t even know what else people call it. It’s the document that you use to define the thing that you’re doing as a product team, and that means product design, engineering, your little squad. And what I think is really useful about this process is that it’s the PM’s artifact. So, designers produce designs, engineers write code. What do PMs do? A lot of people might say nothing. In theory, we write at least this document and it can be a pain. I’ve seen lots of ways where it hasn’t been done very well, but when I think it’s done really well and when it’s really effective is it’s a tool that allows the PM to start with why. And if you structure it correctly, the most important section in my opinion in the document is the first part, which is like what is the background and context?
What is the problem, why does it matter and why does it matter now? And if you get those things right, the rest gets really easy, but it gives you a chance as a PM to center the team around the problem, why that problem exists, whether it’s created by your own product or it’s something the user is experiencing and why that problem is worth solving. That’s a part that I think people sometimes forget to think about and why it’s we’re solving right now versus all the other problems you could be solving and then it can become the home base of the decisions that you make along the way. So, I think it’s best when you have those sections and then also best when you write down on this day, we made this decision or we decided not to do this or we decided only to solve this part of the problem, not this part of the problem. Keeping a running list of that and a link off to all the different artifacts and research and things is helpful for a team.
Lenny: So, just to summarize, what would be the headings again, just if someone’s taking notes and wants to create the rule template?
Maggie Crowley: I don’t think these templates have to be really complicated. It’s like background and context. The problem. I would literally write why this problem matters and why this problem matters now. Don’t make it complicated, just answer those questions and if you can do that, and then again, it’s only really helpful if then you bring that document before you go any further to your team and you use it to have a conversation and you get the smart people around you to take shots at it. I should have mentioned this earlier with the strategy. The first person I go to is typically speaking my engineering counterpart and I say, shred this, go through it, rip it apart, vomit comments on it, tear this down how it gets better. And as a PM you can’t be precious about your work. You need people to poke holes in it.
Lenny: The why this matters now point is so interesting. I don’t often hear that and I think it’s such an important part of specs and plans and strategies because there’s so many things you can do and there’s certain things that are perishable that you can only do now. That if you don’t do now you miss up the opportunity. And so I think that’s a really interesting element that most people don’t include and it reminds me of, I think I’ve done enough podcast episodes now where I’m just connecting all these things as people are talking. [inaudible 00:53:16] the John Nash thing happening where Karri, the founder of Linear talked about this concept of side quests as a founder. Because he’s so good at staying focused and I was just like, “How do you stay focused and just get stuff done when you have so many people coming out?” He’s just like, “There’s the main quest and then there’s the side quests and side quest I don’t need to do right now. There’s the main quest which is build up really successful business.” And I feel like this is a good example of that in action.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, I love his take on quality and taste too.
Lenny: Yeah. What a gem.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, big fan of that. But yeah, I mean it’s really hard to stay disciplined, it’s hard to stay focused and to your point, there’s a million things you could do at any given time, especially if you work at a bigger company. And so the why now is an important question to answer because if not, somebody’s going to ask you. So, you may as well think about it.
Lenny: Yeah, it’s interesting why now comes up a lot in investing in startups but rarely in product building and it feels like it should. Although I will say in the research I’ve done, why now ends up not being that important for startups being successful or not. So, I think there’s a two sides to that coin. Anyway, I’m going to move on to a different topic and this might become a new thing that we do and I’m going to call it contrarian corner. I asked you if you have contrarian opinions about things before we started recording this episode and you had some really good ones. So, there’s a couple topics I’m going to chat about and we’ll see if this becomes a recurring theme and you’re laughing and nodding your head, what are you thinking as I say this?
Maggie Crowley: I’m thinking about when I had a podcast, you would do a show on a topic and we would click the end recording button and then every single guest would be like, I had no idea what I was doing. I made it all up, it was waterfall. None of that matters. I didn’t know what I was … People would say the wildest stuff and I would sit there as a PM and just think what. We just talked about this framework, we just talked about this thing and that’s how you’re supposed to do it. And then they would get off the official part and just say, yeah, it’s wild. Nothing goes the way you want it to go. We’re all just kind of making it up as we go. And so I hope that you get more of those takes in this part of the show.
Lenny: I’m very sensitive to that point right now because someone just tweeted about how they’re just finding that many of my newsletter posts about how companies write product are the ideal version of what they do and I rarely or they rarely share, here’s all the challenges we’re having, which I think there’s truth to that, but I also get into a lot of failures on this podcast. Actually, I think the podcast is a lot more of just here’s things that go wrong versus the newsletter. So, I’m just like shit, I need to do more of that. So, I love that you mentioned that and let’s see what we can get into. But I guess maybe before we get there, is there an example of something that didn’t go just along the lines of some sort of failure slash mistake?
Maggie Crowley: I might be foreshadowing, but a question I ask in every product interview is what’s the worst product you’ve ever shipped? And that’s because I don’t think you’re a good PM if you haven’t shipped something that’s really shitty, you just haven’t had enough reps, you haven’t done it enough time. And it’s not only that you’ve done it but that you can admit it and which one it is. That’s so important. And I remember, it was so dumb, I’m still so mad about this, that we did this. I won’t name which team, which company, I’m not going to call that out, but we decided we needed to do a rewrite, red flag number one of a existing product and engineer who I’d worked with many times. We had a really good relationship and this person was like, yeah, yeah, it’s going to take six months, no problem.
Core part of the product been around for forever. One of those things that the code is still, it’s still the code written by the founders kind of thing. It didn’t take six months, it took two and a half years. It still wasn’t done. It almost never, it went on for so much longer than it should have. It took us forever to get to feature parody. It was the worst project. So, many people rotated in and out of it. Everyone thought it was dumb, sunk cost fallacy, just the worst. And it’s because A, we got arrogant and we thought we could do it. B, we skipped discovery. We didn’t really write a one-pager, we just went for it. We didn’t do enough technical and design research into what the requirements would actually have to be. And there you have it.
Lenny: And did not work out or was it a huge success in the end and it changed the trajectory of the business?
Maggie Crowley: Absolutely not. But you know what, I didn’t get fired, so it’s fine.
Lenny: I feel like I’ve gone through those experiences and then three, four years later it’s like another, maybe this rewrite and redesign may work because we haven’t updated this thing in a long time.
Maggie Crowley: Just don’t do it. Don’t rewrite. If anyone ever tells you to do a rewrite, don’t do it. A side by side re-write, nope.
Lenny: Yeah, what I run into is once you get too far down a redesign slash rewrite everyone’s building in that new world and then you launch an experiment’s negative and then it’s just like, oh, we just got to launch it. We’re going to claw back. We’re going to get figure out how to get back to neutral someday.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah.
Lenny: Yeah.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah. Don’t do that.
Lenny: Good times. Okay, well maybe we’ll start a failure corner. That could be a new segment. We may have a little sound and theme music, but this time we have contrarian corner and you have a couple contrarian opinions about a couple topics. The first is product management. What is something that you believe about product management that maybe other people are less convinced by?
Maggie Crowley: The one I like to have in this area is that people who are really excited about being data-driven, to me that is oftentimes a red flag for their product thinking, especially if it’s an executive who’s saying things like, oh, so we make all our decisions with our dashboards. To me that says that the team is over-emphasizing quantitative data at the expense of qualitative data and they’re not using good judgment. They probably don’t do a lot of direct user research. They don’t really understand the humans who are using the thing, what they need, what they care about, and they’re managing via a dashboard. And maybe if they got really, really good at picking metrics, it would be fine. And oftentimes maybe it is fine. Maybe you have a high volume business that’s really easy to run experiments on and that works for you. But most PMs, most jobs, most products, you’re going to be better off talking to 10 users and you’ll get more and better insights out of why things are happening than you would with any dashboard.
Lenny: So, the takeaway there is just be careful when someone is saying they’re super data-driven. Our team is super data-driven or company company’s super data-driven.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, and maybe it’s true and that’s great. I am not saying that you don’t need data. You absolutely do need to instrument your products and understand if it’s working at scale, but you can’t forget that, you need to know why. It won’t tell you why anything is happening. If you don’t understand why it’s happening, I don’t think you can come up with good insights about what you should do next. One quick story on this. I remember really early on in my career, Adam Medros, who was a VP [inaudible 01:00:24] at TripAdvisor, we were in a room, just had this meeting called product review that was amazing when I first joined and someone was justifying this project and he just, I hope he is okay with me saying this because this is my memory of this moment.
He was just like, this is an obviously better thing. Just do it. Stop. Stop it. Stop doing all the stuff that you’re doing. Stop with these numbers, whatever it was that they were doing, if it’s obviously better, if it’s logically better, use your good judgment and do that thing and let’s move on. And I’ve always thought about that, but you can just do the obviously better thing.
Lenny: Yeah, I love that I pull that card sometimes, but I think you almost have to do it that way of just like, okay, everyone, this one’s just obviously a good idea. Let’s just do it. Enough research. Okay, another topic that you have some interesting opinions about his product content very close to our hearts, both my heart and your heart. Do share.
Maggie Crowley: Really if you’re going to make good content, you have to sanitize and frameworkize the thing that you’re working on. And then slowly, I think for a lot of people who are reading it and looking at it, their thinking starts to become, well look how well I did this framework. Look how well I implemented this thing. And they lose touch with the point which is creating impact. And so all of this content makes it really noisy and then makes people think that, oh, if I just do these things that I’ll get what I want. And now I’ll just check off my list and then I checked it off and then I should get my promotion at the end of the day. But it’s like the best PMs have built up so many different frameworks and they can apply them in different ways. And then sometimes they throw them out and they say, nothing I have in my toolkit makes sense for this moment, but I know what to do because I have intuition and I have data and I’ve talked to users or whatever.
And so content sometimes can get in the way of the impact because you’re trying to apply it and you think that the point is the framework and the point is the one pager or whatever it is that you’re doing when it’s not. And then if you’re a leader and maybe if you’ve had the good and ill fortune of having published content, someone comes to you and says, well, you said in that one podcast episode that you don’t believe in roadmaps, so why are you asking me for a roadmap? And then you’re the who’s sitting there being like, well, it’s a little more complicated than that. And that was a fun take that I had, but I actually need to understand what we’re doing because planning and I need to figure out what my budget is, blah, blah, blah.
Lenny: That’s so funny that I didn’t think about you as a leader having put stuff out that people put back at you. And I think your point about one for you, for people to consume content online about how to do product management, you have to really distill it. And to your point, it often loses the nuance. Because if you had all the ones, no one’s going to even read it so complicated and long. And then the other point of there’s also just it has to be interesting. So, if it’s another just like, here’s how a roadmap really is successfully and it’s like what everyone’s already done, no one’s going to read it. So, you always have to have a new take. And with that comes, it’s not actually always true. I just wanted people to react to this idea.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, I mean it’s helpful. I think there’s some people who create, I mean there’s many things at my last role, we all had your newsletter and we listened to the show and then people would bring, I should have found a clip, but I can’t remember, there were a couple of moments where we would listen to a piece of it or find an article and say, oh, this could help. Or what if we did it that way? I think there was a newsletter article about Figma and they had some templates. They’re like product review template for FigJam. Love that one. Use that one all the time.
Lenny: Amazing.
Maggie Crowley: So, yeah, I mean the stuff’s really useful. It’s just like you have to be smart about when you apply it. And then if you’re a leader and there’s all this content available, you have to know why you’re not following the rules.
Lenny: If they’re just like, hey, look at this newsletter post letting you write, we should be doing it this way. Versus I think people assume these are the one way to do it or innately will work at your company. And I really like your point, which maybe counter to what I do, but I think it’s an important nuance that I feel like I should add to every newsletters. This isn’t necessarily going to work at your company. Sometimes the culture is different and this won’t fit or this isn’t a complete version. As much as I try to give people, here’s everything you need to do this thing well, there’s always a little bit missing
Maggie Crowley: And I think if you don’t have that context, it can be a little demoralizing like, well, how am I ever going to do that thing that they get to do at this magical company? But again, if you view it as more like here all the tools that you can add to your toolkit and you pull them out when you’re in a situation from which they can be useful, that’s how I think about it. Versus this is the one way to do it like you said, the only way you can write a one page or the only way you can write an experiment, it’s more like you can do it in many different ways.
Lenny: And I find myself, I’m not actually, I rarely tell people here’s the way to do it. Usually what I try to describe is here’s how the best companies do it, as much as I can get into and leave it to the reader to decide is this going to be a fit for me, should I try to implement it? But still, I think there’s an implication. This is the way to do research, here’s the way to do roadmap, here’s the way to prioritize. But I think it’s interesting that you also, yourself create a lot of content and you actually found a lot of value from being, let’s not call you content creator because I don’t like being labeled as a creator myself.
Maggie Crowley: Someone one’s called me a product influencer and I’ll died like a little bit.
Lenny: That’s how I feel. I’d love to hear just the impact you’ve seen from spending time creating podcasts and blog posts and tweeting about really great stuff because a lot of people are thinking about investing in this stuff.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, it’s probably the best thing I’ve ever done for my career and I am so grateful for the people whose idea it was, who supported me and especially at Drift, when that became such a part of what we were doing at that time. And it’s been helpful for a couple of reasons. One is just networking and access. I probably wouldn’t be here today if I hadn’t done that and if a friend of a friend had read the thing, it’s like it just creates so many more connections. And so access to people and networking is one of the first benefits.
Also building a personal brand is really helpful if you want, one of the things that I always wanted to do with my career is try to make it so that I’m always employable. I just didn’t want to, I’m an 08 grad not to put my age out there, and it was a hard time. And so I’ve always had this in the back of my mind, you want to be able to have a solid career. And so I thought that investing in my personal brand would be a way to help me get access to roles. It helps in recruiting as well when I’m trying to hire people. Because a lot of my job now is bringing people in and because I’ve been vocal about how I like to work and who I am, a lot of people and they will send me a note and say, I want to work with you, or I want to work on a team like that.
And that’s huge because if my job is to hire people, then that’s great and people can get a sense of who I am without needing to be on the phone with me. My favorite benefit outside of those things has been that it’s helped me learn more from the work I’ve done than I otherwise would’ve been able to. Because in order to make content, you have to think through what you did, you have to summarize it, process it, make it interesting for people. And then especially if it’s in a podcast meeting, talk to somebody about it. And the process of doing that means that you’re paying attention to what you’re learning along the way. And so often we don’t do that because we’re busy working, we have our lives, things are happening. And that to me is, I think what’s made me a better product person faster is because I spent the time to think about what I was doing in a way that I wouldn’t have if I didn’t have to write something down.
Lenny: Something that comes across in your content that you’ve somehow figured out is to avoided being cringy and very thirsty for followers. And I think when a lot of people here build a personal brand, it’s like, I don’t want to.
Maggie Crowley: I know. It makes me ill even saying that, it’s like too gross.
Lenny: I never thought of it or wanted to think of it that way. And I’m just curious what advice you’d give to people that want to go down this route without feeling, I guess one, is just feeling like they’re being cringey, and two, avoiding content people be like, oh my God, I can’t believe this stuff [inaudible 01:09:02].
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, the clickbait tweet thread situation. I think the step one’s going to be cringe. Your first 10, 20, however many posts are going to be bad. I would imagine if you went back and listened to your first episode, you would be cringing just because you’ve learned so much since then. Right?
Lenny: Yeah.
Maggie Crowley: It’s natural.
Lenny: Although randomly the first episode ever is the most popular episode. So, with [inaudible 01:09:29], which I could see why it was so popular.
Maggie Crowley: So, it went really hot with your first guest.
Lenny: That’s right. That’s right.
Maggie Crowley: So, yeah, first get over the fact that it’s going to be cringe. It’s going to be cringe. Like anything, you just have to get started and it’ll fade away eventually and you don’t have to think about it. Two B, this is such gross advice, but you have to be authentic. It has to be real. And I think what came through in the show that I did was those were my real questions that I was really working on.
So, we joked about how we would turn off the recording and then we would get the real story, but I would turn the recording off and I would say, okay, we talked about this thing. Here’s actually happening in my job today, what would you do? And so those were real questions that I had, real processes that I was working on and real advice that I needed at that time. And I think that’s why it was valuable is because I was actively a PM and the way that I’m still actively in product, that was always something that I wanted because it meant that the content had to be relevant for me and wasn’t just for likes and share.
Lenny: I think there’s some two really important points there that stood out to me. One is your stuff’s going to be terrible if you don’t actually have any background or experience in the things, you’re just pretending. It’s like you’re acting like someone that knows about this thing, but you don’t actually. And so I think that’s an incredibly important part of this is don’t try to become an online creator person if you haven’t done the thing, because people will see that you don’t know what you’re really talking about and you’ll run out of stuff and it’ll be like, okay, well I did it for two months and I have nothing more to say.
Maggie Crowley: Right.
Lenny: And then the other piece is there’s a guest who shared this quote that has stuck with me from Einstein, which is something like, “Seek not to be successful but of value.” And I find that that’s a really good framing for sharing stuff is just share things that are interesting to you and useful and come at it from this is useful, not from, I’m trying to build a following. Because people can tell if that’s the-
Maggie Crowley: Yeah, people can absolutely tell. And the other thing is there’s a little bit of too cool for school mixed in here and there are definitely people who will tell you your content is cringe or make fun of you or whatever because that’s what they want to do. And I’m not even going to get into psychology of that, but people will do that. And I’ve always been of the mind that the really interesting people out there, people who are unashamedly interested in stuff and who are like, yeah, I’m nerding out about this and I’m sharing it because I’m interested in it. And for better for worse, I love working in product. I love the job.
Even all the gross stuff you have to do, it’s super interesting. You meet really cool people, you get to ship stuff, you get to see the stuff get used by people and solve problems. It’s a really cool job and I’ve always been interested in how to do it better and it doesn’t matter to me that some people might think that’s cringe because that’s cool, but this is what I do all day long, so I’d like to get better at it.
Lenny: I think that’s such a big part of it. I didn’t even mention that. Just it needs to feel really authentic and clearly for you is just like, there’s just stuff I want to share because it’s really interesting to me.
Maggie Crowley: Yeah.
Lenny: The way I actually started writing was exactly the two reasons you just shared. One is I wanted to learn the thing and so writing helped me figure things out. And then two is I just thought it was interesting and I found it useful and I just assumed other people might find it useful. So, I did also learn, and I wonder if you found this too, is that you think the things are not going to be that interesting or useful to people, so basic for you, but people find the most basic stuff so interesting. Because there’s always more to learn about how to roadmap, how to prioritize, how to hire, how to talk, to have difficult conversations, performance review.
Maggie Crowley: All of that is absolutely true. And I think one of the first pieces of content that I was really happy with was I was working with somebody and they were making a PowerPoint presenter slides or whatever, and I just wrote out in my notebook like, okay, here’s how I do that. I start with an outline on paper and then I draw little boxes for the slides and I write out the headline of the slides. And then once I have a tight outline and I have the literal text that will go across the top of each of those things, then I sketch out how I want the slides to go. And then I go into Google Docs and I actually make the slide.
And it was like some silly little thing and this person sat there and said, holy, you just totally changed the way I did this and this took me 75% less time than it would’ve taken me otherwise. And I was like, I may do this dumb drawing. Why is this a big deal? And yeah, that’s when I realized that the stuff that’s easy for you might be a stuff that is most interesting because it’s something that maybe you’re really good at that you don’t realize.
Lenny: I think people need to really internalize that point. If there’s something that you’re doing that you consistently find useful and works often, that is going to be really useful for someone to hear. So, that could be a good place to start. Maggie, we’ve gone through everything that I was hoping to get through and more, which is awesome.
Maggie Crowley: Great.
Lenny: Before we get to a very exciting lightning round, is there anything else that you want to share or touch on think might be useful to leave folks with?
Maggie Crowley: My hope is always that people listen to stuff like this and realize that it’s messier than you think you can fail a lot and still be successful and that they should have fun. I think that gets missed in a lot of the product content is like, have fun, enjoy it. People are weird, people do weird stuff and you build stuff for people, which it makes it all very entertaining. So, I’ve always found a lot of joy in the job.
Lenny: And to your point of carrying the water as a PM where you’re kind of doing all the things, it’s like you can create that fun. You can make the team your own fun and change the culture, create the culture. I find that so underappreciated for PM.
Maggie Crowley: Absolutely.
Lenny: Okay, well with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
Maggie Crowley: I’m ready.
Lenny: Maggie, what are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Maggie Crowley: First, most common one is probably the Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs, the little tiny one, really great way to improve your speaking skills and your presentation skills and to get distracted executives to agree with the point you’re making. So, that’s one. Thinking in Bets by Annie Duke is the second one. Coming back to the point about being able to make bets, I think that one’s a really interesting one. And then bonus third one, this is more like a desk reference that I now have on my desk, the Scaling People book by Claire Hughes Johnson. I really enjoyed the way that one is working and it just sits on my desk and I reference it every once in a while, especially as manager.
Lenny: I have it both under my laptop right where I’m sitting and then also way behind there and it’s one of the most popular episodes I’ve done with Claire, so if folks haven’t listened to that one. Highly recommend. She’s incredible. Great choice. What is a favorite recent movie or TV show you’ve really enjoyed?
Maggie Crowley: Okay, so my husband is in the industry, as we say here in LA, and so we watch a lot of good and bad shows in TV, but I think my favorite one that I’ve watched recently was Slow Horses. Gary Oldman is incredible. Highly recommend.
Lenny: Wow, I haven’t heard that one yet. Good tip. What is a favorite interview question you really like to ask which I think you already gave away, but let’s touch on it again.
Maggie Crowley: I did. Yeah, it is what is the worst product that you’ve ever shipped? I think the best answers are ones, and I don’t even care if someone listens to this and then I do this in an interview, people immediately laugh a little bit. They remember the horrible thing they did and then they share that horrible thing with you. And it tells me you have some humor, you’re humble and you can point out when you’ve made a mistake. You’ve done enough to be able to confidently say, of course I’ve made a mistake. Because none of us are perfect. And you know how to spot those mistakes and you can learn from them. And I’ve always found that those conversations are the most interesting.
Lenny: What is a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you really like?
Maggie Crowley: One because I’ve seen you on Twitter, you’re a future fit guy.
Lenny: Yeah, I’m.
Maggie Crowley: Is that correct?
Lenny: I use it three times a week. I love it.
Maggie Crowley: Yes. I was also a future fit person. I think it’s great. It’s a great product. I’m now on Ladder Fit.
Lenny: I’ve heard of that.
Maggie Crowley: And personally, I love not being, I don’t have to talk to the coach every day. I don’t need the accountability, so that’s not a thing that I needed as an ex athlete. So, for me, that didn’t serve me and I like the anonymity of it and it comes with a totally unhinged group chat for your whole team. It’s fantastic. I’m really enjoying it.
Lenny: Sweet.
Maggie Crowley: So, that’s one more of a funny one. And the second one, not to get real niche, but I think good products are products that are focused. They do one thing incredibly well and they’re not, to your point about side quest, there’s no side quests. I’m a new mom. There’s this app called Pump Log. I have never seen an execute so well on one problem. There’s not a single thing where I think, oh, I wish it did this. It does it. It’s like I paid $14 for it. I’ve never paid for an app like that in my life.
Lenny: Okay, I’m downloading it right after we finish. Do you have a favorite life motto that you either repeat yourself, often like to share with folks, find useful, and just kind of living life?
Maggie Crowley: I’m sure there’s mottos’ I could say that would be aspirational mottos’, but the real one is if it’s worth doing, it’s worth doing well. And again, from being in sports to going to school to being in product, in my opinion, if you’re going to do something, do it to the best of your ability because that’s what you do with your day. You spend so much time working, you may as well be good at it or trying to get good at it. And that’s always how I’ve lived my life.
Lenny: I so love that message. I always think about that. Final question, you are an Olympic speed skater, which I don’t think people would know necessarily. That’s insane. My question is there some bad speed skating that would surprise people that would be like, what?
Maggie Crowley: Ooh, that is one I’ve never been asked before. The whole experience, I’ve obviously learned a ton from it, and I think what might surprise people about being a small sport athlete is that you have to think in four or eight year chunks. And so it’s one of those things where you grind for so long in a dark corner and then you get a chance to get the light to shine on you and you learn how to love the process. Especially for speed skating, I was a long track speed skater, it’s a 400-meter rink.
You just are always turning left and going in a circle. There’s not a lot going on. It’s just you and your thoughts and you just really, really learn how to get good at perfecting something over and over again, and you learn how to grind, you learn how to focus, and I think it’s also cool you get to go superfast. But yeah, I don’t know if that would surprise people about speed skating, but I think just about being a small sport elite athlete, it’s really about years and years and years of toiling and silence to get maybe one shot at something great.
Lenny: So, much of what you just said would apply 100% to product management and I love that. Maggie, you are awesome. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out and maybe ask you any follow-up questions, and then two, how can listeners be useful to you?
Maggie Crowley: You can find me on Twitter for sure. By LinkedIn, but just speaking of cringe, I just can’t get into LinkedIn posting.
Lenny: LinkedIn’s gotten better, I’d give it a shot. It’s actually pretty interesting now, which sound weird to say.
Maggie Crowley: Thinking about it, I better go back to work in a couple of weeks and thinking about LinkedIn. But yeah, Twitter for sure, LinkedIn for sure, and I’ve always tried to be helpful to other people, so I don’t have an answer for how people can be helpful to me, my goal is really to share what I’ve been doing, the rooms that I get to be in, the access to the content and the people and the learning that I’ve had. So, hopefully I can find ways to keep sharing that.
Lenny: Maybe check out Toast and use Toast when they’re at restaurants.
Maggie Crowley: Oh yes, Plug, Toast. Come work with us. We’re the best. I get to work with John Cutler. It’s phenomenal.
Lenny: Legendary, previous guest. Are there roles you’re hiring for just for folks that are listening and just like, hey, maybe I should go do that.
Maggie Crowley: There are always roles that are open. I don’t know what the most open roles are right now, but yeah, check it out. It’s a great place.
Lenny: Willing to the careers page.
Maggie Crowley: Awesome.
Lenny: Maggie, thank you again so much for being here.
Maggie Crowley: Thank you, Lenny. It was awesome.
Lenny: Bye everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Adam Medros | Adam Medros(TripAdvisor 前 VP) |
| B2B | B2B(Business-to-Business,企业对企业) |
| clickbait | 标题党 |
| discovery | 探索阶段(discovery) |
| feature parity | 功能对等(feature parity) |
| Future Fit | Future Fit(健身训练应用) |
| Google Docs | Google Docs(谷歌在线文档工具) |
| John Cutler | John Cutler(Toast 员工) |
| Karri | Karri(Linear 创始人) |
| Ladder Fit | Ladder Fit(健身训练应用) |
| Minto Pyramid principle | Minto 金字塔原则(先说结论再说支撑论据的表达结构) |
| OKR | OKR(Objectives and Key Results,目标与关键成果) |
| On Writing Well | 《On Writing Well》(一本关于非虚构写作的经典著作) |
| one-pager | 一页纸文档(one-pager) |
| ownership | 主人翁精神(ownership) |
| PM | PM(Product Manager,产品经理) |
| PowerPoint | PowerPoint(微软演示文稿软件) |
| PRD | PRD(Product Requirements Document,产品需求文档) |
| Pump Log | Pump Log(母乳泵送记录应用) |
| rule of three | 三的法则 |
| side quests | 支线任务(side quests) |
| spec | 规格文档(spec) |
| sunk cost fallacy | 沉没成本谬误 |
| SWOT analysis | SWOT 分析(Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats,优势、劣势、机会、威胁分析) |
| tech debt | 技术债务(tech debt) |
| Toast | Toast(餐饮科技平台) |
| zero to one | 从零到一 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
掌握产品策略与 PM 成长之道 | Maggie Crowley(Toast, Drift, TripAdvisor)
文字记录
Maggie Crowley: 如果你发现自己说出类似”那不是我的工作”这样的话,那这件事多半就是你该做的。你知道吗?它确实可能不是你的工作,也确实可能是别人的工作——你可以为此沮丧一辈子,也可以放下情绪,把事情做了。那些愿意直接把事情做了的人,推进速度会更快,他们的产品会更成功,而且他们大概也不会一直带着那些愤怒和负面情绪。因为作为一名 PM,无论好坏——也许我们都希望不是这样——但你往往是团队的情感中心。你的工作就是让团队保持动力、保持热情、让他们对项目持续投入,你必须保持那种乐观。这很辛苦,而其中一部分就是:你知道吗?让我来吧,我来做这件事,我参加这个销售电话,我跟客户一起落地这个功能。你必须不择手段地把事情做成。
Lenny: 今天的嘉宾是 Maggie Crowley。Maggie 目前是 Toast 的产品副总裁。在此之前,她曾担任 Charlie Health 的副总裁兼产品负责人、Drift 的产品高级总监、BevSpot 的产品总监,以及 TripAdvisor 的产品经理。她还有哈佛商学院的 MBA 学位。她还是一名奥运速滑运动员,这简直太疯狂、太酷了。在这次对话中,我们讨论了她所共事、招聘和管理过的最优秀产品经理身上的三个共同特质;如何非常务实地撰写一份产品策略并分享给你的团队和上级;为什么”数据驱动”是产品思维中的一个危险信号;为什么网上找到的产品内容可能是危险的;她对如何进入产品管理领域的最佳建议;以及持续写作对她职业生涯的影响,等等。Maggie 非常棒。
我很期待你能像我一样从她身上学到东西。下面,请听我与 Maggie Crowley 的对话。
成为优秀 PM 的关键特质
Lenny: Maggie,非常感谢你来做客。欢迎来到播客。
Maggie Crowley: 谢谢邀请,我非常激动。
Lenny: 你在播客、博客、推文等各个渠道产出了大量内容,我可能还有很多没看到的。所以我把你能找到的所有内容都翻了一遍,找出我们今天可以深入探讨的话题。我觉得从”如何成为一名成功的产品经理”以及”长期发展需要什么”开始会很有趣。你和很多 PM 共事过,招聘过很多 PM,管理过很多 PM,所以我的问题就是:在你见过的最优秀的 PM 身上,有哪些共同特质?
Maggie Crowley: 这是个很有意思的问题,主要是因为我在创业公司做过从零到一、做过规模化阶段的创业公司、也做过企业级,各种类型都经历过。市面上有大量关于这些不同阶段角色差异、不同类型公司中 PM 差异的内容。但我观察到的是,有一些标准化的东西在任何类型的公司里都是一样的,无论是消费者端还是 B2B、是创业公司还是大企业——尤其是关于什么让 PM 彼此区分开来。当我在招聘、在考虑晋升、或者当某些 PM 在你没有刻意寻找时就脱颖而出时,我会关注三件事。
第一,我认为最优秀的 PM 非常擅长把事情拆解和简化。也就是说,在任何时刻找到真正需要做的那唯一一件事。特别是在大公司里,有八百万个优先级、七百个 OKR、两万五千个项目可以做,团队会被这种复杂性拖住。同样地,在创业公司里,你可能会觉得找到那一件该做的事很容易,但同时有那么多火要灭、那么多事情可以做、那么广阔的机会空间,光是挑一件并坚持下去就已经很难了。所以最优秀的 PM 不仅能找到那一件该做的事,还能在那件事上坚持足够长的时间,真正把它做完。
Lenny: 我觉得这一点特别有意思,因为听起来很简单,还有这个”简化”的理念。但我认为这背后蕴含了很多东西,因为”简化”之中就包含了优先级排序,你几乎可以把 PM 的工作概括为:他们就是在做优先级排序,告诉人们接下来该做什么。所以我觉得你说的这一点非常有力量。
优先级排序的本质
Maggie Crowley: “优先级排序”是一个很棘手的词,因为里面包罗万象,含义复杂。我曾经为这样一些管理者工作过:他们想理解优先级排序的公式,想知道为什么是这个而不是那个,你怎么证明这是正确的选择而不是那个。然后一周过去了,他们又想重新评估优先级,想重新争论一番。所以这远不仅仅是某个时间点上的决策——它是一种坚持下去的能力,是确保这件事持续保持为最重要的事情、把它做完并真正看到它生效的能力,是让人们继续对项目保持兴奋和投入的能力。
Maggie Crowley: 因为我觉得很多时候我们谈论产品,都是在讨论:你应该做什么?你应该发布什么?但真正的问题是,你实际上得把它发布出去,这可能需要一周、一个月、三个月、六个月、一年。所以作为 PM,你的工作是始终跟住这件事,做那个一遍又一遍敲鼓的人。最优秀的 PM 就是那些能坚持下来的人,拥有那种韧性和精力,始终跟到底。
如何提升这三项能力
Lenny: 精力,这是其中非常重要的一部分。我想问你,你建议人们如何在这些方面变得更好?我们可以先聊聊你发现在”简化”方面如何提升,或者把三个都过一遍再回来深入,你觉得怎样比较好?
Maggie Crowley: 那就先把三个快速过一遍,然后再深入展开。
Lenny: 好的。
Maggie Crowley: 好,第一个是简化。第二个跟”坚持到底”这个点有关,就是跟进结果。很多人在需求文档或一页纸提案里会说,好吧,这是我关注的指标,这是我想提升的数字。很好。也许他们甚至会写一个 SQL 查询,搭一个仪表盘,搞清楚今天的数字是多少,这能给你加分。但真正优秀的 PM 会记得去跟进。因为尤其当你做到管理层,往上几层的时候,我不会记得去跟进那个功能。但如果一个 PM 回来找我说,“嘿,还记得我们做的那个东西吗,结果是这样的。“我跟你说这有多罕见——作为领导者,你可能得反复去问才有这样的反馈,而那些不需要你主动去问的人,就是你在评估 PM 时最值得看重的。而且这不难做到。
设置好指标追踪,或者你知道怎么拉取这些数据,或者有人可以帮你拿到这些信息,那跟进起来是相当容易的,而且这是一个非常有价值的活动。第三件事,我觉得我们稍后可能也会谈到,是一个短语——我们在开始前聊到了 David Cancel——叫”挑水”(carrying the water)。这是我刚加入 Drift 时的一个重要主题,意思是说,如果你不愿意去做那些困难的、无聊的、不体面的工作——客户支持、销售、市场、写文案、项目管理——你就做不了一个好 PM。你必须做这些事。这是你的工作。没有别人会替你做,因为说到底,你对结果负责。你就是那个必须做这些事的人,如果你愿意做这些工作,这才是让你的产品成功的关键,而产品的成功才是你的成功。
Lenny: 这份清单特别有意思,因为当你问大多数人,要成为一名出色的产品经理需要在哪些方面提升,他们总是说沟通能力、协作能力、愿景、战略。而你现在说的这些,感觉像是那些人们通常想到的东西的输入指标。
Maggie Crowley: 那些东西在我看来——沟通,超级重要;分析能力,非常非常重要。尤其是当你在做涉及用户体验的工作时,能够审视一个方案,判断它是否能行得通,并在此基础上建立起直觉——这也非常重要。这些是我认为的角色基本功。而这三件事才是让你在角色上变得卓越的东西。至于战略,在我看来——希望我们稍后能聊聊战略——它只是工作的一小片。你确实要做战略,但它大约只占你工作的 5%。没错,它很重要,因为你需要确定正确的战略,需要选择正确的产品。但说到底,战略好的人不会比那些发布更多东西、获得更多练习次数、真正能创造影响力的 PM 更成功。所以在我看来,你可以战略很强,但如果你不擅长这些基本的事情,你的东西出不了门,你永远不会在这个岗位上变得真正出色。
Lenny: 而”影响力”是另一个说法。大家总是说,什么造就了优秀的 PM?“推动大量影响力”嘛。然后——
Maggie Crowley: 但他们从来不说怎么做。
Lenny: 对,没错。
Maggie Crowley: 就好比,好,我们来做战略,来创造影响力。然后我刚开始做 PM 的时候,听到这种建议,读到这些东西,我就坐在那里想:太好了,我想创造影响力。然后我看着我的工作想,然后呢?对,影响力。来吧。它在哪?我怎么找到它?谁来帮帮我。
如何锻炼”简化”的肌肉
Lenny: 我太喜欢了。好,我们回到这三个,我想知道你发现什么方法能帮助你在这些方面变得更好,同时也希望你能不能分享一个例子。比如说”简化”——怎么锻炼这块肌肉?
Maggie Crowley: 这个比较难,因为有些人——有一个大致的概括,在你面试 PM 的时候经常会用到——你是简化者还是复杂化者?你是不是把事情搞复杂?所以有些东西确实跟你是谁、你怎么思考有关。但话虽如此,有一个工具是我在用的,实际上是我上学时从我爸爸那里学来的,就是:当你写了一段东西——我们做 PM 的大量工作都是书面形式的——写完之后大声读出来,真的就是把写的东西大声读一遍。一半的情况下你会发现写得太复杂了,说不通。或者另一种情况是,有人来找我,说,好吧,我在做这个东西,你帮我看看,能读一下吗?
我读完之后放下来说,“你想说什么?“99% 的情况下他们会说,“哦,用户在这个问题上很挣扎,我们在研究中发现了这一点,我们认为解决它的方式是做 X。“但文档里写的并不是这个。所以我的反应永远是——如果跟我共事过的人在听这个,他们会笑的——我的反应永远是,“就那样说。就那样写下来。你刚才在对话中对我说的那句话,就是你应该写下来的东西。“你的文档里的文字没有必要非得是某种固定的样式。我们不是在学校里。我们的目标是把事情做成。所以这些都是我用来简化自己工作的简单小技巧。
至于如何把事情提炼到最核心、找到最重要的事情去做——这是简化的另一个层面——我认为最好的办法就是尽可能多地练习,让别人审阅你的工作,然后倾听他们的意见。PM 之中有一种现象:你加入一家公司,然后突然就觉得我的老板不行、最高薪的人的意见怎样怎样、创始人想插手搞乱一切。但这些人对市场有过深刻的洞察,才让这家公司值得创立,他们大概率比你懂得多,所以也许你应该听他们的。所以找到能审阅你工作的人,倾听他们,请他们帮你简化。
写作简化的具体方法
Lenny: 你刚才说的让我想到了几点,因为这是一个很难教的东西,你必须一次又一次地去做。说实话,我有一个经理曾经教我在写作中简化——战略文档、一页纸概要之类的——我觉得这对我后来 newsletter 的成功有很大影响,就是学会尽可能地把东西精简,把所有不必要的东西都去掉。我来快速分享几点。一是我读过一本书叫 On Writing Well,这是对我写作影响最大的书之一。整本书大概有 20 章,每一章讲的都是你应该从写作中删掉更多东西,然后给出各种示例,这里是修改前,这里是修改后。
所有这些词被删掉之后,意思没有任何改变,它们完全是不必要的。所以我觉得这本书会有帮助,部分原因就是它会让你思考什么是没有必要的——你以为所有这些形容词都很重要,其实不然。另一个我觉得很有用的是”三的法则”,就是始终保持在三个以内。当你在列战略重点或优先级之类的东西时,尽量不超过三个。
Maggie Crowley: 对,这其实是一种非常典型的商学院前咨询顾问的视角,我确实也认同并践行这一点,就是永远只有三件事或更少,绝不超过三件。你得凑出一个整齐的几个来,如果有第四个,你就得想办法把它塞到前三里面去,因为四个看起来就是不对。
Lenny: 同意。虽然我自己也犯过超过三个的错误,但会努力避免。
Maggie Crowley: 对,你在 Notion 里列出三个要点,展开后有子要点,但至少顶层是三个。
Lenny: 没错。另一件事是,我认为你需要锻炼一种专注力——人们经常想把一堆想法揉在一起,但每次这样做都会稀释所有内容。所以我认为,选准一件事,选那件影响最大的事,砍掉其他可能有些影响但远没有那么重要的东西,这里面的力量是非常大的。
做出取舍与承担责任
Maggie Crowley: 我觉得,简化和优先级排序——这两个其实是一回事——经常被当作一个你必须掌握的能力来说,但它确实非常有挑战性。找到那一件你真正该做的事极其困难,而有勇气和魄力对所有其他事情说”不”也非常难,因为在任何给定时刻,大概有十件你该做的事,但你不可能做十件事,如果你什么都做,你永远不会成功。所以你必须选一件。
这既关乎如何对自己的决策建立信心,也关乎你是否愿意——也许我应该把这个加到我刚才说优秀 PM 的特质清单里——你是否愿意下注,并为此承担责任。我认为这就是 PM 角色区别于很多其他角色的地方,也是为什么做好这个工作如此有挑战性——因为你必须愿意承担责任,选出要做的事情是你的工作,为这个选择对团队负责也是你的工作,所以你最好选对。
Lenny: “主人翁精神”(ownership)确实是做 PM 非常重要的一部分。又回到我刚才提到的跟那位前亚马逊的人做的访谈,亚马逊有一条领导力原则就是 ownership,就是那种你对正在做的事情有主人翁意识的感觉。
Maggie Crowley: 我同意,但至少对我来说,“ownership”这个词没有”下注”那种”哦该死”的感觉。你下了一个注,意味着你知道你在做的事情有可能行不通,但你仍然得去做,跳下悬崖、冲进滑雪道的那个人还得是你。所以”ownership”对我来说从来没有传达出那种风险感,而我认为这种风险感是做 PM 与生俱来的。
Lenny: 说得对。关于”简化”这个概念,让我想起 Airbnb 的一条核心价值观就是”简化”。它的意思是我们应该始终努力简化。但后来创始人们意识到他们自己其实并不擅长这件事,把它作为一条价值观却做不到是不公平的。所以他们实际上把”简化”从核心价值观中移除了,因为他们的理念是我们不应该有那种理想化的、做不到的价值观,我们应该反映真实的自己。他们实际上砍掉了两条价值观以使价值观更加清晰,尽管他们仍然想要简化,只是觉得我们实际上并不擅长,那为什么要装作擅长呢。
Maggie Crowley: 我觉得也许在纸面上我还算擅长,但有很多次我身处局面并不简单的情境中,你就是得不断为之战斗。
Lenny: 如果有人在想,好吧,我想作为 PM 有所提升,我要开始尝试简化。简化的例子有哪些?是缩短邮件长度?还是聚焦一页纸文档?这些具体都是什么?另外,如果你能想到一个你曾经简化过的具体例子,也请分享一下。
简化的具体建议
Maggie Crowley: 关于要简化什么以及更具体的建议,我会说任何东西都可以被简化和缩短——也许换一种说法是”缩短”。邮件一定要。我有时候读邮件,不太喜欢那些冗长的邮件,把它弄短。我推荐每个人使用 Minto 原则,就是把结论、核心观点放在最前面,然后支撑论据放在后面。
Lenny: 我有一篇 newsletter 文章专门讲的就是这个概念,我会把链接放在节目备注里——
Maggie Crowley: 太好了。
Lenny: 就是 Minto Pyramid 原则。
Maggie Crowley: 对,每个人都应该这么做。很多新 PM 会掉进一个陷阱,觉得应该先铺垫一番。不要这样做。直接告诉我结论是什么,所有人都会感谢你的。诸如此类的做法,以及你刚才说的,把战略文档、结论、下一步行动限制在最多三条。我一般的经验法则是,你写的几乎每一份文档,前两段都可以删掉,你不需要它们。又回到我爸——我小时候写东西的时候,听起来有点残忍,但我保证不是的——我写学校论文的时候,他那会儿我们还不太有电脑什么的,他就直接把第一页拿走,然后说,从这里开始写。他会说,“第一页上写的全是废话,不要用。”
他甚至都不读,这把我气疯了。他就直接说,“哦,垃圾,我不在乎。“所以我会照做,然后就是找其他人——你身边大概有擅长这个的人——找人帮你编辑你的作品,帮你看看。我有一个小的 Slack 工作区,里面有三个人,我和另外两位女性产品负责人,我们经常互相发送自己的作品,然后说,“嘿,这个我有点卡住了,你能读一下吗?帮我简化一下,帮我改改。“我们就是这样互相帮助的。所以找一个不在竞争领域的同行,让对方帮你做这件事。我到现在还在依靠这些人帮忙。
Lenny: 这个太酷了。能多聊聊你说的这个小组吗?
同行互助小组
Maggie Crowley: 我不知道能不能叫一个”小组”,其实就是三个朋友。向 Alexa 和 Daphne 致敬。我们三个人在 Drift 的时候一起工作过,后来一直保持联系。我发现,要持续做好你的工作,你需要能给你反馈的人,而你越资深,这件事就越难。所以身边有能给你另一个视角的人,有在你作为领导者不方便发泄时可以倾诉的人,有能分享他们正在经历的实践经验的人,这真的非常有价值。我们就是有一个专注产品的小群聊。
Lenny: 太酷了。对于想要创建类似小组的人,你有什么建议吗?跟你一起工作过这点重要吗?Slack 是一个好的沟通方式吗?有没有什么小窍门?
Maggie Crowley: Slack 对我们来说刚好是因为白天我们都在上面,随时能访问这一点很重要。你完全可以用 WhatsApp 或者就是一个普通的群短信。也有一些小型社区——我之前在医疗行业工作了一年多,有人组织了一个医疗创业公司产品负责人的 Slack 社区,跟这种模式很类似,非常强大,是一个特别好的空间。所以你得多去发现这些资源在哪里。你和很多优秀的人一起工作过,你身边有会成为朋友的人,留意他们,离开一份工作后也保持联系,因为你永远不知道什么时候他们会变成你的小 Slack 工作区。
跟进结果
Lenny: 哦,我很喜欢这个。好的,很高兴聊到了这个话题。好,回到正题。你说的第二个类别是跟进结果,就是去做这件事。还有什么可以补充的吗?
Maggie Crowley: 我会在日历里设提醒。对,就是去做这件事。但如果你在发布一款产品,通常你上线之后会有那么几周的高峰期,你在找 bug,在拉数据,每个人都还记得这件事。然后我会在那之后两周、一个月之后、六个月之后都设一个提醒,去检查你的数据看板,或者查看指标,或者查看你当时在跟踪的任何东西,这样你就不会忘记,然后分享给可能关心这件事的人。就这么简单。
Lenny: 这件事之所以被你列为优秀 PM 最具一致性的三件事之一,是因为它能帮你的管理者觉得”哇,Maggie 真是什么都搞得定”,还是更多因为你从中学到东西从而产生更大的影响力,还是两者兼有?
Maggie Crowley: 肯定是两者兼有。我不会假装如果你只是默默做好工作就能得到你想要的。如果你只是在后台埋头苦干、做得很好、取得了成果——如果你有一个好管理者,也许你会成功。但优秀的管理者凤毛麟角,而我的信条是,我从来不想依赖别人来得到我想要的东西。所以我总是会确保分享出去,总是确保分享我的进展,因为我不想把这事交给运气,指望别人会注意到。所以我建议为了这两个原因都去做。这也是那种人们想要假装一切都很完美的事情——我们都很好,我们总会得到想要的,总能升职——但你必须为此付出努力。
Lenny: 我很喜欢这个观点。这让我想到,我发现优秀产品经理最重要的特质之一,就是他们会营造出一种”这事交给我了”的气场——他们把事情揽到自己盘子里,就不会让它掉地上,线索不会被遗忘。这件事和这一点是相通的。大家会觉得 Maggie 会告诉我这个实验结果怎样,我作为管理者不需要操心。
Maggie Crowley: 对,这个点说得好。然后你刚才也提到了一个附加好处,就是你能学到更多。你会回过头去了解某件事为什么发生了或者为什么没有发生。你越跟进自己做过的事情,学到的就越多,每次发布产品你就会变得更好。对我来说,关于什么造就了优秀 PM 的另一个答案是——大量发布过产品的人。你发布得越多,学到的就越多。这就是为什么建立专业能力需要很多年,因为你就是要发布大量的东西。
PM 成长需要时间
Lenny: 有很多人总是很焦虑,觉得自己作为 PM 晋升得不够快。他们在阶梯上没有往上走,“天哪,我做了两年 PM 了,还不是高级 PM。“你能多聊聊这个想法吗,就是真正变好到底需要多长时间?我简单分享一下我的经历吧——我花了四年才真正知道自己在做什么,然后事情才开始飞速发展。你的经历呢?
Maggie Crowley: 我觉得差不多,我花了好多年才对自己的工作有信心。我的第一份 PM 工作是在 TripAdvisor 的产品管理轮岗项目,我没有任何 PM 背景,那是商学院毕业之后。两年结束后我心想,嗯,我在两年里在四个不同团队工作过,发布了这么多东西,我准备好了。然后去了一家创业公司,那里还有另一个做产品的人,后来那个人走了,我就成了公司唯一的产品人员。我很快就意识到,我完全不知道自己在做什么。没有人可以学习,我只有两年的经验,我根本没准备好那份工作。我对自己做的决策没有信心。这就是为什么我加入了 Drift——那个团队有非常出色的产品思考者,他们在发布各种各样的东西,势头很好。我就想,好,我要去那里学习。
然后又过了两年。所以是五年时间我才真正觉得自己知道在做什么。这是因为发布产品需要很长的时间。所以对那些想要晋升的人来说,你可以通过跳槽来晋升,你可以通过在不同创业公司之间辗转来晋升。但对我来说,深耕一家公司——我在 Drift 待了将近四年,我看到了同一产品的两三个周期,从中学到的东西比我在其他地方各花一年时间做的那些加起来还多,因为你看到了自己决策的后果,而这很难得。当然人们,包括我自己,当然想升职,当然想往上走。我有野心,很多人都有野心,但不管怎样,花时间是真正有帮助的,我觉得这让我后来能够走得更快,因为我之前花了时间扎扎实实地磨砺过,为后来打下了更好的基础。
Lenny: 所以这是你经常给的建议吗——深入一家公司或一个产品,而不是在不同公司之间跳来跳去,还是说看情况?
Maggie Crowley: 看情况。跳槽有很多很好的理由,我也跳过,很多人也跳过。但我确实很惊讶于留下来深耕那段经历的价值有多大,以及我从中学到了多少,这是我在开始之前没有预料到的,尤其是因为你不常听到这个观点,至少在我思考自己职业发展轨迹的时候不太听到这个角度,但我很高兴我这样做了。当然,大家总是想升职,总是问这个问题,而我的回答永远是——创造影响力,而这需要时间。
Lenny: 我的第一份工作待了九年,然后创了一年半的公司,之后我们卖给了 Airbnb,然后我在 Airbnb 又待了七年。所以我非常认同你说的这条路——倒不是说一开始就计划好的,但我确实是深入做了下来。我觉得各有利弊,但好处真的很多,理由太多了。好,我们来聊聊最后一部分,也就是你提到的第三点——你用的说法是”carry the water”,搬水,对吧?
Maggie Crowley: 对。这一条没有什么技巧和窍门,就是干活。如果你哪天发现自己说出了”那不是我的工作”这种话,那这件事大概率就是你应该去做的。而且说实话,它确实可能不是你的工作,确实可能是别人的工作——你可以一辈子为此窝火,也可以放下情绪,把活干了。那些愿意直接把活干了的人,推进速度会更快,产品会更成功,而且他们心里大概也不会整天揣着那些愤怒和糟糕的情绪。
因为不管好坏,我们之前也提到过,作为 PM——也许这不是我们所有人都希望的状态——但你往往是团队的情绪中心。你的职责是让团队保持动力、保持热情、让大家对项目有信心,你必须维持那种乐观。这很辛苦。保持积极、让大家持续为一件事情兴奋,真的非常辛苦。其中一部分可能就是——你知道吗,我来扛这个。我来接,不管是什么。我来做这件事。我去参加那个销售电话,我来帮客户做实施。你必须不计一切代价地把事情搞定。
Lenny: 这让我想到你之前在播客某一集里分享过的一条经验。是你2021年 PM 经验总结里的一条,说的是”有疑虑的时候,那就是你作为 PM 该做的事”,我觉得跟刚才说的非常相关。你能展开讲讲吗?
Maggie Crowley: 也许把这个放到团队中其他角色的语境里来看会更清楚。作为工程师,你的工作是写代码,把它拆解清楚、构建出来、让它按规格运行。作为设计师,你的工作可能是设计方案、设计用户体验。当然这些角色本身远比这复杂得多——你们的设计很棒、你们的工程很棒,先声明一下,这不是在简化——但作为 PM,你没有那样一个明确的”东西”,对吧?
不是说”哦,我的工作就是写个一页纸文档”。不是这样的。你的工作也不是仅仅选个问题方向。你的工作是交付一个业务结果。所以你天然处于一个必须填补所有空白的岗位上,因为没有其他人有动力去做这些事。作为工程师,你可以完成自己的工作然后交付出去,说”我做完了”。优秀的工程师当然会在意,但你不是必须在意。而作为 PM,如果最终客户或用户的问题没有被解决,你就没有完成你的工作。所以你的职责就是确保围绕那个产品的一切都能落地。
Lenny: 这让我想到你做过的另一次访谈,你谈到 PM 的工作中有很多内容其实很糟糕。它没有人们想象的那么光鲜,大部分工作都是那些非常无聊、令人厌烦的事情。对此你还有什么想补充的吗?很多人想进入 PM 这个领域,觉得”我要主导一切,太棒了,我要当产品经理,告诉大家该做什么”。但实际情况并不是这样。
Maggie Crowley: 这确实是很多人的一种幻想。当我进入产品领域的时候,PM 这个角色才刚刚开始变成一个很酷的工作。我在商学院的时候,它还不是校园里最热门的工作——那时候更热门的是私募股权、风险投资。现在 PM 确实有了一种光环。但话说回来,又回到之前说的那个点——你确实能做一些很酷的事情。你能决定什么东西被做出来,这确实很酷。你有很大的主人翁精神(ownership),就像我们之前聊过的。你可以把它理解为你拥有很大的权力,但与此同时你也承担着责任。
伴随这种权力而来的,是你必须做对、押对注、做出正确的产品、把它们交付出去的责任。所以有大量琐碎的、不那么体面的工作等着你。比如说项目管理,人人都讨厌它。QA 也是个很好的例子。你应该去测试你的产品。当然如果你有 QA 团队那很好,但你也应该去测试。你应该知道产品是怎么运作的。你应该去做客户实施,你应该能卖你的产品,你应该能找到用户。所有这些都是你应该能做的事,没有任何一件是”不配你做”的。
如何进入产品管理领域
Lenny: 如果有听众现在还不是 PM,而且听完这些也没有被劝退,他们仍然想成为 PM,关于如何真正进入产品管理这个领域,你最好的建议是什么?
Maggie Crowley: 这个问题我想了很多,也去咨询了 Slack 工作区的团队。因为距离我当初进入产品领域已经很久了。我不太清楚现在的情况,因为现在确实很难,我也不知道形势是不是变了。我当时是通过商学院进去的——有一个项目专门招收 MBA 学生。我知道现在有一些大科技公司的入门级项目,如果你能拿到的话很好,但它们非常难进,因为名额很少。所以我见过的最常见的两条路径是:一是在公司内部横向转岗。这也有挑战,但是可以做到。二是加入创业公司。我之前在上一家创业公司的时候,确实招了一个商学院毕业、之前没有产品经验的人来做 PM。我不能说我以后不会再做这样的事,因为那次经历非常好,她也非常优秀——但这背后需要付出大量的工作。
人们之所以不太愿意这么做,是因为作为管理者,带一个没有产品经验的人需要投入大量的精力,因为这些新人需要学的东西太多了。我们当时的做法是,她和我一起在一个 WeWork 里面对面坐了四个月,帮她快速上手这个角色。那段经历非常有成就感,我享受每一秒钟,我真希望能一次又一次地重复这种经历。但为了争取到这个机会,她基本上就是不断来找我。Christina,如果你在听的话,你给我发了好多邮件,我们聊了很多,一直等到时机成熟,你终于说服了我。所以我不知道。我不确定是否有一条可靠的路径可以让我说”这就是我的建议”,除了——试试创业公司、多社交、看看能找到什么机会。
Lenny: 你在其他地方也提到过一点,我觉得这是另一个关键——一旦你的简历上有了一个 PM 头衔,一切都会变得容易很多。作为招聘经理,我看到一份简历,“哦,这个人从来没做过 PM”,那就不会考虑。很少有人愿意招一个从来没当过 PM 的人。
Maggie Crowley: 是的。我经常跟产品领域的人,或者想进入产品领域的人聊天,这也毫不意外。这也是我一直跟他们说的话之一,因为如果他们在几个职位之间做选择,有机会拿到某个机会,我的建议始终是:如果有人愿意给你盖上产品经理的印章,就接受它。因为正如你所说,这是我们筛选的标准。不管好坏,现实就是——你必须先拿到第一份工作。一旦拿到第一份工作,后面就容易多了。你进了门,然后就可以谈论自己的经验了,因为我的第二个问题是:你交付过什么?所以就是,你当过 PM 吗?你交付过什么?很有意思的是,很多人回答不上来这个问题。而那些能回答上来的人,总是领先好几步。
产品战略的写作方法
Lenny: 我们换个话题,聊聊产品战略。很多人被告知你需要提升产品战略能力,你的战略不够好。很多人也只是在困惑,到底什么是战略?怎么提升战略能力?怎么描述一个战略?而你对如何思考这些东西有一个非常好的解释和概述。所以我很想听听你的看法——你实际上是怎么把一个战略写出来、描述清楚的?
Maggie Crowley: 好的。还有一件事经常发生,我先概述一下框架,但还有一点我经常听到,尤其是随着你职业发展越来越深入——而且不幸的是,如果你在科技行业是代表性不足的群体——你会被告知需要”更有战略思维”。这个反馈几乎总会出现,特别是如果你是科技行业产品领域的女性,正在叩响领导岗位的大门,你很可能收到过这个反馈。所以我给自己定了一个任务,弄清楚这个东西到底是什么?我该怎么做?我怎么能用一种可展示的方式去做,这样就再也不会收到”她缺乏战略思维”这样的反馈。
我的做法是这样的——当时我在后台做了一件类似的事情,因为我合作的一位工程师真的很想理解我们为什么在做我们正在做的事,他对表面的回答不满意。他一直在追问、追问、追问。所以我就在一个 Google Doc 里写了下来,一开始就是,不搞花哨的,就是项目符号:使命是什么?公司的目标是什么?我们的目标有哪些?也许我们有一些正在推进的工作的高层框架。然后我加了一个很大的板块,就是”格局”。在这个板块里我放进了:我们的业务现状如何?我们的产品在发生什么?我们对市场的判断是什么?竞争对手是谁?一个 SWOT 分析、我们可能面临的关键风险。把这些全部倒在纸上。然后是当前季度的业务目标,或者不管你们怎么做规划的,公司当前在推进的事情是什么?然后我写进去:好了,以上就是我们运作的背景。
接下来我想搞清楚我们处于什么位置。所以要对你的产品现状、整体业务,以及你具体负责的领域做一个诚实的盘点。哪些有效?哪些无效?你的客户在说什么?自下而上的反馈——用户、客户、团队,你的支持工单有哪些?把这些全部写在纸上。然后非常重要的是,你的技术障碍在哪里?大的技术债务有哪些?你的工程和技术团队一直在唠叨想要投资的是什么?有没有一些即将到来的大事情需要你考虑?把所有东西都写到纸上。然后通常在写下这些的过程中,你会开始看到,好的,我大概知道我们在哪了。我大概知道挑战是什么了。然后你写一个板块——机会在哪里?
从所有这些当中,什么会浮上来成为你团队排在前一两位的机会?你想在哪个领域发力?你能在哪里赢?基于你独特的竞争优势,你认为你们应该在哪里、为什么?然后基于这个机会,挑战是什么?抓住这个机会最难的部分是什么?换一种说法——关于这个世界,必须有什么条件成立,这件事才能行得通?这个框架很有帮助。然后你会怎么做?试着把你的解决方案写下来,你需要构建什么,它可能怎么运作?你有什么想法——我建议这里写三个要点,可能是你想做的事情,然后是一个计划。如果没有任何人有不同意见,你会怎么做?你会怎么排序?你会做什么?你怎么让团队开始做这件事?你的团队需要长什么样?做这件事要花多少钱?你可以开始把所有这类信息一层一层加上去。然后我就把这个文档分享出去。分享给所有人。不应该有任何秘密。你应该能够从公司的使命一路走到你团队的具体优先事项,看到其中的逻辑链条,以及你是怎么推导到那里的。如果任何人不同意,他们可以指出在哪个环节、哪个节点上他们的分歧落在哪个位置。但至少你把所有东西都写在了纸上,你理解了自己是怎么得出这个方向的,然后你可以就不同的部分、数据点和反馈展开争论——但至少人们理解你是怎么走到那一步的。争论就不再是你不同意你这个人,而是我不同意这个具体的点。
Lenny: 这种做法真的很棒。顺便问一下,有没有一个模板可以推荐给大家,就是把这套东西——
Maggie Crowley: 没有,我只在一个随意的 Google Doc 里做过,然后它就会不断扩展和变化。我可以试着把那些要点写出来,但就是——我就是建标题,然后往里面填内容。
Lenny: 这就够了,人们需要的就这些。如果你在这期节目发布之前做出来了,我们就放到 show notes 里。如果没有,大家可以直接去 Twitter 上找你——问 Maggie,你说的那个模板在哪呢?
Maggie Crowley: 好的,我很乐意写在一张纸上拍张照片发给大家。
Lenny: 这就行了。拍得模糊一点,充满颗粒感,一件文物。“我们找到了 Maggie 的模板”。这太棒了。我之前从来没听过有人把格局分析做到这么深的版本,我觉得这非常聪明,因为很多冲突和分歧其实来源于——你们掌握的信息不一样,或者经理、高管什么的认为你没有掌握那些信息。所以如果你直接展示——这是我所知道的一切、这是正在发生的事,如果你不同意这个目标,告诉我,那我们就会调整计划。
Maggie Crowley: 对。
Lenny: 是的。
策略文档的适用范围
Maggie Crowley: 部分原因也在于,通常来说,当你做策略的时候,你是在一个更高的层面在做这件事。所以我不认为每个产品都需要一个策略。每个功能不需要策略,比如你不需要做这件事——如果你只是在做一个产品的小切片,有用户反馈,就别搞复杂了,做那些合理的事就好。但特别是随着我职业生涯越来越资深,问题越来越大,影响范围越来越广,时间线也越来越长。坦白说,也是因为我想把它做对。我不想在某个东西上下注,投入大量资源去解决一个问题,结果搞错了。所以这也是我想为自己做的功课,确保自己在做正确的事。不知道为什么,我总是偏执地觉得别人掌握的信息比我多,或者做得比我好。
所以我就会想,好吧,我得把所有东西都写下来,确保自己做对了,然后分享给所有人,确保他们同意我的判断,这样我就不会把事情搞砸。事实证明这个练习非常有用,所以我就一直坚持在做。当然,人们不会通读全文,他们只看其中一小部分。你会遇到和其他文档一样的问题——但至少我知道我已经做了该做的工作,如果有人愿意认真看看,内容就在那里。
Lenny: 顺着这个思路,我本来想问的是,你觉得这个文档应该多长?比如说按时间维度来看,你在做一个季度策略还是年度策略,大概应该是多少页?有什么参考标准吗?
Maggie Crowley: 很长。真的会变得很长。
Lenny: 多长算长?
Maggie Crowley: 实际内容部分,我最终会写一个摘要——回到 Minto 金字塔原则,我先把整篇东西写完,然后在最上面放一个摘要,这样在”首屏”位置,你就能抓住要点和我认为我们应该做的建议,策略建议在那个部分应该是可以调整的。但它可能会写到二十页,因为如果你想深入分析某个竞争对手,或者市场动态很有意思,或者正在发生一些有趣的技术变化——有时候我会截取其他公司营销网站的截图扔进去,里面可能有一些有意思的评论。所以不一定全是文字,可以是你想放进去的各种不同的东西。
Lenny: 而且你也说过,你并不是指望人们把整篇都读完。有摘要给出结论,理论上如果他们想深挖可以去看。但我好奇的是,你怎么把握这个平衡——写所有内容,写到没人会去读的长度,和真正做到对别人有用,再加上一份摘要?
策略文档到底写给谁
Maggie Crowley: 这要回到我一开始写这份文档的原因——是为了我自己。这是我为有效完成工作而做的功课。我只是确保把它分享出去。我发现,特别是我的工程和设计搭档——如果你在一个真正的铁三角协作中——他们几乎总是会非常深入地参与这份文档,因为他们基本上也身在其中,他们想确保在让团队签约承担某项工作时,他们真正相信你在做的事情。
所以我发现这些人会相当深入地参与。有时候团队里更初级的人也会出于兴趣读得很投入。然后还有一些人会扫一眼前面的部分,要么说”看起来不错”,要么说”你太蠢了,我讨厌这个”。好吧,没问题。总会有这样的人。所以人们是否通读全文对我来说从来不是最重要的事。更重要的是我知道自己必须做这件事才能对自己的决策有信心,然后我可以引导一场讨论,所以读不读全篇真的没那么要紧。
(Eppo 广告段落已跳过)
具体的策略案例
Lenny: 你有没有一个最近想到的或者过去做过的策略案例,可以给大家一些具体的感受,比如 Maggie 会把什么样的问题视为需要围绕它来制定策略的?
Maggie Crowley: 有,我觉得——很明显,产品内容的难点就在这里,因为我确实不能谈论目前正在做的东西。
Lenny: 直接告诉我们所有秘密就行了。
Maggie Crowley: Toast 的公关部门会非常不高兴的。比如这样的问题——如果你是某个地方的产品总监,可能你在负责一个业务板块,到了年度规划的时候。现在是 Q4,明年你要做什么?你怎么回答这个问题?你怎么为自己的选择提供依据?你就会用这样一份文档。或者你意识到你正在做的产品其实没什么意义,没有真正产生影响力,你有点在原地踏步。我会用这个工具来弄清楚——好吧,那你还能做什么?所以,季度规划、年度规划,如果你觉得团队需要转型,或者你认为有一个很有趣的新机会是你们业务或团队应该去追求的,这些时候我都可能会用类似的东西。
Lenny: 太棒了。这让我想起——我一直在提和 Bill Carr 的那次聊天,他是亚马逊早期的高管,亚马逊的叙事方法其中一个好处、也是他们之所以采用这种方式的部分原因,就是让你自己在任何人给你反馈之前就意识到——这是个坏主意。这就是为什么他们逼你写六页深入的文档来阐述你的想法,然后它在公司内部一层一层地传阅。想法就是这样——好吧,这行不通,这不是一个好主意,理由如下。我觉得这里有很多相似之处。
战略与路线图的鸿沟
Maggie Crowley: 是的,有很多时候,如果你把这份文档和流程与简化这一点结合起来,在整个过程中你会开始砍掉很多东西。因为接下来会发生的是——假设你做完了这个练习,你觉得自己已经很清楚想做的三件事是什么了。然后有那么一个时刻,你拿战略去看你的路线图,它们从来对不上。路线图里塞满了各种乱七八糟的东西——哦,我们必须做这个,因为那个原因;我们必须做那个,因为这个原因。这个项目我们还在做,已经延期六个月了,所以我们还是要继续。然后突然之间,你 90% 的资源都投入到了与战略毫无关系的事情上。作为领导者,这是一个非常值得深思的时刻——你坐在那里想,我们该怎么办?当你遇到这个问题时该怎么办?尤其是如果你是 PM,你可能没有权力说”废弃整个路线图,去做我的新战略”。但至少它让你能够批判性地思考自己是否应该做正在做的事,让你能够评估那些事情是否仍然是最重要的。
Lenny: 我快速总结一下这个模板,然后我还有一个相关的问题。如果你想自己做一个模板,先从业务使命开始,然后我想你也会写上团队的使命,因为如果是产品团队的战略,通常会更具体一些。然后是外部环境的分析——竞争格局、竞争对手的 SWOT 分析、风险、产品现状、业务现状等等。接着分享你作为团队或业务当前要达成的目标,还要坦诚地说明产品和技术的现状、技术障碍等可能阻碍你实现这些目标的问题。然后是你看到的机会、我们如何取胜、如何真正把握这个机会、我们可以在哪些方向下注。之后是这样做会面临的挑战、要让这件事成为可能需要满足什么条件。最后才是”我认为我们应该做什么”,也就是方案,最好是三个要点,然后是执行计划。我想计划大概是:第一步,获得高管批准;第二步,为团队配备资源;第三步,启动设计研究冲刺。
Maggie Crowley: 差不多就是这样。
Lenny: 太好了。好,太棒了。如果你没做的话,肯定会有人做出这个模板的。
Maggie Crowley: 是的,希望有人会做。
Lenny: 那就太好了。如果有人做了,我会在推特上转发,也会放在节目备注里。
Maggie Crowley: 好。
Lenny: 这期播客已经承诺了不少东西了。
一页纸模板
接下来同样的话题,你还有一个一页纸(one-pager)模板和流程,我觉得大家会觉得非常有用。我们来聊聊那个,然后我就要转到一个完全不同的方向了。
Maggie Crowley: 好的。关于这个,我觉得很多人已经说过很多次了,不一定有太多新东西可以补充。但不管是规格文档(spec)、PRD、还是一页纸,不管人们怎么叫它——它是你作为产品团队用来定义要做的事情的文档。这里的产品团队包括产品、设计、工程,你们的小分队。我觉得这个流程真正有用的一点是,它是 PM 的产出物。设计师产出设计,工程师写代码。PM 做什么?很多人可能会说什么都不做。理论上,我们至少会写这份文档,而且写起来可能会很痛苦。我见过很多写得很糟糕的情况,但我觉得写得好的时候、真正有效的时候,它是一个让 PM 从”为什么”出发的工具。如果你结构安排得当,我认为文档中最重要的部分是第一节——背景和上下文。问题是什么,为什么它重要,为什么是现在?如果你把这些问题想清楚了,后面的部分就会变得容易很多。但它也给了你作为 PM 一个机会,让团队围绕问题、围绕这个问题的根源——是你们自己的产品造成的,还是用户正在经历的——以及为什么这个问题值得解决,来对齐共识。我觉得人们有时候会忘记思考这个部分,也会忘记思考为什么我们现在要解决它而不是所有其他可以解决的问题。然后这份文档就可以成为后续决策的大本营。所以我觉得最好的做法是包含这些部分,同时最好也记录下来——在这天,我们做了这个决定;我们决定不做这个;我们决定只解决问题的一部分,而不是另一部分。保持一份持续更新的清单,附上各种产出物、研究等的链接,对团队很有帮助。
Lenny: 总结一下,各部分的标题是什么?如果有人在记笔记,想自己创建模板的话。
Maggie Crowley: 我觉得这些模板不需要太复杂。就是背景和上下文、问题。我会直接写”为什么这个问题重要”和”为什么这个问题现在重要”。别搞复杂了,回答这些问题就好。如果你能做到,然后——它只有在以下情况下才真正有用——你在继续推进之前把这份文档带到团队面前,用它来进行讨论,让你身边聪明的人来挑毛病。我之前提到战略的时候应该也说一下这个。我第一个找的人通常是我的工程搭档,我会说,撕碎它,从头到尾看一遍,把它拆了,在上面喷满批注,把它推翻,告诉我怎么改得更好。作为 PM,你不能对自己的作品太敏感。你需要别人来挑毛病。
“为什么是现在”
Lenny: “为什么这个问题现在重要”这一点非常有趣。我不经常听到这个,我认为它是规格文档、计划和策略中非常重要的一部分,因为你能做的事情太多了,而有些事情是有时效性的,只能现在做。如果现在不做,就错过了机会。我觉得这是一个大多数人都不会包含的要素。这让我想起——我想我已经做了足够多的播客节目,现在别人说话的时候我就能把各种东西串联起来了。就像 Karri,Linear 的创始人,谈到过一个作为创始人的”支线任务”(side quests)概念。他非常擅长保持专注,我就问他”你怎么在那么多人找你的情况下还能保持专注、把事情做完?“他说的就是——“有主线任务,也有支线任务。支线任务不需要现在做。主线任务是建立一家真正成功的企业。“我觉得这就是这个思路在实际中的一个很好的例子。
Maggie Crowley: 是的,我也很喜欢他对品质和品味的看法。
Lenny: 是啊,真是难得。
Maggie Crowley: 是的,非常欣赏。但确实,保持纪律性很难,保持专注也很难,而且正如你所说,任何时候你都有一百万件事可以做,尤其是在大公司。所以”为什么是现在”是一个必须回答的重要问题,因为如果不回答,别人也会问你。所以你最好自己先想清楚。
“为什么是现在”的反思与逆向观点环节
Lenny: 有意思的是,“为什么是现在”这个问题在投资创业公司时经常出现,但在产品构建中却很少被提及,尽管感觉上它应该被重视。不过我也要说,在我做过的研究中,“为什么是现在”对于创业公司是否成功并没有那么重要。所以我觉得这是一枚硬币的两面。不管怎样,我打算换一个话题,这可能成为我们做的一个新环节,我打算叫它”逆向观点角”。在录制这期节目之前,我问你有没有什么逆向观点,你给出了几个非常好的。所以我有几个话题想聊聊,看看这个会不会成为我们持续做的环节。你在笑、在点头,你在想什么?
Maggie Crowley: 我在想以前我做一个播客的时候,你围绕一个话题录完节目,点击结束录制按钮后,每位嘉宾都会说,“我刚才完全不知道自己在做什么,全都是即兴发挥的,那是瀑布式开发,那些都不重要,我不知道自己在……”人们会说最离谱的话,而我作为 PM 坐在那里心想,什么?我们刚刚讨论了那个框架,我们刚刚讨论了那套方法,那才是你应该做的。然后他们下了正式录音环节就直说,是啊,太疯狂了。没有什么是按你想要的方式进行的,我们大家基本上都是边走边编。所以我希望你在这个环节能听到更多这样的观点。
产品失败案例:重写项目的教训
Lenny: 我对这一点现在非常敏感,因为最近有人发推说,他们发现我很多 newsletter 里关于各公司如何撰写产品文档的文章,展示的都是理想化的版本,很少分享”这是我们遇到的所有困难”。我觉得这有道理,但我也在这个播客里讲过很多失败案例。实际上我觉得播客更多地是在讲”这是出问题的事情”,而 newsletter 不是。所以我就想,糟糕,我需要多讲一些。所以我很高兴你提到这一点,看看我们能聊出什么来。不过在我们进入正题之前,你有没有某个事情没有按照计划进行的例子,某种失败或者失误?
Maggie Crowley: 我可能是在提前剧透,但我在每场产品面试中都会问的一个问题是:你发布过的最差的产品是什么?这是因为我认为,如果你没有发布过非常糟糕的东西,你就不是一个好的 PM——你只是还没有足够的练习次数,做得还不够多。不仅是你做过,而且你能承认它,能指出是哪一个,这一点非常重要。我记得,那件事真的很蠢,我到现在还很生气我们做了那个决定。我不会说是哪个团队、哪个公司,我不会点名,但我们决定要对一个现有产品进行重写——危险信号一号。是一位我和他合作过很多次的工程师,我们关系非常好,这个人说,“没问题,六个月就能搞定。”
那是产品的核心部分,已经存在很久了。那种代码至今还是创始人写的那套代码。结果没有花六个月,而是花了两年半,还是没完成。几乎就没成功过,持续的时间远远超出了应有的范围。我们花了很长时间才实现功能对等(feature parity)。那是最糟糕的项目。那么多人进进出出,每个人都觉得这个项目很蠢,沉没成本谬误,简直是灾难。原因在于,第一,我们傲慢自大,以为自己能做到。第二,我们跳过了探索阶段,没有真正写一页纸文档(one-pager),直接就开干了。我们没有做足够的技术和设计研究来搞清楚实际需求到底是什么。结果就是这样。
Lenny: 所以最后是没有成功,还是取得了巨大成功、改变了公司的发展方向?
Maggie Crowley: 完全没有。但你知道吗,我没被开除,所以没事。
Lenny: 我感觉自己也经历过类似的情况,然后三四年之后,又有人说,也许这次重写和重新设计能行,因为我们已经很久没有更新这个东西了。
Maggie Crowley: 别做。别重写。如果有人告诉你去做重写,别做。并行的重写,不行。
Lenny: 是的,我遇到的问题是,一旦你在重写/重新设计这条路上走得太远,每个人都在新世界里构建东西,然后你上线实验结果是负面的,就变成了,“哦,我们只能硬上了。我们以后再想办法回到基准线。”
Maggie Crowley: 是的。别那么做。
Lenny: 美好的回忆。好吧,也许我们可以开一个”失败角”,可以作为一个新环节。我们可以搞个音效和主题音乐。不过这次我们做的是”逆向观点角”,你对几个话题有一些逆向看法。第一个是关于产品管理的。关于产品管理,你有什么看法是其他人可能不太认同的?
逆向观点:警惕”数据驱动”的误区
Maggie Crowley: 我在这方面的观点是,那些对”数据驱动”特别兴奋的人,对我来说往往是一个产品思维的警示信号,尤其是如果是一位高管在说”我们所有的决策都是通过仪表盘做的”这种话。这在我看来意味着团队过度强调定量数据而忽视了定性数据,他们没有运用好的判断力。他们可能没有做很多直接的用户研究,并没有真正理解使用产品的人——他们是谁、他们需要什么、他们在乎什么——而是在通过仪表盘来管理。也许如果他们真的非常擅长挑选指标,那也没问题。很多时候可能确实没问题。也许你的业务量很大,做实验非常容易,这对你有效。但对于大多数 PM、大多数工作、大多数产品来说,去跟 10 个用户聊聊,你会获得更多、更好的关于事情为什么发生的洞察,比任何仪表盘给你的都多。
Lenny: 所以核心要点就是,当有人说自己是”超级数据驱动”的时候要小心。我们的团队超级数据驱动,或者公司超级数据驱动。
Maggie Crowley: 对,也许确实如此,那很好。我不是说不需要数据。你绝对需要给产品埋点,了解它在规模化运行时是否正常,但你不能忘记的是,你需要知道”为什么”。数据不会告诉你任何事情发生的原因。如果你不理解事情为什么发生,我不认为你能得出关于下一步该做什么的好洞察。举个简短的例子。我记得在我职业生涯非常早期的时候,Adam Medros,他是 TripAdvisor 的一位 VP,我们在一个房间里,有一个叫”产品评审”的会议,我刚加入时觉得那个会议特别棒。当时有人在为一个项目找依据,他就——我希望他不介意我说这件事,因为这是我对那个时刻的记忆——他就说:“这明显是更好的方案。直接做。停下。别再做你现在做的这些事了。别搞这些数据了,不管你在做什么,如果它明显更好,如果逻辑上它更好,用你的好判断力去做那件事,我们继续往前走。“我一直记得这件事——你其实可以直接去做那个明显更好的方案。
Lenny: 对,我喜欢偶尔也打这张牌。我觉得你有时候就得这么做——好吧各位,这个方案明显是个好主意,直接做吧。别再研究了。
产品内容的价值与陷阱
Maggie Crowley: 说真的,如果你要做出好的内容,你就必须把你正在做的事情提炼和框架化。然后慢慢地,我觉得对于很多阅读和观看这些内容的人来说,他们的思维会变成:“看我把这个框架执行得多好。看我把这个东西实现得多好。“他们渐渐偏离了核心目标——创造影响力。所以所有这些内容制造了很多噪音,然后让人们以为,哦,只要我做了这些事情,我就能得到我想要的。然后我就把清单上的事项打勾,打完勾了,那我到年底就应该得到晋升。但事实上,最好的 PM 积累了非常多的框架,他们能在不同场景下灵活运用。然后有时候他们会把这些框架全部扔掉,说:“我工具箱里的任何东西对当前这个情况都不适用,但我知道该做什么,因为我有直觉,我有数据,我跟用户聊过,等等。”
所以内容有时候反而会妨碍你创造影响力,因为你试图去套用它们,你把重点放在了框架上,放在了一页纸文档(one-pager)上,或者其他你正在做的输出物上——而那并不是重点。然后如果你是一位领导者,也许你还有幸或不幸地发表过一些内容,有人会跑来找你说:“你在那个播客里说过你不相信路线图,那你为什么还要找我要路线图?“然后你就坐在那里想说:“嗯,实际情况比那复杂一点。那是我当时一个有趣的观点,但我确实需要了解我们接下来要做什么,因为需要做规划,我需要弄清楚预算是多少,“等等。
Lenny: 这太好笑了,我没想到你作为领导者,发表的东西会被别人拿回来质问你。我觉得你提到的第一点,对于消费线上产品管理内容的人来说,确实需要把东西高度提炼才能呈现。而正如你所说,这往往会丢失其中的细微之处。因为如果你把所有的前提条件都写出来,没人会去读——太复杂、太长了。另外还有一点,内容还得有趣才行。所以如果又是一篇”如何成功地做路线图”的文章,跟大家已经做过的东西一样,没人会读。所以你总得提出一个新观点。而随之而来的问题是,这个观点并不总是正确的。我只是想让大家对这个想法产生反应。
Maggie Crowley: 对,我觉得它还是有帮助的。有些人创作的内容……我上一份工作时,我们团队每个人都有你的 newsletter,也都听这个节目,然后大家会把内容带进工作中。我本来应该找到一个片段的,但我记不太清了——有几个时刻我们会听其中一段,或者找到一篇文章,然后说”这个可能有帮助”,或者”如果我们这样做会怎么样”。我记得有一期 newsletter 文章是关于 Figma 的,他们有一些模板,比如 FigJam 的产品评审模板。那个我特别喜欢,一直在用。
Lenny: 太棒了。
Maggie Crowley: 所以这些东西确实很有用。关键是你得聪明地判断什么时候该套用它们。然后如果你是领导者,市面上有这么多内容可用,你得清楚自己为什么不按那些规则来。
Lenny: 如果有人只是说”嘿,你看这篇 newsletter 文章,Lenny 写的,我们应该这样做”——而不是……我觉得人们会默认这些就是唯一的做法,或者天然地适用于你的公司。我很喜欢你说的这一点,这可能跟我做的事情恰好相反,但我觉得这是一个很重要的细微之处,我应该加到每一篇 newsletter 里:这不一定适用于你的公司。有时候文化不同,这套东西可能不匹配,或者这不是一个完整的版本。尽管我尽量给读者提供”做好这件事所需的一切”,但总会缺一点点东西。
Maggie Crowley: 而且我觉得如果你没有这个背景认知,可能会有点沮丧——觉得”我怎么可能做到那家神奇公司能做到的事情?“但换个角度,如果你把它看作是”这里有一堆工具可以加到你的工具箱里,当你遇到合适的场景时就拿出来用”——这是我看待它的方式。而不是说这就是唯一的方法,像你说的,写一页纸文档(one-pager)的唯一方式,或者做实验的唯一方式。它更像是你可以有很多种不同的做法。
Lenny: 我发现我其实很少告诉别人”这就是该怎么做”。通常我尝试描述的是”最好的公司是怎么做的”,尽可能详细地呈现,然后让读者自己判断——这对我来说是否适用,我是否应该尝试落地。但即便如此,我觉得仍然隐含着一种暗示:这就是做研究的方式,这就是做路线图的方式,这就是做优先级排序的方式。但我觉得很有意思的是,你自己也创作了大量内容,而且你确实从中发现了很大的价值——我们姑且不叫你”内容创作者”,因为我自己也不喜欢被贴上这个标签。
Maggie Crowley: 有人曾经叫我”产品网红”,我当场就死了那么一下。
Lenny: 我完全懂那种感觉。我很想听听你花时间做播客、写博客文章、发推特分享这些好内容之后看到了什么影响,因为很多人正在考虑是否要投入做这些事情。
创作内容对职业发展的影响
Maggie Crowley: 对,这可能是我职业生涯中做过的最好的一件事。我非常感谢当初有那些想法的人,那些支持我的人,尤其是在 Drift 的时候,当时这成为了我们在那个阶段所做事情的一部分。它带来了帮助有几个原因。首先是人脉和接触机会。如果我没有做过这些内容,如果一个朋友的朋友没有读到那篇文章——我今天可能不会在这里。它创造了非常多的连接。所以接触到更多的人、建立人脉网络,是最早的好处之一。
另外,打造个人品牌也非常有帮助,如果你想要……我一直想在职业生涯中实现的一件事就是确保自己始终有就业能力。我只是不想……我是 08 年毕业的,不想暴露年龄,但那确实是个艰难的时期。所以我心里一直有个念头,你得能维持一份扎实的职业生涯。所以我觉得投资个人品牌会帮助我获得更多的工作机会。它在招聘时也很有帮助,当我需要招人的时候。因为我现在很大一部分工作就是招揽人才,而且我一直公开表达我的工作方式和我是谁,很多人会主动给我发消息说”我想跟你一起工作”,或者”我想在那样一个团队工作”。
这意义很大,因为如果我的工作是招聘人才,那就太好了,人们不需要跟我通电话就能了解我是谁。除了这些之外,我最喜欢的好处是,它让我从自己做过的工作中学到的东西比原本能学到的更多。因为要做内容,你就必须梳理自己做了什么,必须总结它、消化它、把它变得有趣。特别是如果是在播客节目里,还要跟别人讨论这些内容。这个过程意味着你会持续关注自己在过程中学到了什么。而我们往往不会这样做,因为我们忙于工作,有自己的生活,各种事情纷至沓来。我觉得正是这一点让我更快地成为了一个更好的产品人——因为我花时间去思考自己在做什么,而如果不是必须要写点什么的话,我是不会这样做的。
Lenny: 你的内容中有一种特质,你不知怎么地想明白了如何避免令人尴尬,也避免了那种对粉丝的饥渴感。我觉得很多人一听到打造个人品牌就觉得,我不想……
Maggie Crowley: 我知道,光是说这几个字我就浑身不舒服,太恶心了。
Lenny: 我从来没有那样想过,也不想那样想。我很好奇你会给想走这条路的人什么建议,一方面是如何避免觉得自己在做令人尴尬的事,另一方面是避免做出那种让人看了直摇头的内容。
Maggie Crowley: 对,那种标题党推文串的情况。我觉得第一步——一定会尴尬。你最初的那十篇、二十篇,不管多少篇,都会很差。我猜如果你回头去听你的第一期节目,你也会尴尬得不行,就因为从那以后你学到了太多了,对吧?
Lenny: 是的。
Maggie Crowley: 这很自然。
Lenny: 不过说来也巧,有史以来第一期节目反而是最受欢迎的一期。所以,你懂的,我也能理解为什么它那么受欢迎。
Maggie Crowley: 所以你第一期就一炮而红了。
Lenny: 没错,没错。
Maggie Crowley: 所以,第一步,先接受它一定会尴尬这个事实。它就是会尴尬的。跟任何事情一样,你必须先开始,尴尬最终会消退,你也不用再去想它了。第二点,这个建议说起来很俗,但你必须真实。它必须是真诚的。我觉得我做的节目之所以能打动人,是因为那些都是我真实面对的问题,是我真正在工作中处理的。
我们开玩笑说关掉录音之后才能听到真正的故事,但我会关掉录音之后说,好吧,我们刚聊了这个,这是我工作中今天实际发生的事情,你会怎么做?所以那些都是我真实的问题,是我真正在推进的流程,是我在那个时刻真正需要的建议。我觉得这就是它有价值的原因——因为我当时就是一名在职 PM,而我现在也仍然在从事产品工作,这一直是我想要的,因为这意味着内容对我来说必须是切题的,而不只是为了点赞和转发。
Lenny: 我觉得你刚才说的有两个非常重要的点,特别打动我。一个是,如果你实际上没有相关的背景和经验,只是装腔作势,你的内容就会很差。就像你在扮演一个了解某个领域的人,但其实你并不了解。所以我觉得这一点极其重要——如果你自己没做过那件事,就不要试图成为什么在线创作者。因为人们会看出来你并不真正懂你在说什么,而且你会江郎才尽,就像,好吧,我做了两个月,已经没什么可说的了。
Maggie Crowley: 对。
关于分享内容的初心
Lenny: 另一个点是,有一位嘉宾分享过一句爱因斯坦的话,一直让我记忆犹新,大意是:“不要追求成功,而要追求有价值。“我觉得这是分享内容的一个很好的框架——就分享那些你觉得有趣、有用的东西,出发点是”这东西有用”,而不是”我要涨粉”。因为人们看得出来你是不是——
Maggie Crowley: 对,人们绝对看得出来。另外还有一个因素,就是这里面混合了一点那种”太酷了不屑于此”的态度。肯定会有人告诉你你的内容很尴尬,或者拿你开玩笑,什么的,因为他们就是想这么做。我甚至不想去分析这背后的心理,但人们就是会这样做。而我一直以来的态度是,那些真正有趣的人,是那些毫不掩饰自己对事物充满热情的人,那些会说”对,我就是对这个东西很着迷,我之所以分享是因为我真的感兴趣”的人。不管好坏,我热爱做产品,我热爱这份工作。
即便所有那些繁杂琐碎的事情也不影响——这份工作超级有趣。你会遇到很酷的人,你能把东西做出来,你能看到人们在使用它们、解决问题。这是一份非常酷的工作,我一直对如何把它做得更好充满兴趣,有些人可能觉得这很尴尬,但我不在乎——这就是我整天在做的事情,所以我想把它做得更好。
Lenny: 我觉得这是很大的一部分。我刚才甚至没提到这一点。就是它需要让你感觉非常真实,对你来说显然就是——就是有些东西我想分享,因为我觉得它真的很有趣。
Maggie Crowley: 对。
Lenny: 我最初开始写作的原因恰好就是你刚才说的那两个。一个是我想要学某个东西,而写作帮助我理清思路。第二个就是我觉得它有趣、有用,我就假定其他人可能也会觉得有用。所以我确实也学到了一点——我不知道你是否也有同感——你觉得那些东西对别人来说不会那么有趣或有用,对你来说太基础了,但人们偏偏觉得那些最基础的东西特别有趣。因为关于怎么做路线图、怎么排优先级、怎么招人、怎么做艰难的沟通、做绩效评估,永远都有更多值得学的东西。
Maggie Crowley: 这些完全正确。我记得我最早真正满意的内容之一,是我跟一位同事合作,他在做 PowerPoint 演示文稿幻灯片之类的,我就在笔记本上写下来,好吧,我是怎么做这件事的。我先在纸上列一个大纲,然后画小方框代表幻灯片,写下每张幻灯片的标题。等我有了紧凑的大纲,有了每张幻灯片顶部要放的具体文字之后,我再画出我想要的幻灯片布局。然后我才去 Google Docs 里真正制作幻灯片。
就是这么一件小事,然后那个人坐在那里说,天哪,你完全改变了我的做法,我花的时间比原来少了 75%。我当时觉得,我画的不过是那些蠢蠢的小图,这有什么了不起的?是的,就是那个时候我意识到,那些对你来说轻而易举的事情,可能恰恰是最有趣的内容——因为那是你真正擅长但不自知的东西。
Lenny: 我觉得人们真的需要把这一点内化。如果你有一些自己一直在做、而且每次都觉得有用、行之有效的东西,那对别人来说也会是非常有用的。所以,这可能是一个很好的起点。Maggie,我们把我希望能聊到的话题都聊完了,还聊了更多,太棒了。
Maggie Crowley: 好的。
Lenny: 在进入非常精彩的快问快答环节之前,你还有什么想分享的,或者觉得对听众有用的内容?
Maggie Crowley: 我一直希望人们听了这些内容之后能意识到,实际的情况比你想象的要混乱得多,你可以失败很多次但依然取得成功,而且应该享受其中的乐趣。我觉得很多产品内容都忽略了一点:要开心,要享受这个过程。人是各种各样的,人会做各种奇奇怪怪的事情,而你为这些人打造产品,这让一切变得非常有趣。所以,我一直在工作中找到了很多快乐。
Lenny: 正如你之前说的,PM 就像一个打杂的角色,什么都在做——但你可以去创造那种乐趣,可以让团队变得有趣,可以改变文化、塑造文化。我觉得这一点在 PM 这个角色上太被低估了。
Maggie Crowley: 完全同意。
Lenny: 好,那我们就进入非常精彩的快问快答环节。准备好了吗?
Maggie Crowley: 准备好了。
快问快答:书籍推荐
Lenny: Maggie,你向别人推荐最多的两三本书是什么?
Maggie Crowley: 第一本,也是最常推荐的一本,大概是《Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs》,那本小小的书,非常好的提升演讲能力和展示技巧的方法,也能让那些注意力分散的高管们同意你提出的观点。这是第一本。第二本是 Annie Duke 的《Thinking in Bets》,呼应我之前说的关于下赌注的能力,我觉得这本书很有意思。然后额外附赠第三本,这本更像是案头参考书,我现在就把它放在桌上——Claire Hughes Johnson 的《Scaling People》。我非常喜欢这本书的实用性,它就放在我的桌上,我时不时就会翻阅一下,尤其是作为管理者的时候。
Lenny: 我这本就垫在笔记本电脑下面,另外还有一本放在后面很远的地方。我与 Claire 的那期节目是我做过最受欢迎的节目之一,所以如果大家还没听过的话,强烈推荐。她非常厉害。选得好。你最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
快问快答:影视与面试问题
Maggie Crowley: 我丈夫在影视行业,就像我们洛杉矶人说的那样,所以我们看了很多好剧和烂剧。不过我最近最喜欢的应该是《Slow Horses》。Gary Oldman 太厉害了,强烈推荐。
Lenny: 哇,这个还没听人推荐过。好建议。你最喜欢问的面试问题是什么?我想你之前已经透露过了,但我们再聊聊。
Maggie Crowley: 是的,就是”你做过的最差的产品是什么”。我觉得最好的回答是这样的——我不介意有人听了这期节目然后在面试中照做——人们听到这个问题会立刻笑一下,然后回想起自己做过的糟糕的事情,接着把那件糟糕的事跟你分享。这告诉我你有幽默感,你很谦虚,你能指出自己犯过的错误。你做过足够多的事情,所以有底气坦然承认”我当然犯过错”。因为我们没有谁是完美的。而且你知道如何发现那些错误,并从中学习。我一直觉得这样的对话最有意思。
Lenny: 你最近发现的、非常喜欢的产品是什么?
快问快答:产品推荐
Maggie Crowley: 第一个,因为我在 Twitter 上看到过你,你是个 Future Fit 用户。
Lenny: 对。
Maggie Crowley: 没错吧?
Lenny: 我一周用三次,很喜欢。
Maggie Crowley: 对,我也曾是 Future Fit 的用户,我觉得它很好,是一个很好的产品。不过我现在换成了 Ladder Fit。
Lenny: 我听说过那个。
Maggie Crowley: 就我个人而言,我喜欢的是不需要每天跟教练说话,我不需要那种督促机制,这不是我需要的东西,毕竟我是前运动员。所以那个功能对我来说没什么用,我喜欢它的匿名感,而且它还配了一个完全疯狂的团队群聊,特别有意思。我很享受这个。
Lenny: 不错。
Maggie Crowley: 这是一个比较有趣的推荐。第二个,说起来比较小众,但我认为好的产品就是那些专注的产品——它们把一件事做到极致,没有那些——用你之前说的支线任务(side quests)——没有任何支线任务(side quests)。我是一个新手妈妈,有一个叫 Pump Log 的 App。我从未见过哪个产品把一个单一问题执行得这么好。没有任何一个地方让我觉得”哎呀,我希望它还能做这个”。它就是做到了。我花了 14 美元买它,我这辈子从来没为一个 App 花过那种钱。
Lenny: 好,我们一结束我就去下载。你有没有最喜欢的人生信条?就是你会反复对自己说的、喜欢分享给别人的、觉得有用的、在日常生活中指导你的那种。
快问快答:人生信条
Maggie Crowley: 我当然可以说一些听起来很美好的信条,但真正的那个是:如果一件事值得做,就值得做好。同样地,从体育到学业再到做产品,我的看法是,既然要做一件事,就尽全力做到最好,因为这就是你每天在做的事情。你花了那么多时间工作,不如把它做好,或者努力变得更好。我一直都是这样生活的。
Lenny: 我太喜欢这句话了,我也一直在想这个道理。最后一个问题,你是一名奥运速度滑冰运动员,我觉得大家不一定知道这一点,这太疯狂了。我的问题是,关于速度滑冰,有没有什么会让大家感到意外的事情?
速度滑冰与产品管理
Maggie Crowley: 哦,这个问题从来没人问过我。整个经历当然让我学到了很多。我觉得作为小众项目运动员,可能让人意外的一点是:你必须以四年或八年的周期来思考和规划。就是那种你在黑暗的角落里苦练了那么久,然后才得到一次站在聚光灯下的机会,而你需要学会爱上这个过程。特别是速度滑冰,我是大道速滑选手,冰场是 400 米一圈。你就一直在向左转弯、绕圈。没有太多花样,就你和你的思绪。你真正学会的是如何一遍又一遍地打磨完美某个东西,学会如何坚持、如何专注。当然,能滑得特别快也很酷。我不知道这些关于速度滑冰的事情会不会让人惊讶,但我觉得关于小众项目的精英运动员,最重要的就是年复一年地在沉默中磨砺,只为争取一次成就伟大的机会。
Lenny: 你刚才说的那些,百分之百适用于产品管理,我太喜欢了。Maggie,你太棒了。最后两个问题。大家想联系你的话,在网上哪里可以找到你,也许问你一些后续问题?第二,听众怎样才能帮到你?
Maggie Crowley: 肯定可以在 Twitter 上找到我。LinkedIn 也行,不过说到尴尬,我真的没法适应在 LinkedIn 上发帖。
Lenny: LinkedIn 最近变好了,你可以试试看。现在其实挺有意思的,虽然说出来有点奇怪。
Maggie Crowley: 我在考虑这个,过几周我就要回去上班了,也在想 LinkedIn 的事。不过,Twitter 肯定可以,LinkedIn 也可以。我一直以来都尽力去帮助别人,所以关于别人怎么帮助我,我没有特别的答案。我的目标真的是分享我一直在做的事情,分享我能够进入的那些房间、接触到的内容和人,以及我所学到的东西。希望我能找到更多方式持续分享这些。
Lenny: 大家去餐厅的时候可以试试 Toast。
Maggie Crowley: 哦对,安利一下 Toast。来加入我们吧,我们是最棒的。而且我能和 John Cutler 共事,太棒了。
Lenny: 传奇人物,之前上过节目的嘉宾。你们目前有哪些岗位在招人吗?给正在听的观众们说说,也许有人会觉得,嘿,我也许应该去试试。
Maggie Crowley: 一直都有岗位在招。我不太清楚现在最急需的是哪些岗位,但去看看吧,那是个很棒的地方。
Lenny: 我会把招聘页面链接放到节目笔记里。
Maggie Crowley: 太好了。
Lenny: Maggie,再次非常感谢你来参加节目。
Maggie Crowley: 谢谢你,Lenny。太棒了。
Lenny: 大家再见。非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅节目。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评价,这真的能帮助更多听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Adam Medros | Adam Medros(TripAdvisor 前 VP) |
| B2B | B2B(Business-to-Business,企业对企业) |
| clickbait | 标题党 |
| discovery | 探索阶段(discovery) |
| feature parity | 功能对等(feature parity) |
| Future Fit | Future Fit(健身训练应用) |
| Google Docs | Google Docs(谷歌在线文档工具) |
| John Cutler | John Cutler(Toast 员工) |
| Karri | Karri(Linear 创始人) |
| Ladder Fit | Ladder Fit(健身训练应用) |
| Minto Pyramid principle | Minto 金字塔原则(先说结论再说支撑论据的表达结构) |
| OKR | OKR(Objectives and Key Results,目标与关键成果) |
| On Writing Well | 《On Writing Well》(一本关于非虚构写作的经典著作) |
| one-pager | 一页纸文档(one-pager) |
| ownership | 主人翁精神(ownership) |
| PM | PM(Product Manager,产品经理) |
| PowerPoint | PowerPoint(微软演示文稿软件) |
| PRD | PRD(Product Requirements Document,产品需求文档) |
| Pump Log | Pump Log(母乳泵送记录应用) |
| rule of three | 三的法则 |
| side quests | 支线任务(side quests) |
| spec | 规格文档(spec) |
| sunk cost fallacy | 沉没成本谬误 |
| SWOT analysis | SWOT 分析(Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats,优势、劣势、机会、威胁分析) |
| tech debt | 技术债务(tech debt) |
| Toast | Toast(餐饮科技平台) |
| zero to one | 从零到一 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)