出租车利益集团、现金金库与 100% 月环比增长:东南亚最大创业公司的故事 | Kevin Aluwi (Gojek)
Taxi mafias, cash vaults & 100% MoM growth: The story of SEA’s biggest startup | Kevin Aluwi (Gojek)
Kevin Aluwi: In the early days of Gojek, there was a lot of resistance to our services. The most common form of that resistance in the early days was actually by motorcycle taxi mafia. So you would have these areas that are essentially controlled through violence by specific area mafia. And when we start having drivers pick up orders and pick up passengers, these people would actually physically assault our drivers. We’ve had everything from bricks thrown at our drivers to knives and machetes being brandished at them, and I think it would’ve been easy for us to say like, “Hey, they’re all contractors. They’re third parties, let them kind of just sort it out.” But instead, we actually hired private security. So we actually work with private security companies to help our drivers in those situations, to help kind of extract them out of these sticky situations. And so we actually ran a fairly big private security operation for a fairly long time.
Welcome to the Podcast
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s podcast, where I interview world-class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard won experiences building and growing today’s most successful products. Today my guest is Kevin Aluwi. Kevin is the co-founder and former CEO of a company called Gojek, which I’ve always been fascinated by. You may recall a former guest Crystal Widjaja, who was head of growth at Gojek, and I’ve always wanted to get more of the story. Gojek is infamous for their scrappiness, their unique approach to ops and growth, and as being one of the first and most successful super apps in the world. They’ve also long been maybe the biggest startup in Indonesia and all of Southeast Asia. Kevin and the story of Gojek have a lot to teach founders in the US and all over the world, and so I was really excited to sit down with Kevin to dig into the story, he did not disappoint.
You’ll hear all kinds of wild stories about them having to hire a private security team to protect their drivers, having to build their own cash distribution centers to pay their drivers, plus how they won in large part thanks to their early investment in brand, why it’s important to do the hard things as a startup. Also, why super apps are surprisingly overrated and much more. Enjoy this episode with Kevin Aluwi after a short word from our sponsors.
If your team’s work is spread out across different documents and spreadsheets and a stack of workflow tools, that’s why you need Coda. Coda puts data in one centralized location regardless of format, eliminating roadblocks that can slow your team down. Coda allows your team to operate on the same information and collaborate in one place. Take advantage of this special limited time offer just for startups. Sign up today at coda.io/lenny and get a thousand dollars startup credit on your first statement. That’s coda.io/lenny to sign up and get a startup credit of $1,000. Coda.io/lenny.
If you’re writing a report on a growth experiment, you can use Rows to do your analysis on data straight from BigQuery or Snowflake. If you’re deep diving on marketing, you can import reports straight from Google Analytics, Facebook ads, or Twitter. Or if you’re working with sales, you can natively plug Stripe, Salesforce or HubSpot directly into Rows. And when you’re done, you can share your work as a beautiful spreadsheet that’s easy to read and embed charts, tables and calculators into Notion, Confluence or anywhere on the web. I’ve already moved some of my favorite spreadsheet templates to Rose. Go to rows.com/lenny to check them out. That’s rows.com/lenny.
Kevin, welcome to the podcast.
Kevin Aluwi: Thank you. Thanks for having me, Lenny. We’ve finally made it happen after a few weeks or months of going back and forth.
Introduction: What is Gojek
Lenny: Yeah, I’m really excited to finally meet you and to dig into a bunch of stuff. I think this is going to be a really unique episode. I don’t often have founders on the podcast, especially founders of companies that are not based in the US. In this case, Indonesia, Crystal Widjaja, who is on this podcast previously. One of my favorite guests is just like “Lenny, you got to get Kevin on your podcast.” And so here we are.
Kevin Aluwi: I’m glad to be in a small group of category of people that you invite. Thank you. I’m a huge fan of what you do.
What Gojek Actually Did
Lenny: Thanks, man, I really appreciate that. And just redirect to you, you are the co-founder of a company called Gojek. Many people listening have never heard of Gojek, especially people in the US. So just to start, can you just describe what is Gojek, what do y’all do? And then also I think more interestingly is just the scale of I think people in the US, their mind will blow once they hear the scale you’ve reached with this company. They probably hadn’t heard of it.
Kevin Aluwi: So Gojek started as a motorcycle taxi based service. So it’s a kind of uniquely Indonesian things where we have millions of motorcycle taxi drivers in all of the urban centers in Indonesia. And so we started with a very local problem and the first product was a on-demand super app, if you will, where you could ask someone on a motorcycle to give you a ride, send a package for you or buy something and deliver it to you. This then evolved over the years into a more general on demand consumer super app that also included car drivers and other services ranging from the ones mentioned to grocery deliveries and payments and financial services.
And today we took the company public about a year and a half ago after we merged with Indonesia’s top e-commerce platform. And we’ve managed to also expand outside of just Indonesia, where today we have about 2.7 million drivers across Southeast Asia. We’ve completed about 3 billion orders last year, so that’s 3 billion orders. So the scale of our region is often under underappreciated, where we also have about 15 million merchants doing general e-commerce, but also restaurants on our food delivery service. And on that IPO, we’re pretty proud to say that it was Indonesia’s largest IPO of all time, where we raised over a billion dollars at something like 27, 28 billion dollars in terms of valuation.
Rethinking the Super App
Lenny: And these numbers you shared 2.7 million drivers, 30 billion orders,
Kevin Aluwi: 3 billion.
The Importance of Brand Building
Lenny: 3 billion. How would that compare to an Uber or Lyft?
How to Build a Brand
Kevin Aluwi: I don’t know what their latest numbers are, but just in terms of the numbers of people and the number of activity, I would place our scale among the largest US companies.
Lenny: That’s pretty wild that there’s this company out there that a lot of people didn’t know about that is basically of the scale of Uber and Lyft.
Jackets and Helmets: Ultimate Brand Assets
Kevin Aluwi: In terms of volume, I would say that we’re up there with Uber globally and definitely larger than Lyft. I don’t remember how many drivers are in the US, but we definitely have more drivers in the region than all of America.
Grassroots Gojek: Early Wild Startup Stories
Lenny: Just to kind of check this check box, you said it was a super app. What are all the things that Gojek does? Just whatever you want to share, all the things that you can do.
Fighting Clones and Other Grassroots Stories
Kevin Aluwi: From the point when we had the most services, we had everything from ride hailing to package delivery to food delivery, to grocery deliveries. We had moving services on trucks and vans. We had on demand massages, cleaning services. You could get your hair done on Gojek, you could order movie tickets, you could get a loan, you could pay for things. I think at our peak we had something like near 30 different services all in one app.
Violent Threats from Taxi Mafias
Lenny: I think it’s like you’re officially a super app if your founder can’t even remember all the things that you do right now.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah, definitely. I would challenge anyone within the company to be able to name all of our services that we’ve ever had on the app because it was pretty wild at one point. And I’d love to talk a little bit about my thoughts on super apps at some point during the session because I definitely have some mixed views over it as a product strategy as we’ve gone through that whole cycle.
Mini-Companies Inside the Super App
Lenny: It might be actually a good time just to jump into it. I know that I was actually saving that for later, but this might be a good time. And part of the reason I think this is really interesting is if you open up Uber these days, it’s like 40 things that they’re offering now. Elon at Twitter is talking about turning Twitter into a super app like payments, communication, messaging, all these things. So I think it’s a really interesting trend that continues to pop up here in the US and I would absolutely love to hear your perspective on super apps.
Kevin Aluwi: Okay, I’m going to come off a little strong on this, but I am kind of annoyed at how much it’s being mentioned these days. It’s really popular in VC-consultant-analyst circles because it sounds really great on a strategy deck because all of the things that are really appealing, we’ll talk about lower customer acquisition costs, higher attach rates to different products, talk about higher retention across different services, the ease of cross-selling and upselling. All of these things sound great, but in reality, a lot of those benefits don’t pan out. And one probably really good example that I like to reference is that I remember one of our products was mobile phone top up and recharge. In Southeast Asia, a majority of people are on prepaid plans instead of postpaid plans. So everyone basically buys their minutes and their data plans upfront in the beginning of the week or the beginning of the month.
So we had a product which was a mobile top-up product. And so the reason I mentioned this specific product as a really illustrative point on super apps is that it’s a product that 95% plus of our customers need because they’re all on prepaid plans. So it’s a very relevant product. And we had our UX research research team actually look into why the engagement in the product wasn’t as high as we thought it should be. So one of the questions that our URX team asked our customers was like, “Hey, do you know that you could top up your mobile minutes and by data on the Gojek app?” And only about 40% of our customers, like 30 or 40% of our customers knew that this product existed. And that completely blew our minds because one, it’s a product that is relevant for all of our customers.
Two, it was literally there on one of the six buttons on the homepage. And I think the insight that we got here was that there kind of needs to be a unifying concept across all of your services within the app for your users to be able to think about your product in a sensible way. And for us, the way that our customers thought about us was that they thought about the driver. And so when we went from ride hailing to package delivery to food delivery, to grocery delivery, customers really understood that. And we didn’t have to sell this idea to our customers that you had all of these services under one app because they thought about the Gojek driver. That made sense. You can easily cross sell somebody from a ride hailing customer to a grocery customer or a food delivery customer because they understood the unifying factor there being the driver.
But then when you start doing other things that don’t have that unifying factor in terms of the concept that a customer has when they think about your service, it starts breaking down. So one other fun UXR insight here was when we launched massage services. So we had at one point though we’ve shut it down a few years after, we had massage services where you can order a masseuse to come to your place. And a question that many of our customers asked was that, “oh, is the driver going to come into my house and give me a massage?” And for us, that was insane. Of course not, our drivers are not trained masseuses, but that was the question that people asked because they thought like, “oh, this app is an app for these driver related services, so if there was a massage service, I’m assuming it’s that same man who’s going to give me a massage.”
And so I think this kind of illustrates the importance of having these unifying concepts that are easy for customers to think about the multiple different services. It’s not as simple as just saying, oh, we have a lot of engagement, we have a lot of eyeballs at a service. And then you have a super app that makes sense for customers. And so that whole nirvana of lower CAC, higher retention that are all on these great strategy decks often don’t pan out because you kind of have to then resell this idea of like, oh, this is another service and that you can use. And that’s a bit of investment that you have to actually put in terms of advertising and customer education that increases those customer acquisition costs.
And it also leads to design constraints because there’s only so many ways you can display a whole bunch of different services that actually have little to do with each other, which is why when you see super apps today, it’s kind of like this giant menu or this giant grid which does limit the design decisions that you can make, which is unfortunate because if you actually, I think it’s an unsolved problem at this point.
Founders Must Wear Multiple Hats
Lenny: It’s hilarious story about the massage product. Sounds like a lot of startups are going to have some issues scaling to new products and trying to become a super app. I want to shift a little bit and talk about brand. I did a little research on you ahead of this chat. I watched your Marshall graduation and speech and a few other interviews you did, and something that came out of your previous writing and talks is just how much you care about brand and how much value you put into brand. And that you just have a lot of opinions about the importance of brand. And to me and to most people, brand is this really squishy thing and it’s hard to know what exactly to do to build your brand, when to prioritize it, how to prioritize it amongst other things you’re doing, especially early on. So I’d love to hear your advice for founders that are listening and just like, what should I actually do around brand? What’s your advice for how to tactically do something about brand and also just why do you think it’s so important?
Kevin Aluwi: I do agree with you that it is kind of this squishy thing that most people see as an afterthought, may be because it is kind of this squishy thing that it’s hard to define, but I’m a very big believer that the two most important things in a consumer business are product and brand in that order. And I don’t think I need to sell the idea, especially to your audience. That product is absolutely critical and probably the most important. But brand as an afterthought is definitely one of the areas where I think there’s a giant missed opportunity for consumer tech businesses. And I get why we opened the session by talking about the size of the business to get an appreciation of the scale for audience members who might be unfamiliar with us or with the region.
But I wish I did have to start there because we actually started as a very scrappy company where we were by far the underfunded player and without brand. We probably would’ve never gotten to escape velocity beyond that scrappy stage, we’ve maintained our leadership in Indonesia through a lot of the things that we actually did on the brand side to give you a sense of how scrappy we had to be in competition.
For the first six months after launching our app, we had only raised about $2 million and our regional competitor had already raised 250. So they had literally more than a hundred times more capital than we have. So it’s easy to talk about what we built as this kind of giant business, but we came from a place where we were seriously underfunded. And I think a big reason why we survived was that we built a great brand for our consumers and for our drivers and for our merchants. And I think that great brands create associations in their customer’s minds that transcend the typically transactional or utilitarian one that most people have with businesses and they become part of one’s identity.
I think some of the best-in-class examples of these are probably all the Apple fanboys and fangirls, Nike sneakerheads, for these individuals, the brand becomes a really big part of their identity and their loyalty towards the products of the company go beyond a relationship that can easily be swayed just through discounts or other more features that other competitors might have. And so I’m a really firm believer of how important this is because you can see it if you step out of the tech bubble for a second, you can see that there’s so many great companies out there that really rely on the strength of their brand to build these fantastic businesses and to create great experiences for their customers. And you ask, what are the things that one can do?
I think for us, we invested a lot in our brand across multiple areas. And I think one specific area that I think is really important is that you create consistency across all customer touchpoints. And so branding is not just cool logo, cool advertising, fun imagery, but it’s really about the impression that a customer or user has with your product and with your business. So having that consistency across all customer touchpoints is really important. So how you write copy and advertising and in the app, how you’ve even designed the app, but we were the first company of scale to have ads that don’t take ourselves too seriously. We make fun of ourselves, we make fun of our cultural observations of Indonesia. And again, to just build this overall field that like, Hey, we get, we are part of the overall culture of Indonesia. And I think even going beyond the more aesthetic or communication oriented investments, we also leaned into cultural artifacts in our product features to really build this brand that is part of day-to-day culture.
One of my favorite cultural artifacts is that in Asia it’s fairly common to send food as gifts to your loved ones or maybe people you’re interested in dating. So people would send over food as gifts to their romantic interests. And so when we launched our food delivery service, a lot of people were actually using it for this, I’m going to send it to my boyfriend or my girlfriend or the person that I’m interested in dating. And so it became this whole cultural phenomenon of sending go-food for these people and we kind of lean into it in our product feature where all of the other players in the market at the time basically only allowed you to deliver food to your home or your office, but we actually created a feature that allowed you to choose a delivery point that was far away from where you were.
There was a lot of reasons why other companies didn’t allow it at the time because it’s like, oh, it might be used for fraud and stuff like that. But we leaned into it, we leaned into it and actually created features that allowed to put your pickup point far away from where your actual location was. And then we just had fun with this whole idea of go-food dating. And so yes, it’s kind of part of branding, but thinking about branding beyond just marketing communication but actually be as being relatable and being part of the culture and being sensitive of what that culture is, I think was something that we did really well in the early days that allowed us to continue maintaining leadership in spite of the fact that our competitors had more money, which meant that they could offer more discounts, they could offer more incentives to drivers, but we really kind of lean very hard into being not just a utilitarian commodity, which is what a lot of people would say is the nature of our business to some level of accuracy.
From Finance to Tech
Lenny: So just to get even more concrete, one takeaway from what you just shared, which is interesting, is the first part of figuring out how to approach your brand is what’s the personality of your product for you? You said it was like we’re just of the people, we’re like you, we’re here to help you, make your life easier. And then that informs the copy, the messaging, be a little, I forget how you describe it, but just almost bad grammar and stuff just because it relates more to people and then some of these product launches that connect to that. So maybe if there’s anything else you want to add there that’d be interesting. And then what’s like, I don’t know, one or two moments that most helped build the brand. I know you’re kind of famous for having helmets and jackets on the drivers that help spread the Gojek brand. Is there anything else that just like, wow, this was really effective to build this brand that ended up dominating Indonesia?
Kevin Aluwi: The jackets and helmets piece I think is really, really important for two reasons. One, the more obvious reason, which is that because they were just all over the streets of many cities in Indonesia, people were familiar with the imagery and the names, but I think it’s also really important that people saw what was happening. So if we were like, I don’t know, an airline and we branded a bunch of people on the streets with our brand, yeah, sure, that might help with brand recall and people might know about the name. But what was really powerful was that when people would be seeing these drivers with their jackets and helmets, they would be seeing passengers on the backseat as they were stuck in traffic. So I’m stuck in traffic and I’m seeing these people whiz past me with with this imagery on them, and immediately I get that association like, oh, I’m stuck in traffic, but I could be out there cutting through traffic on a motorcycle or you see them carrying packages or delivering food, and you immediately get like, oh, these are guys who can deliver food or deliver packages for me.
And so it was like this beautiful combination of one just having that imagery and having that visual everywhere as a reminder of the brand. But more importantly, it was also a physical reminder of the service of what we do and of how we can help you. And so looking for these opportunities where again, customers can make that connection between the logo and the colors and the name with actually what the service is, I think are the opportunities that I would say people should look out for. They’re admittedly quite rare, which is why in my opinion, the laziest kind of branding tends to be the most popular. Just put your name and your copy on a billboard or on a CPM or CPC campaign. But there are these opportunities I think, on being able to reinforce the value proposition of your business in a way that is beyond just visual recall. And I think that was why that specific anecdote is something I like to talk about because it was really one of those special things that reminded people on why we’re here.
Building Outside Silicon Valley
Lenny: Yeah, I think you tweeted that it was one of the most important things you ever did as a company is decide to put these logos on the helmets and jackets. Reminds me of Lyft’s pink mustache, which went away, but felt like a really important way for them to differentiate.
Kevin Aluwi: No, totally.
Uniqueness of Indonesia and SEA
Lenny: You talked about how scrappy you’ve been, and I want to dig into that a little bit more. I think there’s like US startup scrappy, and then there’s like Gojek scrappy, and it’d be fun to hear maybe a story or two just to illustrate how ridiculously scrappy you were as a company early on, especially.
Kevin Aluwi: One thing that we did in the early days that was absolutely crazy was that we were one of the pioneering companies, one of the pioneering technology companies in Indonesia and in Southeast Asia. And so we came into a environment where a lot of the things that maybe companies or people in more developed economies take for granted, for example, having electronic or digital payments, that was something that actually didn’t really exist that much when we first started. And so we had a problem of actually trying to pay drivers because drivers every day we would be paying out incentives or just having customers pay with their credit cards or their store balance, and then we’d have a challenge and getting our drivers to actually be able to take that money out for their earnings. And in the early days, we actually had cash booths. So we actually had physical spaces with a vault and cash sitting in the vault where drivers can show up that, oh, this is my driver ID and this is the balance that I have with you. Please give me the cash.
And so we would have these actual physical locations where there would be lions of drivers essentially taking cash. And we eventually figured this out of like, okay, we’ll work with a bank and integrate with an ATM network and all that. But in the early days we just did it ourselves of building essentially a mini at ATM network, which I think even that sounds too fancy of what it was it. Because it was literally a booth with a vault with cash in it. And we had at the time already tens of thousands of drivers all across in Indonesia.
Another scrappy story that actually Crystal reminded me of recently that we did was at the time there was a lot of fake driver apps out there because we didn’t have all of the security investments that we eventually made, things like code obfuscation and better API security that wouldn’t allow for these fraudulent driver apps, these basically third party driver apps to connect to our platform. So there were a lot of these drivers using these third party driver apps that were doing things that… So they were kind of doing unsavory things like stealing driver details, some of them even as bad as financial details so that they can then at some point drain driver funds. And the way that they did it, the way that they convinced drivers to actually use these apps was that they actually added some features that at the time we didn’t allow. So things like we wanted drivers to be conscious of what was happening on the app, and so we would actually make sure that drivers would push the accept order button.
We made sure that that was the only way that drivers could accept orders, but this app had a functionality that would automatically accept orders as soon as they came in. And so actually it was kind of this interesting situation where they were doing things that were fraudulent and were not safe for the integrity of the platform, but at the same time they were also providing some value to the people who were using them. And so at the time we had to make a decision of like, okay, we need to nip this in the bud and one way that we could have done it, that would’ve taken time was it really invest in a lot of the technical security aspects of it, but we didn’t have the bandwidth to be able to do that. Engineering and security talent is actually super scarce in Southeast Asia at the time, still is today, but at that time extremely scarce.
And so we ended up making the decision of actually copying those features. So we actually saw all of these third party fraudulent apps and instead of building a whole system to prevent them from being built or preventing them from working on the platform, we just said, “Hey, let’s take their top two or three features and let’s build them into our app.” And that actually significantly reduced the number of users on these third party apps just by having this mentality of you can’t beat them, then join them. And that I would say that wasn’t a philosophical decision or a principal decision. Is was actually a decision made out of necessity because we simply couldn’t build all the capability to combat these apps at the time?
Life After Stepping Down
Lenny: Are you hiring or on the flip side, are you looking for a new opportunity? Well, either way, check out lennysjobs.com/talent. If you’re a hiring manager, you can sign up and get access to hundreds of hand curated people who are open to new opportunities. Thousands of people apply to join this collective. And I personally review and accept just about 10% of them. You won’t find a better place to hire product managers and growth leaders, join almost a hundred other companies who are actively hiring through this collective.
And if you’re looking around for a new opportunity actively or passively join the collective, it’s free. You can be anonymous and you can even hide yourself from specific companies. You can also leave any time and you’ll only hear from companies that you want to hear from. Check out lennysjobs.com/talent.
These are hilarious stories that you had to compete with these ripoff jail broken apps, fraudulent apps, and then you had to build a cash box network all over the country. That’s amazing. I knew there would be good stories in this question and I’m glad you delivered. There’s also this feeling of within Gojek of just doing the hard thing and you just shared a couple stories of this versus the simple… A lot of startups are like, let’s do the simplest thing, feels like you guys lean into the hard thing. Why is that? Where’d that come from? And then is there any other story of something that you did that was like, we’ll do it the hard way?
Kevin Aluwi: I really don’t like the idea of moats. Again, one of the concepts that gets thrown out a lot by strategy type folks of what’s the moat of your business or your product? And usually people are looking for an answer like, oh, look at this capability or look at this feature or look at this distribution partner or all of those kind of things. And I don’t believe that any moats are durable over time. Eventually with enough time all moats can be crossed. And I think one so-called moat that doesn’t get talked about enough is the fact that you’re able to do hard things because hard things are hard and just simply doing things that are hard, as long as they create value to your customers, actually is a position that makes it harder for your competitors to be able to win over your customers because it’s hard to do those things.
And probably another example of doing something that sounds very difficult was that in the early days of Gojek, there was a lot of resistance to our services and one of the forms of that resistance, one of the more most common form of that resistance in the early days was actually by motorcycle taxi mafia. So you would have these areas that are essentially controlled through violence by specific area mafia. And when we start having drivers pick up orders and pick up passengers, these people would actually physically assault our drivers. We’ve had everything from bricks thrown at our drivers to knives and machetes being brandished at them to just physical altercations, literally mobs of people getting into these brawls. And there was a lot of these kind of things that actually happened in the streets of Jakarta at the time. And I think it would’ve been easy for us to say, “Hey, they’re all contractors, they’re third parties, let them kind of just sort it out.”
But instead we actually hired private security. So we actually work with private security companies to help these situations, to help our drivers in those situations, to help extract them out of these sticky situations. And so we actually ran a fairly big private security operation for a fairly long time until it became common to have Gojek drivers do all of these things across cities. We actually ran this very operation intensive thing just to make sure that our drivers could be as safe as possible and it showed our commitment to the driver community, it showed our commitment that we cared. And again, going back to that earlier point around having that branding association, drivers knew that, hey, we weren’t just a platform that didn’t care. We actually cared about their safety and that helped build that goodwill even as competitors started coming in and paying more money, we still had a lot of loyalty within the driver community because of things like that.
Quick Fire Questions
Lenny: How did you actually have a security person on a motorcycle? Were they pretending to be the rider and then just get out and punch them in the face?
Kevin Aluwi: A minority of situations were like that, but a lot of that was just like, having an on-call service where they could just dial a number and somebody within a 5-10 minute distance would actually show up. And so we would have these patrols effectively in specific hotspots where if there was a situation brewing that they would instantly or almost instantly show up to the site and help diffuse it.
Key to Execution: Clear Decision Makers
Lenny: I love that you have this super app that’s doing all these things for people. Plus within the company you’ve built all these mini businesses, like a whole bank to pay people, private security company. There’s probably some other… Crystal shared a story of you guys rented out a stadium for drivers to collect all the drivers and give them phones.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah.
Outro
Lenny: Okay. This is great.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah, that I think is probably one of the hallmarks of this region in general where I have no doubt that what we were building and what we are today is a technology company, but I do think that in the early days you do have to be a lot more operations heavy. And then I think that lends to that scrappiness because there are a lot of things that to solve elegantly and technically will take a lot of time and just kind of over focusing on those type of solutions I think would be doing your customers a disservice because there are opportunities to make things a lot better just through probably more innovation in operations to kind of kickstart things until you have the more elegant, scalable, technical or product solution.
Lenny: That reminds me that at Gojek, you held tons of different roles throughout the time you were there. You were obviously co-founder, your Co-CEO at one point, defacto CPO at one point, CIO, CFO. I heard that you were writing like push notification copy, became a driver at one point just to keep things running. So feels like another good example of exactly what you’re talking about of just doing the hard thing in the operational component.
Kevin Aluwi: I mean, yes, actually I did have a stint as an amateur performance marketer in the early days of Gojek. I would write copy, I would upload ads onto Facebook and Google and try and do my best in optimizing our online marketing spend. But I think I did all of those things, not because I wanted to be scrappy necessarily, but I do think that as, and this is probably most relevant for founders, less for executives, but I think as a founder, I do think it’s really important to understand the work that needs to be done in order to see what excellence looks like. And for us, again, we came from an ecosystem where the availability of experienced talent was relatively low. And so for me it was very hard to be able to say, “oh, let’s hire person X from organization Y with job description Z,” and we know that they probably can deliver because again, the talent availability was really low.
And so a lot of times I felt like I needed to understand, okay, what is this job? What exactly does it entail is, and seeing how bad I am at it allowed me to understand what good looked like. And so I held a lot of those roles just because I wanted to understand every part of the business as best as I could in order to then find somebody who could do it orders of magnitude better than myself. I would say that is true for all of these roles except for being a driver. I think being a driver, I wasn’t trying to understand what excellence as a driver look like. Obviously the drivers do a really challenging job and I think I just wanted to understand what that role was like to build a lot more empathy towards the job and make sure that our product was catered towards what those needs were.
So when we first launched our car ride hailing services, I think I was the first actual driver on the app and I would every now and then be a driver. And I remember the early days when I actually picked up a customer. It was this lady and she put in her destination as a mall. And so I went to this house and I knew that, okay, I needed to drive to this mall, but then this lady comes out with this giant bag and so I had to hop out the car, take this giant bag, put it in my trunk, and then off we went. And in the middle of the drive she’s like, “Hey, I need to drop off and do my laundry on the way to the mall.” And I just had to, “okay, cool.” We took a detour, I lugged this giant bag out of our trunk and helped this lady do her laundry.
And then we went to the mall and I got very little money out of that experience and it wasn’t instant, but this is eventually what led to, I think a lot of the support I gave to our driver teams when they were pushing for, Hey, we need more waiting fees, we need to add multiple stops in order to make sure that hey, a lot of this extra work was actually compensated. And it was something that I obviously experienced personally and it was something that I definitely was excited about as a set of product features and principles when it came to building our driver app.
Lenny: It feels like having to do that ends up being a feature as you said, that you actually experienced a lot of these challenges and you said the really good point about knowing what to hire and what these people are going to actually do.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah.
Lenny: That’s interesting how that often turns into a good thing. I know you also have a pretty interesting journey into tech. What can you share around that?
Kevin Aluwi: So I am basically a failed finance professional. I didn’t really know what I wanted to do in my life. And in 2005, which is when I entered college, the hot sexy thing to do was finance. And I guess that was what I wanted to do. And I went, studied finance, and then the crash of 2008 happened and I graduated 2009, so it’s probably the worst time to try and be a finance professional. And so I went through a really challenging time there, but eventually I got a job at a boutique investment banking firm. And that was, I thought like, okay, now I was set for life. I got the job that I wanted. I’m working in finance. But then long story short, I was not very good. I was not very good. My bosses thought I was underperforming. I didn’t feel like I was performing, and I kind of left that field that I thought I built my entire, I guess future dreams and identity around.
And after I did that, I decided to take a bet in Indonesian technology because when all of this was happening was around 2010, 2011, and it was starting to see the development of the current technology giants in the US at the time. And I thought that it would be pretty cool if Indonesia ever had a technology industry to be part of it at the ground floor. And so I moved back in 2011 and it was super early. It was really early at the time where the level of talent, the level of funding, the level of product market fit, the number of people who transacted on the internet was also still super low. People still saw the internet as a place for chat apps and social media. And so the level of belief that people had in the space at that time was pretty low.
People didn’t think that real businesses and real valuable products could be built, especially be built locally. And so taking that bet was something that I think it really panned out for us to be really early in the space, which today has become very vibrant to the scene. Southeast Asia has become, I think one of the most exciting spaces in technology in the world to date. But at the time it wasn’t obvious. And being able to see that development I think was something that was really important to me because it really shows you what’s possible in a very short time. And I think it’s something that probably people in technology in the US can relate to, the people who’ve been working in this space for like 20, 30 years. But being able to see those early days for me was just really valuable and I think was an experience that I definitely cherish.
Lenny: It’s really hard to just build a company outside of Silicon Valley, and it was even harder back then. COVID and remote work almost made it the easiest it’s ever been.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah.
Lenny: Sounds like a lot of the fact that you were so far away from the Bay Area informed the way that you built this company, the scrappiness that you talked about. I’m curious if you have any advice for a founder who’s trying to build a company now outside of, say the Bay Area or just US in general based on your experience.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah, look, it was super hard back then. It was particularly hard because Indonesia is such a valuable market, Indonesia and the rest, I would say primarily Indonesia just because of its scale. But I think overall Southeast Asia was just such a valuable market and it was interesting for global companies to want to win it. So we competed with global and regional companies, but the local talent and funding ecosystems were really underdeveloped. So that challenge of having to compete with the best in the world for customers in the market while also not having all of the resources available within the market to be able to build products and companies that can compete was I would say one of the most challenging parts of building probably in markets that are atypical or outside of Silicon Valley and maybe some of the other technology centers in the world like China and India.
So some of my learnings probably there that I would take going forward is I think we talked a lot about being scrappy. In the beginning, we were a lot more ops-heavy than tech-heavy. And doing the things that don’t scale through other means I think is definitely something that is absolutely necessary if you’re building outside of these main technology hubs. Another thing I would say is you need to get good at remote work really early. And I think today that’s kind of become a lot more prevalent as more and more people have experience with remote work. For us, we built an engineering center in Bangalore in 2015, and this allowed us to compete a lot better with the global giants because we had access to a really deep talent market in India at the time, but we were really early in this whole remote work thing because it wasn’t common for people in our region, but also globally to have so much talent concentration outside of headquarters.
And I do believe that companies who want to compete against world class competitors outside of these technology centers like Silicon Valley need to become good at remote work really fast because getting that talent probably means having offices or individuals who are outside of your home market or your headquarters. And probably the final I would say tip here is don’t just copy, because Gojek was not an Uber clone, even though that was kind of how some investors or analysts talk about us, we were focused on a solution that was uniquely an Indonesian phenomenon, the motorcycle taxi driver. And this led to both product and branding innovation. On the product side, we were an on-demand super app because we saw that a human being on a motorcycle could do a lot of things. And so we built a product around that idea and hence we ended up with a super app even before super apps were really a thing.
And then that branding point that we talked about a little earlier about giving our drivers jackets and helmets so people could see them zip around town, which actually doesn’t make sense if you’re a car ride hailing service because it’s not very easy to brand a car and the drivers are inside the car. But all of our competitors at the time when they first entered the motorcycle ride hailing space didn’t brand their drivers because they came from a car-centric view. And so again, understanding your unique market dynamics is also really important if you’re building outside of these technology centers.
Lenny: We’ve been chatting about Indonesia and Southeast Asia. I’d love to hear just what should people know about that market? We’ve chatted about what you guys have built and a few other companies here and there, but what companies should people be aware of what’s happening? What’s the latest, what’s exciting?
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah, I think specifically Indonesia, most people don’t know that Indonesia is the fourth largest country in the world and that Southeast Asia holds almost 10% of the world’s population. But beyond the macro picture, I think also we’ve experienced a pretty unique level of pace of adoption for products with great product market fit. So products with great product market fit grow tremendously fast in this part of the world. And in 2015, for example, when we launched our app, we grew more than a hundred percent month on month for the first 16, 18 months. So we more than doubled every month for more than a year.
Lenny: That is insane. I’ve never heard of that.
Kevin Aluwi: No, and our investors at the time, Sequoia is one of our investors at the time, told us that this was the craziest growth story that they’ve ever heard of in the world. And I wouldn’t say because of our necessarily our brilliance, it was a combination of how in Indonesia and in Southeast Asia, there are a lot of these things that are obviously broken and could be improved with better technology and better products. But we also have in this region a very young population who are excited to try new things. And so if you find a solution that really resonates with a lot of these common day-to-day problems, the adoption curve is just absolutely insane. And I think it’s one of the things that are definitely unique to developing regions like this one.
One company that’s really interesting for example, just to give a flavor of the type of seemingly off the wall product or company being built in this part of the world, there’s a company called eFishery, and what they do is they basically create a closed loop ecosystem for fish farmers in currently, I think they’re only operational Indonesia or they’re recently expanding beyond Indonesia.
They help farmers feed their fish through this IOT smart device that helps measure the amount of fish feed that needs to go into the ponds, but they also then help farmers do things that get financing and also sell their produce out to local or even regional or global markets. And it’s a company doing something like a quarter billion dollars in revenue and it’s profitable and it’s basically a fish farmer, a close loop ecosystem. And it’s pretty wild that something like this exists, but it does speak to, I think again earlier what I said earlier about the hunger that the population have for better solutions. And if you can find these better solutions, you can really build companies of the very meaningful scale very, very quickly.
Lenny: So at this point, you’ve stepped down a CEO, you’ve stepped down from the board, what’s next and how does it feel?
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah, I’m still on this journey honestly, of how does it feel. I think that building Gojek is by far the most important professional experience and frankly, one of the most important life experiences I’ve had. It’s made me a way better person actually. And now that I’ve stepped away, I am not as bored or as aimless as people would expect after having such a kind of all-consuming thing be part of my life experience.
What’s next? Honestly, Lenny, I don’t know. I don’t have a plan at this stage. I do some angel investing on the side. I work with other founders to be able to maybe just share some of these experiences that I shared today and just figuring out what makes me happy and what are the kind activities that I find rewarding. I don’t know, maybe I’ll start another company at some point. I think that’s my default, but I think right now I’m just taking things easy and trying to figure out another problem I guess, that I could be obsessed about.
Lenny: You’ve earned that time to explore and look for new problems. Is there anything else you wanted to touch on before we get to our very exciting lightning round?
Kevin Aluwi: No Lenny. I think we’ve covered a lot today, and I just wanted to thank you for the time.
Lenny: Amazing. It’s absolutely my pleasure. And with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. I’ve got five questions for you. Are you ready?
Kevin Aluwi: Yes, let’s go.
Lenny: What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
Kevin Aluwi: What You Do Is Who You Are. I think that was the second most popular Ben Horowitz’s book, but I’m really obsessed with building interesting and engaging cultures, so I think that’s one. Another is a classic marketing book. Again, we talked a lot about branding today, so there’s this book called How Brands Grow by Byron Sharp. I don’t agree necessarily with everything in it, but I do think that it’s a great primer on how to think about branding and marketing.
Lenny: Favorite recent movie or TV show?
Kevin Aluwi: Favorite recent movie, The Menu and favorite recent TV show? Netflix show is a Cyberpunk 2077 Edge Runners.
Lenny: Oh, wow. I haven’t heard of that one.
Kevin Aluwi: Oh, you should check it out. It’s super cool.
Lenny: I’ll go check it out.
Kevin Aluwi: Yeah.
Lenny: Favorite interview question that you like to ask.
Kevin Aluwi: Tell me about a subject or activity you’ve been obsessed with for a long time.
Lenny: What do you look for in an answer that’s like, okay, this is good.
Kevin Aluwi: I want somebody to basically almost pitch to me an obsession they have than makes me interested in knowing more into that subject. The more obscure, the better and the more passionate they are about an obscure thing, even better. And I think it shows people’s capability to be really passionate about something and sell something and think about something in a very structured and detailed way.
Lenny: What are some products that you love and have recently discovered?
Kevin Aluwi: Two products, I think right now that I’ve found absolutely delightful. One is the ARC Browser. I know that it’s gaining a lot of traction out there, but I’m a very chronic tab hoarder. My Chrome tabs are just all over the place, and I love that they’ve figured out I would say the best approach to kind of tab management, and there’s just a ton of little delightful, awesome design details in the app that I think is just really cool. And it’s a browser. When’s the last time there was a really cool browser that came out? So I also love the ambition that the company has.
Second product, Steam Deck. I’m a huge gamer, and I think it is probably, I would say the best game platform to actually build on the vision of truly portable mobile gaming.
Lenny: I love your point with ARC for tab hoarders. I also used to have a lot of tabs and I love it just auto deletes stuff and just disappear, and it forces you to lose your tabs and it works out surprisingly.
Kevin Aluwi: Final question.
Lenny: I’m curious what comes up for this one? What’s something you’ve recently changed or that you’ve heard of someone at Gojek recently changed in their product development process that was maybe minor, that had a tremendous impact on the team’s ability to execute.
Kevin Aluwi: One relatively minor thing that I thought had a lot of impact with execution is being very clear that whoever is accountable for the results should also be the decider. I found that a lot of literature out there says that product teams should be this communal best ideas come from everywhere group, which I think is well-intentioned and absolutely everyone should contribute ideas, but I think not having it be super clear who is accountable and who is deciding often slows down execution a lot. And I think when we switch to making it really clear that who was the decider for any kind of product development process, I think our execution definitely improved significantly.
Lenny: Amazing. Kevin, thank you so much for being here. Gojek is such an interesting and important story, and I feel like most founders can learn something from the story, so I was really excited to bring you on and to hear a lot of these wild stories that you shared. Two final questions. Where can folks find your line if they want to reach out, learn more, and how can listeners be useful to you?
Kevin Aluwi: I am @kaluwi on Twitter. That’s also my email, kaluwi@gmail.com. I’ll always be happy to chat about Gojek or just generally anything technology related. Again, I have nothing I’m working on at the moment, so I just would love to jam with cool people.
Lenny: Amazing. Thank you again for being here.
Kevin Aluwi: Thanks, Lenny.
Lenny: Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| angel investing | 天使投资 |
| API security | API 安全 |
| attach rate | 附加率 |
| boutique investment banking firm | 精品投资银行 |
| CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) | CAC(获客成本) |
| CFO (Chief Financial Officer) | CFO(首席财务官) |
| CIO (Chief Information Officer) | CIO(首席信息官) |
| closed loop ecosystem | 闭环生态系统 |
| code obfuscation | 代码混淆 |
| CPC (Cost Per Click) | CPC(每次点击成本) |
| CPM (Cost Per Mille) | CPM(千次展示成本) |
| CPO (Chief Product Officer) | CPO(首席产品官) |
| cross-sell | 交叉销售 |
| Crystal Widjaja | Crystal Widjaja(Gojek 前增长负责人,保留原文) |
| Gojek | Gojek(印度尼西亚超级应用平台,保留原文) |
| moat | 护城河(商业竞争壁垒的比喻) |
| MoM (Month-over-Month) | 月环比 |
| motorcycle taxi mafia | 摩的出租车黑帮 |
| on-demand | 按需 |
| performance marketer | 效果营销人员 |
| postpaid | 后付费 |
| prepaid | 预付费 |
| product-market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| ride hailing | 网约车 |
| scrappy | 草根(指初创公司资源有限但灵活应变、因陋就简的创业风格) |
| SEA (Southeast Asia) | 东南亚 |
| super app | 超级应用 |
| tab hoarder | 标签页囤积者 |
| top up | 充值 |
| upsell | 追加销售 |
| UXR (User Experience Research) | UXR(用户体验研究) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
出租车利益集团、现金金库与 100% 月环比增长:东南亚最大创业公司的故事 | Kevin Aluwi (Gojek)
文字记录
Kevin Aluwi:
在 Gojek 的早期,我们的服务遭遇了大量抵制。早期最常见的抵制实际上来自摩的出租车黑帮。有些区域基本上被特定的地头势力通过暴力手段控制。当我们开始让司机接单、载客时,这些人真的会对我们的司机进行人身攻击。我们经历过各种情况——从朝司机扔砖头,到用刀和砍刀威胁他们。我想我们本可以轻松地说,“他们都是承包商,是第三方,让他们自己去处理吧。“但我们没有这样做,而是雇佣了私人安保。我们与私人安保公司合作,在那些情况下帮助我们的司机,帮他们从棘手的处境中脱身。所以实际上,我们在相当长的一段时间里维持着一个相当大规模的私人安保行动。
欢迎来到播客
Lenny:
欢迎来到 Lenny 的播客,我在这里采访世界级的产品领导者和增长专家,从他们打造和发展当今最成功产品的宝贵经验中学习。今天的嘉宾是 Kevin Aluwi。Kevin 是一家名叫 Gojek 的公司的联合创始人兼前 CEO,我一直对这家公司非常着迷。你可能还记得之前的嘉宾 Crystal Widjaja,她曾是 Gojek 的增长负责人,我一直想了解更多背后的故事。Gojek 以其敢打敢拼、独特的运营和增长方式著称,也是全球最早、最成功的超级应用之一。长期以来,它们可能也是印度尼西亚乃至整个东南亚最大的创业公司。Kevin 和 Gojek 的故事对美国乃至全球的创始人都大有启发,所以我很兴奋能与 Kevin 坐下来深入挖掘这个故事,他没有让我失望。
你将听到各种疯狂的故事——他们不得不雇佣私人安保团队来保护司机,不得不建立自己的现金分发中心来支付司机薪水,还有他们如何在很大程度上得益于早期的品牌投资而取得胜利,为什么创业公司要做那些困难的事情。此外,为什么超级应用出人意料地被高估了,以及更多内容。稍作休息后,请欣赏这期与 Kevin Aluwi 的节目。
[广告段落已跳过]
初识与 Gojek 是什么
Lenny:
Kevin,欢迎来到播客。
Kevin Aluwi:
谢谢。感谢你的邀请,Lenny。我们经过了几周甚至几个月的来回沟通,终于成行了。
Lenny:
是的,我真的很高兴终于见到你,并深入聊很多话题。我觉得这会是非常独特的一期节目。我的播客上不常请创始人,尤其是总部不在美国的公司创始人。这次是印度尼西亚的公司,Crystal Widjaja 之前上过我的播客,她是我最喜欢的嘉宾之一,她就说”Lenny,你一定要请 Kevin 上你的播客。“所以今天我们在这里。
Kevin Aluwi:
很高兴能成为你邀请的那一小类人中的一员。谢谢你。我是你所做事情的超级粉丝。
Lenny:
谢谢,兄弟,我真的很感激。把话题转向你,你是一家名叫 Gojek 的公司的联合创始人。很多听众从未听说过 Gojek,尤其是美国的听众。所以先简单说一下,Gojek 是什么,你们做什么?然后我觉得更有意思的是规模——我觉得美国的听众一旦听到你们这家公司达到的规模,会大吃一惊。他们可能都没听说过。
Kevin Aluwi:
Gojek 起初是一个基于摩的出租车的服务。这是一种非常有印度尼西亚特色的事物,我们在印度尼西亚所有城市中心有数以百万计的摩的出租车司机。所以我们从一个非常本地化的问题出发,第一款产品是一个按需超级应用,你可以叫一个骑摩托车的人载你一程、替你送包裹,或者替你买东西送到你手上。随后几年,它逐步演变成一个更通用的按需消费超级应用,也加入了汽车司机和更多服务——从前面提到的那些,扩展到杂货配送、支付和金融服务。
大约一年半之前,我们与印度尼西亚最大的电商平台合并后上市了。我们也成功拓展到了印度尼西亚以外的地区,目前在整个东南亚拥有大约 270 万名司机。去年我们完成了约 30 亿笔订单——30 亿笔订单。我们这个地区的规模常常被低估,我们还拥有大约 1500 万商户,涵盖综合电商以及食品配送服务中的餐厅。关于那次 IPO,我们很自豪地说那是印度尼西亚有史以来规模最大的 IPO,我们募集了超过 10 亿美元,估值大约在 270 亿到 280 亿美元之间。
Lenny:
你分享的这些数字——270 万司机、30 亿笔订单……
Kevin Aluwi:
30 亿。
Lenny:
30 亿。这和 Uber 或 Lyft 比起来怎么样?
Kevin Aluwi:
我不知道他们最新的数据,但仅就用户人数和活动量而言,我会把我们的规模放在最大的美国公司之列。
Lenny:
有这么一家很多人都不太了解的公司,规模基本上和 Uber、Lyft 一个量级,确实挺令人惊讶的。
Kevin Aluwi:
就单量而言,我会说我们跟全球范围内的 Uber 是同一级别的,而且肯定比 Lyft 大。我不记得美国有多少司机,但我们在这个地区的司机数量绝对比整个美国都多。
Gojek 到底做了什么
Lenny:
为了确认一下,你刚才说它是一个超级应用。Gojek 到底都做了些什么?随便分享什么都行,能做的所有事情。
Kevin Aluwi:
在我们拥有最多服务的时期,从网约车到包裹递送、外卖配送、生鲜杂货配送,我们应有尽有。我们有搬家服务,用卡车和面包车。我们有按需上门按摩、清洁服务。你可以在 Gojek 上做头发、订电影票、申请贷款、支付各种费用。在我们巅峰时期,大概有将近 30 种不同的服务,全部集中在一个应用里。
Lenny:
我觉得如果连创始人都记不清自家产品到底做了什么,那你就正式成为超级应用了。
Kevin Aluwi:
确实如此。我敢打赌,公司内部没有任何人能说出我们曾经在应用上线的所有服务,因为有一段时间确实疯狂得很。我也很想找个时间谈谈我对超级应用的看法,因为我们经历了那整个周期后,我确实对它作为产品策略有一些矛盾的感受。
超级应用的反思
Lenny:
现在就聊这个可能正好。我知道我原本把这部分留到后面,但现在可能是个好时机。我觉得这件事特别有意思的部分原因是,现在打开 Uber,它提供的功能大概有 40 个之多。Elon 在 Twitter 上也在谈把 Twitter 变成一个超级应用,比如支付、通讯、消息,各种功能都塞进去。所以我觉得这是一个在美国不断冒头的非常有趣的趋势,我非常想听听你对超级应用的看法。
Kevin Aluwi:
好,我在这点上可能会说得很直白——我确实对超级应用最近被频繁提及感到有点厌烦。在 VC、顾问和分析师圈子里,它真的非常流行,因为在战略 PPT 上听起来非常美好——那些看起来很诱人的东西,比如更低的获客成本(CAC)、不同产品之间更高的附加率(attach rate)、跨服务更高的留存、交叉销售和追加销售的便利性。所有这些听起来都很棒,但在现实中,很多这些好处并没有兑现。
有一个我觉得很能说明问题的例子:我记得我们有一个产品是手机话费充值和流量充值。在东南亚,大多数人用的是预付费套餐而不是后付费套餐。所以每个人基本上都在每周或每月初提前买好通话时长和流量包。所以我们有一个手机充值产品。我之所以提到这个具体产品,是因为它能很好地说明超级应用的问题——这是一个超过 95% 的客户都需要的产品,因为他们都是预付费用户。所以这是一个非常相关的产品。然后我们让 UX 研究团队去调查为什么这个产品的参与度没有我们预期的那么高。我们的 UXR 团队问客户的一个问题是:“你知道可以在 Gojek 应用上给手机充值、买流量吗?“结果只有大约 30% 到 40% 的客户知道这个产品的存在。这完全让我们震惊了,因为第一,这是一个对所有客户都有用的产品;第二,它就在首页六个按钮之一上,就在那儿。
我觉得我们在这里得到的洞察是,你的应用内所有服务之间需要有一个统一的概念,用户才能以一种合理的方式理解你的产品。对我们来说,用户理解我们的方式是——他们想到的是司机。所以当我们从网约车扩展到包裹递送、外卖、生鲜配送时,客户完全能理解。我们不需要向客户推销”所有这些服务都在一个应用里”这个概念,因为他们想到的是 Gojek 司机。这就说得通了。你可以很容易地把一个网约车用户转化为生鲜客户或外卖客户,因为他们理解那个统一要素——司机。
但当你开始做其他不符合这个统一概念的事情时——就客户想到你服务时的认知模型而言——它就开始瓦解了。另一个有趣的 UXR 洞察是:当我们推出按摩服务的时候。我们曾经有一段时间提供按摩服务——你可以预约按摩师上门——不过几年后我们把它关掉了。很多客户问的问题是:“哦,是司机要来我家给我按摩吗?“对我们来说这太荒谬了——当然不是,我们的司机又不是受过训练的按摩师。但人们就是会问这样的问题,因为他们觉得:“哦,这个应用就是提供这些跟司机相关服务的应用,那如果有按摩服务的话,我猜也是同一个人来给我按摩。”
所以我觉得这说明了一个问题:拥有这些让客户容易理解多种不同服务的统一概念非常重要。它不像某些人想的那么简单——哦,我们有很多活跃度,我们有很多注意力,然后你就有了一个对客户来说有意义的超级应用。那些更低 CAC、更高留存等美好图景——这些战略 PPT 上常见的卖点——往往不会兑现,因为你实际上必须重新推销”哦,这是另一个你可以使用的服务”这个概念。而这需要你在广告和用户教育上投入,反而增加了那些获客成本。
它还会带来设计上的约束,因为展示一堆彼此没什么关联的服务,能用的方式就那么几种。这就是为什么你看今天的超级应用,基本就是一张巨大的菜单或者巨大的网格,这确实限制了你可做的设计决策,而这是令人遗憾的,因为如果你实际去看——我认为这在目前还是一个未解决的问题。
品牌的重要性与建设
Lenny: 关于按摩产品那个故事真的很好笑。听起来很多创业公司在扩展新产品、试图成为超级应用时都会遇到类似的问题。我想稍微转换一下话题,聊聊品牌。在这次对话之前我做了一些功课,看了你在 Marshall 毕业典礼上的演讲,还有你之前做的几个采访。从你过去的文章和演讲中,有一点非常突出——就是你对品牌的重视程度,以及你赋予品牌的价值。你对品牌的重要性有非常多的看法。而对我来说,对大多数人来说,品牌是一个很模糊的东西,很难知道到底该做什么来建设品牌,什么时候该优先考虑它,如何在其他正在做的事情中给它排优先级,尤其是在早期阶段。所以我很想听听你对正在收听的创始人们的建议——关于品牌,我到底应该做些什么?你对于如何从实操层面入手做品牌有什么建议?以及你为什么认为品牌如此重要?
Kevin Aluwi: 我同意你的看法,品牌确实是大多数人眼中那种模糊的东西,常常被当作事后才考虑的事,也许正因为它是难以定义的模糊事物。但我非常坚信,在消费业务中最重要的两件事就是产品和品牌,按这个顺序。我不需要特别去推销这个理念——尤其是对你的听众来说——产品绝对是关键的,也可能是最重要的。但把品牌当作事后考虑,我认为这是消费科技企业中一个巨大的机会错失。我能理解为什么我们一开始先聊了公司的规模,好让那些不太了解我们或这个地区的听众对规模有个概念。
但我其实不希望必须从那里开始,因为我们最初是一家非常精打细算的公司,当时我们是资金最匮乏的一方,如果没有品牌,我们可能永远无法从那个阶段挣脱出来达到逃逸速度。我们之所以能在印尼持续保持领先地位,很大程度上归功于我们在品牌方面所做的大量工作。可以给你一个概念,我们在竞争中必须多么精打细算——在我们 App 上线后的前六个月,我们只融了大约 200 万美元,而我们的区域性竞争对手已经融了 2.5 亿。所以他们的资本实际上是我们的 100 多倍。所以现在谈论我们建立的这个大型业务很容易,但我们是从严重资金不足的起点走过来的。我认为我们之所以能存活下来,一个重要原因是我们在消费者、司机和商家心中建立了强大的品牌。我认为优秀的品牌能在客户心中创造超越一般交易性或功利性关系的联想,它们成为一个人身份认同的一部分。
我认为最典型的例子大概就是苹果的狂热粉丝、耐克的球鞋爱好者。对这些个体来说,品牌成为他们身份认同中很重要的一部分,他们对公司产品的忠诚度超越了那种仅仅通过折扣或竞争对手可能提供的更多功能就能轻易动摇的关系。所以我非常坚信这一点的重要性,因为如果你暂时跳出科技圈去看一看,你会发现有很多伟大的公司正是依靠品牌的力量建立了出色的业务,为客户创造了极佳的体验。你问,具体能做哪些事情?
品牌建设的具体做法
我认为对我们来说,我们在多个领域对品牌进行了大量投入。其中一个我认为非常重要的方面是:在所有客户触点上保持一致性。所以品牌不仅仅是一个酷炫的 Logo、酷炫的广告、有趣的画面,它真正关乎的是客户或用户在与你的产品和企业互动时获得的整体印象。所以在所有客户触点上保持这种一致性非常重要。比如你在广告和应用中的文案怎么写,应用本身如何设计——我们是大规模企业中第一家在广告中不把自己看得太重的公司。我们会拿自己开玩笑,拿对印尼文化的观察开玩笑。同样是为了营造这样一种整体感觉:我们懂,我们是印尼整体文化的一部分。我认为甚至超越了那些更偏向美学或传播方向的投入,我们还在产品功能中融入了文化符号,真正将品牌打造成日常生活文化的一部分。
我最喜欢的文化符号之一是:在亚洲,给亲人或你感兴趣的人送食物作为礼物是非常常见的。人们会把食物作为礼物送给自己的恋爱对象。所以当我们推出外卖服务的时候,很多人实际上就是在用它来做这件事——“我要把这个送给我男朋友、女朋友,或者我正在追求的人”。于是这就成了一种文化现象,人们通过送 go-food 来表达心意。我们在产品功能上顺势而为——当时市场上其他玩家基本上只允许你把食物送到家里或办公室,但我们专门做了一个功能,让你可以选择一个离你很远的地方作为配送点。
当时其他公司不允许这样做有很多原因,比如可能会被用来欺诈之类的。但我们选择了顺势而为,实际上创建了可以把取货点设置在远离你实际位置的功能。然后我们就围绕 go-food 约会这个概念玩出了很多花样。所以是的,这算是品牌的一部分,但要把品牌思考超越单纯的营销传播,而是真正做到与用户产生共鸣、成为文化的一部分、对文化保持敏感。我认为这是我们在早期做得非常好的一件事,让我们能够持续保持领先地位,尽管竞争对手拥有更多资金——意味着他们可以提供更多折扣、给司机更多激励——但我们真正下大力气做的,是不把自己仅仅定位为一个功利性的日用品,而很多人会说我们的业务本质上在某种程度上就是如此。
Lenny: 为了更具体一些——从你刚才分享的内容中,一个很有意思的收获是,着手做品牌的第一步是弄清楚你的产品人格是什么。对你来说,你说的是我们就是普通人中的一员,和你一样,我们在这里帮你、让你的生活更轻松。然后这个人格会指导你的文案、你的信息传达,带着一点点——我忘了你具体怎么描述的了,但就是那种甚至会用不太标准的语法之类的,因为这更能让人产生共鸣——然后还有一些与此呼应的产品功能上线。如果你在这方面还有什么想补充的会很有意思。另外,有没有一两个对品牌建设帮助最大的时刻?我知道你们因司机头盔和夹克衫而相当有名,这些帮助传播了 Gojek 的品牌。还有没有其他你觉得”哇,这真的非常有效地建设了这个最终主导印尼的品牌”的时刻?
夹克和头盔:最强大的品牌资产
Kevin Aluwi: 夹克和头盔这件事我认为真的非常重要,原因有两个。其一比较明显——因为它们遍布印尼很多城市的街头巷尾,人们对这些视觉形象和名字非常熟悉。但我认为同样重要的是,人们亲眼看到了正在发生的事情。如果我们是一家航空公司,在街头给一群人穿上我们的品牌,当然,这或许有助于品牌回忆,人们可能会知道这个名字。但真正有力量的是,当人们看到这些穿着夹克、戴着头盔的司机时,他们在堵车的时候会看到后座上坐着乘客。我堵在车流里,看到这些人带着这些标志从我身边飞驰而过,立刻就产生了那种联想——哦,我堵在这里,但我也可以像他们一样骑着摩托车穿行于车流之间。或者你看到他们在送包裹、送外卖,你立刻就会想到,哦,这些人可以帮我送外卖、送包裹。
所以这是一种美妙的结合:一方面是让这种视觉形象无处不在,不断强化人们对品牌的记忆;但更重要的是,它也是对我们所提供的服务的实体提醒——我们做什么,我们如何帮助你。所以我觉得,应该去寻找那些让顾客能够在品牌标志、色彩、名称与实际服务之间建立联系的机会,这才是我认为大家应该留意的机会。不可否认,这种机会相当稀少,这也正是为什么在我看来,最偷懒的品牌做法往往最流行——直接把名字和文案放在广告牌上,或者放在 CPM、CPC 广告上。但确实存在这样的机会,能够以一种超越单纯视觉回忆的方式来强化你业务的价值主张。我认为这就是为什么我特别喜欢讲那个具体的故事,因为它确实是那种罕见的、能够提醒人们我们为什么存在的特殊时刻。
Lenny: 对,我记得你发过推文说,给头盔和夹克印上 logo 是你们作为一家公司做过的最重要的事情之一。这让我想起 Lyft 的粉色胡子,虽然后来不用了,但当时确实是一种非常重要的差异化方式。
Kevin Aluwi: 完全同意。
“Gojek 式的草根”:早期的疯狂创业故事
Lenny: 你谈到过你们非常草根(scrappy),我想更深入聊聊这个。我觉得存在”美国初创公司式的草根”,然后还有”Gojek 式的草根”。听一两个故事应该会很有意思,来展示你们在早期到底有多疯狂地因陋就简。
Kevin Aluwi: 早期我们做过一件绝对算得上疯狂的事。我们是印尼乃至东南亚的先驱科技公司之一,所以我们进入的是一个这样的环境——很多在更发达经济体中公司或人们习以为常的东西,比如电子支付或数字支付,在我们刚开始的时候实际上并不存在。于是我们遇到了一个问题:怎么给司机付款。每天我们要给司机发放激励,或者顾客用信用卡或账户余额支付后,我们需要让司机能够把收入提现出来。在早期,我们实际上设立了现金柜台——真正的物理空间,里面放着保险柜,保险柜里装着现金。司机可以过来说,这是我的司机 ID,这是我在你们那里的余额,请给我现金。
所以我们有这些实实在在的物理网点,司机们排着队取现金。后来我们终于搞定了和银行的合作,接入了 ATM 网络,解决了这个问题。但在早期,我们就是自己干的,相当于建了一个迷你的 ATM 网络——不过说实话这听起来都太高级了,因为它其实就是一间放着保险柜和现金的亭子。而当时我们在印尼各地已经有数万名司机了。
Crystal 最近还提醒了我另一件早期的草根故事。当时市面上有大量伪造的司机应用,因为我们还没有做后来那些安全方面的投入,比如代码混淆、更好的 API 安全机制,这些本可以阻止那些欺诈性的司机应用——那些第三方司机应用连接到我们的平台。所以有很多司机在使用这些第三方应用,做着一些……他们在做不太光彩的事情,比如窃取司机的个人信息,有些甚至恶劣到窃取财务信息,然后找机会盗取司机的资金。而这些应用说服司机使用的方式是,它们实际上添加了一些我们当时不提供的功能。比如我们希望司机对应用上发生的事情保持注意力,所以我们确保司机必须手动按下接单按钮。
我们确保这是司机接单的唯一方式,但那个应用有一个功能,可以在订单进来时自动接单。所以这实际上是一个很有意思的局面——这些应用在做欺诈性的、对平台安全性有害的事情,但同时它们也在为使用者提供一些价值。于是我们当时必须做出决定:好吧,我们需要把这个扼杀在萌芽状态。有一种做法是真正在技术安全层面大力投入,但这需要时间,而我们没有这个能力。工程和安全人才在东南亚当时极其稀缺,今天仍然如此,但那个时期更是极度匮乏。
所以我们最终做出了一个决定:直接复制那些功能。我们实际上研究了所有这些第三方欺诈应用,然后没有去构建一整套系统来阻止它们被开发或阻止它们在平台上运行,而是直接说,“嘿,把他们最热门的两三个功能拿过来,做到我们自己的应用里。“这实际上显著减少了这些第三方应用的用户数量——就是抱着一种”打不过就加入”的心态。我想说的是,这不是一个哲学层面的决定,也不是一个基于原则的决定。这实际上是出于无奈的决定,因为我们当时确实没有能力构建对抗这些应用的所有技术手段。
与山寨应用的较量和其他草根故事
这些故事太有趣了——你们居然要跟那些山寨的越狱应用、欺诈应用竞争,然后还得在全国各地建起一个现金充值网络,太不可思议了。我就知道这个问题里一定有好故事,很高兴你讲了出来。Gojek 内部还有一种感觉,就是总是去做困难的事情,你刚才就分享了几个这样的故事。很多创业公司的心态是”做最简单的事”,但感觉你们偏偏倾向于做困难的事。为什么?这个想法从哪来的?还有没有其他类似”我们偏要用困难的方式来做”的故事?
**Kevin Aluwi:**我真的不太喜欢”护城河”这个概念。这也是战略类人士经常抛出来的一个词——你的业务或产品的护城河是什么?通常人们期待的回答是,哦,看看这个能力、看看这个功能、看看这个分发渠道伙伴,诸如此类的东西。但我不认为任何护城河是能够长期持久的。只要给足够的时间,所有护城河最终都可以被跨越。而我认为有一个不怎么被讨论的所谓护城河,就是你能够做困难的事情——因为困难的事情本身就是困难的。只要你做的事情对客户有价值,单纯地去做困难的事情,实际上就形成了一个让你的竞争对手更难抢走客户的地位,因为那些事情本身就是难做的。
摩的出租车黑帮的暴力威胁
可能另一个听起来非常困难的例子是,在 Gojek 早期,我们的服务遭遇了大量抵制,而其中一种、也是早期最常见的一种抵制形式,实际上来自摩的出租车黑帮。一些区域基本上被特定的地方黑帮通过暴力手段所控制。当我们的司机开始接单、接送乘客时,这些人真的会对我们的司机进行人身攻击。我们经历过的情况五花八门——从向司机扔砖头,到挥舞刀具和砍刀,到直接的身体冲突,甚至是成群结队的人打群架。当时雅加达街头确实发生了很多这类事情。我觉得我们大可以说:“他们都是承包商,是第三方,让他们自己去解决吧。”
但我们没有这样做,而是雇佣了私人安保。我们与私人安保公司合作来应对这些情况,在这些场合帮助我们的司机,帮他们从这些棘手的局面中脱身。所以我们实际上运营了一个相当大规模的私人安保行动,持续了相当长的时间,直到 Gojek 司机在各城市做这些事情变得习以为常。我们运营了这个非常运营密集的项目,就是为了确保我们的司机能尽可能安全。这也向司机群体展示了我们的承诺,展示了我们是真心在乎。再说回之前提到的品牌联想——司机们知道,我们不是一个不在乎他们的平台。我们确实关心他们的安全,这帮助我们建立起了那种好感。后来即使竞争对手开始出更高的价钱,我们在司机群体中仍然保持了很多忠诚度,正是因为这样的事情。
**Lenny:**你们的安保人员实际上是怎么操作的?是骑着摩托车假装成乘客,然后跳出来揍人吗?
**Kevin Aluwi:**只有少数情况是那样的,大部分情况下更像是有一个随叫随到的服务——他们可以拨打一个号码,5 到 10 分钟距离内就会有人赶到。所以我们实际上在特定热点区域部署了巡逻,如果某个地方有情况酝酿,他们会立刻或几乎立刻赶到现场,协助化解冲突。
超级应用内部的”迷你企业”
**Lenny:**我太喜欢这个了——你们有这个超级应用,为用户做各种事情;而在公司内部,你们又建起了各种迷你业务,像一整个银行来给人们支付,一家私人安保公司。可能还有其他的……Crystal 还分享过一个故事,说你们租了一个体育场,把司机们召集过来给他们发手机。
**Kevin Aluwi:**对。
**Lenny:**这太棒了。
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的,我觉得这大概也是这个地区的一个标志性特征——我毫不怀疑我们当时在建的以及今天所是的是一家技术公司,但我确实认为在早期你必须更偏重运营。而我认为这也促成了那种草根风格,因为有很多事情如果要用优雅的技术手段来解决,需要花费大量时间。而过度聚焦于这类解决方案,我觉得反而对客户是一种亏欠,因为有很多机会可以通过——也许是运营上的创新——让事情在短期内好很多,作为一种起步,直到你有了更优雅、可扩展的技术或产品方案。
创始人要多角色亲身实践
**Lenny:**这让我想到,在 Gojek 期间你担任过很多不同的角色。你当然是联合创始人,一度担任联合 CEO,一度是事实上的 CPO,还有 CIO、CFO。听说你还亲自写过推送通知的文案,甚至当过司机,就为了让业务继续运转。所以这似乎也是你所说的”去做困难的事”的一个很好的例子,在运营层面亲力亲为。
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的,实际上在 Gojek 早期我确实有过一段业余效果营销的经历。我会写广告文案,把广告上传到 Facebook 和 Google 上,尽我所能优化我们的线上营销支出。但我做所有这些事情,并不一定是因为想要草根,而是我认为——这对创始人来说可能更相关,对高管不太适用——但作为创始人,我确实认为理解需要完成的工作、并看到优秀标准是什么样的,是非常重要的。再说回我们的情况,我们身处的生态系统中,经验丰富的人才供给本来就相对稀缺。所以我很难说”好,我们从 Y 组织招来 X 这个人,他的职位描述是 Z,我们知道他大概能胜任”——因为人才的可用性确实很低。
所以很多时候我觉得自己需要理解:这份工作是什么?具体包含什么内容?而看到自己做得有多糟糕,反而让我理解了”优秀”是什么样子。所以我担任了很多那些角色,只是因为我想尽可能好地理解业务的每一个部分,然后再去找那些能比我做得好几个数量级的人。我觉得这对所有这些角色都成立,除了当司机这件事。当司机的时候,我不是试图理解作为司机的优秀标准是什么。司机们做的确实是一份非常有挑战性的工作,我只是想理解这个角色的体验,培养对这份工作更多的同理心,确保我们的产品真正迎合他们的需求。
**Kevin Aluwi:**所以我们刚推出汽车网约车服务的时候,我觉得自己是平台上第一个真正的司机,隔三差五就会去接几单。我记得早些时候我真的接到了一位乘客——是一位女士,她输入的目的地是一家商场。于是我把车开到她家门口,心里知道好,我需要开去那个商场。但这位女士拎着一个巨大的袋子出来了,我不得不跳下车,把那个大袋子搬进后备箱,然后我们就出发了。开到半路的时候她说:“嘿,我需要在去商场的路上先把衣服送到洗衣店。“我只能应一声”好的,没问题。“我们绕了路,我把那个巨大的袋子从后备箱拖出来,帮这位女士送了洗衣物。
然后我们到了商场,我从这次经历中赚到了很少的一点钱,而且不是马上就赚到的,但这最终让我在很多方面给予了司机团队大力支持——当他们推动说”嘿,我们需要更多的等待费用,我们需要增加多停靠点功能,以确保这些额外的工作确实能得到补偿”的时候。这是我亲身经历过的事情,也是当我们在构建司机端应用时,我非常愿意推动的一组产品功能和原则。
**Lenny:**感觉这种亲力亲为最终反而成了一种优势,就像你说的,你实际体验了很多这些挑战,而且你刚才说的那点非常好——关于知道该招什么样的人、这些人实际要做什么工作。
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的。
从金融到科技
**Lenny:**有意思的是,这种经历往往会转化为一件好事。我知道你进入科技行业也有一段相当有趣的故事。能和我们分享一下吗?
**Kevin Aluwi:**嗯,我基本上是一个失败的金融从业者。我其实不太清楚自己这辈子想做什么。2005年我上大学的时候,最热门、最光鲜的行当就是金融,我猜那也是我当时的追求。于是我学了金融,然后2008年金融危机爆发了,而我是2009年毕业的,所以大概是想成为金融从业者最糟糕的时机。我经历了一段非常艰难的时期,但最终我在一家精品投资银行找到了一份工作。那时候我觉得,好,这辈子稳了。我得到了我想要的工作,在金融行业里做事。但长话短说,我做得不太好。我做得确实不太好。我的上司认为我表现不佳,我自己也不觉得自己表现好到哪里去,然后我就离开了那个我曾经把全部未来梦想和身份认同都寄托在上面的领域。
离开之后,我决定在印度尼西亚的科技领域押一注。因为这一切发生的时间大概在2010、2011年左右,当时美国的科技巨头正在崛起。我当时想,如果印度尼西亚有朝一日也发展出自己的科技产业,能在最开始就参与其中一定非常酷。于是我2011年搬了回去,那时候真的非常早。人才水平、资金规模、product-market fit(产品市场契合度),以及在互联网上进行交易的人数,都还处于极低的水平。人们仍然把互联网看作是一个聊天应用和社交媒体的地方。所以当时人们对这个领域的信心相当低。
人们不认为能够在这里建立真正的企业和真正有价值的产品,尤其是由本地团队来建立。所以做出那个押注——我认为非常幸运地,我们在这个领域的极早期就进入了,而今天这个领域已经变得非常活跃。东南亚已经成为当今世界上科技领域最令人兴奋的市场之一。但在当时这一点并不明显。能够亲眼见证这一发展过程,对我来说非常重要,因为它真切地展示了在很短时间内什么是可能的。我觉得这大概是美国的科技从业者能够感同身受的,那些在这个领域工作了二三十年的人。但对我来说,能够亲历那些早期岁月是非常宝贵的,这也是一段我非常珍惜的经历。
在硅谷之外创业
**Lenny:**在硅谷之外创建一家公司真的很难,而在当时更是难上加难。COVID 和远程办公的出现几乎让这件事变得比以往任何时候都容易了。
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的。
**Lenny:**听起来,你远离湾区这一事实在很大程度上影响了你打造这家公司的方式,也就是你所谈到的那种草根精神。我很好奇,基于你的经验,对于现在试图在湾区或者美国以外创业的创始人,你有没有什么建议。
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的,说实话,那时候真的非常难。尤其难的是,印度尼西亚是一个非常有价值的市场,印度尼西亚以及整个——我主要想说印度尼西亚,因为它的规模——但总体而言东南亚确实是一个非常有价值的市场,而且对全球公司来说也很有吸引力,它们都想赢得这个市场。所以我们同时与全球性和区域性公司竞争,但本地的人才和资金生态系统却非常不成熟。一方面要与世界上最优秀的公司争夺市场上的客户,另一方面又无法在本地获得构建有竞争力产品和公司所需的全部资源——这种挑战,我想大概是在硅谷以及中国、印度等其他科技中心之外的典型市场创业最困难的部分之一。
所以基于这些经验,我的一些心得:我们之前谈了很多关于草根的话题。在早期,我们的运营比重远大于技术比重。通过其他方式去做那些不可扩展的事情,我认为如果你在这些主要科技中心之外创业,这绝对是必要的。另一件事我想说的是,你需要很早就擅长远程工作。我认为这在今天已经变得更加普遍,因为越来越多的人有了远程工作的经验。对我们来说,我们在2015年在班加罗尔建立了一个工程中心,这让我们能够更好地与全球巨头竞争,因为当时我们可以利用印度非常深厚的人才市场。但我们在整个远程工作这件事情上走得非常早,因为在我们这个地区,甚至在全球范围内,把这么多人才集中在总部之外并不常见。
我确实相信,想要在硅谷这样的科技中心之外与世界级竞争对手抗衡的公司,必须非常快地掌握远程工作能力,因为获取那部分人才可能意味着需要在本土市场或总部之外设立办公室或招聘个人。最后一点建议是,不要只是照搬,因为 Gojek 不是 Uber 的翻版,尽管一些投资者或分析师是这么描述我们的。我们专注于一个印度尼西亚独有的现象——摩的出租车司机。这带来了产品和品牌两方面的创新。在产品层面,我们是一个 on-demand(按需)超级应用,因为我们看到一个人骑在摩托车上可以做很多事情。所以我们围绕这个理念打造产品,因此我们最终做成了一个超级应用,甚至在那还是一个概念之前。
还有我们之前稍微聊到的品牌策略——给我们的司机穿上夹克、戴上头盔,让人们能看到他们在城市里穿梭。这其实对汽车网约车服务来说并不适用,因为汽车不容易做品牌化,司机也坐在车里。但当时我们所有竞争对手在进入摩托车网约车领域时都没有给司机做品牌标识,因为他们都是从汽车为中心的视角出发的。所以再说一次,如果你在这些科技中心之外创业,理解你所处的市场独特动态也非常重要。
印度尼西亚与东南亚市场的独特性
**Lenny:**我们聊了不少关于印度尼西亚和东南亚的话题。我想听听,人们对这个市场应该了解什么?我们已经聊了你们团队打造的产品以及其他一些公司,但哪些公司值得关注?正在发生什么?最新动态是什么?有什么令人兴奋的?
**Kevin Aluwi:**是的,具体说到印度尼西亚,大多数人不知道印度尼西亚是世界第四大国家,而东南亚拥有接近全球 10% 的人口。但除了宏观数据之外,我认为我们还经历了一种相当独特的现象——真正实现了产品市场契合度的产品在这里的普及速度极快。在这个地区,拥有良好产品市场契合度的产品增长速度惊人。比如 2015 年我们推出应用时,在最初的 16 到 18 个月里,我们的月环比增长超过了 100%。也就是说,在一年多的时间里,我们每个月的规模都翻了一倍以上。
**Lenny:**这太疯狂了,我从未听说过这样的增长速度。
**Kevin Aluwi:**确实如此,我们当时的投资者之一 Sequoia 告诉我们,这是他们在全球范围内听过的最疯狂的增长故事。我觉得这不一定是因为我们有多么聪明,而是因为印度尼西亚和东南亚确实有很多明显存在问题、可以用更好的技术和产品来改善的地方,同时这个地区又拥有非常年轻的人口,他们对尝试新事物充满热情。所以如果你找到了一个真正能解决大量日常问题的方案,它的采用曲线简直疯狂到难以置信。我觉得这是像这类发展中地区独有的特征之一。
举一个很有意思的公司做例子,让大家感受一下这个地区正在打造的那些看似天马行空的产品或公司。有一家叫 eFishery 的公司,他们做的事情基本上是为鱼塘养殖户打造一个闭环生态系统。目前我认为他们只在印度尼西亚运营,或者最近刚开始向印度尼西亚以外扩展。
他们通过一种 IoT 智能设备帮助养殖户喂鱼,这个设备可以测算鱼塘需要投入多少饲料,同时他们还帮助养殖户获得融资,并将产品销售到本地、区域乃至全球市场。这家公司的收入大约达到了两亿五千万美元,而且是盈利的——本质上就是一个鱼塘养殖户的闭环生态系统。这种公司的存在确实很令人惊叹,但我认为它再次印证了我之前说过的:这个地区的人口对更好的解决方案有着强烈的渴望。如果你能找到这些更好的解决方案,你真的可以非常非常快地建立起规模相当可观的公司。
卸任之后
**Lenny:**那么现在,你已经卸任了 CEO,也退出了董事会,接下来有什么打算?感受如何?
**Kevin Aluwi:**说实话,我还在摸索自己的感受。我觉得打造 Gojek 毫无疑问是我最重要的职业经历,坦率地说,也是我人生中最重要的经历之一。它实际上让我变成了一个更好的人。现在离开了之后,我并没有像人们预期的那样感到无聊或迷茫——毕竟这样一段几乎占据了我全部生活的经历刚刚结束。
接下来做什么?说实话,Lenny,我不知道。目前我没有什么计划。我在做一些天使投资,也在和其他创始人合作,分享一些今天谈到的这些经验,同时也在搞清楚什么让我开心、哪些活动让我觉得有意义。我不知道,也许我将来某个时候会再创立一家公司。我觉得那是我默认的方向,但现在我只是在放慢脚步,试着寻找另一个能让我为之着迷的问题。
**Lenny:**你完全赢得了这段探索和寻找新问题的时间。在进入我们非常令人期待的快问快答环节之前,还有什么想补充的吗?
**Kevin Aluwi:**没有了,Lenny。我觉得今天我们聊了很多,感谢你的时间。
快问快答
**Lenny:**太棒了,这绝对是我的荣幸。那么接下来,我们进入了非常令人期待的快问快答环节。我准备了五个问题。准备好了吗?
**Kevin Aluwi:**准备好了,来吧。
**Lenny:**你最常推荐给别人的两三本书是什么?
Kevin Aluwi:《What You Do Is Who You Are》。我觉得那是 Ben Horowitz 第二受欢迎的书,但我真的非常痴迷于打造有趣且有吸引力的企业文化,所以这是第一本。另一本是一本经典的营销书。我们今天聊了很多关于品牌的话题,有一本叫《How Brands Grow》的书,作者是 Byron Sharp。我不一定认同书里的所有内容,但我确实认为这是一本非常好的入门读物,教你如何思考品牌和营销。
**Lenny:**最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧?
**Kevin Aluwi:**最近最喜欢的电影是《The Menu》,最喜欢的电视剧是 Netflix 的《Cyberpunk 2077: Edge Runners》。
**Lenny:**哦,这个我没听过。
**Kevin Aluwi:**哦,你应该去看看,超级酷。
**Lenny:**我去看看。
**Kevin Aluwi:**嗯。
**Lenny:**你最喜欢问的面试问题是什么?
**Kevin Aluwi:**告诉我一个你长期以来一直痴迷的主题或活动。
**Lenny:**你在回答中寻找什么信号来判断这是一个好的回答?
**Kevin Aluwi:**我希望一个人能几乎像做 pitch 一样向我展示他的痴迷,让我也对那个主题产生兴趣。越冷门越好,而且他们对一个冷门事物越有热情就更好。我认为这展现了一个人对某件事真正充满激情的能力,以及推销和以非常有条理、细致的方式深入思考某件事的能力。
**Lenny:**有哪些你最近发现并非常喜欢的产品?
**Kevin Aluwi:**两款产品,我觉得目前让我感到非常惊喜的。一个是 ARC Browser。我知道它已经获得了很大的关注度,但我是一个非常严重的标签页囤积者,我的 Chrome 标签页总是乱七八糟,而我很欣赏他们找到了我认为最好的标签页管理方案,而且应用里有大量精巧、出色的设计细节,我觉得真的很酷。而且它是一个浏览器——上一次出现一个真正酷的浏览器是什么时候?所以我也很喜欢这家公司的雄心。
第二个产品,Steam Deck。我是一个重度游戏玩家,我认为它可能是在真正便携移动游戏这一愿景上实现得最好的游戏平台。
**Lenny:**我很认同你对 ARC 的看法,特别适合标签页囤积者。我以前也经常开很多标签页,我很喜欢它会自动删除东西,标签就那样消失了,迫使你丢掉那些标签,效果出奇地好。
**Kevin Aluwi:**最后一个问题。
执行力提升的关键:明确决策者
**Lenny:**我很好奇你对这个问题的回答——你最近在产品开发流程中做了什么改变,或者听说 Gojek 的人最近做了什么改变,也许是一件小事,但对团队的执行力产生了巨大影响?
**Kevin Aluwi:**有一件相对很小但我认为对执行力有很大影响的事:非常明确地让所有人都知道,谁对结果负责,谁就应该是决策者。我发现很多文献都说产品团队应该是那种集体讨论、好点子来自四面八方的模式,我觉得这个出发点是好的,确实每个人都应该贡献想法。但我认为,如果不把谁负责、谁决策这件事搞得非常清楚,往往会严重拖慢执行速度。当我们转向在任何产品开发流程中都明确谁是决策者之后,我觉得我们的执行力确实有了显著提升。
尾声
**Lenny:**太棒了。Kevin,非常感谢你来做客。Gojek 是一个非常有趣、也非常重要的故事,我觉得大多数创始人都能从中学到东西,所以我一直很期待邀请你来,听你分享这么多精彩的故事。最后两个问题:如果大家想联系你、了解更多,在哪里可以找到你?听众怎样能帮到你?
**Kevin Aluwi:**我的 Twitter 是 @kaluwi,邮箱也是 kaluwi@gmail.com。我随时乐意聊 Gojek,或者任何跟科技相关的话题。再说一下,我目前没有什么正在做的项目,所以很乐意跟有趣的人交流探讨。
**Lenny:**太好了,再次感谢你来参加节目。
**Kevin Aluwi:**谢谢,Lenny。
**Lenny:**非常感谢大家的收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评价,这真的能帮助更多听众找到这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于这个节目的信息。我们下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| angel investing | 天使投资 |
| API security | API 安全 |
| attach rate | 附加率 |
| boutique investment banking firm | 精品投资银行 |
| CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) | CAC(获客成本) |
| CFO (Chief Financial Officer) | CFO(首席财务官) |
| CIO (Chief Information Officer) | CIO(首席信息官) |
| closed loop ecosystem | 闭环生态系统 |
| code obfuscation | 代码混淆 |
| CPC (Cost Per Click) | CPC(每次点击成本) |
| CPM (Cost Per Mille) | CPM(千次展示成本) |
| CPO (Chief Product Officer) | CPO(首席产品官) |
| cross-sell | 交叉销售 |
| Crystal Widjaja | Crystal Widjaja(Gojek 前增长负责人,保留原文) |
| Gojek | Gojek(印度尼西亚超级应用平台,保留原文) |
| moat | 护城河(商业竞争壁垒的比喻) |
| MoM (Month-over-Month) | 月环比 |
| motorcycle taxi mafia | 摩的出租车黑帮 |
| on-demand | 按需 |
| performance marketer | 效果营销人员 |
| postpaid | 后付费 |
| prepaid | 预付费 |
| product-market fit | 产品市场契合度 |
| ride hailing | 网约车 |
| scrappy | 草根(指初创公司资源有限但灵活应变、因陋就简的创业风格) |
| SEA (Southeast Asia) | 东南亚 |
| super app | 超级应用 |
| tab hoarder | 标签页囤积者 |
| top up | 充值 |
| upsell | 追加销售 |
| UXR (User Experience Research) | UXR(用户体验研究) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)