离开科技巨头,打造排名第一的科技 Newsletter | Gergely Orosz(The Pragmatic Engineer)
Leaving big tech to build the #1 technology newsletter | Gergely Orosz (The Pragmatic Engineer)
Gergely Orosz: In my best year at Uber, I made about 320 or $330,000 in total compensation. And when I quit my job, I was actually thinking, am I crazy? Because I am leaving… Especially in Europe, this is a lot of money [inaudible 00:00:14] this will be similar to something… Someone in a similar position would’ve made five or 600K in total in the U.S. But now I am making more in compensation that I made at Uber. And the difference is that now my compensation… Well, my earnings keep going up as long as the newsletter is growing, so there’s no theoretical cap on this. Of course there’s an actual cap, there’s churn, growth is slowing over time. But it’s very, very strange, because I felt that I was in a really privileged position, just honestly making tons of money, doing a job that I loved. And this was at Uber or as a software engineer. And I’m now doing stuff that I love, and in some strange way, I guess it even pays better.
Lenny: Welcome to Lenny’s Podcast. I’m Lenny, and my goal here is to help you get better at the craft of building and growing products. I interview world class product leaders and growth experts to learn from their hard won experiences building and scaling today’s most successful companies. Today my guest is Gergely Orosz. In a sense, Gergely is the me of engineering. He’s got the top engineering newsletter on Substack, it’s growing really fast, and like me, he does this full time. In this episode, we talk about the life of newslettering full time, like we both do. We get into Gergely’s decision to leave his cushy tech job at Uber, to go into this life full-time, what the day-to-day life of a newsletter person is, the pros and cons of this life, what it takes to be successful, and a bunch of advice for how to get started if you’re curious about going down this route. This is a pretty unique episode, and it was really fun to do. If you ever thought about writing or going down this creator route, you’ll love this episode. With that, I bring you Gergely Orosz.
To learn more, just go to lemon.io/lenny and find your perfect developer or tech team in 48 hours or less. And if you start the process now, you can claim a special discount exclusively for Lenny’s Podcast listeners. 15% off your first four weeks of working with your new software developer. Grow faster with an extra pair of hands. Visit lemon.io/lenny.
Gergely, welcome to the podcast.
Gergely Orosz: It’s awesome. Great to be here, Lenny.
Lenny: So I think this is going to be a pretty special and unique podcast. Your newsletter is the number one technology newsletter on Substack, called the Pragmatic Engineer, by the way. My newsletter is the number one business newsletter on Substack, and so we’re connected in this really special, weird way, and I thought it would be pretty fun to just explore this weird path that we’re on doing this newsletter thing, and in that, help listeners understand the pros and cons of this life, how to go down this route, what it takes to be successful, all that stuff. But before we get into all that, I’d love for you to spend maybe a minute just giving us a little overview of your career, and how you got to where you are today doing this newsletter, and what you spend your time on now.
Gergely Orosz: My career started out as what you might consider a pretty typical software engineer career. I graduated from university, I did a computer science degree for a five year program, so I did bachelor’s and master’s. I worked on the side, I hacked around, built small websites here and there, and during university I worked at a small web agency. And then I worked my way up in the industry. So I started off at a consulting company, we were just building for other companies. I’m originally from Hungary, in Europe. I then moved to UK, which was a big step up for me in terms of just getting access to, I guess, more modern software development. I was at a consulting company there as well. And I moved up to London, which in Europe, I feel it’s like the New York of Europe, or even the Silicon Valley, back in the day. Back before Brexit, it was the biggest tech hub.
I worked at an investment bank there, and then on the side I was always building mobile apps, and I got into Skype. I like to say Skype, but it was Microsoft. They just bought Skype at that point, and it was a lot more startup-y environment, a lot more fast moving. I then moved to another startup where I was a founding engineer of a acquisition. It’s a startup called Skyscanner. And then I ended up at Uber at Amsterdam, where I joined as a senior software engineer, and I became a manager, and then a manager of managers, and it was just… I feel, looking back at that part of my career, I just felt really growing all the time, just taking each step one step at a time, which gave me a lot of appreciation for all these levels.
And then, just as I was on this really good career path, I was on the path to being a senior engineering manager, or who knows, one day I might have had a shot of being their director of engineering as well, I decided to leave Uber. And we’ll talk about it a little later in the podcast, but I didn’t plan like this, but I started writing a newsletter. And now here I am writing a newsletter where a bunch of people are reading it, and it’s a really unexpected turn and a really cool life as well.
Lenny: Awesome. On the newsletter, just to give people a little bit of context of how big this has gotten, can you share just a couple stats about the growth of the newsletter, the size, and anything else you want to share there?
Gergely Orosz: Just today I checked and it said 189,000 subscribers. I think the past 90 days has been growing with 80,000 subscribers, so it’s almost a thousand people per day, which is incredible. Because these numbers are huge. If you’re listening, you’re probably thinking, “Wow.” And that’s how I feel every day as well. But I’ve been writing a blog for many, many years, and these are numbers I never thought it would be. And the growth just seems to be accelerating. There was a tipping point in April where the newsletter was growing… In the first about nine months of the newsletter, it got to 50,000 subscribers, and then the next five months, or six or seven months, it went up by another a hundred and something thousand subscribers. This was when Substack introduced recommendations, which has been a massive growth engine, and I guess being one of the top publications, I benefited from it. But those numbers are again…
So this is a paid newsletter as well. So there’s a free version and a paid version, and there’s thousands of people paying for the newsletter. It’s a single digit percentage, but it’s a very, very healthy one. And again, it just beat all my expectations. And I guess we’re in similar boats, because our newsletter setup, yours and mine, is somewhat similar. We have plenty of differences as well, but I make most of my revenue from subscriptions, and I don’t do sponsorships or ads in the newsletter. So if people sign up for the free one, they get articles every now and then, and for the paid one, they get it a lot more and in more depth.
Lenny: Can you give listeners a sense of just the order of magnitude income you make from this, versus your cushy tech job at Uber? You don’t have to share numbers or anything like that.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. I’ll share a little numbers of my cushy tech job at Uber. I was in Europe, and European tech salaries, or I’ll say total compensation, will be lower than for example the U.S., but it’ll be higher than let’s say regions like India or Indonesia. There’s regional differences, and this is true for big tech as well. Uber was a good example on this. But in my best year at Uber, I made about 320 or $330,000 in total compensation. This was after Uber went public, so it includes the stock, the base salary, the bonus, which was very, very good in Europe. And when I quit my job, I was actually thinking, “Am I crazy? Because I’m leaving…” Especially in Europe, this is a lot of money [inaudible 00:09:53] this will be similar to something… Someone in a similar position would’ve made five or 600 K in total in the U.S.
So I walked away from that, and I was pretty sure that I’ll just [inaudible 00:10:04] a lot less, but I’ll enjoy what I’m doing, or I’ll have… I’ll just give it a go. But now I am making more in compensation that I made at Uber. And the difference is that now my compensation, my earnings, keep going up as long as the newsletter is growing, so there’s no theoretical cap on this. Of course there is an actual cap, there’s churn, growth is slowing over time, but it’s very, very strange, because I felt that I was in a really privileged position, just honestly making tons of money, doing a job that I loved. And this was at Uber or as a software engineer. And I’m now doing stuff that I love, and in some strange way, I guess it even pays better. Part of it is just luck, part of this is situational. I think we’re going to talk a bit more about this. But this was very, very surprising and very unexpected for me.
Lenny: Awesome. That’s a great segue to the first thing I want to talk about, but just to frame what I want to spend our time on today, there’s these four areas I want to explore. One is your decision to leave and start this life of writing, which is a very non-traditional life. Two is what the life of a paid newsletter person is like. What do you do all day? How do you find time to do this? How do you produce so much content? Three, what it takes to be successful at this. A lot of people… I always say it’s easy to start a newsletter, hard to keep it going, and I’m curious what you find is important to be successful. And then four, how do you get started if you want to start your own newsletter?
But before I get into that, I just wanted to add a thought that I had. The way I think about this life in terms of comparing to the old job is, one, it feels instead of one boss, I have thousands of micro bosses, and one of them can fire me and many do every day, but it feels safer than at a tech job where one person can decide. And then the other piece is, assuming it keeps growing, you’re getting a raise almost every day, every week, depending on the growth rate, and that’s cool.
Gergely Orosz: That is really cool. I had a spreadsheet that I maintained for the first year of the publication, where I listed, for every article, how much did my annual revenue go up a week later. So tracking what was the impact. And the crazy thing was that, when I wrote a really good article that resonated with people, sometimes it was an article that I thought was mediocre and people still loved it [inaudible 00:12:20] it was a really good article that I put tons of work in, I saw myself getting a raise. And this is just something you just don’t get in corporate. I mean, it’s by design, and there’s a lot of good stuff about it, but I feel that this life, and we’ll touch more on this, but there’s a lot of surprising things, both good and bad, but this is a really good one. So for doing something awesome, you can just give yourself a raise, especially because this is just like you, mine is also a one person business right now.
Lenny: Yeah. Okay. So you’re at Uber, you’re making hundreds of thousands of dollars writing code, it’s pretty sweet. Uber’s growing. You probably got all these RSUs that are going to keep accumulating. It’s pretty good. And you decide, “I’m going to try to make money on the internet writing,” which is an obvious way to make a lot of money. Not. And so I’m curious, what got you to leave that job and explore writing and get to this writing path?
Gergely Orosz: The short of it is, it was a promise to myself, and COVID, and Uber doing layoffs. And the longer version is that, when I joined Uber, before Uber I was… Now we’re talking numbers on my old job, but I was working in London as a principal engineer at Skyscanner. Skyscanner was a unicorn, one of the few unicorns in the UK, UK headquartered and all that, and I was making like 90-something thousand pounds in base salary, which is maybe a 120, 130, or $140,000, depends on how the pound is doing, or sometimes these days it’s almost just the same. But back then that was a really good… And this was most of it. I got some stock as well. And I thought I was close to the top of the market in London. I knew people, and it seemed this was a really good compensation package.
And then Uber called me up saying, “Do you want to interview?” I interviewed with them, they gave me an offer, and I negotiated, and they basically doubled my compensation. I was like, wow, this is [inaudible 00:14:16] I knew about Silicon Valley compensation, but I assumed that [inaudible 00:14:20] you’re not going to get this, but Uber was getting something closer to that. So I told myself, all right, so I’m getting a really good deal, and most of it is stock, which is… Uber [inaudible 00:14:32] 2016, no-one knew if Uber will go public, although I suspected, because they contacted me to build a payments team so do a SOX compliant payment system. And you need a SOX compliant payment system if you want to go IPO.
Lenny: That’s funny. It reminds me at Airbnb, there’s all these people trying to figure out, when are we going to go public? And then there’s the team working on SOX stuff and Sarbanes-Oxley, this is good.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. So anyway, I said, all right, this is a massive lottery ticket. If it goes in, every year I make two years of salary, pretty much. That’s how I was thinking. But if not, again, don’t forget I’m in Europe where we’re used to not seeing any returns on stock. So European software engineers will not value stock as much, because they just haven’t seen success stories. So I told myself, if four years later Uber exits and I make a bunch of money, I owe it to myself to take a risk, because then I’ll have four years of savings in my bank, which… Back then I had maybe six months of savings or something. So this was the promise to myself.
And then I probably would’ve forgotten about this, but four years later, almost on the dot, COVID starts, and it really hit super hard. We’re laying off people, we had to lay off 20% of the engineers. I was already managing a group of about 30 people, I had managers under me, and 20% of the people or 15% had to be let go. And I was thinking to myself, what am I doing here? I looked ahead, Uber was going to have a really bad year, I’m going to have to manage morale. Up to then, I’d helped put together this team, and we had a really good charter, and we had to throw that charter out the window, because it made no sense with the economic reality. So I thought back, and I told myself, if I’ll be here, I’ll take a risk, and I’ll try to do something else. So I was like, all right, let me pull this trigger.
And my plan was very simple. Leave Uber and start a startup, raise venture capital, because I haven’t done that before but it kind of runs in the family. My brother’s on his second startup, and he sold his first one to Skyscanner, and now he’s building this startup called Craft Docs. It’s a really slick document editing system, they just raised their series B. So through him I know [inaudible 00:16:42] startup life is, and I felt I never did that, I always worked at big companies.
So my plan was [inaudible 00:16:47] leave Uber, raise money, and do something on platform engineering. A classic way that Uber alumni start businesses is, Uber has invested silly amounts of money to build everything custom internally. Everything that you can think of. Our [inaudible 00:17:02] system was custom, our experimentation system, our container, the way we automatically set that up, a lot of the engineering stuff. So a lot of Uber alumni just leave, and whatever they saw there, they just build it for the world to use, because no other company really does what Uber does, because it makes no sense, but a lot of them will pay for.
That was the plan. But before [inaudible 00:17:22] I wanted to finish a book. I’d been writing this book for, it was coming up to a year, called the Software Engineer’s Guidebook, which is just my advice for people to grow professionally in the field. And I figured, all right, let me leave the company, in six months I’ll write the book, I’ll just use my savings to take a break, and then I’ll raise the venture capital. And what happened was, I started to write this book, but I got sidetracked, I started to have fun online in terms of… I was writing on Twitter, on my blog. I accidentally published a book called Building Mobile Apps at Scale. I just did it for a few months.
And the weird thing was that my plan was that I’m going to just not make any money, and this book, Building Mobile Apps at Scale, and another book that I published about tech resumes, I just wrote these in a few months, they started making money. They made about $100,000 in the first year. And I was like, “That’s interesting. People are buying my books.” And I self-published it through Gumroad or places where I get to keep I think 90% of the revenue, but still, this was really interesting. And I got to the point where, all right, I should now start a startup. I should do fundraising and do all that. And then I asked myself, why do I really want to do that?
And the answer was two reasons. One is, I love working in small teams at Uber. I’ll be honest, I didn’t really enjoy being a manager of managers. It felt a bit too abstract. I didn’t like being in the meetings, not doing the work. What I really liked is when we had a small team, and we had this really big vision, and it was us against the world. We were like ten of us, and we were just getting stuff done, we were putting out fires, it was so much fun. So that was one of the reasons I wanted to do startup. I was hoping to recreate this feeling.
And the other thing, honestly, was money. This was in 2021 before the market crashed. Just doing the maths, if you found a company, and I’ll be a CEO and the founder, maybe I’ll have a co-founder, this becomes a unicorn, by that time we will have raised five rounds of funding or six, I’ll be diluted as hell, but I’ll still have let’s say 5%. 5% of the billion is still $50 million, after you pay taxes [inaudible 00:19:30] I can buy a bunch of stuff that I don’t need. And I was asking myself, all right, and then what? And I was like, after I’ve bought everything that I don’t need, I probably want to share what I know with people, do YouTube videos and write books.
And I was thinking to myself, so hold on. I would go off and do this for like ten years, because that’s how much you need to plan to do it. I need to stop doing what I’m doing right now, because I would owe it to my investors and my team to not spend all day on the internet writing about stuff. And then I want to do it again. So it’s reminding me of the story of this fisherman. There’s one that goes [inaudible 00:20:08] there’s the same thing of, you work really hard to do what you’re doing right now. So I decided, let me just try giving this a go. [inaudible 00:20:14]
Lenny: Wait, what’s the story of the fisherman? I think I know what you’re talking about, but… [inaudible 00:20:18]
Gergely Orosz: The story of the fisherman is that, in Mexico, an American businessman sees a fisherman who’s just chilling, fishing. And he asks him, “What are you doing all day?” He’s like, “I fish for three hours, I hang out with my family, I [inaudible 00:20:32] chill and I sleep in every Saturday and Sunday.” He says, “All right, here’s what you should be doing. You should fish not three hours, but you should fish five days a week, eight hours a day, sell that fish, turn over a profit, hire more people to do it, then start to be head of all those people, then sell your fishing company.” He’s like, “Okay. And then what?” “And then you can actually buy an island, and you can just fish for three hours, you can sleep in on Saturdays and sleep on Sundays.”
So I was thinking, look, I have savings. I don’t have huge, but I have it for… I can still take a risk. So let me take a risk on writing. And I was thinking originally of just spending more time to finish my book. But what I didn’t like about books, even though I was making money, is they’re really… It’s hard to predict if you’re going to be making a living, or there’s some people who actually like this excitement, but I didn’t like it. I didn’t know if today I’m going to be making like 50 bucks or 10 bucks or 300 bucks. So I was like, interesting. There’s these paid newsletters which I’ve been thinking about, and you were one of the few people who shared some of your early numbers, and I figured this could be interesting, because it’s recurring revenue.
Gergely Orosz: And the only reason I was really hesitant to start a paid newsletter, I was thinking about doing so for at least 6 to 12 months, is I was worried about writing every single week something really, really worthwhile reading, and it’s a lot of work. But then I looked back and I saw that I wrote three books. [inaudible 00:21:58] I told you I wrote two books, but there was a third one that I also published in a year, and I was like, I’m pretty sure I can write. So for two weeks I collected ideas of what I would write about, and I had this super long list. So I was like, okay, ideas also check.
And then I just said, screw it, I’m going to take a risk. It’s a bit of a more professional risk, and maybe a financial one as well. I’ll announce that I’m going to start a paid newsletter. Every week, I’m going to write something really in depth about software engineering. It’s going to start next week. And I told myself that I’ll… I told my wife as well that I’ll do this for six months, and I’ll see what happens. If there’s traction, it’s great. I might have found myself a new job, basically. If not, I’ll just refund people. Everyone who bought an annual subscription… I didn’t tell this to people, obviously, but for six months I’m going to give it my all. It’s basically like a startup. So I told her and my family that it’s going to be a lot of work and I might not be around as much, and they supported me, and I took a plunge. I took a big breath and started off. And that’s how it went from leaving Uber to starting a venture funded startup to starting to write full time.
Lenny: Awesome. And we’re going to talk about what advice you have for folks that are thinking about starting something like this at the end. What was the period between leaving Uber and starting the newsletter?
Gergely Orosz: It was pretty much a year, a little bit less than a year. Might have been like ten months or so, but it was a year from when I decided to leave Uber. So Uber did layoffs in April, and it was really stressful. It was the first time I… I didn’t lay anyone off, but people on my team were laid off. I wasn’t told who’s going to be laid off. It was just really stressful. It’s weird, in the sense that the people who were let go, obviously worse for them, but I still felt terrible, and I just didn’t feel very good about it. I think this was the breaking point. This was the point where I realized that it’s not a family, which is weird because it never was, but it kind of felt family-like, but it’s just a corporate, and I’m just a number, and this could happen to me, I guess. So I think I lost my sense of the trust in the system, that it’ll take care of me, because I saw some of my colleagues who were really good professionals, I’d argue they were better software engineers and managers than me, they got let go because they were in the wrong team.
So this was April, and in July I went to a holiday, and two weeks in, I just realized I need to leave. And I really had the urge to do somewhere where I’m in charge. And if you’re a manager listening to this, you might relate to this. If you’re an engineer listening to this, maybe just shut your ears or you’ll figure it out eventually. But when I was promoted into management… It wasn’t promoting into it, because it was a side step, I didn’t get [inaudible 00:24:34] or anything, but it still feels a promotion. They only promote the people who are… Only let people transition who are considered pretty good. I felt this would be a big deal. I’m now a manager. What no one told me is, yes I was a manager, but I was a middle manager. I didn’t have too much authority. I didn’t even have budget for my team. Someone was underpaid and I couldn’t do anything except complain for HR for six months and hope that they’d do something.
So it was pretty frustrating, because I didn’t feel in charge in the sense that I didn’t have decision making [inaudible 00:25:02]. And the reason I wanted to do a startup is, I decided I liked being a manager, but I did not how I was not in charge and I couldn’t take corporate [inaudible 00:25:12] telling us to do stuff, and then we were telling them no [inaudible 00:25:16] I don’t want to do that with my people. So I decided for next job, I could be doing this, but instead I’d like to be in charge. So I’d like to be a founder or someone who’s high up, so that I can actually take full responsibility for the things that I want to do or I don’t want to do. The short of it is, I decided to leave in July. We have longer notice periods in Europe, so I served a longer notice period, and then left. But it was a year after the decision.
Lenny: Let’s talk about what your life is like these days, writing a newsletter full time. People might be listening and be like, “Man, $300,000 for writing an email a couple times a week, that’s pretty sweet.” So I want to talk about the good and the bad of this life. So maybe to start, how many posts are you putting out a week?
Gergely Orosz: I started the newsletter saying I’m going to post once a week. You’ll have one pinned up post. And I started to do that, but interesting enough, eventually I upped it to two, so I now promise people two posts a week. There’s more in depth and more timeless posts about some software engineering topic on Tuesdays, and there’s something that’s called the scoop, something a bit more timely, where I reflect or analyze what’s going on in the market, interesting stuff I’m hearing. And every now and then there’s a bonus post. So I’ll say two on average, but the second one came a lot later. But initially in the first few months I was like, I have this one post per week, and it needs to be good.
And it was interesting, because you would think writing a post a week is not a big deal. It’s easy. As you said, let’s say you’re making 300K just writing one post a week. But it actually was pretty stressful in the beginning, because it turns out to write that post, it takes at least a few days or sometimes even longer. Sometimes it takes a week or two for me to research in terms of talking with people. I chose topics that are not covered, because why would people pay for something that is out there already or well known? Then I need to write [inaudible 00:27:10] a first draft. I get some feedback from people who I trust often, not always, but I often do. And then there’s an editing phase where I work with an editor who helps make sure that it’s just correct. And all these things add up. Even if I only spend a day researching the stuff, it’s a day researching, then I have a draft on day two. Day three I get feedback, on day four it’s editing, it’s almost a whole week.
So I was working on parallel things at the same time, and I was often running against the deadline, I was barely finishing it, which is not what I was expecting initially. The first few months I feel was a bit more stressed, but again, the good thing is I cleared my calendar, so I said I’m not talking with anyone, I’m just doing this. So in that sense it was good. But the one thing I realized, if you look at any journalists who’s doing stuff full time, and they’re writing, not these clickbait articles, but actually in depth. You look at the Washington Post or New York Times, search for their name, and look up the articles that they write, and they’re going to be longer articles. They have like one a month. Seriously. You look at the investigative journalist, they might even have less. And they have a bit of a different level, they have to check with legal and all those things, but my editor is a journalist, so he was actually telling me, even back then, “You actually write a lot of original stuff,” because a lot of my emails are about five, 6,000 words, which is considered very long.
Lenny: Yeah. When you said that people listening might be like, one post a week is easy, I think most people are the opposite. They’re just like, I can’t write anything. I don’t have time for any writing. How can you ever write one good thing a week? So I think there’s both sides to it. And it’s cool that you shared the process. Do you have a specific cadence per post? It’s like Monday draft, Tuesday review, Wednesday editor. Is that how you work?
Gergely Orosz: I write every post over multiple weeks, most of them. Some of them I might be able to write faster, but what I now have is, nowadays I actually write two articles. So I have the Thursday that is the scoop, which actually is a lot easier for me to write, interestingly enough. And my cadence is, on Monday I finish up the last of the post that goes out on Tuesday. It’s just small edits, but it’s already done pretty much, so it’s just a few small tweaks, and maybe I have some feedback coming in. On Tuesday, I publish this post, and I do some free writing. I write about some other ideas that I have that’s going to be future posts. On Wednesday, it’s my free day in between, where I… It’s interesting, because what I feel is, when I don’t have pressure, I tend to not do much stuff, which might just… My mind’s saying, “You just need to chill.” Maybe that’s it.
But one thing I miss from the corporate world… And if you’re listening and you’re in a job and you’re thinking, “Gergely’s job is so amazing,” one thing that I liked and I really miss about working at Uber is, I actually had a schedule. This is weird, I hated it back then, but I needed to do these things, and whenever you have a pressure, you do it. And this works with my newsletter. I put in the second newsletter I think to have a bit more pressure. Because the second part of Wednesday, I’m already starting to write my Thursday newsletter. On Thursday, I write that Thursday newsletter, and on Friday I’m now writing the next newsletter for Tuesday. So almost every day except for Wednesday, I have a strong pressure to write. Which when people ask, “Gergely, how do you write so much?” Because I did the maths, and I wrote four or five books’ worth of content just last year. It’s because I have these deadlines, and as you said, I also know that thousands of people are paying me, they have expectations of me.
And so this is how it’s done. If you want to write a book, the easiest way is go to a publisher and sign a contract, not because of the money. In software engineering, you’re not going to get much [inaudible 00:30:57] $5,000 or something like that. That’s what I was offered initially. But it’s the pressure. You absolutely should go to a publisher or have some external… Someone to hold you accountable, and then you’ll get it done. And I’ll let you in on another secret, or not so secret.
Lenny: Do tell.
Gergely Orosz: In my mind, when I started newsletter a year ago in this crossroads, I want to write this book, which I think will be a great book, the Software Engineer’s Guidebook, I feel it’ll be my summary of my last ten years of what I have to share as advice, but I was worried that it’s just a big project that’s just going to take months, and I’ll lose motivation midway.
And partially, I went down the newsletter route because I liked how every week I would have to write something, and I had this sneaky idea of, what if I wrote this book where I write some posts that will be part of the book, and then the book will just come together partially. And I’ve kind of been doing that. I haven’t been telling people, but some of the posts are going to be… Not exactly, but the idea is that I have this chapter, and I have this list, have I written about this topic in the newsletter? And you know where I got this idea from? There’s the book The Three Musketeers, from Alexander Dumas [inaudible 00:32:12]. And do you know how it was written?
Lenny: I don’t.
Gergely Orosz: So he wrote the book for a magazine. He was apparently just low on money, and he started to write for this magazine who told them, “All right, we need you to write something that our readers will want, so that they will buy the magazine.” I think he was getting a cut of some sales or something. So he needs to write in a way that was interesting, and then cut it off in a way that people would come back and buy the next one. And he wrote a whole book, and that book, when I read it, it’s really long, and I was like, hold on, if he could do this, then this is a good strategy. He was writing it because he just needed the money. That’s all. And then he wrote a really good book on the way.
So one big learning for me from newsletters then… I would argue that you can use this not just for newsletters, but any business that you do. If you’re going to go out and start a new business, you’ll probably have some ideas. And it’s not just going to be a newsletter, it’s going to be a bunch of other things. If you put in ways that you have to do certain things, put in constraints for the things that you need to do, and then you’re going to do that.
Without that, when you’re on your own, when you’re entrepreneur, I was a great… I think I was a really diligent employee. I always tried to get my work done, show up on time, I tried to meet all expectations. But what I noticed is, when I started to work for myself, it just went out the window. Almost 15 years of being this star employee who really wants to do well, I found myself upset at myself for not… Just wasting my day. But I fixed it by telling people, “You’re going to get this every week,” and now I have to do it. I just have no choice.
Lenny:
Enter Vanta. Over 3,000 fast growing companies use Vanta to automate up to 90% of the work involved with SOC 2. Vanta can get you ready for security audits in weeks instead of months, less than a third of the time that it usually takes. For a limited time, Lenny’s Podcast listeners get $1,000 off Vanta. Just go to vanta.com/lenny, that’s V-A-N-T-A.com/lenny, to learn more and to claim your discount. Get started today.
I definitely wanted to dig into that a little bit deeper, this issue that folks in our line of work run into, which is unstructured time and having to create your own structure. I had the same exact problem when I started this thing, before I even started the newsletter. How do I use my time well? How do I create some kind of deadline for myself? So I’m curious what other tricks you found to help you stay productive and focus, because there’s Twitter, there’s Instagram, TikTok, there’s all these things that pull my attention. And I’ve learned a couple things I’ll share that have been helpful, but I’m curious, what have you found to help you focus and get things out the door? Two posts a week, which is a lot of work.
Gergely Orosz: So a problem that I have, and this might be unique to newsletters, I’m not sure. I use Twitter for a lot of research. And unfortunately what that means is when I start to write something, it can really pull my attention, because I have Twitter open and then I get a message from someone. It’s a little bit like Slack, but I’d argue it can be worse, because also Twitter for me is also something that is very useful in generating people [inaudible 00:36:16] raising awareness. So whenever I tweet, it helps my business. So that’s a good thing. But it also justifies for me spending more time on, for example, Twitter than I would want to. So I find that I come up with a method, and it works for a few months, and then I need to change it because my brain just learns to work around it. So I’ll tell you a few things that I did, and I’ll tell you where I’m at right now, but I use for example apps. I use this app Centered, but I know you’re also there.
Lenny: Yeah. I love that app. Also an investor [inaudible 00:36:49] disclaimer, but I love it.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. And I found that helpful, the idea of focused time and [inaudible 00:36:56] turned on, but it might just be me, but after a while I get used to these things, and I find it not as efficient. I found the Pomodoro method for a few months useful, when you have the 25 minute intervals. And the one thing that has never failed me, but I just find it hard to do, is I find it hard to start. I have this benefit that I have all this time… Sorry, there’s two things that always work. One is, it’s almost time for me to go home, and then I’m super focused. So when I have this external thing, and I know that there’s no way [inaudible 00:37:30] I need to focus on basically the deadline. So if you have deadlines, that works.
The other thing is, if I start to spend three or four minutes doing something focused, and I get the flow of it. So a trick I sometimes do when I’m just, I just don’t feel doing anything, is I set a timer of 20 minutes, and then I say, “All right, no distractions.” I have a script where I just kill… I use a [inaudible 00:37:57] host file, I just kill all LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, whatever sites. So I just cannot reach it. It’s just a very simple Python script that I wrote for myself. And then in the first few minutes I’m grumbling, I’m like, “I wish I could do this, I wish I could just look at Twitter to research,” but about five minutes in, there’s a switch, and I’m now actually heads down and doing it. And this has been the thing that has consistently worked.
The interesting thing is that I feel guilty a lot of times that I’m not working as hard as I could. And I do wonder if it’s guilt, or if it’s my mind or body telling me that it just wants a break or it wants to do something else. I still haven’t figured it out, but I’m on the way there.
Lenny: Awesome. That’s a really cool trick, the host file trick. So that’s [inaudible 00:38:43] something that you have to be technical to do. I imagine there’s some chrome extensions that could do that to some extent for folks. But the whole idea there is, force your brain not to have any way to look at something that’ll be distracting, by blocking your computer from even being able to go to the site. That’s awesome.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. So there is definitely going to be extensions that you can use, and on this podcast we’ll have a variety of people. If you’re a software engineer, it’s pretty simple, and even if you’re not, you can look it up [inaudible 00:39:10] when you override your host file, you can actually block [inaudible 00:39:13] what you do. And I did this because I wrote a script where I need to run the script, and I need to run the script again to unblock it. And it’s kind of cool, because I put it together for myself. So I usually find that the tools that other people use, maybe this is just me or maybe this is software engineers, I don’t like them because I feel they’re either too opinionated or they’re not opinionated enough. So I don’t know if this is just the fact that I used to like to build my own tools and my own scripts, because I can, so I found that my scripts worked the best for me.
But as you said, there’s a bunch of really good tools. So my advice to people would be, look up all [inaudible 00:39:50] let’s try them out. You won’t know until you try them. And again, I had stuff that worked really well for a certain amount of time. I don’t know why, maybe I just get bored easily or something, that I just need to rotate. But for example, when I went back to Centered… I have no affiliation by the way, so I’m just telling this. But I really liked how they keep evolving as well to do cooler things. They have a community element where you’re competing with people on uninterrupted time and closing stuff. So that to me is a… I’ll do one last [inaudible 00:40:23] Centered again. I have no affiliation. What I really liked about Centered is, it allows you to turn on your video camera, and I felt really forced to do work, because I knew that people on the other side of the world might be watching me, even if it was not true.
Lenny: Yeah. I love that feature. It’s centered.app, by the way, if folks want to check it out. So to summarize some of your tips, which I love, Centered, deadlines, totally work for me too. Blocking sites so that you can’t get distracted by Twitter and LinkedIn and TikTok and all the things. And I guess that’s the three that work best for you.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. And the simple thing, start a 20 minute timer, and you say, “For 20 minutes, I need to focus on this thing,” on your iPhone or somewhere else. It’s just 20 minutes, but during that time you cannot do anything else. And just try it. It works for me, like a charm, once I decide to actually do it.
Lenny: It’s cool Centered does that for you, and it has music and all the things. So I that a lot. Awesome. What do you love most about this life that you lead now, versus what you used to do? And then I’m going to ask you the opposite, but let’s start there.
Gergely Orosz: I really like that it forces me to have my calendar empty, because for so many years my calendar was this giant mess of meetings on top of meetings, and I would barely have any time to actually have focus time. Now I actually have the opposite. I usually have a lot of focus time, and I have very, very few meetings or things. And even now I get a little bit cagey [inaudible 00:41:51] I have this one meeting in the whole day. So I like how it’s [inaudible 00:41:55] manage your time [inaudible 00:41:58] so that’s the best part.
And I also like how much in charge I am. Initially it freaked me out, in the sense of how much creative freedom I have. I can write about whatever. I can change a format, I can do this, I can do that. It can be a little bit overwhelming, because I also know that people are going to be reading this, and what are they going to think about it? But I do like that it’s very entrepreneurial, so I get to experiment a lot as well, which reminds me a little bit of my old job, because at Uber we also experimented a lot, and obviously more in a corporate setting. But I guess that’s just gotten extended. So these are the two favorite things, is the open calendar or very few meetings, and experimenting, trying out stuff and being able to decide what I want to try out.
Lenny: Plus one on both those. I have a rule of no meetings before 3:00 PM, and it generally works 99% of the time. And the reason I do that is, to your point, if there’s a meeting at 11:00, I just can’t do anything really deep until that point, and then afterwards I have to get back on track. And having that deep focus time is so important for this work, even though half the time I’m on Twitter and distracted, as long as I get enough time to focus, good things happen. Okay. Opposite. What are some of the most surprising downsides and sucky parts of this path that you’ve taken?
Gergely Orosz: One is obviously it’s lonely. I do miss… I had a really good team at Uber, and it wasn’t just a team, it was the people. I liked… Everyone has different views on remote work. I actually didn’t enjoy remote work as much, because I just liked hanging out with people. I guess I’m that more outgoing type, and I really like walking up to the coffee station and having a chat with people, or at lunch sitting next to someone and talking about it. And obviously in some sense it was annoying, because I wanted to get work done, but for the most part I miss it more than I have. And so I miss not having that. I compensate for that by working in a shared workspace, a shared office, which is a techy workspace. So everyone needs to work in tech. So I actually get to say hi to people and have a little small talk.
The structure is weird, because I felt really guilty for the first few months, because I felt that at Uber I was more productive, because I had to be. I was doing so many things. In a day, I would start my day let’s say at 9:00 or at 8:30, and I’d finish it up at, I don’t know, 6:00 or 5:30, it depends. I would probably have, on an average day, I would have a good eight meetings, I would finish two or three documents, I would send over this, send over that. I actually have… Looking at my output, now I write a lot, but I wrote a lot. I think I wrote almost as much in terms of emails, chat messages, et cetera. So the downside is, I felt very guilty and a little bit frustrated for myself, for feeling that I’m slacking off. That’s one.
And the other thing, it is surprisingly stressful. So when you start off, it’s kind of lonely. Not many people do this, what we do. That’s also one of the reasons that we connected, because it’s a very small community. And even within the community, I feel, in the newsletter community, it’s different. You’re all running your own business, and there is some level of competition. So you might not… Because it’s a little bit of attention economy as well. People are not going to subscribe or pay for ten newsletters on the same topic, so that makes it a little bit more… It’s not the same as when you work in tech, and you just share exactly everything that you do, because you can only win.
So there’s that part, but there’s a lot of external validation, so whenever looking at your subscriber numbers, which brings a bunch of stress that I didn’t expect. And I’m a successful newsletter [inaudible 00:45:47] I think my success is quite rare. There will be one or two or a handful of people who have similar success, but I’m an outlier. So that’s another thing that I think is just good [inaudible 00:45:58] putting out there. And the downside is, you don’t really know how well you’re doing. External goals are kind of meaningless. Internal goals, either you smash them or you don’t reach them. So there’s this constant sense of, where am I? How am I, and how do I judge myself? Did I make a mistake for leaving my job? I actually asked myself for several months actually, after I started. Or did I make a good one? And I think for a lot of these questions and doubts, having past professional experience working at a company is really useful to set yourself grounded.
Lenny: I actually want to ask you about that, but I’ll add a couple things that I also find are major downsides of this life, because it’s not all rainbows and butterflies. One is, with a paid newsletter especially, but even with a sponsored newsletter, you basically have to get something awesome out every week, in theory for the rest of your life. People are buying an annual plan every day, so that means at least a year you have to write something awesome, if you want to stop. But it’s hard to stop, because as you pointed out, the income is very meaningful, and that’s a hard thing to give up. And so I’m not sure exactly the exit path that exists for us, where we might have to keep writing something awesome for the rest of our life, but I imagine something will emerge and we’ll think of something else that we could do.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. And it’s a really good example, because for a lot of companies, and I assume a lot of listeners are working in tech, typical thing is you work hard, you build equity at a company or you build the value of the company, and then you can sell that company, and then you can have an exit and you can do whatever. For what we’re doing, it’s really tied to us. So however much or little my newsletter will make, it’ll have a value let’s say four or five times the annual revenue as a business, but you cannot really sell it like that and you cannot really walk away.
So that makes it unique, it makes it harder to compete with, which is cool, but it does not create that much of an exit path unless you start to build a company around it, build an organization that can run without you, for example. This is what a lot of book publishing companies… So basically you build a publishing company where you start to hire people, who start to write some of the articles initially, and then later more of them, but it’s not a one-person newsletter any more. Or you keep doing this, until you either stop and then the revenue stops, or you might be able to sell it, but at really under value.
Lenny: Yeah. I really don’t want to manage people. I don’t want to have employees. And so building a media company with writers, that doesn’t sound too fun, but maybe that’s where this goes. That is one route, for sure. The other downside I’ll just add is the fact that you have to write something awesome every week, it’s hard to take meaningful time off, because if you stop producing great stuff, people leave. And I invented this PTO policy for myself where I take four weeks a year off, where I don’t do a newsletter, but that means I can’t take more than a week off usually [inaudible 00:48:58] weeks in a row, I don’t know, people probably won’t care, but it feels like things start to not go great if I just don’t keep producing great stuff. So that’s another downside, just [inaudible 00:49:08] topic.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. But a lot [inaudible 00:49:11] very early. So I think the whole concept of paying users is new, so I think we’re going to do a lot of experimentation. And also a lot of it, I think you need to figure out what your needs are. So in the first year, I did not take a holiday in terms of… Or even when I [inaudible 00:49:25] I was writing, and it caused a bit of friction with my family. And now I’m solving it in a different way, so I am planning to take more time off now, and I’m doing it by working ahead with some of the less time sensitive things. But it is tough.
Gergely Orosz: So a downside we haven’t mentioned, but I’m just going to call it out, is holiday. The great thing at… I never felt… Well, I felt a little guilty sometimes taking holiday, but when I want a holiday, I took it off. When I had my son born, at Uber, they gave me a four month paid holiday. I took the whole four months, I just logged off. It was great. It wasn’t my company. I was still getting stock. The stock price was independent of mostly what I was doing, just being honest. And that was really, really good. So this might be true, by the way, if you start any business, especially while it’s just yourself, it’s hard to turn off. And I think most people don’t mind, I don’t mind, but it gets to you. We should be conscious about burnout as a whole. So you need to solve for that, and I’m starting to solve for that as well.
Lenny: Yeah. Okay. Enough about the downsides. Overall, it’s pretty amazing making hundreds of thousands of dollars writing an email once a week/twice a week. So just to wrap up on that, I’m curious, where do you think this goes long term for you? And then I want to talk about just what it takes to be successful, but before there, do you think this goes long term?
Gergely Orosz: I stopped making long term plans, because three years ago you would’ve asked me what I wanted to do, and I was like, “I want to be, I don’t know, a manager of managers.” And then I became one. And then [inaudible 00:51:01] what is my dream? I would’ve been like, “It’s a stretch, but maybe I want to be a site lead.” And I didn’t become one per se, but I never thought of writing a newsletter, or now writing a successful newsletter. So I’m going with the flow. I’m seeing this less, by the way, as a newsletter or creator, or creator economy as people like to see it. I see this as a business, and I’m trying to put on that business hat. I’m building a one-person business. I want to make it sustainable, I want to make it successful, and I find that this thinking really helps me detach as well. I can actually enjoy my weekends as opposed to thinking, “I need to write this, or I need to write that.” So I also want to make it work for me.
And I’m not married to the idea of, it always needs to be a newsletter, et cetera. Right now it is, but where I see us going is, I’ll keep building the business, I’ll keep playing to my strength, which is I love talking with people, I love writing [inaudible 00:51:56] I love software engineering. So this is a great format, but over time it might shift. So I’m keeping my options open. And what I’ve learned from this journey is, you need to create time for that spark to come. So one of my goals for next few years is to not spend 50 hours a week on a newsletter, which I’m doing right now, but spend 20, and then maybe take a few weeks off and have that spark come. Because the reality is, this newsletter only came because I gave myself six months of unpaid… I’m not going for work, I didn’t ask for any LinkedIn emails. And the idea came and the inspiration came and the motivation came.
Lenny: There’s a lot of similarities with my approach. I don’t think too far long term. I have no idea what’s going to happen. I just take it to… I see where pull is coming from, and if it feels like an interesting opportunity and something that I’d be excited to work on, I explore it, like the podcast for example. And on that point, I will say, once you find that you can spend maybe 20 hours on a newsletter, I guarantee you’ll find more work to fill that gap, because that’s what I’ve been doing.
Gergely Orosz: Yeah. And one last thing to touch on, you said something really important [inaudible 00:53:06] pull, and I want to double down on that. One of the biggest, best things about doing what we do when you’re in charge of your time is, you can double down on pulls. So [inaudible 00:53:18] Uber, like I said, my plan was, I’ll write this book for six months. Two months in, I just put a draft [inaudible 00:53:24] a really long blog post about mobile engineering, and I got a ton of messages, a lot. I usually used to get like three or four messages on Twitter per day. I got 20 in an hour, people saying, “Can I read the draft?” And I was like, that’s interesting. I just felt this pull, of this huge interest of people caring about this. It was this really long blog post about mobile engineering at scale, and someone suggested on a private message, “You could probably turn this into a ebook.” And I was like, that’s a good idea, because it’s a really long blog post. So I said, “It’s going to be an ebook, and it’ll be pay what you want.” And then people started to buy it. And I was like, that’s interesting.
So I didn’t have much else to do, so I was able to double down. I said, for the next two months, I’m going to write this book, because it seems there’s an interest in it. And [inaudible 00:54:07] I turned it into a book that was free for two months, but I got sponsorship. The point was, I was able to double down on this pull. And same thing with the newsletter. So we’re going to talk about how I got the first few thousand subscribers, but the point was, I was able to double down on something that I felt like, this is super interesting, I never expected that people would care about building a large mobile app, more than a few hundred people. Turns out they do. Thousands do.
Lenny: Let’s actually jump to that. Let’s talk about just how to get started, for folks that are like, “This is cool. I want to do a newsletter.” Let’s talk about just how you got started briefly, and then what you think it takes to be successful in the life of a newsletter person. So how’d you actually get your first thousand subscribers?
Gergely Orosz: I’ll tell the story that is kind of true, and people will think it’s amazing, and also the real deal behind it.
Lenny: Okay, great.
Gergely Orosz: I announced my newsletter, I told people, “I’m going to go full time on this.” I had maybe 10,000 Twitter followers and, I don’t know, maybe 1,000 on LinkedIn or something that. And people started signing up the next day. I had 100 subscribers in the first day before I published anything. And within six weeks, when I published my [inaudible 00:55:15] I had 1,000 paid subscribers. And this sounds like a fairytale. And if you do this, I guarantee you’re not going to get the same results. In fact, you’ll probably see way smaller numbers.
What I didn’t tell is that there was at least six years of accidental work behind this. I started a blog six years before… Actually, I’ve always been blogging since I graduated. I had this personal blog where I just published all sorts of random things about software engineering, but it was really… Sometimes it was about an app that I published, sometimes it was a problem that I came across. It was is all over the place. And I got fed up with this, the blog wasn’t going anywhere, and I was just writing for myself, by the way, but I didn’t how it was just all over the place.
And I said, “I’m going to start a blog, it’ll be about software engineering and I’ll call it The Pragmatic Engineer.” I bought the domain, and I read this blog post from Jeff Atwood, who’s the founder of Stack Overflow, and back in 2010, or I think in 2007 when I was still in college, he had the most popular blog on the internet for software engineers. It was called Coding Horror, and all the software engineers I knew read it and were drinking it. It was next level wisdom every single week, twice [inaudible 00:56:26] a week. You read it as well?
Lenny: [inaudible 00:56:29] Yeah. I used to be an engineer, and I was all up in that. And I think Coding Horror came from a… I forget the book, but there’s a book with that graphic.
Gergely Orosz: There’s a book, and there’s a graphic. Yeah. And he wrote a post which really stuck with me for years. He said, how to be famous on the internet. He said, there’s three simple steps. One, write a blog post. Two, do this three times a week. Three, do it for two years. And I guarantee, if you do this, you’re going to be famous. And I always thought it’s kind of ironic, but the more I read it, the more I thought he actually means something with it. And when I started this blog, The Pragmatic Engineer, I said, “I’m tired of my old blog being all over the place, and there’s no focus, and no-one really cares about it. I’m going to do what Jeff Atwood said. I’m going to publish… Okay, it’s not going to be twice a week, but every two weeks I’m going to publish an article, and I’ll do it for a year.” So I started to do this. I published six blog posts about software engineering, going into topics that I [inaudible 00:57:25] research and all that, and then I gave up.
And I’m saying this because I kind of gave up, and I left it for a few months, but then something interesting happened. I had a huge traffic spike, and it crashed my shared hosting at the time. And it came from a site called Hacker News that I [inaudible 00:57:41] heard about, and people were discussing my posts, and they were adding a lot of things. And I was like, that’s interesting. People care about what I wrote six months ago.
Lenny: What was that post, by the way?
Gergely Orosz: It was called, “A comment is an invitation for refactoring.” I wrote my view that if there’s a comment in a code, that means that comment should be deleted and you should just refactor the whole thing. And it exploded on Hacker News. Some people called me an idiot, some people called me absolute wisdom, and it was these two crowds battling it out. And I was like, wow, I actually made software engineers in Silicon Valley argue about my stuff. I saw some of the [inaudible 00:58:17] people, some really high [inaudible 00:58:18] people were really going for [inaudible 00:58:21]. So that’s when I thought [inaudible 00:58:23] my writings, some people might read it, it’s not guaranteed.
And I started to write on that blog once every few months, depending on my mood, but I never stopped doing it. And I partially did it [inaudible 00:58:35] always hoped that it would get onto this site called Hacker News. But by the way, for a while, I didn’t even know you could submit it, so I never submitted my own things. But the other thing was, I just kind of liked it, and I had this habit, and over years… I had this blog from 2015. For six years I was writing that blog, and in the last year… When I worked at Uber, on the side I wrote about my work, in terms of the things that I could write about, not about the details that we did, but some of the learnings [inaudible 00:59:02] for example, distributed systems. And more and more of these posts just started to just pop up on Hacker News. People would either submit it, or sometimes when I submitted it, it would just do well. And I was thinking, so people… I started to get this validation, people care about what I write.
And to question of the success of the newsletter, by the time I launched a newsletter, I had a lot of posts that a lot of software engineers read, and there was a very famous post about performance management, how to do performance reviews. I wrote one about the tri-modal nature of software engineering salaries, where I observed that there’s three different tiers that are… There’s big tech and there’s local companies. And I think what happened is, when I announced that I’m going to write this newsletter, I also put it on the blog. A lot of people realize that they… “I’ve been reading this Pragmatic Engineer, I don’t know who is behind it, but I like it. Let me sign up. I do want to get an email every week, instead of the things that were every now and then.”
So there was years of work, and I wish I could tell you how to build a successful newsletter, but the best advice I have is still what Jeff Atwood does, except I have less conviction. But if you start writing, and you do it regularly, two things will happen. First of all, you’re going to [inaudible 01:00:11] you write for yourself and you keep improving, you’ll be a better writer. That’s for sure. If you’re lucky or if you’re right about stuff, you might start to attract people who think similarly. So step one is get started. Step two is keep it up. And my suggestion is [inaudible 01:00:26] for yourself. The weird thing is, until I started my newsletter, I never thought I would turn this ever into a business, but it always felt rewarding. So I never… If you’re starting out writing a newsletter to do what I’m doing one day, it might work out. But interesting enough, I never even thought that this was an opportunity.
Lenny: So people listening to this that are thinking about, should I explore this life? If you think about your story, you wrote a book, you blogged for a while before this, you worked at Uber for a number of years. In a sense, it comes across a little bit like, there’s no way I can be successful if that’s the background I need to have. I have to have written things and worked at an awesome tech company. What advice do you give folks that are coming to you being like, “Gergely, should I start a newsletter? Does it make sense for me?” Do you need the background that you have, do you think?
Gergely Orosz: Don’t forget that when I started my blog, I didn’t have any of this.
Lenny: And this is while you were at Uber. This is before you started the newsletter.
Gergely Orosz: It was before I was at Uber. So I was maybe at Skyscanner, or maybe at Skype, but I was even blogging before. I was talking to conferences before. So my advice really would be, if you’re thinking of a newsletter or something similar, start teaching and sharing what you know and what you’re observing. This could be a newsletter, this could be a YouTube video, this could be going to meetup. Actually, ten years ago I went to a lot of meetups where I presented all sorts [inaudible 01:01:54] I met a lot of cool people. I would say, share your knowledge one way or the other. And as you’re doing it, you’re going to learn a lot more.
So what I find… This is true, when I was a manager, we had to set goals, and I told people there’s two types of goals you can set. One is [inaudible 01:02:12] people set this goal, I want to be promoted the next thing, or I want to lead this big project. And those are bad goals, because it’s not in your control. So setting a goal that I want to have a successful newsletter with, I don’t know, 20,000 subscribers, that’s a goal where you’re not in charge. A good goal is what you can do. So a good goal for example is, I want to learn this new language in the next year, which I’m going to spend time on, or I want to leave work at 5:00 PM on Fridays to be home with family. So set those goals that you can control.
Gergely Orosz: And this is how actually my blog started initially. My goal was, I want to write once a month. And I did that for a while, and I was proud about that. Or whenever I learn something, I actually want to share it every now and then. So I would say set those goals, and the rest will come, probably. Again, don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to talk people out of doing it. But for me, a lot of this was luck. And the other thing that I would suggest is be curious, and look at your professional career as well. One thing that definitely helped me is getting pedigree. I come from a small country, from a really good university which no-one knows about, but I didn’t grow up in let’s say Silicon Valley, so I actually made a subconscious point to try to work my way up. And after I got to let’s say JPMorgan in London, I was pretty picky of where I would go next. So that’s why, when Skype came along [inaudible 01:03:36] this is great. Everyone knows Skype, I love Skype. And it was same thing with Uber.
So especially these days, people would not pay nearly as much attention to me if I worked at Small Parts Limited. So there’s that part as well. So you need to manage some of these things, figure out what you want to do. For a long time, I pretty much thought that I just want to climb the corporate ladder and prove that I’m good enough at all these companies. I was just doing all this stuff on the side. It’s interesting how it’s now flipped, and now doing these things, this is my main thing, which used to be my side project.
And I guess one last advice is, do some side projects. All of this starts as a side project. At work, no-one’s really going to appreciate that you’re doing a newsletter or this or that. Try stuff on the side, assuming that you have time. Or if you don’t have time, try to make time. Because I feel a lot of what we’re doing is pretty entrepreneurial, and the only way you’re going to get these muscles, if you start some small things.
Lenny: You talk about the pedigree being important. I think there’s also an even deeper point, that you actually need real experience doing real things that scaled and worked and mattered and worked with amazing people, to actually build a foundation to write about, share wisdom from. And that’s really important. There’s a lot of people starting newsletters and tweeting who haven’t done much and don’t have a lot of real life experience to share. And I think that’s the core of a lot of what we do, is it needs to be based on real things that worked and that you’ve learned, or that you have access to other people who have learned these things.
Gergely Orosz: I would say that, but one thing that I’ll double down [inaudible 01:05:09] that’s a really good observation is, if you’re serious, like one day I will want to write a book or a newsletter, it’s kind of the same thing, or teach people about stuff, look at the people that you look up to that you actually trust. Maybe it’s me a bit or maybe it’s you, but it’s more likely people like Kent Beck, for example. He’s the creator of TDD, and he’s written a lot of books. He’s one of my favorite people, I think he’s coming up 50 or 60 [inaudible 01:05:36] if he listens to this, sorry if… I don’t want [inaudible 01:05:38] seem old, but what I love about Kent Beck, is he’s been in the middle of it. He has always worked in the industry, and that he wrote about it. But for example, I think he invented or he was a co-inventor of… Was it TDD or extreme program… Anyway, one of these methodologies.
And then [inaudible 01:05:58] went to work at Facebook. He took a title cut to be a software engineer, and then he hosts the TDD workshop, the test driven development workshop, and no-one showed up at Facebook. And Facebook did no testing, which went against all commercial wisdom. And he took that risk joining this company where he could have been… People would’ve knelt down to him anywhere else, but he went to this company where he just wanted to learn. He’s this lifelong learner. He’s right now writing a book. But what I think [inaudible 01:06:26] if you want to be someone who people listen to, yes, do cool and interesting stuff, push yourself to get into places that do these interesting things.
That’s how, when I went to Uber in 2016, it was one of the highest regarded places back in 2016, and in 2017 it was the other way around. But back in 2016, people were turning down Facebook and Google offers to go at Uber, which we all thought would change the world. So you do need to get into those teams that are doing interesting stuff, prove that you can do that, and you’ll have a lot more interesting stories to share, that’s for sure.
Lenny: If you had to boil down advice for how to be successful in this life of a newsletter, you had to boil it down to just one or two key pieces of advice, what would you say?
Gergely Orosz: One is habit of depth in the field, whatever field you do. So this might mean that I think… I don’t want to say that if you don’t have experience, don’t start one, but it’s kind of true. So become an expert somewhere, somehow, before you start, because you’ll be a lot more credible. I think there’s no shortage of reporters and journalists who don’t know about stuff, but they can interview people, but that doesn’t give anything extra, and I think people feel that.
So I would say choose a field that you’re going to be good at. And you can start on the side, doing this. Assuming you have something, you’re someone with experience in the industry or you have insights, wisdom, observations to share, start doing so, in whatever format. I do newsletters. There’s actually YouTube, a lot of people are becoming pretty successful on YouTube sharing their thing. Three, have a cadence and stick to it, to some extent, because you do need to keep repeating it. And then four, don’t be afraid to try out new things. A good example of a person who did these is Steve Yegge. Steve Yegge is… Have you heard of Steve Yegge?
Lenny: Yeah. He wrote some epic long…
Gergely Orosz: He used to work at Amazon, and then at Google he wrote this internal email about platforms, about how Amazon is great at platforms and Google is terrible. And he was really well known at Google, because he wrote stuff inside Google. So he’s experienced, knows a lot of stuff, and then he quit Google and he started to do a podcast that’s on YouTube. You could check it out, it’s called Stevey’s Podcast. And what he did is, every week he recorded an episode and he talked about a bunch of his learnings, a lot of stuff, and he was pretty clear up front when he started the first one, he said, “What I’m doing is, I’m going to do this for six months and I’ll see if it sticks, see if people care about it or people watch it.”
Now, this guy had a lot of experience, really fun [inaudible 01:08:59] I think it’s really fun to listen to. And in the end, it was I think successful. It got a couple thousand or maybe even 10,000 subscribers, but it wasn’t this rocket ship. And I think what he did, he just stopped after six months, and he actually started head of engineering at Sourcegraph, he actually went back [inaudible 01:09:15] industry. But what I love about this, it shows that you cannot guarantee having success, but you can do what he did, which is start something, do a cadence, see if it sticks. If not, either pivot or do something else. I feel the world is kind of about that as well.
Gergely Orosz: If you think about… Take a step back of, what is a successful newsletter? What is a successful podcast? What is a successful YouTube channel? And it’s stuff that’s interesting. It’s either entertaining or educational. But all of these things, you can’t really put a finger on. If you watch YouTube, Mr. Beast is someone who you probably came across, I actually like watching his videos and [inaudible 01:09:56] how good he does it, but it’s not something you can [inaudible 01:09:59] anyone would have written in a book. So there is a sense of trying to understand what people care about, and a good way to understand is either experiment or observe or just try out stuff.
Lenny: This is great. I feel like I can boil this down even further from everything you just said, which is, build depth in an area, then write a blog post twice a week for two years, and good things will happen.
Gergely Orosz: I’m pretty sure. And here’s an interesting thought as well, just for closure. I was talking with someone on why my newsletter is so successful. It’s really successful, and I honestly don’t know why. And this person told me something interesting. This is a person who had a really successful YouTube channel with about 200,000 subscribers, so more than my newsletter. And he said this. He’s like, “What I noticed is, you started your blog in 2015, 2016, and I started my YouTube channel in 2019 or something like that. And on YouTube, there’s so much quality, there’s super high great productions, everyone is doing YouTube.” And he said, “You know what I don’t see? I don’t see many blogs that are writing in depth stuff regularly. I feel everyone went over to YouTube or TikTok. So there is the other angle of the medium.” And I’m saying this, not [inaudible 01:11:16] but it might be an advantage. These days, fewer people write, because I think a lot of people find it hard and more people will do videos. And you can take advantage of some of these shifts, which might be good or bad.
So if you’re going to be a really well known person on YouTube, you might get more people watching you, but you’ll have a lot more competition. And the last thing is that for me, writing, especially with software engineers, it’s really efficient, because I can scan through it. I don’t like YouTube videos, especially for learning about stuff, because I can’t even scan through the whole thing. It’s just really time consuming.
So I think, decide if you want to do entertainment, which for these podcast listeners, I don’t think that’s in the question, you’re competing with the likes of Spotify and Netflix. Education, which is a little bit more dry, but it’s really useful. Or edutainment, which is entertaining education. And once you figure that out, either if it’s education or edutainment, you can figure out what format might work both for the medium and for you. And at end of the day, you need to enjoy it. I personally have learned over time to love writing. I love being in the zone. So for me it’s not really work, but it’s fun. And once you find that thing, whatever that might be, it just makes it easier.
Lenny: Gergely, it’s always so fun talking about newsletter stuff. I don’t have many people to talk about this life with. I hope this was useful to people who are exploring this path, thinking about it, or even the different creator path. Just two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out or learn more? And how can listeners be useful to you?
Gergely Orosz: You can find me at pragmaticengineer.com. There is a bunch of stuff listed there from the Twitter, LinkedIn, my talent collective, some of the companies that I invest in, et cetera. Everything’s there. And you can also sign up to my newsletter. Listeners being useful to me… If you work in tech, consider signing up to my newsletter. I always tell people we’re a complimentary newsletter. If you work in product or have an interest in product [inaudible 01:13:11] newsletter is an awesome choice. With software engineering management, it goes the other way. And it’s not just… People are telling me when they’re data scientists or even product folks, sometimes they get some value out of it.
I write this column called the scoop every Thursday. If you hear of any interesting scoop happening, especially relevant for techies, this might be some change in the workplace, like your company is just rolling out agile [inaudible 01:13:36] team at Twitter did, feel free to ping me, just a short search for sending scoop to the Pragmatic Engineer. I treat everything as anonymous, so you can tell me interesting stuff. I’m typically interested in the stuff that you might not read about in the traditional media, but us techies really care about.
And finally, if you work at Google and you want anonymity to talk to me, just ping me, because one of my next articles will be Google’s engineering culture. I wrote one about Facebook, one about Amazon, and I tried to talk with mostly software engineers to get a sense of how these companies work from a software engineer and engineer manager perspective.
Lenny: Awesome. I hope this comes out before that post comes out, but if not, then enjoy that post. Gergely, thank you so much for being here. This was awesome. And maybe we’ll do a V2 as things continue to grow.
Gergely Orosz: Awesome. It was great being here, Lenny.
Lenny: Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A/B testing | A/B 测试 |
| accountable | 监督(accountability) |
| big tech | 科技巨头 |
| charter | charter(团队使命章程) |
| churn | 流失率 |
| clickbait | 标题党(clickbait) |
| corporate ladder | 企业阶梯 |
| double down | 乘势而上 / 加倍投入 |
| edutainment | edutainment(寓教于乐) |
| founding engineer | 创始工程师 |
| Gumroad | Gumroad(自出版平台) |
| IPO | IPO(首次公开募股) |
| Mr. Beast | Mr. Beast |
| newsletter | Newsletter |
| North Star metrics | 北极星指标 |
| pedigree | 资历 |
| platform engineering | 平台工程 |
| principal engineer | principal engineer(首席工程师) |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合 |
| pull | 拉力(pull) |
| recurring revenue | 经常性收入 |
| RSUs | RSU(受限股票单位) |
| Sarbanes-Oxley | 《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》 |
| scoop | 速报(scoop) |
| self-published | 自出版 |
| series B | B 轮融资 |
| side project | 副业项目 |
| site lead | site lead(站点负责人) |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 合规 |
| SOX compliant | SOX 合规 |
| talent collective | 人才集合 |
| TDD | TDD(测试驱动开发) |
| The Scoop | The Scoop(专栏名) |
| total compensation | 总薪酬 |
| traction | 增长势头(traction) |
| unicorn | 独角兽 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
离开科技巨头,打造排名第一的科技 Newsletter | Gergely Orosz(The Pragmatic Engineer)
文字记录
Gergely Orosz (00:00:00):
我在 Uber 表现最好的一年,总薪酬大概是 32 万到 33 万美元。辞职的时候,我其实在想,我是不是疯了?因为我离开了……尤其是在欧洲,这是一大笔钱 [听不清 00:00:14],这差不多相当于……在美国,类似职位的人大概能拿到 50 万到 60 万的总包。但现在我的收入已经超过在 Uber 的时候了。区别在于,现在我的薪酬……或者说我的收入,只要 Newsletter 还在增长,就会持续上升,所以理论上没有上限。当然实际上有上限,有流失率,增长也会随时间放缓。但这一切真的很奇怪,因为我曾经觉得自己处在一个非常优越的位置,说实话就是赚着大把的钱,做着自己热爱的工作。那是在 Uber,做软件工程师的时候。而现在我也在做自己热爱的事,而且以一种奇怪的方式,它甚至报酬更好。
Lenny (00:00:59):
欢迎收听 Lenny’s Podcast。我是 Lenny,这里的宗旨是帮助你在打造和增长产品这门手艺上变得更好。我会采访世界级的产品领袖和增长专家,从他们打造和扩展当今最成功公司的来之不易的经验中学习。今天的嘉宾是 Gergely Orosz。从某种意义上说,Gergely 就是工程领域的我。他拥有 Substack 上排名第一的工程类 Newsletter,增长非常迅速,而且和我一样,他是全职做这件事的。在这一集中,我们聊了全职做 Newsletter 的生活——就像我们俩现在这样。我们深入讨论了 Gergely 放弃 Uber 舒适的科技工作、转而全职投入这种生活的决定,Newsletter 创作者的日常作息,这种生活的利弊,成功需要什么,以及如果你对这条路感兴趣,该如何开始的各种建议。这是一期相当特别的节目,做起来也非常开心。如果你曾经想过写作或走上创作者这条路,你一定会喜欢这期节目。话不多说,有请 Gergely Orosz。
本期赞助
Lenny (00:02:06):
本期节目由 lemon.io 赞助播出。你已经实现了产品市场契合。你能够激活、吸引和留住用户。但你缺少所需的工程师来按你想要的速度推进,因为很难快速找到优秀的工程师,尤其是当你试图控制成本的时候。认识一下 lemon.io。lemon.io 会快速为你匹配经验丰富的资深开发者,他们都经过严格筛选、以结果为导向,随时准备好帮你增长——而且价格有竞争力。初创公司选择 lemon.io,是因为他们只提供精心挑选的、拥有三年以上经验和扎实作品集的开发者。申请者中只有 1% 能通过筛选,所以你可以放心,他们提供给你的都是高质量人才。如果出了问题,lemon.io 会迅速提供替换人选,所以你基本上是在有保障的情况下招聘。
Lenny (00:02:55):
了解更多,请访问 lemon.io/lenny,在 48 小时或更短时间内找到你的理想开发者或技术团队。而且如果你现在启动流程,还可以享受 Lenny’s Podcast 听众专属折扣——与新软件工程师合作的前四周享受 15% 的优惠。多一双好手,增长更快。访问 lemon.io/lenny。
Lenny (00:03:20):
本期节目由 Eppo 赞助播出。Eppo 是一个新一代 A/B 测试平台,由前 Airbnb 员工为现代增长团队打造。Netlify、Tenfold 和 Cameo 等公司都依赖 Eppo 来驱动他们的实验。无论你在哪里工作,运行实验越来越重要,但目前没有商业工具能与现代增长团队的技术栈集成。这导致你要么浪费时间搭建内部工具,要么试图通过一个笨拙的营销工具来运行实验。我在 Airbnb 的时候,很喜欢我们的实验平台的一点就是能够轻松按设备、按国家、按 [听不清 00:03:56] 来切分结果。Eppo 能做到这些甚至更多——快速交付结果,避免恼人的冗长分析周期,帮助你轻松找到发现的任何问题的根因。Eppo 让你超越基本的点击率指标,转而使用你的北极星指标,如激活、留存、订阅和支付。而且 Eppo 支持前端、后端、邮件营销甚至机器学习客户端的测试。了解更多请访问 geteppo.com,g-e-t-e-p-p-o.com,让你的实验速度提升 10 倍。
职业历程
Lenny (00:04:28):
Gergely,欢迎来到播客。
Gergely Orosz (00:04:35):
太棒了。很高兴来到这里,Lenny。
Lenny (00:04:36):
我觉得这会是一期相当特别、与众不同的播客。你的 Newsletter 是 Substack 上排名第一的科技类 Newsletter,叫 The Pragmatic Engineer。我的 Newsletter 是 Substack 上排名第一的商业类 Newsletter,所以我们以一种非常特别、奇怪的方式联系在一起。我觉得探索一下我们正在走的这条做 Newsletter 的奇怪路径会很有趣,同时也帮助听众了解这种生活的利弊、如何走上这条路、成功需要什么等等。但在聊这些之前,我希望你能花大概一分钟,简单介绍一下你的职业历程,你是如何走到今天全职做 Newsletter 这一步的,以及你现在的时间都花在什么上面。
Gergely Orosz (00:05:19):
我的职业生涯起步于你可以说是相当典型的软件工程师路径。我大学毕业,拿了计算机科学学位,是一个五年制项目,所以本科加硕士。我边读书边工作,写代码玩,到处搭些小网站,大学期间还在一家小型网络工作室工作过。然后我在行业里一步步往上走。最开始在一家咨询公司,帮别的公司做项目。我来自欧洲的匈牙利。后来搬到了英国,这对我来说是一个很大的提升,因为可以接触到更现代的软件开发。我在那边也是先在咨询公司工作。然后搬到了伦敦,在欧洲我觉得它就像欧洲的纽约,甚至可以说是欧洲的硅谷——在那个时候,英国脱欧之前,它是最大的科技中心。
Gergely Orosz (00:06:11):
我在那里的一家投资银行工作,同时业余一直在开发移动应用,后来进了 Skype。我喜欢说是 Skype,但其实当时是微软,他们刚收购了 Skype,不过环境还是更像创业公司,节奏快得多。之后我去了另一家创业公司,作为创始工程师参与了一次收购。那家创业公司叫 Skyscanner。最后我到了阿姆斯特丹的 Uber,以高级软件工程师的身份加入,后来做了管理者,然后又成了管理者的管理者。回头看那段职业生涯,我觉得自己一直在成长,每一步都走得扎实,这也让我对所有这些层级都充满了敬意。
Gergely Orosz (00:06:51):
然后,就在我走上一条非常好的职业路径的时候——我正在走向高级工程经理的轨道,或者谁知道呢,也许有一天还有机会做工程总监——我决定离开 Uber。我们稍后在播客里会聊到,我当时并没有这样计划,但我开始写一份 Newsletter。现在我在这里写 Newsletter,有很多人在读,这是一个非常意想不到的转折,也是一种非常酷的生活。
Lenny (00:07:19):
太棒了。关于这份 Newsletter,为了让大家对它的规模有一点概念,你能分享几个关于 Newsletter 增长和规模的数据吗,以及其他你想分享的?
Newsletter 的规模与增长
Gergely Orosz (00:07:30):
就在今天我查了一下,显示有 189,000 订阅者。过去 90 天增长了 80,000 订阅者,差不多每天新增一千人,这太不可思议了。因为这些数字确实很庞大。如果你在听这期节目,你可能在想”哇”。我每天也是这种感觉。但我已经写了很多年的博客,这样的数字是我从未想到过的。而且增长似乎还在加速。四月份有一个转折点,Newsletter 的增长……在 Newsletter 的前大约九个月里,达到了 50,000 订阅者,然后在接下来的五个月,或者六七个月里,又涨了十多万订阅者。这发生在 Substack 推出推荐功能的时候,这个功能成了一个巨大的增长引擎,而我作为头部出版物之一,也从中受益了。但这些数字再一次……
Gergely Orosz (00:08:26):
所以这也是一份付费 Newsletter。有免费版和付费版,有数千人在为这份 Newsletter 付费。比例是个位数百分比,但非常健康。而且再一次,它超越了我所有的预期。我想我们的处境差不多,因为我们的 Newsletter 模式,你的和我的,有一些相似之处。也有很多不同,但我大部分收入来自订阅,我不在 Newsletter 里做赞助或广告。所以如果人们注册免费版,他们隔三差五会收到文章,而付费版会收到更多、也更深入的内容。
Lenny (00:08:59):
你能给听众一个量级上的概念,你从中获得的收入和你 Uber 舒适的科技工作相比如何吗?你不需要透露具体数字之类的。
收入对比:Newsletter vs 科技公司
Gergely Orosz (00:09:09):
好。我稍微分享一下我在 Uber 舒适科技工作的数字。我在欧洲,欧洲的科技薪资,或者说总薪酬,会低于比如美国,但会高于比如印度或印度尼西亚这样的地区。存在地区差异,科技巨头也是如此。Uber 就是这方面的一个很好的例子。但我在 Uber 最好的一年,总薪酬大约是 32 万或 33 万美元。那是 Uber 上市之后,所以包含了股票、基本工资、奖金,在欧洲来说非常非常好。当我辞职的时候,我其实在想,“我是不是疯了?因为我要离开……” 尤其是在欧洲,这是一大笔钱 [听不清 00:09:53],这大概相当于……一个类似职位的人在美国能拿到五六十万美元的总薪酬。
Gergely Orosz (00:10:00):
所以我放弃了那些,而且我很确定自己 [听不清 00:10:04] 会赚得少很多,但我会享受自己在做的事,或者我会有……我就放手试试。但现在我的收入已经超过了在 Uber 时的水平。不同之处在于,现在我的收入、我的收益,只要 Newsletter 还在增长,就会持续上升,所以理论上没有上限。当然实际上是有上限的,存在流失率,增长会随时间放缓,但这感觉非常非常奇妙,因为我觉得自己之前已经处于一个非常优越的位置,说实话就是在赚大钱,做着自己热爱的工作。那是在 Uber,或者做软件工程师的时候。而我现在做的也是自己热爱的事情,而且在某种奇怪的程度上,它甚至报酬更好。部分是运气,部分是时机。我想我们稍后会再聊聊这个。但这对我来说是非常非常令人惊讶、也非常出乎意料的。
今天要聊的四个话题
Lenny (00:10:55):
太棒了。这正好可以过渡到我想聊的第一件事。不过先让我框定一下今天想花时间聊的内容,有四个领域我想探讨。第一,你决定离开并开始这种写作生活的决策,这是一种非常非传统的生活方式。第二,作为一个付费 Newsletter 创作者的日常生活是什么样的。你一天到晚都在做什么?你怎么找到时间做这件事?你怎么产出这么多内容?第三,要在这方面取得成功需要什么。我常说,开始一份 Newsletter 很容易,坚持下去很难,我很想知道你认为什么对于成功来说是重要的。第四,如果你想开始自己的 Newsletter,该怎么起步?
Lenny (00:11:30):
但在进入正题之前,我想补充一个我自己的想法。拿这种生活和以前的工作相比,我的感受是,第一,感觉不再是一个老板,而是有了上千个微型老板,其中一个可以”开除”我,而且每天都有很多人这么做,但这感觉反而比科技公司更安全——在那种地方,一个人就能做决定。第二,假设它持续增长的话,你几乎每天都在涨薪,每周都在涨薪,取决于增长率,这很酷。
每篇文章都是给自己加薪
Gergely Orosz (00:11:57):
这确实很酷。我在 Newsletter 的第一年维护了一个电子表格,记录每篇文章发表一周后,我的年收入增长了多少。追踪每篇文章的影响。而令人疯狂的是,当我写出一篇真正引起共鸣的好文章时——有时候是一篇我自己觉得一般但读者很喜欢的文章 [听不清 00:12:20],有时候是一篇我投入了大量心血的好文章——我能看到自己在涨薪。这是你在企业里根本体验不到的。我的意思是,企业这么做是有意为之的,也有很多合理之处,但我觉得这种生活——我们后面还会再聊——有很多令人意外的事情,好的和坏的都有,但这一点确实是非常好的。所以当你做了一件出色的事情,你就可以给自己涨薪,尤其是因为和你一样,我的目前也是一个人的生意。
Lenny (00:12:49):
对。好的。所以你在 Uber,写着代码赚着几十万美元,挺美的。Uber 在增长。你大概还有一堆 RSU 会不断累积。挺好的。然后你决定,“我要尝试在网上靠写作赚钱”,这显然是一个赚大钱的途径嘛。才怪。所以我很好奇,是什么让你离开了那份工作,去探索写作,走上这条写作之路的?
离开 Uber 的契机
Gergely Orosz (00:13:20):
简短来说,是对自己的一个承诺、COVID,以及 Uber 的裁员。更详细的版本是,当我加入 Uber 的时候,在 Uber 之前我……现在我们在聊我旧工作的数字,当时我在伦敦的 Skyscanner 担任 principal engineer。Skyscanner 是一家独角兽公司,英国为数不多的独角兽之一,总部在英国等等,我当时的基本工资是九万多英镑,大约相当于 12 万、13 万或 14 万美元,取决于英镑汇率,有时候这些天几乎就差不多。但在当时那是一个非常好的……而且这几乎就是全部了。我也拿到了一些股票。我觉得自己在伦敦已经接近市场顶部了。我认识一些人,看起来这确实是一个非常好的薪酬方案。
Gergely Orosz (00:14:05):
然后 Uber 打电话给我说,“你想来面试吗?“我去面试了,他们给了我一个 offer,我做了谈判,他们基本上把我的薪酬翻了一倍。我当时就想,哇,这是 [听不清 00:14:16],我了解硅谷的薪酬水平,但我以为 [听不清 00:14:20] 你是拿不到那样的,但 Uber 给的已经接近那个水平了。所以我对自己说,好,我得到了一个非常划算的 deal,其中大部分是股票,也就是……Uber [听不清 00:14:32] 2016 年,没人知道 Uber 会不会上市,虽然我有所预感,因为他们找我是为了搭建一个支付团队,做一个 SOX 合规的支付系统。而你需要一个 SOX 合规的支付系统,才有可能上市。
Lenny (00:14:44):
有意思。这让我想起在 Airbnb 的时候,大家都在琢磨,我们什么时候上市?然后那边有个团队在做 SOX 相关的工作,就是《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley),这就很能说明问题了。
Gergely Orosz (00:14:55):
对。总之,我当时想,好吧,这是一张巨大的彩票。如果成了,基本上我每年能挣到两年的薪水。我当时就是这么算的。但如果没成呢,别忘了,我在欧洲,那边的人对股票回报是不抱什么指望的。所以欧洲的软件工程师不会太看重股票,因为他们根本没见过成功的案例。于是我告诉自己,如果四年后 Uber 成功退出(exit),我赚了一大笔钱,那我也对得起自己去冒这个险,因为到那时我银行里会有四年的存款,而……当时我大概只有六个月的存款之类的。所以这是我给自己做的一个承诺。
COVID 来袭与离开 Uber
Gergely Orosz (00:15:32):
然后我本来可能会忘记这件事,但四年后,几乎分毫不差,COVID 爆发了,冲击非常大。我们在裁员,不得不裁掉 20% 的工程师。那时候我已经管理一个大约 30 人的团队,下面还有经理,而 20% 或者说 15% 的人必须被裁掉。我问自己,我在这里到底在干什么?我往前看,Uber 接下来一年会非常艰难,我得去管理士气。在那之前,我帮忙组建了这个团队,我们有非常好的 charter(团队使命),但不得不把这个 charter 扔出窗外,因为从经济现实来看它已经没有意义了。于是我回想起之前对自己的承诺:如果我还留在这里,我愿意冒这个险,去做点别的事情。所以我决定,好吧,该行动了。
创业计划
Gergely Orosz (00:16:18):
我的计划很简单。离开 Uber,创办一家创业公司,去融资,因为我没做过这事,但这算是家传。我哥哥正在做他的第二次创业,他把第一个公司卖给了 Skyscanner,现在他在做一个叫 Craft Docs 的创业项目。那是一个非常好用的文档编辑系统,他们刚完成了 B 轮融资。所以通过他,我了解创业生活是什么样的,而我感觉自己从来没做过,一直在大公司工作。
Gergely Orosz (00:16:45):
所以我的计划是,离开 Uber,融资,在平台工程(platform engineering)方面做点事情。Uber 校友创业的一个经典路径是——Uber 在内部投入了大量资金,所有东西都是定制的。你能想到的都是。我们的部署系统是定制的,实验系统是定制的,容器以及自动化的设置方式也是定制的,很多工程基础设施都是。所以很多 Uber 校友离开后,就把他们在那里看到的东西做出来给全世界用,因为没有其他公司真的在做 Uber 做的那些事,因为从理性上讲没什么道理,但很多公司愿意为此付费。
意外的写作收入
Gergely Orosz (00:17:20):
计划就是这样。但在此之前,我想先完成一本书。我已经写了将近一年了,叫《Software Engineer’s Guidebook》,就是我对这个行业里职业成长的一些建议。我想,好吧,先离开公司,用六个月写完这本书,就靠存款过日子,然后再去融资。但实际发生的是,我开始写这本书,却被带偏了,在网上玩得很开心——我在 Twitter 上写,在博客上写。我不小心又出了一本书叫《Building Mobile Apps at Scale》。就花了几个月。
Gergely Orosz (00:17:58):
奇怪的是,我的计划本来是不打算挣钱的,但这本《Building Mobile Apps at Scale》以及我出版的另一本关于技术简历的书,我就是在几个月内写出来的,它们开始挣钱了。第一年大概挣了十万美元。我当时想,“有意思,有人在买我的书。“我是通过 Gumroad 自出版的,或者类似的平台,大概能保留 90% 的收入,但不管怎样,这确实很有意思。然后我到了那个节点,好吧,现在该创业了。该去融资,做那些事了。然后我问自己,我到底为什么要做这件事?
重新思考创业的理由
Gergely Orosz (00:18:34):
答案有两个原因。第一,我在 Uber 很喜欢在小团队里工作。说实话,我不太喜欢做”管理者的管理者”。感觉太抽象了。我不喜欢坐在会议上,自己却不在一线干活。我真正喜欢的是,当我们有一个小团队,有一个很大的愿景,我们对抗整个世界。就我们十来个人,拼命把事情搞定,到处救火,太有意思了。所以这是我想创业的原因之一。我希望能重现那种感觉。
Gergely Orosz (00:19:05):
另一个原因,说实话,是钱。那是 2021 年,市场还没崩盘。算笔账,如果你创办一家公司,我是 CEO 兼创始人,也许还有个联合创始人,这家公司成了独角兽,到那时我们已经融了五六轮,我会被稀释得厉害,但可能还持有 5%。十亿美元的 5% 就是五千万美元,交完税之后,我能买一堆我不需要的东西。我问自己,好吧,然后呢?我想,等我把那些我不需要的东西都买了之后,我大概还是想把我所知道的分享给别人,做 YouTube 视频、写书。
Gergely Orosz (00:19:43):
我就想,等等。我要花大概十年去做这件事,因为你必须计划投入这么长时间。我得停下现在正在做的事情,因为我欠我的投资人和团队一个交代,不能整天泡在网上写东西。然后到头来我又想重新做这件事。这让我想起那个渔夫的故事。有一个版本是这样的——道理都一样,你拼命工作,到头来就是为了做你现在正在做的事情。所以我决定,不如直接试试现在做的事情。
渔夫的故事
Lenny (00:20:14):
等等,渔夫的故事是什么?我觉得我知道你说的是哪个,但是……
Gergely Orosz (00:20:17):
渔夫的故事是这样的:在墨西哥,一个美国商人看到一个渔夫在悠闲地钓鱼。他问他,“你整天在干什么?“渔夫说,“我钓三个小时鱼,陪家人待着,放松休息,周六周日睡懒觉。“商人说,“好吧,你应该这样做:你不要只钓三个小时,你应该一周五天、每天八小时地钓鱼,把鱼卖掉,赚取利润,雇更多的人来干,然后成为所有人的老板,然后把你的渔业公司卖掉。“渔夫说,“好吧,然后呢?""然后你就能买下一个岛,每天就钓三个小时鱼,周六睡懒觉,周日也睡懒觉。“
转向 Newsletter
Gergely Orosz (00:21:00):
所以我想,看,我有存款。不算多,但足够……我还是可以冒险的。所以让我在写作上赌一把。最初我打算花更多时间来完成我的书。但我不喜欢写书的一点是,虽然能赚钱,但它们确实……你很难预测自己能不能靠这个谋生。有些人可能喜欢这种不确定性,但我不喜欢。我不知道今天会赚 50 块、10 块还是 300 块。所以我想,有意思。有这些付费 Newsletter,我一直在考虑,你是少数几个分享了早期数据的人之一,我觉得这个模式可能很有意思,因为它是经常性收入(recurring revenue)。
Gergely Orosz (00:21:41):
我之所以一直犹豫要不要开始做付费 Newsletter,其实是因为我担心每周都要写出真正值得一读的内容,工作量太大了。这件事我至少考虑了 6 到 12 个月。但后来我回头一看,发现自己已经写了三本书。[听不清 00:21:58] 我之前跟你说了两本,但其实一年内还有第三本也出版了。我就想,我确定自己是能写的。于是我用两周时间收集选题想法,列了一个超长的清单。所以选题也没问题。
全力投入 Newsletter
Gergely Orosz (00:22:10):
然后我就说,管它呢,我要冒这个险。这多少有点职业风险,也许还有财务风险。我宣布要开始做一份付费 Newsletter——每周写一篇真正深入的软件工程文章,下周就启动。我告诉自己……也告诉了我妻子,我要做六个月,看看情况如何。如果有增长势头(traction),那太好了,基本上我就是给自己找到了一份新工作。如果没有,我就把钱退给大家。所有买了年度订阅的人……当然我没跟读者说这些,但六个月内我会全力以赴。这基本上就像一个创业项目。所以我告诉她和我的家人,工作量会很大,我可能没那么多时间陪他们,他们都支持我。然后我就纵身跳了下去,深吸一口气,开始了。这就是我从离开 Uber,到加入一个有风投支持的创业公司,再到全职写作的全过程。
Lenny (00:23:05):
太棒了。我们最后会聊到你给想开始类似事情的人的建议。从离开 Uber 到开始做 Newsletter,中间隔了多久?
离开 Uber 的心路历程
Gergely Orosz (00:23:14):
差不多一年,不到一年的样子。大概十个月左右吧,但从我决定离开 Uber 到真正离开,差不多是一年。Uber 在四月份做了裁员,压力非常大。那是我第一次……我没有裁任何人,但我团队里有人被裁了。没人告诉我谁会被裁。就是压力非常大。感觉也很奇怪,被裁掉的人显然更惨,但我还是感觉很糟糕,对这件事就是很不舒服。我觉得这是一个转折点。那个时刻我意识到这不是一个”家”,说起来也怪,因为本来就不是,但确实曾经有种家一样的感觉。可它说到底就是一个企业,我只是其中一个数字,这种事也可能发生在我身上。我想我失去了对”这个体系会照顾我”的信任,因为我看到一些非常优秀的同事——我觉得他们是比我更好的软件工程师和管理者——仅仅因为所在的团队不对就被裁掉了。
Gergely Orosz (00:24:08):
所以那是四月。到了七月我去度假,假期过了两周,我就意识到我必须离开。我有一种强烈的冲动,想去一个由我说了算的地方。如果你是管理者听到这段话,你可能会感同身受。如果你是工程师听到这段话,也许先捂住耳朵吧——或者你迟早会明白的。但当我被提升到管理层的时候……其实不算提升,因为是一个平调,我没有得到 [听不清 00:24:34] 之类的东西,但感觉上还是像升职。他们只让那些被认为相当优秀的人转岗。我当时觉得这是一件大事,我现在是管理者了。但没人告诉我的是,没错,我是管理者,但我是中层管理者。我没有太多权力。我甚至连团队的预算都没有。有人薪酬偏低,我除了向 HR 抱怨六个月然后指望他们做点什么之外,什么都做不了。
创业的动机
Gergely Orosz (00:24:58):
所以这非常令人沮丧,因为我不觉得自己在掌权——我没有决策的 [听不清 00:25:02]。我想做创业公司的原因就是,我发现自己喜欢做管理者,但受不了自己说了不算这件事,也受不了那种企业层面 [听不清 00:25:12] 让我们做事情、我们告诉他们不行 [听不清 00:25:16]、我不想让我的手下做那个的局面。所以我决定,下一份工作,我可能还会做管理,但我想要自己说了算。我想做创始人或者高层,这样我才能真正对我要做或不想做的事负全责。长话短说,我在七月决定离开。欧洲的离职通知期比较长,所以我服务了一个较长的通知期,然后就离开了。但从做决定到最终离开,差不多是一年。
Lenny (00:25:41):
全职写作的生活
我们来聊聊你现在的日常生活吧,全职写 Newsletter。有人听了可能会想,“天哪,每周写几封邮件就能赚 30 万美元,太爽了。“所以我想聊聊这种生活的好与坏。先问一下,你每周发几篇?
Gergely Orosz (00:25:59):
我刚开始做 Newsletter 的时候承诺的是每周一篇。你有一篇置顶文章。我一开始也是这么做的,但有意思的是,后来我增加到了两篇,所以现在我向读者承诺每周两篇。周二是一篇更深入、更不受时间限制的软件工程话题文章;还有叫做 The Scoop 的栏目,内容更偏时效性,我会对市场上正在发生的事情进行反思或分析,分享一些我听到的有趣信息。偶尔还会有额外的加更篇。所以平均来说是两篇,但第二篇是很后来才加的。最初几个月我只有每周一篇,而且那一篇必须写好。
写作的真相
Gergely Orosz (00:26:37):
有意思的是,你可能觉得每周写一篇文章没什么大不了的,很容易。就像你说的,每周写一篇文章就能赚 30 万美元。但实际上一开始压力相当大,因为写一篇文章,至少要花几天时间,有时甚至更久。有时候我要花一两周去调研,跟人交流。我选择的都是别人没写过的话题,因为如果内容已经到处都是或者广为人知,人们凭什么付费呢?然后我需要写 [听不清 00:27:10] 初稿。我会找信任的人来给反馈,不是每次都这样,但经常如此。之后还有一个编辑阶段,我会和编辑合作,确保内容准确无误。这些加在一起,即使调研只花一天——一天调研,第二天出草稿,第三天收集反馈,第四天编辑——几乎就是一整周了。
Gergely Orosz (00:27:32):
所以我当时在并行处理多项工作,经常赶截止日期,几乎踩着线完成,这完全出乎我最初的预期。前几个月我感觉压力比较大。但好的一面是,我清空了日程,我跟所有人说我现在谁都不见,只做这件事。从这个意义上说还不错。但我意识到一件事:你去看看任何一个全职从事写作的记者——写的不是那种标题党(clickbait)文章,而是真正有深度的内容——你去《华盛顿邮报》或《纽约时报》搜他们的名字,看他们写的文章,会发现都是长文。他们一个月大概就一篇。真的。你看看调查记者,可能还更少。他们面临的要求层级不太一样,得过法务审核之类的流程,但我的编辑本身就是记者出身,所以当时他就跟我说:“你写的原创内容量真的很惊人。“因为我很多邮件都有五六千词,这被认为是非常长的篇幅。
Lenny (00:28:32):
嗯,你说每周一篇的时候,听众可能会觉得”一周一篇很简单”。但我觉得大多数人恰恰相反——他们会想,我什么都写不出来,根本没时间写作。怎么做到每周写出好东西?所以我觉得两种情况都有。你能分享这个过程挺好的。你每篇文章有固定的时间节奏吗?比如周一写草稿,周二审阅,周三编辑?你是这样工作的吗?
Gergely Orosz (00:28:58):
我的大部分文章都是跨好几周写出来的。有些可能写得更快一些,但我现在的节奏是,实际上我现在写两篇文章。周四那篇是 scoop,也就是速报,有趣的是那个写起来对我来说容易得多。我的节奏是这样的:周一我完成周二要发的那篇文章的收尾工作,只是一些小修改,基本已经写好了,就是做一些微调,可能还有些反馈需要处理。周二,我发布这篇文章,然后做一些自由写作——写一些其他的想法,那些会成为未来的文章。周三是我的自由日,我……很有意思的是,我觉得当我没有压力的时候,反而做不了多少事。可能就是……我的大脑在说”你就是需要休息”。也许就是这么回事。
Gergely Orosz (00:29:49):
但有一件我很怀念企业世界的事情……如果你现在正在上班,心里想着”Gergely 的工作太棒了”,我在 Uber 工作时有一件事我很喜欢、现在也很怀念:我其实有一个日程安排。说出来很奇怪,当时我很讨厌它,但我需要完成这些事情,而且只要你有压力,你就会去做。这个方法也适用于我的 Newsletter。我加了第二份 Newsletter,就是为了给自己更多压力。周三下半周,我已经开始写周四的 Newsletter 了。周四,我写那篇周四的 Newsletter,周五我开始写下一篇周二的 Newsletter。所以几乎每天,除了周三之外,我都有很强的写作压力。所以当人们问我”Gergely,你怎么能写这么多?“因为我算了一下,仅去年一年我写的内容就相当于四五本书的量。就是因为我有这些截止日期,而且正如你所说,我也知道有成千上万的人在付钱给我,他们对我有期望。
写书的秘密
Gergely Orosz (00:30:46):
所以事情就是这样做的。如果你想写一本书,最简单的方法就是去找出版社签合同,不是为了钱。在软件工程领域,你拿不到多少 [听不清 00:30:57]——大概 5000 美元左右吧。这是最初给我的报价。关键在于压力。你一定要去找出版社,或者找某种外部的……找人来监督你,然后你就能完成。我再告诉你一个秘密,或者说不算什么秘密。
Lenny (00:31:16):
说说看。
Gergely Orosz (00:31:16):
一年前我站在那个十字路口开始做 Newsletter 的时候,我心里想的是我要写这本书——《Software Engineer’s Guidebook》,我觉得它会是一本很好的书,是我过去十年经验教训的总结。但我担心这是一个大工程,要花好几个月,中间会失去动力。
Gergely Orosz (00:31:37):
我选择走 Newsletter 这条路,部分原因是我喜欢每周都必须写点东西这种感觉。我有一个偷偷的想法:如果我写这本书,把一些文章写成书的一部分,那这本书不就自然而然成形了吗?我一直在这样做。我没告诉过别人,但有些文章就是……不完全一样,但思路是:我有这个章节,我有一个清单,看看这个话题我在 Newsletter 里写过了没有?你知道我从哪里得到这个想法的吗?《三剑客》那本书,Alexander Dumas [听不清 00:32:12] 写的。你知道那本书是怎么写出来的吗?
Lenny (00:32:15):
不知道。
Gergely Orosz (00:32:16):
他是给一本杂志写的。据说他当时手头很紧,就开始给这本杂志供稿。杂志跟他说:“好吧,你需要写一些读者想看的东西,这样他们才会来买杂志。“我记得他好像是能拿销售额分成之类的。所以他需要写得有趣,而且要在关键地方断开,让读者下周还想来买。他就这么写了一整本书。那本书,我读的时候发现真的很长。我就想,等等,如果他能这样做,这也是个好策略。他写它纯粹是因为需要钱,就这么简单。但结果他写出了一本很好的书。
约束的力量
Gergely Orosz (00:32:52):
所以从 Newsletter 中我学到的一个很重要的东西……我觉得这不仅适用于 Newsletter,你做的任何生意都一样。如果你要出去创业,你可能会有一些想法,不仅仅是一个 Newsletter,还会有一堆其他事情。如果你给自己设定一些必须完成的规则,给你需要做的事情加上约束条件,那你就会去完成。
Gergely Orosz (00:33:16):
没有这些的话,当你自己干、当你是创业者的时候……我以前是一个很好的……我觉得我当员工时非常勤勉。我总是努力完成工作,准时到岗,尽力达到所有期望。但我注意到,当我开始为自己工作的时候,这一切全都飞到九霄云外了。差不多 15 年来一直是那个想表现优秀的明星员工,结果却发现自己对自己很沮丧——因为老是……白白浪费一整天。但我后来解决了这个问题,方法是告诉人们”你们每周都会收到这个”,然后我就必须做到了。别无选择。
广告:Vanta
Lenny (00:33:51):
本节目由 Vanta 赞助播出,帮助你简化安全合规流程,加速业务增长。如果你的业务在云端存储了任何数据,那你可能已经被问过、或者将来会被问到 SOC 2 合规的问题。SOC 2 是一种证明你的公司采取了适当安全措施来保护客户数据的方式,能建立与客户和合作伙伴之间的信任,尤其是那些对安全有严格要求的客户。另外,如果你想向企业客户销售产品,证明安全性是必不可少的。SOC 2 可以为你打开更大更好的合作机会之门,也可能让你的业务停滞不前。如果你没有 SOC 2,很可能连谈判的资格都没有。启动一份 SOC 2 报告是一个巨大的负担,尤其对创业公司而言——耗时、繁琐、成本高昂。
Lenny (00:34:37):
这时候 Vanta 就派上用场了。超过 3000 家快速增长的公司使用 Vanta 来自动化完成 SOC 2 中多达 90% 的工作。Vanta 可以在几周内而不是几个月内让你准备好安全审计,不到通常所需时间的三分之一。限时优惠:Lenny’s Podcast 的听众可以享受 Vanta 1000 美元的折扣。只需访问 vanta.com/lenny,就是 V-A-N-T-A.com/lenny,了解更多并领取折扣。今天就行动起来吧。
管理非结构化时间
Lenny (00:35:08):
我确实想更深入地聊一下这个问题,就是我们这个行业的人都会遇到的——非结构化时间,以及如何为自己创建结构。我开始做这件事的时候也遇到了完全一样的问题,甚至在我开始做 Newsletter 之前。我该怎么好好利用时间?怎么给自己设定某种截止日期?所以我很好奇你发现了什么其他技巧来帮助自己保持高效和专注,因为 Twitter、Instagram、TikTok,有太多东西在分散我的注意力。我也学到了一些有用的东西可以分享,但我很好奇,你发现了什么方法来帮助自己专注并把内容做出来?每周两篇文章,这工作量可不小。
Gergely Orosz (00:35:49):
我遇到的一个问题是——这可能也是 Newsletter 特有的问题,我不太确定。我经常用 Twitter 做研究。但不幸的是,这意味着当我开始写东西的时候,它很容易把我的注意力拉走,因为我开着 Twitter,然后就会收到别人的消息。这有点像 Slack,但我认为可能比 Slack 更糟,因为对我来说 Twitter 同时也是一个非常有用的工具——可以吸引人们 [听不清 00:36:16]、提升知名度。所以每次我发推,对我的业务都有帮助。这是好事。但它也给了我一个理由,让自己在 Twitter 上花比本应花的更多时间。所以我发现自己总会想出一个办法,管用几个月,然后我就得换一种方式,因为我的大脑学会了绕过它。所以我跟你说几个我试过的方法,再告诉你我现在用的是什么,但比如说我用过一些 App。我用过一个叫 Centered 的 App,我知道你也在上面。
Lenny (00:36:45):
对,我特别喜欢那个 App。我也是投资人 [听不清 00:36:49],先声明一下,但我确实很喜欢它。
Gergely Orosz (00:36:51):
对。我觉得它挺有帮助的,专注时间的概念,再加上 [听不清 00:36:56] 开启,但可能只是我自己的问题——过一段时间我就习惯了这些东西,觉得没那么有效了。我发现番茄工作法在前几个月很有用,就是那种 25 分钟间隔的方法。还有一个从来没有让我失望过的东西,但我就是觉得很难做到——我发现难的是开始。我有这个优势,就是有大量时间……不好意思,有两件事一直有效。一是,快到我要回家的时间了,然后我就变得超级专注。所以当有这种外部约束的时候,我知道没办法 [听不清 00:37:30],我基本上需要专注于——也就是截止日期。所以有截止日期的话,是管用的。
Gergely Orosz (00:37:36):
另一件事是,如果我先花三四分钟做一件需要专注的事情,我就能进入状态。所以有时候我就是不想做任何事的时候,我会用一个小技巧——我设一个 20 分钟的计时器,然后告诉自己:“好,不分心。“我有一个脚本,可以直接屏蔽……我使用 [听不清 00:37:57] host 文件,直接屏蔽 LinkedIn、Twitter、Facebook 这些网站。所以我就上不了这些网站。就是一个我自己写的很简单的 Python 脚本。然后刚开始几分钟我会嘟嘟囔囔,心里想”真想看看 Twitter 查点资料”,但大约五分钟后,就会有一个切换,我实际上已经埋头干活了。这一招一直都很管用。
Gergely Orosz (00:38:21):
有趣的是,很多时候我会感到内疚,觉得自己没有尽可能努力地工作。我确实不确定这是一种内疚感,还是我的大脑或身体在告诉我它需要休息,或者想做点别的。我到现在还没搞清楚,但正在摸索中。
Lenny (00:38:39):
太棒了。那个 host 文件的技巧真的很酷。所以这 [听不清 00:38:43] 得懂点技术才能做到。我猜应该有一些 Chrome 扩展也能在一定程度上实现类似的功能。但核心思路就是,强迫你的大脑没有任何途径去看那些会分散注意力的东西,直接让你的电脑无法访问那些网站。太棒了。
Gergely Orosz (00:38:59):
对。肯定是有扩展可以用的,而且在这个播客上我们会有各种各样的听众。如果你是软件工程师,这相当简单;即使你不是,你也可以查一下 [听不清 00:39:10] 如何修改你的 host 文件,你实际上可以屏蔽 [听不清 00:39:13] 你想屏蔽的东西。我之所以这样做,是因为我写了一个脚本,需要运行脚本来屏蔽,然后再次运行脚本来解除屏蔽。这挺酷的,因为是我自己搭的。我通常发现别人用的工具——也许只是我的问题,或者也许这是软件工程师的通病——我不太喜欢它们,因为我觉得它们要么太固执己见,要么不够固执己见。所以我不知道这是否只是因为我过去喜欢搭建自己的工具和脚本——因为我能做——所以我发现自己的脚本对我来说效果最好。
Gergely Orosz (00:39:44):
但正如你所说,有很多非常好的工具。所以我对大家的建议是,把所有 [听不清 00:39:50] 都查一遍,都试试。你不试就不知道哪个管用。再说一遍,我有一些方法在一段时间内效果非常好。我不知道为什么,也许我只是容易厌倦之类的,就是需要轮换。但比如当我重新用回 Centered 的时候……顺便说一下我跟他们没有任何关联,只是说说而已。但我很喜欢他们也在不断进化,做更酷的功能。他们有一个社区元素,你和其他人比拼不间断的专注时间和关闭无关应用。对我来说这是一个……我再最后一次 [听不清 00:40:23] 提一下 Centered。我真的没有任何关联。我非常喜欢 Centered 的一点是,它可以让你打开摄像头,然后我就感觉不得不工作,因为我知道世界另一端可能有人在看着我——即使这并不是真的。
Lenny (00:40:37):
对,我特别喜欢那个功能。顺便说一下,网址是 centered.app,有兴趣的可以去看看。那么总结一下你的一些技巧,我都很喜欢——Centered,截止日期,这对我也是完全管用的。屏蔽网站,让自己不会被 Twitter、LinkedIn、TikTok 这些东西分心。我想这就是对你来说最有效的三个方法了。
Gergely Orosz (00:40:55):
对。还有一个简单的做法,设一个 20 分钟的计时器,然后告诉自己:“这 20 分钟,我必须专注于这件事,“在 iPhone 上或者其他什么地方设都行。就 20 分钟,但在这段时间里你不能做别的。试试看。对我来说,一旦我真的决定去做,效果奇好。
Lenny (00:41:13):
Centered 就是帮你做这个的,而且还有音乐什么的。所以我经常用。太棒了。现在这种生活和你以前做的事情相比,你最喜欢的是什么?然后我还会问你反面的问题,但先从这个开始。
Gergely Orosz (00:41:27):
我很喜欢的一点是,它迫使我的日历保持空白。因为这么多年来,我的日历一直是一团乱麻,会议堆着会议,我几乎没有任何专注时间。现在恰恰相反,我通常有大把的专注时间,会议或安排非常非常少。甚至现在,如果一整天只有一个会议,我都会有点焦虑 [听不清 00:41:51]。我喜欢它 [听不清 00:41:55] 管理你的时间 [听不清 00:41:58]——这是最棒的部分。
Gergely Orosz (00:41:59):
我也很喜欢我能掌控这么多。一开始其实让我有点恐慌,因为我有太多的创作自由了。我可以写任何主题,可以改变形式,可以做这个、做那个。这可能有点让人不知所措,因为我也知道人们会读到这些,他们会怎么想?但我确实喜欢它非常有创业的感觉,所以我可以大量做实验,这让我想起以前的工作,因为在 Uber 我们也做了大量实验,当然是在公司环境里。但我想那种感觉延续了下来。所以最喜欢的两点就是:空白的日历或者说极少的会议,以及做实验、尝试新东西,并且能自己决定想尝试什么。
Lenny (00:42:46): 这两点都深有同感。我有一条规则:下午三点之前不开会,99% 的情况下都能做到。原因就像你说的,如果上午十一点有个会,在那之前我根本没法做任何深度工作,开完之后又得重新进入状态。对于这种工作来说,拥有这样的深度专注时间太重要了,即使我一半时间都在刷 Twitter、分心走神,只要能有足够的专注时间,好东西就会产生。好,反过来聊聊。你们走上的这条路,有哪些最让人意外的坏处和令人沮丧的地方?
Gergely Orosz (00:43:24): 一个显然的问题是孤独。我确实很怀念……我在 Uber 有一个非常棒的团队,不仅仅是团队本身,更是那些人。我喜欢……每个人对远程工作的看法不同。我其实没那么喜欢远程工作,因为我就是喜欢和人待在一起。我算是那种比较外向的类型,真的喜欢走到咖啡站和人聊聊天,或者午饭时坐在某人旁边聊几句。当然某种程度上这也挺烦人的,因为我想把工作做完,但大部分时候我更多的是怀念那段时光,而不是觉得烦。所以我很怀念那种感觉。我的弥补方式是在共享办公空间工作,一个科技类的共享办公室,要求所有人都在科技行业工作。所以我至少还能跟人打个招呼,聊上几句。
作息结构的错位与内疚感
Gergely Orosz (00:44:08): 工作节奏很奇怪,因为前几个月我一直感到内疚,觉得在 Uber 时我更高效,因为我不得不高效。我要做太多事情了。一天之中,我大概八九点或八点半开始,到五六点或五点半结束,看情况。一个普通的日子,大概有八个会议,完成两三份文档,还要发这个、发那个。我确实……回顾我的产出,现在我写很多东西,但以前我也写很多。我觉得在邮件、聊天消息等方面,我的输出量几乎和现在差不多。所以坏处是,我感到非常内疚,也对自己有点沮丧,觉得自己在偷懒。这是其一。
出人意料的压力
Gergely Orosz (00:44:55): 另一件事是,出乎意料地有压力。一开始的时候确实挺孤独的。做我们这行的人不多。这也是我们建立联系的原因之一,因为这个圈子很小。而且即使在这个圈子里,我觉得在 Newsletter 社群里,情况也有所不同。大家都在运营自己的业务,存在一定程度的竞争。所以你可能不会……因为这毕竟也有一点注意力经济的成分。人们不会在同一主题上订阅或付费给十个 Newsletter,所以这让事情变得有点……这和在科技公司工作不同,在科技公司你只需要分享自己所做的一切,因为你只会从中受益。
Gergely Orosz (00:45:35): 所以有那样的因素,但还有大量的外部认可——每次看到订阅者数字的变化,都会带来一堆我没预料到的压力。我算是成功的 Newsletter 作者[听不清 00:45:47],我觉得我的成功其实相当罕见。可能有一两个或一小撮人有类似的成功,但我是一个离群值。所以我觉得这一点也值得[听不清 00:45:58]坦诚地说出来。坏处是,你不太清楚自己做得有多好。外部目标多少有点无意义。内部目标呢,要么远超预期,要么根本达不到。所以总有一种困惑感:我到底在哪里?我做得怎么样?我该如何评判自己?当初辞职是不是一个错误?事实上在开始之后的几个月里,我一直在问自己这个问题。还是说这是一个正确的决定?我认为对于这些问题和疑虑,过去在公司工作的职业经验非常有用,能帮你保持脚踏实地。
永不停歇的产出压力
Lenny (00:46:33): 其实我想问你这个问题,不过我先补充几点我觉得这种生活的主要坏处,因为它并不全是美好和浪漫。第一点是,尤其是付费 Newsletter,即使是赞助型 Newsletter 也一样,你基本上每周都得拿出非常棒的内容,理论上要一辈子这样。每天都有人在购买年度订阅,这意味着你至少在一年内得持续写出好东西,如果你想停的话。但很难停下来,因为正如你所说,收入非常可观,这是很难放弃的。所以我不太确定我们有什么退出路径——我们可能得一辈子每周写出很棒的东西——但我想总会有某种出路,我们会想到别的可以做的事情。
Gergely Orosz (00:47:19): 对,这个例子很好,因为对于很多公司来说——我想大多数听众都在科技行业工作——典型的路径是,你努力工作,在公司积累股权,或者提升公司价值,然后你可以卖掉公司,实现退出,然后做你想做的事。但对我们正在做的事情来说,它是和我们本人紧密绑定的。所以不管我的 Newsletter 赚多赚少,它作为一个业务的价值大概是年收入的四五倍,但你没办法真的这样卖掉它,也没办法真的抽身离开。
Gergely Orosz (00:47:49): 这让这件事很独特,也更难被竞争,这很酷,但它并不能提供太多的退出路径,除非你围绕它建立一家公司,建立一个没有你也能运转的组织。这也是很多图书出版公司所做的……基本上你建立一个出版公司,开始招人,让他们先写一部分文章,后来写越来越多的文章,但它不再是一个人的 Newsletter 了。或者你就一直做下去,直到你停下来,收入也随之停止,或者你可能可以卖掉它,但价格会大打折扣。
Lenny (00:48:24): 对。我真的不想管人,不想有雇员。所以建立一个有写手的媒体公司,听起来不太有意思,但也许最终就是那条路。这确实是一条路线。另一个坏处我补充一下:你必须每周写出很棒的东西,这意味着很难真正休假,因为如果你停止产出好内容,人就会走。我给自己发明了一个 PTO 政策,每年休四周假,不发 Newsletter,但这就意味着我通常一次只能休一周[听不清 00:48:58]连续两周,我不知道,也许大家不会在意,但感觉如果我不持续产出好内容,事情就会开始走下坡路。所以这是另一个坏处,就是[听不清 00:49:08]这个话题。
付费用户的休假难题
Gergely Orosz (00:49:09): 是的。但很多[听不清 00:49:11]还处于非常早期的阶段。所以我认为付费用户这个概念还很新,我们还会做大量实验。而且很大一部分是,我觉得你需要弄清楚自己的需求是什么。第一年我没有休过假——甚至当我[听不清 00:49:25]的时候我也在写东西,这和家人之间产生了一些摩擦。现在我换了一种方式解决,我计划多休息一些时间,做法是提前准备一些不那么时效性强的内容。但确实很难。
Gergely Orosz (00:49:43): 还有一个我们没提到的坏处,我要说一下,就是休假。好处是……我从来不觉得……嗯,有时候休假会有点内疚,但我想休假的时候就休了。我儿子出生的时候,在 Uber,他们给了我四个月的带薪假。我休了整整四个月,直接断联。感觉很好。这不是我的公司。我仍然在拿股票。股票价格基本上和我做的事情无关,说实话。这真的非常非常好。顺便说一下,如果你创业,尤其是只有你一个人的时候,这一点可能都成立——很难真正关机。我觉得大多数人不在意,我也不在意,但它会影响你。我们应该整体上对倦怠保持警觉。所以你需要解决这个问题,我也开始着手解决这个问题了。
长期方向
Lenny (00:50:30): 嗯。好了,坏处说得够了。总体来说,每周写一封/两封邮件就能赚几十万美元,还是挺棒的。总结一下,我好奇,你觉得长期来看这会走向哪里?然后我想谈谈成功需要什么,但在那之前,你觉得长期来看这会怎样?
Gergely Orosz (00:50:50): 我不再做长期计划了,因为三年前你问我想要做什么,我会说,“我想做,不知道,管管理者的管理者。“然后我真的做到了。然后你问我[听不清 00:51:01]我的梦想是什么?我会说,“有点难,但也许我想做一个 site lead。“我倒没有完全做到那个角色,但我从来没想过写 Newsletter,更别说写一个成功的 Newsletter 了。所以我现在顺其自然。顺便说一下,我不太把这看作 Newsletter 或者创作者,或者人们喜欢说的创作者经济。我把这看作一门生意,我试着戴上做生意的帽子。我在建立一个人的企业。我想让它可持续,想让它成功,我发现这种思维方式确实也帮我抽离了。我实际上可以享受周末了,而不是想着,“我得写这个,或者我得写那个。“所以我也想让这件事为我服务。
Gergely Orosz (00:51:40): 而且我并不执着于它必须一直是 Newsletter 之类的。现在是,但我看到我们未来的方向是,我会继续经营这门生意,继续发挥我的优势,就是我喜欢和人聊天,喜欢写作 [听不清 00:51:56],喜欢软件工程。所以这是一个很好的形式,但随着时间的推移可能会转变。所以我保持开放的选择。我从这段旅程中学到的是,你需要为那个灵感的火花创造时间。所以我未来几年的目标之一是,不要每周花 50 个小时在 Newsletter 上——我现在就是这么做的——而是花 20 个小时,然后也许休几周假,让那个火花出现。因为现实是,这个 Newsletter 之所以诞生,只是因为我给了自己六个月的无薪……我没有去找工作,我没有要求任何 LinkedIn 邮件。然后想法来了,灵感来了,动力来了。
Lenny (00:52:36): 我的做法和你的有很多相似之处。我不会想太远的长期计划。我不知道会发生什么。我只是……我看到哪里有拉力,如果感觉是一个有趣的机会,而且是我会兴奋去做的事情,我就会去探索,比如播客就是一个例子。说到这一点,我想说,一旦你发现自己可以只花 20 个小时在 Newsletter 上,我保证你会找到更多工作来填满那个空隙,因为我就是这么做的。
顺势而为:捕捉”拉力”
Gergely Orosz (00:53:00): 对。还有最后一点,你说了一个非常重要的东西 [听不清 00:53:06]——拉力,我想在这个上面再强调一下。做我们现在做的事情最大的好处之一,当你掌控自己的时间时,你可以乘势而上去追逐那些拉力。所以 [听不清 00:53:18] 在 Uber 的时候,如我所说,我的计划是花六个月写这本书。两个月的时候,我只是把一个草稿 [听不清 00:53:24] 发了一篇关于移动工程的超长博客文章,然后我收到了大量消息,非常多。我以前通常每天在 Twitter 上只会收到三四条消息。一个小时内我收到了 20 条,人们说,“我能读那个草稿吗?“我觉得很有意思。我感受到了这种拉力,人们对这个话题有巨大的兴趣。那是一篇关于大规模移动工程的超长博客文章,有人私信建议说,“你可以把它做成一本电子书。“我觉得这主意不错,因为那确实是一篇很长的博客文章。所以我说,“它会是一本电子书,而且采用随意付费的模式。“然后人们开始买了。我觉得很有意思。
Gergely Orosz (00:53:57): 反正我也没别的事可做,所以我能乘势而上。我说,接下来的两个月我要写这本书,因为看起来有人对它感兴趣。[听不清 00:54:07] 我把它变成了一本书,前两个月免费,但我拿到了赞助。重点是,我能够在这股拉力上乘势而上。Newsletter 也一样。我们后面会聊我怎么获得最初几千个订阅者的,但重点是,我能够在某些我觉得超级有趣的事情上乘势而上——我从来没预料到会有超过几百人关心如何构建一个大型移动应用。结果他们关心。成千上万的人关心。
如何起步
Lenny (00:54:30): 我们直接跳到这个话题吧。我们来谈谈怎么起步,给那些觉得”这很酷,我想做 Newsletter”的人。我们来简单谈谈你是怎么开始的,然后你觉得作为 Newsletter 创作者成功需要什么。那你实际上是怎么获得第一个一千个订阅者的?
Gergely Orosz (00:54:51): 我讲一个听起来很厉害的故事,人们会觉得不可思议,但也会讲背后的真实情况。
Lenny (00:54:57): 好,很好。
Gergely Orosz (00:54:58): 我宣布了我的 Newsletter,告诉人们,“我要全职做这件事了。“我当时大概有一万个 Twitter 粉丝,LinkedIn 上也许一千个左右。然后人们第二天就开始注册了。第一天我就有了 100 个订阅者,在发布任何内容之前。六周之内,当我发布 [听不清 00:55:15] 的时候,我有了 1000 个付费订阅者。这听起来像童话故事。如果你也这么做,我保证你不会得到相同的结果。事实上,你看到的数字可能会小得多。
Gergely Orosz (00:55:25): 我没说的是,这背后至少有六年的无心插柳的积累。我在六年前开始写博客……实际上,我毕业以来就一直在写博客。我有一个个人博客,发各种关于软件工程的东西,但内容很杂……有时候是我发布的一个应用,有时候是我遇到的一个问题。什么都往上面放。我对此感到厌烦了,博客没什么起色,而且我只是写给自己看的,但它的方向太散了。
Gergely Orosz (00:55:56): 然后我说,“我要开一个新博客,专门写软件工程,叫 The Pragmatic Engineer。“我买了域名,然后读到了 Jeff Atwood 的一篇博客文章,他是 Stack Overflow 的创始人,在 2010 年,或者我想是 2007 年,那时候我还在上大学,他有互联网上最受欢迎的面向软件工程师的博客。叫 Coding Horror,我认识的所有软件工程师都读它,如饥似渴地读。每周都是超凡的洞见,一周两次 [听不清 00:56:26]。你也读过?
Lenny (00:56:29): [听不清 00:56:29] 读过。我以前是工程师,那上面每篇我都看。而且 Coding Horror 这个名字好像是来自……我忘了那本书,但有一本书用的就是那个图案。
Gergely Orosz (00:56:36): 有一本书,还有一个图形。对。他写了一篇文章,多年来一直印在我脑海里。他说,如何在互联网上出名。他说,很简单三步。第一,写一篇博客文章。第二,每周写三次。第三,坚持两年。我保证,如果你这样做,你就会出名。我一直觉得这有点讽刺,但我越读越觉得他其实是认真的。当我开始写 The Pragmatic Engineer 这个博客时,我说,“我受够了旧博客什么都有、毫无重点、也没人关心。我要照 Jeff Atwood 说的做。我要发布……好吧,不是每周两次,而是每两周发一篇文章,坚持一年。“于是我开始做了。我发了六篇关于软件工程的博客文章,深入探讨我研究过的各种话题,然后我放弃了。
Gergely Orosz (00:57:27): 我说这个是因为我算是放弃了,搁置了几个月,但后来发生了一件有趣的事。我的流量突然暴涨,把当时用的共享主机搞崩了。流量来自一个叫 Hacker News 的网站,我之前听说过,人们在讨论我的文章,还补充了很多东西。我就想,有意思,竟然有人在乎我六个月前写的东西。
Lenny (00:57:49): 顺便问一下,那是篇什么文章?
Gergely Orosz (00:57:50): 叫”注释就是重构的邀请”。我写了我的观点:如果代码里有注释,那就意味着这个注释应该被删除,你应该把整个东西重构掉。这篇文章在 Hacker News 上炸了。有人骂我是白痴,有人说我是绝对智者,就是这两拨人在互相争论。我当时想,哇,我居然让硅谷的软件工程师为我的东西吵起来了。我看到一些很厉害的人也在认真讨论。所以那时候我开始觉得,我写的东西,可能真的有人会读,虽然不是必然的。
坚持写作与 Hacker News
Gergely Orosz (00:58:26): 然后我开始每隔几个月在那篇博客上写一篇,看心情,但再也没有停过。部分原因是我一直希望文章能上 Hacker News 这个网站。不过有段时间我甚至不知道可以自己提交,所以我从来没提交过自己的东西。另一个原因是,我确实喜欢写,养成了习惯,多年下来……我从 2015 年开始写那个博客,写了六年,最后一年……在 Uber 工作时,我会在业余时间写工作中的收获,写那些能写的东西,不是具体细节,而是一些学到的经验,比如分布式系统。越来越多这样的文章开始出现在 Hacker News 上。有时是别人提交的,有时我自己提交的也能有不错的反响。我就想,看来确实有人在乎我写的东西。
Newsletter 成功的基础
Gergely Orosz (00:59:16): 回到 Newsletter 为什么能成功这个问题,到我启动 Newsletter 的时候,我已经有很多软件工程师读过的文章,其中有一篇很有名的关于绩效管理的文章,讲怎么做绩效评审。我还写了一篇关于软件工程薪资”三峰分布”的文章,我观察到存在三个不同的层级……有科技巨头,也有本地公司。我想事情是这样的:当我宣布要写这个 Newsletter 时,我也在博客上发了公告。很多人意识到——“我一直在读 The Pragmatic Engineer,不知道背后是谁写的,但我喜欢。让我订阅吧。我确实想每周收到一封邮件,而不是隔三差五才冒出来一篇。”
Gergely Orosz (00:59:56): 所以这是多年的积累。我很希望能告诉你怎么做一个成功的 Newsletter,但我能给的最好建议仍然是 Jeff Atwood 那套,只不过我信心没那么足。但如果你开始写,并且坚持定期写,会有两件事发生。首先,你会为自己而写,不断进步,你会成为更好的写作者。这是肯定的。如果你运气好,或者你写的东西是对的,你可能会开始吸引到志同道合的人。所以第一步是开始。第二步是坚持。我的建议是为自己而写。奇怪的是,在我开始做 Newsletter 之前,我从没想过有一天会把这变成一门生意,但它一直让我感到有回报。所以如果你现在开始写 Newsletter,目标是有一天做到我这样的程度,那也许行得通。但有趣的是,我从没觉得这是一个机会。
给想开始 Newsletter 的人的建议
Lenny (01:00:48): 所以听这个播客的人如果在想,我该不该试试这条路?想一想你的经历:你写了一本书,在这之前写了很久的博客,在 Uber 工作了好几年。某种程度上给人的感觉是,如果需要这样的背景才能成功,那我肯定没戏。我得写过东西,还得在顶尖科技公司工作过。对于那些来找你说”Gergely,我该不该开始写 Newsletter?这对我有意义吗?“的人,你会怎么建议?你觉得需要你这样的背景吗?
Gergely Orosz (01:01:21): 别忘了,我当初开始写博客的时候,这些背景我一个都没有。
Lenny (01:01:24): 那是你在 Uber 的时候。就是你开始 Newsletter 之前。
Gergely Orosz (01:01:28): 那是在我去 Uber 之前。那时我可能在 Skyscanner,或者在 Skype,但更早之前我就在写博客了,之前也去会议上做过分享。所以我的建议真的是,如果你在考虑做 Newsletter 或类似的事情,就开始教别人、分享你所知道的和所观察到的。可以是 Newsletter,可以是 YouTube 视频,也可以去参加技术聚会。实际上,十年前我参加过很多技术聚会,做了各种各样的分享,认识了很多很酷的人。我想说的是,用各种方式分享你的知识。在这个过程中,你自己也会学到更多。
目标设定的建议
Gergely Orosz (01:02:01): 我发现……这是真的,当我是经理的时候,我们需要设定目标,我告诉人们可以设定两种目标。一种是人们常设的那种——我想晋升到下一个级别,或者我想牵头这个大项目。这些都是糟糕的目标,因为不在你的控制之内。所以设定一个”我想拥有一个成功的 Newsletter,比如两万订阅者”这样的目标,你并不是掌控者。好的目标是你自己能做到的事情。比如,我想在明年学会这门新语言,我会花时间在这上面,或者我想周五下午五点下班回家陪家人。设定那些你能控制的目标。
Gergely Orosz (01:02:41): 实际上这也是我最初开始写博客的方式。我的目标是,我想每个月写一篇。我坚持了一段时间,并为此感到自豪。或者每当我学到什么新东西,我就想时不时地分享出来。所以我想说,设定那些你能掌控的目标,其他的自然会到来,大概是这样。再说一次,别误会,我不是在劝退大家去做这件事。但对我来说,其中很大一部分是运气。另一件我建议的事情是保持好奇心,同时也要认真对待你的职业生涯。有一点确实帮到了我,那就是积累资历。我来自一个小国,一所很好的大学,但没人知道它。我不是在硅谷长大的,所以我其实下意识地决心要一步一步往上走。当我到了伦敦的 JPMorgan 之后,我对下一步去哪里变得相当挑剔。所以这就是为什么,当 Skype 出现的机会来了[听不清 01:03:36],我觉得这太棒了。人人都知道 Skype,我喜欢 Skype。后来去 Uber 也是一样。
Gergely Orosz (01:03:40): 尤其是现在,如果我在”某某小零件有限公司”工作,人们不会对我投以这么多关注。所以这也是其中的一部分。你需要经营这些事情,想清楚自己想做什么。在很长一段时间里,我基本上认为自己就是想往上爬企业阶梯,证明自己在这些公司里足够优秀。而所有这些事情我只是在业余做。有意思的是,现在反过来了,做这些事情成了我的主业,而它们曾经是我的副业项目。
Gergely Orosz (01:04:07): 我想最后一条建议是,做一些副业项目。所有这一切都是从副业项目开始的。在工作中,不会有人真正欣赏你在做 Newsletter 或者这个那个。在业余时间尝试各种东西,前提是你有时间。如果你没有时间,试着挤出时间来。因为我觉得我们做的很多事情都相当具有创业性质,而锻炼这些肌肉的唯一方式,就是从小事开始尝试。
Lenny (01:04:31): 你谈到资历很重要。我觉得还有一个更深层的一点,那就是你确实需要真正的经验——做那些真正规模化运作的、有效的、有影响力的事情,和优秀的人一起工作——从而建立一个基础,以此为基础去写作、分享智慧。这一点非常重要。现在有很多人开始写 Newsletter、发推文,但他们并没有做过什么,也没有多少真实的人生经验可以分享。我觉得我们所做的事情的核心,是它必须建立在真实有效的事情之上——那些你亲身经历并从中学到的东西,或者你能接触到那些有这些经验的人。
Gergely Orosz (01:05:06): 我想说的也是这一点,但有一件事我想加倍强调[听不清 01:05:09],这是一个非常好的观察——如果你是认真的,比如有一天我想写一本书或者做一份 Newsletter,其实本质上是同一件事,或者教别人什么东西,那就去看看那些你仰慕的、你真正信任的人。也许包括我一点点,也许包括你,但更可能是像 Kent Beck 这样的人。他是 TDD 的创始人,写了很多书。他是我最喜欢的人之一,他大概快五十或六十了[听不清 01:05:36],如果他听到这段话,抱歉如果……我不想[听不清 01:05:38]让他显得很老。但我喜欢 Kent Beck 的地方在于,他一直身处其中。他始终在业界工作,并且把所见所闻写了下来。比如,我觉得他发明了、或者说是联合发明了……是 TDD 还是极限编程……总之是这些方法论之一。
Gergely Orosz (01:05:58): 然后[听不清 01:05:58]他去了 Facebook 工作。他接受了降级,以软件工程师的身份入职,然后他组织了一场 TDD 工作坊,也就是测试驱动开发工作坊,结果在 Facebook 没有人来参加。Facebook 当时根本不做测试,这完全违背了一切商业常识。他冒着风险加入了这家公司,而在别的地方人们大概会对他顶礼膜拜,但他去了这家公司,只是想学习。他是一个终身学习者。他现在正在写一本书。但我想说的是[听不清 01:06:26],如果你想成为一个别人愿意倾听的人,是的,去做酷的、有趣的事情,逼自己进入那些在做有趣事情的地方。
选择有挑战性的环境
Gergely Orosz (01:06:33): 这就是为什么,当我在 2016 年去 Uber 的时候,那是 2016 年最受推崇的公司之一,而到了 2017 年情况就完全反转了。但回到 2016 年,人们会拒绝 Facebook 和 Google 的 offer 去加入 Uber,我们当时都觉得 Uber 会改变世界。所以你确实需要进入那些在做有趣事情的团队,证明你能做到,然后你自然会有更多有趣的故事可以分享,这是肯定的。
Newsletter 成功的关键建议
Lenny (01:06:59): 如果你要把如何在 Newsletter 这条路上取得成功的建议浓缩成一两条关键建议,你会怎么说?
Gergely Orosz (01:07:10): 一是在某个领域有深耕的习惯,不管是什么领域。这可能意味着……我不想说你没有经验就别开始,但这基本上是事实。所以在开始之前,先在某个方面、以某种方式成为专家,因为这样你的可信度会高得多。我觉得这个世界上不缺不懂行的记者和新闻工作者,他们可以采访别人,但这不会带来任何额外价值,而我觉得人们能感受到这一点。
Gergely Orosz (01:07:38): 所以我想说,选择一个你会擅长的领域。你可以在业余开始做这件事。前提是你有内容——你是行业中有经验的人,或者你有洞察、智慧、观察可以分享,那就开始分享,以任何形式。我做的是 Newsletter。还有 YouTube,很多人在 YouTube 上分享自己的东西做得相当成功。第三,保持节奏并坚持下去,在某种程度上,因为你确实需要不断重复。第四,不要害怕尝试新东西。一个很好的例子是 Steve Yegge。Steve Yegge 是……你听说过 Steve Yegge 吗?
Lenny (01:08:17): 听说过。他写过一些史诗级的长篇……
Gergely Orosz (01:08:19): 他以前在 Amazon 工作,后来在 Google 写了一封关于平台的内部邮件,讲 Amazon 在平台方面有多厉害,而 Google 做得多糟糕。他在 Google 非常有名,因为他在 Google 内部写了很多东西。他经验丰富,知道很多东西,后来他离开了 Google,开始做一个播客,放在 YouTube 上。你可以去看看,叫 Stevey’s Podcast。他的做法是,每周录一期节目,讲他学到的一堆东西,很多内容。他在开始第一期的时候就明确说了,“我要做的是,持续做六个月,然后看看能不能行得通,看看人们是否在意、是否会看。“
尝试与调整
Gergely Orosz (01:08:55): 这个人有大量经验,真的很有趣[听不清 01:08:59],我觉得听上去很有意思。最后,我觉得算是成功了。获得了几千、也许甚至一万订阅者,但并不是那种火箭般的增长。我觉得他做的是,六个月之后他就停了,然后他去 Sourcegraph 做了工程负责人,他实际上回到了[听不清 01:09:15]业界。但我喜欢这个故事的地方在于,它表明你无法保证成功,但你可以做他所做的事情——开始做一件事,保持节奏,看看能不能行得通。如果不行,要么转型,要么去做别的事情。我觉得这个世界本质上也是如此。
成功的内容是什么样的
Gergely Orosz (01:09:30): 如果你想想……退一步来看,什么是成功的 Newsletter?什么是成功的播客?什么是成功的 YouTube 频道?答案是那些有趣的东西。要么有娱乐性,要么有教育意义。但所有这些东西,你很难精确地指出来。如果你看 YouTube,Mr. Beast 大概是你见过的——我其实很喜欢看他的视频,以及 [听不清 01:09:56] 他做得有多好,但这不是你 [听不清 01:09:59] 任何人都能在一本书里写出来的东西。所以,你需要去理解人们关心什么,而一个好的理解方式要么是实验,要么是观察,要么就是去尝试。
Lenny (01:10:12): 这太好了。我觉得可以从你刚才说的所有内容中进一步提炼出一点:在一个领域建立深度,然后每周写两篇博客,坚持两年,好事就会发生。
为什么写作仍然有优势
Gergely Orosz (01:10:25): 我非常确定。这里还有一个有趣的想法,算是一个总结。我跟一个人聊过,问我的 Newsletter 为什么这么成功。它确实很成功,但老实说我也不知道为什么。这个人跟我说了一件有趣的事。他本人有一个非常成功的 YouTube 频道,大约有 20 万订阅者,比我 Newsletter 的订阅者还多。他是这么说的:“我注意到的是,你在 2015、2016 年就开始写博客了,而我的 YouTube 频道大概是 2019 年才开始的。在 YouTube 上,质量非常高,制作精良的内容比比皆是,大家都在做 YouTube。“他说,“你知道我没看到什么吗?我没看到有多少博客还在定期写有深度的内容。我感觉大家都跑到 YouTube 或 TikTok 去了。所以媒介本身也有另一个角度。“我说这些,不是 [听不清 01:11:16],但这可能是一种优势。现在,写东西的人越来越少了,因为我觉得很多人觉得写作很难,更多人会选择做视频。你可以利用这些变化中的一些趋势,不管是好是坏。
Gergely Orosz (01:11:27): 所以如果你要成为 YouTube 上的知名人物,你可能会有更多人看你,但你的竞争也会激烈得多。最后一点是,对我来说,写作,尤其是面向软件工程师的写作,效率非常高,因为我可以快速扫读。我不喜欢看 YouTube 视频,尤其是学习东西的时候,因为我连快速浏览都没法做到。它就是很耗时。
娱乐、教育与寓教于乐
Gergely Orosz (01:11:47): 所以我认为,你要决定是想做娱乐——对于这档播客的听众来说,我觉得这不在此列——那你在和 Spotify、Netflix 这样的对手竞争。教育,稍微干一些,但真的很有用。或者 edutainment(寓教于乐),即有娱乐性的教育。一旦你想清楚了这一点,不管是教育还是寓教于乐,你就可以找到既适合媒介又适合你自己的形式。说到底,你需要享受这件事。我个人是随着时间推移学会了热爱写作。我喜欢进入那种心流状态。所以对我来说它不算工作,而是乐趣。一旦你找到那样一件事情,无论它是什么,一切都会变得更容易。
尾声
Lenny (01:12:27): Gergely,聊 Newsletter 的事情总是很愉快。能聊这种生活的人我并不多。我希望这对正在探索这条路、正在考虑这条路、或者甚至其他创作者路径的人有所帮助。最后两个问题。大家想联系你或者了解更多的话,可以在哪里找到你?听众怎样才能帮到你?
Gergely Orosz (01:12:45): 你可以在 pragmaticengineer.com 找到我。上面列了一堆东西,包括 Twitter、LinkedIn、我的人才集合、我投资的一些公司等等。所有东西都在那里。你也可以订阅我的 Newsletter。听众怎么帮到我……如果你在科技行业工作,考虑订阅一下我的 Newsletter。我一直跟大家说,我们是一个互补性的 Newsletter。如果你做产品或对产品有兴趣 [听不清 01:13:11],Lenny 的 Newsletter 是非常棒的选择。而软件工程管理方面,则反过来找我就对了。而且不仅是……有人跟我说他们是数据科学家甚至是产品人员,有时候也能从中获得一些价值。
Gergely Orosz (01:13:23): 我每周四会写一个叫 The Scoop 的专栏。如果你听到任何有趣的速报(scoop),特别是和科技圈相关的——可能是工作场所的一些变化,比如你们公司刚在推行敏捷 [听不清 01:13:36],就像 Twitter 的团队做的那样——随时可以联系我,搜索”sending scoop to the Pragmatic Engineer”就能找到。我会把所有信息匿名处理,所以你可以告诉我有趣的事情。我通常感兴趣的是那些传统媒体可能不会报道、但我们科技圈的人真的很在乎的东西。
Gergely Orosz (01:13:51): 最后,如果你在 Google 工作并且愿意匿名跟我聊聊,请联系我,因为我接下来的文章之一会是关于 Google 的工程文化。我已经写过 Facebook 和 Amazon 的了,我主要跟软件工程师交流,了解这些公司从软件工程师和工程经理角度是如何运作的。
Lenny (01:14:11): 太好了。我希望这期节目能在那篇文章出来之前发布,如果不行的话,那就去享受那篇文章吧。Gergely,非常感谢你来到这里。这期太棒了。也许随着我们各自的不断发展,还可以再做一个第二期。
Gergely Orosz (01:14:23): 太棒了。很高兴来到这里,Lenny。
Lenny (01:14:27): 非常感谢大家的收听。如果你觉得这期有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你最喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。同时,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,因为这真的能帮助其他听众发现这档播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A/B testing | A/B 测试 |
| accountable | 监督(accountability) |
| big tech | 科技巨头 |
| charter | charter(团队使命章程) |
| churn | 流失率 |
| clickbait | 标题党(clickbait) |
| corporate ladder | 企业阶梯 |
| double down | 乘势而上 / 加倍投入 |
| edutainment | edutainment(寓教于乐) |
| founding engineer | 创始工程师 |
| Gumroad | Gumroad(自出版平台) |
| IPO | IPO(首次公开募股) |
| Mr. Beast | Mr. Beast |
| newsletter | Newsletter |
| North Star metrics | 北极星指标 |
| pedigree | 资历 |
| platform engineering | 平台工程 |
| principal engineer | principal engineer(首席工程师) |
| product market fit | 产品市场契合 |
| pull | 拉力(pull) |
| recurring revenue | 经常性收入 |
| RSUs | RSU(受限股票单位) |
| Sarbanes-Oxley | 《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》 |
| scoop | 速报(scoop) |
| self-published | 自出版 |
| series B | B 轮融资 |
| side project | 副业项目 |
| site lead | site lead(站点负责人) |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 合规 |
| SOX compliant | SOX 合规 |
| talent collective | 人才集合 |
| TDD | TDD(测试驱动开发) |
| The Scoop | The Scoop(专栏名) |
| total compensation | 总薪酬 |
| traction | 增长势头(traction) |
| unicorn | 独角兽 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)