缔造传奇品牌的艺术 | Arielle Jackson(Google、Square、First Round Capital)
The art of building legendary brands | Arielle Jackson (Google, Square, First Round Capital)
Arielle Jackson: So over time, a word can come to mean something that is beyond what that actual word means. Like Disney means magic today. Volvo means safety. Those names are not good. If I just put it in a spreadsheet or one of those lists, no one would pick it. So that’s kind of what I mean, that the name is just part of the overall marketing or the overall brand and a bad name with a really great company with great company strategy, great marketing is going to be great over time. And a good name is just going to help you, but I don’t think a bad name is going to kill a good company.
Lenny: Arielle Jackson spent nine years at Google, where she helped grow Gmail in its early days, taking it from just a side project to a product that is now used by hundreds of millions of people all over the world. Then she went on to Square, where she was one of the first marketers and helped launch and scale the growth of Square reader. She’s also worked with over 100 early stage companies, helping them nail their brand and marketing efforts, including Patreon, Loom, Front, Eero, Maven, Sprig, just to name a few.
These days, she teaches a super popular course on startup brand strategy and she’s a marketer in residence at First Round capital. In our chat, we cover primarily three things, naming strategies for your startup or your product, a framework for developing your brand, that includes your purpose, your positioning, and your personality, and also getting PR for your startup. I can’t wait for you to listen to this conversation with Arielle. And so with that, I bring you Arielle Jackson.
Hey, Ashley, head of marketing at Flatfile, how many B2B SaaS companies would you estimate need to import CSV files from their customers?
Ashley: At least 40%.
Lenny: And how many of them screw that up? And what happens when they do?
Ashley: Well? Based on our data, about a third of people will consider switching to another company after just one bad experience during onboarding. So if your CSV importer doesn’t work right, which is super common, considering customer files are chock-full of unexpected data and formatting, they’ll leave.
Lenny: I am 0% surprised to hear that. I’m consistently seeing that improving onboarding is one of the highest leverage opportunities for both signup conversion and increasing long-term retention. Getting people to your aha moment more quickly and reliably is so incredibly important.
Ashley: Totally. It’s incredible to see how our customers like Square, Spotify and Zuora are able to grow their businesses on top of Flatfile. It’s because [inaudible 00:02:38] data onboarding acts like a catalyst to get them and their customers where they need to go faster.
Lenny:
Embedding banking into your product, not only adds differentiation, but also helps you acquire, retain and monetize your customers. Unit is the market leader in banking as a service combining multiple bank partners with a developer friendly API to empower companies of all sizes to launch accounts, cards, payments, and lending in just a few weeks. Unit is trusted by leading brands, such as AngelList, [inaudible 00:03:39] Invoice2go And Roofstock.
To hear more about how Unit enables companies like yours to build banking, visit unit.co/ lenny to request a demo or to try their free sandbox. That’s unit.co/lenny.
Welcome to the podcast, Arielle.
Arielle Jackson: Thanks so much for having me. It’s great to be here.
Lenny: It’s absolutely my pleasure. I’ve read so much of your writing online. You’ve done a lot of writing, which I found really helpful. And so I’m really jazzed to be digging into all kinds of really good stuff. Before we get into some of the meat, just a couple questions that I had in my mind. You’ve worked with so many amazing companies, Google, Square, Loom, Patreon, Front. So many others. I don’t want to keep going. What’s been either your favorite or most unusual project that you’ve worked on?
Arielle Jackson: Gosh, it’s like asking me to choose my favorite son. I’m like, gosh, I can’t really like pick one.
Lenny: That’ll be the next question.
Arielle Jackson: I would probably say that my favorite project, and this is because they get reminded of it on a daily basis was working at on the Square stand at Square. It was the first time I ever worked on hardware and our joint Square was 140 people. We had no marketing function. We had a couple marketing people. We had no product managers and the hardware team was running the show on launching this new product that was supposed to get us up market into brick and mortar.
And anyway, I was running event marketing at the time and giving away a bunch of those readers that you stick into a phone for free and having a lot of small merchants use. I volunteered to run the launch of this product as a product marketer for the first time. And it was just so fun, doing everything from positioning it, figuring out how we were going to talk about this beautiful new piece of hardware that would turn your iPad into a real point of sale.
We had people fly around the country and get cool coffee shops and brick and mortar businesses seeding it so that they would all use it. We had I think 15 Metro areas covered with the coolest coffee shops and donut shops and everything at launch. And you know, there was a lot of fake it till you make it. I was negotiating a deal with Best Buy in the Apple store. Never done anything like that before.
Designing packaging was really awesome. There was just so much to it launching a physical product. And at the time it was at a pretty high price point for a company that had always had one free product and helping that company go up market. And I remember I was 30 something weeks pregnant when we launched. We got all the blue bottle stores to use it. And we had this launch event where Jack, our head of hardware, Jesse unveiled this product at the blue bottle in Mint Plaza. And I was super pregnant and super proud. And I still get kind of excited every time I pay on one of those, which is all the time.
Lenny: Super pregnant and super proud. I love it. And that product that was the POS stand, the iPad thing that you kind of swivel and sign.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. And there’s been new versions of it since, there’s a contactless version of it, and there’s one with an integrated screen that I think is Android based, which you don’t have to have an iPad, but that product’s still around. I still pay on that original Square stand all the time. I drink a lot of coffee. Those independent coffee shops around LA. So they’re all still using it.
Lenny: We’re going to talk about positioning a bunch, but while we’re on the topic, what was the positioning of that product while we’re talking about it?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, so at the time Square was mostly used by farmer’s market vendors and event vendors. I made jewelry in a past life and that’s how I got to Square was being one of those vendors. And the positioning was really that it was for brick and mortar businesses, particularly quick serve coffee, donuts, sandwich shops that kind of quick serve brick and mortars. And it was up against your ugly old point of sale. Your cash register effectively. That was our foil. And the benefit was turn your iPad into a point of sale. And the differentiator was about one unified experience that you can do everything you can on your cash register and more, and you’d be proud to have it out on your counter.
Lenny: So you said that you were creating jewelry and that’s how you got into Square to work on this product. I need to hear more about that.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, sure. So I was working at Google before Square and I’d always had this hobby of making jewelry and I used to sell my jewelry in a few different like boutiques around San Francisco and LA. It was a very small side hustle, but it was my creative outlet. And I sold at craft fairs around Hanukah/Christmas time. So I used to sell and just take cash. And then I got a Square reader and I sold at a craft fair that year. And it was awesome. That Square reader, it helped people buy more, it helped me sort of look cool. It was just really great to accept credit cards. I’d never done it before.
I used to take PayPal invoices and be on my computer and send someone an invoice and they’d get it. It was painful. All the reasons that people use Square, I experienced it. And two people I knew from Google, Megan Quinn and Kyle Dink had gone to Square from Google. And so after I had that experience, I think I sent them both an email just being like, this thing’s fucking awesome. I make jewelry. It was great. I sold I think it was 50% more than I did last year because I accepted credit cards and I can’t remember which of them wrote back first, but they were like, come interview. And so that was basically how I ended up at Square.
Lenny: Wow. I bet that helped you a lot through the interview, actual have personal experience.
Arielle Jackson: Having been a merchant, I think it helped me understand the small merchant that initially we were marketing to.
Lenny: And so today you are marketing expert in residence at [inaudible 00:09:45] capital. I was going to ask what does that mean and what is it that you do day to day these days?
Arielle Jackson: Sure. So after I left Square, I went to a tiny startup that was seven people. They were funded by First Round and I helped them with everything that a tiny startup that’s trying to grow needs.
Lenny: What startup was that?
Arielle Jackson: It was called Cover. They were acquired by Twitter. It was an Android app that could get you the right apps at the right time based on where you were by changing the lock screen on your phone. And so that company and that experience of working at this tiny startup that was seven people, I really liked it. And then they got acquired by Twitter, but I had just left Square. So I decided not to join Twitter with the rest of the team. And instead I just decided I was going to help a bunch of other small startups. And I emailed a few friends from past lives who had small startups, which was like, Hey, I’m not going to Twitter with the rest of the team. You do need marketing help. And every single person wrote back and said, yes. And that’s basically how I started consulting.
I guess it was about eight or nine years ago. At the same time, First Round had reached out and said, hey, who did you use for marketing comps for cover? And I got connected with Brett from First Round and he’s like, would you help our companies? And we did a three month project for one day a week, nine years ago. And I’m still there. I work halftime at First Round. So I do everything I do for other companies, but for First Round companies on First Rounds time.
So the way it works is if you’re funded by First Round and as part of your onboarding, we offer a lot of value add services and I’m one of them. And those services can be everything from, we have someone who’s really good at compensation and HR stuff and we have someone who will help you with pricing and I’ll help you with marketing. And what that means when you’re a seed stage startup is everything from naming to positioning, to developing a brand identity, a website and your initial launch, and eventually hiring a marketer. So that’s sort of the bread and butter. That’s what I like working on anyway. So it’s a good fit because we invest in a lot of seed stage companies at First Round, I get to help almost all of them.
Lenny: That’s an excellent segue to what I wanted to get to next. What I want to do in our chat is cover three broad topics. Things that I know are very near and dear to your heart, naming for products and startups, your brand development framework and how to hire marketers. Does that sound good?
Arielle Jackson: Awesome. That’s what I like to talk about. So yeah, let’s do it.
Lenny: Let’s do it. Surprise, surprise. Okay. So with naming, I’ve actually heard from a few founders that you were really helpful to them in naming their startups. Folks that have maybe been on this podcast that will go unnamed. So for founders trying to come up with a name for their company or their product, two questions. What makes a good name for a product or a startup, and then just how do you come up with a great name?
Arielle Jackson: I love naming. I think I’ve named just over 30 companies at this point. And actually when I mention how I got into consulting when I emailed some friends and asked them if they needed marketing help, I think I’m allowed to talk about this one. So one of those companies was some friends from Google, Adrian and Carl. They had left Google, gone to Facebook and then started a company it’s now called Seesaw. It’s an ed tech company. That was the first company I named post Google Square, all of that.
Lenny: It’s an awesome name.
Arielle Jackson: It is an awesome name and I’ll use it as an example. So seesaw is a ed tech company. They had a really bad name before that and we did this whole naming process and ended with that name and why I think that’s a good name is when I say Seesaw, you don’t really know what it is, but when I tell you, oh, it’s this ed tech company and it’s an iPad app and it helps the work that elementary school students do go between the teacher, the parents and the student. And you’re like, oh, well, Seesaw makes sense for elementary school, it’s something that goes back and forth. It has that sort of nostalgic feel. And it makes sense that it’s an ed tech company.
And I personally tend to like those kinds of names that are suggestive or evocative, where when I tell you what the company does, you’re like, oh, that makes sense. But it’s not that what the name is tells you exactly what the company does. So that’s an example, I think of a good name. I don’t know, during COVID and when my older son’s school was closed and they all used Seesaw and I got to tell my son, oh, that’s my friend’s company and we named it back in the day. And he was like, oh, that’s cool. That name makes sense.
Arielle Jackson: That’s the reaction you want. It also has a little bit of emotion to it. It has some nostalgia. It’s fun to say it’s short, it’s memorable. I think all of those things make a good name. Another company that has a good name that you and I have both worked with is Maven. So they’re a First Round company. Gogan has talked about this publicly. We named that company together. Maven is a Yiddish word that means one who understands and it means specifically one who understands because they’ve done something, they’ve acquired the skills or knowledge over time.
And I just think that’s such a cool name for a platform that allows X operators or current operators to teach their skills to other people through cohort based classes. You want to be a Maven, instructors are Maven’s, it’s short, it’s easy to say, when I tell you what that company does, that name makes perfect sense. So I tend to like those [inaudible 00:15:17] of names myself, but I also, I don’t know, I like other kinds of names for other kinds of products too. I think it really comes down to what is your product? What is your company? What is the name trying to achieve and really getting clearer with those criteria. So we can talk about the criteria that always apply, the criteria you might add and a process to get there.
Lenny: That sounds great. Yeah. I’m really curious about a process. If one exists, that’d be really cool. So another question in my mind is just some names are just nonsense words like Yahoo and I don’t know Google, I guess. What’s your take on that as a name, that approach?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So words like that are empty vessels, they really don’t mean anything. If you think about the name Yahoo, it’s actually like really silly. It’s like Yahoo. I always hear it like that. Google has a meaning for people in the know with the one followed by as many zeros. It’s like a big number and it’s a misspelling of that. So that one’s a little less silly to me than Yahoo. My take on empty vessel names is they can be really memorable and they can be evocative of the emotion, but you have to do a lot more marketing work over time to make it mean something.
So if I say Yahoo today, we know it’s that search engine we use before we all switch to Google and we have the purple color in our head, and we think about what it meant at the time that we might have used it, but it took a lot of marketing dollars and a lot of time for that word to be in that. So they’re doable. I worked on a company Eero. That has kind of what is almost an empty vessel name. Eero is for Eero Saarinen who was a designer. He did like these really beautiful buildings, architectural buildings. And then also some tables. You can get a Saarinen and table at Design Within Reach, but that name, nobody knows that unless you’re in the design community. And so that name is effectively an empty vessel and they have to spend a lot and be consistent about making that [inaudible 00:17:16] mean a wifi system.
Lenny: I want to get to the process, but another question is why is it important for the name to kind of connect to the company and what they do? Is that just it feels nice to people or is there some kind of a bigger reason?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So it doesn’t have to, and examples like Eero and Yahoo, it doesn’t. Even if you think about Apple, it doesn’t. Apple has nothing to do with Apple computers. It’s a word we all know. There’s a lot of words where there’s no meaning behind it. If there is a meaning behind your name, your name is doing a little bit more of your marketing work for you. So if your name is Internet Explorer, RIP, I know exactly what you do.
If your name is Chrome and you’re a designer on the web, you kind of might be like, oh, that makes sense. That’s the area around the browsing window. If your name is Firefox, I have no idea what you did. You just took two words and put them together and made something up. And now you have to spend, and you have to be consistent over time in making that word mean something for people. But all three of those browsers were successful at a time. And I don’t think the name had anything to do with Internet Explorer’s demise.
Lenny: Got it. So it’s kind of ideally you can find an easy mode. If that doesn’t work, then you go hard mode. You come up with your empty vessel name and then you just have to do a lot of work.
Arielle Jackson: That’s my personal preference.
Lenny: Okay, cool. That makes sense.
Arielle Jackson: My personal preference is if you think about there’s descriptive names, the Internet Explorer, there’s suggestive names like Chrome, then there’s evocative names, which I would say Seesaw and Maven fit into there where they’re like in between suggestive and evocative, and then there’s empty vessel names or fanciful names. There’s a spectrum. And when you do your brainstorm, we can talk about this in the process, you want to think across all of them, but you might have in your naming brief, we want a suggestive name, or we want a descriptive name. You might go into it with that. And so there’s times and places for all of those names across the spectrum. My personal bias is I tend to like suggestive names.
Lenny: Makes sense. Okay, let’s get into it. What should teams do when they’re trying to name something?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So the first thing is to do your product positioning. I really believe that positioning dictates so much of your marketing and should always be the first thing you do. I had a student in my last class that I taught through Maven. I teach a class on brand strategy and he was I think a second or third time founder, who had never taken a class on brand strategy. He worked really hard. He was awesome. Anyway, at the end of the class and you kind of do this closing thing. And he goes, I’ll never write a line of code without doing positioning first. And that was music to my ears. I think positioning comes first, but in any case, you do that first, and we’ll talk about that in a little bit. And then you write a naming brief and it’s really simple.
What are you naming? Are you naming a company? Are you naming the product? Are you naming both? Usually if you’re early stage company, you’re naming both and they’re going to have one name because you don’t want people to have to remember two things. What do you want the name to communicate? So in that example of Seesaw, we wanted it to communicate young childhood. In the example of Eero, we wanted it to communicate design, being designed forward. It can be whatever you want it to communicate. What do you want to avoid? We don’t want it to sound like this competitor, or we hate this word or whatever you want to avoid. What are the names of competitive and related products? And then are there other considerations? I worked with another First Round company that was operating in China.
Arielle Jackson: And one of the considerations was this has to be pronounceable for a native Chinese speaker. That’s a very valid, additional consideration. And then there are seven criteria for names that always apply in my opinion. And you could add additional ones, like that Chinese speaking one would be an additional one. The seven are trademark, which is kind of obvious, can you use this? Are you violating someone else’s trademark? And the second step with trademark is, do you need to proactively protect the name? Domain availability, so everyone gets hung up on getting a.com like maven.com got maven.com. It was an arduous process that Gogan wrote about on Twitter. But these days, you don’t necessarily need the.com. Square operated on SquareUp for very, very long time. Lots of companies are operating on variants of a .com. So domain availability, distinctiveness. Is it memorable?
Is it sound like someone else’s name? That’s I think one of the most important ones, just is it different and distinctive? Is it timeless? So there’s a lot of naming trends. If you tell me Optimizely I could tell you what year was the company formed when it ends in LY. If you tell me a word like Flicker, I can tell you what year it was, because that was the naming trend to remove vowels. So I generally stay away from naming trends, because I want your company named not to sound dated in 10 or 20 years. The last one is it’s kind of related to that. What we talked about in the brief, what do you want the name to communicate? Which is the name reflective of your key messaging or does it somehow suggest an emotion or feeling that you’re trying to convey, and then sound and ease of pronunciation.
Is it fun to say, is it easy to say, how is it to spell? We almost named a First Round company a while ago Lattice which is now a different company that’s doing quite well, but we didn’t name it that because this was a company that was B2B sales was going to be their main channel. So they’re going to be people on the phone being like, hey, I’m calling from Lattice and we went through this exercise and we’re like lettuce? It’s not so easy to say and spell. So we actually didn’t name the company that and went with something else. But there’s a company now doing quite well.
Lenny: You think that was the right move?
Arielle Jackson: I don’t know. I always say a good name is only going to help you, but a bad name won’t hurt a good company. So I don’t really feel-
Lenny: Interesting. Good to know. Yeah. Keep going.
Arielle Jackson: And then the last two are appearance. So there are some names that just lend themselves really nicely to visual design and they have to do with how tall the letters are and is their symmetry and if you give this to designer, making a logo just so awesome and cool and fun and then length. So a lot of people, they want to name like Square and Stripe and these one syllable names, but a two syllable or even a three syllable name can often be more memorable.
Lenny: lennysnewsletter.com. Shoot.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. Well, so you got the Lenny part with the two syllables is generally a nice sweet spot.
Lenny: Sweet. Have you put out a template or anything that folks can find to do this? Or should they kind of listen here and take notes?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, there’s an article on the First Round review called Positioning Your Startup is Vital, Here’s How to Nail It and all those criteria and how to do naming is actually in that article.
Lenny: Awesome. We’ll put that in our little show notes. And then as you go through this, is this a binary thing or you kind of rate each of these categories one to five?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So the way I do it is I apply the criteria after we do the brainstorm. And then we do red, yellow, green on each of those criteria just to weed out ones that are not doing well on any of those. Got it. And then you add your own criteria. So the next steps the brainstorm. I’m going to go fast through this.
Lenny: Yeah. I was going to ask you about the brainstorm. I’m excited to hear this.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So the way that I run a naming process is I like to first do positioning and then I set up an hour with the founders and me and ideally a couple other people who are interested, but disinterested. So I’ll bring a writer from the First Round team or the founder has a friend who’s a linguist or the founder has a friend who speaks four languages. We like those kind of people to be in it if possible. And it’s generally five to seven people in a brainstorm. And the idea is we spend one hour, I set it up beforehand and we try to come up with hundreds and hundreds of bad ideas and a couple decent ones that are worth exploring more. And the brainstorm is two parts. The first part is based on words in your positioning statement.
So we take all the meaningful words out of your positioning statement is the warmup and we run synonyms, antonyms, free associations, other languages, whatever we can do off of those words. And so if your words in your positioning statement are related to what that you do, which they very well should be, that’s a great way to just come up with hundreds of words really quickly. And then the second step is a thematic brainstorm. So I pick between seven and 10 themes, you can think of them like Jeopardy themes. So it’s like, I don’t know, okay, so there was an-
Lenny: Source.
Arielle Jackson: … AI. Yeah. It was like an AI tool for strawberry picking and the themes would be the history of strawberry farming or botany 101, things that are related. You could do like last names of famous farmers, think about how did Tesla get their name? They probably did last names of people related to electricity, and that’s such a great name, so thematic brainstorm. And then that’s usually a little more fruitful. And we do the same thing, free association, all that.
I spend some time afterwards on Wikipedia and the internet and actually finding words words. Also love the library, check out books sometimes and just read books on the topic and just write down the interesting words that come up. And anyway, so then I give them back a short list. The short list is around 10 to 25 concepts that are ideas that are worth looking at further. And from there narrow it down based on the criteria and the red, yellow, green, we come up with three to five, don’t come up with one because you might not get it for trademark, and it’s really sad when you get really attached to one and then you can’t use it. So yeah, three to five top contenders. And then you go through trademark process domain and kind of go from there.
Lenny: That was amazing. If you’re doing a startup name versus a product, is the process any different or is it basically the same?
Arielle Jackson: No, same. The only difference is if you have a lot of equity in your company name… Square is a good example. Square had a lot of equity. Google is a perfect example. A lot of equity in the company name, you often don’t want to name your products something really creative and different because you actually want the equity in the master brand to come through. So if you think about Square’s names, they have other ones, when they diverge from the Square brand like cash or when they want something new or Google, when they came out with Android and they wanted to diverge from the master brand. But think about all the products. Square Register, Square Stand, Square App, Google Maps, they’re really boring and it’s because the equity is in the company name and the product name can actually be boring and descriptive.
Lenny: That makes sense. I want to come back to a point you made that a great name will help a startup and a bad name is not going to hurt you or I forget the word to use. I’d love to hear that because that’s that’s really interesting.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So if your company has a great name and the name is remarkable, people will be like, oh, that’s a great name, or it just makes sense. In the case of Seesaw like, that’s a good name for that company. That good name is just going to help people talk about it. It’s going to spread word of mouth. People are going to like to talk about the company. If you think about there’s a lot of companies with bad names that we use all the time or even quite boring names that we now love. So if you think about Disney, Walt Disney’s last name, it didn’t mean anything, but over time that’s such a good company and it got imbued with all this meaning and now it stands for magic and stands for so much, but it was just the dude’s last name. So over time a word can come to mean something that is beyond what that actual word means.
Disney means magic today. Volvo means safety. Those names are not good. If I just put it in a spreadsheet or one of those lists, no one would pick it. So that’s kind of what I mean that the name is just part of the overall marketing or the overall brand and a bad name with a really great company with great company strategy, great marketing is going to be great over time. And a good name is just going to help you, but I don’t think a bad name is going to kill a good company.
Lenny: So interesting. So basically your goal is to help find a name that will help. Worst case, you’re going to be okay if your product is awesome.
Arielle Jackson: I think so. Yeah. I mean it also takes a little of the pressure off to be honest. Everyone wants to find that perfect name. If you actually think about it, this happens a lot. You give someone a list of 10 names or 15 names and they’re just cells in the spreadsheet these days, we’re doing most of this virtually. You give people a name like that and it’s like, you have to imagine what it could be. You think about Apple or Disney or Nike or Volvo, Lego, any of these brands, in a cell spreadsheet in plain Arial in 10 point, they’re just okay, you have to grow them over time. You just hear about I think Phil Nate with Nike, when he was given that name as an option, he was like, that’s okay. Yeah. I’ll sleep on it. Such a great name.
Lenny: This makes me think about my startup back in the day, it was called Local Mind, and we went through an exercise similar to this. Not nearly as in depth and well run, but I remember our designer was the person that helped us nail the name. He’s just like, oh, I could do so much with this name. Let’s just see where this one can go. Is that something you find?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. There’s definitely been bad names. I helped a company rebrand recently that they had a bad name. It just looked dated. It didn’t fit any of those. It wasn’t distinctive. It wasn’t timeless. It had one of those like naming trends. Those are not good. You want to avoid those, but if you come up with something that is pretty good and you can make up something beautiful out of it and it fits your company, it does some of the marketing work for you and people like to say it and ideally it’s memorable and it has some emotion to it, go, go for it.
Lenny: Awesome. One last question about naming. What’s a common mistake that people make going through this process coming up with a name?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, a really funny one is if you have a code name for your product or at First Round, a lot of the companies we invest in, they raise their seed round with one name. They may or may not be attached to it, but then they work with me and I’m like, yeah, your name’s not that good, and here’s why, we should probably change it or they say, we can’t use this name. We found out we have a trademark conflict. I really believe in using a code name that’s so ridiculous that you won’t ever launch a product like that if you’re just trying to incorporate and go really quick.
So for example, a lot of people, they need their name for their corporation. And so they are filing all the steps to creating a business and they just like pick something, but then they end up getting attached to it and then they want to actually launch under that name. And it’s like, well, that’s not so great and here’s why I think you should change it. If you pick something so ridiculous that you would never launch, it’s actually helpful because then you can go through a process and find a name that will do more of your work for you and you won’t be attached to something crappy.
Lenny: Such a good point an idea. And by the way, so if you’re a First Round company, you get this naming service for free and all these other things we’re going to talk about just to be clear.
Arielle Jackson: Yes, that’s right.
Lenny: Oh my God. I could do a whole episode about how much I love First Round, but I will say I’m a huge fan. I think I’ve participated in every program that First Round offers. The First Round review is actually one of the first pieces of writing that kind of helped spur my now career. And so I’m really-
Arielle Jackson: I remember that article, was awesome.
Lenny: Yeah. And I did two more after that. So much work, but yeah, that was a big deal. So I’m really appreciative to First Round. And we could talk about First Round a bit at the end, too.
Arielle Jackson: Sure. Yeah. Everything we’re talking about that you’ve asked me so far, I think that you’re going to ask me about positioning and [inaudible 00:33:33] your marketing person, and all of that is stuff we offer to First Round company, we offer my services as part of the investment. There are times when we might get stuck and we have to bring in an outside person to help us with something, but for the most part, it’s all included and you’d pay a lot of money… The naming firm I like the best when I get stuck, it’s called A Hundred Monkeys. They’re awesome. A long time ago, I used to be like, oh yeah, it’s about 47,000 for a name.
Lenny: Wow.
Arielle Jackson: So yeah, it’s gotten expensive, but if you have the means, it’s nice to get some outside help.
Lenny: #valueadd. Okay. I want to transition to your brand development framework, which I read a bunch about. And I know you teach a course about this, which we could also chat a bit about, but first I’m curious, just practically, why is a brand useful? Why is it even something people should spend time investing in? Why does it matter?
Arielle Jackson: Okay. So a lot of founders may think that when we say your brand, we mean your logo and your font and your colors, and that is a visual expression of your brand, but it’s not actually your brand, your brand is who people think you are. And so why is it important for people to think what you want them to think? That really comes down to people’s understanding and particularly your target audience’s understanding of what your company and your product is. And I don’t really think there’s anything else more important than that if I was building a company.
Arielle Jackson: So your brand is who people think you are and developing a brand strategy is what do you want to be? What do you want people to think you are? And what are you going to do to help shape that perception? So when I work on a company, there’s a lot of steps to this, but I kind of have this nice little process that’s right sized for early stage startups. And I like to start with, why do you do what you do? Just having a really clear understanding of that. That’s your purpose. The second part is your product positioning. So meaning how do you want people to understand your product and what role it plays in their lives? And then the last part is your personality, which is how do you show up in the world? What do you like? If your brand was a person, would I want to hang out with them? Would someone else want to hang out with them?
Lenny: We’re going to get into each of these three pieces, but before we get in there, as a founder, how do you know when you’re done with your brand development? I know it’s a never ending ongoing process, but at the end of a process, you figure out your purpose, positioning, and personality, and then there’s logo and colors, when you think about just here’s the brand package, what are all the little pieces of it? And then we’ll dive into these three elements.
Arielle Jackson: I think what you said is right. You get those three components, your purpose, your positioning, your personality, you use that as an informant to your visual design and also to your tone of voice. So the way your copy sounds, the way you show up in written copy. A lot of companies have what they call like a style guide or a brand style guide and it really only covers logo, fonts, colors, like don’t put our logo and blue, don’t tilt it on an angle, here’s what it looks like in white, here’s what it looks like in black, here’s the favicon, but they don’t have that for here’s who we are, here’s 10 lines that could be ad copy for us, here is why we do what we do.
This is the personality of our brand. Here are five attributes. We are playful, but not silly. We can talk about that a little bit more. But I think all of that belongs in the style guide, not just logo, font colors, which is really just a visual articulation that feeds into your brand. I’m a big Volvo fan. I’m on my fourth Volvo right now. So I’m super brand loyal. And I always use them as an example, because if you can picture the Volvo logo in your head right now, it kind of looks like the male symbol, it’s like a circle with an arrow coming off the side.
There’s nothing about that logo that means all the things I like about Volvo, all the things that the Volvo brand has come to mean to me and they’re colors, they’re like black and white and a little blue. There’s nothing more boring than their color palette. And so it’s not the logo and the font and the colors of Volvo that has made them mean… They literally own the word safety in cars right now. It’s other stuff. And if you looked at their style guide actually, looked at their style guide recently and it’s just like, here’s our black and our white and our blue and here’s our tertiary colors and here’s our logo. It would not help you understand Volvo as a brand.
Lenny: I’m guessing some of that happened because they’ve evolved over the years and it’s probably a very different initial brand. So it kind of tells me that it’s more important to have a logo and a brand that can kind of represent many things that isn’t so stuck in a certain positioning, maybe. Does that resonate at all?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. Their logo has to do with a very early history. I researched this because I was a nerd out on this stuff. They had some early history as a ball bearings company. And so I guess that logo had some meaning then, but it wasn’t so descriptive to being a ball bearing company that they were able to keep it as they evolved into a car company.
But if you look at their early writing, it’s so cool. It’s so cool. Long, long time ago they would talk about cars are driven by humans. And our job as a car manufacturer is to protect the humans who drive the cars. That was fundamental formation of the company. So they really knew why they existed. And then they did stuff in I think it was the 1950s when everyone just wore lap bands in the car and they came out with the three point safety harness and instead of patenting it and licensing it, they gave that away for free for everyone because that would make all the world’s cars safer and those kinds of company decisions. That’s what made Volvo stand for safety. It’s not the logo.
Lenny: Very interesting.
And three, it’s just one easy thing that I can do every single day to take care of myself. Right now, it’s time to reclaim your health and arm your immune system with convenient daily nutrition. It’s just one scoop and a cup of water every day. And that’s it. There’s no need for a million different pills and supplements to look out for your health. Make it easy. Athletic Greens is going to give you a free one year supply of immune supporting vitamin D and five free travel packs with your first purchase. All you have to do is visit athleticgreens.com/lenny.
Again, that’s athletic greens.com/lenny to take ownership over your health and pick up the ultimate daily nutritional insurance.
One question on my mind before we get into these three elements, last question kind of setting context is if I’m a non founder or a PM, I’m just like, oh my God, a branding exercise is going to take months going to suck up all these resources. I don’t know what it’s going to do for us. What kind of timeframe do you recommend for early stage companies to go through kind of a branding exercise and go through something like this and maybe even later stage, what’s reasonable?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. It depends on the stage of your company and how much you have already that you have to kind of… It’s hard for people to scrap up what they already have. There’s a lot of sunk cost fallacy type stuff going on. If you’re starting from nothing, I think you can do this in three weeks. The naming process itself because of trademark and domains can take a little longer. When I name companies, it usually takes about a month just for naming, but the whole brand strategy process you could do, if you’re a really early stage company in a matter of weeks.
And I think whatever time it takes you actually is going to save you so much time down the road. It’s going to help you save time on company decision making. It’s going to help you save time, writing your website. Literally your web copy almost writes itself, if you get this all done right. So it’s a small investment of time up front that actually saves you a lot of time down the road is how I would sell it to a skeptical PM.
Lenny: You’ve sold it. That sounds very high ROI. Let’s get into it.
Arielle Jackson: High ROI.
Lenny: So purpose is the first piece. What is that? And then what are some examples of really good executions of purpose that you’ve seen?
Arielle Jackson: Sure. So your purpose is why you do what you do. It makes people want to root for you. And it has a big role in aligning people to come want to work for you and to have employees all feel like they’re part of something. I like to think of it as we exist to blank. And whatever that blank is your purpose. Do you want to hear about examples or do you want to hear about what makes a good purpose?
Lenny: Both would be most excellent.
Arielle Jackson: So a good purpose, it explains the change you want to see in the world irrespective of financial gain. So people often get hung up on mission and vision and values and all this stuff. And values are fine. They’re internal. I’m not going to talk about those today, but I don’t care about mission and vision. I just want one thing because people can only remember one thing and it’s your purpose and it’s why you do what you do. And when you articulate this really well, it helps you make company decisions, it exists on a 10 year frame. So everything we talk about with product positioning, it’s pretty malleable. It exists on an 18 month frame if you’re a early stage company, so it can evolve, whereas your purpose is pretty much going to stay the same for 10 years. It’s that north star.
And it helps align people in the company and it helps the public want you to win. I worked at Google right out of grad school and Google’s purpose was to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. And I thought every company had a purpose that everyone at the company knew. I just thought that was my first real job. It turns out that’s not true. And Google’s actually been amazing at this. I had a person in my last cohort who had recently left Google when they were like, I don’t know, 80 or a hundred thousand people. He said everyone still can say that. That’s amazing. But I joined, it was like 1400 people. And by the time of your first day, you already knew that. It was part of your hiring process.
It was part of your onboarding. It was in your offer letter. It was everywhere. And I just thought that was really cool and a good purpose. One that is kind of related to financial gain, but I still think is cool is Stripe’s, which is to increase the GDP of the internet. I think that’s really well said and cool and just gets you thinking about the internet as a country. I don’t know. If you’re an internet person, it makes you want to root for them.
Nike’s is awesome. I wrote Nike’s down because I don’t remember it, to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. And if you have a body, you are an athlete. It’s not just about LeBron it’s about me and how was my Peloton ride this morning too? So those are some famous companies. I could tell you a little bit about some that I’ve worked on that I think are pretty cool that are companies you may not have heard of yet, just because sometimes we get hung up in like thinking Stripe and Nike and Google are awesome names because of all the meaning we have behind them. And I want to talk about some companies you may not have heard of because you can have a good purpose and not be Stripe and Nike and Google.
Lenny: Yeah. That’d be awesome. And by the way, the purpose, should it be a sentence? Is that the general-
Arielle Jackson: Yes.
Lenny: … guideline. Great.
Arielle Jackson: So you can introduce yourself at a conference. You’re the keynote speaker at a conference and I want you to introduce yourself and I want you to go, hi, I’m Lenny, I’m the founder of the company X, and we exist to blah and say it and have that feel natural.
Lenny: Awesome.
Arielle Jackson: And it should make people want to hear what else you have to say. And the other thing it should be able to do is be the header for your about page. So meaning we exist to blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But you would just take out the we exist and say the verb and start there. That could be the header for your about page. So one company I worked on, First Round company, they’re called LogicLoop and it’s an operations automation company.
You can think of it almost stuff like a no code, low code platform to automate a lot of the operations data based work that people have to do. And we did this whole brainstorm and I really liked their purpose. You can look at their about page. It will be right there it’s to make operations data work harder than operations people. And if you ever have worked in operations or have friends who have, they work really, really hard and it can be kind of thankless. So it gets anyone in that field to root for you. Your data should be working harder than your operations people.
Lenny: Disclaimer, I’m an investor in LogicLoop, and I love that you worked with them.
Arielle Jackson: Cool. Awesome. And then another one that I worked on of another First Round company, they’re called Woolf. They’re informed by the UC model where there’s a bunch of individual schools that all exist by themselves, but they get something from being part of a larger organization. And what they do is they provide accreditation through being part of the larger Woolf University, but every individual college can still operate as their own independent college.
And so their purpose is to increase access to world class higher education and ensure that it is globally recognized and transferable. So this idea of you should be able to take a class from the best instructor online and then go travel to Australia and take a class there and then go to China and take a class there and get the best education that the world can offer.
Another one that I worked on a while ago is Alt. I think they’ve recently gone through a little bit of like a rebranding, but theirs was to increase the transparency and liquidity of alternative assets. And in their case, the product positioning was really about making sports cards as easy to invest in as stocks. So the idea of alternative assets in this case are not private equity and hedge funds in real estate, but alternatives to alternatives, like sports cards and Pokemon cards and art.
Lenny: Awesome. Those are so many awesome examples. That’s going to be useful for people to wrap their head around what a purpose might be. Execution wise, do you just kind of open up a Google doc and just start writing out ideas and brainstorm a little bit and just kind of keep refining with your team?
Arielle Jackson: I actually stole this exercise or borrowed it from [inaudible 00:49:03] that I actually think adds some structure to that. If you do it that way and it works for you, that’s awesome. But if you want to go in and go through a process to get there, what I like to do is list all of the cultural tensions that are happening in the world that are relevant to your business first. And so for Alt, that would be things like there’s an increase in interest in alternatives. People who are now in their 30s are nostalgic for things that happened in the ’90s There is at the time really low interest rates and people are not getting any sort of edge off of investing in the things that their parents used to invest in. So those would be examples of cultural tensions. Cultural tensions are zeitgeist, their things that your audience might be thinking of.
Arielle Jackson: They’re things that they may be even subconscious to them, their current events. So you make a long list of all of those. Then you make a long list of all the ways that you might describe your brand’s best self. And this is related to your product positioning, but let’s say you haven’t done yet, so just think of it as your brand’s best self. How would we want someone to describe us? When everything works perfectly, and our product really delivers, what does it deliver? And again, bullets, just ways that you would talk about that. And then you pick one from each side, that’s really the best articulation of what’s happening in the world, what your product delivers, and with that context, now you’re primed.
With that context in mind, now you do the brainstorm of, we exist to let me finish this sentence, and even before you get there, sometimes it’s helpful to do the world would be a better place if. So for my company, the world would be a better place if, and finish that sentence and then go into the we exist to.
Lenny: Wow. I’m so happy I asked that question. By the way, is there also a place we can point people to that want to do this exercise? Is there another First Round interview post, or I know you have a course on this too.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. There’s another First Round review article it’s called Three Moves Every Startup Founder Should Make, something like that
Lenny: Great. I will find it and I’ll add it.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. Okay. Awesome.
Lenny: Amazing. Okay. Let’s move on to the next part, which is around positioning, which is a big deal. First, just what is positioning? And then I’d love to know just what tells you may have a positioning problem, that’s something you should really focus on?
Arielle Jackson: Okay. So positioning is the space that you occupy in your target customer’s mind and everything you can do to influence how they describe your product. You have a positioning problem if I ask 10 of your customers or 10 of your employees what the company does or what the product does. And I get multiple answers. And unfortunately that’s the case for most companies. It’s okay if the answers are tiny slight variance on the same thing, but I have actually done this with some later stage companies [inaudible 00:52:01] my first step is often I go in and I interview 10 people, and the 10 people are everyone from execs to people who talk to customers to a few customers. And when you get 10 people saying 10 wildly different things, you have a positioning problem. Other ways you might know that if you have a positioning problem is if you can’t explain what you do to me in a sentence that’s, you have a positioning problem.
Lenny: That’s a high bar.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, it is. And when I first started consulting, I would spend the first meeting with a founder, just totally cold. Hey, tell me about your company. And they would take 30 minutes to tell me about their company. And at the end of 30 minutes, I would pretty much get it, but it always took the first 30 minutes. So now when I engage with a new company, I have them fill out this little worksheet beforehand. And one of the questions is what do you do? And they have to write in a box that’s kind of paragraph length.
Lenny: Clever.
Arielle Jackson: And then I go in and I ask questions about that. And ultimately we get it to sentence length.
Lenny: Amazing. Okay. How do you go about figuring out your positioning? Big question.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So I start with your audience. Who’s this for? And we really think about what’s the broadest set of customers or users that you might have and narrow in from there to a target audience, which is who are you outwardly going to try to acquire for the next 18 months?
You can think of it like concentric circles. The biggest circle is your TAM. As you get smaller, there’s five parts to it. So the biggest circle is circle one, circle two, circle three, circle four is your target audience. All of the circles have to be contained within the bigger circle. And then the dot in the middle is your model persona. So this is actually like a person with a name and an age and a location and a job and feelings and priorities and interests and all of that.
And so we talk about the model user and the target audience, the target audience again is who will you outwardly try to acquire for the next 18 months? If you’re an early stage company, it’s very possible that you’re going to acquire people outside of that circle, in the next circle or even the bigger circle, but they’re not who you’re actively going out to try to acquire.
Lenny: Can I ask you a couple questions on the person?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah.
Lenny: I’m doing some writing and research into this stuff. How specific do you suggest people get with this person right at the middle? I love that it’s an actual person, I guess not a real person, but a very descriptive [crosstalk 00:54:29]
Arielle Jackson: Can be a real person or an amalgamation of not real people. So with the target audience, I like to think of it as something you could name. So with Eero, it was tech savvy dads. It’s a category of people. And then the model persona, or that individual user who represents a tech savvy dad for them was this guy who had teenage kids lived in suburban St. Louis, had a 2,800 Square foot house that was made of brick, worked at home on Fridays. His kids were into gaming. He was the VP of sales at a company that was tech adjacent, but not tech. He was more of like a tech enthusiast than an actual software engineer. We knew a lot about him. I could tell you a lot about him. It’s kind of robust, but tech savvy dads was the way to represent him and other people like him, that would be their target audience.
Lenny: A lot of founders have trouble recognizing that going very focused and niche is a good idea versus man, I’m just going to have these 10 people in the world that really want what I want. What have you found to be the reason it’s very powerful and important to start really focused?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So when you are an early stage company, the worst thing you can do is try to be everything to everyone because you don’t have enough runway. You just don’t have enough of anything to do that successfully. The best thing you can do is find an audience that is big enough, that if you got your significant market share among that audience, you’d be a giant business. And tech savvy dads is a pretty big audience. Also that’s just who your outbound going to try to acquire for the next 18 months. I’m a tech savvy mom. I live with a tech savvy dad. I have an Eero system. It doesn’t mean everyone you’ll ever acquire must be in that audience, it means that is who we’re focused on acquiring.
Lenny: Awesome. I took us off course around the positioning process. I think we kind of went off course with concentric circles model. So I’ll give it back to you to keep going.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. Okay. So the way that I like to run positioning exercise is to start with who is this for? And then what is the problem that they have? There’s some problem usually that these people have, they may not even be aware it’s a problem, or they may not be experiencing the problem as particularly troubling, but there’s something going on for these people. And then how do they address that problem today? So they do something, they’re buying something, they’re have a workaround, they’re doing something today. And that something might not be another startup or your direct competitor. It might be the old way of doing things, but they’re doing something. So we go through who is it for? What’s their problem? How do they address it? And then what do you make?
How does it work? And what would you want a user of your product or service to tell another? And that’s kind of if you answer all of those questions, it ultimately leads into this classic four statement, which is not something I invented, it’s something that’s been around for 40 or 50 years. And I learned it when I was 22. And I think it’s one of the most powerful tools in marketing. It can feel like mad libs if you just approach it cold. But if you’ve gone through that work of defining who is it and what’s their problem, all it is a distillation of that. So that statement is for target audience who there’s a statement of need or opportunity. And then you say our product name is a category that has a benefit, unlike the old thing they were doing, our product works this other way.
Lenny: Awesome. And we’ll link to the post that actually has that so people don’t have to write this all down. That last piece you mentioned, I hadn’t heard before, the idea of what will they tell other people or how will they describe it to other people? Is that right?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. So I believe that great benefits if you’ve defined your benefit really, really well will actually be the thing that will be the H1 on your homepage and will be the thing that you want someone to tell someone else. Think about Square Stand and turn your iPad into a point of sale. Turn your iPad into a point of sale. Yeah. If I went to a small business owner and they were having drinks with a friend, who’s also a small business owner, what would I want them to say about the Square Stand? Oh yeah. I just got the Square Stand. It’s this really cool new register that turns my iPad into a point of sale. That’s pretty much exactly what I want them to say. And so if you can write that line, that is your ideal benefit, what you want people to say, and it’s something that your target audience would actually say, that’s great.
Lenny: Interesting. I love that. That makes a lot of sense. For people trying to go through this exercise, you always have such a good answers to how actually the process of coming up with say you’re positioning this case, is it again, you pull up a doc and start writing things or is there something even more structured?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. There’s something more structured. I have kind of a worksheet that goes through all those things we just talked about. So it’s like, who is it for? What are they doing today? All those questions we just talked about, it’s more like a structured brainstorm. There’s an exercise I really love that I’ve called the bar test that is helping you get everything you’ve written into human language because one of the really big pitfalls I see, especially for B2B companies, but really for everyone is they write in a way that people don’t talk. So the document, when I get the first draft back from founders often has things like leverages and empowers and nobody talks like that. And so getting this into turns your iPad into a point of sale blankets your home in fast, reliable wifi, records your screen and cam at the same time, really basic stuff that it describes your product in a way that someone would actually say that’s the type of language that I think people want to use.
First of all, you defined your target. Now you pretend to be someone in your target, having drinks with someone else in your target at a bar and you have to be able to say, hey, I just started using product name. It’s this really great category, that benefit. And the other person goes, hm, tell me more or that’s cool, what do you mean? Or some other similar prompts. And then you have to say your differentiator. You actually have to say it out loud. And if you run through that test and it’s actually stuff people would say out loud, then you’ve done a pretty good job and you can start using that copy publicly.
Lenny: That is very cool. I have not heard this bar test before and I like that it might happen at an actual bar. Is that also something people can find online or is that they write it down right now?
Arielle Jackson: Ooh, I don’t know if that’s online.
Lenny: Okay, cool. This is it. Exclusive.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, that’s in my course, and we talk a lot about that and we go through the exercise like a real role play in the course, but yeah, take some notes.
Lenny: I like that a lot.
Arielle Jackson: Thanks.
Lenny: Your point reminded me of an email I just pulled up that I got from ADP, your point about just you want to make sure you’re branding is something that feels like something you would say to a person. So it’s like ADP, which is a security service for fire, like alarms. I got this email, summer’s on with fun or our free secure app and more. And then it’s like make summer safer and more fun at home or away. ADP, you’re not going to make it more fun. What are you talking about?
Arielle Jackson: See, that’s an example of trying too hard. They tried too hard to make it sound colloquial and fun. They’re a security system, it should be more like secure your home while you’re away. Feel safe when you’re on your summer trip. Stuff like that.
Lenny: They even included a gif of this TikTok’er being like ADP is my MVP.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. This kind of relates to brand personality where the brand personality for ADP, I don’t know, it’s pretty not fun. And so for them, when they put on fun hat, it seems awkward and forced.
Lenny: That’s exactly the feeling I got. And so, yeah, personality, that’s our next topic. It’s not something I you think about when you think about brand and marketing and plans and so I’m really curious to hear why I think that’s important then how to figure out your own personality for your brand.
Arielle Jackson: So I think personality is one of those inputs that will help define your visual design and it will definitely help define your written copy. And it really comes from this idea of brands are like people. And if you start thinking of your brand more like a person, it’s quite obvious that it needs a personality, because all people have personalities. And these days, especially when brands show up in places where people show up, like TikTok and Instagram, your brand certainly needs a personality or else you end up like ADP trying to be fun for the summer, which just feels really off and weird. So personality is one of those things that it’s actually the easiest part. I think it’s the fastest part. It often ends up an hour and you can get it done. But I have some frameworks I like to use that really just get at are you Mountain Dew or are you Rolex or are you somewhere in between?
Arielle Jackson: And when you think about brands that have a lot of equity, they really do have a personality. I often talk about Mountain Dew marketing as that marketing that’s like trying really hard to be cool and rugged and edgy and fast and kind of teen and Rolex, it’s very like Gray Poupon, oh, roll down your window and do you have any Gray Poupon, it’s fancy and sophisticated and a little bit aspirational and maybe even a little British. And those two things are really, really, really different. And there’s a lot in the middle and not everyone’s going to be a Mountain Dew or Rolex, but where are you? And so you can just write it down. I think a lot of these answers come back to like, if you are good with just opening a blank Google doc and like writing down who you are by all means, go for it.
And if that feels daunting and hard for you, use a framework. And the framework that I like to use has two parts. The first part is based on some academic research by Jennifer Aker and it basically analyzed the top brands in the world and figured out that all brands can be segmented into five dimensions of brand personality. And that really strong brand spike in two of the five. So the five dimensions that she found were sincerity, so this is like, is it down to earth and honest, excitement, it’s spirited, this is a Mountain Dew thing, competence, reliable and intelligent, sophisticated, sophistication, which is a charming and upper class and rugged outdoorsy and tough. So sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness. And going back to those two brands we just discussed Mountain Dew is rugged and exciting, Rolex is sophisticated and competent and you can do this with any brand who admire or just think about brands you like and kind of deduce them to their two of those five.
So that’s the first step. Which two of those five are you going to spike in? And it turns out a lot of tech companies end up spiking in sincerity and competence just usually does happen that way. Amazon is sincere and competent. Google is sincere and competent. Apple is not, Apple has a little more of that sophistication to it. But in any case, if you just did that, we would end in a world where everyone’s sincere and competent or maybe sophisticated and competent. It’s like a really boring world. So the next step after you do that is to define five attributes, five brand personalities, thinking about those two dimensions. I like to think about this as a star, five point star and brands need tension to be interesting. So if you tell me we’re helpful, we’re nice, we’re approachable, we’re competent, and we’re reliable.
You basically haven’t told me anything because you just use three words to say one thing and two words to say another thing. Whereas if you tell me, oh, well we’re really savvy, but we’re also really approachable. That’s kind of cool. Because people who are expert are always approachable. They have to have a little tension and then you want to write them as statements that say we are X, but not Y, where Y is taking X too far. So in the example Google is playful but not silly, so they would say we are playful, but not silly, or maybe Mountain Dew would say we are daring, but not stupid. So taking that attribute a little too far. And so yeah, then you end up with these five statements that are we are X, but not Y. And those are really useful in informing how you write and maybe even what your visual design would look like, and certainly what your illustration style photography style ad copy will be like.
Lenny: Once you’ve gone through that exercise and in maybe the other two pieces, where do you put this? Is this just like in a doc that’s like here’s our brand overview, here’s our personality, here’s our positioning, here’s our purpose. And then you refer back to that whenever you’re designing and putting together strategies? Is that how it works?
Arielle Jackson: Yeah, you could do it that way. That’s definitely one way of doing it. That’s a good start. I think that one other place where it shows up, like we talked about that visual style guide that everyone has, that they give to an agency or copywriter who’s writing on their behalf. I think these should all be inputs into that doc that you end up sharing. I think it should go into any onboarding you do for new employees so that they understand who the company is. Any partners that you’re marketing with, co-branding, all of that, it should really be think of it as your little brand Bible about who you are. And also it should be revisited when you’re doing, let’s say a new product or to make sure does this need to be updated or does this new product need to fit into who we are?
Lenny: What do you call this document/place?
Arielle Jackson: When I take all those three components and then add a bunch of other stuff, I call it a creative brief, which is the thing you would hand to an agency or a writer who’s writing on your behalf. It would include some other things too, that we didn’t talk about, like creative inspiration direction. So picking visual clips and written clips and all these things that you like and that you don’t like, so you can show both positive examples and counter examples to the thing you’re looking for.
Lenny: Awesome. Thank you for all of that. There’s so much juice there. I think people are going to have to listen to this a couple times to get all the learnings. Before I let you go, there’s two other areas I wanted to dive into. But I’ll keep them brief because I know we’re going long. One is about getting PR and just a question I wanted to ask you while I had you, founders and even bigger companies, they’re always like, how do I get PR? How do I get press for my product, even though it’s sometimes a waste of time. Do you have just any tactical advice for startups hoping to get some PR?
Arielle Jackson: You mean initial coverage around a launch or ongoing?
Lenny: I’d say early on, yeah, before the launch.
Arielle Jackson: Sure. So the first one is to get your story straight. So, so many times I have founders come to me and they’re like, hey, we need help with this announcement. I’m like, cool. What’s the announcement? And back to the 30 minutes until I understand what the company is, so if you can’t describe it to me in a sentence, your reporter is certainly not going to understand in a sentence and they won’t be able to describe it to their audience in a sentence. And so really getting your story straight, all the stuff we talked about specifically around product positioning is so key. Almost always when someone comes to me and says, I’m ready to announce, we go back to positioning first. Also make sure that your website is ready for the traffic you’re going to drive to it, that you’re not driving traffic to a name that you’re going to later scrap.
Are you really ready for this? So go back to all the other things we discussed first and then having realistic expectations about the outlets that will cover you and the time it will take to get them. So a lot of people will be like, I’m launching next week. And it’s like, well, cool that you’re doing that, but no reporters going to cover you next week. It just doesn’t work like that anymore. Five years ago, eight years ago, founders could really dictate the date of a launch announcement, they could brief three to five outlets under embargo, which means like you all can’t tell our secret news until we tell you at this time you can publish. And at that time, three of the five would all file a story and write, and it just doesn’t work like that anymore. These days for early stage startups, we’re almost always running the launch announcement as an exclusive, which means you give the news to a single outlet.
Arielle Jackson: And they’re the only ones who get to write about it. You can obviously still do all your owned and operated stuff, your blog, your social, your investors, your friends and family, but they’re the only like news outlet who gets to write about it. So having an expectation that this is probably going to be an exclusive, it’s harder than ever to secure funding for a seed stage company and funding in and of itself is not that interesting anymore. There’s so many bad companies getting funding. There’s so many good companies getting funding too just more than ever. And the number of reporters and the number of outlets that are covering it is just less than it used to be. So really just thinking about like, well, who writes about this space? Do they write about company’s at my stage?
That’s another really big one is, hey, we want the New York Times. It’s like, cool, no one’s at the New York Times has ever covered a seed stage startup unless it’s crazy for the last five years. Who do you think is going to write about you? But there are still outlets that do. The other one is don’t do a straight funding announcement. A lot of founders raise money and they’re like, cool, let’s announce. It’s like, no, we’ll use that funding announcement as a news hook to tell a larger story and a larger story might be your products available. You have reference customers, you have momentum, you have some great partnership that you’re announcing. There’s something else going on, not just your funding and using your funding as part of that initial launch is great, but what else are you announcing?
The last thing is really about making what you do interesting and relevant so that it’s not just interesting and relevant to you and the three other people who worked there at the time, but interesting to all the readers of whatever outlet you’re trying to target. And so an example of that is I worked on this company, Vitable Health and the founder, Joseph, he created a product for hourly workers that their employer would buy and it costs like $50 per person per month. And what it does is it provides urgent care and primary care. So these hourly workers who make too much to qualify for Medicaid and too little to pay their health insurance premiums, and so primary and urgent care for hourly workers. And we tied it into this idea of the great resignation and small businesses not being able to hire hourly workers, which was like a big trend end of 2021, and the company operates in Philadelphia and Delaware, and we were actually able to get him the Sunday after Christmas, Philadelphia Inquirer story.
But it was all about making this daycare and this restaurant in Philadelphia into heroes because they offered this cool benefit to their hourly workers. And so the headline was perfect for them, but it wasn’t like here’s Vitable and here’s what they announced and here’s, it was like, hey, look at this cool new thing that local businesses are doing to attract hourly workers. And so think about your company in a way to make it interesting and relevant and don’t sleep on local preps.
If you have a local business or a local story or local customers, this was a huge thing at Square. We turned all of our customers into heroes and went after local press. Most PR firms that service the tech community aren’t experts in local press, but if you have a way to make some connections with some local press, they are the ones hungry for these stories more than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.
Lenny: What a good tip and most likely they’re much more open to writing about you versus New York Times or Wall Street Journal. Cool. Okay. So I want to ask you one question about hiring marketing real quick and I’ll keep it short just because I know we’re going to run out of time. When should a startup hire a full-time marketing person in your experience?
Arielle Jackson: When you have a lot of problems that you’re trying to solve that would be better solved by someone who knew what they’re doing, or when you have a bunch of freelancers and agencies that are becoming too hard to manage by yourself.
Lenny: When do you find that usually ends up being… Is there kind of a heuristic-
Arielle Jackson: Yeah. Ballpark, it kind of depends if you’re a marketing driven business or a sales driven business. So if you’re a sales driven business and you don’t have a repeatable sales motion, it’s not yet time to hire a marketer, get that repeatable sales motion, and marketing’s job is to bring you more marketing qualified leads. So that’s one, so that kind of depends. If you’re a marketing driven business, it generally seems to me like it happens around 10 people, the founders doing most of this themselves, they’re not doing the best job usually or they’ve hired agency here, a freelancer there to kind of cobble some stuff together. And they now realize like, okay, if I had a person who would be able to do all of this and manage these agencies and freelancers, this would be a lot better.
It also is do you have a one point in time project? Do you need to do positioning? Do you need a website? Do you need a name? Do you need to run a test of Google ads? Those things are all discreet when it becomes this is ongoing work that needs to happen over time. It’s better to think about hiring a marketer and really what kind of marketer do you need? Do you need a product marketer, a performance marketer, a comms person, a creative person? Ideally everyone wants all of that. But I kind of like that idea of a T-shaped marketer who’s really deep on one of those functions, but knows enough to be dangerous across all of them.
Lenny: I think we’re going to need another episode just about that one topic. I have so many questions I want to ask, but I need to let you go. That’ll be V2. Before we do that, we’ve gotten to the very exciting lightning round where I’m just going to ask you quick questions and you just give me a quick answer and we will knock through them all. Does that sound good?
Arielle Jackson: Sounds great.
Lenny: What are two or three books that you recommend most to other people?
Arielle Jackson: In marketing land, definitely the book called Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. It’s from 1980, it’s still my favorite marketing book. Another recent marketing book is Alchemy by Rory Sutherland. It’s like my favorite area of reading is behavioral science, psychology meets business. And that’s in there. For fiction, I just read The Vanishing Half by Brit Bennett. It was awesome. I then read her other book called The Mothers, but I think The Vanishing Half’s better.
Lenny: Awesome. I will check that out. What’s a favorite podcast or even newsletter on marketing?
Arielle Jackson: I love Nick Sharma’s weekly newsletter. He’s a growth marketer. He started his career I think at [inaudible 01:17:48] water. So he does a lot of CPG type DTC. He has a great marketing newsletter that comes out every Sunday night. On podcasts, I love How I Built This. I know that’s already really popular, but I love that one. It’s not really marketing, but just general business. The First Round podcast in depth is pretty great. Lenny’s podcast I’ve been listening to is awesome. And then my friend Jasmine from The Concept Bureau has a marketing podcast called Unseen, Unknown. And it’s kind of about culture and branding and how these things and society and trends. It’s not like straight marketing. It’s kind of more of the culture and sociology that informs marketing.
Lenny: Wow. That is a lot of good stuff. What’s a recent movie or TV show that you’ve loved?
Arielle Jackson: This is more embarrassing. How many movies have you seen in the last year? Just curious.
Lenny: Me? A lot, on streaming services. Way too many also, if that’s where you’re going or have you seen none?
Arielle Jackson: Well, I’ve seen maybe four and they’re probably all on Disney+.
Lenny: You’re winning. That’s excellent.
Arielle Jackson: I would say I really like some of those Disney Pixar movies, Luca, Encanto. Those are all really great. I mostly only watch movies with my kids, but I’m pretty excited. I had a celebrity crush on Anthony Bourdain and I’m excited to watch his new documentary if I ever get around to it. And TV shows I’m equally bad.
Lenny: Okay, great.
Arielle Jackson: And there’s this little Netflix show called Old Enough. It’s a Japanese show with subtitles about sending toddlers on errands in Japan. They like go by themselves. It’s 10 minutes. They’re awesome. My whole family watched them together. It’s really cute.
Lenny: Old Enough. I’m going to check that out. Okay. Two more questions. Favorite interview question when hiring a marketing person?
Arielle Jackson: It’s probably tell me a project you’re proud of. Tell me about a project you’re proud of, is just really open-ended and get to hear a lot about a lot of things that way. And then maybe runner up is tell me about a campaign you recently come across that you were not involved with that you thought was cool.
Lenny: Hmm. Love that. Okay. Final question. Who else in the industry do you most respect as a thought leader?
Arielle Jackson: In the marketing industry?
Lenny: In the marketing industry? Yeah, sure.
Arielle Jackson: I guess old school thought leaders, David Ogilvy, Rory Sutherland, Seth Godin. New school thought leaders, we mentioned Nick Sharma. There’s a woman named… I’m probably going to butcher her name, Anna Andjelic. She has a newsletter that I didn’t mention before. It’s called the Sociology of Business. That’s really good. She’s a CMO, chief brand officer type. She kind of turned around Banana Republic recently, which was cool. Emily Hayward from Red Antler. I also really like Ross. I don’t know this guy, but Ross Simmons from Foundation, which is a content marketing agency. I’m not a content marketing expert, but he really is. And I think he puts out some good content.
Lenny: Man, these show notes are going to be a long list of great stuff. Arielle, thank you so much for being here. There’s just so much jampacked knowledge. I don’t know if people were prepared when they started listening to this and so congrats on making it through and I hope you’re probably going to go back and listen again and again. And so again, Arielle, thank you so much for doing this. Two last questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out or ask questions and how can listeners be useful to you?
Arielle Jackson: Sure I’m on Twitter and LinkedIn. Twitter, I’m hiimarielle. And if you’re interested in this stuff, but feeling overwhelmed, I will plug my Maven course. I teach a course on startup brand strategy that covers everything we talked about in this hour, or this is more than an hour now and kind of with a little more hand holding and feedback. So it’s a crash course on all this stuff. The four founders that takes two weeks and you go through all of this and that next cohort of that, I think we’re on cohort four will be this fall. So you can apply for that course at maven.com/arielle/startupbrandstrategy.
Lenny: Amazing. And I guess that’s how listeners can be useful to you.
Arielle Jackson: Yeah.
Lenny: Excellent.
Arielle Jackson: Exactly.
Lenny: All right. Well great. All right, well thank you again, thank you again and [inaudible 01:22:07].
Arielle Jackson: Thanks so much, Lenny. It was fun.
Lenny: Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A Hundred Monkeys | A Hundred Monkeys(命名咨询公司,保留原文) |
| adaptogens | 适应原 |
| Adrian | Adrian(人名,保留原文) |
| aha moment | 顿悟时刻 |
| Banking as a Service | 银行即服务 |
| bar test | 酒吧测试 |
| Best Buy | Best Buy(暂无通用中文译名) |
| Blue Bottle | Blue Bottle(知名精品咖啡品牌,暂无通用中文译名) |
| brand personality | 品牌个性 |
| Brett | Brett(人名,保留原文) |
| brick and mortar | 实体店 |
| Carl | Carl(人名,保留原文) |
| Cover | Cover(被 Twitter 收购的 Android 锁屏应用,保留原文) |
| CPG | CPG(Consumer Packaged Goods,消费品) |
| creative brief | 创意简报 |
| cultural tensions | 文化张力 |
| DTC | DTC(Direct to Consumer,直接面向消费者) |
| ed tech | 教育科技 |
| embargo | embargo(新闻 embargo,指记者在指定时间前不得发布的协议,保留原文) |
| empty vessel | 空容器(指本身无含义的命名方式) |
| exclusive | 独家 |
| favicon | favicon(网站图标,保留原文) |
| First Round | First Round(即 First Round Capital,风险投资机构,保留原文) |
| First Round Review | First Round Review(First Round 的内容平台,保留原文) |
| foil | 参照物(定位语境中指对立参照) |
| Gogan | Gogan(人名,保留原文) |
| Gray Poupon | Gray Poupon(知名高端芥末酱品牌,保留原文) |
| H1 | H1(首页大标题,保留原文) |
| Jack | Jack(此处指 Jack Dorsey,Square 联合创始人,但原文出现处为 Jesse,Jack 在本片段中未直接出现) |
| Jennifer Aker | Jennifer Aker(学者,品牌个性五维度理论提出者,保留原文) |
| Jesse | Jesse(Square 硬件负责人,保留原文) |
| Kyle Dink | Kyle Dink(人名,保留原文) |
| mad libs | 填空游戏 |
| marketer in residence | 驻场营销专家 |
| marketing qualified leads | 营销合格线索 |
| Megan Quinn | Megan Quinn(人名,保留原文) |
| Mint Plaza | Mint Plaza(旧金山地名) |
| naming brief | 命名简报 |
| news hook | 新闻钩子 |
| no code, low code | 无代码、低代码 |
| onboarding | 引导流程 |
| Phil Knight | Phil Knight(Nike 联合创始人,本片段中原文误作 Phil Nate,保留原文) |
| point of sale | 销售终端 |
| product marketer | 产品营销人员 |
| purpose | 宗旨(品牌战略框架中的核心概念,指”我们为什么做我们在做的事”) |
| retention | 留存 |
| role play | 角色扮演 |
| Seesaw | Seesaw(教育科技公司,保留原文) |
| style guide | 风格指南 |
| suggestive or evocative | 暗示性或唤起性的 |
| sunk cost fallacy | 沉没成本谬误 |
| T-shaped marketer | T 型营销人员 |
| three point safety harness | 三点式安全带 |
| zeitgeist | 时代精神 |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
缔造传奇品牌的艺术 | Arielle Jackson(Google、Square、First Round Capital)
文字记录
Arielle Jackson (00:00:00): 所以随着时间的推移,一个词可以逐渐拥有超越其字面含义的意义。比如 Disney 如今就代表着魔力,Volvo 代表着安全。这些名字本身并不好。如果我把它丢进电子表格或者某个候选清单里,没有人会选它。所以我的意思大致是,名字只是整体营销或整体品牌的一部分——一个糟糕的名字,配上真正优秀的公司、出色的公司策略和出色的营销,时间久了依然会变得了不起。而一个好名字只会锦上添花,但我不认为一个坏名字会毁掉一家好公司。
Lenny (00:00:42): Arielle Jackson 在 Google 工作了九年,在 Gmail 早期帮助其成长,将它从一个副业项目发展成为如今全球数亿人使用的产品。之后她去了 Square,成为那里最早的营销人员之一,帮助发布并推动了 Square Reader 的增长。她还与超过 100 家早期公司合作过,帮助它们搞定品牌和营销,包括 Patreon、Loom、Front、Eero、Maven、Sprig,仅举几例。
Lenny (00:01:12): 如今,她在教授一门非常受欢迎的创业品牌策略课程,同时也是 First Round Capital 的驻场营销专家(marketer in residence)。在我们的聊天中,主要聊了三件事:你的创业公司或产品的命名策略;一个打造品牌的框架,包括你的目的(purpose)、定位(positioning)和个性(personality);以及如何为你的创业公司获取公关(PR)。我迫不及待想让你听听与 Arielle 的这段对话。那么,有请 Arielle Jackson。
数据导入的隐性成本
Lenny (00:01:41): 嘿,Ashley,Flatfile 的营销负责人,你估计有多少 B2B SaaS 公司需要从客户那里导入 CSV 文件?
Ashley (00:01:49): 至少 40%。
Lenny (00:01:51): 其中有多少搞砸了?搞砸了会怎样?
Ashley (00:01:54): 嗯,根据我们的数据,大约三分之一的人在引导流程(onboarding)中经历一次糟糕体验后就会考虑换用其他公司。所以如果你的 CSV 导入器不好用——这其实非常普遍,因为客户的文件里总是充满了各种意想不到的数据和格式——他们就会离开。
Lenny (00:02:13): 我对这个一点都不意外。我一直观察到,改善引导流程(onboarding)是提升注册转化和增加长期留存(retention)最高杠杆的机会之一。让用户更快、更可靠地到达他们的”顿悟时刻”(aha moment)实在是太重要了。
Ashley (00:02:28): 完全同意。看到 Square、Spotify 和 Zuora 等客户如何在 Flatfile 之上发展他们的业务,真的很令人惊叹。因为数据引导(data onboarding)起到了催化剂的作用,帮助你和你的客户更快到达目的地。
Lenny (00:02:45): 如果你想了解更多或开始使用,请访问 flatfile.com/lenny 查看 Flatfile。
将银行能力嵌入产品
Lenny (00:02:53): 本期节目由 Unit 赞助。Gusto、Uber、Shopify 和 AngelList 有什么共同点?它们都决定把银行功能嵌入自己的产品。据 AngelList 的产品负责人说,银行功能让每一个功能都变得更有吸引力。有了它,我们的平台就像客户的全功能金融控制中心。没有它,我们只是庞杂技术栈里又一个软件工具而已。
Lenny (00:03:15): 将银行功能嵌入你的产品,不仅增加了差异化,还能帮助你获客、留存和变现。Unit 是银行即服务(Banking as a Service)领域的市场领导者,将多家银行合作伙伴与开发者友好的 API 结合起来,赋能各种规模的公司在短短几周内上线账户、卡片、支付和贷款功能。Unit 受到 AngelList、Invoice2go 和 Roofstock 等领先品牌的信赖。
Lenny (00:03:41): 想了解更多关于 Unit 如何帮助像你这样的公司构建银行功能,请访问 unit.co/lenny 申请演示或试用免费沙盒。即 unit.co/lenny。
初次对话
Lenny (00:03:58): 欢迎来到播客,Arielle。
Arielle Jackson (00:04:01): 非常感谢邀请我。很高兴来到这里。
Lenny (00:04:03): 绝对是我的荣幸。我读过你在线上发表的大量文章。你写了很多东西,我觉得非常有帮助。所以我非常兴奋能深入聊各种精彩的内容。在进入正题之前,我脑子里有几个问题。你和那么多了不起的公司合作过——Google、Square、Loom、Patreon、Front,还有很多其他的,我就不一一点名了。你做过的项目中,哪个是你最喜欢的或者最不寻常的?
Arielle Jackson (00:04:35): 天哪,这就像让我选最喜欢的儿子一样。我想,我真的没法只选一个。
Lenny (00:04:40): 下一个问题就是这个。
Arielle Jackson (00:04:41): 我大概会说,我最喜欢的项目——而且我每天都会被 reminded 这件事——就是在 Square 做 Square Stand。那是我第一次做硬件相关的项目,当时我们整个 Square 才 140 人。我们没有营销部门,只有几个做营销的人。我们没有产品经理,硬件团队主导着这款新产品的发布,这款产品旨在帮我们打入线下实体店的高端市场。
Arielle Jackson (00:05:05): 总之,当时我负责活动营销,免费赠送大量那种插在手机上的读卡器,让很多小商户使用。我主动请缨,第一次以产品营销人员(product marketer)的身份主导这款产品的发布。整个过程非常有趣——从产品定位,到思考如何介绍这款能把你的 iPad 变成真正销售终端的精美硬件。
Arielle Jackson (00:05:31): 我们让人飞遍全国各地,找最酷的咖啡馆和线下实体店提前铺货,让他们先用起来。发布时我们覆盖了大约 15 个大都会区,全部是最酷的咖啡馆、甜甜圈店等等。你知道的,有很多”装到做到为止”(fake it till you make it)的时刻。我在跟 Best Buy 和 Apple Store 谈合作,从来没做过这样的事。
Arielle Jackson (00:05:53): 设计包装也非常棒。发布一款实体产品有太多事情要做。而且当时的价格点对于一家一直只有一个免费产品的公司来说相当高,要帮助公司往上走市场。我记得我们发布时我已经怀孕三十多周了。我们让所有 Blue Bottle 门店都用上了它。我们举办了发布会,我们的硬件负责人 Jesse 在 Mint Plaza 的 Blue Bottle 揭晓了这款产品。我当时大着肚子,也无比自豪。直到现在,每次我用那个支架付款——我经常用到——还是会很激动。
Lenny (00:06:30): 大着肚子又无比自豪。我喜欢。那个产品就是那个 POS 支架,就是那种放 iPad 的、可以旋转签名的那个东西。
Arielle Jackson (00:06:39): 对。后来有了新版本,有非接触式版本,还有一个带集成屏幕的版本,应该是基于 Android 的,不需要自带 iPad。但那个产品还在。我到现在还经常在最初的那个 Square Stand 上付款。我喝很多咖啡,洛杉矶那些独立咖啡馆都还在用它。
Lenny (00:07:01): 我们会大量聊定位的话题,不过既然聊到这里,那个产品的定位是什么?
Arielle Jackson (00:07:07): 对,当时 Square 的主要用户还是农夫市集和活动摊位的摊主。我以前做过首饰,当时就是以摊主身份接触到 Square 的。而我们的定位是面向实体店商家,尤其是快服务类型的——咖啡店、甜甜圈店、三明治店这类快服务实体店。它的对手是你那个又丑又旧的 point of sale,实际上就是你的收银机。那就是我们的参照物。核心利益点是把你的 iPad 变成一台 point of sale。差异化在于提供一个统一的体验——你在收银机上能做的它都能做,而且做得更多,同时你还会很自豪把它摆在柜台上。
Lenny (00:08:01): 你刚才说你之前在做首饰,所以才进入了 Square 做这个产品。我得多听听这个故事。
Arielle Jackson (00:08:08): 好啊。我在去 Square 之前在 Google 工作,一直有个做首饰的爱好,以前会在旧金山和洛杉矶的一些精品寄卖店卖我的首饰。虽然只是很小的副业,但它是我的创意出口。光明节和圣诞节前后我会在手工艺集市上摆摊。以前我都是只收现金。后来我拿到了一个 Square reader,那年就在手工艺集市上用它收款。体验特别好。那个 Square reader 让人们买得更多了,也让我显得挺酷。能刷信用卡收款真的很棒,我以前从没试过。
Arielle Jackson (00:08:49): 以前我都是用 PayPal 开发票,在电脑上给人发一张发票,对方再收到。特别麻烦。大家用 Square 的那些理由,我全都亲身经历过。我在 Google 认识的两个人,Megan Quinn 和 Kyle Dink,从 Google 去了 Square。所以我有了那次体验之后,应该是给他们俩都发了邮件,大意就是:这东西太他妈好用了。我是做首饰的。特别好。因为我能刷信用卡了,销售额大概比去年多了 50%。我不记得他们俩谁先回的,但大意就是:来面试吧。基本上就是这么进的 Square。
Lenny (00:09:27): 哇,我猜那段亲身经历在面试中帮了你很大的忙吧。
Arielle Jackson (00:09:32): 做过商家这段经历,确实帮助我理解了我们最初营销目标中的那种小商家。
从 Square 到驻场咨询
Lenny (00:09:38): 那你现在是 [inaudible 00:09:45] capital 的 marketer in residence。我想问的是,这个头衔是什么意思,你现在的日常工作都做些什么?
Arielle Jackson (00:09:51): 好的。我离开 Square 之后,去了一家只有七个人的小创业公司。他们拿了 First Round 的投资,我帮他们做了所有一家试图成长的小创业公司需要的事情。
Lenny (00:10:06): 哪家公司?
Arielle Jackson (00:10:06): 叫 Cover。后来被 Twitter 收购了。它是一个 Android 应用,能根据你所在的位置,通过改变手机锁屏来在合适的时机给你呈现合适的应用。在那家公司以及在那家只有七个人的小创业公司工作的那段经历,我非常喜欢。后来他们被 Twitter 收购了,但我当时刚离开 Square 不久,所以决定不跟团队一起加入 Twitter。取而代之的是,我决定帮助一大批其他小创业公司。我给之前认识的几个在创业的朋友发了邮件,大意是:我不跟团队去 Twitter 了。你们确实需要营销方面的帮助吧。每个人都回复说:是的。基本上我就是这样开始做咨询的。
Arielle Jackson (00:10:49): 大概八九年之前吧。与此同时,First Round 找到我说,你当时给 Cover 做营销对标用的是什么人?我就这样跟 First Round 的 Brett 对接上了,他说:你愿意来帮我们的被投企业吗?于是九年前我们开始了一个每周一天、为期三个月的项目。我到现在还在。我现在在 First Round 兼职一半时间。所以我做的还是帮其他公司做的那些事,只不过是在 First Round 的时间帮 First Round 的被投企业做。
Arielle Jackson (00:11:17): 运作方式是这样的:如果你拿了 First Round 的投资,作为 onboarding 的一部分,我们会提供很多增值服务,我就是其中之一。这些服务涵盖的面很广——我们有非常擅长薪酬和人力资源的人,有帮你做定价的人,而我帮你做营销。在种子阶段创业公司,所谓做营销就是一切:从起名字到定位,到建立品牌视觉识别、做网站、做首发,一直到最终招聘一位 marketer。这就是我的核心工作内容,也是我最喜欢做的事情。所以很合适,因为 First Round 投资了大量种子阶段的公司,我几乎能帮到所有这些公司。
命名、品牌与招聘
Lenny (00:11:58): 这正好非常自然地引到了我接下来想聊的话题。我想在我们的对话中覆盖三大主题。都是我知道你非常在意的领域:产品和创业公司的命名,你的品牌开发框架,以及如何招聘 marketer。听起来怎么样?
Arielle Jackson (00:12:15): 太好了,这些都是我喜欢聊的。来吧。
Lenny (00:12:19): 来吧。意料之中。那关于命名,我其实从好几个创始人那里听说你在帮他们给创业公司起名字时特别有帮助。其中有些人也许上过这个播客,就不点名了。那么对于正在想给自己的公司或产品起名字的创始人,我有两个问题:什么才算是一个好名字?以及到底怎么才能想出一个好名字?
命名的艺术
Arielle Jackson (00:12:44): 我很喜欢命名。到目前为止我应该已经给三十多家公司起过名字了。其实我前面提到怎么开始做咨询的时候,说我给几个朋友发邮件问他们需不需要营销帮助——有一个应该是可以说出来的。其中一家公司的创始人是我在 Google 的朋友 Adrian 和 Carl。他们离开 Google 后去了 Facebook,然后出来创业,公司现在叫 Seesaw。是一家教育科技公司。那是我在 Google 和 Square 经历之后命名的第一家公司。
Lenny (00:13:09): 这个名字太好了。
Arielle Jackson (00:13:10): 确实是个好名字,我正好拿它当例子。Seesaw 是一家教育科技公司,之前名字很差,我们做了整套命名流程,最终定下了这个名字。为什么我觉得这是一个好名字呢——当我说 Seesaw 的时候,你其实不知道它是干什么的,但当我告诉你,哦,这是一家教育科技公司,是一个 iPad 应用,帮助小学生的作业在老师、家长和学生之间流转。你就会觉得:哦,Seesaw 对小学生来说很合理啊,它是来回上下的东西,又有一种怀旧感。而且它作为教育科技公司的名字也说得通。
Arielle Jackson (00:13:48): 我个人比较偏爱这类暗示性或唤起性的名字——就是当我告诉你这家公司做什么的时候,你会觉得”哦,说得通”。但名字本身并不会直接告诉你这家公司具体做什么。Seesaw 就是一个好名字的例子。后来疫情期间,我大儿子学校停课,他们全班都在用 Seesaw,我就有机会跟儿子说,哦,这是我朋友的公司,当年我们给它起的名字。他就说:哦,好酷。这名字确实说得通。
命名的反应与情感
Arielle Jackson (00:14:21): 这就是你想要的反应。它还带有一点情感。有一种怀旧感。说起来很有趣,简短,容易记住。我觉得所有这些都构成一个好名字。另一个名字起得好的公司是你我都合作过的 Maven。他们是一家 First Round 的公司。Gogan 公开谈过这件事。我们一起给那家公司命的名。Maven 是一个意第绪语词汇,意思是”一个理解的人”,更确切地说,是因为他们做过某些事情、随着时间的推移积累了技能或知识而理解的人。
Arielle Jackson (00:14:58): 我觉得这个名字对于一个平台来说太酷了——这个平台让有经验的运营者或现任运营者通过基于小组的课程把自己的技能教给其他人。你想成为一个 Maven, instructors 就是 Maven,名字简短,容易说,当我告诉你那家公司做什么的时候,这个名字就完全说得通。所以我自己比较偏爱这类名字,但我也不知道,对于其他类型的产品,我也喜欢其他类型的名字。我觉得这真的取决于你的产品是什么?你的公司是什么?名字想要实现什么,以及真正厘清这些标准。所以我们可以谈谈那些始终适用的标准、你可能需要额外添加的标准,以及达成目标的一个流程。
空容器式命名
Lenny (00:15:38): 听起来很好。我确实很好奇这个流程。如果真有这么一个流程的话,那会很酷。我脑子里还有一个问题——有些名字就是无意义的词,比如 Yahoo,还有 Google,我觉得也算。你对这种命名方式怎么看?
Arielle Jackson (00:15:51): 是的。这类词就是空容器,它们本身真的没有什么含义。如果你想想 Yahoo 这个名字,它其实挺傻的。就像——Yahoo。我总是在脑海里听到那种叫声。Google 对于知情的人来说是有含义的——一后面跟着尽可能多的零,就像一个很大的数字,而且是对那个词的拼写变体。所以对我来说 Google 比 Yahoo 少了几分傻气。我对空容器式名字的看法是——它们可以非常容易记住,也能唤起某种情感,但你必须随着时间的推移做大量的营销工作,才能让它有意义。
Arielle Jackson (00:16:25): 所以如果我今天说 Yahoo,我们知道它是那个我们以前用的搜索引擎,后来大家都换成了 Google,我们脑海里会浮现出紫色的品牌色,我们会想起当时使用它时的感受,但要让那个词变成这样,花了大量的营销费用和大量的时间。所以这种方式是可行的。我之前工作过的一家公司 Eero 也是如此。它的名字几乎是空容器式的。Eero 取自 Eero Saarinen,他是一位设计师。他设计过非常漂亮的建筑,还有一些建筑作品。还有一些桌子。你可以在 Design Within Reach 买到 Saarinen 的桌子,但那个名字,除非你在设计圈里,否则没人知道。所以这个名字实际上就是一个空容器,他们需要花很多钱,并持续一致地让那个词代表一套 wifi 系统。
Lenny (00:17:17): 我想聊聊流程,但还有一个问题——为什么名字要和公司及其业务产生关联?是因为让人觉得舒服,还是有更深层的原因?
名字为何需要与业务相关
Arielle Jackson (00:17:30): 是的,其实不是必须的。像 Eero 和 Yahoo 这样的例子,就没有关联。即使你想想 Apple,也没有。Apple 跟苹果电脑没有任何关系。它是一个我们都知道的词。有很多词本身并没有什么背后的含义。如果你的名字背后有一个含义,那你的名字就在替你多做一部分营销工作。所以如果你的名字是 Internet Explorer,逝者安息,我完全知道你是做什么的。
Arielle Jackson (00:17:56): 如果你的名字是 Chrome,而你是做网页设计的,你可能会觉得:哦,说得通。那是浏览器窗口周围的那一圈。如果你的名字是 Firefox,我完全不知道你是做什么的。你就是把两个词拼在一起造了个词出来。然后你就得花钱,并且随着时间推移持续一致地让那个词对人们产生意义。但这三款浏览器在各自的时代都曾很成功。而且我不认为 Internet Explorer 的衰亡跟名字有什么关系。
Lenny (00:18:25): 明白了。所以理想情况下你可以找到简单模式。如果行不通,那就走困难模式——想出一个空容器式的名字,然后你就得做大量的工作。
Arielle Jackson (00:18:33): 这是我个人的偏好。
Lenny (00:18:35): 好的,明白了。说得通。
命名的光谱
Arielle Jackson (00:18:37): 我个人的偏好是这样的——如果你想想看,有描述性名字,比如 Internet Explorer;有暗示性名字,比如 Chrome;然后有唤起性名字,我觉得 Seesaw 和 Maven 就属于这一类,它们介于暗示性和唤起性之间;然后还有空容器式名字,或者叫虚构性名字。这是一个光谱。当你在做头脑风暴的时候——我们可以在聊流程时再谈这个——你需要在整个光谱上思考,但你在命名简报里可能已经写了,我们想要一个暗示性名字,或者我们想要一个描述性名字。你可能一开始就带着这个方向进去的。所以光谱上的各类名字各有各的适用时机和场景。我个人的倾向是我比较偏爱暗示性名字。
Lenny (00:19:16): 说得通。好,让我们进入正题。团队在想给东西命名的时候应该怎么做?
命名流程:从定位开始
Arielle Jackson (00:19:22): 好的。第一件事是做产品定位。我真心认为定位决定了你营销的很大一部分,而且应该永远是你做的第一件事。我之前在 Maven 上教过一门课,有个学生——我教的是品牌战略课——他大概是一个第二次或第三次创业的创始人,从来没上过品牌战略的课。他非常用功,人也很棒。总之,在课程结束的时候,大家做一个类似结课分享的环节。他说:我以后再也不会在不做定位的情况下写一行代码了。这话对我来说简直如闻天籁。我觉得定位应该放在第一位。不过不管怎样,你先做定位,我们稍后会再聊这个。然后你写一份命名简报,这个非常简单。
Arielle Jackson (00:20:07): 你在给什么命名?是给公司命名?还是给产品命名?还是两者都要命名?通常如果你是早期阶段的公司,两者都要命名,而且它们会用同一个名字,因为你不想让别人记住两个东西。你希望名字传达什么?以 Seesaw 为例,我们希望它传达幼年童年的感觉。以 Eero 为例,我们希望它传达设计,体现设计导向。它可以是你想传达的任何东西。你想避免什么?我们不希望它听起来像某个竞争对手,或者我们讨厌某个词,或者任何你想避免的东西。竞争和相关产品的名字有哪些?还有没有其他考量?我之前和另一家 First Round 公司合作过,他们在中国的业务运营。
Arielle Jackson (00:20:53): 其中一个考量是,这个名字必须让中文母语者也能轻松发音。这是一个非常合理的额外考量。然后,我认为有七条命名的标准是始终适用的。你还可以加入额外的标准,比如中文发音那条就算额外的。这七条是:商标,这个比较明显——你能用这个名字吗?有没有侵犯别人的商标?商标的第二步是,你是否需要主动保护这个名字?域名可用性,所以大家总是纠结于要拿到一个 .com,比如 Maven 就拿到了 maven.com。那是一个很艰难的过程,Gogan 在 Twitter 上写过。但如今你未必一定需要 .com。Square 在很长一段时间里用的是 SquareUp 这个域名。很多公司都在用 .com 的变体运营。所以域名可用性,辨识度。它好记吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:21:51): 听起来像不像别人的名字?我觉得这是最重要的标准之一——它够不够独特、够不够有辨识度?它是否经得起时间考验?现在有很多命名潮流。如果你跟我说 Optimizely,我能告诉你这家公司是哪年成立的,因为以 LY 结尾就是那个年代的潮流。如果你跟我说一个像 Flicker 这样的词,我能告诉你它是哪年的,因为那时候的潮流是去掉元音字母。所以我通常会避开命名潮流,因为我不想让你的公司名在十年或二十年后听起来过时。最后一条和前面有点关联,就是我们在命名简报里讨论过的——你希望名字传达什么?这个名字是否反映了你的核心信息,或者它是否在某种程度上暗示了你想传达的某种情绪或感觉?然后是发音和易读性。
Arielle Jackson (00:22:44): 说出来好不好玩?好不好说?拼写怎么样?我们之前差点给一家 First Round 投的公司起名叫 Lattice,现在 Lattice 是另一家公司了,发展得相当不错,但我们没有用这个名字,因为那家公司的主营业务渠道是 B2B 销售,也就是说他们的人要打电话说”嘿,我是 Lattice 打来的”,我们做了这个练习后发现”生菜(lettuce)?“——不好说也不好评写。所以我们最终没有用这个名字,选了别的。不过现在有一家叫这个名字的公司做得相当好。
Lenny (00:23:16): 你觉得那个决定是对的吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:23:18): 不好说。我常说,好名字只会帮你,但坏名字不会伤害一家好公司。所以我确实不太觉得——
Lenny (00:23:25): 有意思。这个观点很好。嗯,请继续。
Arielle Jackson (00:23:27): 然后最后两条:外观。有些名字天生就很适合做视觉设计,跟字母的高低、是否有对称性有关——如果把这个名字交给设计师,做一个 logo 会非常棒、非常酷、非常好玩。然后是长度。很多人想取像 Square、Stripe 这种单音节的名字,但其实双音节甚至三音节的名字往往更容易记住。
Lenny (00:23:57): lennysnewsletter.com。唉。
Arielle Jackson (00:24:00): 嗯,不过 Lenny 那部分是双音节的,双音节一般是一个不错的甜区。
Lenny (00:24:07): 不错。你有没有发布过什么模板之类的,让大家可以找到来做这件事?还是说大家只能在这里听然后自己记笔记?
Arielle Jackson (00:24:15): 有的,First Round Review 上有一篇文章叫”Positioning Your Startup is Vital, Here’s How to Nail It”,所有这些命名标准和方法其实都在那篇文章里。
Lenny (00:24:27): 太好了,我们会把它放在节目的 show notes 里。那在应用这些标准的时候,是一个二元判断,还是说你给每个维度打一到五分?
Arielle Jackson (00:24:36): 对,我的做法是在头脑风暴之后用这些标准来筛选。然后我们对每条标准做红、黄、绿三色标记,把在各项标准上表现都不好的名字淘汰掉。明白了。然后你还可以加上自己的标准。接下来的步骤就是头脑风暴了。这部分我讲快一点。
Lenny (00:24:55): 好,我正想问你头脑风暴的事呢,很期待听这部分。
头脑风暴流程
Arielle Jackson (00:24:57): 好,我运作命名流程的方式是:先做定位,然后我会和创始人安排一个小时,加上我和其他几个感兴趣但利益不相关的人。比如我会从 First Round 团队带一位写手,或者创始人有个搞语言学的朋友,或者创始人的朋友会说四门语言。如果可能的话,我们希望这类人也能参与进来。头脑风暴一般五六七个人。我们的想法是花一个小时——我会提前做好准备——尽量想出几百个烂主意和几个值得进一步探索的还不错的点子。头脑风暴分两个部分。第一部分基于定位声明中的词。
Arielle Jackson (00:25:40): 我们把定位声明里所有有意义的词提取出来作为热身,然后跑同义词、反义词、自由联想、其他语言,围绕这些词能做的都用上。如果你定位声明里的词跟你做的事情相关——它们确实应该相关——这就是一个极好的方式,可以非常快速地想出几百个词。然后第二步是主题式头脑风暴。我会挑七到十个主题,你可以把它们想象成《危险边缘》(Jeopardy)的主题。比如说——嗯,之前有一个——
Lenny (00:26:11): 素材。
Arielle Jackson (00:26:11): ……AI 的例子。对,是一个用于草莓采摘的 AI 工具,主题可以是草莓种植的历史,或者植物学入门,一些相关的话题。你可以用著名农夫的姓氏——想想 Tesla 的名字是怎么来的?他们大概用的是跟电相关的人物的姓氏,这个名字太好了。所以这就是主题式头脑风暴。那部分通常更有成果。我们做同样的事——自由联想等等。
Arielle Jackson (00:26:40): 之后我会花一些时间上 Wikipedia 和互联网,真正去找到那些词。我也很喜欢图书馆,有时会去借书,就读那个主题的书,把出现的有意思的词记下来。总之,然后我会给创始人一份候选名单。候选名单大约是十到二十五个值得进一步考察的概念或想法。然后基于之前的标准和红黄绿标记来筛选,最终得出三到五个候选。不要只出一个,因为你可能在商标上拿不到它,当你对一个名字特别执着然后又不能用的时候,真的很让人伤心。所以,三到五个最终候选。然后你走商标流程、域名,从那里继续推进。
Lenny (00:27:23): 太精彩了。那如果是给创业公司起名和给产品起名,流程有什么不同吗,还是基本一样?
公司名称与产品名称的策略差异
Arielle Jackson (00:27:29): 没有区别,流程一样。唯一的区别是,如果你的公司名已经积累了很高的品牌资产……Square 就是一个很好的例子。Square 积累了很高的品牌资产。Google 是一个完美的例子——公司名有很高的品牌资产,那你通常不希望给产品起一个非常花哨、与众不同的名字,因为你其实是希望主品牌的资产能够传递过来。想想 Square 的产品名就知道了——他们也有例外,当他们想脱离 Square 品牌的时候会取 Cash 这样的名字,或者当他们想做全新品类的时候;Google 也是,推出 Android 的时候想脱离主品牌。但看看其他产品名:Square Register、Square Stand、Square App、Google Maps,它们真的很无聊,但因为品牌资产在公司名上,产品名其实可以无聊一点、描述性一点。
Lenny (00:28:20): 有道理。我想回到你之前提到的一个观点——一个好名字会帮助创业公司,而一个坏名字不会伤害你,或者我忘了你用的具体措辞。我很想再听听这部分,因为确实很有意思。
好名字与坏名字的真正影响
Arielle Jackson (00:28:33): 是的。如果你的公司有一个很棒的名字,而且这个名字令人印象深刻,人们会感叹”哦,这个名字真好”,或者觉得”就是该叫这个”。以 Seesaw 为例,这个名字就很适合那家公司。一个好名字会帮助人们谈论它,促进口碑传播,大家也会更愿意聊起这家公司。但如果你反过来想,有很多名字不好、甚至相当无聊的公司,我们却天天在用,后来还爱上了它们。想想 Disney,Walt Disney 的姓氏,本身没有任何含义,但随着时间推移,这家公司做得太好了,名字被赋予了各种意义,如今它代表着魔法、代表着太多东西,但它不过是那个人的姓氏。所以,一个词随着时间推移,可以拥有远超其本身字面含义的意义。
Arielle Jackson (00:29:21): Disney 今天意味着魔法。Volvo 意味着安全。这些名字本身并不好。如果我只是把它们放进电子表格或者某个名字清单里,没人会选它们。所以我说的就是这个意思——名字只是整体营销或整体品牌的一部分。一个不好的名字,配上一个真正优秀的公司、出色的公司战略和营销,长期来看一样会很出色。而一个好名字只会帮助你,但我不认为一个坏名字能毁掉一家好公司。
Lenny (00:29:51): 太有意思了。所以 basically 你的目标是帮人找到一个能有所帮助的名字。而最差的情况,只要产品足够出色,你也不会有事。
Arielle Jackson (00:29:59): 我觉得是这样。说实话,这也能减轻一些压力。每个人都想找到那个完美的名字。但实际上你想想看,这种情况经常发生——你给别人一份 10 个、15 个名字的清单,它们现在只是电子表格里的单元格,我们大多数时候都是在线上完成这个过程的。你把一个名字交给别人,他们得去想象它能变成什么。你想想 Apple、Disney、Nike、Volvo、Lego,这些品牌中的任何一个,放在电子表格的单元格里,用普通 Arial 十号字显示,它们也就那样——你需要时间去让它们成长。我记得 Phil Knight 拿到 Nike 这个名字的时候,他的反应就是”还行吧”。他说”我再想想”。如今这成了一个多么伟大的名字。
Lenny (00:30:50): 这让我想起了我当年做创业公司的时候,公司叫 Local Mind,我们也做过类似的练习。没有这么深入、也没有这么系统,但我记得是我们的设计师帮我们敲定了这个名字。他就说,“哦,这个名字我能做很多东西。我们就看看这个名字能走到哪里。“你在工作中也会遇到这种情况吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:31:10): 会的。确实有不好的名字。我最近帮一家公司做了品牌重塑,他们之前的名字就不好——看起来很过时,不符合那些命名原则,没有辨识度,不具备 timeless 的特质,还踩中了某种命名潮流的那种。这类名字不好。你要避免这些。但如果你找到一个还算不错的名字,能用它做出漂亮的东西,它和你的公司契合,能帮你完成一部分营销工作,人们愿意说它,而且它最好令人难忘、带有一些情感色彩,那就大胆用吧。
命名过程中常见的坑
Lenny (00:31:39): 太好了。关于起名再问最后一个问题。人们在起名过程中最常犯的错误是什么?
Arielle Jackson (00:31:47): 有一个很有意思的错误——如果你给产品取了一个代号,或者像 First Round 投资的很多公司那样,用某个名字完成了种子轮融资。他们未必对那个名字有多深的感情,但之后和我合作时,我会说”嗯,你的名字不太好,原因如下,我们应该改掉”,或者他们说”我们没法用这个名字了,我们发现存在商标冲突”。我非常建议用一个荒谬到绝对不会拿去发布的代号,尤其是当你只是想快速注册公司的时候。
Arielle Jackson (00:32:18): 比如说,很多人注册公司需要一个名字,于是他们在办理各种手续时就随便挑了一个,但后来就对这个名字产生了感情,然后想正式用这个名字发布产品。但问题是这个名字不太好,而且我建议你换掉。如果你选一个荒谬到绝不会用来发布产品的代号,这其实很有帮助,因为这样你就可以认真走一遍流程,找到一个能帮你做更多工作的名字,而不会对一个糟糕的名字产生感情。
Lenny (00:32:50): 这个建议太好了。顺便说一下,如果你是 First Round 投资的公司,这项命名服务是免费的,我们接下来要聊的其他服务也是免费的,先说明一下。
Arielle Jackson (00:32:59): 是的,没错。
First Round 的附加价值
Lenny (00:33:00): 天哪,我可以专门做一整期节目来聊我有多喜欢 First Round。但我还是想说,我是 First Round 的超级粉丝。我觉得 First Round 提供的每一个项目我都参与过。First Round Review 其实是我写作生涯的起点之一,那篇文章某种程度上推动了后来我整个职业方向的发展。所以我真的非常——
Arielle Jackson (00:33:15): 我记得那篇文章,写得很棒。
Lenny (00:33:17): 是的,后来我又写了两篇。工作量很大,但那确实意义非凡。所以我非常感谢 First Round。我们也可以在最后再聊聊 First Round。
Arielle Jackson (00:33:26): 当然。我们目前聊到的所有内容——你问我的这些,我想你接下来还会问我关于定位和找营销人员的问题——这些都是我们向 First Round 投资组合公司提供的服务,我的工作就是投资的一部分。有时候我们可能会遇到瓶颈,需要引入外部的人来帮忙,但大多数情况下都是包含在内的。而且你需要花很多钱……我最喜欢的那家命名公司,当我遇到瓶颈时会找他们,叫 A Hundred Monkeys,他们非常棒。很久以前我会说,大概 25,000 美元左右。最近我接不了一个非 First Round 的项目,就把客户推荐给了他们——一个名字 47,000 美元。
Lenny (00:34:04): 哇。
Arielle Jackson (00:34:05): 是的,确实越来越贵了,但如果你有这个预算,找一些外部帮助也不错。
品牌开发框架
Lenny (00:34:12): #价值加成。好,我想转到你的品牌开发框架,我读过不少相关内容。我知道你还教了一门相关课程,我们也可以聊聊。但首先我想从实际角度问一下——品牌到底有什么用?为什么人们值得花时间去投资品牌?为什么它重要?
Arielle Jackson (00:34:33): 好的。很多创始人可能以为当我们说”你的品牌”时,指的是你的 logo、字体和颜色,这些确实是品牌的视觉表达,但并不是品牌本身。你的品牌,是人们认为你是谁。那为什么让人们按照你希望的方式去看待你很重要?这归根结底是人们对你的理解——尤其是你的目标受众对你公司和产品的理解。如果我要创业的话,我认为没有什么比这更重要的了。
Arielle Jackson (00:35:08): 所以你的品牌就是人们认为你是谁,而开发品牌战略就是——你想成为什么?你希望人们认为你是什么?以及你打算做什么来帮助塑造那种认知?所以当我为一家公司做品牌的时候,步骤有很多,但我有一个比较适合早期创业公司的精简流程。我喜欢从”你为什么做这件事”开始,对这一点有一个非常清晰的理解。这就是你的使命(purpose)。第二部分是你的产品定位(product positioning),也就是说你希望人们怎样理解你的产品,以及它在他们生活中扮演什么角色?最后一部分是你的个性(personality),就是你以怎样的面貌出现在世界上?你喜欢什么?如果你的品牌是一个人,我会想和他一起玩吗?别人会想和他一起玩吗?
Lenny (00:36:02): 我们会逐一深入这三个部分,但在进入之前,作为一个创始人,你怎么知道你的品牌开发什么时候算完成了?我知道这是一个永无止境、持续迭代的过程,但在一个流程结束时,你确定了使命、定位和个性,然后还有 logo 和颜色——当你想到”这是品牌全套”的时候,它里面都有哪些小零件?然后我们再深入这三个要素。
Arielle Jackson (00:36:30): 我觉得你说得对。你拿到那三个组成部分——使命、定位、个性——然后以此为基础来指导你的视觉设计,以及你的文字语调(tone of voice),也就是你的文案读起来的感觉,你在书面文字中呈现出的面貌。很多公司有所谓的风格指南或品牌风格指南,但里面只覆盖了 logo、字体、颜色——比如不要把我们的 logo 放在蓝色上,不要把它倾斜,这是白色的效果,这是黑色的效果,这是 favicon——但它们没有这些东西:我们是谁,这里是可以作为我们广告文案的十句话,这是我们为什么做我们做的事。
Arielle Jackson (00:37:14): 这是我们品牌的个性。这里有五个属性。我们 playful(有趣好玩),但不是 silly(愚蠢搞笑)。这个我们稍后可以再多聊聊。但我认为所有这些都应该放进风格指南里,而不仅仅是 logo、字体、颜色——那其实只是品牌的一种视觉表达。我是一个超级沃尔沃迷。我现在开的已经是第四辆沃尔沃了。所以我非常有品牌忠诚度。我总是拿他们举例子,因为如果你现在在脑海中想象一下沃尔沃的 logo,它看起来有点像男性符号,就是一个圆圈侧面伸出一个箭头。
Arielle Jackson (00:37:48): 那个 logo 里没有任何东西能代表我喜欢沃尔沃的那些方面,沃尔沃品牌对我来说所意味着的一切——他们的颜色,基本上就是黑白加一点点蓝。没有比他们的色彩方案更无聊的了。所以让沃尔沃拥有今天的含义的,并不是 logo、字体和颜色——他们目前在汽车领域简直把”安全”这个词据为己有了——而是其他东西。如果你去看他们的风格指南,我确实看过他们的风格指南,里面就是——这是我们的黑色、白色和蓝色,这是我们的辅助色,这是我们的 logo。它完全无法帮你理解沃尔沃作为一个品牌意味着什么。
Lenny (00:38:29): 我猜其中一部分原因是它们经过了多年的演变,最初的品牌可能和现在很不一样。这倒让我觉得,拥有一个能代表多种事物、不那么死板地绑定在某个定位上的 logo 和品牌,可能更重要。这个说法你觉得有道理吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:38:44): 是的。他们的 logo 与非常早期的历史有关。我研究过这个,因为我在这方面是个极客。他们早期做过滚珠轴承公司。所以那个 logo 在当时是有某种含义的,但它对”滚珠轴承公司”的描述性并不那么强,因此当他们转型为汽车公司时还能继续使用它。
Arielle Jackson (00:39:05): 但如果你去看他们早期的文字,真的很酷。真的很酷。很久很久以前,他们会说,汽车是由人驾驶的。而我们作为汽车制造商的职责,就是保护驾驶汽车的人。这是这家公司创立之初的根基。所以他们非常清楚自己为什么存在。后来他们在——我想是上世纪五十年代——当时大家都在车里只系腰带,他们推出了三点式安全带,而且他们没有去申请专利然后授权收费,而是免费开放给所有人,因为那样能让世界上所有汽车都更安全——正是这类公司决策,让沃尔沃成为了安全的代名词。不是 logo 的功劳。
Lenny (00:39:48): 非常有意思。
Lenny (00:39:50): 本节目由 Athletic Greens 赞助播出。我在几乎所有我听的播客上都听到过 AG1,比如 Tim Ferriss 和 Lex Fridman 的节目,所以今年早些时候我终于试了一下,它很快就成为我早晨日常的核心部分,尤其是在我需要深度写作或录制像这样的播客的日子里。关于 AG1 我喜欢三点。第一,只需一小勺溶于水中,你就能摄入 75 种维生素、矿物质、益生菌和适应原。我有点把它当作我营养的安全网,以防饮食中遗漏了什么。第二,他们把 AG1 当作一个软件产品来对待。据说他们已经迭代到第 52 版了,而且他们不断根据最新的科学研究、研究论文和内部测试来改进它。
Lenny (00:40:39): 第三,这就是我每天能做的一件简单的事来照顾自己。现在,是时候重新掌控你的健康,用便捷的日常营养来武装你的免疫系统了。每天只需一勺加一杯水,就这样。不需要吃一堆五花八门的药片和补剂来关注自己的健康。简单就好。Athletic Greens 会给你免费的一年用量维生素 D(支持免疫系统)和五份免费旅行装,只要你完成首次购买。你只需要访问 athleticgreens.com/lenny。
Lenny (00:41:10): 再次强调,athleticgreens.com/lenny,掌控你的健康,获取终极日常营养保障。
品牌开发的时间投入
Lenny (00:41:18): 在进入这三个要素之前我还有一个问题,最后一个铺垫性的问题是——如果我不是一个创始人,而是一个 PM,我心里想的是,天哪,一个品牌项目要花好几个月,要消耗掉这么多资源,我不知道它对我们有什么用。对于早期公司来说,你建议花多长时间做一个品牌项目、走一遍这样的流程?也许也包括后期阶段,什么时间范围是合理的?
Arielle Jackson (00:41:45): 好的。这取决于你公司的阶段,以及你已经有多少已有的东西需要……让人们放弃已有的东西是很难的。这里面有很多沉没成本谬误之类的情况。如果你是从零开始,我觉得你可以在三周内完成这件事。命名流程本身因为商标和域名的问题可能会花更长时间。我给公司命名通常需要大约一个月,但整个品牌战略流程,如果你是一家非常早期的公司,几周就能完成。
Arielle Jackson (00:42:15): 而且我认为,不管你花多少时间,实际上都会在后续为你节省大量时间。它会帮你节省公司决策的时间,帮你节省撰写网站内容的时间。说真的,如果你把这些做好了,你的网站文案几乎是自己写出来的。所以这是一笔前期的小额时间投资,实际上会为你后续省下大量时间——这就是我会向一个持怀疑态度的 PM 推销它的方式。
Lenny (00:42:40): 你说服我了。听起来 ROI 非常高。我们开始吧。
Arielle Jackson (00:42:43): 高 ROI。
Lenny (00:42:43): 那么 purpose(宗旨)是第一部分。它是什么?你见过哪些非常好的 purpose 执行案例?
Arielle Jackson (00:42:50): 好的。你的 purpose 就是你为什么做你在做的事。它让人们愿意为你加油。它在让人们愿意来为你工作、让所有员工觉得自己是某个更大事业的一部分方面,扮演着重要角色。我喜欢把它想成”我们存在是为了____“。那个空白处填的就是你的 purpose。你想听案例,还是想听什么才是一个好的 purpose?
Lenny (00:43:14): 两者都听就最好了。
Arielle Jackson (00:43:16): 一个好的 purpose,它阐明的是你希望在世界上看到的改变,与经济利益无关。人们经常纠结于使命、愿景、价值观等等这些概念。价值观没问题,它是内部的,我今天不会谈这些。但我不关心使命和愿景,我只想要一个东西,因为人们只能记住一个东西——那就是你的 purpose,就是你为什么做你在做的事。当你把它表达得很好的时候,它会帮你做公司决策。它存在于一个十年的框架内。所以我们谈到的所有关于产品定位的内容,它是相当灵活可变的。如果你是一家早期公司,它存在于一个十八个月的框架内,所以它可以演变。而你的 purpose 基本上会在十年内保持不变。它就是那颗北极星。
Arielle Jackson (00:44:03): 它帮助公司内部的人保持一致,也让公众希望你赢。我研究生毕业就去 Google 工作了,Google 的 purpose 是整合全球信息,使其人人皆可访问且有用。我当时以为每家公司都有一个所有员工都知道的 purpose。那只是我的第一份正式工作,我以为本来就应该是那样的。结果发现并不是这样。Google 在这方面确实做得非常棒。我上一期有个学员,他不久前刚从 Google 离职,那时候 Google 大概有八万或十万人。他说每个人都还能说出那句话。这真的很了不起。而我加入时,公司大概一千四百人。到你入职第一天的时候,你就已经知道了。它是你招聘流程的一部分。
Arielle Jackson (00:44:51): 它是你引导流程的一部分。它在你的录用通知信里。它无处不在。我觉得这真的很酷,是一个很好的 purpose。还有一个与经济利益有点关系、但我仍然觉得很酷的是 Stripe 的——提高互联网的 GDP。我觉得这个说法非常精妙、很酷,就是会让你把互联网想象成一个国家。怎么说呢,如果你是个互联网人,它会让你想为他们加油。
Arielle Jackson (00:45:21): Nike 的也很棒。我把 Nike 的写下来了,因为我记不住——为世界上每一位运动员带来灵感与创新。只要你有一个身体,你就是运动员。这不仅仅是关于 LeBron,也是关于我,以及我今天早上的 Peloton 骑行表现怎么样。这些是一些知名公司。我可以讲几个我参与过的案例,我觉得挺酷的,都是你们可能还没听说过的公司,因为有时候我们会陷入一种思维——觉得 Stripe、Nike、Google 是了不起的名字,是因为我们赋予了它们那么多意义。而我想讲一些大家可能没听过的公司,因为即使你不是 Stripe、Nike 和 Google,你也可以有一个好的 purpose。
Lenny (00:46:07): 好的,那太棒了。顺便问一下,purpose 应该是一句话吗?这是不是大致的……
Arielle Jackson (00:46:08): 是的。
Lenny (00:46:08): ……准则。很好。
Arielle Jackson (00:46:09): 就是你能在一个会议上做自我介绍的那种。你是会议的主旨演讲者,我想让你介绍自己,我想让你说”大家好,我是 Lenny,我是 X 公司的创始人,我们存在是为了……”然后把它说出来,而且感觉很自然。
Lenny (00:46:21): 太棒了。
Arielle Jackson (00:46:22): 而且它应该让人觉得想听你接下来要说什么。另外它还应该能做到的一点是,它可以作为你”关于”页面的标题。也就是说”我们存在是为了…………”但你只需要去掉”我们存在”,从动词开始。那就可以作为你”关于”页面的标题。我做过的一家公司,一家 First Round 的公司,叫 LogicLoop,是一家运营自动化公司。
Arielle Jackson (00:46:48): 你几乎可以把它想象成一个无代码、低代码平台,用来自动化大量人们不得不做的基于运营数据的工作。我们做了完整的头脑风暴,我真的很喜欢他们的 purpose。你可以去看看他们的”关于”页面,它就在那里——让运营数据比运营人员更努力地工作。如果你曾经从事过运营工作,或者有朋友在做运营,他们真的非常非常辛苦,而且往往是默默无闻的那种。所以它能让那个领域的任何人都为你加油——你的数据应该比你的运营人员更努力地工作。
Lenny (00:47:21): 声明一下,我是 LogicLoop 的投资人,很高兴你和他们合作过。
Arielle Jackson (00:47:24): 好的,太棒了。还有一个我参与过的,另一家 First Round 的公司,叫 Woolf。他们的模式参考了加州大学(UC)的模式——有一大批独立的学校各自独立运作,但它们能从属于一个更大的组织中获得某些东西。Woolf 的做法是通过成为更大的 Woolf University 的一部分来提供认证,但每一所独立的学院仍然可以作为自己的独立学院运作。
Arielle Jackson (00:47:52): 所以他们的 purpose 是提高获得世界一流高等教育的机会,并确保这种教育在全球范围内得到认可和可转换。这个理念就是,你应该能够在线上跟随最好的讲师上一门课,然后去澳大利亚旅行时在那上一门课,然后再去中国在那上一门课,获得这个世界能提供的最好的教育。
Arielle Jackson (00:48:15): 还有一个我很久以前参与过的是 Alt。我觉得他们最近经历了一点品牌重塑,但他们的 purpose 是提高另类资产的透明度和流动性。在他们的案例中,产品定位主要是让运动卡片像股票一样容易投资。所以另类资产在这里指的不是私募股权、对冲基金和房地产,而是”另类中的另类”,比如运动卡片、宝可梦卡牌和艺术品。
Lenny (00:48:45): 太棒了。这么多精彩的案例。这对人们理解 purpose 可能是什么会很有帮助。在执行层面,你是直接打开一个 Google Doc,然后开始写下想法、做头脑风暴,然后跟团队不断打磨吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:48:58): 我其实是从 [inaudible 00:49:03] 那里偷来或者说借来了一个练习,我认为它给这个过程增加了一些结构。如果你就那样做、而且对你有效的话,那很好。但如果你想通过一个流程来达到目标,我喜欢的做法是,首先列出世界上所有与你的业务相关的文化张力。比如对于 Alt 来说,这些可能包括:人们对另类投资越来越感兴趣;现在三十多岁的人对 90 年代的事情怀有怀旧情绪;当时利率非常低,人们从他们父母曾经投资的东西中得不到任何优势。这些就是文化张力的例子。文化张力就是时代精神,是你的受众可能正在想的事情。
Arielle Jackson (00:49:51): 这些东西甚至可能是他们潜意识中的认知,是他们身边的时事。所以你先把所有这些都列一个长长的清单。然后再列一个长长的清单,写下所有你可以描述品牌最佳状态的方式。这跟你的产品定位有关,但假设你还没做过定位,那就把它想成是你的品牌最佳状态。我们希望别人怎么描述我们?当一切运转完美、产品真正发挥价值的时候,它带来了什么?同样,用要点的方式,把你可能会用来描述的所有方式写下来。然后从两边各选一个,一个最能表达当今世界正在发生什么,一个最能表达你的产品带来了什么,有了这个上下文,你就做好了准备。
头脑风暴 purpose 的方法
Arielle Jackson (00:50:30): 带着这个上下文,现在你来做头脑风暴,“我们的存在是为了____“,让我来完成这句话。甚至在那之前,有时候先做”世界会变得更美好,如果____“这个练习会很有帮助。所以对于我的公司来说,“世界会变得更美好,如果____“,完成这句话,然后再进入”我们的存在是为了____”。
Lenny (00:50:49): 哇,我真高兴问了这个问题。顺便问一下,有没有什么地方可以推荐给想做这个练习的人?是 First Round 的另一篇访谈文章吗,还是我知道你也有一个相关课程?
Arielle Jackson (00:50:59): 有的。First Round Review 上还有一篇文章,叫《每位创业创始人应该做的三个动作》之类的。
Lenny (00:51:07): 太好了,我会找到它然后加上链接。
Arielle Jackson (00:51:09): 好。太棒了。
什么是定位
Lenny (00:51:10): 太好了。好,我们进入下一部分,关于定位,这是一个很重要的话题。首先,什么是定位?然后我想知道,哪些信号告诉你可能存在定位问题,需要真正重视它?
Arielle Jackson (00:51:23): 好。定位是你在目标客户心智中占据的空间,以及你能做的一切来影响他们如何描述你的产品。如果你有定位问题,那就是当我问你的 10 个客户或 10 个员工你们公司做什么、产品做什么的时候,我会得到不同的答案。而不幸的是,大多数公司都是这种情况。如果答案只是同一件事上的微小差异,那没关系。但我确实跟一些较后期的公司做过这个练习 [inaudible 00:52:01],我的第一步通常是进去采访 10 个人,这 10 个人涵盖从高管到与客户对接的人再到一些客户。当 10 个人说了 10 个截然不同的东西时,你就有了定位问题。其他可能表明你有定位问题的方式是,如果你不能用一句话向我解释你是做什么的,那你就有定位问题。
Lenny (00:52:25): 这个标准挺高的。
Arielle Jackson (00:52:26): 是的,确实。当我刚开始做咨询的时候,我与创始人的第一次见面就是完全冷启动。嘿,跟我说说你们公司。他们会花 30 分钟来告诉我他们的公司。30 分钟结束后我基本能理解,但总是需要前 30 分钟。所以现在当我和一家新公司合作时,我会让他们先填一个小工作表。其中一个问题是:你是做什么的?他们必须在一个大约段落长度的方框里写下来。
Lenny (00:52:55): 很聪明。
Arielle Jackson (00:52:56): 然后我进去就此提问,最终我们把它精简到一句话的长度。
Lenny (00:53:00): 太棒了。好,你怎么着手确定你的定位?大问题。
定位的受众分析
Arielle Jackson (00:53:05): 是的。我从受众开始。这是给谁用的?我们真正思考的是你可能拥有的最广泛的客户或用户群体,然后从中缩小到目标受众,也就是你未来 18 个月计划对外争取获取的人群。
Arielle Jackson (00:53:25): 你可以把它想成同心圆。最大的圆是你的 TAM(总可达市场)。随着圆圈缩小,一共分为五个部分。最大的圆是第一圈,然后第二圈、第三圈、第四圈是你的目标受众。所有的圆都必须包含在更大的圆之内。最中间的那个点就是你的模型用户画像。这实际上是一个有名字、有年龄、有地点、有工作、有情感、有优先事项、有兴趣爱好等等的具体的人。
Arielle Jackson (00:53:54): 所以我们讨论模型用户和目标受众,目标受众再强调一下,就是你未来 18 个月计划对外争取获取的人群。如果你是一家早期公司,你很有可能会获取那个圈之外的人,在下一个圈甚至更大的圈里,但他们不是你主动出击要去获取的对象。
Lenny (00:54:15): 关于这个人我可以问几个问题吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:54:17): 当然。
Lenny (00:54:18): 我正在就这个话题做一些写作和研究。对于最中间的这个人,你建议人们具体到什么程度?我很喜欢这是一个真实的人,我猜不是一个真正的人,而是一个非常有描述力的 [crosstalk 00:54:29]
Arielle Jackson (00:54:29): 可以是一个真正的人,也可以是多个真实人物的结合体。对于目标受众,我喜欢把它想成是一种你可以命名的东西。比如对于 Eero 来说,就是”精通科技的爸爸”。这是一类人。然后模型用户画像,即代表精通科技的爸爸的那个个体用户,是一个住在圣路易斯郊区、有十几岁孩子、拥有 2800 平方英尺砖结构房子的男人,周五在家办公。他的孩子们喜欢打游戏。他是一家与科技相关但非科技公司做销售副总裁。他更像是科技爱好者而非真正的软件工程师。我们对他的了解很多,我可以告诉你关于他的很多事情。描述相当丰富,但”精通科技的爸爸”就是代表他和其他类似人群的方式,那就是他们的目标受众。
聚焦的力量
Lenny (00:55:22): 很多创始人在接受”非常聚焦、非常小众是好主意”这件事上有困难,他们担心”天啊,这样全世界就只有这 10 个人真正想要我的东西”。你发现为什么一开始非常聚焦是很有力且重要的?
Arielle Jackson (00:55:37): 是的。当你是一家早期公司的时候,你能做的最糟糕的事情就是试图成为所有人的一切,因为你没有足够的跑道。你根本没有足够的资源来成功做到这一点。你能做的最好的事情是找到一个足够大的受众群体,如果你在其中获得了可观的市场份额,你就会成为一家巨大的企业。而”精通科技的爸爸”是一个相当大的受众群。而且那只是你未来 18 个月对外争取获取的对象。我是一个精通科技的妈妈,我和一个精通科技的爸爸住在一起,我有 Eero 系统。这并不意味着你未来要获取的每个人必须都在那个受众群内,它意味着的是我们聚焦于获取的是谁。
Lenny (00:56:24): 太棒了。我刚才把我们带偏了定位流程的轨道。我觉得我们在同心圆模型那里跑偏了。所以我把话筒交还给你继续。
定位练习的方法
Arielle Jackson (00:56:36): 好的。那么我喜欢的定位练习方式是这样开始的:这是给谁用的?然后是,他们有什么问题?通常这些人存在某种问题,他们甚至可能没意识到这是个问题,或者他们并不觉得这个问题特别困扰,但这些人的确有某种状况。接着是,他们现在怎么应对这个问题?他们一定在做些什么——买什么东西、有个变通办法、在做某件事。他们现在做的事不一定是在用另一家创业公司的产品或你的直接竞争对手,可能是旧有的做事方式,但他们确实在做些什么。所以我们依次梳理:这是给谁用的?他们的问题是什么?他们怎么应对的?然后才是——你做的是什么?
Arielle Jackson (00:57:20): 它是怎么运作的?以及你希望你的产品或服务的用户怎么对别人描述它?基本上,如果你把这些问题都回答了,最终就会导出那句经典的四段式陈述。这不是我发明的,它已经存在四五十年了。我 22 岁时就学到了它。我认为这是营销中最强大的工具之一。如果你冷冰冰地去套用它,会觉得像在填空游戏。但如果你已经做了那些定义”给谁用""他们有什么问题”的工作,那它不过就是这些工作的提炼。这句话的结构是:对于目标受众,他们存在某种需求或机会。然后你说,我们的产品名是一个某某品类,它有一个什么好处,不同于他们之前做的旧方式,我们的产品以这种另一种方式运作。
Lenny (01:01:07): 太棒了。我们会链接到那篇实际上包含这个模板的文章,这样大家就不用全抄下来了。你提到的最后一点,我之前没听过——就是”他们会怎么跟别人说”或者”他们会怎么向别人描述”这个想法。是这样吗?
Arielle Jackson (00:58:22): 是的。我认为,如果你把好处定义得非常好、非常好,它实际上就会成为你首页的 H1 大标题,也会成为你希望用户告诉别人的那句话。想想 Square Stand——“把你的 iPad 变成一台销售终端”。把你的 iPad 变成一台销售终端。没错。如果我去找一个小企业主,他正在和一个朋友喝东西,对方也是小企业主,我会希望他们怎么谈论 Square Stand?哦对,我刚买了 Square Stand。它是一个特别酷的新收银机,能把我的 iPad 变成一台销售终端。这几乎就是我希望他们说出口的话。所以,如果你能写出那句话——那就是你理想的好处,是你希望人们说的话,而且它是你的目标受众真的会说出口的那种话——那就太好了。
Lenny (00:59:12): 有意思。我很喜欢这个说法。非常有道理。对于想走一遍这个练习的人来说,你总是有很好的实操建议来指导实际过程——比如做定位这种事,是不是又是打开一个文档开始写,还是有更结构化的方法?
Arielle Jackson (00:59:28): 有的,有更结构化的方式。我有一份工作表,涵盖了刚才讨论的所有内容。比如,这是给谁的?他们现在在做什么?所有我们刚才聊过的那些问题,它更像是一个结构化的头脑风暴。有一个我非常喜欢的练习,我叫它”酒吧测试”——帮助你把你写的所有内容转化成人的语言,因为我看到的一个很大的坑,尤其是 B2B 公司,但其实所有公司都容易犯——就是他们写出来的东西不是人说话的方式。所以当我收到创始人第一版草稿时,文档里经常出现”利用""赋能”这类词,没有人会这么说话。所以要把语言转化成——“把你的 iPad 变成一台销售终端”、“让你的家被快速、可靠的 WiFi 覆盖”、“同时录制你的屏幕和摄像头”——这种最基本的、用人们真正会说的方式来描述你的产品的语言,我觉得这才是大家想要使用的语言。
酒吧测试
Arielle Jackson (01:00:28): 首先,你已经定义了你的目标群体。现在假装你是目标群体中的一个人,正在和目标群体中的另一个人在酒吧喝酒,你得能说出:嘿,我刚开始用产品名。它是这个品类,有这个好处。然后对方会说,嗯,说说看?或者,挺酷的,什么意思?或者类似的追问。然后你得说出你的差异化卖点。你真的要把它说出来。如果你跑完这个测试,发现那些确实是人们会说出口的话,那你就做得相当不错了,可以开始在公开场合使用那些文案了。
Lenny (01:01:07): 太酷了。我之前没听过这个酒吧测试,而且我喜欢它可能真的在酒吧里发生。这个也是大家能在网上找到的吗,还是说只能现在自己记下来?
Arielle Jackson (01:01:18): 嗯,我不确定网上有没有。
Lenny (01:01:20): 好的,太棒了。这就是独家内容。
Arielle Jackson (01:01:22): 是的,这个在我的课程里,我们在课程里会详细讲这个,还会做一个真正的角色扮演练习,不过——记一下笔记吧。
Lenny (01:01:31): 我非常喜欢这个。
Arielle Jackson (01:01:33): 谢谢。
Lenny (01:01:33): 你说的这点让我想起了一封我刚才调出来的邮件,是 ADP 发来的——就是你说的那个观点,你想确保你的品牌语言感觉像是你会对一个人说的话。ADP 是一家做安全安防的公司,就是火灾报警之类的。我收到这封邮件,上面写着”夏天来了,尽情玩乐,或使用我们的免费安全 App,以及更多”。然后又说”让夏天在家里或外出时更安全也更有趣”。ADP,你不会让夏天更有趣的,你在说什么啊?
Arielle Jackson (01:02:01): 你看,这就是用力过猛的例子。他们太努力地想让它听起来口语化、有趣。他们是安防系统,应该说类似”出门在外也能保障你的家居安全”、“夏天旅行时安心无忧”这样的话。
Lenny (01:02:16): 他们甚至还附了一个 GIF,是一个 TikTok 博主在那说”ADP 是我的 MVP”。
Arielle Jackson (01:02:21): 对。这其实跟品牌个性有点关系。ADP 的品牌个性,怎么说呢,确实不怎么有趣。所以当它们戴上”有趣”的帽子时,就显得很别扭、很牵强。
品牌个性
Lenny (01:02:36): 这正是我的感受。所以,品牌个性,这是我们下一个话题。当你想到品牌、营销、规划这些东西时,个性不一定是你会想到的,所以我很好奇为什么你觉得它重要,然后怎么为你的品牌找到自己的个性。
Arielle Jackson (01:02:51): 我认为品牌个性是帮助定义视觉设计的输入之一,它也一定会帮助定义你的文字文案。它背后的理念是:品牌就像人。如果你开始把你的品牌当作一个人来思考,那它显然需要一个个性,因为所有人都有个性。尤其是现在,品牌出现在人们出现的那些地方——TikTok、Instagram,你的品牌当然需要一个个性,否则你就会像 ADP 那样试图在夏天装有趣,感觉就是很不自然、很奇怪。所以品牌个性这个东西,其实是最容易做的部分。我觉得也是最快的部分。通常一个小时就能搞定。但我有一些我喜欢的框架,本质上就是在回答:你是 Mountain Dew 还是 Rolex,还是介于两者之间?
Arielle Jackson (01:03:46): 当你想到那些拥有很多品牌资产的品牌时,它们确实都有自己的个性。我经常拿 Mountain Dew 的营销来说事,那种营销就是拼命想显得很酷、很粗犷、很前卫、很快、有点青少年感。而 Rolex 就很 Gray Poupon——“摇下车窗,请问您有 Gray Poupon 吗”那种调调,精致、讲究、有点令人向往,甚至有点英伦范儿。这两者真的非常、非常、非常不同。中间还有很多空间,不是每个品牌都要成为 Mountain Dew 或 Rolex,但你处在哪个位置?所以你直接写下来就好了。我觉得很多这些问题的答案归根结底都是——如果你能打开一个空白 Google Doc 直接写下你是谁,那当然尽管去做。
Arielle Jackson (01:04:35): 如果这让你觉得望而生畏、很难下手,那就用框架。我喜欢的框架分两部分。第一部分基于 Jennifer Aker 的一些学术研究,她基本上分析了全球顶级品牌,发现所有品牌都可以被划分为五个品牌个性维度,而真正强大的品牌会在其中两个维度上特别突出。她发现的五个维度分别是:真诚,也就是接地气、诚实;兴奋,充满活力,这是 Mountain Dew 那种风格;能力,可靠、聪明;精致,也就是迷人和上档次;以及粗犷,户外、硬朗。所以就是真诚、兴奋、能力、精致和粗犷。回到我们刚才讨论的那两个品牌,Mountain Dew 是粗犷加兴奋,Rolex 是精致加能力。你可以对任何你欣赏的品牌这样做,或者就想想你喜欢的品牌,然后把它们归结为那五个维度中的两个。
Arielle Jackson (01:05:39): 这就是第一步。那五个维度中你要在哪两个上突出?结果发现很多科技公司最终都在真诚和能力上突出,通常就是会这样。Amazon 是真诚加能力。Google 是真诚加能力。Apple 不是,Apple 多了一些精致的成分。但不管怎样,如果你只做这一步,我们最终会生活在一个所有人都真诚加能力、或者精致加能力的世界里,那就太无聊了。所以下一步是在这两个维度的基础上,定义五个属性、五个品牌个性。我喜欢把它想象成一颗星,五角星,而品牌需要张力才能有趣。所以如果你告诉我,我们很有帮助,我们很友善,我们很亲切,我们很有能力,我们很可靠——
Arielle Jackson (01:06:37): 你基本上什么都没说,因为你用了三个词在说同一件事,两个词在说另一件事。但如果你告诉我,哦,我们非常内行,但我们也非常平易近人。这就有意思了。因为真正专业的人往往不那么亲切,所以必须有一点张力。然后你要把它们写成陈述句,格式是”我们是 X,但不是 Y”,其中 Y 是把 X 推得太过的结果。比如,Google 是活泼但不是滑稽,所以他们会说我们是活泼的,但不是滑稽的。或者 Mountain Dew 可能会说,我们是大胆的,但不是愚蠢的。就是把那个属性稍微推过一点。然后你就得到了五个陈述句,“我们是 X,但不是 Y”。这些对于指导你的文案写作非常有用,甚至可能影响你的视觉设计风格,当然还会影响你的插画风格、摄影风格、广告文案。
Lenny (01:07:39): 做完这个练习,也许还有另外两个部分之后,你把这些东西放在哪里?就是一篇文档,写着这是我们的品牌概览,这是我们的品牌个性,这是我们的定位,这是我们的宗旨,然后你在设计和制定策略的时候回头去参考它?是这样运作的吗?
Arielle Jackson (01:08:00): 对,你可以那样做。那绝对是一种做法,也是个好的开始。我觉得它还会出现在另一个地方,就是我们之前提到的那个每个人都有的视觉风格指南,发给代理公司或替你写文案的撰稿人的那份。我觉得所有这些都应该作为那份最终要分享的文档的输入。我觉得它也应该纳入任何新员工的引导流程,让他们了解这家公司是谁。任何和你一起做营销的合作伙伴、联合品牌合作等等,它真的应该被当作你的品牌圣经,关于你是谁的小圣经。而且当你做比如新产品的时候,也应该回过头来看看——这需要更新吗?还是这个新产品需要符合我们现有的定义?
Lenny (01:08:40): 你怎么称呼这份文档/这个地方?
Arielle Jackson (01:08:44): 当我把那三个部分都整合起来,再加上一堆其他东西时,我把它叫做创意简报(creative brief),就是你会交给代理公司或替你写文案的撰稿人的那份东西。它还会包含一些我们没谈到的其他内容,比如创意灵感方向——挑选你喜欢的和不喜欢的视觉素材和文字素材,这样你可以同时展示正面示例和反面示例,让对方知道你在找什么样的东西。
Lenny (01:09:09): 太棒了。谢谢你说了这么多。信息量太大了,我觉得大家得听好几遍才能消化所有内容。在你离开之前,我还想深入聊两个领域。但我会简短一些,因为我知道我们已经超时了。一个是关于获取 PR 的事,趁你在我想问你这个问题——创始人甚至更大的公司,他们总是在问:我怎么获得 PR?我怎么让媒体报导我的产品?虽然有时候这其实是浪费时间。你对希望获得一些 PR 的创业公司有什么战术性的建议吗?
Arielle Jackson (01:09:43): 你是指发布时的初始报导,还是持续的?
Lenny (01:09:47): 我觉得是早期,对,发布之前。
Arielle Jackson (01:09:49): 当然。第一件事就是把你的故事理清楚。很多时候创始人来找我,说”嘿,我们需要帮忙做这个发布”,我说”好的,发布什么?“然后就回到那三十分钟才能搞清楚这家公司是做什么的状态。所以如果你不能用一句话向我描述清楚,记者肯定也无法用一句话理解,他们也无法用一句话向他们的受众描述。所以真正把你的故事理清楚,我们刚才谈到的那些围绕产品定位的内容,是非常关键的。几乎每次有人跟我说”我准备好发布了”,我们都会先回到定位。另外还要确保你的网站已经为你即将引来的流量做好了准备,你不是在把流量引向一个你之后会换掉的名字。
Arielle Jackson (01:10:32): 你真的准备好了吗?所以先回到我们讨论过的所有其他内容,然后对会报导你的媒体和获得这些报导所需的时间要有现实的预期。很多人会说”我下周发布”。好吧,挺不错的,但没有记者会在下周报导你。现在不是这么运作的了。五年前、八年前,创始人真的可以决定发布消息的日期,他们可以在 embargo 下向三到五家媒体做简报,意思就是你们都不能公开我们的秘密消息,直到我们告诉你们在这个时间可以发布。那时候,五家中有三家都会写稿发出来。但现在不是这样了。现在对于早期创业公司,我们几乎总是把发布消息做成独家,意思是你把新闻给到一家媒体。
Arielle Jackson (01:11:19): 而且他们是唯一有权报导的媒体。你显然仍然可以做所有你自有渠道的事情——你的博客、社交媒体、投资人、亲朋好友——但他们是你唯一允许报导的新闻媒体。所以要有一个预期:这大概率会是一个独家。对于种子阶段的公司来说,获得融资比以往任何时候都难,而融资这件事本身也不再那么有新闻价值了。有太多差公司拿到了融资。当然也有很多好公司拿到了融资,只是数量前所未有地多。而报导这个领域的记者和媒体数量比以前少了。所以要真正想清楚,这个领域谁在写稿?他们会报导我这个阶段的公司吗?
Arielle Jackson (01:12:08): 另一个很常见的想法是,嘿,我们想上《纽约时报》。我想说,挺不错的,过去五年里《纽约时报》没有人报导过种子阶段的创业公司,除非特别疯狂。你觉得谁会来写你?但还是有一些媒体会写的。另外一点是,不要做一个单纯的融资公告。很多创始人融完资就说,好,我们来发布吧。我想说,不行,我们应该把融资公告当作一个新闻钩子,来讲一个更大的故事。这个更大的故事可能是你的产品上线了,你有标杆客户了,你有势头了,或者你在发布某个很棒的合作。总得有别的东西在发生,而不仅仅是你的融资。把融资作为初始发布的一部分很好,但你还在发布什么?
Arielle Jackson (01:12:55): 最后一点是,要让你做的事情变得有趣和相关,不仅仅是让你自己和当时在那里工作的另外三个人觉得有趣和相关,而是让你想争取的那家媒体的所有读者都觉得有趣和相关。举个例子,我之前做过一家公司叫 Vitable Health,创始人 Joseph,他为时薪工人做了一个产品,由雇主买单,大约每人每月 50 美元。这个产品提供紧急护理和初级保健服务。这些时薪工人收入太高,不够资格申请 Medicaid,又收入太低,付不起医疗保险的保费。所以就是为时薪工人提供初级和紧急护理。我们把这个故事和”大辞职潮”以及小企业招不到时薪工人这个话题挂钩,那是 2021 年底的一个大趋势。这家公司的业务在费城和特拉华州,我们最终帮他拿到了圣诞节后周日《费城询问报》的报导。
Arielle Jackson (01:13:57): 但整个故事的核心是让费城这家日托机构和这家餐厅成为英雄,因为他们为时薪工人提供了这么好的福利。所以那个标题对他们来说非常完美,但不是那种”这是 Vitable,他们发布了什么什么”,而是”看看本地企业正在做的这件酷事来吸引时薪工人”。所以要换一个角度思考你的公司,让它变得有趣和相关,而且不要忽视本地媒体。
Arielle Jackson (01:14:23): 如果你有本地业务、本地故事或本地客户,这是非常有价值的。在 Square 我们就是这么做的,我们把所有客户塑造成英雄,然后去争取本地媒体的报导。大多数服务于科技圈的公关公司并不擅长本地媒体,但如果你能和一些本地媒体建立联系,他们比《纽约时报》和《华尔街日报》更渴望这类故事。
Lenny (01:14:50): 这个建议太好了,而且他们大概率比《纽约时报》或《华尔街日报》更愿意写你。好的。那我想快速问你一个关于招聘营销人员的问题,我会简短一些,因为我知道我们快没时间了。根据你的经验,创业公司什么时候应该招一个全职的营销人员?
Arielle Jackson (01:15:08): 当你有很多问题需要解决,而一个懂行的人能解决得更好的时候;或者当你有一堆自由职业者和外包公司,已经多到你自己管不过来的时候。
Lenny (01:15:21): 你觉得通常是什么时候……有没有一个大概的经验法则——
Arielle Jackson (01:15:25): 有。大致来说,取决于你是一个营销驱动的业务还是一个销售驱动的业务。如果你是销售驱动的业务,而且你还没有形成可复制的销售流程,那就还没到招营销人员的时候。先把那个可复制的销售流程建立起来,营销的工作是为你带来更多营销合格线索(marketing qualified leads)。这是一种情况,所以要看具体情况。如果你是营销驱动的业务,在我看来通常发生在团队 10 人左右的时候。创始人自己做了大部分营销工作,通常做得不是很好,或者这儿找个外包、那儿找个自由职业者拼凑一些东西。然后他们意识到,如果我有一个能把所有这些事情都做掉、同时管理这些外包和自由职业者的人,那会好得多。
Arielle Jackson (01:16:13): 另一个判断标准是,你是否只有一个时间点的项目?你是否需要做定位?是否需要一个网站?是否需要一个名字?是否需要跑一轮 Google 广告测试?这些都是离散的任务。当这些变成需要持续进行的工作时,就该考虑招一个营销人员了。而且要真正想清楚你需要什么样的营销人员——你需要一个产品营销人员、效果营销人员、传播人员,还是创意人员?理想情况下大家都想要全部。但我比较喜欢”T 型营销人员”的概念——在某一个职能上非常深入,但在其他所有职能上也都懂得足够多,能做出有意义的贡献。
Lenny (01:16:48): 我觉得我们可能需要再单独做一期节目,就聊这一个话题。我有太多想问的了,但我得放你走了。那就留到 V2 吧。在那之前,我们到了非常令人期待的快问快答环节,我只问你一些快速的问题,你快速回答,我们一气呵成搞定。听起来怎么样?
Arielle Jackson (01:17:06): 听起来很棒。
Lenny (01:17:07): 你会推荐给别人的两三本书是什么?
Arielle Jackson (01:17:09): 在营销领域,一定推荐那本叫《Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind》的书。1980 年出版的,至今仍是我最喜欢的营销书。另一本最近的营销书是 Rory Sutherland 写的《Alchemy》。我最喜欢读的领域是行为科学、心理学与商业的交叉,那本书就在这个范畴里。小说的话,我最近读了 Brit Bennett 的《The Vanishing Half》,非常棒。然后我又读了她的另一本叫《The Mothers》的书,但我觉得《The Vanishing Half》更好。
推荐的播客和 newsletter
Lenny (01:17:36): 太好了,我去看看。你最喜欢的营销相关的播客或 newsletter 是什么?
Arielle Jackson (01:17:41): 我很喜欢 Nick Sharma 的周报。他是一个增长营销人员,好像是在 [听不清 01:17:48] water 开始他的职业生涯的。所以他做了很多 CPG 类的 DTC 业务。他有一个很棒的营销 newsletter,每周日晚出。播客方面,我很喜欢《How I Built This》。我知道这个已经很流行了,但我就是喜欢。它不完全是营销,而是更偏综合商业类的。First Round 的播客 in depth 也很好。Lenny 的播客我一直在听,非常棒。然后我的朋友 Jasmine,来自 The Concept Bureau,她有一个营销播客叫《Unseen, Unknown》。内容大致是关于文化、品牌,以及这些与社会和趋势的关系。不是那种纯粹的营销,更像是影响营销的文化和社会学层面的东西。
Lenny (01:18:30): 哇,好多好东西。你最近喜欢的电影或电视节目是什么?
Arielle Jackson (01:18:35): 这个比较尴尬。你过去一年看了多少部电影?好奇问一下。
Lenny (01:18:41): 我吗?很多,都在流媒体上看的。也太多了,如果你是想往这个方向说的话——还是说你一部都没看?
Arielle Jackson (01:18:48): 嗯,我大概看了四部,而且可能都是在 Disney+ 上看的。
Lenny (01:18:53): 你赢了。太棒了。
Arielle Jackson (01:18:56): 我想说我真的很喜欢迪士尼皮克斯的几部电影,《Luca》《Encanto》,都非常好看。我基本上只跟孩子一起看电影,不过我挺兴奋的。我之前一直很崇拜 Anthony Bourdain,我很期待看他的新纪录片,如果能抽出时间的话。电视剧我也一样看得很少。
Lenny (01:19:16): 好的,很好。
Arielle Jackson (01:19:16): 有一个 Netflix 的小节目叫《Old Enough》。是一个日本节目,带字幕的,讲的是让小朋友在日本自己跑腿办事。他们真的是自己一个人去。每集十分钟。特别棒。我们全家一起看的。真的很可爱。
Lenny (01:19:29): 《Old Enough》。我要去看看。好的,还有两个问题。招聘营销人员时,你最喜欢的面试问题是什么?
Arielle Jackson (01:19:35): 大概是”跟我说一个你引以为豪的项目”吧。“跟我说一个你引以为豪的项目”,这个问题非常开放,可以从中听到很多方面的信息。然后备选问题可能是”说一个你最近看到过的、你自己没有参与的、但你觉得很棒的营销活动”。
Lenny (01:19:53): 嗯,喜欢这个。好的,最后一个问题。在行业内,你最尊敬的营销思想领袖是谁?
Arielle Jackson (01:20:01): 营销行业内的?
Lenny (01:20:02): 营销行业内的?对。
Arielle Jackson (01:20:04): 老派的思想领袖,David Ogilvy、Rory Sutherland、Seth Godin。新一代的思想领袖,我们提到了 Nick Sharma。还有一位女性叫……我可能会把她的名字念错,Anna Andjelic。她有一个我之前没提到的 newsletter,叫《Sociology of Business》,非常好。她是那种 CMO、首席品牌官类型的角色。她最近把 Banana Republic 做了一个翻盘,挺厉害的。Red Antler 的 Emily Hayward。我也很喜欢 Ross。我不认识这个人,但 Ross Simmons 来自 Foundation,一家内容营销 agency。我不是内容营销专家,但他真的是。我觉得他产出的内容很不错。
Lenny (01:20:48): 天哪,这期节目的 show notes 要变成一大串好东西的清单了。Arielle,非常感谢你来。这里面装了太多干货了。我不知道大家刚开始听的时候有没有做好准备,恭喜你听完了,我猜你可能要回去一遍又一遍地重听。那么再次感谢,Arielle,非常感谢你来做这期节目。最后两个问题。大家想联系你的话,在网上哪里可以找到你?听众可以怎么帮到你?
Arielle Jackson (01:21:14): 好的,我在 Twitter 和 LinkedIn 上都有。Twitter 上我是 @hiimarielle。如果你对这些内容感兴趣,但觉得有点信息量太大,我推荐一下我的 Maven 课程。我教一门关于创业公司品牌战略的课程,涵盖了我们这一个多小时里聊到的所有内容,而且会有更多的手把手指导和反馈。所以它是一个关于这些东西的速成课,面向创始人,为期两周,全部内容都会过一遍。下一期——我想我们应该是第四期了——会在今年秋季。你可以在 maven.com/arielle/startupbrandstrategy 申请报名。
Lenny (01:21:57): 太好了。我想这也是听众能帮到你的方式。
Arielle Jackson (01:22:00): 对。
Lenny (01:22:01): 很好。
Arielle Jackson (01:22:01): 没错。
Lenny (01:22:02): 好的,太棒了。好的,再次感谢,再次感谢,以及 [听不清 01:22:07]。
Arielle Jackson (01:22:07): 非常感谢,Lenny。很开心。
Lenny (01:22:09): 非常感谢你的收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcast、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅。另外,也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这真的能帮助更多听众找到这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于这个节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| A Hundred Monkeys | A Hundred Monkeys(命名咨询公司,保留原文) |
| adaptogens | 适应原 |
| Adrian | Adrian(人名,保留原文) |
| aha moment | 顿悟时刻 |
| Banking as a Service | 银行即服务 |
| bar test | 酒吧测试 |
| Best Buy | Best Buy(暂无通用中文译名) |
| Blue Bottle | Blue Bottle(知名精品咖啡品牌,暂无通用中文译名) |
| brand personality | 品牌个性 |
| Brett | Brett(人名,保留原文) |
| brick and mortar | 实体店 |
| Carl | Carl(人名,保留原文) |
| Cover | Cover(被 Twitter 收购的 Android 锁屏应用,保留原文) |
| CPG | CPG(Consumer Packaged Goods,消费品) |
| creative brief | 创意简报 |
| cultural tensions | 文化张力 |
| DTC | DTC(Direct to Consumer,直接面向消费者) |
| ed tech | 教育科技 |
| embargo | embargo(新闻 embargo,指记者在指定时间前不得发布的协议,保留原文) |
| empty vessel | 空容器(指本身无含义的命名方式) |
| exclusive | 独家 |
| favicon | favicon(网站图标,保留原文) |
| First Round | First Round(即 First Round Capital,风险投资机构,保留原文) |
| First Round Review | First Round Review(First Round 的内容平台,保留原文) |
| foil | 参照物(定位语境中指对立参照) |
| Gogan | Gogan(人名,保留原文) |
| Gray Poupon | Gray Poupon(知名高端芥末酱品牌,保留原文) |
| H1 | H1(首页大标题,保留原文) |
| Jack | Jack(此处指 Jack Dorsey,Square 联合创始人,但原文出现处为 Jesse,Jack 在本片段中未直接出现) |
| Jennifer Aker | Jennifer Aker(学者,品牌个性五维度理论提出者,保留原文) |
| Jesse | Jesse(Square 硬件负责人,保留原文) |
| Kyle Dink | Kyle Dink(人名,保留原文) |
| mad libs | 填空游戏 |
| marketer in residence | 驻场营销专家 |
| marketing qualified leads | 营销合格线索 |
| Megan Quinn | Megan Quinn(人名,保留原文) |
| Mint Plaza | Mint Plaza(旧金山地名) |
| naming brief | 命名简报 |
| news hook | 新闻钩子 |
| no code, low code | 无代码、低代码 |
| onboarding | 引导流程 |
| Phil Knight | Phil Knight(Nike 联合创始人,本片段中原文误作 Phil Nate,保留原文) |
| point of sale | 销售终端 |
| product marketer | 产品营销人员 |
| purpose | 宗旨(品牌战略框架中的核心概念,指”我们为什么做我们在做的事”) |
| retention | 留存 |
| role play | 角色扮演 |
| Seesaw | Seesaw(教育科技公司,保留原文) |
| style guide | 风格指南 |
| suggestive or evocative | 暗示性或唤起性的 |
| sunk cost fallacy | 沉没成本谬误 |
| T-shaped marketer | T 型营销人员 |
| three point safety harness | 三点式安全带 |
| zeitgeist | 时代精神 |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)