如何精准定位你的产品 | April Dunford (Obviously Awesome)
How to nail your product positioning | April Dunford (Obviously Awesome)
April Dunford: 40 to 60% of B2B purchase processes end in no decision. If you scratch on that data, the majority of those aren’t saying, “Well, I’m not making a decision to buy something new because the old thing we were doing is better.” That’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of those is they couldn’t figure out how to make a choice confidently. So what they did was they just went to their boss and said, “You know what? Now’s not a good time. Let’s not do it now. Let’s do it next year. Let’s just delay it.” Because that is the safe risk-free thing for that person who’s on the hook to make the decision to do.
Welcome and Catching Up
Lenny: Today. My guest is April Dunford. April is the world’s foremost authority on product positioning. She’s the author of the bestselling book, Obviously Awesome, which is my favorite book on positioning. And this is her second time on the podcast because she just published a new book called Sales Pitch, which builds on her 25-year career as VP of marketing and advisor to companies like Google and Epic Games and many others. The book guides you through a better way to pitch and sell your product. And in our conversation, April shares the framework that she has seen work most often in getting potential customers to get excited about your product and to decide to buy your product.
Like I say, at the top of this episode, you’ll become better at pitching and selling your product by the end of this episode. And if that’s useful to you, which it should be, this episode is for you. With that, I bring you April Dunford after a short word from our sponsors.
Speaker 1 (00:01:32):
Composer also has a powerful back tester to see the historical performance of your strategies, and you can then invest with a single click. Once you invest, Composer will automatically trade for you based on the logic of your strategy. With $1 billion in trading volume and over 1 million trades executed, composer already has many big time investors using the platform regularly.
April, thank you so much for being here. Welcome back to the podcast.
April Dunford: So great to be back. We were talking about this earlier, but it feels like it was so long ago when I did the last one. I was one of the first guests and I feel like, man, you’ve been running this thing forever. And that was like a year ago.
New Book: Sales Pitch
Lenny: It feels like a lifetime, but it was about a year ago.
Missing Positioning in Sales Demos
April Dunford: But what you’ve done with it is amazing, right? The growth in it, everything else, it’s super inspirational.
Lenny: Thanks April. I appreciate that.
Help Scout: Positioning-Driven Demo Structure
April Dunford: You’re welcome. It’s true though. I think everybody looks at your stuff and goes, “What the heck? How does he do it?”
Lenny: The secret is a lot of work.
The Traditional Feature-Listing Demo
April Dunford: Yes.
Lenny: That’s the get rich quick scheme there.
Positioning-Driven Demos: Frame Then Value
April Dunford: Nobody wants to hear that.
Why the Improved Demo Works
Lenny: Yeah. But it’s work that’s extremely fulfilling and we get to chat again and you are a very rare return guest, which makes me very happy. And the reason you’re back is you’ve written an incredible new book, which I have right here if you’re on YouTube called Sales Pitch.
Two Core Modules of the Demo
April Dunford: That’s so cool.
Lenny: There it is. And it’s in your background, too. It’s like a inception. The book is called Sales Pitch, How to Craft a Story to Stand Out and Win. And we’re going to be spending our time today digging into all of the lessons and frameworks in the book as much as we can in the hour that we have. And my goal for this conversation is for listeners to leave this podcast with better skills at pitching and selling their product. Which I think every product leader and founder will want to do and get better at. How does that sound?
Final Setup Steps: Alternatives and Ideal World
April Dunford: That sounds great.
Lenny: Okay, sweet. I was thinking as a way to get into the conversation, we start with maybe a story or an example of a company that you worked with where you applied the frameworks and lessons they teach in the book. And then use that as kind of a jumping off point for digging in further.
The Pitch: Differentiated Value and Close
April Dunford: Yeah, sure. So my background is, I do positioning work. And so in the work that I do with clients, generally what we’re working on is a shift in the positioning, which is a little bit of a shift in our thinking around, how do we win in the market? So in order to test that positioning, what we want to do is take the positioning and translate it into a sales pitch and then test it live with prospects.
And one of the things I noticed right at the beginning of doing this work is that everybody’s sales pitch kind of looked the same and they weren’t all that great. And for the most part what was happening in the sales pitch is there was no positioning going on in the sales pitch at all. The sales pitch was essentially a product exposition, so essentially a glorified product box room. If there was five dropdown menus, we’re going to click on all five dropdown menus and show everybody everything just feature, feature, feature, feature, feature.
And so, most of the teams weren’t used to doing any kind of pitching in the pitch really. It was just the facts Jack, were just going to show you that. Some would do this really lightweight thing. Here’s the problem, we’re the solution. Now let me walk you through all the dropdown menus, but it is basically the same thing like that.
And so what I wanted to do was build a pitch structure that would reflect the positioning. And so in order to do that, we have to get a little bit into storytelling mode. Not a lot, but at least a little. And when we’re talking about features, we shouldn’t be talking about features. We should be talking about the value that the features deliver.
So let me give you an example and I’ll do before and after what this would look like. So I work with these folks, Help Scout, and so they’re in the customer service space, so think Zendesk or whatever. They’re in that space. And what’s interesting about them is they were built from the ground up to serve digital businesses. So businesses that don’t have a physical store, they don’t have sales reps. And so their approach to customer service was different from the outset. Help Scout said, “Well, you know what? Customer service for that kind of business is really important. It’s the only time you ever get to interact with actual customers.” And so the data shows that if you give them a really great interaction in service, it improves loyalty, it improves repeat purchases, and it’s actually a growth driver. Now, most folks in other industries see customer service as a cost center.
So your telephone company for example, wants to get you off the phone as fast as possible. And they want to push you to the self-serve FAQ channels, and they don’t care about giving you a good service at all. They don’t care about any of that. And so they’re all about driving the cost down. So if we look at Help Scout in their positioning, the alternatives to Help Scout are a handful of things. Most folks start using a shared inbox and it’s really easy to use and the reps love it. It’s easy to use. The problem is, is you start growing and then you want customer service features. You want to be able to do assignments and prioritization and things like that. So then these customers end up upgrading to help desk software and now they’re in this whole different world.
So the first thing is really hard to use. So we’re not in shared inbox territory anymore. And the second thing is that there’s this attitude of we’re trying to push folks to low cost channels. We don’t really care about them. We’re going to assign you a ticket number. You’re not a person anymore. All this stuff. So that’s the situation. So Help Scout, if they did a typical pitch the way I see most SaaS companies pitch, they would just expose the features. Right? So the pitch would look like this. Digital business comes in and they say, “Hi, Help Scout, let me show you how to log in, let me show you all the features. Look, there’s a shared inbox thing there that’s really great. Oh, look, we can do assignments and prioritization and we can do this other thing and we can do this other thing and la, la la.” And I keep going until the time runs out and I don’t have any more features to talk about.
The problem with that pitch is the customer’s sitting there going, “I don’t know, man, that sounds a little bit like my shared inbox, but it also sounds like help desk software. Is it different than help desk software? I’m not so sure. And there’s overlap in the features there.” And so it doesn’t really answer the question, why pick us over the other guys?
And so a different style of pitch would be one, we would do a little bit of setup to give everybody an idea about how we fit amongst all the other solutions and what our point of view is in the market. And then when we get to exploring the features, we would do that within the context of the differentiated value. So here’s how that pitch would look like. Customer comes in and Help Scout says, “Hey, digital business, we work with a lot of companies like you, and I’m going to show you the product. But before we get there, one of the things we think is interesting is that digital businesses look at customer service differently. They look at it as a growth driver rather than a cost center. And so most of the folks we work with see delivering a really amazing experience as a key part of customer service. Would you agree with that?”
Yeah, we would. They have a little conversation and then they say, “Great. We you have choices here. So most of the folks we work with start with a shared inbox, and that’s great because it’s really easy, really easy to use all that stuff. The problem is if you’re growing and you probably are, then you’re going to outgrow that because you’re going to need prioritizations assignments, help desk stuff.
And so then your option is to go to help desk software. And so help desk software is great, does all the things. The problem is that it was not designed for businesses like you. It was designed for businesses that want to take the cost out of customer service. So it’s going to do some things that are weird. It’s going assign your customers a ticket number and it’s going to try to drive them to low cost channels. So can we agree that in a perfect world for digital business like yours, we’d want something as easy to use as a help desk, but had all the bells and whistles so we wouldn’t have to migrate to something else. And on top of that was built from the ground up to deliver amazing customer service. Do we agree we want that?”
Now, at that point, the customer is either with you or you’re not. But if they are, then we switch to the actual demo part. If we do a demo and then we say, “Great, we’ve got those three things. Let me show you how that works. So one as easy to use an inbox. Look, here’s the inbox. It’s easy to use. Looks just like an inbox. It’s amazing. Two, features, so you never have to outgrow it. Look, here’s how we do prioritizations assignments, whatever. We can do all the stuff you need as you grow, and you’re never going to have to switch platforms. And then last one, deliver an amazing experience. Look, the customer gets to choose which channel that they interact with you with. And look, they get to stay Dave and not ticket number 1479.”
That sort of thing. So that’s how the pitch looks in the after. But that’s a really different pitch. That pitch is designed to answer the question, “Why pick us over the other folks?” And so as you might imagine, it is a lot more effective at actually getting clients to get their head around, what is this thing? Why is it different? Why should I pick you? And it just works way better in a sales situation.
How to Handle Objections
Lenny: Awesome. So just to maybe summarize the framework ‘cause you went through each of these pieces, and I think it might be helpful to give people the kind of steps. And I have them here, but maybe it might be better for you to kind work through.
April Dunford: So you can think of it is… So first of all, the pitch structure has two big pieces. So the first is the setup. The setup piece is not about us, it’s about the market, our point of view on the market. The second bit is all about our differentiated value. So why pick us over the other guys? So those pieces aren’t equal. In a normal sales pitch situation, we don’t want to spend all day in the setup part. We want to get to the meat, which is our differentiated value, but we can’t skip that bit. So if I’ve got a half hour call or a 45-minute call, maybe I spend a few minutes on this upfront, this upfront stuff is really important though.
And we could break the upfront into three pieces. So it starts with our insight into the market. So you can think of this as our point of view on the market or kind of like the problem inside the problem, in some ways. So in Help Scout’s case, the insight is, ” Hey, customer service is just different for digital businesses, and this is really a growth driver, not a cost center. So we need to think about customer service in a different way.” That’s their insight. So we start with that.
The second piece is pluses and minuses of alternative solutions. What we want to do is paint a picture of the entire market and talk about what’s good and bad of the other ways of approaching the job. And then out of that conversation, we have a conclusion, which is what I call perfect world. But just kind of like can we agree that if we really wanted to solve this problem and knowing what works and doesn’t work in the alternate solutions, can we agree really good solutions should tick these boxes? This is getting the customer aligned with your worldview.
If they’re aligned, then we switch to the follow through. The follow through has a handful of steps, but the main step is this differentiated value step. So usually what we’d start with is an introduction. “Hey, we’re Help Scout. We do customer service stuff specifically for digital businesses.” And then we would move on to, “Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it. Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it. Here’s the value we deliver. Here’s how we do it.”
We generally end the sales pitch with a couple of little steps. So one is after we talk about the value, generally there’s a step for proof, which is how can we prove that we do what we say we could do. Which is often a customer case study or it might be independent third party verification on stuff. But usually there’s a proof step. There’s an optional step after that, which is handling objections that haven’t come up during the call. So sometimes we’ll have a silent objection, “Yeah, that sounds really good, but it sounds really hard to adopt.” Or, “Yeah, that sounds really good, but it’s probably pretty expensive.” Or, “Yeah, that’s okay, but it probably doesn’t meet our needs for security or whatever.”
And so we handle that at the end in this special objection step. And then we end the pitch with what I call the ask, which is whatever we want the customer to do next. So it could be just asking for the sale or it could be, “Hey, we want to do a proof of concept. Who do we need to talk to about that?” Or, “Hey, we’re going to do a project. Who needs to be involved in defining the project?” Whatever the next step is in your sales process. That’s how we end is with dask.
Structuring Discovery in the Demo
Lenny: Cool. I wanted to actually talk about objections. ‘Cause I imagine going through this, companies often don’t agree with what you’re saying, and I wonder how you handle that. So you’re going in this, do you agree? And yeah, the silent objection is really interesting. I don’t even think about that, where they’re just like, “Yeah, yeah, yeah, we agree.” But they don’t really agree. How would you suggest people handle them being like, “No, I don’t actually see the world that way.” Or the silent objection, which I guess is something you save for the end.
Customers Lack Perfect Market Understanding
April Dunford: Typically when we’re starting with insight, our insight into the market, if we’re doing this well, the insight is generally not all that controversial. So you could think of it this way. So it’s kind of the reason you built what you built. So most founders, when you talk to them, they didn’t just come up with the idea out of nowhere. They woke up in the morning and said, “You know what sucks about email, this thing sucks about email. And so I’m going to build this different kind of email that solves that problem.” Or in the case of Help Scout, it’s like, do you know what sucks about customer service? It just wasn’t built for these kinds of businesses.
And so if you’ve got a point of view on the world and you’re talking to a customer that just fundamentally doesn’t agree with that… In the case of a Help Scout, they come in and they say, “No, actually it’s a cost center for us. We’re just trying to get the cost down.” They should disqualify that deal because they can’t serve that customer better than Zendesk does. Zendesk is going to win that deal. But if you’ve done this properly, your insight should resonate for the target account that you’re trying to go after. Now, that doesn’t mean there aren’t going to be other objections, and usually there’s all kinds of other objections. But the objections are more on a level of, if I can get you hooked at the beginning in this setup, then we go to the value, which is just proving I can do what we already agreed we wanted to get done. Then the objections tend to be more like operational stuff. “Yeah, this sounds good, but I don’t know if we can forward it.” Or “This sounds good, but boy, we’re going to have to migrate off the old thing or whatever.”
So mentally they’re kind of sold already, but they’re worried about, “Well, what’s IT going to say? And can I actually get budget about this?” And in B2B, we’ve got this network of people that we’ve got to go get agreement from to move forward on this thing. And so often there’s objections around that. The beginning of the sales pitch thing… One more thing on that is that part of what we’re doing in that setup is what salespeople would call discovery. And so that setup part should not be me talking at you. It should be a conversation between me and the client saying, “Do you agree with this? Is this what you’re seeing? Did you start with a shared inbox? What are you doing right now? Did you ever consider using help desk software? Why yes, why no? Do you have any constraints on what you’re looking at? What have you tried before? What are you looking at trying right now?”
This is part of the discovery that we do in a first substantive sales call that your sales reps would know how to do this. Typically, one of the things we don’t have in the pitch decks that I see in SaaS companies is there’s no good place to do this discovery. So it kind of happens outside of the structure of the pitch. In this pitch structure, there’s a definite spot for discovery. So by the time we get to the end of the setup, we should either be aligned like, “Yep, this looks like a good prospect for us. Yep, we can do something. Yep, they got a problem we can solve. This all looks good.” Or we kind of jointly come to the conclusion, “Hey, this just… Our stuff just ain’t for you, man.” And that’s it.
Many Purchases End in No Decision
Lenny: I mentioned a lot of this comes from doing this enough times. You get to understand where people generally agree, this is a problem. We all know this is our problem. And it’s unlikely that you’re going to have to throw everything out because someone just decides, “No, this isn’t for us.”
I think one of the biggest shift maybe from this framework is that you go into a teaching mindset. It’s not just like, “Here’s our product, it’s going to solve your problem.” It’s more, “Here’s what’s happening broadly. Maybe you don’t have the time to do the research we’ve done. Here’s what we found.” And then that builds trust, I think in you as a company and as a leader, a salesperson. And then they’re like, “Okay, see, they see the world the way we do.” Or, “I’ve just realized something new. I never thought of it that way.” And then, “Okay, cool. How do they think about the solution to this?”
April Dunford: Right. One of the key things to think about in all of this stuff that I think we don’t think about enough as software vendors is that customers will come to us and they’ve done their homework. They’ve Googled around and they’ve looked at stuff, but that doesn’t mean they have perfect understanding of the market. In fact, it’s usually far from it. If we think about it, most of the folks in B2B software, most of the time, your buyer has never purchased software like yours before. This is the first time they’ve done it. And their bosses come to them and said, “Hey, figure this out. Go find us a CRM and look at all the CRMs and figure it out.”
And the buyers looking at it going, “Geez, I don’t know, man. There’s a lot of CRMs out there, and I’m looking at all the things. I’m on G2 Crowd and there’s 24 CRMs in the top right corner. And I’m looking at Gardner Group and I’m looking at this thing and I’m actually doing my research, but I’m overwhelmed. What I don’t have is a clear picture of the market. What are the different approaches to this problem? Forget about products. What are the approaches to the problem? Where do the products fit in those approaches? What’s a good solution for me look like? What should be my purchase criteria?” That’s really hard for buyers to figure out.
And in general, in a sales process, we’re not doing anything to help the buyer figure that out, even though we know it. We eat, sleep and breathe this market. We spend all day looking at competitors and thinking about this stuff and whatever. But we’ve got this idea, “Well, we shouldn’t do this because first of all, we can’t talk about the other guys that we’d be seen as bashing our competition, and that’s bad.” The other thing is, even if we did give our opinion, nobody would trust us because we’re biased. But if you look at the research on this stuff, the research doesn’t support that. The research actually says what B2B software buyers want in a sales interaction is perspectives on the market and help weighing their options. And we don’t do that. We’re just like, “Here’s our stuff. You figure it out, it’s up to you. You figure it out.”
And so as a result, what we get are these buyers come in, they’re overwhelmed with all this information. They come in and they sit in our sales process, and we overwhelm them even more with more features and more information. And what they’re really worried about is, “What if I make a bad choice here? I’ve never done this before and I’m going to have to recommend to my boss. And if I make the wrong suggestion to my boss, maybe my boss thinks I’m stupid. Or maybe I buy something and the whole department hates me because awful to use. Or maybe I pick something and it’s just bad software and then bad things happen for the business, maybe I get fired.”
And so the data on this shows that for B2B, 40 to 60% of B2B purchase processes end in no decision. And then when you look at, if you scratch on that data, the majority of those aren’t saying, “Well, I’m not making a decision to buy something new because the old thing we were doing is better.” That’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of the…
April Dunford: The old thing we were doing is better, that’s not true at all. In fact, the majority of those is they couldn’t figure out how to make a choice confidently. So what they did was they just went to their boss and said, “You know what? Now’s not a good time. Let’s not do it now. Let’s do it next year. Let’s just delay it,” because that is the safe risk-free thing for that person who’s on the hook to make the decision to do.
Helping Customers Understand the Market
Lenny: I think this is one of the most interesting insights that you share in your book and you also share this in the newsletter post about how buying software you could argue is harder than selling it because people will have learned there’s skills and training for selling, but buying is, as you described, extremely stressful. Basically your job’s on the line if you make a mistake. Is there anything more you can share along those lines just to help reinforce that buying software is extremely hard and stressful and people don’t understand that?
Why FOMO Fails with Hesitant Buyers
April Dunford: Once you get into that mindset, I think then you look at the situation a lot different. I think we’ve seen the statistics on this that says the buyer is 80% of the way through their buying journey by the time they talk to your sales rep. Yeah, maybe, but they might be 80% of the way to saying, “Nope, I’m not buying nothing.” And in fact that’s true 60% of the time. And so how do we combat that? The way we combat that is not just talking about ourselves, it’s actually about trying to be helpful to that person in this very stressful situation that is trying to figure out how do I make a really good decision.
So what we should be doing is giving them a way to think about the whole market and say, in the case of Help Scout, “Look, there’s shared inbox and then there’s help desk software and then there’s us. And I don’t care who the vendor is, I’m going to put them in one of those buckets.” And so you can just think of it that way. So you don’t need to know every single feature, every single thing. I’m giving you a bigger picture of the whole market and helping you feel good. Well, if you choose this or you choose that, now you know why.
Lenny: I think what’s interesting about this is a lot of startups fail because they can’t convince anyone to switch from the status quo. And I think people always think of that as the current product is good enough and that’s why they’re losing, but I think this adds an additional wrinkle of it’s also the person buying it is just like, “I don’t want to add the stress to even decide and make the choice and put my butt on the line to switch.” And I never thought of it that way.
Teaching Customers How to Buy
April Dunford: I think that hurdle is a lot more than you think. So we obviously have to compete with status quo, we can’t ignore status quo, because sometimes status quo just is good enough and so we can’t ignore that. We still lose deals to status quo, but we lose an awful lot of deals to just plain customer indecision, customers being more afraid of screwing up than missing out.
Lenny: So to try to overcome that, to drill into the things you find most powerful, one is help the customer understand the bigger picture and why essentially they’re falling behind, why maybe competition is going to have an advantage because they’re thinking in a different way.
The Natural Advantage of Market Leaders
April Dunford: Well, I’ll throw something out about that.
B2B Champions and Stakeholders
Lenny: Please.
Arming Your Internal Champion
April Dunford: And I’ve heard people talk about this a lot that one of the things we could do in this situation when a customer is feeling this indecision is to lean into this FOMO and say, “Look, you’re missing out. The competitors are all doing it and you’re not doing it.” And so this is an interesting question. And so I was super excited, Matt Dixon wrote this book called The JOLT Effect, and in that they studied two and a half million sales calls, they recorded on Gong and they studied it with AI, and then they looked at what happened after the sales call, so were these successful or not successful, did a deal happen or whatever. It’s pretty rare that we get a chance to dig into some data like this.
And so what his data showed is if a customer is indecisive, throwing FOMO into the mix makes it worse. So they’re less likely to close the deal if you throw that in. And the idea is that they’re already stressed out and you’re just putting more stress on them by pressuring them, by saying, “Oh, this is happening, bad things are going to…” You’re like, “Bad things will happen if I do something, bad things happen if I don’t do something, what do I do?”
How Product Teams Benefit
Lenny: They just put their head in the sand, right? They’re just like, “Ah, forget it.”?
What Differentiated Value Actually Means
April Dunford: So they’re just like, “Forget it, I’m doing nothing. Now I’m totally paralyzed.” And so there’s an assumption that companies are very motivated by this FOMO thing, but I think that that is not always true, and if the customer is actually indecisive, throwing in this FOMO thing isn’t going to do it. So what does work in that situation is, one, giving them the tools to make the decision. So that includes paint the picture of the market, teaching them how to buy essentially. So teaching them, look, for customers like you, you just have to worry about these three, four things, and all this other stuff, it doesn’t apply to you. That applies to bigger companies, that applies to whatever, so this idea of teaching a customer how to buy is one way to take that stress down.
And then there’s a whole bunch of other techniques you can use. So one is if it’s a really big deal, we can split it into smaller pieces, we can do things like offer you a money back guarantee, we can do things like sometimes we have services and support that are going to help you if things go bad and this is how we’re going to make sure. So this idea of being able to take risk off the table is a really serious one if we’ve got a customer that is actually paralyzed because of this indecision thing.
Lenny: That makes a lot of sense, basically it’s like how do we help the buyer cover their ass if they made a mistake, because what you’re saying is that’s the main reason they’re not buying your product.
LevelJump’s Differentiated Value Example
April Dunford: And this FOMO thing is just not going to do it.
From Differentiated Value to Insight
Lenny: That’s so interesting. So I really like this framework. I wrote this down, teaching them how to buy, that is a really simple way of just thinking about this whole process.
April Dunford: Well, it’s funny, I was having this conversation with Bob Moesta, he did Jobs To Be Done.
Signs Your Differentiated Value Fails
Lenny: Yeah, I watched that episode.
April Dunford: So he’s just the best. And so one of the things I think of is normally when we come at this we’re like, “Well, how can we convince the customer that we do the job that they need to have done?” And obviously we need to do that, but there is this secondary job that the champion of the deal is, and that’s how do I make a decision without getting fired? And so we got to help them accomplish that job, otherwise we don’t get what we want, which is the money.
How Honest to Be About Competitors
Lenny: It’s so interesting. And it’s not even necessarily get fired, it’s even the performance sufferers or they don’t get the promotion, it’s did they do a good job. This makes me think of a process at Airbnb we went through to buy community forum software and I just remember these massive teams of salespeople come to the office and pitching everyone on the software and they just keep pushing you to make what’s the next step here, who do we need to roll in, who needs to buy into it? And it’s just like, “Oh my God, it’s so stressful. I have to keep this thing moving.” And then there’s IT coming in like, “Oh, we got to make sure it integrates with Salesforce.” And you start with I just wanted the best community forum software because we were trying to build something really different and unique and you end up with like, “Okay, it’s fine, just go with the thing that works with Salesforce. It’s all good. I’m just going to move on to another process.”
April Dunford: Well, this is the thing, it’s so easy to default to the market leader in that situation. The market leader has this big advantage that you can say, “You know what? Who’s going to get me in trouble for picking Salesforce? Nobody.” It’s so easy to just flip back on that. And so if you’re the challenger in this situation, the brand that’s number two or number three, you’ve got to get over all of this inertia and tilting towards the status quo, because it’s just so easy, it’s the lowest risk decision, besides do nothing is to just pick the leader in the market and we’ll just run with that.
Category Creation and Bowling Pin Strategy
Lenny: I think the classic phrase was no one gets fired for buying Microsoft. I wonder is it Salesforce now that’s the default version of that now?
April Dunford: Yeah, the original one was IBM. [inaudible 00:30:57]
Solution Features in a Perfect World
Lenny: I think you’re right. Oh, man.
The Follow-Up: Differentiated Value
April Dunford: Now you totally get fired for buying IBM. I don’t know what happens. The other thing you bring up is I think an interesting thing to think about too that really messes people up in these situations is that in B2B, typical purchase process, we have five to seven people involved in making the deal happen and so there’s this complexity we don’t have a consumer, but a lot of people I think overcomplicate that. In a typical B2B purchase process, we’ve got someone in that buying team is what we would call the champion. So that person is the person who’s been tasked with, hey, pick us the accounting software or pick us the CRM, you figure it out. And so that person is the person that does the initial research, makes the short list, probably sits on the first calls, and then there’s all these other people.
Now, the other people can’t make a deal happen, but they can kill it a thousand ways. So the way this works is your positioning and your pitch needs to really work for the champion, because if it doesn’t, you don’t even get to talk to anybody else, you don’t even get to go near anybody else if you don’t make it out of the shortlist and you don’t get the deal cooking. But once the deal is cooking it is on you to arm that champion to handle all the objections potentially of all the other groups. So if you’re the line of business buyer, let’s say you’re in the sales department and you’re buying a CRM, IT is going to have to get involved at some point, and IT doesn’t really care about the value of your CRM, but they do care does it meet the security requirements and does it integrate with the stuff we already have and how much of a pain is this thing going to be to manage, and so we’re not actually pitching value to those people, we’re just handling objections.
And so once we realize that, then we can get really tight on our positioning in our sales pitch. What we’re really trying to do is just cook the champion, get the champion, and then once the deal’s going we got to arm the champion for how to handle all these objections of all these other groups so that you can get a consensus to get a deal moving forward.
Proof and Handling Objections
Lenny: How do you actually do that? Is it ask them what are all the concerns you’re hearing? Is it ask the individual stakeholders what your biggest concern is?
April Dunford: Well, if we’re really smart, we already know because we’ve done lots of deals. So if we’re being a good partner in this, sometimes even in the very first meeting in that spot where we’re talking about objectives, we’re going to say, “Hey, look, IT is going to come in and they’re going to be worried about this, this, and this, and don’t worry, we got you.”
So we’re SOC 2 compliant, we do this, we do that, we know because we’ve done 15 deals and we know what these deals are like and we know what the stuff is going to be. You might have the champion come in and say, “Well, I don’t know, end users might not like it.” And it’s like, “Okay, well, here’s how we’re going to get your end users on board, this is the training we have, this is the stuff we’re going to do.” The neat thing, if you have a product like [inaudible 00:33:54] on the front end of that, it takes that objection off the table. And you might have other things like you’re going to take this to your boss and they’re going to want to know ROI numbers, blah, blah, blah, and we’ve already done that, look, here’s our calculator, if you give us this information, we can put this in, here’s how you sell your boss.
So that’s what we’re doing. We’re trying to arm them because we’ve done a million deals, they’ve never bought software like this before. So half the time you’ll be doing deals and they don’t even know what the purchase process is. And so if we’re being good partners, we’re like, “Okay, does this need to go to purchasing?” And they’ll say, “Yeah, it probably does.” Oh, well, here’s what typically happens at purchasing. They’re going to do this, this, this, and we’re going to give you this stuff and that’s going to help you get it through purchasing.
How to Know If Demos Work
Lenny: The way you’re describing it now makes it feel like you need to be a big company for this to be useful because smaller companies don’t have all these reps and they may not have the resources to do all these things you’re describing. Who is this framework useful for? Can you use this approach if you’re just, say, an early stage B2B?
April Dunford: Well, so it’s B2B products. If you don’t have a sales team, I still think you can use this structure to build a story that marketing can use and you can use in different ways, and we can talk about that. But in the companies that I work with, they’re B2B, they’ve got a sales team, and so the immediate thing we’re doing is we’re making a shift in positioning, we’re building a sales pitch that reflects that positioning, we can immediately implement that in sales even though it’s going to take a while for us to forklift the messaging and do other stuff and change our campaigns and everything else to match this new positioning, but we can tighten up the sales pitch and have an immediate impact over in sales on that. Second thing is that I’ve worked with tons of companies where the founder is the only sales rep and this works pretty good for that.
I don’t think we need a ton of resources to do it, but I do think we need to have enough traction in the market that we understand how a deal typically goes. So if we haven’t sold anything yet then we don’t know yet, it’s hard for us to help you buy something if we don’t even know how to sell it. But if I’ve done 10 deals, I know what happens, I got a pretty good guess of what IT is going to say when you try to implement this stuff, I have a good guess of what’s going to happen when we go to roll it out, I have a pretty good guess of what your boss might object to or might get excited by. And so I don’t necessarily need a research team to go figure this out. This is just me trying to be helpful and help the champion do their job of getting this deal to the finish line.
Seeing Immediate Results
Lenny: So maybe the MVP of this approach is a deck that you continue iterating and adjust and restructure, and also bullet points of things you want to bring up like, “Okay, cool, IT is going to ask for these things,” a few bullet points that you keep track of.
April Dunford: Exactly.
The Role of Marketing
Lenny: I’m also thinking from the perspective of a product team building a product, they don’t really sell it themselves. They work with sales, they work with marketing. Is there anything that you would recommend or that you think product teams could learn from this approach of selling that would help them build products in a different way or work with sales in a different way?
April Dunford: Yeah. So here’s what I think, the core of a good sales pitch is really deeply understanding your differentiated value, which is what is the value I can deliver that no other solution can. Often what I see at companies is you got a smart product team and they know a lot about the stuff they’re building and why it’s important and what the value is to the customer, and they did all this work on that when they were building it, but that information never made the jump to sales, because sales isn’t even trying to pitch value. They’re just pitching features like here’s the dropdown menus, here’s what they do. And so the first step in fixing this I think is to have a cross-functional team work on positioning.
So if I’ve got product, marketing, and sales together in the room working on defining what our differentiated value is, then I’m going to get all the good juice out of the product team that deeply understands the product, deeply understand what’s differentiated about it, deeply understands value, and then I’m also going to have all the juice from the sales team that understands what the common objections are, what the champion really wants to get done and doesn’t want to get done, what the situation is in a typical account, and then all of this cool information sharing happens, which actually you end up with way better definition of your differentiated value in the first place.
And so once we’ve done that work, it is very natural then for us to work together on the sales pitch that reflects that. What typically happens is not that at all. What typically happens is product’s working on some stuff, sales is working on some stuff, marketing’s working on some stuff. Marketing in their own little bubble comes up with positioning, they might build some stuff for the sales team, heave it over to the sales team. Sales team looks at it and says, “I don’t get what any of this stuff is. I disagree with this. This doesn’t match what I see,” and they just throw it out and they go back to doing the same pitch they’ve been doing since the year of the flood.
Comparing with Andy Raskin’s Framework
Lenny: That’s a long time. So first podcast episode was all around positioning, and so folks want to get deep into that, they should listen to that, so we’re not going to spend tons of time there, but differentiated value is a big part of this process also so I think it’s worth spending a bit of time here. Could you maybe share a couple examples of what this is to give people a sense of what does it mean to share differentiated value?
Advice on Choosing a Framework
April Dunford: Yeah. So differentiated value is the answer to the question why pick us over the other alternatives? And so the way we get at that in positioning is we start with putting a stake in the ground of who do we actually compete with? And so if we didn’t exist in the market, what would a customer do? And so typically there’s some status quo thing, it might not even look like you, it might just be a spreadsheet, or do it with the intern or manual labor, and then there’s whatever else ends up on a short list against us. And it’s basically the definition of I got to beat all this plus indecision in order to win a deal, so I can stick my stake in the ground. Sales knows the answer to this question. If you have a sales team, they know the answer to this question, what would a customer do if we didn’t exist, they know.
And then we get to the next step is, well, so what do we have that’s different? And that’s capability wise, feature function of the product or capability of the company, so it could be features, it could be your pricing model, it could be we have support in a way that the other folks don’t. So there’s all kinds of things it could be. It could be be the breadth of the portfolio that you have beyond that one product, we can fill whiteboards with this stuff. And then what we do is we go down that list of features and we say, “So what? You got advanced AI, whatever the heck the thing is, so what? Why does anybody care?” And the answer to that so what is your value. And because it came from this differentiated feature, it’s generally value that the other guys can’t deliver because they don’t have the capabilities that underpin it.
So if I give you an example, a company I worked with a few years back, they’ve recently been acquired by Salesforce called LevelJump, and so they’re in the sales enablement space, which is terrible. There’s a million companies in the sales enablement space and they all look the same. And so LevelJump, so if you look at, well, what’s the competitive alternatives, if I look at all the companies in the sales enablement space, you can put them into two buckets in terms of approaches, they’re either a CMS like a jazzy content repository where you could make sure that people are using the right content and whatever, or they’re an LMS, a learning management system, which I can build the course and certify you on the course, and that’s how we’re going to train the sales reps.
If you look at LevelJump, they’re differentiated capability is they’re the only one that’s built on top of Salesforce. That’s the feature, we’re built on Salesforce, the other folks aren’t. And then who cares? So what? And so when we first had a conversation about it, there was five or six different answers to that so what question, but the big answer was, well, because we’re built on top of Salesforce, my sales enablement data is integrated with my sales data. And then you say, “Well, so what about that?” Well, because then that means I can actually tell did the sales enablement improve time to first deal or improve time to make quota? Well, so what about that? Well, if I improve that ramp time, then we get way more revenue faster. So that’s the differentiated value.
When I go to do that in a sales pitch, I can translate that into my insight. My insight is every day your rep’s not making [inaudible 00:42:36] it costs you money. So if we really want to solve sales enablement, don’t we really want to have something where we can measure whether or not the sales enablement is working with sales metrics? Yeah, we do.
Favorite Interview Question
Lenny: Interesting. So the differentiated value often informs the insight that you start with?
April Dunford: It does. It absolutely is. The insight is basically the context that makes your differentiated value important, what is the thing you need to know to understand the importance of my differentiated value? In the case of Help Scout, the insight is, look, digital businesses like customer service is a growth driver, where does that come from? If you look at their differentiated value, it’s there. And so we can just reverse it, flip it around. Even if the product wasn’t necessarily constructed with that insight, maybe we got there sideways or the roundabout way or whatever, we iterated our way into that. We can look at the differentiated value and then basically reverse it out to the insight.
Favorite New Product
Lenny: What’s a sign that the differentiated value or insight that you’ve come up with just isn’t clicking?
Upbringing in an Entrepreneurial Family
April Dunford: If the differentiated value doesn’t work in a sales pitch, what you’ll get is the company going, “Why would I pay for that? This is not value for me, buddy.” The companies I work with, the way I look at it is if you’re in market and you’re selling and you have happy, engaged customers, there’s differentiated value there. That’s why they picked you. That’s why they love you. That’s why they don’t turn out on you. It’s there. You might not know what it is, we might have to do a little process to get at it, but it’s there and it exists.
My Favorite City
Lenny: Awesome. Another question that’s been in the back of my mind since we started talking about differentiated values is just how honest should you be about the competition? Obviously there’s a spectrum of extremely honest to super biased, what’s your guidance on just how honest to be there?
April Dunford: The posture I think you should assume in a sales situation, I had an old boss used to talk about this, is the posture we should have is calm confidence. So where that calm confidence comes from is we really understand why people should pick us. So this is differentiated value, we really understand it and we really understand who that’s a really good fit for, and we don’t even bother trying to chase anybody else.
So we should be able to come in and say, “Look, we’re sales enablement that delivers results. If you don’t care about those results, you shouldn’t pick us. You should pick someone else.” And so generally what we’re trying to be is extremely honest. We’re trying to come in and actually give credit where credit is due with the other approaches, because typically the other approaches work just fine for other kinds of companies. If you’re really small and you’re not growing e-commerce business, use a shared inbox. It’s free, it’s easy to use, there’s no problems there, just use it. If you’re really worried about bringing the cost down in a customer service center, maybe you should use Zendesk. And so I think the more we can act as a guide in this situation and come in and say, “Look, these guys are good for this, these folks are good for this, and we’re good for this. And you might not care about that, and if you don’t care about that, we’re not the one for you. You shouldn’t pick us.” But I think that…
We’re not the one for you. You shouldn’t pick us. But I think that this calm confidence idea is that where we know the client should pick us, we should be unafraid to fight for that business. But we should totally walk away from business where we’re not the best fit. We shouldn’t be chasing that business at all.
Lenny: And this comes back to teaching them how to buy again and again. For these cases where you’re like, “This is not a fit.” Ideally you know that before you fly to their office and pitch them.
April Dunford: Yeah, generally you’ve had some kind of qualification happen upstream, and so that qualification could be done in lots of different ways. If you’ve got some kind of product like growth motion in the beginning, you’re looking for signals in that. And if the signals aren’t there, then you’re not talking to them. And so if you’ve designed your signals right, then you already know there’s intent there. You already know you’re a fit. You already know stuff. The way a lot of companies do this is they’ll have inside sales do a qualification call before they set up a first call with a sales rep. In that qualification call, you’re trying to make sure is this the right person? Do they have a need that we can actually meet? Is this actually a good fit for what we do? And if they’re not, they don’t even make it to the call.
Lenny: Mm-hmm. Imagine a place where you can find all your potential customers and get your message in front of them in a cost efficient way. If you’re a B1B business, that place exists, and it’s called LinkedIn. LinkedIn Ads allows you to build the right relationships, drive results, and reach your customers in a respectful environment. Two of my portfolio companies, Webflow and Census, are LinkedIn success stories. Census had a 10x increase in pipeline with the LinkedIn startup team. For Webflow after ramping up on LinkedIn in Q3, they had the highest marketing source revenue quarter to date. With LinkedIn Ads you’ll have direct access to and can build relationships with decision makers including 950 million members, 180 million senior execs and over 10 million C-level executives. You’ll be able to drive results with targeting and measurement tools built specifically for B2B. In tech LinkedIn generated two to five x higher return on ad spend than any other social media platforms.
Audiences on LinkedIn have two times the buying power of the average web audience, and you’ll work with a partner who respects the B2B world you operate in. Make B2B marketing everything it can be and get $100 credit on your next campaign. Just go to linkedin.com/podlenny to claim your credit. That’s linkedin.com/podlenny. Terms and conditions apply.
Another question around this idea of differentiated value and just alternative approaches is there’s a certain previous guest who was very big on creating a category being extremely important, and that potentially being the only way to build a legendary business. I know you have a different perspective on that because in theory if you go that direction, there’s no alternative. It’s like “We’re the one.” What’s your take on that?
April Dunford: Well, so here’s a few things. So one, obviously creating a category is not the only way to create a legendary business because the vast majority of legendary businesses did not create the categories that they’re in. So Google did not create search, Facebook did not create social network. There’s so many of them. It’s actually more of an exception to the rule that the company is creating a category than the other way around. So I think it’s a bit disingenuous to say the only way. It is a way to build a big business, no question about that. But it’s absolutely not the only way. In fact, it is not the most common way, but it is a way and it does work. So that’s one thing. The second thing is that category creation is interesting. Like most companies, if you look at their arc, even the category creators that are successful, they did not start out as category creators.
So they started out as a niche play in an existing category, and that’s because that’s generally the easiest way to get traction for a company early because what is the job of the market category? The job of a market category is to help answer the question, what is this thing all about? If I’m positioning an existing category, I can say, “Well, I’m CRM for very small businesses.” That was Salesforce’s initial positioning. I didn’t have to explain to you what a CRM was, that already existed. There was already billion dollar company in that space. We know what a CRM is, and I could say “We’re CRM for very small businesses. The reason you can use in this very small businesses is we don’t have any software. So you don’t have to have an IT department to babysit it. It’s fantastic.”
So most companies start there. Now what happens is that if you become the dominant player in that space, which again, category creation folks talk about this like no category creator has ever lost the market. In fact, most category creators wins their market. Like what happened to MySpace? What happened to Ask Jeeves? It didn’t work out so good for them. Most category creators actually get overtaken by fast followers. So if we look at the CRM market, Siebel was the big dominant player there and now they’re not. So now we’ve got Salesforce. Once you’re the dominant player in that market, a cool move to do is to actually extend the boundaries of the category so that you can continue to grow. And most of the category creation examples we see are companies that when they were 200, 300, 400 million revenue dominating their space, then decided to move the goalposts and say, “Well actually now we’re expanding into all these other areas and we’re going to call this category something. And that’s what it is.”
And there’s loads of examples of that. Like Qualtrics for example, is a company that a lot of people talk about very successful category creation. Well, they were survey software up until there were 300 million revenue just like everybody else in an existing category. So that got them there and that worked just fine. Oh, well, once we’re dominating it, now we can say it’s whatever, it is, customer experience software, whatever it is. Snowflake. Another good example like data warehousing in the cloud, they were that data warehousing, an existing market, were data warehousing for the cloud. That is not category creation. And that took them all the way up to the point where they were about to go public and now they’re cloud data, which is their attempt to expand and say, “Well, it’s not just data warehousing, it’s actually data lakes and all other data stuff.”
And so that’s a smart move for them because they’re now very well known in that space. I’m not saying category creation is a bad thing. There are examples of company that came right out of the gate and successfully created a category and then survived to own the category longer term. But a more common thing that happens is that the company does the hard work of creating the category and in exactly the moment where the category starts to take hold, fast follower can come in with fresh funding and a lot of it and learn from all your mistakes and come in and knock you off the peak right when you think you’ve made it.
So I think category creation is, again, it’s good, it works, but I think we have to be very careful when we’re thinking about doing that at an early stage business or a business that isn’t already dominating the category that they’re in. It’s much more common to see companies come in, shave off a piece of the market, dominate that, and then successfully branch out. It’s what Jeffrey Moore called bowling pin strategy. Almost all successful companies follow bowling pin strategy.
Lenny: Wait, what is that? Let’s touch on that real quick.
April Dunford: Oh yeah, you remember that thing. It’s funny how many times I’ve talked about bowling pin strategy in the last two months. So this comes from a bunch of work that was done around the way innovation gets adopted, blah, blah. So there’s a bunch of research done on this stuff, and I’m going to misquote it because Jeffrey Moore stuff, I’ve been reading it for decades. But bowling pin strategy goes like this. The easiest way to take over a great big market is to define a segment of the market that is underserved by the market leader.
And so if you think about a bunch of bowling pins, we’re going to circle around the lead pin, which is this little piece of the market that’s easy for us to go get, and the market leader probably doesn’t care about it. And so we knock over that pin and knocking over that pin enables us to get to the three pins right beside it. And so now I’m established here as a beachhead and I can go get the next three pins, I’m going to knock those over, and eventually I get big enough to challenge the market leader and then I overtake them.
So the example for my early career was I worked at this company, we thought we were enterprise software. We narrowed it down to CRM for investment banks, and so we literally drew bowling pins for our investors and said, “Lead pin is CRM for investment banks. Once we knock that over, then we’re going to go to retail banking, then we’re going to be CRM for banking. And then once we knock that over, we’re going to go to insurance, then we’re going to be CRM for financial services. Once we knock that over, then we’re going to be a great big company and we’re going to challenge Siebel to be CRM for enterprise software.” Instead we got acquired by Siebel for like $1 billion, but whatever. So most companies, if you look at the history of them, they actually start that way. And so yeah, if we just fast forwarded to when they were 300 million, we can say “Category creation’s the only thing to do,” but it’s like, well, what happened before then? That was something different.
Lenny: Awesome. Let’s come back to your framework. I’m looking at the list of bullet points. So we’ve covered a lot of this already actually. So there’s the insight where you helped them understand what’s happening in the world and what’s changing and why this is important. Then you talk about what the alternative approaches might be, pros and cons. Then there’s this third step, which we haven’t talked about yet, which is sharing the perfect world characteristics of a perfect solution. Can you talk a bit about that and why that’s important?
April Dunford: So this is the conclusion of the setup phase. So if I’m Help Scout for example, the conclusion is we say, “Look, you really want customer success software that’s as easy to use as an inbox. You’re never going to outgrow it, but it was built from the ground up to be deliver an amazing service.” And so it’s this part of the pitch where we actually get agreement with the customer that we are aligned in terms of our point of view on the universe. So it’s where I say, “Okay, we’ve had our little discussion about the pros and cons of the other alternatives,” and we say, “So look, so are you with me, man? Can we all agree that a really good solution for you would have A, B and C?” And the customer is either like, “Yeah, right,” or they’re not. And so if they’re right with you on this definition of the perfect world, then I’ve got you. I’ve already won the deal and I haven’t even talked about us yet because the way I’ve set it up, I’m the only one that can deliver that.
So if you say, “Right,” all I got to do is prove that I can do that and get you over the hurdle that it’s possible for you to adopt it.
Lenny: Sounds too easy.
April Dunford: Yeah, I mean…
Lenny: It’s like you lure them in.
April Dunford: If all of this was easy, Lenny we would be on a beach drinking out of a coconut.
Lenny: Oh man, let’s make it happen. Okay, so that’s the setup. What do you call the second part again?
April Dunford: It’s the follow through-
Lenny: The follow through.
April Dunford: … which is really focused on differentiated value. So in the second part, the first step is usually we introduce our stuff, which is where the market category is important. So we come in and we say, “Okay, can we agree that a really good solution should tick these boxes? Yes. Okay, good. Now let’s talk about us. Okay, so we believe that. That’s why we build what we build.”
So here I am, I’m Help Scout, we’re customer service software for digital businesses or whatever our market category is. So we introduce it just to get people straight in their mind about what it is, and then we move to here’s the value, here’s how we do it. If we think about a typical sales call, like let’s say a sales call is half an hour, 45 minutes, I would expect to spend more than half of the time in the sales call in this differentiated value phase. So if we’re doing a demo, that’s the demo, and we’re saying, “Okay, step one, let me show you how we do this. So easy to use as an inbox. Here’s the features. Never have to outgrow it, here’s the features. Delivers amazing customer experience, here’s the features.” And so that’s where we’re getting to the meat of what you thought you were getting when you clicked on the button that said, “Give me a demo.”
So that’s what we’re doing there. And then we end with these three little pieces. One is generally I got to show you some proof that I can do what I say I can do. So if I’m claiming this thing delivers an amazing customer experience, how do I prove that? Well, I can prove it by other customers saying it was amazing. That’s one way to prove it. If I had some independent third party data that proved whatever I was claiming, I could show that there too. But a lot of times what we’re doing is we’re like, “Let me show you how this worked in a company that used our stuff. So this is what the before looked like. They did this thing, here’s the after.” And so customer case study is usually good way to do that, but there’s usually a step called proof, which is, I showed you the value, now here’s the proof that I can actually deliver on that value and it’s not just me blowing smoke.
And then the step after that then is this optional objection step where they say, “Oh yeah, sounds good, but IT is never going to go for it,” or “Sounds good, but maybe it’s going to be too expensive,” or something. And so you’re going to handle that objection as best as you can. And then you finish with the ask, which is whatever the next step in your sales process is. So it’s, “Hey, so what we have to do to get a deal cooking here, do we have to get IT involved? Does IT need to see it? Would you like us to come in and present with you with IT or do you want me to just help you work on some stuff for IT?” It’s whatever your next step in the sales process is.
Lenny: Awesome. So let me read through this just to have it also succinctly here in case people are taking notes or trying to remember the stuff. So there’s the setup, there’s the follow through. Within the setup, you have the insight, the alternative approaches, pros and cons, in the perfect world. And then you introduce your product, talk about the differentiated value, share the proof of why it works, potentially handle objections, silent objections, and then the ask of what comes next.
April Dunford: That’s right. That’s it.
Lenny: In terms of knowing if this is working and if your differentiated value works or if your insight works, do you have kind of a heuristic of a success rate that feels right? How often should this work for you to feel like “I think we have it?”
April Dunford: Well, so generally if the sales pitch isn’t working, it’s because the positioning was weak.
And so companies that jumped straight to building the new sales pitch without going back and really making sure that they really nailed the differentiated value, who knows? Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. And a lot of times it doesn’t, I think. And so in the work I do with my clients, we go all the way back to the beginning. So we go right back to let’s work on the positioning first. Now, if I’ve got the smartest people from the company in the room and we’ve done enough deals that we are pretty knowledgeable about how customers buy and what they like and what they don’t know. If I’ve got the senior executive team in the room and they’ve got a reasonable amount of customer experience, we can pretty much feel good that the positioning we come up with if we’re following a process will be good.
Then it’s just a matter of taking that positioning, mapping it to the sales pitch and then going to test it. So I think there’s a bunch of things in testing that are really important. So one is we absolutely need sales involved in building the pitch. If we don’t have sales involved in building the pitch, the pitch is never going to stick. The rule with sales reps is even if they don’t like their current pitch, they’re comfortable with the current pitch and they know it and they’ve memorized it and they have a little joke they tell on slide three. So they’re not going to give up the current pitch without a fight. So you got to get sales management involved in building a new pitch, and then I would never just build the new pitch and then heave it over the wall and say, “Good luck, Chuck.” Because what’ll happen is they’ll come up with all kinds of excuses why they can’t use this pitch.
Instead, what you do is you take your best sales rep, your best one, and you bring your best sales rep over and you train them on the new pitch. They got to learn it, they got to pitch it to you, pitch it to the head of sales. We do a bunch of repetition on that, and then we have that rep test the pitch with qualified prospects. So we don’t go to existing customers. They’ve already been polluted with the old positioning and the old pitch, and this needs to work with a qualified prospect, so let’s do it in the way it was intended. We’re going to take qualified prospects and work that new pitch with them. Usually what we’ll do is a test period where after every pitch we’ll huddle and say, “What worked? What didn’t work? Maybe that word is tripping people up. Maybe we need to move this slide from here to here,” and so we’ll tune it.
And then after we’ve done a bunch of pitches, one of two things happens. And so in this test structure, I am very much relying on the expertise of my best rep to know what’s good. So after the best rep is comfortable with the pitch, done a bunch of pitches, re-twizzled it, at some point the rep will say, “Okay, I think we’re done optimizing this pitch, and I’m not going back to the old pitch. I’m sticking with this pitch because I think this one works better.” An experienced sales rep will know that, whether the pitch is better than the old pitch, if you give them the opportunity to feel comfortable with it, work with it a bit and pitch a bunch of new prospects with it.
So if your best sales rep says, “Oh, this is way better than the old pitch. I can just feel it from the way people react to it and the number of times we’ve been able to convert people over into actual opportunities from a first call.” Then what you do is at that point I call that pass. So then we take that rep, we can film them doing the pitch for training, and then we can take that rep, go back to the rest of the sales team and have that rep sell everybody else on it. So that rep goes back and says, “Listen up people, you’re stupid if you’re using that old pitch, which sucks. This new pitch is way better. Trust me, I’m the best rep on this whole team. By the way here’s the list of deals I have cooking in the pipeline that I got using this deck. You should go do it and I’m going to teach you how to do it.”
Now I got sales, teaching sales, teach and sales instead of marketing, sort of throwing something over the wall and crossing their fingers and saying, “Hey, I hope this works.” What we should see is an immediate uplift in what happens after first call. So most of the time what that is we get a higher percentage of deals converting into opportunities after that first substantive calls. Sometimes depending on the quality of the pipeline we had coming in, we’re actually disqualifying more. But sometimes that’s a good thing.
But what we should see is an immediate uptick. It’s stuff coming into the pipeline. It’s a neat trick to pull, especially right now when everybody’s budgets are really tight and you’re just trying to squeeze more juice out of the lemon. It’s a really easy way to get some more juice out of the pipeline. Just go in, tighten up your positioning, tighten up that sales pitch. And we can have instant impact with that because we can roll that out in a couple of weeks and start getting better deals flowing through the pipeline because these customers are understanding your value better, understanding why to pick you better. It’s just easy, low hanging fruit to do when the economy’s bad.
Lenny: To give people a sense of maybe how easy that might be, how long would you suggest people spend on maybe tweaking their positioning and then also on this pilot, how much total time could it take to potentially significantly increase sales?
April Dunford: So in the customers that I work with, when we do the positioning stuff, the positioning stuff takes a week. We’re beginning and we’re done in a week. We’re all about speed on this thing. We’re trying to get the thing happening fast. So we’re in and out on the positioning in a week. It might take you, it depends on the company, the bigger the company, the slower this is, but some big companies are actually quite fast, and if you’re motivated, it shouldn’t take long for us to take that pitch and make it real.
Then we got to find a rep, train the rep, and then how long it takes us to test it really depends on how much deal flow you’ve got. So if you’re working on monster deals and you don’t actually get that many qualified prospects to pitch, that might take a few weeks. But if you’ve got a lot of prospects coming through the door, and you can get through this fairly quickly. So I’ve had companies do it start to finish. We got new pitch out the door and people using it in two weeks. That’s about as fast as you can get it done. Most folks, I would say take about a month.
Lenny: Cool. That is a very short-
April Dunford: Sometimes you’re like IBM and who knows when you get to it, right? But most folks could get through it if everybody’s motivated, we can get it out and have it running a month.
Lenny: You mentioned marketing and earlier you said that marketing is involved in this process in some way. What’s your advice to just how to involve marketing, where they fit in?
April Dunford: Yeah, so usually marketing is going to end up being the stewards of the positioning once the positioning is done. So they’re going to end up being positioning police after this because a lot of the positioning stuff is going to take the form of marketing things. So they’re invested in this. So when I was the VP marketing, I was the person that would instigate the positioning thing, let’s get everybody together and work on the positioning. And then I would usually be the person that is driving, getting the sales pitch figured out, but it’s me and sales and product working together. And then once the sales pitch is done, depending on the size of the organization and whether or not you have sales enablement or somebody inside sales that can babysit the pitch. Usually me and the head of sales would work on, “Okay, this is the pitch and this is locked down and we’re not actually going to change this pitch until something happens that requires us to change the positioning. And then that’s when we’ll re-look at the pitch.”
So we would look at recertifying the reps every quarter on the pitch and all that kind of stuff. And that would be generally, me in partnership with the head of sales. But it depends on how you do it. I don’t think it really matters who owns it. If you have a good product marketing organization, good product marketing organization generally is very concerned with the positioning and the pitch, and those two things sit in their purview, but depends on how you define it. I can’t wait till you get Airbnb. Tell us how this stuff works. They’re different because they’re a consumer, but companies are arranged in all different ways. So if you have product marketing, it looks one way. If you don’t, it looks another way. Somebody’s got to kind of be the owner of this thing though. And so we have to decide who that’s going to be.
Lenny: Just a couple more questions. One is to motivate people to do this. What kind of impact have you seen at companies that invest this time and rethink the way they pitch?
April Dunford: Well, so people don’t like me to talk about revenue stuff. Hugely what we’ve seen though is again, the immediate impact is felted sales, and everybody’s very jazzed about that.
April Dunford: Impact is felt in sales, and everybody’s very jazzed about that. Because sometimes what the worry is, is we’ve got this old positioning and they came in through the pipeline that way. So they were exposed to our marketing somewhere with this old positioning, and then we hit them with the new positioning with this sales pitch. And aren’t they going to be all like, “Oh, you moved my cheese.” And usually it ends up not being a problem at all. So usually what we see immediately is an uptick in what’s happening in sales. And so I’ve had a couple of companies tell me they’ve doubled the number of deals that they’re bringing from first sales call to opportunity just by tightening up the pitch and getting that going. I think that’s not unusual. I worked at a company where we did it in-house where I was the VP marketing, and we, within two quarters, had doubled the revenue just by tightening up the pitch. Just tighten it up.
Lenny: Holy shit. All right.
April Dunford: Tighten it up.
Lenny: No big deal.
April Dunford: Yep.
Lenny: Okay. So-
April Dunford: It was a big shift in positioning, I’ll tell you that. Not small. Most of the time, we’re not doing that. Most of the time, it’s a tightening. We’re not saying, “Oh, we used to be this and now we’re this.” Most of the time, it’s a tightening, but usually the pitches are so bad. I’m telling you they’re so bad that there’s this low hanging fruit there that if we could improve it even a little bit, it actually has this big impact on how much stuff survives down the pipe.
Lenny: And again, if folks want to go deep into the positioning step, your first book Obviously Awesome, is a great guide, and our first podcast episode goes through this. Plus you have a guest post in my newsletter where you give them a quick start guide. So there’s so many tools to help you through this process.
April Dunford: So many tools.
Lenny: The other thought I’ve had in the back of my mind as we’ve been chatting is a previous guest, Andy Raskin, has a different framework, feels similar, but I know they’re different. His framework starts with a shift that’s happened in the world, and then here’s who’s going to win in the shift, here’s who’s going to lose. And then he goes into why this product is the best. What’s your perspective on that approach versus this approach and the big differences?
April Dunford: So the thing with that framework is I do think it works in certain conditions, but again, I think the conditions might be kind of edgy. So there’s a couple of things that I think are lacking in that structure for a sales pitch. So the first one is there’s actually no concept of differentiated value in that pitch, which for me is a giant miss. So in that pitch, it assumes that new is inherently valuable and old is inherently bad, and sometimes that’s true. So sometimes there’s just you versus the status quo and the status quo is some terrible old thing, some legacy thing or it’s manual processes or something, and you’re the only thing out there, then you can get away with that. But most of the time, we don’t have that. Most of the time, there’s multiple new ways of doing something and you just can’t say, “Well, I’m the only new and the rest of you are old and bad.”
So usually I’ve got to thread the needle. And so that’s the first thing. The second thing is that for most companies, if we really understood customer and decision, old is good, it’s safe, it’s not risky. And does anybody ever say, “No, I’m not going to buy Salesforce. That’s the old stuff,”? I just don’t think that happens. So in a lot of cases, I don’t think you can rely, it’s lazy to say, “Buy this because it’s new and new is better.” Most of the time, the customers are going to want to know, well, what’s better about it? Tell me what the value is that I can’t get anywhere else. And you’re going to have to get more specific than just saying, “Trust me, it’s new and new is good.” So that’s the first thing. The second thing is this idea of starting with a trend. On the surface it looks kind of good, but the problem is often the trend is not unique to you. So everybody else sees the trend too. And so you are starting in a way that any of your competitors could start the same way.
I did this for years where I was taught to do problem solution. We would define the problem like a trend. We’d say, “Well, the change in the world.” I was selling databases and I’d say, “Change in the world, data is exponentially growing.” It’s like, no shit. We all know that. All of my competitors could say that, and all of my competitors deal with the trend in the same way. So unless you have a particularly unique take on the trend, well, then it’s not the trend at all really, is it? It’s your insight into the trend. So I don’t think trend is that great because it’s not always unique to you. And ideally what we want is something that we can say that none of our competitors can. And typically a trend is something outside of our control. It’s out in the world and everybody else can see it too.
So I don’t think it’s great. I think that structure looks a lot like the structure we use in a VC pitch or an investor pitch because we’re talking about much longer timelines and we can say, “Look, the world is really changing and 10 years from now there’s going to be chaos and destruction and the only one standing is us and therefore there is no competition.” And because the timeframes are longer and we’re talking about disruption of an entire market, which is pretty theoretical, we can get away with a lot of that stuff in investor pitch. In fact, we want to go there in investor pitch. Sales pitch is all about right now. Sales pitch is like, okay, I’m going to exchange my money for right now. You can’t get too far into the future. Otherwise, all I’m doing is giving everybody a reason to delay, which they’re likely to do anyway because they’re indecisive about what they should do.
Lenny: I feel like I need a debate version of this podcast where people come on and-
April Dunford: I know, but here’s the thing that I think people should think about when they’re looking at all this stuff because it’s terribly confusing if you’re trying to figure this out. The one thing I really dislike about the category creation folks is they say that’s the only way that you can be successful. And in general, that’s just not true about anything. There’s lots of ways to do everything. And so I think people should mess around with stuff. And for any of these frameworks, I think they should look at it and see if it works for them and their situation. And maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t.
And I think they should steal things from wherever they can steal it and figure out what works in their own situation. My stuff, I like to think is a starting point, folks should use it as a starting point, but people shouldn’t be slaves to it. There are lots of things that work at a market, and I think the only thing that we know for certain is that we can’t say, “Well, this is the rule and it always works like this.” If it was that easy, again, this wouldn’t be so hard. We wouldn’t have podcasts and newsletters and all kinds of things trying to figure this stuff out.
Lenny: Extremely true. Well, with that, we’ve reached our very exciting lightning round. Are you ready?
April Dunford: Oh yeah. Lightning round. Oh gosh. It gives me stress. Okay.
Lenny: Okay, question number one. What are two or three books that you’ve recommended most to other people?
April Dunford: Well, that’s an easy question. So right now I’m really into Matt Dixon’s work right now, which we’ve mentioned him a couple of times on the podcast, but Matt Dixon’s new book called The JOLT Effect is really great just because there’s all this data and the things that he discovered with that data, a lot of it go against what we would consider accepted sales wisdom. And so I think that book is full of juicy nuggets and everybody should look at it. His previous book, The Challenger Sale, and there was a companion book to that called The Challenger Customer. Those were also excellent and based on a deep set of research. And those books are older now, but what we see in The JOLT Effect is all the stuff holds true. All the stuff from The Challenger Sale has not changed in 10 years. So I think those books together are really cool.
The other one that I always recommend is the original book on positioning, which is the book by Ries and Trout Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. I have my copy of it, is dogeared. I probably read that book 100 times and I still see stuff in that book that I didn’t see before. So I think if you really want to go deep on this positioning stuff, my book is the how to book. Their book is what is it in the first place book. And I think everybody that’s interested in positioning should go read that.
Lenny: Amazing. By the way, I have your first book somewhere behind me there. I don’t know where it is, but it’s there.
April Dunford: I got mine right here so I can do this gag. There it is.
Lenny: Nailed it.
April Dunford: There’s the new one, there’s the old one.
Lenny: The YouTube audience can see that trick that you’ve learned. Second question, what is a favorite recent movie or TV show that you’ve really enjoyed?
April Dunford: Oh man, I’m going to get in trouble for this. So you know Bong Joon-ho is the guy that did the movie Parasite?
Lenny: Yeah.
April Dunford: So [inaudible 01:17:48] before Parasite, there was this book called, this movie called Snow Piercer. It’s really old. I think it came out in-
Lenny: I’ve seen that. Is that with the train?
April Dunford: 2013. Have you seen it?
Lenny: Yeah.
April Dunford: So I love this movie so much. So recently I went on a train trip with my dad and before I went to the train trip, we got talking about trains. And then we all had to go watch Snow Piercer again. Like me and my daughter watching Snow Piercer. We’re really into this movie. And it’s funny, when it came out, I was working at a startup and the CEO came and said, “Seen any good movies lately?” And I was like, “Oh man, you got to see this movie Snow Piercer.” And he went on a first date with a woman and he came back the next day and he was so mad. He was not just kind of mad. He was really mad at me. He was like, “That was the worst movie I’ve ever seen.” I was like, “Dude, you should have told me you were going on a date. I didn’t know.”
Lenny: Yeah, that is my experience with that movie. I did not enjoy it, but I think you have to go into it [inaudible 01:18:46]
April Dunford: It’s polarizing. You either think it’s amazing or you’re like, that was terrible. What did I just watch?
Lenny: This explains your taste in movies. We learned a lot about you, April. That movie is something else.
April Dunford: Did you see Parasite? That was amazing.
Lenny: That was amazing. Very different. Not what I imagined. I didn’t realize it was the same person.
April Dunford: Oh yeah.
Lenny: All right. Okay, cool. That’s two movies for people to watch. I’m curious how people think of Snow Piercer.
April Dunford: Be warned don’t go on a date with this.
Lenny: Oh man, I still think about that movie sometimes. Next question, what is a favorite interview question you like to ask people that you’re interviewing? Usually this is for when you’re hiring, so whatever this comes up for you.
April Dunford: So back when I was running teams internally back in my VP marketing days, I felt like a lot of marketing folks came with a certain amount of bad habits, particularly startup marketing folks. It’s a bit of the wild west in marketing. And so sometimes they’d come in and you get into somebody new and they’d be really smart, but they learned something at the previous company that you’re like, please never do that here. It’s not going to work here. And so I developed a thing where I was just looking for attitude. Were you enthusiastic? Are you super into what we’re doing here? And I can teach you pretty much anything. The only thing I can’t teach you is persuasive writing. And I think that’s a learnable skill. I think people can learn how to do persuasive writing.
I just don’t have time to teach it to you myself. And so I used to give people a writing test, so I’d say, “Look, think of something you bought recently and write me two paragraphs and just sell me on it.” And I used to love that test because people could either do it or they can’t. And there’s just so much stuff we end up doing in product marketing and marketing that involves a little bit of writing that it’s kind of a foundational skill. And if you don’t have that, that was the one thing I couldn’t teach you.
Lenny: Wow, that is fascinating. I’ve never heard of that as an interview question. And I love it. I feel like product managers-
April Dunford: I stole it from a company that made me do it before I got hired, and I was like, this is a really smart thing. I’m [inaudible 01:20:53] stealing it. My thing was I got anxiety and I couldn’t decide what product to write about, and I had literally just bought a new pair of running shoes. So I wrote two paragraphs about my new Brooks distance running shoes. But it was good. I got the job.
Lenny: It is an excellent segue to our next question, which is, is there a favorite product you’ve recently discovered that you really like?
April Dunford: Right now I’m kind of into, I don’t even know how to describe this category of things, but things that are kind of low tech but are awesome. And so one of the category of things that I really love right now is I’m really into fountain pens. I don’t know if you’ve ever written with a fountain pen. [inaudible 01:21:35]
Lenny: I haven’t, but I know what they are.
April Dunford: And so there’s this company, Lamy, they’re based in Germany, and they make the world’s greatest fountain pens. They’re beautiful, they’re amazing. Some of them are really expensive. If you want to spend a lot of money on a pen, you can. But they have this one called the AL-Star, which is not an expensive pen. It’s 20, $30. It may be expensive for a pen, but it’s not so much money that you wouldn’t feel bad if you lost it. So Lamy AL-Star. That’s my great product lately. I don’t have one right here. I should, it’d be a great prop to pick it up, but I actually don’t have my bag here and it’s in my bag. But Lamy AL-Star. You Google it. These are beautiful pens. And then if you haven’t written with a fountain pen, it takes a minute to get used to it, but then it’s like, gosh, it just feels great. You’ll never write with a ballpoint pen again.
Lenny: I was going to ask, is it the feel of the writing that you really enjoy about it?
April Dunford: Feel. Totally different. Yeah. Amazing.
Lenny: I use Muji pens. I don’t know if you know these pens.
April Dunford: Oh yeah, these are actually really good. They’re like roller ball pens, roller ball pen, very good, but not as good as the fountain pen.
Lenny: It’s no fountain pen.
April Dunford: The Muji pen is pretty good.
Lenny: Then do you have to dip it in ink and stuff? How does that work?
April Dunford: No. You actually, they either come with a little cartridge that you stick in or if you feel bad about the environment, you don’t want to be throwing out cartridges all the time, there’s a refillable cartridge, so you basically just stick another thing and it sucks it up and yeah, you don’t dip it in ink. That would be crazy. I can’t take that on the airplane, man.
Lenny: Confiscate your ink. All right, questions get a little more challenging potentially or really easy. Do you have a favorite life motto that you like to repeat to yourself, you like to share with people, that you find useful to come back to?
April Dunford: My thing lately is, and maybe this is just an old person thing, but my thing lately is nothing’s a big deal. Nothing’s a big deal, nothing’s a big deal. And so you’ll have stuff that you think is a really big deal, positive or negative, and you’ll be like, wow, if this thing happened, it’d be so great, and then it happens and you’re like, yeah, it’s pretty great, but things are good otherwise, or it’ll be the opposite. Like, oh, if this thing happened, it’d be so bad. Then it happens and you’re like, that wasn’t that bad. And so I don’t know if this is good or bad, but lately I’m in this zone of I’m in this kind of chill zone where I’m like, nothing’s a big deal, man. Everything’s cool.
Lenny: That super resonates. And as much as you say that to yourself, it’s still hard to convince yourself of that sometimes. But that is a really good motto. I’m going to steal that myself. I kind of say that to myself often in different way.
April Dunford: Yeah.
Lenny: What is the most valuable lesson your mom or your dad taught you?
April Dunford: Yeah, it is funny because it’s a little bit related to that. So my dad ran a business, so I grew up in a really small town and my dad and it’s cottage country in Canada. And so my dad ran the local toys for tourists, like boats and motorcycles and ATVs and that sort of thing. And he ran that business for years and years and he sold it a few years back when he retired. But it’s a neat thing to grow up in entrepreneurial family because you kind of see this highs and lows. The business is really good. Then the business was really bad and then we were all broke and then the business was good and we were not broke. So there was this thing, and my dad used to always kind of have this attitude of you just got to grind it out.
You’re just going to grind it out. There’s going to be good stuff, there’s going to be bad stuff, but the key is to just keep going, just keep going. And so he ran that business for whatever, 30, 40 years. I don’t know. His motto is the home of fun since ‘71. So he started it in ‘71. I think he sold it three, four years ago. So a long time.
Lenny: Wow.
April Dunford: It all worked out good in the end. And so I don’t know, I think there’s something cool about growing up in a family where you can see the highs and lows and then again be like everything’s we’re just grinding it out over here. Nothing’s a big deal.
Lenny: It’s clear where all that comes from now.
April Dunford: Yeah.
Lenny: Final question. You do a lot of traveling, you do a lot of speaking, you go to a bunch of cities. I’m curious just what is your favorite either city that you go to that maybe people may not know about or venue that you speak at?
April Dunford: It’s such a cliche, but I love Paris. I just love it. But for me, Paris is like a particular vibe. So when I was in university, I did an exchange when I was in engineering and I did third year engineering at a school just outside of Paris. And so I spent the whole year there, learned a bit of French. My French was pretty good at the end. My French is really bad now. So I kind of get Paris. I like Paris. And so when I go to Paris, I just have the best time. I have my set of restaurants I want to go to. I have my handful of places I want to go shopping. I put my butt down in a cafe, look at the beautiful people, drink my nice coffee. I just really dig the whole vibe of Paris and people are starting to know that now. So French companies will call me and they’ll say, “Do we get a Paris discount? We hear you like coming here.” And I go, “Okay.”
Lenny: Now this is going to [inaudible 01:26:51]
April Dunford: There’s a great product management conference there called La Product Conference run by these folks at Tega, shout out to Tega. So I’ve been there a number of times for their conferences and they do an amazing job and the venue is really great. It changes around. But last year, the last time I went there, which was two years ago, it was at an old theater in [inaudible 01:27:13]. Absolutely beautiful. And that was a pretty great venue in a great city with a great conference. So yeah, shout out to French people.
Lenny: Oh man. That sounds dreamy. Paris. I see how that could be a favorite. April, I think we accomplished everything we were hoping to accomplish. I think everyone that has listened to this podcast is going to be better at pitching and selling. It feels like even if they take one element of this framework, say starting with an insight or focusing on different value will make them better. And so I’m proud of us. Thank you so much for doing this. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out and how can listeners be useful to you?
April Dunford: So where can people find me? I’m aprildunford.com. The only social media I’m doing these days is LinkedIn. I’m a bit social media-ed out. I’m experimenting a little on threads and Instagram, but LinkedIn is a good place to find me if you just want low lift way to follow my stuff. But I’m doing all the things now, Lenny, I got a podcast, it’s called Positioning with April Dunford. I got a newsletter that’s also called Positioning. You can find that if you go to, it’s on Substacks, you can find it there, otherwise aprildunford.com/books and you can sign up there. But those are the big things. And then there’s the books, obviously, if you want to learn more about this stuff. Everything I know is in the book. There isn’t stuff that I know that isn’t in the book to be honest.
Lenny: Amazing. And then how can listeners be useful to you? Just check out those things.
April Dunford: I guess so. You know what? I’m in this phase. I think, again, I think it’s an old age thing. I am in this kind of philosophical phase where I’m not going to be doing this forever. And what I’m trying to do right now is get everything that’s useful out of my head and out in the world before I’m done. And so right now I’m very focused on delivering useful things for other people. I didn’t think I needed to write a book about sales pitches, but then I got the idea in my head, everybody’s sales pitch is so bad and there isn’t a book on how to build a sales pitch. And I’m not saying mine’s the world’s greatest thing, but it’s better than nothing. So this is what I’m trying to do right now. I’m trying to be useful to other people because pretty soon I’m not going to be doing anything, I think is the idea.
Lenny: Arnold Schwarzenegger’s new book is called Be Useful. And I feel like that’s the perfect description of how to be successful and especially in the work that we do, just helping people. But I keep coming back to that. It’s just be useful.
April Dunford: I think this is a really important thing. When I wrote the first book, people started writing back to me and saying, “Oh, your book was so great.” And my reflex action was to say, “Oh, I’m glad you enjoyed it.” But then I stumped myself and I was like, you know what? I don’t actually care if you enjoyed it. This isn’t entertainment. I’m actually trying to create something that’s useful. So what I really want is for people to read this stuff and come back and say, “That was useful. We were struggling with this thing, and that unlocked something for me and that was useful.” And that’s what I’m trying to do right now.
Lenny: April, thank you so much for being here. This was amazing.
April Dunford: Thanks so much. It’s always good to be here.
Lenny: Always good to have you here. And we might do a V3 when you do a third book if you ever-
April Dunford: No, not happening.
Lenny: Okay. All right. Well, bye everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lennyspodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
Glossary
| English | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Andy Raskin | Andy Raskin(人名,保留原文) |
| Ask Jeeves | Ask Jeeves(品牌名,保留原文) |
| ballpoint pen | 圆珠笔 |
| beachhead | 滩头阵地 |
| Bob Moesta | Bob Moesta(人名,保留原文) |
| Bong Joon-ho | 奉俊昊(国际知名导演,使用公认中文译名) |
| bowling pin strategy | 保龄球策略 |
| Brooks | Brooks(跑鞋品牌,保留原文) |
| calm confidence | 从容自信 |
| category creation | 品类创造 |
| champion | champion(B2B 采购中主导选型的内部推动者,保留原文) |
| CMS | CMS(内容管理系统,Content Management System) |
| cost center | 成本中心 |
| CRM | CRM(客户关系管理,行业通用缩写,保留原文) |
| differentiated value | 差异化价值 |
| dominant player | 主导者 |
| fast follower | 快速跟随者 |
| FOMO | FOMO(错失恐惧,Fear of Missing Out) |
| fountain pen | 钢笔 |
| G2 Crowd | G2 Crowd(软件评测平台,保留原文) |
| Gardner Group | Gardner Group(咨询机构,保留原文) |
| Gong | Gong(销售智能平台,保留原文) |
| growth driver | 增长驱动力 |
| help desk software | 帮助台软件 |
| Help Scout | Help Scout(品牌名,保留原文) |
| inside sales | 内部销售 |
| insight | 洞察 |
| investor pitch | 投资者路演 |
| Jeffrey Moore | Jeffrey Moore(人名,保留原文) |
| Jobs To Be Done | Jobs To Be Done(理论名称,保留原文) |
| Lamy | Lamy(德国钢笔品牌,保留原文) |
| lead pin | 首瓶 |
| LevelJump | LevelJump(销售赋能公司,被 Salesforce 收购) |
| line of business | 业务部门 |
| LMS | LMS(学习管理系统,Learning Management System) |
| low hanging fruit | 低垂的果实 |
| Matt Dixon | Matt Dixon(人名,保留原文) |
| Muji | Muji(品牌名,保留原文) |
| MVP | 最小可行版本(Minimum Viable Product,保留原文缩写) |
| MySpace | MySpace(品牌名,保留原文) |
| Obviously Awesome | 《Obviously Awesome》(书名) |
| Parasite | 《寄生虫》(电影名,使用公认中文译名) |
| positioning | 产品定位 |
| Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind | 《Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind》(书名,保留原文) |
| product exposition | 产品展示 |
| product positioning | 产品定位 |
| qualification call | 资格审查电话 |
| Qualtrics | Qualtrics(品牌名,保留原文) |
| ramp time | 上手周期 |
| Ries and Trout | Ries 和 Trout(人名,保留原文) |
| roller ball pen | 滚珠笔 |
| sales enablement | 销售赋能 |
| Sales Pitch | 《Sales Pitch》(书名) |
| sales pitch | 销售演示 |
| Salesforce | Salesforce(CRM 平台,保留原文) |
| shared inbox | 共享收件箱 |
| short list | 候选名单 |
| Siebel | Siebel(品牌名,保留原文) |
| Snow Piercer | 《雪国列车》(电影名,使用公认中文译名) |
| Snowflake | Snowflake(品牌名,保留原文) |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2(安全合规标准,保留原文) |
| status quo | 现状 |
| The Challenger Customer | 《The Challenger Customer》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Challenger Sale | 《The Challenger Sale》(书名,保留原文) |
| The JOLT Effect | 《The JOLT Effect》(书名,保留原文) |
| time to first deal | 首单成交时间 |
| time to make quota | 达到业绩配额的时间 |
| VC pitch | VC 融资路演 |
| Zendesk | Zendesk(品牌名,保留原文) |
Reformatted by reformat_english.py
如何精准定位你的产品 | April Dunford (Obviously Awesome)
如何精准定位你的产品 | April Dunford (《Obviously Awesome》)
访谈记录
April Dunford: B2B 采购流程中有 40% 到 60% 最终以”不做决定”收场。如果你深入挖掘这些数据,会发现大多数情况并不是他们认为”我们现有的做法更好,所以不买新的”。完全不是这样。事实上,大多数情况是他们无法自信地做出选择。所以他们跑去跟老板说,“你知道吗?现在时机不太好,先别做了,明年再说吧,先拖着。“因为对那个要为决策负责的人来说,拖延是最安全、零风险的做法。
Lenny: 今天我的嘉宾是 April Dunford。April 是全球产品定位领域最权威的专家,她著有一本畅销书《Obviously Awesome》,这也是我最喜欢的关于产品定位的书。这是她第二次做客我们的播客,因为她刚刚出版了一本新书,叫《Sales Pitch》,这本书建立在她 25 年的营销副总裁职业生涯以及为 Google、Epic Games 等众多公司提供咨询的经验之上。这本书将引导你用更好的方式来推介和销售你的产品。在今天的对话中,April 分享了她所见过的最有效的框架,帮助你让潜在客户对你的产品产生兴趣,并最终决定购买。
就像我在本期开头所说的,听完这期节目,你会变得更擅长推介和销售你的产品。如果这对你有用——当然应该有用——那这期就是为你准备的。好了,在简短的赞助商信息之后,我为大家请出 April Dunford。
[广告部分已跳过]
重逢与寒暄
Lenny: April,非常感谢你能来。欢迎回到播客。
April Dunford: 很高兴回来。我们之前聊过这个,但感觉上次来好像是好久以前的事了。我是最早的嘉宾之一,我觉得天哪,你这个播客已经做了好久了。其实大概也就一年前吧。
Lenny: 感觉像过了一辈子,但其实差不多就是一年前。
April Dunford: 但你做出的成绩真的了不起,对吧?它的增长速度、方方面面,都非常令人振奋。
Lenny: 谢谢 April,我很感激。
April Dunford: 不客气,不过这是实话。我觉得大家看你的东西都会想,“他到底是怎么做到的?”
Lenny: 秘诀就是大量的工作。
April Dunford: 没错。
Lenny: 这就是那个快速致富的方案。
April Dunford: 没人想听这个。
Lenny: 哈哈,但这份工作非常有成就感,而且我们又能聊天了。你是非常少见的返场嘉宾,这让我非常开心。你回来的原因是你写了一本了不起的新书,我手边就有一本——如果你在看 YouTube 的话——叫《Sales Pitch》。
April Dunford: 太酷了。
新书《Sales Pitch》
Lenny: 就是这本。而且你背景里也有一本,简直像盗梦空间一样。书名叫《Sales Pitch: How to Craft a Story to Stand Out and Win》。我们今天会在这一个小时里尽量深入挖掘书中的所有方法和框架。我对这次对话的期望是,听众在听完这期播客后,能掌握更好的推介和销售产品的技能。我认为每位产品负责人和创始人都需要并且希望在这方面有所提升。听起来怎么样?
April Dunford: 听起来很好。
Lenny: 好,太好了。我想作为进入对话的一个切入点,我们可以先讲一个故事或案例——你合作过的一家公司,你在那里应用了书中所教授的框架和方法。然后以此为跳板,再进一步深入探讨。
销售演示中的定位缺失
April Dunford: 好,没问题。我的背景是做产品定位工作的。所以在我与客户合作的过程中,通常我们在做的是调整定位,也就是在”我们如何在市场中取胜”这个思路上做一些转变。为了验证这个定位,我们需要把定位转化为销售演示(sales pitch),然后在实际潜在客户中进行测试。
我在刚开始做这项工作的时候就注意到一件事:所有人的销售演示看起来都差不多,而且都不怎么样。基本上,大多数销售演示里根本没有定位可言。销售演示本质上是一场产品展示,说白了就是一个包装过的产品演示。如果有五个下拉菜单,我们就把五个下拉菜单全都点开,给每个人展示所有功能——功能、功能、功能、功能、功能。
所以大多数团队并不习惯在演示中真正去做”推介”。就是直白地罗列事实,给你看看就是了。有些团队会做一点很轻量的处理——“这是问题,我们是解决方案,现在让我带你走一遍所有下拉菜单”——但本质上还是一回事。
所以我想做的是构建一个能够反映定位的演示结构。要做到这一点,我们需要稍微进入讲故事的模式。不需要很多,但至少得有一点。而且当我们谈论功能的时候,我们不应该只是在说功能本身,我们应该说的是这些功能所交付的价值。
Help Scout 的案例:定位驱动的演示结构
April Dunford: 我来举个例子,给你看看改进前后的对比。我曾经和 Help Scout 合作过,他们做的是客户服务领域的产品,你可以类比 Zendesk 之类的,就是那个赛道。他们有意思的地方在于,这家公司从一开始就是为数字化企业打造的——那些没有实体门店、没有销售代表的企业。因此他们对客户服务的理解从一开始就不一样。Help Scout 说:“你知道吗?对于这类企业来说,客户服务其实非常重要,因为这几乎是你唯一能跟真实客户互动的机会。” 数据也证明了这一点——如果在服务环节给客户一个非常好的体验,就能提升忠诚度、提升复购率,实际上它是一个增长驱动力。而大多数其他行业的人则把客户服务视为成本中心。
比如你的电信公司,恨不得尽快让你挂电话,想方设法把你推到自助FAQ渠道上去,根本不在乎给你提供什么好的服务,完全不在意。他们关心的是把成本压下来。那么我们来看看 Help Scout 的产品定位,他们的替代方案有这么几类。大多数团队一开始用的是共享收件箱,很好用,客服代表们也喜欢,上手很快。问题在于,当你开始增长,你就会需要更多客户服务功能——比如工单分配、优先级排序之类的。于是这些客户最终会升级到帮助台软件,进入一个完全不同的世界。
传统的”功能罗列式”演示
首先是很难用,我们已经不在共享收件箱的地盘了。其次是那种态度——把用户推向低成本渠道,根本不在乎他们,给你分配一个工单号,你不再是一个人了,诸如此类。所以情况就是这样。如果 Help Scout 按照我见过的大多数 SaaS 公司的方式去做演示,他们就会直接展示功能。演示大概是这样:数字化企业来了,他们说:“你好,欢迎了解 Help Scout,我来给你演示怎么登录,给你看看所有功能。看,这里有个共享收件箱,非常好用。看,我们可以做分配和优先级排序,还能做这个、做那个。” 然后一路讲下去,直到时间用完、没有更多功能可讲为止。
这种演示的问题在于,客户坐在那里心想:“我也不确定啊,这听起来有点像我的共享收件箱,但听起来又像帮助台软件。它跟帮助台软件有什么区别吗?我不太确定。而且功能上有重叠。” 所以它并没有真正回答那个问题——为什么选我们而不是别人?
定位驱动的演示:先设框架,再讲价值
April Dunford: 一种不同的演示方式是,我们会先做一点铺垫,让每个人了解我们在所有解决方案中的位置,以及我们对市场的观点。然后当我们进入功能展示环节时,我们会把功能放在差异化价值的语境中去讲。演示大概是这样的:客户来了,Help Scout 说:“你好,数字化企业,我们和很多像你这样的公司合作过,接下来我会给你展示产品。但在那之前,有一点我们觉得很有意思——数字化企业看待客户服务的方式是不一样的。他们把它看作增长驱动力,而不是成本中心。所以我们的客户中大多数人认为,提供卓越体验是客户服务的核心。你同意吗?”
对方说同意,双方简单交流几句。然后 Help Scout 说:“很好。你现在有几个选择。我们大多数客户一开始用的是共享收件箱,这很好,因为真的很好上手。但如果你在增长——你很可能在增长——那你迟早会超出它的能力范围,因为你需要优先级排序、工单分配这些帮助台功能。于是你的下一个选项就是帮助台软件。帮助台软件当然好,什么都能做。问题在于,它不是为你这种企业设计的。它是为那些想把客户服务成本压到最低的企业设计的。所以它会做一些奇怪的事——给你的客户分配工单号,把他们推向低成本渠道。那我们能不能达成共识:对于一个像你这样的数字化企业来说,最理想的情况是——既像收件箱一样好用,又功能齐全、不需要迁移到别的平台,而且从一开始就是为提供卓越客户服务而设计的。我们想要的是这个,对吗?”
到这一步,客户要么认同你,要么不认同。但如果认同,我们就切入实际的演示环节。我们会说:“好,我们刚才说了三个要点,让我来展示它是怎么实现的。第一,像收件箱一样好用——看,这是收件箱,很好用,看起来就像普通收件箱,很棒。第二,功能齐全,你永远不需要换平台——看,这是我们做优先级排序和分配的方式,你成长过程中需要的一切都能做到,永远不需要切换平台。第三,提供卓越体验——看,客户可以选择他们想和你互动的渠道,而且他们叫 Dave,不是1479号工单。“
改进后的演示为什么更有效
诸如此类。这就是改进后的演示。但这完全是一种不同的演示。这个演示的设计目的就是回答”为什么选我们而不是别人”这个问题。你可以想象,它在让客户真正理解”这个东西是什么、有什么不同、为什么该选你”方面,效果要好得多。在销售场景中就是更管用。
Lenny: 太好了。要不我来把框架总结一下,因为你刚才逐个讲了这些部分,我觉得把步骤列出来可能会对大家有帮助。我这里也有笔记,不过可能由你来讲会更清楚。
演示结构的两大模块
April Dunford: 你可以这样理解。首先,这个演示结构有两大块。第一块是铺垫。铺垫部分不是讲我们自己,而是讲市场——我们对市场的观点。第二块是讲我们的差异化价值,也就是为什么选我们而不是别人。这两块的权重不一样。在正常的销售演示场景中,我们不想在铺垫部分花太多时间,我们想尽快进入正题——也就是我们的差异化价值,但铺垫那部分又不能跳过。如果是一个半小时或45分钟的通话,我可能在前面花几分钟做铺垫,但这些前置内容真的很重要。
铺垫可以拆成三个部分。首先是我们的市场洞察。你可以把它理解为我们对市场的观点,或者某种程度上像是”问题里面的问题”。拿 Help Scout 来说,他们的洞察是:“客户服务对数字化企业来说是不一样的,这其实是一个增长驱动力,不是成本中心。所以我们需要换一种方式来思考客户服务。” 这就是他们的洞察。我们就从这里开始。
铺垫的后两步:替代方案的优劣与完美世界
April Dunford: 第二部分是替代方案的优劣。我们要做的是描绘整个市场的全貌,讲清楚其他解决方式有什么好的和不好的地方。然后在这个对话的基础上,我们得出一个结论,也就是我所说的”完美世界”。大概意思是,如果我们真的想解决这个问题,而且知道各种替代方案中什么有效、什么无效,我们能不能同意,一个真正好的方案应该满足这几个条件?这一步就是让客户与你的世界观对齐。
正式展示:差异化价值与收尾
如果他们已经对齐了,我们就切换到后半段。后半段有几个步骤,但核心步骤是差异化价值这一步。通常我们会从一个介绍开始:“大家好,我们是 Help Scout,我们专门为数字化企业提供客户服务方面的产品。“然后我们就进入正题:“这是我们交付的价值。我们是怎么做到的。这是我们交付的价值。我们是怎么做到的。这是我们交付的价值。我们是怎么做到的。“就这样反复几轮。
销售演示的结尾通常还有几个小步骤。一个是在讲完价值之后,一般会有一个证明环节,也就是如何证明我们确实能做到我们所说的事情。这通常是一个客户案例研究,也可能是来自独立第三方的验证。总之通常会有一个证明步骤。之后还有一个可选步骤,就是处理通话过程中没有浮现出来的异议。有时候会存在一种沉默的异议:“嗯,听起来很不错,但看起来很难落地。“或者,“嗯,听起来很不错,但估计挺贵的。“再或者,“嗯,还行吧,但可能在安全性方面满足不了我们的需求。”
我们会在最后用一个专门的异议处理环节来应对这些问题。然后我们用我所说的”请求”来结束整个演示——也就是我们希望客户接下来做的事情。可以是直接要求成交,也可以是”我们想做一个小规模验证,需要和谁谈?“或者”我们要启动一个项目,需要谁来参与定义?“总之就是你的销售流程中的下一步是什么,我们就以那一步来收尾。
如何处理异议
Lenny: 很好。我其实想聊聊异议这个话题。因为我想象一下,走完这个流程,公司常常不会同意你说的东西,我想知道你怎么处理这种情况。你在这个流程中说”你同意吗?“然后那个沉默异议真的很有意思。我甚至都没想过这个,就是他们表面上说”嗯嗯嗯,我们同意”,但其实并没有真正同意。对于那些直接说”不,我其实不是这么看这个世界的”的人,你会怎么建议?或者沉默异议——我猜那是留到最后处理的东西。
April Dunford: 通常我们从洞察出发的时候——我们对市场的那个洞察——如果我们做得好,这个洞察一般不会太有争议。你可以这样理解:这基本上就是你为什么要做这个产品的原因。大多数创始人,你和他们聊的时候,他们的想法不是凭空冒出来的。他们某天早上醒来,发现”邮件这东西有一个地方真的很糟糕。所以我要做一个不同的邮件产品来解决这个问题。“或者 Help Scout 的情况就是,“你知道客户服务有什么问题吗?它根本就不是为这类企业设计的。”
所以如果你对世界有一个观点,而你面对的客户从根本上不认同这个观点——拿 Help Scout 来说,他们进来就说”不,对我们来说这就是个成本中心,我们只是想把成本降下来。“那他们就应该把这笔交易筛掉,因为他们不可能比 Zendesk 更好地服务这个客户。Zendesk 会赢下那笔交易。但如果你做得到位,你的洞察应该能引起你目标客户的共鸣。这不代表不会有其他异议,通常会有各种各样的异议。但这些异议更多是操作层面的。如果我在前面的铺垫阶段把你吸引住了,然后我们进入价值部分——那只是在证明我能做到我们已经达成共识想要完成的事情——那么异议往往会是:“嗯,听起来不错,但我不知道我们能不能转发。“或者”听起来不错,但是要从旧系统迁移出来,天哪。”
所以他们在心理上其实已经接受了,但他们担心的是:“IT 部门会怎么说?我真的能申请到预算吗?“在 B2B 领域,我们有一个需要获得各方同意才能推进的网络。所以异议经常围绕这些问题。关于销售演示开头的部分……还有一点,就是我们在铺垫阶段做的事情,销售人员称之为”需求发现”。铺垫部分不应该是我在对你单方面讲。它应该是我和客户之间的对话:“你同意这个吗?这是你看到的吗?你们一开始用的是共享收件箱吗?你们现在在用什么?你有没有考虑过用帮助台软件?为什么考虑?为什么不?你们有什么限制条件吗?你们之前试过什么?现在在看什么?“
需求发现的结构化位置
这就是我们在第一次实质性销售通话中做的需求发现,你的销售代表应该知道怎么做。通常,我在 SaaS 公司看到的演示文档里,没有一个合适的地方来做这种需求发现。它往往发生在演示结构之外。而在我们这个演示结构里,需求发现有一个明确的位置。所以到铺垫结束的时候,我们要么已经对齐了——“好的,这个客户对我们来说是个好线索,我们能做点什么,他们有一个我们能解决的问题,一切看起来都不错。“要么我们共同得出一个结论:“嘿,我们的产品确实不适合你。“就这样。
Lenny: 我之前提到过,这些很大程度上来自足够多的实践。你逐渐理解人们在哪些地方通常会达成共识,“这是一个问题,我们都知道这是我们的问题。“而不太可能发生那种因为你把整个铺垫都做了、然后有人说”不,这不适合我们”就全盘推翻的情况。
我认为这个框架最大的转变之一,是你进入了一种教导的心态。不是简单的”这是我们的产品,它能解决你的问题”,而是更像是”这是大环境的趋势,也许你没有时间做我们做过的那些研究,这是我们发现的。“然后这会建立对你作为一家公司、作为领导者、作为销售人员的信任。然后他们会说:“好的,他们看世界的方式和我们一样。“或者”我刚刚意识到了一些新的东西,我以前从来没这么想过。“然后,“好的,那他们怎么看待这个问题的解决方案呢?“
客户对市场的理解并不完美
April Dunford: 对。在所有这些事情中有一个关键点,我觉得我们作为软件供应商想得不够多的是:客户找到我们的时候,他们确实做了功课。他们在网上搜索过,看过各种东西,但这并不意味着他们对市场有完美的理解。事实上通常差得很远。想一想,在 B2B 软件领域,大多数情况下,你的买家从来没有买过像你这样的软件。这是他们第一次做这件事。他们的老板找到他们说:“嘿,你去搞清楚。去把市面上的 CRM 都看看,搞明白。”
April Dunford: 而买家看着这一切心想:“天哪,我也不知道。市面上的 CRM 那么多,我什么都看了。我上 G2 Crowd 一看,右上角就有 24 个 CRM。我看了 Gardner Group,看了这个那个,我真的做了功课,但还是不知所措。我缺少的是对市场的清晰认知。解决这个问题的不同方法有哪些?先别管产品,解决问题的方法有哪些?各个产品在这些方法中处于什么位置?对我来说什么样的解决方案才是好的?我的采购标准应该是什么?” 这些对买家来说真的很难搞清楚。
一般来说,在销售过程中,我们没有做任何事情来帮助买家弄清楚这些,尽管我们对此了如指掌。我们日复一日地泡在这个市场里。我们整天研究竞争对手,思考这些东西。但我们有一种想法:“嗯,我们不应该这样做,因为首先,我们不能谈论其他厂商,否则会被认为是在抨击竞争对手,那不好。” 另一个原因是,即使我们给出了自己的看法,也没人会相信我们,因为我们有偏见。但如果你看看这方面的研究,研究并不支持这种观点。研究实际上表明,B2B 软件买家在销售互动中最想要的是对市场的看法和权衡选项的帮助。而我们没有做到这一点。我们只是说:“这是我们的产品。你自己看着办,你来搞清楚。”
因此,结果就是这些买家进来的时候,已经被各种信息淹没了。他们进入我们的销售流程,我们又用更多的功能和更多的信息把他们淹没得更厉害。他们真正担心的是:“万一我在这里做了一个错误的选择怎么办?我从来没做过这件事,而且我还要向老板推荐。如果我向老板提了一个错误的建议,也许老板会觉得我很蠢。或者我买了什么东西,整个部门都讨厌我,因为太难用了。或者我选了一个东西,结果就是很差劲的软件,然后给公司带来了不好的后果,说不定我会被解雇。“
大量采购以”不做决定”告终
数据表明,在 B2B 领域,40% 到 60% 的采购流程最终以不做决定告终。然后如果你深入看这些数据,其中大多数并不是说:“嗯,我不打算买新的东西,因为原来的做法更好。“完全不是这么回事。事实上,大多数……
那些”原来的做法更好”的情况,完全不是这么回事。事实上,大多数情况是他们无法自信地做出选择。所以他们就去跟老板说:“你知道吗?现在时机不太好。我们先不做了吧。明年再做。先拖一拖。“因为对于那个要为决策负责的人来说,这是最安全、最没有风险的做法。
Lenny: 我觉得这是你在书中分享的最有意思的洞察之一,你在那篇 newsletter 文章里也提到了——购买软件可以说比销售软件更难,因为人们学过销售,有销售的技能培训,但购买正如你所描述的,压力极大。基本上如果你犯了错,你的饭碗都保不住。关于这一点你还有什么可以分享的吗,帮助进一步说明购买软件是非常困难和充满压力的,而人们并没有意识到这一点?
April Dunford: 一旦你进入那种心态,我认为你对这种情况的看法就会大不一样。我们看到过这样的统计,说到买家和你的销售代表交谈时,已经完成了 80% 的采购旅程。是的,也许吧,但他们可能 80% 的路程是走向”不买了,什么都不买”。事实上 60% 的情况确实如此。那我们如何应对这个问题?应对的方法不是只谈我们自己,而是真正去帮助那个处于极度压力之下的人,帮助那个正在想办法做出一个好决定的人。
帮助客户建立对市场的全局认知
所以我们应该做的是给他们一种理解整个市场的方式,比如说 Help Scout 的例子:“你看,有共享收件箱,有帮助台软件,然后还有我们。我不在乎是哪家厂商,我会把他们归到其中一个类别里。“所以你可以这样来思考。你不需要知道每一个功能、每一个细节。我给你的是整个市场的大图景,帮助你做出判断。如果你选这个或者选那个,你现在就知道为什么了。
Lenny: 我觉得这其中有意思的一点是,很多创业公司失败是因为他们无法说服别人放弃现状。人们总是认为这是因为现有的产品已经够用了,所以他们才输,但我认为这还多了一层——也是因为负责购买的那个人就是觉得:“我不想承受做决定和做出选择的那种压力,也不想冒风险去做切换。“我以前从来没从这个角度想过。
April Dunford: 我认为这个障碍比你想象的大得多。显然我们必须要和现状竞争,我们不能忽视现状,因为有时候现状确实够用了,所以我们不能忽视它。我们仍然会因为现状而丢单,但我们有大量的丢单纯粹是因为客户犹豫不决,客户更害怕搞砸而不是害怕错过。
Lenny: 那为了克服这个问题,深入谈谈你觉得最有效的方法——一个是帮助客户理解更大的图景,以及为什么他们本质上正在落后,为什么竞争对手可能会因为他们用不同的方式思考而获得优势。
April Dunford: 嗯,关于这个我想说一点。
Lenny: 请讲。
FOMO 反而会让犹豫的客户更不可能成交
April Dunford: 我经常听人谈到的一点是,在这种情况下,当客户感到犹豫不决时,我们可以利用 FOMO(错失恐惧),说:“你看,你正在错过。竞争对手都在做,而你没有。“所以这是一个有趣的问题。我当时非常兴奋,Matt Dixon 写了一本书叫《The JOLT Effect》,他们在书中研究了 250 万通销售电话,通过 Gong 录音并用 AI 进行分析,然后他们追踪了通话后的结果——这些电话是否成功,有没有成交等等。我们很少有机会能深入研究这样的数据。
他的数据表明,如果客户本身就犹豫不决,再给他们加 FOMO 只会让情况更糟。所以如果你加这一手,他们成交的可能性反而更低。原因是他们已经压力很大了,而你通过施压只是给他们增加更多压力——你说”哦,大家都在这么做,不好的事情会……”他们就会想:“做了会有不好的事情发生,不做也会有不好的事情发生,我该怎么办?”
Lenny: 他们就干脆把头埋进沙子里,对吧?就像”算了,不管了”?
April Dunford: 所以他们就会想,“算了,什么都不做了。现在我完全瘫痪了。“人们普遍假设企业非常容易被 FOMO 所驱动,但我认为这并不总是成立的,如果客户本身就犹豫不决,再抛出 FOMO 这一套是没用的。在这种情况下,真正有效的方法是,第一,给他们做决策的工具。这包括描绘市场格局,本质上就是教他们如何购买。就是告诉他们:对于像你这样的客户,你只需要关注这三四个要点,其他那些东西跟你没关系。那些是给更大的公司准备的,是给别的什么场景准备的。所以,教客户如何购买这个思路,是降低他们压力的一种方式。
还有就是一系列其他技巧可以用。比如,如果这是一笔很大的交易,我们可以把它拆成更小的部分;我们可以提供退款保证;有时候我们有服务和支持团队,万一出了问题可以帮忙兜底,我们会这样确保万无一失。所以,如果客户因为犹豫不决而真的陷入瘫痪状态,能够帮他们把风险从台面上拿掉,这个思路是非常关键的。
Lenny: 这非常合理,本质上就是——我们怎么帮买家兜底,万一他们犯错了怎么办。因为你说的就是,他们不买你产品的主要原因就是这个。
April Dunford: 而 FOMO 这一套就是解决不了这个问题。
Lenny: 太有意思了。我非常喜欢这个框架。我把这个记下来了——教他们如何购买,这是理解整个流程的一种非常简洁的方式。
April Dunford: 说起来挺好笑的,我之前跟 Bob Moesta 聊过这个,他是 Jobs To Be Done 理论的提出者。
Lenny: 对,我看过那一期节目。
教客户如何购买
April Dunford: 他真的是最棒的。我想到的一点是,通常我们思考这个问题的方式是,“我们怎么说服客户,我们能完成他们需要完成的工作?“这当然是必须做到的,但这个交易中的 champion 还有一个次要任务,那就是——我怎么做了一个决策还不会被开除?所以我们必须帮助他们完成这个任务,否则我们就得不到我们想要的,也就是钱。
Lenny: 太有意思了。而且不一定是被开除那么严重,甚至是绩效受影响,或者升不了职,就是——我有没有把这件事做好。这让我想起在 Airbnb 时我们经历过的一次采购社区论坛软件的过程。我记得一大群销售团队来到办公室,向所有人推销他们的软件,他们就是不停地推着你往下走——下一步是什么,谁需要加入,谁需要认可?就是那种感觉,“天哪,压力太大了。我得一直推动这件事往前走。“然后 IT 部门也来了,“哦,我们得确保它跟 Salesforce 能集成。“你一开始只是想要最好的社区论坛软件,因为我们想要做一个真正与众不同的东西,结果最后变成了,“好吧,就这样吧,选那个跟 Salesforce 兼容的就行了。没事了,我去忙下一个流程了。“
市场领导者的天然优势
April Dunford: 这就是问题所在,在这种情况下太容易默认选择市场领导者了。市场领导者有一个巨大的优势,你可以说,“你想想,选 Salesforce 谁会找我麻烦?没有人。“太容易就倒向那个选择了。所以如果你在这种情况下的挑战者,是排名第二或第三的品牌,你就必须克服所有这些惯性和向现状倾斜的倾向,因为选择市场领导者是最低风险的决策——除了什么都不做之外,就是直接选市场领导者,然后就这么定了。
Lenny: 我记得那句经典的话是——买 Microsoft 没人会因此被开除。我在想现在是不是 Salesforce 成了那句话的默认版本了?
April Dunford: 对,最早的那句其实是 IBM。
Lenny: 你说得对,是 IBM。哎,天哪。
April Dunford: 现在你选 IBM 反而真会被开除了。谁知道呢。你刚才提到的另一个问题也值得思考,它在这种情况下真的会把人搞得很头疼——在 B2B 的典型采购流程中,通常有五到七个人参与推动这笔交易,这就带来了消费者场景中没有的复杂性,但我觉得很多人把这个想得太复杂了。在典型的 B2B 采购流程中,采购团队里有一个人我们称之为 champion。这个人被委派了一个任务——嘿,你来帮我们选一个会计软件,或者选一个 CRM,你来搞定。这个人负责做初步调研,制定候选名单,大概率也会参加最初的沟通会议,然后还有其他一堆人。
B2B 采购中的 Champion 与利益相关方
现在,其他那些人没法推动交易,但他们有一千种方式可以毙掉它。所以这套逻辑是这样的——你的产品定位和销售演示必须对 champion 真正有效,因为如果不行,你连跟其他人说话的机会都没有,如果你连候选名单都进不去,这笔交易就根本启动不了。但是一旦交易启动了,你就必须武装这个 champion,让他能够应对所有其他团队可能提出的各种异议。比如说,如果业务部门的买家是销售部门的人,他要采购一个 CRM,IT 部门迟早会介入,而 IT 部门并不真正关心你的 CRM 的差异化价值,但他们确实关心——它是否满足安全要求,是否能跟我们现有的系统集成,管理起来会有多麻烦。所以我们其实不是在向这些人展示价值,而只是在处理异议。
所以一旦我们意识到这一点,就可以把产品定位和销售演示做得非常精准。我们真正要做的就是拿下 champion,搞定 champion,然后交易推进之后,我们要武装 champion,教他怎么应对所有其他团队的异议,这样你才能达成共识,推动交易往前走。
Lenny: 具体怎么做到呢?是问他们你听到了哪些顾虑?还是问各个利益相关方他们最大的顾虑是什么?
April Dunford: 如果我们足够聪明的话,我们其实已经知道了,因为我们做过很多类似的交易。如果我们在这个过程中是一个好的合作伙伴,有时候甚至在第一次会议中,在我们讨论目标的那一段,我们就会说,“嘿,你看,IT 部门后面会介入,他们会担心这个、这个和这个,别担心,我们帮你准备好了。”
我们是 SOC 2 合规的,我们做了这个、做了那个,我们之所以知道,是因为我们做过十五笔这样的交易,我们知道这类交易是什么样的,知道会遇到什么问题。你可能会有 champion 过来说,“嗯,我不知道,终端用户可能不喜欢。“那就好,“没问题,这是我们让终端用户上手的方式,这是我们提供的培训,这是我们会做的事情。“有意思的是,如果你有一个产品能在前端就把这个问题解决掉,就直接把这个异议从台面上消除了。你可能还会遇到其他情况,比如你要把这个方案拿给你的老板看,他会要 ROI 数据,等等,我们已经准备好了——看,这是我们的计算器,你把这些信息给我们,我们输进去,这是你怎么向老板推销。
为 champion 配备武器
April Dunford: 所以我们做的就是这件事。我们在努力为他们配备武器,因为我们做过无数次交易,而他们从来没买过这类软件。所以一半的时候,你在做交易,他们甚至不知道采购流程是什么样的。如果我们是好的合作伙伴,我们就会问,“好,这个需要走采购部门吗?“他们会说,“大概需要。“哦,那采购部门通常会这样做:他们会这个、这个、这个,所以我们给你准备了这些东西,帮你过采购这关。
Lenny: 你现在这么一说,感觉好像得是大公司才能用得上这套方法,因为小公司没有那么多销售代表,也可能没有资源来做你说的这些事情。这个框架对谁有用?如果你只是一个早期阶段的 B2B 公司,能用这套方法吗?
April Dunford: 这个方法是针对 B2B 产品的。如果你没有销售团队,我仍然认为你可以用这个结构来构建一个营销可以用的故事,也可以用在其他不同的场景中,这个我们可以之后再聊。但在我合作的公司里,他们都是 B2B,都有销售团队,所以我们立刻做的事情就是调整产品定位,构建一个反映这个定位的销售演示,我们可以立刻在销售中落地——虽然要把全部信息换掉、调整各种营销活动来匹配新的产品定位还需要一段时间,但我们可以先收紧销售演示,在销售端立刻产生影响。第二点是,我跟很多创始人本身就是唯一销售代表的公司合作过,这种方式对他们也很适用。
我不认为我们需要大量资源来做这件事,但我确实认为我们需要在市场上有足够的经验,了解一笔典型的交易是怎么走的。所以如果我们还没卖出过任何东西,那我们什么都还不知道——如果连我们自己都不知道怎么卖,就很难帮助客户去买。但如果我已经做过十笔交易,我就知道会发生什么,我大概能猜到 IT 部门在你尝试部署这个东西时会说什么,我大概知道上线推广时会发生什么,我也大概知道你的老板可能会反对什么、会对什么兴奋。所以我不一定需要一个研究团队去搞清楚这些。这只是我在努力做一个好的合作伙伴,帮助 champion 完成他的工作——把这笔交易推过终点线。
Lenny: 所以这套方法的最小可行版本可能就是一份幻灯片,你不断迭代、调整、重组,再加上一些你要提的要点——比如”好,IT 部门会问这些”,记几个要点。
April Dunford: 没错。
产品团队如何从中受益
Lenny: 我也在从产品团队的角度想这个问题。他们构建产品,但并不亲自卖,他们跟销售合作,跟营销合作。你有没有什么建议,或者你认为产品团队能从这套销售方法中学到什么,从而帮助他们以不同的方式打造产品,或者以不同的方式与销售协作?
April Dunford: 有的。我是这么想的:一个好的销售演示的核心,是真正深入地理解你的差异化价值,也就是我能交付的、其他任何方案都无法交付的价值是什么。我经常在公司里看到的情况是,你有一个聪明的产品团队,他们对自己做的东西了如指掌,知道它为什么重要、对客户有什么价值,他们在开发的时候做了大量这方面的工作,但这些信息从来没有传递到销售那边去——因为销售根本没在推介价值,他们只是在推介功能:这是下拉菜单,这是它能做什么。所以解决这个问题的第一步,我认为是让一个跨职能团队一起来做产品定位。
如果我把产品、营销和销售放在一起,共同定义我们的差异化价值,那我就能把产品团队的好东西全部榨出来——他们深度理解产品,深度理解差异化在哪里,深度理解价值;同时我也能把销售团队的好东西全部榨出来——他们了解常见的异议是什么,champion 真正想做什么、不想做什么,典型客户账户里的情况是什么样的。然后所有这些有价值的信息交流就发生了,最终你会得到一个远比之前更好的差异化价值定义。
一旦我们完成了这些工作,接下来很自然地我们就能一起做一个反映这个差异化价值的销售演示。但通常发生的情况完全不是这样。通常的情况是:产品团队在做自己的事,销售团队在做自己的事,营销团队也在做自己的事。营销在自己的小泡泡里搞出一套产品定位,可能还会给销售团队做些材料,扔过去。销售团队看了一眼说,“我完全不知道这些东西在说什么。我不同意这个。这跟我看到的实际情况对不上。“然后他们就把这些东西扔了,继续用他们从盘古开天辟地以来就在用的那套销售演示。
Lenny: 那可真是够久了。所以第一期播客节目全部围绕产品定位,大家如果想深入了解,可以去听那一期,所以我们不会在这里花太多时间。但差异化价值也是这个流程中很大的一部分,所以我觉得值得在这里花点时间。你能不能分享几个例子,让大家感受一下,什么叫传达差异化价值?
差异化价值的含义
April Dunford: 好。差异化价值就是”为什么选我们而不是其他替代方案”这个问题的答案。在产品定位中我们切入这个问题的方式是,先立一个锚点:我们到底在和谁竞争?如果市场上没有我们,客户会怎么做?通常会有一些现状方案,它可能看起来跟你完全不一样,可能就是一个电子表格,或者让实习生做,或者纯靠手工。然后就是其他最终会出现在你的候选名单上的东西。基本上就是,我得打败所有这些,再加上客户的犹豫不决,才能赢得一笔交易——我可以把这个锚点立住。销售知道这个问题的答案。如果你有销售团队,他们知道这个问题的答案——如果我们不存在,客户会怎么做,他们知道。
然后下一步就是,我们有什么不同的东西?这个不同可以是能力层面的,产品功能层面的,或者是公司能力层面的——可能是功能特性,可能是你的定价模式,可能是我们的支持方式是其他公司没有的。各种各样的可能性都有。也可能是你除了那一个产品之外的产品组合的广度,这些东西可以写满一整块白板。然后我们要做的,就是逐条过那个功能清单,问一句,“所以呢?你有高级 AI,不管那个东西到底是什么——所以呢?为什么有人在手?“那个”所以呢”的答案,就是你的价值。而因为它来源于这个差异化的功能,所以它通常是其他竞争对手无法交付的价值,因为他们没有支撑这个价值的能力。
LevelJump 的差异化价值案例
April Dunford: 举个例子,我几年前合作过的一家公司,最近被 Salesforce 收购了,叫 LevelJump。他们做的是销售赋能(sales enablement)领域,这个赛道非常糟糕,有一大堆公司都在做销售赋能,而且看起来都一样。如果去看 LevelJump,分析一下竞争替代方案——销售赋能领域的所有公司,按方案思路可以分成两类:要么是 CMS,就是一个花哨的内容仓库,确保销售人员用的是正确的内容;要么是 LMS,即学习管理系统,我可以搭课程、做认证,以此来培训销售代表。
再看 LevelJump,他们的差异化能力在于——他们是唯一一家构建在 Salesforce 之上的。这就是那个功能特性:我们构建在 Salesforce 上,其他家不是。那又怎样?所以呢?我们最初讨论这个问题的时候,“所以呢”这个问题有五六个不同的答案,但最重要的答案是:因为我们构建在 Salesforce 之上,我的销售赋能数据与我的销售数据是打通的。然后你接着问,“那又怎样?“因为这意味着我可以真正衡量销售赋能是否缩短了首单成交时间,或者是否加快了达到业绩配额的速度。然后呢?如果我能缩短这个上手周期,我们就能更快地获得更多收入。这就是差异化价值。
从差异化价值到洞察
当我把这个带入销售演示时,可以把它转化为我的洞察。我的洞察是:你的销售代表每一天没有开单,都在让你亏钱。所以如果我们真的想解决销售赋能的问题,难道不应该有一种方式,能用销售指标来衡量销售赋能到底有没有效果吗?当然应该。
Lenny: 有意思。所以差异化价值通常会决定你开场的那个洞察?
April Dunford: 是的,绝对是。洞察本质上就是让你的差异化价值变得重要的那个背景——你需要知道什么,才能理解我的差异化价值的重要性?以 Help Scout 为例,洞察是:数字化企业的客户服务是一个增长驱动力。这从哪来的?看看他们的差异化价值就知道了。所以我们可以反过来推。即使产品最初并不是基于这个洞察构建的——也许我们是歪打正着、绕了个弯,或者通过不断迭代才走到那一步——我们可以看差异化价值,然后把它反推回洞察。
差异化价值不成立的信号
Lenny: 你总结出来的差异化价值或洞察不奏效时,有什么迹象?
April Dunford: 如果差异化价值在销售演示中不成立,你会听到客户说:“我为什么要为这个付钱?这对我来说没有价值。“跟我合作的公司,我的看法是——如果你已经在市场上销售了,而且有满意、活跃的客户,那差异化价值一定在那里。这就是他们选你的原因,这就是他们喜欢你的原因,这就是他们不流失的原因。它就在那里。你可能不知道它具体是什么,我们可能需要走一个小流程把它挖掘出来,但它存在,就在那里。
面对竞争对手应该多诚实
Lenny: 太好了。自从我们开始聊差异化价值以来,我心里一直有个问题:在谈论竞争对手时,你应该多诚实?显然这里有一个从极度诚实到极度偏袒的光谱,你在这方面有什么建议?
April Dunford: 在销售场景中,我认为你应该采取的姿态——我以前有个老板常讲这个——就是”从容自信”(calm confidence)。这种从容自信来自于我们真正理解为什么客户应该选我们。这就是差异化价值,我们真正理解它,也真正理解它最适合谁,而且我们根本不去追逐其他人。
我们应该能够走进来说:“看,我们是能交付结果的销售赋能方案。如果你不在乎这些结果,你不应该选我们,你应该选别人。“所以总体来说我们要做到极度诚实。我们要进来,对其他方案该肯定的肯定,因为通常其他方案对其他类型的公司完全没问题。如果你规模很小,又不是高速增长的电商业务,用共享收件箱就好了——免费的,好用,没毛病,直接用就行。如果你确实想把客服中心的成本降下来,也许你应该用 Zendesk。所以我觉得,在这种情况下我们越是能扮演一个向导的角色——走进来说:“看,这些方案适合这种情况,那些方案适合那种情况,而我们适合这种情况。你可能并不在乎这一点,如果你不在乎,我们就不是适合你的选择,你不应该选我们。”
我认为这种从容自信的理念就是:当客户应该选我们时,我们应当毫不畏惧地去争取这笔业务。但对于我们不是最佳匹配的业务,我们应该干脆放手,根本不应该去追。
Lenny: 这又回到了反复提到的教会他们如何购买。对于那些你觉得”这不是一个匹配”的情况,理想状态是你飞到他们办公室去推销之前就知道这一点。
April Dunford: 对,通常在上游已经做了某种资格审查,这个资格审查可以有很多种方式。如果你在最初阶段有某种产品驱动增长模式,你会在其中寻找信号。如果信号不在,你就不会跟他们谈。如果你的信号设计得当,你早就知道对方有意图,你早就知道你们是匹配的,你早就知道很多事情。很多公司的做法是让内部销售先做一个资格审查电话,然后再安排与销售代表的第一次通话。在那通资格审查电话里,你要确认:这是对的人吗?他们的需求我们真的能满足吗?这确实适合我们做什么的吗?如果不是,他们根本不会进入下一步。
品类创造与保龄球策略
Lenny: 关于差异化价值和不同方法,还有一个问题。之前有一位嘉宾非常强调创造品类(category creation)的重要性,甚至认为这可能是打造传奇企业的唯一途径。我知道你对此有不同看法,因为理论上如果你走那条路,就不存在替代方案了——就是”我们就是唯一”。你对此怎么看?
April Dunford: 这么说吧,有几点。第一,显然创造品类并不是打造传奇企业的唯一途径,因为绝大多数传奇企业并没有创造它们所在的品类。Google 没有创造搜索,Facebook 没有创造社交网络。这样的例子太多了。实际上,企业创造品类反而是例外,而非规律。所以我觉得说”唯一途径”有些不太诚实。这确实是打造大企业的一种方式,毫无疑问。但它绝对不是唯一的方式。事实上,它也不是最常见的方式,但它确实是一种可行的方式,而且确实有效。这是第一点。
第二点是,品类创造这件事很有意思。大多数公司,如果你看它们的发展轨迹,即便是那些成功的品类创造者,它们最初也并非以品类创造者的身份起步。它们通常是从现有品类中的一个细分市场切入,因为那通常是公司早期获得牵引力最容易的方式。因为市场品类的功能是什么?市场品类的功能就是帮助回答”这东西到底是什么”这个问题。如果我在一个现有品类中做产品定位,我可以说”我是面向极小型企业的 CRM”。这就是 Salesforce 最初的产品定位。我不需要向你解释 CRM 是什么,那已经存在了,那个领域已经有十亿美元级别的公司了。大家都知道 CRM 是什么,我可以说”我们是面向极小型企业的 CRM。你能在极小型企业中使用它的原因是我们没有任何软件需要安装,所以你不需要 IT 部门来维护它。这太棒了。”
大多数公司都是从这里起步的。接下来发生的是,如果你成为那个领域的主导者——这里要注意品类创造论的倡导者谈论这个话题时,好像从来没有哪个品类创造者输掉过市场。但 MySpace 后来怎样了?Ask Jeeves 后来怎样了?结果并不太好。大多数品类创造者实际上都被快速跟随者(fast follower)超越了。如果我们看 CRM 市场,Siebel 曾是那里的主导者,现在不是了,现在我们有了 Salesforce。一旦你成为那个市场的主导者,一个很聪明的举措是实际扩展品类的边界,这样你就能继续增长。我们看到的大多数品类创造的案例,都是那些在收入达到两亿、三亿、四亿美元、主导了自己领域之后,才决定移动球门,说”实际上现在我们正在扩展到所有这些其他领域,我们要给这个品类起个新名字”的公司。
这样的例子非常多。比如 Qualtrics,很多人谈论它是一个非常成功的品类创造案例。嗯,在收入达到三亿美元之前,他们就是调查软件,和现有品类中的其他公司没什么两样。那让他们走到了那一步,而且效果很好。等到我们主导了这个领域,现在我们可以说它是——随便什么——客户体验软件。Snowflake 是另一个好例子——云端数据仓库,他们做的就是数据仓库,一个现有市场,是面向云端的数据仓库。那不是品类创造。那让他们一路走到了准备上市的阶段,然后他们才变成”cloud data”,这是他们试图扩展并宣称”嗯,这不仅仅是数据仓库,实际上还包括数据湖和其他所有数据相关的东西”的尝试。
这对他们来说是个聪明的举措,因为他们现在在那个领域已经非常知名了。我不是说品类创造是坏事。确实有一些公司从一开始就成功创造了品类,然后长期存活并拥有该品类。但更常见的情况是,公司做了创造品类的艰苦工作,而恰恰在品类开始站稳脚跟的那一刻,快速跟随者可以带着大量新鲜资金进来,从你所有的错误中学习,然后在你以为已经成功的时候把你从巅峰上踢下来。
所以我认为品类创造,再说一次,是好的,是有效的,但我觉得我们在考虑让早期阶段的企业或还没有主导其所在品类的企业去做这件事时,需要非常谨慎。更常见的情况是公司切入市场,切下市场的一块,主导那块市场,然后成功向外扩展。这就是 Jeffrey Moore 所说的保龄球策略(bowling pin strategy)。几乎所有成功的公司都遵循保龄球策略。
Lenny: 等等,那是什么?我们快速聊一下这个。
April Dunford: 对,你记得那个概念。最近两个月我谈论保龄球策略的次数真是太多了。这来自于一系列关于创新被采纳方式的研究。这方面有大量的研究,我可能会引用得不太精确,因为 Jeffrey Moore 的东西我已经读了几十年了。但保龄球策略是这样的:拿下一个大市场的最简单方式,是定义一个被市场领导者服务不足的细分市场。
如果你想象一堆保龄球瓶,我们要围绕首瓶(lead pin)画一个圈,就是这块我们容易拿下的小市场,而市场领导者可能根本不在意它。我们推倒那根球瓶,推倒那根球瓶让我们能够够到紧挨着它的三根球瓶。现在我在这里建立了一个滩头阵地(beachhead),我可以去拿下接下来三根球瓶,把它们推倒,最终我变得足够大,可以挑战市场领导者,然后超越他们。
所以我早期职业生涯的例子是,我在一家公司工作,我们以为自己是企业软件。后来我们把它缩小到投资银行的 CRM,然后我们真的为投资者画了保龄球瓶,说”首瓶是投资银行的 CRM。一旦我们推倒它,我们就去零售银行,然后我们就变成银行业的 CRM。一旦我们推倒那个,我们就去保险业,然后我们就变成金融服务的 CRM。一旦我们推倒那个,我们就会成为一家大公司,然后挑战 Siebel 成为企业软件的 CRM。“结果我们被 Siebel 以大约十亿美元收购了,不过无所谓了。大多数公司,如果你看它们的历史,实际上都是这样起步的。所以如果我们只是快进到它们收入三亿美元的时候,我们可以说”创造品类是唯一要做的事”,但问题是,在那之前发生了什么?那完全是另一回事。
完美世界的方案特征
Lenny: 太好了。我们回到你的框架上来。我正在看那几个要点列表。实际上我们已经涵盖了其中大部分内容了。首先是洞察,你帮助他们理解世界上正在发生什么、正在发生什么变化,以及为什么这件事很重要。然后你谈到可能的替代方案有哪些,各自的优缺点。接着还有第三个步骤,我们还没有讨论过,就是分享完美解决方案的特征。你能谈谈这个吗,为什么它很重要?
April Dunford: 这是铺垫阶段的结论部分。以 Help Scout 为例,结论部分我们会说,“你看,你真正想要的是像收件箱一样好用的客户成功软件。你永远不会超出它的能力范围,而且它从底层架构开始就是为了提供卓越的服务而构建的。“在销售演示的这个环节,我们实际上是要与客户达成共识——确认我们在世界观上是一致的。所以我会说,“好了,我们已经讨论了其他替代方案的优缺点,“然后说,“那么,你同意吗?我们能不能达成共识,对你来说一个真正好的方案应该具备 A、B 和 C?“客户要么说”没错,同意”,要么不同意。如果他们在完美世界的定义上与你完全一致,那我就拿下了。我已经赢下了这个单子,而我甚至还没有谈到我们自己——因为按照我铺设的方式,我是唯一能够交付这个结果的人。所以说,如果你说”对”,我接下来要做的只是证明我能做到,并帮你克服采纳它的障碍。
Lenny: 听起来太简单了。
April Dunford: 是啊,我的意思是……
Lenny: 感觉像是在引他们入套。
April Dunford: 如果这些事情都简单的话,Lenny,我们早就在海滩上捧着椰子喝饮料了。
Lenny: 哎,咱们争取让它实现吧。好,这就是铺垫部分。第二部分你叫什么来着?
April Dunford: 叫跟进——
Lenny: 跟进。
跟进阶段:差异化价值
April Dunford: 这个阶段的核心是差异化价值。在第二部分中,第一步通常是我们介绍自己的产品,这时市场品类就很关键了。我们进来说,“好的,我们能不能同意一个真正好的方案应该勾选这些框?是的。好,很好。现在让我们来谈谈我们自己。好,我们相信这一点。这就是为什么我们做了我们所做的产品。”
假设我是 Help Scout,我们是为数字企业提供客户服务软件的,或者不管我们的市场品类怎么定义。我们先介绍品类,让客户心里清楚我们是什么东西,然后再进入价值部分——这是我们如何做到的。如果我们想一下一个典型的销售电话,假设半小时、45 分钟,我预期在这通电话中,超过一半的时间要花在差异化价值这个阶段。如果我们在做演示,那就是演示的部分。我们会说,“好,第一步,让我展示我们是怎么做到的。像收件箱一样好用,这是对应的功能。永远不会超出它的能力范围,这是对应的功能。提供卓越的客户体验,这是对应的功能。“这就是你当初点击’给我看演示’按钮时真正想得到的核心内容。
证明与异议处理
然后我们用三个小部分来收尾。第一,通常我需要向你展示一些证据,证明我能做到我所说的。如果我说这个产品能提供卓越的客户体验,我怎么证明?我可以通过其他客户说它很棒来证明,这是一种方式。如果我有一些独立的第三方数据能证明我所声称的,我也可以拿出来。但很多时候我们的做法是,“让我给你看看一个使用我们产品的公司是怎么做的。这是之前的样子,他们做了这件事,这是之后的样子。“客户案例研究通常是不错的方式,但通常会有一个叫”证明”的步骤——我向你展示了价值,现在给你证据证明我真的能交付这个价值,而不仅仅是我在吹牛。
接下来就是可选的异议处理步骤,他们会说,“哦,听起来不错,但 IT 部门绝对不会同意的,“或者”听起来不错,但可能太贵了,“之类的。你要尽可能地处理这些异议。最后以”请求”收尾,就是你的销售流程中的下一步是什么。比如,“嘿,那我们要推进这件事的话,需要 IT 部门参与吗?IT 需要看看吗?你想让我们进来和 IT 一起做演示,还是你想让我帮你准备一些给 IT 的材料?“就是你的销售流程中接下来的那一步。
Lenny: 好的。让我把这个复述一遍,也方便做笔记或记住这些内容的人。框架分两部分:铺垫和跟进。在铺垫中,有洞察、替代方案及优缺点、完美世界的方案特征。然后你介绍产品,讲差异化价值,分享它为什么有效的证明,可能还需要处理异议、沉默异议,最后是提出下一步的请求。
April Dunford: 没错。就是这样。
如何判断销售演示是否有效
Lenny: 关于如何判断这个框架是否有效,你的差异化价值是否有效,或者你的洞察是否有效,你有没有一个大致的经验法则,比如一个什么样的成功率感觉是对的?这个框架应该多频繁地奏效,才能让你觉得”我觉得我们找对了”?
April Dunford: 一般来说,如果销售演示不奏效,那是因为产品定位太弱了。
那些跳过了回去重新审视产品定位的步骤、直接去搭建新销售演示的公司,没有真正确保他们把差异化价值搞对了——结果谁知道呢,也许有效,也许无效。而且很多时候是无效的。所以在我与客户的合作中,我们会一路回到起点。我们回到最开头,先做产品定位。如果我把公司里最聪明的人都关在一个房间里,而且我们已经做了足够多的交易,对客户的购买方式、他们喜欢什么、他们不了解什么都有相当的了解。如果高管团队在房间里,而且他们有合理的客户经验,那么只要我们遵循一个流程,我们基本上可以对得出的产品定位感到有信心。
接下来就是把产品定位映射到销售演示上,然后去测试。我认为测试中有几件事非常重要。第一,我们绝对需要销售团队参与构建销售演示。如果没有销售团队参与,这个销售演示永远不会被采用。销售代表的特点是——即使他们不喜欢现在的销售演示,他们也已经习惯了,他们熟悉它,背下来了,而且在第三页幻灯片上还有一个他们爱讲的小笑话。所以他们不会轻易放弃现有的销售演示。所以你必须让销售管理层参与构建新的销售演示,而且我绝对不会把新的销售演示做好了就直接扔过去说,“祝你好运。“因为接下来会发生的是,他们会找出一堆借口来说为什么不能用这个销售演示。
April Dunford: 正确的做法是,把你最好的销售代表挑出来,把最好的那个叫过来,让他学习新的销售演示。他们得学会,得向你演示,向销售负责人演示。我们反复练习,然后让这位代表用合格的潜在客户去测试这个销售演示。我们不会去找现有客户——他们已经被旧的产品定位和旧的销售演示”污染”了,而这套新的销售演示需要的是对合格潜在客户有效,所以我们按照它设计的方式来用。我们拿合格的潜在客户,对他们使用新的销售演示。通常我们会安排一个测试期,每次演示完之后大家聚在一起讨论,“哪些地方有效?哪些地方不行?也许那个词让客户犯迷糊了。也许我们需要把这张幻灯片从这里挪到那里,“就这样不断调整。
做了足够多的演示之后,通常会出现两种结果。在这个测试框架下,我非常依赖我最优秀的代表的专业判断力来辨别好坏。当最优秀的代表对销售演示感到满意了,做了大量演示,反复调整过,到某个节点这位代表会说,“好了,我觉得这个销售演示已经优化到位了,我不会再回到旧的销售演示了。我就用这个,因为我觉得这个效果更好。“一位有经验的销售代表是能判断出来的——只要你给他们机会去熟悉它、磨合它,用它向一批新的潜在客户做演示,他们就知道这个销售演示是不是比旧的更好。
如果你的最佳销售代表说,“哦,这比旧的销售演示好太多了。我从客户的反应方式就能感觉得到,从首次通话就能转化成实际机会的数量也能感觉得到。“那你该怎么办?到这个阶段,我称之为”通过”。然后我们就可以把这位代表演示的过程录下来用于培训,再让这位代表回到销售团队其余人面前,由他来说服大家。这位代表回去以后会说,“各位听着,你们要是还在用那个旧的销售演示就太蠢了,那玩意儿烂透了。这个新的销售演示好太多了。相信我,我是整个团队里业绩最好的。顺便说一句,这是我用这套演示文稿拿到的正在推进的交易清单。你们也应该去用,我来教你们怎么做。”
这样一来,就是销售教销售——销售教销售,而不是市场部隔墙把东西扔过去,然后祈祷说,“希望这玩意儿管用。“我们应该看到的是首次通话之后的即时提升。大多数情况下,这意味着在首次实质性通话之后,转化为机会的交易比例更高了。有时候,取决于进入管道的潜在客户质量,我们实际上淘汰掉的更多。但有时候这也是好事。
立竿见影的效果
但我们应该看到的是一个即时的提升——更多交易进入管道。这是一招很漂亮的棋,尤其是在当下大家的预算都很紧张、你只想从柠檬里再挤点汁出来的时候。这是一个非常简单的方法,能从管道里多榨出一些成果。只需要回去,收紧你的产品定位,收紧那个销售演示。我们可以立刻产生影响,因为几周之内就能推行,然后开始让更好的交易流过管道——因为客户更理解你的价值了,更明白为什么应该选你了。在经济不好的时候,这就是容易摘到的低垂果实。
Lenny: 为了让大家感受一下这件事可能有多容易,你会建议人们花多长时间来调整产品定位,然后在这个试点上又要花多少时间?总共需要多少时间才能有可能显著提升销售?
April Dunford: 在与我合作的客户中,当我们做产品定位的时候,产品定位部分只需要一周时间。我们从开始到结束就是一周。我们在这件事上追求的就是速度,要尽快推动事情落地。产品定位一周之内进进出出就搞定了。之后可能需要——这取决于公司,公司越大就越慢,但有些大公司其实也挺快的——如果你有动力,我们把销售演示做出来并落地也不应该花太长时间。
然后我们需要找到一位代表,培训这位代表,测试需要多长时间则取决于你有多少交易流量。所以如果你做的是大单,合格的潜在客户本身就不多,那可能需要几周。但如果你有大量潜在客户源源不断地进来,那就能很快完成。我有客户从开始到结束,新的销售演示推出去、团队开始使用,两周就搞定了。这大概是最快的速度了。大多数人,我觉得大约需要一个月。
Lenny: 很好。这个时间确实非常短——
April Dunford: 有时候你是 IBM,天知道什么时候才能推进,对吧?但大多数人如果大家都有动力,我们可以一个月内推出来并让它跑起来。
Lenny: 你提到了市场部,之前你也说过市场部在某种程度上参与了这个过程。关于如何让市场部参与、他们在什么环节介入,你有什么建议?
April Dunford: 是的,通常在产品定位完成之后,市场部最终会成为产品定位的守护者。他们会变成产品定位的”警察”,因为很多产品定位相关的东西最终都会以营销物料的形式呈现。所以他们对此是有切身利益的。当我在做市场副总裁的时候,我通常是那个发起产品定位工作的人——“我们大家一起来做产品定位吧。“然后通常也是我来推动确定销售演示,但这是我和销售、产品三方一起协作的。销售演示定稿之后,取决于组织的规模以及你是否有销售赋能团队或者销售内部的某个人来负责维护销售演示——通常我和销售负责人会一起确定,“好,这就是我们的销售演示,已经锁定,在出现需要我们调整产品定位的情况之前,我们不会改动它。到那时候我们再重新审视这个销售演示。“
市场部的角色
我们会每个季度对代表进行销售演示的重新认证之类的工作。这部分通常由我和销售负责人共同负责。但具体怎么做取决于你。我觉得谁来负责这件事其实没那么重要。如果你有一个好的产品营销团队,好的产品营销团队通常会对产品定位和销售演示非常上心,这两件事属于他们的职权范围,但具体还是取决于你怎么定义职责。我等不及想看你采访 Airbnb 了,让他们讲讲这套东西是怎么运作的。他们不一样,因为他们是面向消费者的,但每家公司的组织架构都各不相同。如果你有产品营销团队,那就是一种模式;如果没有,就是另一种模式。但总得有人来当这个负责人。所以我们必须决定谁来担这个角色。
Lenny: 最后还有几个问题。一个是为了激励大家去做这件事——在那些花时间投入并重新思考销售演示方式的公司中,你看到过什么样的成效?
April Dunford: 嗯,大家不太喜欢我谈论收入方面的数据。但我们确实看到了巨大的效果——同样,最直接的影响体现在销售端,每个人都为此非常兴奋。
April Dunford: 销售端的感受最明显,每个人都为此非常兴奋。因为有时候大家会担心,我们原来的产品定位已经存在了,客户也是通过这个定位进入销售漏斗的。所以他们在营销中接触的是旧的产品定位,然后我们在销售演示中又用新的产品定位去冲击他们。他们不会觉得,“哦,你动了我的奶酪”吗?结果通常完全不是问题。所以我们通常能立刻看到销售端的提升。有好几家公司告诉我,仅仅通过优化销售演示并加以推广,他们从首次销售电话到商机阶段的交易数量翻了一番。我觉得这并不罕见。我自己之前在一家公司做内勤时就经历过,当时我是市场副总裁,我们仅通过优化销售演示,在两个季度内就让收入翻倍了。就是优化一下销售演示。
Lenny: 我的天哪。好吧。
April Dunford: 优化销售演示。
Lenny: 没什么大不了的。
April Dunford: 是的。
Lenny: 好的,那么——
April Dunford: 我得说,那是一次很大的产品定位调整,不是小调整。大多数时候,我们不会做到那种程度。大多数时候,只是收紧和优化。我们不是说”哦,我们以前是这个,现在变成那个了”。大多数时候只是收紧和优化,但通常销售演示做得实在太差了。我告诉你,真的差得离谱,所以这里有低垂的果实——只要稍微改进一下,就能对销售漏斗中后续环节的转化率产生巨大的影响。
Lenny: 再说一次,如果大家想深入了解产品定位的步骤,你的第一本书《Obviously Awesome》是一本很好的指南,我们的第一期播客也讲过这个话题。另外你还在我的newsletter里发过一篇客座文章,给了一个快速入门指南。所以有非常多的工具可以帮助你完成这个过程。
April Dunford: 确实很多。
与 Andy Raskin 框架的对比
Lenny: 在我们聊天的过程中,我心里一直想着另一位之前的嘉宾 Andy Raskin,他有一套不同的框架,感觉有些相似,但我知道它们是不同的。他的框架从世界上发生的一个变化开始,然后讲在这个变化中谁会赢,谁会输,接着再讲为什么这个产品是最好的。你对那种方法跟这种方法相比有什么看法?最大的区别在哪里?
April Dunford: 关于那个框架,我确实认为它在某些条件下是有效的,但同样,我认为那些条件可能比较边缘化。我觉得那个销售演示框架有几个地方是有缺失的。首先是,那个框架中完全没有差异化价值这个概念,对我来说这是一个巨大的遗漏。在那个框架中,它假设”新的”天然就有价值,“旧的”天然就不好,有时候确实是这样。有时候就是你和对现状的较量,而现状是某种糟糕的旧东西——某个遗留系统,或者是手工流程之类的,而你是市场上唯一的解决方案,那你可以这么搞。但大多数时候,我们面对的不是这种情况。大多数时候,做同一件事有多种新的方式,你不能简单地说”我是唯一的新方案,其他都是又旧又差的。”
所以我通常需要更加精准地穿针引线。这是第一点。第二点是,对于大多数公司来说,如果我们真正理解客户和决策的话,“旧的”是好的——它安全,没有风险。有人会说”不,我才不会买 Salesforce,那是旧东西”吗?我觉得不会。所以在很多情况下,你不能依赖”买这个因为它是新的,新的更好”这种说法,这其实是偷懒。大多数时候,客户想知道的是,它到底好在哪里?告诉我能从你这里得到什么别处得不到的价值。你必须比”相信我,它是新的,新的就是好”更具体才行。这是第一点。
第二点是关于从一个趋势开始的想法。表面上看挺不错的,但问题在于,这个趋势通常不是你独有的。其他人也看到了这个趋势。所以你的开场方式,任何竞争对手都可以用同样的方式开场。
我以前做销售演示很多年,一直被教导用”问题-解决方案”的结构。我们会像定义趋势一样来定义问题。我们会说”世界正在发生变化”。我当时卖数据库,就说”世界正在变化,数据呈指数级增长。“这不废话嘛,我们都知道。我所有的竞争对手都能说这句话,而且我所有竞争对手应对这个趋势的方式也是一样的。所以除非你对趋势有特别独到的见解,否则那其实不叫趋势,而是你对趋势的洞察。所以我觉得趋势不是特别好,因为它不总是你独有的。而我们理想中想要的是,我们能说出一些竞争对手说不出来的东西。而趋势通常是超出我们控制范围的,它存在于外部世界,其他人也能看到。
所以我觉得它不太好。我认为那种结构很像我们在 VC 融资路演或投资者路演中使用的结构,因为我们在那种场合讨论的是更长的时间线,我们可以说”看,世界真的在发生变化,十年之后将会是一片混乱和毁灭,唯一站着的只有我们,因此不存在竞争。“因为时间跨度更长,我们讨论的是整个市场的颠覆——这本身就是相当理论化的东西——所以在投资者路演中我们可以用很多这样的手法。事实上,投资者路演中我们就应该这么做。但销售演示关注的是当下。销售演示是,好的,我现在要拿我的钱换当下的价值。你不能扯太远的东西,否则你就是在给每个人一个拖延的理由,而他们本来就因为不知道该怎么办而犹豫不决。
Lenny: 我觉得我需要做一个辩论版的播客,请人来——
关于框架选择的建议
April Dunford: 我知道,但我想说一件事,我觉得大家在研究这些东西的时候应该想一想,因为如果你试图搞清楚这些,真的会非常困惑。我非常不喜欢那些做品类创造的人的一点是,他们说那是成功的唯一方式。一般来说,任何事情都不是这样的。做任何事情都有很多种方法。所以我觉得大家应该多尝试。对于任何一个框架,我觉得他们应该看一看,看看是否适合自己和自己的情况。也许适合,也许不适合。
我觉得他们应该从任何能借鉴的地方借鉴,找出适合自己情况的方法。我的东西,我希望大家把它当作一个起点,但大家不应该被它束缚。市场上有很多行之有效的方法,我觉得我们唯一可以确定的是,我们不能说”嗯,这就是规则,事情总是这样运作的。“如果真有那么简单,那这就不会这么难了。我们也就不需要播客、newsletter和各种东西来试图搞清楚这些了。
Lenny: 确实如此。好了,说到这里,我们已经到了非常令人兴奋的闪电问答环节。你准备好了吗?
April Dunford: 哦,是的。闪电问答。天哪,好紧张。好吧。
Lenny: 好,第一个问题。你向别人推荐最多的两三本书是什么?
April Dunford: 这个问题好回答。最近我非常沉迷于 Matt Dixon 的作品,我们在播客里已经提到过他几次了。Matt Dixon 的新书《The JOLT Effect》非常棒,因为他有大量数据支撑,而他从数据中发现的很多东西,很多都跟我们公认的营销智慧相悖。所以我觉得那本书充满了有价值的干货,每个人都应该看看。他的前一本书《The Challenger Sale》,以及那本书的姊妹篇《The Challenger Customer》,也非常优秀,同样基于深入研究。那些书现在已经有年头了,但我们在《The JOLT Effect》中看到,所有这些结论都依然成立。《The Challenger Sale》里的所有内容在十年后都没有改变。所以我觉得这几本书放在一起读非常棒。
另一本我总是推荐的书,是最早关于产品定位的书,也就是 Ries 和 Trout 写的《Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind》。我的那本已经翻得卷了角。那本书我大概读了一百遍,到现在仍然能从中发现以前没注意到的东西。所以如果你真的想在产品定位这个问题上深入钻研,我的书是”怎么做”的书,他们的书是”到底是什么”的书。我觉得所有对产品定位感兴趣的人都应该去读那本书。
Lenny: 太棒了。顺便说一句,你的第一本书就在我身后某个地方。我不知道具体在哪,但就在那儿。
April Dunford: 我这本就在手边,所以我可以做这个噱头。看,在这儿。
Lenny: 漂亮。
April Dunford: 这是新的那本,那是旧的那本。
Lenny: 看 YouTube 的观众可以欣赏到你学会的这个花活儿。第二个问题,你最近最喜欢的电影或电视剧是什么?
April Dunford: 天哪,我说这个要惹麻烦了。你知道奉俊昊吗,就是拍《寄生虫》的那位?
Lenny: 知道。
April Dunford: 在《寄生虫》之前,他有一部电影叫《雪国列车》。这片子挺老了。好像是——
Lenny: 我看过。就是那部火车上的?
April Dunford: 2013 年的。你看过吗?
Lenny: 看过。
April Dunford: 我太喜欢这部电影了。最近我跟爸爸一起坐火车旅行,出发前我们聊起了火车,然后我们全家又把《雪国列车》重温了一遍。我和我女儿一起看,我们对这部电影真的是非常着迷。有意思的是,这片子刚上映的时候,我在一家创业公司工作,CEO 过来问我:“最近看了什么好电影吗?“我说:“天哪,你一定要去看《雪国列车》。“结果他带着一个女生去第一次约会看了这部电影,第二天回来气坏了。不是有点生气,是非常非常生我的气。他说:“那是我看过最烂的电影。“我说:“兄弟,你要是告诉我你去约会,我就不会推荐了。我不知道啊。”
Lenny: 对,那也是我对那部电影的感受。我并不享受它,但我觉得你得带着某种心态去看——
April Dunford: 它是两极分化的。你要么觉得它太棒了,要么就会说,这也太烂了,我刚才看了什么?
Lenny: 这倒很能说明你的电影品味。我们对你了解了不少,April。那部电影确实很特别。
April Dunford: 你看过《寄生虫》吗?那部确实厉害。
Lenny: 那部确实厉害。非常不一样。跟我之前想象的完全不同。我没意识到是同一个人导演的。
April Dunford: 对,是的。
Lenny: 好了。两部电影推荐给大家。我很好奇大家对《雪国列车》会怎么看。
April Dunford: 不过提醒大家,约会别看这部。
最喜欢的面试问题
Lenny: 天哪,我到现在还时不时想起那部电影。下一个问题,你面试别人时最喜欢问什么问题?通常是招聘的时候,你可以根据自己情况来回答。
April Dunford: 以前我在公司内部带团队的时候,还在做营销副总裁那会儿,我觉得很多营销人员都带着一些坏习惯,尤其是创业公司的营销人员。营销这一行有点像野蛮生长的西部,所以有时候新人进来,人很聪明,但在前一家公司学了些东西,你会想说,求你别在这儿这么干,在我们这儿行不通。所以后来我总结出了一套方法,我主要看重态度。你是不是很有热情?对我们做的事情是不是非常投入?其他东西我几乎都能教你。唯一我教不了的是说服性写作。我觉得这是一项可以学习的技能,人是可以学会说服性写作的。
只是我没有时间亲自教你。所以我以前会给候选人一个写作测试,我会说:“这样,想想你最近买的东西,给我写两段话,就把它推销给我。“我特别喜欢这个测试,因为行就是行,不行就是不行,一目了然。我们在产品营销和营销工作中最终要做的很多事情,都多少涉及一些写作,所以这是一项基础技能。如果你不具备这个能力,那恰恰是我唯一教不了你的东西。
Lenny: 哇,这个太有意思了。我从来没听说过拿这个当面试问题的。我很喜欢。我觉得产品经理——
April Dunford: 这是我从一家公司偷来的,那家公司招我的时候让我做了这个测试,我当时就想,这招真聪明,我要偷走。当时的问题是,我焦虑得不行,不知道该写什么产品,而我正好刚买了一双新的跑鞋。所以我就写了关于我那双新的 Brooks 长跑跑鞋的两段话。不过写得还不错,我拿到了那份工作。
最喜欢的新产品
Lenny: 这正好可以自然过渡到下一个问题:你最近有没有发现什么特别喜欢的产品?
April Dunford: 最近我有点沉迷于——我甚至不知道该怎么描述这类东西——就是那种科技含量低但非常棒的产品。其中一类我现在特别喜欢的是钢笔。我不知道你有没有用过钢笔写字。
Lenny: 没有,但我知道是什么。
April Dunford: 有一家公司叫 Lamy,总部在德国,他们做世界上最好的钢笔。非常漂亮,非常惊艳。有些型号非常贵,如果你想花很多钱买一支笔,完全没问题。但他们有一款叫 AL-Star 的,不算贵,大概二三十美元。对于一支笔来说可能算贵了,但又不至于贵到丢了会心疼。所以 Lamy AL-Star 就是我最近最喜欢的产品。我现在手边没有,应该有一支的,拿起来展示一下效果会很好,但我的包不在这儿,笔在包里。Lamy AL-Star,你可以去搜一下,这些笔真的很漂亮。如果你没用过钢笔写字,需要一点时间来适应,但适应之后就会觉得,天哪,感觉太好了。你再也不想用圆珠笔了。
Lenny: 我正想问,你最享受的是不是书写的手感?
April Dunford: 手感。完全不同的体验。对,非常棒。
Lenny: 我用的是 Muji 的笔。不知道你知不知道那种笔。
April Dunford: 哦知道,那个确实挺好的。它们是滚珠笔,滚珠笔,很好用,但还是比不上钢笔。
Lenny: 毕竟不是钢笔。
April Dunford: Muji 的笔确实不错。
Lenny: 那你需要蘸墨水之类的吗?怎么用的?
April Dunford: 不用。它们要么自带一个小墨囊,你插进去就行;如果你心疼环境,不想老是扔墨囊,还有一种可重复填充的墨囊,基本上就是再插一个东西进去,它就把墨水吸上来了。所以不用蘸墨水,那也太疯了。我可没法把那玩意儿带上飞机,老兄。
Lenny: 人家会没收你的墨水。好了,接下来问题可能更有挑战性,也可能特别简单。你有没有一个最喜欢的、经常对自己重复、喜欢跟别人分享、觉得值得反复提醒自己的人生座右铭?
April Dunford: 我最近的状态是——也许这只是上了年纪的人才这样——但我最近的状态就是:没什么大不了的。没什么大不了的,没什么大不了的。你会遇到一些觉得天大的事,好的坏的都有,你会想,哇,如果这件事发生了就太好了,然后它真的发生了,你觉得,嗯,确实挺好的,但本来日子也过得不错。反过来也一样,哦,如果这件事发生了就太糟了,然后它真的发生了,你觉得,好像也没那么糟。所以我不知道这算好还是坏,但最近我就处在这样一个比较放松的状态,觉得没什么大不了的,兄弟,一切都挺好的。
Lenny: 这个太有共鸣了。虽然你这么说,但有时候还是很难真正说服自己。不过这确实是个很好的座右铭。我要偷走自己用。我也经常用不同的方式对自己说类似的话。
April Dunford: 是啊。
Lenny: 你爸妈教给你的最有价值的道理是什么?
创业家庭的熏陶
April Dunford: 有意思的是,这跟刚才说的有点关系。我爸做生意,我长在加拿大的一个小镇上,那边是加拿大的度假湖区。我爸经营着给游客玩的那些东西——船啊、摩托啊、ATV 之类的。他经营那门生意做了好多年,几年前退休的时候把它卖了。但在创业家庭长大是一件很特别的事,因为你能亲眼看到这些起起落落。生意很好,然后生意很差,然后我们都穷了,然后生意又好了,我们又不穷了。所以我爸一直有一种态度:你就得咬牙扛过去。
就是咬牙扛过去。好事会有,坏事也会有,但关键就是继续走下去,继续走下去。他经营那门生意大概三、四十年吧,我也不太清楚。他的口号是”乐趣之家,始于 ‘71 年”。他是 71 年开始做的,大概是三四年前卖的。很长时间了。
Lenny: 哇。
April Dunford: 最后结果都挺好的。所以我觉得在一个你能看到起起落落的家庭中长大,有一种很酷的东西,然后又回到那个感觉——我们就在这里咬牙扛着,没什么大不了的。
Lenny: 现在看得出这一切的源头了。
April Dunford: 是啊。
最爱的城市
Lenny: 最后一个问题。你经常出差、做演讲,去过很多城市。我好奇,你有没有一个大家可能不太知道的、你特别喜欢的城市,或者你特别喜欢做演讲的场地?
April Dunford: 说起来挺老套的,但我就是爱巴黎。就是喜欢。但对我来说,巴黎是一种特别的氛围。我上大学的时候做过交换生,当时在学工程,第三年在巴黎郊区的一所学校读的。我在那里待了一整年,学了一点法语。到后来我法语还挺不错的。现在法语已经很糟糕了。所以我对巴黎有一种理解,我喜欢巴黎。每次去巴黎我都玩得特别开心。我有自己想去的那几家餐厅,有几个想去逛的地方。我就往咖啡馆一坐,看看漂亮的人,喝杯好咖啡。我真的很享受巴黎的整体氛围。现在大家开始知道这件事了,法国公司会打电话给我说:“我们能拿到巴黎折扣吗?听说你喜欢来这里。“我就说:“好吧。”
Lenny: 这下好了,[听不清]。
April Dunford: 那里有一个很棒的产品管理会议叫 La Product Conference,是 Tega 团队办的,向 Tega 致敬。我去过好几次他们的会议,他们做得非常棒,场地也特别好。场地会换,但上次——也就是两年前——是在一个老剧院里。美极了。那是一个很棒的场地,一个很棒的城市,一个很棒的会议。所以,向法国人民致敬。
Lenny: 天哪,听起来太梦幻了。巴黎,我能理解为什么是最爱。April,我觉得我们完成了所有想完成的事情。我想每个听了这期播客的人都会在销售演示和推销方面变得更好。哪怕只从这个框架里取一个要素——比如从一个洞察开始,或者聚焦差异化价值——都会让他们有所提升。所以我很为我们骄傲。非常感谢你来做这期节目。最后两个问题。大家如果想联系你,在网上哪里可以找到你?听众怎样能帮到你?
April Dunford: 哪里能找到我?我的网站是 aprildunford.com。我现在唯一在做的社交媒体就是 LinkedIn。我有点社交媒体疲劳了。我在 threads 和 Instagram 上稍微试了试,但 LinkedIn 是找我最好的地方,如果你想用最省事的方式关注我的动态的话。不过我现在什么都做了,Lenny,我有一个播客,叫 Positioning with April Dunford。我还有一份通讯,也叫 Positioning,你可以在 Substack 上找到,或者去 aprildunford.com/books 也可以订阅。这些是主要的东西。然后就是书了,如果你想深入了解这些东西的话。我知道的一切都在书里。说实话,没有什么我知道的东西是不在书里的。
Lenny: 太棒了。那听众怎样能帮到你?就是去看看这些东西?
April Dunford: 应该是这样吧。你知道吗?我现在处在这个阶段,我觉得,再说一次,可能也是上了年纪的关系。我处在这样一种哲思的阶段:我不会永远做这件事。我现在想做的就是把所有有用的东西从我的脑子里拿出来,在我结束之前放到这个世界上。所以我现在非常专注于为别人提供有用的东西。我本来没觉得我需要写一本关于销售演示的书,但后来我脑子里有了这个想法——所有人的销售演示都太糟糕了,而且根本没有一本关于如何做销售演示的书。我不是说我的就是世界上最牛的东西,但总比什么都没有好。这就是我现在在做的事情——努力对别人有用,因为用不了多久我就什么都不做了,我觉得大概就是这个意思。
Lenny: Arnold Schwarzenegger 的新书叫 Be Useful。我觉得这句话完美概括了如何获得成功,尤其是在我们做的工作中,就是帮助别人。我一直在反复想这句话——做一个有用的人。
April Dunford: 我觉得这件事真的很重要。我写第一本书的时候,人们开始给我写信说,“你的书太棒了。“我的第一反应是说,“很高兴你喜欢。“但后来我反问自己,你知道吗?我其实不在乎你喜不喜欢。这不是娱乐。我真正想做的是创造有用的东西。所以我真正希望的是人们读完这些东西之后回来说,“这很有用。我们一直在纠结这个问题,你帮我们打通了某个关节,这很有用。“这就是我现在想做的事。
Lenny: April,非常感谢你能来。这次太精彩了。
April Dunford: 非常感谢。来这里总是很愉快。
Lenny: 随时欢迎你来。等你出第三本书的时候我们也许可以再来一版 V3,如果你有朝一日——
April Dunford: 不会的,不可能。
Lenny: 好吧。好的。那么,大家再见。非常感谢收听。如果你觉得这期节目有价值,可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 或你喜欢的播客应用上订阅本节目。也请考虑给我们评分或留下评论,这能帮助更多听众发现这个播客。你可以在 lennyspodcast.com 找到所有往期节目或了解更多关于本节目的信息。下期再见。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| Andy Raskin | Andy Raskin(人名,保留原文) |
| Ask Jeeves | Ask Jeeves(品牌名,保留原文) |
| ballpoint pen | 圆珠笔 |
| beachhead | 滩头阵地 |
| Bob Moesta | Bob Moesta(人名,保留原文) |
| Bong Joon-ho | 奉俊昊(国际知名导演,使用公认中文译名) |
| bowling pin strategy | 保龄球策略 |
| Brooks | Brooks(跑鞋品牌,保留原文) |
| calm confidence | 从容自信 |
| category creation | 品类创造 |
| champion | champion(B2B 采购中主导选型的内部推动者,保留原文) |
| CMS | CMS(内容管理系统,Content Management System) |
| cost center | 成本中心 |
| CRM | CRM(客户关系管理,行业通用缩写,保留原文) |
| differentiated value | 差异化价值 |
| dominant player | 主导者 |
| fast follower | 快速跟随者 |
| FOMO | FOMO(错失恐惧,Fear of Missing Out) |
| fountain pen | 钢笔 |
| G2 Crowd | G2 Crowd(软件评测平台,保留原文) |
| Gardner Group | Gardner Group(咨询机构,保留原文) |
| Gong | Gong(销售智能平台,保留原文) |
| growth driver | 增长驱动力 |
| help desk software | 帮助台软件 |
| Help Scout | Help Scout(品牌名,保留原文) |
| inside sales | 内部销售 |
| insight | 洞察 |
| investor pitch | 投资者路演 |
| Jeffrey Moore | Jeffrey Moore(人名,保留原文) |
| Jobs To Be Done | Jobs To Be Done(理论名称,保留原文) |
| Lamy | Lamy(德国钢笔品牌,保留原文) |
| lead pin | 首瓶 |
| LevelJump | LevelJump(销售赋能公司,被 Salesforce 收购) |
| line of business | 业务部门 |
| LMS | LMS(学习管理系统,Learning Management System) |
| low hanging fruit | 低垂的果实 |
| Matt Dixon | Matt Dixon(人名,保留原文) |
| Muji | Muji(品牌名,保留原文) |
| MVP | 最小可行版本(Minimum Viable Product,保留原文缩写) |
| MySpace | MySpace(品牌名,保留原文) |
| Obviously Awesome | 《Obviously Awesome》(书名) |
| Parasite | 《寄生虫》(电影名,使用公认中文译名) |
| positioning | 产品定位 |
| Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind | 《Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind》(书名,保留原文) |
| product exposition | 产品展示 |
| product positioning | 产品定位 |
| qualification call | 资格审查电话 |
| Qualtrics | Qualtrics(品牌名,保留原文) |
| ramp time | 上手周期 |
| Ries and Trout | Ries 和 Trout(人名,保留原文) |
| roller ball pen | 滚珠笔 |
| sales enablement | 销售赋能 |
| Sales Pitch | 《Sales Pitch》(书名) |
| sales pitch | 销售演示 |
| Salesforce | Salesforce(CRM 平台,保留原文) |
| shared inbox | 共享收件箱 |
| short list | 候选名单 |
| Siebel | Siebel(品牌名,保留原文) |
| Snow Piercer | 《雪国列车》(电影名,使用公认中文译名) |
| Snowflake | Snowflake(品牌名,保留原文) |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2(安全合规标准,保留原文) |
| status quo | 现状 |
| The Challenger Customer | 《The Challenger Customer》(书名,保留原文) |
| The Challenger Sale | 《The Challenger Sale》(书名,保留原文) |
| The JOLT Effect | 《The JOLT Effect》(书名,保留原文) |
| time to first deal | 首单成交时间 |
| time to make quota | 达到业绩配额的时间 |
| VC pitch | VC 融资路演 |
| Zendesk | Zendesk(品牌名,保留原文) |
此文档由 AI 分片翻译(translate_long_document)