科学是推动人类前进的引擎
科学是推动人类前进的引擎
“相信科学”是一个矛盾修辞
Naval: 欢迎,Brett,来到同名的Naval播客。我们最初讨论的话题是关于财富创造的永恒原则。然后我们稍微触及了内在幸福、平静和福祉。
我首先是一个科学的学生。我是一个失败的物理学家,在这个意义上:我热爱物理学,我想追求它,但我从未觉得自己能在这方面做得很好。我更被技术所吸引,这是应用科学。
尽管如此,我仍然是一个科学的学生。我仍然对它着迷。我所有真正的英雄都是科学家,因为我相信科学是推动人类前进的引擎。
我们很幸运生活在一个科学和技术进步似乎不是可能,而是必然的时代。我们已经习惯了生活总是变得更好的想法。
尽管大家都在抱怨生产力增长停滞不前,但现实是,任何拥有智能手机、开车甚至住在房子里的人,都一次又一次地看到技术提高了他们的生活质量。我们认为这种进步是理所当然的,这要归功于科学。
对我来说,科学也是关于真理的研究。我们知道什么是真实的?我们如何知道某件事是真实的?随着年龄的增长,我发现自己对任何不深植于真理的事物都无法保持注意力。
这个特定播客系列的背景是,我以为自己很了解科学。而且我对科学有很多想当然的看法,比如什么是科学理论,以及科学理论是如何形成的。
我们大多数人对它都有一个模糊的概念。有些人认为科学是科学家所做的事情,这有一个定义问题。什么是科学家?其他人认为科学是做出可证伪或可检验的预测,也许这更接近真相。有时人们说,“这是科学方法。“那什么是科学方法?然后他们开始描述他们初中化学实验,之后就迷失了方向。
尤其是在这些日子里,当我们被告知要”相信科学”——这是一个矛盾修辞——人们尊重科学,但他们不理解科学是什么。
科学是什么的概念被劫持了,有时是被善意的人劫持,他们想让你相信科学,有时是被不那么善意的人劫持,他们想影响你的思考、感受和行为方式。
Science Is the Engine That Pulls Humanity Forward
“Believe in science” is an oxymoron
Naval: Welcome, Brett, to the eponymous Naval podcast. The topic that we started out on was the timeless principles of wealth creation. And then we touched a little bit on internal happiness and peace and well-being.
I’m first and foremost a student of science. I’m a failed physicist, in the sense that I loved physics, I wanted to pursue it, but I never felt I was going to be great at it. I was more pulled into technology, which is applied science.
Nevertheless, I remain a student of science. I remain fascinated by it. All of my real heroes are scientists, because I believe science is the engine that pulls humanity forward.
We’re lucky to live in an age when scientific and technological progress seem not likely, but inevitable. We’ve gotten used to this idea that life always gets better.
Despite all the complaining about how productivity growth is stagnant, the reality is, anyone who owns a smartphone or drives a car or even lives in a house has seen technology improve their quality of life over and over again. We take this progress for granted, and it’s thanks to science.
To me, science is also the study of truth. What do we know to be true? How do we know something to be true? As I get older, I find myself incapable of having an attention span for anything that isn’t steeped in the truth.
The background on this particular podcast series is that I thought I knew a lot about science. And there was a lot about science that I took for granted, such as what a scientific theory is and how scientific theories are formed.
Most of us have a vague idea of it. Some people think science is what scientists do, which has a definitional problem. What is a scientist? Other people think science is making falsifiable or testable predictions, and maybe that’s closer to it. Sometimes people say, “It’s the scientific method.” And what is the scientific method? And then they start describing their junior high school chemistry experiment and lose the trail after that.
Especially these days, when we’re told to “believe in science”—which is an oxymoron—people respect science, but they don’t understand what science is.
The idea of what science is gets hijacked, sometimes by well-meaning people who want to convince you of the science and sometimes by not so well-meaning people who want to influence the way that you think and feel and act.