Finding Time to Invest in Yourself
If you have to work a “normal job,” take on accountability to build your specific knowledge
This is a transcript of the bonus material at the end of the giant How to Get Rich episode.
Nivi: A common question we get: “How do I find the time to start investing in myself? I have a job.”
You have to rent your time to get started
In one of the tweets from the cutting room floor, you wrote: “You will need to rent your time to get started. This is only acceptable when you are learning and saving. Preferably in a business where society does not yet know how to train people and apprenticeship is the only model.”
Naval: Try to learn something that people haven’t quite figured out how to teach yet. That can happen if you’re working in a new and quickly expanding field. It’s also common in fields that are circumstantial—where the details matter and it’s always moving. Investing is one of those fields; so is entrepreneurship.
Chief of Staff for a founder is one of the most coveted jobs for young people starting out in Silicon Valley. The brightest kids will follow an entrepreneur around and do whatever he or she needs them to do.
In many cases, the person is way overqualified. Someone with multiple graduate degrees might be running the CEO’s laundry because that’s the most important thing at the moment.
At the same time, that person gets to attend the most important meetings. They are privy to all the stress and theatrics, the fundraising decks and the innovation—knowledge that can only come from being in the room.
Coming out of college, Warren Buffett wanted to work for Benjamin Graham to learn to be a value investor. Buffett offered to work for free, and Graham responded, “You’re overpriced.” What that means is you have to make sacrifices to take on an apprenticeship.
Find the part of the job with the steepest learning curve
If you can’t learn in an apprenticeship model because you need to make money, try to be innovative in the context of your job. Take on new challenges and responsibilities. Find the part of the job with the steepest learning curve.
You want to avoid repetitive drudgery—that’s just biding time until your job is automated away.
If you’re a barista at the coffee shop, figure out how to make connections with the customers. Figure out how to innovate the service you offer and delight the customer. Managers, founders and owners will take notice.
Develop a founder mentality
The hardest thing for any founder is finding employees with a founder mentality. This is a fancy way of saying they care enough.
People will say, “Well, I’m not the founder. I’m not being paid enough to care.” Actually, you are: The knowledge and skills you gain by developing a founder mentality set you up to be a founder down the line; that’s your compensation.
You can get a lot out of almost any position. You just have to put a lot into it.
Accountability is something you can take on immediately
Nivi: We’ve discussed accountability, judgment, specific knowledge and leverage. If I’m working a “normal” job, is specific knowledge the one I should focus on?
Naval: Judgment takes experience. It takes a lot of time to build up. You have to put yourself in positions where you can exercise judgment. That’ll come from taking on accountability.
Leverage is something that society gives you after you’ve demonstrated judgment. You can get it faster by learning high-leverage skills like coding or working with the media. These are permissionless leverage. This is why I encourage people to learn to code or produce media, even if it’s just nights and weekends.
So, judgment and leverage tend to come later. Accountability is something you can take on immediately. You can say, “Hey, I’ll take charge of this thing that nobody wants to take charge of.” When you take on accountability, you’re also publicly putting your neck on the chopping block—so you have to deliver.
You build specific knowledge by taking accountability for things that other people don’t know how to do. Perhaps they’re things you enjoy doing or are naturally inclined towards doing anyway.
If you work in a factory, the hardest thing may be raising capital to keep the factory running. Maybe that’s what the owner is always stressed out about.
You might notice this and think, “I’m good at balancing my checkbook and have a good head for numbers; but I haven’t raised money before.” You offer to help and become the owner’s sidekick solving their fundraising problem. If you have a natural aptitude and take on accountability, you can put yourself in a position to learn quickly. Before long, you’ll become the heir apparent.
Early on, find things that interest you and allow you to take on accountability. Don’t worry about short-term compensation. Compensation comes when you’re tired of waiting for it and have given up on it. This is the way the whole system works.
If you take on accountability and solve problems on the edge of knowledge that others can’t solve, people will line up behind you. The leverage will come.
Specific knowledge can be timely or timeless
There are two forms of specific knowledge: timely and timeless .
If you become a world-class expert in machine learning just as it takes off and you got there through genuine intellectual interest, you’re going to do really well. But 20 years from now, machine learning may be second hat; the world may have moved on to something else. That’s timely knowledge.
If you’re good at persuading people, it’s probably a skill you picked up early on in life. It’s always going to apply, because persuading people is always going to be valuable. That’s timeless knowledge.
Now, persuasion is a generic skill—it’s probably not enough to build a career on. You need to combine it in a skill stack, as Scott Adams writes . You might combine persuasion with accounting and an understanding of semiconductor production lines. Now you can become the best semiconductor salesperson and, later on, the best semiconductor company CEO.
Timeless specific knowledge usually can’t be taught, and it sticks with you forever. Timely specific knowledge comes and goes; but it tends to have a fairly long shelf life.
Technology is a good place to find those timely skills sets. If you can bring in a more generic specialized knowledge skill set from the outside, then you’ve got gold.
Technology is an intellectual frontier for gaining specific knowledge
Nivi: There were a couple other tweets from the cutting-room floor on this topic. The first: “The technology industry is a great place to acquire specific knowledge. The frontier is always moving forward. If you are genuinely intellectually curious, you will acquire the knowledge ahead of others.”
Naval:
Danny Hillis famously said technology is everything that doesn’t work yet . Technology is around us everywhere. The spoon was technology once; fire was technology once. When we figured out how to make them work, they disappeared in the background and became part of our everyday lives.
Technology is, by definition, the intellectual frontier. It’s taking things from science and culture that we have not figured out how to mass produce or create efficiently and figuring out how to commercialize it and make it available to everybody.
Technology will always be a great field where you can pick up specific knowledge that is valuable to society.
If you don’t have accountability, do something different
Nivi: Here’s another tweet from the cutting-room floor related to accountability: “Companies don’t know how to measure outputs, so they measure inputs instead. Work in a way that your outputs are visible and measurable. If you don’t have accountability, do something different.”
Naval: The entire structure of rewarding people comes from the agricultural and industrial ages, when inputs and outputs matched up closely. The amount of hours you put into doing something was a reliable proxy for what kind of output you’d get.
Today, it’s extremely nonlinear. One good investment decision can make a company 100 million. One good product feature can be the difference between product-market fit and complete failure.
As a result, judgment and accountability matter much more. Often the best engineers aren’t the hardest workers. Sometimes they don’t work very hard at all, but they dependably ship that one critical product at just the right time. It’s similar to the salesperson who closes the huge deal that makes the company’s numbers for the quarter.
People need to be able to tell what role you had in the company’s success. That doesn’t mean stomping all over your team—people are extremely sensitive to others taking too much credit. You always want to be giving out credit. Smart people will know who was responsible.
Some jobs are too removed from the customer for this type of accountability. You’re just a cog in a machine.
Consulting is a good example. As a consultant, your ideas are delivered through someone else within the organization. You may not have visibility to the top people; you may be hidden behind a screen. That’s a trade-off you’re making in exchange for your independence.
You’ll develop thick-skin if you take on accountability
When you have accountability, you get a lot more credit when things go right. Of course, the downside is you get hurt a lot more when things go wrong. When you stick your neck out, you have to be willing to be blamed, sacrificed and even attacked.
If you’re the kind of person who thrives in a high-accountability environment, you’re going to end up thick-skinned over time. You’re going to get hurt a lot. People are going to attack you if you fail.
Scale your specific knowledge with apprentices
Nivi: Once you get some specific knowledge, you can scale it by training your own apprentices and outsourcing tasks to them.
Naval: For example, I made good investments and figured out the venture business. I could have kept doing that and making money. Instead, I co-founded Spearhead to train up-and-coming founders to become angels and venture investors. We give them a checkbook to start investing.
It’s an apprenticeship model. They come to us with deals they’re looking at, and we help them think it through. This model is more scalable than my personal investing.
Specific knowledge comes on the job, not in a classroom
At Spearhead we lead classes teaching founders about investing, and we also hold office hours to discuss specific deals they bring.
It turns out the classes and talks we lead are largely worthless. You can give all the generic advice people need in about an hour. After that, the advice gets so circumstantial that it essentially cancels to zero. But the office hours are incredibly useful.
This reinforces the notion that investing is one of those skills that can only be learned on the job. When you find a skill like that, you’re dealing with specific knowledge.
Another good indicator of specific knowledge is when someone can’t give a straight answer to the question: “What do you do every day?” Or you get an answer along the lines of, “Every day is different based on what’s going on.”
The thing is so complicated and dependent upon circumstances that it can’t be boiled down into a textbook form.
Nivi: The mafia figured out this apprenticeship model a long time ago. The best way to end up running one of the families was to become the driver for the Don.
Naval: Tony Soprano was a businessman who had to enforce his own contracts. That’s a very complicated business.
找到投资自己的时间
如果你必须从事一份”正常的工作”,那就主动承担责任,以积累你的特定知识(specific knowledge)
这是那期大型节目《如何致富》(How to Get Rich)末尾附加内容的文字稿。
Nivi:我们常被问到一个问题:“我有一份工作,怎么找到时间开始投资自己?“
你必须先出租自己的时间来起步
Naval 在未入选的推文中有这样一条:“你必须先出租自己的时间来起步。这只有在你正在学习和储蓄的时候才可接受。最好是在一个社会还不知道如何培训人员的行业中,学徒制是唯一的模式。”
Naval:试着去学一些人们还没完全弄清楚怎么教的东西。如果你在一个快速扩张的新领域工作,这种情况就有可能发生。在一些因情境而异的领域也很常见——细节很重要,而且情况总在变化。投资就是这样的领域之一;创业也是。
创始人的幕僚长(Chief of Staff)是硅谷年轻人起步时最令人羡慕的职位之一。最聪明的孩子会跟随一位创业者,做他或她需要做的任何事情。
很多时候,这个人的资质远超岗位所需。一个拥有多个研究生学位的人可能在给 CEO 跑腿洗衣,因为那恰恰是当下最重要的事。
与此同时,这个人能参加最重要的会议。他们能接触到所有的压力和戏码、融资演示文稿和创新——这些知识只有身在房间里才能获得。
沃伦·巴菲特(Warren Buffett)大学毕业后想去给本杰明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)干活,学习做一名价值投资者。巴菲特主动提出免费工作,格雷厄姆回答说:“你太贵了。“意思是你必须做出牺牲才能获得学徒机会。
找到工作中学习曲线最陡的部分
如果你因为需要赚钱而无法以学徒模式学习,那就试着在你的工作情境中创新。承担新的挑战和责任。找到工作中学习曲线最陡的部分。
你要避免重复性的苦差事——那只是在消磨时间,直到你的工作被自动化取代。
如果你是咖啡店的咖啡师,想办法与顾客建立联系。想办法创新你提供的服务,让顾客感到愉悦。经理、创始人和老板们会注意到的。
培养创始人思维
对任何创始人来说,最难的就是找到具有创始人思维的员工。这是一种好听的说法,意思是他们足够在乎。
人们会说,“我又不是创始人。没人付给我足够让我去在乎的薪水。“实际上,有的:通过培养创始人思维所获得的知识和技能,为你日后成为创始人做好了准备;这就是你的报酬。
你几乎可以从任何职位中获得很多收获。你只需要投入很多。
承担责任是可以立即着手的事
Nivi:我们讨论过承担责任(accountability)、判断力(judgment)、特定知识(specific knowledge)和杠杆(leverage)。如果我正在从事一份”正常”的工作,我应该优先关注特定知识吗?
Naval:判断力需要经验。它需要很长时间的积累。你必须把自己置于能够锻炼判断力的位置上。这来自于承担责任。
杠杆是社会在你展现了判断力之后给予你的东西。你可以通过学习高杠杆技能来更快获得它,比如编程或从事媒体工作。这些是无需许可的(permissionless)杠杆。这就是为什么我鼓励人们学习编程或制作媒体内容,哪怕只是在晚上和周末。
所以,判断力和杠杆往往来得比较晚。承担责任是可以立即着手的事。你可以说,“嘿,这个没人愿意负责的事我来负责。“当你承担责任时,你也在公开场合把自己的脖子放在砧板上——所以你必须交出成果。
你通过为那些别人不知道怎么做的事情承担责任来积累特定知识。也许是那些你本身就喜欢做或天生倾向去做的事情。
如果你在一家工厂工作,最难的事情可能是筹集资金维持工厂运转。也许这正是老板总是焦虑的事。
你可能会注意到这一点并想,“我善于管理自己的支票簿,对数字有很好的感觉;但我没筹集过资金。“你主动提出帮忙,成为老板身边解决筹资问题的副手。如果你有天赋并承担责任,你就能让自己处于快速学习的位置。用不了多久,你就会成为理所当然的接班人。
在早期,找到那些让你感兴趣并让你能承担责任的事情。不要担心短期报酬。报酬会在你厌倦等待、放弃期待的时候到来。整个系统就是这样运转的。
如果你承担责任,并在别人无法解决的知识前沿解决问题,人们会追随你。杠杆会随之而来。
特定知识的两种形态:时效性的与永恒的
特定知识有两种形式:时效性的(timely)和永恒的(timeless)。
如果你在机器学习刚起飞时就成为世界级的专家,而且你是通过真正的智力兴趣走到那一步的,你会做得非常好。但 20 年后,机器学习可能已是司空见惯之事;世界可能已经转向别的东西了。这就是时效性知识。
如果你擅长说服别人,这可能是你生命早期就掌握的技能。它会一直适用,因为说服别人永远是有价值的。这就是永恒性知识。
当然,说服力是一种通用技能——仅凭它可能不足以支撑一个职业。你需要把它组合到技能栈(skill stack)中,正如 Scott Adams 所写的那样。你可以把说服力与会计知识和对半导体生产线的理解结合起来。这样你就能成为最好的半导体销售员,日后成为最好的半导体公司 CEO。
永恒的特定知识通常无法教授,并且会永远伴随你。时效性的特定知识来了又去;但它往往有相当长的保质期。
技术是寻找这些时效性技能组合的好地方。如果你能从外部带入一套更通用的专业知识技能组合,那你就拥有了金子。
技术是获取特定知识的智力前沿
Nivi:关于这个话题,还有几条未入选的推文。第一条:“科技行业是获取特定知识的绝佳领域。前沿总是在不断推进。如果你有真正的智力好奇心,你会比他人更早获得这些知识。”
Naval:Danny Hillis 有一句名言:技术就是一切还没正常运行的东西。技术无处不在。勺子曾经是技术;火曾经是技术。当我们搞清楚如何制造它们,它们就隐入背景,成为日常生活的一部分。
技术,按其定义,就是智力前沿。它把我们尚未弄清楚如何大规模生产或高效创造的科学与文化成果拿过来,想办法将其商业化,使之对所有人可用。
技术将永远是一个你可以从中获取对社会有价值的特定知识的伟大领域。
如果没有承担责任,就换一种方式
Nivi:还有一条未入选的推文与承担责任相关:“公司不知道如何衡量产出,所以只好衡量投入。以一种让你的产出可见且可衡量的方式工作。如果你没有承担责任,就换一种方式。”
整个奖励人们的结构源自农业和工业时代,那时投入与产出高度匹配。你投入多少小时做某件事,是产出多少的可靠指标。
如今,这一切变得极度非线性。一个明智的投资决策可以为公司赚取一千万或一亿美元。一个出色的产品功能,可能就是达成产品市场契合(product-market fit)与彻底失败之间的分水岭。
因此,判断力和承担责任的重要性大大提高。最优秀的工程师往往不是最拼命工作的人。有时他们根本不怎么卖力,但他们总能在恰好的时机可靠地交付那个关键产品。这就像那个拿下大单、让公司一整季度业绩达标的那位销售。
人们需要能看出你在公司成功中扮演了什么角色。这并不意味着要把功劳全部揽到自己身上——人们对别人抢功极为敏感。你永远应该主动把功劳分给别人。聪明的人自然会知道谁是真正的功臣。
有些工作离客户太远,无法实现这种承担责任。你只是机器里的一颗齿轮。
咨询就是一个很好的例子。作为顾问,你的想法是通过组织内部的另一个人传递出去的。你可能无法接触到高层;你可能被隐藏在一块屏幕后面。这是你为了换取独立性而做出的权衡。
承担责任会让你变得厚脸皮
当你承担了责任,事情做对了,你会获得多得多的功劳。当然,代价是事情搞砸时你受到的伤害也大得多。当你把脖子伸出去(stick your neck out),你必须愿意被责备、被牺牲,甚至被攻击。
如果你是那种在高承担责任环境中如鱼得水的人,久而久之你会变得厚脸皮。你会被伤害很多次。如果你失败了,人们会攻击你。
用学徒来扩展你的特定知识
Nivi: 一旦你掌握了一些特定知识,你可以通过培养自己的学徒、将任务外包给他们来扩展它。
Naval: 比如,我做出了不错的投资,摸清了风险投资的门道。我本可以继续做下去、继续赚钱。但我没有,我联合创办了 Spearhead,训练有潜力的创始人成为天使投资人和风险投资人。我们给他们一本支票簿,让他们开始投资。
这是一种学徒模式。他们带着正在考察的交易来找我们,我们帮助他们理清思路。这个模式比我个人做投资更具可扩展性。
特定知识来自实践,而非课堂
在 Spearhead,我们开设课程教创始人投资,也会安排办公时间(office hours)讨论他们带来的具体交易。
结果发现,我们上的课和做的演讲基本上没什么用。你大约一个小时就能把人们需要的所有通用建议讲完。在那之后,建议就变得如此依赖具体情境,基本上归零了。但办公时间却极其有用。
这进一步印证了一个观点:投资是那种只能靠实践才能学会的技能之一。当你发现这样一种技能时,你面对的就是特定知识。
特定知识的另一个好指标是,当有人无法对”你每天在做什么”这个问题给出一个干脆的回答时。或者你得到的回答类似于:“每天都不同,取决于发生了什么事。”
这件事如此复杂、如此依赖情境,以至于无法被浓缩成教科书的形式。
Nivi: 黑手党很早就搞明白了这种学徒模式。想要最终成为某个家族的首领,最好的办法是给 Don(老大)当司机。
Naval: Tony Soprano 就是一个不得不亲自执行自己合同的商人。那是一门非常复杂的生意。
术语表
| 原文 | 中文 |
|---|---|
| accountability | 承担责任 |
| Danny Hillis | Danny Hillis(计算机科学家) |
| judgment | 判断力 |
| leverage | 杠杆 |
| permissionless | 无需许可的 |
| Scott Adams | Scott Adams(漫画家、作家) |
| skill stack | 技能栈 |
| specific knowledge | 特定知识 |
| timeless | 永恒的 |
| timely | 时效性的 |
此文章由 AI 翻译(miaoyan_chunk_translate)