科学在葬礼中前进

Naval Ravikant 2021-05-07

科学在葬礼中前进


科学在葬礼中前进

即使最优秀的人也会陷入僵局


Naval: 多重宇宙理论和费曼路径积分之间存在着某种深刻的对称性,对吗?

Brett: 你说得完全正确。费曼相信多重历史,但这是一个悬而未决的问题:他是否认为这些实际上是物理上真实存在的东西,还是仅仅是数学对象。他对此相对保持沉默。

费曼是一个实在论者和绝对的天才——可能是继爱因斯坦之后20世纪第二伟大的物理学家——但他发表过最糟糕的俏皮话之一。他说:“如果你认为你理解量子理论,那你就不理解量子理论。“这完全是胡说。大卫·多伊奇就理解量子理论。那是费曼少数几次陷入非理性的情况之一。

Naval: 我想是普朗克说过:“科学在葬礼中前进。“不幸的是,即使最优秀的人也会陷入僵局。

我在自己的领域也看到了这一点。我们这个时代一些最伟大的投资者——像沃伦·巴菲特查理·芒格这样的人——是绝对的天才,但他们无法理解加密货币。

存在一种超主权货币,它原生存在于互联网且可编程,这个想法对他们来说是陌生的,因为他们的货币总是由政府提供并由政府控制的东西。他们根本无法想象还有其他方式。

这就是人的本性。


Science Advances One Funeral at a Time


Science Advances One Funeral at a Time

Even the best get stuck


Naval: There’s some deep symmetry between multiverse theory and Feynman path integrals, right?

Brett: You’re absolutely right. Feynman believed in multiple histories, but it’s an open question whether he thought these were actually physically real things or merely mathematical objects. He was relatively silent on the matter.

Feynman was a realist and an absolute genius—probably the second greatest physicist of the 20th century after Einstein—but he made one of the worst quips. He said, “If you think you understand quantum theory, you don’t understand quantum theory.” Which is nonsense. David Deutsch understands quantum theory. That was one of the few occasions when Feynman fell into irrationality.

Naval: I think it was Planck who said, “Science advances one funeral at a time.” Unfortunately, even the best get stuck behind.

I see this in my own field. Some of the greatest investors of our time—people like Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger—are absolute geniuses but cannot wrap their minds around cryptocurrencies.

The idea that there’s extra-sovereign money that’s native to the Internet and programmable is foreign to them because their money is always something that has been provided by the government and controlled by the government. They just cannot imagine it any other way.

It’s just the nature of people.