选择具备智慧、精力和诚信的合作伙伴

Naval Ravikant 2019-03-22

选择具备智慧、精力和诚信的合作伙伴

这三者缺一不可


Naval:
在选择合作伙伴时,要选择那些具备高智慧、高精力和高诚信的人,我发现这是三个不可妥协的标准。

你需要一个聪明的人,否则他们会走向错误的方向。最终你无法到达正确的地方。你需要一个精力充沛的人,因为世界上充满了聪明但懒惰的人。

我们都认识生活中那些非常聪明,却无法起床或动动手指的人。我们也认识那些精力非常充沛但不太聪明的人。所以他们努力工作,但某种程度上是在朝着错误的方向奔跑。

聪明并不是贬义词。这并不意味着某人聪明,其他人就愚蠢。而是每个人在不同事情上都有各自的聪明之处。因此,根据你想做好的事情,你必须找到在那方面聪明的人。

至于精力,很多时候人们对特定事情缺乏动力,但对其他事情却充满动力。例如,有人可能对去上班、坐在办公室毫无动力,但对去画画可能充满动力,对吧?

那么,在这种情况下,他们应该成为画家。他们应该把艺术作品发布到网上,想办法从中建立职业生涯,而不是戴着领带,去做一份沉闷的工作。

高诚信是最重要的,因为如果你拥有前两者但没有诚信,你得到的就是一个聪明勤奋的骗子,最终会欺骗你。所以你必须弄清楚这个人是否具有高诚信。

正如我们讨论过的,你通过信号来判断。信号是他们的行为,而不是他们的言语。是他们在认为没人注意时所做的一切非言语行为。


动力必须来自内在

Nivi:
关于精力,Sam Altman 之前说过一件有趣的事情,他在谈论授权时说:“授权的一个重要原则是,把任务授权给真正擅长你想要他们做的事情的人。”

这是最明显的事情,但似乎……你希望与那些自然而然会做你想让他们做的事情的人合作。

Naval:
是的。如果我不认为某人对我想让他们做的事情感兴趣,我几乎不会创办公司、雇佣这个人或与他们合作。

年轻时,我曾试图说服人们做事。我以为你可以通过推销让人做某事。但你做不到。你无法保持他们的动力。你最初可以激励他们。如果你是像亨利五世那样的国王,试图让他们冲锋陷阵,然后他们会自己想办法,那可能有效。

但如果你想长期保持某人的动力,这种动力必须来自内在。你无法创造它,如果他们没有内在动力,你也不能成为他们的依靠。所以你必须确保人们确实精力充沛,并且想要做你想让他们做的事情,以及你想与他们合作的事情。


诚信是某人的行为,而非他们的言语

解读信号非常非常重要。信号是人们的行为,而不是他们的言语。因此,关注细微的信号很重要。我们都知道,在社交场合,如果有人对餐厅的服务员态度很差,那么他们对你态度差只是时间问题。

如果有人陷害敌人并对他们怀有报复心,那么他们把你从朋友重新定义为敌人,让你感受到他们的愤怒也只是时间问题。所以,愤怒、愤慨、报复心强、短视的人在现实生活的许多互动中本质上都是这样的。

人们出奇地一致。这是你了解他们的一个方面。所以,你想要找到长期的人。你想要找到那些似乎非理性地道德高尚的人。

例如,我有个朋友的公司我投资了,公司失败了,他本可以让所有投资者血本无归。但他不断投入更多个人资金。经过三次不同的转型,他不断投入个人资金,直到公司最终成功。在这个过程中,他从未让投资者血本无归。

我一直对此感激他。我说:“哇,你对投资者这么好真是令人惊讶。你没有让他们血本无归。“他对此感到生气。他说:“我不是为你做的。我不是为我的投资者做的。我是为我自己做的。这是我自己的自尊。这是我在乎的。这就是我生活的方式。“这就是你想要合作的那种人。

另一个我喜欢的引语,我有一条关于这个的推文。我想我在别处读到过这个,所以我不为此邀功。但我稍微修改了一下。那就是”自尊是你与自己拥有的声誉。“你总是会知道。

所以,好人、有道德的人、有伦理的人、容易合作的人、可靠的人,往往有很高的自尊,因为他们与自己有很好的声誉,他们明白这一点。

这不是自我。自尊和自我是不同的东西。因为自我可能是不应得的,但自尊至少让你觉得你活出了自己内心的道德准则。

因此,与最终被发现诚信度低的人合作非常困难。而且很难弄清楚谁是高诚信、谁是低诚信。通常,一个人越是声称自己有道德、有伦理、高诚信,他们就越不可能真是那样。

这很像地位信号。如果你公开竞逐地位,如果你公开谈论自己地位高,那是一种低地位的行为。如果你公开谈论自己多么诚实、可靠、值得信赖,你可能并不那么诚实可信。这是骗子的特征。

所以,是的,选择一个你可以与长期的人玩长期游戏的行业。


获取播客
Apple | Breaker | Overcast | Spotify | YouTube | 下载


Pick Partners With Intelligence, Energy and Integrity

You can’t compromise on any of these three


Naval:
In terms of picking people to work with, pick ones that have high intelligence, high energy, and high integrity, I find that’s the three-part checklist that you cannot compromise on.

You need someone who is smart, or they’ll head in the wrong direction. And you’re not going to end up in the right place. You need someone high-energy because the world is full of smart, lazy people.

We all know people in our life who are really smart, but can’t get out of bed, or lift a finger. And we also know people who are very high energy, but not that smart. So, they work hard, but they’re sort of running in the wrong direction.

And smart is not a pejorative. It’s not meant to say someone is smart, someone else is stupid. But it’s more that everyone is smart at different things. So, depending on what you want to do well, you have to find someone who is smart at that thing.

And then energy, a lot of times people are unmotivated for a specific thing, but they’re motivated for other things. So, for example, someone might be really unmotivated to go to a job, and sit in an office. But they might be really motivated to go paint, right?

Well, in that case they should be a painter. They should be putting art up on the internet. Trying to figure out how to build a career out of that, rather than wearing a collar around their neck, and going to a dreary job.

And then high integrity is the most important because otherwise if you’ve got the other two, what you have is you have a smart and hard working crook, who’s eventually going to cheat you. So, you have to figure out if the person is high-integrity.

And as we talked about, the way you do that is through signals. And signals is what they do, not what they say. It’s all the non-verbal stuff that they do when they think nobody is looking.


Motivation has to come intrinsically

Nivi:
With respect to the energy, there was this interesting thing from Sam Altman a while back, where he was talking about delegation, and he was saying, “One of the important things for delegation is, delegate to people who are actually good at the thing that you want them to do.”

It’s the most obvious thing, but it seems like… you want to partner with people who are naturally going to do the things that you want them to do.

Naval:
Yeah. I almost won’t start a company, or hire a person, or work with somebody if I just don’t think they’re into what I want them to do.

When I was younger, I used to try and talk people into things. I had this idea that you could sell someone into doing something. But you can’t. You can’t keep them motivated. You can get them inspired initially. It might work if you’re a king like Henry V, and you’re trying to get them to just charge into battle, and then they’ll figure it out.

But if you’re trying to keep someone motivated for the long-term, that motivation has to come intrinsically. You can’t just create it, nor can you be the crutch for them if they don’t have that intrinsic motivation. So, you have to make sure people actually are high-energy, and want to do what you want them to do, and what you want to work with them on.


Integrity is what someone does, despite what they say they do

Reading signals is very, very important. Signals are what people do despite what they say. So, it’s important to pay attention to subtle signals. We all know that socially if someone treats a waiter, or waitress in a restaurant really badly, then it’s only a matter of time until they treat you badly.

If somebody screws over an enemy, and is vindictive towards them, well it’s only a matter of time before they redefine you from friend to enemy, and you feel their wrath. So, angry, outraged, vindictive, short-term thinking people are essentially that way in many interactions in real life.

People are oddly consistent. That’s one of the things you learn about them. So, you want to find long-term people. You want to find people who seem irrationally ethical.

For example, I had a friend of mine whose company I invested in, and the company failed, and he could have wiped out all of the investors. But he kept putting more and more personal money in. Through three different pivots he put personal money in until the company finally succeeded. And in the process, he never wiped out the investors.

And I was always grateful to him for that. I said, “Wow, that’s amazing that you were so good to your investors. You didn’t wipe them out.” And he got offended by that. He said, “I didn’t do it for you. I didn’t do it for my investors. I did it for me. It’s my own self-esteem. It’s what I care about. That’s how I live my life.” That’s the kind of person you want to work with.

Another quote that I like, I have a tweet on this. I think I read this somewhere else, so I’m not taking credit for this. But I kind of modified it a little bit. Which is that “self-esteem is the reputation that you have with yourself.” You’ll always know.

So, good people, moral people, ethical people, easy to work with people, reliable people, tend to have very high self-esteem because they have very good reputations with themselves, and they understand that.

It’s not ego. Self-esteem and ego are different things. Because ego can be undeserved, but self-esteem at least you feel like you lived up to your own internal moral code of ethics.

And so it’s very hard to work with people who end up being low integrity. And it’s hard to figure out who is high integrity and low integrity. Generally, the more someone is saying that they’re moral, ethical, and high integrity, the less likely they are to be that way.

It’s very much like status signalling. If you overtly bid for status, if you overtly talk about being high status, that is a low status move. If you openly talk about how honest, reliable, and trustworthy you are, you’re probably not that honest and trustworthy. That is a characteristic of con men.

So, yeah, pick an industry in which you can play long-term games with long-term people.


Get podcast
Apple | Breaker | Overcast | Spotify | YouTube | Download