悲观主义似乎是一种理智上严肃的立场

Naval Ravikant 2021-05-17

悲观主义似乎是一种理智上严肃的立场

我们通过创新走出了之前的困境

Brett: 如果你是学者,能够解释所有存在的问题、这些问题有多危险,以及为什么需要资金来更深入地研究它们,这似乎是理智上严肃的立场;而声称我们能解决问题的人听起来有点过于理想化。

事实上,合作、协作和资源开发将推动知识经济发展,使我们能够解决这些问题。

如果你能皱着眉头站在TED演讲观众面前说:“这些是我们将要死亡的方式,地球将要毁灭的方式,以及我们将要走向灭亡的方式”,这似乎总是显得更加理智严肃。

Naval: 我很内疚录制了其中一个末日预言播客。那是我最后悔的一期播客。我们进行了一次很棒的对话,但我从根本上不同意我们应该因为世界将要终结而放慢脚步的观点。

唯一的出路就是通过进步。

我没有像推广其他播客那样推广那期播客。当我阅读Deutsch时,我明白了原因:悲观主义是一个容易陷入的陷阱,但它暗示人类没有创造力。悲观主义不承认我们通过创新走出之前困境的所有方式。

企业家天生乐观,因为他们因乐观而获得回报。正如你所说,知识分子因悲观而获得回报。所以存在激励偏差。

如果你是悲观主义者,你会从其他人那里获得反馈。这是一种社会行为。你在说服别人接受你的悲观主义。但企业家从自然和自由市场获得反馈,我相信这些是更现实的反馈机制。

到目前为止,大多数悲观的预测都被证明是错误的。如果你看看世界应该终结或环境灾难应该发生的时间表,它们都相当错误。


Pessimism Seems Like an Intellectually Serious Position

We’ve innovated our way out of previous traps

Brett: If you’re an academic, being able to explain all of the problems that are out there and how dangerous these problems are and why you need funding to look at them in more depth appears to be the intellectually serious position; whereas, someone who claims that we can solve it sounds a little bit kumbaya.

In fact, collaboration, cooperation and resource exploitation are the things that will drive this knowledge economy forward so that we can solve these problems.

It always seems more intellectually serious if you can stand out there with a frown on your face in front of a TED Talk audience and say, “These are all the ways in which we’re going to die, in which the Earth is going to fail, and in which we’re going to come to ruin.”

Naval: I’m guilty of having recorded one of these [doomsayer podcasts](about enders blowing up the Earth). That was the one podcast I regretted the most. We had a great conversation, but I don’t fundamentally agree with conclusions that we should slow down because the world is going to end.

The only way out is through progress.

I haven’t promoted that podcast as much as others. When I read Deutsch, I realized why: Pessimism is an easy trap to fall into, but it implies that humans are not creative. Pessimism doesn’t acknowledge all the ways that we have innovated our way out of previous traps.

Entrepreneurs are inherently optimistic because they get rewarded for being optimistic. As you were saying, intellectuals get rewarded for being pessimistic. So there is incentive bias.

If you’re a pessimist, you get your feedback from other people. It’s a social act. You’re convincing other people of your pessimism. But entrepreneurs get feedback from nature and free markets, which I believe are much more realistic feedback mechanisms.

So far, most of the pessimistic predictions have turned out to be false. If you look at the timelines on which the world was supposed to end or environmental catastrophes were supposed to happen, they’ve been quite wrong.