大胆猜测,淘汰失败
大胆猜测,淘汰失败
最好的理论来自你的想象力,而非外推法
Naval: 更进一步说,这不仅仅是科学。
当我们审视创新、技术和建设时——例如,托马斯·爱迪生和尼古拉·特斯拉所做的一切——这些都来自试错,也就是创造性猜测和尝试。如果你观察进化如何通过变异和自然选择运作,它会尝试大量随机突变,然后筛选掉那些不起作用的突变。
这似乎是一个通用模型,所有复杂系统都通过这个模型随时间自我改进:它们先进行大胆猜测,然后淘汰那些不起作用的东西。
这在所有知识创造中都存在着美丽的对称性。它最终是一种创造行为。我们不知道它来自哪里。它不仅仅是观察结果的机械外推。
我将以最著名的例子来结束。我们谈到了黑天鹅和沸水,但有趣且简单的例子是火鸡。
有一只火鸡每天都被喂养得很好,长得很肥。火鸡认为它生活在一个仁慈的家庭中——直到感恩节到来。然后,它会得到一个非常残酷的觉醒。这向你展示了归纳法的局限性。
Brett: 正是如此。现在,理论必须被猜测出来。
我们所有伟大的科学家总是发出类似这样的声音。只有哲学家和某些数学家认为科学是这种归纳趋势寻求的方式,从过去的观察外推到未来。
爱因斯坦说他并不一定比大多数人聪明;而是他对特定问题充满热情。他有好奇心和想象力。想象力对他来说至关重要。他需要想象什么可能解释这些事情。
爱因斯坦并不是通过观察过去的现象来提出广义相对论的。他试图解释物理学中存在的某些问题。归纳法不是其中的一部分。
Naval: 好的解释依赖于创造力。当然,它们是可测试和可证伪的,而且难以改变,并能做出风险和狭窄的预测。对于任何试图弄清楚如何将这些概念融入日常生活的人来说,这是一个很好的指导点。
你最好的理论将是创造性的猜测,而不是简单的外推。
Make Bold Guesses and Weed Out the Failures
The best theories come from your imagination, not extrapolation
Naval: Going even further, it’s not just science.
When we look at innovation, technology and building—for example, everything that Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla did—this came from trial and error, which is creative guesses and trying things out. If you look at how evolution works through variation and then natural selection, it tries a lot of random mutations and filters out the ones that didn’t work.
This seems to be a general model through which all complex systems improve themselves over time: They make bold guesses and then they weed out the things that didn’t work.
There’s a beautiful symmetry to it across all knowledge creation. It’s ultimately an act of creativity. We don’t know where it comes from. It’s not just a mechanical extrapolation of observations.
I’ll close with the most famous example of this. We talked about black swans and boiling water, but the fun and easy one is the turkey.
You have a turkey that’s being fed very well every single day and fattened up. The turkey thinks that it lives in a benevolent household—until Thanksgiving arrives. Then, it’s in for a very rude awakening. That shows you the limits of induction.
Brett: Precisely. Now, the theories have to be guessed.
All of our great scientists have always made noises similar to this. It’s only the philosophers and certain mathematicians who think that science is this inductive trend-seeking way of extrapolating from past observations into the future.
Einstein said that he wasn’t necessarily brighter than most other people; it’s that he was passionately interested in particular problems. And he had a curiosity and an imagination. Imagination was key for him. He needed to imagine what could possibly explain these things.
Einstein wasn’t looking at past phenomena in order to come up with general relativity. He was seeking to explain certain problems that existed in physics. Induction wasn’t a part of it.
Naval: Good explanations rely on creativity. They are testable and falsifiable, of course, and they’re also hard to vary and to make risky and narrow predictions. That’s a good guiding point for anybody who is trying to figure out how they can incorporate these concepts in their everyday life.
Your best theories are going to be creative guesses, not simple extrapolations.