为自由而量入为出

Naval Ravikant 2019-03-11

为自由而量入为出


播客链接

  • Apple
  • Breaker
  • Overcast
  • Spotify
  • YouTube
  • 下载

Nivi: 除了出租时间外,还有其他应该避免的重大事项吗?

Naval: 是的,我发布了两条相关的推文。第一条我谈到的是,一个人的生活方式升级速度不应太快。那条推文基本上是说,那些生活水平远低于其收入能力的人,享受着那些忙于升级生活方式的人无法理解的自由。

我认为这一点非常重要,就是不要一直升级你的生活方式。为了保持你的自由。这给了你行动的自由。基本上,一旦你赚了一点钱,你仍然希望像过去的自己一样生活,这样忧虑就会消失。所以,不要急着去升级房子、生活方式等等。

最危险的东西是海洛因和月薪

假设你每小时能赚1000美元。问题是,当你进入这样的工作生活方式时,你不会突然从每小时赚20美元变成每小时赚1000美元。那是一个漫长职业生涯的渐进过程。

在这个过程中,一个微妙的问题是,随着你赚的钱越来越多,你会升级你的生活方式。而这种生活方式的升级会提高你对财富的认知标准,使你陷入这种工资奴隶的陷阱。

所以我忘了是谁说的,也许是纳西姆·塔勒布。但他说过:“最危险的东西是海洛因和月薪。“对吧,因为它们都极易上瘾。你想要致富的方式是,你要保持贫穷的状态,然后工作、工作、再工作。

理想情况下,你应该以离散的方式赚钱

这就是科技行业的运作方式。你十年不赚钱,然后在第十一年,你可能会有一次巨大的收益。

顺便说一句,这也是为什么对所谓的富人征收非常高边际税率是有缺陷的原因之一,因为在最高风险、最具创造性的职业中,你实际上在十年里都在亏钱,同时承担着巨大风险,不断亏损、亏损、再亏损。

然后在第十一年或第十五年,你可能会有一次大的收益。但当然,山姆大叔会出现,基本上说:“嘿,你知道吗,你今年赚了很多钱。所以,你是富人。所以,你是邪恶的,你必须把所有钱都交给我们。“所以这直接摧毁了这类创造性的风险承担职业。

但理想情况下,你希望以离散的方式赚钱,在很长的时间间隔内分开,这样你自己的生活方式就没有机会快速适应,然后你基本上可以说:“好了,现在我完成了。现在我退休了。现在我自由了。我仍然会工作,因为你必须为生活做点什么,但我只会在我想要的时候,做我想做的事情。“这样你就有更多的创造性表达,更少地关注金钱。


Live Below Your Means for Freedom


  • Apple
  • Breaker
  • Overcast
  • Spotify
  • YouTube
  • Download

Nivi: Any other big things you should avoid, other than renting out your time?

Naval: Yeah, there are two tweets that I put out that are related. The first one I was talking about where someone, like, how your lifestyle has to upgrade, shouldn’t get upgraded too fast. And that one basically said, people who are living far below their means enjoy a freedom that people busy upgrading their lifestyles just can’t fathom.

And I think that’s very important, just to not upgrade your lifestyle all the time. To maintain your freedom. And it just gives you freedom of operation. You basically, once you make a little bit of money, you still want to be living like your old self, so that just the worry goes away. So, don’t run out to upgrade that house, and lifestyle, and all that stuff.

The most dangerous things are heroin and a monthly salary

Let’s say you’re getting paid 1,000anhour.Theproblemis,isthatwhenyougointoaworklifestylelikethat,youdontjustsuddenlygofrommaking1,000 an hour. The problem is, is that when you go into a work lifestyle like that, you don't just suddenly go from making 20 an hour to making $1,000 an hour. That’s a progression over a long career.

And as that happens, one subtle problem is that you upgrade your lifestyle as you make more, and more money. And that upgrading of the lifestyle kind of ups what you consider to be wealth, and you stay in this wage slave trap.

So, I forget who said it, maybe it was Nassim Taleb. But he said, “The most dangerous things are heroin, and a monthly salary.” Right, because they are highly addictive. The way you want to get wealthy is you want to be poor, and working, and working, and working.

Ideally, you’ll make your money in discrete lumps

And this is for example how the tech industry works. Where you don’t make any money for ten years, and then suddenly at year eleven, you might have a giant payday.

Which is by the way one reason why these very high marginal tax rates for the so-called wealthy are flawed because the highest risk-taking, most creative professions you literally lose money for a decade over your life, while you take massive risk, and you bleed, and bleed, and bleed.

And then suddenly in year eleven, or year fifteen, you might have one single big payday. But then of course Uncle Sam show up, and basically say, “Hey, you know what, you just made a lot money this year. Therefore, you’re rich. Therefore, you’re evil and you’ve got to hand it all over to us.” So, it just destroys those kinds of creative risk taking professions.

But ideally you want to make your money in discrete lumps, separated over long periods of time, so that your own lifestyle does not have a chance to adapt quickly, and then you basically say, “Okay, now I’m done. Now I’m retired. Now I’m free. I’m still gonna work because you got to do something with your life, but I’m gonna work on only the things that I want, when I want.” And so you have much more creative expression, and much less about money.