人生在竞技场上
人生在竞技场上
Naval: 人生在竞技场上。你只能通过实践来学习。如果你不去实践,那么你获得的所有学习都太过笼统和抽象。那真的就变成了贺卡上的格言。你不知道什么该用在什么地方、什么时候。
这类普遍原则和建议大多不是数学。有时你用”富有”这个词表示一种意思,其他时候你用这个词表示另一种意思。“财富”这个词也是如此。“爱”或”幸福”也是如此。这些都是多义词。所以这不是数学。
这些不是精确的定义。你无法从中形成一个可以像计算机一样遵循的剧本。相反,你必须理解在什么背景下应用它们。所以正确的学习方式是真正去做某事,当你在做的时候,你会弄清楚应该如何做。
然后你可以去看看我发的推文,或者你在多伊奇那里读到的东西,或者你在叔本华那里读到的东西,或者你在网上看到的东西,然后说:“哦,那个人是这个意思。这就是他谈论的普遍原则。我知道在类似这种情况下应用它,不是机械地,不是100%的时间,而是作为当我再次遇到这种情况时的一个有用的启发式方法。”
你从推理开始,然后建立你的判断力。当你的判断力足够精炼时,它就变成了品味、直觉或本能感觉,这就是你运作的基础。但你必须从具体开始。
如果你从普遍开始,并停留在普遍层面——只是阅读原则、格言、年鉴等书籍——你会像那些上过大学的人:受过过度教育,但却迷失了。他们试图在错误的地方应用东西。纳西姆·塔勒布称之为”知识分子却愚蠢”,IYIs。
Nivi: 我正要提到的一条推文正是这个。来自6月3日:
“获取知识很容易,困难的是知道该应用什么以及何时应用。
这就是为什么所有真正的学习都是’在职学习’。
人生在竞技场上。”
Naval: 我喜欢那条推文。
实际上,我只想发推说”人生在竞技场上”,仅此而已。我想就放在那里。但我觉得需要稍微多解释一点,因为”竞技场上的人”是一个著名的引用,所以我想从我的角度稍微展开一下。但这是我一次又一次意识到的道理。
Life is Lived in The Arena
Naval: Life is lived in the arena. You only learn by doing. And if you’re not doing, then all the learning you’re picking up is too general and too abstract. Then it truly is Hallmark aphorisms. You don’t know what applies where and when.
And a lot of this kind of general principles and advice is not mathematics. Sometimes you’re using the word rich to mean one thing. Other times you’re using it to mean another thing. Same with the word wealth. Same with the word love or happiness. These are overloaded terms. So this is not mathematics.
These are not precise definitions. You can’t form a playbook out of them that you can just follow like a computer. Instead, you have to understand what context to apply them in. So the right way to learn is to actually go do something, and when you’re doing it, you figure something out about how it should be done.
Then you can go and look at something I tweeted or something you read in Deutsch or something you read in Schopenhauer or something you saw online and say, “Oh, that’s what that guy meant. That’s the general principle he’s talking about. And I know to apply it in situations like this, not mechanically, not 100% of the time, but as a helpful heuristic for when I encounter this situation again.”
You start with reasoning and then you build up your judgment. And then when your judgment is sufficiently refined, it just becomes taste or intuition or gut feel, and that’s what you operate on. But you have to start from the specific.
If you start from the general, and stay at the level of the general—and just read books of principles and aphorisms and almanacs and so on—you’re going to be like that person that went to university: overeducated, but they’re lost. They try to apply things in the wrong places. What Nassim Taleb calls the Intellectual Yet Idiots, IYIs.
Nivi: One of the tweets I was going to bring up is exactly that. From June 3rd:
“Acquiring knowledge is easy, the hard part is knowing what to apply and when.
That’s why all true learning is ‘on the job.’
Life is lived in the arena.”
Naval: I like that tweet.
Actually, I just wanted to tweet, “Life is lived in the arena” and that was it. I wanted to just drop it right there. But I felt like I had to explain just a little bit more because “The Man in the Arena” is a famous quote, so I wanted to unpack a little bit from my direction. But this is a realization that I keep having over and over.