学会销售,学会创造

Naval Ravikant 2019-03-31

学会销售,学会创造

如果你能同时做到这两点,你将势不可挡

Nivi:
谈到技能组合,你曾说过应该”学会销售,学会创造,如果你能同时做到这两点,你将势不可挡。”

Naval:
这是一个非常广泛的范畴。它包含两个广泛的领域。一个是创造产品。这很困难,而且是多变量的。它可以包括设计、开发、制造、物流、采购,甚至可以是设计和运营服务。它有很多很多定义。

但在每个行业中,都有创造者的定义。在我们科技行业,这是CTO,是程序员,是软件工程师,硬件工程师。但即使在洗衣行业,也可能是建立洗衣服务的人,确保火车准点运行的人,确保所有衣物在正确的时间到达正确地点的人,等等。

另一方面是销售。同样,销售的定义非常广泛。销售不一定只是向个别客户推销,它可以意味着营销、沟通、招聘、融资、激励人们,也可以是做公关。这是一个广泛的伞形类别。

硅谷模式是创造者与销售者的组合

所以,一般来说,硅谷初创企业模式往往效果最好。这不是唯一的方式,但可能是最常见的方式,当你有两位创始人,其中一位在销售方面是世界级的,另一位在创造方面是世界级的。

例子当然是苹果的史蒂夫·乔布斯和史蒂夫·沃兹尼亚克,盖茨和艾伦在微软早期可能有类似的责任分工,拉里和谢尔盖可能也是按照这些路线划分的,尽管那里有点不同,因为那是一个非常技术性的产品,通过简单的界面交付给最终用户。

但总的来说,你会看到这种模式一遍又一遍地重复。有一个创造者,有一个销售者。有一个CEO和CTO的组合。风险投资和技术投资者几乎被训练成尽可能寻找这种组合。这是神奇的组合。

如果你能同时做到这两点,你将势不可挡

最终境界是当一个人能同时做到这两点。那时你就获得了真正的超能力。那时你就能找到可以创造整个行业的人。

活生生的例子是埃隆·马斯克。他可能不一定亲自建造火箭,但他理解得足够多,实际上做出了技术贡献。他对技术的理解足够深入,没有人能在这方面欺骗他,他也不会到处做出他认为最终无法兑现的承诺。他可能在时间表上乐观,但他认为这在交付的合理范围内。

即使是史蒂夫·乔布斯也培养了足够的产品技能,并足够参与产品,以至于他也在这两个领域运作。拉里·埃里森从程序员开始,我认为他编写了Oracle的第一个版本,或者实际上深度参与了它。

马克·安德森也在这个领域。他可能对自己的销售技能没有足够的信心,但他是编写Netscape Navigator的程序员,或者编写了其中很大一部分。所以,我认为任何领域的真正巨人都是那些既能创造又能销售的人。

我宁愿教工程师营销,也不愿教营销人员工程

通常,创造是销售人员后来生活中无法掌握的技能。它需要太多专注的时间。但创造者可以在稍后学习销售,特别是如果他们天生就是良好的沟通者。比尔·盖茨有句名言:“我宁愿教工程师营销,也不愿教营销人员工程。”

我认为,如果你从创造心态开始,拥有创造技能,而且你还足够年轻,或者你有足够的专注时间认为可以学习销售,并且你有一些自然特征或者你是一个好的销售人员,那么你可以加倍投入这些。

现在,你的销售技能可能与传统领域不同。例如,假设你是一个非常好的工程师,然后人们说,嗯,现在你需要擅长销售,好吧,你可能不擅长面对面的销售,但你可能是非常好的作家。

而写作是一种比面对面销售更容易学习的技能,所以你可能会培养写作技能,直到你成为一个良好的在线沟通者,然后用它来进行销售。

另一方面,可能你是一个好的创造者,但写作不好,不喜欢与大众沟通,但你擅长一对一交流,那么你可能会将销售技能用于招聘或融资,这些更像是单对单的努力。

这指出,如果你处于这两者的交叉点,不要绝望,因为你不会成为最好的技术专家,也不会成为最好的销售人员,但奇怪的是,那种组合,回到斯科特·亚当斯的技能堆栈,那种两种技能的组合是势不可挡的。

长期来看,理解底层产品、知道如何构建它并能销售它的人,对投资者来说是猫薄荷,这些人如果有足够的精力,可以打破墙壁,几乎可以完成任何事情。

Nivi:
如果你只能选择一个擅长,你会选择哪一个?

Naval:
当你试图从噪音中脱颖而出时,创造实际上更好,因为有太多没有实质支持的推销员和销售人员。当你刚开始,当你试图被认可时,创造更好。

但在很久以后,创造会变得精疲力竭,因为它是一项专注的工作,很难保持最新状态,因为总有新人、新产品出现,他们有更新的工具,坦白说还有更多时间,因为它非常紧张,是一项非常专注的任务。

所以,销售技能实际上随着时间的推移扩展得更好。例如,如果你有构建伟大产品的声誉,那很好,但当你发布新产品时,我会根据产品来验证它。但如果你有作为良好商业伙伴的声誉,并且你有说服力和沟通能力,那么这种声誉几乎会自我实现。

所以,我认为如果你只能选择一个,你可以从创造开始,然后过渡到销售。这是一个回避的回答,但我认为这实际上是正确的答案。


Learn to Sell, Learn to Build

If you can do both, you will be unstoppable

Nivi:
Talking about combining skills, you said that you should “learn to sell, learn to build, if you can do both, you will be unstoppable.”

Naval:
This is a very broad category. It’s two broad categories. One is building the product. Which is hard, and it’s multivariate. It can include design, it can include development, it can include manufacturing, logistics, procurement, it can even be designing and operating a service. It has many, many definitions.

But in every industry, there is a definition of the builder. In our tech industry it’s the CTO, it’s the programmer, it’s the software engineer, hardware engineer. But even in the laundry business, it could be the person who’s building the laundry service, who is making the trains run on time, who’s making sure all the clothes end up in the right place at the right time, and so on.

The other side of it is sales. Again, selling has a very broad definition. Selling doesn’t necessarily just mean selling individual customers, but it can mean marketing, it can mean communicating, it can mean recruiting, it can mean raising money, it can mean inspiring people, it could mean doing PR. It’s a broad umbrella category.

The Silicon Valley model is a builder and seller

So, generally, the Silicon Valley startup model tends to work best. It’s not the only way, but it is probably the most common way, when you have two founders, one of whom is world class at selling, and one of whom is world class at building.

Examples are, of course, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak with Apple, Gates and Allen probably had similar responsibilities early on with Microsoft, Larry and Sergey probably broke down along those lines, although it’s a little different there because that was a very technical product delivered to end users through a simple interface.

But generally, you will see this pattern repeated over and over. There’s a builder and there’s a seller. There’s a CEO and CTO combo. And venture and technology investors are almost trained to look for this combo whenever possible. It’s the magic combination.

If you can do both you will be unstoppable

The ultimate is when one individual can do both. That’s when you get true superpowers. That’s when you get people who can create entire industries.

The living example is Elon Musk. He may not necessarily be building the rockets himself, but he understands enough that he actually makes technical contributions. He understands the technology well enough that no one’s going to snow him on it, and he’s not running around making claims that he doesn’t think he can’t eventually deliver. He may be optimistic on the timelines but he thinks this is within reasonableness for delivery.

Even Steve Jobs developed enough product skills and was involved enough in the product that he also operated in both of these domains. Larry Ellison started as a programmer and I think wrote the first version of Oracle, or was actually heavily involved in it.

Marc Andreessen was also in this domain. He may not have had enough confidence in his sales skills, but he was the programmer who wrote Netscape Navigator, or a big chunk of it. So, I think the real giants in any field are the people who can both build and sell.

I’d rather teach an engineer marketing than a marketer engineering

And usually the building is a thing that a sales person can’t pick up later in life. It requires too much focused time. But a builder can pick up selling a little bit later, especially if they were already innately wired to be a good communicator. Bill Gates famously paraphrases this as, “I’d rather teach an engineer marketing, than a marketer engineering.”

I think if you start out with a building mentality and you have building skills and it’s still early enough in your life, or you have enough focused time that you think you can learn selling, and you have some natural characteristics or you’re a good salesperson, then you can double down on those.

Now, your sales skills could be in a different than traditional domain. For example, let’s say you’re a really good engineer and then people are saying, well, now you need to be good at sales, well, you may not be good at hand-to-hand sales, but you may be a really good writer.

And writing is a skill that can be learned much more easily than, say, in-person selling, and so you may just cultivate writing skills until you become a good online communicator and then use that for your sales.

On the other hand, it could just be that you’re a good builder and you’re bad at writing and you don’t like communicating to mass audiences but you’re good one-on-one, so then you might use your sales skills for recruiting or for fundraising, which are more one-on-one kinds of endeavors.

This is pointing out that if you’re at the intersection of these two, don’t despair because you’re not going to be the best technologist and you’re not going to be the best salesperson, but in a weird way, that combination, back to the Scott Adams skill stack, that combination of two skills is unstoppable.

Long term, people who understand the underlying product and how to build it and can sell it, these are catnip to investors, these people can break down walls if they have enough energy, and they can get almost anything done.

Nivi:
If you could only pick one to be good at, which one would you pick?

Naval:
When you’re trying to stand out from the noise building is actually better because there’re so many hustlers and sales people who have nothing to back them up. When you’re starting out, when you’re trying to be recognized, building is better.

But much later down the line building gets exhausting because it is a focus job and it’s hard to stay current because there’s always new people, new products coming up who have newer tools, and frankly more time because it’s very intense, it’s a very focused task.

So, sales skills actually scale better over time. Like for example, if you have a reputation for building a great product, that’s good, but when you ship your new product, I’m going to validate it based on the product. But if you have a reputation for being a good person to do business with and you’re persuasive and communicative then that reputation almost becomes self-fulfilling.

So, I think if you only had to pick up one, you can start with building and then transition to selling. This is a cop-out answer, but I think that is actually the right answer.