律师还是保险销售员?

Naval Ravikant 2005-11-30

律师还是保险销售员?

当你创办一家初创公司时,很可能在融资阶段,你必须聘请一位公司律师。大多数律师收费高得离谱且令人恼火。以下是一些建议:

  • 不要仅仅因为风投公司坚持就选择他们的律师。 这些律师会与风投公司合作上百次融资,而与你只合作一次。你认为他们的忠诚度在哪里?聘请自己的律师,不要让步。

  • 警惕诱饵调包手法——这种情况发生在你面试了健谈、聪明的资深合伙人后,一旦你签约,他们就会换成不那么受欢迎、经验较少的合伙人。新换的人可能收费较低,但不会低太多。

  • 按项目固定费用付费,尤其是在完成融资时,特别是对于对方的律师(风投的一个老把戏是让初创公司在交易完成时支付风投律师的费用!这种荒谬的做法被辩解为”行业标准”)

  • 如果你对账单有异议,在付款解决。 占有即优势……

  • 让你的律师承担起草融资文件的重任。 起草方默认会赢得所有细节问题

最后,好的律师是顾问,他们在给出具有财务影响的建议时会权衡利弊(几乎所有建议都有财务影响)。差的律师是畏首畏尾的保险销售员——他们会鼓励你为防范每一种可能的风险而花费到破产。风险可以且应该尽可能地被量化


Lawyers or Insurance Salesmen?

At some point when you have a startup, probably when raising money, you’ll HAVE to get a corporate lawyer. Most are hideously expensive and infuriating. A few tips:

  • Don’t just go with the lawyer that the VCs insist upon. These lawyers will work with the VC on a hundred financings and with you on only one. Where do you think their loyalties lie? Get your own lawyer, and don’t budge.

  • Watch out for the bait-and-switch – this is when you interview the gregarious, smart senior partner, who then swaps in the less popular, less experienced partner once you’ve signed them up. And the new person might be cheaper, but not much cheaper.

  • Put them on fixed-fee per job, especially for closing a financing, and especially for lawyers for the other side (one of the old great VC tricks is that startups pay for the VC’s attorneys in closings! A ridiculous practice justified as being “standard”)

  • If you have issues with the bill, resolve before paying. Possession is 9/10ths…

  • Make your lawyers do the heavy lifting of drafting the financing docs. The drafting side wins all of the small points, by default

Finally, good lawyers are advisors who weight pros and cons when giving advice that has a financial impact (which almost all of it does). Bad lawyers are whimpering insurance salesmen – and will encourage you to spend yourself to ruin by covering against every possible risk. Risks can and should be quantified whenever possible.