你无法欺骗大自然

Naval Ravikant 2025-09-22

你无法欺骗大自然

Naval: 你必须为发生在你身上的一切坏事承担责任——这是一种心态。

也许这有点虚假,但它非常利己。事实上,如果你能更进一步,把你身上发生的一切好事都归功于运气,那可能也有帮助。但在某种程度上,真相非常重要。你不想假装。

根据我的观察,事实是:那些非常努力工作、投入自己、不放弃并在足够长的时间尺度上为结果承担责任的人,最终在他们专注的任何事情上都会成功。每一个成功案例都知道这一点。

理查德·费曼过去常说,他不是天才。他只是一个投入自己并非常努力工作的男孩。是的,他显然非常聪明。但那是必要的,但不是充分的。我们都知道聪明但懒惰的人的刻板印象。

我喜欢骚扰我所有的朋友——包括Nivi——我注意到这些人的一个问题是你只是远低于潜力地运作。你的潜力比你现在的水平高得多。你必须把其中一些转化为动能。

讽刺的是,这会提高你的潜力,因为我们不是静态的生物。

我们是动态的生物。你会学到更多。你会通过实践来学习。所以别再找借口了,进入竞技场吧。

Nivi: 你也喜欢叔本华。你从叔本华那里学到了什么,或者他的作品中有没有什么令人惊讶的东西?

Naval: 叔本华不适合所有人,而且有很多不同的叔本华。他写了很多东西,你可以读他更晦涩的哲学文本,比如《作为意志和表象的世界》,那是他为其他哲学家写的。或者你可以读他更实用的东西,比如《论存在的虚无》。

他是历史上少数几个毫不退缩地写作的人之一。他写的是他认为是真实的东西。他并不总是正确的,但他从未对你撒谎——这一点很明显。他对事物的思考非常深入。

他不太在乎别人对他的看法。他只知道:“我写下的东西我知道是真实的。”

他也不摆架子。他不使用花哨的语言;他不试图给你留下深刻印象。

人们称他为悲观主义者。我认为这不完全公平。我认为他的世界观可以被解释为悲观的,但我只是在我想要读一剂严厉的真相时读他。

叔本华对我来说独特的地方是,他给了我完全的许可去做我自己。他根本不在乎大众的想法,他对普通思维的蔑视表露无遗。

现在,我不一定认同这一点——我比他更平等主义一些。但他真的给了你许可去做你自己。所以如果你擅长某件事,不要害羞。接受你擅长某件事的事实。

这对我来说很难,因为我们都想合群。如果你想在一个群体中相处,你不想太突出。这是老话:枪打出头鸟。

但如果你要做任何非凡的事情,你确实必须以某种方式押注于自己。如果你在某方面很出色,那确实需要你承认你在那方面很出色——或者至少努力做到——并且不担心别人怎么想。

现在,你也不想变得妄想。任何从事投资业务的人都会不断遇到那些说”我在某方面非常出色”的人,他们有点妄想。不,你不能说你在某方面很出色。其他人才能说你在某方面很出色,而且你妈妈不算数。

来自其他人的反馈通常是虚假的。奖项是虚假的。评论家是虚假的。来自朋友和家人的赞誉是虚假的。他们可能试图真诚,但它迷失在如此多的虚假海洋中,以至于你不会得到真实的反馈。

真实的反馈来自自由市场和大自然。 物理学是残酷的:你的产品要么有效,要么无效。自由市场是残酷的:人们要么买它,要么不买。但来自其他人的反馈是虚假的。

你无法从群体中获得好的反馈,因为群体只是想和睦相处。个人寻求真理,群体寻求共识。 一个不和睦的群体会解体。它会分崩离析。群体越大,你从中获得的好反馈就越少。

你不一定想依赖来自你妈妈、朋友或家人的反馈,甚至不想依赖颁奖典礼和奖励系统的反馈。

如果你优化你的公司是为了登上杂志封面,或者为了赢得行业奖项,那你就是在失败。

你需要客户。那是你真正的反馈。你需要来自大自然的反馈。

  • 你的火箭发射了吗?
  • 你的无人机飞起来了吗?
  • 你的3D打印机是否在应该的时间内、在应该的成本预算内、以应该的公差打印出了物体?

欺骗自己很容易。被别人欺骗也很容易。

你无法欺骗大自然。

相关


It Is Impossible to Fool Mother Nature

Naval: You have to take responsibility for everything bad that happens to you—and this is a mindset.

Maybe it’s a little fake, but it’s very self-serving. And in fact, if you can go the extra mile and just attribute everything good that happens to you to luck, that might be helpful too. But at some level, truth is very important. You don’t want to fake it.

From what I have observed, the truth of the matter is: People who work very hard and apply themselves and don’t give up and take responsibility for the outcomes on a long enough time scale, end up succeeding in whatever they’re focused on. And every success case knows this.

Richard Feynman used to say that he wasn’t a genius. He was just a boy who applied himself and worked really hard. Yeah, he was very smart, obviously. But that was necessary, but not sufficient. We all know the trope of the smart, lazy guy.

And I like to harass all of my friends—including Nivi—that one of the problems I notice with these guys is you’re just operating way below potential. Your potential is so much higher than where you are. You have to apply some of that into kinetic.

And ironically that will raise your potential because we’re not static creatures.

We’re dynamic creatures. And you will learn more. You will learn by doing. So just stop making excuses and get in the ring.

Nivi: You also like Schopenhauer. What have you learned from Schopenhauer, or is there anything surprising in his work?

Naval: Schopenhauer is not for everybody and there are many different Schopenhauers. He wrote quite a bit, and you could read his more obscure philosophical texts, like The World as Will and Idea, where he was writing for other philosophers. Or you could read his more practical stuff like On the Vanity of Existence.

He was one of the few people in history who wrote unflinchingly. He wrote what he believed to be true. He wasn’t always correct, but he never lied to you—and that comes across. He thought about things very deeply.

He didn’t care that much what people thought of him. All he knew was, “What I am writing down I know to be true.”

He also didn’t put on any airs. He didn’t use fancy language; he didn’t try to impress you.

People call him a pessimist. I don’t think that’s entirely fair. I think his worldview could be interpreted as pessimistic, but I just read him when I want to read a harsh dose of truth.

What Schopenhauer did uniquely for me is that he gave me complete permission to be me. He just did not care at all what the masses thought, and his disdain for common thinking comes out.

Now, I don’t necessarily share that—I’m a little bit more of an egalitarian than he was. But he really gives you permission to be yourself. So if you’re good at something, don’t be shy about it. Accept that you’re good at something.

And that was hard for me because we all want to get along. If you want to get along in a group, you don’t want to stand out too much. It’s the old line: The tall poppy gets cut.

But if you’re going to do anything exceptional, you do have to bet on yourself in some way. And if you’re exceptional at something, that does require you acknowledging that you’re exceptional at it—or at least trying to be—and not worrying about what other people think.

Now, you don’t want to be delusional either. Anyone who has been in the investing business is constantly hit by people who say, “I’m so great at something,” and they’re a little delusional. No, you don’t get to say you’re exceptional at something. Other people get to say you’re exceptional at something, and your mom doesn’t count.

Feedback from other people is usually fake. Awards are fake. Critics are fake. Kudos from your friends and family are fake. They might try to be genuine, but it’s lost in such a sea of fakeness that you’re not going to get real feedback.

Real feedback comes from free markets and nature. Physics is harsh: either your product worked, or it didn’t. Free markets are harsh: either people buy it, or they don’t. But feedback from other people is fake.

You can’t get good feedback from groups because groups are just trying to get along. Individuals search for truth, groups search for consensus. A group that doesn’t get along decoheres. It falls apart. And the larger the group, the less good feedback you’re going to get from it.

You don’t want to necessarily rely on feedback from your mom or your friends or your family, or even from award ceremonies and award systems.

If you’re optimizing your company to end up on the cover of a magazine, or to win an industry award, you’re failing.

You need customers. That’s your real feedback. You need feedback from nature.

  • Did your rocket launch?
  • Did your drone fly?
  • Did your 3D printer print the object within the tolerances that it was supposed to, in the time it was supposed to, in the cost budget that it was supposed to?

It’s very easy to fool yourself. It’s very easy to be fooled by others.

It is impossible to fool Mother Nature.

Related