灵感层层递进
灵感层层递进
Nivi: 欢迎回到Naval播客,我相信我们自2020年以来断断续续地发布节目。我们将讨论一些《如何致富》的内容。我从Naval过去一年的Twitter中挑选了一些推文。我也得到了SuperGrok的一些帮助,我们将逐一浏览它们。
这实际上是我的第一个问题。你告诉我你从Eric Jorgenson那里拿到了埃隆的书的早期副本。里面有什么令人惊讶的内容吗?
Naval: 我只读了大约20%。这本书真的很棒。它完全是埃隆自己的话语。我认为令人印象深刻的是贯穿全书的独立感、自主性和紧迫感。
我不认为通过阅读这些东西你一定能学到一步一步的过程;你无法模仿他的过程。这是为他设计的。这是为SpaceX设计的,这是为特斯拉设计的。它是情境化的,但看到他不让任何事情阻碍他,看到他如何狂热地质疑一切,以及他如何强调速度和迭代以及务实的执行,这非常鼓舞人心。
因此,这让你想要站起来奔跑,并在你的公司做同样的事情。对我来说,这就是好书的作用。如果我听史蒂夫·乔布斯的演讲,它会让我想要变得更好。如果我读埃隆关于他如何执行的内容,它会让我想要更好地执行,然后我会找到自己的方式。
细节不一定对应,但更重要的是,我认为正是灵感在驱动一切。
Nivi: 这很有趣,因为我认为人们将你视为鼓舞人心的——是的,显然——但也制定了人们实际遵循的原则。
Naval: 我保持我的原则高层次且不完整。部分原因是这样听起来更好,更容易记住,但也因为它更具适用性。我对《如何致富》内容的一个问题是,人们在Twitter上用140或280个字符向我提出高度具体的问题,而我没有足够的背景来回应。
这些事情需要背景。这就是为什么我喜欢Airchat。这就是为什么我喜欢Clubhouse。这就是为什么我喜欢口头形式。当我过去做Periscopes时,当人们问我一个问题时,我可以反问他们一个后续问题,他们可以再问我另一个问题,我们可以深入挖掘,试图找到他们问题的核心。
然后我可以说:“好吧,根据我掌握的信息,如果我处于你的位置,我会做以下事情。“但大多数这些情况都是高度情境化的,所以很难复制别人的细节。适用的是原则。这就是为什么我保持我的内容非常高层次的原因。
事实上,我认为作者Eric Jorgenson在尝试分解可引用的片段并将它们放在独立的句子中做得很好。所以他正在从埃隆的作品中提取推文。
但我不知道。我只是做我的风格。埃隆做他的;他以自己的方式激励他人。也许我以自己的方式激励某人。我受到他的启发。我受到其他人的启发——灵感层层递进。
Inspiration All the Way Down
Nivi: Welcome back to the Naval Podcast where we post intermittently since 2020, I believe. We are going to talk about some How to Get Rich content. I’ve pulled out some tweets from Naval’s Twitter from the last year. I got a little help from SuperGrok as well, and we’re just going to go through them.
Here’s actually my first question. You told me that you got an early copy of the Elon book from Eric Jorgenson. Anything surprising in there?
Naval: I’m only about 20% of the way through. It’s really good. It’s just Elon in his own words. And I think what’s striking is just the sense of independence, agency, and urgency that just runs throughout the whole thing.
I don’t think you necessarily learn a step-by-step process by reading these things; you can’t emulate his process. It’s designed for him. It’s designed for SpaceX, it’s designed for Tesla. It’s contextual, but it’s very inspiring just to see how he doesn’t let anything stand in his way, how maniacal he is about questioning everything, and how he just emphasizes speed and iteration and no-nonsense execution.
And so that just makes you want to get up and run and do the same thing with your company. And to me, that’s what the good books do. If I listen to a Steve Jobs speech, it makes me want to be better. If I read Elon on how he executes, it makes me want to execute better, and then I’ll figure out my own way.
The details don’t necessarily map, but more importantly, I think just the inspiration is what drives.
Nivi: That’s pretty interesting because I think people look to you as inspirational—yes, obviously—but also laying out principles that people actually do follow.
Naval: I keep my principles high level and incomplete. Partially because it just sounds better and it’s easier to remember, but also just because it’s more applicable. One of the problems I have with the How to Get Rich content is people ask me highly specific questions on Twitter in 140 or 280 characters, and I just don’t have enough context to respond.
These things require context. That’s why I liked Airchat. That’s why I liked Clubhouse. That’s why I liked spoken format. Back when I used to do Periscopes, when people would ask me a question, then I could ask a follow-up question back to them and they could ask me another question and we could dig through and try to get to the meat of what they were asking.
And then I could say, “Well, given the information that I have, if I were in your shoes, I would do the following thing.” But most of these situations are highly contextual, so it’s hard to copy details from other people. It’s the principles that apply. And so that is why I keep my stuff very high level.
And in fact, I think Eric Jorgenson, the author, has done a good job of trying to break out the little quotable bits and put them in their own standalone sentences. So he is pulling tweets out of Elon’s work.
But I don’t know. I just do my style. Elon does his; he inspires in his own way. Maybe I inspire someone in my own way. I get inspired by him. I get inspired by others—inspiration all the way down.