基因进化是模因进化的前奏
基因进化是模因进化的前奏
思想经历与基因相同的进化过程
布雷特:
波普尔有一本书叫《客观知识》,副标题是”一种进化论的方法”。这也不是偶然的。正如我们所理解的那样,认识论理论与进化论之间存在着对称性。
在我们理解所谓的达尔文进化论之前,人们唯一的概念是这些实体必须被创造出来。你周围看到的所有植物和动物都必须由造物主创造。没有其他的解释机制。
有些人提出了随时间逐渐变化的想法。拉马克就是其中之一。他的想法是,长颈鹿之所以有长脖子,是因为它们的祖先脖子稍短,所以它们试图伸长脖子去够那些够不到的叶子。
但同样,除了个体去健身房锻炼二头肌,二头肌会随时间变得稍大之外,并没有其他机制。虽然你可以通过健身来增大二头肌,但这并不意味着你的孩子会继承这些特征。
达尔文提出的想法与波普尔在知识方面的想法类似。这是一种错误修正。这个想法是,一个有机体会在特定环境中试验自己,如果它不适应那个环境,它就会死亡。但如果它适应那个环境,它就会存活下来。
所以你有这种生物体与环境之间的现实遭遇。是环境从现实中给你反馈,并摧毁那些不够适应生存的有机体。
新达尔文主义的观点是告诉我们选择单位是什么。不是群体或兽群;甚至不是个体。是基因。这就是自私基因的概念,来自理查德·道金斯,他说如果这些基因中有任何一个不适应特定环境,就可能导致该有机体的死亡。物种可能会存活下来,但随着环境的变化,其整个DNA会随时间发生极其微妙的变化。
现在我们已经将其提升了一个层次。我们人类是那个进化过程的下一步,我们可以创造解释性知识,做同样的事情。多伊奇喜欢说:“基因进化仅仅是一个前奏。接下来是模因进化。”
从现在开始,宇宙的历史将是思想经历与先前基因相同的进化过程的历史。
Genetic Evolution Was a Prelude to Memetic Evolution
Ideas undergo the same evolutionary process as genes
Brett:
Popper has a book called “Objective Knowledge,” and it’s subtitled “An Evolutionary Approach.” And that’s no accident, either. There’s a symmetry between the theory of epistemology and the theory of evolution as we understand it.
Before we understood what is known as the Darwinian theory of evolution, the only idea that people had was that these entities had to be created. All the plants and animals that you see around you had to be created by a creator. There was no other explanatory mechanism.
Some people came up with the idea of gradual change over time. Lamarck was one. His idea was the reason why giraffes have long necks is that their ancestors had slightly shorter necks, so they tried to stretch their necks to reach the leaves they couldn’t reach.
But again, there was no mechanism for this beyond the fact that an individual goes off to the gymnasium and works on their biceps and their biceps get a little bigger over time. Although you can work out in the gym and increase the size of your biceps, that doesn’t mean your children are going to inherit those characteristics.
What Darwin came up with is a similar idea to what Popper had in knowledge. It was an error correction. The idea is that an organism would trial itself out in a particular environment and if it wasn’t, as we say, fit for that environment, then it would die off. But if it was fit in that environment, then it would survive.
So you have this encounter with reality between living organisms and the environment. And it’s the environment that’s giving you feedback from reality and destroying those organisms that aren’t fit enough to survive.
The Neo-Darwinist view is to give us what the unit of selection is. It’s not the group or the herd; it’s not even the individual. It’s the gene. It’s the selfish gene idea, which comes to us from Richard Dawkins, who says if any one of those genes happens to be not fit for the particular environment, that could cause the death of that organism. The species might survive, but its entire DNA will ever so subtly change over time as the environment changes.
Now we have leveled that up. We human beings are the next step in that evolutionary process where we can create explanatory knowledge, which does the same thing. Deutsch likes to say, “Genetic evolution was merely a prelude. What’s coming next is memetic evolution.”
The history of the universe from here on out is going to be the history of ideas undergoing the same evolutionary process as the genes did previously.