不要依赖可信度印章
不要依赖可信度印章
从机构到个人的代际转变将会混乱
Naval:
当今社会中有很多机构依赖可信度印章。
它们曾经是你在社会中获得可信度的方式。如果你是为《纽约时报》或《华盛顿邮报》撰稿的记者,那么你就拥有《时报》和《邮报》的报头信誉。如果你是哈佛大学的教授,你就有可信度,因为你是哈佛大学的教授。
当然,这些系统被攻破了。许多没有资格告诉世界该做什么的社会科学家现在伪装成经济学家或自然科学家,带着荒谬的政治模型混入其中。你有活动人士在这些曾经伟大的报纸报头下写作,烧毁这些报纸长期以来积累的可信度资本。
互联网正在缓慢但稳定地揭露他们,我们正处于一个过渡阶段,大众仍然相信这些机构。
我们被困在这个谢林点,这个机构的协调点:我如何知道我是否应该雇用你?你会有一张哈佛大学的文凭吗?我知道它不如以前那么好。我知道哈佛大学的人文学科文凭现在可能毫无意义,但我没有其他可信度指标来筛选你,我需要以高效的方式来做这件事。
我们看到的是权力从机构向个人的转移,但这将会混乱,并且至少需要一代人的时间。
与此同时,机构正在反击。我们正处于《帝国反击战》阶段,他们试图接管像Twitter、Facebook、Patreon这样的新平台,这些平台赋予个人权力。
Brett:
大学和整个学术界在培养自己的下一代教师方面拥有很大的权力,这些教师随后去教育下一代中小学学生。
Naval:
这是一个祭司阶层。你只能说祭司们批准的内容,而且只有如果你是祭司才能说这些,而祭司们决定谁是祭司。
Don’t Rely on Credibility Stamps
The generation-long shift from institutions to individuals will be messy
Naval:
There are a lot of institutions in our society today that rely on credibility stamps.
They used to be how you gain credibility in society. If you were a journalist writing for The New York Times or The Washington Post, then you had the masthead of The Times and The Post. If you’re a professor at Harvard, you have credibility because you’re a professor at Harvard.
Of course, those systems got hacked. A lot of social scientists who have no business telling the world what to do are now in there with nonsense political models masquerading as economists or natural scientists. You have people who are activists writing under the mastheads of these formerly great newspapers and burning up the credibility capital that these newspapers have built up over time.
The Internet is exposing them slowly but steadily, and we’re going through a transition phase where the masses still believe in the institutions.
We’re caught in this Schelling point, this coordination point for the institutions: How do I know if I should hire you? Will you have a diploma from Harvard? I know it’s not as good as it used to be. I know a Harvard humanities diploma’s probably nonsense at this point, but I don’t have any other credibility metric to filter you and I need to do it in an efficient way.
What we’re seeing is the transition of power from institutions to individuals, but it’s going to be messy and it’s going to take at least a generation.
In the meantime, the institutions are fighting back. We’re in the Empire Strikes Back phase where they’re trying to take over the new platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Patreon, which empower the individuals.
Brett:
The university and all of the academia have a very big stick in terms of being able to train their own next generation of teachers who then go on to teach the next generation of primary and secondary school students.
Naval:
It’s a priesthood. You’re only allowed to say what the priests have approved, and you can only say that if you are a priest, and the priests get to decide who’s a priest.