不要基于光鲜或名声做出职业决定
不要基于光鲜或名声做出职业决定
行名失己, 非士也 [追求名声而丧失自我的人,不是真正的学者]。 ( 庄子 [Zhuangzi] , ” 大宗师 [The Grandmaster]” )
仅仅因为某个领域或部门看起来很光鲜就进入它,这不是一个好主意;同样,仅仅因为某个问题(或数学家)最著名就专注于它——老实说,数学总体上并没有那么多名声或光鲜,不值得把这些作为你的主要目标去追逐。任何光鲜的事物都可能是高度竞争的,只有那些拥有最扎实背景(特别是对该领域不那么光鲜的方面有丰富经验)的人才可能有所成就。
一个著名的未解决问题几乎不可能凭空解决。一个人必须首先花费大量时间和精力研究更简单(且远不那么著名)的模型问题,获取:
- 技术
- 直觉
- 部分结果
- 背景知识
- 文献
这才能在对该领域任何真正重大问题有任何实际解决机会之前,形成富有成效的方法并排除无效的方法。(偶尔,这些问题中会有一个相对容易地解决,仅仅是因为拥有合适工具集的合适人群之前没有机会研究这个问题,但对于那些被深入研究的问题——特别是那些已经有大量”不可行”定理和反例排除了整个攻击策略的问题——通常情况并非如此。)
出于类似的原因,永远不要将奖项或认可作为追求数学的主要理由;从长远来看,更好的策略是仅仅产出好的数学并为你的领域做出贡献,奖项和认可自然会随之而来(当它们最终出现时,也是应得的)。
另一方面,研究一个问题或数学家为什么出名,或者一个机构或部门如何获得其声望,可能是值得的;这些具体信息可以帮助你决定这个问题、数学家或部门是否会引起你的兴趣。另请参阅”我应该申请哪些大学?”
Don’t base career decisions on glamour or fame
行名失己, 非士也 [One who pursues fame at the risk of losing one’s self, is not a scholar]. ( 莊子 [Zhuangzi] , ” 大宗師 [The Grandmaster]” )
Going into a field or department simply because it is glamorous is not a good idea, nor is focusing on the most famous problems (or mathematicians) within a field, solely because they are famous – honestly, there isn’t that much fame or glamour in mathematics overall, and it is not worth chasing these things as your primary goal. Anything glamorous is likely to be highly competitive, and only those with the most solid of backgrounds (in particular, lots of experience with less glamorous aspects of the field) are likely to get anywhere.
A famous unsolved problem is almost never solved ab nihilo. One has to first spend much time and effort working on simpler (and much less famous) model problems, acquiring:
- Techniques
- Intuition
- Partial results
- Context
- Literature
This enables fruitful approaches to the problem and ruling out fruitless ones, before having any real chance of solving any really big problem in the area. (Occasionally, one of these problems falls relatively easily, simply because the right group of people with the right set of tools hadn’t had a chance to look at the problem before, but this is usually not the case for the very intensively studied problems – particularly those which already have a substantial body of “no go” theorems and counterexamples which rule out entire strategies of attack.)
For similar reasons, one should never make prizes or recognition a primary reason for pursuing mathematics; it is a better strategy in the long-term to just produce good mathematics and contribute to your field, and the prizes and recognition will take care of themselves (and be well-earned when they eventually do appear).
On the other hand, it can be worth researching why a problem or mathematician is famous, or how an institution or department earnt its prestige; such specific information can help you decide whether this problem, mathematician, or department would be of interest to you. See also “Which universities should I apply to?”