Mac的回归

Paul Graham 2005-03-01

Mac的回归

2005年3月

我认识的所有最好的黑客都在逐渐转向Mac。我的朋友Robert说,他在MIT的整个研究小组最近都给自己买了Powerbook。这些人不是90年代中期苹果低谷时期购买Mac的图形设计师和祖母们。他们是你能找到的最核心的OS黑客。

原因当然是OS X。Powerbook设计精美,运行FreeBSD。你还需要知道什么?

我在去年年底买了一台Powerbook。当我的IBM Thinkpad的硬盘很快损坏后,它成了我唯一的笔记本电脑。当我的朋友Trevor最近出现在我家时,他拿着一台与我相同的Powerbook。

对我们大多数人来说,这不是转向苹果,而是回归。尽管在90年代中期很难相信,但Mac在其时代是典型的黑客计算机。

1983年秋天,我大学的一门CS课教授站起来,像先知一样宣布,很快将有一种计算机具有半MIPS的处理能力,可以放在飞机座位下,价格如此便宜,我们可以从暑假工作中节省足够的钱来买一台。整个房间都倒吸了一口气。当Mac出现时,它甚至比我们希望的还要好。它如承诺的那样小、强大和便宜。但它也是我们从未想过计算机能成为的东西:设计精美。

我必须拥有一台。我不是一个人。在80年代中后期,我认识的所有黑客都在为Mac编写软件,或者想要这样做。剑桥的每个沙发床垫上似乎都躺着一本相同的胖白皮书。如果你把它翻过来,上面写着”Inside Macintosh”。

然后是Linux和FreeBSD,黑客们跟随最强大的OS wherever it leads,发现自己转向了Intel盒子。如果你关心设计,你可以买一台Thinkpad,如果你能把Intel和Microsoft的标签从前面撕掉,它至少不会 actively 令人反感。[1]

随着OS X的出现,黑客们回来了。当我走进剑桥的苹果商店时,就像回家一样。很多东西都变了,但空气中仍然有那种苹果的酷炫感,感觉表演是由真正关心的人运营的,而不是随机的公司交易者。

那又怎样,商界可能会说。谁在乎黑客是否再次喜欢苹果?毕竟,黑客市场有多大?

相当小,但相对于其规模来说很重要。当涉及计算机时,黑客现在正在做的事情,十年后每个人都会做。几乎所有的技术,从Unix到位图显示到Web,都是在CS部门和研究实验室中首先流行的,然后逐渐传播到世界其他地方。

我记得1986年告诉我父亲,有一种叫做Sun的新型计算机,它是一台严肃的Unix机器,但如此小和便宜,你可以拥有一个自己坐在前面,而不是坐在连接到单个中央Vax的VT100前面。我建议,也许他应该买一些这家公司的股票。我想他真的希望他听了。

1994年,我的朋友Koling想和他在台湾的女朋友交谈,为了节省长途账单,他写了一些软件,将声音转换为可以通过互联网发送的数据包。当时我们不确定这是否是互联网的适当用途,互联网当时仍然是一个准政府实体。他现在做的事情被称为VoIP,它是一个巨大且快速增长的业务。

如果你想知道十年后普通人会用计算机做什么,只需在一个好大学的CS部门走一圈。无论他们在做什么,你都会做。

在”平台”问题上,这种趋势更加明显,因为新颖的软件源自伟大的黑客,他们倾向于首先为他们个人使用的任何计算机编写它。软件销售硬件。Apple II的初始销售中,如果不是大多数的话,很多来自购买它来运行VisiCalc的人。为什么Bricklin和Frankston为Apple II编写VisiCalc?因为他们个人喜欢它。他们可以选择任何机器使其成为明星。

如果你想吸引黑客编写销售你的硬件的软件,你必须使它成为他们自己使用的东西。仅仅使其”开放”是不够的。它必须开放且好。

而开放且好正是Macs再次成为的。中间的几年创造了一种据我所知前所未有的情况:苹果在低端和高端都很受欢迎,但在中间不。我七十岁的母亲有一台Mac笔记本电脑。我拥有计算机科学博士学位的朋友都有Mac笔记本电脑。[2] 然而苹果的整体市场份额仍然很小。

尽管前所未有,但我预测这种情况也是暂时的。

所以爸爸,有家叫苹果的公司。他们制造一种新型计算机,设计得像Bang & Olufsen音响系统一样好,下面是你能买到的最好的Unix机器。是的,市盈率有点高,但我想很多人会想要这些。

注释

[1] 这些可怕的标签很像前Google搜索引擎上流行的侵入性广告。它们对客户说:你不重要。我们关心Intel和Microsoft,而不是你。

[2] Y Combinator(我们希望)主要被黑客访问。操作系统的比例是:Windows 66.4%,Macintosh 18.8%,Linux 11.4%,FreeBSD 1.5%。Mac数字与五年前相比是一个很大的变化。

意大利语翻译

俄语翻译

中文翻译

Return of the Mac

March 2005

All the best hackers I know are gradually switching to Macs. My friend Robert said his whole research group at MIT recently bought themselves Powerbooks. These guys are not the graphic designers and grandmas who were buying Macs at Apple’s low point in the mid 1990s. They’re about as hardcore OS hackers as you can get.

The reason, of course, is OS X. Powerbooks are beautifully designed and run FreeBSD. What more do you need to know?

I got a Powerbook at the end of last year. When my IBM Thinkpad’s hard disk died soon after, it became my only laptop. And when my friend Trevor showed up at my house recently, he was carrying a Powerbook identical to mine.

For most of us, it’s not a switch to Apple, but a return. Hard as this was to believe in the mid 90s, the Mac was in its time the canonical hacker’s computer.

In the fall of 1983, the professor in one of my college CS classes got up and announced, like a prophet, that there would soon be a computer with half a MIPS of processing power that would fit under an airline seat and cost so little that we could save enough to buy one from a summer job. The whole room gasped. And when the Mac appeared, it was even better than we’d hoped. It was small and powerful and cheap, as promised. But it was also something we’d never considered a computer could be: fabulously well designed.

I had to have one. And I wasn’t alone. In the mid to late 1980s, all the hackers I knew were either writing software for the Mac, or wanted to. Every futon sofa in Cambridge seemed to have the same fat white book lying open on it. If you turned it over, it said “Inside Macintosh.”

Then came Linux and FreeBSD, and hackers, who follow the most powerful OS wherever it leads, found themselves switching to Intel boxes. If you cared about design, you could buy a Thinkpad, which was at least not actively repellent, if you could get the Intel and Microsoft stickers off the front. [1]

With OS X, the hackers are back. When I walked into the Apple store in Cambridge, it was like coming home. Much was changed, but there was still that Apple coolness in the air, that feeling that the show was being run by someone who really cared, instead of random corporate deal-makers.

So what, the business world may say. Who cares if hackers like Apple again? How big is the hacker market, after all?

Quite small, but important out of proportion to its size. When it comes to computers, what hackers are doing now, everyone will be doing in ten years. Almost all technology, from Unix to bitmapped displays to the Web, became popular first within CS departments and research labs, and gradually spread to the rest of the world.

I remember telling my father back in 1986 that there was a new kind of computer called a Sun that was a serious Unix machine, but so small and cheap that you could have one of your own to sit in front of, instead of sitting in front of a VT100 connected to a single central Vax. Maybe, I suggested, he should buy some stock in this company. I think he really wishes he’d listened.

In 1994 my friend Koling wanted to talk to his girlfriend in Taiwan, and to save long-distance bills he wrote some software that would convert sound to data packets that could be sent over the Internet. We weren’t sure at the time whether this was a proper use of the Internet, which was still then a quasi-government entity. What he was doing is now called VoIP, and it is a huge and rapidly growing business.

If you want to know what ordinary people will be doing with computers in ten years, just walk around the CS department at a good university. Whatever they’re doing, you’ll be doing.

In the matter of “platforms” this tendency is even more pronounced, because novel software originates with great hackers, and they tend to write it first for whatever computer they personally use. And software sells hardware. Many if not most of the initial sales of the Apple II came from people who bought one to run VisiCalc. And why did Bricklin and Frankston write VisiCalc for the Apple II? Because they personally liked it. They could have chosen any machine to make into a star.

If you want to attract hackers to write software that will sell your hardware, you have to make it something that they themselves use. It’s not enough to make it “open.” It has to be open and good.

And open and good is what Macs are again, finally. The intervening years have created a situation that is, as far as I know, without precedent: Apple is popular at the low end and the high end, but not in the middle. My seventy year old mother has a Mac laptop. My friends with PhDs in computer science have Mac laptops. [2] And yet Apple’s overall market share is still small.

Though unprecedented, I predict this situation is also temporary.

So Dad, there’s this company called Apple. They make a new kind of computer that’s as well designed as a Bang & Olufsen stereo system, and underneath is the best Unix machine you can buy. Yes, the price to earnings ratio is kind of high, but I think a lot of people are going to want these.

Notes

[1] These horrible stickers are much like the intrusive ads popular on pre-Google search engines. They say to the customer: you are unimportant. We care about Intel and Microsoft, not you.

[2] Y Combinator is (we hope) visited mostly by hackers. The proportions of OSes are: Windows 66.4%, Macintosh 18.8%, Linux 11.4%, and FreeBSD 1.5%. The Mac number is a big change from what it would have been five years ago.