我们告诉孩子的谎言
我们告诉孩子的谎言
2008年5月
成年人不断地对孩子撒谎。我不是说我们应该停止,但我认为我们至少应该审视我们告诉他们什么谎言以及为什么。
这对我们可能也有好处。我们小时候都被骗过,有些我们被告知的谎言仍然影响着我们。因此,通过研究成年人对孩子撒谎的方式,我们或许能够清除我们被告知的谎言。
我在非常广泛的意义上使用”谎言”这个词:不仅仅是明显的虚假陈述,还包括我们误导孩子的所有更微妙的方式。虽然”谎言”有负面含义,我并不是建议我们永远不应该这样做——只是说当我们这样做时应该注意。[1]
我们对孩子撒谎的方式最显著的事情之一是,这个阴谋是多么广泛。所有成年人都知道他们的文化对孩子撒谎什么:那些你回答”问你父母”的问题。如果一个孩子问1982年谁赢得了世界大赛或碳的原子量是多少,你可以直接告诉他。但如果一个孩子问你”有上帝吗?“或”妓女是什么?“你可能会说”问你父母”。
既然我们都同意,孩子们很少看到他们被呈现的世界观中有裂缝。最大的分歧是在父母和学校之间,但即使那些也很小。学校对有争议的话题说话很小心,如果他们确实与父母希望孩子相信的相矛盾,父母要么迫使学校保持沉默,要么把孩子转到新学校。
这个阴谋是如此彻底,以至于大多数发现它的孩子只是通过发现他们被告知的内容中的内在矛盾才发现的。对于那些在手术过程中醒来的孩子来说,这可能是创伤性的。爱因斯坦的经历是这样的:
通过阅读流行的科学书籍,我很快确信圣经故事中的许多内容不可能是真的。其结果是一种积极的自由思考,伴随着青年故意被国家通过谎言欺骗的印象:这是一个压倒性的印象。[2]
我记得那种感觉。到15岁时,我确信世界从头到尾都是腐败的。这就是为什么像《黑客帝国》这样的电影有如此共鸣。每个孩子都在一个虚假的世界中长大。在某种程度上,如果背后的力量像一群邪恶机器一样明确区分,人们可以通过吃药就能彻底摆脱,那会更容易。
保护
如果你问成年人为什么对孩子撒谎,他们给出的最常见的原因是为了保护他们。孩子们确实需要保护。你想为新生儿创造的环境与大城市的街道非常不同。
这似乎如此明显,以至于称之为谎言似乎是错误的。告诉婴儿世界是安静、温暖和安全的,这当然不是一个坏谎言。但如果这种无害的谎言不加以审视,可能会变味。
想象一下,如果你试图让某人在像新生儿一样受保护的环境中生活到18岁。如此严重地误导某人关于世界的事情,似乎不是保护而是虐待。当然,这是一个极端的例子;当父母做这种事情时,它成为全国新闻。但你在较小的范围内看到了同样的问题,在郊区青少年感到的不适中。
郊区的主要目的是为孩子们提供一个受保护的环境成长。它似乎对10岁的孩子很棒。我10岁时喜欢住在郊区。我没有注意到它是多么贫瘠。我的整个世界不比我骑自行车去的几个朋友的家和我跑来跑去的一些树林大。在对数尺度上,我介于婴儿床和地球之间。郊区的街道正好合适。但随着我长大,郊区开始感觉令人窒息地虚假。
生活在10岁或20岁时可能相当好,但在15岁时经常令人沮丧。这是一个太大的问题,无法在这里解决,但15岁生活糟糕的一个原因肯定是孩子们被困在一个为10岁孩子设计的世界里。
父母希望通过在郊区抚养孩子来保护他们免受什么伤害?一个搬出曼哈顿的朋友只是说她3岁的女儿”看到太多”。我能想到的包括:喝醉或吸毒的人、贫穷、疯狂、可怕的医疗状况、不同程度的奇怪性行为,以及暴力的愤怒。
我想如果我有3岁的孩子,最让我担心的是愤怒。我29岁时搬到纽约,即使那时我也感到惊讶。我不希望一个3岁的孩子看到我目睹的一些争吵。那太可怕了。成年人对年幼孩子隐瞒的很多事情,他们隐瞒是因为这些事情会吓到孩子,而不是因为他们想隐瞒这些事情的存在。误导孩子只是一个副作用。
这似乎是成年人对孩子撒谎的最正当的类型之一。但因为谎言是间接的,我们没有对它们进行严格的统计。父母知道他们隐瞒了关于性的事实,许多人在某个时刻会坐下来向孩子解释更多。但很少有人告诉他们孩子真实世界和他们成长起来的茧之间的区别。将此与父母试图在孩子心中灌输的信心结合起来,每年你都会得到一批新的18岁年轻人,他们认为他们知道如何管理世界。
不是所有18岁的年轻人都认为他们知道如何管理世界吗?实际上这似乎是一个最近的创新,不超过100年。在前工业时代,青少年是成人世界的初级成员,相对较清楚自己的不足。他们能看到他们不像村里的铁匠那么强壮或熟练。在过去时代,人们对某些事情对孩子撒谎比我们现在多,但人工、受保护环境中隐含的谎言是最近的发明。像许多新发明一样,富人首先得到了这个。国王和贵族的孩子是第一批与世界脱节长大的人。郊区意味着一半人口在这方面可以像国王一样生活。
性(和毒品)
在纽约抚养青少年孩子,我会有不同的担忧。我较少担心他们会看到什么,更担心他们会做什么。我和许多在曼哈顿长大的孩子一起上大学,总的来说他们似乎相当玩世不恭。他们似乎平均在14岁左右失去童贞,到大学时尝试过的毒品比我听说的还要多。
父母不希望青少年孩子有性生活的原因很复杂。有一些明显的危险:怀孕和性传播疾病。但这些不是父母不希望孩子有性生活的唯一原因。14岁女孩的平均父母会讨厌她有性生活的想法,即使怀孕或性传播疾病的风险为零。
孩子可能能感觉到他们没有被告诉全部真相。毕竟,怀孕和性传播疾病对成年人来说同样是问题,而他们有性生活。
什么真正让父母对他们青少年孩子的性生活感到困扰?他们对这个想法的厌恶是如此本能,可能是天生的。但如果是天生的,它应该是普遍的,而且有很多社会父母不介意青少年孩子有性生活——事实上,14岁成为母亲是正常的。那么发生了什么?似乎确实存在一个普遍禁忌,反对与青春期前的儿童发生性关系。人们可以想象这有进化原因。我认为这是工业化社会父母不喜欢青少年孩子有性生活的主要原因。他们仍然认为他们是孩子,尽管从生物学上讲他们不是,所以对儿童性行为的禁忌仍然有力量。
成年人对性隐瞒的一件事他们也对毒品隐瞒:它可以带来极大的快乐。这就是性和毒品如此危险的原因。对它们的渴望可能会模糊一个人的判断力——当被模糊的判断力已经是青少年孩子糟糕的判断力时,这尤其令人恐惧。
这里父母的愿望冲突。较老的社会告诉孩子他们判断力差,但现代父母希望孩子自信。这可能是比把他们放在位置上的旧计划更好的计划,但它有副作用,即在隐含地对孩子的判断力撒谎之后,我们不得不再次对他们如果相信我们可能会遇到麻烦的所有事情撒谎。
如果父母告诉孩子关于性和毒品的真相,那将是:你应该避免这些事情的原因是你的判断力糟糕。有你两倍经验的人仍然会被它们烧伤。但这可能是那些真相不会有说服力的情况之一,因为糟糕判断力的症状之一是相信你有好的判断力。当你太弱而举不起某物时,你能看出来,但当你冲动地做决定时,你更加确信。
天真
父母不希望孩子有性生活的另一个原因是他们想保持他们的天真。成年人对孩子应该如何行为有一定的模型,这不同于他们对其他成年人的期望。
最明显的区别之一是孩子们被允许使用的词语。大多数父母在与他人交谈时使用不希望孩子使用的词语。他们试图尽可能长时间地隐瞒这些词语的存在。这是每个人都参与的另一个阴谋:每个人都知道你不应该在孩子面前说脏话。
我从未听过对父母告诉孩子的任何事情有比为什么他们不应该说脏话更多不同的解释。我认识的每个父母都禁止孩子说脏话,但没有两个人有相同的理由。很明显,大多数开始是不希望孩子说脏话,然后编造理由。
所以关于正在发生的事情的理论是,脏话的功能是将说话者标记为成年人。“shit”和”poopoo”的意思没有区别。那么为什么一个孩子可以说一个被禁止?唯一的解释是:根据定义。[3]
为什么当孩子做保留给成年人的事情时,成年人如此困扰?一个满嘴脏话、愤世嫉俗的10岁孩子靠在灯柱上,嘴角落出一支香烟的想法非常令人不安。但为什么?
我们希望孩子天真的一个原因是我们被编程喜欢某种无助感。我几次听到母亲说她们故意不纠正年幼孩子的错误发音,因为它们如此可爱。如果你想一想,可爱就是无助。设计得可爱的玩具和卡通角色总是茫然无知的表情和短小、无效的四肢。
考虑到人类后代在如此长的时间里如此无助,我们有天生的愿望去爱和保护无助的生物并不奇怪。没有使孩子可爱的无助感,他们会非常烦人。他们只会像无能的成年人。但还有更多。假设的玩世不恭的10岁孩子如此困扰我的原因不仅是他会很烦人,而是他很早就切断了他的成长前景。要变得玩世不恭,你必须认为你知道世界如何运作,而10岁孩子对此的任何理论可能都是相当狭隘的。
天真也是思想开放。我们希望孩子天真,这样他们才能继续学习。听起来矛盾,但有某些知识会妨碍其他知识。如果你要学习世界是一个残酷的地方,充满试图互相利用的人,你最好最后学习这个。否则你不会费心学习更多。
非常聪明的成年人似乎通常异常天真,我不认为这是巧合。我认为他们故意避免学习某些事情。当然我这样做。我曾经我想知道一切。现在我知道我不想。
死亡
除了性,死亡是成年人对孩子撒谎最明显的话题。我相信他们隐瞒性是因为深深的禁忌。但为什么我们向孩子隐瞒死亡?可能是因为年幼的孩子对它特别恐惧。他们想感到安全,而死亡是终极威胁。
我们父母告诉我们的最壮观的谎言之一是关于我们第一只猫的死亡。多年来,当我们询问更多细节时,他们被迫编造更多,所以故事变得相当精心。猫在兽医办公室死亡。死因?麻醉本身。猫为什么在兽医办公室?要做绝育手术。为什么这样一个常规手术杀死了它?这不是兽医的错;猫有先天性心脏虚弱;麻醉对它来说太强了;但没有人能提前知道这一点。直到我们二十多岁真相才出来:我妹妹,当时大约三岁,不小心踩到了猫并弄断了它的背。
他们不觉得需要告诉我们猫现在在猫天堂快乐地生活。我父母从未声称死去的人或动物”去了更好的地方”,或我们会再次见到他们。这似乎没有伤害我们。
我祖母告诉我们一个关于我祖父死亡的编辑版本。她说有一天他们正坐着看书,当她对他说什么时,他没有回答。他似乎睡着了,但当她试图唤醒他时,她不能。“他走了。“心脏病发作听起来像睡着。后来我了解到事情没有那么整洁,心脏病发作花了一天的大部分时间才杀死他。
除了这样的彻头彻尾的谎言,当死亡话题出现时,肯定有很多改变话题的情况。我当然不记得这个,但我可以从我直到大约19岁才真正意识到我会死亡这一事实推断出来。我怎么可能这么长时间错过如此明显的事情?既然我看到父母处理这个话题,我能看出如何:关于死亡的问题被温和但坚定地避开。
在这个话题上,特别是,孩子们迎合他们一半。孩子们经常想被欺骗。他们希望相信他们生活在一个舒适、安全的世界,就像他们的父母希望他们相信的那样。[4]
身份认同
一些父母对种族或宗教群体有强烈的依恋,希望他们的孩子也感受到这一点。这通常需要两种不同的撒谎:第一种是告诉孩子他或她是X,第二种是X群体通过相信来区分自己的特定谎言。[5]
告诉孩子他们有特定的种族或宗教身份是你能告诉他们的最粘性的事情之一。几乎你告诉孩子的任何其他事情,他们都可以在开始为自己思考后改变主意。但如果你告诉孩子他们是某个群体的成员,这似乎几乎不可能摆脱。
尽管这可能是父母最预谋的谎言之一。当父母信仰不同宗教时,他们经常在他们之间同意他们的孩子将”被抚养为X”。而且这有效。孩子们顺从地长大,认为自己是X,尽管如果他们的父母选择了另一种方式,他们会长大认为自己是Y。
这如此有效的一个原因是涉及的第二种谎言。真相是公共财产。你无法通过做理性的事情和相信真实的事情来区分你的群体。如果你想把自己与他人区分开来,你必须做武断的事情,相信虚假的事情。在花了一生做武断的事情和相信虚假的事情,并因此被”外人”视为奇怪之后,推动孩子认为自己是X的认知失调一定是巨大的。如果他们不是X,为什么他们坚持所有这些武断的信仰和习俗?如果他们不是X,为什么所有非X都称他们为X?
这种形式的谎言不是没有用处的。你可以用它来携带有益信仰的载荷,它们也将成为孩子身份认同的一部分。你可以告诉孩子,除了从不穿黄色、相信世界是由巨型兔子创造的,以及在吃鱼前总是弹指外,X群体也特别诚实和勤奋。然后X孩子会长大,感觉诚实和勤奋是他们身份认同的一部分。
这可能解释了现代宗教传播的很大一部分,并解释了为什么它们的教义是有用的和怪异的组合。怪异的一半使宗教粘住,有用的一半是载荷。[6]
权威
成年人对孩子撒谎最不可原谅的原因之一是为了维持对他们的权力。有时这些谎言是真正邪恶的,像儿童骚扰者告诉受害者如果他们告诉任何人发生了什么他们会遇到麻烦。其他似乎更无辜;这取决于成年人为了维持权力撒谎的程度,以及他们用它做什么。
大多数成年人努力对孩子隐瞒他们的缺点。通常他们的动机是混合的。例如,有外遇的父亲通常对孩子隐瞒这件事。他的动机部分是这会让他们担心,部分是这会引入性话题,部分(比他愿意承认的更大部分)是他不想在他们眼中玷污自己。
如果你想了解告诉孩子什么谎言,阅读任何一本教他们关于”问题”的书。[7] Peter Mayle写了一本叫《我们为什么要离婚?》的书。它从关于离婚要记住的三件最重要的事情开始,其中之一是:你不应该责怪一方父母,因为离婚从来不只是一个人的错。[8] 真的吗?当男人带着他的秘书私奔时,总是部分他妻子的错吗?但我能理解为什么Mayle可能这么说。也许孩子尊重父母比了解他们的真相更重要。
但因为成年人隐瞒他们的缺点,同时坚持对孩子的高行为标准,很多孩子长大感到他们无望地达不到标准。他们走来走去,因为说了脏话而感到可怕地邪恶,而事实上他们周围的大多数成年人都在做更糟糕的事情。
这在智力问题和道德问题上都会发生。人们越自信,他们似乎越愿意回答”我不知道”。不太自信的人觉得他们必须有答案,否则他们会看起来很糟糕。我父母在承认不知道事情方面相当好,但我肯定被老师告诉了很多这种类型的谎言,因为我直到上大学才听到老师说”我不知道”。我记得因为在全班面前听到有人这么说如此令人惊讶。
我第一次暗示老师不是全知的是六年级,在我父亲反驳了我在学校学到的东西之后。当我抗议老师说了相反的话时,我父亲回答说那个人不知道他在说什么——他毕竟只是个小学老师。
只是个老师?这个短语似乎几乎不合语法。老师不知道他们教科目的一切吗?如果不是,为什么他们是教我们的人?
可悲的事实是,美国公立学校老师通常不太理解他们教的东西。有一些极好的例外,但一般来说,计划从事教学的人在学术上在大学生群体中排名接近底部。所以我11岁时仍然认为老师是不会错的,这一事实显示了系统对我的大脑做了什么。
学校
孩子在学校学到的内容是复杂的谎言混合物。最可原谅的是那些为了简化思想使其容易学习而说的谎言。问题是,很多宣传被以简化的名义偷偷塞入课程。
公立学校教科书代表了各种有势力的群体希望被告知的内容之间的妥协。谎言很少是公开的。通常它们要么是遗漏,要么是以牺牲其他话题为代价过度强调某些话题。我们在小学得到的历史观是一个粗略的圣徒传记,每个有势力的群体至少有一个代表。
我记得的著名科学家是爱因斯坦、玛丽·居里和乔治·华盛顿·卡弗。爱因斯坦很重要,因为他的工作导致了原子弹。玛丽·居里与X射线有关。但卡弗让我困惑。他似乎用花生做了一些事情。
现在很明显,他在名单上是因为他是黑人(顺便说一句,玛丽·居里在名单上是因为她是女性),但作为孩子,我对他困惑了多年。我想知道告诉我们真相会不会更好:没有著名的黑人科学家。将乔治·华盛顿·卡弗与爱因斯坦并列不仅误导了我们对科学的认识,也误导了对他那个时代黑人面临障碍的认识。
随着科目变得越来越软,谎言变得越来越频繁。当你到达政治和近代历史时,我们学到的几乎纯粹是宣传。例如,我们被教导将政治领导人视为圣人——特别是最近殉难的肯尼迪和金。后来了解到他们都是 serial womanizers,而肯尼迪还是一个瘾君子,这令人震惊。(当金的抄袭出现时,我已经失去了对名人恶行感到惊讶的能力。)
我怀疑你可以在不教孩子谎言的情况下教他们近代历史,因为几乎所有对此有话要说的人都有某种倾向。大部分近代历史都是由倾向构成的。可能只教他们像这样的元事实会更好。
然而,学校里最大的谎言可能是成功的方式是通过遵循”规则”。事实上,大多数这样的规则只是为了有效管理大群体而存在的技巧。
和平
在我们对孩子撒谎的所有原因中,最强大的可能是他们对我们的同样平凡的原因。
当我们对人们撒谎时,通常不是任何有意识策略的一部分,而是因为他们对真相会有暴力反应。孩子,几乎按定义,缺乏自控力。他们对事情有暴力反应——所以他们被撒了很多谎。[9]
几年前的感恩节,我的朋友发现自己处于一个完美地说明了我们对孩子撒谎的复杂动机的情况。当烤火鸡出现在桌上时,他异常敏锐的5岁儿子突然问火鸡是否想死。预见到灾难,我的朋友和他的妻子即兴编造:是的,火鸡想死,事实上它活着的全部目标就是成为他们的感恩节晚餐。而那(呼)就是那个的结束。
每当我们为保护孩子而对他们撒谎时,我们通常也是在撒谎以维持和平。
这种安抚性谎言的一个后果是,我们长大 thinking 可怕的事情是正常的。作为成年人,我们很难对我们 literally 被训练不担心的事情感到紧迫感。当我大约10岁时,我看了一部关于污染的纪录片,让我陷入恐慌。似乎地球正在被不可挽回地毁灭。之后我去问我母亲是否如此。我不记得她说了什么,但她让我感觉好些,所以我停止担心它。
这可能是处理受惊的10岁孩子的最佳方式。但我们应该理解代价。这种谎言是坏事持续存在的主要原因之一:我们都被训练忽略它们。
戒毒
比赛中的短跑选手几乎立即进入一种称为”氧债”的状态。他的身体切换到比常规有氧呼吸更快的应急能量来源。但这个过程建立了废物,最终需要额外的氧气来分解,所以在比赛结束时他必须停下来喘气一会儿来恢复。
我们带着一种真相债务到达成年。我们被告知很多谎言让我们(和我们的父母)度过童年。有些可能是必要的。有些可能不是。但我们所有人都带着充满谎言的头脑到达成年。
从来没有一个时刻,成年人会坐下来解释他们告诉你的所有谎言。他们忘记了大部分。所以如果你想清除头脑中的这些谎言,你必须自己动手。
很少有人这样做。大多数人一生中头脑中粘着包装材料的碎片而不知道。你可能永远无法完全消除你被告知的谎言的影响,但值得一试。我发现每当我能消除被告知的一个谎言时,很多事情都就位了。
幸运的是,一旦你到达成年,你就获得了一个有价值的新资源,你可以用它来弄清你被告知了什么谎言。你现在是一个撒谎者。你可以在幕后观看成年人如何为下一代孩子编织世界。
清理头脑的第一步是意识到你离中立观察者有多远。当我离开高中时,我以为,我是一个完全的怀疑论者。我意识到高中是垃圾。我以为我准备好质疑我知道的一切。但在我不知道的许多其他事情中,我的头脑中已经有多少碎片。仅仅考虑你的头脑是一块石板是不够的。你必须有意识地擦除它。
注释
[1] 我坚持使用如此残酷简单的词的原因是,我们告诉孩子的谎言可能不像我们想象的那么无害。如果你看过去成年人告诉孩子的事情,他们对孩子撒谎的程度令人震惊。像我们一样,他们出于最好的意图这样做。所以如果我们认为我们对孩子尽可能开放,我们可能是在自欺欺人。100年后的人可能对我们告诉的一些谎言感到震惊,就像我们对100年前人们告诉的某些谎言感到震惊一样。
我无法预测这些会是什么,我不想写一篇在100年后看起来很愚蠢的文章。因此,我不使用对根据当前时尚似乎可原谅的谎言的特殊委婉语,我只是将我们所有的谎言称为谎言。
(我省略了一种类型:为了玩弄孩子的轻信而说的谎言。这些范围从”假装”,这并不是真正的谎言,因为它是眨眼说的,到哥哥姐姐说的可怕谎言。关于这些没有什么可说的:我不希望第一种消失,也不期望第二种。)
[2] Calaprice, Alice (编.), The Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, 1996.
[3] 如果你问父母为什么孩子不应该说脏话,受教育程度较低的父母通常用一些回避问题的答案回答,如”不合适”,而受教育程度较高的父母提出复杂的合理化。事实上,受教育程度较低的父母似乎更接近真相。
[4] 正如一个有小孩子的朋友指出的那样,小孩子很容易认为自己是永生的,因为时间对他们来说似乎过得如此缓慢。对一个3岁的孩子来说,一天感觉像对成年人来说的一个月。所以80年对他来说听起来像对我们来说的2400年。
[5] 我意识到我会因为将宗教归类为一种谎言而受到无尽的责难。通常人们用一些含糊其辞回避这个问题,暗示被足够多的人相信足够长时间的谎言对真相的标准是免疫的。但我无法预测未来几代人会认为哪些谎言是不可原谅的,我不能安全地省略我们告诉的任何类型。是的,100年后宗教似乎不太可能过时,但这不比1880年的人认为1980年的学童会被教导手淫是完全正常的,不为此感到内疚更不可能。
[6] 不幸的是,载荷可以包括坏习俗和好习俗。例如,美国某些群体认为的”表现得像白人”的某些品质。事实上,其中大多数可以准确地称为”表现得像日本人”。这种习俗没有特定的白人特征。它们是所有有长期城市生活传统的文化的共同特征。因此,一个群体认为相反的行为方式是其身份的一部分可能是一个失败的赌注。
[7] 在此背景下,“问题”基本上意味着”我们要对他们撒谎的事情”。这就是为什么这些话题有特殊名称。
[8] Mayle, Peter, Why Are We Getting a Divorce?, Harmony, 1988.
[9] 讽刺的是,这也是孩子对成年人撒谎的主要原因。如果当人们告诉你可怕的事情时你大惊小怪,他们不会告诉你。青少年不告诉父母他们本该在朋友家过夜的那晚发生了什么,原因与父母不告诉5岁孩子感恩节火鸡的真相相同。如果他们知道了,他们会大惊小怪。
感谢Sam Altman、Marc Andreessen、Trevor Blackwell、Patrick Collison、Jessica Livingston、Jackie McDonough、Robert Morris和David Sloo阅读本文草稿。由于这里有一些有争议的想法,我应该补充说他们中没有一个人同意其中的所有内容。
Lies We Tell Kids
May 2008
Adults lie constantly to kids. I’m not saying we should stop, but I think we should at least examine which lies we tell and why.
There may also be a benefit to us. We were all lied to as kids, and some of the lies we were told still affect us. So by studying the ways adults lie to kids, we may be able to clear our heads of lies we were told.
I’m using the word “lie” in a very general sense: not just overt falsehoods, but also all the more subtle ways we mislead kids. Though “lie” has negative connotations, I don’t mean to suggest we should never do this—just that we should pay attention when we do. [1]
One of the most remarkable things about the way we lie to kids is how broad the conspiracy is. All adults know what their culture lies to kids about: they’re the questions you answer “Ask your parents.” If a kid asked who won the World Series in 1982 or what the atomic weight of carbon was, you could just tell him. But if a kid asks you “Is there a God?” or “What’s a prostitute?” you’ll probably say “Ask your parents.”
Since we all agree, kids see few cracks in the view of the world presented to them. The biggest disagreements are between parents and schools, but even those are small. Schools are careful what they say about controversial topics, and if they do contradict what parents want their kids to believe, parents either pressure the school into keeping quiet or move their kids to a new school.
The conspiracy is so thorough that most kids who discover it do so only by discovering internal contradictions in what they’re told. It can be traumatic for the ones who wake up during the operation. Here’s what happened to Einstein:
Through the reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally being deceived by the state through lies: it was a crushing impression. [2]
I remember that feeling. By 15 I was convinced the world was corrupt from end to end. That’s why movies like The Matrix have such resonance. Every kid grows up in a fake world. In a way it would be easier if the forces behind it were as clearly differentiated as a bunch of evil machines, and one could make a clean break just by taking a pill.
Protection
If you ask adults why they lie to kids, the most common reason they give is to protect them. And kids do need protecting. The environment you want to create for a newborn child will be quite unlike the streets of a big city.
That seems so obvious it seems wrong to call it a lie. It’s certainly not a bad lie to tell, to give a baby the impression the world is quiet and warm and safe. But this harmless type of lie can turn sour if left unexamined.
Imagine if you tried to keep someone in as protected an environment as a newborn till age 18. To mislead someone so grossly about the world would seem not protection but abuse. That’s an extreme example, of course; when parents do that sort of thing it becomes national news. But you see the same problem on a smaller scale in the malaise teenagers feel in suburbia.
The main purpose of suburbia is to provide a protected environment for children to grow up in. And it seems great for 10 year olds. I liked living in suburbia when I was 10. I didn’t notice how sterile it was. My whole world was no bigger than a few friends’ houses I bicycled to and some woods I ran around in. On a log scale I was midway between crib and globe. A suburban street was just the right size. But as I grew older, suburbia started to feel suffocatingly fake.
Life can be pretty good at 10 or 20, but it’s often frustrating at 15. This is too big a problem to solve here, but certainly one reason life sucks at 15 is that kids are trapped in a world designed for 10 year olds.
What do parents hope to protect their children from by raising them in suburbia? A friend who moved out of Manhattan said merely that her 3 year old daughter “saw too much.” Off the top of my head, that might include: people who are high or drunk, poverty, madness, gruesome medical conditions, sexual behavior of various degrees of oddness, and violent anger.
I think it’s the anger that would worry me most if I had a 3 year old. I was 29 when I moved to New York and I was surprised even then. I wouldn’t want a 3 year old to see some of the disputes I saw. It would be too frightening. A lot of the things adults conceal from smaller children, they conceal because they’d be frightening, not because they want to conceal the existence of such things. Misleading the child is just a byproduct.
This seems one of the most justifiable types of lying adults do to kids. But because the lies are indirect we don’t keep a very strict accounting of them. Parents know they’ve concealed the facts about sex, and many at some point sit their kids down and explain more. But few tell their kids about the differences between the real world and the cocoon they grew up in. Combine this with the confidence parents try to instill in their kids, and every year you get a new crop of 18 year olds who think they know how to run the world.
Don’t all 18 year olds think they know how to run the world? Actually this seems to be a recent innovation, no more than about 100 years old. In preindustrial times teenage kids were junior members of the adult world and comparatively well aware of their shortcomings. They could see they weren’t as strong or skillful as the village smith. In past times people lied to kids about some things more than we do now, but the lies implicit in an artificial, protected environment are a recent invention. Like a lot of new inventions, the rich got this first. Children of kings and great magnates were the first to grow up out of touch with the world. Suburbia means half the population can live like kings in that respect.
Sex (and Drugs)
I’d have different worries about raising teenage kids in New York. I’d worry less about what they’d see, and more about what they’d do. I went to college with a lot of kids who grew up in Manhattan, and as a rule they seemed pretty jaded. They seemed to have lost their virginity at an average of about 14 and by college had tried more drugs than I’d even heard of.
The reasons parents don’t want their teenage kids having sex are complex. There are some obvious dangers: pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. But those aren’t the only reasons parents don’t want their kids having sex. The average parents of a 14 year old girl would hate the idea of her having sex even if there were zero risk of pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.
Kids can probably sense they aren’t being told the whole story. After all, pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases are just as much a problem for adults, and they have sex.
What really bothers parents about their teenage kids having sex? Their dislike of the idea is so visceral it’s probably inborn. But if it’s inborn it should be universal, and there are plenty of societies where parents don’t mind if their teenage kids have sex—indeed, where it’s normal for 14 year olds to become mothers. So what’s going on? There does seem to be a universal taboo against sex with prepubescent children. One can imagine evolutionary reasons for that. And I think this is the main reason parents in industrialized societies dislike teenage kids having sex. They still think of them as children, even though biologically they’re not, so the taboo against child sex still has force.
One thing adults conceal about sex they also conceal about drugs: that it can cause great pleasure. That’s what makes sex and drugs so dangerous. The desire for them can cloud one’s judgement—which is especially frightening when the judgement being clouded is the already wretched judgement of a teenage kid.
Here parents’ desires conflict. Older societies told kids they had bad judgement, but modern parents want their children to be confident. This may well be a better plan than the old one of putting them in their place, but it has the side effect that after having implicitly lied to kids about how good their judgement is, we then have to lie again about all the things they might get into trouble with if they believed us.
If parents told their kids the truth about sex and drugs, it would be: the reason you should avoid these things is that you have lousy judgement. People with twice your experience still get burned by them. But this may be one of those cases where the truth wouldn’t be convincing, because one of the symptoms of bad judgement is believing you have good judgement. When you’re too weak to lift something, you can tell, but when you’re making a decision impetuously, you’re all the more sure of it.
Innocence
Another reason parents don’t want their kids having sex is that they want to keep them innocent. Adults have a certain model of how kids are supposed to behave, and it’s different from what they expect of other adults.
One of the most obvious differences is the words kids are allowed to use. Most parents use words when talking to other adults that they wouldn’t want their kids using. They try to hide even the existence of these words for as long as they can. And this is another of those conspiracies everyone participates in: everyone knows you’re not supposed to swear in front of kids.
I’ve never heard more different explanations for anything parents tell kids than why they shouldn’t swear. Every parent I know forbids their children to swear, and yet no two of them have the same justification. It’s clear most start with not wanting kids to swear, then make up the reason afterward.
So my theory about what’s going on is that the function of swearwords is to mark the speaker as an adult. There’s no difference in the meaning of “shit” and “poopoo.” So why should one be ok for kids to say and one forbidden? The only explanation is: by definition. [3]
Why does it bother adults so much when kids do things reserved for adults? The idea of a foul-mouthed, cynical 10 year old leaning against a lamppost with a cigarette hanging out of the corner of his mouth is very disconcerting. But why?
One reason we want kids to be innocent is that we’re programmed to like certain kinds of helplessness. I’ve several times heard mothers say they deliberately refrained from correcting their young children’s mispronunciations because they were so cute. And if you think about it, cuteness is helplessness. Toys and cartoon characters meant to be cute always have clueless expressions and stubby, ineffectual limbs.
It’s not surprising we’d have an inborn desire to love and protect helpless creatures, considering human offspring are so helpless for so long. Without the helplessness that makes kids cute, they’d be very annoying. They’d merely seem like incompetent adults. But there’s more to it than that. The reason our hypothetical jaded 10 year old bothers me so much is not just that he’d be annoying, but that he’d have cut off his prospects for growth so early. To be jaded you have to think you know how the world works, and any theory a 10 year old had about that would probably be a pretty narrow one.
Innocence is also open-mindedness. We want kids to be innocent so they can continue to learn. Paradoxical as it sounds, there are some kinds of knowledge that get in the way of other kinds of knowledge. If you’re going to learn that the world is a brutal place full of people trying to take advantage of one another, you’re better off learning it last. Otherwise you won’t bother learning much more.
Very smart adults often seem unusually innocent, and I don’t think this is a coincidence. I think they’ve deliberately avoided learning about certain things. Certainly I do. I used to think I wanted to know everything. Now I know I don’t.
Death
After sex, death is the topic adults lie most conspicuously about to kids. Sex I believe they conceal because of deep taboos. But why do we conceal death from kids? Probably because small children are particularly horrified by it. They want to feel safe, and death is the ultimate threat.
One of the most spectacular lies our parents told us was about the death of our first cat. Over the years, as we asked for more details, they were compelled to invent more, so the story grew quite elaborate. The cat had died at the vet’s office. Of what? Of the anaesthesia itself. Why was the cat at the vet’s office? To be fixed. And why had such a routine operation killed it? It wasn’t the vet’s fault; the cat had a congenitally weak heart; the anaesthesia was too much for it; but there was no way anyone could have known this in advance. It was not till we were in our twenties that the truth came out: my sister, then about three, had accidentally stepped on the cat and broken its back.
They didn’t feel the need to tell us the cat was now happily in cat heaven. My parents never claimed that people or animals who died had “gone to a better place,” or that we’d meet them again. It didn’t seem to harm us.
My grandmother told us an edited version of the death of my grandfather. She said they’d been sitting reading one day, and when she said something to him, he didn’t answer. He seemed to be asleep, but when she tried to rouse him, she couldn’t. “He was gone.” Having a heart attack sounded like falling asleep. Later I learned it hadn’t been so neat, and the heart attack had taken most of a day to kill him.
Along with such outright lies, there must have been a lot of changing the subject when death came up. I can’t remember that, of course, but I can infer it from the fact that I didn’t really grasp I was going to die till I was about 19. How could I have missed something so obvious for so long? Now that I’ve seen parents managing the subject, I can see how: questions about death are gently but firmly turned aside.
On this topic, especially, they’re met half-way by kids. Kids often want to be lied to. They want to believe they’re living in a comfortable, safe world as much as their parents want them to believe it. [4]
Identity
Some parents feel a strong adherence to an ethnic or religious group and want their kids to feel it too. This usually requires two different kinds of lying: the first is to tell the child that he or she is an X, and the second is whatever specific lies Xes differentiate themselves by believing. [5]
Telling a child they have a particular ethnic or religious identity is one of the stickiest things you can tell them. Almost anything else you tell a kid, they can change their mind about later when they start to think for themselves. But if you tell a kid they’re a member of a certain group, that seems nearly impossible to shake.
This despite the fact that it can be one of the most premeditated lies parents tell. When parents are of different religions, they’ll often agree between themselves that their children will be “raised as Xes.” And it works. The kids obligingly grow up considering themselves as Xes, despite the fact that if their parents had chosen the other way, they’d have grown up considering themselves as Ys.
One reason this works so well is the second kind of lie involved. The truth is common property. You can’t distinguish your group by doing things that are rational, and believing things that are true. If you want to set yourself apart from other people, you have to do things that are arbitrary, and believe things that are false. And after having spent their whole lives doing things that are arbitrary and believing things that are false, and being regarded as odd by “outsiders” on that account, the cognitive dissonance pushing children to regard themselves as Xes must be enormous. If they aren’t an X, why are they attached to all these arbitrary beliefs and customs? If they aren’t an X, why do all the non-Xes call them one?
This form of lie is not without its uses. You can use it to carry a payload of beneficial beliefs, and they will also become part of the child’s identity. You can tell the child that in addition to never wearing the color yellow, believing the world was created by a giant rabbit, and always snapping their fingers before eating fish, Xes are also particularly honest and industrious. Then X children will grow up feeling it’s part of their identity to be honest and industrious.
This probably accounts for a lot of the spread of modern religions, and explains why their doctrines are a combination of the useful and the bizarre. The bizarre half is what makes the religion stick, and the useful half is the payload. [6]
Authority
One of the least excusable reasons adults lie to kids is to maintain power over them. Sometimes these lies are truly sinister, like a child molester telling his victims they’ll get in trouble if they tell anyone what happened to them. Others seem more innocent; it depends how badly adults lie to maintain their power, and what they use it for.
Most adults make some effort to conceal their flaws from children. Usually their motives are mixed. For example, a father who has an affair generally conceals it from his children. His motive is partly that it would worry them, partly that this would introduce the topic of sex, and partly (a larger part than he would admit) that he doesn’t want to tarnish himself in their eyes.
If you want to learn what lies are told to kids, read almost any book written to teach them about “issues.” [7] Peter Mayle wrote one called Why Are We Getting a Divorce? It begins with the three most important things to remember about divorce, one of which is: You shouldn’t put the blame on one parent, because divorce is never only one person’s fault. [8] Really? When a man runs off with his secretary, is it always partly his wife’s fault? But I can see why Mayle might have said this. Maybe it’s more important for kids to respect their parents than to know the truth about them.
But because adults conceal their flaws, and at the same time insist on high standards of behavior for kids, a lot of kids grow up feeling they fall hopelessly short. They walk around feeling horribly evil for having used a swearword, while in fact most of the adults around them are doing much worse things.
This happens in intellectual as well as moral questions. The more confident people are, the more willing they seem to be to answer a question “I don’t know.” Less confident people feel they have to have an answer or they’ll look bad. My parents were pretty good about admitting when they didn’t know things, but I must have been told a lot of lies of this type by teachers, because I rarely heard a teacher say “I don’t know” till I got to college. I remember because it was so surprising to hear someone say that in front of a class.
The first hint I had that teachers weren’t omniscient came in sixth grade, after my father contradicted something I’d learned in school. When I protested that the teacher had said the opposite, my father replied that the guy had no idea what he was talking about—that he was just an elementary school teacher, after all.
Just a teacher? The phrase seemed almost grammatically ill-formed. Didn’t teachers know everything about the subjects they taught? And if not, why were they the ones teaching us?
The sad fact is, US public school teachers don’t generally understand the stuff they’re teaching very well. There are some sterling exceptions, but as a rule people planning to go into teaching rank academically near the bottom of the college population. So the fact that I still thought at age 11 that teachers were infallible shows what a job the system must have done on my brain.
School
What kids get taught in school is a complex mix of lies. The most excusable are those told to simplify ideas to make them easy to learn. The problem is, a lot of propaganda gets slipped into the curriculum in the name of simplification.
Public school textbooks represent a compromise between what various powerful groups want kids to be told. The lies are rarely overt. Usually they consist either of omissions or of over-emphasizing certain topics at the expense of others. The view of history we got in elementary school was a crude hagiography, with at least one representative of each powerful group.
The famous scientists I remember were Einstein, Marie Curie, and George Washington Carver. Einstein was a big deal because his work led to the atom bomb. Marie Curie was involved with X-rays. But I was mystified about Carver. He seemed to have done stuff with peanuts.
It’s obvious now that he was on the list because he was black (and for that matter that Marie Curie was on it because she was a woman), but as a kid I was confused for years about him. I wonder if it wouldn’t have been better just to tell us the truth: that there weren’t any famous black scientists. Ranking George Washington Carver with Einstein misled us not only about science, but about the obstacles blacks faced in his time.
As subjects got softer, the lies got more frequent. By the time you got to politics and recent history, what we were taught was pretty much pure propaganda. For example, we were taught to regard political leaders as saints—especially the recently martyred Kennedy and King. It was astonishing to learn later that they’d both been serial womanizers, and that Kennedy was a speed freak to boot. (By the time King’s plagiarism emerged, I’d lost the ability to be surprised by the misdeeds of famous people.)
I doubt you could teach kids recent history without teaching them lies, because practically everyone who has anything to say about it has some kind of spin to put on it. Much recent history consists of spin. It would probably be better just to teach them metafacts like that.
Probably the biggest lie told in schools, though, is that the way to succeed is through following “the rules.” In fact most such rules are just hacks to manage large groups efficiently.
Peace
Of all the reasons we lie to kids, the most powerful is probably the same mundane reason they lie to us.
Often when we lie to people it’s not part of any conscious strategy, but because they’d react violently to the truth. Kids, almost by definition, lack self-control. They react violently to things—and so they get lied to a lot. [9]
A few Thanksgivings ago, a friend of mine found himself in a situation that perfectly illustrates the complex motives we have when we lie to kids. As the roast turkey appeared on the table, his alarmingly perceptive 5 year old son suddenly asked if the turkey had wanted to die. Foreseeing disaster, my friend and his wife rapidly improvised: yes, the turkey had wanted to die, and in fact had lived its whole life with the aim of being their Thanksgiving dinner. And that (phew) was the end of that.
Whenever we lie to kids to protect them, we’re usually also lying to keep the peace.
One consequence of this sort of calming lie is that we grow up thinking horrible things are normal. It’s hard for us to feel a sense of urgency as adults over something we’ve literally been trained not to worry about. When I was about 10 I saw a documentary on pollution that put me into a panic. It seemed the planet was being irretrievably ruined. I went to my mother afterward to ask if this was so. I don’t remember what she said, but she made me feel better, so I stopped worrying about it.
That was probably the best way to handle a frightened 10 year old. But we should understand the price. This sort of lie is one of the main reasons bad things persist: we’re all trained to ignore them.
Detox
A sprinter in a race almost immediately enters a state called “oxygen debt.” His body switches to an emergency source of energy that’s faster than regular aerobic respiration. But this process builds up waste products that ultimately require extra oxygen to break down, so at the end of the race he has to stop and pant for a while to recover.
We arrive at adulthood with a kind of truth debt. We were told a lot of lies to get us (and our parents) through our childhood. Some may have been necessary. Some probably weren’t. But we all arrive at adulthood with heads full of lies.
There’s never a point where the adults sit you down and explain all the lies they told you. They’ve forgotten most of them. So if you’re going to clear these lies out of your head, you’re going to have to do it yourself.
Few do. Most people go through life with bits of packing material adhering to their minds and never know it. You probably never can completely undo the effects of lies you were told as a kid, but it’s worth trying. I’ve found that whenever I’ve been able to undo a lie I was told, a lot of other things fell into place.
Fortunately, once you arrive at adulthood you get a valuable new resource you can use to figure out what lies you were told. You’re now one of the liars. You get to watch behind the scenes as adults spin the world for the next generation of kids.
The first step in clearing your head is to realize how far you are from a neutral observer. When I left high school I was, I thought, a complete skeptic. I’d realized high school was crap. I thought I was ready to question everything I knew. But among the many other things I was ignorant of was how much debris there already was in my head. It’s not enough to consider your mind a blank slate. You have to consciously erase it.
Notes
[1] One reason I stuck with such a brutally simple word is that the lies we tell kids are probably not quite as harmless as we think. If you look at what adults told children in the past, it’s shocking how much they lied to them. Like us, they did it with the best intentions. So if we think we’re as open as one could reasonably be with children, we’re probably fooling ourselves. Odds are people in 100 years will be as shocked at some of the lies we tell as we are at some of the lies people told 100 years ago.
I can’t predict which these will be, and I don’t want to write an essay that will seem dumb in 100 years. So instead of using special euphemisms for lies that seem excusable according to present fashions, I’m just going to call all our lies lies.
(I have omitted one type: lies told to play games with kids’ credulity. These range from “make-believe,” which is not really a lie because it’s told with a wink, to the frightening lies told by older siblings. There’s not much to say about these: I wouldn’t want the first type to go away, and wouldn’t expect the second type to.)
[2] Calaprice, Alice (ed.), The Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, 1996.
[3] If you ask parents why kids shouldn’t swear, the less educated ones usually reply with some question-begging answer like “it’s inappropriate,” while the more educated ones come up with elaborate rationalizations. In fact the less educated parents seem closer to the truth.
[4] As a friend with small children pointed out, it’s easy for small children to consider themselves immortal, because time seems to pass so slowly for them. To a 3 year old, a day feels like a month might to an adult. So 80 years sounds to him like 2400 years would to us.
[5] I realize I’m going to get endless grief for classifying religion as a type of lie. Usually people skirt that issue with some equivocation implying that lies believed for a sufficiently long time by sufficiently large numbers of people are immune to the usual standards for truth. But because I can’t predict which lies future generations will consider inexcusable, I can’t safely omit any type we tell. Yes, it seems unlikely that religion will be out of fashion in 100 years, but no more unlikely than it would have seemed to someone in 1880 that schoolchildren in 1980 would be taught that masturbation was perfectly normal and not to feel guilty about it.
[6] Unfortunately the payload can consist of bad customs as well as good ones. For example, there are certain qualities that some groups in America consider “acting white.” In fact most of them could as accurately be called “acting Japanese.” There’s nothing specifically white about such customs. They’re common to all cultures with long traditions of living in cities. So it is probably a losing bet for a group to consider behaving the opposite way as part of its identity.
[7] In this context, “issues” basically means “things we’re going to lie to them about.” That’s why there’s a special name for these topics.
[8] Mayle, Peter, Why Are We Getting a Divorce?, Harmony, 1988.
[9] The ironic thing is, this is also the main reason kids lie to adults. If you freak out when people tell you alarming things, they won’t tell you them. Teenagers don’t tell their parents what happened that night they were supposed to be staying at a friend’s house for the same reason parents don’t tell 5 year olds the truth about the Thanksgiving turkey. They’d freak if they knew.
Thanks to Sam Altman, Marc Andreessen, Trevor Blackwell, Patrick Collison, Jessica Livingston, Jackie McDonough, Robert Morris, and David Sloo for reading drafts of this. And since there are some controversial ideas here, I should add that none of them agreed with everything in it.