为什么在经济衰退时期创业

Paul Graham 2008-10-01

为什么在经济衰退时期创业

想要创业吗?获得Y Combinator的资助。

2008年10月

经济形势显然如此严峻,一些专家担心我们可能会迎来一个像七十年代中期那样糟糕的时期。当时微软和苹果公司成立。

正如这些例子所示,经济衰退时期可能不是创业的坏时机。我并不是说这特别好。真相更无聊:经济状况其实并不那么重要。

如果我们从资助这么多创业公司中学到了一件事,那就是它们的成功或失败取决于创始人的素质。经济当然有影响,但作为成功的预测因素,与创始人相比,它只是四舍五入的误差。

这意味着重要的是你是谁,而不是你什么时候做。如果你是合适的人,即使在经济不好的时候你也会成功。如果你不是,好的经济也无法拯救你。那些认为”我最好现在不要创业,因为经济如此糟糕”的人,与在泡沫时期认为”我只需要创业,就会变得富有”的人犯了同样的错误。

所以如果你想提高机会,你应该更多地考虑你能招募谁作为联合创始人,而不是经济状况。如果你担心公司生存的威胁,不要在新闻中寻找它们。照照镜子。

但对于任何给定的创始人团队,在经济好转之前等待跳跃不是更明智吗?如果你要开餐厅,也许吧,但如果你从事技术工作,就不是了。技术的发展或多或少独立于股票市场。所以对于任何给定的想法,在经济不好时快速行动的回报比等待更高。微软的第一个产品是Altair的Basic解释器。这正是1975年世界所需要的,但如果盖茨和艾伦决定等几年,那就太晚了。

当然,你现在有的想法不会是你最后一个。总是有新的想法。但如果你有一个特定的想法想要付诸行动,现在就行动。

这并不意味着你可以忽视经济。客户和投资者都会感到拮据。客户感到拮据不一定是问题:你甚至可能从中受益,通过制造省钱的东西。创业公司通常让东西更便宜,所以在这方面,它们比大公司更有条件在衰退中繁荣。

投资者更多是个问题。创业公司通常需要筹集一定数量的外部资金,投资者往往在经济不好时不愿意投资。他们不应该这样。每个人都知道你应该在时机不好时买入,在时机好时卖出。但当然,投资如此违反直觉的原因是,在股权市场中,好时机被定义为每个人都认为是买入的时候。你必须是一个逆向投资者才能正确,根据定义,只有少数投资者可以。

所以就像1999年的投资者们互相踩踏试图投资糟糕的创业公司一样,2009年的投资者们大概也会不愿意投资好的创业公司。

你必须适应这一点。但这没什么新鲜的:创业公司总是必须适应投资者的反复无常。在任何经济条件下问任何创始人是否认为投资者善变,看看他们做的表情。去年你必须准备好解释你的创业公司如何病毒式传播。明年你必须解释它如何能够抵御衰退。

(这两者都是很好的状态。投资者犯的错误不是他们使用的标准,而是他们总是倾向于关注一个而排除其他的。)

幸运的是,让创业公司抵御衰退的方法就是做你无论如何都应该做的事情:尽可能便宜地运营它。多年来我一直告诉创始人,成功的最可靠途径成为企业界的蟑螂。创业公司死亡的直接原因总是资金耗尽。所以你的公司运营成本越低,就越难杀死它。幸运的是,运行创业公司的成本已经变得非常便宜。衰退会让它更便宜。

如果真的来了核冬天,做蟑螂可能比保住工作更安全。如果客户不再负担得起你,他们可能会一个个离开,但你不会一下子失去他们;市场不会”减少人手”。

如果你辞职创业失败了,找不到另一份工作怎么办?如果你从事销售或市场营销,这可能是个问题。在这些领域,在经济不好时找新工作可能需要几个月。但黑客似乎更具流动性。好的黑客总能找到某种工作。可能不是你梦想的工作,但你不会饿死。

坏时机的另一个优势是竞争更少。技术列车定期离站。如果其他人都在角落里发抖,你可能会有一整节车厢给自己。

你也是投资者。作为创始人,你用工作购买股票:拉里和谢尔盖如此富有,与其说是他们做了价值数百亿美元的工作,不如说他们是谷歌的第一批投资者。像任何投资者一样,你应该在时机不好时买入。

几段前当我谈到投资者不愿意在坏市场向创业公司投资时,即使那时他们理性上应该最愿意购买,你是否点头同意,认为”愚蠢的投资者”?嗯,创始人也好不到哪里去。时机不好时,黑客去读研究生。毫无疑问这次也会发生。事实上,让前一段话成真的是大多数读者不会相信它——至少不会到付诸行动的程度。

所以也许经济衰退是创业的好时机。很难说像缺乏竞争这样的优势是否胜过像不情愿的投资者这样的劣势。但无论如何这不重要。重要的是人。对于给定的人在给定的技术上工作的时候总是现在。

Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy

Want to start a startup? Get funded by Y Combinator.

October 2008

The economic situation is apparently so grim that some experts fear we may be in for a stretch as bad as the mid seventies. When Microsoft and Apple were founded.

As those examples suggest, a recession may not be such a bad time to start a startup. I’m not claiming it’s a particularly good time either. The truth is more boring: the state of the economy doesn’t matter much either way.

If we’ve learned one thing from funding so many startups, it’s that they succeed or fail based on the qualities of the founders. The economy has some effect, certainly, but as a predictor of success it’s rounding error compared to the founders.

Which means that what matters is who you are, not when you do it. If you’re the right sort of person, you’ll win even in a bad economy. And if you’re not, a good economy won’t save you. Someone who thinks “I better not start a startup now, because the economy is so bad” is making the same mistake as the people who thought during the Bubble “all I have to do is start a startup, and I’ll be rich.”

So if you want to improve your chances, you should think far more about who you can recruit as a cofounder than the state of the economy. And if you’re worried about threats to the survival of your company, don’t look for them in the news. Look in the mirror.

But for any given team of founders, would it not pay to wait till the economy is better before taking the leap? If you’re starting a restaurant, maybe, but not if you’re working on technology. Technology progresses more or less independently of the stock market. So for any given idea, the payoff for acting fast in a bad economy will be higher than for waiting. Microsoft’s first product was a Basic interpreter for the Altair. That was exactly what the world needed in 1975, but if Gates and Allen had decided to wait a few years, it would have been too late.

Of course, the idea you have now won’t be the last you have. There are always new ideas. But if you have a specific idea you want to act on, act now.

That doesn’t mean you can ignore the economy. Both customers and investors will be feeling pinched. It’s not necessarily a problem if customers feel pinched: you may even be able to benefit from it, by making things that save money. Startups often make things cheaper, so in that respect they’re better positioned to prosper in a recession than big companies.

Investors are more of a problem. Startups generally need to raise some amount of external funding, and investors tend to be less willing to invest in bad times. They shouldn’t be. Everyone knows you’re supposed to buy when times are bad and sell when times are good. But of course what makes investing so counterintuitive is that in equity markets, good times are defined as everyone thinking it’s time to buy. You have to be a contrarian to be correct, and by definition only a minority of investors can be.

So just as investors in 1999 were tripping over one another trying to buy into lousy startups, investors in 2009 will presumably be reluctant to invest even in good ones.

You’ll have to adapt to this. But that’s nothing new: startups always have to adapt to the whims of investors. Ask any founder in any economy if they’d describe investors as fickle, and watch the face they make. Last year you had to be prepared to explain how your startup was viral. Next year you’ll have to explain how it’s recession-proof.

(Those are both good things to be. The mistake investors make is not the criteria they use but that they always tend to focus on one to the exclusion of the rest.)

Fortunately the way to make a startup recession-proof is to do exactly what you should do anyway: run it as cheaply as possible. For years I’ve been telling founders that the surest route to success is to be the cockroaches of the corporate world. The immediate cause of death in a startup is always running out of money. So the cheaper your company is to operate, the harder it is to kill. And fortunately it has gotten very cheap to run a startup. A recession will if anything make it cheaper still.

If nuclear winter really is here, it may be safer to be a cockroach even than to keep your job. Customers may drop off individually if they can no longer afford you, but you’re not going to lose them all at once; markets don’t “reduce headcount.”

What if you quit your job to start a startup that fails, and you can’t find another? That could be a problem if you work in sales or marketing. In those fields it can take months to find a new job in a bad economy. But hackers seem to be more liquid. Good hackers can always get some kind of job. It might not be your dream job, but you’re not going to starve.

Another advantage of bad times is that there’s less competition. Technology trains leave the station at regular intervals. If everyone else is cowering in a corner, you may have a whole car to yourself.

You’re an investor too. As a founder, you’re buying stock with work: the reason Larry and Sergey are so rich is not so much that they’ve done work worth tens of billions of dollars, but that they were the first investors in Google. And like any investor you should buy when times are bad.

Were you nodding in agreement, thinking “stupid investors” a few paragraphs ago when I was talking about how investors are reluctant to put money into startups in bad markets, even though that’s the time they should rationally be most willing to buy? Well, founders aren’t much better. When times get bad, hackers go to grad school. And no doubt that will happen this time too. In fact, what makes the preceding paragraph true is that most readers won’t believe it—at least to the extent of acting on it.

So maybe a recession is a good time to start a startup. It’s hard to say whether advantages like lack of competition outweigh disadvantages like reluctant investors. But it doesn’t matter much either way. It’s the people that matter. And for a given set of people working on a given technology, the time to act is always now.