五位创始人
五位创始人
五位创始人 2009年4月
Inc最近问我,我认为过去30年中最有趣的5位创业创始人是谁。你如何决定谁是最有趣的?最好的标准似乎是影响力:哪5个人对我影响最大?当我与我们投资的公司交谈时,我会用谁作为例子?我发现自己经常引用谁的话?
- 史蒂夫·乔布斯
我猜史蒂夫不仅对我,而且对大多数人来说都是最有影响力的创始人。很多创业文化都是苹果文化。他是最初的年轻创始人。虽然”疯狂伟大”的概念在艺术界已经存在,但在20世纪80年代将其引入公司是一个新颖的想法。
更值得注意的是,他在30年里一直保持着人们的兴趣。人们期待新的苹果产品,就像期待受欢迎小说家的新书一样。史蒂夫可能不是亲自设计它们,但如果没有他担任CEO,这些产品就不会出现。
史蒂夫聪明且充满动力,但硅谷的很多人也是如此。使他独特的是他的设计感。在他之前,大多数公司把设计看作是多余的奢侈品。苹果的竞争对手现在明白了这一点。
- TJ·罗杰斯
TJ·罗杰斯不像史蒂夫·乔布斯那么出名,但他可能是硅谷CEO中最好的作家。关于创业思维方式,我从他那里学到的可能比从任何其他人都多。不是从他写的具体内容,而是通过重构产生这些思想的思维:极其坦率;积极地淘汰过时的想法;但受实用主义而不是意识形态驱动。
我读到的他的第一篇文章是如此令人振奋,以至于我清楚地记得当时在哪里。那是《高科技创新:自由市场还是政府补贴?》,我当时在哈佛广场T站的楼下。感觉就像有人在我脑中打开了一个电灯开关。
- 拉里和谢尔盖
我很抱歉把拉里和谢尔盖当作一个人来对待。我一直认为这对他们不公平。但谷歌确实似乎是一次合作。
在谷歌之前,硅谷的公司已经知道拥有最好的黑客很重要。至少他们是这么声称的。但谷歌比任何人都更进一步地推动了这个想法。他们的假设似乎是,至少在初始阶段,你只需要优秀的黑客:如果你雇佣所有最聪明的人,让他们在可以衡量其成功的问题上工作,你就会赢。其他所有东西——包括商学院认为商业所包含的所有东西——你可以在过程中弄清楚。结果不会完美,但它们会是最佳的。如果这是他们的假设,现在已经被实验验证了。
- 保罗·布赫海特
很少有人知道这一点,但有一个人,保罗·布赫海特,负责谷歌所做的三件最好的事情。他是GMail的原创作者,这是谷歌在搜索之后最令人印象深刻的东西。他还写了AdSense的第一个原型,是谷歌口号”不要作恶”的作者。
PB在一次演讲中提出的观点,现在我对我们资助的每家创业公司都提到:最初,让少数用户真正喜欢你比让大量用户有点喜欢你更好。如果我只能告诉创业公司十句话,这会是其中之一。
现在他是一家名为Friendfeed的创业公司的联合创始人。它才成立一年,但硅谷的每个人已经在关注他们。一个对谷歌的三个最大想法负责的人将会想出更多。
- 萨姆·奥特曼
有人告诉我,我不应该在这个名单中提到YC资助公司的创始人。但萨姆·奥特曼不会被这样脆弱的规则阻止。如果他想在这个名单上,他就会在。
说实话,萨姆和史蒂夫·乔布斯一样,是我向创业公司提供建议时最常提到的创始人。在设计问题上,我问”史蒂夫会怎么做?“但在战略或抱负问题上,我问”萨马会怎么做?”
从与萨马会面中我学到的是,选民教义适用于创业公司。它适用的程度远比大多数人认为的要少:创业投资并不像赛马那样试图挑选获胜者。但有几个人具有如此强大的意志力,他们将得到他们想要的任何东西。
Five Founders
Five Founders April 2009
Inc recently asked me who I thought were the 5 most interesting startup founders of the last 30 years. How do you decide who’s the most interesting? The best test seemed to be influence: who are the 5 who’ve influenced me most? Who do I use as examples when I’m talking to companies we fund? Who do I find myself quoting?
- Steve Jobs
I’d guess Steve is the most influential founder not just for me but for most people you could ask. A lot of startup culture is Apple culture. He was the original young founder. And while the concept of “insanely great” already existed in the arts, it was a novel idea to introduce into a company in the 1980s.
More remarkable still, he’s stayed interesting for 30 years. People await new Apple products the way they’d await new books by a popular novelist. Steve may not literally design them, but they wouldn’t happen if he weren’t CEO.
Steve is clever and driven, but so are a lot of people in the Valley. What makes him unique is his sense of design. Before him, most companies treated design as a frivolous extra. Apple’s competitors now know better.
- TJ Rodgers
TJ Rodgers isn’t as famous as Steve Jobs, but he may be the best writer among Silicon Valley CEOs. I’ve probably learned more from him about the startup way of thinking than from anyone else. Not so much from specific things he’s written as by reconstructing the mind that produced them: brutally candid; aggressively garbage-collecting outdated ideas; and yet driven by pragmatism rather than ideology.
The first essay of his that I read was so electrifying that I remember exactly where I was at the time. It was High Technology Innovation: Free Markets or Government Subsidies? and I was downstairs in the Harvard Square T Station. It felt as if someone had flipped on a light switch inside my head.
- Larry & Sergey
I’m sorry to treat Larry and Sergey as one person. I’ve always thought that was unfair to them. But it does seem as if Google was a collaboration.
Before Google, companies in Silicon Valley already knew it was important to have the best hackers. So they claimed, at least. But Google pushed this idea further than anyone had before. Their hypothesis seems to have been that, in the initial stages at least, all you need is good hackers: if you hire all the smartest people and put them to work on a problem where their success can be measured, you win. All the other stuff—which includes all the stuff that business schools think business consists of—you can figure out along the way. The results won’t be perfect, but they’ll be optimal. If this was their hypothesis, it’s now been verified experimentally.
- Paul Buchheit
Few know this, but one person, Paul Buchheit, is responsible for three of the best things Google has done. He was the original author of GMail, which is the most impressive thing Google has after search. He also wrote the first prototype of AdSense, and was the author of Google’s mantra “Don’t be evil.”
PB made a point in a talk once that I now mention to every startup we fund: that it’s better, initially, to make a small number of users really love you than a large number kind of like you. If I could tell startups only ten sentences, this would be one of them.
Now he’s cofounder of a startup called Friendfeed. It’s only a year old, but already everyone in the Valley is watching them. Someone responsible for three of the biggest ideas at Google is going to come up with more.
- Sam Altman
I was told I shouldn’t mention founders of YC-funded companies in this list. But Sam Altman can’t be stopped by such flimsy rules. If he wants to be on this list, he’s going to be.
Honestly, Sam is, along with Steve Jobs, the founder I refer to most when I’m advising startups. On questions of design, I ask “What would Steve do?” but on questions of strategy or ambition I ask “What would Sama do?”
What I learned from meeting Sama is that the doctrine of the elect applies to startups. It applies way less than most people think: startup investing does not consist of trying to pick winners the way you might in a horse race. But there are a few people with such force of will that they’re going to get whatever they want.